22:
71:
53:
175:
for importance. Given that I started the articles for
Hardgainer and Milo, and those were both questioned (and passed the test), I thought that fans of these pages might want to weigh in on whether they consider
212:
1. There is evidence that a reasonable number of people are, were or might be concurrently interested in the subject (eg. it is at least well-known in a community).
117:
152:
I changed the name of the magazine in the body to its proper title. Should the title of the article also be changed? I'm not sure how to do that...
262:
189:
128:
111:
267:
236:
has been publishing now for about 13 years, so I think this demonstrates significant interest in the weight-training community.
257:
87:
161:
229:
3. obscure. (Detailed obscure topics hurt no-one because it's hard to find them by accident, and
Knowledge isn't paper.)
205:
that has been quoted already on discussions for a couple of weight-training AfD discussions, and seems relevant here:
220:
If an article is "important" according to the above then there's no reason to delete it on the basis of it being:
78:
58:
243:
33:
166:
157:
86:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
209:
An article is "important" enough to be included in
Knowledge if any one of the following is true:
147:
21:
153:
39:
202:
8:
183:
177:
172:
251:
239:
However, I would certainly agree that the article could use some expansion.
240:
197:
83:
70:
52:
188:
In response to this article being tagged for importance by
223:
1. of insufficient importance, fame or relevance, or
82:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
180:important enough. Tjic 21:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
116:This article has not yet received a rating on the
171:I note that an editor has tagged the new article
249:
19:
133:for tips on how to improve this article.
195:As I posted on the discussion page for
250:
263:Unknown-importance magazine articles
129:WikiProject Magazines' writing guide
76:This article is within the scope of
15:
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
14:
279:
226:2. currently small or a stub, or
167:Significance of Powerlifting USA
69:
51:
20:
96:Knowledge:WikiProject Magazines
268:WikiProject Magazines articles
99:Template:WikiProject Magazines
1:
90:and see a list of open tasks.
258:Stub-Class magazine articles
162:20:16, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
7:
10:
284:
118:project's importance scale
124:
115:
64:
46:
244:14:00, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
28:This article is rated
79:WikiProject Magazines
203:Knowledge:Importance
216:It then continues:
34:content assessment
145:
144:
141:
140:
137:
136:
102:magazine articles
275:
178:Powerlifting USA
173:Powerlifting USA
154:Stephen Fletcher
104:
103:
100:
97:
94:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
47:
31:
25:
24:
16:
283:
282:
278:
277:
276:
274:
273:
272:
248:
247:
186:
169:
150:
101:
98:
95:
92:
91:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
281:
271:
270:
265:
260:
231:
230:
227:
224:
221:
214:
213:
210:
185:
182:
168:
165:
149:
148:Magazine title
146:
143:
142:
139:
138:
135:
134:
122:
121:
114:
108:
107:
105:
88:the discussion
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
280:
269:
266:
264:
261:
259:
256:
255:
253:
246:
245:
242:
237:
235:
228:
225:
222:
219:
218:
217:
211:
208:
207:
206:
204:
200:
199:
193:
191:
181:
179:
174:
164:
163:
159:
155:
132:
131:
130:
123:
119:
113:
110:
109:
106:
89:
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
238:
233:
232:
215:
196:
194:
187:
170:
151:
127:
126:
77:
40:WikiProjects
190:User:FRCP11
252:Categories
198:Hardgainer
184:Notability
30:Stub-class
93:Magazines
84:magazines
59:Magazines
241:Dsreyn
36:scale.
234:Milo
192:...
158:talk
125:See
112:???
254::
201:,
160:)
156:(
120:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
