161:
140:
49:
355:
171:
334:
448:
553:
532:
427:
563:
109:
266:
245:
458:
21:
1173:
where you might expect it. I have looked a mainstream vegan organisation sources, veternary sources, and farming sources and seen no sign of this terminology. Do you really want to try and (incorrectly as it happens) use the technicalities of WP policy to withold relevant information from our readers? If needed we can have anothe RfC, although I would prefer civil discussion.
898:
It is perfectly normal to describe the normal scope of a specialist term in
Knowledge, for example we have, 'In thermodynamics, entropy (usual symbol S) is a measure of the number of specific realizations..'. We say that because 'entropy' is a term specific to thermodynamics; it is very rarely used
1061:
FV, there are unlikely to be sources that say that the term 'commodity status of animals' is used mainly in the animal right and ethics community just as there are no sources that say that enthalpy is mainly used in the thermodynamics community but these fact clearly are true. All the sources cited
1158:
animal ethics sources. I am not fussy about the term 'animal ethics', I chose it because it sounds relatively broad in scope and not too radical, like 'animal rights', 'animal activism', or 'extreme veganism' would. If you would like to propose a more appropriate term please feel free to do so.
1087:
Just look for yourself, the term is almost completely absent from mainstream animal protection organisations or major vegan organisations. I see no sight of its being used in more general literature or media It is quite obviously specific to a particular area of study. It is not a crtiticism of a
758:
A quick look at mainstream animal rights organisations web sites, such as the RSPCA, Compassion in World
Farming, and the ASPCA shows no sign of the terminology 'commodity status'. Instead the RSPCA, for example, use the more descriptive wording,'Puppies are being traded like scrap with no regard
1172:
I am genuinely puzzled by your objection and desire to avoid saying what is obviously true. The term 'commodity status of animals', with the meaning given by Sammy, is only used in animal ethics literature. It is not found in the media or anywhere else (to any significant degree) even in places
1135:
I'm not sure if that's an accurate characterization of the contexts in which animals are discussed as commodities; the market-related sources suggest otherwise. When an editor is uncertain about whether a statement is true, it should not be added unless supported by a reliable source. The MOS, a
637:
Just noting that the current second sentence awaits a better source. The issue of free-roaming animals is complicated and varies depending on the country. There are wild animals who are traded as exotic pets, sold to zoos, and shot by hunters who pay for the privilege. I've left the sentence
927:
That last observation should be strong indication to you that it is not rhetoric, as you claim. This article is well-referenced, and you are claiming, dubiously, that the multiple academic sources are all written by scholars with "extreme" views. The onus is now on you to support this
912:
You are the one who needs to provide sources if you want to demonstrate that term 'commodity status of animals' is commonly used outside the animal rights sources that you have cited. It is not even used by mainstream animal protection organisations or major vegan organisations.
1214:. Not only does "discrimination" denote exclusivity from animals by definition, but its association to this law-based article can be viewed as biased and extreme. This is clearly an animal rights (and ethics) matter, and should be categorized as such.
931:
It is not a personal attack to say your behavior is disruptive when it plainly is. Your repeated implications that you have not been treated civilly during the extraordinarily long discussion on this question may likewise be read as disparaging.
781:
Please note that this does not meant that I want to dispute the meaning of the term as used in animal right literature. I am perfectly happy to leave that to those with knowledge and an interest in such matters.
830:
discussed elsewhere for the past six months. I'm going to insist you provide high-quality sources for this, and I'm not going to participate in another meandering rope-a-dope conversation on this page until you
825:
You have never provided sources to support your wrong ideas. This article cites many authors who are not apparently "radical vegans" in any sense, and your contention that this phrase is "rhetoric" has been
735:
Just noting that I've removed this for now, as it was causing confusion elsewhere (are all pets commodities, etc). When there's time, we can perhaps develop a section about it, as it's quite a complex area.
409:
802:
It is perfectly clear that 'commodity status of animals' is language used almost exclusively in certain animal rights and vegan literature. There is absolutely no sign that it is
1296:
399:
31:
755:
The term 'commodity status of animals' is found almost exclusively in extreme animal rights literature and therefore needs to be identified as such in this article.
1301:
1291:
978:
977:, "Accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence" constitute personal attacks. Some evidence of your long-term disruptive behavior has been collected at
316:
1120:
in which the topic is being considered by supplying the set of circumstances or facts that surround it. What is the reason for wanting to ignore this policy?
1023:. None of the sources state where the term is used; Martin's own analysis of the situation, based on a subset of the sources currently in the article, is not
375:
227:
1256:
1251:
718:
Hi Jon, it says: "The commodity status of animals refers to the legal status as property of most non-human animals ... and their use as objects of trade."
820:
514:
1182:
1145:
1097:
1004:
990:
961:
941:
922:
847:
724:
1036:
982:
933:
839:
362:
339:
1281:
306:
615:
1266:
778:. Whether it is jargon or rhetoric, we do need to make clear that 'commodity status of animals' is language used by a specific minority.
217:
838:
you want to be civil, doesn't mean you are being civil. This is particularly true when, as here, you are being deliberately disruptive. --
1286:
1276:
1311:
712:
504:
1271:
1261:
644:
852:
You really must stop your personal attacks against me and concentrate on discussing the content of the article. I am following the
685:
282:
90:
742:
665:
1316:
1306:
881:
My sources are the the ones already given in the article. My text said, 'Within the animal right and ethics community the term
676:
ethical arguments: e.g. whether commodification necessarily leads to exploitation; development of the idea of "living property."
193:
1237:
1154:
used in animal ethics sources; you and others have given me plenty of animal ethics sources which use the term; I did not say
1129:
885:
is used ...'. That is in complete agreement with all the cited sources, which are from the animal right and ethics community.
791:
1326:
605:
752:
The AfD has come down firmly on the side of keeping the article but that does not mean that it does not have to be neutral.
480:
1223:
273:
250:
1088:
term to give its normal context, you will find it done throughout WP. It not OR either to state the blatantly obvious.
1331:
1321:
184:
145:
1233:
What is a "non-human animal"? There is no such thing as human animal. It should be corrected to "non-human being".
471:
432:
699:
there was been some discussion on the different between commodification and property status. The article starts
690:
463:
94:
806:
in the media, general veternary and animal publications, or even mainstream animal protection organisations.
580:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
632:
120:
1150:
Well, if we are going to be pedantic, it is verifiably true that the phrase 'commodity status of animals'
649:
86:
160:
139:
797:
Please, I made a bold edit to show what I would like to say here; that is not 'bludgeoning this issue'.
1228:
730:
576:
537:
27:
1021:
analysis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources
479:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
374:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
281:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
192:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
85:
is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
1219:
1178:
1125:
1093:
1000:
957:
918:
816:
787:
661:
exotic pet trade, including the black-market trade in endangered species (interesting article in
108:
708:
126:
759:
for their welfare'. Googling ' "commodity status" animals' get mainly excerpts from the WP
1141:
1032:
1024:
20:
8:
986:
937:
843:
654:
Leaving a note here with some ideas for article development. We could have sections on:
1215:
1174:
1121:
1089:
996:
968:
953:
914:
812:
783:
747:
176:
1062:
that use 'commodity status of animals' are on the subject of animal right and ethics.
771:
704:
1137:
1028:
974:
737:
719:
680:
639:
61:
57:
1207:
1196:
1190:
1245:
1211:
853:
696:
371:
278:
48:
1016:
1234:
189:
568:
701:
The commodity status of animals refers to the legal status as property
354:
333:
1160:
1113:
763:
page together with animal right liteature. I can see no evidence of
552:
531:
476:
447:
426:
562:
775:
760:
367:
995:
Sammjy, can we please just stick to discussing article content.
265:
244:
457:
979:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive278#Martin Hogbin
1136:
style guideline, doed not override the verifiability policy.
811:
What evidence do you have that this term is in general use?
774:
although, in my opinion, it is in fact animal rights/vegan
1163:; we have plenty of sources confirming what I want to say.
581:
673:
the trade in entertainment, sporting and working animals
1195:
According to
Knowledge (and many other dictionaries),
952:
a personal atack to call me disruptive. Please stop.
767:
of this term in the media or in general literature.
558:
475:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
453:
366:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
277:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
188:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
166:
1297:
High-importance
Veganism and Vegetarianism articles
1243:
1206:This article is, as of now, part of a series on
384:Knowledge:WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism
43:
1302:WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism articles
1292:Start-Class Veganism and Vegetarianism articles
387:Template:WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism
1257:Knowledge articles that use British English
1252:Knowledge articles that use Oxford spelling
1199:is "the act of making distinctions between
106:
1116:says of the first paragraph , ' It should
1244:
363:WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism
1282:Top-importance Animal rights articles
638:semi-sourced until I have more time.
93:, this should not be changed without
574:This article is within the scope of
469:This article is within the scope of
360:This article is within the scope of
271:This article is within the scope of
182:This article is within the scope of
102:
15:
1267:Low-importance Agriculture articles
1210:. I believe it would fit better in
1027:and may be false (cf the UN etc.).
584:and the subjects encompassed by it.
390:Veganism and Vegetarianism articles
291:Knowledge:WikiProject Animal rights
125:It is of interest to the following
13:
1287:WikiProject Animal rights articles
1277:Start-Class Animal rights articles
294:Template:WikiProject Animal rights
30:on 25 January 2016. The result of
14:
1343:
1312:Low-importance Economics articles
1159:There is no reason not to follow
202:Knowledge:WikiProject Agriculture
1272:WikiProject Agriculture articles
1262:Start-Class Agriculture articles
561:
551:
530:
456:
446:
425:
353:
332:
264:
243:
205:Template:WikiProject Agriculture
169:
159:
138:
107:
47:
19:
610:This article has been rated as
509:This article has been rated as
489:Knowledge:WikiProject Economics
404:This article has been rated as
311:This article has been rated as
222:This article has been rated as
26:This article was nominated for
1317:WikiProject Economics articles
1307:Start-Class Economics articles
1238:21:52, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
492:Template:WikiProject Economics
1:
703:- could be seen as ambiguous.
670:the trade in pedigree animals
483:and see a list of open tasks.
464:Business and economics portal
378:and see a list of open tasks.
285:and see a list of open tasks.
196:and see a list of open tasks.
1327:High-importance law articles
1183:10:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
1146:01:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
1130:23:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
1098:14:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
1037:16:44, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
1005:10:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
991:23:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
962:14:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
942:21:31, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
923:20:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
899:outside that field of study.
848:15:29, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
821:15:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
792:11:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
770:At best this terminology is
743:07:10, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
725:16:02, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
713:15:08, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
686:00:48, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
645:03:37, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
7:
883:commodity status of animals
10:
1348:
616:project's importance scale
515:project's importance scale
410:project's importance scale
381:Veganism and Vegetarianism
340:Veganism and Vegetarianism
317:project's importance scale
228:project's importance scale
856:principle. I have made a
609:
590:Knowledge:WikiProject Law
546:
508:
441:
403:
348:
310:
274:WikiProject Animal rights
259:
221:
154:
133:
1332:WikiProject Law articles
1322:Start-Class law articles
1224:10:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
864:everted it, now we must
593:Template:WikiProject Law
834:Also, just because you
185:WikiProject Agriculture
297:Animal rights articles
115:This article is rated
1118:establish the context
860:old change, you have
691:commodity or property
472:WikiProject Economics
1015:It seems to me that
633:Free-roaming animals
208:Agriculture articles
91:relevant style guide
87:varieties of English
663:Scientific American
650:Article development
89:. According to the
495:Economics articles
177:Agriculture portal
121:content assessment
1229:non-human animals
741:
731:Companion animals
723:
684:
643:
630:
629:
626:
625:
622:
621:
525:
524:
521:
520:
420:
419:
416:
415:
327:
326:
323:
322:
238:
237:
234:
233:
101:
100:
42:
41:
1339:
1019:is the problem:
972:
740:
722:
683:
642:
598:
597:
594:
591:
588:
571:
566:
565:
555:
548:
547:
542:
534:
527:
526:
497:
496:
493:
490:
487:
466:
461:
460:
450:
443:
442:
437:
429:
422:
421:
392:
391:
388:
385:
382:
357:
350:
349:
344:
336:
329:
328:
299:
298:
295:
292:
289:
268:
261:
260:
255:
247:
240:
239:
210:
209:
206:
203:
200:
179:
174:
173:
172:
163:
156:
155:
150:
142:
135:
134:
118:
112:
111:
103:
54:This article is
51:
44:
23:
16:
1347:
1346:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1242:
1241:
1235:Miroslav ÄŽurian
1231:
1193:
966:
750:
733:
693:
652:
635:
612:High-importance
595:
592:
589:
586:
585:
577:WikiProject Law
567:
560:
541:High‑importance
540:
494:
491:
488:
485:
484:
462:
455:
435:
406:High-importance
389:
386:
383:
380:
379:
343:High‑importance
342:
296:
293:
290:
287:
286:
253:
207:
204:
201:
198:
197:
175:
170:
168:
148:
119:on Knowledge's
116:
95:broad consensus
62:Oxford spelling
58:British English
12:
11:
5:
1345:
1335:
1334:
1329:
1324:
1319:
1314:
1309:
1304:
1299:
1294:
1289:
1284:
1279:
1274:
1269:
1264:
1259:
1254:
1230:
1227:
1208:discrimination
1197:Discrimination
1192:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
929:
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:
900:
891:
890:
889:
888:
887:
886:
874:
873:
872:
871:
870:
869:
832:
808:
807:
799:
798:
765:widespread use
749:
746:
732:
729:
728:
727:
692:
689:
678:
677:
674:
671:
668:
659:
658:cattle markets
651:
648:
634:
631:
628:
627:
624:
623:
620:
619:
608:
602:
601:
599:
573:
572:
556:
544:
543:
535:
523:
522:
519:
518:
511:Low-importance
507:
501:
500:
498:
481:the discussion
468:
467:
451:
439:
438:
436:Low‑importance
430:
418:
417:
414:
413:
402:
396:
395:
393:
376:the discussion
358:
346:
345:
337:
325:
324:
321:
320:
313:Top-importance
309:
303:
302:
300:
283:the discussion
269:
257:
256:
254:Top‑importance
248:
236:
235:
232:
231:
224:Low-importance
220:
214:
213:
211:
194:the discussion
181:
180:
164:
152:
151:
149:Low‑importance
143:
131:
130:
124:
113:
99:
98:
52:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1344:
1333:
1330:
1328:
1325:
1323:
1320:
1318:
1315:
1313:
1310:
1308:
1305:
1303:
1300:
1298:
1295:
1293:
1290:
1288:
1285:
1283:
1280:
1278:
1275:
1273:
1270:
1268:
1265:
1263:
1260:
1258:
1255:
1253:
1250:
1249:
1247:
1240:
1239:
1236:
1226:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1216:GyozaDumpling
1213:
1212:Animal Rights
1209:
1204:
1202:
1198:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1175:Martin Hogbin
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1162:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1122:Martin Hogbin
1119:
1115:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1090:Martin Hogbin
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1025:WP:Verifiable
1022:
1018:
1014:
1006:
1002:
998:
997:Martin Hogbin
994:
993:
992:
988:
984:
980:
976:
973:According to
970:
969:Martin Hogbin
965:
964:
963:
959:
955:
954:Martin Hogbin
951:
947:
946:
945:
944:
943:
939:
935:
930:
926:
925:
924:
920:
916:
915:Martin Hogbin
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
897:
896:
895:
894:
893:
892:
884:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
867:
863:
859:
855:
851:
850:
849:
845:
841:
837:
833:
829:
824:
823:
822:
818:
814:
813:Martin Hogbin
810:
809:
805:
804:commonly used
801:
800:
796:
795:
794:
793:
789:
785:
784:Martin Hogbin
779:
777:
773:
768:
766:
762:
756:
753:
745:
744:
739:
726:
721:
717:
716:
715:
714:
710:
706:
702:
698:
697:Talk:Veganism
688:
687:
682:
675:
672:
669:
666:
664:
660:
657:
656:
655:
647:
646:
641:
617:
613:
607:
604:
603:
600:
583:
579:
578:
570:
564:
559:
557:
554:
550:
549:
545:
539:
536:
533:
529:
528:
516:
512:
506:
503:
502:
499:
482:
478:
474:
473:
465:
459:
454:
452:
449:
445:
444:
440:
434:
431:
428:
424:
423:
411:
407:
401:
398:
397:
394:
377:
373:
372:vegetarianism
369:
365:
364:
359:
356:
352:
351:
347:
341:
338:
335:
331:
330:
318:
314:
308:
305:
304:
301:
288:Animal rights
284:
280:
279:animal rights
276:
275:
270:
267:
263:
262:
258:
252:
251:Animal rights
249:
246:
242:
241:
229:
225:
219:
216:
215:
212:
195:
191:
187:
186:
178:
167:
165:
162:
158:
157:
153:
147:
144:
141:
137:
136:
132:
128:
122:
114:
110:
105:
104:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
59:
53:
50:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1232:
1205:
1201:human beings
1200:
1194:
1155:
1151:
1117:
1112:
1020:
949:
882:
865:
861:
857:
835:
827:
803:
780:
769:
764:
757:
754:
751:
734:
700:
694:
679:
662:
653:
636:
611:
596:law articles
575:
510:
470:
405:
361:
312:
272:
223:
183:
127:WikiProjects
82:
81:; note that
78:
75:organization
74:
70:
66:
55:
35:
828:extensively
705:Jonpatterns
582:legal field
199:Agriculture
190:agriculture
146:Agriculture
117:Start-class
56:written in
1246:Categories
1138:FourViolas
1029:FourViolas
928:assertion.
868:iscuss it.
748:Neutrality
569:Law portal
1161:MOS:BEGIN
1114:MOS:BEGIN
983:Sammy1339
934:Sammy1339
840:Sammy1339
772:wp:jargon
486:Economics
477:Economics
433:Economics
975:WP:WIAPA
776:rhetoric
761:Veganism
368:veganism
28:deletion
738:SarahSV
720:SarahSV
695:On the
681:SarahSV
640:SarahSV
614:on the
513:on the
408:on the
315:on the
226:on the
79:analyse
71:realize
1191:Series
854:WP:BRD
123:scale.
67:colour
1017:WP:OR
60:with
1220:talk
1203:".
1179:talk
1156:only
1142:talk
1126:talk
1094:talk
1033:talk
1001:talk
987:talk
981:. --
958:talk
938:talk
919:talk
844:talk
817:talk
788:talk
709:talk
606:High
400:High
370:and
83:-ize
36:keep
34:was
948:It
836:say
831:do.
587:Law
538:Law
505:Low
307:Top
218:Low
1248::
1222:)
1181:)
1152:is
1144:)
1128:)
1096:)
1035:)
1003:)
989:)
960:)
950:is
940:)
932:--
921:)
846:)
819:)
790:)
711:)
77:,
73:,
69:,
1218:(
1177:(
1140:(
1124:(
1092:(
1031:(
999:(
985:(
971::
967:@
956:(
936:(
917:(
866:d
862:r
858:b
842:(
815:(
786:(
707:(
667:)
618:.
517:.
412:.
319:.
230:.
129::
97:.
65:(
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
