Knowledge

Line of battle

Source 📝

355:(2/3 June 1653), both fleets began parallel to each other, arranged in three squadrons nose to tail. The English ships were able to fire continuous broadsides, resulting in terrible loss of life and damage to the Dutch fleet. The Dutch were unable to approach the enemy at close quarters, their preferred tactic. This usually prevailed if they could isolate and attack individual ships. The tactic revealed by the Battle of the Gabbard was not new to naval warfare, but was a consequence of the reforms imposed on the English navy. The New Fighting Instructions meant that senior officers could more easily control their ship captains, who could no longer easily evade fighting, or race heroically ahead of the rest of the fleet. 40: 122: 29: 333: 254: 464: 325:(18–20 February 1653), the English were scattered at the start of the battle, and so were unable to attack the Dutch fleet effectively. It was at Portland that Monck saw how little control admirals had in controlling a fleet and passing commands to his ships. One of the first precise written instructions adopting the line of battle tactic were contained in the English Navy's Fighting Instructions, written by Blake and his colleagues, and published in 1653. 394: 239:
necessary that the sight of the latter must never be interrupted by a friendly ship. Only one formation allows the ships of the same fleet to satisfy fully these conditions. That formation is the line ahead . This line, therefore, is imposed as the only order of battle, and consequently as the basis of all fleet tactics." The Dutch
358:
The line-of-battle tactic favoured very large ships that could sail steadily and maintain their place in the line in the face of heavy fire. The change toward the line of battle also depended on an increased disciplining of society and the demands of powerful centralized government to keep permanent
77:
without fear of hitting a friendly ship. This means that in a given period, the fleet can fire more shots. Another advantage is that a relative movement of the line in relation to some part of the enemy fleet allows for a systematic concentration of fire on that part. The other fleet can avoid this
367:
was marked by a successively stricter organization. Battle formations became standardized, based on calculated ideal models. The increased power of states at the expense of individual landowners led to increasingly larger armies and navies. A ship that was powerful enough to stand in the line of
238:
cannon, which did not deploy the broadside to its best effect. These new vessels required new tactics, and "since ... almost all the artillery is found upon the sides of a ship of war, hence it is the beam that must necessarily and always be turned toward the enemy. On the other hand, it is
493:
carried out a radical reform of ship design – between 1810 and 1840, every detail was altered, and more advances occurred during this period than had happened since the 1660s. There was, however, no change in the principle of the tactic of a line of battle. These alterations were
285:
with 12 ships. After Tromp refused to strike sail in salute, a battle took place, but the Dutch, despite their superior numbers, failed to capture any English ships. The engagement was, according to the historian Ben Wilson, "a good old-fashioned melee lacking any sophisticated tactics".
194:
manned by 460 men, and entered Ormuz Bay, being surrounded by 250 warships and a 20,000 men army on land. Albuquerque made his small fleet (but powerful in its artillery) circle like a carrousel, but in a line end-to-end, and destroyed most of the ships that surrounded his
320:
After 1652, battles would be determined by the ability of a line of battle to not be broken down. The line was difficult to maintain when ships performed differently from each other and were affected by the sea conditions and the "chaos of conflict". At the
69:
in which a fleet of ships forms a line end to end. The first example of its use as a tactic is disputed—it has been variously claimed for dates ranging from 1502 to 1652. Line-of-battle tactics were in widespread use by 1675.
222:, which meant faster, more stable vessels. These newer warships could mount more cannons along the sides of their decks, concentrating their firepower along their broadside, while presenting a lower target to their enemy. 416:
The main problem with the line of battle was that when the fleets were of similar size, naval actions using it were generally indecisive. The French in particular were adept at gunnery and would generally take the
425:
at long range to bring down masts. Eventually so many vessels in a line would be damaged that they would be forced to retire for repairs while the French took few casualties and very little damage.
293:(28 September 1652) revealed the weakness of the Dutch fleet, largely consisting of smaller ships, against the English. The Dutch consequently began a large shipbuilding programme. The 73:
Compared with prior naval tactics, in which two opposing ships closed on one another for individual combat, the line of battle has the advantage that each ship in the line can fire its
596: 428:
Fleet commanders sometimes met with greater success by altering or abandoning the line of battle outright by breaking the enemy line and moving through it, as occurred during the
131: 118:, recognized that at sea, the Portuguese "fight at a distance, as if from walls and fortresses...". He recommended the single line ahead as the ideal combat formation. 455:. Ships broke through the enemy line and then, acting simultaneously with other vessels that remained on the original side, would engage the enemy fleet. 451:
If the opposing fleets were of similar size, a portion of the line might be overwhelmed by focused gunfire of the entire enemy line by a tactic known as
1529: 359:
fleets led by a corps of professional officers. These officers were better able to manage and communicate between the ships they commanded than the
519:, meant that by the 1870s, sail power had been abandoned. Battleships of the line were still in use in the early 20th century, using steam-driven 558:
and/or had long range, meant that gun engagements were no longer decisive, so that there was no longer any need for a line-of-battle formation.
78:
by manoeuvring in a line itself, with a result typical for sea battles since 1675: two fleets sail alongside one another (or on the opposite
607: 297:(30 November 1652) was a victory for the Dutch, and led to the revitalisation of the Commonwealth Navy. One innovation introduced by 167: 147: 440:. Another tactic cut off and isolated part of the enemy's line while concentrating a stronger force on it (as happened during the 1500: 1386: 1364: 1336: 1313: 1292: 1266: 1243: 1213: 1161: 1139: 1113: 1090: 1068: 1021: 996: 298: 102:
suggests that the tactic was in place before this date. Portuguese fleets overseas deployed in line ahead, firing one
1255: 572: 511:
showed that sailing ships needed to be converted if they were to be of any military use. The introduction of the
1228: 1519: 126: 474: 136: 106:
and then putting about in order to return and discharge the other, resolving battles by gunnery alone. In a
1524: 1198: 39: 1035: 917: 1223: 1193: 290: 1325: 1102: 985: 329:, issued on 29 March 1653, was the first clear evidence of the line of battle becoming official policy. 1235: 1205: 1013: 943: 494:
superseded by changes brought about by the advance of steam power and industrially-produced armaments.
490: 33: 19:
This article is about the line formation in fleet. For the line of battle in infantry and cavalry, see
1489: 1281: 534:
When ramming fell out of fashion, the logic of the line of battle tactic returned. It was used in the
363:
that often comprised large parts of a navy's force. The new type of warfare that developed during the
1441: 1401: 163: 178:, earlier in the same year. Another early, but different form of this strategy, was used in 1507 by 543: 302: 151: 121: 1175: 28: 1447: 1407: 819: 811: 344: 187: 51: 528: 278: 274: 258: 1128: 1060: 445: 433: 352: 270: 179: 306: 115: 1534: 567: 247: 95: 833:(subscription may be required or content may be available in libraries that are in the UK) 309:, which introduced the concept of Red, White, and Blue squadrons, each with an admiral, a 210:
as the decisive factor in combat. At the same time, the natural tendency in the design of
162:
against a Muslim fleet. One of the earliest recorded deliberate uses is documented in the
8: 1171: 497: 437: 397: 364: 294: 1083:
Navies and Nations: Warships, Navies and State Building in Europe and America, 1500–1680
79: 1472: 551: 535: 486: 322: 90:
The first recorded mention of the use of a line of battle tactic is to be found in the
1496: 1476: 1464: 1424: 1382: 1360: 1332: 1309: 1288: 1262: 1239: 1209: 1181: 1157: 1135: 1109: 1104:
The Ironclads: an illustrated history of battleships from 1860 to the First World War
1086: 1064: 1041: 1017: 992: 539: 103: 74: 1381:. Vol. 1: The Development of the Battlefleet 1650–1850. Conway Maritime Press. 1156:. Vol. 1: The Development of the Battlefleet 1650–1850. Conway Maritime Press. 317:, The Articles of War established the line of battle as a tactic for naval warfare. 1460: 1456: 1420: 1416: 547: 524: 516: 429: 409: 370: 282: 196: 98:, to the commander of a fleet dispatched to the Indian Ocean. The precision in the 20: 1484: 1436: 1396: 1354: 1303: 1276: 1054: 1007: 501: 467: 441: 336: 332: 43: 1200:
The Military Revolution: military innovation and the rise of the West, 1500–1800
225: 171: 1031: 577: 555: 207: 1185: 1045: 301:(the first English professional soldier to become a senior naval officer) and 1513: 1468: 1428: 360: 243: 155: 66: 273:
appear to have experimented with the technique in 1652, possibly including
1374: 1149: 507:
converted to steam in 1846, becoming the first steam ship of the line. The
421:
position to enable their fleet to retire downwind while continuing to fire
314: 310: 231: 183: 253: 1123: 1056:
Tudor and Stuart Seafarers: The Emergence of a Maritime Nation, 1485–1707
508: 219: 463: 1257:
Schittering en Schandaal: Dubbelbiografie van Maerten en Cornelis Tromp
542:(1916), and – for the last time – in the 512: 422: 393: 381: 215: 206:
gradually became the most important weapon in naval warfare, replacing
16:
Naval warfare tactic in which a fleet of ships forms a line end to end
1230:
The Cambridge Illustrated History of Warfare: The Triumph of the West
1078: 520: 235: 175: 482: 107: 664: 234:, the tactics of a fleet were often to "charge" the enemy, firing 418: 240: 211: 191: 159: 1085:. Vol. 1. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International. 1359:. Conway's History of the Ship. London: Conway Maritime Press. 203: 1491:
The Command of the Ocean, a Naval History of Britain 1649–1815
1283:
The Command of the Ocean, a Naval History of Britain 1649–1815
527:, ramming again became a method of attack, as occurred at the 327:
Instructions for the better ordering of the Fleet in Fighting
226:
Development during the Anglo-Dutch battles of the early 1650s
531:, the first ever fleet engagement involving ironclad ships. 623:
While the Japanese succeeded in crippling the battle line…
1327:
Empire of the Deep: the Rise and Fall of the British Navy
861: 756: 114:, Portuguese theorist on naval warfare and shipbuilding, 703: 1442:"Image and Reality in Eighteenth-Century Naval Tactics" 961: 885: 734: 732: 730: 681: 679: 652: 281:(19 May 1652). Tromp faced Blake as he approached from 458: 388: 1305:
The Battle of Leyte Gulf : The Last Fleet Action
849: 837: 780: 768: 744: 1252: 987:
The Metal Fighting Ship in the Royal Navy, 1860–1970
897: 792: 727: 691: 676: 670: 628: 715: 640: 1488: 1440: 1400: 1324: 1280: 1254: 1227: 1197: 1127: 1101: 984: 873: 500:replaced wind power during the 19th century, with 1402:"The Development of Broadside Gunnery, 1450–1650" 1356:The Line of Battle: The Sailing Warship 1650–1840 1177:The Influence of Sea Power Upon History 1660–1783 523:and armed with turrets. With the introduction of 1511: 589: 918:"Clash at Surigao Strait: The Last Battle Line" 1261:(in Dutch). Amsterdam; Antwerp: Arbeidspers. 402: 246:first used the line of battle tactic in the 146:Line-of-battle tactics had been used by the 1040:. Vol. 29. The Navy Records Society. 32:Two fleets in their line of battle during 1308:. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 982: 967: 1530:Naval warfare of the Early Modern period 1301: 891: 462: 392: 331: 252: 120: 38: 27: 1030: 915: 762: 685: 190:. Albuquerque commanded a fleet of six 1512: 1322: 1275: 1222: 1192: 1148: 1122: 1005: 903: 867: 855: 843: 786: 774: 750: 738: 709: 697: 646: 634: 341:The Battle of the Gabbard, 2 June 1653 48:The Battle of Copenhagen, 2 April 1801 1331:. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. 1180:. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. 1170: 1077: 1052: 798: 721: 658: 481:In the years following the defeat of 250:, although some have disputed this. 1099: 879: 473:, the first steam ship of the line ( 804: 515:, which made it impossible to have 459:Age of Steam and later developments 389:Problems associated with the tactic 379:. In time this became shortened to 13: 1346: 14: 1546: 1253:Prud’homme van Reine, R. (2001). 810: 573:Naval tactics in the Age of Steam 1037:Fighting Instructions, 1530–1816 214:was for longer ships with lower 936: 909: 554:, particularly those that were 263:British Battles on Land and Sea 202:From the mid-16th century, the 1461:10.1080/00253359.2003.10659294 1421:10.1080/00253359.1996.10656604 1353:Gardiner, Robert, ed. (2004). 269:Captains on both sides of the 148:Fourth Portuguese India Armada 127:Fourth Portuguese India Armada 1: 944:"Battle Group – Introduction" 550:as well as a wide variety of 475:Maritime Institute of Ireland 168:Third Portuguese India Armada 85: 7: 561: 546:(1944). The development of 368:battle came to be called a 291:Battle of the Kentish Knock 261:(19 May 1652), depicted in 10: 1551: 1236:Cambridge University Press 1206:Cambridge University Press 1014:Cambridge University Press 991:. New York: Arco Pub. Co. 983:Archibald, E.H.H. (1971). 976: 199:. He then captured Ormuz. 132:Livro de Lisuarte de Abreu 96:Manuel I, king of Portugal 18: 924:. Warfare History Network 671:Prud’homme van Reine 2001 606:: 3. 2017. Archived from 408:(1854), showing a French 164:First Battle of Cannanore 1032:Corbett, Julian Stafford 583: 544:Battle of Surigao Strait 412:forming a line of battle 174:and the naval forces of 152:Battle of Calicut (1503) 916:Lippman, David (2013). 820:Oxford University Press 400:, an illustration from 345:Royal Museums Greenwich 182:at the entrance to the 67:tactic in naval warfare 52:Royal Museums Greenwich 34:the Battle of Cuddalore 1495:. London: Allen Lane. 1437:Rodger, Nicholas A. M. 1397:Rodger, Nicholas A. M. 1287:. London: Allen Lane. 1130:The Price of Admiralty 1108:. London: Southwater. 529:Battle of Lissa (1866) 478: 413: 403: 348: 266: 143: 94:, provided in 1500 by 54: 36: 1520:Naval warfare tactics 1485:Rodger, Nicholas A.M. 1277:Rodger, Nicholas A.M. 1061:Bloomsbury Publishing 1053:Davey, James (2018). 1009:The Battle of Jutland 1006:Brooks, John (2016). 517:ships with a full rig 489:in 1815, the British 466: 446:Battle of the Saintes 434:Battle of Schooneveld 396: 353:Battle of the Gabbard 335: 271:First Anglo-Dutch War 256: 180:Afonso de Albuquerque 124: 112:The Art of War at Sea 42: 31: 1448:The Mariner's Mirror 1408:The Mariner's Mirror 1379:The Ship of the Line 1323:Wilson, Ben (2014). 1154:The Ship of the Line 1134:. New York: Viking. 1100:Hore, Peter (2006). 568:Sailing ship tactics 498:Marine steam engines 248:Fight in the Channel 1525:Tactical formations 870:, pp. 155–156. 712:, pp. 200–201. 661:, pp. 115–116. 438:Battle of Trafalgar 398:Antoine Morel-Fatio 377:line of battle ship 365:early modern period 295:Battle of Dungeness 812:"'battleship, n.'" 765:, pp. 99–104. 597:"Battle of Midway" 552:anti-ship missiles 536:Battle of Tsushima 487:Battle of Waterloo 479: 414: 349: 323:Battle of Portland 267: 144: 129:of 1502, from the 116:Fernão de Oliveira 55: 37: 1502:978-0-7139-9411-7 1388:978-0-85177-252-3 1366:978-08517-7-954-6 1338:978-07538-2-920-2 1315:978-02530-0-351-5 1302:Willmott (2005). 1294:978-0-7139-9411-7 1268:978-90-295-3572-4 1245:978-05217-3-806-4 1215:978-0-521-47426-9 1163:978-0-85177-252-3 1141:978-0-670-81416-9 1115:978-18447-6-299-6 1092:978-91-22-01565-9 1070:978-14729-5-678-1 1023:978-11071-5-014-0 998:978-06680-2-509-6 613:on 16 August 2023 604:Combat Narratives 548:aircraft carriers 540:Battle of Jutland 525:ironclad warships 188:conquest of Ormuz 1542: 1506: 1494: 1480: 1444: 1432: 1404: 1392: 1370: 1342: 1330: 1319: 1298: 1286: 1272: 1260: 1249: 1233: 1224:Parker, Geoffrey 1219: 1203: 1194:Parker, Geoffrey 1189: 1167: 1145: 1133: 1119: 1107: 1096: 1074: 1049: 1027: 1002: 990: 971: 965: 959: 958: 956: 954: 940: 934: 933: 931: 929: 913: 907: 901: 895: 889: 883: 877: 871: 865: 859: 853: 847: 841: 835: 834: 831: 829: 827: 822:. September 2022 808: 802: 796: 790: 784: 778: 772: 766: 760: 754: 748: 742: 736: 725: 719: 713: 707: 701: 695: 689: 683: 674: 668: 662: 656: 650: 644: 638: 632: 626: 625: 620: 618: 612: 601: 593: 430:Four Days Battle 406: 371:ship of the line 208:boarding actions 140: 21:Line (formation) 1550: 1549: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1510: 1509: 1503: 1483: 1435: 1395: 1389: 1373: 1367: 1352: 1349: 1347:Further reading 1339: 1316: 1295: 1269: 1246: 1216: 1164: 1142: 1116: 1093: 1071: 1024: 999: 979: 974: 966: 962: 952: 950: 948:Global Security 942: 941: 937: 927: 925: 914: 910: 902: 898: 890: 886: 878: 874: 866: 862: 854: 850: 842: 838: 832: 825: 823: 809: 805: 797: 793: 785: 781: 773: 769: 761: 757: 749: 745: 737: 728: 720: 716: 708: 704: 696: 692: 684: 677: 669: 665: 657: 653: 645: 641: 633: 629: 616: 614: 610: 599: 595: 594: 590: 586: 564: 461: 442:Battle of Texel 391: 337:Heerman Witmont 307:Articles of War 279:Battle of Dover 259:Battle of Dover 228: 186:, in the first 134: 88: 44:Nicholas Pocock 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1548: 1538: 1537: 1532: 1527: 1522: 1508: 1507: 1501: 1481: 1455:(3): 281–296. 1433: 1415:(3): 301–324. 1393: 1387: 1371: 1365: 1348: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1337: 1320: 1314: 1299: 1293: 1273: 1267: 1250: 1244: 1220: 1214: 1190: 1168: 1162: 1146: 1140: 1120: 1114: 1097: 1091: 1075: 1069: 1050: 1034:, ed. (1905). 1028: 1022: 1003: 997: 978: 975: 973: 972: 968:Archibald 1971 960: 935: 908: 896: 894:, p. 217. 884: 872: 860: 858:, p. 154. 848: 846:, p. 277. 836: 803: 801:, p. 176. 791: 789:, p. 207. 779: 777:, p. 206. 767: 755: 753:, p. 208. 743: 726: 724:, p. 204. 714: 702: 700:, p. 193. 690: 675: 673:, p. 417. 663: 651: 639: 637:, p. 125. 627: 587: 585: 582: 581: 580: 578:Crossing the T 575: 570: 563: 560: 460: 457: 390: 387: 361:merchant crews 230:Until the mid- 227: 224: 87: 84: 59:line of battle 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1547: 1536: 1533: 1531: 1528: 1526: 1523: 1521: 1518: 1517: 1515: 1504: 1498: 1493: 1492: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1449: 1443: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1409: 1403: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1375:Lavery, Brian 1372: 1368: 1362: 1358: 1357: 1351: 1350: 1340: 1334: 1329: 1328: 1321: 1317: 1311: 1307: 1306: 1300: 1296: 1290: 1285: 1284: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1264: 1259: 1258: 1251: 1247: 1241: 1237: 1234:. Cambridge: 1232: 1231: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1211: 1207: 1204:. Cambridge: 1202: 1201: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1178: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1150:Lavery, Brian 1147: 1143: 1137: 1132: 1131: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1111: 1106: 1105: 1098: 1094: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1057: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1038: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1019: 1015: 1012:. Cambridge: 1011: 1010: 1004: 1000: 994: 989: 988: 981: 980: 970:, p. 81. 969: 964: 949: 945: 939: 923: 919: 912: 906:, p. 58. 905: 900: 893: 892:Willmott 2005 888: 882:, p. 16. 881: 876: 869: 864: 857: 852: 845: 840: 821: 817: 813: 807: 800: 795: 788: 783: 776: 771: 764: 759: 752: 747: 741:, p. 16. 740: 735: 733: 731: 723: 718: 711: 706: 699: 694: 688:, p. 85. 687: 682: 680: 672: 667: 660: 655: 649:, p. 94. 648: 643: 636: 631: 624: 609: 605: 598: 592: 588: 579: 576: 574: 571: 569: 566: 565: 559: 557: 556:cruise guided 553: 549: 545: 541: 537: 532: 530: 526: 522: 518: 514: 510: 506: 505: 499: 495: 492: 488: 484: 476: 472: 471: 465: 456: 454: 449: 447: 443: 439: 435: 431: 426: 424: 420: 411: 407: 405: 399: 395: 386: 384: 383: 378: 374: 372: 366: 362: 356: 354: 346: 342: 338: 334: 330: 328: 324: 318: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 287: 284: 280: 276: 272: 264: 260: 255: 251: 249: 245: 244:Maarten Tromp 242: 237: 233: 223: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 200: 198: 193: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 161: 157: 156:Vasco da Gama 153: 149: 141: 138: 133: 128: 123: 119: 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 93: 83: 81: 76: 71: 68: 64: 60: 53: 49: 45: 41: 35: 30: 26: 22: 1490: 1452: 1446: 1412: 1406: 1378: 1355: 1326: 1304: 1282: 1256: 1229: 1199: 1176: 1153: 1129: 1124:Keegan, John 1103: 1082: 1055: 1036: 1008: 986: 963: 951:. Retrieved 947: 938: 926:. Retrieved 922:WWII History 921: 911: 899: 887: 875: 863: 851: 839: 824:. Retrieved 815: 806: 794: 782: 770: 763:Corbett 1905 758: 746: 717: 705: 693: 686:Corbett 1905 666: 654: 642: 630: 622: 615:. Retrieved 608:the original 603: 591: 538:(1905), the 533: 503: 496: 480: 469: 452: 450: 427: 415: 401: 380: 376: 369: 357: 350: 340: 326: 319: 315:rear admiral 311:vice admiral 299:George Monck 288: 275:Robert Blake 268: 262: 232:17th century 229: 220:aftercastles 201: 184:Persian Gulf 172:João da Nova 166:between the 145: 130: 111: 100:Instructions 99: 92:Instructions 91: 89: 72: 62: 58: 56: 47: 25: 1535:Age of Sail 1172:Mahan, A.T. 953:10 December 904:Brooks 2016 868:Lavery 2003 856:Lavery 2003 844:Keegan 1989 826:25 November 787:Wilson 2014 775:Wilson 2014 751:Wilson 2014 739:Rodger 2004 710:Wilson 2014 698:Wilson 2014 647:Parker 1996 635:Parker 2008 509:Crimean War 351:During the 216:forecastles 135: [ 63:battle line 50:(undated), 1514:Categories 1186:1084844208 1079:Glete, Jan 1059:. London: 1046:1045333716 928:8 December 816:OED Online 799:Glete 1993 722:Davey 2018 659:Mahan 1890 521:propellers 513:gun turret 436:, and the 423:chain-shot 382:battleship 236:bow chaser 86:Background 1477:109717660 1469:0025-3359 1429:0025-3359 880:Hore 2006 617:16 August 491:Admiralty 404:La Marine 373:of battle 110:of 1555, 104:broadside 75:broadside 1487:(2004). 1439:(2003). 1399:(1996). 1377:(2003). 1279:(2004). 1226:(2008). 1196:(1996). 1174:(1890). 1152:(2003). 1126:(1989). 1081:(1993). 562:See also 483:Napoleon 453:doubling 444:and the 410:squadron 313:, and a 305:was the 212:galleons 197:squadron 192:carracks 154:, under 108:treatise 977:Sources 485:at the 419:leeward 277:at the 241:admiral 176:Calicut 160:Malabar 158:, near 150:at the 61:or the 1499:  1475:  1467:  1427:  1385:  1363:  1335:  1312:  1291:  1265:  1242:  1212:  1184:  1160:  1138:  1112:  1089:  1067:  1044:  1020:  995:  265:(1873) 204:cannon 170:under 1473:S2CID 611:(PDF) 600:(PDF) 584:Notes 375:, or 303:Deane 139:] 65:is a 1497:ISBN 1465:ISSN 1425:ISSN 1383:ISBN 1361:ISBN 1333:ISBN 1310:ISBN 1289:ISBN 1263:ISBN 1240:ISBN 1210:ISBN 1182:OCLC 1158:ISBN 1136:ISBN 1110:ISBN 1087:ISBN 1065:ISBN 1042:OCLC 1018:ISBN 993:ISBN 955:2022 930:2022 828:2022 619:2024 504:Ajax 502:HMS 470:Ajax 468:HMS 289:The 257:The 218:and 125:The 80:tack 57:The 1457:doi 1417:doi 448:). 283:Rye 82:). 1516:: 1471:. 1463:. 1453:89 1451:. 1445:. 1423:. 1413:82 1411:. 1405:. 1238:. 1208:. 1063:. 1016:. 946:. 920:. 818:. 814:. 729:^ 678:^ 621:. 602:. 432:, 385:. 339:, 137:pt 46:, 1505:. 1479:. 1459:: 1431:. 1419:: 1391:. 1369:. 1341:. 1318:. 1297:. 1271:. 1248:. 1218:. 1188:. 1166:. 1144:. 1118:. 1095:. 1073:. 1048:. 1026:. 1001:. 957:. 932:. 830:. 477:) 347:) 343:( 142:) 23:.

Index

Line (formation)

the Battle of Cuddalore

Nicholas Pocock
Royal Museums Greenwich
tactic in naval warfare
broadside
tack
Manuel I, king of Portugal
broadside
treatise
Fernão de Oliveira

Fourth Portuguese India Armada
Livro de Lisuarte de Abreu
pt
Fourth Portuguese India Armada
Battle of Calicut (1503)
Vasco da Gama
Malabar
First Battle of Cannanore
Third Portuguese India Armada
João da Nova
Calicut
Afonso de Albuquerque
Persian Gulf
conquest of Ormuz
carracks
squadron

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.