Knowledge

Standardized service contract

Source 📝

112:
implementation so that it can be based on industry standards. This can be achieved by the application of a decoupled contract design pattern. Also that the ‘contract first’ approach needs to be followed so that the underlying logic only makes use of standardized data models. Furthermore, the requirement for centralized data models may end in transmission of redundant data between services, as the actual data a service needs may be only a subset of the data defined in the standardized schema imposed on the service.
94:
the standardized service contract principle requires standardized data models, which further helps create a standardized data representation architecture that can be reused across the enterprise to define standardized service capabilities. Schema centralization directly supports the objectives of data model standardization design pattern, which further supports creation of centrally governed schemas.
93:
Two services exchanging messages based on the same type of data—e.g., a purchase order—might model that data according to different schemas, which requires data model transformation. This clearly adds overhead, and stands in the way of service interoperability and reuse. To avoid this transformation,
84:
The service's operations need to be defined using standardized naming conventions. This would also apply to the constituent input and out message names and their corresponding type names. This helps to increase the service contract's correct interpretation, which in turn increases service’s reuse and
102:
Service policies represent terms of use for a service. So, for a service to be reusable, its behavioral requirements must be expressed consistently using standardized policy expressions based on industry standard vocabularies. This type of standardization further promotes separation of policies from
52:
Within service-oriented solutions, a service contract represents a fundamental artifact, as this is the only medium through which services interact with each other or other consumer programs. This creates a strong need to standardize the service contracts in order to make services reusable and
48:
is usually measured in terms of the reusability level of its contained services. However, this reusability relates directly to the way the service contract defines service capabilities. A service built on a potentially reusable functional context but with a contract that does not convey this
111:
Application of this design principle depends on design standards at the service inventory level. This requires additional resources, in terms of time and effort. Secondly, to apply this design principle effectively, the actual contract must be physically isolated from the service logic and
53:
recomposable as much as possible. In order to achieve this, the standardized service contract design principle needs to be applied as its application results in standardized service contracts that are based on design standards as set within a service inventory.
103:
service contracts into individual policy documents, which facilitates centralized governance. In some cases, two policies, though syntactically different, might mean the same thing—therefore, design standards must dictate acceptable policy structure.
64:. This also helps in making services more interoperable. Another important goal of this design pattern is to use a standardized way of expressing service capabilities so that their purpose and ability can be easily understood at design time. 31:
to guarantee that service contracts within a service inventory (enterprise or domain) adhere to the same set of design standards. This facilitates standardized service contracts across the service inventory.
240: 289: 56:
One of its goals is to reduce the need for data transformations as two services interact with each other, which can be achieved if the service contracts use standardized data models e.g.
237: 76:
document, XML schema(s) and policy document(s). Consequently, this principle needs to be applied across three areas of a service contract as described below:
305:
As services are usually implemented as web services so this article focuses on the application of this design principle within the context of web services.
286: 269: 440: 319: 85:
interoperability. When service contracts clearly express their capabilities, the chance of service duplication is also reduced.
344: 383: 221: 393: 73: 204:
Cellary, Wojciech; Strykowski, Sergiusz. "E-Government Based on Cloud Computing and Service-Oriented Architecture".
367:, pp. 1–10, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2010. Date accessed: 8 April 2010. 183: 158: 133: 45: 266: 400: 364: 206:
Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Theory and practice of electronic governance
407: 8: 25: 315: 379: 217: 340: 209: 41: 293: 273: 244: 28: 394:
Software Product Lines and Service Oriented Architectures:can they be connected
287:
A preliminary study on Service-oriented migration for a small-scale migration.
434: 256:
The boundary of the service, i.e., the type of functions the service provides
213: 401:
A Multi-Agent Framework for Developing Adaptable and Open Service Systems
365:
Service Oriented Device Integration - An Analysis of SOA Design Patterns.
61: 238:
Evolution of principles of Service Orientation: Service Contract, part 2
371: 57: 197: 179: 154: 21: 129: 49:
reusability correctly does not achieve its reusability potential.
425: 420: 79: 72:
A technical service contract is usually composed of a
267:
Guidelines for Using Web Service Contract Technologies
308: 333: 432: 172: 147: 230: 203: 88: 279: 97: 60:if the services have been implemented as 299: 433: 441:Service-oriented (business computing) 80:Functional expression standardization 24:design principle applied within the 370: 259: 46:service-oriented architecture (SOA) 13: 14: 452: 414: 250: 122: 106: 376:SOA Principles of Service Design 347:from the original on 2010-02-13 322:from the original on 2010-02-11 316:"Schema Centralization Pattern" 186:from the original on 2010-03-13 161:from the original on 2012-05-01 136:from the original on 2010-04-29 410:.Date accessed: 12 April 2010. 403:.Date Accessed: 10 April 2010. 396:.Date Accessed: 10 April 2010. 296:.Date Accessed: 10 April 2010. 276:.Date accessed: 12 April 2010. 247:.Date accessed: 12 April 2010. 67: 1: 208:. ICEGOV '09. pp. 5–10. 115: 18:standardized service contract 341:"Decoupled Contract Pattern" 7: 408:SOA Contract Maturity Model 10: 457: 89:Data model standardization 35: 406:Kjell-Sverre Jerijærvi. 214:10.1145/1693042.1693045 392:Paul-Alexandru Istoan. 98:Policy standardization 180:"Service Inventory" 155:"Service Contracts" 26:service-orientation 426:SOA Terms Glossary 292:2011-08-15 at the 272:2012-10-03 at the 243:2011-09-29 at the 130:"Design Principle" 385:978-0-13-234482-1 378:. Prentice Hall. 223:978-1-60558-663-2 448: 399:Youssef Achbany. 389: 356: 355: 353: 352: 337: 331: 330: 328: 327: 312: 306: 303: 297: 283: 277: 263: 257: 254: 248: 234: 228: 227: 201: 195: 194: 192: 191: 176: 170: 169: 167: 166: 151: 145: 144: 142: 141: 126: 456: 455: 451: 450: 449: 447: 446: 445: 431: 430: 417: 386: 360: 359: 350: 348: 339: 338: 334: 325: 323: 314: 313: 309: 304: 300: 294:Wayback Machine 284: 280: 274:Wayback Machine 264: 260: 255: 251: 245:Wayback Machine 236:Michael Poulin. 235: 231: 224: 202: 198: 189: 187: 178: 177: 173: 164: 162: 153: 152: 148: 139: 137: 128: 127: 123: 118: 109: 100: 91: 82: 70: 38: 29:design paradigm 12: 11: 5: 454: 444: 443: 429: 428: 423: 416: 415:External links 413: 412: 411: 404: 397: 390: 384: 368: 363:Mauro. et al. 358: 357: 332: 307: 298: 278: 258: 249: 229: 222: 196: 171: 146: 120: 119: 117: 114: 108: 107:Considerations 105: 99: 96: 90: 87: 81: 78: 69: 66: 44:promised by a 37: 34: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 453: 442: 439: 438: 436: 427: 424: 422: 419: 418: 409: 405: 402: 398: 395: 391: 387: 381: 377: 373: 369: 366: 362: 361: 346: 342: 336: 321: 317: 311: 302: 295: 291: 288: 282: 275: 271: 268: 262: 253: 246: 242: 239: 233: 225: 219: 215: 211: 207: 200: 185: 181: 175: 160: 156: 150: 135: 131: 125: 121: 113: 104: 95: 86: 77: 75: 65: 63: 59: 54: 50: 47: 43: 33: 30: 27: 23: 19: 421:SOA Concepts 375: 349:. Retrieved 335: 324:. Retrieved 310: 301: 285:kou-Kai Lin. 281: 265:Tost. et al. 261: 252: 232: 205: 199: 188:. Retrieved 174: 163:. Retrieved 149: 138:. Retrieved 124: 110: 101: 92: 83: 71: 62:web services 55: 51: 39: 17: 15: 372:Erl, Thomas 68:Application 58:XML schemas 351:2010-02-18 326:2010-02-18 190:2010-03-09 165:2010-03-09 140:2010-03-07 116:References 435:Category 374:(2008). 345:Archived 320:Archived 290:Archived 270:Archived 241:Archived 184:Archived 159:Archived 134:Archived 22:software 42:agility 36:Purpose 382:  220:  20:is a 380:ISBN 218:ISBN 74:WSDL 40:The 16:The 210:doi 437:: 343:. 318:. 216:. 182:. 157:. 132:. 388:. 354:. 329:. 226:. 212:: 193:. 168:. 143:.

Index

software
service-orientation
design paradigm
agility
service-oriented architecture (SOA)
XML schemas
web services
WSDL
"Design Principle"
Archived
"Service Contracts"
Archived
"Service Inventory"
Archived
doi
10.1145/1693042.1693045
ISBN
978-1-60558-663-2
Evolution of principles of Service Orientation: Service Contract, part 2
Archived
Wayback Machine
Guidelines for Using Web Service Contract Technologies
Archived
Wayback Machine
A preliminary study on Service-oriented migration for a small-scale migration.
Archived
Wayback Machine
"Schema Centralization Pattern"
Archived
"Decoupled Contract Pattern"

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.