Knowledge

Free Law Project

Source 📝

960: 167: 329:. For each PACER document, the software will first check if it has already been uploaded by another user. If no free version exists and the user purchases the document from PACER, it will automatically upload a copy to the RECAP server, thereby building the database. The original RECAP implementation uploaded documents to the 29: 354:
Some courts have acknowledged RECAP's free distribution of documents. A small handful of PACER users receive fee-exempt access (fee waivers are granted on a district-by-district basis), and a condition of the fee waiver generally requires that fee exempt users not further distribute documents they
193:
that provides free access to primary legal materials, develops legal research tools, and supports academic research on legal corpora. Free Law Project has several initiatives that collect and share legal information, including the largest collection of American
250:
website with court dockets, 900,000 minutes of oral argument recordings, more than eight thousand judges, and more than three million opinions. All of the opinions on Court Listener are interlinked by a citator, and the graph of citations is available via an
533:
this guy out in Oakland .. works for this nonprofit called the Free Law Project .. project going on for several years, to obtain from the administrative office of the courts, every financial disclosure for every federal judge, and digitize
350:
However, the automated downloading triggered a government investigation. No criminal charges were filed, because PACER had provided lawful access and the documents copied were in the public domain, and the case was closed.
346:
Swartz downloaded 2.7 million documents, all public domain, representing less than 1 percent of the documents in PACER. These public domain documents were later uploaded to RECAP and made available to the public for free.
257:, which allows users to automatically search for free copies of documents during a search in the fee-based online US legal database PACER, creating a free alternative database at the 968:
provides free access to federal court documents that someone has already purchased for RECAP / CourtListener and invites users to purchase a copy of others for CourtListener / RECAP.
688: 333:; as of late 2017, the Free Law Project version now uploads documents to the Free Law Project, with a promise to mirror that data to the Internet Archive on a quarterly basis. 356: 1025: 651:
The database contains information about more than sixteen thousand state and federal judges, making it a treasure trove for those wishing to do judicial analytics.
1020: 295:
is software which allows users to automatically search for free copies of documents during a search in the fee-based online U.S. federal court document database
568:
The Free Law Project, a new California nonprofit, launched Tuesday and will provide free and easy access to legal material and research for anyone to download.
515: 872: 1040: 842: 550: 1030: 413: 1035: 465: 308: 300: 696: 392: 283:, which provides information about more than 700 US courts. All of Free Law Project's work is open source and available online. 921: 1005: 1010: 809: 211: 1015: 247: 1000: 311:, and is now maintained as part of the Free Law Project. The name "RECAP" derives from "PACER", spelled backward. 299:, and to help build up a free alternative database. It was created in 2009 by a team from Princeton University's 630: 267:, which provides biographical and electoral information about more than 16,000 American judges and appointors. 88: 787: 746: 722: 387: 215: 520: 470: 322: 220: 66: 663: 555: 418: 326: 225: 355:
receive under the waiver, pursuant to Judicial Conference policy. Some courts such as the
8: 959: 166: 28: 926: 819: 304: 203: 142: 894: 814: 742: 613: 590: 330: 318: 258: 492: 868: 315: 895:"Welcome to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts" 199: 994: 551:"Free Law Project provides access to legal materials and research for public" 493:"Milestone: CourtListener has 365 Days of Continuous Oral Argument Listening" 343:
set up an automatic download from an official library entry point to PACER.
195: 179: 594: 727: 463: 340: 231:
Free Law Project was founded in 2013 by Michael Lissner and Brian Carver.
375: 296: 207: 617: 336:
PACER continued charging per page fees after the introduction of RECAP.
843:"The inside story of Aaron Swartz's campaign to liberate court filings" 664:"Announcing a New Open Database of Court Information, IDs, and Parsers" 607: 70: 976: 965: 464:
Coulter Jones; James V. Grimaldi; Joe Palazzolo (September 28, 2021).
638: 274: 190: 183: 80: 981: 363:
page: "fee exempt PACER users must refrain from the use of RECAP".
393:
Public.Resource.Org § Access to United States legal resources
186: 695:. Center for Information Technology Policy. 2013. Archived from 580: 985: 810:"FBI Investigated Coder for Liberating Paywalled Court Records" 360: 899:
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
466:"How the Journal Found Judges' Violations of Law on Conflicts" 750: 971: 689:"RECAP Documents Now More Searchable Via Internet Archive" 772: 239:
Free Law Project has a number of initiatives, including:
273:, which provides information about more than 400 legal 378:
software project to archive and host court documents.
1026:
Non-profit organizations based in the United States
953: 440: 206:, the RECAP Project, which collects documents from 159: 869:"A Complete Chronology of PACER Fees and Policies" 507: 773:"RECAP Project — Turning PACER Around Since 2009" 747:"Plug-in opens up federal courts, with your help" 683: 681: 544: 542: 297:PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) 992: 357:District Court for the District of Massachusetts 150:Michael Lissner, Brian Carver, Ansel Halliburton 459: 457: 1021:Legal organizations based in the United States 678: 548: 539: 513: 228:cases regarding violations by federal judges. 922:"I Read Court Documents for Fun. Hear Me Out" 516:"The Federal Law That 138 Judges Have Broken" 919: 770: 454: 913: 716: 714: 958: 901:. Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts 860: 801: 411: 165: 741: 405: 339:Prior to the creation of RECAP, activist 1041:2009 establishments in the United States 779: 711: 301:Center for Information Technology Policy 866: 788:"The Next Version of RECAP is Now Live" 786:Lissner, Michae l (November 13, 2017). 785: 720: 993: 807: 16:Free legal research tools and database 1031:Online companies of the United States 735: 721:Johnson, Bobbie (November 11, 2009). 549:Taylor A. Vega (September 29, 2013). 841:Lee, Timothy B. (February 8, 2013). 723:"Recap: cracking open US courtrooms" 359:display a prominent reminder on its 867:Lissner, Michael (April 13, 2017). 840: 13: 875:from the original on March 6, 2018 514:Kate Linebaugh (October 1, 2021). 246:, which provides a searchable and 202:from 200 United States courts and 14: 1052: 1036:Organizations established in 2013 945: 920:Tarpley Hitt (December 1, 2020). 808:Singel, Ryan (October 5, 2009). 366: 27: 887: 834: 764: 656: 631:"Judge and Disclosure Database" 972:RECAP The Law Project homepage 623: 600: 573: 485: 433: 412:Justin Rau (October 5, 2021). 234: 126:CourtListener, RECAP, Bots.law 1: 398: 58:Michael Lissner, Brian Carver 977:Judge and Appointer Database 818:. Condé Nast. Archived from 265:Judge and Appointer Database 7: 1006:Free Access to Law Movement 388:Free Access to Law Movement 381: 10: 1057: 1011:Free Firefox WebExtensions 198:, daily collection of new 154: 140: 130: 122: 114: 106: 98: 86: 76: 62: 54: 46: 38: 26: 1016:Google Chrome extensions 314:RECAP is available as a 287: 1001:American legal websites 521:The Wall Street Journal 471:The Wall Street Journal 323:Google Chrome extension 221:The Wall Street Journal 144:Board of directors 556:The Daily Californian 419:The Los Angeles Times 271:Database of Reporters 210:, and user-generated 204:administrative bodies 99:Registration no. 33:Free Law Project Logo 226:conflict of interest 224:expose 138 cases of 218:. Their data helped 745:(August 14, 2009). 641:on January 22, 2024 261:and Court Listener. 196:oral argument audio 23: 927:The New York Times 771:Free Law Project. 441:"Free Law Project" 414:"Crime and Courts" 305:Harvard University 132:Executive Director 21: 743:McCullagh, Declan 244:CourtListener.com 173: 172: 1048: 962: 957: 956: 954:Official website 939: 938: 936: 934: 917: 911: 910: 908: 906: 891: 885: 884: 882: 880: 864: 858: 857: 855: 853: 838: 832: 831: 829: 827: 805: 799: 798: 796: 794: 783: 777: 776: 768: 762: 761: 759: 757: 739: 733: 732: 718: 709: 708: 706: 704: 685: 676: 675: 673: 671: 666:. March 10, 2020 660: 654: 653: 648: 646: 637:. Archived from 635:Free Law Project 627: 621: 620: 604: 598: 597: 587:Free Law Project 577: 571: 570: 565: 563: 546: 537: 536: 530: 528: 511: 505: 504: 502: 500: 489: 483: 482: 480: 478: 461: 452: 451: 449: 447: 437: 431: 430: 428: 426: 409: 331:Internet Archive 327:Safari extension 259:Internet Archive 176:Free Law Project 169: 164: 161: 145: 31: 24: 22:Free Law Project 20: 1056: 1055: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1047: 1046: 1045: 991: 990: 952: 951: 948: 943: 942: 932: 930: 918: 914: 904: 902: 893: 892: 888: 878: 876: 865: 861: 851: 849: 839: 835: 825: 823: 822:on May 15, 2023 806: 802: 792: 790: 784: 780: 769: 765: 755: 753: 740: 736: 719: 712: 702: 700: 699:on June 1, 2016 687: 686: 679: 669: 667: 662: 661: 657: 644: 642: 629: 628: 624: 606: 605: 601: 579: 578: 574: 561: 559: 547: 540: 526: 524: 512: 508: 498: 496: 491: 490: 486: 476: 474: 462: 455: 445: 443: 439: 438: 434: 424: 422: 410: 406: 401: 384: 369: 316:Mozilla Firefox 290: 237: 158: 147: 143: 136:Michael Lissner 133: 91: 34: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1054: 1044: 1043: 1038: 1033: 1028: 1023: 1018: 1013: 1008: 1003: 989: 988: 982:Freelawproject 979: 974: 969: 963: 947: 946:External links 944: 941: 940: 912: 886: 859: 833: 800: 778: 763: 734: 710: 677: 655: 622: 599: 582:Court Listener 572: 538: 506: 495:. June 8, 2016 484: 453: 432: 403: 402: 400: 397: 396: 395: 390: 383: 380: 368: 365: 309:Berkman Center 289: 286: 285: 284: 278: 268: 262: 252: 248:API-accessible 236: 233: 216:visualizations 200:legal opinions 171: 170: 156: 152: 151: 148: 141: 138: 137: 134: 131: 128: 127: 124: 120: 119: 116: 112: 111: 108: 104: 103: 100: 96: 95: 92: 87: 84: 83: 78: 74: 73: 64: 60: 59: 56: 52: 51: 48: 44: 43: 40: 36: 35: 32: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1053: 1042: 1039: 1037: 1034: 1032: 1029: 1027: 1024: 1022: 1019: 1017: 1014: 1012: 1009: 1007: 1004: 1002: 999: 998: 996: 987: 983: 980: 978: 975: 973: 970: 967: 966:CourtListener 964: 961: 955: 950: 949: 929: 928: 923: 916: 900: 896: 890: 874: 870: 863: 848: 844: 837: 821: 817: 816: 811: 804: 789: 782: 774: 767: 752: 748: 744: 738: 730: 729: 724: 717: 715: 698: 694: 693:RECAP The Law 690: 684: 682: 665: 659: 652: 640: 636: 632: 626: 619: 615: 611: 610: 603: 596: 592: 588: 584: 583: 576: 569: 558: 557: 552: 545: 543: 535: 523: 522: 517: 510: 494: 488: 473: 472: 467: 460: 458: 442: 436: 421: 420: 415: 408: 404: 394: 391: 389: 386: 385: 379: 377: 373: 372:CourtListener 367:CourtListener 364: 362: 358: 352: 348: 344: 342: 337: 334: 332: 328: 324: 320: 317: 312: 310: 306: 302: 298: 294: 282: 279: 276: 272: 269: 266: 263: 260: 256: 255:RECAP Project 253: 249: 245: 242: 241: 240: 232: 229: 227: 223: 222: 217: 213: 212:Supreme Court 209: 205: 201: 197: 192: 188: 185: 181: 180:United States 177: 168: 163: 157: 153: 149: 146: 139: 135: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 93: 90: 85: 82: 79: 75: 72: 68: 65: 61: 57: 53: 49: 45: 41: 37: 30: 25: 19: 933:November 25, 931:. Retrieved 925: 915: 905:February 14, 903:. Retrieved 898: 889: 877:. Retrieved 862: 850:. Retrieved 847:Ars Technica 846: 836: 824:. Retrieved 820:the original 813: 803: 791:. Retrieved 781: 766: 754:. Retrieved 737: 728:The Guardian 726: 701:. Retrieved 697:the original 692: 668:. Retrieved 658: 650: 643:. Retrieved 639:the original 634: 625: 608: 602: 586: 581: 575: 567: 562:November 25, 560:. Retrieved 554: 532: 527:November 25, 525:. Retrieved 519: 509: 497:. Retrieved 487: 477:November 24, 475:. Retrieved 469: 444:. Retrieved 435: 425:November 21, 423:. Retrieved 417: 407: 371: 370: 353: 349: 345: 341:Aaron Swartz 338: 335: 313: 292: 291: 280: 270: 264: 254: 243: 238: 230: 219: 175: 174: 115:Headquarters 107:Legal status 39:Abbreviation 18: 826:January 12, 376:open source 235:Initiatives 118:Oakland, CA 995:Categories 595:Q117745639 399:References 94:46-3342480 89:Tax ID no. 67:Emeryville 63:Founded at 50:2013-09-24 731:. London. 670:March 17, 645:March 14, 281:Courts-DB 275:reporters 214:citation 191:nonprofit 184:501(c)(3) 81:501(c)(3) 47:Formation 879:March 5, 873:Archived 793:March 5, 618:Q7276289 614:Wikidata 591:Wikidata 499:June 21, 446:June 21, 382:See also 182:federal 123:Services 102:C3594588 55:Founders 852:May 31, 756:May 16, 703:May 31, 189:-based 187:Oakland 155:Website 110:Charity 986:GitHub 616:  593:  374:is an 325:, and 319:add-on 815:Wired 609:RECAP 293:RECAP 288:RECAP 208:PACER 178:is a 935:2022 907:2024 881:2018 854:2013 828:2013 795:2018 758:2017 751:CNET 705:2013 672:2021 647:2024 564:2022 529:2021 501:2016 479:2022 448:2016 427:2022 303:and 251:API. 162:.law 160:free 77:Type 984:on 534:it. 361:ECF 307:'s 42:FLP 997:: 924:. 897:. 871:. 845:. 812:. 749:. 725:. 713:^ 691:. 680:^ 649:. 633:. 612:, 589:, 585:, 566:. 553:. 541:^ 531:. 518:. 468:. 456:^ 416:. 321:, 71:CA 69:, 937:. 909:. 883:. 856:. 830:. 797:. 775:. 760:. 707:. 674:. 503:. 481:. 450:. 429:. 277:.

Index

Free Law Project Logo showing the scales of justice and the main initiatives of the organization, CourtListener, RECAP, and Bots.law
Emeryville
CA
501(c)(3)
Tax ID no.
Board of directors
free.law
Edit this at Wikidata
United States
501(c)(3)
Oakland
nonprofit
oral argument audio
legal opinions
administrative bodies
PACER
Supreme Court
visualizations
The Wall Street Journal
conflict of interest
API-accessible
Internet Archive
reporters
PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records)
Center for Information Technology Policy
Harvard University
Berkman Center
Mozilla Firefox
add-on
Google Chrome extension

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.