Knowledge

Selfridge–Conway procedure

Source 📝

68: 47:, who told many people, but Selfridge did not publish it. John Conway later discovered it independently, and also never published it. This procedure was the first envy-free discrete procedure devised for three partners, and it paved the way for more advanced procedures for 58:
A procedure is envy-free if each recipient believes that (according to their own measure) no other recipient has received a larger share. The maximal number of cuts in the procedure is five. The pieces are not always contiguous.
280:
Let's see why the procedure is envy-free. It must be shown that each player believes that no other player received a larger share. Without loss of generality, we can write (see illustration above):
764: 17: 769:
We can apply the same procedure again on the remainders. By doing so an infinite number of times, we get an envy-free division of the
138:
thinks that the two largest parts are equal (such that no trimming is needed), then each player chooses a part in this order:
803: 87:. Where the procedure gives a criterion for a decision it means that criterion gives an optimum choice for the player. 924: 902: 873: 844: 774: 773:
cake. A refinement of this infinite procedure yields a finite envy-free division procedure: the
730: 52: 32: 929: 766:
equal pieces and the other partners follow by trimming. The resulting division is envy-free.
8: 40: 898: 869: 840: 809: 799: 625:), then we only need to use the first part of the Selfridge–Conway procedure, i.e.: 817: 44: 36: 327:
In the following analysis "largest" means "largest according to that player":
918: 622: 821: 67: 659:
This procedure can be generalized to 4 partners in the following way:
638:
trims at most one piece such that the two largest pieces are equal;
813: 94:
divides the cake into three pieces they consider of equal size.
837:
Fair Division: From cake-cutting to dispute resolution
617:
Note that if all we want is an envy-free division for
733: 428:
in 3 pieces, so for them all those pieces are equal.
115:
to make it the same size as the second largest. Now
758: 723:By induction, the procedure can be generalized to 542:since they cut the cake in the first round. Also, 186:chooses the last piece leaving just the trimmings 43:. Selfridge discovered it in 1960, and told it to 916: 514:didn't receive a larger share. In other words: 468:didn't receive a larger share. In other words: 366:. So no other player received a larger share: 882: 853: 828: 793: 727:partners, the first one dividing the cake to 168:chooses a piece with the limitation that if 888: 859: 834: 796:Cake-Cutting Algorithms: Be Fair If You Can 889:Brams, Steven J.; Taylor, Alan D. (1996). 860:Brams, Steven J.; Taylor, Alan D. (1996). 835:Brams, Steven J.; Taylor, Alan D. (1996). 632:divides the cake into three equal pieces; 31:is a discrete procedure that produces an 66: 895:From cake-cutting to dispute resolution 866:From cake-cutting to dispute resolution 798:. Natick, Massachusetts: A. K. Peters. 794:Robertson, Jack; Webb, William (1998). 720:This guarantees that there is no envy. 656:This guarantees that there is no envy. 35:for three partners. It is named after 14: 917: 210:; let's call the player who chose it 263:chooses the last remaining piece of 787: 194:It remains to divide the trimmings 119:is divided into: the trimmed piece 24: 18:Selfridge–Conway discrete procedure 612: 424:. Also, they are the one that cut 25: 941: 358:. And they consider their choice 62: 101:the largest piece according to 75:Suppose we have three players 13: 1: 780: 7: 621:of the cake (i.e. we allow 362:to be the largest piece of 275: 10: 946: 202:has been chosen by either 29:Selfridge–Conway procedure 868:]. pp. 131–137. 759:{\displaystyle 2^{n-2}+1} 698:largest pieces are equal; 684:largest pieces are equal; 162:and the two other pieces. 71:Selfridge–Conway division 229:into three equal pieces. 925:Fair division protocols 775:Brams–Taylor procedure 760: 680:pieces, such that the 666:divides the cake into 158:chooses a piece among 127:. Leave the trimmings 72: 53:envy-free cake-cutting 33:envy-free cake-cutting 761: 694:piece, such that the 488:chose their piece of 214:and the other player 198:. The trimmed piece 131:to the side for now. 70: 897:]. p. 137. 839:. pp. 116–120. 731: 704:takes a piece, then 644:takes a piece, then 530:. Remember that for 249:chooses a piece of 235:chooses a piece of 756: 123:and the trimmings 111:cuts off a bit of 73: 41:John Horton Conway 805:978-1-56881-076-8 420:since they chose 16:(Redirected from 937: 909: 908: 886: 880: 879: 857: 851: 850: 832: 826: 825: 791: 765: 763: 762: 757: 749: 748: 594:did not receive 484:. Remember that 21: 945: 944: 940: 939: 938: 936: 935: 934: 915: 914: 913: 912: 905: 887: 883: 876: 858: 854: 847: 833: 829: 806: 792: 788: 783: 738: 734: 732: 729: 728: 615: 613:Generalizations 602:would not envy 586:took the whole 278: 180:must choose it. 65: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 943: 933: 932: 927: 911: 910: 903: 881: 874: 852: 845: 827: 804: 785: 784: 782: 779: 755: 752: 747: 744: 741: 737: 718: 717: 699: 690:trims at most 685: 676:trims at most 671: 654: 653: 639: 633: 614: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 558: + ( 510:believes that 505: 504:in their view. 464:believes that 429: 391: 374: ≥  325: 324: 310: 296: 277: 274: 273: 272: 258: 244: 230: 192: 191: 190:to be divided. 181: 172:didn't choose 163: 153: 152: 151: 106: 95: 64: 61: 51:partners (see 37:John Selfridge 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 942: 931: 928: 926: 923: 922: 920: 906: 900: 896: 892: 891:Fair Division 885: 877: 871: 867: 863: 862:Fair Division 856: 848: 842: 838: 831: 823: 819: 815: 811: 807: 801: 797: 790: 786: 778: 776: 772: 767: 753: 750: 745: 742: 739: 735: 726: 721: 715: 711: 707: 703: 700: 697: 693: 689: 686: 683: 679: 675: 672: 670:equal pieces; 669: 665: 662: 661: 660: 657: 651: 647: 643: 640: 637: 634: 631: 628: 627: 626: 624: 623:free disposal 620: 605: 601: 597: 593: 589: 585: 581: 577: 574: ≥  573: 570:); therefore 569: 566: +  565: 562: +  561: 557: 554: =  553: 550: +  549: 546: =  545: 541: 537: 533: 529: 525: 522: ≥  521: 517: 513: 509: 506: 503: 500: ≥  499: 495: 491: 487: 483: 479: 476: ≥  475: 471: 467: 463: 460: 459: 457: 454: =  453: 449: 446: ≥  445: 441: 437: 433: 430: 427: 423: 419: 416: ≥  415: 411: 408: ≥  407: 404:. For them, 403: 399: 395: 392: 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 369: 365: 361: 357: 354: ≥  353: 349: 346: ≥  345: 341: 337: 333: 330: 329: 328: 322: 318: 314: 311: 308: 304: 300: 297: 294: 290: 286: 283: 282: 281: 270: 267:- we name it 266: 262: 259: 256: 253:- we name it 252: 248: 245: 242: 239:- we name it 238: 234: 231: 228: 224: 221: 220: 219: 217: 213: 209: 205: 201: 197: 189: 185: 182: 179: 175: 171: 167: 164: 161: 157: 154: 149: 145: 141: 137: 133: 132: 130: 126: 122: 118: 114: 110: 107: 104: 100: 96: 93: 90: 89: 88: 86: 82: 78: 69: 63:The Procedure 60: 56: 54: 50: 46: 42: 38: 34: 30: 19: 930:Cake-cutting 894: 890: 884: 865: 861: 855: 836: 830: 795: 789: 770: 768: 724: 722: 719: 713: 709: 705: 701: 695: 691: 687: 681: 677: 673: 667: 663: 658: 655: 649: 645: 641: 635: 629: 618: 616: 603: 599: 595: 591: 587: 583: 579: 575: 571: 567: 563: 559: 555: 551: 547: 543: 539: 538:is equal to 535: 531: 527: 523: 519: 515: 511: 507: 501: 497: 493: 489: 485: 481: 477: 473: 469: 465: 461: 455: 451: 447: 443: 442:. For them, 439: 435: 431: 425: 421: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 397: 393: 387: 383: 379: 375: 371: 367: 363: 359: 355: 351: 347: 343: 342:. For them, 339: 335: 331: 326: 320: 316: 312: 306: 302: 298: 292: 288: 284: 279: 268: 264: 260: 254: 250: 246: 240: 236: 232: 226: 222: 215: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 193: 187: 183: 177: 173: 169: 165: 159: 155: 147: 146:and finally 143: 139: 135: 128: 124: 120: 116: 112: 108: 102: 98: 91: 84: 80: 76: 74: 57: 48: 28: 26: 582:. (Even if 97:Let's call 45:Richard Guy 919:Categories 904:0521556449 875:0521556449 846:0521556449 781:References 315:received: 301:received: 287:received: 743:− 434:received 396:received 334:received 822:2730675W 814:97041258 276:Analysis 712:, then 708:, then 648:, then 496:, thus 492:before 901:  872:  843:  820:  812:  802:  771:entire 619:a part 893:[ 864:[ 225:cuts 899:ISBN 870:ISBN 841:ISBN 810:LCCN 800:ISBN 590:and 450:and 412:and 350:and 83:and 39:and 27:The 596:A22 580:A21 568:A23 564:A22 560:A21 528:A21 520:A22 502:A23 498:A22 482:A23 474:A22 440:A22 402:A23 388:A22 380:A23 372:A21 360:A21 340:A21 321:A22 307:A23 293:A21 269:A23 255:A22 241:A21 218:. 206:or 134:If 55:). 921:: 818:OL 816:. 808:. 777:. 714:P1 710:P2 706:P3 702:P4 688:P3 674:P2 664:P1 650:P1 646:P2 642:P3 636:P2 630:P1 606:.) 604:PA 600:P1 598:, 592:P1 588:A2 584:PA 578:+ 576:A1 556:A1 552:A2 548:A1 534:, 532:P1 526:+ 524:A1 518:+ 512:PA 508:P1 494:PB 490:A2 486:P1 480:+ 472:+ 466:PB 462:P1 458:. 448:A1 438:+ 432:P1 426:A2 410:A1 400:+ 394:PB 386:+ 382:, 378:+ 370:+ 368:A1 364:A2 352:A1 344:A1 338:+ 336:A1 332:PA 319:+ 313:P1 305:+ 299:PB 291:+ 289:A1 285:PA 265:A2 261:PB 251:A2 247:P1 237:A2 233:PA 227:A2 223:PB 216:PB 212:PA 208:P3 204:P2 200:A1 196:A2 188:A2 184:P1 178:P2 176:, 174:A1 170:P3 166:P2 160:A1 156:P3 148:P1 144:P2 142:, 140:P3 136:P2 129:A2 125:A2 121:A1 109:P2 103:P2 92:P1 85:P3 81:P2 79:, 77:P1 907:. 878:. 849:. 824:. 754:1 751:+ 746:2 740:n 736:2 725:n 716:. 696:2 692:1 682:3 678:2 668:5 652:. 572:C 544:A 540:A 536:C 516:C 478:B 470:C 456:B 452:C 444:C 436:C 422:B 418:C 414:B 406:B 398:B 390:. 384:C 376:B 356:C 348:B 323:. 317:C 309:. 303:B 295:. 271:. 257:. 243:. 150:. 117:A 113:A 105:. 99:A 49:n 20:)

Index

Selfridge–Conway discrete procedure
envy-free cake-cutting
John Selfridge
John Horton Conway
Richard Guy
envy-free cake-cutting

free disposal
Brams–Taylor procedure
ISBN
978-1-56881-076-8
LCCN
97041258
OL
2730675W
ISBN
0521556449
ISBN
0521556449
ISBN
0521556449
Categories
Fair division protocols
Cake-cutting

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.