Knowledge

Template talk:Hats

Source 📝

22: 71: 53: 81: 141: 179:
I've removed the Deep Blue Sea listing within the template. My understanding is that this template exists to identify generic styles (eg, Picture hat, Dolly Varden, Kepi, and so on) not one-off designs. If we allow one 'named' creation in we'll have to allow others in and that will make the template
311:
is to gather up articles on a common subject, to make them easily available for the reader; so putting the Anthony Eden hat in parenthesis after Homburg (or Flat cap with Coppola cap, or Side cap with Titovka, or Baseball cap with Trucker cap, even though they are 'the same hat') is perfectly
450:
It seem the template is biased against non-Western hats while also promoting a particular view of what is west and what is folk. How are these two determined? Example: Are Mexican sobreros less Western and more folk than Jewish caps from Eastern Europe?
466:
Agreed. Categorization needs a complete overhaul; the Western/Folk distinction is nonsensical, and many of the categories within "Western" are applicable outside the West. Not sure exactly what the new categorization should look like, however.
335:. Not all of the subsequent improvements are to my credit. Of those that are, I don't expect you to commend me about it. But before you go about miscrediting the user behind upon criticism of a detail of the final result, have you considered 428: 279:
Hardly proportionate to include one individual's hat, style and biography in such a section in such a template - also misleading, since it can give the impression that it is something else than a homburg
403:
While they all pertained to the hat, they were three different questions. You know what, how about you accuse other users of bad faith when that is clearly the case. Thanks!
156: 339:? As for the very hat, obviously I fail to understand your arguments that it regards a distinctively separate hat altogether - how does it differ from a black felt 203:, which appear only tenuously related, and I'm not sure all the entries under Wrapped are technically wrapped - I would not consider a hood wrapped, for example. 170: 254:
Some of the hats need to be organized by material (fur, woven fabric, leather, metal, straw-like etc) and or the professions that use said hat type.
189: 255: 199:
I suggest that this template needs reorganising as it is getting a little overwhelmingly list-y. There are also some strange entries, such as
312:
appropriate; in fact, using parentheses is precisely what we should do in such cases. So I suggest you let it go, or risk censure for
440: 476: 491: 496: 412: 390: 352: 422: 370: 325: 298: 263: 268: 103: 249: 244: 94: 58: 33: 366: 294: 460: 436: 374: 147: 102:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
456: 302: 194: 185: 331:
Here's how the template looked before I tried to improve it to the best of my understanding:
39: 432: 332: 8: 378: 172: 386: 321: 259: 452: 313: 232: 200: 181: 472: 408: 348: 240: 284: 301:) that your premise is wrong, you should accept the consensus on the matter and 86: 485: 382: 336: 317: 308: 445: 468: 404: 344: 340: 290: 274: 236: 220: 210:
Basic types (Boater, Bowler, Top Hat, Turban, Conical Asian hat, etc)
224: 70: 52: 293:
still don't understand (despite being told by numerous people in
99: 287:, it misunderstands the purpose of having a navigation template. 343:? - but that's alright. You have it your way, I don't mind. 140: 98:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 76: 371:
Talk:Anthony Eden hat#Requested move 1 January 2019
483: 206:I'm thinking maybe something along these lines: 431:. I've removed the red link from the template. 231:Also, is there a reason we have a separate 32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's 377:. No need to discuss this over again at 484: 92:This template is within the scope of 21: 19: 135: 15: 283:I've reverted this; not only is it 38:It is of interest to the following 13: 375:User talk:PPEMES#Hats and headgear 367:Talk:Anthony Eden hat#Merge, again 151: 146:This template was considered for 14: 508: 139: 79: 69: 51: 20: 492:Template-Class fashion articles 497:NA-importance fashion articles 461:08:02, 14 September 2020 (UTC) 423:Link to deleted portal removed 1: 477:06:51, 28 November 2020 (UTC) 112:Knowledge:WikiProject Fashion 106:and see a list of open tasks. 365:. See closed discussions at 273:This template was edited by 190:10:28, 20 January 2015 (UTC) 115:Template:WikiProject Fashion 7: 413:09:42, 6 January 2019 (UTC) 391:04:09, 6 January 2019 (UTC) 353:02:24, 6 January 2019 (UTC) 326:22:41, 5 January 2019 (UTC) 264:18:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC) 10: 513: 441:10:14, 29 April 2019 (UTC) 307:Second (just to be clear) 295:your failed merge proposal 269:Homburg (Anthony Eden hat) 373:, and the current one at 309:the purpose of a template 250:Reorganization (material) 245:11:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC) 235:? Should they be merged? 64: 46: 299:your failed move request 277:with the edit summary 379:every forum available 233:template for Headgear 219:Historical headgear ( 213:Ethnographic headgear 427:The Hats portal was 154:. The result of the 173:Deep Blue Sea (hat) 95:WikiProject Fashion 361:Already explained 314:disruptive editing 216:Religious headgear 175:from this template 34:content assessment 201:Haredi burqa sect 168: 167: 134: 133: 130: 129: 126: 125: 504: 429:recently deleted 153: 143: 136: 120: 119: 118:fashion articles 116: 113: 110: 89: 84: 83: 82: 73: 66: 65: 55: 48: 47: 25: 24: 23: 16: 512: 511: 507: 506: 505: 503: 502: 501: 482: 481: 448: 433:BlackcurrantTea 425: 289:First, even if 271: 252: 197: 177: 117: 114: 111: 108: 107: 85: 80: 78: 12: 11: 5: 510: 500: 499: 494: 480: 479: 447: 444: 424: 421: 420: 419: 418: 417: 416: 415: 396: 395: 394: 393: 356: 355: 306: 303:drop the stick 288: 282: 270: 267: 251: 248: 229: 228: 217: 214: 211: 196: 195:Reorganisation 193: 180:unmanageable. 176: 169: 166: 165: 144: 132: 131: 128: 127: 124: 123: 121: 104:the discussion 91: 90: 87:Fashion portal 74: 62: 61: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 509: 498: 495: 493: 490: 489: 487: 478: 474: 470: 465: 464: 463: 462: 458: 454: 443: 442: 438: 434: 430: 414: 410: 406: 402: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 392: 388: 384: 380: 376: 372: 368: 364: 360: 359: 358: 357: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 330: 329: 328: 327: 323: 319: 315: 310: 304: 300: 296: 292: 286: 281: 276: 266: 265: 261: 257: 247: 246: 242: 238: 234: 226: 222: 218: 215: 212: 209: 208: 207: 204: 202: 192: 191: 187: 183: 174: 163: 159: 158: 149: 145: 142: 138: 137: 122: 105: 101: 97: 96: 88: 77: 75: 72: 68: 67: 63: 60: 57: 54: 50: 49: 45: 41: 35: 31: 27: 18: 17: 453:Sietecolores 449: 426: 362: 278: 272: 253: 230: 205: 198: 182:Libby norman 178: 162:do not merge 161: 155: 152:2018 June 12 93: 40:WikiProjects 29: 341:homburg hat 221:Poke bonnet 486:Categories 363:ad nauseam 157:discussion 171:Removing 383:Mathglot 318:Swanny18 256:Eyreland 225:Fontange 148:deletion 30:template 227:, etc.) 109:Fashion 100:Fashion 59:Fashion 469:Hsplus 405:PPEMES 345:PPEMES 337:WP:AGF 285:pointy 275:PPEMES 237:Mabalu 36:scale. 160:was " 28:This 473:talk 457:talk 446:Bias 437:talk 409:talk 387:talk 349:talk 322:talk 297:and 260:talk 241:talk 186:talk 291:you 280:hat 150:on 488:: 475:) 459:) 439:) 411:) 389:) 381:. 369:, 351:) 324:) 316:. 262:) 243:) 223:, 188:) 164:". 471:( 455:( 435:( 407:( 385:( 347:( 333:1 320:( 305:. 258:( 239:( 184:( 42::

Index

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Fashion
WikiProject icon
Fashion portal
WikiProject Fashion
Fashion
the discussion

deletion
discussion
Deep Blue Sea (hat)
Libby norman
talk
10:28, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Haredi burqa sect
Poke bonnet
Fontange
template for Headgear
Mabalu
talk
11:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Eyreland
talk
18:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
PPEMES
pointy
you
your failed merge proposal

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.