Knowledge

Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code

Source đź“ť

467:"The existence of these obsolete offences in this country had been used by other countries as justification for the retention of similar laws which have been actively used to suppress political dissent and restrict press freedom. Abolishing these offences will allow the UK to take a lead in challenging similar laws in other countries, where they are used to suppress free speech.” 293:, who presided over Tilak's case, widened the understanding of Section 124A. Under Strachey's definition, the attempt to excite "feelings of enmity" against the government was also a form of sedition. Tilak was found guilty by the jury and sentenced to 18 months of rigorous imprisonment. Tilak again faced charges against sedition for two 1160: 553:
A law student proposes "the following modification to the law is suggested. Section 124A should be retained subject to three conditions: first, that, the offender must be in a position of authority...; second, that, the offending words must be understood in context...; and, third, they should have a
117:
Whoever, by words, either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards, the Government established by law in India, shall be punished with imprisonment for life,
393:
drew attention to the fact that the rate of conviction under sedition is very low and that this law has been misused by the executive powers. Some critics of the law further elaborate on this point by claiming that the purpose of this law is not to convict the charged, but to harass and to silence
159:
Whoever by words, either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, excites, or attempts to excite, feelings of disaffection to the Government established by law in British India, shall be punished with transportation for life or for any term, to which
189:
Stephen's version of 1870 was amended to a large extent through the IPC Amendment Act of 1898. The current section stands very much similar to the 1898 section; however minor alterations were made at various points in India's colonial and post-colonial history—in 1937, 1948, 1950, and by Part B
167:
Such a disapprobation of the measures of the Government as is compatible with a disposition to render obedience to the lawful authority of the Government, and to support the lawful authority, of the Government, against unlawful attempts to subvert or resist that authority, is not disaffection.
102:
introduces the criminal law into the parliament and said sedition has been turned into treason. As per the proposed laws, the criticising government is fully permissible. Any activity will be considered treason only if it is intended against the integrity, sovereignty, and unity of the nation.
197:
heard by the Allahabad High Court declared the sedition law void. The Punjab high court had also struck down the law. A Supreme Court judgment in 1962 brought back sedition into the Constitution, interpreting the section to say that it only applies if there is "incitement to violence".
489:“We have noticed, with dismay, a growing trend in India in recent times where both central and state governments have routinely slapped sedition charges on journalists for articles, tweets, Facebook posts that criticise government policies…In January 2021, IWPC founder member 250:. The Act was described as "forced Europeanisation" and a gag on Hindus, who were described as legally incapable and prevented from rebelling against the Act. The authorities put forth a claim that Bose had incited rebellion; in his instructions to the jury, the Chief Justice 289:. This turned into an annual celebration commemorating the anniversary of Shivaji's coronation. Three years later, Tilak published reports of this celebration, as "Shivaji's Utterances"; this essay doubled as an attack on the colonial government. Justice 212:
suspended the colonial-era law. The court said that the law has been misused by governments to quash dissent and that it was not in tune with the times. Due to this, hundreds of people who were jailed under the law have become eligible for
134:.—Comments expressing disapprobation of the measures of the Government to obtain their alteration by lawful means, without exciting or attempting to excite hatred, contempt, or disaffection, do not constitute an offence under this section. 254:
explained the meaning of "disaffection" as "a feeling contrary to affection, in other words, dislike or hatred" and linked it with disobedience towards the government. Bose was nevertheless released on bail, and the case was dropped.
302:. Despite the verdict, this trial, according to historian Mithi Mukherjee, "marked a fundamental discursive rupture in the history of empire and paved the way for mass anticolonial movements under the leadership of Gandhi. In 1922, 297:
articles, titled "The Country's Misfortune" (12 May 1908) and "These Remedies Are Not Lasting" (9 June 1908). Once again Tilak was found guilty under the newly drafted section 124A, and sentenced to six years of imprisonment in
449:
and that it has no place in a modern democracy. Critics further point out that the law was introduced by the colonial government in India to curtail dissent and that Britain has since abolished this law in 2009. The then
316:'s imprisonment under the sedition section. While appearing in court, Gandhi referred to Section 124A as the "prince among the political sections of the Indian Penal Code designed to suppress the liberty of the citizen". 140:.—Comments expressing disapprobation of the administrative or other action of the Government without exciting or attempting to excite hatred, contempt, or disaffection, do not constitute an offence under this section. 1161:"Disha Ravi, an environmental activist from Bengaluru, arrested by Delhi police and charged with sedition for 'formulation and dissemination' of a toolkit to aid protesting farmers which was shared by Greta Thunberg" 90:
was now permissible. In 1962 the Supreme Court of India interpreted the section to apply only if there is, say, "incitement to violence" or "overthrowing a democratically elected government through violent means".
36:. Section 124A forms part of Chapter VI of the Code which deals with offences against the state. Chapter VI comprises sections from 121 to 130, wherein sections 121A and 124A were introduced in 1870. The then 549:
officers, legal thinkers and judges, scholars, human rights and civil liberty advocates, journalists, and so on have commented against the sedition law, calling for it to be scrapped or undergo amendments.
217:. The ruling does not overturn the sedition law, the law has only been put on temporary hold and no further cases can be registered under this law until the ongoing review by the government is completed. 1947: 1917: 2045: 2035: 2025: 1942: 1912: 1892: 1862: 168:
therefore, the making of comments on the methods of the Government, with the intention of against unlawful a exciting only this species of disapprobation, is not an offence within this clause.
2171: 2161: 2115: 2015: 1995: 1985: 1975: 1937: 1922: 1907: 1897: 1887: 1872: 1857: 1832: 1902: 1882: 1867: 1852: 1837: 410:
proposed to "get rid of it " as written, and favoured handling sedition-related by other means. Several opinion-makers have called for the abolishing of sedition laws in the context of the
2090: 2085: 2080: 2075: 1877: 1842: 1435: 343:
During the 21st century, various notable authors, creative professionals, activists, and politicians have been charged with sedition under Section 124A. Cases include the then
1198: 1235: 664: 506:. Furthermore, some critics of the law say that the purpose of this law is not to convict, but for the government to harass its critics through the drawn out process. 1729: 829: 186:, and fearing that Muslim preachers would incite religious war in the Indian subcontinent, the Raj introduced this section under the title "Exciting disaffection". 1409: 1700: 1614: 1338: 1286: 1492: 1384: 1799: 442:, an "astonishing number" of citizens faced trial under Section 124A: 23,000 were in temporary custody, of whom 9,000 were arrested only for sedition. 434:
had been in power (2004–2014), the section had remained intact and was used to file charges on various citizens; following 2012-2013 protests against
262:
is historically famous. Tilak, a lawyer by training, was also politically active in support of independence. He established and published two dailies—
178:
drafted the Penal Code in 1837. However, for reasons unknown, it was omitted from the actual Code. It was finally added in 1870 on the suggestion of
402:
In post-independence India, Section 124A came under criticism at numerous intervals, being singled out for its curbing of free speech. When the
1111: 968: 613: 1184: 1134: 403: 383:
Between 2014 and 2019, 326 sedition cases were filed in India, charge sheets were filed in 141 cases which resulted in only 6 convictions.
1260: 1085: 1313: 750: 1033: 2270: 777: 557:
In 2021, Kishorechandra Wangkhemcha and Kanhaiya Lal Shukla petitioned the Supreme Court against the law. The court admitted the case.
1461: 1648: 524: 336:, which in 1962 ruled that speeches against the government or political parties were not illegal while upholding it as applicable to 803: 503: 1674: 1588: 1792: 718: 638: 451: 888: 160:
fine may be added, or with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, to which fine may be added, or with fine.
2197: 2187: 2151: 2135: 1965: 1055: 2234: 2213: 2177: 2141: 2005: 1932: 518: 455: 118:
to which fine may be added, or with imprisonment which may extend to three years, to which fine may be added, or with fine.
2095: 1927: 1847: 1827: 580: 2070: 1822: 1757: 728: 202: 1785: 915: 760: 2125: 1518: 855: 995: 1436:"Editors Guild welcomes Supreme Court verdict on sedition case against Vinod Dua | India News - Times of India" 435: 332:, which also concluded that it struck at the very root of free speech. The Government of India appealed to the 2203: 2295: 546: 530: 337: 286: 2300: 2290: 2280: 423: 44:
on the Indian subcontinent would wage a war against them. Particularly after the successful suppression of
889:"Supreme Court order brings hope for thousands jailed on controversial colonial-era sedition law in India" 502:
has condemned the use of this law by state governments against senior journalists for the coverage of the
430:(INC) included a specific proposal to abolish Section 124A in their manifesto. However, while the INC-led 2275: 2053: 1957: 431: 415: 37: 1547: 175: 445:
Critics of the law claim that sedition is an outdated law from the colonial era and it curtails the
422:
published a consultation paper that asked for a possible amendment or repeal of the law. During the
427: 247: 419: 179: 946: 1462:"Journalists' Bodies Slam Sedition FIRs Against Editors, Reporters for Farmers' Rally Coverage" 1236:"Is India made of porcelain? Question CJI Ramana should ask Modi govt at next sedition hearing" 473: 387: 333: 251: 209: 95: 1199:"Why do you need the 'colonial law' of sedition after 75 years of Independence, CJI asks govt" 2244: 1969: 542: 493:
and some other journalists were booked for sedition for tweets relating to farmers’ protest.”
344: 299: 60: 560:
As of 11 May 2022, the law has been put on hold by the Supreme Court citing re-examination.
2207: 352: 329: 201:
Sedition was made cognizable for the first time during the tenure of Indira Gandhi via the
182:, at the time handling legal issues in the colonial Government of India. Due to increasing 639:"SC puts sedition trials on hold until Govt re-examines it, says affected can seek relief" 174:
The section related to sedition initially had its place in the code, as Section 113, when
8: 2009: 499: 231: 74:
The section kept drawing criticism in independent India as well for being a hindrance to
55:, the need was felt for such a law. Throughout the Raj, the section was used to suppress 1385:"India's sedition law is just another colonial hangover and has no place in a democracy" 1999: 1979: 1015: 916:"India's top court halts use of controversial sedition law in rebuke to the government" 79: 328:
ruled Section 124A to be unconstitutional. A similar ruling was passed in 1959 by the
2285: 2165: 2119: 1808: 1622: 1569: 1361: 1206: 1019: 863: 756: 724: 446: 325: 313: 56: 41: 25: 2019: 1559: 1007: 411: 407: 267: 239: 514:
The following laws in India address the same aspects covered by the sedition law—
2238: 348: 290: 665:"'Sedition to be treason': Amit Shah explains proposed changes to criminal laws" 303: 279: 259: 128:.—The expression “disaffection” includes disloyalty and all feelings of enmity. 87: 68: 64: 2264: 2181: 2049: 1626: 1573: 1210: 1011: 867: 368: 364: 360: 83: 1135:"Kerala: Two students of Malappuram college arrested on charges of sedition" 2099: 1493:"Six Decades Later, Challenge To Sedition Law Is Back In The Supreme Court" 996:"Sedition, Law, and the British Empire in India: The Trial of Tilak (1908)" 490: 390: 2191: 2129: 459: 356: 308: 75: 33: 690: 2029: 439: 372: 1564: 1339:"Congress manifesto promises to do away with British-era sedition law" 480:, and has demanded the repeal of this law and has also expressed that 2155: 2145: 830:"How a Supreme Court judgment brought back the sedition law in India" 183: 99: 46: 1777: 1185:
326 sedition cases filed in india between 2014 19 only 6 convictions
752:
Offend, Shock, or Disturb: Free Speech under the Indian Constitution
394:
critics of the government by the means of a long drawn out process.
2248: 2109: 29: 1730:"Sedition: Why does India follow a law that the world has junked?" 541:
Numerous critics, students, former government employees including
2039: 1615:"Sedition law | Supreme Court sends strong message to government" 282: 82:
for the first time in history in India, during the tenure of PM
1989: 278:. In 1894, Professor R. P. Karkaria presented his paper on the 581:"The Case to Amend Sedition Law, India's Self-Inflicted Wound" 94:
As of 11 May 2022, This law has been put on temporary hold by
2217: 969:"Panel Discussion on Free Speech and Sedition in a Democracy" 275: 214: 50: 1701:"Why Supreme Court must strike down sedition law entirely" 1410:"Sedition law in UK abolished in 2009, continues in India" 913: 778:"Section 124A: An Archaic Way to Stifle Dissent In India" 340:; this pronouncement had the effect of diluting the law. 230:
The first known registered case under the section was in
1548:"A Theoretical Analysis of the Law on Sedition in India" 482:"this law has no space in any modern liberal democracy" 98:
citing re-examination. In December 2023, Home Minister
32:. The Indian Penal Code was enacted in 1860, under the 1314:"Law Commission calls for re-think on sedition clause" 856:"India's Top Court Suspends Colonial-Era Sedition Law" 554:
tendency to actually cause violence or disorder....""
536: 1086:"To repeal or not: Nehruvian dilemma on sedition law" 1649:"Don't let sedition law make a mockery of democracy" 484:. The Indian Women Press Corps (IWPC) also has said: 1519:"India's Absurd Sedition Law – And What It Enables" 723:. Universal Law Publishing. pp. 220, 226–227. 1728: 716: 146: 71:, both of whom were found guilty and imprisoned. 2262: 1362:"Why India needs to get rid of its sedition law" 614:"Disagreeing with govt is not sedition, says SC" 1755: 1359: 1287:"The Indian State must scrap the sedition law" 1034:"Republic of dissent: Gandhi's sedition trial" 748: 1793: 1261:"Why India's sedition law needs to be buried" 944: 1998:(false evidence to procure conviction for a 1132: 404:First Amendment of the Constitution of India 2174:(culpable homicide not amounting to murder) 1079: 1077: 1800: 1786: 1490: 1382: 1305: 1279: 914:Swati Gupta and Rhea Mogul (11 May 2022). 854:Kumar, Hari; Yasir, Sameer (11 May 2022). 853: 578: 1612: 1563: 1545: 1311: 1196: 1159:SAYEED, VIKHAR AHMED (15 February 2021). 993: 712: 710: 708: 1675:"Amend sedition law to check its misuse" 1383:Reema Omer, Dawn com (4 February 2020). 1312:Rajagopal, Krishnadas (30 August 2018). 1112:"5 high profile sedition cases in India" 1074: 947:"A Look Back At Tilak's Sedition Trials" 940: 938: 936: 744: 742: 740: 579:Chndrachud, Abhinav (22 February 2021). 1646: 827: 691:"Section 124A in The Indian Penal Code" 611: 238:. Bose's article, published in his own 205:(CR.P.C) which replaced the 1898 CRPC. 2263: 1613:Rajagopal, Krishnadas (15 July 2021). 1516: 1197:Rajagopal, Krishnadas (15 July 2021). 1158: 801: 705: 452:Parliamentary Under Secretary of State 378: 274:in English; both being published from 1807: 1781: 1723: 1721: 1698: 1672: 1541: 1539: 1486: 1484: 1482: 1253: 1233: 1229: 1227: 1048: 933: 775: 737: 236:Queen Empress v Jogendra Chunder Bose 1589:"Scrap sedition. Stop UAPA's misuse" 1586: 1187:, freepressjournal.in, 19 July 2021. 1178: 804:"The nine lives of the sedition law" 607: 605: 603: 601: 574: 572: 319: 1587:Azad, Yashovardhan (20 July 2021). 1083: 537:Amending and repealing Section 124A 406:was passed in 1951, Prime Minister 258:The sedition trial of 1897 against 225: 157:Section 124A. Exciting disaffection 86:in 1973, that is, arrest without a 13: 1718: 1536: 1479: 1224: 828:Noorani, A. G. (15 January 2021). 802:Bhatia, Gautam (24 January 2016). 16:Law on the punishment for sedition 14: 2312: 2271:Sections of the Indian Penal Code 1491:Chaturvedi, Arpan (11 May 2021). 1360:Biswas, Soutik (29 August 2016). 1133:Scroll Staff (22 February 2019). 1056:"Anti-sedition law needs the bin" 782:Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news 720:Textbook on the Indian Penal Code 598: 569: 338:separatism by persuasion or force 1673:Sarna, Ayush (15 October 2019). 1647:Dwivedi, Rakesh (20 July 2021). 1517:Sharma, Aditya (22 March 2021). 523:Public Safety Acts (such as the 220: 1749: 1699:Singh, Anushka (17 July 2021). 1692: 1666: 1640: 1606: 1580: 1510: 1454: 1428: 1402: 1376: 1353: 1331: 1234:Gupta, Shekhar (17 July 2021). 1190: 1152: 1126: 1104: 1026: 1000:Law, Culture and the Humanities 987: 961: 907: 881: 847: 821: 612:Utkarsh, Anand (4 March 2021). 509: 287:Royal Asiatic Society in Bombay 203:1973 Code of Criminal Procedure 1756:S.G.VOMBATKERE (15 May 2022). 795: 769: 683: 657: 631: 436:Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant 147:Development and current status 1: 1552:Christ University Law Journal 1546:Aishwarya, Narayanan (2015). 945:Saxena, Namit (8 July 2018). 776:Kumar, Ayush (3 March 2021). 563: 547:Indian Administrative Service 28:lays down the punishment for 2052:with murder or resulting in 1036:. Live Mint. 25 January 2019 424:2019 Indian general election 397: 7: 2054:persistent vegetative state 1341:. India Today. 2 April 2019 1114:. Rediff. 13 September 2012 755:. Oxford University Press. 432:United Progressive Alliance 416:Jawaharlal Nehru University 345:Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) 38:British government of India 10: 2317: 717:Gaur, Krishna Deo (2009). 2227: 2063: 1956: 1815: 1758:"Sedition and the L BJaw" 1679:Tribuneindia News Service 1653:Tribuneindia News Service 994:Mukherjee, Mithi (2020). 371:(2019), climate activist 367:(2012), student activist 176:Thomas Babington Macaulay 2138:(privacy of rape victim) 1980:waging war against India 1958:Capital offence sections 1012:10.1177/1743872116685034 428:Indian National Congress 248:Age of Consent Act, 1891 190:States (Law) Act, 1951. 2200:(attempted acid attack) 749:Bhatia, Gautam (2016). 519:Unlawful Activities Act 474:Editor's Guild of India 420:Law Commission of India 180:James Fitzjames Stephen 106: 2208:unnatural sex offences 1092:. No. The Tribune 496: 470: 388:Chief Justice of India 334:Supreme Court of India 312:resulted into his and 306:'s three articles for 252:William Comer Petheram 210:Supreme Court of India 171: 152:Historical text (1870) 112:Section 124A. Sedition 96:Supreme Court of India 78:. Sedition was made a 543:Indian Police Service 531:National Security Act 486: 464: 386:On 15 July 2021, the 208:On May 11, 2022, the 154: 2296:Free speech case law 353:Simranjit Singh Mann 330:Allahabad High Court 2301:Separatism in India 2291:Censorship in India 2281:1870 in British law 1970:criminal conspiracy 1022:– via SCOPUS. 500:Press Club of India 456:Ministry of Justice 379:Low conviction rate 363:(2010), cartoonist 232:Calcutta High Court 195:Ram Nandan v State, 2276:1870 introductions 1735:The Times of India 1705:The Indian Express 1442:. TNN. 5 June 2021 1440:The Times of India 1416:. 14 February 2016 860:The New York Times 671:. 21 December 2023 643:The Indian Express 476:has called this a 347:general secretary 80:cognisable offence 2258: 2257: 2239:attempted suicide 2166:culpable homicide 2120:unlawful assembly 1809:Indian Penal Code 1565:10.12728/culj.6.5 1293:. 15 January 2019 1267:. 18 January 2019 1090:10 September 2018 1062:. 15 January 2019 447:freedom of speech 426:, the opposition 326:Punjab High Court 320:Post-independence 314:Shankarlal Banker 246:, criticized the 184:Wahabi activities 57:political dissent 42:Khilafat movement 26:Indian Penal Code 2308: 1802: 1795: 1788: 1779: 1778: 1773: 1772: 1770: 1768: 1753: 1747: 1746: 1744: 1742: 1732: 1725: 1716: 1715: 1713: 1711: 1696: 1690: 1689: 1687: 1685: 1670: 1664: 1663: 1661: 1659: 1644: 1638: 1637: 1635: 1633: 1610: 1604: 1603: 1601: 1599: 1584: 1578: 1577: 1567: 1543: 1534: 1533: 1531: 1529: 1514: 1508: 1507: 1505: 1503: 1488: 1477: 1476: 1474: 1472: 1458: 1452: 1451: 1449: 1447: 1432: 1426: 1425: 1423: 1421: 1406: 1400: 1399: 1397: 1395: 1380: 1374: 1373: 1371: 1369: 1357: 1351: 1350: 1348: 1346: 1335: 1329: 1328: 1326: 1324: 1309: 1303: 1302: 1300: 1298: 1283: 1277: 1276: 1274: 1272: 1257: 1251: 1250: 1248: 1246: 1231: 1222: 1221: 1219: 1217: 1194: 1188: 1182: 1176: 1175: 1173: 1171: 1156: 1150: 1149: 1147: 1145: 1130: 1124: 1123: 1121: 1119: 1108: 1102: 1101: 1099: 1097: 1084:Prakash, Satya. 1081: 1072: 1071: 1069: 1067: 1052: 1046: 1045: 1043: 1041: 1030: 1024: 1023: 991: 985: 984: 982: 980: 965: 959: 958: 956: 954: 942: 931: 930: 928: 926: 911: 905: 904: 902: 900: 885: 879: 878: 876: 874: 851: 845: 844: 842: 840: 825: 819: 818: 816: 814: 799: 793: 792: 790: 788: 773: 767: 766: 746: 735: 734: 714: 703: 702: 700: 698: 687: 681: 680: 678: 676: 661: 655: 654: 652: 650: 635: 629: 628: 626: 624: 609: 596: 595: 593: 591: 576: 504:farmers protests 408:Jawaharlal Nehru 226:Pre-independence 193:A case in 1958, 54: 40:feared that the 2316: 2315: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2254: 2223: 2059: 2000:capital offence 1952: 1811: 1806: 1776: 1766: 1764: 1754: 1750: 1740: 1738: 1727: 1726: 1719: 1709: 1707: 1697: 1693: 1683: 1681: 1671: 1667: 1657: 1655: 1645: 1641: 1631: 1629: 1611: 1607: 1597: 1595: 1593:Hindustan Times 1585: 1581: 1544: 1537: 1527: 1525: 1523:thediplomat.com 1515: 1511: 1501: 1499: 1489: 1480: 1470: 1468: 1460: 1459: 1455: 1445: 1443: 1434: 1433: 1429: 1419: 1417: 1414:Hindustan Times 1408: 1407: 1403: 1393: 1391: 1381: 1377: 1367: 1365: 1358: 1354: 1344: 1342: 1337: 1336: 1332: 1322: 1320: 1310: 1306: 1296: 1294: 1291:Hindustan Times 1285: 1284: 1280: 1270: 1268: 1259: 1258: 1254: 1244: 1242: 1232: 1225: 1215: 1213: 1195: 1191: 1183: 1179: 1169: 1167: 1157: 1153: 1143: 1141: 1131: 1127: 1117: 1115: 1110: 1109: 1105: 1095: 1093: 1082: 1075: 1065: 1063: 1054: 1053: 1049: 1039: 1037: 1032: 1031: 1027: 992: 988: 978: 976: 975:. 24 March 2016 967: 966: 962: 952: 950: 943: 934: 924: 922: 912: 908: 898: 896: 893:www.cbsnews.com 887: 886: 882: 872: 870: 852: 848: 838: 836: 826: 822: 812: 810: 800: 796: 786: 784: 774: 770: 763: 747: 738: 731: 715: 706: 696: 694: 693:. Indian Kanoon 689: 688: 684: 674: 672: 669:Hindustan Times 663: 662: 658: 648: 646: 637: 636: 632: 622: 620: 618:Hindustan Times 610: 599: 589: 587: 577: 570: 566: 539: 512: 478:"draconian law" 418:. In 2018, the 400: 381: 359:(2007), author 349:Praveen Togadia 322: 291:Arthur Strachey 228: 223: 172: 153: 149: 109: 45: 17: 12: 11: 5: 2314: 2304: 2303: 2298: 2293: 2288: 2283: 2278: 2273: 2256: 2255: 2253: 2252: 2242: 2231: 2229: 2225: 2224: 2222: 2221: 2211: 2201: 2195: 2185: 2175: 2169: 2159: 2149: 2139: 2133: 2123: 2113: 2103: 2093: 2088: 2083: 2078: 2073: 2067: 2065: 2064:Other sections 2061: 2060: 2058: 2057: 2056:of the victim) 2043: 2033: 2023: 2013: 2003: 1993: 1983: 1973: 1962: 1960: 1954: 1953: 1951: 1950: 1945: 1940: 1935: 1930: 1925: 1920: 1915: 1910: 1905: 1900: 1895: 1890: 1885: 1880: 1875: 1870: 1865: 1860: 1855: 1850: 1845: 1840: 1835: 1830: 1825: 1819: 1817: 1813: 1812: 1805: 1804: 1797: 1790: 1782: 1775: 1774: 1748: 1717: 1691: 1665: 1639: 1605: 1579: 1535: 1509: 1497:BloombergQuint 1478: 1453: 1427: 1401: 1375: 1352: 1330: 1304: 1278: 1252: 1223: 1189: 1177: 1151: 1125: 1103: 1073: 1060:Economic Times 1047: 1025: 1006:(3): 454–476. 986: 960: 932: 906: 880: 846: 820: 794: 768: 761: 736: 730:978-8175347038 729: 704: 682: 656: 630: 597: 567: 565: 562: 538: 535: 534: 533: 528: 521: 511: 508: 399: 396: 380: 377: 321: 318: 304:Mahatma Gandhi 260:Lokmanya Tilak 227: 224: 222: 219: 170: 169: 151: 150: 148: 145: 144: 143: 142: 141: 135: 129: 120: 119: 108: 105: 88:police warrant 69:Mahatma Gandhi 65:Lokmanya Tilak 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2313: 2302: 2299: 2297: 2294: 2292: 2289: 2287: 2284: 2282: 2279: 2277: 2274: 2272: 2269: 2268: 2266: 2250: 2246: 2243: 2240: 2236: 2233: 2232: 2230: 2226: 2219: 2215: 2212: 2209: 2205: 2202: 2199: 2196: 2193: 2189: 2186: 2183: 2182:grievous hurt 2179: 2176: 2173: 2170: 2167: 2163: 2160: 2157: 2153: 2150: 2147: 2143: 2140: 2137: 2134: 2131: 2127: 2124: 2121: 2117: 2114: 2111: 2107: 2104: 2101: 2097: 2094: 2092: 2089: 2087: 2084: 2082: 2079: 2077: 2074: 2072: 2069: 2068: 2066: 2062: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2044: 2041: 2037: 2034: 2031: 2027: 2024: 2021: 2017: 2014: 2011: 2007: 2004: 2001: 1997: 1994: 1991: 1987: 1984: 1981: 1977: 1974: 1971: 1967: 1964: 1963: 1961: 1959: 1955: 1949: 1948:Chapter XXIII 1946: 1944: 1941: 1939: 1936: 1934: 1931: 1929: 1926: 1924: 1921: 1919: 1918:Chapter XVIII 1916: 1914: 1911: 1909: 1906: 1904: 1901: 1899: 1896: 1894: 1891: 1889: 1886: 1884: 1881: 1879: 1876: 1874: 1871: 1869: 1866: 1864: 1861: 1859: 1856: 1854: 1851: 1849: 1846: 1844: 1841: 1839: 1836: 1834: 1831: 1829: 1826: 1824: 1821: 1820: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1803: 1798: 1796: 1791: 1789: 1784: 1783: 1780: 1763: 1759: 1752: 1737:. 3 June 2021 1736: 1731: 1724: 1722: 1706: 1702: 1695: 1680: 1676: 1669: 1654: 1650: 1643: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1609: 1594: 1590: 1583: 1575: 1571: 1566: 1561: 1558:(1): 87–101. 1557: 1553: 1549: 1542: 1540: 1524: 1520: 1513: 1498: 1494: 1487: 1485: 1483: 1467: 1463: 1457: 1441: 1437: 1431: 1415: 1411: 1405: 1390: 1386: 1379: 1363: 1356: 1340: 1334: 1319: 1315: 1308: 1292: 1288: 1282: 1266: 1262: 1256: 1241: 1237: 1230: 1228: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1193: 1186: 1181: 1166: 1162: 1155: 1140: 1136: 1129: 1113: 1107: 1091: 1087: 1080: 1078: 1061: 1057: 1051: 1035: 1029: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 990: 974: 970: 964: 948: 941: 939: 937: 921: 917: 910: 895:. 11 May 2022 894: 890: 884: 869: 865: 861: 857: 850: 835: 831: 824: 809: 805: 798: 783: 779: 772: 764: 762:9780199089529 758: 754: 753: 745: 743: 741: 732: 726: 722: 721: 713: 711: 709: 692: 686: 670: 666: 660: 645:. 12 May 2022 644: 640: 634: 619: 615: 608: 606: 604: 602: 586: 582: 575: 573: 568: 561: 558: 555: 551: 548: 544: 532: 529: 526: 522: 520: 517: 516: 515: 507: 505: 501: 495: 494: 492: 485: 483: 479: 475: 469: 468: 463: 461: 457: 453: 448: 443: 441: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 417: 413: 412:2016 protests 409: 405: 395: 392: 389: 384: 376: 374: 370: 369:Rinshad Reera 366: 365:Aseem Trivedi 362: 361:Arundhati Roy 358: 354: 350: 346: 341: 339: 335: 331: 327: 324:In 1951, the 317: 315: 311: 310: 305: 301: 296: 292: 288: 284: 281: 277: 273: 269: 265: 261: 256: 253: 249: 245: 241: 237: 233: 221:Notable cases 218: 216: 211: 206: 204: 199: 196: 191: 187: 185: 181: 177: 166: 163: 162: 161: 158: 139: 138:Explanation 3 136: 133: 132:Explanation 2 130: 127: 126:Explanation 1 124: 123: 122: 121: 116: 115: 114: 113: 104: 101: 97: 92: 89: 85: 84:Indira Gandhi 81: 77: 72: 70: 66: 62: 59:in favour of 58: 52: 48: 43: 39: 35: 31: 27: 23: 19: 2105: 2100:court of law 2042:with murder) 1943:Chapter XXII 1913:Chapter XVII 1893:Chapter XIII 1863:Chapter VIII 1765:. Retrieved 1761: 1751: 1739:. Retrieved 1734: 1708:. Retrieved 1704: 1694: 1682:. Retrieved 1678: 1668: 1656:. Retrieved 1652: 1642: 1630:. Retrieved 1618: 1608: 1596:. Retrieved 1592: 1582: 1555: 1551: 1526:. Retrieved 1522: 1512: 1500:. Retrieved 1496: 1469:. Retrieved 1465: 1456: 1444:. Retrieved 1439: 1430: 1418:. Retrieved 1413: 1404: 1392:. Retrieved 1388: 1378: 1366:. Retrieved 1355: 1343:. Retrieved 1333: 1321:. Retrieved 1317: 1307: 1295:. Retrieved 1290: 1281: 1269:. Retrieved 1264: 1255: 1243:. Retrieved 1239: 1214:. Retrieved 1202: 1192: 1180: 1168:. Retrieved 1164: 1154: 1142:. Retrieved 1138: 1128: 1116:. Retrieved 1106: 1094:. Retrieved 1089: 1064:. Retrieved 1059: 1050: 1038:. Retrieved 1028: 1003: 999: 989: 977:. Retrieved 972: 963: 951:. Retrieved 923:. Retrieved 919: 909: 897:. Retrieved 892: 883: 871:. Retrieved 859: 849: 837:. Retrieved 833: 823: 811:. Retrieved 807: 797: 785:. Retrieved 781: 771: 751: 719: 695:. Retrieved 685: 673:. Retrieved 668: 659: 647:. Retrieved 642: 633: 621:. Retrieved 617: 588:. Retrieved 584: 559: 556: 552: 540: 513: 510:Alternatives 497: 491:Mrinal Pande 488: 487: 481: 477: 471: 466: 465: 444: 401: 385: 382: 342: 323: 307: 294: 280:Maratha king 271: 263: 257: 243: 235: 229: 207: 200: 194: 192: 188: 173: 165:Explanation: 164: 156: 155: 137: 131: 125: 111: 110: 93: 73: 63:, including 61:independence 22:Section 124A 21: 20: 18: 2192:acid attack 2130:hate speech 2032:for ransom) 1938:Chapter XXI 1933:Chapter XXA 1923:Chapter XIX 1908:Chapter XVI 1898:Chapter XIV 1888:Chapter XII 1873:Chapter IXA 1858:Chapter VII 1833:Chapter III 1762:The Citizen 675:21 December 460:Claire Ward 391:N.V. Ramana 357:Binayak Sen 309:Young India 76:free speech 34:British Raj 2265:Categories 2030:kidnapping 2018:(abetting 1928:Chapter XX 1903:Chapter XV 1883:Chapter XI 1868:Chapter IX 1853:Chapter VI 1848:Chapter VA 1838:Chapter IV 1828:Chapter II 949:. Live Law 585:TheLeaflet 564:References 440:Tamil Nadu 373:Disha Ravi 2156:blasphemy 2146:obscenity 1878:Chapter X 1843:Chapter V 1823:Chapter I 1627:0971-751X 1619:The Hindu 1574:2278-4322 1389:Scroll.in 1318:The Hindu 1211:0971-751X 1203:The Hindu 1165:Frontline 1139:Scroll.in 1020:152184820 973:The Hindu 868:0362-4331 834:Frontline 398:Criticism 244:Bangobasi 242:magazine 234:in 1891; 100:Amit Shah 51:Waliullah 2286:Sedition 2249:adultery 2110:sedition 2006:302, 303 1816:Chapters 1466:The Wire 1240:ThePrint 375:(2020). 355:(2005), 351:(2003), 272:Mahratta 53:Movement 30:sedition 2228:Defunct 2040:dacoity 2020:suicide 1741:22 July 1710:22 July 1684:22 July 1658:22 July 1632:22 July 1598:22 July 1528:22 July 1502:22 July 1471:11 June 1446:11 June 1420:11 June 1394:11 June 1245:20 July 1216:20 July 1170:11 June 1144:11 June 839:5 March 813:5 March 787:5 March 623:5 March 590:5 March 458:of UK, 454:at the 414:at the 285:to the 283:Shivaji 268:Marathi 240:Bengali 24:of the 2010:murder 1990:mutiny 1767:18 May 1625:  1572:  1368:29 May 1345:29 May 1323:27 May 1297:29 May 1271:29 May 1209:  1118:28 May 1096:27 May 1066:27 May 1040:29 May 1018:  979:28 May 953:28 May 925:11 May 899:11 May 873:11 May 866:  759:  727:  697:22 May 649:12 May 525:JK PSA 295:Kesari 264:Kesari 47:Wahabi 2218:fraud 1364:. BBC 1016:S2CID 462:said: 300:Burma 2198:326B 2188:326A 2152:295A 2136:228A 2126:153A 2106:124A 2050:rape 2046:376A 2036:364A 2026:364A 1966:120B 1769:2022 1743:2021 1712:2021 1686:2021 1660:2021 1634:2021 1623:ISSN 1600:2021 1570:ISSN 1530:2021 1504:2021 1473:2021 1448:2021 1422:2021 1396:2021 1370:2019 1347:2019 1325:2019 1299:2019 1273:2019 1265:Mint 1247:2021 1218:2021 1207:ISSN 1172:2021 1146:2021 1120:2019 1098:2019 1068:2019 1042:2019 981:2019 955:2019 927:2022 901:2022 875:2022 864:ISSN 841:2021 815:2021 808:mint 789:2021 757:ISBN 725:ISBN 699:2019 677:2023 651:2022 625:2021 592:2021 545:and 498:The 472:The 276:Pune 270:and 215:bail 107:Text 67:and 2245:497 2235:309 2214:420 2204:377 2178:320 2172:304 2162:299 2142:294 2116:144 2016:305 1996:194 1986:122 1976:121 1560:doi 1008:doi 920:CNN 438:in 266:in 2267:: 2096:20 1760:. 1733:. 1720:^ 1703:. 1677:. 1651:. 1621:. 1617:. 1591:. 1568:. 1554:. 1550:. 1538:^ 1521:. 1495:. 1481:^ 1464:. 1438:. 1412:. 1387:. 1316:. 1289:. 1263:. 1238:. 1226:^ 1205:. 1201:. 1163:. 1137:. 1088:. 1076:^ 1058:. 1014:. 1004:16 1002:. 998:. 971:. 935:^ 918:. 891:. 862:. 858:. 832:. 806:. 780:. 739:^ 707:^ 667:. 641:. 616:. 600:^ 583:. 571:^ 2251:) 2247:( 2241:) 2237:( 2220:) 2216:( 2210:) 2206:( 2194:) 2190:( 2184:) 2180:( 2168:) 2164:( 2158:) 2154:( 2148:) 2144:( 2132:) 2128:( 2122:) 2118:( 2112:) 2108:( 2102:) 2098:( 2091:5 2086:4 2081:3 2076:2 2071:1 2048:( 2038:( 2028:( 2022:) 2012:) 2008:( 2002:) 1992:) 1988:( 1982:) 1978:( 1972:) 1968:( 1801:e 1794:t 1787:v 1771:. 1745:. 1714:. 1688:. 1662:. 1636:. 1602:. 1576:. 1562:: 1556:4 1532:. 1506:. 1475:. 1450:. 1424:. 1398:. 1372:. 1349:. 1327:. 1301:. 1275:. 1249:. 1220:. 1174:. 1148:. 1122:. 1100:. 1070:. 1044:. 1010:: 983:. 957:. 929:. 903:. 877:. 843:. 817:. 791:. 765:. 733:. 701:. 679:. 653:. 627:. 594:. 527:) 49:/

Index

Indian Penal Code
sedition
British Raj
British government of India
Khilafat movement
Wahabi
Waliullah
political dissent
independence
Lokmanya Tilak
Mahatma Gandhi
free speech
cognisable offence
Indira Gandhi
police warrant
Supreme Court of India
Amit Shah
Thomas Babington Macaulay
James Fitzjames Stephen
Wahabi activities
1973 Code of Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of India
bail
Calcutta High Court
Bengali
Age of Consent Act, 1891
William Comer Petheram
Lokmanya Tilak
Marathi
Pune

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑