Knowledge

Independence of premise

Source 📝

601: 438:
This is classically provable, as follows: Either an index for a proof of the Goldbach conjecture exists, or no such index exists. On the one hand, if one does exist, then whatever that index is also functions as a valid
284:
has a proof or it does not. If it does not have a proof, then to assume it has a proof is absurd and anything follows - in particular, it follows that it has a proof. Hence, there is some natural number index
710: 443:
in the above proposition. On the other hand, if no such index exists, then for such an index to also exist is contradictory, and then by explosion anything follows - and in particular it follows that
504: 660: 209:
becomes trivial: "If θ is satisfiable then θ is satisfiable." For illustration purposes, let it be granted that θ is a decidable predicate in arithmetic, meaning for any given number
749: 624: 403:
As noted, the independence of premise principle for fixed φ and any θ follows both from a proof of φ as well as from a rejection of it. Hence, assuming the
362:
An implication is strengthened when the antecedent can be weakened. Of interest here are premises in the form of a negated statements, φ := ¬η.
189:, now in contrast to the two points above, consider the case in which it is not known how to prove or reject φ. A core case is when φ is the formula 466:. Classically, it suffices to draw the same conclusion of interest when starting from two hypotheticals about φ. In the latter framework, 221:
is the index of a formal proof of some mathematical conjecture whose provability is not known. Certainly here, one way to establish
82:
is assumed to be inhabited. That is, part of the theory is at least some term. For the discussion we distinguish one such term as
665: 395:
For existential-quantifier-free φ, theories over intuitionistic logic tend to be well behaved in regard to rules of this nature.
66:, where the principle is not generally valid. Its crucial equivalent special case is discussed below. The principle is valid in 712:. The schema implies the strictly weaker excluded middle for negated propositions (WLEM) through the intuitionistic form of 596:{\displaystyle {\big (}\eta \to (\alpha \lor \beta ){\big )}\to {\big (}(\eta \to \alpha )\lor (\eta \to \beta ){\big )}} 447:
is an index of a proof of the Goldbach conjecture. In both cases, some index exists that validates the proposition.
300:
for intuitionistic proofs, which should be compared against the classical proof calculus. BHK says that a proof of
262: 719: 633: 776:
Nemoto, Takako; Rathjen, Michael (2019). "The independence of premise rule in intuitionistic set theories".
725: 404: 316:. Here proofs themselves can act as input to functions and, when possible, may be used to construct an 819: 24: 389: 713: 139: 473:
is asserted to exist either which way, and the logic does not demand for it to be explicated.
797: 752: 609: 63: 756: 8: 281: 79: 176:
in particular validates the conclusion of the principle. So in both of these two cases,
777: 374: 297: 217:) can easily be inspected for its truth value. More specifically, θ shall express that 168:
bound in the premise is reused in the conclusion, and it is generally not the a priori
662:, this reduces to the shorter but indeed equivalent so called Dirk Gently’s principle 430:, such that if an index of a proof of the Goldbach conjecture exists, then the number 498:
have analogs in propositional logic. In the intuitionistic calculus, the finite form
339:
has that value. In the proof calculus - like in the weak counterexample - a suitable
335:, together with a function that converts a proof of φ into a proof of θ in which 67: 805:. in S. Buss ed., The Handbook of Proof Theory, North-Holland. pp. 337–405. 16:
Mathematical principle largely used in proof theory and constructive Mathematics
354:
does not suffice for a generic proof of existence as granted by the principle.
86:. In the theory of the natural numbers, this role may be played by the number 813: 56: 20: 454:
such that one can demonstrate (then aided by φ assumed valid and so also ∃
346:
Indeed, using violating models, it has been established that the premise
722:, obtained by adopting this schema for negated propositions, i.e. with 253:
exactly encodes the proof of a conjecture not yet proven or rejected.
273:
cannot be provable by intuitionistic means: Being able to inspect an
308:
comprises a function that takes a proof of φ and returns a proof of
782: 289:
such that if one assumes the Goldbach conjecture has a proof, that
280:
For example, consider the following classical argument: Either the
795: 606:
may be understood as expressing that information in the premise
233:
for which it can be shown (then aided by the assumption that
705:{\displaystyle (\alpha \to \beta )\lor (\beta \to \alpha )} 422:
always holds. More concretely, consider the proposition:
261:
The arithmetical example above provides what is called a
62:
The main application of the principle is in the study of
343:
can only be given using more input tied to amenable φ.
388:
It is not known whether this also applies to familiar
249:
is not possible (not yet and possibly never), as such
116:, if φ is established to be true, then if one assumes 728: 668: 636: 612: 507: 172:
that validates it. In the second scenario, the value
434:
is the index of a proof of the Goldbach conjecture."
630:proposition in a pair of conjuncts it implies. For 407:disjunction axiomatically, the principle is valid. 365:It has been meta-theoretically established that if 245:genuinely satisfies θ. However, explicating a such 743: 704: 654: 618: 595: 59:of φ, while θ can be a predicate depending on it. 811: 799:Gödel's functional ("Dialectica") interpretation 138:, if φ is established to be false, then, by the 277:validating φ → θ would resolve the conjecture. 775: 588: 548: 538: 510: 796:Jeremy Avigad and Solomon Feferman (1999). 296:The issue can also be approached using the 256: 781: 655:{\displaystyle \eta =\alpha \lor \beta } 450:Constructively, one needs to provide an 157:(and indeed any predicate of this form.) 35:θ are sentences in a formal theory and 481: 229:would be to provide a particular index 812: 476: 106:is a predicate that can depend on in. 398: 109:The following is easily established: 98:denote propositions not depending on 13: 744:{\displaystyle \eta =\neg \delta } 735: 14: 831: 755:. The corresponding rule is an 426:"There exists a natural number 201:, in which case the antecedent 769: 699: 693: 687: 681: 675: 669: 583: 577: 571: 565: 559: 553: 543: 533: 521: 518: 142:, any proposition of the form 1: 762: 626:is not required to establish 293:is an index of such a proof. 73: 124:to be provable, there is an 29:independence of premise (IP) 7: 10: 836: 405:law of the excluded middle 183:validates the conclusion. 462:) that θ holds for that 357: 328:must then demonstrate a 25:constructive mathematics 257:In intuitionistic logic 161:In the first scenario, 745: 714:consequentia mirabilis 706: 656: 620: 597: 265:. The existence claim 31:states that if φ and ∃ 746: 707: 657: 621: 619:{\displaystyle \eta } 598: 385:has a proof as well. 753:disjunction property 726: 720:Kreisel–Putnam logic 666: 634: 610: 505: 482:Kreisel–Putnam logic 64:intuitionistic logic 486:IP and the shorter 477:Propositional logic 282:Goldbach conjecture 263:weak counterexample 153:formally satisfies 80:domain of discourse 27:, the principle of 741: 702: 652: 616: 593: 410:For example, here 399:In classical logic 298:BHK interpretation 241:satisfies θ) that 213:the proposition θ( 78:As is common, the 51:is provable. Here 43:is provable, then 827: 806: 804: 788: 787: 785: 773: 751:, still has the 750: 748: 747: 742: 711: 709: 708: 703: 661: 659: 658: 653: 625: 623: 622: 617: 602: 600: 599: 594: 592: 591: 552: 551: 542: 541: 514: 513: 497: 421: 384: 372: 353: 327: 315: 307: 272: 228: 208: 200: 156: 145: 131: 123: 50: 42: 835: 834: 830: 829: 828: 826: 825: 824: 820:Predicate logic 810: 809: 802: 792: 791: 774: 770: 765: 757:admissible rule 727: 724: 723: 667: 664: 663: 635: 632: 631: 611: 608: 607: 587: 586: 547: 546: 537: 536: 509: 508: 506: 503: 502: 487: 484: 479: 411: 401: 378: 373:has a proof in 366: 360: 347: 321: 309: 301: 266: 259: 222: 202: 190: 154: 143: 129: 117: 76: 68:classical logic 44: 36: 17: 12: 11: 5: 833: 823: 822: 808: 807: 790: 789: 767: 766: 764: 761: 740: 737: 734: 731: 701: 698: 695: 692: 689: 686: 683: 680: 677: 674: 671: 651: 648: 645: 642: 639: 615: 604: 603: 590: 585: 582: 579: 576: 573: 570: 567: 564: 561: 558: 555: 550: 545: 540: 535: 532: 529: 526: 523: 520: 517: 512: 483: 480: 478: 475: 436: 435: 400: 397: 359: 356: 258: 255: 159: 158: 133: 75: 72: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 832: 821: 818: 817: 815: 801: 800: 794: 793: 784: 779: 772: 768: 760: 758: 754: 738: 732: 729: 721: 717: 715: 696: 690: 684: 678: 672: 649: 646: 643: 640: 637: 629: 613: 580: 574: 568: 562: 556: 530: 527: 524: 515: 501: 500: 499: 495: 491: 474: 472: 469: 465: 461: 457: 453: 448: 446: 442: 433: 429: 425: 424: 423: 419: 415: 408: 406: 396: 393: 391: 386: 382: 376: 370: 363: 355: 351: 344: 342: 338: 334: 331: 325: 320:. A proof of 319: 313: 305: 299: 294: 292: 288: 283: 278: 276: 270: 264: 254: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 226: 220: 216: 212: 206: 198: 194: 188: 184: 182: 179: 175: 171: 167: 164: 152: 149: 146:holds. Then, 141: 137: 134: 127: 121: 115: 112: 111: 110: 107: 105: 101: 97: 93: 89: 85: 81: 71: 69: 65: 60: 58: 57:free variable 54: 48: 40: 34: 30: 26: 22: 798: 771: 718: 627: 605: 493: 489: 485: 470: 467: 463: 459: 455: 451: 449: 444: 440: 437: 431: 427: 417: 413: 409: 402: 394: 390:set theories 387: 380: 368: 364: 361: 349: 345: 340: 336: 332: 329: 323: 317: 311: 303: 295: 290: 286: 279: 274: 268: 260: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 224: 218: 214: 210: 204: 196: 192: 186: 185: 180: 177: 173: 169: 165: 162: 160: 150: 147: 135: 125: 119: 113: 108: 103: 99: 95: 91: 87: 83: 77: 61: 55:cannot be a 52: 46: 38: 32: 28: 21:proof theory 18: 458:θ for some 128:satisfying 783:1911.08027 763:References 375:arithmetic 330:particular 74:Discussion 739:δ 736:¬ 730:η 697:α 694:→ 691:β 685:∨ 679:β 676:→ 673:α 650:β 647:∨ 644:α 638:η 614:η 581:β 578:→ 575:η 569:∨ 563:α 560:→ 557:η 544:→ 531:β 528:∨ 525:α 519:→ 516:η 140:explosion 90:. Below, 814:Category 383:(¬η → θ) 136:Secondly 102:, while 496:θ) → θ) 420:θ) → θ) 377:, then 326:(φ → θ) 271:(φ → θ) 227:(φ → θ) 187:Thirdly 114:Firstly 49:(φ → θ) 367:¬η → ∃ 237:value 803:(PDF) 778:arXiv 628:which 358:Rules 348:φ → ∃ 302:φ → ∃ 203:φ → ∃ 155:φ → θ 144:φ → ψ 130:φ → θ 118:φ → ∃ 37:φ → ∃ 468:some 235:some 178:some 163:some 94:and 23:and 492:((∃ 445:x=7 416:((∃ 148:any 19:In 816:: 759:. 716:. 392:. 243:it 195:θ( 70:. 786:. 780:: 733:= 700:) 688:( 682:) 670:( 641:= 589:) 584:) 572:( 566:) 554:( 549:( 539:) 534:) 522:( 511:( 494:y 490:x 488:∃ 471:x 464:x 460:y 456:y 452:x 441:x 432:x 428:x 418:y 414:x 412:∃ 381:x 379:∃ 371:θ 369:x 352:θ 350:x 341:x 337:x 333:x 324:x 322:∃ 318:x 314:θ 312:x 310:∃ 306:θ 304:x 291:x 287:x 275:x 269:x 267:∃ 251:x 247:x 239:z 231:x 225:x 223:∃ 219:x 215:b 211:b 207:θ 205:x 199:) 197:z 193:z 191:∃ 181:x 174:a 170:a 166:x 151:x 132:. 126:x 122:θ 120:x 104:θ 100:x 96:ψ 92:φ 88:7 84:a 53:x 47:x 45:∃ 41:θ 39:x 33:x

Index

proof theory
constructive mathematics
free variable
intuitionistic logic
classical logic
domain of discourse
explosion
weak counterexample
Goldbach conjecture
BHK interpretation
arithmetic
set theories
law of the excluded middle
consequentia mirabilis
Kreisel–Putnam logic
disjunction property
admissible rule
arXiv
1911.08027
Gödel's functional ("Dialectica") interpretation
Category
Predicate logic

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.