114:
93:
62:
124:
21:
220:
It is indeed quite suspicious that several numbers are missing from the launch list. For example, the launch of
Tempest-4 would imply the launch of Tempest-3, however, Starchaser never wrote about any launch with this number. I suppose that Tempest-3 for example was the failed launch that took place
203:
Several rockets are listed as 'meeting objectives' and therefore classified as 'successful' when the recovery parachutes failed to deploy correctly (or indeed at all) causing ballistic impact of the rocket components. Unfortunately the only press reports for these launches were press-releases by
297:
I suspect that the height given in Source 4 is just the height of a proposed, never built rocket that unfortunately shares the same name with the one that was actually launched. The rocket given in the report is a two-stage liquid fed rocket with four strap-on boosters, while the one that was
252:"The world's first privately funded fully re-usable two stage research rocket" By July 2000 the private rocket industry and hobby in the UK was very established. Hundreds of amateur and professional two stage research rockets had been flown by this time.
271:
267:
235:
Do you think it would be acceptable if the aforementioned launch of 'Tempest-3' would be added to the list as 'unnumbered
Tempest launch' or something along the line?
275:
180:
346:
283:
253:
207:
204:
Starchaser
Industries and therefore there appear to be no citations available from authoritative sources. Many undisputably unsuccessful launches (e.g.
266:
Indeed, Starchaser seems no more sophisticated than an average HPR hobbiest. The article could plausibly fall afoul of the "notability" guidelines.
322:
245:
374:
170:
229:
Even most of the launches that were deemed 'sucessful' by
Starchaser did never reach the altitudes that they were supposed to achieve.
379:
369:
354:
291:
261:
42:
215:
146:
137:
98:
47:
303:
73:
197:
300:
Nevertheless, sadly news sources can not agree on the height of the rocket that was actually launched.
345:] shows parachute deployment failure, rocket separation and ballistic impact of the lower section.
40:
on 11 March 2024. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see
28:
145:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
350:
287:
282:"it is the largest rocket launched from British soil" Reports of this rocket size vary greatly (
257:
211:
61:
79:
37:
318:
241:
8:
298:
actually launched was a single-stage rocket powered by a cluster of solid rocket motors.
129:
33:
222:
314:
237:
232:
I'll definitly soon add this information to the description of alleged successes.
308:
363:
304:
https://epoxycraft.com/projects/epoxy-helping-the-uk-reach-for-the-stars/
142:
113:
92:
343:
In reference to
Skybolt 2: "met all objectives", the video at
141:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
119:
361:
223:https://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-england-31126820
226:(Same as 1, just seen from a different angle.)
313:These two sources agree on 37ft for example.
309:https://www.spacedaily.com/news/rlv-01y.html
59:
46:; for the discussion at that location, see
362:
268:2601:647:6480:B640:F022:415A:B35E:9B3C
135:This article is within the scope of
55:
15:
375:Low-importance spaceflight articles
78:It is of interest to the following
13:
14:
391:
155:Knowledge:WikiProject Spaceflight
380:WikiProject Spaceflight articles
370:Start-Class spaceflight articles
158:Template:WikiProject Spaceflight
122:
112:
91:
60:
19:
206:]) are missing from this list.
175:This article has been rated as
1:
276:02:46, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
149:and see a list of open tasks.
7:
10:
396:
355:07:56, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
292:07:56, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
262:07:56, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
216:07:56, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
181:project's importance scale
323:22:44, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
246:22:25, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
174:
107:
86:
29:Skybolt (sounding rocket)
138:WikiProject Spaceflight
221:on February 4th 2015:
68:This article is rated
38:Starchaser Industries
26:The contents of the
161:spaceflight articles
198:Disputed statements
130:Spaceflight portal
74:content assessment
338:] states 90 feet.
334:] states 50 feet.
330:] states 43 feet.
195:
194:
191:
190:
187:
186:
54:
53:
387:
163:
162:
159:
156:
153:
132:
127:
126:
125:
116:
109:
108:
103:
95:
88:
87:
71:
65:
64:
56:
45:
23:
22:
16:
395:
394:
390:
389:
388:
386:
385:
384:
360:
359:
200:
160:
157:
154:
151:
150:
128:
123:
121:
101:
72:on Knowledge's
69:
41:
20:
12:
11:
5:
393:
383:
382:
377:
372:
358:
357:
341:
340:
339:
335:
331:
326:
325:
311:
306:
301:
299:
280:
279:
278:
250:
249:
248:
236:
233:
230:
227:
225:
199:
196:
193:
192:
189:
188:
185:
184:
177:Low-importance
173:
167:
166:
164:
147:the discussion
134:
133:
117:
105:
104:
102:Low‑importance
96:
84:
83:
77:
66:
52:
51:
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
392:
381:
378:
376:
373:
371:
368:
367:
365:
356:
352:
348:
347:StuartLivings
344:
342:
337:
336:
333:
332:
329:
328:
327:
324:
320:
316:
312:
310:
307:
305:
302:
296:
295:
293:
289:
285:
284:StuartLivings
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
264:
263:
259:
255:
254:StuartLivings
251:
247:
243:
239:
234:
231:
228:
224:
219:
218:
217:
213:
209:
208:StuartLivings
205:
202:
201:
182:
178:
172:
169:
168:
165:
148:
144:
140:
139:
131:
120:
118:
115:
111:
110:
106:
100:
97:
94:
90:
89:
85:
81:
75:
67:
63:
58:
57:
49:
48:its talk page
44:
39:
35:
31:
30:
25:
18:
17:
176:
136:
80:WikiProjects
27:
152:Spaceflight
143:spaceflight
99:Spaceflight
70:Start-class
43:its history
364:Categories
315:Darkcoucou
238:Darkcoucou
32:page were
179:on the
76:scale.
34:merged
36:into
351:talk
319:talk
288:talk
272:talk
258:talk
242:talk
212:talk
294:):
171:Low
366::
353:)
321:)
290:)
274:)
260:)
244:)
214:)
349:(
317:(
286:(
270:(
256:(
240:(
210:(
183:.
82::
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
