21:
49:
271:
Is there another source that claims Rush is an ubersexual? Additionally, the current statement is a paradigm of weasel word usage--"Some consider Rush
Limbaugh an ubersexual."
156:
I'm not entirely sure I follow why someone, specifically the people you classify as ubersexual, are. The artical doesn't clarify exactly what an ubersexual is.
168:
Yeah, it should be merged there's no reason for seperate articles for such similar topics, particularly when this one was such a small blip on the radar.
263:
207:
31:
169:
220:
249:
110:
150:
133:
262:
Is there a source for that or did someone just make it up? Rush
Limbaugh seems to be considered an ubersexual and he isn't a lib.
142:
The ubersexual is a legitimate term, however, I would opt for merging it with the metrosexual article. For more info, please read
266:
121:
275:
210:
206:
Clearly a joke, as the "advertiser" was born in 1860 and ... Vin Deisel, Chuck Norris and Mr. T? Internet fads anyone?
196:
187:
257:
160:
126:
242:
201:
100:
172:
27:
178:
96:
Is this a
Knowledge article or undergraduate original research? Should this be listed at AfD? --
74:
81:
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
216:
Those last were added just today. I think the ad firm has survided its founder's demise. -
20:
8:
157:
82:
237:
217:
192:
Or David Potts of Intel? He must be that guy who put himself on this silly list.
130:
107:
91:
61:
143:
147:
272:
193:
231:
184:
97:
69:
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
118:
73:] The anchor (#Übersexual) is no longer available because it was
229:(I was waiting for the Chuck Norris reference. *sigh*)
165:Who the @#$ #@ makes up these terms?
43:
30:on December 11, 2005. The result of
15:
13:
106:Seconded. Please put it on AfD. --
14:
286:
47:
19:
127:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
26:This article was nominated for
1:
221:19:56, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
211:14:07, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
161:06:01, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
151:21:48, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
146:I wrote about the two words.
122:14:16, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
101:11:48, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
276:04:02, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
197:04:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
134:15:11, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
111:15:11, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
7:
267:04:00, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
188:19:48, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
183:Who is Charlie McGrath? --
10:
291:
250:20:49, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
173:22:56, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
258:Ubersexuals = liberals?
202:Deleted last paragraph
89:
88:
75:deleted by a user
64:in most browsers.
42:
41:
282:
245:
240:
234:
83:Reporting errors
51:
50:
44:
23:
16:
290:
289:
285:
284:
283:
281:
280:
279:
260:
247:
243:
238:
232:
204:
181:
179:Charlie McGrath
117:What's AfD? --
94:
85:
67:
66:
65:
48:
12:
11:
5:
288:
259:
256:
255:
254:
253:
252:
236:
224:
223:
203:
200:
180:
177:
154:
153:
139:
138:
137:
136:
114:
113:
93:
90:
87:
86:
80:
79:
78:
62:case-sensitive
56:
55:
54:
52:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
287:
278:
277:
274:
269:
268:
265:
251:
248:
246:
241:
235:
228:
227:
226:
225:
222:
219:
215:
214:
213:
212:
209:
199:
198:
195:
190:
189:
186:
176:
174:
171:
166:
163:
162:
159:
152:
149:
145:
141:
140:
135:
132:
128:
125:
124:
123:
120:
116:
115:
112:
109:
105:
104:
103:
102:
99:
84:
76:
72:
71:
70:
63:
59:
53:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
270:
264:24.130.6.237
261:
230:
205:
191:
182:
167:
164:
155:
144:this article
95:
68:
60:Anchors are
57:
35:
218:Will Beback
131:Ghirlandajo
108:Ghirlandajo
208:LupusCanis
158:the iceman
148:Mcmvanbree
273:Bad ideas
194:Bad ideas
233:mxdxcxnx
185:Mikeblas
92:Untitled
28:deletion
77:before.
98:Wetman
170:Velps
119:H005
58:Tip:
36:keep
34:was
175:.
129:--
244:C
239:T
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
