Knowledge

R v Marshall

Source 📝

42: 501: 566: 490: 622:
Both decisions proved highly controversial. The first elicited anger from the non-Indigenous fishing community for giving seemingly-complete immunity to Indigenous peoples to fish. The second decision, which was claimed to be an "elaboration," was seen as a retreat from the first decision and angered
590:
In 1999, the court of appeal heard the Marshall case, indicated that the trial judge had made an error in law and overturned the decision (p. 89). The appeal judge Justice Binnie, stated that the trial judge's error was in not focusing attention on the Maliseet–British treaty of 1 February 1760.
623:
Indigenous communities. The second decision was issued on a motion for re-hearing the case brought by fishermen's associations in which the court elaborated in particular about such things as the relationship between treaty rights and conservation that had been more implicit in the first decision.
606:
Cameron argues, among other things, that the Supreme Court was wrong in asserting that it was being asked to decide on the rights of all Mi'kmaq. He holds that the courts were being asked to decide only on the right of an individual Mi'kmaq from Cape Breton, Donald Marshall.
924: 934: 599:
A 2009 book by a former Nova Scotia crown attorney, Alex M Cameron, who had argued similar cases for the Province against Indigenous logging, was sharply critical of the Supreme Court's decision in
587:
and that federal fishery regulations governing a closed fishing season and the regulating and the requirement of licences to fish and sell the catch would infringe the treaty right.
603:. Other commentators, including Greg Flynn (2010), and Dianne Pothier (2010), have seen Alex Cameron's analysis as lacking "nuance and balance," and as being "fundamentally flawed" 866: 619:
elaborated the extension of Indigenous treaty rights stating that they are still subject to regulation when conservation is proven to be a concern or other public interests.
1272: 1440: 990: 914: 775:
Dianne Pothier, "Book Review of Alex M. Cameron, Power Without Law: The Supreme Court of Canada, the Marshall Decisions, and the Failure of Judicial Activism", 33
647: 1041: 529: 426: 93: 1223: 859: 616: 1328: 150: 476: 1523: 681: 451: 355: 852: 325: 320: 122: 239: 88: 637: 522: 1293: 1216: 494: 219: 110: 1433: 919: 569:
The case recognized the traditional role of fishing in Mi'kmaq culture. Shown is a seagoing canoe used for fishing and transport.
1419: 1167: 739: 229: 105: 1554: 1265: 1179: 664: 335: 244: 209: 173: 1549: 808: 642: 515: 456: 350: 267: 234: 199: 1466: 214: 1035: 1544: 749: 272: 83: 471: 1211: 461: 184: 1199: 904: 691: 194: 145: 1258: 888:
Note: "Aboriginal law" refers to Canadian law dealing with Indigenous peoples; "Indigenous law" refers to the
373: 1286: 1173: 984: 675: 398: 393: 345: 155: 100: 834: 824: 787:
Power Without Law: The Supreme Court of Canada, the Marshall Decisions, and the Failure of Judicial Activism
770:
Power without law: The Supreme Court of Canada, the Marshall decisions, and the failure of judicial activism
1029: 388: 340: 31: 1471: 1083: 1185: 909: 282: 1307: 330: 20: 19:
This article is about the 1999 decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada. For the 2005 decision, see
1003: 686: 308: 1458: 1053: 972: 879: 875: 652: 554: 140: 52: 956: 1205: 798: 1244: 41: 8: 844: 632: 580: 313: 1509: 1481: 66: 1447: 1090: 1059: 804: 745: 669: 204: 1426: 1279: 1161: 1023: 996: 584: 571: 1335: 1192: 403: 378: 115: 1321: 966: 565: 466: 431: 300: 1538: 1485: 1398: 1369: 1356: 1342: 978: 929: 889: 505: 408: 224: 189: 1492: 1377: 1349: 277: 160: 1504: 1475: 1405: 383: 1412: 1384: 1363: 1300: 1251: 1154: 658: 166: 1146: 1141: 1047: 262: 179: 780: 1136: 1131: 1126: 1121: 1116: 1111: 1106: 1101: 1096: 800:
Mi'kmaq Treaties on Trial: History, Land and Donald Marshall Junior
936:
United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act
1391: 1497: 59: 874: 915:
Section 25 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
585:
1760 and 1761 treaties between the Mi'kmaq and Britain
648:
The Canadian Crown and First Nations, Inuit and Métis
1014: 557:on a single case regarding a treaty right to fish. 785:Greg Flynn, 2010. Book Review of Alex M. Cameron, 1524:Index of articles related to Indigenous Canadians 682:Section Thirty-five of the Constitution Act, 1982 1536: 583:'s catching and selling of eels was valid under 1224:Ongoing treaty negotiations in British Columbia 860: 523: 925:Section 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867 553:3 S.C.R. 533 are two decisions given by the 867: 853: 638:Burying the Hatchet ceremony (Nova Scotia) 579:The Court held in the first decision that 530: 516: 920:Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 564: 16:Judgement of the Supreme Court of Canada 1420:St Catharines Milling and Lumber Co v R 1168:James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement 741:The Marshall Decision and Native Rights 1537: 1294:Native Women's Assn of Canada v Canada 796: 737: 665:Indian Health Transfer Policy (Canada) 174:Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada 1434:Tsilhqot'in Nation v British Columbia 848: 200:Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women 1245:Attorney General of Canada v Lavell 13: 762: 719:Dianne Pothier, 2010, pp 190, 191. 14: 1566: 1266:Chippewas of Sarnia Band v Canada 818: 781:https://ssrn.com/abstract=2130714 610: 560: 892:of individual Indigenous groups. 772:. Montreal: McGill-Queens. 2009. 499: 488: 40: 1200:Duty to consult and accommodate 1036:Lake Simcoe–Lake Huron Purchase 905:Aboriginal land title in Canada 803:. University of Toronto Press. 146:British Columbia Treaty Process 791:Canadian Public Administration 731: 722: 713: 704: 1: 1555:Supreme Court of Canada cases 1287:Delgamuukw v British Columbia 1174:Nunavut Land Claims Agreement 985:Peace and Friendship Treaties 697: 676:R. v. Marshall; R. v. Bernard 594: 1550:Canadian Aboriginal case law 1030:Penetanguishene Bay Purchase 710:Dianne Pothier, 2010, p 189. 692:2020 Mi'kmaq lobster dispute 643:Canadian Aboriginal case law 615:In its second decision, the 151:Crown and Indigenous peoples 7: 1084:Gradual Enfranchisement Act 797:Wicken, William C. (2002). 626: 389:Indigenous English Dialects 10: 1571: 910:Royal Proclamation of 1763 18: 1545:1999 in Canadian case law 1519: 1457: 1308:R v Marshall; R v Bernard 1259:Calder v British Columbia 1236: 1073: 954: 945: 897: 886: 728:Cameron, 2009. Pp 61, 62. 495:Indigenous North Americas 21:R v Marshall; R v Bernard 1459:Indigenous customary law 1004:Gradual Civilization Act 991:Treaties of Fort Niagara 687:Treaty Day (Nova Scotia) 273:Indigenous personalities 1329:Paul v British Columbia 1186:Nisga'a Final Agreement 1054:Saugeen Tract Agreement 973:Great Peace of Montreal 653:Exclusive Economic Zone 555:Supreme Court of Canada 948:governmental relations 576: 777:Dalhousie Law Journal 568: 1042:Huron Tract Purchase 793:, 53 (no. 2), p 289. 738:Coates, Ken (2000). 399:Aboriginal syllabics 374:Indigenous languages 876:Canadian Aboriginal 839:R v Marshall (No 2) 829:R v Marshall (No 1) 633:Burnt Church Crisis 550:R v Marshall (No 2) 544:R v Marshall (No 1) 427:Traditional beliefs 268:Indigenous cultures 111:Residential schools 101:Settler colonialism 1482:Great Law of Peace 1206:Jordan's Principle 1074:Post-Confederation 1062:(1850, 1854, 1859) 577: 32:Indigenous peoples 1532: 1531: 1448:Restoule v Canada 1273:Corbiere v Canada 1232: 1231: 1091:Numbered Treaties 1069: 1068: 1060:Robinson Treaties 810:978-0-8020-7665-6 768:Alex M. Cameron. 670:Numbered Treaties 547:3 S.C.R. 456 and 540: 539: 506:Canada portal 452:Index of articles 205:Numbered Treaties 1562: 1441:Daniels v Canada 1427:R v Van der Peet 1280:Daniels v Canada 1024:Toronto Purchase 1012: 1011: 997:Douglas Treaties 952: 951: 869: 862: 855: 846: 845: 814: 756: 755: 735: 729: 726: 720: 717: 711: 708: 572:Atlantic Neptune 532: 525: 518: 504: 503: 502: 493: 492: 491: 210:Royal Commission 116:Indian hospitals 89:Pre-colonization 44: 28: 27: 1570: 1569: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1528: 1515: 1467:Self-government 1453: 1336:Paulette Caveat 1228: 1217:specific claims 1208:(proposed 2005) 1193:Paix des Braves 1075: 1065: 1016: 1010: 959: 947: 941: 893: 882: 873: 821: 811: 765: 763:Further reading 760: 759: 752: 744:. p. 128. 736: 732: 727: 723: 718: 714: 709: 705: 700: 629: 613: 597: 581:Donald Marshall 563: 536: 500: 498: 497: 489: 487: 482: 481: 447: 439: 438: 422: 414: 413: 379:Inuit languages 369: 361: 360: 301:Indian reserves 296: 288: 287: 258: 250: 249: 220:Specific claims 215:Self-government 176: 136: 128: 127: 79: 33: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1568: 1558: 1557: 1552: 1547: 1530: 1529: 1527: 1526: 1520: 1517: 1516: 1514: 1513: 1501: 1489: 1479: 1469: 1463: 1461: 1455: 1454: 1452: 1451: 1444: 1437: 1430: 1423: 1416: 1409: 1402: 1395: 1388: 1381: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1360: 1353: 1346: 1339: 1332: 1325: 1322:Mitchell v MNR 1318: 1311: 1304: 1297: 1290: 1283: 1276: 1269: 1262: 1255: 1248: 1240: 1238: 1234: 1233: 1230: 1229: 1227: 1226: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1209: 1203: 1197: 1189: 1183: 1177: 1171: 1165: 1159: 1158:(1876–present) 1151: 1150: 1149: 1144: 1139: 1134: 1129: 1124: 1119: 1114: 1109: 1104: 1099: 1088: 1079: 1077: 1071: 1070: 1067: 1066: 1064: 1063: 1057: 1051: 1045: 1039: 1033: 1027: 1020: 1018: 1009: 1008: 1000: 994: 988: 982: 976: 970: 967:Covenant Chain 963: 961: 949: 943: 942: 940: 939: 932: 927: 922: 917: 912: 907: 901: 899: 898:Sources of law 895: 894: 887: 884: 883: 880:Indigenous law 872: 871: 864: 857: 849: 843: 842: 832: 820: 819:External links 817: 816: 815: 809: 794: 783: 773: 764: 761: 758: 757: 750: 730: 721: 712: 702: 701: 699: 696: 695: 694: 689: 684: 679: 672: 667: 662: 655: 650: 645: 640: 635: 628: 625: 612: 611:Decision No. 2 609: 596: 593: 562: 561:Decision No. 1 559: 538: 537: 535: 534: 527: 520: 512: 509: 508: 484: 483: 480: 479: 474: 469: 464: 459: 454: 448: 445: 444: 441: 440: 437: 436: 435: 434: 432:Inuit religion 423: 420: 419: 416: 415: 412: 411: 406: 401: 396: 391: 386: 381: 376: 370: 367: 366: 363: 362: 359: 358: 353: 348: 343: 338: 333: 328: 323: 318: 317: 316: 311: 303: 297: 294: 293: 290: 289: 286: 285: 280: 275: 270: 265: 259: 256: 255: 252: 251: 248: 247: 242: 237: 232: 227: 222: 217: 212: 207: 202: 197: 192: 187: 182: 177: 172: 170: 163: 158: 153: 148: 143: 141:Indigenous law 137: 134: 133: 130: 129: 126: 125: 123:Reconciliation 120: 119: 118: 113: 108: 98: 97: 96: 86: 80: 77: 76: 73: 72: 71: 70: 63: 56: 46: 45: 37: 36: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1567: 1556: 1553: 1551: 1548: 1546: 1543: 1542: 1540: 1525: 1522: 1521: 1518: 1511: 1507: 1506: 1502: 1499: 1495: 1494: 1490: 1487: 1486:Haudenosaunee 1483: 1480: 1477: 1473: 1472:Grand Council 1470: 1468: 1465: 1464: 1462: 1460: 1456: 1450: 1449: 1445: 1443: 1442: 1438: 1436: 1435: 1431: 1429: 1428: 1424: 1422: 1421: 1417: 1415: 1414: 1410: 1408: 1407: 1403: 1401: 1400: 1399:R v Pamajewon 1396: 1394: 1393: 1389: 1387: 1386: 1382: 1380: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1370:Gladue report 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1361: 1359: 1358: 1357:R v Gladstone 1354: 1352: 1351: 1347: 1345: 1344: 1343:Powley ruling 1340: 1338: 1337: 1333: 1331: 1330: 1326: 1324: 1323: 1319: 1317: 1316: 1312: 1310: 1309: 1305: 1303: 1302: 1298: 1296: 1295: 1291: 1289: 1288: 1284: 1282: 1281: 1277: 1275: 1274: 1270: 1268: 1267: 1263: 1261: 1260: 1256: 1254: 1253: 1249: 1247: 1246: 1242: 1241: 1239: 1235: 1225: 1222: 1218: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1210: 1207: 1204: 1201: 1198: 1195: 1194: 1190: 1187: 1184: 1181: 1178: 1175: 1172: 1169: 1166: 1163: 1160: 1157: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1145: 1143: 1140: 1138: 1135: 1133: 1130: 1128: 1125: 1123: 1120: 1118: 1115: 1113: 1110: 1108: 1105: 1103: 1100: 1098: 1095: 1094: 1092: 1089: 1086: 1085: 1081: 1080: 1078: 1072: 1061: 1058: 1055: 1052: 1049: 1046: 1043: 1040: 1037: 1034: 1031: 1028: 1025: 1022: 1021: 1019: 1013: 1006: 1005: 1001: 998: 995: 992: 989: 986: 983: 980: 979:Nanfan Treaty 977: 974: 971: 968: 965: 964: 962: 958: 957:Confederation 953: 950: 946:Treaties and 944: 938: 937: 933: 931: 930:Treaty rights 928: 926: 923: 921: 918: 916: 913: 911: 908: 906: 903: 902: 900: 896: 891: 890:customary law 885: 881: 877: 870: 865: 863: 858: 856: 851: 850: 847: 840: 836: 833: 830: 826: 823: 822: 812: 806: 802: 801: 795: 792: 788: 784: 782: 778: 774: 771: 767: 766: 753: 751:9780773521087 747: 743: 742: 734: 725: 716: 707: 703: 693: 690: 688: 685: 683: 680: 678: 677: 673: 671: 668: 666: 663: 661: 660: 656: 654: 651: 649: 646: 644: 641: 639: 636: 634: 631: 630: 624: 620: 618: 617:Supreme Court 608: 604: 602: 592: 588: 586: 582: 574: 573: 567: 558: 556: 552: 551: 546: 545: 533: 528: 526: 521: 519: 514: 513: 511: 510: 507: 496: 486: 485: 478: 475: 473: 470: 468: 465: 463: 462:First Nations 460: 458: 455: 453: 450: 449: 443: 442: 433: 430: 429: 428: 425: 424: 418: 417: 410: 409:Inuit grammar 407: 405: 402: 400: 397: 395: 392: 390: 387: 385: 382: 380: 377: 375: 372: 371: 365: 364: 357: 356:Pacific Coast 354: 352: 349: 347: 344: 342: 339: 337: 334: 332: 329: 327: 324: 322: 319: 315: 312: 310: 307: 306: 304: 302: 299: 298: 292: 291: 284: 281: 279: 276: 274: 271: 269: 266: 264: 261: 260: 254: 253: 246: 243: 241: 240:Organizations 238: 236: 233: 231: 228: 226: 225:Treaty rights 223: 221: 218: 216: 213: 211: 208: 206: 203: 201: 198: 196: 193: 191: 190:Land defender 188: 186: 183: 181: 178: 175: 171: 169: 168: 164: 162: 159: 157: 156:Health Policy 154: 152: 149: 147: 144: 142: 139: 138: 132: 131: 124: 121: 117: 114: 112: 109: 107: 104: 103: 102: 99: 95: 92: 91: 90: 87: 85: 82: 81: 75: 74: 69: 68: 64: 62: 61: 57: 55: 54: 53:First Nations 50: 49: 48: 47: 43: 39: 38: 35: 30: 29: 26: 22: 1503: 1493:Pittailiniit 1491: 1446: 1439: 1432: 1425: 1418: 1411: 1404: 1397: 1390: 1383: 1378:R v Gonzales 1376: 1362: 1355: 1350:R v Drybones 1348: 1341: 1334: 1327: 1320: 1315:R v Marshall 1314: 1313: 1306: 1299: 1292: 1285: 1278: 1271: 1264: 1257: 1250: 1243: 1202:(since 2004) 1191: 1153: 1093:(1871–1921) 1082: 1015:Upper Canada 1002: 935: 838: 828: 799: 790: 786: 776: 769: 740: 733: 724: 715: 706: 674: 657: 621: 614: 605: 601:R v Marshall 600: 598: 589: 578: 570: 549: 548: 543: 542: 541: 295:Demographics 278:Country food 165: 161:Idle No More 65: 58: 51: 25: 1510:Plains Cree 1505:Wahkohtowin 1406:R v Sparrow 1212:Land claims 1162:White Paper 1087:(1869–1876) 1076:(post-1867) 1007:(1857–1869) 993:(1764–1784) 987:(1725–1779) 779:189, 2010 404:Chinuk pipa 384:Chinuk Wawa 368:Linguistics 351:Territories 321:Atlantic CA 185:Land claims 1539:Categories 1413:Re Eskimos 1385:R v Guerin 1364:R v Gladue 1301:Kruger v R 1252:R v Badger 1155:Indian Act 960:(pre-1867) 841:via CanLII 831:via CanLII 698:References 659:Indian Act 595:Commentary 457:Indigenous 195:Land title 167:Indian Act 1048:Treaty 45 999:(1850–54) 835:Full text 825:Full text 575:, ca 1770 421:Religions 180:Land Back 34:in Canada 1237:Case law 1017:treaties 627:See also 245:Politics 235:Case law 230:Genocide 135:Politics 106:Genocide 94:Genetics 84:Timeline 1476:Miꞌkmaq 1392:R v Jim 969:(1670s) 257:Culture 78:History 1196:(2002) 1188:(1998) 1182:(1995) 1176:(1993) 1170:(1975) 1164:(1969) 1056:(1836) 1050:(1836) 1044:(1827) 1038:(1815) 1032:(1798) 1026:(1787) 981:(1701) 975:(1701) 807:  748:  1498:Inuit 477:Stubs 472:Métis 467:Inuit 446:Index 314:Métis 283:Music 67:Métis 60:Inuit 1180:RCAP 955:Pre- 878:and 837:for 827:for 805:ISBN 746:ISBN 394:NAPA 305:AB 263:Art 1541:: 1147:11 1142:10 789:. 346:SK 341:QC 336:ON 331:MB 326:BC 309:FN 1512:) 1508:( 1500:) 1496:( 1488:) 1484:( 1478:) 1474:( 1137:9 1132:8 1127:7 1122:6 1117:5 1112:4 1107:3 1102:2 1097:1 868:e 861:t 854:v 813:. 754:. 531:e 524:t 517:v 23:.

Index

R v Marshall; R v Bernard
Indigenous peoples
in Canada

A life-sized bronze statue of an Aboriginal and eagle above him; there is a bear to his right and a wolf to his left, they are all looking upwards towards a blue and white sky
First Nations
Inuit
Métis
Timeline
Pre-colonization
Genetics
Settler colonialism
Genocide
Residential schools
Indian hospitals
Reconciliation
Indigenous law
British Columbia Treaty Process
Crown and Indigenous peoples
Health Policy
Idle No More
Indian Act
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada
Land Back
Land claims
Land defender
Land title
Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women
Numbered Treaties
Royal Commission
Self-government
Specific claims

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.