Template talk:Speciesbox/Archive 1

330:

Template:Automatic taxobox" since this is not correct; taxon is the correct parameter for the Automatic taxobox template, but not for the Speciesbox template. It would be much better if the parameters were indeed the same. This seems a matter of allowing "taxon = GENUSNAME EPITHET" in using the Speciesbox template and converting it to "genus = GENUSNAME |species = EPITHET". I personally prefer to explicitly put the taxon parameter in rather than pick up the page title (a) for documentation purposes (b) in case the page gets moved.

3724: 1920: 31: 2154: 4344:

Name" to "Species". Listing the binomial twice doesn't become less redundant just because the first time lists the abbreviation and lacks the authorship--this just makes it look broken or incomplete. Furthermore, the phrase "Binomial name" is itself redundant and non-standard use that seems to have been invented by this template. It should read either "Binomial" or "Scientific name", which are essentially synonyms. Using your example, for

2428: 1876: 2476:

that for the species autobox, it wont pick up any subclassifications between genus and family, so not worth doing yet for those? I spend some time at the Wikibird project, and we also have issues with keeping regional lists up to date. Perhaps down the road the automated taxobox can be adapted (or something like it) to keep up with those changes? Perhaps other taxa that maintain regional lists could benefit?.....

2381: 575: 424: 4126: 3202: 1387: 442: 1075:

to weigh air-- it's easier with the help of a balloon to put the air inside of). When I ran this trial several months ago, I found that the automatic taxobox added approximately 6-8 seconds of back-end processing time to articles that would otherwise use a manual taxobox (which I see is no longer the case!). Martin, you used to use a tool for calculating the memory used, didn't you?

4577:

the Scientific classification heading, which they should fall under. The next header within the taxobox should be whatever specialty section is added next, like range maps or synonyms. I don't think this is that big a change and I doubt anybody not intimately familiar with taxoboxes would even notice. As for consensus, there seem to be very few people actually watching this page...

1644:

bold the redirects as well instead of linking them circularly. That said, all taxa (with the exception of synonyms) shown in any taxobox should ideally be either linked (even if it's a redlink) or bolded. A common exception here is the list of species that appears in many dinosaur taxoboxes, and rightly so, as there are no articles about individual species of dinosaurs.

4350:, the full or abbreviated specific epithet is listed in the taxobox no less than three times! Once in the header (which should really be the common name, if available), once under Species, and once under Binomial Name. Only one (the third one, for some reason) list the authority. I think once should do it, maybe twice if it also needs to be in the header. 1592:, we've always abbreviated the name in the species parameter (including the genus is mandatory, since the epithet is meaningless by itself) and displayed the full name in the binomial parameter. You've just not noticed this before because you're working on dinosaurs, where the genus is most often the subject of an article, as opposed to the species. 4944:

was not present, the template had some code which, if I understand its purpose correctly, was meant to set a default based on whether on not the page was actually at the genus, although using a taxobox for a species – which would be the usual situation for a monospecific genus. However, this code did

4324:

Ultimately the problem comes down to Linnaeus' choice of two-part names for species, of which the first is the genus. This forces species to be treated differently from other ranks. (There's also the issue of making the box suitable for names under both the botanical and zoological codes, which treat

3159:

For a more-complete test (to show a branch taxon), then {Speciesbox/sandbox} should also be tested on the talk-page of a species or genus article, rather than just subpages here, because {Speciesbox} will check the {PAGENAME} of the specific talk-page as being the name of a genus taxon, and a subpage

2475:

I just found this site, what a fantastic idea. It won't work every time, but sure sounds like an easier way to update taxonomy than doing it manually. So I'm assuming in order to put up a species automatic taxobox, everything with a higher classification to it needs to to be done first? I also read

1453:

When a taxobox ends at the rank of genus or higher, the list of ranks and rank names is entirely homogeneous: a rank name paired with a one word taxon name. The difference comes when the taxobox ends at a species or lower, because here the taxon name is no longer one word. To make the point, consider

958:

How do you accurately determine the processing time for a template? The change probably did slightly increase the time since I used two auxiliary templates. Their code could instead be made inline (at the cost of making the template even more unreadable). Also to minimize the chance of introducing an

4576:

Or we could simply drop the special box, which is clearly redundant, and just standardize them to the Genus type box. To the avergae reader, using the special box (green highlight, centered title as in the examples you posted) almost make the "Genus" and "species" seem like distinct categories from

2342:

In response to Martin, well, it's not part of the "Species" either... However, it does seem to me to be a bit redundant to display a dagger twice. Also suppose you have a list of synonyms below the binomial name: you wouldn't put a dagger on each of them, so perhaps it would be a bit odd to have it

1074:

When performing such trials, you need to fully clear your Internet cache for every single test. Also, don't hit the save button, just the preview button (of course). The reason I chose this article is because it's a very large article that takes a considerable amount of time to load (imagine trying

3638:

It's better than nothing (if a user doesn't know what it means), and linking might generate complaints about overlinking. That's why I'm using it. There was a discussion about this somewhat recently, but I forget where, and I don't have time to look for it. It was on one of the Wikiprojects...

1643:

In this case, it's a combination of the second two. In the taxobox, all taxa (usually) link to a relevant article. When constructing a taxobox for an organism whose scientific name is the same as the article title, this automatically bolds the text instead of displaying a link. It's appropriate to

1220:

Ok, well, I'll try it, but I find that the load time on this side of the Atlantic varies considerably by time of day (much faster when it's night-time in North America), so even with a quick comparison of two versions I worry about what exactly is being measured. I was hoping there was some way of

189:

parameter, as with a normal taxobox. I'm not sure whether it's better to accommodate subspecies within this template, or to make a "subspeciesbox", which would make the coding simpler (better performance, easier to maintain, less prone to bugs). I'm inclined to do the latter; what do you think?

4956:

The defaults set were also not in line with the HTML comment in the code explaining that the default should be 1 level (above genus), to provide some context (they were 0 in most cases and 2 for a correctly detected monospecific genus). So I've removed the faulty code and set a default of 1 above

4343:

redundant, as you say, and it's also less redundant than listing the binomial twice in a row. I would suggest the following options: 1) Drop the "Binomial Name" section entirely and leave everything else the same while adding an authority for Species. 2) Drop the Species line and change "Binomial

2527:

While in-between (minor) taxa will be omitted from the speciesbox, it's important to include these anyway, since they might be called by the automatic taxobox for a different article about a higher-level taxon. For example, an article about the genus would benefit from someone having included the

2168:

P.S. I hadn't intended for that code to be used as presented...it would need converted in a more relevant manner to MediaWiki, of course. Only problem I foresee in that solution (which doesn't matter as I like Matt's solution better) might be slowing down the system in finding the kingdom to the

4554:

It has always seem anomalous to me that the "target taxon" just appears at the end of the list for ranks higher than species, but is put in a special box for species. If there were general agreement that this should be fixed for both automated and non-automated taxoboxes, I would suggest always

476:

was not defined, the value of the expression was not the genus name picked up from the page name but the genus name plus a space character, which caused the evaluated label not to match the test string. The exasperating thing is that if you try to see whether a space where I have '+' matters by

3386:

Because the prior processing treated the entire name as having the first word removed, then the first word became repeated in the species or binomial name, rejected as no longer matching PAGENAME when trying to italicize. Thanks for noting the 2 problems were triggered by a long genus name.

1266:

Caching query: Bob noted that you must clear the cache when timing. However, there are (at least) two caches which matter: the one your browser maintains and the one that the WP server maintains. Reloading a page clearing the local cache doesn't clear the WP cache, so the template is not

329:

Actually, you're right: it doesn't do anything; the template picks up the page title. I've been misled (as have others since, as usual, rather than read the documentation I copied working examples :-) ). However the documentation is misleading when it says "Usage is exactly the same as

2317:

I thought we did! Can't remember, but I copied that style after another article here. :P Now that you ask it though, I'm not so sure. I've always included a dagger in the binomen field, as well as the type if appropriate. If nobody else does that, I guess its fine as of now. So...

923:

The advantage of using separate genus and species parameters is that there is less processing for the template to do (probably increasing speed). It might be worth checking whether your modifications had a measurable effect on the speed of the template. If not - wonderful!

1489:

So I think the duplication occurs because it's unusual to see the term "specific epithet" outside highly specialized taxonomic sources, and once you substitute "species" you can't avoid some duplication (note that the genus name is reduced to the first letter on the first

1292:

both before and after the Speciesbox template expansion. In every case I got back the same time. I conclude that I simply don't know enough about what is happening server-side to understand what timing in the way that Bob suggests actually measures. Can anyone help?

4291:

It would seem more logical, if you want to eliminate redundancy, to remove the extra section at the bottom for a species, whether this is headed "Binomial name" or "Species". But then you would need to repeat the genus name, i.e. in my example have something like:

1609:

The second is that the last entry above "Binomial name" is always in bold, which draws attention to it. I can't see any good reason for this. Each of the lines in the taxobox shows a rank; why should the last line for the lowest rank show its value in bold?

4287:

But your suggestion doesn't change the inconsistency in the treatment of a genus and a species when they are the "target" of the taxobox. Further, looking down the taxon ranks you wouldn't see "Species" where you would expect it; it would be in a different

3915:

and note the "Conservation status" portion of the box. Both use the same code, but the automatic taxobox places the extinction date in the box and speciesbox doesn't. I'm not sure if this was intended, but I picked it up from somewhere when I was using

4882:. The cause of the error is clear: the taxonomic hierarchy stored in the "Template:Taxonomy/..." templates is too deep. What's puzzling is why this has shown up now, since I still can't find any changes that may have caused it. There are two solutions: 4649:

I disagree. There's no reason two different templates should be kept in line with each other. In fact it would be good to differentiate them, otherwise we might as well abandon this one and just use the standard Automatic taxobox for everything.

4809:

I'm not absolutely sure, but I think the problem is that the template expansion depth is being exceeded. If I'm right, somewhere along the taxonomic hierarchy extra nodes have been inserted. Right now, the problem affects all articles from

4271:

The issue of redundancy has been discussed a number of times in the past (not just here, I think, but also at one of the other talk pages for taxobox templates). To take a particular example, I agree that it seems odd that the taxobox for

1524:

I see. This strikes me as somewhat... phylogenetic, for a species box. But isn't the species epithet inherently incomplete? I've never seen it used the way you listed, as species lists the binomial with simply the genus abbreviation. See

477:

displaying the result of the expression (rather than making it the label of a #switch statement), the wikimedia software converts multiple spaces to a single space, so it looks ok. It really is a ghastly language in which to write code.

1510:). Now the trinomial is repeated. (To cope with botanical names it would have to deal with at least the infraspecific ranks "subsp." and "var.", if not "f." and "cv.", which is more difficult and hasn't yet been done to my knowledge.) 2132:

this doesn't work. So at present including a test of the kind you suggest, although sensible, didn't work when I tried it. (Oh, and of course it's not just Plantae but all the groups to which the ICBN rather than the ICZN applies.)

2655:

To clarify: the template has not changed, but a new version of the MediaWiki software produces an error report not previously generated. If the Speciesbox template worked before, it still does; to this extent it's a false report.

615:

was used to give the displayed taxobox the common name as its title, it didn't work. It could be argued that editors shouldn't use different titles for the page and the taxobox, but they do, so the template needs to deal with it.

1551:

the specific epithet is meaningless by itself that you have to show the genus, which makes it look as if the name is repeated. But the point of the "Species:" line is not to show the full name, but to show the specific epithet.

3838:

What's not quite right is the difference in position of the †. The genus has it next to the name (and included inside the wikilink) – a placement produced by the core template code – whereas the species has it separated,

3878:. The individual taxa templates only record a true or false value for extinct, and though I haven't tried digging through the code, I'm sure it's processed in one central place. I figured it would be a simple fix. 1212:

I use a stopwatch. The time for it to load on your own machine is trivial-- if you have a look at the HTML source for a taxobox, you'll see it's plain HTML, no scripts for your machine to process. In other words,

3031:

be used in such cases. My request can therefore be resurrected; please modify the template to detect if the focal species is in a monotypic genus and automatically show the next higher taxon in the hierarchy.

1709:, which happens to be last one I created, the binomial is displayed three times, bolded each time: twice in full (as the title of the taxobox and as the binomial) and once with the genus abbreviated. I think 1796:

seems to use is "name of an infraspecific taxon" but I wouldn't suggest "Infraspecific name" for the taxobox. The best I could come up with is "Full name". It's fairly easy to produce a different version of

1858:

taxobox templates. It's easier to understand for a general audience than Binomial or Trinomial name. (and "Binomial name" is itself a redundancy! "Two name name"? If anything it should be simply Binomen).

3669:

quite frequently actually in my writing on Tertiary insects and plants. I always set up an Automatic taxobox for the article, and often the species I am writing about is placed into an extant genus, see

467:

For the technically minded (perhaps only Martin and Bob), the problem seemed to be that there was a space character where I've put a '+' in this expression, which was in the label of a #switch statement:

3355:

to see why a species article title would default to repeat the genus-genus name and also stop page-name italics, which can handle 50-letter names. If anyone else pinpoints the problem, then reply here.

227:

is just one example that comes to mind, since I happened to be reading about it last week (the WP article currently lists it as a species, but it was a subspecies until 2007, and may yet change back).

3827:

Precisely. And if the genus is extinct and labelled as such in the taxonomy template, then the species is marked with † automatically according to my tests. Thus the taxobox opposite is created by

2796:

has been commenting some templates trying to reduce expansion depth limit. I think we need Smith609's supervision for these changes. I have restored the template and the colors are showing up now.

2147:

My apologies...that smiley was intended to indicate my astonishment that an unknown problem had been pointed out and solved in an ingenious manner. I approve. But again, this affects the entire

1731:. If we were to unbold either of the two, I'd opt for the full scientific name to be the one unbolded, as the bolding in the classification shows all the taxa described in the article at hand. 4144: 4794:

is an example. I have no idea what's wrong, or how to fix it. There is no color parameter currently set in the articles. Should there be? Is that the problem? Any ideas or help appreciated.

4790:

Last week, the WP:BIRDS cleanup listing got a slew of new articles, all with the error message "Taxoboxes with an invalid color". All are extinct species using the {{speciesbox}} template;

4268:

It would not be sensible to change this template without changing the standard (non-automated) taxobox template which can also be used to display the classification hierarchy for a species.

959:

error I did a global replace of particular existing expressions with uses of the two auxiliary templates. Now I'm sure that the logic is right, there's at least one place where the use of

2862:, there's a line of whitespace at the top that I can't diagnose/cure properly. (Removing the linebreaks (smushing all the template onto a single-line) works, but shouldn't be necessary). 2343:

on the first binomial. (I guess in zoological names, where both parts of the binomial are names, you could have two daggers for an extinct species in an extinct genus – only joking!)

1690:

it then nicely shows up the 'topic' genus in bold in an article in which it's used. However, there has to be a reason for inserting circular links. You wouldn't start an article on

4551:

Let's leave the header out of the discussion; it seems to be agreed that infoboxes generally have headers and these aren't the scientific name where the English name is well known.

3998:

does some processing of the extinct parameter itself, since it does inherit from the genus (as noted above). I'm happy to look at changing the sandbox version of this template.

3065:, which would be set to 2 when {PAGENAME} is a genus. I think that should work, and I have tested the depth to ensure that the added markup would not affect the depth limit. If 1811: 3188:" (a genus) and is detected as having rank "genus" by {Speciesbox}. Testing here only confirms the general infobox format, rather than the format as shown in a genus article. - 2973:, it would be greatly beneficial if this template could detect if the focal species is in a monotypic genus (which will almost always manifest as {{{PAGETITLE}}} matching the 4325:

binomials somewhat differently – the second part is a name in the ICZN but not in the ICN.) We seem to have agreed in the past that the current structure is the least worst.

4949:

it did not deal with the case where the genus name needs disambiguating, so the page was at the species name or (contrary to normal practice) at the disambiguated genus name

1217:

end is only delayed by the rate at which however many bit of data can be transferred over the link (by the way, you should run these tests when the connection is not busy).

723: 703: 656: 864:. All the cases I've checked seem to work, but if you encounter any problems, please revert the template! I'll update the documentation when I'm sure the template is ok. 1144:

Bob: when you say measure the load time, do you mean just timing it manually on your machine? I was looking for some way to directly measure the server processing time.

394:

No, all pages where the binomen is the article title are not italicizing. Hope to get the chance to investigate soon, but would be delighted if someone beat me to it!

141: 2246:

I'm having similar problems to Kevmin above with an extinct species but an extant genus. The species field shows the extinction dagger but not the binomial field when

4186:

it doesn't actually "work" since it doesn't produce a correctly formatted taxobox for a species, in which the last "sub-box" should be headed "Binomial name" (as per

4138: 2175: 1414:

I'll take credit for breaking it...when copying and pasting a bit of code, I didn't see I left the output in that bit. My thanks to those who saw it and took action.

451: 212:

If you deem it appropriate, go for it. I don't know of any instance where a species has become a subspecies or vice versa-- the rank always stays the same for those.

3926:. If this is an intended effect, I can't make my taxoboxes consistent because monotypic extinct genera can't display extinction dates, while polytypic genera will. 3572:

Looking at the code, it is supposed to pick up a dagger from a taxonomy template, if not specified here. I'll look into this when I have time – prod me if I forget.

2947:

with a non-automated taxobox. These must be on the same line. This template doesn't cause problems so often because there isn't usually another template before it.

4562:

change, and would need a lot of discussion and a strong consensus, given how many articles would change appearance if the various taxobox templates were changed.

2291:

the dagger be displayed in the binomen box? (It's not part of the binomial name, after all.) If it should, it'd be easy to modify the template accordingly (per

4201: 4118: 2283: 2163: 2142: 1849: 1737: 1722: 1653: 1619: 1420: 1257: 1243: 1119: 1081: 910: 839: 625: 552: 486: 339: 324: 313: 297: 5003: 1829: 277: 2905: 787:

is slower and less efficient because of this change. Does this matter? If so, as hybrid species are rarely the subject of articles, there could be a parameter

4160: 2600: 2575: 2553: 4664:

Note that I wrote "Taxobox" not "Automatic taxobox". The way that taxoboxes for species are laid out is quite independent of which template you use, whether

84: 5014: 4918: 2665: 2404: 2352: 1885: 1868: 1598: 1435:

Is there any particular reason this template includes the binomial name twice? It displays Species: etc. and Binomial Name: etc., which are the same thing.

1378: 1302: 1230: 941: 895: 824: 584: 433: 411: 389: 218: 207: 180: 236: 4109: 2997: 2634: 2237: 3633: 3619: 3118: 3041: 3009: 2707: 2648: 4935: 4767: 4659: 4624: 4586: 4359: 4334: 2956: 2531:

The regional lists are a very interesting idea! I'm not sure we have a powerful-enough MediaWiki functionality in the to do that just yet, though. But

2337: 2312: 1755: 1626:

Good question, and I've got an answer for you. The short answer is it's what we've always done. But I don't like that answer. Here's the longer answer:

1561: 1540: 1519: 994: 873: 248: 128:

is a structural template at the foundation of the code of this template, this edit could potentially cause havoc if not evaluated first for soundness.

4591:

But this template is less used than the non-automated taxobox, and should be kept in line with it. It's important that switching between the standard

3831:. So it now seems to me that except for the mouseover issue, the template behaves correctly: if the genus is marked as extinct, you don't need to use 3506: 2912:

have to smush templates together onto one line, if those templates add categories. Hence all the articles that aren't displaying this problem already

2841: 2808: 174:

Of course. But glad you asked. I applaud your efforts here; does this template handle species that contain subspecies, and does it handle subspecies?

4868: 4846: 4832: 3482:: "Unrecognised rank: Informal group Caca". Sorry, I don't find much about taxobox templates that is self-explanatory. Can someone fix this? Thanks. 2716: 2695: 1647:

Thus, all species-centric articles should have the species parameter and the binomial parameter bolded, as well as any immediate monotypic parents.

975:

already contains the binomial (if it's present at all). I'll happily work on optimizing if I can easily determine the difference in processing time.

4103: 4007: 3889: 3650: 3624:

Ah, sorry, my mistake. But is the mouseover text really helpful? I wasn't aware that it was there, and it requires very precise mouse positioning.

3599: 3308: 3287: 3221: 3192: 3096: 3078: 2616: 886:

parameter wasn't the correct latin name without any formatting). Otherwise the revised template seems to be ok. I'll now update the documentation.

3702: 2928: 2580:

Ah. Looks like you tried to put a taxobox on a template page-- that's not what goes there. I've repaired both templates and added a reference for

1331:

It can easily be fixed by removing the color field entirely, but yeah, it's probably currently messing up articles now that specify lightgreen.--

963:

can be made more efficient: the old version and the current version both construct a binomial to test for a match against the page title from the

318:

The genus and species parameters should be used instead of the taxon parameter. I wasn't aware the taxon parameter did anything on that template.

5026: 3566: 3524:? Shouldn't it get that from the template? Is this just too much trouble to get right or is there some reason why this is desirable? Thanks, 3413: 3396: 3341: 3147: 1506:

which works for zoological names which are always trinomials without the infraspecific rank shown (it's currently only used on three pages: see

4930: 4912: 4571: 3455: 1206: 2782: 1171:

In terms of processing time, if the template is properly optimized (which it isn't yet), I would expect that the time taken order would be:

4718:

for example. The "extra box at the bottom" style is also used for subspecies and other infra-specific ranks, whether these are set up with

3555:

instead of just the raw symbol? That way if people mouse over it, it tells them what the symbol means (in case they can't figure it out).

2216: 681:, i.e. taxa where the × character appears between the genus name and the specific epithet, with or without a space before the latter (e.g. 4255: 2615:

Something is wrong with this template. I clicked on a few randomly chosen pages that use this template, and they all were in the category

662:, which does not provide for the × character; I've left a request for it to be added (protected template), so we'll see if this fixes it. 2538:

Also-- if you're interested in regional lists, I think it would be wonderful if we could get a collaboration going between Knowledge and

2514:

belongs to this family, and requires the genus to exist in the database, and its parent, and its parent's parent, etc, all the way up to

1493:

A different issue is why the term "Binomial name" is used instead of some more general term like "Scientific name", which I would prefer.

4803: 3426:

Actually there might be a problem with this template. If you see pages, where it is used there is a code displayed within the taxobox.--

1409: 1343: 3545:

If it can figure out that a species is extinct if the genus is, that would be great. Also, in the template code, could we please use

3491: 2542:, which specializes in exactly that sort of thing. I've been making efforts lately to add as much data as possible to their databases. 833:

Speed's always been an issue with this template family. If there's anything you can do to make it faster most of the time, go for it.

671: 3970:, so if, say, a family is labelled extinct, this does not pass down to a genus belonging to that family. I'm very reluctant to touch 2732: 2628: 1444: 847: 4081: 4044:

suggests dental similarities between these North African stem strepsirrhines and European cercamoniines , particularly to the genus

2894: 2591: 4879: 3950:

in response to both your comments above, looking at the code, the extinct parameter is processed differently. As I understand it,

4891:

The "global" solution is to cut out levels in the taxonomic hierarchy, i.e. bypass some of the "Template:Taxonomy/..." templates.

2593: 4218:

Would it be possible to eliminate some of the redundancies in the template? For example, the species name is listed twice, e.g.

2524:. Most of the time, you won't need to enter more than a small handful of these, since the higher-level taxa are already entered. 256:

and I have failed to get this template to work with articles where the title is the common name. (An example where we failed is

4040:, and needs to be given a new generic name. However, the fact that this species was originally allocated to the European genus 2990: 1147:

Martin (or Bob): in the version of the template before I made changes, usually when the genus is needed the expression used is

2465: 2112:

by filling in the taxonomic hierarchy, it does indeed link in this way. I've tried (but not too hard!) to understand why when

1835:

Instead of duplicating, I'd recommend a check to see what kingdom the taxon is in and display the trinomial label accordingly.

1817:

can ensure that "subsp." is always present and that "Trinomial name" is substituted by e.g. "Full name" or "Scientific name".

3863: 3435: 3132: 2485: 3109:

I seem to be a lone voice in not liking this form of taxobox on genus pages, so it seems sensible to implement this change.

4284:

repeats the "target" taxon, first against "Species" and then in a completely new section of the taxobox as a binomial name.

2191: 3539: 168: 4814:

downwards in the taxonomic hierarchy. I'm looking into it, but the automatic taxobox system is complex and hard to debug!

3250: 3087:

I've tried it out on a few test cases, and it looks fine to me. If there are no objections, I suggest we implement it. --

2728: 383:

Weird...I don't have time to do any deep debugging right now-- sorry. Is this the only article doing this? Surely not...

3057:

to check for {PAGENAME} rank as "genus" as a possible method to detect a monotypic genus. The Taxobox/core parameter is

377: 5008: 4148: 3169: 1727:

Well, if you guys are interested in changing the way we do it, better make sure it's okay with the rest of the crew at

76: 71: 66: 4820: 1486:

Now it's obvious that the list should end with a separate entry for the full species name, since this hasn't appeared.

529:

I've made another change to the template, so that when this template is used it is now no longer necessary to specify

4785: 4213: 2459: 1684: 4859:

No joy so far. If it doesn't get fixed, the only solution will be to use a manual taxobox in the relevant articles.

3937: 3614: 3534: 223:

Actually, its worth noting that species become subspecies, and vice versa, all the time - its really quite common.

4024:

is known throughout the literature as needing a new generic name. To quote Fleagle, 2013 (source in the article):

2535:

seems to offer hope for a bright future in this sort of topic-- I look forward to seeing what can be done with it.

131:

I'm requesting anyone who has enough know-how to evaluate this proposed modification respond to the RfC listed at

4013: 2970: 1135: 268:" doesn't work as it does with Automatic taxobox. Are we doing something wrong or does it not work in this case? 1578:(as well as the rest of the automatic taxobox family) are programmed to enforce a long-standing practice at the 3604:

No, it doesn't produce a link. Maky said it produces mouseover text, which I am seeing in your example Peter.

3461: 2737: 2584: 2559: 1286: 1187:

can be faster than using the page title because it can avoid the need to use the string processing involved in

799: 763: 713: 3234: 2901: 4758:. So there would definitely need to be a consensus over all the "tree of life" projects to make the change. 3699: 3452: 3325: 2789: 2563: 2213: 1430: 3723: 4555:

having a special box for the target taxon, so you would get taxboxes with the patterns shown to the left.

3054: 2292: 2442: 985:

I'm more concerned about the change I made to allow the multiply character to be processed – see below.

4732: 4708: 4678: 3954: 3684: 3362: 3238:

is not getting the italic title? Also, the species and binomial have the genus repeated twice. Thanks.

2849: 2688: 2528:

subfamily in the genus temple, since any subfamily ought to be included in the genus article's taxobox.

2498: 2196:

What is the correct coding to get an extinct species to display a dagger when the genus is extinct (eg

809: 733: 132: 38: 2981:

to at least 2). My template programming isn't up to it, but it looks like it should be easy enough. --

1807:

which parameterizes the term displayed for a trinomial name, with a default of "Trinomial name"; then

1606:

The first is as discussed above, and is unavoidable, namely that the genus abbreviation must be shown.

1237:

I don't think there's any legitimate reason to pull the first word from the genus, only the PAGENAME.

3980:

to change the behaviour of the generated †. This is a complex template, used by all the others. Only

1308: 4819:

I've now asked the editor who wrote the topmost levels of the display of automated taxonomies – see

1770:

could be modified to display botanical subspecies correctly. The problem unfortunately goes back to

638:

Currently (15:04 UTC, 12 May 2011) the template fails if it encounters a × character, either in the

4752: 3319: 1919: 633: 47: 17: 4715: 2491:

Hi, and sorry for the late response! Several questions were asked...I'll provide several answers:

5022: 4999: 4926: 4908: 4864: 4828: 4763: 4620: 4567: 4330: 4197: 4181: 4133: 4113: 4099: 4094:. Automatic taxoboxes require some degree of certainty as to the classification, it seems to me. 4003: 3985: 3859: 3672: 3629: 3595: 3502: 3114: 3005: 2977:

parameter), and automatically show the next higher taxon in the hierarchy (equivalent to setting

2952: 2830: 2771: 2724: 2661: 2624: 2610: 2595: 2548: 2397: 2348: 2330: 2276: 2232: 2170: 2158: 2138: 1880: 1844: 1825: 1732: 1718: 1648: 1615: 1593: 1557: 1515: 1415: 1374: 1298: 1253: 1238: 1226: 1202: 1115: 1110:

because this discussion relates to both changes I made which are described in separate sections.

1076: 990: 905: 891: 869: 834: 820: 743: 683: 667: 621: 579: 548: 482: 446: 428: 384: 335: 319: 309: 292: 273: 213: 175: 136: 4742: 4020: 2879: 2518: 2126: 2089: 2078: 2047: 1764: 1500: 102: 3441:

Could you please provide links to pages where you see this happening so we can check it out?--

1283:

The only way I could get the time stamp output to change was to use edit/preview or edit/save.

4188: 4088: 4053: 3974: 3964: 3801: 3421: 3160:("/sandbox") is not a genus name. For example, check the use of {Speciesbox/sandbox} at page: 2453: 2116: 2106: 2096: 1801: 1774: 1353: 1191: 1060:

These trials should produce numbers which can be used to calculate several things, including

457: 357: 122: 2855: 1788:

are specified. However, as I noted above, "Trinomial name" is a term simply not used in the

4156: 3610: 3530: 3283: 3092: 3037: 2986: 2964: 2941: 2750: 2703: 2571: 2481: 1705: 1603:

There are actually, I think, two reasons why it does look as if the full name is repeated:

597: 533: 3854:

Since there's no mouseover for the genus †, surely it wouldn't be useful for the species?

2937:

Yes, it's annoying but seems unavoidable. A classic source of an extra line is the use of

2754:. And yes, it was correctly displaying before. Any idea what changed with the template?-- 2504:

to work, all higher taxa for that taxon must exist already in the template database. The

978:

In general, though, I believe that the advantages of having the same parameter outweigh a

593:

The problem was in the same piece of code, i.e. where the decision is made whether to add

151:

I assume that in all cases the "authority" will be identical to the "binomial authority"?

8: 4976: 4900: 4698: 4688: 4605: 3992: 3352: 3260: 3022: 3018:

Update. The background issues seem to have been sorted out, and there is acceptance that

2678: 2508: 2252: 1572: 1363: 1316: 1275: 781: 753: 1839://logic if(regnum.equals("Plantae")) return "Scientific name"; return "Trinomial name"; 1450:

That's a very good question, which I've thought about too. Here's my conclusion to date.

416:

Oh, what I would give to have the time to do that right now instead of writing AI for a

5018: 4995: 4922: 4904: 4860: 4824: 4759: 4655: 4616: 4582: 4563: 4355: 4326: 4251: 4193: 4192:). Instead you get a kind of bastardized genus box with a single species listed twice. 4095: 3999: 3855: 3718: 3678: 3625: 3591: 3498: 3110: 3001: 2948: 2924: 2890: 2815: 2756: 2720: 2657: 2620: 2470: 2420: 2388: 2344: 2321: 2306: 2267: 2134: 2084:. Because the regnum is Plantae, the text "Trinomial name" is supposed to be linked to 1914: 1864: 1821: 1714: 1611: 1553: 1536: 1511: 1440: 1400: 1370: 1334: 1294: 1249: 1222: 1198: 1111: 986: 935: 887: 865: 816: 663: 617: 568: 544: 478: 405: 371: 331: 305: 269: 201: 162: 4278:

ends with the "target" taxon, i.e. the one the page is about, whereas the taxobox for

2385:

I think keeping the daggers on the list of ranks should be good enough. Thanks all.--

4087:

Off the top of my head, I'd use a manual taxobox, and use the "query notation" as at

4064: 3487: 3431: 3408: 3392: 3336: 3303: 3245: 3227: 3216: 3189: 3142: 3074: 2803: 1507: 232: 146: 112: 89: 1680:

Having circular links bolded is useful in many cases; e.g. by wikilinking genera in

1248:

No, I couldn't see any reason. I'll try changing it in my user space version first.

1015:

The method I've used is several identical trials. The trial I prefer is as follows:

4886:

The "one off" solutions are to edit all the affected pages to use manual taxoboxes.

4842: 4799: 4722: 4668: 4595: 3920: 3872: 3694: 3580: 3549: 3447: 3375:{{remove first word|Omphalomargarites sagamiensis}} → Omphalomargarites sagamiensis 2869: 2448: 2259: 2225: 2208: 1586: 4611:

doesn't radically change the layout. So it would need a wide discussion involving

2558:

Thanks Bob......It was very helpful. I am stumped a bit though. I tried creating

4896: 4152: 3605: 3525: 3515: 3279: 3088: 3033: 2982: 2906:

Template talk:Pp-move-indef#Fix the unnecessary linebreaks added by this template

2699: 2567: 2477: 1957: 879: 652:

I think this is because some string handling templates which it uses in turn use

351: 253: 3365:, which only checked for 15-letter names, now expanded to allow 30-letter names: 1713:

was right to be a little surprised by this; we've probably just got used to it.

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4811: 4346: 4280: 3748: 3478: 3470: 3179: 2641: 2198: 1990: 1944: 1456: 257: 224: 108:, it has been advised this faster and more capable template take the place of 4651: 4612: 4578: 4546: 4351: 4247: 3981: 3911: 3777: 2920: 2886: 2859: 2302: 2296: 2148: 1970: 1891: 1860: 1728: 1710: 1579: 1532: 1436: 1047: 1038: 1029: 1020: 931: 925: 650:

parameters, or in the title of the article, so it can't be used with hybrids.

401: 395: 367: 361: 197: 191: 158: 152: 2441:

The structure of this and related templates is the subject of discussion at

3483: 3427: 3404: 3388: 3332: 3299: 3241: 3212: 3138: 3070: 2799: 2793: 2085: 228: 4838: 4795: 3905: 3689: 3442: 2916:

put the templates on the same line. Ie. {{pp-move-indef}}{{Speciesbox....

2744: 2203: 2024: 1980: 4952:

it did not, and could not, deal with the page being at the English name.

1780:

which embeds the 'title' lines "Binomial name" or "Trinomial name" when

1658:

Bob, you'll not be surprised that I don't find that a very good answer.

2742:

The light brown color for animals is not showing up in these articles:

2000: 882:

fixed a few cases where there was a problem (because the value of the

4919:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Dinosaurs#Automated taxonomy system errors

4791: 4074: 4036:

is almost certainly a djebelemurid rather than a member of the genus

3945: 3930: 3882: 3761: 3643: 3559: 3184: 2635:

Knowledge:Village pump (technical)#Page exceeded the expansion depth?

3497:

It was due to vandalism at a higher level taxonomy template. Fixed.

2532: 2256:. How does the workaround work exactly? (i.e. where should I place 5015:

Knowledge talk:Automated taxobox system#Taxonomy templates updated

1698:. If you don't insert the circular link, then it won't get bolded. 1629:

There are three reasons to bold something in a Knowledge article:

1547:

I've obviously not managed to make my point clear. It's precisely

777:(probably addressed to Martin or Bob): I suspect that the revised 4305: 4296: 4274: 3381:{{remove first word|Omphalomargarites sagamiensis}} → sagamiensis 1673:) is a species of ...." The species line in the taxobox gives an 4143:

It might work as far as the article namespace is concerned, but

4110:

Template:Automatic taxobox/doc/advanced#Questionable assignments

2717:

Knowledge:Village_pump_(technical)#Templates_and_expansion_depth

611:

was given. So when the page had the latin name as the title but

2010: 1326: 719:

which can handle any of the characters specifically defined in

417: 3868:

My suggestion was to replace the symbol in all templates with

3466:

Something seems to have recently changed, which is causing an

4234:. It would be more streamlined to simple eliminate the first 3735: 1931: 1854:

I would support changing this field to "Scientific name" for

1527: 852:

I've uploaded a revised version of the template which allows

2998:

Template talk:Automatic_taxobox#Speciesbox in genus articles

1221:

getting at the server processing cycles or some equivalent.

3209:

Looks good. Thanks Wikid77. I have implemented the change.

739:

which is limited to the ASCII subset). I have then revised

3899:

Also, there is a difference in behavior between using the

3069:

is not enough, then it could be 3, 7 or whatever higher. -

1051:

including an automatic taxobox (or related template) with

3323:

looks okay without the genus and species parameters, but

3051:

Proposed change in {Speciesbox/sandbox} for display_taxa:

2696:

Template talk:Automatic taxobox/Archive 8#Expansion depth

2539: 2431: 4880:

User talk:Peter_coxhead#Automated taxonomy system errors

3835:; if the genus isn't extinct but the species is, you do. 543:

situation where the article title should be italicized.

4028:

A very similar species from the Late Eocene of Egypt, '

2566:

but they aren't working quite right. Can you help?....

3170:

Talk:Mononykus#Changing_Speciesbox_to_show_extra_taxon

1183:

given < name picked up from page title. Specifying

4964:

It's also worth noting that when set as a parameter,

1042:

including an automatic taxobox (or related template).

3851:(!!), when there's no space. This needs to be fixed. 3587: 3157:

Also test {Speciesbox/sandbox} on a genus talk-page:

1677:

version of the full name, but not an alternate name.

3903:in a speciesbox versus the automatic taxobox. See 3135:. It should have displayed the branch, Mononykini. 2919:

I'll just 'fix' them as I see them, individually. —

1288:how to purge the WP cache. So then I tried putting 4821:User_talk:Wikid77#Automated_taxonomy_system_errors 1159:which seems unnecessarily different and slower if 2694:, I think it's best if discussion is focussed at 607:. In the original version, it was never added if 3131:Does not seem to work in my testing. Please see 2617:Category:Pages where expansion depth is exceeded 2169:point that the template doesn't finish loading. 1661:You wouldn't in the text write something like: " 2698:, where this issue is also under discussion. -- 2074:2. Bob, see the taxobox opposite, created with 1349:For the record, this was caused by an error in 1267:re-evaluated. To check when it was, I included 1167:since there could be a reason for it. Is there? 135:. The template is being used in this template. 3349:Seems to be a complex bug in default settings: 1843:Make sense? Or are we on two different pages? 1792:so should not be displayed. The only term the 1197:(although it doesn't in the current version). 4837:Thanks Peter! Let me know what you find out. 4261:Actually, you've already asked this question 3829:{{Speciesbox |taxon=Adoketophyton parvulum }} 1069:Time sacrificed for automation of the taxobox 4982:. The genus is displayed regardless; to get 4070:How would you suggest handling these cases? 1359:, so affected more than just articles using 1107: 699:: An admin has now added the × character to 438:It's still an issue, but I'm still busy.... 2437:Pointer to a relevant discussion elsewhere. 1163:has been specified. I haven't changed this 4936:Incorrect code for default display_parents 4339:"Which also looks redundant" but it's not 3960:just passes the value of the parameter to 3317:I am still intrigued by this. Why is that 3133:Template_talk:Speciesbox/sandbox#Mononykus 2377:Haha, I did put a dagger on the synonyms. 1756:Subspecies box for botanical names (again) 249:Use where article title is the common name 4262: 1157:{{first word|{{{genus|{{PAGENAME}} }}} }} 1149:{{{genus|{{first word|{{PAGENAME}} }} }}} 567:Thanks for tackling that! Welcome to the 470:{{{genus|{{first word|{{PAGENAME}} }}+}}} 3000:before responding to this edit request. 2619:(and yes, the category does not exist). 1151:. However, in determining the value for 2102:). If you create the same taxobox with 1703:In a typical article on a species, say 1066:Time required for calculating deep taxa 14: 4895:This needs wider discussion involving 1873: 1063:Back-end processing time for a taxobox 185:Subspecies can be displayed using the 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4032:, seems to belong in the same group. 2378: 572: 460:which no longer contains an explicit 421: 4145:Template:Taxonomy/Anchomomys milleri 2865:Is it coming from this template, or 456:I seem to have fixed this; see e.g. 25: 4228:Binomial name (itself redundancy): 1460:. A self-consistent list would be: 1313:All plant articles which are using 677:The template now works with hybrid 23: 4704:is just an easier way of invoking 4149:Category:Automatic taxobox cleanup 2813:Thanks for tracking that down. -- 2715:This is under discussion again at 24: 5037: 3988:have ever extensively edited it. 1820:Any views on pursuing this line? 1496:Incidentally, there's a template 848:Revision to allow parameter taxon 85:Upgrading to the next version of 4124: 3722: 3200: 2443:Template talk:Taxobox#Redundancy 2426: 2379: 2152: 2151:, so we better take it to them. 1918: 1874: 1385: 1325:) currently shows up like this: 1321:with the color field filled in ( 1055:(or relevant upper-level taxon). 856:to be used as an alternative to 709:. I have created a new template 573: 440: 439: 422: 98:Per the recent modifications to 29: 4716:Template:Taxobox#Animal species 2971:Template talk:Automatic taxobox 2902:Template talk:Pp-move-indef#Use 4986:extra levels above genus, set 4931:08:55, 11 September 2016 (UTC) 4913:08:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC) 4869:09:22, 10 September 2016 (UTC) 4265:, in slightly different terms. 3456:18:45, 23 September 2013 (UTC) 3436:18:11, 23 September 2013 (UTC) 3401:Thanks for figuring this out. 2560:Template:Taxonomy/Accipitrinae 1635:Alternate name for the subject 13: 1: 4847:19:58, 9 September 2016 (UTC) 4833:15:12, 9 September 2016 (UTC) 4804:11:34, 9 September 2016 (UTC) 4615:and descendant wikiprojects. 4238:line and change the heading " 3342:17:57, 29 November 2012 (UTC) 3326:Omphalomargarites sagamiensis 3309:17:14, 29 November 2012 (UTC) 3288:15:01, 29 November 2012 (UTC) 3251:14:45, 29 November 2012 (UTC) 3235:Omphalomargarites sagamiensis 3222:13:30, 29 November 2012 (UTC) 3193:13:10, 29 November 2012 (UTC) 3148:03:54, 29 November 2012 (UTC) 3119:16:13, 27 November 2012 (UTC) 3097:07:48, 26 November 2012 (UTC) 3079:13:31, 24 November 2012 (UTC) 3042:19:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC) 2957:16:55, 9 September 2012 (UTC) 2929:18:42, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 2895:18:37, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 2842:19:14, 1 September 2012 (UTC) 2809:18:42, 1 September 2012 (UTC) 2783:00:12, 1 September 2012 (UTC) 2466:00:35, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 2405:03:02, 14 November 2011 (UTC) 2353:20:16, 13 November 2011 (UTC) 2338:16:29, 13 November 2011 (UTC) 2313:16:19, 13 November 2011 (UTC) 2284:14:40, 13 November 2011 (UTC) 1140:A couple of points (so far). 434:16:42, 14 February 2011 (UTC) 412:15:07, 14 February 2011 (UTC) 390:01:27, 13 February 2011 (UTC) 378:22:54, 12 February 2011 (UTC) 237:12:54, 12 February 2011 (UTC) 5027:23:00, 1 February 2017 (UTC) 5004:14:06, 6 December 2016 (UTC) 4151:. Can that be fixed, too? -- 3414:23:27, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 3397:21:29, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 3010:10:49, 9 November 2012 (UTC) 2991:07:18, 9 November 2012 (UTC) 2564:Template:Taxonomy/Lophonetta 2192:extant genus extinct species 2157:I support this change, too. 1760:I've been investigating how 982:increase in processing time. 219:16:24, 4 February 2011 (UTC) 208:13:42, 4 February 2011 (UTC) 181:01:26, 4 February 2011 (UTC) 169:16:53, 1 February 2011 (UTC) 142:03:27, 6 February 2011 (UTC) 7: 4968:refers to the levels above 4335:15:32, 10 August 2013 (UTC) 4321:which also looks redundant. 4256:13:12, 10 August 2013 (UTC) 3055:Template:speciesbox/sandbox 2733:23:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC) 2293:Template:Speciesbox/sandbox 2238:01:49, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 2217:00:11, 23 August 2011 (UTC) 1106:I've started a new section 1033:including a normal taxobox. 10: 5042: 5009:Taxonomy templates updated 4451:Scientific classification 4370:Scientific classification 4224:(with no listed authority) 4202:09:01, 19 April 2015 (UTC) 4161:05:41, 19 April 2015 (UTC) 4139:19:38, 18 April 2015 (UTC) 4119:19:21, 18 April 2015 (UTC) 4104:21:25, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 4082:21:07, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 4008:23:15, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 3938:16:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 3890:16:44, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 3864:10:02, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 3703:00:00, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 3685:Mastotermes electromexicus 3651:16:44, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 3634:22:53, 23 March 2015 (UTC) 3620:16:56, 23 March 2015 (UTC) 3600:15:54, 23 March 2015 (UTC) 3567:18:57, 22 March 2015 (UTC) 3363:Template:Remove_first_word 2424: 1383: 133:Template talk:PAGENAMEBASE 4527: 4522: 4450: 4436: 4431: 4369: 4214:Redundant species heading 3807: 3800: 3719:Scientific classification 3717: 3712: 3507:15:51, 3 April 2014 (UTC) 3492:14:30, 3 April 2014 (UTC) 2900:Gah. Found explanations: 2601:20:01, 15 July 2012 (UTC) 2576:01:03, 15 July 2012 (UTC) 2554:04:39, 13 July 2012 (UTC) 2494:In order for any type of 2486:21:30, 25 June 2012 (UTC) 2053: 2046: 1915:Scientific classification 1913: 1908: 1890:1. I strongly agree with 1696:'']'' is a species of ... 1469:Subfamily: Asphodeloideae 1155:, the expression used is 452:17:41, 3 March 2011 (UTC) 4768:16:53, 15 May 2016 (UTC) 4660:12:54, 15 May 2016 (UTC) 4625:20:58, 11 May 2016 (UTC) 4587:20:08, 11 May 2016 (UTC) 4572:16:22, 11 May 2016 (UTC) 4360:09:14, 11 May 2016 (UTC) 3639:It's just a suggestion. 3320:Cantharidoscops frigidus 2176:18:54, 31 May 2011 (UTC) 2164:18:51, 31 May 2011 (UTC) 2143:17:39, 31 May 2011 (UTC) 1886:21:54, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 1869:21:48, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 1850:21:45, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 1830:21:03, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 1738:18:48, 31 May 2011 (UTC) 1723:17:23, 31 May 2011 (UTC) 1685:Clade polysporangiophyte 1654:21:40, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 1620:21:03, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 1599:18:27, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 1562:21:03, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 1541:17:42, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 1520:17:50, 24 May 2011 (UTC) 1466:Family: Xanthorrhoeaceae 1445:14:49, 24 May 2011 (UTC) 1421:18:23, 16 May 2011 (UTC) 1410:09:06, 16 May 2011 (UTC) 1379:08:30, 16 May 2011 (UTC) 1344:03:28, 16 May 2011 (UTC) 1303:07:57, 14 May 2011 (UTC) 1258:20:30, 13 May 2011 (UTC) 1244:20:07, 13 May 2011 (UTC) 1231:20:30, 13 May 2011 (UTC) 1207:19:47, 13 May 2011 (UTC) 1120:19:33, 13 May 2011 (UTC) 1108:#Timing and optimization 1082:19:08, 13 May 2011 (UTC) 995:18:57, 13 May 2011 (UTC) 942:17:56, 13 May 2011 (UTC) 911:14:39, 10 May 2011 (UTC) 896:12:42, 10 May 2011 (UTC) 874:09:02, 10 May 2011 (UTC) 840:04:38, 13 May 2011 (UTC) 825:19:58, 12 May 2011 (UTC) 672:15:05, 12 May 2011 (UTC) 626:06:25, 10 May 2011 (UTC) 464:but has an italic title. 283:Fill in two parameters, 118:where possible. Because 18:Template talk:Speciesbox 4014:Handling unclear genera 3986:User:Bob the Wikipedian 3673:Calocedrus huashanensis 3540:22:17, 5 May 2014 (UTC) 2708:09:56, 8 May 2012 (UTC) 2666:08:52, 8 May 2012 (UTC) 2649:02:26, 8 May 2012 (UTC) 2629:01:36, 8 May 2012 (UTC) 1136:Timing and optimization 791:, say, which if set to 684:Narcissus × medioluteus 585:23:30, 9 May 2011 (UTC) 553:22:44, 9 May 2011 (UTC) 487:20:09, 8 May 2011 (UTC) 340:08:45, 8 May 2011 (UTC) 325:21:22, 7 May 2011 (UTC) 314:21:01, 7 May 2011 (UTC) 298:20:03, 7 May 2011 (UTC) 278:15:23, 7 May 2011 (UTC) 4050: 3814:Adoketophyton parvulum 3462:Obscure template error 3256:Now fixed. Looks like 2738:Colors messed up again 2090:Trinomial nomenclature 904:Great! That was fast! 689:Narcissus ×medioluteus 4026: 3713:Speciesbox/Archive 1 3586:does produce a link: 3476:to be transcluded by 2585:Taxonomy/Accipitrinae 1909:Speciesbox/Archive 1 1024:including no taxobox. 800:Remove first word/any 764:Remove first word/any 714:Remove first word/any 458:Polypodium hydriforme 358:Polypodium_hydriforme 356:Not working, e.g. in 42:of past discussions. 4945:not work correctly: 4714:for a species.) See 4558:But this would be a 4189:? Nycticebus linglom 4021:'Anchomomys' milleri 3182:" has the PAGENAME " 2751:Ecnomiohyla rabborum 1812:Subspeciesbox/botany 1706:Disporum viridescens 1632:Title of the article 1431:Species vs. Binomial 1285:Now discovered from 260:.) Putting "taxon = 4030:Anchomomys' milleri 3361:The problem was in 3353:Template:Speciesbox 2908:. It seems that we 2253:Araucaria mirabilis 2250:is set to yes. See 749:, which is used by 4182:Bob the Wikipedian 4135:Bob the WikipediaN 4115:Bob the WikipediaN 4091:Nycticebus linglom 4056:Nycticebus linglom 3679:Sassafras hesperia 2856:Galápagos tortoise 2850:Whitespace at top? 2597:Bob the WikipediaN 2550:Bob the WikipediaN 2234:Bob the WikipediaN 2172:Bob the WikipediaN 2160:Bob the WikipediaN 1882:Bob the WikipediaN 1846:Bob the WikipediaN 1734:Bob the WikipediaN 1650:Bob the WikipediaN 1595:Bob the WikipediaN 1478:Specific epithet: 1417:Bob the WikipediaN 1281:in my user-space. 1240:Bob the WikipediaN 1078:Bob the WikipediaN 907:Bob the WikipediaN 836:Bob the WikipediaN 581:Bob the WikipediaN 448:Bob the WikipediaN 430:Bob the WikipediaN 386:Bob the WikipediaN 321:Bob the WikipediaN 294:Bob the WikipediaN 215:Bob the WikipediaN 177:Bob the WikipediaN 138:Bob the WikipediaN 4988:|display_parents= 4966:|display_parents= 4959:|display_parents= 4942:|display_parents= 4733:Automatic taxobox 4709:Automatic taxobox 4679:Automatic taxobox 4537: 4536: 4533: 4446: 4445: 4442: 4316: 4230:Tyrannosaurus rex 4065:open nomenclature 3955:Automatic taxobox 3822: 3821: 3618: 3576:I don't see that 3538: 3232:Any ideas on why 2840: 2825: 2792:was the culprit. 2781: 2766: 2689:automatic taxobox 2547:Hope that helps! 2499:automatic taxobox 2463: 2310: 2092:(see the code of 2065: 2064: 1508:Sonoran Pronghorn 1323:|color=lightgreen 1309:Colors messing up 939: 810:Remove first word 734:Remove first word 724:str index/getchar 704:str index/getchar 697:Technical details 657:str index/getchar 409: 375: 205: 166: 82: 81: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5033: 4993: 4981: 4975: 4967: 4960: 4943: 4757: 4751: 4747: 4741: 4737: 4731: 4727: 4721: 4713: 4707: 4703: 4697: 4693: 4687: 4683: 4677: 4673: 4667: 4610: 4604: 4600: 4594: 4550: 4531: 4448: 4447: 4440: 4367: 4366: 4314: 4185: 4136: 4132: 4128: 4127: 4116: 4080: 4077: 4059:was assigned to 3997: 3991: 3979: 3973: 3969: 3963: 3959: 3953: 3949: 3936: 3933: 3925: 3919: 3902: 3888: 3885: 3877: 3871: 3850: 3846: 3834: 3830: 3816: 3812: 3776: 3765: 3727: 3726: 3710: 3709: 3697: 3692: 3668: 3649: 3646: 3608: 3589: 3585: 3579: 3565: 3562: 3554: 3548: 3528: 3523: 3475: 3469: 3450: 3445: 3412: 3340: 3307: 3277: 3273: 3269: 3265: 3259: 3249: 3220: 3208: 3204: 3203: 3146: 3068: 3064: 3060: 3053:I have modified 3027: 3021: 2980: 2976: 2946: 2940: 2884: 2878: 2874: 2868: 2838: 2835: 2829: 2828: 2823: 2820: 2814: 2807: 2779: 2776: 2770: 2769: 2764: 2761: 2755: 2693: 2687: 2683: 2677: 2644: 2598: 2589: 2583: 2551: 2523: 2517: 2513: 2507: 2503: 2497: 2464: 2458: 2457: 2438: 2430: 2429: 2402: 2400: 2395: 2393: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2335: 2333: 2328: 2326: 2300: 2281: 2279: 2274: 2272: 2263: 2249: 2235: 2230: 2224: 2211: 2206: 2173: 2161: 2156: 2155: 2131: 2125: 2121: 2115: 2111: 2105: 2101: 2095: 2083: 2077: 2059: 2057:Allium cepa cepa 1923: 1922: 1906: 1905: 1883: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1847: 1816: 1810: 1806: 1800: 1787: 1783: 1779: 1773: 1769: 1763: 1735: 1697: 1689: 1683: 1651: 1596: 1591: 1585: 1577: 1571: 1505: 1499: 1418: 1407: 1404: 1389: 1388: 1368: 1362: 1358: 1352: 1341: 1338: 1324: 1320: 1291: 1280: 1274: 1270: 1241: 1196: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1079: 1054: 1053:|taxon=Eukaryota 974: 971:values, whereas 970: 966: 962: 929: 908: 885: 863: 859: 855: 837: 814: 808: 804: 798: 794: 790: 789:|hybrid-species= 786: 780: 768: 762: 758: 752: 748: 742: 738: 732: 728: 722: 718: 712: 708: 702: 661: 655: 649: 645: 641: 634:Use with hybrids 614: 610: 606: 603:to the value of 602: 596: 582: 578: 577: 576: 538: 532: 475: 471: 463: 449: 445: 444: 443: 431: 427: 426: 425: 399: 387: 365: 322: 295: 290: 286: 216: 195: 188: 178: 156: 139: 127: 121: 117: 111: 107: 101: 94: 88: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5041: 5040: 5036: 5035: 5034: 5032: 5031: 5030: 5011: 4987: 4979: 4973: 4965: 4958: 4957:genus whenever 4941: 4938: 4788: 4786:"Invalid color" 4755: 4753:Infraspeciesbox 4749: 4745: 4739: 4735: 4729: 4725: 4719: 4711: 4705: 4701: 4695: 4691: 4685: 4681: 4675: 4671: 4665: 4608: 4602: 4598: 4592: 4544: 4216: 4179: 4134: 4125: 4123: 4114: 4075: 4071: 4016: 3995: 3989: 3977: 3971: 3967: 3961: 3957: 3951: 3943: 3931: 3927: 3923: 3917: 3900: 3883: 3879: 3875: 3869: 3848: 3844: 3832: 3828: 3810: 3809: 3796: 3774: 3763: 3721: 3695: 3690: 3666: 3644: 3640: 3583: 3577: 3560: 3556: 3552: 3546: 3521: 3520:Why do we need 3518: 3473: 3467: 3464: 3448: 3443: 3424: 3402: 3351:I will examine 3330: 3297: 3275: 3271: 3267: 3263: 3257: 3239: 3230: 3210: 3201: 3199: 3136: 3066: 3063:display_parents 3062: 3058: 3025: 3019: 2979:display_parents 2978: 2974: 2967: 2944: 2938: 2882: 2876: 2872: 2866: 2852: 2836: 2831: 2826: 2821: 2816: 2797: 2777: 2772: 2767: 2762: 2757: 2740: 2691: 2685: 2681: 2675: 2642: 2613: 2611:expansion depth 2596: 2587: 2581: 2549: 2521: 2515: 2511: 2505: 2501: 2495: 2473: 2452: 2446: 2439: 2436: 2434: 2427: 2423: 2398: 2391: 2389: 2387: 2380: 2331: 2324: 2322: 2320: 2277: 2270: 2268: 2266: 2257: 2247: 2233: 2228: 2222: 2209: 2204: 2194: 2171: 2159: 2153: 2129: 2123: 2122:is driven from 2119: 2113: 2109: 2103: 2099: 2093: 2081: 2075: 2055: 2042: 2028: 1917: 1881: 1875: 1845: 1840: 1814: 1808: 1804: 1798: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1771: 1767: 1761: 1758: 1733: 1695: 1687: 1681: 1649: 1594: 1589: 1583: 1575: 1569: 1503: 1497: 1433: 1416: 1402: 1399: 1392: 1391: 1386: 1366: 1360: 1356: 1350: 1336: 1333: 1322: 1314: 1311: 1289: 1278: 1272: 1268: 1239: 1194: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1138: 1077: 1052: 972: 968: 964: 960: 906: 883: 880:User:Stemonitis 861: 857: 853: 850: 835: 812: 806: 802: 796: 792: 788: 784: 778: 775:Technical query 766: 760: 756: 750: 746: 740: 736: 730: 726: 720: 716: 710: 706: 700: 659: 653: 647: 643: 639: 636: 612: 608: 604: 600: 594: 580: 574: 536: 530: 473: 469: 462:{{italictitle}} 461: 447: 441: 429: 423: 385: 354: 320: 293: 288: 284: 254:User:Stemonitis 251: 214: 186: 176: 149: 137: 125: 119: 115: 109: 105: 99: 96: 92: 86: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5039: 5010: 5007: 4971: 4954: 4953: 4950: 4937: 4934: 4903:at the least. 4893: 4892: 4888: 4887: 4876: 4875: 4874: 4873: 4872: 4871: 4852: 4851: 4850: 4849: 4816: 4815: 4812:Enantiornithes 4787: 4784: 4783: 4782: 4781: 4780: 4779: 4778: 4777: 4776: 4775: 4774: 4773: 4772: 4771: 4770: 4636: 4635: 4634: 4633: 4632: 4631: 4630: 4629: 4628: 4627: 4561: 4556: 4552: 4535: 4534: 4529:Roscoea alpina 4525: 4524: 4520: 4519: 4514: 4510: 4509: 4508:Zingiberaceae 4506: 4502: 4501: 4498: 4494: 4493: 4490: 4483: 4482: 4479: 4472: 4471: 4468: 4461: 4460: 4457: 4453: 4452: 4444: 4443: 4434: 4433: 4429: 4428: 4427:Zingiberaceae 4425: 4421: 4420: 4417: 4413: 4412: 4409: 4402: 4401: 4398: 4391: 4390: 4387: 4380: 4379: 4376: 4372: 4371: 4365: 4364: 4363: 4362: 4347:Roscoea alpina 4322: 4319: 4318: 4317: 4312:Roscoea alpina 4308: 4302: 4299: 4289: 4285: 4281:Roscoea alpina 4269: 4266: 4215: 4212: 4211: 4210: 4209: 4208: 4207: 4206: 4205: 4204: 4170: 4169: 4168: 4167: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4163: 4015: 4012: 4011: 4010: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3894: 3893: 3892: 3852: 3842: 3836: 3820: 3819: 3818: 3805: 3804: 3798: 3797: 3789: 3787: 3783: 3782: 3772: 3768: 3767: 3759: 3752: 3751: 3746: 3739: 3738: 3733: 3729: 3728: 3715: 3714: 3706: 3705: 3662: 3661: 3660: 3659: 3658: 3657: 3656: 3655: 3654: 3653: 3574: 3517: 3514: 3512: 3510: 3509: 3479:Thalassocystis 3463: 3460: 3459: 3458: 3423: 3420: 3419: 3418: 3417: 3416: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3376: 3367: 3366: 3357: 3345: 3344: 3314: 3313: 3312: 3311: 3291: 3290: 3229: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3196: 3195: 3180:Talk:Mononykus 3176: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3162: 3161: 3153: 3152: 3151: 3150: 3126: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3082: 3081: 3067:display_taxa=2 3047: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3013: 3012: 2966: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2959: 2932: 2931: 2917: 2851: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2739: 2736: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2669: 2668: 2652: 2651: 2643:Gadget850 (Ed) 2612: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2536: 2529: 2525: 2472: 2469: 2425: 2422: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2241: 2240: 2199:Osmunda wehrii 2193: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2051: 2050: 2048:Trinomial name 2044: 2043: 2036: 2034: 2030: 2029: 2022: 2020: 2016: 2015: 2008: 2004: 2003: 1998: 1994: 1993: 1991:Amaryllidaceae 1988: 1984: 1983: 1978: 1974: 1973: 1968: 1961: 1960: 1955: 1948: 1947: 1942: 1935: 1934: 1929: 1925: 1924: 1911: 1910: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1790:Botanical Code 1757: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1678: 1645: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1636: 1633: 1627: 1623: 1622: 1607: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1494: 1491: 1487: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1476: 1470: 1467: 1464: 1457:Aloe buettneri 1451: 1432: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1384: 1382: 1381: 1310: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1169: 1168: 1145: 1137: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1067: 1064: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1043: 1034: 1025: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 983: 976: 949: 948: 947: 946: 945: 944: 916: 915: 914: 913: 899: 898: 849: 846: 845: 844: 843: 842: 828: 827: 771: 770: 744:select species 693: 692: 651: 635: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 588: 587: 564: 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 558: 557: 556: 555: 518: 517: 516: 515: 514: 513: 512: 511: 510: 509: 498: 497: 496: 495: 494: 493: 492: 491: 490: 489: 465: 353: 350: 349: 348: 347: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 303: 258:White asphodel 250: 247: 246: 245: 244: 243: 242: 241: 240: 239: 225:Himalayan wolf 148: 145: 95: 83: 80: 79: 74: 69: 64: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5038: 5029: 5028: 5024: 5020: 5019:Peter coxhead 5016: 5006: 5005: 5001: 4997: 4996:Peter coxhead 4991: 4985: 4978: 4969: 4962: 4951: 4948: 4947: 4946: 4933: 4932: 4928: 4924: 4923:Peter coxhead 4920: 4915: 4914: 4910: 4906: 4905:Peter coxhead 4902: 4898: 4890: 4889: 4885: 4884: 4883: 4881: 4870: 4866: 4862: 4861:Peter coxhead 4858: 4857: 4856: 4855: 4854: 4853: 4848: 4844: 4840: 4836: 4835: 4834: 4830: 4826: 4825:Peter coxhead 4822: 4818: 4817: 4813: 4808: 4807: 4806: 4805: 4801: 4797: 4793: 4769: 4765: 4761: 4760:Peter coxhead 4754: 4744: 4743:Subspeciesbox 4734: 4724: 4717: 4710: 4700: 4690: 4680: 4670: 4663: 4662: 4661: 4657: 4653: 4648: 4647: 4646: 4645: 4644: 4643: 4642: 4641: 4640: 4639: 4638: 4637: 4626: 4622: 4618: 4617:Peter coxhead 4614: 4607: 4597: 4590: 4589: 4588: 4584: 4580: 4575: 4574: 4573: 4569: 4565: 4564:Peter coxhead 4559: 4557: 4553: 4548: 4543: 4542: 4541: 4540: 4539: 4538: 4530: 4526: 4521: 4518: 4515: 4512: 4511: 4507: 4504: 4503: 4500:Zingiberales 4499: 4496: 4495: 4491: 4488: 4485: 4484: 4480: 4477: 4474: 4473: 4469: 4466: 4463: 4462: 4458: 4455: 4454: 4449: 4439: 4435: 4430: 4426: 4423: 4422: 4419:Zingiberales 4418: 4415: 4414: 4410: 4407: 4404: 4403: 4399: 4396: 4393: 4392: 4388: 4385: 4382: 4381: 4377: 4374: 4373: 4368: 4361: 4357: 4353: 4349: 4348: 4342: 4338: 4337: 4336: 4332: 4328: 4327:Peter coxhead 4323: 4320: 4313: 4309: 4307: 4303: 4300: 4298: 4294: 4293: 4290: 4286: 4283: 4282: 4277: 4276: 4270: 4267: 4264: 4260: 4259: 4258: 4257: 4253: 4249: 4245: 4241: 4240:Binomial name 4237: 4233: 4231: 4225: 4223: 4203: 4199: 4195: 4194:Peter coxhead 4191: 4190: 4183: 4178: 4177: 4176: 4175: 4174: 4173: 4172: 4171: 4162: 4158: 4154: 4150: 4146: 4142: 4141: 4140: 4137: 4131: 4122: 4121: 4120: 4117: 4111: 4107: 4106: 4105: 4101: 4097: 4096:Peter coxhead 4093: 4092: 4086: 4085: 4084: 4083: 4079: 4078: 4068: 4066: 4062: 4058: 4057: 4049: 4047: 4043: 4039: 4035: 4031: 4025: 4023: 4022: 4009: 4005: 4001: 4000:Peter coxhead 3994: 3987: 3983: 3982:User:Smith609 3976: 3966: 3956: 3947: 3942: 3941: 3940: 3939: 3935: 3934: 3922: 3914: 3913: 3912:Hadropithecus 3908: 3907: 3891: 3887: 3886: 3874: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3861: 3857: 3856:Peter coxhead 3853: 3840: 3837: 3826: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3817: 3815: 3806: 3803: 3802:Binomial name 3799: 3795: 3794: 3788: 3785: 3784: 3781: 3780: 3779:Adoketophyton 3773: 3770: 3769: 3766: 3760: 3757: 3754: 3753: 3750: 3749:Tracheophytes 3747: 3744: 3741: 3740: 3737: 3734: 3731: 3730: 3725: 3720: 3716: 3711: 3708: 3704: 3701: 3698: 3693: 3687: 3686: 3681: 3680: 3675: 3674: 3664: 3663: 3652: 3648: 3647: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3631: 3627: 3626:Peter coxhead 3623: 3622: 3621: 3616: 3612: 3607: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3597: 3593: 3592:Peter coxhead 3582: 3575: 3573: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3564: 3563: 3551: 3544: 3543: 3542: 3541: 3536: 3532: 3527: 3513: 3508: 3504: 3500: 3499:Peter coxhead 3496: 3495: 3494: 3493: 3489: 3485: 3481: 3480: 3472: 3457: 3454: 3451: 3446: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3433: 3429: 3422:Code in pages 3415: 3410: 3406: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3394: 3390: 3385: 3380: 3377: 3374: 3371: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3364: 3360: 3354: 3350: 3347: 3346: 3343: 3338: 3334: 3328: 3327: 3322: 3321: 3316: 3315: 3310: 3305: 3301: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3292: 3289: 3285: 3281: 3262: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3247: 3243: 3237: 3236: 3223: 3218: 3214: 3207: 3198: 3197: 3194: 3191: 3187: 3186: 3181: 3177: 3171: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3158: 3155: 3154: 3149: 3144: 3140: 3134: 3130: 3129: 3128: 3127: 3120: 3116: 3112: 3111:Peter coxhead 3108: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3080: 3076: 3072: 3056: 3052: 3049: 3048: 3043: 3039: 3035: 3030: 3024: 3017: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3011: 3007: 3003: 3002:Peter coxhead 2999: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2972: 2958: 2954: 2950: 2949:Peter coxhead 2943: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2930: 2926: 2922: 2918: 2915: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2881: 2880:pp-move-indef 2871: 2863: 2861: 2860:Albertosaurus 2857: 2843: 2839: 2834: 2824: 2819: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2805: 2801: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2780: 2775: 2765: 2760: 2753: 2752: 2747: 2746: 2735: 2734: 2730: 2726: 2722: 2721:Alan Liefting 2718: 2709: 2705: 2701: 2697: 2690: 2684:is a fork of 2680: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2667: 2663: 2659: 2658:Peter coxhead 2654: 2653: 2650: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2636: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2626: 2622: 2621:RockMagnetist 2618: 2602: 2599: 2594: 2592: 2586: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2552: 2546: 2541: 2537: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2520: 2519:Taxonomy/Life 2510: 2500: 2493: 2492: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2483: 2479: 2468: 2467: 2461: 2455: 2451: 2450: 2444: 2433: 2406: 2403: 2401: 2396: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2345:Peter coxhead 2341: 2340: 2339: 2336: 2334: 2329: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2311: 2308: 2304: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2282: 2280: 2275: 2261: 2255: 2254: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2239: 2236: 2227: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2215: 2212: 2207: 2201: 2200: 2177: 2174: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2162: 2150: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2135:Peter coxhead 2128: 2127:Subspeciesbox 2118: 2108: 2098: 2091: 2087: 2080: 2079:Subspeciesbox 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2060: 2058: 2052: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2040: 2035: 2032: 2031: 2027: 2026: 2021: 2018: 2017: 2014: 2013: 2009: 2006: 2005: 2002: 1999: 1996: 1995: 1992: 1989: 1986: 1985: 1982: 1979: 1976: 1975: 1972: 1969: 1966: 1963: 1962: 1959: 1956: 1953: 1950: 1949: 1946: 1945:Tracheophytes 1943: 1940: 1937: 1936: 1933: 1930: 1927: 1926: 1921: 1916: 1912: 1907: 1904: 1893: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1884: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1857: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1848: 1842: 1841: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1822:Peter coxhead 1818: 1813: 1803: 1795: 1791: 1776: 1766: 1765:Subspeciesbox 1739: 1736: 1730: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1715:Peter coxhead 1712: 1708: 1707: 1702: 1693: 1692:Junkus junkii 1686: 1679: 1676: 1672: 1671: 1667:(also called 1666: 1665: 1664:Junkus junkii 1660: 1659: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1652: 1646: 1642: 1638:Circular link 1637: 1634: 1631: 1630: 1628: 1625: 1624: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1612:Peter coxhead 1608: 1605: 1604: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1597: 1588: 1582:. When using 1581: 1574: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1554:Peter coxhead 1550: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1529: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1512:Peter coxhead 1509: 1502: 1501:Subspeciesbox 1495: 1492: 1488: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1475: 1471: 1468: 1465: 1462: 1461: 1459: 1458: 1452: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1422: 1419: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1408: 1406: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1371:Peter coxhead 1369:. Now fixed. 1365: 1355: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1342: 1340: 1329: 1328: 1318: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1295:Peter coxhead 1290:{{TIMESTAMP}} 1287: 1284: 1277: 1271:in a copy of 1269:{{TIMESTAMP}} 1265: 1264: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1250:Peter coxhead 1247: 1246: 1245: 1242: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1223:Peter coxhead 1219: 1218: 1216: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1199:Peter coxhead 1193: 1166: 1146: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1112:Peter coxhead 1109: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1083: 1080: 1073: 1068: 1065: 1062: 1061: 1059: 1050: 1049: 1048:Tyrannosaurus 1045:Load time of 1044: 1041: 1040: 1039:Tyrannosaurus 1036:Load time of 1035: 1032: 1031: 1030:Tyrannosaurus 1027:Load time of 1026: 1023: 1022: 1021:Tyrannosaurus 1018:Load time of 1017: 1016: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 996: 992: 988: 987:Peter coxhead 984: 981: 977: 957: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 950: 943: 940: 937: 933: 927: 922: 921: 920: 919: 918: 917: 912: 909: 903: 902: 901: 900: 897: 893: 889: 888:Peter coxhead 881: 878: 877: 876: 875: 871: 867: 866:Peter coxhead 841: 838: 832: 831: 830: 829: 826: 822: 818: 817:Peter coxhead 811: 801: 783: 776: 773: 772: 765: 755: 745: 735: 725: 715: 705: 698: 695: 694: 690: 686: 685: 680: 676: 675: 674: 673: 669: 665: 664:Peter coxhead 658: 627: 623: 619: 618:Peter coxhead 599: 592: 591: 590: 589: 586: 583: 570: 566: 565: 554: 550: 546: 545:Peter coxhead 542: 535: 528: 527: 526: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 519: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 499: 488: 484: 480: 479:Peter coxhead 466: 459: 455: 454: 453: 450: 437: 436: 435: 432: 419: 415: 414: 413: 410: 407: 403: 397: 393: 392: 391: 388: 382: 381: 380: 379: 376: 373: 369: 363: 359: 341: 337: 333: 332:Peter coxhead 328: 327: 326: 323: 317: 316: 315: 311: 307: 306:Peter coxhead 304: 302:Thanks, Bob. 301: 300: 299: 296: 282: 281: 280: 279: 275: 271: 270:Peter coxhead 267: 263: 259: 255: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 221: 220: 217: 211: 210: 209: 206: 203: 199: 193: 187:|subdivision= 184: 183: 182: 179: 173: 172: 171: 170: 167: 164: 160: 154: 144: 143: 140: 134: 129: 124: 114: 104: 103:strfind short 91: 78: 75: 73: 70: 68: 65: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5012: 4989: 4983: 4963: 4955: 4939: 4916: 4901:WP:Dinosaurs 4894: 4877: 4789: 4528: 4516: 4492:Commelinids 4486: 4475: 4470:Angiosperms 4464: 4437: 4411:Commelinids 4405: 4394: 4389:Angiosperms 4383: 4345: 4340: 4311: 4279: 4273: 4243: 4239: 4235: 4229: 4227: 4221: 4219: 4217: 4187: 4147:is still in 4129: 4090: 4072: 4069: 4060: 4055: 4051: 4045: 4041: 4037: 4033: 4029: 4027: 4019: 4018:The species 4017: 3975:taxobox/core 3965:taxobox/core 3928: 3910: 3904: 3898: 3880: 3845:|extinct=yes 3833:|extinct=yes 3813: 3808: 3792: 3791: 3778: 3755: 3742: 3707: 3683: 3677: 3671: 3667:|extinct=yes 3641: 3571: 3557: 3522:|extinct=yes 3519: 3511: 3477: 3465: 3425: 3378: 3372: 3358: 3348: 3324: 3318: 3274:rather than 3233: 3231: 3205: 3183: 3156: 3059:display_taxa 3050: 3028: 2969:As noted at 2968: 2965:Edit request 2913: 2909: 2864: 2853: 2832: 2817: 2794:User:Wikid77 2773: 2758: 2749: 2743: 2741: 2714: 2639: 2638: 2614: 2474: 2447: 2440: 2386: 2319: 2299: 2288: 2265: 2251: 2231:will do it. 2197: 2195: 2117:Taxobox/core 2107:Taxobox/core 2097:Taxobox/core 2086:Ternary name 2056: 2054: 2038: 2037: 2033:Subspecies: 2023: 2011: 1964: 1951: 1938: 1903: 1855: 1819: 1802:Taxobox/core 1793: 1789: 1775:Taxobox/core 1759: 1704: 1691: 1674: 1669: 1668: 1663: 1662: 1548: 1526: 1490:occurrence). 1479: 1473: 1455: 1434: 1398: 1354:Taxobox/core 1332: 1330: 1312: 1282: 1214: 1192:PAGENAMEBASE 1170: 1164: 1139: 1046: 1037: 1028: 1019: 979: 928: 851: 805:rather than 774: 696: 688: 682: 678: 637: 540: 398: 364: 355: 265: 261: 252: 194: 155: 150: 130: 123:PAGENAMEBASE 97: 60: 43: 37: 5013:Please see 4961:is absent. 4232:(authority) 4108:Please see 4052:Similarly, 3906:Megaladapis 3849:|extinct=no 3793:A. parvulum 3178:That page " 2996:Please see 2942:italictitle 2745:Ecnomiohyla 2540:iNaturalist 2449:SMcCandlish 1997:Subfamily: 1981:Asparagales 1958:Angiosperms 1786:|trinomial= 1694:by writing 1675:abbreviated 1179:given < 598:italictitle 569:WP:TAXFORCE 534:italictitle 266:common_name 36:This is an 4977:Speciesbox 4699:Speciesbox 4689:Speciesbox 4606:Speciesbox 4248:MMartyniuk 4153:Stemonitis 4061:Nycticebus 4046:Anchomomys 4042:Anchomomys 4038:Anchomomys 4034:A. milleri 3993:Speciesbox 3762:Lycophytes 3606:ErikHaugen 3526:ErikHaugen 3379:Currently: 3280:Stemonitis 3261:speciesbox 3089:Stemonitis 3061:to handle 3034:Stemonitis 3023:speciesbox 2983:Stemonitis 2700:Stemonitis 2679:speciesbox 2568:Pvmoutside 2509:speciesbox 2478:Pvmoutside 2471:Great idea 2421:Redundancy 2318:anyone?-- 2039:A. c. cepa 2001:Allioideae 1892:MMartyniuk 1861:MMartyniuk 1782:|binomial= 1711:MMartyniuk 1573:speciesbox 1533:MMartyniuk 1437:MMartyniuk 1364:Speciesbox 1317:Speciesbox 1276:Speciesbox 1153:|binomial= 782:Speciesbox 759:, to use 754:Speciesbox 262:latin_name 4792:Abavornis 4481:Monocots 4400:Monocots 4310:Species: 4295:Kingdom: 4226:and then 4220:Species: 3984:and then 3901:|extinct= 3843:you have 3786:Species: 3732:Kingdom: 3590:example. 3373:Formerly: 3329:doesn't? 3266:requires 3185:Mononykus 2248:|extinct= 2019:Species: 1928:Kingdom: 1670:J. junkii 1480:buettneri 862:|species= 648:|species= 289:|species= 264:| name = 147:Authority 77:Archive 4 72:Archive 3 67:Archive 2 61:Archive 1 4897:WP:Birds 4652:Dinoguy2 4579:Dinoguy2 4547:Dinoguy2 4523:Species 4459:Plantae 4456:Kingdom: 4378:Plantae 4375:Kingdom: 4352:Dinoguy2 4341:actually 4236:Species: 4063:, using 3615:contribs 3535:contribs 3395:) 18:19/ 3296:Thanks. 3272:species= 2921:Quiddity 2887:Quiddity 2729:contribs 2533:WikiData 2460:Contribs 2303:Smith609 1987:Family: 1971:Monocots 1390:Resolved 932:Smith609 795:selects 729:(unlike 402:Smith609 368:Smith609 198:Smith609 159:Smith609 113:str find 90:str find 4970:species 4723:Taxobox 4669:Taxobox 4596:Taxobox 4517:Roscoea 4505:Family: 4438:Roscoea 4424:Family: 4306:Roscoea 4304:Genus: 4297:Plantae 4275:Roscoea 4244:Species 3921:Taxobox 3873:extinct 3771:Genus: 3736:Plantae 3581:extinct 3550:extinct 3516:Extinct 3484:Wbm1058 3428:Juandev 3405:Ganeshk 3389:Wikid77 3356:Thanks. 3333:Ganeshk 3300:Ganeshk 3242:Ganeshk 3228:Italics 3213:Ganeshk 3190:Wikid77 3139:Ganeshk 3071:Wikid77 2870:taxobox 2854:At eg. 2822:BSIDIAN 2800:Ganeshk 2763:BSIDIAN 2260:extinct 2226:extinct 2025:A. cepa 2007:Genus: 1977:Order: 1932:Plantae 1587:taxobox 1549:because 1472:Genus: 1397:\o/ -- 1177:species 969:species 858:|genus= 854:|taxon= 679:species 644:|genus= 640:|taxon= 472:. When 420:agent! 352:Italics 285:|genus= 229:Anaxial 39:archive 4839:MeegsC 4796:MeegsC 4613:WP:TOL 4513:Genus: 4497:Order: 4432:Genus 4416:Order: 4288:place. 4242:" to " 4222:T. rex 3841:unless 3682:, and 3665:I use 3359:FIXED: 3276:taxon= 3268:genus= 2390:Obsidi 2323:Obsidi 2297:Martin 2289:Should 2269:Obsidi 2149:WP:TOL 2012:Allium 1729:WP:TOL 1580:WP:TOL 1401:Obsidi 1335:Obsidi 926:Martin 613:|name= 609:|name= 605:|name= 418:Blokus 396:Martin 362:Martin 192:Martin 153:Martin 4532:Royle 4487:Clade 4476:Clade 4465:Clade 4406:Clade 4395:Clade 4384:Clade 4315:Royle 4263:above 3756:Clade 3743:Clade 3471:error 2975:genus 2875:, or 2788:This 2719:. -- 2456:〈°⌊°〉 2454:Talk⇒ 2264:?)-- 2202:)? -- 1965:Clade 1952:Clade 1939:Clade 1528:Human 1327:click 1185:taxon 1181:taxon 1173:genus 1165:logic 1161:genus 980:small 973:taxon 965:genus 961:taxon 884:taxon 474:genus 16:< 5023:talk 5000:talk 4927:talk 4917:See 4909:talk 4899:and 4878:See 4865:talk 4843:talk 4829:talk 4800:talk 4764:talk 4656:talk 4621:talk 4601:and 4583:talk 4568:talk 4356:talk 4331:talk 4252:talk 4198:talk 4157:talk 4130:Done 4100:talk 4076:Maky 4004:talk 3946:Maky 3932:Maky 3909:vs. 3884:Maky 3860:talk 3645:Maky 3630:talk 3611:talk 3596:talk 3561:Maky 3531:talk 3503:talk 3488:talk 3432:talk 3409:talk 3393:talk 3337:talk 3304:talk 3284:talk 3278:. -- 3270:and 3246:talk 3217:talk 3206:Done 3143:talk 3115:talk 3093:talk 3075:talk 3038:talk 3006:talk 2987:talk 2953:talk 2925:talk 2904:and 2891:talk 2858:and 2804:talk 2790:edit 2748:and 2725:talk 2704:talk 2662:talk 2625:talk 2572:talk 2562:and 2482:talk 2445:. — 2399:Soul 2349:talk 2332:Soul 2307:Talk 2295:). 2278:Soul 2139:talk 2088:not 1865:talk 1826:talk 1794:Code 1719:talk 1616:talk 1568:The 1558:talk 1537:talk 1516:talk 1474:Aloe 1463:.... 1441:talk 1375:talk 1299:talk 1254:talk 1227:talk 1215:your 1203:talk 1116:talk 991:talk 967:and 936:Talk 892:talk 870:talk 860:and 821:talk 668:talk 622:talk 549:talk 483:talk 406:Talk 372:Talk 336:talk 310:talk 287:and 274:talk 233:talk 202:Talk 163:Talk 4972:in 4940:If 4748:or 4694:. ( 4684:or 4560:big 4441:Sm. 4301:... 4246:". 3847:or 3764:(?) 3696:min 3691:Kev 3688:.-- 3449:min 3444:Kev 3029:can 2885:? — 2837:OUL 2778:OUL 2674:As 2637:--- 2432:FYI 2210:min 2205:Kev 1856:all 1784:or 793:yes 687:or 646:or 541:any 539:in 5025:) 5017:. 5002:) 4994:. 4992:+1 4980:}} 4974:{{ 4929:) 4921:. 4911:) 4867:) 4845:) 4831:) 4823:. 4802:) 4766:) 4756:}} 4750:{{ 4746:}} 4740:{{ 4738:, 4736:}} 4730:{{ 4728:, 4726:}} 4720:{{ 4712:}} 4706:{{ 4702:}} 4696:{{ 4692:}} 4686:{{ 4682:}} 4676:{{ 4674:, 4672:}} 4666:{{ 4658:) 4623:) 4609:}} 4603:{{ 4599:}} 4593:{{ 4585:) 4570:) 4358:) 4333:) 4254:) 4200:) 4159:) 4112:. 4102:) 4089:? 4073:– 4067:. 4054:? 4006:) 3996:}} 3990:{{ 3978:}} 3972:{{ 3968:}} 3962:{{ 3958:}} 3952:{{ 3929:– 3924:}} 3918:{{ 3881:– 3876:}} 3870:{{ 3862:) 3758:: 3745:: 3676:, 3642:– 3632:) 3613:| 3598:) 3584:}} 3578:{{ 3558:– 3553:}} 3547:{{ 3533:| 3505:) 3490:) 3474:}} 3468:{{ 3434:) 3403:— 3331:— 3298:— 3286:) 3264:}} 3258:{{ 3240:— 3211:— 3137:— 3117:) 3095:) 3077:) 3040:) 3032:-- 3026:}} 3020:{{ 3008:) 2989:) 2955:) 2945:}} 2939:{{ 2927:) 2914:do 2910:do 2893:) 2883:}} 2877:{{ 2873:}} 2867:{{ 2798:— 2731:) 2727:- 2706:) 2692:}} 2686:{{ 2682:}} 2676:{{ 2664:) 2640:— 2627:) 2588:}} 2582:{{ 2574:) 2522:}} 2516:{{ 2512:}} 2506:{{ 2502:}} 2496:{{ 2484:) 2435:– 2351:) 2305:– 2262:}} 2258:{{ 2229:}} 2223:{{ 2141:) 2130:}} 2124:{{ 2120:}} 2114:{{ 2110:}} 2104:{{ 2100:}} 2094:{{ 2082:}} 2076:{{ 1967:: 1954:: 1941:: 1867:) 1828:) 1815:}} 1809:{{ 1805:}} 1799:{{ 1778:}} 1772:{{ 1768:}} 1762:{{ 1721:) 1688:}} 1682:{{ 1618:) 1590:}} 1584:{{ 1576:}} 1570:{{ 1560:) 1539:) 1531:. 1518:) 1504:}} 1498:{{ 1443:) 1377:) 1367:}} 1361:{{ 1357:}} 1351:{{ 1319:}} 1315:{{ 1301:) 1279:}} 1273:{{ 1256:) 1229:) 1205:) 1195:}} 1189:{{ 1175:+ 1118:) 993:) 934:– 894:) 872:) 823:) 815:. 813:}} 807:{{ 803:}} 797:{{ 785:}} 779:{{ 767:}} 761:{{ 757:}} 751:{{ 747:}} 741:{{ 737:}} 731:{{ 727:}} 721:{{ 717:}} 711:{{ 707:}} 701:{{ 670:) 660:}} 654:{{ 642:, 624:) 601:}} 595:{{ 571:! 551:) 537:}} 531:{{ 485:) 404:– 370:– 360:. 338:) 312:) 291:. 276:) 235:) 200:– 161:– 126:}} 120:{{ 116:}} 110:{{ 106:}} 100:{{ 93:}} 87:{{ 5021:( 4998:( 4990:N 4984:N 4925:( 4907:( 4863:( 4841:( 4827:( 4798:( 4762:( 4654:( 4619:( 4581:( 4566:( 4549:: 4545:@ 4489:: 4478:: 4467:: 4408:: 4397:: 4386:: 4354:( 4329:( 4250:( 4196:( 4184:: 4180:@ 4155:( 4098:( 4048:. 4002:( 3948:: 3944:@ 3858:( 3811:† 3790:† 3775:† 3700:§ 3628:( 3617:) 3609:( 3594:( 3588:† 3537:) 3529:( 3501:( 3486:( 3453:§ 3430:( 3411:) 3407:( 3391:( 3387:- 3339:) 3335:( 3306:) 3302:( 3282:( 3248:) 3244:( 3219:) 3215:( 3145:) 3141:( 3113:( 3091:( 3073:( 3036:( 3004:( 2985:( 2951:( 2923:( 2889:( 2833:S 2827:† 2818:O 2806:) 2802:( 2774:S 2768:† 2759:O 2723:( 2702:( 2660:( 2623:( 2590:. 2570:( 2480:( 2462:. 2394:n 2392:♠ 2347:( 2327:n 2325:♠ 2309:) 2301:( 2273:n 2271:♠ 2214:§ 2137:( 1894:. 1863:( 1824:( 1717:( 1614:( 1556:( 1535:( 1514:( 1439:( 1405:n 1403:♠ 1373:( 1339:n 1337:♠ 1297:( 1252:( 1225:( 1201:( 1114:( 989:( 938:) 930:( 890:( 868:( 819:( 769:. 691:. 666:( 620:( 547:( 481:( 408:) 400:( 374:) 366:( 334:( 308:( 272:( 231:( 204:) 196:( 165:) 157:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index