802:, who are also Inland but linguistically/ethnographically connected to the Coast in many more ways than I should start listing; OMR and others could tell you, though, that there's a clear "cultural divide" between the Pacific Northwest Coast and the Northwest Plateau (Columbia-Fraser Plateau); usually the line is drawn linguistically, separating the Athapaskan and interior Salish rfrom the Coast Salish an their upcoast neighbours; the Chinook/Clatsops et al are generally considered teh soutehrn end of the cultural ecument of the "Northwest Coast cultures"; but the other Oregon Coast/Williamette people farther south, while not lingusitically related (otehr than the Tillamook) were definitely socially and historically related; the idea is that t he Northwest Coast "culture area" is kind of an identifiable, tangible thing; on the southern end, though it's hard to know where to draw the line;
535:; the Oregon Native template maybe could be broadened in scope and retitled re the Interior/Plateau, and I'm not sure as to "the culture area" they should be aligned with; perhaps California as well as the Great Basin and teh Plateau ?? I know OMR, as an "i.p." (indigenous person) from the coastal cultures feels they should be on a distinct template, but he wasn't sure how far south to take it. With the Plateau peoples I usually find the cut-off to the Subarctic kind of arbitrary, i.e. the Athapaskan-Salishan "divide" - as the Tslihqot'in and Dakelh/Carrier/Wet'su-we'ten have more shared cultural elements with their coastal and southward neighbours than the more "bush" peoples northwards, who are less numerous and "more like" their kin in the Yukon and NWT - all are "Dine" or "Dene", and will be on
502:
in my talkpage archives for sure, also...I've been meaning to do teh
Plateau one, but didn't know where southwards to "cut it off", and ditto out through the Gorge of the Columbia; as much as the Chinook were a coastal people and interconnected with the other great canoe cultures to hte north, they were also a river people and hill country people and interconnected southwards as well as into the Columbia Plateau in a way their northward counterparts just didn't, especially north of Puget Sound. I guess I could statt it and ask for guidance southwards/westwards/eastwards; And I'm long-overdue, come to think of it, to write a teimline for the Pacific Northwest section of
573:
about indigenous people on wikipedia. There are specific things where I'll call out as
American POV, especially things to boarder and US-politics stuff. Where it's appropriate, like tribal-governance and Nation-State laws/histories intersecting with the indigenous people, of course it should reflect that in a NPOV. But, as Skookum referenced from what I say, the boarder is imposed, and culturally, geographically, historically, there was no boarder. Inflicting a boarder paradigm on the article is POV. I think most would agree? (I hope.) Anyways, perhaps we could work together on the template I started and also on
71:
53:
22:
771:), is to favour the IPOV over the WPOV (which is CPOV+APOV="white man's point of view"); for example we'd had {{tl:First Nations on Vancouver Island}} but classifying stuff by geographic unit does'nt work; all three of the island's main culture groups "spill over" or are otherwise connected to the adjoining mainland. So that's even not at a political level of the issue; it's a sensitivity/awareness thing; not a "Canadian point of view"; OMR is much more a Skwxwu7mesh and a Kwakwaka'wakw
441:
Twana, the
Squamish to teh Nooksack; yes, we imposed different systems and even names on them - that's reflected already in our cat hierarchies, by the way - but in terms of navigation templates that make cultural sense - and won't alienate the people(s) who might drop by (we need their contributions and respect, not "oh this is just stupid white people etc") - it's their call about how to group them. There's already another dcouple of border-spanning templates i made a while back
399:-speakers" aren't partitioned, although they do have imposed on them colonially-mandated governments without validity in the traditional culture. A culture which is still the facts on teh ground up in those parts, by the way....anyway, I've gotten OMR to soften things like using aboriginal spelling across the board, even for US-side tribes whose own often-self-written pages use the anglicized form; I can't link to all our debates about this but I did get the
147:
129:
614:
socially/politically to the Nuu-chah-nulth and Makah, although their art/society/lore I'm not sure has much in common with those northwards; Chehalis and
Quinaults are the Salishan "grey area", but those northward from the Chehalis seem to be part of the same cultural ecumene as the Georgia Strait/Lower Mainland/South Island peoples.
813:"Northwest Plateau" culture area usually ends at the Interior Salish-Athapaskan frontier in the Cariboo or thereabouts; not trying to hector here, just explaining the complexities; beyond the plateau northwards I think we dcan stop there; those people, other than the Tahltans, Tsetsaut and Inland Tlingit, nearly all will figure in
716:. If we want to, we can just leave the politics out of it, make the political issues it's own navbox distinct to the country. Myself and Skookum went through this with the individual tribes/nations. We decided best to seperate the (first)nation from cultural-people. Similar to there being a difference between
899:
realize it's not a
Canadian agenda of OMR's I'm supporting/endorsing - it's IPOV, Indigenous-point-of-view. The region discussions I laid out also aren't CPOV, though there's CPOV perspetive in them; tehy're historical/anthropological/enthographic/linguistic. Almost, therein lies the problem - that "almost".
898:
Well, no; simply put - OMR's isn't CPOV, it's IPOV; I'm CPOV, just trying to intermediate APOV into the equation; actually I'm BPOV in historical terms (British as opposed to
Canadians; BC being very different from "the Canadas"). So sorry to butt in, just trying to intermediate, and also get you to
501:
one....btw I've always liked some of your Oregon templates; a bit large at times but I'd say it clued me/us in about their usefulness and visual potential; same with infoboxes and such, which are nice to see cropping up on pages I launched.....anyway I'll dig out a talkpage or two, probably something
366:
It's for situatiosn/milieux like this that I suggested somewhere a Wiki TaskForce comprising the Indgn/BC/OR/WA/ID/MT/YT/AK WikiProjects; we've already discovered the benefits of cross-border info exchange on the various
Columbia Basin articles/templates and I keep on finding bits from one article or
883:
I was actually responding to Old Man Rivers, but it's the same thing. We can talk about POV in the abstract all day, all year, but it won't really improve the content. If there are specific ways I'm ignoring the
Canadian or the native POV, just point them out, or change them. Trust me, I'm not going
758:
Actually it's not a
Canadian point-of-view - CPOV that I'm on about, it's reflecting the indigenous point of view (IPOV) and much of the reality; the Okanagan and Ktunaxa organizations are border-spanning, by way of example, and the Coast Salish core area is bisected, East/West Germany style, by the
666:
I don't have any problem if my edits are called POV, as long as it's understood that it's a problem that can be fixed. Of course my edits on this topic reflect my point of view; its' the only point of view I have. I assure you, any absence of
Canadian point of view in my editing simply reflects that
634:
popular, OMR, with those of us who are familiar with your excellent work (albeit with IPOV lots of times - "indigenous point of view" vs APOV="American Point of View", BPOV="British point of view" and CPOV="Canadian Point of View", each of which I've used at different times). I think here might be a
596:
Note about Coast Salish. It shouldn't affect a borderless template, but FYI I believe it was determined that the Coast Salish culture didn't actually extend into Oregon, but that a couple of the languages were considered branches of the Salishan language? Tillamook was one, I think. I can't remember
440:
I think it was; but "to get it right" the Island didn't work as a defining parameter for the situation; separate culture/ethnic-group templates did; same as the Lower Mainland peoples are interconnected with the Southeast Island peoples, the Lummi and Clallam are tied to the Saanich and Songhees and
342:
Well, that's a heckuva list, on top of what Skookum came up with. Some I had found, some not. In a way, it makes me want to just say fine, we'll delete mine...but on the other hand, in kind of underscores the need for navboxes to organize and unify some of this stuff. If that much escaped my notice,
966:
I dropped by this template and to my chagrin saw that Pacific Northwest ended somewhere just a bit north of the Columbia; I added items in a north-to-south order for the coastal peoples, and will re-order the Interior peoples once I find all the Washington/Idaho ones; the BC list is complete, other
797:
As to the breakdown by area, nope the Fraser River is core to it, not a border - y'see, that's an example of crossborder POV, including the Canadian one; but never mind that, it's just a reality of how the border has divided white consciousness in this region as well....anyway, the usual divisions
934:
files in the face of the usual meaning of the Pacific Nrothest peoples (wihtout including Inteiror Washington and BC peoples also) that I hope the problem is clear; if it's not clear....well, I don't know what to say. mentiong hte Nez Perce without also naming the Cayuse or Spokan or Okanagan or
929:
goes in people? - of the hundreds possible....) and still has that name and area-definition problem from above; and it's compounded in the Tribes section by the luymping of the PacNWCoast peoplers into one links while Oregon-specific tribes are specified; this is so unprotocolic in native culture
812:
is a bit easier to define, depending on where the Great Basin begins and ends (spillover there, too, I'd say) but also because the Tshilhqot'in and Wet'su'we'ten and Dakelh aren't usually included; in BC they necesarily are because THAT is CPOV; it's our plateau, not a US-perceived one where the
775:, I'm sure he'd agree. if the template is put together well, also, it won't alienate indigenous visitors and/or potential editors/contributors; just thoughtfulness and respect, that's the issue, not so much POV; not so much POV as perspective....and that elusive "cultural authenticity" thing....
572:
with Washington and Oregon in mind. Like wikipedia is supposed to be: a collaboration. Most of the work I've been doing I've purposely left open ended for others to contribute to also. My recommendation is to merge them somehow. This template is obviously US-centric, like most things written
868:
will get you started...can't rememvber if the Chinookans were part of the PNW Sprachbund, though...peoples farther south that pretty quickly resemble California native peoples; another distinct culture area, California, come to think of it....(I mean indigenously, rather than post-indigenously,
684:
I like the idea of doing some kind of merge, but I think the big question is: How to divide stuff up? Do we do a single navbox for all native peoples west of the Rockies, north of the Klamath Mts, and south of the Fraser River? (which is, very roughly speaking, what I was attempting.) Or do we
362:
Aha, found ya....went to OMR's "Indigenous"-ly worded template as that terminology is, er, politically acceptable ("native peoples" isn't). Anyway here's what I'd written on OregonTalk just when the announcmenet to make for the template talk pages was made; I'd put this somewhere else first:
833:
ultimately, which is a whole 'nother story. Aboriginal/indigenous realities demand that, fror Wiki content to be taken wseriously by the communities it's about, it reflect their perceptions of themselves; that's why designing this tempalte is important. BTW everyone here pls see
613:
That would be just the Tillamook/Nehalem, don't think there's any further south; in Costello's 1909 book he mentions them in passing as still-existing, not sure the historical continuity there; the Chinooks were, in most accounts, part of the NW Coast culture and closely connected
703:
Okay, my idea is to do one or mutlple navboxes. I like some of the things you have on yours like "Court cases and treaties" and "Armed conflicts" and "Modern issues". Obviously these would be an issue when coming to things that are very specific to the country like the
422:; all I could do in that instance (to win) was to say if the Native American contributors who wrote and added those pages prefer the one spelling over the one you want as correct, who are you to say? I think you'll find our 49th Parallel discussion on
759:
international frontier; the idea is not to classify them as Canadian or American, although that's inherent in the category hierarchies...but it doesnt' have to be on templates. What I'm trying to explain that OMR's position, which I (as a
205:, which lists the nine federally-recognized tribal governments in Oregon. If you want to leave the U.S. gov't out of it, then go with the individual peoples that make up those entities--not all of those have been included. See also
581:
south of the boarder is a bit of a blank to me. (So is northern Coast Salish actually). And I imagine there are others places where contributions and collaborations would be awesome. Thanks anyways, that's my two cents.
806:
597:
which of the interrelated pages it was, one of language pages maybe. There was something about removing Oregon-related cats and/or project templates from the page in question. I'll see if I can find the diffs/discussion...
409:
template to use the "white man spelling" for Muckleshoot and Duwamish instead of .... well, you know what it looks like in Lushootseed, right? He and I are good Wiki friends/colleagues now, but it all started somewhere at
367:
story on one side of the border which add to the article on the other side; it's what I was saying about the inextricability of BC's history from the adjacent states'.....now, about this 49th thing, you're making
343:
I think it's partly because the articles are not fully interlinked, and there aren't navboxes or "umbrella articles" that help those of us new to the subject get a bird's eye view of how everything fits together.
427:
241:(Kalapuyans, Athapaskans of Southwestern Oregon (Umpqua, Coquille, Chasta, Galice, Applegate, Tututni, and more), Takelma, Chinookans of the Lower Columbia, Tillamook, Alseans, and Siuslawans and Coosans), and
853:
724:. Maybe we can create three navboxes, one for all cultural-people stuff, and two others for political things distinct to each others respective country. (*Note: Canada is not my country. I'm not "
717:
935:
Ktunaxa? I don't think you realize the import of that to the template's credibility, esp. with native people who migh visit a page it's displayed on.....I added what I added to make a point;
225:, but note that it's incomplete for the the latter part of the 19th century, and the 1855 mess. As far as regions, my Oregon Archaeology/Anthropology class covered these regions and peoples :
1040:
1045:
636:
1021:
1009:
751:
737:
1035:
861:
95:
798:
are Coast and Plateau, with certain crossovers because of alliances/regular contact (e.g. the Wet-su-we'ten, a northern BC Athapaskan people who are closely connected to the
591:
213:(which you've linked). Washington has many more recognized tribes and governments than Oregon, and I'm not sure you want to even tackle BC or if this should just be for the
908:
893:
784:
698:
516:
606:
357:
878:
847:
856:
or whatever it is; at least the Northwest Coast identity/multiculture is a self-conceived reality, rather than one imposed from outside; years of collective community
661:
623:
569:
532:
333:
78:
58:
558:
981:) of about 50 entries; similarly the Kwakwaka'wakw and other groups have subpeople names but I "didn't go there" because of the complexity that would result. The
943:. And try tothink of the Pacific Northwest as including something more than Oregon pls.....(that this template has Oregon-template colours is also kinda obvious).
939:
of these sections is a large template - a very large tempalte - in its own right. Redefine the parameters, come to terms with the scope of potential content, and
475:
952:
667:
I don't know much about it. I've never been to western Canada, unfortunately. Doesn't mean I don't like it, or think it shouldn't be represented on Knowledge.
270:
485:
827:
539:
1003:
465:
982:
574:
565:
202:
998:
817:
222:
1050:
1055:
986:
705:
461:, but those are "government" templates and not inclusive of peoples, communities, languages, subarticles et al; I think there's a good
434:
305:
685:
subdivide that region? East and west of the Cascades? Or something else entirely? I'm sure there's no perfect answer, but if we chose
545:
when "we" finally ge4t around to it; but I think the central-BC Athapaskans "belong" on the same template as the Plateau (well, they
455:
206:
348:
So, clearly, my first stab leaves a lot to be desired -- but is it a foundation worth building on, or should it just be pitched? -
471:
template now, though only a few articles as yet; there's a series of experimental templates OMR and I mucked around with; I made
163:
210:
83:
526:
971:(q.v.) and the lack of specification of the various Coast Salish (in BC or Washington); that's whole template in itself (
864:, which pretty much also describes the region laid out above; there's no proper article on that, google it...., although
963:
925:
I made a few additions to the peoples section, but overall I think this template is ill-conceived, hard to prioritize (
91:
445:
154:
134:
564:
Skookum makes me out to be a popular person around here. Well, I'm one of, like, 3 people who've been working on
713:
920:
196:
385:
peoples to him is very important; the boundary is an imposition on him and his people, in his view. He's half-
742:
I forgot to add: I suck at naming conventions. So naming suggestions for these navboxes, much appreciated.
201:
I guess the discussion is moving here? Anyway, as far as Oregon goes, here are my random thoughts. There are
233:(Klamath and Modoc, Wasco, Wishram and Cascades, Cayuse, Umatilla and Walla Walla, Nez Perce, and Molala),
87:
33:
852:
BTW that Denendeh one would supplant an etnography/linguistics-based classification, as found i tneh cats
423:
214:
218:
162:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
94:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
495:
389:
301:
531:
AFAIK there's no "merge" process for templates, otherwise I'd place merge tempaltes here and on
747:
733:
643:
587:
320:
and yet more in BC....and that's only the distinguished names....I gotta get around to writing
975:
889:
694:
403:
379:
353:
39:
415:
411:
8:
1017:
994:
948:
904:
874:
843:
835:
780:
657:
619:
554:
512:
375:
but he's having none of it; cultural appropriateness is the issue and the unity of the
329:
221:
affected Oregon tribes adversely and the fight to restore recognition is ongoing. See
957:
743:
729:
583:
372:
313:
885:
709:
690:
602:
419:
349:
266:
70:
52:
317:
289:
246:
1029:
1013:
990:
968:
944:
900:
870:
839:
776:
653:
615:
550:
508:
325:
578:
297:
884:
to take offense -- I do not regard myself as an expert in these matters. -
728:". I'm Sḵwxwú7mesh & Kwakwaka'wakw.) How's that for a suggestion?
649:
637:
Knowledge:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America#Northwest Coast
598:
503:
262:
254:
159:
865:
396:
309:
281:
245:(Tolowa, and Shastan Peoples). More later, I'm tired, but don't forget
989:
finally, as it's been in the offing for a while and needs to get done.
491:
and related ones; now I see how to expand them, on the model of OMR's
250:
962:
Following up on my recent tirade, as no doubt some will see it, on
725:
293:
285:
217:, though the idea of ignoring modern boundaries is a good one. The
799:
721:
321:
985:
link could be moved up to form a section heading; I'll draft up
258:
324:(or hope someone else does, my book on him's back in BC...).
223:
List of United States treaties#U.S. Native American treaties
146:
128:
1041:
NA-importance Indigenous peoples of North America articles
533:
Template:Indigenous peoples of the Pacific Northwest Coast
549:
on the Plateau....). Anyway, again, back to steamboats.
104:
Knowledge:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America
1046:
WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America articles
107:
Template:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America
395:
and very passionate about that heritage also, but the "
1036:
NA-Class Indigenous peoples of North America articles
158:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
82:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
983:Indigenous peoples of the Pacific Northwest Coast
566:Indigenous peoples of the Pacific Northwest Coast
203:List of Native American Tribal Entities in Oregon
1027:
708:court case which set a president in Canada over
639:etc. (a regional subgroup of the IndProj - see
79:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America
428:Template talk:Coast Salish in British Columbia
869:although that's all too true also isn't it?).
110:Indigenous peoples of North America articles
987:Indigenous peoples of the Northwest Plateau
854:Category:Peoples of the Canadian Sub-Arctic
807:Indigenous peoples of the Northwest Plateau
1004:PacNW Coast subproject of WP:NorthAmNative
689:answer, we can get to work. Suggestions? -
1008:Hi; seemed appropriate to drop notice of
207:Category:Native American tribes in Oregon
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
1012:here. Please weigh in as seen fit.....
1028:
718:Government of United States of America
506:....anyway, back to steamboats ;-: -->
211:List of Indian reservations in Oregon
152:This template is within the scope of
76:This template is within the scope of
21:
19:
15:
1051:Template-Class Archaeology articles
101:Indigenous peoples of North America
92:indigenous peoples of North America
59:Indigenous peoples of North America
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
1056:NA-importance Archaeology articles
964:Template talk:Oregon Early History
14:
1067:
435:First Nations on Vancouver Island
430:maybe....or...long ago there was
172:Knowledge:WikiProject Archaeology
763:agree with...well maybe I'm not
456:Ktunaxa Kinbasket Treaty Council
175:Template:WikiProject Archaeology
145:
127:
69:
51:
20:
714:British Columbia Treaty Process
261:and many more from Washington.
1:
860:produce something called the
652:working group for an example.
166:and see a list of open tasks.
98:and see a list of open tasks.
1022:21:28, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
862:Pacific Northwest Sprachbund
371:the same argument I made to
88:Indigenous peoples in Canada
7:
577:page too. I'll be honest,
10:
1072:
909:04:39, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
894:04:24, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
879:04:14, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
848:04:10, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
785:03:59, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
752:06:24, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
738:06:23, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
699:01:48, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
662:19:49, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
624:19:53, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
607:19:49, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
592:19:15, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
559:13:21, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
517:05:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
424:Template talk:Coast Salish
358:07:00, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
334:14:06, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
271:06:06, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
215:Northwestern United States
999:15:02, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
941:deal with that name issue
219:Indian termination policy
140:
64:
46:
953:03:38, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
446:Okanagan Nation Alliance
967:than a split needed on
302:August Jack Khatsahlano
155:WikiProject Archaeology
921:additions & issues
712:and other things like
197:More feedback for Pete
773:than he is a Canadian
635:good place to field
416:Talk:Squamish Nation
412:Talk:Squamish people
178:Archaeology articles
767:but I'm definitely
229:(Northern Paiute),
836:Talk:Local history
568:. I created that
527:"Merge" discussion
34:content assessment
314:Chief Hunter Jack
194:
193:
190:
189:
186:
185:
122:
121:
118:
117:
1063:
980:
974:
832:
826:
822:
816:
811:
805:
710:Aboriginal title
648:
642:
544:
538:
500:
494:
490:
484:
480:
474:
470:
464:
460:
454:
450:
444:
439:
433:
420:Talk:Skwxwu7mesh
408:
402:
394:
388:
384:
378:
282:Chief Dan George
239:Western Interior
180:
179:
176:
173:
170:
149:
142:
141:
131:
124:
123:
112:
111:
108:
105:
102:
84:Native Americans
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
47:
25:
24:
23:
16:
1071:
1070:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1026:
1025:
1010:this discussion
1006:
978:
972:
960:
923:
830:
824:
820:
814:
809:
803:
761:cultus whiteman
646:
640:
542:
536:
529:
498:
492:
488:
482:
478:
472:
468:
462:
458:
452:
448:
442:
437:
431:
406:
400:
392:
386:
382:
376:
257:. Then there's
235:Northwest Coast
199:
177:
174:
171:
168:
167:
109:
106:
103:
100:
99:
12:
11:
5:
1069:
1059:
1058:
1053:
1048:
1043:
1038:
1005:
1002:
959:
956:
922:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
756:
755:
754:
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
628:
627:
626:
528:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
451:and, I think,
345:
344:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
318:Simon Gunanoot
247:Chief Comcomly
198:
195:
192:
191:
188:
187:
184:
183:
181:
164:the discussion
150:
138:
137:
132:
120:
119:
116:
115:
113:
96:the discussion
90:, and related
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1068:
1057:
1054:
1052:
1049:
1047:
1044:
1042:
1039:
1037:
1034:
1033:
1031:
1024:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1001:
1000:
996:
992:
988:
984:
977:
970:
969:Nicola people
965:
955:
954:
950:
946:
942:
938:
933:
928:
910:
906:
902:
897:
896:
895:
891:
887:
882:
881:
880:
876:
872:
867:
863:
859:
855:
851:
850:
849:
845:
841:
837:
829:
819:
808:
801:
796:
786:
782:
778:
774:
770:
766:
762:
757:
753:
749:
745:
741:
740:
739:
735:
731:
727:
723:
719:
715:
711:
707:
702:
701:
700:
696:
692:
688:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
665:
664:
663:
659:
655:
651:
645:
644:NorthAmNative
638:
633:
629:
625:
621:
617:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
604:
600:
595:
594:
593:
589:
585:
580:
576:
571:
567:
563:
562:
561:
560:
556:
552:
548:
541:
534:
518:
514:
510:
505:
497:
496:Kwakwaka'wakw
487:
477:
467:
457:
447:
436:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
405:
398:
391:
390:Kwakwaka'wakw
381:
374:
370:
365:
364:
361:
360:
359:
355:
351:
347:
346:
341:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
182:
165:
161:
157:
156:
151:
148:
144:
143:
139:
136:
133:
130:
126:
125:
114:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
1007:
976:Coast Salish
961:
940:
936:
931:
926:
924:
857:
772:
768:
764:
760:
744:OldManRivers
730:OldManRivers
686:
631:
630:Oh, but you
584:OldManRivers
579:Coast Salish
546:
530:
404:Coast Salish
380:Coast Salish
373:OldManRivers
368:
298:Wickaninnish
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
200:
153:
77:
40:WikiProjects
29:
650:Anishinaabe
504:Indian Wars
476:Nlaka'pamux
255:Toby Riddle
227:Great Basin
169:Archaeology
160:Archaeology
135:Archaeology
1030:Categories
866:sprachbund
310:Klatassine
243:California
958:expansion
769:whitemans
706:Delgamukw
486:Secwepemc
397:Kwak'wala
251:Kintpuash
1014:Skookum1
991:Skookum1
945:Skookum1
937:each one
901:Skookum1
871:Skookum1
840:Skookum1
828:Denendeh
777:Skookum1
726:Canadian
654:Skookum1
616:Skookum1
570:template
551:Skookum1
540:Denendeh
509:Skookum1
326:Skookum1
306:Spintlum
294:Maquinna
286:Maquinna
30:template
800:Gitxsan
722:America
466:Ktunaxa
369:exactly
322:Slumach
237:and/or
231:Plateau
930:terms
765:cultus
599:Katr67
290:Nicola
263:Katr67
259:Sealth
36:scale.
838:.....
28:This
1018:talk
995:talk
949:talk
905:talk
890:talk
886:Pete
875:talk
844:talk
818:Dene
781:talk
748:talk
734:talk
720:and
695:talk
691:Pete
658:talk
620:talk
603:talk
588:talk
575:this
555:talk
513:talk
481:and
354:talk
350:Pete
330:talk
280:And
267:talk
253:and
209:and
932:and
927:who
858:did
823:or
687:any
632:are
547:are
507:...
426:or
418:or
414:or
1032::
1020:)
997:)
979:}}
973:{{
951:)
907:)
892:)
877:)
846:)
831:}}
825:{{
821:}}
815:{{
810:}}
804:{{
783:)
750:)
736:)
697:)
660:)
647:}}
641:{{
622:)
605:)
590:)
557:)
543:}}
537:{{
515:)
499:}}
493:{{
489:}}
483:{{
479:}}
473:{{
469:}}
463:{{
459:}}
453:{{
449:}}
443:{{
438:}}
432:{{
407:}}
401:{{
393:}}
387:{{
383:}}
377:{{
356:)
332:)
316:,
312:,
308:,
304:,
300:,
296:,
292:,
288:,
284:,
269:)
249:,
86:,
1016:(
993:(
947:(
903:(
888:(
873:(
842:(
779:(
746:(
732:(
693:(
656:(
618:(
601:(
586:(
553:(
511:(
352:(
328:(
265:(
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
