Skew arch - Knowledge

2753:

this difficulty by the simple expedient of adjusting the angle of the intrado—or is it that, rather than acknowledge his inferiority, he persists in what he knows to be wrong, and addresses his book to the working classes in the hope of escaping detection? It is perfectly distressing to see a problem which admits of easy solution so miserably mutilated in his hands. Mr. Nicholson's rules however are not only very unnecessarily tedious, but it would appear by his own showing, that they are not over certain in their results. However, I will say no more. For this time I have, as he observes, "done with him" and I hope enough has been said to show Mr. Nicholson that his ideas have got a twist in their beds by no means adapted to skew-bridges, and that no species of brow-beating or invective on his part will be of the slightest use to him, while his book remains so very imperfect

1083: 181: 781:

thinner towards the most acutely angled quoin (located where the face of the arch makes an obtuse angle with the abutment in the plan view, at S and Q in the development to the left, and at the left hand side of the photograph of the intrados on the right) and thicker towards the most obtusely angled quoin (at O and G in the development and just off the right hand side of the photograph), requiring specially cut stones, no two of which in a given course being the same, which precludes the use of mass-produced bricks. Nevertheless, two courses beginning at opposite ends of the barrel at the same height above the

424: 935: 1075: 167: 920: 408: 1672:. If a helicoidal skew arch has a semicircular cross section, when taken on the square, perpendicular to the abutments, its barrel will have a shape based on the common cylinder (a semicylinder, in fact), and its cross section (taken on the skew, parallel with its faces) will be semi-elliptical. Segmental circular skew arches also have barrels based on the shape of the common cylinder, while those constructed with a semi-elliptical square section will have a flatter, wider semi-elliptical skew section. The 753: 737: 1099: 846: 606: 1091: 745: 1115: 530: 1126: 436: 416: 38: 356:

the abutments. The result is known as a "false" skew arch and analysis of the forces within it shows that in each corner where the face forms an acute angle with an abutment there are resultant forces that are not perpendicular to the planes of the stone courses whose tendency is to push the stones out of the face, the only resistance to this being provided by friction and the adhesion of the mortar between the stones. An example of such a false skew arch is the

1107: 159: 1037: 2801:

is the necessity for keeping the arch flat; and for the following reasons. All semi-arches built with spiral courses are strongest at the summit, because the stones in that position approach nearer to a right angle than in any other; therefore, the more remote from the summit, the more weak the arch will unavoidably be; consequently, as they near the horizon, they decrease in strength and beauty, as they increase in cost and difficulty of construction.

598: 522: 1029: 391:

are required for many applications, mathematicians and engineers such as Chapman abandoned the idea of laying the courses of stones parallel to the abutments and considered the alternative of laying the courses perpendicular to the faces of the arch, and accepting the fact that they would then no longer run parallel to the abutments. Though Outram's Store Street Aqueduct was constructed with this principle in mind, it was done so

326:. It was constructed in the form of a long gallery, some 200 feet (61 m) long and 34 feet (10 m) wide, consisting of iron girders resting on walls built parallel with the road; the girders, and consequently the faces of the bridge, being perpendicular to the roadway and the railway line being laid out obliquely across the top, the need to build a highly skewed bridge of 80 feet (24 m) span was therefore avoided. 551:

voussoir, rather than its inner surface, along the desired line, thereby better approximating the ideal placement than Nicholson was able to achieve. Secondly, it enabled him to develop an arbitrary number of concentric intermediate surfaces so as to plan the courses in multi-ring skew arch barrels, allowing them for the first time to be constructed in brick, and therefore much more economically than was previously possible.

343: 514: 729: 712:, thereby over-correcting the deficiencies of the false skew arch and weakening the obtuse angle, the mathematical purists recommend that helicoidal construction be restricted to segmental arches and not be used in full-centred (semicircular) designs. Despite this there were many full-centred skew bridges built to the helicoidal pattern and many still stand, 630:

dimension of a skew arch to be calculated without recourse to taking measurements from scale drawings and it allowed him to calculate the theoretical minimum angle of obliquity to which a practical semicircular helicoidal skew bridge could be designed and safely built. The "Buck Limit", as it is known, has a value of 25°40′ or, when quoted in terms of the

1224:, 1834–1836), a long and complex structure, which has subsequently been widened on both its southern (1842) and northern (1850) sides, and also extended westwards to Charing Cross (1864) and northwards to Cannon Street (1866). Helicoidal skew brickwork is visible at several locations where it spans existing roads that cross the line at oblique angles. 555:

becomes quite evident, that the transverse sections of all these spiral stones are the same throughout the whole arch. It will be obvious, that the beds of the stones should be worked into true spiral planes." So, a stone skew arch built to Fox's plan would have its voussoirs cut with a slight twist, in order to follow the shape of a

1065:

on 28 May 1830 for £420, an increase of £93 over the original tender. As the principles were not completely understood, the work continued to prove difficult and its imminent collapse was solemnly predicted right up until the time, a few days before the opening of the branch, the centring was removed

554:

In order to explain how he visualised the courses of voussoirs in a stone skew arch, Fox wrote, "The principle which I have adopted is, to work the stones in the form of a spiral quadrilateral solid, wrapped round a cylinder, or, in plainer language, the principle of a square threaded screw: hence it

481:

the greater their deviation from perpendicularity. Thus Nicholson's method is not the perfect solution, but it is a workable one that has one great advantage over more purist alternatives, namely that since the helical courses run parallel to each other, all the voussoir stones can be cut to the same

381:

along the length of its barrel. In an oblique or skew arch the axis of the barrel is deliberately not perpendicular to the faces, the deviation from perpendicularity being known as the skew angle or the "obliquity" of the arch. For this reason a skew arch needs to be thought of as a three-dimensional

2752:

It is really very lamentable to see a man of the standing Peter Nicholson once had, obliged to have recourse to so mean and unworthy subterfuge; and it is still more lamentable to see him forget himself so much in the language he makes use of. Is he ignorant of the fact that Mr. Buck has surmounted

962:

and later championed by French civil engineer A. Boucher. Because the series of arch ribs are all regular arches this method of construction has the advantage of being less demanding of unskilled artisans but it has received considerable criticism as being weak, susceptible to frost damage, ugly and

390:

A characteristic of the regular arch is that the courses of stones run parallel to the abutments and perpendicular to the faces. In an oblique arch these two conditions cannot both be met because the faces and the abutments are deliberately not perpendicular. Since skew angles greater than about 15°

355:

of stone are laid parallel to the abutments, which in a regular arch causes them also to lie perpendicular to its faces. For only slightly oblique bridges, where the skew angle is less than approximately 15° it is possible to use the same construction method, laying the stones in courses parallel to

2800:

Arches of great obliquity are much the strongest when constructed with a segmental elevation; whether the segment of a circle or an ellipse, is of little importance, so long as the rise is between a third and sixth of the span of the semi-figure. The more oblique the plan of the bridge, the greater

1610:

Strictly speaking, the development of the face of a skew arch is not actually a straight line, but an S-shaped curve, the curvature of which becomes more pronounced with increasing angle of skew. Nicholson therefore added a straight line, called "the approximate line", between the ends of each face

1244:

The original West Bridge over the River Avon adjacent to Bath (Spa) station by Isambard Kingdom Brunel (Great Western Railway, 1840), comprising two 80-foot (24 m) span skew arches made from laminated timber ribs. It was replaced with the present wrought iron skew lattice girder bridge between

991:

at an extremely acute angle of approximately 25°, a figure more acute than the theoretical limit of 25°40′ proposed by Buck, and requiring a bridge with a skew angle of 65°, a situation not unlike that faced by the London and Birmingham railway 30 years earlier at Denbigh Hall. This time the chosen

949:

The ribbed skew arch is a form of the false skew arch in which several narrow regular arches or ribs, offset laterally with respect to one another, are used to approximate a true skew arch. Motivated by the lack of skilled stonemasons in the 18th century United States, the design was first proposed

780:

curves be projected onto a cylindrical surface, hence its name. In terms of strength and stability, a skew bridge built to the logarithmic pattern has advantages over one built to the helicoidal pattern, especially so in the case of full-centred designs. However, the courses are not parallel, being

637:

Buck paid particular attention to the design of bridges of extreme obliquity, addressing two potential problems he had identified. Firstly, he noted that the acutely angled quoins at the obtuse corners of the plan view were very susceptible to damage during construction, settlement or by accidental

376:

When considering the balance of forces within a regular arch, in which all courses of masonry that make up the barrel are parallel with its abutments and perpendicular to its faces, it is convenient to consider it as a two-dimensional object by taking a vertical section through the body of the arch

642:

the edge, removing the single acute angle and replacing it with two obtuse angles and, in his own words, "the quantity thus cut off from the acute quoin, is gradually diminished to the opposite or obtuse quoin, where the cutting vanishes; by this contrivance no angle less than a right angle is any

350:

The strength of a regular arch (also known as a "square" or "right" arch) comes from the fact that the mass of the structure and its superincumbent load cause lines of force that are carried by the stones into the ground and the abutments without producing any tendency for the stones to slide with

3185:

Culley, 1886, op. cit., pp. 115–116. "This method is very faulty, and cannot be too severely condemned. There is no bond between the several ribs, as each rib is separate and distinct in its construction and its position; the load above the arch is never uniform throughout the whole length of the

971:

designed by Gustavus A. Nicolls with six skewed spans of 70 feet (21 m) across the river and six more land-based skew arches, which was built close to the site of Latrobe's proposed bridge and completed in 1856. Thanks to the reinforcing of the spandrel walls in 1935, the bridge continues to

659:

on the West Coast Main Line, is an example of a segmental arch of extreme obliquity that was designed by Buck and incorporates both of these features. Constructed in masonry, with a brick barrel, stone quoins and a 58° angle of skew, it was completed in 1837. Shortly before the railway opened the

550:

as separate surfaces mapped onto concentric cylinders by drawing a separate development for each. This approach had two advantages. Firstly, he was able to develop a theoretical third, intermediate surface midway between the intrados and the extrados, which allowed him to align the centre of each

772:

between 18 November 1835 and 27 January 1836, during which time he was elected vice-president of the Society, though his work was not published until 1840. The logarithmic method is based on the principle of laying the voussoirs in "equilibrated" courses in which they follow lines that run truly

2044:

When a road crosses a canal in an oblique direction, the bridge is often made oblique. When the angle does not vary more than ten or twelve degrees from a right angle, the arch-stones may be formed as already described; but in cases of greater obliquity, a different principle of construction is

910:

approach tends to result in a structure that is almost as strong as one built to the logarithmic pattern and considerably stronger than one built to the helicoidal pattern but, again, the extra complexity has meant that the method has not seen widespread adoption, especially since the simpler

333:

never succeeding in working out a solution to the problem of constructing a strong skew arch and as a consequence all his overbridges were built at right angles to the waterway, with double bends in the roadway, where necessary, and to this day many of them cause inconvenience to their users.

629:

approach and considerable practical experience to the problem. This book was acknowledged as the definitive work on the subject of the helicoidal skew arch and remained a standard text book for railway engineers until the end of the 19th century. Buck's trigonometrical approach allowed every

1227:

Boxmoor Railway Bridge, adjacent to what is now Hemel Hempstead station, Hertfordshire by George W. Buck (London and Birmingham Railway, 1836–1837), a brick arch with stone quoins and a 58° angle of skew built to a very high standard of workmanship by contractors W. and L. Cubitt of

1335:

Sickergill Skew Bridge, near Penrith, Cumbria by George Joseph Bell, County Surveyor (a post previously held by Peter Nicholson) and Bridge Master of Cumberland (Raven Beck at Renwick, 1898), a single arch masonry skew bridge that is interesting for having been photographed during

301:

of the arch. The positions of the courses in the vicinity of the crown were first marked out at right angles to the faces using long wooden straight-edges, then the remaining courses were marked out in parallel. The masons then laid the stones, cutting them to shape as required.

707:

The helicoidal method of laying down the stone or brick courses championed by Nicholson, Fox and Buck is only an approximation to the ideal. Since the courses are only square to the faces of the arch at the crown and deviate more from perpendicularity the closer they are to the

463:

of the intrados of the arch from the plan and elevation drawings, effectively unrolling and flattening the surface, then drawing the courses perpendicular to the faces, adding the header joints perpendicular to the courses, then finally rolling up the development diagram by

468:

the detail of the intrados back onto the plan and elevation drawings, a technique also used by others who would later offer alternative solutions to the problem. This method resulted in the courses of stone voussoirs making up the barrel of the skew arch following parallel

996:

as a ribbed skew arch, which opened for traffic in 1868 and was successfully widened in 1893 when the line was converted to quadruple track. Despite the aforementioned criticisms of the design, the bridge is still standing and in daily use by express and commuter trains.

588:

method of constructing brick skew arches. Using this method many thousands of skew bridges were built either entirely of brick or of brick with stone quoins by railway companies in the United Kingdom, a substantial number of which survive and are still in use today.

305:

Contemporary designs by rival engineers were less successful and for a time skew bridges were considered weak in comparison with the regular, or "square" arch bridge and so were avoided if at all possible, the alternatives being to construct the road or canal with a

1637:

is a curved surface swept out by a radius moving in a helical path about an axial line. The bearing surfaces of a square threaded screw and its associated nut are helicoidal, and so are the bedding planes between adjacent courses of voussoirs in this class of skew

493:(1839), he does claim to have invented the method for producing the templates that enabled the accurate cutting of the voussoir stones used in all skew bridges built between the years 1828 and 1836, citing testimonials from the builders of major works, such as the 2045:

necessary. These cases should, however, be avoided wherever it is possible; as, however solid the construction of an oblique bridge may be in reality, it has neither the apparent solidity nor fitness which ought to characterize a useful and pleasing object.

3186:

arch, and on account of this lack of bond in the arch, it will be distorted by its unequal settlement. Again, the outer ribs are constantly being forced outwards by the action of frost upon the material that finds lodgement between their heading surfaces."

906:, both of which survive and are in daily use. The brickwork is considerably more complex than in a helicoidal design and, in order to ensure that the courses of bricks meet the faces of the arch at right angles, many had to be cut to produce tapers. The 455:

first set out in clear and understandable terms a workable method for determining the shape and position of the stones required for the construction of a strong skew arch that enabled them to be prepared in advance of the actual construction process.

2383:(plate 17) it will at once appear that the intrado is the only surface developed, and the approximate line laid down upon it, all the courses are drawn at right angles to that line; the courses therefore are drawn with reference to the intrado only 3170:

Boucher, A. (1848). "Note sur la construction des voûtes biaises au moyen d'une série d'arcs droits accolés les uns aux autres" [Notes on the construction of skewed vaults by means of a series of right arches built one against the other].

1019:

Notice that the two bridges in the photographs skew in opposite directions. Southdown Road bridge is said to have a left-hand skew due to the near face being offset to the left of the far face, while Hereford Road bridge has a right-hand skew.

334:

However, it was the coming of the railway, with its need to cross existing obstacles, such as rivers, roads, canals and other railways, in as straight a line as possible, that rekindled the civil engineer's interest in the skew arch bridge.

562:

While claiming a superior method, Fox openly acknowledged Nicholson's contribution but in 1837 he felt the need to reply to a published letter written in support of Nicholson by fellow engineer Henry Welch, the County Bridge Surveyor for

861:

or "cow's horn" method is another way of laying courses such that they meet the face of the arch orthogonally at all elevations. Unlike the helicoidal and logarithmic methods, in which the intrados of the arch barrel is cylindrical, the

1060:

proved too difficult for the original contractors, Thomas Worth and John Batie, who, after piling the foundations for the abutments and laying the lower courses of masonry, abandoned the work. The contract was re-let to James Wilson of

1044:

Early skew arch bridges were painstakingly built from masonry blocks, each individually and expensively cut to its own unique shape, with no two edges either parallel or perpendicular. A fine example of such construction is the famous

571:

that, following a number of earlier altercations in which the originality of his writings was questioned, left the 71-year-old Nicholson feeling bitter and unappreciated. The following year Fox, still aged only 28 and employed by

687:, entered the fray, initially signing himself cryptically W.H.B., but eventually declaring publicly his strong support for Buck. Nicholson, by this time aged 75 and his health failing, had been struggling financially since the 1632:

is a special case of the generic spiral and applies only to a line. It is used to describe the rifled appearance of the intrados of this particular class of skew arch: the courses follow helical paths between the imposts. The

1372:

has a complex bridge consisting of a normal arch and a skew arch butted together; the brick courses in the roof change from normal to helical approximately two-thirds of the way through. This accommodates a road junction

310:, so as to allow it to cross the obstacle at right angles, or to build a regular arch bridge with the extra width or span necessary to clear the obstacle "on the square". An example of the latter type of construction is 796:

was the first to put the theory into practice, building several skew bridges to the logarithmic pattern on that route, including the semi-elliptical Grade II listed bridge number 74A that carries the line over the

288:

with a skew angle of 63° and a skew span of 42 feet (13 m), resulting in a clear span of 18 feet (5.5 m) and a rise of 7 feet (2.1 m). The common method they all used was to clad the timber

643:

where presented on the exterior of the work the effect produced is elegant and pleasing to the eye." Secondly, he recommended that the extrados of the barrel of an arch of great obliquity be formed into

1581:

or semicircular skew arch, in which case the rise is equal to the radius of the arch, or half the skew span. For segmental, three-centred, and elliptical skew arches the rise is less than this limiting

537:

In performing his calculations Nicholson considered the arch barrel to be made from one ring of stones and of negligible thickness and therefore he developed only the intrados. The idea was expanded in

41:

A masonry skew arch bridge photographed shortly after its completion in 1898, showing the helicoidal nature of its stonework. Sickergill Skew Bridge over the River Raven at Renwick, near Penrith

769: 838: 88:, as the cuts do not form right angles, but once the principles were fully understood in the early 19th century, it became considerably easier and cheaper to build a skew arch of 2379:

No one would for a moment hesitate to acknowledge the obligations which practical men are under to that highly talented individual Mr Peter Nicholson; but on referring to his

505:. However, by 1836 a young engineer called Charles Fox had improved on Nicholson's helicoidal method and other writers were proposing alternative approaches to the problem. 1182: 825:

in which he expounded the virtues of building skew bridges with equilibrated courses, but due to the poor complexity to benefit ratio, there have been few other adopters.

382:

object and by considering the direction of the lines of force within the barrel the optimum orientation for the courses of stonework that make the barrel can be decided.

1395: 968: 2396: 1214:

over the River Gaunless near Cockfield, County Durham, by Thomas Storey (Stockton and Darlington Railway, 1830), the first skew bridge to carry a railway over a river.

360:

in Saint Paul, Minnesota. Before starting work on Store Street Aqueduct, Outram built a number of false skew arches, one of them with a skew angle as great as 19°, as

1494:

of the angle of skew, though there is some confusion in a number of the 19th century texts where angle of skew and angle of obliquity tend to be used interchangeably.

870:

surface that dips in the middle, rather like a saddle. Despite being known as the French method of skew arch building, it was actually introduced by English engineer

3353: 1482:

is the angle between the centre line of the arch barrel and the perpendicular to the face of the arch. A regular arch is defined as having a zero angle of skew. The

1231:

Leeds and Liverpool Canal bridge number 74A, near Chorley, Lancashire by Alexander J. Adie (Bolton and Preston Railway, 1838), built to Sang's logarithmic pattern.

1049:, which was designed with a skew span of 54 feet (16 m), in order to give a clear span across the railway of 30 feet (9.1 m) at a skew angle of 56° by 31: 399:

stone as it was required, and it was not until 1828 that details of the technique were published in a form that was useful to other engineers and stonemasons.

1595:

is used because it is the mathematically correct term, referring to the curved surface of the inside of the arch barrel. The equivalent architectural term is

273: 3657:

A Practical Treatise on Segmental and Elliptical Oblique or Skew Arches, Setting Forth the Principles and Details of Construction in Clear and Simple Terms

683:

to continue acrimoniously as Nicholson accused Buck of stealing his ideas and Buck issued a counter-claim. In 1840, Buck's assistant, the young engineer

773:

perpendicular to the arch faces at all elevations, while the header joints between the stones within each course are truly parallel with the arch face.

297:) with planks, known as "laggings", laid parallel with the abutments and carefully planed and levelled to approximate closely the required curve of the 651:

walls in order to overcome their tendency to slide off the arch barrel. The bridge carrying the London and Birmingham Railway over the London Road at

1269: 695:. While both Fox and Buck had been happy to acknowledge Nicholson's work and had fought a mostly intellectual battle, Barlow's attacks became less 3138: 963:

wasteful of materials. Although Latrobe's bridge was never built as proposed, his method of construction was later to be used extensively by the

1389: 357: 3508: 1350: 1217: 1398:, Fairmount Park, Philadelphia by Gustavus A. Nicolls (Philadelphia and Reading Railroad, 1856), a ribbed skew arch viaduct made of stone. 2872:

When the bed joints are of such a form that the arch is in equilibrium without friction, the courses are called the equilibrated courses

1258:

Rewe Skew Bridge, Rewe, Devon by William Froude (Bristol and Exeter Railway, 1844), one of possibly only two examples in Britain of the

1423: 1369: 1248: 1129: 1577:

of a skew arch is equal to the rise of a regular arch whose span is equal to the skew span of the skew bridge. A limiting case is the

882:, which opened in 1844. Although no details of Froude's work in this area survive and despite being better remembered for his work on 1767: 1294:

and John Bourne (Leeds Northern Railway, 1849–51), has two stone skew arches where it spans the River Tees and 41 brick right arches.

1056:

A contemporary skew bridge built to carry the Haggerleazes branch of the Stockton and Darlington Railway over the River Gaunless in

1417: 1118: 886:, he is known to have built at least two overbridges in red brick with stone quoins using this principle on the line just north of 539: 128: 699:

and more personal causing Nicholson, who later received anonymous public support from the mysterious M.Q., considerable distress.

1252: 1392:, Saint Paul, Minnesota, by Andreas W. Munster (1888), a false skew arch built with the stone courses parallel to the abutments. 776:

While a helix is produced by projecting a straight line onto the surface of a cylinder, Sang's method requires that a series of

1316:, Harpenden, Hertfordshire by Charles Liddell and William H. Barlow (Midland Railway, 1868), a ribbed skew arch built of brick. 805:

with the intention of connecting it to the northern section, though this was never achieved as the necessary aqueduct over the

3616: 3574: 3467: 2981: 3004: 477:

appearance. Although these courses meet the arch faces at right angles at the crown of the arch, the nearer they are to the

2369:. Third series. Vol. X (January–June 1837). London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green & Longman. pp. 167–169 979:

in the United Kingdom suffered from no such shortage of skilled workers but as part of its southern extension towards its

460: 3386: 3367: 1201: 1046: 3492: 3077: 2110: 2083: 1971: 1944: 1917: 1861: 1819: 1713: 1401: 964: 618: 486:, where the barrel meets the faces of the arch, each of which is unique but has an identical copy in the other face. 322:

at an acute angle of only 25°. Now a Grade II listed structure, the bridge is still in use today, carrying the busy

1987: 1205: 1178: 691:

of one of his publishers in 1827 and he was in desperate need of the revenue he hoped to receive from sales of his

625:

in which he also acknowledged Nicholson's contribution but, finding it lacking in detail, applied his own original

1332:, Ledbury, Herefordshire (Ledbury and Gloucester Railway, 1881), a ribbed skew arch made of stone and blue brick. 1272:, 1849). These are contiguous skew spans, each of six cast iron spandrels, carrying the railway line used by the 911:

helicoidal structure can be built much stronger if a segmental design is chosen, rather than a full-centred one.

675:, containing its criticism of Nicholson's work, was published in July 1839, just a few months before Nicholson's 656: 277: 368:. The fact that these inherently weak structures are still standing today is attributed to their light loading. 1346:, 1899), a blue brick structure, the three central arches of which are skewed in order to cross the River Soar. 1009: 810: 1615:

to the curve of the face only at the crown, with the difference increasing with distance away from that point.

1241:, 1838–1839), widened by the building of an adjacent parallel bridge in 1892 to carry a second pair of tracks. 1277: 1262:

method of brick construction pioneered by Froude, the other being at Cowley Bridge Junction on the same line.

577: 315: 1082: 3404: 2533: 2510: 1405: 1221: 311: 185: 180: 2018: 898:

Exeter–Barnstaple road crosses at an oblique angle and, about 4 miles (6.4 km) to the northeast, at

2127: 452: 116: 17: 3671: 3771: 3766: 3761: 1411: 1383: 1313: 1273: 993: 984: 923: 879: 818: 793: 644: 568: 253: 108: 3145: 2896:

A Practical Treatise on the Construction of Oblique Bridges: With Spiral and With Equilibrated Courses

1892:. Vol. XXII (Sigonio – Steam-vessel) (1st ed.). London: Charles Knight & Co. p. 87. 2158: 1329: 1281: 1001: 938: 798: 365: 3530: 2014: 1234: 465: 285: 2707: 2426: 2288: 2195: 1611:

on the development drawing and then drew the courses perpendicular to it. The approximate line is

2867: 2795: 2342: 2248: 875: 3247: 3103: 617:, having also worked on the London and Birmingham Railway under Stephenson before moving to the 1408:, 1883–1884), a pair of helicoidal semicircular masonry arches with a skew angle of 27 degrees. 959: 891: 3606: 3196: 2950: 2833: 2814: 2766: 2739: 2685:"A few Remarks on the Construction of Oblique Arches and on some recent Works on that Subject" 2684: 2661: 2638: 2587: 2470: 2444: 2362: 2100: 2063: 2037: 1934: 1745: 1703: 3781: 3776: 3067: 2894: 2266: 2222: 1961: 1907: 1887: 1661: 1343: 1323: 1238: 1195: 352: 241: 153: 3706: 1988:"Keys to the Past: Railway Bridge over Gaunless, Hagger Leazes; Listed building (Cockfield)" 1053:

and built as a full-sized wooden model in an adjacent field before being completed in 1830.

740:

Bridge number 74A carrying the Bolton and Preston Railway over the Leeds and Liverpool Canal

423: 1752:. Vol. III. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green & Longman. pp. 251–260. 1491: 1429: 684: 483: 361: 323: 3299: 1778: 1519:

span of the skew arch, for which it must be engineered, and it is always greater than the

443:

showing the development (left) and the plan view of the intrados of a helicoidal skew arch

192:

Skew bridges are not a recent invention, having been built on exceptional occasions since

8: 2982:"Leeds Liverpool Canal, Railway Bridge over Leeds Liverpool Canal at Sd 595 162, Chorley" 378: 249: 3672:"Minnesota's Historic Bridges: Seventh Street Improvement Arches, Historic Significance" 3023: 2861: 2789: 2594:. I (October 1837–December 1838). London: Hooper, Weale, Taylor & Williams: 367–368. 2493: 2420: 2336: 2242: 2189: 788:

In 1838, Alexander James Adie, son of the famous optical instrument manufacturer of the

166: 1677: 1354: 1301: 556: 221: 3745: 3739: 3632: 2615: 1074: 845: 3694:] Street Improvement Arches as 'the most important piece of masonry in the city'. 3612: 3488: 3463: 3436: 3073: 2106: 2079: 1967: 1940: 1913: 1857: 1815: 1709: 1185:, 1862), a brick railway viaduct with five full-centred skew arches and stone quoins. 1050: 744: 665: 581: 573: 120: 95:

The problem of building skew arch masonry bridges was addressed by a number of early

934: 764:

method of constructing a skew arch led to the proposal of the logarithmic method by

533:

A plate from Fox's paper showing skew courses as sections of a square threaded screw

3552: 2071: 1339: 1297: 1159: 951: 717: 609:

Boxmoor Skew Bridge detail, showing the chamfered acute quoins and stepped extrados

261: 217: 104: 3655: 2042:. Vol. VI. Edinburgh: Archibald Constable & Company. 1824. p. 569. 2039:

Supplement to the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Editions of the Encyclopædia Britannica

1319: 1291: 976: 919: 814: 802: 782: 768:, a mathematician living in Edinburgh, in his presentation in three parts to the 713: 709: 661: 478: 229: 112: 37: 2928: 2224:

The Guide to Railway Masonry, containing a Complete Treatise on the Oblique Arch

1936:

The Origins of Railway Enterprise: The Stockton and Darlington Railway 1821–1863

1811: 1326:, 1862), a stone skew viaduct constructed in line with Nicholson's instructions. 1012:

at an angle of approximately 45° across the Hereford Road, now a section of the

491:

The Guide to Railway Masonry, containing a Complete Treatise on the Oblique Arch

196:

times, but they were little understood and rarely used before the advent of the

2273:. Vol. IV. London: Longman, Orme, Brown, Green & Longman. p. 90. 1265: 1155: 871: 789: 748:

The development of the intrados of a skew arch built to the logarithmic pattern

614: 564: 489:

Nicholson never pretended to have invented the skew arch but in his later work

330: 319: 281: 248:. Outram's design is believed to be based on work done on the Kildare Canal in 225: 213: 205: 174: 136: 132: 96: 3320: 3069:

The Way of a Ship in the Midst of the Sea: The Life and Work of William Froude

2821:. XX (October 1835–April 1836). Edinburgh: Adam & Charles Black: 201, 421. 2422:

Skew Arches: Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Methods of Construction

1098: 407: 3755: 2583: 1544:

is the span of the arch measured perpendicular to the abutments. This is the

1141:

Finlay Bridge, Naas, County Kildare by William Chapman (Kildare Canal, 1787).

1090: 1057: 883: 850: 761: 605: 498: 494: 269: 100: 70: 3371: 3273: 3197:"Fairmount Park Railroad Bridge #4, over the Schuylkill River, Philadelphia" 2247:(1st ed.). London: Thomas Hurst, Edward Chance & Company. pp. 473:

paths between the abutments, giving the view along the barrel an attractive

3222: 1648: 1307: 1287: 1114: 1016:. The railway having closed in 1959, it is now used as part of a footpath. 955: 806: 626: 529: 237: 233: 193: 85: 3742:– Southern E-Group's Railway Structures section, Skewed Brick Bridges page 2838: