1318:@Al-A, what do you want to add to the articles. That muslim scholars dont consider it authentic? Like you said, Mubarakpuri mentions those events/battles. So Muslims do consider them reliable. You will always find people who consider it reliable and people who dont. Even true for Sahih Bukhari, shia's dont trust it, and sunni's do. Also, you said "if the statements appear in works of modern scholars like Mubarakpuri, Muir or others (though it still doesn't necessarily mean it's authentic or sound)". Now there is a BIG problem with that statement. Who decides what authentic and what not, if Mubarakpuri mentions it. then he considers it authentic, and he is muslim. So you can never say on those articles that use Mubarakpuri, that "Muslims dont consider this event reliable"--
984:, but Ibn Kathir explains what he meant by this. By adding that they wanted to defeat him, you want to mislead people by making them think they wanted to kill him? right, as that is more apologetical. But source makes it clear that they did NOT want to kill him. just expel him ! so i am unhappy with the part which says they wanted to "to fight and defeat Muhammad and his message" , please add that they did not want to kill him. Since if you expel someone you cant kill them now can you? Or i will add it myself--
72:
193:
1452:) in a positive light, i can always go to all battle articles and talk about Imam Shaffi, and Al-Zuhri's view on the authenticity of the contents of the Maghazi in general. But i didnt do that, because whats the point? If you insist on adding the views of scholars on the authenticity of the battles/expeditions of muhammad, you should consider mentioning Imam Shaffi and al-Zuhri's view, and Ibn Qayyim also quoted a lot of Maghazi of Ibn Ishaq that he considered reliable --
209:
21:
131:
103:
1838:
peaceful quotes attributed to
Muhammad, it is because these scholars believe in Naskh (abrogation). Imam Shaffi, and al-Zuhri reportedly viewed the content of al-Maghazi (mentioned by Ibn Ishaq) in a positive light, i can always go to all battle articles and talk about Imam Shaffi, and Al-Zuhri's view on the authenticity of the contents of the Maghazi in general."
1157:, Book of Idols or Tabari? These sources usually quote Muhammed companions (they hardly quote Muhammad himself). They also quote those who knew the companion, i.e the Tabi-in. You opened a Pandoras box by doing this. Now i will have to go to those articles (about 10-20%) that do cite hadith and say how reliable they are. e.g how reliable
676:((( Just so folk know, after several days of staring at this template - which I know has "an image" at the top of it - I've just realised that it a chap on a horse waving a flag with a giant birdie beside him. I seriously hadn't managed to work out what I was looking at before - maybe the lighter background colur has helped! Doh. --
1466:
Sorry, who asked you to offer your views of Imam Al-Shafi'i ? Have you seen anyone discuss Al-Shafi'i here ? Nobody, so stop beating around the bush. It's really clear and simple, you talked for long and misled many people into this "there is no such thing as hadith verification", but then I find out
1349:
Oh, Al-A, you said you were going to buy some sira books. I am guessing you will only by books by Muslim authors. Make sure you buy some by non-muslim authors like Watt or
Rodwell to, because you will probably see huge differences between the 2 sources. I have used Mubarakpuri on a lot of my articles
1297:
or others then I'm going to add the hadith authenticity template, which was created specifically for this. Notice I haven't mentioned Sahih al-Bukhari, Sahih Muslim as the authenticity of their hadiths (or almost all their hadiths) are established and accepted by hadith scholars. I know also that the
1221:
This "no hadith cited" narrative was later switched after the board closed the report. It has now become: ok, they're probably hadith BUT the Muslim community has not done a good job verifying every narrative from
Muhammad and therefore it makes no sense to add the template when Muslim scholars have
1837:
I didn't twist your words, here's an exact quote of what you said previously in this thread, "In
General, you will find that people like Imam Shaffi accept the authenticity of the Maghazi (battles of Muhammad) but reject all verses in the Quran which promote peace and tolerance and also reject many
1073:
I think the first thing to do is establish some clear criteria for what this template is about. Is the source a book? (if so, which one?). Is there a traditional list? Or what. Or are pages added to this template at the whim of a given editor. Al-A seems to think he has a "golden rule" for removing
902:
I don't think that is particularly plausible, but is that indeed the criterion you are proposing? That we need a preponderance of sources that describe each event as part of a "campaign"? Your assertion that including it is OR doesn't really work. What you mean is, you don't like it. If you were so
1538:
Your claim: "In
General, you will find that people like Imam Shaffi accept the authenticity of the Maghazi (battles of Muhammad) but reject all verses in the Quran which promote peace and tolerance and also reject many peaceful quotes attributed to Muhammad, it is because these scholars believe in
1443:
that i can tell you the reliability of certain quotes because they are famous, but not all quotes (because discussions on the reliability of the non famous quotes are hard to find). If you can find the views of scholars on the reliability of the other quotes in the articles, feel free to add their
1364:
Really ironic, to hold and defend the position that it's perfectly fine to quote primary sources like Al-Tabari and Ibn Hisham without the need to verify the assessment of the hadiths. But now suddenly, one has to be careful of using the very same sources you used for your articles. Now about your
1270:
So now that it has become clear how misleading your "no hadith was cited" claim is, it is important to realize that the above are facts, not my opinions. So don't be mistaken that I'm here to convince you to accept these hadith definitions or something, and when I act upon what's stated above, you
1288:
I've ordered a couple of books on Seerah, all edited versions meaning that the assessment of the hadiths are included in the footnotes. Once I receive them, I will go over these articles one by one and tag appropriately any statements cited straight from translated primary works like Al-Tabari. I
1209:
literatures. If you have any doubts or misunderstanding of a particular issue, which certainly is the case as the last few encounters has shown, then I wouldn't mind you bugging me on my talk page, or using the talk pages of the (1) articles, (2) related templates, or (3) WikiProject Islam which
1089:
I have left a message on an obvious crietia. I have also made a suggestion. Please let me know if you back the suggestion about changing the name to something which makes the criteria more obvious. This dispute is mainly between me, and Al-A about whether the demolition of Masjid al Dirar can be
1444:
views. In
General, you will find that people like Imam Shaffi accept the authenticity of the Maghazi (battles of Muhammad) but reject all verses in the Quran which promote peace and tolerance and also reject many peaceful quotes attributed to Muhammad, it is because these scholars believe in
1254:
definiton of hadith which is agreed upon by all hadith scholars. (this is not to say that reports of statements/actions of the companions and the tabi'un are not considered for verification, they are actually and using the same principles used for hadith verification, but they referred to as
1289:
don't have a problem with including say Al-Tabari's statements if the statements appear in works of modern scholars like
Mubarakpuri, Muir or others (though it still doesn't necessarily mean it's authentic or sound), but when an article cites a number of statements from translated works of
879:
None of the cited sources refers to the event (two men burning a mosque with a lighted palm branch) as a campaign (whether it is a battle or a sariyyah). For now, this is an OR by
Misconceptions2 and I've removed it from the template until suitable references are provided.
1813:
I can do what your doing as well. You reply does not prove that the Moon is made out of cheese. Where does your sources claim that Water is made from sand? CounterTime, eEverything you have said so far first makes a baseless suggestion that I proposed something that I did
1662:
They hold that unbelief in itself is not the justification for war. These jurists therefore maintain that only combatants are to be fought; noncombatants such as women, children, clergy, the aged, the insane, farmers, serfs, the blind, and so on are not to be killed in
785:
Problem is that a soon as more data is added the page becomes large and no longer trivial. I have done the bare minimum on these pages to keep them as their own articles. in the future i plan on expanding them so merging them to 1 page wont work out. i tried it in the
1429:
You said it is hypocritical to provide the reliability of a quote like i did in the Exp. Usama b Zayd article. To you, its hypocritical because i said that the quote is unreliable while i didnt mention anything about the reliabiliy of the other articles which quote
1266:
You can also see that the term hadith applies to anything attributed to
Muhammad regardless of the source or the time the claim was made. So whether the hadith appears in Sahih al-Bukhari, in Ibn Hisham's Seerah, in a tabloid newspaper or your notebook, it is a
1332:
The template is clear: it says include the assessment of the hadith. Now if 2 scholars, regardless of their backgrounds, differ on the authenticity of a hadith, then both views should be presented neutrally, giving each the appropriate weight. Got it ?
966:: all that happened there is that an idol is destroyed and a helpless woman is killed. That one, obviously, is even less a "campaign". Unless there is some clear criterion as to was is part of the "campaign" then the entire template is effectively OR
929:(expedition) and how the terms have come to be used by classical and modern biographers of the Islamic prophet Muhammad, instead of sharing with us your wisdom on how I should be spending my time. I asked for one reference that names this event as a
1572:
pg.6 last paragraph on page starting: "...Regarding monks, two contradictory opinions are attributed", primary source: Shaffi, Kitab al-Umm v.4 pg. 253-254. These 4 Imams promoted extreme violence. Its scary and evil, killing non combatants is
1013:
As for the debate about what is a campaign and what is not. I have also redirected another template called "expeditions of muhammad" to this template. So i think this justifies adding anything which sources label as expeditions !, to this box
1489:
So, what happened? Al-A tagged a pile of articles, presumably because he thought there were problems. Have I missed the follow-up on talk pages where he discussed what those problems were in detail, and attempted to resolve them?
767:
This isn't about the template, but this may be the most convenient place to talk. There are too many trivial pages about minor campaigns. They would be far better as a smaller number of longer pages that actually said something
1393:. It doesn't say automatically adding it. There is no indication of what consideration you've used, because in all cases you failed to provide edit summaries. Please discuss controversial mass actions in advance, not arrears
1580:
where it says "It was the jurist al-Shafi'i who developed the concept of naskh in such a way that the verse prescribing fighting (2:216) came to cancel out the significane of earlier, non violent interpretations of Jihad.
448:
That looks alot better. Readable now. Looks like you edited the image too. Good. I was thinking you wanted to keep the nighttime theme. The reader/audience can see the links clearer I think now. 07:26, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
1507:@William, Al-A keeps removing my comments from his talk page. Nothing much happened. He just said he will buy some books about the biography of Muhammad, presumably to see if it matches with what i said in my articles--
1707:
590:
M2: it looks like consensus is against you. Could you stop reverting and try to convince people on talk? I for one think the current is better than the black, though I would be even happier with plain black-on-white
1685:
The RS you provided talks only about one particular verse (2:216), and again anything that is related from him needs to be authentic, or at least, its authenticity should be assigned, so as to satisfy WP:MOS/Hadith.
200:
113:
1636:
That's not correct, according to the majority of jurists (amongst whom are the 3 Imams: Ibn Hanbal, Abu Hanifa, Malik -- and we can add al-Shafi'i according to one of the opinions narrated to him), the Qur’ānic
542:
They used tons of colors to determine groups, so why are you trying to push that he just used black. Do some research yourself instead of just using one statement; as white is the most common, then yellow, then
216:
117:
294:
546:
Anyways, to the point, the box is extremely HUGE; so black is making it extremely UGLY. Do you like how the article looks with it? You've got other opinions, so try to make it leveled or something. It was
1735:
of his theory on naskh." + you need to show that these narrations are authentic, to help you, these particular reports of al-Shafi'i are found in وفيات الأعيان : 5 / 409 --- تاريخ مدينة دمشق : 60 /
382:
Can't read it still ... I made the links darker and put the tablebackground back to match the image. Maybe the image 'blue' need to be lightened and then match the background to a that light color. --
1043:
Well, he didn't, so I've done it for him. Back to the topic at hand: exactly who gets to declare a given thingy part of the campaigns template? What criteria are there? So far I've seen no reply
692:
See what you mean, guv. I didn't notice that before, either. I've tried to just make the background plain white, which allows all the links to go back to standard blue, which is much easier
279:
This template belongs only in articles that strictly discuss battles/expeditions ordered by
Muhammad, main articles on Muhammad or his military career. I'm reverting all unnecessary spam
1539:
Naskh (abrogation). Imam Shaffi, and al-Zuhri reportedly viewed the content of al-Maghazi (mentioned by Ibn Ishaq) in a positive light," is unsourced. Please provide an RS to back it up.
1052:
1214:) where you correlated irrelevant and misleading claims like the alleged Twinkle abuse or the removal of Al-Baladhuri's cited view, when in fact my edit summary clearly says that I
1936:
1593:
1516:
1083:
799:
621:
861:: what exactly is the precise criterion for being a "campaign of Muhammad"? If we have an answer to that, we can settle the question. If we don't have an answer, then we can't
1946:
1126:
1114:
1402:
946:
912:
889:
1770:
1719:
264:
1941:
701:
870:
729:
405:
i have changed the colour to a darker blue. i think the links should be blue as that is usually standard for the colour of the web links. let me know if you can read it--
1479:
1461:
1374:
1359:
1342:
1327:
1311:
1188:
1174:
1028:
Talk here has become somewhat incivil on Al-A's part. I've asked him to redact his incivil comments. I'm going to leave this for a little while in the hope that he does
1007:
496:
452:
Does anybody agree how ugly it is now? You can't just copy-cat from another template, as they have different styles. A huge black box is extremely irritating. Sorry :(
1951:
537:
666:
565:
442:
356:
1058:@William, i see disputes in the future. Would you support changing the name of the template to "Armed missions of Muhammad" or "Muhammad and armed Missions"???--
777:
1271:
can revert and discuss and so on. That's not going to happen again really. Under no circumstance you remove a tag from an article until the issue is resolved (
1916:
937:
of Muhammad, you and Misconceptions2 have not provided any so far. I have removed the tag (again) and I will continue to do so until a reference is provided.
419:
You switched it back to a blue. Sigh. 00009c is a Primary (Blue). Why are you doing this? Do you understand the colors need to contrast so you can read it? --
1864:
752:
1499:
1037:
975:
600:
578:
480:
1023:
1898:
1885:
1842:
1823:
1800:
1751:
1692:
1559:
1543:
1215:
1103:
1067:
993:
638:
574:
even read it (blue background and blue links = not good). Go Simple, white and black ... with a very light grey (or some other very light color) ...--
414:
377:
1931:
1467:
recently, just days after the incident, that you did include someone's views on the authenticity of one of al-Tabari's quotes, which is hypocritical.
143:
1421:
1350:
and have notice how he always misses out contrversial parts of Muhammad's life. You should mainly buy a book which contains a lot of al-Maghazi. --
1250:
by Muhammad ? Yes they were, and by the above definition, any events related to those expeditions are hadith. Keep in mind that I'm using here the
1141:
237:
306:
288:
520:
1702:
Shaffi said about Maghazi: "Whoever wishes to obtain a complete acquaintance with the early Muslim conquests, must borrow his information from
685:
325:
1272:
851:
466:
1688:
In sum you did not provide any RS which state that al-Shafi'i considered all maghazi accounts to be authentic because of his theory on naskh.
1365:
misrepresentation of sources in al-Dirar's article ? misleading statements to the admins ? or your uneducated statements regarding hadith ?
1179:
You also change the wording of the template. if you keep the new wording, i will nominate it for deletion or ask admins to decide its fate--
423:
386:
334:
707:
316:
The grey/blue background colour is too dark to make easy reading of the items in the lists. Please can we make it lighter (eg 94BAD2). --
1210:
apparently has a hadith task force. But I will certainly not accept you taking the issue to the admins board (after a clearly disruptive
819:
817:
815:
51:
629:
anyway. i have took it back to blue. when it was blue. people complained that links where to light. so now made links much darker. --
41:
1857:
1074:
things, but quite what his rule is, is not clear to me. At the moment there appear to be several "trivial" incidents in the list
492:
Plain white. Great Idea. Who'da thunk? Be the easiest and best way, JIMO. But there is a motif thing I think that is going on. --
1409:
508:
Personally I don't have any preferences to black or white in this template, but black could be justified as a resembling of the
138:
108:
1584:
I used to have the primary source about shaffi's views on naskh, but I lost it, i am sure it is in Kitab al-Umm, look it up.--
1470:
Also, why did you reply on my talk page ? Didn't I express my position here ? Therefore I expect you to reply here not there.
1795:
In any case, that doesn't even support that "al-Shafi'i considered all maghazi accounts related by Ibn Ishaq to be authentic
260:
147:
400:
365:
364:
ok, i have lightened the background and image so that the text is more noticeable. you can compare. this is old version
1440:
1673:
1657:
1091:
963:
471:
Agreed. The huge black box is horribly ugly, and very distracting in an article. Why can't it just be plain white?
330:
The background of the table makes the template UNREADABLE. Please make a white background with clear black text. --
1731:
lol that's still doesn't support your assertion that, "al-Shafi'i considered all maghazi accounts to be authentic
1878:
706:
I've updated as per my suggestion in previous comment (coz it wasn't clear to all what I meant by ‘default’.) My
1618:
YOU DID NOT PROVIDE AN RS THAT STATES THAT "al-SHAFI'I ACCEPTED THE AUTHENTICITY OF MAGHAZI AND REJECTED ...etc"
1495:
1398:
1079:
1048:
1033:
971:
908:
866:
773:
762:
697:
596:
476:
858:
844:
830:
808:
745:
722:
659:
394:
Dear J.D Redding, i believe you have caused some problems, as some text have dissapered. here is your version
142:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
1576:
Regarding Shaffi's belief that peaceful version in the quran have been abrogated and no longer apply, see:
1242:
of Muhammad, or of his tacit approval of something said or done in his presence". Weren't the expeditions (
83:
1125:"Articles on hadith should make clear the reliability of the hadith – if they don't, then consider adding
528:
i dont mind any colour, but prefer black because of the black flag muhammad used according to the hadith--
1222:
not verified them. And hey! let's just assume they're all correct because...they have not been verified !
1108:
1094:, which is also called the Demolition of al-Lat. The article in dispute is also a demolition article--
1819:
1799:
of his theory on naskh." neither that this was due to his theory on naskh. 23:29, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
1766:
1715:
1589:
1512:
1491:
1457:
1394:
1355:
1323:
1184:
1170:
1099:
1075:
1063:
1044:
1029:
1019:
989:
967:
904:
862:
807:
795:
769:
693:
634:
617:
592:
533:
472:
438:
410:
373:
352:
311:
271:
256:
27:
1681:
Regarding Shaffi's belief that peaceful version in the quran have been abrogated and no longer apply
1165:, and Sunan Abu Dawud is. What will you do after i have done that? Will you then add another tag? --
712:“Almost wiki default! Just kept the color to match image. Used |pipe| instead of raw <html /: -->
401:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Template:Campaignbox_Campaigns_of_Muhammad&oldid=431843704
366:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Template:Campaignbox_Campaigns_of_Muhammad&oldid=430837296
430:
338:
293:
A more appropriate template (or category) to include in articles on Muhammad's companions would be
341:
is done better than this template, if you wanna keep the background, make the damn text clearer.
1761:"All"? Only an idiot would say all. That doesnt even sound believable, i never used that word--
1628:
You yourself state that two contradictory opinions are attributed to him, which one is correct?
1577:
1118:
980:@Andalusi, why do you keep adding that they wanted to defeat Muhammad? The source does say it
1889:
1846:
1804:
1755:
1696:
1547:
1475:
1417:
1370:
1338:
1307:
1238:
Considering the definition of hadith in the strict sense, they are "reports of statements or
1137:
1003:
942:
885:
302:
284:
89:
734:
Nice it is, after Misconceptions2's edit following mine. It looks better without the image.
1830:
1815:
1790:
1762:
1726:
1711:
1608:
1585:
1531:
1508:
1453:
1351:
1319:
1211:
1180:
1166:
1095:
1059:
1015:
985:
822:
791:
630:
613:
529:
434:
406:
369:
348:
252:
248:
20:
8:
1154:
516:
981:
1912:
1739:
But in any case, that still doesn't support your assertion that "al-Shafi'i considered
681:
321:
1448:. Imam Shaffi, and al-Zuhri reportedly viewed the content of al-Maghazi (mentioned by
1904:
1670:
1654:
847:
748:
725:
662:
563:
464:
1872:
1471:
1413:
1366:
1334:
1303:
1133:
999:
938:
881:
826:
298:
280:
242:
1903:
I think the purpose is ease of navigation, similarly to campaign boxes such as
1445:
917:
First of all, I think you really should have acquainted yourself more with the
512:
509:
1201:
I'm really baffled by the uneducated claims you've been making concerning the
608:
currently, its a mess. this is how it looks like on my google chrome browser:
1925:
1908:
1868:
1158:
787:
677:
317:
1218:), and never mind the claim that no hadith works were cited by the articles.
30:. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
1162:
839:
834:
740:
717:
654:
552:
453:
1639:
551:
better before, but editors were mostly complaining about the text color.
192:
1643:(justification of war) are restricted to aggression against Muslims and
276:
Why is this template being added to almost every single page on Islam ?
1569:
1299:
575:
493:
420:
383:
331:
960:
2 men burning a mosque with a lighted palm branch is hardly a campaign
715:
which is the same as what I wanted to mean in the previous comment. »
1703:
1449:
1294:
1290:
337:
Ps., be nice to get the table to a 275px or less width. ... Pps.,
921:
literature, particularly on the meaning and difference between a
790:
article. it became to large and i had to separate the articles --
208:
609:
1150:
918:
1273:
your removal of the tags and misinterpretation of the sources
1881:
already exists, and already serves the purpose of this box?
1149:
But Al-Andalusi. Most of the articles dont even use or cite
1578:
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=3n_P0Fztsn8C&pg=PA3
1090:
included in the template. I think this case is same as the
1647:—persecution of Muslims because of their religious belief.
1624:
Regarding monks, two contradictory opinions are attributed
1225:
My reply: this utter nonsense doesn't belong on Knowledge.
837:. Please talk, before doing further edit on the matter. »
130:
102:
1937:
Template-Class Middle Eastern military history articles
1153:(quotes of Muhammad), they cite historial sources like
570:
It's way better than what it was before ... before you
1667:
The Islamic Law of War: Justifications and Regulations
1651:
The Islamic Law of War: Justifications and Regulations
1615:
First and foremost you completely missed my question,
1947:
Template-Class early Muslim military history articles
1942:
Middle Eastern military history task force articles
1952:Early Muslim military history task force articles
1566:Regarding shaffi endorsing killing non combatants
1923:
243:http://military.hawarey.org/military_english.htm
1877:and others, what is the purpose of this box if
903:fussy about OR, you'd be very active elsewhere
429:ok, i have used the same colour scheme as this
347:ok, will do that tommorow, as today i am busy--
1391:consider adding Template:Hadith authenticity
201:Middle Eastern military history task force
1439:However, i have told you clearly before,
136:This template is within the scope of the
82:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
1932:Template-Class military history articles
238:Sirya and Ghazah of the Prophet Muhammad
217:Early Muslim military history task force
1632:These 4 Imams promoted extreme violence
1924:
1275:in one of the articles comes to mind).
156:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history
146:. To use this banner, please see the
295:Participants of Battle/Expedition "X"
159:Template:WikiProject Military history
71:
69:
1570:http://www.webcitation.org/5zu3YZaDj
65:
15:
88:It is of interest to the following
38:Delete "career" navbox, keep others
13:
1905:Napoleonic Wars navigational boxes
207:
191:
14:
1963:
1743:maghazi accounts to be authentic
1092:Expedition of Abu Sufyan ibn Harb
1858:What is the purpose of this box?
1669:, pp. 78-9. Palgrave Macmillan.
1653:, pp. 78-9. Palgrave Macmillan.
964:Raid of Sa'd ibn Zaid al-Ashhali
129:
101:
70:
26:This template was nominated for
19:
1879:List of expeditions of Muhammad
1:
859:Demolition of Masjid al-Dirar
610:http://tinypic.com/r/8x5zc9/7
265:20:21, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
1127:Template:Hadith authenticity
1117:to some of the articles per
1115:Template:Hadith authenticity
433:, hope you can read it now--
139:Military history WikiProject
7:
1302:contains few weak hadiths.
10:
1968:
1841:11:53, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
1824:23:33, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
1771:23:25, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
1750:23:17, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
1720:22:32, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
1691:21:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
1665:(Ahmed Al-Dawoody (2011),
1649:(Ahmed Al-Dawoody (2011),
1594:21:38, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
1542:21:09, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
307:20:06, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
289:19:58, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
1917:03:14, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
1884:17:57, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
1517:23:09, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
1500:21:51, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
1480:04:06, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
1462:21:12, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
1422:23:54, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
1375:23:38, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
1360:23:19, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
1343:23:38, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
1328:23:02, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
1312:22:29, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
1068:20:56, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
1053:20:32, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
1038:07:53, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
1024:21:16, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
1008:00:58, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
994:21:16, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
976:21:12, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
947:01:15, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
913:21:05, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
890:17:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
871:17:02, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
852:16:58, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
800:19:47, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
778:14:31, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
753:19:18, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
730:17:20, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
702:15:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
686:15:14, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
667:14:46, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
639:14:11, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
622:13:34, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
601:08:20, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
579:23:35, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
497:23:35, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
215:
199:
174:
170:
162:military history articles
124:
96:
1747:of his theory on naskh."
1403:14:34, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
1389:The text you quote says
1189:10:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
1175:21:31, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
1142:21:19, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
1104:21:56, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
1084:09:23, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
962:. Let us compare, then,
566:04:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
538:14:28, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
521:10:29, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
481:08:30, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
467:07:27, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
443:12:55, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
431:Template:Islamic Culture
424:10:51, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
415:18:16, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
387:15:53, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
378:12:18, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
357:16:33, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
339:Template:Islamic Culture
335:02:01, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
326:20:48, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
650:default Knowledge theme
175:Associated task forces:
763:Too many trivial pages
212:
196:
40:, 2019 August 24, see
821:is noticed involving
211:
195:
1492:William M. Connolley
1395:William M. Connolley
1212:Knowledge:Canvassing
1076:William M. Connolley
1045:William M. Connolley
1030:William M. Connolley
968:William M. Connolley
905:William M. Connolley
863:William M. Connolley
814:A probable edit war
770:William M. Connolley
694:William M. Connolley
593:William M. Connolley
473:William M. Connolley
50:, 2006 June 16, see
1155:Hisham Ibn Al-Kalbi
1446:Naskh (abrogation)
1119:WP:MOSISLAM#Hadith
1109:Hadith reliability
219:(c. 600 – c. 1600)
213:
197:
144:list of open tasks
84:content assessment
833:in a question of
831:Burning of Mosque
809:Burning of Mosque
648:Can't we use the
312:Background colour
272:Template location
268:
251:comment added by
235:
234:
231:
230:
227:
226:
223:
222:
148:full instructions
64:
63:
60:
59:
1959:
1902:
1876:
1834:
1794:
1730:
1682:
1633:
1625:
1612:
1560:user:CounterTime
1535:
842:
743:
720:
657:
561:
560:
462:
461:
267:
245:
182:
172:
171:
164:
163:
160:
157:
154:
153:Military history
133:
126:
125:
120:
109:Military history
105:
98:
97:
75:
74:
73:
66:
32:
31:
23:
16:
1967:
1966:
1962:
1961:
1960:
1958:
1957:
1956:
1922:
1921:
1896:
1862:
1860:
1831:Misconceptions2
1828:
1816:Misconceptions2
1791:Misconceptions2
1788:
1763:Misconceptions2
1727:Misconceptions2
1724:
1712:Misconceptions2
1680:
1677:
1661:
1631:
1623:
1609:Misconceptions2
1606:
1586:Misconceptions2
1532:Misconceptions2
1529:
1509:Misconceptions2
1454:Misconceptions2
1352:Misconceptions2
1320:Misconceptions2
1181:Misconceptions2
1167:Misconceptions2
1111:
1096:Misconceptions2
1060:Misconceptions2
1016:Misconceptions2
986:Misconceptions2
840:
823:Misconceptions2
812:
792:Misconceptions2
765:
741:
718:
655:
631:Misconceptions2
614:Misconceptions2
554:
553:
530:Misconceptions2
455:
454:
435:Misconceptions2
407:Misconceptions2
370:Misconceptions2
349:Misconceptions2
314:
274:
253:Misconceptions2
246:
240:
180:
161:
158:
155:
152:
151:
111:
12:
11:
5:
1965:
1955:
1954:
1949:
1944:
1939:
1934:
1920:
1919:
1865:Misonceptions2
1859:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1839:
1835:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1748:
1737:
1689:
1686:
1683:
1678:
1664:
1648:
1634:
1629:
1626:
1621:
1613:
1597:
1596:
1582:
1574:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1540:
1536:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1468:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1406:
1405:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1268:
1264:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1223:
1219:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1177:
1131:
1130:
1110:
1107:
1087:
1086:
1056:
1055:
1011:
1010:
958:So, Al-A said
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
949:
895:
894:
893:
892:
874:
873:
811:
806:
805:
804:
803:
802:
764:
761:
760:
759:
758:
757:
756:
755:
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
627:
626:
625:
624:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
544:
510:Black Standard
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
446:
445:
398:
397:
396:
395:
362:
361:
360:
359:
313:
310:
273:
270:
239:
236:
233:
232:
229:
228:
225:
224:
221:
220:
214:
204:
203:
198:
188:
187:
185:
183:
177:
176:
168:
167:
165:
134:
122:
121:
106:
94:
93:
87:
76:
62:
61:
58:
57:
56:
55:
45:
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1964:
1953:
1950:
1948:
1945:
1943:
1940:
1938:
1935:
1933:
1930:
1929:
1927:
1918:
1914:
1910:
1906:
1900:
1895:
1894:
1893:
1891:
1887:
1882:
1880:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1848:
1844:
1840:
1836:
1832:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1806:
1802:
1798:
1792:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1759:
1757:
1753:
1749:
1746:
1742:
1738:
1734:
1728:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1717:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1700:
1698:
1694:
1690:
1687:
1684:
1679:
1675:
1674:9780230111608
1672:
1668:
1659:
1658:9780230111608
1656:
1652:
1646:
1642:
1641:
1635:
1630:
1627:
1622:
1620:
1619:
1614:
1610:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1567:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1537:
1533:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1442:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1411:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1296:
1292:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1274:
1269:
1265:
1262:
1258:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1224:
1220:
1217:
1213:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1159:Sahih Bukhari
1156:
1152:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1128:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1120:
1116:
1106:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1026:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1009:
1005:
1001:
998:
997:
996:
995:
991:
987:
983:
978:
977:
973:
969:
965:
961:
948:
944:
940:
936:
932:
928:
924:
920:
916:
915:
914:
910:
906:
901:
900:
899:
898:
897:
896:
891:
887:
883:
878:
877:
876:
875:
872:
868:
864:
860:
856:
855:
854:
853:
850:
849:
846:
843:
836:
832:
828:
824:
820:
818:
816:
810:
801:
797:
793:
789:
788:Caravan raids
784:
783:
782:
781:
780:
779:
775:
771:
754:
751:
750:
747:
744:
737:
733:
732:
731:
728:
727:
724:
721:
714:
709:
705:
704:
703:
699:
695:
691:
690:
689:
687:
683:
679:
668:
665:
664:
661:
658:
651:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
636:
632:
623:
619:
615:
611:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
598:
594:
580:
577:
576:J. D. Redding
573:
569:
568:
567:
564:
562:
559:
558:
550:
545:
541:
540:
539:
535:
531:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
518:
514:
511:
498:
495:
494:J. D. Redding
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
478:
474:
469:
468:
465:
463:
460:
459:
450:
444:
440:
436:
432:
428:
427:
426:
425:
422:
421:J. D. Redding
417:
416:
412:
408:
403:
402:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
385:
384:J. D. Redding
380:
379:
375:
371:
367:
358:
354:
350:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
340:
336:
333:
332:J. D. Redding
328:
327:
323:
319:
309:
308:
304:
300:
296:
291:
290:
286:
282:
277:
269:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
244:
218:
210:
206:
205:
202:
194:
190:
189:
186:
184:
179:
178:
173:
169:
166:
149:
145:
141:
140:
135:
132:
128:
127:
123:
119:
115:
110:
107:
104:
100:
99:
95:
91:
85:
81:
77:
68:
67:
53:
49:
46:
43:
39:
36:
35:
34:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1883:
1861:
1796:
1787:
1744:
1740:
1732:
1666:
1650:
1644:
1638:
1617:
1616:
1565:
1557:
1488:
1407:
1390:
1260:
1256:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1206:
1202:
1163:Sahih Muslim
1132:
1112:
1088:
1057:
1027:
1012:
979:
959:
957:
934:
930:
926:
925:(battle) or
922:
838:
813:
766:
739:
735:
716:
711:
675:
653:
649:
628:
589:
571:
557:~ AdvertAdam
556:
555:
548:
543:green...etc.
507:
470:
458:~ AdvertAdam
457:
456:
451:
447:
418:
404:
399:
381:
363:
329:
315:
292:
278:
275:
241:
137:
118:Early Muslim
90:WikiProjects
79:
47:
37:
1899:CounterTime
1886:CounterTime
1873:Al-Andalusi
1843:CounterTime
1801:CounterTime
1752:CounterTime
1693:CounterTime
1640:casus belli
1544:CounterTime
1472:Al-Andalusi
1414:Al-Andalusi
1367:Al-Andalusi
1335:Al-Andalusi
1304:Al-Andalusi
1134:Al-Andalusi
1000:Al-Andalusi
939:Al-Andalusi
882:Al-Andalusi
857:Sooo... re
827:Al-Andalusi
710:comment is
299:Al-Andalusi
281:Al-Andalusi
247:—Preceding
114:Middle East
1926:Categories
1573:terrorism.
1300:Ibn Kathir
1298:Tafsir of
52:discussion
42:discussion
1704:Ibn Ishaq
1450:Ibn Ishaq
1410:hypocrisy
1291:Al-Tabari
572:could not
513:Davidelah
1909:Eperoton
1869:Eperoton
1295:Ibn Sa'd
935:sariyyah
927:sariyyah
678:SGBailey
318:SGBailey
261:contribs
249:unsigned
80:template
28:deletion
1871:, and
1797:because
1745:because
1733:because
1430:Tabari.
1408:Oh the
1267:hadith.
1248:ordered
1240:actions
1216:kept it
931:ghazwah
923:ghazwah
841:nafSadh
742:nafSadh
719:nafSadh
656:nafSadh
1814:not.--
1708:source
1261:khabar
1252:strict
1244:saraya
1207:hadith
1203:seerah
1151:hadith
1113:Added
919:Seerah
86:scale.
1645:fitna
1568:see:
1257:athar
835:WP:OR
78:This
1913:talk
1890:talk
1847:talk
1820:talk
1805:talk
1767:talk
1756:talk
1716:talk
1697:talk
1671:ISBN
1663:war.
1655:ISBN
1590:talk
1548:talk
1513:talk
1496:talk
1476:talk
1458:talk
1441:here
1418:talk
1399:talk
1371:talk
1356:talk
1339:talk
1324:talk
1308:talk
1259:and
1205:and
1185:talk
1171:talk
1138:talk
1100:talk
1080:talk
1064:talk
1049:talk
1034:talk
1020:talk
1004:talk
990:talk
982:here
972:talk
943:talk
909:talk
886:talk
867:talk
825:and
796:talk
774:talk
708:edit
698:talk
688:)))
682:talk
652:? »
635:talk
618:talk
597:talk
549:alot
534:talk
517:talk
477:talk
439:talk
411:talk
374:talk
353:talk
322:talk
303:talk
285:talk
257:talk
48:Keep
1741:all
1736:117
1706:"
933:or
848:say
845:did
829:on
749:say
746:did
726:say
723:did
663:say
660:did
1928::
1915:)
1907:.
1892:)
1867:,
1822:)
1807:)
1769:)
1758:)
1718:)
1710:--
1699:)
1676:.)
1660:.)
1592:)
1515:)
1498:)
1478:)
1460:)
1420:)
1412:.
1401:)
1373:)
1358:)
1341:)
1326:)
1310:)
1293:,
1263:).
1246:)
1187:)
1173:)
1161:,
1140:)
1129:."
1121::
1102:)
1082:)
1066:)
1051:)
1036:)
1022:)
1014:--
1006:)
992:)
974:)
945:)
911:)
888:)
869:)
798:)
776:)
738:»
736::P
700:)
684:)
637:)
620:)
612:--
599:)
536:)
519:)
479:)
441:)
413:)
376:)
368:--
355:)
324:)
305:)
297:.
287:)
263:)
259:•
181:/
116:/
112::
1911:(
1901::
1897:@
1888:(
1875::
1863:@
1849:)
1845:(
1833::
1829:@
1818:(
1803:(
1793::
1789:@
1765:(
1754:(
1729::
1725:@
1714:(
1695:(
1611::
1607:@
1588:(
1581:"
1558:@
1550:)
1546:(
1534::
1530:@
1511:(
1494:(
1474:(
1456:(
1416:(
1397:(
1369:(
1354:(
1337:(
1322:(
1306:(
1183:(
1169:(
1136:(
1098:(
1078:(
1062:(
1047:(
1032:(
1018:(
1002:(
988:(
970:(
941:(
907:(
884:(
865:(
794:(
772:(
713:”
696:(
680:(
633:(
616:(
595:(
532:(
515:(
475:(
437:(
409:(
372:(
351:(
320:(
301:(
283:(
255:(
150:.
92::
54:.
44:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
