22:
139:
349:
assault, and were three times driven back, but finally succeeded. The position of
Aguibella was turned; and, without sustaining any loss, the allied army forced the enemy to abandon it. An armistice was solicited and granted for only forty-eight hours, in consequence of which the Austrians occupied Montleiiau (?), and the enemy Gregis, Tournonz, and Gily. At the same time, Suchet renewed, with greater earnestness, his desire for an armistice,...
77:
53:
216:
If the
Neapolitan War gets its own campaignbox, it should still be included on the Hundred Days page as it was after all part of the War of the Seventh Coalition. The problem is that the coverage on Knowledge of the Hundred Days is terribly Anglocentric. There's no mention of the Austrian invasion of
348:
by assault. In this affair the
Austrians lost 1,000 men. The Piedmontese behaved with great bravery. Continuing his advance, the positions of Conflans and Le Hopital were forced, and the enemy driven out of them. At the latter place, the defence was very obstinate; the allies three times took it by
257:
I agree that mention of the
Neapolitan War should be included in the Hundred Days as should include the Austrian invasion (did the Russians and the Spanish cross the border?) as should a campaign box.If you have a reliable source why not add a paragraph or two about these events to the Hundred Days
276:
Just to be clear, I wasn't insisting that there be no major/minor distinction; you're in a better position to determine whether it's appropriate from a historiographic standpoint here. My thought was more for the formatting; it's neater, I think, if the distinction can be made without doing away
196:
I think in this case it is necessary as most histories -- particularly
British histories -- of the campaign are very limited after the Battle of Waterloo. They seem to assume (probably correctly) that it was all over bar the shouting. But I think that battles where there were thousands casualties
402:
The successful
British delaying action at Genappe on 17th of June is not is not usually known as 1st in English language histories, but remains unnumbered. This is probably because the second delaying action at Genappe by the French against the Prussians on the night of the 18th is not usually
333:
343:
of Arly, near
Conflans, which the enemy held with 3,000 men. The Sardinian general, Dandceaire, occupied the enemy's attention on his right; while General Frank, with the Austrian regiment, Du?as, carried the position of the
307:
192:
cases where such approaches may be both helpful to the reader and sufficiently well-sourced that they do not constitute original research, they are both unnecessary and confusing in most circumstances.
357:
188:
The use of special formatting (such as bolding or changes in font size) in the list of battles—particularly to mark battles as "important"—is generally discouraged; while there are a
146:
63:
310:
via Google Books Result. "Albertville was attacked by
Austrian flying columns, who pursued the retreating French to Conflans. Suchet tried to save the situation. ..."
176:
01:07, 5 September 2007 Kirill
Lokshin @Shouldn't really do major/minor splits, per WP:CAMPAIGN; but if truly needed, there's already a conventional format for it"
426:
89:
288:
431:
265:
252:
281:
436:
403:
recorded in
English Language histories as the opponents were the Prussians and it was unsuccessful in delaying their advance/pursuit. --
261:
But as this is a campaign box about the Waterloo campaign, I do not think that the Neapolitan War should but included in this one. --
84:
58:
369:
323:
208:
93:
392:
217:
southern France and occupation of Lyon and Monaco, and apart from the infobox, there's no mention of the Neapolitan War.
245:
412:
299:
I said that I did not find a reference to the Battle of Conflans in the history of the article, but I did find
239:
88:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
33:
294:
167:
39:
280:(If you have any good ideas about the formatting, incidentally, you might want to drop by
8:
388:
285:
181:
218:
397:
374:
384:
201:
420:
408:
365:
319:
383:
is misspelled Cambari. Someone please fix since the template is protected.
353:
The action is described from a different perspective by William Siborne in
339:
General Bubna advanced from mount Cenis, and on the 29th, attacked the
331:
History of the Wars Occasioned by the French Revolution, from the ...
197:
ought be included in a campaign box even if they are not well known.
404:
361:
315:
262:
205:
138:
380:
282:
WT:MILHIST#Marking major/minor engagements in campaignboxes
76:
52:
277:
with the overall chronological ordering of the list.
204:should be broken out into its own campaign box. --
418:
314:But I don't know if that counts as a battle. --
82:This template is within the scope of the
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
427:Template-Class military history articles
305:Napoleon's Italian Campaigns: 1805-1815
432:Template-Class Napoleonic era articles
419:
102:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history
92:. To use this banner, please see the
105:Template:WikiProject Military history
21:
19:
15:
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
437:Napoleonic era task force articles
137:
14:
448:
172:From the history of the article:
75:
51:
20:
336:also mentions this engagement:
1:
393:03:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
303:Frederick C. Schneid (2002).
289:03:36, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
266:08:21, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
253:19:18, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
209:16:56, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
85:Military history WikiProject
7:
355:The Waterloo Campaign, 1815
10:
453:
370:00:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
324:00:06, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
147:Napoleonic era task force
145:
120:
116:
108:military history articles
70:
46:
413:16:45, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
121:Associated task forces:
142:
141:
200:However I think the
295:Battle of Conflans
143:
90:list of open tasks
34:content assessment
379:In the template,
168:major minor split
165:
164:
161:
160:
157:
156:
153:
152:
94:full instructions
444:
250:
248:
242:
234:
231:
228:
225:
222:
149:(c. 1792 – 1815)
128:
118:
117:
110:
109:
106:
103:
100:
99:Military history
79:
72:
71:
66:
59:Military history
55:
48:
47:
25:
24:
23:
16:
452:
451:
447:
446:
445:
443:
442:
441:
417:
416:
400:
377:
329:C. H. Gifford
297:
246:
240:
238:
232:
229:
226:
223:
220:
170:
126:
107:
104:
101:
98:
97:
61:
12:
11:
5:
450:
440:
439:
434:
429:
399:
396:
376:
373:
351:
350:
337:
312:
311:
296:
293:
292:
291:
278:
273:
272:
271:
270:
269:
268:
259:
202:Neapolitan War
194:
193:
178:
177:
169:
166:
163:
162:
159:
158:
155:
154:
151:
150:
144:
134:
133:
131:
129:
123:
122:
114:
113:
111:
80:
68:
67:
64:Napoleonic era
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
449:
438:
435:
433:
430:
428:
425:
424:
422:
415:
414:
410:
406:
395:
394:
390:
386:
382:
372:
371:
367:
363:
359:
356:
347:
342:
341:tete-du-point
338:
335:
332:
328:
327:
326:
325:
321:
317:
309:
306:
302:
301:
300:
290:
287:
283:
279:
275:
274:
267:
264:
260:
256:
255:
254:
249:
243:
236:
235:
215:
214:
213:
212:
211:
210:
207:
203:
198:
191:
187:
186:
185:
183:
175:
174:
173:
148:
140:
136:
135:
132:
130:
125:
124:
119:
115:
112:
95:
91:
87:
86:
81:
78:
74:
73:
69:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
401:
378:
354:
352:
346:tete-du-pont
345:
340:
330:
313:
304:
298:
219:
199:
195:
189:
179:
171:
83:
40:WikiProjects
29:
182:WP:CAMPAIGN
421:Categories
385:Djmaschek
334:Page 1517
358:page 776
308:Page 160
258:article.
247:contribs
30:template
398:Genappe
381:Cambrai
375:Cambrai
286:Kirill
184:says:
36:scale.
241:reply
28:This
409:talk
389:talk
366:talk
320:talk
405:PBS
362:PBS
316:PBS
284:.)
263:PBS
206:PBS
190:few
180:As
423::
411:)
391:)
368:)
360:--
322:)
251:–
244:•
237:–
127:/
62::
407:(
387:(
364:(
318:(
233:y
230:t
227:n
224:e
221:C
96:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
