728:, introduced (in 2016): ""Bright rising sun illuminating the clouds over a featureless horizon" has become such a staple image since the advent of modern photography, it's easy to forget that it had to begin somewhere. Likewise, if George Frederic Watts is remembered at all nowadays it's as the painter of formal portraits of dignitaries and of earnestly portentious paintings with titles like Love and Death and The Slumber of the Ages, not as the painter of dramatic landscapes. After the Deluge is an explicitly religious painting, yet contains no religious imagery of any kind, and is an interesting snapshot of the transition between 19th-century symbolism and 20th-century abstraction. Because this has spent the last century in the backwater of Compton rather than in a high-profile institution like the Tate Gallery or the Yale Center for British Art, there hasn't been all that much written about this particular piece so the article is shorter than usual, but I believe this collates together everything significant that there is to say about it. And yes, I know it looks like I've accidentally cut-and-pasted a chunk of body text into the wikilink but Light and Colour (Goethe's Theory)—The Morning after the Deluge—Moses Writing the Book of Genesis genuinely is the name of Turner's painting of the same subject." - We miss you. Best wishes for whatever you do! --
701:
55:
752:
455:
420:
469:
32:
260:
but not coming in the door. Perhaps some supportive would-be customer would find a way to let you know that there was a problem, and if anyone managed to get past the skunk, it was likely to be mentioned in a small-talk kind of way. But in e-commerce, if there was a big, obvious, solvable problem, you might not find out about it.
259:
In the early days of web commerce, Silicon Valley types told stories about the problem of a skunk in the doorway: If a skunk were standing in the doorway of a brick-and-mortar store, the store employees would notice that nobody was coming inside and would investigate why people were on the sidewalk
558:
Administrators may revoke the rollback user right or impose a block in response to a user who is persistently failing to explain their reverts, regardless of the methods or means that are used to perform the actual reversions. However, they should notify or warn the editor sufficiently first, and
567:
those who have a repeated history of doing so – may have their rollback permissions revoked, regardless of the methods or means that were used to engage in the behavior. Additionally, administrators who persistently misuse rollback may have their administrator permissions revoked, and solely in
287:
I noticed that in your signature in the RfC, it shows a timestamp but not your name. This (as you probably know) happens when you type five tildes instead of four. Maybe try re-signing with four tildes and see if that makes a difference? FWIW I think the fact that five tildes creates a name-less
271:
messages, but I'm not sure that's a sufficient explanation for it going completely unnoticed. I can (and plan to) post the usual sorts of announcements, but I'd appreciate it if some folks would take a look and tell me if I've made it too complicated or irritating first. Thanks,
559:
allow the editor the time and opportunity to respond and explain their reversions before taking any action – there may be justification of which the administrator is not aware (such as reversion of edits made by a banned user). Similarly, editors who persistently engage in
387:
Hey Iri, I see you made a stealth edit in
December, so you might still be skulking around. I'm thinking of running this one at TFA sometime in April; give me a shout if you've got a better idea. I see above that you've been busy lately; hope you're busy and happy. - Dank
670:
Twinkle is the non-standard gadget ("non-standard" meaning, for the moment, "not being turned on by default"). It allows you to add a comment explaining the rollback; in fact, at leat with AGF rollback, it's required (not providing an edit summary stops the rollback).
742:
477:
463:
485:. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from
220:
609:
With
Twinkle rollback, there's an AGF, "neutral," and vandalism option. On top of that, Twinkle provide an opportunity to explain your edits. MediaWiki rollback has neither of these features.
624:
Since the page specifies that "standard" MediaWiki rollback does not allow a custom edit summary, I assume that the edit summary is available through some non-standard method (a gadget?).
264:
757:
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the
496:
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with
763:
744:
576:
I am curious about how we came to have a software-specific set of rules, namely: that if I want to revert an unwanted non-vandalism edit without an explanatory edit summary:
517:
780:
535:
Where the following text refers to "Standard" rollback, it means the usual form of rollback, which does not include the option to provide a custom edit summary.
310:
Double checking, I noticed the same thing; you have a date, there's even fine print provided by a userscript that you created the page, but there's no signature.
237:
Wishing you and yours a Happy New Year, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free and may Janus light your way.
799:
267:
and tell me if there's a skunk in the doorway. It's been listed as an RFC for two and a half days now, with zero responses. Yapperbot is no longer posting
794:
320:
I've used five tildes when noting when I've edited a talk page message. However, if this bug/feature were to disappear tomorrow, I wouldn't miss it much.
489:
is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with
Knowledge policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an
587:
In fact, if you misuse
Twinkle rollback, you can lose access to MediaWiki rollback, but not, apparently, to the tool you were actually misusing.
335:
Fun fact: Unsigned RFC questions were required back in the day. I'm not sure that it makes any difference, but I can add my name later.
716:
486:
46:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.
580:
I can click the MediaWiki rollback button, and I can lose access to MediaWiki rollback for failing to provide an edit summary, but
497:
675:
613:
490:
481:. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Knowledge may not meet the criteria required by
324:
681:
647:
619:
344:
568:
order to remove the rollback user rights from them (although, in practice, such cases would require the intervention of the
493:; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
330:
768:
552:
501:
661:
599:
374:
358:
268:
583:
I can click the
Twinkle rollback button, and I won't lose access to Twinkle rollback for doing exactly the same thing.
301:
436:
281:
569:
297:
180:
178:
176:
174:
172:
170:
168:
166:
164:
162:
160:
158:
156:
154:
152:
150:
148:
146:
144:
142:
140:
138:
136:
134:
132:
130:
128:
126:
124:
122:
120:
118:
116:
114:
112:
110:
108:
106:
104:
102:
100:
17:
448:
393:
522:
380:
362:
98:
96:
94:
92:
90:
88:
86:
84:
82:
38:
635:
unexplained (and non-obvious) reverts, we'll take away whatever tools are making it easy for you to do that.
536:
432:
725:
678:
616:
540:
381:
327:
761:
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
404:
590:
Most of our rules are tool-agnostic, and I wonder whether this one is also meant to be tool-agnostic.
482:
246:
71:
712:
758:
410:
254:
737:
733:
672:
657:
643:
610:
595:
560:
370:
340:
321:
277:
652:
Also, does anyone remember how long it's been since the last admin was de-sysopped over this?
708:
511:
318:
FWIW I think the fact that five tildes creates a name-less signature is a bug not a feature.
444:
59:
8:
293:
54:
700:
528:
242:
729:
667:
653:
639:
606:
591:
544:
366:
336:
307:
273:
210:
776:
506:
464:
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Watts – Hope stamp Jordan 1974 low res.jpg
440:
228:
219:
400:
389:
354:
314:
289:
191:
788:
238:
197:
551:. Since rollback is part of the core administrator tools, an admin could be
539:– editors who misuse standard rollback (for example, by using it to reverse
638:
But it should IMO apply to all the tools, not just to MediaWiki rollback.
361:, is likely a significant source of the non-response. I might go ask the
195:
772:
764:
Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 14 § Museum collections
745:
Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 14 § Museum collections
435:, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made
265:
Knowledge:Requests for comment/When there is no consensus either way
263:
I am here to ask a few talk page stalkers to please take a look at
193:
31:
454:
419:
691:
198:
547:
would normally be expected) may have their rollback rights
531:. guideline. In particular, I'm looking at this language:
537:
Standard rollback may only be used in certain situations
365:
to deliver a generic message to the FRS names for me.
500:. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
786:
478:File:Watts – Hope stamp Jordan 1974 low res.jpg
498:section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion
39:This user is not currently active on Knowledge
800:Wikipedians who opt out of template messages
795:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery
627:It sounds like the actual rule is: If you
553:stripped of their administrative privileges
699:
487:Knowledge:Non-free use rationale guideline
543:edits in situations where an explanatory
217:
53:
14:
787:
399:It's current on for the 27th. - Dank (
42:. Iridescent has not edited Knowledge
62:"assuming good faith" with an editor.
414:
184:
26:
24:
527:Hello, all, today I am looking at
467:
359:Knowledge:Feedback request service
288:signature is a bug not a feature.
269:Knowledge:Feedback request service
25:
811:
750:
453:
431:Hi Iridescent! On behalf of the
418:
218:
30:
555:entirely to remove those tools.
502:media copyright questions page
363:Knowledge:Mass message senders
13:
1:
449:00:27, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
405:23:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
247:14:37, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
523:Brain trust: rollback rules
394:03:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
375:19:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
7:
726:After the Deluge (painting)
382:After the Deluge (painting)
345:22:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
331:01:48, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
302:17:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
282:17:09, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
10:
816:
738:07:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
682:16:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
662:17:17, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
648:17:15, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
620:13:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
600:16:57, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
518:23:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
483:Knowledge:Non-free content
439:and became a Wikipedian!
781:07:25, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
769:categories for discussion
707:
698:
224:
475:Thank you for uploading
357:, and consequently the
472:
353:The apparent death of
63:
44:since 16 December 2023
570:Arbitration Committee
471:
427:Happy First Edit Day!
411:Happy First Edit Day!
255:Skunks in the doorway
60:arbitration committee
57:
724:Thank you today for
441:The Herald (Benison)
491:image copyright tag
743:CfD nomination at
529:Knowledge:Rollback
473:
433:Birthday Committee
64:
771:page. Thank you.
722:
721:
673:I dream of horses
611:I dream of horses
461:
460:
322:I dream of horses
252:
251:
208:
207:
204:
203:
50:
49:
16:(Redirected from
807:
754:
753:
703:
696:
695:
514:
509:
470:
457:
422:
415:
222:
215:
214:
199:
185:
182:
76:
66:
65:
34:
27:
21:
815:
814:
810:
809:
808:
806:
805:
804:
785:
784:
755:
751:
748:
694:
525:
512:
507:
468:
466:
437:your first edit
429:
413:
385:
257:
213:
200:
194:
183:
81:
78:
70:
23:
22:
18:User:Iridescent
15:
12:
11:
5:
813:
803:
802:
797:
759:categorization
749:
747:
741:
720:
719:
705:
704:
693:
690:
689:
688:
687:
686:
685:
684:
664:
636:
625:
585:
584:
581:
574:
573:
556:
524:
521:
465:
462:
459:
458:
451:
430:
425:
423:
412:
409:
408:
407:
384:
379:
378:
377:
355:User:Yapperbot
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
311:
256:
253:
250:
249:
234:
233:
229:Happy New Year
225:
223:
212:
211:Happy New Year
209:
206:
205:
202:
201:
196:
192:
190:
188:
80:
79:
77:
69:
48:
47:
35:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
812:
801:
798:
796:
793:
792:
790:
783:
782:
778:
774:
770:
766:
765:
760:
746:
740:
739:
735:
731:
727:
718:
714:
710:
706:
702:
697:
683:
680:
679:(Neigh at me)
677:
674:
669:
665:
663:
659:
655:
651:
650:
649:
645:
641:
637:
634:
630:
626:
623:
622:
621:
618:
617:(Neigh at me)
615:
612:
608:
604:
603:
602:
601:
597:
593:
588:
582:
579:
578:
577:
571:
566:
562:
557:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
533:
532:
530:
520:
519:
516:
515:
510:
504:. Thank you.
503:
499:
494:
492:
488:
484:
480:
479:
456:
452:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
428:
424:
421:
417:
416:
406:
402:
398:
397:
396:
395:
391:
383:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
346:
342:
338:
334:
333:
332:
329:
328:(Neigh at me)
326:
323:
319:
316:
312:
309:
305:
304:
303:
299:
295:
291:
286:
285:
284:
283:
279:
275:
270:
266:
261:
248:
244:
240:
236:
235:
232:
230:
226:
221:
216:
189:
187:
186:
181:
179:
177:
175:
173:
171:
169:
167:
165:
163:
161:
159:
157:
155:
153:
151:
149:
147:
145:
143:
141:
139:
137:
135:
133:
131:
129:
127:
125:
123:
121:
119:
117:
115:
113:
111:
109:
107:
105:
103:
101:
99:
97:
95:
93:
91:
89:
87:
85:
83:
75:
74:
68:
67:
61:
56:
52:
45:
41:
40:
36:
33:
29:
28:
19:
762:
756:
730:Gerda Arendt
723:
676:(Hoofprints)
668:WhatamIdoing
654:WhatamIdoing
640:WhatamIdoing
632:
629:persistently
628:
614:(Hoofprints)
607:WhatamIdoing
592:WhatamIdoing
589:
586:
575:
564:
561:edit warring
548:
545:edit summary
526:
505:
495:
476:
474:
426:
401:push to talk
390:push to talk
386:
367:WhatamIdoing
337:WhatamIdoing
325:(Hoofprints)
317:
308:WhatamIdoing
274:WhatamIdoing
262:
258:
227:
72:
51:
43:
37:
633:high-volume
508:Vanjagenije
789:Categories
565:especially
541:good-faith
315:Clayoquot
290:Clayoquot
298:contribs
239:Ealdgyth
73:Archives
767:on the
549:removed
773:Ham II
717:places
513:(talk)
713:music
709:story
631:make
777:talk
734:talk
658:talk
644:talk
596:talk
445:talk
371:talk
341:talk
294:talk
278:talk
243:talk
58:The
692:TFA
563:–
791::
779:)
736:)
715:·
711:·
660:)
646:)
598:)
572:).
447:)
403:)
392:)
373:)
343:)
300:)
296:|
280:)
245:)
775:(
732:(
666:@
656:(
642:(
605:@
594:(
443:(
388:(
369:(
339:(
313:@
306:@
292:(
276:(
241:(
231:!
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
