146:
applies to
Poulnabrone - people get out of the car, walk over, take a picture, walk back. Leamaneh is (IIRC) on private property and (strictly speaking) off limits for visitors. Since we do not have visitor numbers we can't use a threshold of, say, XXX visits per year or more means it gets included in the box. There is also the question·what the purpose of such a tourism navbox is on WP as opposed to Wikivoyage. Since I never use the latter I do like having this box on WP - but in a consistent encyclopedia there should also be boxes like this for the other counties...
215:, I'm posting this here. Maybe it is hard to see in the header, but I can't find it where it is now, buried in the middle of the list. I certainly don't expect the link to the main subject in the row to be that many entries deep in the list, even if it is alphabetically sorted. Certainly we can find some more prominent spot for it, perhaps the first list entry? -
97:
It was more a suggestion than a request. The cathedral does deserve a page...unfortunately, all my local interest books including those very detailed
Cunningham publications from the 1980s and 1990s are on the bookshelf in our house in Ireland. :-( I'll see if I can scrape sth together with my meager
48:
I have put
Kilfenora in the list because Kilfenora Cathedral redirects to Kilfenora. The same with Carrigaholt Castle.But you are free to write and article about the cathedral or castle and then I will change the link. On the other hand: this was the first start: tweaking and polishing has to be done
121:
The purist original author of this template is rather concerned about the way this template is developing. My idea was to have an overview of the touristical sites that tourist could visit or participate in. These are still in the list. But it seems that now also "photo opportunities" are listed
145:
I know what you mean. Feel free to remove anything you don't think appropriate or sufficiently "touristy". However, the selection will be somewhat arbitrary anyway - ruins like Dough or
Shanmuckinish are basically also just photo ops for most people. If you think about it for a moment that even
163:
Strange enough, we do not have a separate article about
National Park The Burren (only about the entire region). And I am deeply worried about the aggressive advertising by the "Clare Heritage and Genealogical Research Centre", claiming that they are now
186:
Yeah, well. Unfortunately, this is supported by the
National Park website. It is some sort of private-public cooperation, I guess. I personally like the Kilfenora place better, too. It was really quaint back in the 1980s. :-)
76:
222:
211:
I moved the link for the Burren to that row's header back in March, but that was reverted rather quickly. (I just saw it today, hence the long delay.) Per
92:
21:
Purists might argue with having a tourism navbox that includes a hodgepodge of stuff like commercial enterprises, historic sites/buildings and villages.
241:
139:
196:
181:
155:
111:
62:
98:
sources here. Another question is whether a topic "tourism in Co Clare" that is encyclopedic and not guide-booky :-) would benefit from a link to
42:
206:
188:
147:
103:
34:
16:
25:, for example, is a regular entry for the town - not for the cathedral. So if that qualifies why not include other places like
160:
Poulnabrone has some visitor amenities and information boards. Doonagore, Dough and
Leamanah not. (own research, I know)
99:
235:
175:
133:
86:
56:
8:
219:
72:
68:
192:
151:
123:
107:
38:
230:
170:
128:
81:
51:
216:
212:
168:
Burren
Infomation Centre, often displacing the much older Kilfenora centre.
26:
22:
30:
67:
At your request I have changed the links "Carrigaholt" into
102:, illustrating a way things went wrong in the past.
126:, a private house). I am not happy with that.
228:I have made it bold, that should be enough.
13:
14:
253:
71:(redirect) and "Kilfenora" into
17:Somewhat arbitrary selection....
1:
207:Location of "The Burren" link
7:
197:16:18, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
182:13:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
156:13:11, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
140:11:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
112:22:43, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
93:18:22, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
63:17:55, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
43:16:11, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
10:
258:
100:Mullaghmore, County Clare
242:09:18, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
223:04:23, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
77:Burren Display Centre
73:Kilfenora Cathedral
69:Carrigaholt Castle
33:in this navbox??
249:
240:
233:
180:
173:
138:
131:
124:Doonagore Castle
91:
84:
61:
54:
257:
256:
252:
251:
250:
248:
247:
246:
231:
229:
209:
171:
169:
129:
127:
82:
80:
75:(redirect) and
52:
50:
19:
12:
11:
5:
255:
245:
244:
208:
205:
204:
203:
202:
201:
200:
199:
161:
119:
118:
117:
116:
115:
114:
18:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
254:
243:
239:
238:
234:
227:
226:
225:
224:
221:
218:
214:
198:
194:
190:
185:
184:
183:
179:
178:
174:
167:
162:
159:
158:
157:
153:
149:
144:
143:
142:
141:
137:
136:
132:
125:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
94:
90:
89:
85:
78:
74:
70:
66:
65:
64:
60:
59:
55:
47:
46:
45:
44:
40:
36:
32:
28:
24:
236:
210:
176:
165:
134:
120:
87:
57:
27:Ballyvaughan
20:
79:(redlink).
232:The Banner
172:The Banner
130:The Banner
83:The Banner
53:The Banner
23:Kilfenora
213:WP:BRD
189:Drow69
148:Drow69
122:(like
104:Drow69
35:Drow69
31:Fanore
217:happy
49:yet.
237:talk
220:5214
193:talk
177:talk
152:talk
135:talk
108:talk
88:talk
58:talk
39:talk
166:the
29:or
195:)
154:)
110:)
41:)
191:(
150:(
106:(
37:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.