Knowledge

Talk:Hezbollah armed strength

Source đź“ť

572:
the ship's defences. Now that the Israeli's claim to have shot one down, and presumably have alerted their ships to the threat and taken measures to defeat incoming drones, they may feel more comfortable feeding their own public news of any further attempted attacks using drones. There may still, however, be a tendency to continue to attribute any successful attacks to missiles, as missiles will always (in the public's mind) be a 'less avoidable' threat than drones. The Israeli's might also be concerned at the reaction of the public to the concept of a drone that can be targeted, as opposed to the current fairly random rocket threat.
544:) carrying explosives. The claim that the ship was hit by a missile came from the Israeli's on July 15 and was reported by the Guardian as follows: "The attack late Friday alarmed Israel because initial information indicated the guerrillas had used a drone for the first time to attack Israeli forces. But the army's investigation showed that Hezbollah had fired an Iranian-made missile at the vessel from the shores of Lebanon, said Brig. Gen. Ido Nehushtan. ``We can confirm that it was hit by an Iranian-made missile launched by Hezbollah. We see this as very profound fingerprint of Iranian involvement in Hezbollah, 555:
US/British/Australian navies would be that a ship engaged in 'hostilities' would be on full alert with all defences activated (anti-missile/anti-aircraft/anti-mine), and that any failure to to maintain full alert would trigger an inquiry into the command of the ship. On the other hand, it was not apparent whether the Israeli ship was actively 'engaged' at the time of the attack. Even so, a ship does not have to be engaged in actually firing to be on alert. Usually simply 'presence in the battle zone' is sufficient cause to maintain active defensive surveillance and reaction capability.
375: 391: 21: 359: 1810: 1650: 1608: 1513: 1489: 1465: 1388: 440: 1536: 735: 419: 66: 1780: 1757: 1693: 1411: 1833:
review and I found significant bias, poor citations, unverified research in the sources and felt that the prose was poor. Arguably it is also excessively detailed as it contains a lot of information that is available on other pages, which, unless it is well maintained, means it quickly degrades in quality and ends up with different figures/facts. I have not provided blow by blow what needs to be changed, as the article really needs to have a
450: 244: 630:, a large Katyusha launcher, although Hezbollah's 220mm rockets probably aren't launched from that exact vehicle. Katyusha isn't the name of a model, just a general class—it may refer to any truck-mounted MRLs or just to Soviet/Russian-made ones. The term is commonly used by the news media, but it's probably better to refer to rocket calibre or specific model of launcher when possible, to prevent this kind of confusion. 1584: 139: 316: 305: 294: 283: 272: 563:"The Israeli air force shot down a Hezbollah drone for the first time, sending its wreckage plunging into the sea, the army said. Israeli media said the unmanned aircraft had the capacity to carry 90lbs of explosives, nearly as much as the more powerful rockets Hezbollah has been firing into Israel for the last 27 days. Unlike the rockets, however, the drone has a guidance system to for accurate targeting." 568:
attack as Hezbollah have claimed all along. This is not to suggest that Israel distorted the truth in order to attribute the attack to Iranian armament because the drones that Hezbollah have are also Iranian-sourced. The point about Iranian involvement could have been equally well made with either device, even down to the suggestion about the potential involvement of Iranian advisors at the launch site.
202: 170: 551:
wiki article on this missile suggests that it is normally programmed to strike the target near the waterline, and penetrate the hull before exploding, in order to inflict maximum damage. The Israeli's have said that the ship's anti-missile defences were not switched on, suggesting that they believed that the ship would normally have had adequate defences against this type of missile.
1029: 1506:
Whilst the article is well cited and apparently without much original research, many of the citations are of poor quality and are a based on a single bias opinion. Therefore a lot of the facts here could be considered to be very close to original research as they do not provide multiple/peer reviewed
707:
True, a referenced book would be much better, but at least the BBC can be considered a relatively reliable source: a professional news organization with a reputation for fact-checking. And it is verifiable, by clicking to the BBC article, a reader can see that it says things like "it is thought" and
1601:
The article is not really just focused on a encyclopedic coverage of the strength of Hezbollah, but rather appears to be an attempt to prove that Hezbollah has a certain level of strength and is better than its opponents. There are some very good parts, but also a lot of unreliable figures quoted as
575:
Further work on 'getting to the bottom of this' might proceed along the lines of getting further information on the nature of the damage to the Israeli warship - if it was superstructure then a drone might be more likely. The issue of the second ship that was 'hit' might need looking into as well.
567:
This latest report regarding a Hezbollah drone, particularly the news that it was shot down over the sea (and that it could carry 90kg of explosive) suggests the possibility that the Israeli's may have chosen to describe the first attack as a missile attack, whereas it may have actually been a drone
558:
According to Wiki, Hezbollah's weapons include the C-802 anti-ship missile, but also an Iranian drone or UAV called the Mohajer-4. A report today on TimesOnline reports on an Israeli claim to have shot down a Hezbollah drone. No date is given for the shooting down, but the inference is that it was
1832:
This article has not been accepted for GA status and I would currently rate it somewhere between C & B class on a quality scale. It is confused over what it is trying to say and in many cases is just a list of facts and figures that needs blending together into an article. This was only a quick
915:
The denial is as clear as can be, it says 'the Syrian Foreign Ministry said in a statement. "The Syrian Arab Republic denies these fabrications."'. I've corrected the article's title. Don't use primary sources (gov't press releases) when secondary sources in reliabel mainstream media are available.
699:
Even BBC articles are not sufficiently referenced to be raised from the “speculation” status. To put it in a provocative way: “Is a reference to an unreferenced article a reference?” An article citing Debka as reference isn’t a reference, as long as Debka reliability is far from being proved. MEMRI
599:
This table is not supported by the reference given. Most references I saw only mention the 122mm Katyushas, the Fajr-3, Fajr-5 and Zelzal-2. I think that unless better references are found only these rockets should be included in the table. Incidentally it may be useful to include a column with the
550:
The device that struck the Israeli ship was subsequently identified by the Israeli's as being a C-802 anti-ship missile. Although this is of Chinese manufacture, it is understood that Iran (amongst others) have stocks of this missile. This missile carries approximately 165 kilos of explosive. The
531:
No, the 'black hole' near the waterline is I understand an exhaust stain. The wiki article on the Hanit suggests that you'll see similar markings on other warships of this class. A close look at the photo tends to support the exhaust stain viewpoint. I'd also note that the photo is 'too perfect'
1381:
This article is not written in a flowing and consistent prose that tells an encyclopedic story. The introduction is well written, but after that it is clear that the article has not been edited together properly. A lot of facts and figures are quoted, often out of date order and contradicting each
571:
The significance might in fact be in that Israel did not want the public to know that something no more sophisticated (in the public's mind) than a remote control 'toy' aircraft inflicted considerable damage on an Israeli warship, and particularly that something so 'unsophisticated' had penetrated
554:
There has (apparently) been no suggestion that the ship's command were negligent in failing to activate the ship's anti-missile defences, or any explanation why they were not activated. The inference is that no such attack was 'contemplated'. My understanding is that the normal experience of the
1482:
Many of the sources and citations listed are very dubious. There is a significant bias towards pro-Hezbollah and anti-Israel sources (especially news sites and opinion pieces). Very few of the facts are backed up by reliable figures that come from independent assessments. A lot of the points are
125:
If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is
1382:
other. The sentence structure after the introduction is poor, with a lot of short statements and lists that appear to be taken from a lot of difference sources with little linking together. In many sections there is no context or 'so what' from all the facts and figures listed.
590:
First of all the website from which it has been taken is not neutral secondly couple of days ago i saw this picture with the description "palestenian fighters with anti-aircaft guns" I dont have the link to verify it right now but I will try my best to find one soon. Thanks
1643:
This article is far from a neutral viewpoint. It shows significant bias towards Hezbollah and highlighting how it is 'better' than it opponents repeatably, often with dubious or bias sources. The article is not currently encyclopedic in nature and leans towards
868:
Hi, Well I was wondering, do people have any sources that Hezbollah possess the types weapons that part of the article says they do? Some items are cited but quite a lot isn't. e.g. anti-ship, anti-tank, part of the anti-air weapons and some of the rockets.
784:
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on
1483:
presented as hard verifiable facts. Many of the facts and figures quoted in the table are apparently backed up by 4 or 5 different sources. However, an analysis of these sources shows that they quote different figures to the ones shown in the table.
576:
There seems to be a peculiar lack of information about that incident (but that's not unusual when events onshore tend to swamp the news feeds). I'll do some digging. If anyone else is interested they're welcome to pick up a shovel. Cheers,
366: 180: 1991: 398: 188: 1946: 2024: 2041: 2008: 1975: 2204: 1970: 1225:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); 781:
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
703:
So ok, this may be the best available, but some introduction article on the mostly speculative nature of the data provided -especially about Zelzal capabilities- wouldn’t hurt, would it?
870: 2069: 2036: 2199: 2003: 528:"The Israeli corvette INS Hanit before it suffered severe damage by Hezbollah anti-ship missile on July 14, 2006." Shouldn't it be "after", seeing the black hole near the water? 1459:
See below for further details. Many of the sources are out of date (some from pre-2005) and have not been updated to reflect the current situation. There are several dead links
1578:
The article covers a good range. However, it needs to be more closely linked to the main Hezbollah article section of the same name, as they have different facts and figures.
2224: 2125: 382: 184: 2219: 1034: 2087: 1909:), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold. 809: 257: 925: 2144: 980: 917: 616:
No 220mm Katyushas or 333mm Fajr-5 rockets are mentioned; instead 220mm Ouragan (?) rockets and a 302 mm rocket based on the Chinese WS-1 with 175 kg warhead.
2166:, where the content of the former is already covered in greater depth than the latter. No need for too separate articles that cover the same topic and scope. 1039: 858: 1222: 1067: 815: 546:
Nehushtan said in an interview with The Associated Press." Brig. Gen. Ido Nehushtan went on to describe a second missile striking a nearby merchant ship.
804: 762:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with 2057: 214: 506: 1159: 770: 742: 951: 898: 585: 1182: 999: 984: 1837:
and be updated and re-written. Once that has occurred and the article is more balanced and flowing it could be re-considered for GA nomination.
729: 786: 1007: 243: 1057: 83:, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic: 2110: 931: 532:
to be anything other than a 'portrait'. A photo of the real damage would likely not be taken from a particularly advantageous position.
2194: 1319: 878: 837: 827: 90: 2234: 1186: 1178: 496: 2120:
don't forget that The Hezbollah troops sent to confront Kurdish forces failed miserably. Kurdish forces defeated them with ease.
1984: 1955: 759: 909: 669:
Some of the online sources which doesn't exist anymore and should be replaced with other sources. There are some new sources in
1170: 1106: 874: 778: 774: 751: 580: 209: 175: 2148: 2239: 2214: 2189: 1876: 1110: 218: 2121: 1602:
absolute fact, including contradictions due to different parts being edited at different times and from different sources.
620: 604: 2017: 854: 790: 2209: 2083: 1334: 689: 472: 52: 992: 2229: 2140: 2091: 1085: 683: 43: 892: 694: 471:-related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 1892:; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics. 1174: 2175: 540:
Hezbollah initially claimed (and apparently still maintains) that the Israeli ship was hit on 14 July by a drone (
2129: 2096: 1620: 1270: 1062: 976:- clean up the sources and write proper citations. One source is cited 30 times. That probably shouldn't happen. 905: 535: 38: 32: 1236: 1229: 2159: 2106: 1311: 463: 424: 213:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a 2134: 2065: 2032: 1999: 1966: 150: 119: 76: 1889: 118:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
1323: 1214: 1100: 921: 901: 115: 646:
By the way, BM-21 and BM-27 are the names of Soviet/Russian launchers, not of the rocket ammunition.
1872: 1855: 1218: 1166: 80: 746:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
594: 2163: 2102: 800: 2061: 2050: 2028: 1995: 1962: 1935:, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status 1919: 1423: 1315: 1262: 1194: 1144: 541: 1206:(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with 1951:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
1665: 1281: 1255: 1081: 107: 1096: 945: 679: 156: 2139:
Is this an ad for Hezbollah? The article needs way more citations and less biased language.
2171: 1240: 2101:
Really? We're just using western propaganda as a trustworthy news source now because why?
613:
reports 122mm Katyushas with a 30kg warhead and 30-50km range. What do you make of this?
8: 888: 796: 138: 111: 2046:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
2013:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
1980:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
1624:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. 1274:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. 830:
linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
2074: 1751:
The images appear to comply with all copyright rules and are well used and informative.
1330: 1003: 988: 956: 897:
Denial is not very clear in haaretz and the name for the haaretz article is incorrect.
747: 1535: 979:
If this stuff was done the article would be in basic shape. Then we should move it to
2153: 1013: 48: 1841: 826:
when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an
1779: 1756: 1716: 1712: 1692: 1410: 1299: 1295: 937: 719: 675: 664: 652: 636: 97: 1888:
This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of
1809: 1649: 1607: 1512: 1488: 1464: 1387: 2167: 1720: 1303: 1135: 967:- flesh out and finish sections on training, supply, command, and infrastructure 863: 850: 2079:? “… has blocked Iranian trucks and planes from passing through its territory.” 1961:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —
93:
account (granted automatically to accounts with 500 edits and an age of 30 days)
1207: 884: 823: 455: 96:
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in
1583: 1405:
On the whole the article follows the MoS and the layout is sensible and works.
2183: 1261:(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see 819: 617: 601: 1939:
appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.
610: 374: 2115: 1906: 1124: 1088:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. 763: 1664:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing 1280:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing 716: 649: 633: 390: 1905:
to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as
1687:
Appears to be fairly stable with only minor changes occurring regularly.
734: 1947:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
79:
procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the
1774:
The captions all support the images and add to the article and photos.
65: 1826: 670: 577: 1879:
can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article.
1118: 822:, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the 358: 1834: 439: 418: 468: 2042:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
2009:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
1976:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
1747:(images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) 1344: 936:
Anyone can add an updated number of Hezbollah fighters in Syria?
843:
That this article is linked to from the image description page.
883:
no this article is done by conseus . democracy at its best .--
1854:
Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the
1792: 627: 2205:
Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
840:
on the image's description page for the use in this article.
523: 758:
Knowledge article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
713:
Agreed that the other sources are not as easily evaluated.
1819:
This article does not meet all the criteria for GA status.
973:- better integrate sources for the various weapons tables 201: 169: 106:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
2200:
B-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
41:
at the time (March 18, 2017). There are suggestions on
661:
hizboollahh is a very intelligent man .He has aforces
586:
The alleged Hezbbolah fightr shown in civilain dress
467:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 445: 255:
This article has been checked against the following
2225:
Middle Eastern military history task force articles
789:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 367:
Military science, technology, and theory task force
47:for improving the article. If you can improve it, 1160:understandable to an appropriately broad audience 700:is also known to be biased, not mentioning MEIB… 2220:B-Class Middle Eastern military history articles 2181: 961:Here's what needs to be done with this article: 810:Image copyright problem with Image:Khaibar-1.jpg 559:'recent'. The full text of the report follows: 2056:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 2023:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 1990:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 853:. For assistance on the image use policy, see 998:Alright all of these things are done lol. 399:Middle Eastern military history task force 983:and add sections on leaders and history. 818:is used in this article under a claim of 1770:(appropriate use with suitable captions) 207:This article is within the scope of the 1162:; spelling and grammar are correct; and 136: 2182: 779:Knowledge:Fair use rationale guideline 730:Fair use rationale for Image:54949.jpg 227:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history 217:. To use this banner, please see the 1922:, are also covered by this criterion. 1858:or subpages of the guides listed, is 1158:(a) the prose is clear, concise, and 695:Source reliability through proxy site 230:Template:WikiProject Military history 20: 461:This article is within the scope of 132: 72:Warning: active arbitration remedies 60: 15: 964:- rebuild section on missile force 932:Updated number of fighters in Syria 855:Knowledge:Media copyright questions 155:It is of interest to the following 13: 733: 389: 373: 357: 242: 14: 2251: 2195:B-Class military history articles 1086:Talk:Hezbollah armed strength/GA1 1808: 1778: 1755: 1691: 1648: 1606: 1582: 1534: 1511: 1487: 1463: 1409: 1386: 970:- source the small arms section 777:. Using one of the templates at 448: 438: 417: 314: 303: 292: 281: 270: 200: 168: 137: 64: 19: 2235:Low-importance Lebanon articles 1918:Other media, such as video and 1530:The reviewer has no notes here. 1507:sources and are not verifiable. 1478:(citations to reliable sources) 849:This is an automated notice by 501:This article has been rated as 2176:22:32, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 1925: 1912: 1895: 1882: 1865: 1848: 1223:could reasonably be challenged 859:02:36, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 791:Media copyright questions page 1: 2160:Hezbollah military activities 2111:18:24, 12 December 2023 (UTC) 1320:valid non-free use rationales 1008:03:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC) 952:18:59, 25 February 2014 (UTC) 805:03:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC) 760:boilerplate fair use template 621:23:59, 9 September 2006 (UTC) 605:22:35, 9 September 2006 (UTC) 600:estimated number of rockets. 481:Knowledge:WikiProject Lebanon 475:and see a list of open tasks. 120:contentious topics procedures 2240:WikiProject Lebanon articles 2215:Weaponry task force articles 2190:Former good article nominees 2097:Voice of America as a source 2092:11:16, 18 October 2023 (UTC) 2070:11:07, 9 November 2019 (UTC) 993:09:40, 13 January 2017 (UTC) 871:Knight Prince - Sage Veritas 824:requirements for such images 787:criteria for speedy deletion 484:Template:WikiProject Lebanon 210:Military history WikiProject 89:You must be logged-in to an 7: 1862:required for good articles. 879:22:42, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 10: 2256: 2004:07:47, 27 March 2019 (UTC) 1985:Hezbollah parade, 2000.jpg 1971:05:33, 27 March 2019 (UTC) 1956:Hezbollah parade, 2000.jpg 1931:The presence of images is 1208:the layout style guideline 1133: 1111:12:48, 18 March 2017 (UTC) 926:18:43, 15 April 2010 (UTC) 910:18:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC) 771:the image description page 690:10:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 581:11:53, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 507:project's importance scale 275:Referencing and citation: 37:, but it did not meet the 2210:B-Class weaponry articles 2149:19:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC) 2135:tone of article is biased 2037:20:06, 25 June 2019 (UTC) 1165:(b) it complies with the 893:23:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC) 773:and edit it to include a 500: 433: 397: 381: 365: 340: 336: 254: 233:military history articles 195: 163: 122:before editing this page. 2230:B-Class Lebanon articles 2164:Hezbollah armed strength 2130:17:28, 7 June 2024 (UTC) 1873:parenthetical references 1856:Manual of Style mainpage 1526:(copyvio and plagiarism) 752:explanation or rationale 708:"some analysts believe". 116:normal editorial process 27:Hezbollah armed strength 1333:to the topic, and have 542:unmanned aerial vehicle 536:Drone or missile attack 341:Associated task forces: 286:Coverage and accuracy: 2018:Hezbollah fighters.jpg 1901:Vandalism reversions, 838:non-free use rationale 738: 394: 378: 362: 319:Supporting materials: 247: 145:This article is rated 112:standards of behaviour 1548:Broad in its coverage 1254:(a) it addresses the 1248:Broad in its coverage 1134:Further information: 981:military of Hezbollah 902:Supreme Deliciousness 754:as to why its use in 737: 393: 377: 361: 246: 98:limited circumstances 81:Arab–Israeli conflict 39:good article criteria 2082:incomplete sentence 1429:no original research 1237:copyright violations 1230:no original research 1200:no original research 626:9P140 Uragan is the 108:purpose of Knowledge 33:Warfare good article 2103:Idontknowanythingok 1668:or content dispute. 1502:(original research) 1284:or content dispute. 1235:(d) it contains no 1221:. All content that 1127:- Review Criteria 1125:Good Article Status 816:Image:Khaibar-1.jpg 464:WikiProject Lebanon 383:Weaponry task force 308:Grammar and style: 261:for B-class status: 29:was nominated as a 2062:Community Tech bot 2029:Community Tech bot 1996:Community Tech bot 1963:Community Tech bot 1707:, if possible, by 1316:copyright statuses 1290:, if possible, by 1187:list incorporation 775:fair use rationale 739: 723:2007-08-08 15:18 Z 656:2006-09-10 14:25 Z 640:2006-09-10 14:04 Z 395: 379: 363: 248: 215:list of open tasks 151:content assessment 91:extended confirmed 77:contentious topics 73: 1890:featured articles 1824: 1823: 1789: 1788: 1702: 1701: 1659: 1658: 1617: 1616: 1545: 1544: 1420: 1419: 1335:suitable captions 1322:are provided for 1258:of the topic; and 1139: 1076: 1075: 724: 657: 641: 521: 520: 517: 516: 513: 512: 412: 411: 408: 407: 404: 403: 332: 331: 219:full instructions 131: 130: 71: 59: 58: 51:; it may then be 2247: 1940: 1929: 1923: 1916: 1910: 1899: 1893: 1886: 1880: 1869: 1863: 1852: 1842:Additional notes 1812: 1797: 1796: 1782: 1759: 1730: 1729: 1695: 1675: 1674: 1652: 1631: 1630: 1610: 1586: 1557: 1556: 1538: 1515: 1491: 1467: 1438: 1437: 1413: 1390: 1360: 1359: 1324:non-free content 1228:(c) it contains 1215:reliable sources 1132: 1097:Stingray Trainer 1030:Copyvio detector 1018: 1017: 918:Nick Fitzpatrick 836:That there is a 750:but there is no 722: 687: 655: 639: 489: 488: 487:Lebanon articles 485: 482: 479: 458: 453: 452: 451: 442: 435: 434: 429: 421: 414: 413: 348: 338: 337: 322: 318: 317: 311: 307: 306: 300: 296: 295: 289: 285: 284: 278: 274: 273: 252: 251: 235: 234: 231: 228: 225: 224:Military history 204: 197: 196: 191: 176:Military history 172: 165: 164: 148: 142: 141: 133: 68: 61: 23: 22: 16: 2255: 2254: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2180: 2179: 2156: 2137: 2118: 2099: 2077: 2075:Missing subject 2058:nomination page 2044: 2025:nomination page 2011: 1992:nomination page 1978: 1949: 1944: 1943: 1930: 1926: 1917: 1913: 1900: 1896: 1887: 1883: 1870: 1866: 1853: 1849: 1844: 1829: 1795: 1574:(major aspects) 1347: 1342: 1341: 1169:guidelines for 1167:Manual of Style 1141: 1138: 1128: 1121: 1080:This review is 1072: 1044: 1016: 959: 934: 866: 812: 743:Image:54949.jpg 732: 697: 674: 667: 597: 588: 538: 526: 486: 483: 480: 477: 476: 454: 449: 447: 427: 346: 320: 315: 309: 304: 298: 293: 287: 282: 276: 271: 232: 229: 226: 223: 222: 178: 149:on Knowledge's 146: 110:, any expected 103: 44:the review page 12: 11: 5: 2253: 2243: 2242: 2237: 2232: 2227: 2222: 2217: 2212: 2207: 2202: 2197: 2192: 2155: 2154:Merge proposal 2152: 2136: 2133: 2122:212.117.151.42 2117: 2114: 2098: 2095: 2076: 2073: 2054: 2053: 2043: 2040: 2021: 2020: 2010: 2007: 1988: 1987: 1977: 1974: 1959: 1958: 1948: 1945: 1942: 1941: 1924: 1911: 1894: 1881: 1864: 1846: 1845: 1843: 1840: 1828: 1825: 1822: 1821: 1816: 1805: 1804: 1801: 1794: 1791: 1790: 1787: 1786: 1776: 1771: 1764: 1763: 1753: 1748: 1741: 1740: 1737: 1734: 1728: 1727: 1724: 1700: 1699: 1689: 1683: 1682: 1679: 1673: 1672: 1669: 1657: 1656: 1646: 1639: 1638: 1635: 1629: 1628: 1625: 1615: 1614: 1604: 1598: 1591: 1590: 1580: 1575: 1568: 1567: 1564: 1561: 1555: 1554: 1551: 1543: 1542: 1532: 1527: 1520: 1519: 1509: 1503: 1496: 1495: 1485: 1479: 1472: 1471: 1461: 1456: 1449: 1448: 1445: 1442: 1436: 1435: 1432: 1418: 1417: 1407: 1402: 1395: 1394: 1384: 1378: 1371: 1370: 1367: 1364: 1358: 1357: 1354: 1346: 1343: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1329:(b) media are 1327: 1310:(a) media are 1307: 1285: 1275: 1267: 1266: 1259: 1251: 1245: 1244: 1233: 1226: 1211: 1203: 1191: 1190: 1179:words to watch 1163: 1155: 1130: 1129: 1123: 1122: 1120: 1117: 1115: 1091: 1090: 1074: 1073: 1071: 1070: 1065: 1060: 1054: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1045: 1043: 1042: 1040:External links 1037: 1032: 1026: 1023: 1022: 1015: 1012: 1011: 1010: 958: 955: 933: 930: 929: 928: 865: 862: 847: 846: 845: 844: 841: 811: 808: 797:BetacommandBot 731: 728: 727: 726: 710: 709: 696: 693: 666: 663: 644: 643: 596: 595:Rockets' table 593: 587: 584: 565: 564: 537: 534: 525: 522: 519: 518: 515: 514: 511: 510: 503:Low-importance 499: 493: 492: 490: 473:the discussion 460: 459: 456:Lebanon portal 443: 431: 430: 428:Low‑importance 422: 410: 409: 406: 405: 402: 401: 396: 386: 385: 380: 370: 369: 364: 354: 353: 351: 349: 343: 342: 334: 333: 330: 329: 327: 325: 324: 323: 312: 301: 290: 279: 265: 264: 262: 249: 239: 238: 236: 205: 193: 192: 173: 161: 160: 154: 143: 129: 128: 102: 101: 94: 86: 69: 57: 56: 24: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2252: 2241: 2238: 2236: 2233: 2231: 2228: 2226: 2223: 2221: 2218: 2216: 2213: 2211: 2208: 2206: 2203: 2201: 2198: 2196: 2193: 2191: 2188: 2187: 2185: 2178: 2177: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2151: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2132: 2131: 2127: 2123: 2113: 2112: 2108: 2104: 2094: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2080: 2072: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2052: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2039: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2019: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2006: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1986: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1973: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1957: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1938: 1934: 1928: 1921: 1915: 1908: 1904: 1898: 1891: 1885: 1878: 1874: 1868: 1861: 1857: 1851: 1847: 1839: 1838: 1836: 1820: 1817: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1806: 1802: 1799: 1798: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1775: 1772: 1769: 1766: 1765: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1752: 1749: 1746: 1743: 1742: 1738: 1735: 1732: 1731: 1726: 1725: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1703: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1688: 1685: 1684: 1680: 1677: 1676: 1671: 1670: 1667: 1663: 1660: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1645: 1641: 1640: 1636: 1633: 1632: 1627: 1626: 1623: 1622: 1618: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1603: 1599: 1596: 1593: 1592: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1579: 1576: 1573: 1570: 1569: 1565: 1562: 1559: 1558: 1553: 1552: 1549: 1546: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1531: 1528: 1525: 1522: 1521: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1508: 1504: 1501: 1498: 1497: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1484: 1480: 1477: 1474: 1473: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1460: 1457: 1454: 1451: 1450: 1446: 1443: 1440: 1439: 1434: 1433: 1430: 1426: 1425: 1421: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1406: 1403: 1400: 1397: 1396: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1383: 1379: 1376: 1373: 1372: 1368: 1365: 1362: 1361: 1356: 1355: 1352: 1349: 1348: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1308: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1286: 1283: 1279: 1276: 1273: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1263:summary style 1260: 1257: 1253: 1252: 1249: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1231: 1227: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1209: 1205: 1204: 1201: 1197: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1171:lead sections 1168: 1164: 1161: 1157: 1156: 1153: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1146: 1140: 1137: 1126: 1116: 1113: 1112: 1108: 1105: 1102: 1098: 1095: 1089: 1087: 1083: 1078: 1077: 1069: 1066: 1064: 1061: 1059: 1056: 1055: 1053: 1052: 1048: 1047: 1041: 1038: 1036: 1033: 1031: 1028: 1027: 1025: 1024: 1020: 1019: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 996: 995: 994: 990: 986: 982: 977: 974: 971: 968: 965: 962: 954: 953: 949: 948: 943: 942: 941: 927: 923: 919: 914: 913: 912: 911: 907: 903: 899: 895: 894: 890: 886: 881: 880: 876: 872: 861: 860: 856: 852: 842: 839: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 829: 825: 821: 817: 807: 806: 802: 798: 794: 793:. Thank you. 792: 788: 782: 780: 776: 772: 769:Please go to 767: 765: 761: 757: 753: 749: 745: 744: 736: 725: 721: 718: 712: 711: 706: 705: 704: 701: 692: 691: 685: 681: 677: 672: 662: 659: 658: 654: 651: 642: 638: 635: 629: 625: 624: 623: 622: 619: 614: 612: 607: 606: 603: 592: 583: 582: 579: 573: 569: 562: 561: 560: 556: 552: 548: 547: 543: 533: 529: 508: 504: 498: 495: 494: 491: 474: 470: 466: 465: 457: 446: 444: 441: 437: 436: 432: 426: 423: 420: 416: 415: 400: 392: 388: 387: 384: 376: 372: 371: 368: 360: 356: 355: 352: 350: 345: 344: 339: 335: 328: 326: 321:criterion met 313: 310:criterion met 302: 299:criterion met 291: 288:criterion met 280: 277:criterion met 269: 268: 267: 266: 263: 260: 259: 253: 250: 245: 241: 240: 237: 220: 216: 212: 211: 206: 203: 199: 198: 194: 190: 186: 182: 177: 174: 171: 167: 166: 162: 158: 152: 144: 140: 135: 134: 127: 123: 121: 117: 113: 109: 104: 99: 95: 92: 88: 87: 84: 82: 78: 70: 67: 63: 62: 54: 50: 46: 45: 40: 36: 35: 34: 28: 25: 18: 17: 2157: 2138: 2119: 2100: 2084:62.31.71.214 2081: 2078: 2055: 2045: 2022: 2012: 1989: 1979: 1960: 1950: 1936: 1932: 1927: 1914: 1907:copy editing 1902: 1897: 1884: 1867: 1859: 1850: 1831: 1830: 1818: 1813: 1783: 1773: 1767: 1760: 1750: 1744: 1708: 1704: 1696: 1686: 1661: 1653: 1642: 1619: 1611: 1600: 1594: 1587: 1577: 1571: 1547: 1540:Undetermined 1539: 1529: 1523: 1516: 1505: 1499: 1492: 1481: 1475: 1468: 1458: 1455:(references) 1452: 1428: 1422: 1414: 1404: 1398: 1391: 1380: 1374: 1351:Well-written 1350: 1291: 1287: 1277: 1269: 1256:main aspects 1247: 1219:cited inline 1199: 1193: 1152:Well-written 1151: 1145:good article 1142: 1131: 1114: 1103: 1093: 1092: 1079: 1068:Instructions 978: 975: 972: 969: 966: 963: 960: 946: 939: 938: 935: 896: 882: 867: 848: 813: 795: 783: 768: 755: 741: 740: 714: 702: 698: 668: 660: 647: 645: 631: 615: 608: 598: 589: 574: 570: 566: 557: 553: 549: 545: 539: 530: 527: 502: 462: 256: 208: 157:WikiProjects 124: 105: 85: 74: 42: 31: 30: 26: 2141:98.13.2.218 1920:sound clips 1705:Illustrated 1644:propaganda. 1314:with their 1288:Illustrated 1082:transcluded 828:explanation 676:Sa.vakilian 297:Structure: 189:Middle East 53:renominated 2184:Categories 2168:Longhornsg 2051:Fajr-3.jpg 1827:Discussion 1424:Verifiable 1241:plagiarism 1195:Verifiable 1035:Authorship 1021:GA toolbox 957:The future 851:FairuseBot 814:The image 181:Technology 2116:Hezbollah 1903:proposals 1877:footnotes 1597:(focused) 1094:Reviewer: 1058:Templates 1049:Reviewing 1014:GA Review 940:GreyShark 671:Hezbollah 524:INS Hanit 114:, or any 49:please do 1835:copyedit 1733:Criteria 1711:such as 1666:edit war 1560:Criteria 1441:Criteria 1363:Criteria 1331:relevant 1294:such as 1282:edit war 1136:WP:WIAGA 1119:Criteria 1107:contribs 1063:Criteria 1000:Denarivs 985:Denarivs 885:KAWASAKI 820:fair use 764:fair use 748:fair use 673:article. 665:Clean up 618:Dianelos 602:Dianelos 258:criteria 185:Weaponry 126:covered. 1871:Either 1739:Result 1681:Result 1637:Result 1621:Neutral 1588:On hold 1566:Result 1447:Result 1377:(prose) 1369:Result 1271:Neutral 1183:fiction 864:Sources 717:Michael 650:Michael 634:Michael 505:on the 478:Lebanon 469:Lebanon 425:Lebanon 147:B-class 2158:Merge 1803:Notes 1800:Result 1793:Result 1713:images 1662:Stable 1345:Review 1318:, and 1312:tagged 1296:images 1278:Stable 1185:, and 1175:layout 153:scale. 2162:into 1736:Notes 1721:audio 1719:, or 1717:video 1709:media 1678:Notes 1634:Notes 1563:Notes 1444:Notes 1427:with 1401:(MoS) 1366:Notes 1326:; and 1304:audio 1302:, or 1300:video 1292:media 1232:; and 1198:with 1084:from 947:dibra 628:BM-27 611:study 609:This 2172:talk 2145:talk 2126:talk 2107:talk 2088:talk 2066:talk 2033:talk 2000:talk 1967:talk 1814:Fail 1784:Pass 1761:Pass 1697:Pass 1654:Fail 1612:Fail 1517:Fail 1493:Fail 1469:Fail 1415:Pass 1392:Fail 1217:are 1213:(b) 1147:is— 1101:talk 1004:talk 989:talk 922:talk 906:talk 889:talk 875:talk 857:. -- 801:talk 756:this 578:Tban 75:The 2060:. — 2027:. — 1994:. — 1937:are 1933:not 1875:or 1860:not 1768:(b) 1745:(a) 1595:(b) 1572:(a) 1524:(d) 1500:(c) 1476:(b) 1453:(a) 1399:(b) 1375:(a) 1239:or 497:Low 2186:: 2174:) 2147:) 2128:) 2109:) 2090:) 2068:) 2035:) 2002:) 1969:) 1715:, 1298:, 1265:). 1181:, 1177:, 1173:, 1143:A 1109:) 1006:) 991:) 950:) 924:) 908:) 900:-- 891:) 877:) 803:) 766:. 720:Z. 688:-- 653:Z. 637:Z. 347:/ 187:/ 183:/ 179:: 2170:( 2143:( 2124:( 2105:( 2086:( 2064:( 2031:( 1998:( 1965:( 1723:: 1550:: 1431:: 1353:: 1337:. 1306:: 1250:: 1243:. 1210:; 1202:: 1189:. 1154:: 1104:· 1099:( 1002:( 987:( 944:( 920:( 904:( 887:( 873:( 799:( 715:— 686:) 684:c 682:- 680:t 678:( 648:— 632:— 509:. 221:. 159:: 100:) 55:.

Index

Warfare good article
good article criteria
the review page
please do
renominated

contentious topics
Arab–Israeli conflict
extended confirmed
limited circumstances
purpose of Knowledge
standards of behaviour
normal editorial process
contentious topics procedures

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Military history
Technology
Weaponry
Middle East
WikiProject icon
Military history WikiProject
list of open tasks
full instructions
B checklist
criteria
Taskforce icon
Military science, technology, and theory task force

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑