Knowledge

Multicenter trial

Source đź“ť

42:, which compare the new treatment to an established one, are usually multicenter ones. In contrast, Phase I trials, which test potential toxicity of the treatment, and Phase II trials, which establish some preliminary efficacy of the tested treatment, are usually single-center trials, as they require fewer participants. 46:
increase the generalizability of the study. In many cases, efficacy will vary significantly between population groups with different genetic, environmental, and ethnic or cultural backgrounds ("demographic" factors); multicenter trials are better at evaluating these factors, by giving the opportunity for more
24:
that involves more than one independent medical institutions in enrolling and following trial participants. In multicenter trials the participant institutions follow a common treatment protocol and follow the same data collection guidelines, and there is a single coordinating center that receives,
45:
The benefits of multicenter trials also include the potential for a more heterogenous sample of participants, from different geographic locations and a wider range of population groups, treated from physicians of different backgrounds, and the ability to compare results among centers, all of which
33:
An important benefit of multicenter trials is that they permit the enrollment of a larger number of participants at a faster rate, in comparison to a single-center trial, putting to use the sources of multiple institutions. This is crucial when the anticipated benefit from a treatment will be
221: 50:. Heterogeneity in the sample means that the findings will be more generalizable. On the other hand, a more heterogeneous study population generally requires a larger sample size to detect a given difference. 253: 222:
Role of ICH GCP and Recruitment Strategies Training of Clinical Sites Staff in Successful Patient Recruitment Rates By Marithea Goberville, Ph.D.
38:
necessary. Therefore, studies on preventive measures and therapies tend to be designed as multicenter trials. In studying novel pharmaceuticals,
545: 541: 591: 549: 537: 246: 712: 628: 493: 463: 239: 171: 136: 88: 750: 557: 595: 317: 743: 428: 226: 722: 216: 153: 686: 658: 587: 341: 772: 736: 412: 531: 777: 469: 417: 297: 128: 515: 385: 363: 332: 307: 290: 68: 666: 503: 424: 507: 394: 302: 266: 231: 473: 8: 380: 312: 39: 633: 583: 398: 327: 285: 707: 671: 563: 485: 262: 167: 132: 116: 84: 47: 163: 481: 402: 356: 351: 159: 124: 76: 34:
relatively small, or an expected outcome is likely to be uncommon, making a larger
676: 499: 454: 80: 702: 623: 575: 368: 280: 21: 766: 681: 648: 643: 152:
Bryant, J; et al. (2014). "Multicenter Trials: Rationale and Examples".
523: 407: 717: 571: 444: 434: 35: 519: 511: 477: 439: 346: 579: 567: 613: 212: 618: 119:; et al. (1986). "Single-center versus multicenter trials". 261: 192: 190: 123:(Online ed.). Oxford Academic. pp. 23–29. 187: 764: 67:Friedman, LM; Furberg, CD; et al. (2015). 66: 247: 121:Clinical Trials: Design, Conduct and Analysis 155:Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online 254: 240: 129:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195035681.003.0004 111: 109: 107: 546:Preventable fraction among the unexposed 542:Attributable fraction for the population 550:Preventable fraction for the population 538:Attributable fraction among the exposed 115: 60: 765: 196: 151: 104: 235: 158:(Online ed.). Wiley. p. 1. 713:Correlation does not imply causation 629:Animal testing on non-human primates 25:processes and analyzes study data. 13: 14: 789: 206: 164:10.1002/9781118445112.stat04947 75:. Springer, Cham. p. 427. 73:Fundamentals of Clinical Trials 596:Pre- and post-test probability 318:Patient and public involvement 145: 1: 53: 723:Sex as a biological variable 217:National Library of Medicine 81:10.1007/978-3-319-18539-2_21 7: 687:Intention-to-treat analysis 659:Analysis of clinical trials 588:Specificity and sensitivity 342:Randomized controlled trial 28: 10: 794: 18:multicenter research trial 731: 696:Interpretation of results 695: 657: 606: 556: 530: 492: 462: 453: 429:Nested case–control study 379: 326: 273: 298:Academic clinical trials 516:Relative risk reduction 364:Adaptive clinical trial 308:Evidence-based medicine 291:Adaptive clinical trial 504:Number needed to treat 227:IBPA Publications 2005 508:Number needed to harm 395:Cross-sectional study 347:Scientific experiment 303:Clinical study design 474:Cumulative incidence 69:"Multicenter Trials" 381:Observational study 313:Real world evidence 267:experimental design 667:Risk–benefit ratio 634:First-in-man study 584:Case fatality rate 425:Case–control study 399:Longitudinal study 213:ClinicalTrials.gov 773:Clinical research 760: 759: 708:Survivorship bias 672:Systematic review 639:Multicenter trial 602: 601: 592:Likelihood-ratios 564:Clinical endpoint 532:Population impact 486:Period prevalence 263:Clinical research 48:subgroup analyses 785: 607:Trial/test types 482:Point prevalence 460: 459: 403:Ecological study 386:EBM II-2 to II-3 357:Open-label trial 352:Blind experiment 328:Controlled study 256: 249: 242: 233: 232: 200: 194: 185: 184: 182: 180: 149: 143: 142: 113: 102: 101: 99: 97: 64: 40:Phase III trials 793: 792: 788: 787: 786: 784: 783: 782: 778:Clinical trials 763: 762: 761: 756: 727: 691: 653: 598: 552: 526: 500:Risk difference 488: 449: 383: 375: 330: 322: 286:Trial protocols 269: 260: 209: 204: 203: 195: 188: 178: 176: 174: 150: 146: 139: 114: 105: 95: 93: 91: 65: 61: 56: 31: 12: 11: 5: 791: 781: 780: 775: 758: 757: 755: 754: 751:List of topics 747: 740: 732: 729: 728: 726: 725: 720: 715: 710: 705: 703:Selection bias 699: 697: 693: 692: 690: 689: 684: 679: 674: 669: 663: 661: 655: 654: 652: 651: 646: 641: 636: 631: 626: 624:Animal testing 621: 616: 610: 608: 604: 603: 600: 599: 576:Mortality rate 562: 560: 554: 553: 536: 534: 528: 527: 498: 496: 490: 489: 468: 466: 457: 451: 450: 448: 447: 442: 437: 432: 422: 421: 420: 415: 405: 391: 389: 377: 376: 374: 373: 372: 371: 369:Platform trial 361: 360: 359: 354: 349: 338: 336: 324: 323: 321: 320: 315: 310: 305: 300: 295: 294: 293: 288: 281:Clinical trial 277: 275: 271: 270: 259: 258: 251: 244: 236: 230: 229: 224: 219: 208: 207:External links 205: 202: 201: 186: 172: 144: 137: 103: 89: 58: 57: 55: 52: 30: 27: 22:clinical trial 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 790: 779: 776: 774: 771: 770: 768: 753: 752: 748: 746: 745: 741: 739: 738: 734: 733: 730: 724: 721: 719: 716: 714: 711: 709: 706: 704: 701: 700: 698: 694: 688: 685: 683: 682:Meta-analysis 680: 678: 675: 673: 670: 668: 665: 664: 662: 660: 656: 650: 649:Vaccine trial 647: 645: 644:Seeding trial 642: 640: 637: 635: 632: 630: 627: 625: 622: 620: 617: 615: 612: 611: 609: 605: 597: 593: 589: 585: 581: 577: 573: 569: 565: 561: 559: 555: 551: 547: 543: 539: 535: 533: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 509: 505: 501: 497: 495: 491: 487: 483: 479: 475: 471: 467: 465: 461: 458: 456: 452: 446: 443: 441: 438: 436: 433: 430: 426: 423: 419: 416: 414: 413:Retrospective 411: 410: 409: 406: 404: 400: 396: 393: 392: 390: 387: 382: 378: 370: 367: 366: 365: 362: 358: 355: 353: 350: 348: 345: 344: 343: 340: 339: 337: 334: 333:EBM I to II-1 329: 325: 319: 316: 314: 311: 309: 306: 304: 301: 299: 296: 292: 289: 287: 284: 283: 282: 279: 278: 276: 272: 268: 264: 257: 252: 250: 245: 243: 238: 237: 234: 228: 225: 223: 220: 218: 214: 211: 210: 198: 193: 191: 175: 173:9781118445112 169: 165: 161: 157: 156: 148: 140: 138:9780199864478 134: 130: 126: 122: 118: 112: 110: 108: 92: 90:9783319185392 86: 82: 78: 74: 70: 63: 59: 51: 49: 43: 41: 37: 26: 23: 19: 749: 742: 735: 638: 524:Hazard ratio 408:Cohort study 199:, p. 3. 177:. Retrieved 154: 147: 120: 94:. Retrieved 72: 62: 44: 32: 17: 15: 718:Null result 677:Replication 572:Infectivity 494:Association 445:Case report 435:Case series 418:Prospective 197:Bryant 2014 179:12 February 117:Meinert, CL 96:12 February 36:sample size 767:Categories 520:Odds ratio 512:Risk ratio 478:Prevalence 464:Occurrence 440:Case study 54:References 580:Morbidity 568:Virulence 470:Incidence 744:Glossary 737:Category 614:In vitro 455:Measures 274:Overview 215:from US 29:Benefits 619:In vivo 170:  135:  87:  558:Other 20:is a 397:vs. 265:and 181:2024 168:ISBN 133:ISBN 98:2024 85:ISBN 160:doi 125:doi 77:doi 769:: 594:, 590:, 586:, 582:, 578:, 574:, 570:, 566:, 548:, 544:, 540:, 522:, 518:, 514:, 510:, 506:, 502:, 484:, 480:, 476:, 472:, 401:, 189:^ 166:. 131:. 106:^ 83:. 71:. 16:A 431:) 427:( 388:) 384:( 335:) 331:( 255:e 248:t 241:v 183:. 162:: 141:. 127:: 100:. 79::

Index

clinical trial
sample size
Phase III trials
subgroup analyses
"Multicenter Trials"
doi
10.1007/978-3-319-18539-2_21
ISBN
9783319185392



Meinert, CL
doi
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195035681.003.0004
ISBN
9780199864478
Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online
doi
10.1002/9781118445112.stat04947
ISBN
9781118445112


Bryant 2014
ClinicalTrials.gov
National Library of Medicine
Role of ICH GCP and Recruitment Strategies Training of Clinical Sites Staff in Successful Patient Recruitment Rates By Marithea Goberville, Ph.D.
IBPA Publications 2005
v

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑