133:
194:
comparable to popular pages, but if I compare it to that of the individual cell lines pages that exist in
Knowledge, it is in the same ball park. So I am not sure what is your criteria for notable in term of pages describing scientific resources. I checked for PROSITE which I established in 1988 and of course its 4-5x times higher but that's a resource used for already 30 years!! And in term of papers citing Cellosaurus entries this is becoming enormous as it the resource used for cell lines identification in many journal in the last year. At the latest count there were already : -->
77:
53:
22:
393:
Its not yet discussed in review papers as it is too young to figure in them. The paper you site is more an example of the use by a research group of the resource like many other that I cited above but then these are not reviews per se. I am not sure a video made by a company counts as a review, but
355:
which is pretty useful to support notability. The issue with proving notability for an encyclopedia like
Knowledge, is that it relies heavily on secondary courses to assert notability for a subject. Primary sources can't really be used to support notability, since editors won't know the benchmarks
193:
For "notability": if you wish I can send you the Google
Analytic statistics, but in 2 years on the ExPASy server it already reached 2 million pages (see tweet below) and in term of the pageviews on Knowledge the Cellosaurus page is seen an average of 174 times per month since its creation. Nothing
189:
In term of the
Cellosaurus page itself: I left the "COI" tag which is objectively true, but took away the 2 other tags as: For "primary" I already added 2 secondary sources and can add many more if you wish as the number of places/articles where the Cellosaurus is described is increasing
414:
That video, that's you talking about
Cellosaurus, not independent. Your comments, "So I am not sure what is your criteria for notable" and "you do not seem to understand what notability means in term of scientific research". Once again, read about
123:
142:
63:
361:
324:
You will see that there are alreasy 362 publications that make use of the
Cellosaurus. This is an enormous number for a resources that is only available online for about 2.5 years.
190:
excponentially (of all the resouces I created this is the one with the highest growth rate, primarily because there is no other independant (of vendors) data bases on cell lines).
204:
473:
458:
117:
205:
https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&start=2016-05&end=2018-06&pages=Cellosaurus
419:. You don't know what I do or do not understand about what notability means in term of scientific research. This is Knowledge, not a scientific journal.
308:
I can go on like that with hundreds of sites. But it seems to me that you do not seem to understand what notability means in term of scientific research.
478:
260:
453:
407:
376:
368:
is assessing is whether there are other sources that can be relied upon to assert that it is notable, in this case reviews or news articles.
170:
93:
428:
335:
243:
276:
84:
58:
268:
255:
Here is small list collated in 10 minutes of independant publications, software tools, resources that cite the
Cellosaurus:
468:
147:
311:
If you do a search of the subset of literature that is open access and indexed in PubMed central and you do a search on:
352:, is the topic discussed in any review papers (e.g. discussing its accuracy or impact on the field)? I found this one:
181:
463:
369:
353:
284:
258:
218:
266:
33:
357:
314:
132:
398:
describes the
Cellosaurus starting at around 12' and ending at 13'. And thanks a lot for your comments.
272:
395:
164:
294:
292:
270:
224:"Primary". The two links you added are primary listing so don't do anything about the primary issue.
234:
Given your conflict of interest you are not the one who should be removing these maintenance tags.
92:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
424:
239:
177:
21:
356:
and comparisons to interpret whether that primary data sufficiently supports significance (e.g.
227:"Notability". Don't bother sending anyone the Google Analytic statistics. Instead read about
39:
199:
286:
172:). It's about issues with the Cellosaurus page so it belongs on the Cellosaurus talk page.
8:
290:
420:
365:
235:
173:
296:
403:
331:
214:
89:
288:
282:
264:
447:
399:
349:
327:
210:
76:
52:
274:
416:
228:
278:
262:
315:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/?term=%22CVCL_%22+AND+%22cell+line%22
321:
Note: "CVCL_" is the prefix of the
Cellosaurus accession numbers.
231:. Independent reliables sources that discuss cellosaurus.
200:
https://twitter.com/Cellosaurus/status/987301545195819009
280:
88:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
474:
WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology articles
122:This article has not yet received a rating on the
169:The following was copied from my talk page (difs
445:
348:There's definitely a lot of primary references.
459:Unknown-importance Molecular Biology articles
186:Hi I answered your comments on the COI page.
19:
143:the Molecular and Cell Biology task force
479:All WikiProject Molecular Biology pages
102:Knowledge:WikiProject Molecular Biology
454:Start-Class Molecular Biology articles
446:
105:Template:WikiProject Molecular Biology
195:1'500 papers with Cellosaurus RRIDs.
82:This article is within the scope of
15:
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
131:
14:
490:
364:has been cited 7 times). So what
75:
51:
20:
1:
140:This article is supported by
96:and see a list of open tasks.
85:WikiProject Molecular Biology
394:if it is than the following
7:
469:Low-importance MCB articles
10:
495:
362:the main Cellosuarus paper
108:Molecular Biology articles
429:11:31, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
408:16:18, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
377:01:18, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
139:
121:
70:
46:
464:Start-Class MCB articles
336:11:41, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
244:05:23, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
219:16:37, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
182:05:17, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
136:
28:This article is rated
135:
252:Notability issues:
165:Cellosaurus issues
137:
34:content assessment
373:
162:
161:
158:
157:
154:
153:
99:Molecular Biology
90:Molecular Biology
59:Molecular Biology
486:
371:
124:importance scale
110:
109:
106:
103:
100:
79:
72:
71:
66:
55:
48:
47:
31:
25:
24:
16:
494:
493:
489:
488:
487:
485:
484:
483:
444:
443:
167:
107:
104:
101:
98:
97:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
492:
482:
481:
476:
471:
466:
461:
456:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
360:usage or that
341:
340:
339:
338:
325:
322:
319:
318:
317:
309:
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
253:
247:
246:
232:
225:
208:
207:
202:
166:
163:
160:
159:
156:
155:
152:
151:
148:Low-importance
138:
128:
127:
120:
114:
113:
111:
94:the discussion
80:
68:
67:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
491:
480:
477:
475:
472:
470:
467:
465:
462:
460:
457:
455:
452:
451:
449:
430:
426:
422:
421:duffbeerforme
418:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
405:
401:
397:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
378:
375:
367:
366:Duffbeerforme
363:
359:
354:
351:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
337:
333:
329:
326:
323:
320:
316:
313:
312:
310:
307:
306:
305:
304:
297:
295:
293:
291:
289:
287:
285:
283:
281:
279:
277:
275:
273:
271:
269:
267:
265:
263:
261:
259:
257:
256:
254:
251:
250:
249:
248:
245:
241:
237:
236:duffbeerforme
233:
230:
226:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
212:
206:
203:
201:
198:
197:
196:
191:
187:
184:
183:
179:
175:
174:duffbeerforme
171:
149:
146:(assessed as
145:
144:
134:
130:
129:
125:
119:
116:
115:
112:
95:
91:
87:
86:
81:
78:
74:
73:
69:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
370:T.Shafee(Evo
209:
192:
188:
185:
168:
141:
83:
40:WikiProjects
30:Start-class
448:Categories
417:notability
229:notability
400:Amb sib
350:Amb sib
328:Amb sib
211:Amb sib
36:scale.
396:video
372:&
358:CVCL_
425:talk
404:talk
374:Evo)
332:talk
240:talk
215:talk
178:talk
118:???
64:MCB
450::
427:)
406:)
334:)
242:)
217:)
180:)
150:).
62::
423:(
402:(
330:(
238:(
213:(
176:(
126:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
