Knowledge

Talk:Brahmic scripts

Source 📝

31: 1936:
digraph itself (Thai อย) survives in 4 Thai words and is very much a new letter. The same pattern applies to Tai Tham (a.k.a. Lanna) which is currently not in the table, and probably to Tai Viet. Syllable initially, the earliest loans into Thai and Lao used the first member of the pair. Modern Pali/Sanskrit writing uses the second member of the first three in the Thai script. I have accordingly updated the table to use the former letter. I have also removed the equation of LAO LETTER NYO with Indic <ñ: -->
500: 1518:---There is no dispute. There are plenty of authentic citations in favour of "Telugu-Kannada". I do agree that there are a couple of citations in favour of "Old Kannada". The most reasonable thing to do is to have both with respective citations. Since there is widespread use of "Telugu-Kannada" by linguists, it should be given prominence while mentioning "Old Kannada" too. That is what I am doing? In the name of 'consensus' you are trying to stifle my voice. OK. I shall write this in 95: 198: 177: 702: 758: 208: 737: 664: 768: 643: 553: 532: 563: 422: 395: 1160: 85: 64: 22: 432: 1130:
transcription is not, and can hardly be, detailed enough to warrant the specific IPA notation used, from this perspective is not the transliteration enough? It is after all a graphological comparison of the script. I personally believe the phonetic guides are better suited in the respective scripts’ articles and in some language evolution article.
2612:
This topic maybe is related to the 'Tables getting too big' topic. Individual letters/symbols are too small for me to be able to recognize them. I tried ctrl + mousewheel but no sideways scrollbar appears, so that letters/symbols to the right are simply getting pushed out of view. Can any body help?
1935:
split into Thai DO CHADA v. TO PATAK, DO DEK v. TO TAO, BO BAI MAI v. PO PLA and, in Lao, LETTER NYO v. LETTER YO. The former preserved the shape and is the usual syllable-final symbol, whereas the latter best represents the Indic spelling. LAO LETTER YO actually replaced a digraph in the area; the
1278:
Buddhism and Brahmi script spread from Bihar via Orissa to coastal Andhra first. Sala kingdom ruling from Bhattiprolu was the earliest dynasty in South India which existed even before Mauryans. The Brahmi progenitor of Telugu-Kannada script with a few Telugu words was found on the Bhattiprolu stupa.
1090:
When I inserted the table I put 'Pronunciation is taken from Sanskrit where possible, but other languages where necessary,' which is needed because of letters like Tamil ழ whose sounds are not present in Sanskrit. If we want to be precise, we could specify which are from Sanskrit and which for other
1736:
I'm not the one who created those big tables, but I'm the one who added that quick note, which needs some edits. The text above the table says, "Pronunciation is taken from Sanskrit", meaning IPA is correct only for Sanskrit. For another language (such as Lao), the IPA part is correct only when the
1222:
IMO that is not a useful generalization. The default configurations of all current operating systems lack support of some of these scripts. I am running MacOS 10.4.11 and I have researched and downloaded all the free Unicode fonts necessary to view every character in this article. It was some work,
2477:
Ah, but the consonant order does align. A relevant subsequence from the Brahmic scripts is 'k', 'c', 't', 'n', 'p', 'm', 'y', 'r', 'v'. Now, Japanese /h/ is a historically weakened form of /p/, as is hinted at in the voicing marks. Palatal consonants have a tendency to simplify to 's', though I
1761:
are pronounced identically. For example, we can see Devanagari य and Oriya ଯ are in the same column, meaning that they were originally the same letter ("graphemeically corresponding" <-- this was not a good expression), while Devanagari य and Oriya ଯ are phonetically not identical (i.e. they
1499:
regarding the same issue and that has to be resolved first. Once the consensus is reached by all, we'll work together and change all articles according to consensus. Till then, don't push your POV in articles relating the issue. Now, please revert your edits back. By the way, why don't you work on
1113:
The IPA is still here. As others above have indicated, it is grossly misleading to have this column, since pronunciations are different between different languages. Even within one script, such as Devanagari, the pronunciation of ऋ differs between Classical Sanskrit and Modern Hindi. Seems like
1364:
There is no dispute regarding "Telugu-Kannada script". There is abundant evidence (at least 6 authentic references) now. In fact, the use of "Old Kannada" must be discontinued as it was fabricated by biased people, which crept into webpages such as those run by Adluri and Lawrence. Gnanapiti must
1826:
Hi, I can view nearly all the scripts in this article properly, except for those listed above. I can also correctly view the characters on the separate Knowledge pages for the Balinese and Javanese scripts. For consistency's sake, could the fonts used on this page for Balinese, Javanese etc be
1806:
I found two images which were not illustrative of the sections that they were in. Also, I added an image in Brahmi as there were none. Since this is a page about Brahmi and a number of its descendants (used cumulatively by more than a billion people), please discuss the utility of images before
1867:
Font for Indonesian scripts (Javanese, Balinese, Sundanese, and Buginese) does not render the vowel e correctly. It should be placed before the consonant, but it is always rendered after the consonant, unless the input is graphical rather than logical. I use logical input, which I think is the
1906:
IMO, there's enough in this section to warrant creating an article for "List of Brahmic Scripts." That way we could shorten this article, and the new one could host a number of easy-to-read tables with more information (for example: scripts by number of users, by geography, by time period).
2261:
that the article should not be deleted. It's about Brahmi script and its descendants so the title seems appropriate. That said, I wouldn't oppose renaming it to Indic scripts so long as "Brahmic scripts" redirected to it and the content, Brahmi script and its descendants, was made clear.
1129:
I’ve transposed/turned/rotated two of the tables (vowels left), so that they take less horisontal space and that new scripts are easier to add. From a pure aesthetical point of view I would like to remove the IPA as I it is quite similar to the transliteration. Further, as noted above, the
1476:
As explained above, I have retained the original version. New references that came to light in favour of Telugu-Kannada script are readded without disturbing the main body. Why do you persist in reverting my edits? Is there any reason? Why do you do this without discussion? Is wiki your
1737:
pronunciation of the letter in question happens to be the same with the pronunciation of the corresponding letter in Sanskrit. If the table was about phonetics, this would be terrible, because almost everything is wrong. But the table is about letters... It just says that the letter L
1716:
in relation to the historical assimilation process of Pali in Lao). For that matter the letter "ດ" mysteriously disappears from the chart... Some glyphs are supposed to be unrepresented but all the same. I guess the key is found in this sentence, which I can't manage to decipher:
2110: 1712:
article. I did not take the initiative to correct this present article given my poor IPA skills and my lack of knowledge of historical pronounciation of Lao. One thing is sure: ທ is "th"-ey in sound, and definitely not "d"-sounding and probably never was (see:
1279:
The display boards in National Museum (New Delhi) clearly mention Bhattiprolu script first and evolution of Telugu-Kannada script from it. Historians know the script as Telugu-Kannada script but use of Kannada words to denote this script smacks of bias.
1333:
have these vowels; the question is why vowel sounds are transliterated with Latin consonants. They are simply the closest sounds available in the alphabet. They are all retroflex, as indicated by the dot under the letter in transliteration. See
1004:
When the relation between the Aramaic and Indic scripts is still shrouded in controversy and debate, why are Indic scripts mentioned under the Aramaic script in the History of Scripts? Is that not presenting a biased point of view?
2290:
I don't have the impression that in the context of South Asia "Indic" is used to refer narrowly to the Indo-Aryan languages. From what I've seen, it's just a general term to refer broadly to anything related to South Asia. –
2173:
Coming to the topic, the term "Brahmic scripts" simply refers to the scripts derived from Brahmi script. The topic of the article is certainly not a hoax, and the term "Brahmic" is not a hoax either. It is used in multiple
1863:
Added two other derivation of Brahmi used In Indonesia. There are several others actually, Batak, Rejang, and Rencong. But reliable information about Sundanese and Buginese are somewhat more abundant, so I only add them.
942:
There are lots of different scripts used in India. We should have an overview article for them. I don't see why this couldn't become one. It looks a half-way decent attempt at a start. I see no reason to delete it. --
2113: 1559:
Abugidas vs. Syllabic alphabets vs. Alphasyllabaries—that's not important. Whichever is fine (but not that only one of them is THE correct term). More importantly, I'd like to explain the concept a bit. Like...
1263:
First brahmi inscription of south india is in Brahmagiri edict where kannada words are found. Brahmagiri edicts are by Ashoka. I want to edict the earliest known Brahmi inscription to this one. Any objections
2337:
As I read this today, "Canadian Aboriginal syllabics, 19th century" is listed as an offshoot of Nagari Gupta script on the list of Brahmic scripts. Isn't that an error? --Sukkoth 07:52, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
1842:
I had same problem, but know I can view them properly with added syntax as well as "Tuladha Jejeg" font for Javanese, and "Aksara Bali" for Balinese. I don't know if it'll work in other computers as well.
1159:
We at Marathi Language wikipedia do not have enough expertise to update IPA related info in our article, specialy we have been unable to import/update IPA templates and do not know how to use IPA symbols.
1821: 1782:
This is an incorrect reading, This was found in Sri Lanka (not South India) and it's not Tamil. This was purposely read as Tamil by some historians (who are trying to prove Sri Lanka has Tamil Origin).
1901: 1777: 2276:
I think the reason "Indic" might be disprefered is that many of the scripts are Dravidian, not Indic. Moving this article might open another can of worms, and this time not a crackpot one either. —
1388:
and based on the consensus we'll change all articles. And no, don't even try to scare me with your hoax threatenings. Because I care a squat about your threatenings. I'm reverting your edits back.
1719:
Some pronunciations may be inaccurate or different from the ones listed, partly because the graphemically corresponding glyphs listed in the same column are not necessarily phonetically identical.
2691: 879:. Please note that the two are very different. The Indus script was last used 3500 years ago and it hasn't been deciphered; Indic scripts are a family of scripts used by a billion Indians today. 1297:---Bhattiprolu stupa and surrounding structures existed since pre-Mauryan times (4th century). The stupa was constructed before Asokan period. A small kingdom with the capital at Pratipalapura ( 2010: 1887:
I'm no native user of these scripts, but it seems Assamese and Bengali script are very much alike. There are some letters that are different, but the rest is same. Should it be merged?
1508:
reply there, that issue is not going to move forward. Dispute can't be resolved just by one side involved in it. And till the dispute is not resolved, don't make changes in articles.
2681: 2028: 2024: 1762:
represent different sounds). Then again, the current explanation of the table may not be very good, and like you suggested there may be several problems in the table itself too.—
1655:
does not mean that a consonant has an inherent vowel, though that is the case in most abugidas; the basic meaning is that vowels are obligatory but not accorded primary position.
846:
Why does the history of the alphabet (box) start with the Middle Bronze Age 19th c. BCE? Especially as it is well known that the Indus Valley (Harappan) script is much older.
2696: 1836: 347: 2751: 2628:
Everybody please pardon me having bothered y'all. I was simply being too stupid to handle Knowledge and my keyboard. (I really miss the 'ashamed' Emoji, right now...)
2499:
Hmm, hmm, very interesting, yes. I think I see it. I'd be interested in getting an actual quote from the indicated reference, since I don't have access to it myself.
1832: 1651:
Something along those lines would be good. I think the start of the intro should be history and extent of use, with a basic functional description coming after. Also,
2593:
The tables for consonants, vowels and numerals are getting too big to be edited comfortably. I suggest that they be moved into templates (like the Unicode charts).
1919: 1796: 159: 2116: 1273: 2648:
Are all of those letters for 'maa' supposed to have the chandrabindu on top? I can't speak for the other scripts, but no such symbol exists in the Tamil script.
2653: 2206:
IMO, the proposed deletion of this article is completely unwarranted, but I'll let other users address it, since you feel 'threatened' by me. Pinging the top
1165:
We seek and request for help in updating above mentioned article and would like to know relevant resources and refferences in respect of Devanagari and IPA .
2345: 1339: 1224: 336: 264: 1441:
why telugu,kannada and many other scripts mentioned as 16th century when we know it much older then that?even tamil scriptures mentioned as 8th century
857: 1868:
Unicode standard. For Javanese, correct rendering can be achieved by using Tuladha Jejeg font and using Mozilla browser. Anyone know about the others?
824: 2736: 2649: 1976: 1249:
Tamil letter ஃ is missing in the table. also ஜ, ஸ, ஷ, ஹ are not tamil letters but wrongly been included in the table. These things have to be fixed--
1012: 898:
Accept or not looking at the structure, each alphabets are unique and is a mother of all language with out any political reservation or superiority
361: 2629: 2614: 1309: 1283: 719: 2746: 2706: 1292: 514: 149: 1077:
I agree with Sukh here. Unless we specify that these IPA values are accurate for Sanskrit only, they should not be included. It's misleading. --
625: 490: 1428:---Retained the old version which talks of 'Old Kannada' and readded my input with citations, which was being persistenly deleted/reverted by 1353: 1123: 2756: 1531: 1258: 999: 1852: 2716: 2285: 1703: 1095: 1024: 254: 2252: 2138: 1238: 125: 2318: 2300: 2271: 2144:
First of all, let's do away with this victm complex ("threatened"). You were simply asked not to indulge in original research such as:
2801: 2676: 2607: 2557: 2487: 2081: 1730: 1512: 1392: 1268: 814: 2154: 2076: 1695: 1669: 1549: 1056:
The list of IPA characters for Indic script letters is not suitable because pronunciation of consonants in Indic languages varies.
2741: 2721: 2701: 2574:
noting a century as CE. Accordingly, as per MoS, use of AD/BC is not applicable because it does not preserve the existing style. --
1422: 322: 2466:
Can anyone clarify what the sources are claiming with regard to Brahmic script collation influencing Japanese kana collation? ‑‑
1081: 2786: 2686: 709: 2622: 1771: 1174: 2806: 2771: 2731: 1161:
Please click here-this link- to provide help to update "IPA transliteration for Indic Languages" article for Marathi wikipedia
1153: 615: 480: 1946: 1144: 230: 121: 108: 69: 1636:
With this kind of intro, the following big tables would be much more understandable for ordinary readers. Any suggestions? —
1537: 35: 2791: 2711: 2471: 2353: 1828: 1349: 1234: 509: 405: 2776: 2761: 1323: 790: 590: 2796: 2360: 1784: 883:
OMG! why was this EVER up for deletion??? How could you begin to confuse the two - like confusing Linear A with Greek!
289: 1924: 1877: 1495:
number of editors. I can't repeat the same thing again, again, again again and again. There is a dispute going on in
1457: 680: 299: 294: 2657: 1968: 284: 2781: 2526: 1020: 221: 182: 2637: 1977:
https://web.archive.org/web/20051224070409/http://www.bhashaindia.com:80/developers/MSTech/indicsupport/index.aspx
1253: 912:
Is it possible to make it a redirect? Once the language is deciphered (if possible), this article will be useful.
2766: 2726: 2671: 2164: 2159: 2119: 1951: 2027:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1526: 1481: 1461: 1190: 2602: 1896: 1645: 781: 742: 1412:
which you should adhere to regardless of the situation. You are an experienced editor and should know better.
2106: 1816: 1436: 1402: 1378: 1369: 1215: 876: 861: 2152: 2643: 2571: 2511: 2071: 1314: 872: 671: 648: 315: 44: 2549: 2545: 2541: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2522: 2518: 2514: 1536:
Currently, the table says which mean Apical, but I think they should be with the dental diacritics (See
865: 1211: 1043: 887: 585: 576: 537: 455: 445: 400: 2046:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2349: 1980: 1967:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1858: 1119: 2122: 1107: 2588: 2183: 308: 2583: 2179: 1686:
part, than saying "The Brahmic family is abugidas, which in general means...". I'll think about it.—
2098: 1345: 1230: 1708:
The comparison chart is clearly problematic as far as Lao is concerned, and inconsistent with the
1139: 1068: 789:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
679:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
229:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2062: 1827:
changed to be the same as those used on the main pages describing those scripts? With thanks, AJ
1678:
Thanks for your suggestions, kwami. You're right. It's much better to say "The Brahmic family is
1554: 2031:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
950:
Should at the least be a stub and links to the other relevant articles (and there are a few) --
2109:
to take my concerns to the article's talk page. These are the references used in this article:
2047: 1584:), which means, with a few exceptions, every character represents either a vowel (for example, 2483: 2314: 2281: 2231: 2210:
contributors to this page by edits / added bytes (accroding to Revision history statistics):
2175: 2134: 2034: 1665: 1468: 1453: 1384:
Don't start another edit war now. Your words are not final. Let everybody reach consensus on
1335: 1244: 1223:
but well worth it to me. Leave a note at my Talk page if you’d like my font recommendations.
1179: 1115: 968:
and redirected here, I expect the above is all rather irrelevant, but there it is anyway. --
113: 50: 2503: 2341: 2267: 2054: 2001: 1942: 1910:
If we don't end up doing this, I believe "List of Brahmic Scripts" needs to redirect here.
1882: 1801: 1445: 1199: 1039:
of the ancient world. Although its not proven either so perhaps its best to keep it broad.
1016: 1008: 849: 8: 2633: 2618: 969: 944: 21: 2444:. The vowel order aligns with the Brahmic scripts, but the consonantal order does not. 2598: 2507: 2249: 2013:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1892: 1873: 1848: 1569: 1501: 1496: 1385: 1359: 116:
interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to
2548:, which otherwise in the Brahmic ordering would come at the end, whereas the Japanese 2125: 2053:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1053:
Each Alphabets are so unique, Sanskrit, Devnagri language is mother of all language
992:
22:21, 31 Jul 2004 (UTC) This is very much true of the majority of Brahmic scripts. --
2579: 2372: 2296: 1915: 1792: 1726: 1419: 906: 213: 2494: 2479: 2463:. As pangrams, their ordering was not related to the ordering of Brahmic scripts. 2310: 2277: 2238: 2227: 2215: 2195: 2130: 2127:, not a single one contains the term "Brahmic". Can someone explain what going on? 1812: 1661: 1616:). A syllable with a non-inherent vowel is represented using a diacritic, known as 1449: 1092: 1030: 841: 343: 2565: 2384:
In simplified terms, the canonical order of Japanese kana in the so-called 五十音順 (
2305:
I figured that was a reason for coining the term "Brahmic". Could also be to dab
2263: 2219: 2191:
The more popular term is "Indic scripts", and I've no problem if the article and
1964: 1960: 1938: 1767: 1691: 1641: 1545: 1540:). I'd like to change them as such, if is just a typo for . Would that be ok? — 1409: 1320: 1250: 1207: 1196:
Please modify the UTF-8 used here. This page is utterly un viewable on a MAC!!!
1078: 984:'u' is written below, short 'i' is written to the left if distinct from long 'i'. 961: 951: 902: 773: 2332: 2201:
are moved to new titles. That'd actually go against your "Indian origin" tirade.
988:
looks dubious to me. I assume it doesn't fit all scripts of the brahmic family.
2544:. I suspect you're right that the Brahmic phonetic value was reinterpreted as 2211: 2091: 1597: 1509: 1429: 1389: 1135: 1065: 993: 965: 924: 326: 117: 100: 2158:
Punjabi belongs to "Scytho-Punjabi" branch of the Indo-Iranian language family
2019:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1374:---If Gnanapiti continues to revert my edits I shall seek a block against him. 2665: 2594: 2258: 2245: 2102: 2083: 1888: 1869: 1844: 1523: 1519: 1505: 1478: 1433: 1399: 1375: 1366: 1306: 1280: 1187: 1180: 1171: 1104: 499: 2575: 2292: 2087: 1911: 1788: 1722: 1413: 989: 853: 568: 437: 94: 1714: 2553: 2467: 2223: 2020: 1808: 1302: 1298: 1289: 1265: 1048: 1040: 936: 884: 371: 1753:
were derived from the same letter of the Brahmi script. It doesn't say L
1329:
The question is not meaningful unless you turn it around: These scripts
120:
on Knowledge. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by
1763: 1709: 1687: 1637: 1541: 1288:
what is the age of bottiporulu inscriptions can you site any sources.
1203: 920: 913: 332: 226: 2163:"users of Indian origin deceiving the public" by hiding these 'facts' 2151:
Gurmukhi is a "Sikh-Scythic" or "Scythian" script, not Brahmic script
2368: 2309:, which was also an Indic script used for Sanskrit, prakrits, etc. — 2306: 1568:
is a large group of writing systems descended from or related to the
1131: 1057: 197: 176: 1981:
http://www.bhashaindia.com/Developers/MSTech/indicsupport/index.aspx
1822:
Balinese, Javanese, Philippines & other insular SE Asian scripts
893: 584:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the 453:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the 786: 757: 736: 701: 354: 2540:
glides, but that is a later development from Old Japanese phoneme
1778:
Tamil-Brahmi writing found on pottery in South India and Sri Lanka
2460: 1573: 928: 663: 642: 1319:
Why are there two "r"s and two "l"s that can be used as vowels?
975: 552: 531: 421: 394: 2692:
Knowledge level-3 vital articles in Society and social sciences
932: 676: 581: 450: 2521:, but that is a later development from Old Japanese phoneme 1986:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
84: 63: 2376: 2552:
kana are ordered where the Brahmic 'c' letters occur. ‑‑
2478:
don't know Japanese well enough to point to an example. --
1971:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1660:
And of course your IPA corrections above are appropriate.
1152:
We apreciate your valuable contribution in article named
1902:"List of Brahmic Scripts"--should it be its own article? 2682:
Knowledge vital articles in Society and social sciences
2447:
There are other Japanese ordering systems, notably 天地 (
1365:
refrain from reverting my edit supported by citations.
1035:
I thought it was thought to be Aramaic, as it was the
2697:
C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
923:, but that's not the only Indic script; there's also 2510:
article, the 'c' is the weak point. Japanese has a
785:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 763: 675:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 558: 427: 225:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 203: 90: 2023:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 370:Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to 2752:C-Class Indian history articles of Mid-importance 2663: 1274:First Brahmi inscription is on Bhattiprolu stupa 580:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of 449:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of 2613:I'm afraid I'd mess up the whole table trying. 2097:I have been advised or (maybe threatened) by a 2009:This message was posted before February 2018. 2570:The first use of AD/CE/BC/BCE appears to be 1959:I have just modified one external link on 1538:International_Phonetic_Alphabet#Diacritics 875:probably because it was confused with the 2737:C-Class India articles of Mid-importance 2408:, then the same five vowels preceded by 323:History of Bangladesh after independence 1398:---This reply reveals your true nature. 106:This article falls within the scope of 19: 2747:Mid-importance Indian history articles 2707:Top-importance Writing system articles 2664: 2608:No Scrollbar when Magnifying Tables... 1154:Knowledge:Indic transliteration scheme 2107:User talk:Peeta Singh#Gurmukhi script 1998:to let others know (documentation at 134:Knowledge:WikiProject Writing systems 2388:, or "fifty-sound order") is vowels 1532:IPA diacritics for त etc. (t̺ vs t̪) 1301:) was the earliest known kingdom in 1259:First Brahmi inscription south India 1000:Relation of Aramaic to Indic scripts 779:This article is within the scope of 669:This article is within the scope of 574:This article is within the scope of 443:This article is within the scope of 219:This article is within the scope of 137:Template:WikiProject Writing systems 15: 2757:WikiProject Indian history articles 2367:"They were also the source of the 1704:Pb in the comparison chart with Lao 49:It is of interest to the following 13: 2717:Mid-importance Bangladesh articles 1432:. I hope he will be satisfied now. 498: 346:back to FA as it was demoted (see 335:back to FA as it was demoted (see 276:WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list: 14: 2818: 1963:. Please take a moment to review 1612:, assuming the inherent vowel is 2802:Mid-importance Pakistan articles 2677:Knowledge level-3 vital articles 2527:voiceless postalveolar affricate 1785:External link about this reading 1487:Issue has been explained to you 766: 756: 735: 700: 662: 641: 561: 551: 530: 430: 420: 393: 239:Knowledge:WikiProject Bangladesh 206: 196: 175: 93: 83: 62: 29: 20: 2742:C-Class Indian history articles 2722:WikiProject Bangladesh articles 2702:C-Class Writing system articles 1408:Gnanapiti, may I remind you of 819:This article has been rated as 714:This article has been rated as 620:This article has been rated as 485:This article has been rated as 259:This article has been rated as 242:Template:WikiProject Bangladesh 154:This article has been rated as 2787:Mid-importance Bhutan articles 2687:C-Class level-3 vital articles 2603:06:16, 25 September 2023 (UTC) 2459:), all of which were based on 1797:13:55, 30 September 2011 (UTC) 1550:09:57, 17 September 2009 (UTC) 1354:13:58, 10 September 2007 (UTC) 1175:16:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1103:Yeah, I've noticed this also! 799:Knowledge:WikiProject Pakistan 1: 2807:WikiProject Pakistan articles 2772:Mid-importance Nepal articles 2732:Mid-importance India articles 2319:23:28, 22 November 2016 (UTC) 2301:21:19, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 2286:21:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC) 2272:23:10, 15 November 2016 (UTC) 2253:15:44, 15 November 2016 (UTC) 2139:06:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC) 1239:03:48, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 1216:17:19, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 1145:Seeking help and contribution 866:10:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 802:Template:WikiProject Pakistan 793:and see a list of open tasks. 683:and see a list of open tasks. 507:This article is supported by 233:and see a list of open tasks. 2558:23:10, 26 October 2021 (UTC) 2512:Voiceless alveolar affricate 2488:13:59, 25 October 2021 (UTC) 2077:06:43, 7 November 2016 (UTC) 1947:03:29, 12 January 2016 (UTC) 1837:00:59, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 1817:06:20, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 1772:13:04, 24 October 2009 (UTC) 1731:15:14, 23 October 2009 (UTC) 1462:13:37, 29 October 2009 (UTC) 1191:13:37, 2 December 2006 (UTC) 1108:14:08, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 873:Knowledge:Votes_for_deletion 689:Knowledge:WikiProject Bhutan 510:the Indian history workgroup 316:Climate change in Bangladesh 7: 2792:WikiProject Bhutan articles 2712:C-Class Bangladesh articles 2658:05:33, 27 August 2024 (UTC) 2472:23:15, 28 August 2019 (UTC) 2257:I'm in full agreement with 2226:. Also pinging the creator 1920:02:53, 8 October 2014 (UTC) 1696:08:11, 6 October 2009 (UTC) 1670:11:03, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 1646:10:54, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 1140:06:28, 19 August 2009 (UTC) 1124:18:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC) 1114:something should be done? 1044:13:50, 2 October 2005 (UTC) 919:Could possibly redirect to 888:13:50, 2 October 2005 (UTC) 692:Template:WikiProject Bhutan 600:Knowledge:WikiProject Nepal 465:Knowledge:WikiProject India 109:WikiProject Writing systems 10: 2823: 2777:WikiProject Nepal articles 2762:WikiProject India articles 2506:table and referencing the 2504:Brahmic_scripts#Consonants 2361:Collation of Japanese kana 2040:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1956:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1807:inserting them. Thanks. -- 1682:abugidas", explaining the 1254:11:20, 17 April 2007 (UTC) 1025:09:14, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 825:project's importance scale 720:project's importance scale 626:project's importance scale 603:Template:WikiProject Nepal 491:project's importance scale 468:Template:WikiProject India 367:Make a MRT line 3 article. 265:project's importance scale 160:project's importance scale 2797:C-Class Pakistan articles 2644:First picture on the page 2584:02:15, 28 July 2022 (UTC) 1925:Thai-Lao Consonant Splits 1596:) or a consonant with an 1310:12:17, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 1061: 996:05:24, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) 972:01:13, 22 Aug 2003 (UTC) 964:has now been merged with 909:19:38, 14 Aug 2003 (UTC) 818: 751: 713: 657: 619: 588:and add your name to the 546: 506: 484: 415: 309:Bangladesh Liberation War 271: 258: 191: 153: 78: 57: 2365:The article states that 2099:Knowledge:Administrators 1897:08:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC) 1878:08:15, 9 June 2013 (UTC) 1853:08:01, 9 June 2013 (UTC) 1527:08:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1513:07:44, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1482:07:37, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1437:07:19, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1423:07:17, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1403:11:22, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 1393:19:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 1379:18:57, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 1370:07:40, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 1324:10:29, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 1293:13:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC) 1284:06:27, 20 May 2007 (UTC) 1269:12:28, 16 May 2007 (UTC) 1096:16:16, 2 July 2006 (UTC) 1082:20:42, 1 July 2006 (UTC) 1069:20:06, 1 July 2006 (UTC) 954:02:10, 2003 Aug 20 (UTC) 947:12:53, 16 Aug 2003 (UTC) 939:02:20, 15 Aug 2003 (UTC) 916:00:41, 15 Aug 2003 (UTC) 871:This page was listed in 318:, it needs a lot of work 124:and/or leave a query at 2782:C-Class Bhutan articles 2638:11:58, 3 May 2024 (UTC) 2623:11:47, 3 May 2024 (UTC) 2525:. Japanese also has a 1952:External links modified 1749:in the writing system L 1741:in the writing system S 1500:resolving the issue in 1186:redirect to this page? 140:Writing system articles 126:the project’s talk page 2767:C-Class Nepal articles 2727:C-Class India articles 2672:C-Class vital articles 2589:Tables getting too big 1634: 1156:on english WIkipedia. 503: 222:WikiProject Bangladesh 1562: 1336:Approximant_consonant 502: 36:level-3 vital article 2021:regular verification 1315:Vowels or consonants 980:This bullet point: 782:WikiProject Pakistan 2333:Unclear Information 2011:After February 2018 1990:parameter below to 1624:= consonant letter 1168:Thanks and Regards 360:Take a look at the 307:Add more images to 245:Bangladesh articles 2508:Palatal consonants 2176:scholarly articles 2065:InternetArchiveBot 2016:InternetArchiveBot 1859:Indonesian scripts 1578:syllabic alphabets 1502:Talk:Telugu script 1497:Talk:Telugu script 1386:Talk:Telugu script 1149:Dear Wikipedians, 672:WikiProject Bhutan 504: 362:requested articles 45:content assessment 2357: 2344:comment added by 2234:, the creator of 2041: 1465: 1448:comment added by 1218: 1202:comment added by 1027: 1011:comment added by 868: 852:comment added by 839: 838: 835: 834: 831: 830: 805:Pakistan articles 730: 729: 726: 725: 636: 635: 632: 631: 577:WikiProject Nepal 525: 524: 521: 520: 446:WikiProject India 388: 387: 384: 383: 380: 379: 357:and related pages 311:and related pages 214:Bangladesh portal 170: 169: 166: 165: 2814: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2498: 2369:dictionary order 2339: 2243: 2237: 2232:Grover cleveland 2200: 2194: 2178:, including for 2075: 2066: 2039: 2038: 2017: 2005: 1929:Indic <ṭ: --> 1787:written by me. — 1745:and the letter L 1582:alphasyllabaries 1504:? Unless you or 1464: 1442: 1342: 1227: 1197: 1116:Grover cleveland 1063: 1006: 847: 807: 806: 803: 800: 797: 776: 771: 770: 769: 760: 753: 752: 747: 739: 732: 731: 704: 697: 696: 693: 690: 687: 666: 659: 658: 653: 645: 638: 637: 608: 607: 604: 601: 598: 571: 566: 565: 564: 555: 548: 547: 542: 534: 527: 526: 473: 472: 469: 466: 463: 440: 435: 434: 433: 424: 417: 416: 411: 408: 397: 390: 389: 344:Bengali language 273: 272: 247: 246: 243: 240: 237: 216: 211: 210: 209: 200: 193: 192: 187: 179: 172: 171: 142: 141: 138: 135: 132: 122:the project page 103: 98: 97: 87: 80: 79: 74: 66: 59: 58: 42: 33: 32: 25: 24: 16: 2822: 2821: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2662: 2661: 2646: 2610: 2591: 2568: 2502:Looking at the 2492: 2363: 2335: 2241: 2235: 2198: 2192: 2095: 2069: 2064: 2032: 2025:have permission 2015: 1999: 1969:this simple FaQ 1961:Brahmic scripts 1954: 1927: 1904: 1885: 1861: 1824: 1804: 1780: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1706: 1576:(also known as 1557: 1555:About the intro 1534: 1522:talk page too. 1471: 1443: 1362: 1340: 1317: 1276: 1261: 1247: 1225: 1184: 1147: 1051: 1033: 1002: 978: 962:Indic alphabets 905:- unnessesary. 903:Indic alphabets 896: 844: 804: 801: 798: 795: 794: 774:Pakistan portal 772: 767: 765: 745: 695:Bhutan articles 694: 691: 688: 685: 684: 651: 605: 602: 599: 596: 595: 567: 562: 560: 540: 470: 467: 464: 461: 460: 436: 431: 429: 409: 403: 304: 244: 241: 238: 235: 234: 212: 207: 205: 185: 139: 136: 133: 131:Writing systems 130: 129: 118:writing systems 99: 92: 72: 70:Writing systems 43:on Knowledge's 40: 30: 12: 11: 5: 2820: 2810: 2809: 2804: 2799: 2794: 2789: 2784: 2779: 2774: 2769: 2764: 2759: 2754: 2749: 2744: 2739: 2734: 2729: 2724: 2719: 2714: 2709: 2704: 2699: 2694: 2689: 2684: 2679: 2674: 2645: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2609: 2606: 2590: 2587: 2567: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2554:Eiríkr Útlendi 2532:, only before 2517:, only before 2500: 2468:Eiríkr Útlendi 2362: 2359: 2346:Sukkoth Qulmos 2334: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2203: 2202: 2188: 2187: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2161: 2156: 2146: 2145: 2094: 2080: 2059: 2058: 2051: 1984: 1983: 1975:Added archive 1953: 1950: 1934:and <y: --> 1926: 1923: 1903: 1900: 1884: 1881: 1860: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1829:202.93.215.105 1823: 1820: 1803: 1800: 1779: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1705: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1673: 1672: 1657: 1656: 1620:(for example, 1600:(for example, 1598:inherent vowel 1566:Brahmic family 1556: 1553: 1533: 1530: 1516: 1515: 1470: 1467: 1430:User:Gnanapiti 1426: 1425: 1396: 1395: 1361: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1316: 1313: 1275: 1272: 1260: 1257: 1246: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1195: 1183: 1178: 1146: 1143: 1127: 1126: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1085: 1084: 1073: 1050: 1047: 1032: 1029: 1001: 998: 986: 985: 977: 974: 966:Brahmic family 958: 957: 956: 955: 948: 940: 917: 895: 892: 891: 890: 843: 840: 837: 836: 833: 832: 829: 828: 821:Mid-importance 817: 811: 810: 808: 791:the discussion 778: 777: 761: 749: 748: 746:Mid‑importance 740: 728: 727: 724: 723: 716:Mid-importance 712: 706: 705: 698: 681:the discussion 667: 655: 654: 652:Mid‑importance 646: 634: 633: 630: 629: 622:Mid-importance 618: 612: 611: 609: 606:Nepal articles 573: 572: 556: 544: 543: 541:Mid‑importance 535: 523: 522: 519: 518: 515:Mid-importance 505: 495: 494: 487:Mid-importance 483: 477: 476: 474: 471:India articles 442: 441: 425: 413: 412: 410:Mid‑importance 398: 386: 385: 382: 381: 378: 377: 376: 375: 368: 365: 358: 351: 340: 329: 319: 312: 303: 302: 297: 292: 287: 281: 278: 277: 269: 268: 261:Mid-importance 257: 251: 250: 248: 231:the discussion 218: 217: 201: 189: 188: 186:Mid‑importance 180: 168: 167: 164: 163: 156:Top-importance 152: 146: 145: 143: 105: 104: 101:Writing portal 88: 76: 75: 73:Top‑importance 67: 55: 54: 48: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2819: 2808: 2805: 2803: 2800: 2798: 2795: 2793: 2790: 2788: 2785: 2783: 2780: 2778: 2775: 2773: 2770: 2768: 2765: 2763: 2760: 2758: 2755: 2753: 2750: 2748: 2745: 2743: 2740: 2738: 2735: 2733: 2730: 2728: 2725: 2723: 2720: 2718: 2715: 2713: 2710: 2708: 2705: 2703: 2700: 2698: 2695: 2693: 2690: 2688: 2685: 2683: 2680: 2678: 2675: 2673: 2670: 2669: 2667: 2660: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2639: 2635: 2631: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2620: 2616: 2605: 2604: 2600: 2596: 2586: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2559: 2555: 2528: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2496: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2485: 2481: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2469: 2464: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2445: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2427: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2387: 2382: 2381: 2378: 2375: 2374: 2370: 2358: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2343: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2298: 2294: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2260: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2251: 2247: 2240: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2204: 2197: 2190: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2172: 2171: 2165: 2162: 2160: 2157: 2155: 2153: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2126: 2123: 2120: 2117: 2114: 2111: 2108: 2104: 2100: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2079: 2078: 2073: 2068: 2067: 2056: 2052: 2049: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2036: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2012: 2007: 2003: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1957: 1949: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1932: 1922: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1908: 1899: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1880: 1879: 1875: 1871: 1865: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1819: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1799: 1798: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1715: 1711: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1633: 1631: 1628:+ vowel sign 1627: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1570:Brāhmī script 1567: 1561: 1552: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1529: 1528: 1525: 1521: 1520:Telugu script 1514: 1511: 1507: 1506:User:Altruism 1503: 1498: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1480: 1474: 1469:Be reasonable 1466: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1439: 1438: 1435: 1431: 1424: 1421: 1420: 1417: 1416: 1411: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1401: 1394: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1377: 1372: 1371: 1368: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1343: 1337: 1332: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1322: 1312: 1311: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1295: 1294: 1291: 1286: 1285: 1282: 1271: 1270: 1267: 1256: 1255: 1252: 1245:Tamil letters 1240: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1193: 1192: 1189: 1182: 1181:Indic scripts 1177: 1176: 1173: 1169: 1166: 1163: 1162: 1157: 1155: 1150: 1142: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1106: 1097: 1094: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1083: 1080: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1071: 1070: 1067: 1059: 1054: 1046: 1045: 1042: 1038: 1037:lingua franca 1028: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 997: 995: 991: 983: 982: 981: 973: 971: 967: 963: 953: 949: 946: 941: 938: 934: 930: 926: 922: 918: 915: 911: 910: 908: 904: 901: 900: 899: 894:Text from VfD 889: 886: 882: 881: 880: 878: 874: 869: 867: 863: 859: 855: 851: 826: 822: 816: 813: 812: 809: 792: 788: 784: 783: 775: 764: 762: 759: 755: 754: 750: 744: 741: 738: 734: 733: 721: 717: 711: 708: 707: 703: 699: 682: 678: 674: 673: 668: 665: 661: 660: 656: 650: 647: 644: 640: 639: 627: 623: 617: 614: 613: 610: 593: 592: 591:member's list 587: 583: 579: 578: 570: 559: 557: 554: 550: 549: 545: 539: 536: 533: 529: 528: 516: 513:(assessed as 512: 511: 501: 497: 496: 492: 488: 482: 479: 478: 475: 458: 457: 452: 448: 447: 439: 428: 426: 423: 419: 418: 414: 407: 402: 399: 396: 392: 391: 373: 369: 366: 363: 359: 356: 352: 349: 345: 341: 338: 334: 330: 328: 324: 320: 317: 313: 310: 306: 305: 301: 298: 296: 293: 291: 288: 286: 283: 282: 280: 279: 275: 274: 270: 266: 262: 256: 253: 252: 249: 232: 228: 224: 223: 215: 204: 202: 199: 195: 194: 190: 184: 181: 178: 174: 173: 161: 157: 151: 148: 147: 144: 127: 123: 119: 115: 111: 110: 102: 96: 91: 89: 86: 82: 81: 77: 71: 68: 65: 61: 60: 56: 52: 46: 38: 37: 27: 23: 18: 17: 2647: 2611: 2592: 2569: 2566:AD/CE dating 2465: 2456: 2455:), and いろは ( 2452: 2448: 2446: 2441: 2437: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2421: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2383: 2379: 2366: 2364: 2340:— Preceding 2336: 2207: 2129: 2096: 2063: 2060: 2035:source check 2014: 2008: 1995: 1991: 1987: 1985: 1958: 1955: 1933: 1930:, <t: --> 1928: 1909: 1905: 1886: 1883:Very similar 1866: 1862: 1825: 1805: 1802:About images 1781: 1718: 1707: 1683: 1680:this kind of 1679: 1652: 1635: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1565: 1563: 1558: 1535: 1517: 1492: 1488: 1475: 1473:Gnanapiti, 1472: 1440: 1427: 1418: 1414: 1397: 1373: 1363: 1330: 1318: 1296: 1287: 1277: 1262: 1248: 1194: 1185: 1170: 1167: 1164: 1158: 1151: 1148: 1128: 1102: 1072: 1055: 1052: 1036: 1034: 1003: 987: 979: 959: 907:Vancouverguy 897: 877:Indus script 870: 845: 820: 780: 715: 670: 621: 589: 586:project page 575: 569:Nepal portal 508: 486: 456:project page 454: 444: 438:India portal 260: 220: 155: 107: 51:WikiProjects 34: 2495:RichardW57m 2480:RichardW57m 2386:gojū-on jun 2228:PierreAbbat 2216:Kwamikagami 2131:Peeta Singh 2082:References 2002:Sourcecheck 1572:. They are 1477:playground? 1450:Sureshnaidu 1444:—Preceding 1303:south India 1299:Bhattiprolu 1251:Ravishankar 1198:—Preceding 1093:Moszczynski 1091:languages. 1007:—Preceding 976:Vowel signs 848:—Preceding 372:New Eskaton 325:, it needs 114:WikiProject 2666:Categories 2650:Yodudes101 2449:Ame Tsuchi 2264:DRMcCreedy 2220:Drmccreedy 2072:Report bug 1939:RichardW57 1710:Lao script 1618:vowel sign 1360:No dispute 1321:Le Anh-Huy 1290:meghamitra 1266:meghamitra 1079:SameerKhan 1013:Iyerakshay 921:Devanagari 348:discussion 337:discussion 333:Bangladesh 236:Bangladesh 227:Bangladesh 183:Bangladesh 2630:Korinthus 2615:Korinthus 2572:this edit 2307:Kharosthi 2212:Dbachmann 2184:Gurumukhi 2055:this tool 2048:this tool 1684:this kind 1510:Gnanapiti 1491:times by 1390:Gnanapiti 994:Kadooshka 970:Oliver P. 945:Oliver P. 321:Clean up 314:Clean up 39:is rated 2595:KLITE789 2461:pangrams 2451:), 大為爾 ( 2373:Japanese 2354:contribs 2342:unsigned 2259:utcursch 2246:utcursch 2180:Gurmukhi 2103:utcursch 2061:Cheers.— 1889:Alteaven 1870:Alteaven 1845:Alteaven 1574:abugidas 1524:Kumarrao 1479:Kumarrao 1458:contribs 1446:unsigned 1434:Kumarrao 1410:WP:CIVIL 1400:Kumarrao 1376:Kumarrao 1367:Kumarrao 1307:Kumarrao 1281:Kumarrao 1212:contribs 1200:unsigned 1188:Doldrums 1172:Mahitgar 1105:Tuncrypt 1031:Semitic? 1021:contribs 1009:unsigned 862:contribs 850:unsigned 842:Untitled 796:Pakistan 787:Pakistan 743:Pakistan 355:Bengalis 353:Improve 342:Improve 331:Improve 2293:Uanfala 2239:Brahmic 2196:Brahmic 2092:WP:HOAX 1988:checked 1965:my edit 1912:Elmsbye 1789:D dasun 1723:Rdavout 1653:abugida 990:Pjacobi 929:Kannada 854:Enduron 823:on the 718:on the 624:on the 489:on the 406:History 290:history 263:on the 158:on the 41:C-class 2453:Tawini 2440:, and 2230:; and 2224:Hintha 2222:, and 2208:active 2084:WP:RDD 1996:failed 1809:Eukesh 1041:Khirad 960:Since 937:Efghij 933:Telugu 885:Khirad 686:Bhutan 677:Bhutan 649:Bhutan 47:scale. 2530:/t͡ʃ/ 2515:/t͡s/ 2457:Iroha 2311:kwami 2278:kwami 2088:WP:RS 1764:Gyopi 1757:and L 1688:Gyopi 1662:kwami 1638:Gyopi 1542:Gyopi 1415:Gizza 1204:Odzer 925:Tamil 914:wshun 597:Nepal 582:Nepal 538:Nepal 462:India 451:India 401:India 300:purge 295:watch 28:This 2654:talk 2634:talk 2619:talk 2599:talk 2580:talk 2576:Pete 2550:/s-/ 2542:/ti/ 2538:/j-/ 2536:and 2523:/tu/ 2484:talk 2377:kana 2350:talk 2315:talk 2297:talk 2282:talk 2268:talk 2250:talk 2135:talk 1992:true 1943:talk 1937:. - 1916:talk 1893:talk 1874:talk 1849:talk 1833:talk 1813:talk 1793:talk 1768:talk 1727:talk 1692:talk 1666:talk 1642:talk 1564:The 1546:talk 1454:talk 1208:talk 1136:talk 1132:kess 1120:talk 1066:Talk 1058:Sukh 1017:talk 952:Jake 935:. - 927:and 858:talk 327:NPOV 285:edit 112:, a 2546:/s/ 2534:/i/ 2519:/u/ 2371:of 2105:at 2029:RfC 2006:). 1994:or 1979:to 1632:). 1580:or 1062:ਸੁਖ 1049:IPA 815:Mid 710:Mid 616:Mid 481:Mid 255:Mid 150:Top 2668:: 2656:) 2636:) 2621:) 2601:) 2582:) 2556:│ 2486:) 2470:│ 2436:, 2432:, 2428:, 2424:, 2420:, 2416:, 2412:, 2404:, 2400:, 2396:, 2392:, 2380:." 2356:) 2352:• 2317:) 2299:) 2284:) 2270:) 2248:| 2244:. 2242:}} 2236:{{ 2218:, 2214:, 2199:}} 2193:{{ 2182:/ 2137:) 2124:, 2121:, 2118:, 2115:, 2112:, 2101:, 2090:, 2086:, 2042:. 2037:}} 2033:{{ 2004:}} 2000:{{ 1945:) 1931:, 1918:) 1895:) 1876:) 1851:) 1835:) 1815:) 1795:) 1770:) 1729:) 1721:" 1694:) 1668:) 1644:) 1626:ka 1622:ki 1610:pa 1608:, 1606:ta 1604:, 1602:ka 1592:, 1588:, 1548:) 1460:) 1456:• 1352:) 1348:• 1341:MJ 1338:. 1331:do 1305:. 1237:) 1233:• 1226:MJ 1214:) 1210:• 1138:) 1122:) 1064:| 1060:| 1023:) 1019:• 864:) 860:• 517:). 404:: 2652:( 2632:( 2617:( 2597:( 2578:( 2497:: 2493:@ 2482:( 2442:w 2438:r 2434:y 2430:m 2426:h 2422:n 2418:t 2414:s 2410:k 2406:o 2402:e 2398:u 2394:i 2390:a 2348:( 2313:( 2295:( 2280:( 2266:( 2186:. 2166:. 2133:( 2074:) 2070:( 2057:. 2050:. 1941:( 1914:( 1891:( 1872:( 1847:( 1831:( 1811:( 1791:( 1766:( 1759:2 1755:1 1751:2 1747:2 1743:1 1739:1 1725:( 1717:" 1690:( 1664:( 1640:( 1630:i 1614:a 1594:u 1590:i 1586:a 1544:( 1493:n 1489:n 1452:( 1350:c 1346:t 1344:( 1235:c 1231:t 1229:( 1206:( 1134:( 1118:( 1015:( 931:- 856:( 827:. 722:. 628:. 594:. 493:. 459:. 374:. 364:. 350:) 339:) 267:. 162:. 128:. 53::

Index


level-3 vital article
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Writing systems
WikiProject icon
icon
Writing portal
WikiProject Writing systems
WikiProject
writing systems
the project page
the project’s talk page
Top
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Bangladesh
WikiProject icon
Bangladesh portal
WikiProject Bangladesh
Bangladesh
the discussion
Mid
project's importance scale
edit
history
watch
purge
Bangladesh Liberation War

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.