Knowledge

Prospective cohort study

Source šŸ“

72:
collected, subjects in a prospective cohort study are then followed "longitudinally," i.e., over a period of time, usually for years, to determine if and when they become diseased and whether their exposure status changes outcomes. In this way, investigators can eventually use the data to answer many questions about the associations between "risk factors" and disease outcomes. For example, one could identify smokers and non-smokers at baseline and compare their subsequent incidence of developing heart disease. Alternatively, one could group subjects based on their body mass index (BMI) and compare their risk of developing heart disease or cancer. Prospective cohort studies are typically ranked higher in the
38: 433: 71:
of diseases and disorders. The distinguishing feature of a prospective cohort study is that at the time the investigators begin enrolling subjects and collecting baseline exposure information, none of the subjects have developed any of the outcomes of interest. After baseline information is
87:
One of the advantages of prospective cohort studies is that they can help determine risk factors for being infected with a new disease because they are a longitudinal observation over time, and the collection of results is at regular time intervals, so recall error is minimized.
64:. For example, one might follow a cohort of middle-aged truck drivers who vary in terms of smoking habits to test the hypothesis that the 20-year incidence rate of lung cancer will be highest among heavy smokers, followed by moderate smokers, and then nonā€“smokers. 97: 104:ā€™ due to these terms having contradictory and overlapping definitions. STROBE also recommends that whenever authors use these words, they specify which definition they use, including a detailed description of how and when data collection took place. 437: 350: 375:
Vandenbroucke, Jan P; von Elm, Erik; Altman, Douglas G; GĆøtzsche, Peter C; Mulrow, Cynthia D; Pocock, Stuart J; Poole, Charles; Schlesselman, James J; Egger, Matthias (2007-10-01).
476: 354: 251: 228: 768: 764: 814: 772: 760: 469: 935: 851: 716: 686: 462: 17: 973: 60:) who differ with respect to certain factors under study to determine how these factors affect rates of a certain 345:
Porta M (editor). A dictionary of epidemiology. 5th. edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. Edited by
41:
Caseā€“control study versus cohort on a timeline. "OR" stands for "odds ratio" and "RR" stands for "relative risk".
780: 818: 540: 448: 113: 995: 966: 651: 377:"Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration" 945: 31: 909: 881: 810: 564: 206: 959: 635: 173: 120:
Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging / Ɖtude longitudinale canadienne sur le vieillissement (CLSA-ƉLCV)
101: 77: 754: 692: 520: 738: 608: 586: 555: 530: 513: 889: 726: 647: 136: 81: 730: 617: 525: 489: 73: 61: 454: 696: 8: 603: 535: 142: 57: 856: 806: 621: 550: 508: 411: 376: 328: 281: 188: 178: 50: 930: 894: 861: 786: 708: 485: 416: 398: 320: 273: 332: 704: 625: 579: 574: 406: 388: 312: 285: 263: 899: 722: 677: 393: 213: 148: 925: 846: 798: 591: 503: 183: 37: 989: 904: 871: 866: 402: 250:
Euser, Anne M.; Zoccali, Carmine; Jager, Kitty J.; Dekker, Friedo W. (2009).
193: 746: 630: 420: 346: 324: 277: 53: 154: 96:
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (
940: 794: 667: 657: 214:"Definition of prospective cohort study - NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms" 100:) recommends that authors refrain from calling a study ā€˜prospectiveā€™ or ā€˜ 742: 734: 700: 662: 569: 130: 268: 802: 790: 351:"Oxford University Press: A Dictionary of Epidemiology: Miquel Porta" 442: 316: 300: 836: 68: 374: 841: 301:"Genes, environment and the value of prospective cohort studies" 160: 124: 484: 298: 119: 125:
The CARTaGENE cohort / Quebec's largest prospective study
299:
Manolio TA, Bailey-Wilson JE, Collins FS (October 2006).
249: 67:
The prospective study is important for research on the
56:
that follows over time a group of similar individuals (
252:"Cohort Studies: Prospective versus Retrospective" 987: 229:"Prospective and Retrospective Cohort Studies" 470: 131:Cebu Longitudinal Health and Nutrition Survey 231:. Boston University College of Public Health 292: 477: 463: 410: 392: 267: 769:Preventable fraction among the unexposed 765:Attributable fraction for the population 36: 773:Preventable fraction for the population 761:Attributable fraction among the exposed 14: 988: 458: 30:For other uses of "prospective", see 936:Correlation does not imply causation 852:Animal testing on non-human primates 226: 24: 25: 1007: 80:and can be more expensive than a 436: This article incorporates 431: 819:Pre- and post-test probability 541:Patient and public involvement 449:U.S. National Cancer Institute 368: 339: 243: 220: 155:Tsimaneā€™ Amazonian Panel Study 114:Caerphilly Heart Disease Study 13: 1: 199: 946:Sex as a biological variable 394:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297 91: 78:retrospective cohort studies 32:Prospective (disambiguation) 7: 910:Intention-to-treat analysis 882:Analysis of clinical trials 811:Specificity and sensitivity 565:Randomized controlled trial 167: 107: 10: 1012: 444:Dictionary of Cancer Terms 174:Retrospective cohort study 29: 954: 919:Interpretation of results 918: 880: 829: 779: 753: 715: 685: 676: 652:Nested caseā€“control study 602: 549: 496: 256:Nephron Clinical Practice 27:Longitudinal cohort study 521:Academic clinical trials 47:prospective cohort study 739:Relative risk reduction 587:Adaptive clinical trial 531:Evidence-based medicine 514:Adaptive clinical trial 727:Number needed to treat 438:public domain material 137:Framingham Heart Study 42: 731:Number needed to harm 618:Cross-sectional study 570:Scientific experiment 526:Clinical study design 74:hierarchy of evidence 40: 996:Cohort study methods 697:Cumulative incidence 604:Observational study 536:Real world evidence 490:experimental design 143:Million Women Study 890:Riskā€“benefit ratio 857:First-in-man study 807:Case fatality rate 648:Caseā€“control study 622:Longitudinal study 189:Therapeutic effect 179:Blinded experiment 82:caseā€“control study 43: 983: 982: 931:Survivorship bias 895:Systematic review 862:Multicenter trial 825: 824: 815:Likelihood-ratios 787:Clinical endpoint 755:Population impact 709:Period prevalence 486:Clinical research 269:10.1159/000235241 133:, the Philippines 18:Prospective study 16:(Redirected from 1003: 830:Trial/test types 705:Point prevalence 683: 682: 626:Ecological study 609:EBM II-2 to II-3 580:Open-label trial 575:Blind experiment 551:Controlled study 479: 472: 465: 456: 455: 452: 435: 434: 425: 424: 414: 396: 372: 366: 365: 363: 362: 353:. Archived from 343: 337: 336: 296: 290: 289: 271: 262:(3): c214ā€“c217. 247: 241: 240: 238: 236: 227:LaMorte, Wayne. 224: 218: 217: 210: 127:, Quebec, Canada 21: 1011: 1010: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1002: 1001: 1000: 986: 985: 984: 979: 950: 914: 876: 821: 775: 749: 723:Risk difference 711: 672: 606: 598: 553: 545: 509:Trial protocols 492: 483: 441: 432: 429: 428: 373: 369: 360: 358: 349: 344: 340: 317:10.1038/nrg1919 305:Nat. Rev. Genet 297: 293: 248: 244: 234: 232: 225: 221: 212: 211: 207: 202: 170: 161:The UK biobank 149:Rotterdam Study 110: 94: 35: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1009: 999: 998: 981: 980: 978: 977: 974:List of topics 970: 963: 955: 952: 951: 949: 948: 943: 938: 933: 928: 926:Selection bias 922: 920: 916: 915: 913: 912: 907: 902: 897: 892: 886: 884: 878: 877: 875: 874: 869: 864: 859: 854: 849: 847:Animal testing 844: 839: 833: 831: 827: 826: 823: 822: 799:Mortality rate 785: 783: 777: 776: 759: 757: 751: 750: 721: 719: 713: 712: 691: 689: 680: 674: 673: 671: 670: 665: 660: 655: 645: 644: 643: 638: 628: 614: 612: 600: 599: 597: 596: 595: 594: 592:Platform trial 584: 583: 582: 577: 572: 561: 559: 547: 546: 544: 543: 538: 533: 528: 523: 518: 517: 516: 511: 504:Clinical trial 500: 498: 494: 493: 482: 481: 474: 467: 459: 427: 426: 367: 338: 311:(10): 812ā€“20. 291: 242: 219: 204: 203: 201: 198: 197: 196: 191: 186: 184:Clinical trial 181: 176: 169: 166: 165: 164: 158: 152: 151:, Netherlands. 146: 140: 134: 128: 122: 117: 109: 106: 93: 90: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1008: 997: 994: 993: 991: 976: 975: 971: 969: 968: 964: 962: 961: 957: 956: 953: 947: 944: 942: 939: 937: 934: 932: 929: 927: 924: 923: 921: 917: 911: 908: 906: 905:Meta-analysis 903: 901: 898: 896: 893: 891: 888: 887: 885: 883: 879: 873: 872:Vaccine trial 870: 868: 867:Seeding trial 865: 863: 860: 858: 855: 853: 850: 848: 845: 843: 840: 838: 835: 834: 832: 828: 820: 816: 812: 808: 804: 800: 796: 792: 788: 784: 782: 778: 774: 770: 766: 762: 758: 756: 752: 748: 744: 740: 736: 732: 728: 724: 720: 718: 714: 710: 706: 702: 698: 694: 690: 688: 684: 681: 679: 675: 669: 666: 664: 661: 659: 656: 653: 649: 646: 642: 639: 637: 636:Retrospective 634: 633: 632: 629: 627: 623: 619: 616: 615: 613: 610: 605: 601: 593: 590: 589: 588: 585: 581: 578: 576: 573: 571: 568: 567: 566: 563: 562: 560: 557: 556:EBM I to II-1 552: 548: 542: 539: 537: 534: 532: 529: 527: 524: 522: 519: 515: 512: 510: 507: 506: 505: 502: 501: 499: 495: 491: 487: 480: 475: 473: 468: 466: 461: 460: 457: 453: 450: 446: 445: 439: 422: 418: 413: 408: 404: 400: 395: 390: 386: 382: 381:PLOS Medicine 378: 371: 357:on 2011-06-04 356: 352: 348: 342: 334: 330: 326: 322: 318: 314: 310: 306: 302: 295: 287: 283: 279: 275: 270: 265: 261: 257: 253: 246: 230: 223: 215: 209: 205: 195: 194:Randomization 192: 190: 187: 185: 182: 180: 177: 175: 172: 171: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 141: 138: 135: 132: 129: 126: 123: 121: 118: 115: 112: 111: 105: 103: 102:retrospective 99: 89: 85: 83: 79: 75: 70: 65: 63: 59: 55: 52: 48: 39: 33: 19: 972: 965: 958: 747:Hazard ratio 640: 631:Cohort study 443: 430: 387:(10): e297. 384: 380: 370: 359:. Retrieved 355:the original 347:Miquel Porta 341: 308: 304: 294: 259: 255: 245: 233:. Retrieved 222: 208: 95: 86: 66: 54:cohort study 51:longitudinal 46: 44: 941:Null result 900:Replication 795:Infectivity 717:Association 668:Case report 658:Case series 641:Prospective 743:Odds ratio 735:Risk ratio 701:Prevalence 687:Occurrence 663:Case study 361:2011-04-21 200:References 803:Morbidity 791:Virulence 693:Incidence 403:1549-1277 157:, Bolivia 92:Reporting 990:Category 967:Glossary 960:Category 837:In vitro 678:Measures 497:Overview 421:17941715 333:20773705 325:16983377 278:19690438 168:See also 108:Examples 69:etiology 842:In vivo 412:2020496 286:8471855 235:Nov 25, 62:outcome 58:cohorts 419:  409:  401:  331:  323:  284:  276:  139:, USA. 98:STROBE 781:Other 440:from 329:S2CID 282:S2CID 145:, UK. 116:, UK. 76:than 49:is a 620:vs. 488:and 417:PMID 399:ISSN 321:PMID 274:PMID 237:2013 163:, UK 407:PMC 389:doi 313:doi 264:doi 260:113 992:: 817:, 813:, 809:, 805:, 801:, 797:, 793:, 789:, 771:, 767:, 763:, 745:, 741:, 737:, 733:, 729:, 725:, 707:, 703:, 699:, 695:, 624:, 447:. 415:. 405:. 397:. 383:. 379:. 327:. 319:. 307:. 303:. 280:. 272:. 258:. 254:. 84:. 45:A 654:) 650:( 611:) 607:( 558:) 554:( 478:e 471:t 464:v 451:. 423:. 391:: 385:4 364:. 335:. 315:: 309:7 288:. 266:: 239:. 216:. 34:. 20:)

Index

Prospective study
Prospective (disambiguation)

longitudinal
cohort study
cohorts
outcome
etiology
hierarchy of evidence
retrospective cohort studies
caseā€“control study
STROBE
retrospective
Caerphilly Heart Disease Study
Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging / Ɖtude longitudinale canadienne sur le vieillissement (CLSA-ƉLCV)
The CARTaGENE cohort / Quebec's largest prospective study
Cebu Longitudinal Health and Nutrition Survey
Framingham Heart Study
Million Women Study
Rotterdam Study
Tsimaneā€™ Amazonian Panel Study
The UK biobank
Retrospective cohort study
Blinded experiment
Clinical trial
Therapeutic effect
Randomization
"Definition of prospective cohort study - NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms"
"Prospective and Retrospective Cohort Studies"
"Cohort Studies: Prospective versus Retrospective"

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘