Talk:Ratt/Archive 1

246:

is the legitimate source for the band being of "continuing importance and influence over rock music and the United States|American music industry"? On the former claim, one or two bands claiming they like RATT's sound doesn't qualify, otherwise every band could claim similar influence. Where is the source from objective rock journalism, or the multiple sources to multiple successful and productive current bands that nod toward RATT as an influence? Also, even if sourced, the claim will most likely have to be qualified, i.e., "RATT's early music continues to be influentital for..." or "RATT's music continues to be influential for the rising generation of metal bands." For the latter claim, precisely how is RATT continuing to influence the music industry today? Have they reimagined the album format, brought legions of new fans to a small genre, returned the genre to its roots in live performance, pioneered downloading, etc.? Finally, the claim that the band is "rivaled" only by Nirvana, GnR, Metallica, and Def Leppard appears tremendously vague and incredibly overblown. First, rival in what way? In terms of influence or historical importance, the band isn't even close to being regarded alongside Nirvana. In terms of album sales in the 80s, Def Leppard far outstrips them; in terms of album sales today, Metallica far outranks them. In fact, to claim that the band is "only rivaled" by this handful of bands implies that RATT sits atop a hill onto the peak of which that the other mentioned bands occasionally nudge their way. In its current state, the article simply uses the term "widely" five times, each use allowing the claim to elide concerns for sourcing, qualification, and specificity. --

212:

that RATT was influential for people who bought the record (though one would need to be specific in precisely how this influence manifested itself to include the claim; e.g., "The studio complexity of 'Pet Sounds' was influential on the Beatles as they worked on "Sergeant Peppers...."). Nor would I counter the claim that the band influenced others within and without its genre. But I disagree that the article, in places, does not try to make sections of the band's recordings "on par with the Beach Boys" (which was, if you read my post carefully, never a comparison I made; I compared Jan & Dean to the Beach Boys in terms of quality and only mentioned RATT in relation to the Beach Boys in terms of the dates at which they appeared on the Southern California music scene). Certainly, the claim about RATT having an album--and that album, of all that one might have chosen-that remains a "pillar" to "the annals of rock history" is one that few would support. Really, would any serious rock historian or knowledgable fan consider "Dancing Undercover" an integral, supporting album that helps support an understanding of sixty-five years of rock? There's no problem with developing well supported, qualified claims defining the band's influence or importance. That's simply not what the article does right now. Finally, I like the music, grew up on it, but none of that should matter at all as the article develops. Indeed, having crtical voices in the mix can really help the tone and quality of the evolving product. --

227:

rooms.) Can anyone seriously make the argument that "Dancing Undercover" is "important" in the "annals of rock ' roll history"? Also, the claim that they are "pioneers of the Southern California music scene" (in any sense, "intrepid" or otherwise) is pretty tough to make given that they first charted in the 1980s, well after, one would imagine, that scene had established itself with, say, the Beach Boys and Jan & Dean. Obviously, Ratt is in a different generic category (and incidentally, enjoyed far less commercial success) than these groups, but the fact that such claims allow for the confusion only highlights the problems with the article to date. The article is simply trying to hard to make the band sound as if it was/were significant within rock history--and its tough to make a comparison with Chuck Berry, Nirvana, Elvis, Beatles, etc.--rather than significant within the more appropriately limited genre of glam metal. I mean, though they're before my time, I like the previously mentioned California groups. But the Beach Boys was an important rock group; Jan & Dean was "only" an important surf rock group. Any arguments to be made against some fairly substantial deltions and/or re-writing? --

2007:. I am not attempting to be disruptive or cause any harm. I merely stated the facts as they are and updated the page in a concise manner according to the current information as it is. I applied the updates, and there seemed to be no issues until it was converted back to the version from over a year ago, therefore basically erasing a year's worth of history for this band. I see above it is stated you wanted to wait until legal proceedings were complete, but there is no clue as to when this will happen, so the page should be updated to state what the current status is. Because people come here to find this information. And, as it stands now, the information is incorrect as it refers to the court date with DeMartini, but does not provide the outcome, therefore leading readers to believe there wasn't one, or to come to their own conclusion. This is skewed data and needs to be updated. 648:

hook emphasis (favoring vocals as opposed to riffs) makes for a pretty clear line between that and any Heavy Metal genre. Generally with these bands, you'll see more space allowed for an earthy side, where tinges of southern rock, blues shuffle swagger and Chuck Berry-isms abound. (looking at Poison, Guns 'N Roses, Bon Jovi, etc. here) Also there's the bands who did put out some material in a Heavy Metal vein and completely dropped it for more rock/AOR directions, causing further confusion about their later material.(most infamously, Def Leppard) And White Lion is as heavy as a paperclip.

31: 1790:

part of fact and history and should be documented as such. You removed ALL legal references I had input to legally back up why all changes should be made. I had all of the information with the legal proceedings. And you removed all of this. This is ALL part of the history. Do you not agree this part of the history? You're going to arbitrarily remove the history of the last years because you don't like it? Or don't agree with it? Now THAT is against Knowledge's policies.

1893:. On November 5, 2015, a ruling overturned Warren Demartini and his attempt to procure an injunction to prevent Ratt Owner and Ceo Bobby Blotzer from using and touring under the Ratt trademark. Since then, Bobby Blotzer was allowed to use the name RATT. Since this time they are legally considered RATT. As I stated previously, this is part of the history and cannot be just removed. 655:. Motley Crue, W.A.S.P., Twisted Sister, Dokken, Quiet Riot... I feel they were the core of what the movement represents. Older, established Heavy Metal/Speed Metal/NWOBHM bands also released albums with Glam Metal aspects during the mid-80's: Judas Priest, Black Sabbath(w Tony Martin), Ozzy Osbourne band, Scorpions, Warlock, Saxon, for example. 2219:

Jack Russell's Great White. After the threat, I'm afraid to do any changes, and have unfortunately had to post elsewhere for help. However, if you are able to revert the changes, I can notate that you did them. If you don't feel comfortable doing this, I understand, and will continue to pursue other means to get this resolved. Thank you again.

611:

to be thrashier by having more mid-tempo pop oriented songs? Look at the song list and sing the chorus in your head and you can see how not-heavy the album is. That's why the fans didn't like it as much as the first album or EP. If it's not heavy, it's not metal. Out of the Cellar has some heavy stuff. 23 October 2008 REL

2234:

issues with these facts - they are what they are and someone's opinion on the matter does not matter). Since there is an understandable issue with using the RATT FB page as a reference, here is another link that states that Bobby Blotzer won the case over a year ago against DeMartini to use the RATT name:

3010:

Someone has once again removed the American Made Tour lineup. Since nothing has been heard from Blotzer, perhaps let this rest. However, there should be nothing else removed regarding the version and/or members of Blotzer's RATT, as this is part of the history of the band. Please let me know what you

2953:

If you've actually read the page, it states Pearcy toured in 99-2000 as Nitronic, and then later as Ratt Featuring Stephen Pearcy. He did not tour as RATT, as Bobby's version has. Bobby's version was legal at that time. Yes, it is confusing. But the fact - and it is fact - remains Bobby's version was

2349:

Made changes to reflect Blotzer's court proceedings, band members, and tour. Unable to revert due to conflicting changes. Someone had already added the November 2016 court ruling, but the citation wasn't input correctly, so I fixed this as well. Thank you to everyone for your input/help/assistance. I

1935:

I am still not seeing a response from either one of you. Would you not agree that this is what was needed to show you that the band that is currently touring and in place is RATT? And would you not agree that the updates I had in place were accurate? If I do not receive a response or input, I'm going

275:

It would be helpful if the anonymous poster reverting to POV comments would use the talk page to address these problems or provide sources for his/her opinion. Failing that, the page would seem to be fated to bouncing back and forth. Is there any reason not to submit this difference for mediation?

245:

Again, the previous Hall of Fame assertions were extremely POV and completely unsupportable. There's simply no way to demonstrate the the bad is "guaranteed" admission, a fact the bulk of the current article admits in detailing mainstream critics' frequent dismaissal of much of its work. Also, what

2443:

In the Ratt albums I noticed that somebody is trying to delete the RYM links and ratings. I think we should keep it because there are alot of other albums with the RYM ratings. It may not be professional reviews but thet are reviews made by fans and if certain fans liked the albums you might like it

2045:

When someone says "legally" it can be assumed that the person is related to the subject. Moreover, Facebook is not necessarily a good source as most of the time it contains POV from certain party, which doesn't belong here. Current band's status is something similar to Great White vs. Jack Russell's

811:

RATT. Now whether we like it or not, I believe that we have an obligation to report the closest we can to the truth, and I believe that the Bobby/Blaze/Alan/Ellis/Griffin band is what would currently count as RATT. I find that either way with the status of the original members feuds, that given that

610:

Back in the early 80's, they would have been labled metal just as Van Halen was. They would not have been considered thrash metal. Looking back you can see how "pop" they were trying to be as a metal band. So the "Dancing Undercover" section should be changed. How does anyone say Ratt was trying

2930:

Then we should list the band members when Stephen Pearcy tried to book dates as Ratt in 2000 as well? And Deep Purple band members in the early 80's, when their original singer tried to use the band name? It can be listed in the history of the band, but to list them as current band member when that

647:

I agree with what you're saying, as long as it's clear that it's a blurry crossover territory. From where I stand, it's easy to discredit most of the so-called Glam Metal scene and correctly classify most of it as Hard Rock in it's 80's form. Differences in melodic content, lyrical atmospheres, and

207:

The article does need a clean up but not for the reasons that the previous comment suggested. The tone of the article is not a grandstanding attempt to make RATT on par with the Beach Boys, as that comment said. It is obvious that this person a negative POV toward this type of music. RATT may not

2233:

There seems to be a misunderstanding that I'm posting this information as from my POV (as Mlpearc seemed to point out on my wall). The facts are the facts - the judgments have been made. This is not a POV issue, this is not my opinion, but actual things that have occurred (despite that others have

2218:

reverted my changes after you and I made the consensus, and then sent me two messages threatening to have me removed if I revert the page again. Is it at all possible that you can revert the change you made? I know this is asking a lot, and I will absolutely make the changes so the page similar to

1789:

version of RATT, which is your opinion. Not fact. What I input is the history of RATT, and the current members (Bobby Blotzer, Joshua Alan, Mitch Perry, Brad Lang, and Stacey Blades) cannot be erased from the history. True, there are still legal proceedings, but it does not matter as this is still

1775:

Legally this is the version of RATT and should be reflected. Your discussion took place nearly a year ago and since then the band received legal allowance to tour as RATT and is considered RATT. It does not matter that you consider it to not to be. Legally it is. And it is part of RATT's history,

440:

Based on Pearcy interviews, if RATT recorded new music and released it, Pearcy would be owed money because of the use of the RATT name. So from what I understand based on various articles read, RATT as it is today will simply tour but not record or release new tunes. Best bet would be to watch the

211:

Thanks for your thoughts on this. First, I don't know why it's "obvious" I have negative feelings about the band or its genre of music. I simply suggested that the claims of the article, as it stood when I wrote the comment, were unsupported, and, it seems, overblown in some cases. I don't deny

2887:

A judge said Bobby Blotzer can not use the Ratt name, the few times he tried in the last month. A cease and desist was issued the show was cancelled. he is expelled from the partnership and has no legal rights to the name. So how are you doing Blotzer, enjoying some cheesecake with your time off?

2412:

Please read and come to a consensus on this talk page prior to making changes to the RATT page. The line up with Blotzer still has tour dates scheduled until the end of this year (and into 2017) and nothing has prevented them from going on these dates. There is no court order to state they cannot

1685:

I reassessed the article to C status. More than half of the article lacks references and some of the links provided are dead. I cleaned up some prose and wikilinks, but the suspect of original research remains for various contents of the article. Some free images and sound clips would be welcome,

226:

As it currently stands, this article approaches hagiographical tone in regard to the band's quality. What is the sourced, scholarly justification for Ratt being "talented" (how does one even measure this?) or "pop-savvy" (when was its last hit on the pop charts?)? (Not fan sites, blogs, or chat

632:

Lets make it clear once for all. Ratt were heavy metal. They are clearly not trash metal and they are very different form Iron Maiden and Judas Priest. This is why they are glam metal, which is still heavy metal, like it or not. This is it. Heavy metal. hard rock and glam metal is the trio which

2912:

Despite what the judge states, this is part of the history of this band. It doesn't matter what anyone thinks... It's fact and history. That's what Knowledge is about. Just adding my own consensus as what has been decided upon in the past. Again... It's about fact. What the history is. It's all

2483:

I see in the infobox that there are sources identifying Ratt as heavy metal, glam metal, and hard rock. And yet the lead sentence defines them as heavy metal, and it isn't until the end of the lead that it mentions the obvious fact that they are more in the vein of glam/hair metal. I think this

351:

I see no mention anywhere of Milton Berle. I'm positive that this band's lead singer is Milton Berle's great-nephew--that's why Uncle Miltie was in the band's video, if anybody remembers the Round and Round vid. I may start to look for a citation. For someone as significant to entertainment as

236:

Indeed, the tone of the article does sound more like a late night pitch for CDs than an encyclopedia article. For example, "impressive guitar solos," could better be written as "noted for the strength of the guitar solos," if such a reference could be cited would be a more encyclopedic tone.

333:

True, the song was written by Rufus Thomas. However, Ratt's cover was inspired by the Aerosmith version, from the album Aerosmith (1973). Indeed, Aerosmith was very influential in the Southern California metal scene. GnR covered Mama Kin from the same Aerosmith album. My revision notes the

2973:

Pearcy tried to tour as Ratt, then a judge shot it down, like a judge did to Bobby Blotzer. Jack Russell is legally allowed to tour as long as it is called Jack Russell's Great White, that is in their court settlement. A judge ordered that Blotzer has no right to the name. You are clueless.

876:

I believe more photos of the band and band members need to be in the article. even a original photo of the original Mickey Ratt era. Having only one photo of the band wont turn people on to what they were or looked like back then, other band articles have lots this article needs a few more.

3030:

The article has been flagged for a lack of sources for more than a decade. It still needs more sources, and has been tagged accordingly. It also could use more information about the band's formation. There are a few instances where sections do not seem connected to their section headings.

2988:

Listing that it happened is one thing, but to list it as a current line up, when a judge said it isn't a legal lineup and that he can't use the name is asinine. There are no dates booked, and he can't legally book dates, if he does, there will be a cease and desist and the show will be

1746:

Info was updated a few months ago to reflect the new members of RATT. User Sabbatino reverted all changes with the comment, "Last good version." This is someone's opinion and should not be instituted within Knowledge. I reverted his changes to reflect the facts. November 28, 2016.

260:

Please injclude sourced support for the claim the the band's induction to the Hall of Fame is "guaranteed"--is it even possible to do this?--or cease reverting to the section that includes this claim. This is POV, and more properly the realm for fan sites, not an encyclopedia.

855:

We should leave Ratt on hiatus until all legal disputes are over. In my opinion, there's no need to change its last known lineup to "current" members of Blotzer's version as there's not many sources which tell us how the lawsuits are going between Blotzer and the others. –

162:

No mention whatsoever is made of the Ratt song "Tell The World" which initially appeared on Metal Blade Record's Metal Massacre I. The ten included tracks were mostly thrash metal, notably Metallica's "Hit the Lights", and "Tell the World" was omitted in later pressings

2195:

The only reason why there is this "hostility" towards edits is because there used to be a user who claimed that he/she was connected to Blotzer's Ratt and always added copyvio material. But as long as there's an understanding I'm not going to revert recent changes. –

1999:. But since I was still within the conversation in which I was replying to myself, I kept the same indent... I provided the legal documentation stating that the current lineup is the correct line up for RATT. This was decided upon in a court of law. This adheres to 730:

A Lotta people compare and put Crue and Ratt against and rival echother when it comes to the 80's, Motley crue to people are fully credited as a heavy metal band, but what about Ratt, when ratt first hit the scene it was all heavy metal 1982, so its hard but I was

1498:

OK, on second thought I see the reason. Since the "official" Ratt seems to be in debate, we should not link to either website in the infobox until that's resolved. I'll remove the link there and remove the "official" descriptor from the external links section.

2856:

Because, the community decides what is listed in Knowledge, not some judge or even the President for that matter :P Now the thing to do is start a new discussion about removing it and if the community agrees, out it goes, that how it works around here. -

512:

I write to report that this article has been vandalized in various parts in these days. Luckily it only involved minor vulgar attacks, but still I had to undo more than one edit. If this goes on, I think it would be wise to have the page semi-protected.

812:

this band has officially started promoting themselves as RATT and not "Bobby Blotzer's Ratt Experience" as the same group of musicians, and that DeMartini is currently failing his lawsuits against them, it seems that this is really the new Ratt. See:

2506:

It's fine the way it is. There's no mention of them being "more in the vein of glam/hair metal". That sentence only makes a mention that they were one the most important bands of that scene, but that doesn't mean they aren't heavy metal. For example,

290:

Hello everyone, Cory pratt here. I would like to thank all of you for helping me with this article and the articles related to this, however, some of you are making too much POVish statements. Some of you are making Ratt sound like they were like

2095:

Thank you. That I can do. If you don't mind, I'm going to revert the latest version that included all the edits made by the bots and others, and all the latest references, and then will edit it to be similar to Jack Russell's Great White.

1780:

I have been using and editing within Knowledge for going on 9 years now (no, not on a regular basis). However, I am well aware of the fact that content is not to be edited based on people's opinions. It is to show the facts. And, in your

2093:"Current band's status is something similar to Great White vs. Jack Russell's Great White situation. If the reverted content is added again then it should be in the vein of Great White situation and there won't be any problems." 449:

There's been reports that Pearcy and DeMartini have been writing songs and that the band will release a new album in 2009. Of course, it's up fairly up in the air, so until the band enters the studio, it's speculation.

746:

Plus Albums, Shout at The Devil came out 1983 it was known as Heavy Metal, same with Out of the cellar and the EP 1983-1984. Plus its hard going on which albums heavier I personally love both and both are heavy metal

2214:. I'm not sure who that user is that is making the claims of being connected to Blotzer (actually I do recall someone stating they were related to him, but I have no idea who that is - I am not related to him.). But 2802: 479:---Response My honest opinion is that they were a Glam Metal band. I say this because of how they dressed, but to seperate them from the Poisons, Warrants, and Cinderellas, they were much, much heavier. 2812:

If nobody can find a reason to keep Blotzer's Ratt listed within a few days, only the current version of Ratt featuring Pearcy, Demartini and Croucier will be listed, because that was the judge's order.

394:

Hello again. I'm kinda confused whether that sticker on that car in the VH1 Classic Commercial is Winnie the Pooh or that Grateful Dead Bear. Does anyone know? Because both of them look a lot alike.--

498:

Well, I don't think it does make any difference anyway. Mötley Crüe was called hair metal and was pretty much as heavy as Ratt. Anyway, from what episode is that Simpsons bit? I'd like to see it.

2165:

and I came to a consensus, and I was doing exactly as he requested, and then I'm being accused of being in an edit war? I'm going to once again revert the changes. If the changes are reverted by

2335:

The admin hold on the page has been removed, so I'm going to revert and start applying the promised changes and also update with the latest news as well. I will update here when done. Thanks!

74:

I've been trying to learn all I can about the Mickey Ratt period of the band. They went through various line-ups during that time, including quite a few people who were also in Rough Cutt.

2661: 1585: 1405: 962: 316:"On the back cover of the EP, the band gives a "special thanks to Beth". This is in reference to Beth Fairbrother, who managed Ratt prior to the band signing with Atlantic Records." 2679: 2675: 1603: 1599: 1423: 1419: 980: 976: 2561: 208:

be important to critics but they did have an enormous effect upon the music of the 80's and the substantial amount of people that bought their records and watched them on MTV.

1483:

from the band's verified Twitter account the official website has changed. The old one may have been official for longer, but I see no reason not to update our information.

2611: 2571: 2595: 766:, not the opinions of people who want to edit the article. The way to determine the genre of a band is to look at the published sources and summarize them for the reader. 2798: 2236: 815: 622: 131: 666: 379: 193:

which was tagged incorrectly as a Windows screenshot. Unless an editor can get permission to use this image under GFDL or similar, the image is going to be deleted.

174: 798: 603: 578: 560: 2806: 803:

The status of this band has been absolutely crazy and the edits on this page have joined in on the madness, yet no one has brought up a discussion about it. My

1037: 190: 2763: 1936:

to assume that my legal backup is proof enough that the changes were, in fact, accurate and that I can revert the page back to the correct text. Thank you.

589: 455: 499: 470:

Does it really matter if we call Ratt a hair or glam metal? For me I think that Glam Metal is a more appropriate genre to call them. What do you think?--

2444:

too. And if certain fans hate it you might also hate it. So I think we need to work something out like maybe create a section on the infobox that says "

2046:

Great White situation. If the reverted content is added again then it should be in the vein of Great White situation and there won't be any problems. –

2267:

This is to let you know that I, unfortunately, had to place a dispute regarding Mlpearc (he's asked me to not ping him). You can see the dispute here

824: 784:

Its not just the opinion, Its the truth about the era and albums, Its always the truth about me and the true guys who grew up in the metal era. TRUTH

483:

Ratt are connected to Rough Cutt, who are connected to Ronnie James Dio's bands. Obviously, musical classification is going to be kind of difficult.

2181:

and wished me good luck, and then he throws an accusation at me for starting an edit war? Wrong on all counts. And completely unprofessional. edit:

1092:. I'd avoid Blabbermouth unless it's reviews or else press releases, since it's hard to gauge the editorial oversight for news postings on the site. 651:

To the point though, early Ratt DOES represent in every aspect what I would include in the actual, fleeting genre known as Glam Metal as opposed to

2990: 2975: 2948: 2932: 2907: 2889: 2851: 2833: 2772: 2744: 849: 2413:

tour. To state their last date was on November 30, 2016 is incorrect. Please fix the dates to reflect the correct timeframe. Thank you. See ref:

2407: 2401: 1712: 546: 451: 335: 320: 1317:

I've never listened to Ratt, but I know that they were one of the big glam metal groups. Thank you for providing some context to the request.--

708: 105: 2562:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110927222032/http://www.metalsludge.tv/home/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1570&Itemid=1

1230:

from Alberta, Canada, has been insisting on his own interpretation of the band's genre. For instance, he has removed the "glam metal" genre

2091:

I understand what you're saying. Unfortunately that was their only platform at that time, which is why the press release was placed there.

778: 434: 2732: 545:

Ratt a heavy metal band ?. You must be joking!. It's ridiculous. It's like calling ABBA rock and roll. Ratt is a mainstream pop rock band.

151: 2612:

https://web.archive.org/web/20101030153324/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=148402

2572:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110606053924/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/Blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=132413

901: 2596:

https://web.archive.org/web/20101220071115/http://metalholic.com/2010/03/ratt-interview-with-warren-demartini-let-the-infestation-begin/

1551: 418: 2878: 2737:

The case was closed and decided by a judge and appeal's court. This is silly and make Knowledge a joke and unreliable by listing it.

2555: 2524: 1758:

As I see that you're a new user, I advise you to get familiar with Knowledge's policies before editing, adding or removing content. –

1342: 1312: 2727: 2565: 1778:"As I see that you're a new user, I advise you to get familiar with Knowledge's policies before editing, adding or removing content." 1069: 1052:. For a band like this that had the type of mainstream presence that it did, there should be plenty of reliable sources to draw from. 816:

https://www.facebook.com/TheRattExperience/photos/a.769995743110547.1073741828.769610033149118/856446344465486/?type=3&permPage=1

2998: 2983: 2940: 2897: 2841: 2826: 2784: 2756: 2657:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

865: 422: 2967: 2922: 2330: 2316: 2228: 2205: 2105: 2055: 1799: 3020: 2791:

It sounds like Bobby Blotzer keeps really editing himself as a member of Ratt. Even though a judge told him he isn't allowed to.

2615: 2589: 2575: 2355: 2344: 2302: 2255: 2190: 2138: 2016: 1979: 1945: 1902: 1844: 1048:. Also, most of the sources are primary, in that they are press releases or other similar news clippings, most re-posted through 633:

describes them well, as it describes well Poison, Motley Crue, Cinderella, Warrant, Dokken and many other 80's bands of the time.

2599: 2475:

As well as a similar name the 'british' band RAT:ATT:AGG uses the same fonts as the RATT logo, any one know any more about this

1669:, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section. 720: 2157:

Well, I reverted the changes and was in the process of editing the page to make it similar to Jack Russell's Great White, when

2089:"Facebook is not necessarily a good source as most of the time it contains POV from certain party, which doesn't belong here." 1649: 1469: 135: 1754:

This was discussed on multiple occasions in the past and it was determined to leave everything as it was before the split.

1026: 756: 2954:

a version of RATT, and did tour as such. All bookings used the logo and the name. Just like Great White and Jack Russell's

1727: 1508: 1235: 1045: 696: 618: 231: 127: 83: 2269: 793: 740: 398: 2764:

http://loudwire.com/ratt-dispute-settled-stephen-pearcy-warren-demartini-juan-croucier-oust-bobby-blotzer-regain-control/

2484:

should be re-arranged, but knowing how prickly people get about genre changes I'm bringing it here for discussion first.

1686:

too. I also removed the assessment of WikiProject San Diego, which has nothing to do with Ratt, a band from Los Angeles.

1227: 892:

There's only one picture related to Ratt on Wikimedia Commons. Therefore, more pictures aren't available at this time. –

878: 785: 748: 732: 662: 502: 375: 280: 170: 3032: 1695: 688: 599: 574: 556: 474: 1720:

Yeah, there names has always been stylized in all capital letter as "RATT". That needs to be changed in the article.

1679: 492: 2530: 1514: 1350: 702: 2547: 1220: 265: 2493: 1767: 626: 588:

Do you think that Europe the band that had topped the charts with "The Final Countdown" were influenced by Ratt ?.

529: 383: 197: 2161:

decided to revert the changes and then send me two messages accusing me of doing an edit war. This is ridiculous.

1991:

Yes, you did ask a question, but included "WTF" within that question, which was rather disrespectful. Pretty sure

886: 827: 825:

http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/warren-demartini-vs-bobby-blotzer-the-continuing-battle-over-rights-to-ratt-name/

676: 670: 323: 2780: 2752: 907: 582: 338: 299:

which they're actually not. Some of you need to stop making these POVish statements in the article. Bye for Now--

178: 3040: 2832:

How can there be a consensus when, a judge granted rights to one side and ordered the other not to use the name?

2678:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

1675:

Article has much content and media but probably needs better and more references for Good Article nomination. -

1602:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

1422:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

1059: 979:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

459: 363: 216: 2003:, as the reference was provided to state that legal outcome. All information was kept neutral and factual, per 1335: 1213: 1089: 642: 533: 414: 389: 2433: 1492: 303: 78: 1174: 1134: 1735: 821: 2722: 2651: 2645: 2639: 2633: 2627: 2621: 2243:/ratt-battle-over-band-name-continues-the-choke-hold-misappropriation-of-power-has-ended-says-bobby-blotzer 1124: 250: 1231: 1129: 1095: 725: 465: 221: 2697:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1621:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1441:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

998:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2817:

There is a consensus to list both versions and until we decide otherwise, this is what we will list. –

2546:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1731: 1654: 1169: 1031: 567:

How many ttimes do I have to tell you guys that Ratt are not heavy metal ?. They are a pop rock band

90: 38: 3059: 1715: 328: 1552:

http://web.archive.org/web/20150920105021/http://articles.latimes.com/2002/jun/14/local/me-passings14

410: 270: 184: 1877: 769:

It doesn't matter what your personal opinion is; it only matters what was published about the band.

2556:

http://www.metalsludge.tv/home/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1454&Itemid=42

1741: 1474: 308: 98: 2605: 2566:

http://www.metalsludge.tv/home/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1570&Itemid=1

2293:. The volunteer asked if you wish to have any input. If you wish to, please go ahead. Thank you. 2713: 2478: 1711:

Their website renders their name in all caps. I changed it on the page, but someone reverted it.

1114: 882: 789: 752: 736: 716: 2682:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

1606:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

1426:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

983:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

3036: 2698: 1622: 1555: 1442: 1189: 1119: 999: 692: 428: 2616:

http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=148402

2590:

http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.Net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=117604

2576:

http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/Blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=132413

1280: 1251: 433:

Does anyone know if Ratt is still writing music or have any plans to release further albums?-

319:

The back cover of the original album I have on Time Coast/Enigma contains no such reference.--

2776: 2748: 2685: 2600:

http://metalholic.com/2010/03/ratt-interview-with-warren-demartini-let-the-infestation-begin/

2395: 2307:

My hands are tied on this one as the article is now protected and only admins can edit it. –

2169:, I will have to report him. Everything is documented here that a consensus was made, as per 1954:

before replacing your changes and this discussion so far is not consensus. Oh, please review

1691: 1641: 1609: 1461: 1429: 1308: 1184: 1179: 1149: 1040:

to look through Ratt's discography and identify unreliable sources. This is what I've found:

1018: 986: 807:

is that of course this new band is not RATT. However, I think that officially, this new band

774: 1661: 1480: 681:

Who were the members involved with Stephen's pseudo-version of the band back in 2000/2001?

2868: 2794: 2768: 2740: 2705: 2489: 1992: 1723: 1629: 1576: 1449: 1006: 818: 684: 658: 638: 614: 595: 570: 552: 525: 517: 406: 371: 346: 255: 166: 123: 1387: 944: 8: 2994: 2979: 2936: 2893: 2837: 2822: 2520: 2415: 2312: 2201: 2170: 2051: 1951: 1763: 1099: 1085: 897: 871: 861: 540: 507: 488: 352:

Berle, at least a passing refence seems right. Added 09-06-06 1315 CST by Jason S. Klepp

277: 262: 247: 228: 213: 147: 69: 3025: 2664:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2583: 1588:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1408:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1326: 1242:

good sources about Ratt! Some have been cited in the articles, but not enough of them.

1204: 1065: 965:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 845: 712: 285: 157: 2704:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

1628:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

1448:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

1005:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

3016: 2963: 2918: 2429: 2351: 2340: 2326: 2298: 2251: 2224: 2186: 2128: 2101: 2012: 1969: 1941: 1898: 1834: 1795: 1533: 1369: 1139: 1075: 1055: 926: 142:

I think the article needs to go into a lot more detail about the Mickey Ratt period.

1703:

Last edited at 09:48, 15 June 2015 (UTC). Substituted at 03:57, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

3055: 2246:. I hope this helps to better clear up the reference I mentioned above. Thank you. 1996: 1955: 1687: 1637: 1457: 1304: 1245: 1079: 1049: 1014: 770: 202: 2859: 2543: 2501: 2485: 2465: 2453: 1676: 1541: 1527: 1377: 1363: 1274: 1266: 1257: 1154: 1144: 1109: 934: 920: 634: 521: 471: 395: 360: 300: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3045: 3005: 2818: 2516: 2308: 2262: 2211: 2197: 2162: 2152: 2047: 2004: 1930: 1870: 1759: 1504: 1488: 1164: 893: 857: 837: 828:

http://loudwire.com/ratt-bobby-blotzer-wins-second-court-ruling-over-band-name/

484: 143: 75: 2670:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1594:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1414:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 971:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2508: 2000: 1666: 1318: 1248:

they were a hair band and a glam metal band, mixing hard rock with pop hooks.

1196: 841: 194: 112: 711:

without discussion. Not sure how this affects the other compilation albums.

3012: 2959: 2914: 2425: 2336: 2322: 2294: 2247: 2220: 2215: 2182: 2174: 2166: 2158: 2145: 2119: 2112: 2097: 2008: 1986: 1960: 1937: 1923: 1894: 1863: 1825: 1814: 1791: 1706: 1159: 833: 292: 2512: 2464:

Does anyone have any links to show how many albums Ratt has sold to date?-

3051: 2955: 2671: 1595: 1415: 972: 822:

http://loudwire.com/bobby-blotzer-wins-first-round-battle-over-ratt-name/

763: 296: 240: 2652:

http://www.blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=186270

2646:

http://www.blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=173941

2640:

http://www.blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=172865

2634:

http://www.blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=171761

2628:

http://www.blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=169001

2622:

http://www.blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=168875

2438: 1538:

after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add

1374:

after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add

1046:

News article on Ultimate Guitar that is not attributed to a staff member

931:

after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add

1300: 1296: 189:

This article contains a copyrighted image downloaded from the Internet

1238:. We must stick with genres found in the literature. Of course, there 2913:

there. Just because someone doesn't like it, doesn't make it untrue.

1500: 1484: 1292: 441:

VH1 show tonight to see if they offer any insight for Ratt's future.

47: 17: 1303:

into the same genre, which means that Ratt is certainly glam metal.

1995:

have something to say about that. Thanks for the reference to the

1546:

to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

1382:

to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

1277:

that Ratt was one of the big hair metal bands from the L.A. scene.

939:

to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

2931:

band doesn't legally exist is asinine and make Knowledge a joke.

2470: 2459: 2606:

http://www.planetrock.com/Article.asp?id=1998354&spid=35830

1072:

that doesn't even fully support the content it's supposed to.

2515:

says "rock band", while their infoboxes say the opposite. –

1561:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

1556:

https://articles.latimes.com/2002/jun/14/local/me-passings14

1393:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

950:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

3050:

This article needs something about how the band formed. --

2539: 1523: 1359: 916: 2550:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

355:

Milton is not the lead singer's nephew, he was the band's

1522:

I have just added archive links to one external link on

1358:

I have just added archive links to one external link on

1286:

that Ratt is the "poster child" for the pop metal genre.

915:

I have just added archive links to one external link on

819:

http://ultimateclassicrock.com/ratt-re-infestation-tour/

2404:

without discussion or consensus here on the talk page.

2117:

Well, I'm moving on, good luck with your consensus. -

1388:

http://www.juancroucier.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/007476.html

1060:

Review on Ultimate Guitar that is not by a staff member

945:

http://www.juancroucier.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/007476.html

1105:

The following articles have no sources listed at all:

368:

I bet you mean UNCLE, not nephew? - Anonymous Coward

1875:

I had all documentation within the page. Please see

2674:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1598:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1418:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 975:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 799:Who is in RATT? And how do we resolve this here. 445:Damn! Pearcy should go to hell then!-Cory pratt 1665:, and are posted here for posterity. Following 2660:This message was posted before February 2018. 1584:This message was posted before February 2018. 1404:This message was posted before February 2018. 961:This message was posted before February 2018. 1659:The comment(s) below were originally left at 2958:, which has both versions on the same page. 1254:says that Ratt's best output was pop metal. 2538:I have just modified 12 external links on 1773:"This was discussed on multiple occasions" 14: 2321:Yes, I see that. Thank you very much! 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2799:2601:543:4080:2D96:8C9A:36DB:D7B5:7E4 1950:I just asked a question. You'll need 1776:whether people agree with it or not. 1573:to let others know (documentation at 25: 1228:Special:Contributions/75.155.46.228 23: 707:One of the compilation albums was 24: 3070: 2733:There is no Bobby Blotzer's Ratt. 2542:. Please take a moment to review 1667:several discussions in past years 1526:. Please take a moment to review 1362:. Please take a moment to review 919:. Please take a moment to review 3011:think and if you agree. Thanks! 1080:What looks like a PIRATING SITE! 120:Heres the answer to Micky Ratt 29: 2650:Corrected formatting/usage for 2644:Corrected formatting/usage for 2638:Corrected formatting/usage for 2632:Corrected formatting/usage for 2626:Corrected formatting/usage for 2620:Corrected formatting/usage for 2604:Corrected formatting/usage for 2554:Corrected formatting/usage for 2420:/ratt-n-rolling-december-onward 1282:The Encyclopedia of Heavy Metal 3041:06:01, 14 September 2020 (UTC) 2400:Member line up was changed by 1785:the 2014 version was the last 1736:00:50, 22 September 2016 (UTC) 1386:Attempted to fix sourcing for 1195:I hope that this is helpful.-- 943:Attempted to fix sourcing for 721:20:43, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 339:23:04, 17 September 2006 (UTC) 324:23:04, 17 September 2006 (UTC) 13: 1: 2494:22:43, 28 February 2017 (UTC) 2331:14:55, 30 November 2016 (UTC) 2317:09:37, 30 November 2016 (UTC) 2303:03:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC) 2256:22:43, 29 November 2016 (UTC) 2229:21:04, 29 November 2016 (UTC) 2206:20:17, 29 November 2016 (UTC) 2191:17:30, 29 November 2016 (UTC) 2139:17:04, 29 November 2016 (UTC) 2106:14:11, 29 November 2016 (UTC) 2056:10:37, 29 November 2016 (UTC) 2017:03:58, 29 November 2016 (UTC) 1980:02:24, 29 November 2016 (UTC) 1946:02:13, 29 November 2016 (UTC) 1903:22:15, 28 November 2016 (UTC) 1845:21:53, 28 November 2016 (UTC) 1800:21:36, 28 November 2016 (UTC) 1768:21:11, 28 November 2016 (UTC) 1716:05:30, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 1680:04:20, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 1470:07:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC) 1343:05:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC) 1313:05:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC) 1221:03:59, 16 February 2016 (UTC) 1175:Shame Shame Shame (Ratt song) 1135:What You Give Is What You Get 902:16:17, 21 December 2015 (UTC) 887:21:57, 19 December 2015 (UTC) 866:21:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC) 850:06:39, 21 November 2015 (UTC) 794:06:15, 21 November 2015 (UTC) 493:16:53, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 460:01:47, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 384:09:20, 28 November 2007 (UTC) 364:18:42, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 2434:18:08, 1 December 2016 (UTC) 2356:16:35, 1 December 2016 (UTC) 2345:15:18, 1 December 2016 (UTC) 2177:even stated above that he's 1125:Lack of Communication (song) 1027:18:47, 25 January 2016 (UTC) 779:05:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC) 757:18:59, 26 October 2015 (UTC) 741:18:59, 26 October 2015 (UTC) 643:19:12, 27 January 2010 (UTC) 627:16:40, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 534:14:57, 27 January 2010 (UTC) 423:20:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC) 179:00:00, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 152:18:29, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 79:09:28, 7 November 2005 (UTC) 7: 1271:also has a section on Ratt. 1096:Round and Round (Ratt song) 399:02:47, 12 August 2006 (UTC) 10: 3075: 2691:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2535:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1650:17:18, 24 March 2016 (UTC) 1615:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1544:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} 1519:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1509:00:33, 20 March 2016 (UTC) 1493:00:29, 20 March 2016 (UTC) 1435:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1380:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} 1355:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1259:The Big Book of Hair Metal 1226:The problem has been that 1130:You're in Love (Ratt song) 992:(last update: 5 June 2024) 937:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} 912:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 840:to join the discussion. — 697:17:06, 15 April 2013 (UTC) 583:11:45, 28 March 2008 (UTC) 304:09:47, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 281:22:19, 6 August 2006 (UTC) 266:21:56, 6 August 2006 (UTC) 251:15:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC) 232:16:24, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 217:15:49, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 198:09:45, 12 April 2006 (UTC) 136:00:51, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 91:The Garage Tape Dayz 78-81 3021:17:37, 30 July 2017 (UTC) 2999:22:00, 21 July 2017 (UTC) 2984:21:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC) 2968:03:54, 19 July 2017 (UTC) 2941:21:51, 15 July 2017 (UTC) 2923:23:31, 14 July 2017 (UTC) 2898:14:09, 13 July 2017 (UTC) 2879:21:44, 12 July 2017 (UTC) 2842:21:34, 12 July 2017 (UTC) 2827:18:39, 12 July 2017 (UTC) 2807:10:40, 12 July 2017 (UTC) 2785:01:15, 12 July 2017 (UTC) 2757:18:35, 11 July 2017 (UTC) 2728:19:58, 30 June 2017 (UTC) 2525:08:00, 1 March 2017 (UTC) 2350:really appreciate it. ] ( 1696:09:48, 15 June 2015 (UTC) 1674: 703:Blanked compilation album 671:16:16, 8 March 2013 (UTC) 475:15:09, 21 July 2006 (UTC) 313:I removed the following: 1263:examines Ratt in detail. 1252:This book by David Konow 1170:Lovin' You's a Dirty Job 503:10:28, 15 May 2007 (UTC) 99:Rattus Erectus 1976-1982 3060:03:22, 9 May 2021 (UTC) 2531:External links modified 1515:External links modified 1351:External links modified 908:External links modified 334:Aerosmith connection.-- 1275:Deena Weinstein writes 1190:Best of Me (Ratt song) 1120:Wanted Man (Ratt song) 1115:You Think You're Tough 709:blanked and redirected 592:20:17, 28 March 2008 549:12:01, 27 March 2008 390:Pooh or Grateful Dead? 84:Mickey Ratt (Pre Ratt) 1185:Nobody Rides for Free 1150:Body Talk (Ratt song) 1044:Ratt (main article): 677:Stephen Pearcy's Ratt 191:Image:CurrentRatt.jpg 42:of past discussions. 2672:regular verification 1819:WTF do you mean by " 1596:regular verification 1530:. If necessary, add 1416:regular verification 1401:to let others know. 1366:. If necessary, add 1337:See what I have done 1215:See what I have done 1180:Givin' Yourself Away 973:regular verification 958:to let others know. 923:. If necessary, add 762:Knowledge relies on 411:A plague of rainbows 2662:After February 2018 2456:20:31, 16 May 2006 1683:== Reassessment == 1586:After February 2018 1565:parameter below to 1406:After February 2018 1397:parameter below to 1291:Knowledge combines 1268:American Hair Metal 1090:A Blabbermouth post 1086:Infestation (album) 1036:I was requested by 963:After February 2018 954:parameter below to 726:Motley Crue Vs Ratt 590:User :Aishah Bowron 466:Glam or Hair Metal? 222:In need of clean up 2716:InternetArchiveBot 2667:InternetArchiveBot 2278:/Wikipedia:Dispute 1884:/TheRattExperience 1662:Talk:Ratt/Comments 1655:Assessment comment 1591:InternetArchiveBot 1411:InternetArchiveBot 1066:Dancing Undercover 1032:Unreliable sources 968:InternetArchiveBot 2876: 2809: 2797:comment added by 2787: 2771:comment added by 2759: 2743:comment added by 2692: 2136: 1977: 1842: 1738: 1726:comment added by 1701: 1700: 1648: 1616: 1468: 1436: 1340: 1218: 1140:Dance (Ratt song) 1076:Detonator (album) 1056:Out of the Cellar 1025: 993: 687:comment added by 661:comment added by 617:comment added by 607: 598:comment added by 585: 573:comment added by 564: 555:comment added by 537: 520:comment added by 425: 409:comment added by 386: 374:comment added by 271:Avoiding edit war 185:Copyrighted image 169:comment added by 138: 126:comment added by 106:In Your Direction 67: 66: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3066: 3009: 2952: 2911: 2877: 2873: 2866: 2864: 2855: 2792: 2766: 2738: 2726: 2717: 2690: 2689: 2668: 2587: 2505: 2424: 2411: 2292: 2266: 2245: 2156: 2149: 2137: 2133: 2126: 2124: 2116: 1990: 1978: 1974: 1967: 1965: 1934: 1927: 1892: 1888:/873713249405462 1874: 1867: 1843: 1839: 1832: 1830: 1818: 1742:Reverted Changes 1721: 1672: 1671: 1664: 1644: 1643:Talk to my owner 1639: 1614: 1613: 1592: 1580: 1545: 1537: 1475:Official website 1464: 1463:Talk to my owner 1459: 1434: 1433: 1412: 1381: 1373: 1338: 1334: 1331: 1323: 1261:by Martin Popoff 1216: 1212: 1209: 1201: 1050:Blabbermouth.net 1021: 1020:Talk to my owner 1016: 991: 990: 969: 938: 930: 764:verifiable facts 699: 673: 629: 593: 568: 550: 536: 514: 404: 369: 309:Beth Fairbrother 181: 121: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3074: 3073: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3048: 3028: 3003: 2946: 2905: 2869: 2860: 2858: 2849: 2735: 2720: 2715: 2683: 2676:have permission 2666: 2581: 2548:this simple FaQ 2533: 2499: 2481: 2479:Wording in lead 2473: 2462: 2441: 2439:Rate Your Music 2421: 2419: 2417: 2414: 2405: 2398: 2289: 2287: 2285: 2283: 2281: 2279: 2277: 2275: 2273: 2271: 2268: 2260: 2242: 2240: 2238: 2235: 2150: 2143: 2129: 2120: 2118: 2110: 1984: 1970: 1961: 1959: 1928: 1921: 1889: 1887: 1885: 1883: 1881: 1879: 1876: 1868: 1861: 1835: 1826: 1824: 1812: 1744: 1709: 1660: 1657: 1647: 1642: 1607: 1600:have permission 1590: 1574: 1539: 1531: 1517: 1477: 1467: 1462: 1427: 1420:have permission 1410: 1375: 1367: 1353: 1336: 1327: 1319: 1214: 1205: 1197: 1155:Slip of the Lip 1145:Eat Me Up Alive 1110:Ratt: The Video 1038:123.136.111.174 1034: 1024: 1019: 984: 977:have permission 967: 932: 924: 910: 874: 830: 801: 728: 705: 682: 679: 656: 612: 543: 515: 510: 468: 431: 392: 349: 331: 329:Walkin' The Dog 311: 288: 273: 258: 243: 224: 205: 187: 164: 160: 86: 72: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3072: 3047: 3044: 3027: 3024: 2971: 2970: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2886: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2830: 2829: 2790: 2762: 2734: 2731: 2710: 2709: 2702: 2655: 2654: 2648: 2642: 2636: 2630: 2624: 2618: 2610:Added archive 2608: 2602: 2594:Added archive 2592: 2578: 2570:Added archive 2568: 2560:Added archive 2558: 2532: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2480: 2477: 2472: 2469: 2461: 2458: 2452:". Any ideas?- 2440: 2437: 2397: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2212:User:Sabbatino 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1743: 1740: 1728:108.65.214.174 1708: 1705: 1699: 1698: 1656: 1653: 1640: 1634: 1633: 1626: 1559: 1558: 1550:Added archive 1516: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1476: 1473: 1460: 1454: 1453: 1446: 1391: 1390: 1352: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1278: 1272: 1264: 1255: 1249: 1193: 1192: 1187: 1182: 1177: 1172: 1167: 1165:I Want a Woman 1162: 1157: 1152: 1147: 1142: 1137: 1132: 1127: 1122: 1117: 1112: 1103: 1102: 1100:A tabloid site 1093: 1083: 1073: 1063: 1053: 1033: 1030: 1017: 1011: 1010: 1003: 948: 947: 909: 906: 905: 904: 873: 870: 869: 868: 814: 800: 797: 782: 781: 767: 727: 724: 704: 701: 678: 675: 653:80's Hard Rock 619:76.126.151.194 542: 539: 509: 506: 496: 495: 467: 464: 448: 444: 439: 430: 429:Writing Music? 427: 403:its the bear 391: 388: 348: 345: 343: 330: 327: 310: 307: 287: 284: 278:Patchyreynolds 272: 269: 263:Patchyreynolds 257: 254: 248:Patchyreynolds 242: 239: 229:Patchyreynolds 223: 220: 214:Patchyreynolds 204: 201: 186: 183: 159: 156: 155: 154: 128:90.194.110.235 118: 117: 109: 102: 95: 85: 82: 71: 68: 65: 64: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3071: 3062: 3061: 3057: 3053: 3043: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3023: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3007: 3001: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2986: 2985: 2981: 2977: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2950: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2938: 2934: 2924: 2920: 2916: 2909: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2895: 2891: 2880: 2874: 2872: 2865: 2863: 2853: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2839: 2835: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2810: 2808: 2804: 2800: 2796: 2788: 2786: 2782: 2778: 2774: 2770: 2765: 2760: 2758: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2742: 2730: 2729: 2724: 2719: 2718: 2707: 2703: 2700: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2687: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2663: 2658: 2653: 2649: 2647: 2643: 2641: 2637: 2635: 2631: 2629: 2625: 2623: 2619: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2607: 2603: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2591: 2585: 2579: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2557: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2549: 2545: 2541: 2536: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2509:Black Sabbath 2503: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2476: 2468: 2467: 2457: 2455: 2451: 2447: 2436: 2435: 2431: 2427: 2423: 2409: 2403: 2396:Member Lineup 2357: 2353: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2291: 2264: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2244: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2226: 2222: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2188: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2154: 2147: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2134: 2132: 2125: 2123: 2114: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2094: 2090: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1993:WP:GUIDELINES 1988: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1975: 1973: 1966: 1964: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1932: 1925: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1891: 1872: 1865: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1846: 1840: 1838: 1831: 1829: 1822: 1816: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1788: 1784: 1779: 1774: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1739: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1718: 1717: 1714: 1704: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1684: 1681: 1678: 1673: 1670: 1668: 1663: 1652: 1651: 1645: 1638: 1631: 1627: 1624: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1611: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1587: 1582: 1578: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1543: 1535: 1529: 1525: 1520: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1479:According to 1472: 1471: 1465: 1458: 1451: 1447: 1444: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1431: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1407: 1402: 1400: 1396: 1389: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1379: 1371: 1365: 1361: 1356: 1344: 1339: 1332: 1330: 1324: 1322: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1285: 1283: 1279: 1276: 1273: 1270: 1269: 1265: 1262: 1260: 1256: 1253: 1250: 1247: 1246:AllMusic says 1244: 1243: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1217: 1210: 1208: 1202: 1200: 1191: 1188: 1186: 1183: 1181: 1178: 1176: 1173: 1171: 1168: 1166: 1163: 1161: 1158: 1156: 1153: 1151: 1148: 1146: 1143: 1141: 1138: 1136: 1133: 1131: 1128: 1126: 1123: 1121: 1118: 1116: 1113: 1111: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1101: 1097: 1094: 1091: 1087: 1084: 1081: 1077: 1074: 1071: 1067: 1064: 1061: 1057: 1054: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1039: 1029: 1028: 1022: 1015: 1008: 1004: 1001: 997: 996: 995: 988: 982: 978: 974: 970: 964: 959: 957: 953: 946: 942: 941: 940: 936: 928: 922: 918: 913: 903: 899: 895: 891: 890: 889: 888: 884: 880: 879:75.155.46.228 867: 863: 859: 854: 853: 852: 851: 847: 843: 839: 835: 832:Shout out to 829: 826: 823: 820: 817: 813: 810: 806: 796: 795: 791: 787: 786:75.155.46.228 780: 776: 772: 768: 765: 761: 760: 759: 758: 754: 750: 749:75.155.46.228 744: 742: 738: 734: 733:75.155.46.228 723: 722: 718: 714: 713:In ictu oculi 710: 700: 698: 694: 690: 686: 674: 672: 668: 664: 663:69.156.168.40 660: 654: 649: 645: 644: 640: 636: 630: 628: 624: 620: 616: 608: 605: 601: 597: 591: 586: 584: 580: 576: 572: 565: 562: 558: 554: 548: 547:Aishah Bowron 538: 535: 531: 527: 523: 519: 505: 504: 501: 494: 490: 486: 482: 481: 480: 477: 476: 473: 463: 461: 457: 453: 446: 442: 437: 436: 426: 424: 420: 416: 412: 408: 401: 400: 397: 387: 385: 381: 377: 376:75.153.64.234 373: 366: 365: 362: 358: 353: 344: 341: 340: 337: 326: 325: 322: 317: 314: 306: 305: 302: 298: 294: 283: 282: 279: 268: 267: 264: 253: 252: 249: 238: 234: 233: 230: 219: 218: 215: 209: 200: 199: 196: 192: 182: 180: 176: 172: 171:72.146.198.11 168: 153: 149: 145: 141: 140: 139: 137: 133: 129: 125: 115: 114: 113:Pre-Ratt Days 110: 108: 107: 103: 101: 100: 96: 93: 92: 88: 87: 81: 80: 77: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3049: 3033:24.29.56.240 3029: 3002: 2987: 2972: 2929: 2885: 2871:open channel 2870: 2861: 2831: 2811: 2793:— Preceding 2789: 2767:— Preceding 2761: 2739:— Preceding 2736: 2714: 2711: 2686:source check 2665: 2659: 2656: 2537: 2534: 2482: 2474: 2463: 2449: 2445: 2442: 2399: 2282:_noticeboard 2216:User:Mlpearc 2178: 2175:User:Mlpearc 2171:WP:CONSBUILD 2167:User:Mlpearc 2159:User:Mlpearc 2131:open channel 2130: 2121: 2092: 2088: 1972:open channel 1971: 1962: 1837:open channel 1836: 1827: 1820: 1786: 1782: 1777: 1772: 1755: 1751: 1745: 1722:— Preceding 1719: 1710: 1702: 1682: 1658: 1635: 1610:source check 1589: 1583: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1560: 1521: 1518: 1478: 1455: 1430:source check 1409: 1403: 1398: 1394: 1392: 1357: 1354: 1328: 1320: 1281: 1267: 1258: 1239: 1206: 1198: 1194: 1160:Way Cool Jr. 1104: 1035: 1012: 987:source check 966: 960: 955: 951: 949: 914: 911: 875: 831: 808: 804: 802: 783: 745: 729: 706: 689:192.231.40.3 683:— Preceding 680: 657:— Preceding 652: 650: 646: 631: 609: 600:82.15.233.74 587: 575:82.15.233.74 566: 557:82.15.233.74 544: 511: 500:201.9.142.17 497: 478: 469: 447: 443: 438: 432: 402: 393: 367: 356: 354: 350: 347:Uncle Miltie 342: 332: 318: 315: 312: 289: 274: 259: 256:Hall of Fame 244: 235: 225: 210: 206: 188: 161: 119: 111: 104: 97: 89: 73: 60: 43: 37: 2956:Great White 2471:RAT:ATT:AGG 2460:Album sales 2450:Fan Reviews 2446:Fan Ratings 2416:rattwebsite 2290:_discussion 2286:.23Reverted 2280:_resolution 2210:Thank you, 2179:"moving on" 1688:Lewismaster 1577:Sourcecheck 1305:Binksternet 1070:A wiki site 872:More Photos 771:Binksternet 613:—Preceding 594:—Preceding 569:—Preceding 551:—Preceding 541:heavy metal 516:—Preceding 508:Vandalizing 405:—Preceding 370:—Preceding 297:The Beatles 165:—Preceding 122:—Preceding 70:Mickey Ratt 36:This is an 3026:Needs work 2989:cancelled. 2862:FlightTime 2723:Report bug 2502:Beeblebrox 2486:Beeblebrox 2466:Cory pratt 2454:Cory pratt 2284:#Talk:Ratt 2272:.wikipedia 2237:bravewords 1481:this tweet 1329:Talk to me 1301:glam metal 1297:hair metal 1207:Talk to me 635:FateForger 522:FateForger 472:Cory pratt 435:Cory pratt 396:Cory pratt 361:Cory pratt 301:Cory pratt 286:Too POVish 158:no mention 3006:Sabbatino 2991:VHFanatic 2976:VHFanatic 2949:VHFanatic 2933:VHFanatic 2908:VHFanatic 2890:VHFanatic 2852:VHFanatic 2834:VHFanatic 2819:Sabbatino 2773:VHFanatic 2745:VHFanatic 2706:this tool 2699:this tool 2584:dead link 2517:Sabbatino 2513:Motörhead 2309:Sabbatino 2263:Sabbatino 2198:Sabbatino 2163:Sabbatino 2153:Sabbatino 2048:Sabbatino 1997:WP:INDENT 1956:WP:INDENT 1952:consensus 1931:Sabbatino 1880:.facebook 1871:Sabbatino 1760:Sabbatino 1630:this tool 1623:this tool 1450:this tool 1443:this tool 1293:pop metal 1007:this tool 1000:this tool 894:Sabbatino 858:Sabbatino 838:Sabbatino 485:Gringo300 359:nephew.-- 357:manager's 144:Gringo300 76:Gringo300 61:Archive 1 18:Talk:Ratt 2795:unsigned 2781:contribs 2769:unsigned 2753:contribs 2741:unsigned 2712:Cheers.— 2408:Rambotje 2402:Rambotje 2288:_Changes 1724:unsigned 1713:Tim Long 1677:cgilbert 1636:Cheers.— 1534:cbignore 1456:Cheers.— 1370:cbignore 1321:3family6 1199:3family6 1013:Cheers.— 927:cbignore 842:DLManiac 747:classics 685:unsigned 659:unsigned 615:unsigned 596:unsigned 571:unsigned 553:unsigned 530:contribs 518:unsigned 452:Farrarsm 419:contribs 407:unsigned 372:unsigned 336:DannyRay 321:DannyRay 295:and the 293:Zeppelin 203:clean up 195:Zetawoof 167:unsigned 124:unsigned 3013:Dijares 2960:Dijares 2915:Dijares 2588:tag to 2544:my edit 2426:Dijares 2337:Dijares 2323:Dijares 2295:Dijares 2248:Dijares 2221:Dijares 2183:Dijares 2146:Mlpearc 2122:Mlpearc 2113:Dijares 2098:Dijares 2009:Dijares 2005:WP:NPOV 1987:Mlpearc 1963:Mlpearc 1938:Dijares 1924:Mlpearc 1895:Dijares 1864:Mlpearc 1828:Mlpearc 1823:" ? - 1821:Legally 1815:Dijares 1792:Dijares 1783:opinion 1646::Online 1563:checked 1528:my edit 1466::Online 1395:checked 1364:my edit 1023::Online 952:checked 921:my edit 834:Mlpearc 805:opinion 39:archive 3052:Beardo 3046:Origin 2580:Added 2448:" or " 2001:WP:VER 1886:/posts 1787:stable 1571:failed 1542:nobots 1378:nobots 935:nobots 877:Thanks 116:(2007) 94:(2000) 2276:/wiki 2241:/news 731:there 16:< 3056:talk 3037:talk 3017:talk 2995:talk 2980:talk 2964:talk 2937:talk 2919:talk 2894:talk 2838:talk 2823:talk 2803:talk 2777:talk 2749:talk 2540:Ratt 2521:talk 2490:talk 2430:talk 2418:.com 2352:talk 2341:talk 2327:talk 2313:talk 2299:talk 2274:.org 2252:talk 2239:.com 2225:talk 2202:talk 2187:talk 2102:talk 2052:talk 2013:talk 1942:talk 1899:talk 1882:.com 1796:talk 1764:talk 1732:talk 1707:Caps 1692:talk 1567:true 1524:Ratt 1505:talk 1501:Huon 1489:talk 1485:Huon 1399:true 1360:Ratt 1309:talk 1299:and 1284:says 1236:here 1234:and 1232:here 956:true 917:Ratt 898:talk 883:talk 862:talk 846:talk 836:and 790:talk 775:talk 753:talk 737:talk 717:talk 693:talk 667:talk 639:talk 623:talk 604:talk 579:talk 561:talk 526:talk 489:talk 456:talk 415:talk 380:talk 175:talk 148:talk 132:talk 2680:RfC 2614:to 2598:to 2574:to 2564:to 2511:or 1878:www 1604:RfC 1581:). 1569:or 1554:to 1424:RfC 1240:are 981:RfC 241:POV 3058:) 3039:) 3019:) 2997:) 2982:) 2966:) 2939:) 2921:) 2896:) 2840:) 2825:) 2805:) 2783:) 2779:• 2755:) 2751:• 2693:. 2688:}} 2684:{{ 2586:}} 2582:{{ 2523:) 2492:) 2432:) 2354:) 2343:) 2329:) 2315:) 2301:) 2270:en 2254:) 2227:) 2204:) 2189:) 2173:. 2104:) 2054:) 2015:) 1958:- 1944:) 1901:) 1798:) 1766:) 1756:2. 1752:1. 1734:) 1694:) 1617:. 1612:}} 1608:{{ 1579:}} 1575:{{ 1540:{{ 1536:}} 1532:{{ 1507:) 1491:) 1437:. 1432:}} 1428:{{ 1376:{{ 1372:}} 1368:{{ 1341:) 1333:| 1311:) 1295:, 1219:) 1211:| 1098:: 1088:: 1078:: 1068:: 1058:: 994:. 989:}} 985:{{ 933:{{ 929:}} 925:{{ 900:) 885:) 864:) 848:) 809:is 792:) 777:) 755:) 743:. 739:) 719:) 695:) 669:) 641:) 625:) 606:) 581:) 563:) 532:) 528:• 491:) 462:) 458:) 421:) 417:• 382:) 276:-- 261:-- 177:) 150:) 134:) 3054:( 3035:( 3015:( 3008:: 3004:@ 2993:( 2978:( 2962:( 2951:: 2947:@ 2935:( 2917:( 2910:: 2906:@ 2892:( 2875:) 2867:( 2854:: 2850:@ 2836:( 2821:( 2801:( 2775:( 2747:( 2725:) 2721:( 2708:. 2701:. 2519:( 2504:: 2500:@ 2488:( 2428:( 2422:/ 2410:: 2406:@ 2339:( 2325:( 2311:( 2297:( 2265:: 2261:@ 2250:( 2223:( 2200:( 2185:( 2155:: 2151:@ 2148:: 2144:@ 2135:) 2127:( 2115:: 2111:@ 2100:( 2050:( 2011:( 1989:: 1985:@ 1976:) 1968:( 1940:( 1933:: 1929:@ 1926:: 1922:@ 1897:( 1890:/ 1873:: 1869:@ 1866:: 1862:@ 1841:) 1833:( 1817:: 1813:@ 1794:( 1762:( 1730:( 1690:( 1632:. 1625:. 1503:( 1487:( 1452:. 1445:. 1325:( 1307:( 1203:( 1082:. 1062:. 1009:. 1002:. 896:( 881:( 860:( 844:( 788:( 773:( 751:( 735:( 715:( 691:( 665:( 637:( 621:( 602:( 577:( 559:( 524:( 487:( 454:( 450:( 413:( 378:( 173:( 146:( 130:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index