132:
60:". I see it in numerous articles. Someone has read something and tried to write hi own account of what he has read without double-checking his facts. As a result, serious errors get into the article and, because the verifiabily rule is so relaxed, it stays there "pending a citation". Never mind pending, it is unverified so get rid. Immediately.
81:
Please don't give up on us all. I see from the history of your user page that you wrote/developed the articles on
Ansdell, Lytham, St. Anne's, and Squire's Gate stations! Thank you!! There are a lot of us who just want to work on articles. Please reconsider.
144:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before
Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
156:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
63:
A knowledgeable editor comes along who decides that he will highlight the problems and remove rubbish. What happens? Some schoolkid who knows everything and understands nothing reinstates it all.
172:
42:
Only back two or three days and it is already clear as day that the site has not improved one bit. If anything, it is much worse because it is evident that many
190:
121:
53:
reasonable. A good soundbite. Until you realise that what it entails is "any idiot can edit". And they do. There is a whole army of them.
91:
114:
75:
186:
37:
46:
editors whom I encountered in 2013 have long since moved out. The dross, however, remains and there is much more of it.
182:
17:
165:
177:
98:
Seconded. You may need a nice break, but I hope you came back. Are you sure the site ever was any
153:
87:
164:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
8:
111:
140:
122:
149:
83:
103:
161:
67:
157:
107:
57:
168:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
131:
171:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
66:
As I say, the site is a shambles. I have better things to do.
56:
The big problem on here is what the site politely calls "
152:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
102:frustrating for knowledgeable editors? See
34:This user is no longer active on Knowledge.
14:
141:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
24:
25:
203:
138:Hello, Old Lanky. Voting in the
130:
115:18:49, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
92:17:39, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
76:15:20, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
13:
1:
191:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
154:Knowledge arbitration process
38:What a shambles this site is
7:
175:and submit your choices on
10:
208:
183:MediaWiki message delivery
173:the candidates' statements
71:
150:Arbitration Committee
123:ArbCom Elections 2016
166:arbitration policy
125:: Voting now open!
49:"Anyone can edit"
58:original research
16:(Redirected from
199:
134:
31:
30:
21:
207:
206:
202:
201:
200:
198:
197:
196:
195:
194:
178:the voting page
135:
127:
40:
35:
32:
28:
27:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
205:
136:
129:
128:
126:
120:
119:
118:
95:
94:
39:
36:
33:
26:
18:User:Old Lanky
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
204:
193:
192:
188:
184:
180:
179:
174:
169:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
146:
143:
142:
133:
124:
116:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
96:
93:
89:
85:
80:
79:
78:
77:
73:
69:
64:
61:
59:
54:
52:
47:
45:
19:
176:
170:
147:
139:
137:
99:
65:
62:
55:
50:
48:
43:
41:
84:Yngvadottir
162:topic bans
158:site bans
68:Old Lanky
108:Bishonen
104:WP:RANDY
29:Retired
51:sounds
187:talk
148:The
112:talk
100:less
88:talk
72:talk
44:good
189:)
181:.
160:,
110:|
106:.
90:)
74:)
185:(
117:.
86:(
70:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
