186:
recording the years of kings, as described above. Thiele's inductive method, then, was based on inscriptional evidence from the ancient Near East, and not on the presuppositions followed by liberal scholarship. It is Thiele's method that has produced the determinative studies for the chronology of the kingdom period, not the presupposition-based method, so that even those interpreters who continue in late-date theories for the authorship of
Scripture have recognized the credibility of Thiele's scholarship in determining the date for the division of the kingdom after the death of Solomon, as cited above. The work of Thiele and other textual scholars who have followed an inductive (evidence-based) approach is therefore significant in providing an alternative to the methods of the documentary hypothesis, and the success of that approach has been seen as theologically significant in supporting a high view of the inspiration of Scripture, particularly regarding its integrity in the abundant and complex historical data related to the kingdom period.
1899:'R. Kittel: “Wellhausen has shown, by convincing reasons, that the synchronisms within the Book of Kings cannot possibly rest on ancient tradition, but are on the contrary simply the products of artificial reckoning.. . .”5 Theodore H. Robinson: “Wellhausen is surely right in believing that the synchronisms in Kings are worthless, being merely a late compilation from the actual figures given.”6 S. R. and G. R. Driver: “Since, however, it is clear on various grounds that these synchronisms are not original, any attempt to base a chronological scheme on them may be disregarded.”7 Karl Marti: “Almost along the whole line, the discrepancy between synchronisms and years of reign is incurable.”8 TMSJ 18:1 (Spring 2007) p. 102 Cyrus Gordon: “The numerical errors in the Books of Kings have defied every attempt to ungarble them. Those errors are largely the creation of the editors. . . . he editors did not execute the synchronisms skillfully.”9', Young, Roger C, 'Inductive And Deductive Methods As Applied To OT Chronology',
1914:' The most thorough work in this regard was Leslie McFall’s 1991 article in Bibliotheca Sacra.22 McFall made his way through the reign lengths and synchronisms of Kings and Chronicles, and using an exact notation that indicated whether the years were being measured according to Judah’s Tishri years or Israel’s Nisan years, he was able to produce a chronology for the divided monarchies that was consistent with all the scriptural texts chosen. That was the logical outgrowth of Thiele’s work, and it attained a holy grail that had been sought for twenty-two centuries, namely a rational explanation of the chronological data of the Hebrew monarchies that was consistent with the scriptural texts used to construct the chronology, and also consistent with several fixed dates from Assyrian and Babylonian history.', Young, Roger, 'Inductive And Deductive Methods As Applied To OT Chronology', Master's Seminary Journal Volume 18. 2007 (1) (105–106). Sun Valley, CA: The Master's Seminary.
1863:'In a 1996 article, Kenneth Strand wrote, “What has generally not been given due notice is the effect that Thiele’s clarification of the Hebrew chronology of this period of history has had in furnishing a corrective for various dates in ancient Assyrian and Babylonian history.”28 The purpose of Strand’s article was to show that Thiele’s methodology accomplished more than just producing a coherent chronology from scriptural data. His chronology, once produced, proved useful in settling some troublesome problems in Assyrian and Babylonian history. As Strand pointed out, this outcome was quite the opposite of what some of Thiele’s critics asserted, namely that Thiele merely juggled the scriptural data until he could match generally accepted dates from the surrounding nations.', Young, Roger, 'Inductive And Deductive Methods As Applied To OT Chronology', Master's Seminary Journal Volume 18. 2007 (1) (112–113). Sun Valley, CA: The Master's Seminary.
1923:'Grabbe suggests that the names and sequence of kings in Israel and Judah, and their approximate chronological placement, agrees with what can be gleaned from extra-biblical sources. To this extent the biblical framework (meaning primarily 1 and 2 Kings) is reliable: even if we had no external sources we could have reasonable confidence in the biblical sequence of Jeroboam I, Nadab, Baasha, Elah, Omri, Ahab, Jehu, etc. in Samaria, and David, Solomon, Rehoboam, Abijam, Asa, Jehoshaphat, etc. in Jerusalem, along with their interrelationships. Beyond that it starts to get more and more tricky, with decreasing reliability in the biblical narrative as the detail increases (this is a general statement, and there are sometimes exceptions in specific instances).', Grabbe, L. L. (2007). Reflections on the Discussion. In L. L. Grabbe (Ed.), Ahab Agonistes: The Rise and Fall of the Omri Dynasty (L. L. Grabbe, Ed.) (337). London: T&T Clark.
1890:'It remained then for others to complete the application of principles that Thiele used elsewhere, thereby providing a chronology for the eighth-century kings of Judah that is in complete harmony with the reign lengths and synchronisms given in 2 Kings and 2 Chronicles. The most thorough work in this regard was Leslie McFall’s 1991 article in Bibliotheca Sacra.22 McFall made his way through the reign lengths and synchronisms of Kings and Chronicles, and using an exact notation that indicated whether the years were being measured according to Judah’s Tishri years or Israel’s Nisan years, he was able to produce a chronology for the divided monarchies that was consistent with all the scriptural texts chosen.', Young, Roger, 'Inductive And Deductive Methods As Applied To OT Chronology', Master's Seminary Journal Volume 18. 2007 (1) (105–106). Sun Valley, CA: The Master's Seminary.
1689:'Driver described Thiele’s system as an “important work, which comes very near to, if it does not actually reach, a final solution of the problem of the dates of the kings of Israel and Judah.” Even a critic of Thiele’s system who accused him of manipulating variable factors to achieve his goal of fitting the biblical evidence into Near Eastern history and who described his work as “more a study in numerical ingenuity than in scholarly research” had to admit that “Thiele’s assumption is validated by the results achieved: inner consistency and harmony and conformity with the fixed dates of ancient Near Eastern history.”', McFall, Leslie, 'A Translation Guide to the Chronological Data in Kings and Chronicles', Bibliotheca Sacra Volume 148. 1991 (589) (4). Dallas, TX: Dallas Theological Seminary.
191:
consistent with
Assyrian and Babylonian chronology. This mathematical demonstration should sit in judgment over the various theories of text formation: If a theory of text formation cannot explain how the chronological data of the MT has produced a chronology that in every respect seems authentic for the four centuries of the monarchic period, then that theory must be rejected as another example of a presupposition-based approach that cannot meet the rational criteria for credibility.
1743:'Following Thiele’s revolutionary work, The Mysterious Numbers of the Hebrew Kings, a consensus has emerged that the kingdom under Solomon divided at his death in 931 BC. This date must be the starting point for any chronological reconstruction of previous events.', Merrill, Eugene H, ‘Fixed Dates in Patriarchal Chronology’, Bibliotheca Sacra Volume 137. 1980 (547) (237). Dallas, TX: Dallas Theological Seminary.
1725:'The numerous extrabiblical synchronisms he invokes do not always reflect the latest refinements in Assyriological research (cf. E.2.f below). In many cases, he posits an undocumented event in order to save a biblical datum (e.g., the circumstances surrounding the appointment of Jeroboam II as coregent; Thiele 1983: 109)', Freedman, DN (1996). Vol. 1: The Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (1006). New York: Doubleday.
1881:'While also somewhat conservative in his approach to the figures in MT, Tadmor’s pragmatic reconstruction delves into the process by which the redactor(s) of Kings compiled their chronological framework from heterogeneous materials, sometimes leaving traces in textual inconsistencies (Tadmor EncMiqr 4: 45).', Freedman, D. N. (1996). Vol. 1: The Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (1006). New York: Doubleday.
1872:'H. Tadmor (EncMiqr 4: 245–310) bases his chronology upon considerations similar to those of Begrich and Thiele, but assumes far fewer systemic fluctuations; items which are inexplicable are regarded as late editorial calculations or errors.', Freedman, D. N. (1996). Vol. 1: The Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (1006). New York: Doubleday.
1375:
numerous specific points in his chronology, his work has won considerable praise even from those who disagree with his final conclusions. Nevertheless, even scholars sharing Thiele's religious convictions have maintained that there are weaknesses in his argument such as unfounded assumptions and assumed circular reasoning.
1637:'Despite that fact of scholarly dedication, neither Thiele’s carefully argued University of Chicago dissertation, nor anyone else’s, has achieved as yet universal acceptance.', Kaiser, WC (1998). A history of Israel: From the bronze age through the Jewish Wars (293). Nashville, TN: Broadman & Holman Publishers.
1680:'but his harmonizing approach has not gone unchallenged, especially because of the many shifts in the basis of reckoning dates that it requires (e.g., Jepsen 1968: 34–35)—shifts which were unlikely in actual practice.', Freedman, DN (1996). Vol. 1: The Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (1006). New York: Doubleday.
1374:
wrote “The chronology most widely accepted today is one based on the meticulous study by Thiele,” and, more recently, Leslie McFall: “Thiele’s chronology is fast becoming the consensus view among Old
Testament scholars, if it has not already reached that point.” Although criticism has been leveled at
185:
of the scholars, since diverse presuppositions produce diverse results." In contrast, Thiele's method of determining the chronology of the Hebrew kings was based on induction, that is, making it a matter of first priority to determine the actual methods used by ancient scribes and court recorders in
70:
method in the other. Under the accession year method, if a king died in the middle of a year, the period to the end of that year would be called the "accession year" of the new king, whose Year 1 would begin at the new year. Under the non-accession year method the period to the end of the year would
61:
had a cumulative error of 1 year for each succeeding reign of the kings of Israel: the first cross-reference resulted in an error of 1 year, the second gave an error of 2 years, the third of 3 years and so on. He explained this pattern as a result of two different methods of reckoning regnal years:
145:
of Judah towards the end of the kingdom of Israel and reluctantly concluded that at that point the ancient authors had made a mistake. Oddly, it is at that precise point that he himself makes a mistake, by failing to realize that
Hezekiah had a coregency with his father Ahaz, which explains the
180:
Wellhausen's methodology in interpreting the
Scriptures and the history of Israel has therefore been classed by RK Harrison as a deductive approach; that is, one that starts with presuppositions and derives a historical reconstruction from those presuppositions. A necessary consequence of this
1384:
This citation, from a critic of Thiele's system, demonstrates the difference mentioned above between the deductive approach based on presuppositions and an inductive approach based on data, not a priori assumptions. Thiele is criticized here for basing his theories on data or evidence, not on
1369:
Thiele's chronological reconstruction has not been accepted by all scholars, nor has any other scholar's work in this field. Yet the work of Thiele and those who followed in his steps has achieved acceptance across a wider spectrum than that of any comparable chronology, so that
Assyriologist
1408:
Scholarly attitudes towards the
Biblical record of the Israelite monarchies from the late nineteenth century to the mid-twentieth century were largely disparaging, treating the records as essentially fictional and dismissing the value of the regnal synchronisms. In contrast, modern scholarly
1379:
In his desire to resolve the discrepancies between the data in the Book of Kings, Thiele was forced to make improbable suppositions… There is no basis for Thiele's statement that his conjectures are correct because he succeeded in reconciling most of the data in the Book of Kings, since his
1388:
Despite these criticisms Thiele's methodological treatment remains the typical starting point of scholarly treatments of the subject, and his work is considered to have established the date of the division of the
Israelite kingdom. This has found independent support in the work of J. Liver,
190:
If the chronological data of the MT were not authentic—the actual dates and synchronisms for these various kings—then neither Thiele nor McFall nor anyone else could have constructed a chronology from them that in every case is faithful to the original texts and in every proven instance is
1405:, and his work has also been used by scholars in other disciplines to establish Assyrian and Babylonian dates. Criticism of Thiele's reconstruction led to further research which has refined or even departed from his synthesis. Notable studies of this type include work by Tadmor and McFall.
181:
approach has been that no general agreement has been reached on the chronology of the Hebrew kingdom period as calculated by authors who adopted this method. "The disadvantage of the deductive approach is that nothing is settled for certain; the results obtained are as diverse as the
56:
However, some of the biblical cross references did not seem to match, so that a reign which is said to have lasted for 20 years results in a cross reference that would give a result of either 19 or 21 years. Thiele noticed that the cross references given during the long reign of King
1628:'Not all scholars are convinced by this solution, and commentators on the prophetic books often accept that dates can only be approximate.', McConville, G (2002). Exploring the Old Testament, Volume 4: The Prophets (viii). London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.
44:
The chronology of the kings of Israel and Judah rests primarily on a series of reign lengths and cross references within the books of Kings and
Chronicles, in which the accession of each king is dated in terms of the reign of his contemporary in either the southern
169:. Wellhausen taught that the chronological data of the books of Kings and Chronicles were artificially put together at a date much later than the events they were ostensibly describing and were basically not historical. This was a necessary consequence of his
1409:
attitudes to the monarchical chronology and synchronisms in 1 and 2 Kings has been far more positive subsequent to the work of Thiele and those who have developed his thesis further, a change in attitude to which recent archaeology has contributed.
1393:, and others studying the chronology of the kings of Tyre. Thiele's work has found widespread recognition and use across various related scholarly disciplines. His date of 931 BCE, in conjunction with the synchronism between Rehoboam and Pharaoh
89:
Unknown to Thiele when he first published his findings, these same conclusions that the northern kingdom used non-accession years and a spring New Year while the southern kingdom used accession years and a fall New Year had been discovered by
1734:'Thiele’s work has become a cornerstone of much recent chronological discussion (cf. De Vries IDB 1: 580–99; IDBSup: 161–66);', Freedman, D. N. (1996). Vol. 1: The Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (1006). New York: Doubleday.
134:
paying tribute in 841 BC. As these two events are dated by
Assyrian chronology as being 12 years apart, Ahab must have fought the Assyrians in his last year and Jehu paid tribute in his first year.
177:
summarized this position as follows: "Wellhausen is surely right in believing that the synchronisms in Kings are worthless, being merely a late compilation from the actual figures given."
173:
assumption that the biblical books as we have them today were the work of late-date editors who could not possibly have known the correct history of the times they were writing about.
71:
be Year 1 of the new king and Year 2 would begin at the start of the new year. Israel appears to have used the non-accession method, while Judah used the accession method until
86:. The cumulative impact of differing new years and different methods of calculating reigns explained, to Thiele, most of the apparent inconsistencies in the cross references.
36:. The book is considered the classic and comprehensive work in reckoning the accession of kings, calendars, and co-regencies, based on biblical and extra-biblical sources.
1461:, rev. ed. (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1998), p. 249. See also, in the notes below, the list of scholars who accept his date for the beginning of the divided kingdom.
1453:
3, Part 1, p. 445). Thiele's chronology with the slight modifications of Leslie McFall, ("A Translation Guide to the Chronological Data in Kings and Chronicles,"
1850:(Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1991), pp. 29-55, and also in Rodger C. Young, "Three Verifications of Thiele's Date for the Beginning of the Divided Kingdom,"
33:
1901:
1667:
146:
Hoshea/Hezekiah synchronisms. This correction has been supplied by subsequent writers who built on Thiele's work, including Thiele's colleague
137:
Thiele was able to reconcile the Biblical chronological data from the books of Kings and Chronicles with the exception of synchronisms between
1808:
1980:
1513:
1428:, (1st ed.; New York: Macmillan, 1951; 2d ed.; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1965; 3rd ed.; Grand Rapids: Zondervan/Kregel, 1983).
1965:
1445:
Thiele's chronology is accepted in several recent study Bibles, and is the chronology used for the Hebrew monarchs in the
1960:
1955:
25:
1652:
32:. The book was originally his doctoral dissertation and is widely regarded as the definitive work on the chronology of
1433:
1970:
1591:
1950:
1710:
1402:
1935:
182:
161:
Thiele's method in arriving at his chronology has been contrasted with the analytical method employed by
50:
174:
75:
seized power in Judah, when Israel's non-accession method appears to have been adopted in Judah.
166:
1700:
508:
78:
In addition, Thiele also concluded that Israel counted years starting in the spring month of
8:
1975:
893:
731:
1706:
1429:
1390:
1228:
1110:
910:
782:
637:
582:
162:
1616:
797:
746:
652:
597:
441:
123:
46:
1820:
J. Liver, "The Chronology of Tyre at the Beginning of the First Millennium B.C.,"
1522:
393:
360:
155:
131:
91:
29:
1371:
151:
147:
119:
1905:
Volume 48. 2005 (2) (233). Lynchburg, VA: The Evangelical Theological Society.
1944:
1765:
1398:
1150:
127:
1449:(T. C. Mitchell, "Israel and Judah until the Revolt of Jehu (931-841 B.C.)"
195:
475:
408:
114:
were really 12 years. This enabled him to date their reigns precisely, for
58:
94:
of Belgium some years previously, a fact which Thiele acknowledges in his
834:
541:
1394:
1296:
307:
53:, and fitting them into the chronology of other ancient civilizations.
1584:
1260:
458:
1502:, 1st ed., JD Douglas, editor; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1962, p. 217.
1473:, 3rd ed., p. 59, n. 17, citing V. Coucke, "Chronique biblique," in
1330:
1073:
982:
701:
322:
142:
72:
106:
Based on his conclusions, Thiele showed that the 14 years between
1543:(New York: Meridian Books, 1957) p. 151, originally published as
1380:
assumptions… are derived from the chronological data themselves…"
927:
329:
1186:
1054:
942:
850:
138:
83:
1486:
Siegfried H. Horn, "The Chronology of King Hezekiah’s Reign,"
1585:"Inductive and Deductive Methods as Applied to OT Chronology"
1401:, is used by Egyptologists to give absolute dates to Egypt's
999:
492:
79:
122:
which records the Assyrian advance into Syria/Israel at the
82:, while Judah counted years starting in the autumn month of
1848:
Studies in the Chronology of the Divided Monarchy of Israel
1794:, "Israel and Judah until the Revolt of Jehu," pp. 445-446.
1015:
686:
526:
115:
111:
107:
1846:
A summary of these studies is found in William H. Barnes,
1457:
148 , pp. 3-45) is accepted in Jack Finegan's influential
196:
Chronology of the Hebrew kings according to Thiele's work
1034:
1029:
423:
1833:
Frank M. Cross, "An Interpretation of the Nora Stone,"
1069:
1835:
Bulletin of the American School of Oriental Research
24:(1951) is a reconstruction of the chronology of the
1665:Leslie McFall, “The Chronology of Saul and David,”
1609:
The Reconstructed Chronology of the Divided Kingdom
226:
1942:
231:
213:
1770:The Chronology of the Kings of Israel and Judah
1702:The Chronology of the Kings of Israel and Judah
165:and other scholars who follow some form of the
1902:Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society
1668:Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society
1607:Rodger C. Young, review of Christine Tetley's
1569:R. K. Harrison, "The Critical Use of the OT,"
1803:Israel Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman,
1089:
1007:
1004:
400:
1047:
1045:
1042:
1039:
1026:
1024:
1013:
435:
433:
431:
428:
421:
419:
417:
406:
1426:The Mysterious Numbers of the Hebrew Kings
21:The Mysterious Numbers of the Hebrew Kings
1611:(Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2005), in
1936:Tabular summary of Thiele's chronologies
126:in 853 BC, and Jehu is mentioned on the
1943:
1807:(New York: Free Press, 2001), p. 131 (
1781:McFall, "Translation Guide," p. 33-34.
1475:Supplément au Dictionnaire de la Bible
962:
957:
872:
867:
314:
39:
1698:
1582:
241:
236:
218:
1656:(Leicester: Intervarsity, 1993), 27.
1541:Prolegomena to the History of Israel
223:
210:
1852:Andrews University Seminary Studies
1613:Andrews University Seminary Studies
1488:Andrews University Seminary Studies
13:
1653:Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries
1545:Prolegomena zur Geschichte Israels
1511:
14:
1992:
1981:Books about the ancient Near East
1929:
1477:, ed. Louis Pirot, vol. 1, 1928.
1917:
1908:
1893:
1884:
1875:
1866:
1857:
1840:
1827:
1814:
1797:
1784:
1775:
1759:
1746:
1737:
1728:
1719:
1692:
1683:
1674:
1659:
1640:
1631:
1622:
1601:
1576:
1459:Handbook of Biblical Chronology
1103:
1100:
1097:
1094:
1087:
1084:
1082:
1071:
1010:
997:
403:
398:
391:
1563:
1550:
1533:
1505:
1493:
1480:
1464:
1439:
1418:
101:
1:
1772:(Leiden: Brill, 1996), p. 14.
1593:The Master's Seminary Journal
1412:
1521:, p. 12, archived from
1364:
26:kingdoms of Israel and Judah
16:1951 book by Edwin R. Thiele
7:
1966:History books about Judaism
1596:, vol. 18, p. 102
10:
1997:
1961:History books about Israel
1956:20th-century history books
1822:Israel Exploration Journal
1615:45:2 (2007), pp. 282-283 (
1346:
1312:
1276:
1244:
1210:
1202:
1166:
1130:
1125:
1061:
989:
934:
917:
900:
842:
839:
813:
789:
762:
738:
714:
693:
668:
644:
617:
612:
589:
561:
556:
533:
516:
513:
499:
482:
465:
448:
375:
341:
205:
1792:Cambridge Ancient History
1573:(Jan–Mar 1989) pp. 12–20.
1560:(Oxford, 1932) I, p. 454.
1447:Cambridge Ancient History
975:
973:
970:
967:
954:
951:
940:
886:
883:
880:
877:
864:
861:
848:
317:
312:
305:
291:
284:
265:
258:
202:
1837:208 (1972) p. 17, n. 11.
1583:Young, Rodger C (2007),
298:
277:
270:
253:
248:
1971:Religious studies books
1854:45 (2007), pp. 179-187.
1699:Galil, Gershon (1996),
1547:(Berlin: Reimer, 1878).
1951:1951 non-fiction books
1671:53 (2010) 215, n. 101.
1556:Theodore H. Robinson,
1382:
193:
167:documentary hypothesis
66:method in one and the
1377:
188:
158:, and Leslie McFall.
1824:3 (1953), p. 113-120
1705:, Brill, p. 4,
1500:New Bible Dictionary
118:is mentioned in the
1805:The Bible Unearthed
1558:A History of Israel
1539:Julius Wellhausen,
1490:2 (1964) pp. 48–49.
40:Biblical chronology
1790:T. C. Mitchell in
1646:Donald J Wiseman,
1471:Mysterious Numbers
603:son of Jehoshaphat
96:Mysterious Numbers
68:non-accession year
1571:Bibliotheca Sacra
1515:Translation Guide
1455:Bibliotheca Sacra
1385:presuppositions.
1362:
1361:
1337:
1303:
1267:
1235:
1217:
1193:
1157:
1117:
1080:
1022:
949:
859:
804:
753:
659:
604:
548:
415:
367:
332:
301:
296:
289:
282:
275:
268:
263:
256:
251:
244:
239:
234:
221:
216:
175:Theodore Robinson
163:Julius Wellhausen
51:Kingdom of Israel
1988:
1924:
1921:
1915:
1912:
1906:
1897:
1891:
1888:
1882:
1879:
1873:
1870:
1864:
1861:
1855:
1844:
1838:
1831:
1825:
1818:
1812:
1801:
1795:
1788:
1782:
1779:
1773:
1763:
1757:
1750:
1744:
1741:
1735:
1732:
1726:
1723:
1717:
1715:
1696:
1690:
1687:
1681:
1678:
1672:
1663:
1657:
1644:
1638:
1635:
1629:
1626:
1620:
1605:
1599:
1597:
1589:
1580:
1574:
1567:
1561:
1554:
1548:
1537:
1531:
1529:
1527:
1520:
1512:McFall, Leslie,
1509:
1503:
1497:
1491:
1484:
1478:
1468:
1462:
1443:
1437:
1422:
1335:
1302:son of Jehoiakim
1301:
1265:
1233:
1211:
1191:
1155:
1115:
1078:
1020:
947:
857:
802:
751:
706:daughter of Ahab
657:
602:
546:
413:
365:
327:
299:
292:
285:
278:
271:
266:
259:
254:
249:
242:
237:
232:
219:
214:
200:
199:
124:Battle of Qarqar
49:or the northern
47:Kingdom of Judah
1996:
1995:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1987:
1986:
1985:
1941:
1940:
1932:
1927:
1922:
1918:
1913:
1909:
1898:
1894:
1889:
1885:
1880:
1876:
1871:
1867:
1862:
1858:
1845:
1841:
1832:
1828:
1819:
1815:
1802:
1798:
1789:
1785:
1780:
1776:
1764:
1760:
1751:
1747:
1742:
1738:
1733:
1729:
1724:
1720:
1713:
1697:
1693:
1688:
1684:
1679:
1675:
1664:
1660:
1645:
1641:
1636:
1632:
1627:
1623:
1606:
1602:
1587:
1581:
1577:
1568:
1564:
1555:
1551:
1538:
1534:
1525:
1518:
1510:
1506:
1498:
1494:
1485:
1481:
1469:
1465:
1444:
1440:
1436:, 9780825438257
1423:
1419:
1415:
1367:
1348:
1334:
1314:
1300:
1278:
1264:
1232:
1215:
1213:
1204:
1190:
1168:
1156:son of Manasseh
1154:
1132:
1127:
1116:son of Hezekiah
1114:
1091:
1077:
1036:
1031:
1019:
964:
959:
946:
874:
869:
856:
854:
815:
801:
764:
750:
716:
705:
656:
619:
614:
601:
563:
558:
545:
425:
412:
377:
366:son of Rehoboam
364:
343:
326:
294:
287:
280:
273:
261:
228:
198:
183:presuppositions
156:Kenneth Kitchen
132:Shalmaneser III
104:
92:Valerius Coucke
42:
30:Edwin R. Thiele
17:
12:
11:
5:
1994:
1984:
1983:
1978:
1973:
1968:
1963:
1958:
1953:
1939:
1938:
1931:
1930:External links
1928:
1926:
1925:
1916:
1907:
1892:
1883:
1874:
1865:
1856:
1839:
1826:
1813:
1796:
1783:
1774:
1758:
1745:
1736:
1727:
1718:
1711:
1691:
1682:
1673:
1658:
1639:
1630:
1621:
1600:
1575:
1562:
1549:
1532:
1504:
1492:
1479:
1463:
1438:
1424:Edwin Thiele,
1416:
1414:
1411:
1391:Frank M. Cross
1366:
1363:
1360:
1359:
1357:
1355:
1353:
1350:
1345:
1343:
1340:
1338:
1326:
1325:
1323:
1321:
1319:
1316:
1311:
1309:
1306:
1304:
1292:
1291:
1288:
1286:
1283:
1280:
1275:
1273:
1270:
1268:
1256:
1255:
1253:
1251:
1249:
1246:
1243:
1241:
1238:
1236:
1224:
1223:
1220:
1218:
1209:
1206:
1201:
1199:
1196:
1194:
1182:
1181:
1178:
1176:
1173:
1170:
1165:
1163:
1160:
1158:
1146:
1145:
1142:
1140:
1137:
1134:
1129:
1124:
1121:
1118:
1106:
1105:
1102:
1099:
1096:
1093:
1088:
1086:
1083:
1081:
1070:
1067:
1066:
1063:
1060:
1058:
1050:
1049:
1046:
1044:
1041:
1038:
1033:
1028:
1025:
1023:
1012:
1009:
1006:
1003:
995:
994:
991:
988:
986:
978:
977:
974:
972:
969:
966:
961:
956:
953:
950:
948:son of Azariah
939:
936:
933:
931:
923:
922:
919:
916:
914:
906:
905:
902:
899:
897:
889:
888:
885:
882:
879:
876:
871:
866:
863:
860:
858:son of Amaziah
847:
844:
841:
838:
830:
829:
826:
823:
820:
817:
812:
810:
807:
805:
794:
791:
788:
786:
778:
777:
774:
772:
769:
766:
761:
759:
756:
754:
752:son of Ahaziah
743:
740:
737:
735:
727:
726:
724:
722:
720:
718:
713:
711:
709:
707:
698:
695:
692:
690:
682:
681:
678:
676:
673:
670:
667:
665:
662:
660:
658:son of Jehoram
649:
646:
643:
641:
633:
632:
629:
627:
624:
621:
616:
611:
608:
605:
594:
591:
588:
586:
578:
577:
574:
571:
568:
565:
560:
555:
552:
549:
538:
535:
532:
530:
522:
521:
518:
515:
512:
504:
503:
501:
498:
496:
488:
487:
484:
481:
479:
471:
470:
467:
464:
462:
454:
453:
450:
447:
445:
437:
436:
434:
432:
430:
427:
422:
420:
418:
416:
405:
402:
399:
397:
389:
388:
386:
384:
382:
379:
374:
372:
370:
368:
356:
355:
352:
350:
348:
345:
340:
338:
335:
333:
319:
316:
313:
311:
303:
302:
297:
290:
283:
276:
269:
264:
257:
252:
246:
245:
240:
235:
230:
225:
222:
217:
212:
208:
207:
204:
197:
194:
152:T. C. Mitchell
148:Siegfried Horn
141:of Israel and
103:
100:
64:accession year
41:
38:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1993:
1982:
1979:
1977:
1974:
1972:
1969:
1967:
1964:
1962:
1959:
1957:
1954:
1952:
1949:
1948:
1946:
1937:
1934:
1933:
1920:
1911:
1904:
1903:
1896:
1887:
1878:
1869:
1860:
1853:
1849:
1843:
1836:
1830:
1823:
1817:
1810:
1806:
1800:
1793:
1787:
1778:
1771:
1767:
1766:Gershon Galil
1762:
1755:
1749:
1740:
1731:
1722:
1714:
1708:
1704:
1703:
1695:
1686:
1677:
1670:
1669:
1662:
1655:
1654:
1649:
1648:1 and 2 Kings
1643:
1634:
1625:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1604:
1595:
1594:
1586:
1579:
1572:
1566:
1559:
1553:
1546:
1542:
1536:
1528:on 2010-08-27
1524:
1517:
1516:
1508:
1501:
1496:
1489:
1483:
1476:
1472:
1467:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1442:
1435:
1434:0-8254-3825-X
1431:
1427:
1421:
1417:
1410:
1406:
1404:
1400:
1399:1 Kings 14:25
1396:
1392:
1386:
1381:
1376:
1373:
1358:
1356:
1354:
1351:
1344:
1341:
1339:
1336:son of Josiah
1333:
1332:
1328:
1327:
1324:
1322:
1320:
1317:
1310:
1307:
1305:
1299:
1298:
1294:
1293:
1289:
1287:
1284:
1281:
1274:
1271:
1269:
1266:son of Josiah
1263:
1262:
1258:
1257:
1254:
1252:
1250:
1247:
1242:
1239:
1237:
1234:son of Josiah
1231:
1230:
1226:
1225:
1221:
1219:
1207:
1200:
1197:
1195:
1189:
1188:
1184:
1183:
1179:
1177:
1174:
1171:
1164:
1161:
1159:
1153:
1152:
1148:
1147:
1143:
1141:
1138:
1135:
1122:
1119:
1113:
1112:
1108:
1107:
1076:
1075:
1068:
1064:
1059:
1057:
1056:
1052:
1051:
1021:son of Jotham
1018:
1017:
1002:
1001:
996:
992:
987:
985:
984:
980:
979:
945:
944:
937:
932:
930:
929:
925:
924:
920:
915:
913:
912:
908:
907:
903:
898:
896:
895:
891:
890:
853:
852:
845:
837:
836:
832:
831:
827:
824:
821:
818:
811:
808:
806:
800:
799:
795:
792:
787:
785:
784:
780:
779:
775:
773:
770:
767:
760:
757:
755:
749:
748:
744:
741:
736:
734:
733:
729:
728:
725:
723:
721:
719:
712:
710:
708:
704:
703:
699:
696:
691:
689:
688:
684:
683:
679:
677:
674:
671:
666:
663:
661:
655:
654:
650:
647:
642:
640:
639:
635:
634:
630:
628:
625:
622:
609:
606:
600:
599:
595:
592:
587:
585:
584:
580:
579:
575:
572:
569:
566:
553:
550:
544:
543:
539:
536:
531:
529:
528:
524:
523:
519:
511:
510:
506:
505:
502:
497:
495:
494:
490:
489:
485:
480:
478:
477:
473:
472:
468:
463:
461:
460:
456:
455:
451:
446:
444:
443:
439:
438:
414:son of Abijah
411:
410:
396:
395:
390:
387:
385:
383:
380:
373:
371:
369:
363:
362:
358:
357:
353:
351:
349:
346:
339:
336:
334:
331:
325:
324:
320:
310:
309:
304:
247:
209:
201:
192:
187:
184:
178:
176:
172:
168:
164:
159:
157:
153:
149:
144:
140:
135:
133:
129:
128:Black Obelisk
125:
121:
117:
113:
109:
99:
97:
93:
87:
85:
81:
76:
74:
69:
65:
60:
54:
52:
48:
37:
35:
31:
27:
23:
22:
1919:
1910:
1900:
1895:
1886:
1877:
1868:
1859:
1851:
1847:
1842:
1834:
1829:
1821:
1816:
1804:
1799:
1791:
1786:
1777:
1769:
1761:
1753:
1748:
1739:
1730:
1721:
1701:
1694:
1685:
1676:
1666:
1661:
1651:
1647:
1642:
1633:
1624:
1612:
1608:
1603:
1592:
1578:
1570:
1565:
1557:
1552:
1544:
1540:
1535:
1523:the original
1514:
1507:
1499:
1495:
1487:
1482:
1474:
1470:
1466:
1458:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1441:
1425:
1420:
1407:
1403:22nd Dynasty
1387:
1383:
1378:
1368:
1329:
1295:
1259:
1227:
1214:16 Jehoiakim
1185:
1149:
1109:
1072:
1053:
1014:
998:
981:
941:
926:
909:
892:
849:
833:
803:son of Joash
796:
781:
745:
730:
700:
685:
651:
636:
596:
581:
540:
525:
507:
491:
474:
457:
440:
407:
392:
359:
321:
306:
189:
179:
170:
160:
136:
105:
95:
88:
77:
67:
63:
59:Asa of Judah
55:
43:
34:Hebrew Kings
20:
19:
18:
1216:31 Zedekiah
1212:17 Jehoahaz
1192:son of Amon
1079:son of Ahaz
1062:732/1-723/2
1008:740/9-732/1
990:742/1-740/9
840:793/2-782/1
835:Jeroboam II
542:Jehoshaphat
466:886/5-885/4
449:909/8-886/5
401:910/9-909/8
315:931/0-910/9
250:overlapping
102:Conclusions
1976:Chronology
1945:Categories
1712:9004106111
1413:References
1372:DJ Wiseman
1297:Jehoiachin
547:son of Asa
308:Jeroboam I
120:Kurk Stele
1752:Finegan,
1365:Reception
1261:Jehoiakim
1005:752-740/9
935:752-742/1
894:Zechariah
855:(Uzziah)
843:782/1-753
790:798-782/1
739:814/3-798
694:841-814/3
534:874/3-853
517:880-874/3
514:885/4-880
500:885/4-880
295:coregency
267:sole king
227:Accession
1754:Handbook
1331:Zedekiah
1229:Jehoahaz
1111:Manasseh
1074:Hezekiah
983:Pekahiah
732:Jehoahaz
702:Athaliah
323:Rehoboam
233:Reign as
171:a priori
143:Hezekiah
73:Athaliah
1756:p. 249.
1395:Shishak
928:Menahem
911:Shallum
901:753-752
851:Azariah
798:Amaziah
783:Jehoash
664:22 (42)
653:Ahaziah
645:852-841
598:Jehoram
590:853-852
583:Ahaziah
330:Solomon
328:son of
229:age as
203:ISRAEL
1709:
1432:
1308:18 (8)
1203:641/0-
1187:Josiah
1167:643/2-
1131:687/6-
1126:697/6-
1090:716/5-
1055:Hoshea
1035:732/1-
963:740/9-
943:Jotham
868:792/1-
562:870/9-
557:872/1-
442:Baasha
424:911/0-
361:Abijah
342:931/0-
274:regent
262:regent
243:Age at
238:Length
220:Length
206:JUDAH
139:Hoshea
84:Tishri
1588:(PDF)
1526:(PDF)
1519:(PDF)
1169:641/0
1133:643/2
1128:687/6
1092:687/6
1037:716/5
1032:732/1
1000:Pekah
965:732/1
960:740/9
921:0,08
875:740/9
747:Joash
638:Joram
559:870/9
493:Tibni
486:0,02
483:885/4
476:Zimri
426:870/9
394:Nadab
378:911/0
300:death
293:son's
288:birth
286:son's
224:King
215:Reign
211:King
80:Nisan
1809:Link
1707:ISBN
1617:Link
1430:ISBN
1347:597-
1318:0,25
1313:598-
1277:609-
1248:0,25
1151:Amon
1030:735-
1016:Ahaz
958:750-
904:0,5
873:767-
814:796-
763:835-
715:841-
687:Jehu
618:848-
613:853-
527:Ahab
509:Omri
459:Elah
376:913-
281:king
279:sole
255:sole
154:and
116:Ahab
112:Jehu
110:and
108:Ahab
62:the
1650:in
1451:CAH
1397:in
1349:586
1315:597
1290:36
1279:598
1245:609
1222:39
1205:609
1180:24
1144:66
1104:54
1048:40
1011:20
976:44
938:10
918:752
887:68
870:767
846:41
828:54
816:767
793:16
776:46
765:796
742:17
717:835
697:28
680:22
669:841
648:12
631:44
620:841
615:848
576:59
564:848
537:22
520:12
452:24
409:Asa
354:59
344:913
318:22
272:Co-
260:co-
130:of
28:by
1947::
1811:).
1768:,
1590:,
1352:11
1342:21
1285:19
1282:11
1272:25
1240:23
1208:31
1175:17
1162:22
1139:45
1136:55
1123:22
1120:12
1101:44
1098:33
1095:29
1085:25
1065:9
1043:16
1040:16
1027:20
993:2
971:21
968:16
955:36
952:25
884:57
881:33
878:52
865:39
862:16
825:30
822:15
819:29
809:25
771:22
768:40
675:22
626:23
610:37
607:32
593:2
573:54
570:23
567:25
554:38
551:35
469:2
429:41
404:2
347:17
337:41
150:,
98:.
1716:.
1619:)
1598:.
1530:.
1198:8
1172:2
758:7
672:1
623:8
381:3
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.