3722:
BANWELL, BARBEARY, BARGEN, T BARNARD, BARNETT, BARROW, N BARTLETT, BARTLETT, BARTLETT, BARTLETT, BATES, Ar BATES, Be BATES, Ge BAULK, Ar BAYNES, G BEAN, Fre BEAR, Joh BEARMAN, BECK, Geo BEECHY, J BEESTON, BELCHAMBE BELL, Wil BENNETT, BENNETT, BENTLEY, BEVERLEY, BEX, Will BILLINGHA BILLINS, BIRTLES, BISHOP, G BLACK, Ro BLACKSHAW BLAKE, Ed BLANDFORD BLOOR, Th BOBBETT, BOND, Geo BONNICK, BORAMAN, BORNE, Ja BOSWORTH, BOWEN, Ge BRAGG, Ja BRAIN, Wi BRIDGES, BRINDLEY, BRISCOE, BROAD, Wi BROCKWAY, BROWN, Ro BROWN, Wi BROWNING, BUCKENHAM BUCKINGHA BUNTING, BURDEN, E BURFOOT, BURREN, G BURROWS, BURTON, J BURY, Fre BUSBY, Wa BUTLER, F BUTLER, G BUTLER, R BYNG, Jam CADBY, Wi CADMAN, C CAKE, Wil CAMERON, CANNON, J CARD, Wil CARTER, C CARTER, T CARVIN, C CHAMBERS, CHAPLIN, CHARLTON, CHEATER, CHESWORTH CHILD, Al CHITTY, A CLARK, Wi CLAY, Fra CLAYTON, CLEARY, F COLBECK, COLE, Fra COLLECOTT COLLETT, COLLIER, COLLINS, COLLIS, W COMPTON, CONNOLLEY CONSTABLE COOGAN, J COOK, Fre COOKE, Ho COOMBS, J COOPER, G COOPER, W COPE, Her COSSEY, A COULTHARD COVEY, Je COWLEY, G COX, Henr COX, Jame COX, John COYLE, Jo CROMPTON, CROSS, An CRUSE, Pe CULLINGTO CUMMING, CUNNINGHA CUNNINGHA DABBS, He DAGWELL, DALLAS, W DANIELS, DARBY, Wi DASENT, M DAVEY, Er DAVIS, Ar DAWSON, A DAWSON, J DE STE CR DEAN, Fra DENHAM, H DENNIS, H DEVESON, DEVLIN, J DIAMOND, DIAPER, H DODD, Wil DOHERTY, DOHERTY, DOMINEY, DONNELLY, DOOLEY, S DOVE, Geo DOWLAND, DOWNES, J DOWSON, J DRUMMOND, DUFF, Pet DUFFIN, A DUNCAN, A DUNN, Les DURRANT, DYER, Geo EADES, Ja EAST, Ern ECCLESTON EDWARDS, ELLISON, ELMER, Ge ELSON, Re EPPS, Joh EVANS, Ge EVANS, Jo EVANS, Pe EVANS, Ro EVANS, Wi EVERETT, EWING, Wa EYRE, Jam FALLOWFIE FARINDON, FARTHING, FEAR, Edm FELLOWES, FELLOWS, FERRETT, FERRETT, FERRIMAN, FIELD, Ge FIELDING, FINCKEN, FISKEN, P FITCH, Jo FITZGERAL FLACK, Fr FLANAGAN, FLAVIN, M FLEMING, FLEMING, FLEXMAN, FONEY, Fr FORREST, FORREST, FOSTER, E FOSTER, J FOTHERGIL FOWLER, A FRASER, C FREEMAN, FREEMAN, GALE, Her GALE, Wil GANDER, J GARDNER, GARRETT, GARRETT, GARSDEN, GEARNS, J GEORGE, E GERRARD, GIBBS, Wi GIBSON, W GILDERSLE GILES, Ha GISBORN, GLOVER, F GLOVER, G GOBLE, Al GOMM, Cha GOODFELLO GORDON, J GRACE, Wi GRANT, Sa GREEN, Ge GREEN, Jo GREEN, Jo GREENAN, GREENHILL GREENWOOD GREY, Eri GRINYER, GROOMBRID GROVES, T GROVES, W HACKEN, R HAGAN, Jo HAGAN, Jo HAINES, A HAINSWORT HAMLIN, C HANSELL, HARDEN, C HARDING, HARGREAVE HARMAN, D HARPER, A HARRIS, L HARRIS, S HARRISON, HARRISON, HARRISON, HART, Cli HART, Geo HARVEY, J HARWOOD, HAWKINS, HAWKINS, HAWKINS, HAYES, Ha HAYLER, J HAZEL, Sy HAZEON, C HEAD, Geo HEATH, Ma HEDGES, E HEGGS, Jo HENEAGE, HENNESSAY HENRY, Th HENWOOD, HESELWOOD HEWITT, F HICK, Har HIGGINS, HILL, Edw HILL, Geo HILL, Joh HILL, Rob HILL, Tho HILLS, He HIRTZEL, HISCOCK, HOBBS, Fr HOBSON, M HOCKLESS, HODGKINSO HOLBROOK, HOLDEN, J HOLL, Geo HOLLAMBY, HOLLEY, J HOLLIS, S HOLLOWAY, HOLTOM, H HOOK, Fre HOOKER, B HOOKHAM, HOPE, Cha HORROCKS, HOUGHTON, HOWDEN, W HOWE, Her HUDSON, S HUGHES, R HUMPHREY, HUNT, Fra HUNTER, E HUNTER, E HUNTER, F HUNTER, G INNOLES, IRESON, W ISHERWOOD IVES, Joh JAMES, Gi JAMIESON, JARVIS, B JARVIS, J JEFFRIES, JELLEY, T JENNINGS, JENNINGS, JENOURE, JEWITT, L JOELS, Er JOHNSTON, JOHNSTON, JOHNSTONE JONES, Co JONES, Ev JONES, Ha JONES, Jo JONES, Jo JONES, Th JONES, Wi JORDAN, A KANAAR, J KEBBLE, A KEEPING, KENDALL, KENNEDY, KENNY, Th KENWARD, KIMBER, W KIRBY, Ja KIRBY, Wi KIRKUP, F KNIGHT, G KNIGHT, H KNIGHT, J KNOWLSON, LACEY, Re LACY, Art LAITY, Jo LAMB, Jos LAMPARD, LAMPITT, LARKING, LARKINS, LATTER, W LATTIMORE LAWLER, W LAWLER, W LAWRENCE, LEACH, Th LEADER, L LEDGER, A LEDWOOD, LEE, Will LESLIE, F LEWIS, Ja LEWIS, Jo LILLEY, A LIND, Cha LIPSCOMBE LITTLE, R LITTLEWOO LOCKER, G LOVEGROVE LOWE, Jam LOWE, Tom LOWE, Wil LOWERY, H LYFIELD, LYNCH, Jo LYNN, Alb MACGREGOR MALLARD, MALLET, C MALLETT, MANSER, F MARINER, MARNER, G MARSHALL, MARSHALL, MARSHALL, MARTIN, C MARTIN, G MARTIN, R MASKELL, MASTERS, MATTHEWS, MAXTED, H MAYHEW, E MCADAM, W MCCALL, D MCDONNELL MCFARLANE MCGARRIGL MCGARVIE, MCGOWAN, MCGRATH, MCINTYRE, MCLAUGHLI MCLOUGHLI MCNALLY, MCNEILL, MCPHERSON MEDHURST, MELHUISH, MERRITT, MERWOOD, MEW, Jose MIDDLETON MITCHNER, MOORE, Ge MOORE, Ri MORETON, MORLEY, A MORPHEW, MORRIS, E MORRIS, F MORRIS, F MORTIEAU, MORTON, A MORTON, C MOULD, Al MUDIE, Do MULLEN, D MULLINS, MULVEY, P MUNTON, A MUSSON, T NAYLOR, A NEELD, Al NEWBEGIN, NEWMAN, J NINEHAM, NOEL, Har NORRINGTO NORRIS, A NORTH, Ar NORTH, Ge NORTHOVER NOVICE, J NOWLAND, NUGENT, M NYE, Char O'CONNELL OLIVER, F OLIVER, J ORMONDE, OUBRIDGE, OULTON, W OWEN, Nor PAGE, Joh PAMPLIN, PARKER, G PARKER, J PARKHURST PARKS, Wi PARSONS, PARSONS, PARSONS, PASHLEY, PATON, Da PATTENDEN PAYNE, Ar PAYNE, Ha PAYNE, Ha PEARCE, A PELLETT, PENGILLY, PERRY, Du PERRY, Pe PESSELL, PETERS, W PETTETT, PETTETT, PHILLIPS, PIPER, Fr POLLARD, PONSFORD, PORTER, A POTTER, F POWELL, J POWELL, W PRAGNELL, PRAGNELL, PURNELL, QUINTON, RAGLESS, RAMSEY, P RANDELL, RAWLINS, REDFERN, REED, Geo REED, Wil REES, Wil REEVE, Ge REYNOLDS, REYNOLDS, REYNOLDS, RICHARDS, RIGBY, Ja RILEY, Er RIORDAN, ROBERTS, ROBERTSON ROBERTSON ROBEY, Wi ROBINSON, ROBINSON, ROGERS, E ROGERS, W ROGERS, W ROSE, Reg ROSSITER, ROWELL, W ROWLEY, J RUSSELL, RYAN, Ste RYAN, Wil RYLES, Ma SALISBURY SALOWAY, SANDOM, G SAUNDERS, SAVILL, H SCRIVEN, SEE, Char SEMPLE, R SEXTON, R SEYMOUR, SHAILL, T SHANKS, J SHANKS, J SHARP, Wa SHARPLES, SHAW, Jam SHEARMAN, SHEPHERD, SHEPHERD, SHERWIN, SHEURER, SHIELDS, SHORT, Wi SIDEBOTHA SILK, Ern SILLS, Er SIRDIFIEL SKINNER, SKYNNER, SMEDLEY, SMITH, Al SMITH, Al SMITH, Al SMITH, Be SMITH, Er SMITH, Ge SMITH, Ge SMITH, Ge SMITH, He SMITH, Wa SMITH, Wi SNELL, Sa SNOW, Vin SNOWDEN, SOWDEN, W SPARKES, SPARROW, SPEDDING, SPENCER, SPIERS, O SQUIRE, W STABLES, STAFFORD, STALLARD, STANLEY, STARMORE, STEAD, Ed STEELE, C STEPHENS, STEVENSON STEWART, STEWART, STRINGER, STRINGER, STRINGER, STRINGER, SUCKLEY, SUTTON, A SWEETZER, TAILBY, G TAPPER, S TAYLOR, E TAYLOR, H TAYLOR, J TERRY, Pe THOMPSON, THOMPSON, THORNTON, THWAITES, TIDEY, St TILBURY, TILLING, TINGLEY, TIPPING, TIZARD, P TOONE, Sa TREFFRY, TRODD, Ha TROTT, Jo TRUE, Edm TUCK, Cha TUCKER, C TUNNICLIF TURNER, E TURNER, F TURNER, F TWOMEY, L VARNDELL, VEALE, Mi VERLANDER VERNON, H VINCE, St VIVIAN, R WAGSTAFF, WAIGHT, F WALDEN, E WALKER, A WALKER, A WALLER, W WALTERS, WATERMAN, WATERMAN, WATERS, H WATTHEW, WATTS, Ar WATTS, Ch WAUGH, Ja WEBB, Joh WELSBY, W WENHAM, W WEST, Cha WHEELER, WHEELER, WHEELER, WHELAN, H WHITE, Be WHITE, Er WHITE, Fr WHITE, Fr WHITE, Ge WHITE, Jo WHITE, Wi WHITLOCK, WHITNEY, WHITWORTH WICKENS, WICKER, R WIGFALL, WIGG, Wil WILDEN, G WILKINSON WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS, WILLS, Wi WILSON, A WILSON, B WILSON, W WITHINGTO WOOD, Fre WOOD, Jam WOOD, Wil WOODGER, WYMER, Fr YEATES, C YOUNG, Ja KITCHENER DONALDSON ROBERTSON, O'BEIRNE McLOUGHLIN RIX, Mr. SURGUY-SHI GURNEY, W FITZGERALD ELLERSHAW McPHERSON UNNAMED CivilianClerk UNNAMED CivilianClerk UNNAMED Servant(personal) Sorry to be demonstrative, but this source
7039:(stress added). The reason I think flexibility needs to be actively recognised rather than subjugated is that River x is 99% of the time a descriptor never seen in the streetwise or historical context at all! As for taking the michael out of style. Sacrilege! No well, seriously I just don't see why you have to bring sentence length into it. If anyone needs to stop, slow down and read then it is today's younger generation. Who are being fed a soundbite culture. And need to learn to look behind assertions and how and in what ways they might be challenged. Looking back at causation, alternatives in interpretation and so on. I'm somewhat for a modicum of introductory rigour. But I'm all for recognising diversity and modifying style accordingly even of a summary. The two are not always easily combined. I don't see why we have to be too prescriptive about the length of introduction. The main thing is to do justice, not do lip service to special cases.-
7013:
scientist at one of the UK’s top research universities and in the 12 years since I received my PhD, I have authored 30 peer-reviewed publications. (Through my university I have access to journal articles and book chapters that are behind a paywall - you know this already.) I therefore have a very good idea of what well-written ‘academic
English’ looks like. In your talk pages you often claim or imply that you are writing in an academic way - you are not. Academic writing is clear, precise and concise. Sentence length does vary, but it is rare to find one with more than three clauses - two clauses (mostly one main and one subordinate) is the general rule. When terms are being defined (as they would be early in the lede) a short sentence with a single main clause (and no subordinate clauses) is common.
3520:
few times! I look at the US system for the sake of comparison and see their elections actually have reliable ranges of polls on whether an election is a "toss up", "weak" "strong" "very weak" for a particular district etc etc. and whilst I am not seeking to emulate that degree of finesse (which is much harder to justify with a more nuanced range of parties in the UK) it would be sensible to at least give some visual statistics rather than bandying about 'safe' and 'marginal' overall judgments in so many of "our" articles. Many so-called safe seats have only been in one party's hands a decade. Others just happen to have lacked demographic change and teeter on slim, marginal majorities that news editors love to call "safe" only to create a double-whammy therefore of headlines for weeks to come!-
7148:
perfectly in categories, which fit together with to form super-categories etc). (So in your example, every river has a single source, which is the one furthest from the mouth and all other headwaters are tributaries.) As we all know, real life is not like that - clear distinctions are rarer than you might expect. And perhaps that is the problem with
Wikipedians in general (at the risk of stereotyping) - we tend to be people who like the world to be well ordered and precisely defined, and are guilty of perhaps getting a little frustrated when expectation doesn’t quite live up to reality. Often the conflicts on Knowledge are between contributors who share the same goal of describing a ‘messy’ world in an ordered way, but disagree on how best to achieve it!
5208:
6680:. The paper is very interesting and much of the second half is devoted to the capture of the headwaters of the Blackwater by the Wey. Having read the paper in full, I can categorically state that the author does not call the North Branch of the Wey the Western Branch, (in fact he uses the term 'Alton Wey', which I have seen elsewhere). It's true that author does talk about the 'western branches' of the Wey (note the plural), but when you look at the full context it is clear that he means the river above the confluence with the Cranleigh Waters - i.e. the 'western branches' in this usage refers to BOTH the North and South Branches. I will therefore remove the reference on the grounds that it has failed verification. Best wishes
4461:
chilled/free-spirited is it really and could you do with some more chill/a pleasant dose of leniency yourself? Your revert was really uncalled for. Other languages are much less tolerant of people's utter ignorance (believe me having edited various other wikipedias) about language. People getting a pronunciation wrong, Leicester, however is not a seminal matter of culture, it is just a bit of trivia. That is our interpretation of that sort of issue in
English-speaking cultures. I was in a good mind to just remove the whole section, but on balance I thought a little micro-obsession with pronunciation (a matter of detail not substance) I thought might be good for the sake of international balance between cultures.-
3653:. I was struck by the beauty of Bkissin's style, yet I think it a bit grand – we don't assign numbers to parliaments in even broadsheets here unless being very quaint. I prefer even more what User:82.5.106.137 did. Though I appreciate the general, perhaps retentive abhorrence of different formats in politics studies though personally am a great fan of latitude and even format diversity. People with intellect should be able to assign different weights based on years and numbers. They don't. We have a 'soundbite' culture and lack of intense maths-english analysis done on first reading (these days) all of which means many people would benefit from a starker User:82.5.106.137 style breakdown of the service of MPs.
1414:
love about
Knowledge is the inclusivity of everyone being able to make edits and to make their own contributions, but I'm sure you know as well as I how infuriating it can be when someone makes worse an article about someone you have invested a great deal of personal attention and love over the years. FE Smith is my personal hero and someone who I have dedicated a large part of my life to. I am asking you, if possible, to refrain from making any further edits to his page. This is not a territorial gesture; I am not trying to start a war. I merely think there are others better placed to manage his page, both for the good of familiars and strangers to his memory. I hope you take this in good heart.
787:
relatively new to GA reviews, and the review itself is quite good from what I can see (there's no doubt it was very close to GA, and you were certainly right to pass it), but a copyedit is one of the most helpful things a GA reviewer can do: a fresh pair of eyes on the article (which has usually been predominantly the work of a single editor) is invaluable, and it saves a lot of bother at FA. Even just a basic copyedit is always a really good idea. (I also have some POV concerns about the article, but they're probably outside the purview of the GA criteria.) I hope this helps with future GA reviews; please keep doing them, as the backlog is dreadful. :)
2646:
1736. Son of:- Sir
Christopher Musgrave MP (21 March 1661 - 2 July 1689). Son of:- Sir Christopher Musgrave MP (1631c - 29 July 1704) 4th Baronet of Musgrave Eden Hall. Son of:- Sir Philip Musgrave (21 May 1607 - - 7 February 1678) 2nd Baronet Musgrave of Eden Hall. Son of:- Sir Richard Musgrave (1585c - 1615, in Naples, Italy) 1st Baronet Musgrave of Eden Hall. Son of:- Christopher Musgrave (1553c - 15 October 1585, at Eden Hall). Son of:- Sir Simon Musgrave MP Kt (1510c - 30 January 1597, in Kirby Stephen), of Harde Castle. Son of:- Sir Edward Musgrave of Edenhall (1461 - 23 May 1542). I could go on further back, but that is pointless.
7017:
course, that would be more appropriate in the main body of the article. (I anticipate that you will have an objection to a ‘formula’ - and clearly there will be a few exceptions for which the suggestion above is not appropriate - but those cases will be rare.) Clearly you are an editor with great passion and enthusiasm - and you have an ability to find interesting historical and scientific details which others would envy - and much of the information that you add is relevant and important. I want to work with you (and other enthusiastic editors) on ensuring that our contributions enhance articles for readers.
2789:
something as an alternate route is both quaint and does not do justice to the stations along that route (which often as not would be much longer by one alternate). The northern line is a perfect example where to describe its
Charing Cross and Bank branches as branches standalone (note I dislike the term per se) would be a totally misleading misnomer. They are fundamental alternatives that reunite. I believe the use of the word branch in this context goes back to an age where they actually were just branches, not alternative routes, and indeed there are many examples of geography in wikipedia such as
7330:
words after a little time has passed, will give you a fresher perspective on the readability of this extract. There are many that would find this incomprehensible - that is not a reflection on education/literacy standards, the younger generation, soundbite culture etc - that is a reflection on the quality of your writing; I was only able to work out what you mean, by looking at the previous version of the page before your changes. I would urge you to set yourself a strict word limit for each sentence that you write and to review your draft for clarity before hitting the submit button.
7119:. I refer to my original 'glib' remark that defining water in Britain is rather messy. I don't want to pre-empt people's replies as that was rather short-tempered, supercilious and bad-mannered of me. I will offer you all best wishes and thanks too, as I think thanks is often lacking when obviously we assume that we, as contributors, making great strides in research of course offer each other implicit thanks in every post we write. I do have that thanks in my thoughts. But I am often too keen on not being trodden on or sideswept to express it.-
1168:
least one well-known item. Essex as a whole does, Thurrock never does. Even ITN/Sky/BBC never put on the national news in
Thurrock, anymore so than in Tameside, Bracknell Forest or the London Borough of Waltham Forest. Arguably that's not as they are totally dumbed down. I have nothing against a Thurrock category as a whole, which exists though as it is bound to have plenty of culturally and geographically interesting places. Please also review the existing subcategories, on Henley and Abingdon as I am not sure they should exist.-
5566:
french would write that sound from old RP to new RP, which is so subtle based on old films as to be non-existent for all but the most unusual parochial backwater speakers, who might with a look of puzzlement from listeners say 'ey/ay' as in "thaht's baytter'. I mean that's an obviously out of place distinction and must be for some political reason or complete detraction - are we doing Scots pronunciation of London places next? I'd say people use variations right through the three-main academically stated spectrum main sounds:
7076:
enjoy reading and to look at the way that sentences and paragraphs are divided up. I think you it will surprise you how short sentences are compared to the ones that you often use. It really is very rare to find a sentence with more than three clauses. I very much admire your pursuit of precision, but would caution you that when taken to extremes, it very easy to end up being long winded and incomprehensible. Good writing is clear, precise and concise in equal measure - those qualities apply here as much as anywhere else.
7420:(good). This means further asthma etc. is likely net reduced (but only away from them). The hyperactive motor lobby on here would hasten to point out they are 3-into-1-lane style mergers by an android with a hatred for humanity. The reasoned, enlightened counter-argument is it is the roads further out that are too big, obstructions to nature, take up useful land, blight nearby land too, but excite the motor lobby no end, which are the true multiplexes, or more accurately "funplexes"...Plus ça change.-
4071:
reference to the position of the sun at the equinox and not a deemed position relative a distant star. There is no fixed Point of Aries, it moves. You may however prefer a semantic difference of emphasis in that you are among that class of astronomers who prefer to imagine an orbit of the sun purely relative to the fixed stars behind however it is at its very basis a case of the earth having to complete an orbit of the sun and when one takes the start and end of that orbit. The without which nothing (
7072:. Perhaps you would do well to remember that divide and to seek to unite rather than to pour scorn. The young would accuse certain members of the older generation of believing too much in 'soundbites' (Get Brexit Done; oven-ready deal etc) and not questioning 'assertions' (the German car industry will march into Merkel’s office to demand a good deal; they need us more than we need them) etc. (Note that I am not making any assumptions or comment on your own politics - that is your own business!)
845:
627:
2126:
4863:
format. I am hardly quoting much. Even though the source itself disclaims liability stressing it disapplies (does not constitute) a statement of the law, i.e. a proper substitute for paid/professional legal advice or the most involved, complex works on the law. How very excessively up-front and overly highlighting they insist they be. Very
Orwellian. Still best go along with them. I'll be a good chap rather than take their copyright legions to task. I have better things to do.-
3921:". One meaning of "vernal equinox" is a ray from the center of the earth along the line at which the ecliptic plane intersects the equatorial plane, toward the First point of Aries (as opposed to the other ray, the autumnal equinox, which goes toward the First Point of Libra). This ray of course can be used as one side of an angle, and is so used in determining sidereal time. The direction of the ray has nothing to do with the direction of the sun at any particular moment.
5850:
1339:
5095:
be a X Party safe seat but is now a Y safe seat" as though that is acceptable in an encyclopedia (when the very definition of "safe" is mainly in the PRESS an opinion as in truth must be rooted in both length of unbroken success ('a party's holding' if you like) and the size of the majorities. Mind you I have never said the
American system of 'XY toss-up', 'leans X' 'strong leans X' 'slightly leans Y' is compatible with our often three-party/candidate system.-
4761:
oppression and more thanks, including you. As I say at least you never write false old
Victorian-sourced data, street rumour and historiography which I am too careful to avoid. The more we work to weed that sort of stuff out the better, and not perseverate about minute details. Agreed? Perhaps I should have put I am a regular Gnome, I don't have the ego problem of some editors on here in claiming they wrote half of a particular topic, which is usually false.-
8291:
5879:
104:
290:
grammatical changes, improvements to references and the like, that have been overwritten by your recent edits. I think you must have been working offline on an old version of the article, which you have pasted back in, thus losing any changes made by me since your last edit. Anyway, no matter; I'll leave it for a bit so you can finish your updates, and then go through the article again repeating my changes where I think they're uncontroversial.
5956:
4710:
English edition of wikipedia. As to "where it meets" I copied the exact form of the existing prose, which has been good-article accepted, so why challenge it; it is actually less technical language than "at the junction with" which is longer. Your approach is that of a slapdash form-focussed Norman overlord who does not like plain Anglo-Saxon English nor technical language but prefers only text that is poetic and most pleasing to
6046:, having some experience in this field and keen for it to match the other fields of law. Really it is not criminal, it is just plain petty to start reverting and restoring just for the sake of it. One wonders whether you have ultra-backward views and would rather we still lived in a feudal age. Mainly due to your seeming appreciation of padding throughout the article and your rigid desire to revert, revert, revert.-
913:
2054:? Well it was almost done but I forgot what happened and I just couldn't finish it off. I just wanted to tell you that I renominated it again and I would love it if you're willing to do a re-review. It's not going to take much really. The main issue (the lead) is now fixed and appropriate to GA standards. Let me know. Thanks! P.S. By the way it's Proudbolsahye...I recently changed my username to EtienneDolet.
2909:
colour change that might not even be rendered on some screens. Were the diagrams in which this comes to light prose then there would be strong calls to clarify what is history and what is today's operations and so the same should be true in diagrams! One has to 'move with the times' and 'go with God', or at least the present. Let us not lose sight of what is meaningful and what is merely resonance.-
2612:
They go back through the Musgraves of Eden Hall and Harde Castle. Although this in itself does go back to Hartley Castle it is when they had the Lordship of Hartley and were the Sheriffs of Westmorland. if however you want to follow the family back to its origins you will end up around 1030c with Gamel of Musgrave (a Feudal Lord), the father of Wasculinus, who was either of German or Norman descent.
2943:
same way as others. That is never seen elsewhere and is a sad indictment of attitudes towards the railways quite frankly. I cannot speak for consensus but surely must we have some intuition that it might be popular (and a winning argument, without much discourse) to distinguish frankly and with all due weight about what is former and what is not '(closed)' and other logical synonyms (and moreover
3333:, which I have set up to be identical to the main template as it was yesterday. We can add one new feature at a time to the sandbox, and make sure each is correct before the next is added to the sandbox. In the meantime, I suggest that we restore the live template to yesterday's version - remember that every time it is altered, no matter how small the change, every page transcluding it (there are
1297:
6722:
The Jubilee Volume of the Geologists' Association (1858-1908) p483. This is the problem with using the snippet view in Google Books, I'm afraid - you really do need to read the whole source and not just a few fragmentary sentences. Again "upper - waters" here in your quote relates to the Wey above the confluence with the Cranleigh Waters (i.e. it includes both the North and South Branches).
5578:) looking at the place name and how some people deal with th in the middle of words differently. I have a very keen interst in IPA write-out of sounds mainly based on places in the world with counterintuitive pronunciations vs spellings, that is the section of this that led me into that. Truly I think it is the bow sound that people abroad might well guess wrong with, never the Bethnal!-
2545:, which means all of these connections should not be made the prominent subject of every District/Place on wikipedia, don't there go into too much fine print on roads/railways especially as these have their own articles. Other editors frequently make reference to that as it is quite right to avoid the encyclopaedia becoming the worst form of National Rail (ATOC) or Top Gear Travel Guide.-
5779:
3211:
character is urban, as it upsets all those with green gardens/allotments and a sense of know-everyone villagey-ness which is at the heart of England. In every town therefore you will find pleasant parts where people say they feel like and even live in a village, even in London and in Birmingham for example, less so in the most industrial cities but on their outskirts that is true too!-
4886:
into account views from both sides of the border. It's a much more reliable source that some bloke drawing lines on a personal Google map, but contrary to what you wrote, it's pretty much identical to the areas defined by the Google hobbyist and the parish map. To quote a very wise source, if you have any issues or wish to discuss something, then please do leave a new message.
1146:
is not a science and more of an art. Hundreds is considered generally too long for categories and one (e.g. Castle Point) suggests it is too short. Counties are just right. I am sure that is how the London list came about. I very much appreciate your work in respect of Thurrock as I would not have known which places to add for sure were it not for your knowledge.
7064:
with similar apparent ‘fits of pique’. (You have admitted in that archive that you do need to 'chill' more.) If those comments are sarcastic and/or meant to be funny, then they fail to hit the target by some margin. There are several who have (justifiably in my opinion) taken offence. You should also think about the tone that you adopt in your edit summaries.
4212:: "This counter-intuitive term, dwelling house, applies to exclude only businesses and highly indistinct subdivisions of houses or flats such as where shared and no particular set of joint tenants can be said to be entitled to the whole; flats and single rooms are included within the definition of a separate dwelling house as are converted barns, windmills etc."
4715:
note the denotation that the adjective adds quite rightly means it doesnt even run anywhere near alongside the line of the street... Or did you consider that? But that is more easy to finesse than to revert and have someone have to put the useful image back in and leave the false data dreamt up by some ill-informed, poorly-read person - obviously not you. -
2541:
Craven article that the area is the only decent point at which to get from the North East to the North West. As to travel links, any decent map tells you all of Yorkshire, Cumbria, the Midlands indeed virtually all of England has rapid transport connections and a motorway within a few miles (albeit via odd roads and layouts), I would just point you towards
8822:" I would stress I put in adds far more. After all, are we dragging stuff out? Are we in the business of lying? I do hope not, for I have also been guilty of that especially in earlier years. It is all to easy to get into that kind of business without knowing it, often regurgitating the sort of vague sophistry the "en vogue" top press gurus abound with.-
3141:
thrust of your edit. Your time could more usefully be employed also actually making some new colouring for semi-fast services and fast services at various stations rather than debating on whether a partly part-time station really ought to be considered a nice neat red dot. You seem to be a very good influencer, and have more knowledge of the railways.-
6440:
geography is distinctly shakey. He seems to think the confluence of the two branches of the river join above Shalford, hence his use of the term westen for the Alton branch as it flows east past Godalming. The Ordnance Survey, and the Environment Agency regard it as the northern branch. And I still don't know what your edit summary comment means.
1434:'The article is however problematic for its lack of notability in the lead'! Christ! You tout yourself as a guardian of lay-people-speak but you write totally unintelligibly. You would do well to not confuse accessible, clear speech with writing a lot while remaining, even becoming more unintelligible to lay-people. You are in the latter camp.
6696:
Bury , † that the upper - waters of the western branch of the Wey at one time found their way to the Thames through the gap at the western..."), but it does clearly connote both in the light of what you say, leaving no east branch ever so called very unsatisfactorily. However now I see that was a multi-use term too. Very odd. Even in 1836,
275:
on Eccles Pike and have paid recognition to your point. On a constructive note, a summary of topographical features would be welcome for the parish as a whole, without duplicating too much the functions of a good map, or details of other articles, and I'd be grateful for any interesting walks/peaks in the parish which should be listed.
399:
8716:
article penned by the BBC for those who might be young teenagers but might occasionally require reaching for a dictionary or look-up for that particular audience where succinctly putting across the best terms on a technical subject. If one wants a more basic rendering then Basic English wikipedia exists. Few people know this.-
209:"Become a member and assessor of the Wikiproject:Surrey - we thank you for your demonstrated high scholarly standards and would welcome assistance with any areas of the project in which you may have an interest." That's very flattering. :) I ought to join the project, as I have lived in Cranleigh for almost all my life. JH (
5308:] because they make little sense or have relevance to the article. e.g. The reason: "The Sun: ambiguities removed. +20° is not on a given summer's day, but a specific NORTH HEMIS. SUMMER DAY!!!" Yet plainly the season or hemisphere is totally irrelvant to culmination time when it crosses the local meridian.
6199:
the word Surrey. See it's Canals in Surrey. It's a sub-cat of Tourist Attractions, and thanks to some housekeeping really stands out. Let's keep it that way. See it makes it easier to navigate to the sort of tourist attractions that interest the reader, and not a wapping great big list of attractions.-
7254:
remember that whilst we may all enjoy the process of research and writing for Knowledge, at the end of the day we are in large part working (voluntarily) as a service to others. Those 'end users' should never be pushed out of our minds by an inflated sense of self importance or intellectual superiority.
8817:
OK OK. I will tone them down. But "subsequently" for a chronologically listed extra legal change. Isn't that obvious? Isn't equal representation a terrible bowdlerisation. How is never pairing with a mainland "equal". I have no doubt people write on here eloquently, and we have high quality states of
8654:
In general, "seat" is not a synonym for "constituency" - a constituency is a geographical construction: a set of borders on a map describing a particular geographic area. A "seat" is an MPs place in the House of Commons. The two are similar but different but there are places where you have introduced
7329:
I would ask you to consider the phrases “It can in political geography conveniently be deemed” and “loosely clustered German cities” and to ask yourself whether a visitor to this page, who knows nothing of the rivers of central Germany would find this easy to understand. I hope that approaching your
7245:
to pick on two obvious examples.) Conventions have been established (often by 19th century antiquarians) that in an ideal world we would now change/redefine (not something unique to rivers). But as Wikipedians, it’s not our job to try to change those conventions - our duty is to write about them and
7016:
I hope the above does not sound too critical, but I am writing this with the best of intentions. I would urge you to draw breath before you dive in to respond and not to feel offended/angry. As I say, I am trying to ensure that we do not clutter the lede with over-detailed descriptions of a river’s
6439:
I took offence on your being rude about inserting maintenance tags. As for being knowledgable, having re-read the 1848 cite (NB, please give page numbers) it doesn't say what you think it does. For a start the author might be veru knowledgable about geology, I am not in a position to comment, but his
6355:
Also how dare you put sole mention of a source I top from the took rankings on google, of 1848! The 1930 source book source that pops up (being readable as out of copyright) is equally good. The later mapmakers with no helpful use of cardinal compass points, a binary understanding of direction, and
6198:
regarding category pages. I abhorred it at first too. It is that you cannot put things in a sub-category or sub-subcategory into a parent category also, as they are already there, nested, in the subcategories at the top of the category page. In this case you need to see the category that fits with
5913:
collaborative historians work I put in before talked about gravel right next to the surface and how poor it makes the land for crops. Obviously it depended on crops, peas, trees and much of market gardening was not that bad. Even as a compromise just mention the gravel extraction the article mentions
5666:
page have resulted in a wordy and confusing sentence. Also, while you say your reason for making these edits was because the previous wording was '100% unverifiable', you haven't actually provided a reference to support the new claim either. Would you mind reviewing your edit and provide a supporting
5311:
The other is by saying: "Article carefully considered: some mistruths debunked too boldly asserted in lead having read and had re-constructed all the other related articles. Distinctions made better." I think this has not properly thought through, as most of these changes are just wrong. In declaring
5243:
unpublished peacock phrases often need to be rephrased or erased. Their publishers must be notified which typically involves identifying non-encyclopaedic terms such as "lively community", "beautiful", "great", "leading school", "thriving", "affluent", "within easy reach of" and "blighted by/ shabby/
4995:
My point is one of comparative practice and equivalence. Surely make your argument on Italian wikipedia also. Or I'll do that "dirty work" for you. All information is good faith in such articles with links to SIMBAD and other more precise databases for more accurate, emerging data. If you don't take
4862:
Oh. Government-published things are it transpires in practice risibly more complex in licensing than others, wikipedia it seems kowtowing to them saying they merit their own "special licensing template" footnote even though wikipedia is a purely summary, quasi-news, quasi-pithy extracts encyclopedia
4714:
ear. I would however agree that crossed perpendicularly is the same as and better than bisected perpendicularly (Perhaps I have been involved in too many physics related projects lately). "Crossed" alone as to streams/rivers could mean at any angle and having come from any angle beforehand - you will
3696:
Hello. I have changed your figure of 736 deaths (including Lord Kitchener) when HMS Hampshire was sunk back to 650. This is simply because the lower figure is the traditionally accepted one, most recently recorded in the 2016 Faught biography cited in the Kitchener article. However your note suggests
3648:
of more rows clarifying number of elections won. It was rejected: 7 June 2017 by User:DavyCrockettJones. He hadn't discussed this. But nor had User:82.5.106.137. The later (the revert to the current, pared down, the UK-wide format) wrote "use same format as other articles". The same argument is made
3542:
You are right that the style is not new. It is a style I have noticed is used in many Canadian Riding articles. However, it is new to the UK articles, apart from Battersea. I think it is better to have a consistency in presentation and would not welcome seeing some of these lists being changed to the
3291:
I cannot get that minor imperfection ironed out. To embellish it too much I believe I was going by a bad route from the outset of trying to use parts of the Military History bespoke template. Please could someone just enable the template I have prepared and I will set about one-by-one assessing and
3264:
work, that's the point - your edits have brought in several problems by removing some essential parameters, and altering other parameter values in such a way that portions of the template no longer behave as they should - for example, the categorisation by importance is compromised. The sandbox is at
2908:
How very retrogressive and illiberal. And who are you and others like you to dictate that should be so? Is there no intuition in the railways fraternity or merely an unhealthy focus on the past with regard to present important infrastructure, so as to conflate past with present barring a very small
2842:
I have question in relation to your amendments to the entry for Speen, Berkshire on 12 December 2014. In respect of the sub-section concerning Speen House, you inserted the following reference: "Early historians have dated a few stones among the foundations to the Roman village of 'Spinae', but it is
2698:
I think a lot of it is down to interpretation of documents, in that being a titular holder of the 'Baronet of Musgrave', whilst actually being resident of Edenhall or Kempton Park, has over time brought about a belief that there is actually a Baronetage of Eden Hall and Kempton Park. Unfortunately to
1601:
Ah, OK. Sorry you weren't aware of that. Tague could not have been on the sixth floor of the Depository since that's where Oswald was and surely he would have seen him. Tague was near the bridge (triple underpass) that was in FRONT of the motorcade, while Oswald was on the sixth floor of the building
1413:
You recently made a number of edits to F.E. Smith's page. I have taken issue with almost every edit you made. I found that you damaged the writing either by addition or subtraction; muddied the waters with superfluous information or diluted the waters by removing good information. One of the things I
802:
No you're right I was setting my ambition high toward clearing the backlog, a more detailed analysis is necessary of not merely the meaning and hermeneutics which are satisfactory, but of also the punctuation (and possibly grammar). Indeed the version of English is something I will have to watch out
499:
as it is for articles distinct enough to warrant being separate, but not enough to be very separate subjects. As places within a civil parish are technically part of the main article main is seen more commonly. Above all the format of the UK guidance is helpful and I'll update some statistics which
8774:
article readable, but not basic (which is not a criticism!) and quite enjoyed it! The only sentence I wasn’t sure about was in the lead section: what does it mean by “It reaches double its normal number of storeys, ten above ground”? I’m sure it is just my own issue with understanding, but could you
8715:
Oh well perhaps you are beholden to your own style. Your style doesn't rule the roost and you are clearly too easily ruffled as that was virtually fine and better in fewer unnecessary bytes too, per the "fluff" essay. I hope you get what I'm talking about. This not a vivid wp:BASICENGLISH journalese
8248:
jobsworth lawyer reading seeing a contrarian view to normal, logical, natural words stands defenceless is permissible but not necessary. You will find far more frequent examples across global geography, but it would be 'ever so correct' LB Richmond where such anxiety is acute. To that extent I think
7325:"It can in political geography conveniently be deemed to rise as the White Main in the north of the south-east state Bavaria and flows west for 525 kilometres (326 mi) to meet the Rhine below Russelsheim, which is between three loosely clustered German cities: Mainz, Wiesbaden and Frankfurt am Main."
7188:
I think if a river has a source that is formally acknowledged as being THE source, then in the lede I would only mention that one source. However in the main body of the article, I would discuss other headwaters. (I would want to avoid talking about ‘parallel’ headwaters - after all, parallel lines
6011:
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit
5636:
I see you've been blocked for 15 days now for serial sock-puppetry and it does not surprise me that simply wishing to put across how many there were of particular types of unit and in more succinct English, without alleging post towns are somehow formal Subdivisions of a sacrosanct numbering system,
5548:
Well Hi! 99.9% of people have a purely amateur interest, and in my experience, editors starting across with such a lovely bit of self-effacement tend to be those most keen to get their points through. I agree with you entirely, I was in whatever article you are speaking about - you'll need to state
4248:
Most terms are left undefined such as this term in other Acts. In Acts before the 1990s there was a general trend towards vagueness and judicial latitiude which remains in later Acts governing controversial inherently "blurry" scenarios. The courts say they have their "natural meaning", which gives
3890:
We can definitely debate the logic of predictions and good ideas til the cows come home, we just can't put them in an encyclopedia. Thanks for your reply anyway :-) For the record, I don't know how we'd build a structure or apply a technology large enough to protect two-thirds of the world from heat
3780:
Hello. Thank you for producing the evidence to correct this point - I certainly did not expect a record of the full list of fatalities (except the two unnamed clerks and Kitchener's personal servant) to be available! The higher figure is clearly the correct one and hopefully the one that will appear
3656:
The question is simple. Does adding a line showing the re-election(s) give due weight to the MP, which would be a shame to do without (some countries do this, some don't on their wikipedias). The counter-argument is that it somehow makes MPs who have achieved re-election somehow seem more important,
3055:
I don't understand your objection to using a name for these lines, as this is only an operational description used by railway enthusiasts and as a reference for maintenance by Railtrack. Did you find the reference that has Railtrack use it as recently as 2009? You could probably hold a season ticket
3036:
Well indeed, that is precisely what the operators are doing. That will all come out in due course. Consensus has already moved on clearly by virtue of sheer numbers using the line from not the Windsor Branch and whilst you have published sources by old waxworks running the system citing the old name
2645:
Back again, unfortunately my mains power went off before I could finish the above. Here are some family lineage dates:- Philip Musgrave 6th Baronet (b circa 1711 Edenhall - 5 July 1795 Kempton Park). Son of:- Sir Christopher Musgrave MP 5th Baronet Musgrave of Eden Hall (25 December 1688 - 3 January
1145:
sub-lists are too short if you were to create such sub-lists and do not reflect groups of equal size. Just if you are considerably fortunate to live in those places (UAs) to only have one layer of local government should not mean you get special lists, look at the list for London for example. This
312:
to be mere "hamlets" of Chapel-en-le-Frith—they're sizeable villages, physically and culturally separate from Chapel, and there's plenty more could be said about both (the former has its own railway station and major quarries, and the latter gives its name to a reservoir and the significant moorland
8397:
to be dished out in turn, do you? (Knowledge admins can be *very* unforgiving, another thing I'd like to think you know very well.) I suggest that if there is something you really, honestly feel should be included in these articles - no matter how relevant it looks, how much sense it makes, and how
7170:
article. The lede says clearly that the stream/river has two sources on the north side of Leith Hill, but does not elaborate further. Then in the main body of the article, you have detailed the precise locations of those sources. That section works well enough that no one has sought to change it in
7110:
source. This is one of those annoying quirks of prolific backwardness which every time one set of mapmakers or book writers think they done away with, some firebrand reactionaries contest, or is probably as political as the Thames and best reserved for a whole controversy section. We are forbidden
7059:
Hi Adam37. Thank you for your reply. I am not sure that I fully understand everything you have written, but let’s start where I think we agree. As I understand it, you can see the value of a ‘formula’ or of ‘standardisation’, but like me you appreciate that there will be some cases where this form
6588:
Chawton, I thought if writers about city bliss put one more "located", "situated", then play a game of loose associations and buzzwords I'll raise them a Jane Austen idyll like all the signs round there and enough thatch and exclusively old architecture for them to chew on and actually pay a visit.
6490:
Oh OK. Edit summary Gu.-Weyb. means the river doesn't go, at the same pace as previous places: Guildford straight to Weybridge, there is a fair bit of land e.g. as the basin (I have some doubts about) implies, in between. Otherwise we have almost undue focus, understandably to have some of the odd
6230:
Technically right now. But I wouldn't place any money on that category with 2 items surviving, one is a different canal, the other a tunnel which could be divorced from the canal like every other tunnel does not feature in its parent canal category when there is one. This seems to explain why the
5717:
You don't quite get it, do you? You simply don't have a clue what you're talking about. How would you fare on a highly academic context English comprehension test, I wonder. If the "crystal standard" of Plain English is what you're after then restrict yourself to Basic English wikipedia or start
5523:
Hullo, I have purely amateur interest, but I just wanted to query something you put. You talked about pronouncing the TH as an F, which I'm sure many if not most locals do, but you called it a "hard TH". What does that mean? I can foresee calling THs voiced or unvoiced, eg, wither and ether, but is
5432:
says: "the ability to read and write English well enough to avoid introducing incomprehensible text into articles and to communicate effectively." Much of your alleged improvements so far exampled are just incomprehensible. The continuing failure is in destroying context: shown in items ,,. You are
5094:
I've added the extra statistic needed. I've tried to balance the very simplistic sensationalism of most seats that have changed hands against a complex picture, which as you have helped to write, is very much the case. You are absolutely right to do this. A lot of seats still read "the seat used to
4980:
Regardless of what Italian Knowledge may or may not do, here any claims that cannot be supported by external references are liable to be removed at any time. Rather than just delete the whole article, it would be better to provide some references. Simply hoping that numbers you got somewhere else
3979:
Now you are providing a qualification to the sun's involvement as a back-formation. The position of the sun relative to the other stars at the March equinox determines the concept, nothing else. Furthermore the equinox is a moment in time and should not be conflated with a vector which is sought by
2942:
Good work speaks for itself. Bold strikingly obvious editing is part of wikipedia and any good guide to a system. If there are redundant, pedantic or more to the point esoteric stations listed in a diagram then quite frankly it is misleading and whimsical to emphasise them in almost precisely the
2793:
that truthfully portray the current status of a place, rather than what perhaps an absolute majority of those with power in the place would have you mistakenly believe (such as Richmond, Surrey!). In essence we are here to cut through jargon and misnomers in an encyclopedia (making mention of them
2788:
It's used in roads, railways and everywhere. It is an accurate description where a line fitting its description is operated by the same operator but is not generally used as a loop. In historic times most corollaries were described as alternate routes but we are living in an age where to describe
2297:
which another editor saw may be for its tourist credentials - the A5 is rich in history. By sad contrast the M1 has in places become a sad scar on the landscape (mentioned on talk to explain all the books on it for fear of upsetting the burgeoning motorway lobby as opposed to say alternatives such
2198:
links to it. I am keen to give clearer meaning to things, so St John's? But your point about a few centuries of English unclarity is almost convincing. However the telling factor is it could suggest two St John's churches in the village which is not true. All of your sources are not as officious
1487:
to the section. But there are a large number of incoming links which previously led to an article at the title "Portsea" and now lead to the disambiguation page. It is your responsibility to sort these out - you have broken those links. Please fix them now, or revert to the previous situation where
476:
guidance is categoric that settlement articles should be as broad and succinct as possible. Thus wherever something belonging to a town or village has a notable history which could be summed up in a more succinct way than relevant books might, then subsume that into the main article. Particularly
375:
The church is a massive and spacious edifice with a nave and aisles, 106 feet in length by 60 in breadth, and having a tower at the west end 103 feet high. In the eastern corner of the south aisle is a handsome monument of the Baker family, who formerly had large possessions in the parish, and from
274:
given I've changed the subject in line with other places to be about the civil parish as well as the town proper. Otherwise your desire to consolidate would have remained about the small hamlets, which either/or may one day achieve their own civil parishes. I'm very much grateful for the comments
8733:
I am quite sure that you have the absolute best of intentions, evidenced by your frequent references to various policies and guidelines in your edit summaries, but the simple problem is that your edits are not always an improvement and sometimes are reducing the quality of articles. I might gently
8433:
and a little tolerance for latitude. The approach taken is one of homogenisation. And it is rather Soviet in how it comes across. By the way I am no fan of postcodes one bit. Don't delete talk discussions as that is a far bigger breach of policy. I could easily report you. But I am not the sort to
7984:
It has been a pleasure to fix the headings. Very ambiguous. Also there are no graphs, there are tables. They were made by very high-up editors here in wikipedia who like to lord over UK elections. It is worthwhile submitting to A. Pope's "fools rush in where angels fear to tread" in regards to
7253:
in the lede and what can be left for discussion in the main text?’ Of course I am guilty here of anthropomorphising, but 'needs to be', seems to be the best way of conveying the requirement of a reader for a clear, concise and precise summary at the start of an article. It is important, I feel, to
7063:
I note that you have said that you do not ‘rush into things emotively’, however this is not the impression you give. Just last week you wrote (on this talk page) - “Also how dare you…” as part of a conversation with a very knowledgeable and generous editor. The archive of this talk page is filled
6725:
I think at this point it is wise to conclude that the use of the term "western branch" for the North Branch was uncommon a century ago, is not in current 21st century usage and that this claim should therefore be removed from the main body of the article. I would however support a footnote, which
6721:
Hi Adam37. I'm afraid that ", it is worth mentioning the suggestion of Mr. Bury , † that the upper - waters of the western branch of the Wey at one time found their way to the Thames through the gap at the western..." does not come from the 1930 paper. It is from a 1910 book: Geology in the Field:
6695:
Agreed. To contribute my sixpence, I shunned the English conventional N/S or E/W dichotomy as I thought it rather cliché and unhelpful and had recalled some calling it the western branch, possibly in an old travelogue. Your plural quote is not true (", it is worth mentioning the suggestion of Mr.
4070:
The definition as it stands remains wrong, perhaps I should not have added the word revolutions as well as rotations as I see that was a short quote, sorry about that. However I was a little surprised in my reading to discover the sidereal year and hence sideral time is actually only measurable by
3853:
This change and comment appear to be uncited and unsubstantiated conjecture on your part. The 'abject' and 'doom-saying' appear to be a subjective view, which brings no benefit to the article. Accordingly, I have revoked this change. I am happy to discuss any future changes you may propose on the
3519:
first and considered it roundly, objectively a great improvement. We can discuss until the cows come home and I don't necessarily discount that it becomes deprecated, but it adds visual clues against representatives who have lasted just one short Parliament versus those that have been re-elected a
2927:
There might be an argument for using better separated colours than the current pink used for disused and the red for active. I wonder where you would raise this for consensus? One of my aims is to see that you don't do a lot of work that attracts opposition and is reversed. Give that some thought.
2439:
Thank you very much for that. I think Hornsey is much clearer now. That sentence is maybe getting a wee bit long now but I'm not going to go and fiddle with it ... it might be fine, and no-one will benefit from me getting hung up about it! As for "whilst", thanks ... and gosh! I'm going to have to
379:
Being local perhaps you could find where that used to be, and decide whether to include its final reference "To the north of the village is a well called Bully well, the water of which is said to be efficacious for diseases of the eye." The only reason I haven't included that is for risk of being
173:
Thanks ever so much. We're aiming to get Woking to a Featured Article status. If there is any part of Surrey that you're particularly good at please try to improve them articles. Please don't let Knowledge:Wikiproject Surrey clash with anything else-Only do it if you want to! :-) I look forward to
8428:
and the present rating of the articles. You will find serious academic readers are the aim of all articles. Do you really think that each post town was just 'invented' and that is not interesting how much they diverge from what most people or many people conceive those places as, in graphic form.
8223:
By the way these are not "attacks" as plainly putting a tag cannot be totally "thick" it is a forgiveable hypebole for narrowly prescriptive in English comprehension and indolent in removing any possible absurdity from the narrow way in which "one" reads. It is not effort at all to move the 100%
7764:
There was a particular editor... Now I see what section you mentioned, I recall why I really didn't want to turn back to the article. We sort of have really different approaches. He used the Harvard style in his other article hence the problem arises. I apologise for my laziness. These are really
7555:
I saw that you removed the word “subsequently” numerous times from the article. I see that it was of good-faith and you wanted to change up the wording a little. However, some of your word choice has been grammatically incorrect, with some missing commas and sentences that make little sense. Next
7419:
Also multiplexes could pass muster if the road was made bigger and free-flowing. Anyone who knows Hammersmith, Putney, Commercial Road and around Southwark knows these places are daftly choked pinchpoints of London roads where yes pollution across the centre is thus discouraged in favour of rail
7402:
Will do. But I am not sure that your comment is any clearer, involving the jargon "multiplex" which is not in lay media use for instance. It quite clearly for those acquainted or dreaming the world of geometry says what it says. It says it takes four straight lines to roughly follow the Thames
7147:
Hi Adam37. Thank you for your reply. Perhaps this is the problem with Knowledge - it’s a site that often views the universe as a perfect hierarchy. It 'sees' each object/territory/phenomenon as both a constituent part of something bigger and can itself be neatly subdivided, (sub categories nestle
6257:
I added the citation needed tag to the claim that the north branch is sometimes known as the west branch. There is really no need to be rude about it. If you make changes to articles you should be able to back them up with sources. Incidentally, I have done quite a lot of research on the Wey and
5565:
I thought more; and you might mean the seat in the Commons. I'm right. In fact I didn't write as you write, I put the only average way people would say it since when people have played with it and put daftly obscure fact of 'conservative RP' as if anyone needs to find a distinction in 'ei' as the
5074:
You recently edited the constituency's political history section. I was concerned that the analysis you provided, while fitting your edit summary of being "up to date and neutral", contained interpretations which were largely unsourced. Knowledge is not an editorial column. It also did not give a
4885:
I see that you made wholesale changes to the Hornsey boundary section, rather denigrating the info given from the CENF. I've re-edited that as per WP:Source, focussing on the more reliable source that I gave. The survey was closely overseen by the Council and so had to be fairly conducted, taking
4630:
It is good to see you do not revert data people have corrected that is, as the sources around it attest, totally wrong. It appears some of your reverts border on the obsessive. Forgive me when I say this but an awful lot of bad prose is out there and just because a long spiel has been reviewed as
4373:
article it explains nautical language was the lingua franca of the high seas for hundreds of years. On the contrary, I put you to find a major European language which does not have the Portguese-based word. Perhaps move the citation if you think this not basic knowledge... In fact I'll do that to
2846:
The listing entry does not refer to the matters quoted above and I therefore suspect your information comes from another source; I would be very grateful if you could tell me what that source is. I know Speen House well and I strongly suspect the statement is correct, but it would be great to see
2611:
Hi, just to explain my removal of your edits. Basically the Musgrave Baronets of Kempton are not descendents of the Musgrave Baronets of Hartley Castle. That Baronetcy started in 1611. The Musgrave Baronets of Kempton Park are from an offshoot of the family prior to then, back in the early 1500s.
2540:
You're very welcome: it so happened to top one of the four large land use categories that ONS uses. I would say the National Park status clearly agrees that it's nice the Dales resisted the idea of another trans-pennine expressway - it resists the connotation from that Pennines Passes map in the
1913:
Or one can simply click 'hide' as even I will confess they are sometimes of use. Where there are six sections of no more than 2 paras each (and three of these are See also, External Links ands References or similar) (regardless of how many 'subsections or sub-sublists/sections') there is usually
1232:
P.S. I have to say I'm a bit offended you gave barnstars to three other very early contributors to that article, but not me, who actually wrote and did the research for over 85% of the current article that was award GA status by you. Not that I am on Knowledge for awards, but I worked pretty darn
1167:
us about topics which are particularly badly known, such as the places in Essex, or the places by the River Thames, receiving little or no media coverage nationally, and very little lately in leisure coverage and guides, then the sorts of lists best in precision will feature something that has at
605:
I'm not entirely sure if your snide tone is necessary. I have removed ALL mentions of specific constituency change proposals because it's no longer relevant to include them. They are not going to happen, so they shouldn't be mentioned. It's nothing to do with specific parties or excess seats; I'm
471:
which digresses a great deal into the wildlife and geography of the Eye (spit of land). All the better perhaps, unless you happen to have a researcher with a purely wildlife/green spaces interest; I hope there is a redirect for Blakeney Eye... Those articles have, I admit, relentlessly gathered
7075:
Finally you have queried sentence length. There are a huge number of studies which show that the longer a sentence is, the less comprehensible it is - a quick internet search will reveal this to you. I would respectfully suggest that you take a little time to look at a newspaper or book that you
6521:
I've read the odd 18th century synopsis on British-History and various other flick-throughs that suggest Guildford "has always been the county town" but there are a few others of similar date which assert the town doesn't really have one and strongly like Southwark and Croydon for it. These same
6215:
I'm with you now. Sorry, I got lead down a somewhat blind alley at first as the category Canals in Surrey hadn't been used at all with reference to tat page. To be picky that shouldn't be used either, or Canals in Hampshire, as Basingstoke Canal is a sub-category of both I've discovered. regards
4996:
my creative point that the data is up in the air on many precisest points then again, make your argument (or I will) on such fellow wikipedia projects and stress for the sake of the risk of fake-news in this area (completely laughable) needs to be cited line-by-line, that seems a poor reading of
3641:. These detailed out how many re-elections the winner saw. I did so as did not have time to make the case so conceded it for the time being and wondered what the eventual outcome might be. There was briefly a partial come-back and it was for a few weeks, passing other notable editors, successful:
3140:
P.S. You are of course talking about Crossrail 2. The actual operations are open for consultation, but as a diagramatic representation which is used elsewhere for many stations sometimes run through as part of a semi-fast or fast service as on the east part of the North Downs Line, I accept the
1437:
What you have to understand is that this is not some perverse, inverted 1984 where every even slightly non-household term is fleshed out to its absolute maximum, which is what you tried to do with Lord Chancellor. The whole point of having hyperlinks on terms like that is so that if people don't
486:
of Midsomer Norton finding his article having to be subsumed into the village. The policy is Grade II and Grade II* are not Grade I and so do not deserve their own articles "except if exceptionally, eg. internationally notable". Indeed you'll see under Landmarks such a policy even goes further
289:
Hi Adam - thanks for your reply (here and on my talk page). Maybe I was a bit hasty removing certain paragraphs from the Chapel article that I felt could have been added elsewhere, but that wasn't my main point. My main beef was that I had made lots of other changes, most of them uncontroversial
8483:
Do you not stop and think, even for the slightest moment, that your time here on Knowledge would perhaps be better spent editing articles relating to things that you *are* a fan of, or at least take a significant interest in? How big a need is there, really, for you to edit articles relating to
7831:
of the small squares (place = platz) you cannot use motor vehicles; except for deliveries, in those that you can use motor vehicles I am looking for a convenient shorthand. I tend toward the German model of English where you can simply use terms somewhat creatively and indeed motorized in some
3721:
ADAMS, Ha ADAMS, Wa ADAMS, Wa ALEXANDER ALLEN, Er ALLEN, Fr ALLEN, Wi ALLUM, Ge AMEY, Nel AMEY, Wil AMOS, Jos AMY, Will ATTWOOD, ATTWOOD, AUSTIN, A AYLING, C AYTON, Ge BAGLEY, J BAILEY, C BAILEY, G BAILEY, H BAILEY, J BAINES, S BAKER, Fr BAKER, Pe BALLARD, BANCROFT,
3310:
If I added a second HOOK which is unnecessary then just remove it, and any other fields, even task forces which I see under WP:TASKFORCES might re-invigorate the project and inform people which part of the county someone is from or something is really to do with. The first HOOK is a major step
2867:
It is possible the list entry has changed so as to be verifiable. Alternatively I have missed the source as Page's contribution to the quite comprehensive Victoria County History project makes no mention of this either. These would probably be my only sources but have a look for nearby listed
890:
Hi! I just wanted to thank you for your recent edits on the article Slow! That replacement of the word "civilian" was helpful, in fact I myself admit that it did seem "holier-than-thou" before, but I couldn't think of something else at that time. Do you think the article qualifies for GA? I was
8091:
That's good but I'm really not concerned about people using a browser at the wrong resolution to make their side panels too big or small. Countless are the times I have spelt out what images show so people without full sight have at least a hope of what is going on. I will of course adopt your
4709:
That really is the most self-serving of arguments; one person's technical language is another person's jargon. And one person's tagging is as good as another's with the same experience in complex articles. I am one of the most successful editors on here. Do you want to just stick to the Simple
3210:
like in wikipedia and democracy! However in 1981 Swanscombe Parish Council was upgraded to Swanscombe and Greenhithe Town Council, and that stamp of change means the answer is town. In England local government and central government will not use the word town unless they are sure the central
1564:
Please stop changing the article to make it sound like Tague was standing on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository. He was not, of course, and I'm sure you know that, but the wording you are using makes it sound like he was. He was near the triple underpass and was slightly BELOW
1438:
understand something they can find more about it on its designated page. If your approach was adopted by other Knowledge editors the servers wouldn't last an hour. I will continue to edit F.E. Smith's page for as long as I see that it can be improved and will not buckle to your petty threats.
1125:
What is incoherent - the category, the discussion, my contribution? Actually, I haven't heard of standardisation of categories. Can you point me to some discussion? A category - populated places on the River Thames in Thurrock makes sense from where I'm sitting. There is a perfectly reasonable
8386:. And don't think that I'm the only one objecting to your actions here, just because no-one else has up to now: that may very well be just chance. I'm sure you know very well, too, that some edits can go for months and even years before someone finally objects to them with some justification.
7067:
I will ignore the comment that you made about ‘today’s younger generation’, save only to note that one of real tragedies of our current political climate is the way in which old and young have turned against each other. In part, this is because of a lack of respect and unwillingness to listen
6700:
the Cranleigh one simply called the "south-eastern branch of the Wey". I demur on the half of the paper about capture of the upper Blackwater if for no better reason than want of evidence. Se my talk page the conflicting story of the Alton branch flowing north which seems a 'natural' line.-
6301:
Firstly, the place to discuss things is the relevant talk pages, not the edit summaries. See: (I'll concede that Surrey certainly does not have a proper county town, though the innumerate "sudden antiquary" paper writers actually promoting housing beg to differ; however one must add some true
3121:
It doesn't have any of the early morning or late evening trains as the operators recognise there is demand to get to London etc quickly from the line without calling at a station 1/4 of a mile away from another on the line and a line which is already much slower than those around it having no
2625:
suggests it was rebuilt from a crumbling structure in grand 19th century stone or bricks following the baronetcy coming into the cadet branch of the family. It seems the higher numerical Musgraves Baronets therefore took on the mantle of leading Cumberland dignitaries from their 1-4th baronet
8536:
Like, what the heck? Wouldn't you be more inclined to want articles relating to things that you *are* a fan of - or at least take a significant interest in - to get "good article" status? Wouldn't someone who likes golf but not soccer, for instance, be more inclined to want the article about
7436:
Proving how horribly divisive roads are, I looked to the third road, being 3-digits at the above article and see it says. "dual carriageway accordingly at times beset by illegal racing" in the lede! If you, too, agree that is a bit non-encyclopedic then demand a citation or demote at will.-
7012:
On a more personal note, I know that when you receive well-intended, constructive criticism from others, you have a tendency to 'lash out' and accuse those who do not appreciate your ‘style’ of wanting to dumb down and of being unable to understand ‘academic English’. I am an active research
6767:
Hi Adam37. I’ve noticed that you have making several edits to articles on rivers in the past few weeks. A lot of your edits involve changes to the lede sections. Those changes can sometimes overload what should be a clear, concise summary with excessive detail that might find a better home
2729:, which, talking about the church, says "It has been referred to as the 'cathedral of the Chilterns', on an outcrop hill, seemingly the most easterly of the Chiltern Hills however geologically linked to the ." This still stands in the article - do you know what it is geologically linked to? –
7606:
P.S. and it's not the first time on here we are coming across grammar "reversionista dictators" in spades. Such a waste of energy. I can't work out whether they specialize in PR, in government comms, or twitter, or all three. There's so much more energy to give to other articles, please.-
4760:
One article I did a lot on and yes I'm 15th ranked, but I thanked, liaised, reviewed others edits very sensitively and played my part, I've not "taken it" as you write. Stop spinning my own lines away from what they logically say, you may get dizzy. Everyone is entitled to a little bit less
4484:
I seem to recall some kerfuffle with the American pronunciation issue when I was originally improving the article a few years back, and what reliable sources existed to back it up, but it's regularly wheeled out as an archetypical example of British names that are confusing for Americans to
786:
violations (not even consistent in which variation it used!), misused apostrophes in plurals, capitalisation errors in headings (!), and just the general things that would normally be picked up in a GA review, and I'm not even a third of the way through the article. I notice you said you're
5407:
as closest-star is about 9,000 years. That is put in, instead of the unduly wordy finding taken from the same author. Also Alpha not Proxima will be the closest for some of the time so the double inconsistency (or falsehood) has been identified. I'm not some sort of wayward chimpanzee.-
7745:
Well, that's a very disheartening attitude that you "won't help" when you clearly can help. I have fixed it by figuring out where you copied the info from. Can you at least copy full references next time? You should also at least mention where info is copied from in the edit summary per
5614:
If I were you, I would have first started the appropriate discussions on the articles' talk pages. I would have described the issues I had with the existing text, and how I wanted to change the text so as to sort out these issues. And I would have welcomed the opinions of other editors.
978:
Anything I had moved was far smaller and had far more sources so hardly worth my work in doing as you suggest. Please be aware sources are the governing rule of wikipedia, anything unsourced and with potential to be challenged entitles any other editors to remove it. Interally devised
4460:
Possibly I do need to chill. Perhaps look to the substance (edits) instead of the form (edit summaries) as that is kinder and more helpful to the project. Facta non forma. As to keeping on top of everything I sympathise a lot, though your "keep on top of everything" is not particularly
4227:
I don't have access to the source material you cited, so I can't use that to work out what you meant; can you please rephrase this paragraph so that a reasonably competent reader of english can understand it (it's important, because it discusses important legal rights and obligations).
7093:
I totally agree with the principles you now set out. I also now have a civility guru. There is an unaddressed question: what if a river has many competing sources? I propose for many where the source is rarely, variously or unconvincingly mapped stating the type of headwater drainage
5742:
Please don't be rude. Thank you for providing a citation. I'm certainly not after a "crystal standard" of plain English, but the sentence as it stands is barely sensical. You're making an important point, so I'm sure you'll agree it needs to be written in a way that is understandable.
2176:
The village name, then, in the absence of convincing evidence otherwise, should I think be written without apostrophe as "St Johns". Since I know you are interested and experienced in grammar and place name spellings I'd be glad for you to consider this and make the changes if agreed?
3604:
I didn't notice that and would not normally code like that purely for wasting bytes. Whoever edited Battersea and made it look more logical and respectful of politicians' respective tenures (or lack thereof) clearly should have understood that first, but understood here anyway now.-
6564:. That certainly muddies the waters no end. But looking at the anticline upshift and those sharp, twisty, soft-matter-lined gradients down from Farnham, my contention that a flow from Tilford could not ascend, contrary to all geology and go north, up to Farnham is all the stronger
317:
before, so I can see where you're coming from. I guess the best solution might be to add subsections for each daughter settlement to the Chapel article, with a brief summary and {{main}} links to the main articles for each. But that's for another day; I'll tread cautiously for now.
5075:
complete account of the constituency's political history, and in some cases was misleading (e.g. Labour's vote share) and worded confusingly. I have edited most of the analysis and removed the parts of it which I thought were least relevant, but I would welcome you to add sources.
7403:
from Central London to a point in Berkshire. It also mentions Marlow as the UK economy cannot be ignored. It serves a number of populous towns. I think be bold and just tone down my own sophistry which I admit was rather present. I think axis and orientation are unnecessary.-
5970:; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the
5702:
Please don't be rude. There's nothing in my comment to indicate skepticism - I said your edit resulted in a sentence that was wordy and confusing (it's also grammatically incorrect). And it requires a supporting reference because of its significance, not because I'm disputing it.
2772:
Hi. Is "corollary" a kind of Term Of Art in railways or =something? I'd honestly never seen it before in this context. I am admittedly very much NOT an expert in rail matters but I was just a bit surprised to see a term that was "new" to me in some of the articles I watch. Cheers
2199:
or official as say, offices and councils of the public sector, which for better or worse, have great sway in orthography in Britain. In the last 5 years words have been broken up which never used to be and apostrophes added to many other place names. In the words of that nun on
4963:
It is just a translation. I know the Italians work to different standards on wikipedia. As Gaia data examination corrects much what has been published, I am sure what they have put and indeed I have no doubt has been fairly and accurately published, will be much better refined.-
8734:
suggest that where you are amending the syntax of a sentence, you read and re-read what you have written as though you were an outsider trying to read the article for the first time, and try and establish whether what you have written would make immediate sense to someone else.
7060:
of words does not fit. I also agree that we would want to avoid starting with ‘River X is a river’ - however in the examples above, you’ll see that I have not used that phrasing. So I ask now that when you edit river/canal etc articles in the future that you follow this pattern.
2621:. Why is this not mentioned in the prose? Eden Hall did similarly become it seems the second or first home of the family for a few generations, before it was demolished in the early 20th century and is not mentioned, though has never been part of a title as far as I can see.
3463:. Adam37, please don't reformat any other MP lists until there has been a discussion. I would have reverted as part of "Bold, Revert, Discuss", but it was complicated because you'd done other changes in the same edit (no problem with that, I tend to do the same thing). Thanks.
6768:
elsewhere in the articles concerned. I wondered if we could perhaps agree a ‘formula’ for the first couple of sentences of the lede for articles on rivers, which might help readers (some of whom might be of Primary School age) to quickly understand what an article is about.
7386:
I would suggest that it's worth borrowing from the formula that we developed for rivers - all you need to say is where the road starts and ends, and also to note that a section is apparently 'missing' due to multiplexes with the A219 and A3. With very best wishes and thanks
3740:
One must consider the forensic credentials of the author(s). There is strong possible inter-relation of these sources and "historiographical" elements in the book which I have not read - it is £25, (and whether the methods used are sound or not). I agree the four sources in
1140:
Of course you are not incoherent. I would respectfully disagree about a sub-category. Most contributors brow-beat others into line when you try and make up your own categories. I have little against Thurrock I just would not, given London's example, depart from that, and
3713:
Hi. Thinking more on my edit where it refers to four sources, I would have been astounded if I were wrong but I have checked and realised many studies were undertaken in the centenary year, 2016. This abbreviated list numbers 737: the first ten characters of the 737 killed
8801:
with regards to edit summaries? "Nonsense", "claptrap" - this is passing judgement on editors who had their own reason to phrase things as they did. In some cases your edits are not improvements, they're just tinkering. Be more open to working with other editors, please.
543:
I have to say that I thought of the chapel as more of a history topic, in that there's little there now and it will soon be completely gone. No particular logic to that since the church has hundreds of years of history, and my nature reserves tend to start in the Ice Age
7510:. I may be telling you something you already know, but I've only just discovered that these articles are 'open source' (i.e. no longer behind a paywall). I am not sure if this is a recent change, but I wasn't aware until this month and so thought I would spread the word.
2675:
in Sunbury-on-Thames in that article. If the information by various earlier editors on the article page is correct you have actually proven that the Musgrave Baronets of Kempton Park are immediate descendents and main heirs of the Musgrave Baronets of Hartley Castle! -
3891:
over 100 C, caused by a fireball 1/3rd of a million times bigger than it. It'd be a far less effort to go to another planet or something else involving legging it. So I can't see how it's even good theory or logical... At any rate, thanks for your time and for talking.
1069:
I never said there was, I said if you would read it more carefully, in the categories, as someone has deleted numerous Oxford villages on the same ground. Please specify which, I am no vandal so will not simply restore something we cannot develop coherent policy on. -
6406:
Rather than take offence it's better to take the philosophy of "honi soit qui mal y pense" and "benefit of the doubt", as I am something of a source when it comes to water. I do appreciate you probably rank alongside me in terms of extreme Surrey knowledge though.-
2994:
Accepted in this instance. Change is often too slow to come in the railways but if it stands any chance of competing with roads then those sort of misnomers will need to be sorted by Network Rail or ministers, the greedy little companies again perpetuating myths.-
1715:
Forgiven; forgive me also, I was pre-emptively censoring in case some architectural renegade with a grenade in his hand decides to knock any of your work on the head as a little too one-man specific. Which makes you a specialist, which can only be a good thing. -
2399:
I have now clarified what was meant about "larger than", it may well be the whole place will just become it's station doorstep properties, the way it is has shrunk. Let's hope more wards are named after it in future as it's obviously neutral and down-to-earth. -
8576:
on the basis that the edits did not overall improve the article. Aside from some cosmetic copyediting, you introduced a number of grammatical constructions that simply do not make sense, and as I suspect this will be contested, I wanted to give a few examples:
2525:
However I did mention there - the route called A56-M65 - - but thank god the A56 valiantly struggled over into in Lancs before it got gobbled up. Do you think you could mention that the M65 comes the closest to Craven? I cant think how to phrase it, any ideas?
4844:
so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this legal requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the
8206:
The reason is where there are two perfectly plausible subjects and one would result in a logical error (absurdity) you select the subject of the not very long sentence that makes most sense, rather than proceed to tag at will. Knowledge is not a tag fest.-
6132:
states that he was again convicted at the retrial, which was upheld upon second appeal). But if he eventually was acquitted it seems an important fact to include in there, so I thought I'd leave you a message in case there was a source I'd missed. Thanks!
8352:
You've tested my patience with your edits to postcode area articles, you really have - particularly your "correlations to traditional terms" on the UB and HA articles, and your rambling (politest word I could think of) on the talk page for the HA article.
3426:. I think if this sort of change is going to be acceptable to the list in this article then it should occur across all UK Parliament constituency articles, both current and historic. If this is your intention, it may be worth you opening a discussion at
803:
for, which normally in shorter articles remains consistent. I will happily correct the points you make. Rather than plough through the backlog like "St Peter on steroids", I'll try instead to employ my considerable powers of copyediting to good use. -
1734:
No worries. Really glad you like the Burges stuff. I read somewhere that St John the Baptist, Outwood, was in a poor state of repair and was struggling for restoration funds. I see you live in Surrey. Do you know if the position is any better now?
2616:
Thank you for the full overview, which is always hard to discover and prove outside of Westminster/Royal records as it is all so long ago. I understand the break in male lineage to a cousin. However the title itself underwent a period when it became
145:
and I saw you were a member of Knowledge:Wikiproject Surrey. I was wondering, as you are a on the Participants List weather on not you would like to help improve more Surrey articles and make Knowledge:Wikiproject Surrey and active Wikiproject again.
3623:
I see the article had two periods (2010 to 2017) (and Spring 2017) when the section showed the re-elections (if any) in the list of MPs returned by date. None of this I added, I merely deigned to defend it and some editor thought I might have added
1602:
BEHIND Kennedy. While I did not write that section of the article, I assume that the person who did write it mentioned the window to show how far away Tague was from Oswald when he was hit by either a bullet fragment or ricocheting concrete piece.
8398:
appealing it may be to casual readers - you discuss it on the corresponding talk pages first (without rambling, too). And if the outcome of the discussion turns out to be one you don't accept, well I'm sorry, but you might just have to accept it.
8174:
wasn't about a tag I'd added, to see whether it was me that you were personally attacking. Checking the edit summary for when it was added, it's a fair enough point: it read like it was talking about the view from the bridge rather than the path.
5500:
Thanks, forgotten policy. In regards to declaring it as may refer in the UK to these places the word is 'notable', the rest are just not notable from a global perspective so far as editors so far have written/researched about - they still exist.-
4374:
avoid such obvious pettiness. On that score the French article asserts boldly the word is from Malay and boldly rubbishes the idea it is from Chinese. I am sure you will agree at least we are even-handed and fair in the English article to date.-
481:
on the matter. We should not have Mrs Y of Midsomer Norton writing about her Grade II* listed church in its own article, gathering reams of history and architecture on the matter to find her article accepted but then find Mr Z who has purchased
8374:
and/or animated sitcoms. And, indeed, articles about the postcode areas of the UK are neither supposed to appeal solely to fans of postcodes and/or geographic areas, nor be edited from the POV of a fan of postcodes and/or geographic areas.
2280:
change you added a ref/note which doesn't actually make grammatical sense (the bit about the A5); would you mind taking a quick look and seeing what you meant? I've had a go, but i don't quite know what you wanted to say. Thanks, Cheers,
7691:
The article cites "Summerhayes 2010" and "Deacon 1972" but no such sources are listed in the bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste
4524:
Since the bridge is in Louisisana, I'd expect anyone with a basic understanding of French to pronounce it absolutely correctly (which incidentally may / not include many US citizens!). A good example—a classic from the tourists at LST—is
5829:
3873:
It is uncited; and would be logical to take place to save the planet from frying over millions (or billions of years) if Earth's life's progress continues. I admit and apologise the edit is way ahead of where we need to be right now!-
6356:
indeed from reading this article no knowledge that the west branch probably flowed to the north, thus from its WSW origin, are to be deprecated insofar as it is possible without their ignorance prevailing. And it is theirs not yours.-
6740:
Labouring your reply so verbatim when someone has conceded the point is didactic. I don't think with so many disparate terms this is the place for the glossary, I was wrong. When someone says agreed of my style they do mean 'agreed'.-
4934:
tools, as having some issues to fix. There's a lot of hard data, especially in the starbox, not all of it supported by the given external links. Inline citations are really needed to show where specific claims like numbers come from.
1983:(one of c. 100 around the country) I suspect one article will be sufficient, especially as the names are rightfully about the same. On a separate point, given the dual use I see no reason not to cover it under a Amenities section in
4390:
I wasn't disputing the validity of the assertion, just requesting that it be supported by a reference. Thanks for providing that. Can you provide a readable link to the Manguin article? I can't seem to find it on the web. Cheers,
7490:
2571:
Hi. Could you revisit the section in this article about Clapham South, please? Something's not reading quite right in it, and I'm not quite sure what it was that you were wanting to say when you amended it in the autumn. Thanks.
8473:
despite not being a fan of this soap one bit, or indeed any soap at all? Or someone to make frequent and sizeable edits to articles about the Rolling Stones despite not being a fan of this band one bit, or indeed a music fan at
8710:
earlier and the grammar was very confusing, to the point where I had to go back through the edit history to try and establish what was the article was trying to say. I saw that you had recently copyedited that article as well.
8468:
Then with all the respect in the world, why on earth are you even editing these postcode area articles in the first place? Would you, for instance, seriously expect someone to make frequent and sizeable edits to articles about
4686:
is a good read too. (Of course, you can probably pick examples where I've been over-verbose and say "aah-haaa - why don't you practice what you preach" but I certainly don't claim to be perfect and it doesn't really negate my
4790:
I took the liberty of making a few more changes at the top, including the commenting-out of one sentence and ref. that I thought was just too impenetrable for the summary section (I suspect you do too: "long-winded"). I hope
313:
area of Combs Moss, for example). That said, you're probably right that the Chapel article should cover the whole parish, and I'll admit that (although I'm usually a stickler for policy) I hadn't read the relevant section of
4306:. I've removed some sections from the existing article and replaced them with the top-level section "Modern definition" and some sub-headings. If you have any comments, they would be welcome in the talk page of the sandbox.
3726:
does not seem biased and gives this list. I invite you update the author of a book citing the much lower figure which is "“A magnificent historiography, bridging the gulf between local and national history.” Dr Ray Fereday
1643:
Oh good point, it was the source in general. The English used does not imply causation, the ridiculous old expression I used 'much to the rise of' means the latter profited from not was caused by the forerunner activity. -
8224:
blatant digression to the start of the sentence is it? It is thick to the extent it assumes next readers will all be incapable of understanding which should contextually not have to relate to the last noun before ,which.-
4981:
are OK and assuming somebody will go out and do your dirty work for you is not good enough, and weasel words about Gaia and ongoing research aren't good enough either. Knowledge, Italian or otherwise, is not a reference.
8661:
Wrong. REDISTRIBUTION OF SEATS ACT 1885. The Victorians had no qualms with your particular obfuscation of using "constituencies"; it is your preference for sophistry that is saddening, not mine for equally precise terms.-
3757:
now at 737 plus 9 on the other vessel I would be loathe to criticise personally, I wouldn't want to upset any of the families considering if that were my relative on that stone. If they died on other vessels then which?-
3430:. Should your new style of presentation be deemed by others as an improvement, you will still have much work ahead of you. I don't think you will get many other editors keen to make this change to all the other articles.
1233:
hard over a few months to do extensive research and write that article, and now shepherd it through a lot of review processes; and its not so nice for to see others be given recognition for what was mostly my own work.
5386:
Hardly fair in casting my recent edits as uncited; if you care to look at the diagrams and links in the very same article you will see they are all correct. As to 'removing a reference to a text' that is just not true.-
4104:
If we measure sidereal days and sidereal years in atomic seconds, we see that variations in sidereal days due to variations in the rotational rate of the Earth has no effect whatever on the length of the sidereal year.
1142:
5718:
with a good look at countless articles on linguistics, physics or philosophy at grade C or above. There you'll find much more that will no doubt jar with your narrow filter of what makes good reading. Your demand for
4127:
Thank you. And as an aside I wasn't implying the last sentence. We could just say the origin of the sidereal year is where the earth returns to a previous point of reference among the background stars, in a relatively
2892:
Maybe, but if you are going to put "former" on every disused facility on every diagram in Knowledge this will need discussion And if you think it will help the sight impaired that is what you are going to have to do..
8550:
8506:
7381:
The road has four principal axes to stay no more than 3 miles from the River Thames to run from Central London upstream to Bisham, Berkshire which faces the town of Marlow across the river, explaining its four main
3845:
Hi, you recently changed the text "approximately 2.3 billion years from now, the increase of the Sun's radiation will have caused Earth's oceans to evaporate" by adding "unless shielded by artificial intervention".
3460:
606:
aware that Knowledge shouldn't have space wasted on abandoned or aborted proposals. The article on the Sixth Periodic Review is quite enough - listing scores of seats that will never exist seems wasteful and silly.
5610:
Knowledge may encourage its editors to be bold, but for each article there is an extent to which an editor can be bold. You went past the extent for the postcode area articles. In simpler terms, you were too bold.
6128:, among other edits. I've removed it because it was unsourced and unsupported by the body of the article; I've also been reading quite extensively about the case and couldn't find any sources for it (indeed, the
1088:
At the moment all the places in the Essex category are actually in Thurrock (not just the current unitary authority, but also the preceding borough). Has the deletion of Thurrock category been discussed anywhere?
4443:
has looked over it too. However, we can’t guarantee to keep on top of every single drive by edit made to the article since. Also, punctuation marks are difficult to distinguish when viewed on a smartphone, in my
5764:
5248:
strong scholarly (e.g. non-tourism focussed book) or governmental sources can be found to verify such content and it is worthy of a Global Encyclopedia article. Essentially many articles otherwise turn into a
3056:
as a passenger for your whole career and not hear the lines described in this way. If that is what the lines are called that is what we use, and if you are trying to change that this is not the place to do it.
367:
Perhaps you have failed to click on the source in the citation, which I could have placed in a more logical order for you. That is a slightly odd accusation, knee-jerk for sure and does not assume any form of
4354:, among European languages. If he doesn't discuss this, then it would be appropriate to supply another reference or to undo the assertion, correct as it probably is. I'll look for your thoughts, here. Cheers,
2747:
Fixed. I was reading an article on the sands and sandstones of nearby but that does not form a separate ridge here lining 'Vale of the Great Ouse' also known as the 'Vale of Bedford' unlike at Woburn Sands.-
1545:. Unfortunately I haven't been able to give much time to Knowledge recently, but hopefully I'll get some time nearer Christmas. Also, thanks for improving Surrey settlement articles, keep up the good work! --
5549:
the article - just reconciling as best I could. I would go still further than you and say I have a passing interest only in pronunciation. Something must have grated on me to venture into that shady realm.-
376:
whom the manor of Chew-Baker has its name; and inserted in a window of the aisle, is a wooden effigy, supposed to be of Hautville: in the eastern corner of the north aisle are monuments to the Strachy family.
8567:
8419:
8361:
too? Articles about Manchester United are neither supposed to appeal solely to fans of Manchester United and/or soccer, nor be edited from the POV of a fan of Manchester United and/or soccer. Articles about
7665:
Thanks. Hopefully I've given them a grasp of proportion. It seems to be the sort of new-fangled craze to create articles about absolutely every division, even when they are quite beyond global obscurity.-
8356:
Surely you, a Knowledge editor of nearly fourteen years, know very well that each and every Knowledge article is supposed to appeal to casual readers first and foremost, and is supposed to be edited from a
3956:
The role of the sun is indirect; the sun and earth together define the plane of the earth's orbit about the sun. The instantaneous position of the sun is not directly involved in determining sidereal time.
7165:
So to rivers with multiple sources. I am well aware of the issues you describe, however I think that you (working with others) have already solved this problem successfully in one case! Take a look at the
3697:
that there may have been recent research changing this. Could I suggest that, if this is so, you could provide the source references and amend the 650 figure (which appears twice in the article). Regards.
4249:
leeway. If you wish to example the wording of the Act, please do. Sometimes the breakdown of the term is more confusing and vague than attempting the backstop provision of giving it its ordinary meaning!
2868:
sites, such as ramparts on the map search function of Historic England - I sometimes combine all those supporting structure articles into one overview which would be best practice if they did the same! -
1668:"Unsigned, inappropriate, trite." Re. the signed edit from the person who created the page solely as a contribution to Wiki's coverage of Burges. You sure know how to win friends and influence people.
491:, insert please the section heading article links (not really hatnotes), insert a landmarks section, put the used buildings under it and where fully-fledged and non-puffed up articles exist on a topic.
4204:
You claim on your user page to be a grammar nut, and you claim to advocate for simple english. Your user page, however, is full of incomprehensible subordinate clauses and over-elaborate constructions.
3849:
Your comment justifying this change was: "Clearly a shield could be constructed over hundred of years (or robotically or whatever) to block this added solar radiation mentioned. Abject doom-saying...".
3106:
You are right about the terminus but the other station (Kempton Park) has had the same service as the others on the branch since June 2006 according to the SWT wayback quoted in the station's article.
2173:
agree that it is written without apostrophe. This is also backed up by the peerage title of Baroness Anelay of St Johns, whose name is taken from that of the village and is written without apostrophe.
8554:
6380:
The second source quoted does not appear to be readable on-line and searching on key words doesn't bring up a suitable reference, hence me restricting my comments to a source I could actually access.
6258:
this is the first time I have come across a such a description. The fact that you had to go back to a relatively obscure scientific paper in 1848 shows that it is not a common or current description.
5280:) 10:37, 20 March 2019 (UTC) If you see unclear then you are in a minority, fix it yourself as I being a decently kind person would. Also in regards to meaningless, obviously not. I'm not that bad.-
6726:
also referred to a historical use of the names 'western Wey' and 'Alton Wey', should you wish to add one. (Incidentally the 1930 paper refers to the South Branch as the 'Headley Wey'.) Best wishes
2843:
more likely that these oldest stones were sourced and hewn for the late medieval manor house, nothing else of which survives." You have cited the house's listing entry in support of this statement.
2492:
253:
article since your edits earlier this afternoon (some of them to the new material you'd added) but your latest edit has overwritten all my changes, so I'm going to have to do them all again. Thanks.
5066:
3348:
229:
in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks,
7791:
Hello Adam, while reading through the jaywalking article I stumbled upon this term. As I can't find it in a dictonary or using Google I'd like to ask you what synonym could be used for this term.
553:
I'm quite happy to leave the policies on towns etc to the experts, I'm well aware that I'm a birder who's trampling roughshod through the villages of North Norfolk. I almost feel I should upgrade
4405:
Unfortunately I'm no longer a member of JSTOR. Perhaps ask someone who is at university still or a university academic who has access or visit a library that has that journal or access to it.-
2486:
4095:
The sidereal year is defined as the time for the Earth to make one revolution about the Sun (or vice versa, as you prefer), relative to the fixed stars, not with respect to the vernal equinox.
8681:
Overall, I don't like to revert an edit where only part of it is particularly problematic, but there were so many poor changes introduced by that edit I felt that I didn't have much choice.
3169:
in August which includes Gloucestershire. A chance to win £250 as well! If contests aren't your thing we welcome independent contributors too. If interested sign up at participants. Cheers!♦
6042:
Ironic, any further petty warring I would find an admin to actually impose sentence on you, or on me if they so choose. But let's not fall out when I am trying to make a coherent project of
1229:
just needs a few more supporting votes to get it over the line. If you wanted to have a look over it and add your support, or criticism if it needs more work, that would be really helpful!
463:
Your contributions to Norfolk have rivalled my prodigious ones to Politics and Surrey, Jim. The problem of the smallest articles which have little about them which is strictly relevant and
8249:
the tag not really that bad, but it is still a lazy lack of application of mind, even 99% intrinsically, i.e. among good people who are unable to visualise who do have my honest sympathy.-
5682:
I don't think I'll take pointers from someone who cannot even spell Bevin in a title. However I will find something from the copious realms of literature on British mining to satisfy your
2329:
706:
5451:
Utterly wrong. In regards to whether 33,000 years to 42,000 years is 9,000 years, it is. And anyone bar an android with a hatred for English would admit my edit removed clutter words.-
4694:- the writing is atrocious and it's been tagged as such for several months. I think you'd find your editing time to be more positive if you focused on prose already tagged for attention.
2073:
assessors I have come across. I am appalled by a few of the GA crew who rejected one of my own nominations, not just failing but demoted two grades and having to toil to even get it to
951:
from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at
7521:
2449:
8754:. Again save bytes. It makes much more sense for me to reply here. I will take up your points even if they do not represent brevity. Which to many minds has a beauty all of its own.-
676:- it's gratifying after all the work I've put in. Does this mean you'll be passing the article as GA? Or does some period of time need to expire for others to comment as well? Thanks
353:. I was wondering if you had a source or more information about the manor of "Chew Baker", as I'm not familiar with it and can't find any sources which mention it. If it is a play on
7887:? I'd quite like to look it up and flesh out the article a bit more with it, as it's rather stubbish at the moment. I used to go to keyboard fairs there and play on the new digital
4675:
3352:
473:
7969:
as atm that article's graph isn't very good and there is even a graph for "MPs changing seats not returned" which makes no sense, but the graph you made would make it look better.
782:
Hi. Regarding your recent GA review here - don't take this the wrong way, but did you copyedit the article at all? In the half-hour since I first looked at it, I've found multiple
4812:
Your edit adds further to its excellent coverage of a complex topic traversing all of linguistics. You are clearly well-versed in the subject, I wish I could say that I was too!-
3360:
394:
Thanks & I apologise for my inappropriate comment. I've improved the ref format (BHO has an option at the top to format references for wikipedia) & dabed John Strachey to
8439:
The very least you should do is upgrade the articles as other people will spend time adding more debateably useful content of some sort and it will waste their time completely.-
5867:
2490:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
2327:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
8745:
8727:
8698:
7556:
time, please make sure that your edits are grammatically correct, since it is hard to copy edit the whole article. Thanks for your contributions, and have a nice day! Cheers,
6668:. I presume that you have found this through a Google Books search and that you were only able to view a snippet, however I have access to the full paper concerned, which is:
6279:
sources come up in seconds. I have obviously read more on the subject than you. Sorry to use a harsh word but the north/south simplification cannot withstand serious minds.-
5403:
What you mean to say is 'removing a finding in the further reference' which was as it actually is a false summary. The diagram lifted from the same source shows the period of
8410:
5312:"...and had re-constructed all the other related articles." is very promlematic and it fails NPOV to impose another. Doing so would, in this case, is not very constructive.
1856:
have nine (the first two having one and seven subsections respectively). If you don't like to see a TOC in articles, you can suppress the display of them using the following
8604:
8546:
8502:
8402:
8629:
The "or more" means "or more than one"; this is implicit. Slow down and read, please. The latter is a technical term so wikilinked and enframes a much more complex idea.
5296:
2323:
1226:
5088:
983:
does not apply to wikipedia as suggested so your wording was excessive, particularly as regards attribution which is a matter of courtesy, which I well now understand. -
8484:
things that you are not a fan of, besides making the most basic edits in these articles like correcting punctuation, fixing tables, expanding references and adding tags?
7624:
7573:
5272:
is garbled. Why would Scotland want St Davids day as a holiday? And the sentence "The Scottish Parliament has passed a law ..." is meaningless. Could you fix it please?
1431:'The article is however problematic for its lack of notability in the lead - he was very notable as Lord Chancellor which should be put in lay terms as archaic post'...
8266:
Thanks for fixing the sentence, which I agree needed some trivial rearrangement. Making a crack about "the thickness of the tag maker's head" is inappropriate, though.
7937:
However not to be discounted for inherent profit/intrigue-making, "Local tradition asserts that Hall Place itself was a shooting-box of the Black Prince." See in 1911:
7647:
Hi. You seem to have been left off an original ping list for this one. Your involvement in place articles could suggest you might interested in this topic. Thanks. See:
6660:
Hi Adam37. I have just checked the reference for your claim that the north branch is sometimes known as the western branch. You have added a reference to a 1930 paper:
6179:
s well as other. There is, and was, no link on that page to any Category:Canals in Surrey so I don't understand what your reasoning is, perhaps you could enlighten me?
8510:
8450:
7864:
5809:
924:
a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "
738:
7237:
So far as getting the ‘official/traditional’ source ‘wrong’ (as some might say is the case for the Thames), I don’t think this is a uniquely British phenomenon! (See
906:
518:
Thanks for bouquet. The chapel is a bit of an anomaly really. Most of my Norfolk articles are nature reserves, some of which are of international importance as such (
8523:
So you edit these postcode area articles simply because you want them to get so-called "good article" status and keep it, even though you are not a fan of postcodes?
3661:
3427:
1583:
as no I wasn't aware. I wasn't aware there was an underpass. Why the focus on the window, perhaps what is meant is perpendicular with that window? I apologise. -
3372:
So, what else is needed? For example, do you wish each taskforce to have its own importance rating, independent of the general WikiProject Surrey importance rating?
7810:
5930:
You can add whatever relevant content you want. You just can't add stuff you happen to know is true (over and over) without citing a reliable source. Thank you.
5047:. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
3166:
691:
Hi Adam37, thanks for the barnstar, but I'm afraid it is undeserved, I had nothing to do with the Bruce article. Feel free to remove it from my talkpage. Regards,
7924:, his wife. So were several other manors. Rumours of courting by the Cray are it seems uncited from the time; this was her third-husband and an arranged marriage.
7974:
4736:
As I said at the top, you need to chill out, take a deep breath, and realise you aren't as smart as you think you are. By the way, I see you claim to have taken
3637:
Let's see what has happened to the extra column and rows that came in, work of User:Bkissin, in 2010. I duly removed all this per the discussion of January 2017
2394:
editor in what is the tricky domain of London's pattern of old established 'districts'. I'm adding plenty of the original maps and broader history of this area.
5380:
4643:
in places. You appear to demonstrate that yourself in many of your reverts which are reverts of such unacceptable prose from any encyclopedia's point of view.-
5134:
5112:
4832:
2821:
2807:
2413:
2184:
1619:
4481:
review with unanimous consensus - yet nobody spotted it. I wonder why that is - it's a straight forward fix that could be done by anyone, possibly even a bot?
1637:
4048:(NIST), making it appear NIST is incompetent by attributing them your false explanation. If you make any further edits to this article without citation to a
1386:
8501:. With your undiscussed (at that point) "correlations to traditional terms", for instance, I'm sorry to say that, IMHO, you were being a little *too* bold.
6772:
The aim here is to reach a consensus to ensure that all active editors are pulling in the same direction and that individual contributions are constructive.
1914:
consensus they be auto suppressed, or at the very least auto-hidden. TOCs are a bit wasteful on the web where it all fits in about one screen, low zoom. -
5722:-worded articles is mirrored by the way in which you require everything minutely cited even with what is a fair but not laboured overview of content (per
5187:
5159:
1063:
414:
but I haven't yet found anything else about it. There is an unnamed spring at ST580642 (N51:22:33 (51.375745), W2:36:14 (-2.604019)). I will ask around.—
8573:
7581:
5534:
4856:
3344:
1463:
7729:
Won't help sorry R. I'm not the source and the fact that it has an article to that level of detail is, to my view "daft", but some others will differ!-
5342:
5322:
5319:
3292:
re-assessing the articles labouriously which is my intention. I do not like to be compromised by just an issue of auto-categorisation (by importance).-
2419:
1098:
7970:
5328:
4587:
4568:
4543:
1045:
5316:
2708:
8784:
8406:
8103:
2180:
7632:
7618:
7601:
5325:
972:
8334:
7453:
Also the 2 sentences there (A217) will definitely leave you panting for breath. I can't say roads make me anywhere near as breathless as rivers.-
6556:
True. Coming back to the flow of the Blackwater I've read one recent Project/Group long paper that reckon it took the top of the Wey N or W branch
5141:
4010:
The time at which the Sun passes through either of these intersection points; i.e., when the apparent ecliptic longitude of the Sun is 0° or 180°.
2380:
1961:
700:
8092:
learning and am immensely grateful. However I find it less important than the changes I have effected - just to note - on other pages of course.-
7590:. I now recall they're edited at one hell of a pace. Not in a bad way. We have rather had a helluva a year "and they didn't escape my radar".-
6485:
5524:
that the same distinction as hard and soft? If so, Bethnal, surely unvoiced; so unvoiced=hard! Alternatively, they're two different distinctions.
4792:
4784:
771:
327:
6762:
2812:
Well, they say that you learn something every day, and I just did. Thank you very much for the thoughtful and intriguing reply. With best wishes
2761:
2165:
The name of the village varies on signs and street names but local historians, older people, deeds to property, and usage in The London gazette:
960:
7345:
7029:
8284:
8156:
5353:
5113:
4938:
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on
4045:
3892:
3859:
3091:
1657:
1181:
1135:
1120:
1083:
30:
to Knowledge! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
8027:
5433:
responsible for your edits, and if challenged, the onus of proof is on the individual who adds the edit. (After reading your 'explanation' on
2881:
2689:
8590:
This is not proper grammar. The previous construction was absolutely fine, but simply replacing "as to" with "in" would be better than this.
7035:
I don't rush into things emotively as you imply. I think standardisation is OK if limited to the type you give. Let's exclude 'river X' is a
5648:
5068:
5061:
3749:, ISBN 9780953594573, Irvine, Budge and Callist (2016) is OK. The stone memorial itself commemorates a further 9 men who died on HM Drifter
3689:
3544:
3454:
3431:
3356:
3224:
2480:
1964:
is justifiable, but as I haven't any experience with British architecture articles (and their proper sourcing), I leave it to you to decide.
1264:
487:(which I have not written and does not chime entirely with consensus). This is where such policies get undermined. Anyway back to Blakeney,
8260:
8235:
8218:
8201:
7847:
6634:
6618:
6604:
6579:
6551:
6516:
6502:
6449:
6418:
6389:
6340:
6324:
6290:
6242:
6225:
6210:
6161:
5589:
5560:
3706:
2509:
2108:
2094:
1346:
for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.
299:
284:
7996:
7566:
5939:
5925:
5462:
5446:
5419:
5398:
4287:
4269:
3343:
It would help a lot if I knew what you were trying to achieve. I'm clear on one thing: that you want to add five taskforces, one each for:
2741:
8333:
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Knowledge's
8139:
8044:
7952:
6098:
6082:
6057:
5752:
5737:
5712:
5697:
5542:
5011:
4990:
4975:
4874:
4772:
4726:
4704:
4654:
4511:
4472:
4416:
4400:
4385:
2216:
2063:
1467:
8877:
8833:
8765:
8497:, you ask. While there's no denying that boldness is encouraged when editing any article, you also cannot deny that it's only encouraged
8005:
5963:
3867:
3618:
3599:
3405:
3387:
3305:
2782:
2263:
1945:
1927:
1908:
1820:
1245:
858:
640:
592:
513:
7723:
7677:
7538:
7480:
7464:
7448:
7431:
7414:
7362:
7266:
7130:
7088:
7050:
6752:
6735:
6712:
5512:
5106:
4363:
4064:
3930:
2558:
2311:
2013:
Perhaps I should have said "an article" rather than "a separate article"; it doesn't seem to be discussed except in your parenthesis at
1441:
As for my quatrain, it wasn't supposed to be taken seriously, as you might understand if you had the slightest whiff of literary nous.
1368:
1322:
238:
8011:
7776:
7759:
7740:
7189:
do not meet!) For a river with multiple headwaters in close proximity, none of which is identified as the source, I would simply say:
6491:
branch business resolved on the upstream parts (and less water). Plus they both have page numbers. What page number haven't I put? -
5023:
5021:
4912:
4841:
you included material from a webpage that is available under an Open Government Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution
3900:
3885:
3154:
3135:
3065:
3050:
3037:
at that point in London some tiresomely obvious independent study could easily override that. Never mind, have it in a cosseted way.-
3008:
2964:
2937:
2922:
1932:
Oh and you can have a virtual token of apology, in that I was probably neatening and got carried away and neatened a little too much.-
1611:
1596:
830:
816:
406:. I've looked in a couple of local history books and not found any mention. If it is north of the village it must be on the slopes of
8673:
6537:
6367:
4332:
4143:
4114:
4086:
4028:
3991:
3966:
3947:
3831:
3790:
3771:
3675:
3570:
3552:
3324:
3177:
2600:
2034:
2004:
1960:
Thanks for your recent tweaks to some of the Onslows. Given the number of incoming links, I'm inclined to think a separate article on
1199:
214:
7966:
for the 2019 election and thought it was great! I was wondering if you might add it to the other article about MPs who lost in 2019:
4823:
3908:
3837:
3281:
2817:
2778:
2445:
2376:
1677:
8010:
I think your link to the Battersea article is a bit broken, as for me it leads straight to the page as it currently exists. Perhaps
6557:
5630:
3533:
3482:
2470:, which you added to the Cranleigh article, does not appear to exist, as it's a red link. (It sounds like a good idea, though.) JH (
1762:
1744:
1729:
1710:
1696:
1530:
1016:
996:
418:
389:
249:
Hi there—can you make sure you work on the very latest version of an article? I'd made quite a few additions and corrections to the
186:
161:
7683:
5033:
4957:
4683:
2988:
1663:
1270:
8545:- and therefore edit the former article accordingly, and not edit the latter article at all (except perhaps to make minor fixes)?
8171:
5792:
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
5518:
3506:
3439:
2021:
would be better; the focus could be the structure and its architecture, but with some background on the history of the manor (cf.
7547:
4055:
In as much as the definition of a sidereal year is separate from the definition of sidereal time, your edit summary is off topic.
3334:
2346:
1459:
8279:
8184:
7572:
Adam37 I was wondering do you frequent the hurricanes corner of Knowledge? I haven't seen you edit these pages until that day.--
5607:. Also, your summary of "Copyedit (major)" for the edit you made to the ME area article was too short and not very descriptive.
4493:
was pronounced like the device you put bread in. Of course, the perfect comeback for Americans is, "Alright, how d'ya pronounce
4315:
4041:
3914:
2655:
2240:
2069:
The essence was good but the connotations, occasionally divisive terminology and conjugations would offend all but the most lax
1979:
Sort of. Grade II* is borderline. Also, as it is a school building that was originally a grandiose (ie not just agricultural)
1300:
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
7868:
3628:
3516:
3365:
3254:
I am available to be asked regarding advice on WikiProject banner templates, as I have much experience in this area. Regarding
3244:
2861:
262:
8860:
7623:
It's a very busy article, the Atlantic hurricane one. Pacific typhoon one is also very busy especially this past week or so.--
5676:
5306:
3200:
3115:
443:
has just a wikilink. Again, I have no preference on style, but it seems inconsistent to treat the two FAs differently. Cheers
8327:
8134:
7938:
7814:
5979:
5269:
4489:
being pronounced "Chizz-wick" (I confess I struggled to keep a straight face with that one) and amazement / incredulity that
4369:
Nonsense I have just read the French article as well and it refers to the Italian and various others and explains why in the
4347:
4338:
3690:
2902:
2042:
1574:
80:
8118:
4609:
2663:
Quite sadly that is suggesting the article is neglecting to cover Eden Hall as well. They are the same five baronets as the
2144:
932:, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Knowledge has a feature that allows pages to be
73:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
8085:
7860:
6542:
Ah right! Based, I believe on a mis-reading of a medieval charter. Ironically Surrey may soon have a county town - Woking.
6315:
I'm not even sure what you mean by it, who are these innumerate "sudden antiquary" paper writers? Do you mean innumerable?
5032:
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether HD 34137 should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at
4477:
What's interesting about the punctuation issue is it's been there for two years while the article passed GA, then passed a
4350:. I'm not able to see into the Pierre-Yves Manguin reference to confirm that he talks about the commonality of words, like
3423:
2853:
2813:
2774:
2441:
2372:
1489:
1394:
685:
133:
122:
4895:
4237:
4221:
3. 'highly indistinct': could it be that you mean simply 'indistinct'? I don't think there are degrees of indistinctness.
2726:
2188:
1807:
It has an exemption for very small number of non-substantive sections (e.g. 3) I hardly overstepped the policy by much. -
1225:
to GA status. Well its now been through a fair bit of peer review to try and get to FA status, and it is almost there but
821:
Thanks for this gracious response! Would that more editors responded to this sort of thing in this way, quite frankly. :)
7659:
3417:
3330:
3266:
3249:
2974:
2533:
2497:
2334:
2051:
1542:
1213:
900:
435:
article. I'm not objecting to that, but I would be interested to see the actual policy on this. In the town article, the
220:
8811:
7284:
5494:
2639:
1126:
catgeory populated places in Essex on the River Thames. A similar category related to Thurrock would be a sub-category.
796:
477:
articles on fields, hamlets, neighbourhoods, housing estates, places of worship in general and junior schools. That is
8109:
7806:
7747:
6188:
6139:
6043:
5603:
Some of the edits you have made to these articles come across as you wanting to suit yourself, which is a violation of
4164:
on quasars located in distant galaxies. Due to the great distance, any motion of these distant sources is undetectable.
4075:) of the whole concept of years, hours, minutes, seconds is just when you take the start and end of that orbit to be.-
3256:
3160:
2367:
Where is "whilst" deprecated, please? I'm not greatly in favour of changing it and would love to read why we should! :)
2317:
1455:
1398:
1333:
754:
721:
7333:
As I say, I admire your quest for precision, but precision must not come at the expense of of clarity or conciseness.
7317:
Perhaps I could then respectfully ask you to review one of the sentences which you wrote yesterday in the lede of the
6522:
people singing the constant praises of Guildford and paying scant service to what a county town truly was, a place of
6267:
6144:
5291:
1683:
Actually the work on Burges you have done is great, he is inherently notable and plenty has been written about him. -
7967:
6004:
4293:
3812:
2718:
7507:
7377:
article please? (Ignoring the conversion template, it is 40 words long.) I have no idea what you are trying to say.
7106:
is interesting reading and I bet you've read it. As to British rivers especially this is often not the same as the
6036:
5903:
4806:
3650:
3645:
2287:
7899:
5368:
4918:
4752:
4702:
4622:
4566:
4509:
4452:
880:
725:
380:
made a fool, particularly if this was no more than a short-lived feature/story. Do let me know if it still exists!
6689:
6560:(yes, I thought that was likely) and one that thinks the opposite (as to the "upper part of the Blackwater" only)
5207:
4431:
You need to calm down and take a deep breath. As regards your comment “has this article been proof-read?”, yes by
3122:
semi-fast service. You are talking about the part of the day when most hard-working people are already at work.-
2475:
8780:
8081:
7978:
7901:
5841:
5820:
5766:
3230:
662:
615:
457:
6129:
4754:
4624:
4454:
2529:
I've always been hoping people would add to my epic work but you're the first. Congratulations, Thanks Kildwyke
1973:
1483:
while stub-sorting, and have labelled it as a disambiguation page and tidied it up, also making a redirect from
203:
7628:
7577:
5971:
5618:
Please consider starting such discussions in the future, instead of going gung-ho into editing these articles.
5595:
3101:
3030:
2222:
1801:
1554:
1040:
877:
659:
534:(my daughter is a stonemason and conservator), and one of my obscure sources had two articles about the chapel.
361:
8345:, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in
2581:
1428:
Your edits were nearly all decidedly for the worst. Your writing is horrendous. Just re-read this little gem:
8581:"The Boundary Commission for Northern Ireland announced in 2006 that minor changes to seats would take place
7396:
5805:
4019:
I reject your application of the term "sophists" to the US Naval Observatory and the UK Hydrographic Office.
3487:
I see now that you've reformatted many lists already, but please now stop until there is discussion. Thanks.
2887:
2735:
1559:
1103:
It is incoherent. I am sure you have heard of standardisation of categories! Plus I've been meaning to add
403:
54:
7351:
I clearly have been loving far too many House of Lords and Court of Appeal judgments. Times have moved on.-
5836:
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
1511:
89:
8839:
8323:
8299:
7832:
dictionaries appears as an opposition to pedestrianized. I will rewrite, as obviously in a pedestrianized
7498:
Hi Adam37. I thought you'd let you know (as a fellow Surrey enthusiast) that many research papers from the
5987:
5837:
5816:
5437:
above, you still haven't got the significant issues with context. e.g. Changing any truths into fictions.)
4931:
4161:
3649:
by two contributors above. So who made the original invention? It was by User:Bkissin on the 10th May 2010
3461:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Politics_of_the_United_Kingdom#MP_lists_in_constituency_articles_-_format_change
3191:
is called "a small town", but it categorised as "Villages in Kent". What do you think it is, officially? --
2025:), which might overburden the St Mary Cray article. (The moreso as it's no longer being used as a school.)
2014:
917:
39:
5982:
for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
8165:
5991:
5657:
4901:
Fine. I wasn't aware it had received the Borough's approval. As such I am inclined to agree with you.-
4663:"; that's an earful of a sentence that only gets to the finite verb about half way along. And you wrote "
4603:
4519:
4494:
4215:
1. 'counter-intuitive' is subjective, and being part of an Act of Parliament, is clearly a term of art.
4006:
Either of the two points on the celestial sphere at which the ecliptic intersects the celestial equator.
3447:
2351:
1628:
being a result of shipbuilding. I can't find a supporting quotation in Sylva. Do you have a page number?
921:
5530:
And in the estuary pronunciation, the 'and' should just be an 'm', not the 'ən' given, don't you think?
5367:
this was not deliberate nor vandalism act, but I do implore you to justify and discuss these edits here
4635:
does not mean its prose can still at times be ambiguous, misleading or opinion-laden in the style of an
4606:
2979:
These are simply the operational names for certain lines that run out of Waterloo. Google them and see.
8776:
8342:
8077:
7964:
5887:
5180:
5152:
5127:
5043:
is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on
4880:
3392:
Nothing else. I don't see the need to add anything else, thank you for fixing the coding, very much.-
2276:
243:
94:
7794:
6329:
Both, they're hopeless on striking a balance between history/modernity and appear to be multiplying.-
3196:
8346:
8130:
6565:
5999:
4436:
2719:
2606:
1893:
1786:
1633:
1131:
1094:
1059:
952:
851:
844:
633:
626:
395:
59:
8190:
I don't think that the natural reading, I think the strained reading of someone needing the khazi.-
4612:
4208:
Well, I don't care about your user page. I care about this paragraph, that you added to the article
3581:
use HTML 4.01 attributes which are marked obsolete in HTML5. Is there any reason that you can't use
304:
Thanks again—I think I understand your position. As a local, I have to say that I wouldn't consider
8389:
I strongly suggest you reconsider your approach to editing postcode area articles. You do not want
8378:
Your "correlations to traditional terms" come across, to me anyway, as bordering on violating both
8311:
7934:! These works confirm Hall Place's hidden agenda in whatever hot and cold running ghosts it offers.
7786:
7711:
7642:
7301:
5891:
4838:
4580:
4536:
4132:
or the sun's rest frame (I am not sure which). The one thing it isn't is when the equinox recurs.-
3182:
3087:
2857:
2834:
2704:
2651:
2514:
2099:
Aw man and we were so close to getting it passed. All it needed was a better lead. Thanks anyways.
1423:
1390:
777:
696:
5527:
I've never heard anyone say Bethnal and make a diphthong out of the 'e', that you write as 'ey'.
7913:
7884:
6558:
https://surreynaturepartnership.files.wordpress.com/2018/05/wlp-catchment-plan_sert_-draft-v3.pdf
5910:
5804:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they
5626:
5472:
5260:
4671:"? The more concise you can get the facts across, the more likely the reader is to pick up on it.
4659:
No, it's just I think you have a habit of saying more when less will do. For example, you wrote "
4258:
I think the word missing is "certain" or the words missing are "certain variously interpreted".-
2152:
2116:
1241:
940:
896:
681:
947:
at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a
198:
Thanks for your work on the Cranleigh article, and in particular the excellent photographs. JH (
8792:
8275:
8180:
7527:
Thanks, I am very interested in the Magna Carta barons' camp and wonders of the Roman period.-
6614:
6547:
6512:
6481:
6445:
6385:
6320:
6263:
6221:
6184:
5983:
5967:
5538:
5330:: all have similar issues in this regard. None of these are particular helpful. Please consult
5265:
4778:
4199:
4129:
3798:
2730:
2140:
2104:
2059:
750:
717:
323:
295:
258:
234:
149:
I hope you will come and help make Knowledge: Wikiproject Surrey an active Wikiproject again.
34:
27:
4741:
2699:
get into the research required to prove there is actually such a Baronetage may encroach on .
2667:
of Hartley Castle as their birth and death dates are identical. So why is there no mention of
1050:
I have reverted one of your category removals pending fuller explanation. There is nothing on
530:. I wrote the church article as a result of reading an article on medieval church graffiti in
8315:
5935:
5899:
5442:
5376:
5348:, especially as this text is neither formally cited nor properly sourced, It looks more like
5174:
5146:
5121:
4233:
3422:
I have noticed that you have introduced a new style of presentation of the list contained in
3288:
2078:
1845:
1479:
You seem to have left matters in a bit of a muddle after your work on Portsea. I came across
667:
440:
270:
Hi Dave. I hope you'll agree to at the very least compromise on any reductionist changes to
66:
7853:
Thanks you for the clarification. I wish you a happy new year, too, and stay healthy. Eike
4678:- it's a good set of exercises to try your hand at, particularly if you ever want to tackle
3858:
talk page, to reach consensus and agreement before any similar changes are made. Thank you.
3557:
I was about to implement boldly the perceived improvement throughout. Do I have no taste?-
3192:
2440:
try to absorb all that a bit. I'll get back to you if stuck but for the moment, best wishes
2022:
8640:
in the number of Westminster constituencies from 646 to 650 for the 2010 general election."
8241:
8121:
8023:
7897:
7880:
7856:
7802:
7242:
7238:
6863:
6075:
6029:
5914:
below perhaps instead. Basically the grass is parched in summer and stony soils dominate.-
5748:
5708:
5672:
5232:
5169:
5057:
5044:
4986:
4953:
4939:
4851:
4750:
4744:, I have worked with the editors who really did. Sorry, I can't work with liars - I'm out.
4700:
4620:
4564:
4507:
4450:
4396:
4359:
1832:
sections, plus seventeen subsections in addition, making a total of 33 entries in the TOC.
1629:
1451:
1382:
1127:
1090:
1055:
1035:
980:
959:
that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at
70:
8314:
with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the
7939:
https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Selborne_Magazine_and_Nature_Notes/emNCAQAAMAAJ
8:
8856:
8807:
8739:
8319:
7927:
Hall Place may have had a forerunner, but its fabric starts two centuries later. Agreed:
7648:
6526:
meaningful markets, government etc., know the price of everything and value of nothing.-
5975:
5863:
4636:
4303:
3936:
Incorrect. The ecliptic plain is a product (ie machination) of the position of the Sun.-
3595:
3383:
3277:
3207:
3083:
2700:
2647:
2542:
2519:
That's a great addition you made to the Craven page, about it being free from motorways:
2459:
2269:
2236:
2195:
2168:
1904:
1797:
1484:
885:
611:
587:
558:
478:
452:
369:
74:
8706:
More concerningly, this appears to be something of a pattern - I happened to be reading
6507:
Its the innumerate "sudden antiquary" paper writers I don't understand as I said above.
6120:
The defendant was found not guilty (acquitted) at the retrial the year after his appeal.
3340:
Once all of the changes to the sandbox version are finished, we can than copy that live.
8648:
The quota did not derive from personal preference of the Commission. It was set by law.
8383:
8145:
Gosh your opinions are strong. It's not consensus jumping. It's not spam. Get a grip.-
7655:
7517:
7476:
7392:
7341:
7262:
7084:
7025:
6731:
6685:
6167:
5622:
5490:
5201:
5168:
nominations when it becomes apparent that the article has changed. Suggest you reread
5083:
4943:
4440:
2626:
Musgrave cousins. That seems categorical unless numbers have gone missing somewhere.-
2530:
1625:
1550:
1237:
1163:
I would just like to bring something else to the table, if the categories are there to
948:
944:
892:
873:
838:
677:
655:
385:
344:
314:
280:
271:
250:
118:
49:
5371:. If you have an doubt, then feel free to discuss them on talkpages or ask questions.
4614:) - if you get upset when it happens, you need to detach yourself from the situation.
3079:
2430:
which I have come to agree is unencyclopedic text: contrast based on personal opinion.
1785:
to an article unless you provide some other means of showing a table of contents, see
8498:
8390:
8271:
8176:
7755:
7719:
6948:
6917:
6610:
6543:
6508:
6477:
6441:
6381:
6316:
6259:
6252:
6217:
6180:
6176:
6134:
6111:
5950:
5801:
5719:
5228:
5216:
4891:
3896:
3863:
3855:
3839:
3240:
3111:
3061:
3026:
2984:
2933:
2898:
2767:
2664:
2136:
2100:
2074:
2055:
1955:
1607:
1570:
1363:
1317:
929:
826:
792:
762:
745:
729:
712:
692:
496:
432:
319:
309:
291:
254:
230:
191:
182:
167:
157:
86:
6062:
Please take it to the article talk page rather than making comments like that here.
3723:
8872:
8828:
8771:
8760:
8722:
8707:
8693:
8668:
8599:
8445:
8295:
8255:
8230:
8213:
8196:
8151:
8098:
8039:
7991:
7947:
7842:
7795:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Jaywalking&diff=prev&oldid=965155234
7771:
7735:
7685:
7672:
7613:
7596:
7563:
7533:
7459:
7443:
7426:
7409:
7357:
7125:
7045:
6961:
6886:
6835:
6747:
6707:
6665:
6629:
6599:
6574:
6532:
6497:
6413:
6362:
6335:
6285:
6237:
6205:
6156:
6093:
6052:
5931:
5920:
5895:
5872:
5732:
5692:
5643:
5584:
5555:
5507:
5457:
5438:
5414:
5393:
5372:
5286:
5277:
5101:
5006:
4970:
4907:
4869:
4818:
4767:
4721:
4649:
4467:
4411:
4380:
4327:
4311:
4282:
4264:
4229:
4224:
4. 'such as where shared' up to the semi-colon: I cannot parse this clause at all.
4138:
4110:
4081:
4060:
4024:
3986:
3962:
3942:
3926:
3880:
3826:
3808:
3786:
3766:
3730:“Succeeds in its goal admirably, deserves a place on any bookshelf.” Sigurd Towrie
3702:
3670:
3613:
3565:
3548:
3528:
3435:
3400:
3319:
3300:
3219:
3170:
3149:
3130:
3045:
3003:
2959:
2917:
2876:
2802:
2790:
2756:
2684:
2634:
2595:
2577:
2553:
2505:
2471:
2408:
2387:
2342:
2306:
2258:
2247:
2211:
2089:
2030:
1999:
1969:
1940:
1922:
1853:
1815:
1757:
1724:
1691:
1652:
1591:
1525:
1373:
1259:
1194:
1176:
1115:
1078:
1011:
991:
811:
783:
766:
620:
508:
210:
199:
142:
17:
1378:
Just wanted to thank you for that splendid update you made to the Coulsdon page.
8849:
8798:
8394:
8019:
7892:
6940:
6561:
6065:
6019:
6016:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
5849:
5744:
5704:
5668:
5478:
5345:
5053:
4982:
4949:
4846:
4801:
4745:
4695:
4640:
4615:
4559:
4502:
4445:
4432:
4392:
4355:
4209:
3014:
2564:
1474:
1405:
1343:
1291:
1030:
600:
554:
527:
468:
436:
426:
8073:, so prevents awkward line breaks that result in a line beginning with a dash.
7503:
5978:
among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See
5195:
4691:
4276:
I have had a go. These are complex arrangements. You are right - it needed it.-
2364:. I like what you've done but I don't think it quite works yet. Hope this helps.
2081:
subject. So I really am not going to stick my neck out sadly on this article.-
1221:
A couple of months ago you were good enough to review and promote by article on
472:
enough fascinating information to have reached a well-written FA standard. The
8852:
8819:
8803:
8751:
8735:
8593:
Wrong; in is ambiguous, as to reminds the audience it's not local gov. seats.-
8494:
8430:
8358:
8303:
7874:
7373:
Hi Adam37. Can I ask you to review the following sentence from the lede of the
6839:
6008:
5859:
5723:
5571:
3588:
3497:
3473:
3459:
I don't think the new format is an improvement, and have raised the subject at
3376:
3270:
3015:
2391:
2232:
1897:
1790:
1740:
1706:
1673:
1536:
1502:
968:
758:
733:
607:
580:
519:
488:
445:
226:
7985:
their somewhat hard-to-grasp columns, in my considerable experience of them.-
6996:
then flows 34 km (21 mi) in a generally southerly direction to empty into the
4302:" article and would appreciate it if you could look at my progress so far, at
8845:
8425:
8379:
8267:
8050:
7958:
7888:
7651:
7513:
7472:
7388:
7337:
7258:
7246:
to point out how they are disputed (using appropriate citations, of course!).
7080:
7021:
6921:
6913:
6727:
6681:
6302:
highlight for context as it is not Gu-Weyb. that's all as strongly connoted.)
6195:
5604:
5486:
5429:
5364:
5331:
5224:
5165:
5076:
5040:
4679:
4577:
where gangs of men terrorise the countryside with their close harmony singing
4426:
4299:
4186:
4182:
4049:
3918:
3742:
2283:
2132:
2125:
1776:
1580:
1546:
1222:
1104:
1003:
Also I see someone has already imported the history so many thanks anyway. -
925:
865:
673:
647:
492:
114:
44:
8294:
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Knowledge, as you did at
7321:
article? Ignoring the length conversion, it is 47 words with three clauses:
5815:
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
5637:
must have irked you and caused you to make so many obfuscatory reversions.-
8542:
8063:
7928:
7921:
7751:
7715:
7368:
7318:
7103:
6985:
6932:
6905:
6878:
6859:
6855:
6831:
5785:
5770:
5349:
5338:
4887:
4632:
4478:
3236:
3107:
3057:
3022:
2980:
2929:
2894:
2228:
2200:
2070:
2018:
1984:
1833:
1603:
1566:
1358:
1353:
1349:
1312:
1307:
1303:
1287:
1272:
1022:
822:
788:
523:
178:
153:
8626:
I genuinely have no idea what this sentence is now trying to communicate.
8613:"Greater London was reviewed borough-by-borough – some were "paired" i.e.
4160:
As I understand it, the concept of "fixed stars" is currently realized by
2947:
function/footnotes) are seen in other diagrams abroad. I don't think the
1282:
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
398:. I will try to find out more re the manor name. The well is mentioned in
8867:
8823:
8755:
8717:
8688:
8663:
8594:
8440:
8250:
8225:
8208:
8191:
8146:
8093:
8034:
7986:
7942:
7917:
7837:
7766:
7730:
7667:
7608:
7591:
7528:
7454:
7438:
7421:
7404:
7352:
7120:
7040:
7005:
6944:
6890:
6843:
6742:
6702:
6624:
6594:
6569:
6527:
6492:
6408:
6357:
6330:
6280:
6232:
6200:
6151:
6088:
6047:
5915:
5727:
5687:
5638:
5579:
5550:
5502:
5452:
5409:
5388:
5357:
5302:
5281:
5273:
5254:
5220:
5096:
5001:
4997:
4965:
4902:
4864:
4813:
4762:
4716:
4644:
4555:
4485:
pronounce. I've witnessed it first-hand on several occasions, as well as
4462:
4406:
4375:
4344:
4322:
4321:
Seems good, cannot think of any more suggestions than in the talk page.-
4307:
4277:
4259:
4133:
4106:
4076:
4056:
4020:
3981:
3958:
3937:
3922:
3875:
3819:
3804:
3782:
3759:
3698:
3665:
3606:
3558:
3521:
3393:
3312:
3293:
3235:
The entire sentence doesn't make sense. It's nothing to do with the moat.
3212:
3142:
3123:
3038:
2996:
2952:
2910:
2869:
2795:
2749:
2677:
2627:
2588:
2573:
2546:
2520:
2501:
2401:
2338:
2299:
2294:
2251:
2204:
2082:
2026:
1992:
1980:
1965:
1933:
1915:
1808:
1750:
1717:
1684:
1645:
1584:
1518:
1252:
1251:
I missed the blatantly obvious later additions and am therefore sorry. -
1187:
1169:
1108:
1071:
1004:
984:
804:
501:
464:
407:
381:
276:
8636:"This net increase of 4 constituencies resulted in an overall increase,
7649:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_England/Parishes_RfC
7171:
five years! I think this ‘formula’ could easily be replicated elsewhere.
6231:
article has so many categories still. Pretty messy but then water is.-
5819:
without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
5485:
content. Most of the articles listed had no mention of Cranley Gardens.
1338:
7167:
5894:
and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
5663:
5172:. But you can ride it into the ground. Your call, I guess. Cheers.
4796:
4674:
I would recommend (indeed, I would recommend it to anybody) to look at
4602:...and reverting of good-faith edits is all part of a day's work here (
3188:
1329:
1283:
1276:
1051:
411:
372:. Referring to the County History it is the only manor referred to:
350:
305:
8617:
to ensure that the sizes of the electorates are not overly disparate,
8568:
Recent copyedit on Fifth Periodic Review of Westminster constituencies
6593:
Rutland motto which leads me on to Wey beers - have we covered that?-
103:
8538:
8290:
7374:
7001:
6993:
6989:
6936:
6909:
6874:
6827:
6124:
6112:
5878:
4490:
4255:
Agreed. To correct this any editor can be bold (please do change it)
3488:
3464:
2460:
1841:
1825:
1736:
1702:
1669:
1493:
964:
415:
358:
354:
192:
4052:
that directly supports the change I will pursue dispute resolution.
6882:
5955:
5848:
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
5434:
5404:
4924:
4531:
4526:
4486:
2622:
1849:
1837:
1186:
Update: all lists have been peer-reviewed and so has my grammar. -
7836:= platz = square a man can cross where he wants. Happy New Year!-
7249:
I hope this is of use. I think the thing to ask yourself is ‘what
6566:
https://www.farnhamgeosoc.org.uk/currentdocuments/localgeology.pdf
5119:
Sometimes you get the bear, sometimes the bear gets you. Cheers.
3311:
forward as provides for rigorous B-class assessment by everyone.-
2131:
For all the terrific work you've done expanding articles, such as
903:(I am typing this from my mobile so there can be many typos etc.)
8015:
7912:
Hasted and other main researchers who cite contemporary manorial
6847:
6623:
Saving that book for my retirement. There's a book in everyone!-
5883:
5788:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
4676:
User:Tony1/Redundancy exercises: removing fluff from your writing
2565:
2361:
1480:
672:
Thanks for your kind words and positive review for GA status for
110:
8818:
all of these articles, but the petty "tinkering" or rather "non-
8370:
and/or animated sitcoms, nor be edited from the POV of a fan of
6670:
Linton DL (1930). "The development of the Wey drainage system".
6997:
6894:
6851:
6007:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
4737:
3657:
even if a heavy table line is used only if the MP changes name.
3165:
Hi. I was wondering if you'd be interested in participating in
8120:
on my talk. I urge to promptly revert your mass-messaging. --
7932:
Sutton Companion to the Folklore, Myths and Customs of Britain
5600:
Please do not go gung-ho into editing postcode area articles.
3781:
in future accounts of the sinking of HMS Hampshire. Regards.
1624:
I have removed the comment and reference about the decline in
912:
77:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place
8655:"seat" in place of "constituency" and it just doesn't work.
7278:
Hi Adam37. I thought I’d pass along these two links for you:
891:
concerned after your edits. Thank you very much again!! :) --
8541:
to get "good article" status, rather than the article about
5000:
as nigh-on all of it appears in SIMBAD which is linked to.-
4181:
Information about the sidereal year belongs in the article "
3733:“An in-depth study, highly recommended.” Cdr. John Bingeman
3578:{| border=1 cellpadding=5 cellspacing=0 |- bgcolor="CCCCCC"
1991:
as well. That might be ample coverage. What do you think?-
1701:
Appreciated. Forgive my churlish response. All the best.
1296:
861:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
643:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
7821:
Thank you Eike. I am conscious that in France, in at least
6698:
Transactions of the Geological Society of London - Page 143
5778:
3753:
clearing mines on 17 days later that June. As matters are
3287:
I am at a loss, after hours of not quite fruitful study of
2160:
943:, you should be able to move an article yourself using the
225:
Hey Adam37; I'm dropping you this note because you've used
8687:
I bet you don't then copy out what you don't understand.-
7502:
are now available from the Archaeology Data Service here:
3747:
HMS Hampshire: a Century of Myths and Mysteries Unravelled
707:
Talk:2012–13 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team/GA1
410:
and probably flows into Winford Brook (a tributary of the
8645:
I just don't know what the italicised section is saying.
6175:
Regarding your changing of various category links on the
5826:
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
5567:
3662:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
3428:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
1857:
1844:
have eleven, plus four and six subsections respectively.
357:
then it's funny but dowsn't really belong on wikipedia.—
3167:
Knowledge:WikiProject England/The West Country Challenge
166:
P.S. Either reply or Knowledge:Wikiproject Surrey on my
85:
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
8770:
I happened upon this discussion by chance. I found the
8055:
Just noted your edit to Euston Square, where you wrote
5662:
Hello, I'm concerned that your good-faith edits to the
4942:. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at
3646:
a lovely, abbrievated, non-dated coding technique style
2246:
That will help people participating most frequently in
1488:
they led to an appropriate article. I'll put a note at
474:
WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements
5998:
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
3745:
article tally and it would seem from critics the book
2386:
Thanks for the compliments and I am glad to see a non-
2169:
https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/52173/page/9
1517:
I apologise for the delay. I have been rather busy. -
7302:"Sentence length, conciseness, clarity and ambiguity"
5481:
because disambiguation pages are navigation aides to
4000:
gives this definition in its Glossary for "equinox":
3269:, please use that for making experimental changes. --
3021:
Please read the above and consider its implications.
2587:
Complete. Thank you for your thank you afterwards. -
7907:
There is only that Black Prince in regional history.
5990:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
5297:
Reverts on Culmination article (and some other ones)
2422:
so both are deprecated and I remember now I've used
2420:
How_to_write_about_settlements as to while or whilst
8844:Please remember with editing and edit summaries to
8574:
Fifth Periodic Review of Westminster constituencies
8322:with them. Alternatively, you can read Knowledge's
6964:
5882:Please do not add or change content, as you did at
4185:" and has very little relationship to the article "
3357:
the Reigate & Banstead and Tandridge task force
3080:
http://www.southwesttrains.co.uk/May-timetable.aspx
3078:
The term "Windsor lines" is in current use by SWT (
928:move", and it is undesirable because it splits the
6584:I just wanted to publicly flog myself for putting
6118:Hi, a couple of months ago you added the sentence
3349:the Mole Valley & Epsom & Ewell task force
3345:the Runnymede, Spelthorne and Elmbridge task force
1143:List of Populated Places in Windsor and Maidenhead
1027:Can you supply a reference to that helpful edit--
8366:are neither supposed to appeal solely to fans of
8326:page, and ask for independent help at one of the
7100:/ and the other options on that drainage page, .
4343:Hi Adam37. Thank you for your recent addition to
3724:http://www.naval-history.net/xDKCas1916-06Jun.htm
2298:as a COMPETITIVE railway building alternative).-
936:to a new title together with their edit history.
857:Message added 19:09, 27 July 2013 (UTC). You can
639:Message added 21:12, 24 July 2013 (UTC). You can
8341:Please ensure you are familiar with Knowledge's
7765:good official report references so great work.-
7494:papers now available on Archaeology Data Service
6912:in south east England. It rises to the south of
6666:https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=s2m1AAAAIAAJ
6087:Please keep your forum preference to yourself.-
6014:even if you do not violate the three-revert rule
5974:to work toward making a version that represents
5369:Talk:Culmination#Revert of Incorrect Assumptions
5140:But in a larger sense, you were the impetus for
4923:Hi, I'm Lithopsian. Adam37, thanks for creating
3638:
920:to Knowledge. It appears that you tried to give
8434:make pointless ideological threats like you do.
7299:
6194:It is a technical point of wikipedia policy at
4795:meets your approval; please say if it doesn't.
4218:2. 'applies to exclude' - what does this mean?
3644:On 21 April 2017 User:82.5.106.137 introduced
961:Knowledge:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen
907:Mayor of London's Sky Ride (Cut and paste move)
439:FA is pointed to by a section hatnote, whereas
7929:water down the folk history/ghost stories from
6970:
6562:http://weyriver.co.uk/theriver/wey_north_B.htm
6476:to separate items in infoboxes is deprecated.
5808:over time. You may like to take a look at the
5114:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Crooked Billet
4833:Copying licensed material requires attribution
4046:National Institute of Standards and Technology
3736:“A darned good read.” Professor Tom Stevenson
3337:) gets placed in the job queue for re-parsing.
1620:Decline in Deer Parks because of shipbuilding.
6947:and flows southwards for 40 miles (64 km) to
6609:Wey beers? You have me strangely interested!
5069:Sutton and Cheam (UK Parliament constituency)
7285:"Sentence length: why 25 words is our limit"
7282:
2157:Thank you for the edits on St Johns Woking:
1987:. An internal link could be added there in
431:I saw your merge of Blakeney Haven into the
8638:as approximately preset by statutory quota,
8585:the east of the province (such as Belfast)"
8059:, and thought maybe you hadn't come across
6893:for 40 miles (64 km) to meet the Thames at
5966:shows that you are currently engaged in an
5964:R v Ingram, C., Ingram, D. and Whittock, T.
711:I believe I have addressed your concerns.--
8268:Comment on content, not on the contributor
7471:Thanks Adam37. Much improved. With thanks
6973:
6662:Proceedings of the Geologists' Association
4661:From St Giles Circus, where it meets ....
4554:the English both get totally flummoxed by
2794:by all means) and not to perpetuate them!
2161:https://en.wikipedia.org/St_John's,_Woking
2135:, you deserve a beer. All the very best,
1046:Populated places in Thurrock on the Thames
65:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
8572:I recently reverted a copyedit by you on
7113:the sources in the infobox / listed right
5686:21st century skepticism of trite facts.-
5477:Hi Adam37, I made significant changes to
5034:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/HD 34137
4690:As a further suggestion, why not look at
2426:wrongly once before. It's the same with
850:Hello, Adam37. You have new messages at
632:Hello, Adam37. You have new messages at
109:Thanks for taking the time to review the
8866:I do. Accept latitude in these things.-
8459:You're "not a fan of postcodes one bit"?
5812:to see how you can improve the article.
5206:
4684:Knowledge:Principle of Some Astonishment
3353:the Surrey Heath & Woking task force
8547:2A02:8084:F1BE:9180:91F6:7747:E957:35F1
8503:2A02:8084:F1BE:9180:5C2D:589B:D894:2386
8420:2A02:8084:F1BE:9180:8090:10A0:C7C6:BB65
8403:2A02:8084:F1BE:9180:8090:10A0:C7C6:BB65
8244:refers; moulding every sentence so any
6763:Lede sections for articles on UK rivers
5301:I have just reverted your two edits on
5227:statements. As concerns UK Places see
14:
8285:Your edits to 2 postcode area articles
6669:
5334:, as it is an editorial requirement.
5327:(removing a reference to the text) or
3998:Astronomical Almanac for the Year 2017
3629:Battersea (UK Parliament constituency)
2194:True. See apostrophes in place names:
1787:Help:Section#Replacing the default TOC
8775:clarify? Incidentally, great work! -
8335:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
6992:in the south of England. It rises at
6976:
6939:in the south of England. It rises at
5270:Public holidays in the United Kingdom
4930:I've just tagged the page, using our
3691:Herbert Kitchener, 1st Earl Kitchener
3361:the Guildford and Waverley task force
2725:Hi, I just saw that in 2013 you made
2487:Category:Historic parishes in England
2481:Category:Historic parishes in England
2360:I've left a clarification request at
3660:I will move this discussion over to
3424:Barking (UK Parliament constituency)
1490:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Hampshire
939:In most cases, once your account is
126:THIS ONE GOES OUT TO ALL MY READERS!
8006:Discussion on Members of Parliament
6967:
6916:and flows 26 miles (42 km) to meet
5344:are disturbing because of possible
3543:Battersea style on an ad hoc basis.
3331:Template:WikiProject Surrey/sandbox
3267:Template:WikiProject Surrey/sandbox
2052:Geographical name changes in Turkey
2017:. I think an article separate from
23:
8012:copying this will serve you better
7963:hi I saw the graph you'd created:
7920:was confirmed directly to pass to
7748:Knowledge:Copying within Knowledge
7098:X rises in / several] headwaters
6881:in central England. It rises near
6044:Category:English criminal case law
5954:
5890:. Please review the guidelines at
5777:
4837:Hi. I see in a recent addition to
957:Also, if there are any other pages
955:to have it moved by someone else.
843:
625:
24:
8889:
8393:to develop on these articles and
8310:If you are engaged in an article
8076:FYI only, free feel to ignore. --
7500:Surrey Archaeological Collections
7492:Surrey Archaeological Collections
7300:Adrian Wallwork (4 August 2012).
7257:With thanks and very best wishes
5857:Thanks again, and happy editing!
5796:The article has been assessed as
5202:How to write about UK settlements
3329:I suggest that we start with the
1492:to draw other eyes to the issue.
8289:
6960:
5877:
3375:What else do you want to add? --
2124:
1664:Church of St Nicholas, Charlwood
1337:
1295:
911:
102:
8619:that is little malapportionment
8014:. I learnt this magic from the
7879:Have you got a source that the
7548:2020 Atlantic hurricanes seasom
6003:—especially if you violate the
5980:the bold, revert, discuss cycle
5962:Your recent editing history at
5315:Notably too, these recent edits
3803:I like your work on the islands
2543:wikipedia is not a travel guide
2050:Remember the GA nomination for
941:four days old and has ten edits
7799:Greetings from Germany Eike
7539:12:03, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
7522:10:01, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
7481:22:53, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
7465:18:44, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
7449:18:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
7432:18:10, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
7415:17:51, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
7397:17:35, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
7363:09:24, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
7346:08:20, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
7283:Sara Vincent (4 August 2014).
5513:16:59, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
5495:12:23, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
5352:. Just be very careful not to
5337:Also recent additions made on
5144:. All's well that ends well.
5039:If you're new to the process,
3791:06:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
3772:19:28, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
3707:03:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
3664: as the first comment says.-
2762:19:32, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
2742:15:27, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
1369:17:52, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
1323:21:20, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
500:I have a liking for. Thanks -
13:
1:
8615:see a straddling seat or more
7869:22:32, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
7848:11:38, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
7815:10:39, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
7777:09:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
7760:04:05, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
7741:20:08, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
7724:19:58, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
7678:16:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
7660:14:25, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
7633:03:48, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
7619:17:35, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
7602:17:30, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
7582:14:26, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
7567:22:24, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
7267:08:06, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
7131:20:36, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
7089:20:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
7051:19:05, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
7030:11:14, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
6889:and flows southwards through
5840:without posting a request to
5631:03:25, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
5519:Bethnal Green's pronunciation
4288:14:56, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
4270:14:47, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
4238:14:28, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
4044:you altered a quotation from
3832:16:16, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
3813:22:38, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
3406:17:29, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
3388:20:03, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
3325:19:14, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
3306:19:10, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
3282:19:04, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
3245:18:23, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
3225:23:30, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
2043:Geographical name changes GAN
1612:23:43, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
1597:15:36, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
1575:07:33, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
1555:18:07, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
1531:19:41, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
1512:23:44, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
1456:MyNameIsGeorgeNathanielCurzon
1265:18:58, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
1246:13:29, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
1200:10:19, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
215:10:58, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
204:18:18, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
35:The five pillars of Knowledge
6854:for 80 km (50 miles) to the
6850:and flows northwest through
5649:09:14, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
5590:19:12, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
5561:19:00, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
5543:22:47, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
5324:(without cite or proof) or
5164:Some editors withdraw their
4252:This is as plain as crystal.
4162:Long-baseline interferometry
4144:18:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
4115:18:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
4087:17:11, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
4065:16:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
4029:18:26, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
3992:15:27, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
3967:15:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
3948:15:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
3931:14:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
3901:18:29, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
3886:14:38, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
3868:14:27, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
3619:22:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
3600:23:35, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
3571:21:04, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
3553:21:02, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
3534:20:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
3507:09:07, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
3483:09:03, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
3440:08:18, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
3201:13:19, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
2822:20:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
2808:19:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
2783:08:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
2601:15:11, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
2582:23:29, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
2559:13:38, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
2534:05:00, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
2510:19:56, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
2476:16:27, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
2450:18:38, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
2414:16:24, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
2381:14:57, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
2347:21:39, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
2227:A trial run is available at
2035:03:11, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
2015:Denzil Onslow (of Stoughton)
2005:21:26, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
1974:14:55, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
1946:10:00, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
1928:09:56, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
1909:21:21, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
1821:20:56, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
1802:20:50, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
1658:20:58, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
1638:20:07, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
1468:23:10, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
1399:20:43, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
134:Knowledge:Wikiproject Surrey
113:article, much appreciated.
55:How to write a great article
7:
8621:due to demographic change."
7111:by convention from writing
6753:19:11, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
6736:19:00, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
6713:18:34, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
6690:18:12, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
6635:20:02, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
6619:19:42, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
6605:17:59, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
6580:17:22, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
6552:16:59, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
6538:16:47, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
6517:16:28, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
6503:15:14, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
6486:14:50, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
6450:14:48, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
6419:14:24, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
6390:14:08, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
6368:12:59, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
6341:14:27, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
6325:14:08, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
6291:12:56, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
6268:12:52, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
6243:17:29, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
6226:17:22, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
6211:16:41, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
6189:16:00, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
5800:, which is recorded on its
5188:19:25, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
5160:16:09, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
5135:15:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
4680:Featured Article Candidates
4665:bisected it perpendicularly
4495:Lake Pontchartrain Causeway
4298:I'm trying to improve the "
3575:The techniques used - i.e.
3418:Members of Parliament lists
3250:Template:WikiProject Surrey
2975:Windsor fast and slow lines
2468:Historic parishes in Surrey
1763:22:03, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
1745:22:01, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
1730:21:29, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
1711:21:23, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
1697:21:16, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
1678:21:12, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
1227:its nomination to FA status
1214:Stanley Bruce FA Nomination
1182:20:35, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
1136:20:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
1121:19:45, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
1099:19:44, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
1084:19:22, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
1064:19:18, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
1041:13:17, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
467:has been skirted around by
221:Article Feedback deployment
10:
8894:
8424:I would point you towards
8347:loss of editing privileges
8298:. Your edits appear to be
8117:Please see my reply to you
8110:Spam and consensus-jumping
7701:'User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'
6162:12:25, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
6145:12:12, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
5868:00:58, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
5753:11:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
5738:10:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
5713:23:32, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
5698:14:57, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
5677:20:50, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
5292:19:02, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
5022:Deletion discussion about
4417:14:31, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
4401:14:24, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
4386:13:50, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
4364:13:40, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
4333:16:11, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
4316:14:59, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
3161:The West Country Challenge
2847:some documentary support.
2709:12:33, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
2690:10:06, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
2656:09:41, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
2640:09:06, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
2324:Category:Medieval parishes
2318:Category:Medieval parishes
2217:18:14, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
2189:17:17, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
2145:03:35, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
1017:18:02, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
997:17:57, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
973:07:55, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
922:Mayor of London's Sky Ride
328:17:41, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
300:17:17, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
285:17:14, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
263:16:46, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
239:22:48, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
123:15:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
8878:17:24, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
8861:22:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
8785:00:43, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
8302:and have been or will be
8157:19:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
8140:18:55, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
8104:11:22, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
8086:11:04, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
8070:
8056:
8045:12:22, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
8028:12:02, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
7997:12:45, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
7979:12:33, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
7953:19:11, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
7902:18:28, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
7693:
7336:With my very best wishes
6788:insert type of river here
6130:one source in the article
5363:It is assumed here under
5107:16:07, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
5089:14:53, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
5062:14:25, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
5012:14:48, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
4991:14:17, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
4976:14:11, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
4958:14:05, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
4913:08:48, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
4896:17:22, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
4824:13:38, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
4807:10:47, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
4773:19:44, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
4755:19:36, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
4727:09:20, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
4705:09:07, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
4655:08:58, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
4625:08:46, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
4588:12:01, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
4569:10:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
4544:10:43, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
4512:10:26, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
4473:10:05, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
4455:09:56, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
4437:Talk:Leicester Square/GA1
3676:10:34, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
3178:11:53, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
2882:20:06, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
2862:14:30, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
2720:Shillington, Bedfordshire
2498:Categories for discussion
2335:Categories for discussion
2312:20:03, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
2288:06:09, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
2264:14:14, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
2241:14:23, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
2203:, go with God, Crispy!?-
2109:20:44, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
2095:19:54, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
2064:08:31, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
1894:Special:MyPage/common.css
1290:-status according to the
901:14:34, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
881:19:09, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
852:Talk:Norman, Oklahoma/GA1
831:09:21, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
817:07:35, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
797:01:15, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
772:00:17, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
739:10:46, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
701:00:43, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
686:06:30, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
663:21:12, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
634:Talk:Norman, Oklahoma/GA1
616:17:52, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
593:06:19, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
514:12:31, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
458:11:57, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
419:16:23, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
396:John Strachey (geologist)
390:14:35, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
362:19:38, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
349:Thanks for your edits to
227:the article feedback tool
187:10:39, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
90:14:30, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
8834:08:11, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
8812:07:55, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
8766:06:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
8746:22:21, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
8728:06:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
8699:06:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
8674:06:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
8605:06:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
8555:19:35, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
8511:22:12, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
8451:18:20, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
8411:21:44, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
8280:13:22, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
8261:18:46, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
8236:18:34, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
8219:18:29, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
8202:18:24, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
8185:18:22, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
6664:, Volume 41, 1930, p173
6099:15:32, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
6083:15:15, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
6058:14:07, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
6037:13:47, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
5892:Knowledge:Citing sources
5851:leaving us some feedback
5838:create articles yourself
5817:create articles yourself
5667:reference. Many thanks.
5463:08:35, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
5447:00:04, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
5420:10:50, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
5399:10:14, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
5381:02:46, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
4919:Ways to improve HD 34880
4875:08:38, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
4857:00:06, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
4839:Easements in English law
4692:Pingu#Production history
3582:
3576:
3155:10:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
3136:10:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
3116:15:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
3092:14:17, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
3066:13:49, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
3051:11:46, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
3031:11:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
3009:10:58, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
2989:10:25, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
2965:20:04, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
2938:21:15, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
2923:20:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
2903:08:06, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
1892:This would be placed in
1861:
162:14:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
8343:policies and guidelines
7914:inquisition post mortem
7885:Edward the Black Prince
6474:NB I gather the use of
5940:17:25, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
5926:17:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
5911:Victoria County History
5904:17:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
3909:Edit to "Sidereal time"
3511:I haven't introduced a
3231:Charlwood Clarification
2371:Thanks and best wishes
2293:Corrected now :-) The
8797:Adam can you remember
8071:&nbnsp;–
8069:yet? It encapsulates
7204:, from where it flows
7079:With very best wishes
7020:With very best wishes
6776:My proposal would be:
5959:
5782:
5596:Postcode area articles
5212:
4667:" - why not just say "
4130:local standard of rest
3584:{| class=wikitable |-
3102:Shepperton Branch Line
2223:Surrey cleanup listing
916:Hi, and thank you for
848:
630:
378:
8777:Aussie Article Writer
8359:neutral point of view
8328:relevant noticeboards
8078:John Maynard Friedman
5958:
5842:Articles for creation
5821:Articles for creation
5781:
5767:Articles for creation
5210:
5041:articles for deletion
3633:Members of Parliament
3289:Template:WPBannerMeta
2888:Former is a good word
1846:Esher railway station
1836:has twelve sections.
1781:Hi, please don't add
1749:I don't know sadly.-
1560:Kennedy Assassination
1348:Message delivered by
1302:Message delivered by
847:
629:
495:is often better than
373:
177:Thanks again, pbl1998
8840:Rochester and Strood
7881:Black Prince, Bexley
7625:CyclonicallyDeranged
7574:CyclonicallyDeranged
6864:Hampton Court Palace
6589:Very bad. A sort of
6000:blocked from editing
5358:verifiability issues
5067:Your recent edit to
4550:Mind you, Americans
3651:and looked like this
2826:You're very welcome.
2493:the category's entry
2330:the category's entry
1565:Kennedy, not above.
8316:article's talk page
8166:Obtuse edit summary
8057:abc – def
7712:your common.js page
7115:, but we can write
6796:part of the country
6070:God Save the Queen!
6024:God Save the Queen!
5886:, without citing a
5765:Your submission at
5658:Edits to Bevin Buys
5211:Avoid Peacock Terms
5196:Subdue that Peacock
4787:. You improved it!
4529:being "pronounced"
4339:Etymology of "junk"
4304:User:Jc3s5h/sandbox
4014:The vernal equinox.
3363:. We can add these
3206:Thankfully that is
3187:Can you help here?
2951:is controversial.-
2352:Hornsey, and whilst
2196:orthographic reform
2077:. It was not on a
1485:Portsea, Portsmouth
1332:you nominated as a
174:seeing you around.
75:Knowledge:Questions
26:Hello, Adam37, and
8743:(reply on my talk)
8324:dispute resolution
8270:, and all that. --
8170:Had to check that
7504:ADS Library search
6800:location of source
6275:
6122:to the article on
5988:dispute resolution
5960:
5783:
5213:
4881:Hornsey Boundaries
4583:—SerialNumber54129
4539:—SerialNumber54129
4499:Vive la difference
1286:you nominated for
918:your contributions
859:remove this notice
849:
744:Just a reminder.--
641:remove this notice
631:
272:Chapel-en-le-Frith
251:Chapel-en-le-Frith
244:Chapel-en-le-Frith
95:A brownie for you!
40:How to edit a page
8846:assume good faith
8744:
8471:Coronation Street
8138:
7871:
7859:comment added by
7817:
7805:comment added by
7552:Hi there Adam37,
7206:general direction
6949:Southampton Water
6918:Southampton Water
6812:location of mouth
6804:general direction
6273:
6177:Basingstoke Canal
6005:three-revert rule
5773:has been accepted
5356:nor the text has
5350:personal research
5045:how to contribute
4783:Adam, thanks for
4590:
4571:
4546:
4523:
3856:Orbit of the Moon
3840:Orbit of the Moon
3818:More work done.-
3451:
3448:talk page watcher
2671:in Langwathby or
2665:Musgrave baronets
2607:Musgrave Baronets
2500:page. Thank you.
2337:page. Thank you.
2150:
2149:
1581:assume good faith
1471:
1454:comment added by
1402:
1385:comment added by
1356:
1310:
770:
737:
557:as atonement for
497:Template:See also
484:The Manor (House)
152:Thanks, pbl1998--
131:
130:
8885:
8875:
8831:
8772:Faraday Building
8763:
8742:
8725:
8708:Faraday Building
8696:
8671:
8602:
8448:
8423:
8416:On the contrary
8296:UB postcode area
8293:
8258:
8233:
8216:
8199:
8154:
8129:
8127:
8125:
8101:
8072:
8068:
8062:
8058:
8042:
7994:
7950:
7854:
7845:
7830:
7829:
7825:
7800:
7787:Motorized square
7774:
7738:
7709:
7708:
7705:
7702:
7699:
7696:
7686:A329(M) motorway
7684:Missing cite in
7675:
7643:Civil parish bot
7616:
7599:
7562:
7536:
7462:
7446:
7429:
7412:
7360:
7313:
7311:
7309:
7296:
7294:
7292:
7128:
7048:
6983:
6982:
6979:
6978:
6975:
6972:
6969:
6966:
6887:Northamptonshire
6836:southern England
6750:
6710:
6679:
6632:
6602:
6577:
6535:
6500:
6416:
6365:
6338:
6288:
6240:
6208:
6159:
6142:
6096:
6081:
6078:
6071:
6068:
6055:
6035:
6032:
6025:
6022:
5923:
5881:
5853:
5845:
5832:
5735:
5695:
5646:
5587:
5570:, as in tether,
5558:
5510:
5460:
5417:
5396:
5346:prejudice issues
5289:
5219:terms into more
5186:
5176:7&6=thirteen
5158:
5148:7&6=thirteen
5133:
5123:7&6=thirteen
5104:
5087:
5079:
5029:Hello, Adam37,
5009:
4973:
4910:
4872:
4854:
4849:
4821:
4804:
4770:
4724:
4670:
4666:
4662:
4652:
4585:
4574:
4549:
4541:
4517:
4516:
4470:
4414:
4383:
4330:
4285:
4267:
4141:
4084:
3989:
3945:
3913:I have reverted
3883:
3838:Your changes to
3829:
3824:
3769:
3764:
3673:
3616:
3611:
3591:
3568:
3563:
3531:
3526:
3504:
3495:
3480:
3471:
3458:
3445:
3403:
3398:
3379:
3368:
3322:
3317:
3303:
3298:
3273:
3259:
3222:
3217:
3183:Town or village?
3175:
3152:
3147:
3133:
3128:
3048:
3043:
3006:
3001:
2962:
2957:
2920:
2915:
2879:
2874:
2839:Good afternoon,
2835:Speen, Berkshire
2805:
2800:
2791:Richmond, London
2759:
2754:
2738:
2733:
2687:
2682:
2637:
2632:
2598:
2593:
2556:
2551:
2521:Craven#Transport
2515:Craven Transport
2411:
2406:
2309:
2304:
2279:
2261:
2256:
2250:. Thank you. -
2214:
2209:
2128:
2121:
2120:
2092:
2087:
2002:
1997:
1943:
1938:
1925:
1920:
1900:
1889:
1886:
1883:
1880:
1877:
1874:
1871:
1868:
1865:
1854:Westcott, Surrey
1818:
1813:
1793:
1784:
1760:
1755:
1727:
1722:
1694:
1689:
1655:
1650:
1594:
1589:
1528:
1523:
1509:
1500:
1470:
1448:
1401:
1379:
1367:
1347:
1341:
1321:
1301:
1299:
1262:
1257:
1197:
1192:
1179:
1174:
1118:
1113:
1081:
1076:
1039:
1033:
1014:
1009:
994:
989:
963:. Thank you. -
915:
870:
869:
862:
814:
809:
778:Stanley Bruce GA
748:
715:
652:
651:
644:
590:
583:
565:park nicely and
511:
506:
455:
448:
143:Knowledge:Surrey
106:
99:
98:
84:
18:User talk:Adam37
8893:
8892:
8888:
8887:
8886:
8884:
8883:
8882:
8873:
8859:
8842:
8829:
8810:
8795:
8761:
8723:
8694:
8669:
8600:
8570:
8493:And what about
8446:
8417:
8312:content dispute
8287:
8256:
8231:
8214:
8197:
8168:
8152:
8123:
8122:
8112:
8099:
8066:
8060:
8053:
8040:
8008:
7992:
7961:
7948:
7883:is named after
7877:
7843:
7827:
7823:
7822:
7789:
7772:
7736:
7706:
7703:
7700:
7697:
7694:
7689:
7673:
7645:
7614:
7597:
7588:long yesteryear
7560:
7550:
7534:
7496:
7460:
7444:
7427:
7410:
7371:
7358:
7307:
7305:
7290:
7288:
7202:in/around place
7126:
7046:
6963:
6959:
6818:Some examples:
6765:
6748:
6708:
6672:Proc. Geol. Ass
6630:
6600:
6591:multum in parvo
6575:
6533:
6498:
6414:
6363:
6336:
6286:
6255:
6238:
6206:
6170:
6157:
6140:
6116:
6094:
6076:
6069:
6066:
6063:
6053:
6030:
6023:
6020:
6017:
5992:page protection
5953:
5921:
5888:reliable source
5875:
5870:
5835:
5828:
5824:
5775:
5733:
5693:
5660:
5644:
5598:
5585:
5556:
5521:
5508:
5479:Cranley Gardens
5475:
5473:Cranley Gardens
5458:
5415:
5394:
5299:
5287:
5263:
5261:Public holidays
5198:
5173:
5145:
5120:
5117:
5102:
5081:
5077:
5072:
5027:
5007:
4971:
4921:
4908:
4883:
4870:
4852:
4847:
4835:
4819:
4802:
4781:
4768:
4722:
4668:
4664:
4660:
4650:
4581:
4537:
4468:
4429:
4412:
4381:
4341:
4328:
4296:
4294:"Sidereal time"
4283:
4265:
4210:Assured tenancy
4202:
4139:
4082:
4050:reliable source
3987:
3943:
3911:
3881:
3843:
3827:
3820:
3801:
3767:
3760:
3694:
3671:
3614:
3607:
3589:
3586:
3585:
3580:
3579:
3566:
3559:
3529:
3522:
3498:
3489:
3474:
3465:
3452:
3420:
3401:
3394:
3377:
3364:
3320:
3313:
3301:
3294:
3271:
3255:
3252:
3233:
3220:
3213:
3185:
3171:
3163:
3150:
3143:
3131:
3124:
3104:
3046:
3039:
3019:
3004:
2997:
2977:
2960:
2953:
2918:
2911:
2890:
2877:
2870:
2837:
2803:
2796:
2770:
2757:
2750:
2736:
2731:
2723:
2685:
2678:
2635:
2628:
2619:of Kempton Park
2609:
2596:
2589:
2569:
2554:
2547:
2517:
2483:
2464:
2409:
2402:
2354:
2320:
2307:
2300:
2275:
2274:Hi Adam. With
2272:
2259:
2252:
2225:
2212:
2205:
2155:
2153:St Johns Woking
2119:
2117:A beer for you!
2090:
2083:
2045:
2000:
1993:
1958:
1941:
1934:
1923:
1916:
1898:
1891:
1890:
1887:
1884:
1881:
1878:
1875:
1872:
1869:
1866:
1863:
1816:
1809:
1791:
1782:
1779:
1758:
1751:
1725:
1718:
1692:
1685:
1666:
1653:
1646:
1630:Rjm at sleepers
1622:
1592:
1585:
1562:
1539:
1526:
1519:
1503:
1494:
1477:
1449:
1426:
1408:
1380:
1376:
1361:
1352:, on behalf of
1344:Talk:Shepperton
1315:
1306:, on behalf of
1280:
1260:
1253:
1216:
1195:
1188:
1177:
1170:
1128:Rjm at sleepers
1116:
1109:
1091:Rjm at sleepers
1079:
1072:
1056:Rjm at sleepers
1048:
1029:
1028:
1025:
1012:
1005:
992:
985:
953:requested moves
909:
888:
867:
866:
863:
856:
841:
812:
805:
780:
709:
670:
649:
648:
645:
638:
623:
614:
603:
588:
581:
569:get arrested!).
555:Trimley St Mary
528:Titchwell Marsh
509:
502:
469:Blakeney Chapel
453:
446:
437:Blakeney Chapel
429:
347:
246:
223:
196:
141:I've refounded
136:
97:
78:
60:Manual of Style
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
8891:
8881:
8880:
8855:
8841:
8838:
8837:
8836:
8806:
8794:
8793:Edit summaries
8791:
8790:
8789:
8788:
8787:
8731:
8730:
8704:
8703:
8702:
8701:
8679:
8678:
8677:
8676:
8652:
8651:
8650:
8649:
8642:
8641:
8633:
8632:
8631:
8630:
8623:
8622:
8610:
8609:
8608:
8607:
8587:
8586:
8569:
8566:
8564:
8562:
8561:
8560:
8559:
8558:
8557:
8529:
8528:
8527:
8526:
8525:
8524:
8516:
8515:
8514:
8513:
8488:
8487:
8486:
8485:
8478:
8477:
8476:
8475:
8463:
8462:
8461:
8460:
8454:
8453:
8436:
8435:
8339:
8338:
8331:
8286:
8283:
8264:
8263:
8240:On reflection
8238:
8221:
8204:
8167:
8164:
8162:
8160:
8159:
8111:
8108:
8107:
8106:
8052:
8049:
8048:
8047:
8033:Done thanks.-
8007:
8004:
8002:
8000:
7999:
7960:
7957:
7956:
7955:
7935:
7925:
7909:
7908:
7876:
7873:
7861:85.212.122.226
7851:
7850:
7788:
7785:
7784:
7783:
7782:
7781:
7780:
7779:
7707:// Backlink: ]
7688:
7682:
7681:
7680:
7644:
7641:
7640:
7639:
7638:
7637:
7636:
7635:
7604:
7549:
7546:
7544:
7542:
7541:
7511:
7495:
7489:
7488:
7487:
7486:
7485:
7484:
7483:
7451:
7434:
7417:
7384:
7383:
7370:
7367:
7366:
7365:
7327:
7326:
7315:
7314:
7304:. SpringerLink
7297:
7276:
7275:
7274:
7273:
7272:
7271:
7270:
7269:
7255:
7247:
7228:
7227:
7226:
7225:
7224:
7223:
7222:
7221:
7220:
7219:
7218:
7217:
7179:
7178:
7177:
7176:
7175:
7174:
7173:
7172:
7156:
7155:
7154:
7153:
7152:
7151:
7150:
7149:
7138:
7137:
7136:
7135:
7134:
7133:
7101:
7095:
7077:
7073:
7065:
7061:
7054:
7053:
7010:
7009:
6952:
6925:
6898:
6871:River Cherwell
6867:
6816:
6815:
6798:. It rises in
6764:
6761:
6760:
6759:
6758:
6757:
6756:
6755:
6723:
6716:
6715:
6658:
6657:
6656:
6655:
6654:
6653:
6652:
6651:
6650:
6649:
6648:
6647:
6646:
6645:
6644:
6643:
6642:
6641:
6640:
6639:
6638:
6637:
6582:
6519:
6488:
6475:
6461:
6460:
6459:
6458:
6457:
6456:
6455:
6454:
6453:
6452:
6428:
6427:
6426:
6425:
6424:
6423:
6422:
6421:
6397:
6396:
6395:
6394:
6393:
6392:
6373:
6372:
6371:
6370:
6350:
6349:
6348:
6347:
6346:
6345:
6344:
6343:
6308:
6307:
6306:
6305:
6304:
6303:
6294:
6293:
6254:
6251:
6250:
6249:
6248:
6247:
6246:
6245:
6169:
6166:
6165:
6164:
6115:
6110:
6108:
6106:
6105:
6104:
6103:
6102:
6101:
5952:
5949:
5947:
5945:
5944:
5943:
5942:
5874:
5871:
5823:if you prefer.
5814:
5810:grading scheme
5793:
5790:
5776:
5774:
5763:
5762:
5761:
5760:
5759:
5758:
5757:
5756:
5755:
5659:
5656:
5654:
5652:
5651:
5597:
5594:
5593:
5592:
5572:thorn (letter)
5563:
5520:
5517:
5516:
5515:
5474:
5471:
5470:
5469:
5468:
5467:
5466:
5465:
5423:
5422:
5401:
5298:
5295:
5262:
5259:
5251:beauty contest
5197:
5194:
5193:
5192:
5191:
5190:
5116:
5111:
5110:
5109:
5071:
5065:
5026:
5020:
5019:
5018:
5017:
5016:
5015:
5014:
4920:
4917:
4916:
4915:
4882:
4879:
4878:
4877:
4834:
4831:
4829:
4827:
4826:
4793:what I've done
4780:
4779:Your SFL edits
4777:
4776:
4775:
4734:
4733:
4732:
4731:
4730:
4729:
4688:
4672:
4600:
4599:
4598:
4597:
4596:
4595:
4594:
4593:
4592:
4591:
4482:
4428:
4425:
4424:
4423:
4422:
4421:
4420:
4419:
4348:with this edit
4340:
4337:
4336:
4335:
4295:
4292:
4291:
4290:
4273:
4272:
4256:
4253:
4250:
4245:
4244:
4201:
4200:Simple English
4198:
4197:
4196:
4195:
4194:
4193:
4192:
4191:
4190:
4172:
4171:
4170:
4169:
4168:
4167:
4166:
4165:
4151:
4150:
4149:
4148:
4147:
4146:
4120:
4119:
4118:
4117:
4099:
4098:
4097:
4096:
4090:
4089:
4038:
4037:
4036:
4035:
4034:
4033:
4032:
4031:
4017:
4016:
4015:
3972:
3971:
3970:
3969:
3951:
3950:
3910:
3907:
3906:
3905:
3904:
3903:
3842:
3836:
3835:
3834:
3800:
3799:Thames Islands
3797:
3796:
3795:
3794:
3793:
3775:
3774:
3719:
3718:
3715:
3693:
3688:
3687:
3686:
3685:
3684:
3683:
3682:
3681:
3680:
3679:
3678:
3658:
3654:
3642:
3635:
3625:
3583:
3577:
3540:
3539:
3538:
3537:
3536:
3515:, I saw it in
3419:
3416:
3415:
3414:
3413:
3412:
3411:
3410:
3409:
3408:
3373:
3370:
3341:
3338:
3251:
3248:
3232:
3229:
3228:
3227:
3184:
3181:
3162:
3159:
3158:
3157:
3138:
3103:
3100:
3099:
3098:
3097:
3096:
3095:
3094:
3084:David Biddulph
3071:
3070:
3069:
3068:
3018:
3013:
3012:
3011:
2976:
2973:
2972:
2971:
2970:
2969:
2968:
2967:
2889:
2886:
2885:
2884:
2854:165.225.80.125
2836:
2833:
2832:
2831:
2830:
2829:
2828:
2827:
2769:
2766:
2765:
2764:
2722:
2717:
2716:
2715:
2714:
2713:
2701:Richard Harvey
2695:
2694:
2693:
2692:
2648:Richard Harvey
2643:
2642:
2608:
2605:
2604:
2603:
2568:
2563:
2562:
2561:
2516:
2513:
2482:
2479:
2463:
2458:
2457:
2456:
2455:
2454:
2453:
2452:
2432:
2431:
2416:
2396:
2395:
2369:
2368:
2365:
2353:
2350:
2319:
2316:
2315:
2314:
2271:
2268:
2267:
2266:
2224:
2221:
2220:
2219:
2154:
2151:
2148:
2147:
2129:
2118:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2111:
2047:Hello Adam37,
2044:
2041:
2040:
2039:
2038:
2037:
2008:
2007:
1962:Kevington Hall
1957:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1948:
1930:
1862:
1778:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1665:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1621:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1561:
1558:
1538:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1476:
1473:
1425:
1422:
1407:
1404:
1387:Andrewstimothy
1375:
1372:
1279:
1275:nomination of
1269:
1268:
1267:
1215:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1086:
1047:
1044:
1024:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1000:
999:
908:
905:
887:
884:
855:
842:
840:
837:
836:
835:
834:
833:
779:
776:
775:
774:
708:
705:
704:
703:
669:
666:
637:
624:
622:
619:
610:
602:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
573:
572:
571:
570:
548:
547:
546:
545:
538:
537:
536:
535:
520:Blakeney Point
428:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
346:
343:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
245:
242:
222:
219:
218:
217:
195:
190:
135:
132:
129:
128:
107:
96:
93:
71:sign your name
63:
62:
57:
52:
47:
42:
37:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
8890:
8879:
8876:
8871:
8870:
8865:
8864:
8863:
8862:
8858:
8854:
8851:
8847:
8835:
8832:
8827:
8826:
8821:
8816:
8815:
8814:
8813:
8809:
8805:
8800:
8786:
8782:
8778:
8773:
8769:
8768:
8767:
8764:
8759:
8758:
8753:
8750:
8749:
8748:
8747:
8741:
8737:
8729:
8726:
8721:
8720:
8714:
8713:
8712:
8709:
8700:
8697:
8692:
8691:
8686:
8685:
8684:
8683:
8682:
8675:
8672:
8667:
8666:
8660:
8659:
8658:
8657:
8656:
8647:
8646:
8644:
8643:
8639:
8635:
8634:
8628:
8627:
8625:
8624:
8620:
8616:
8612:
8611:
8606:
8603:
8598:
8597:
8592:
8591:
8589:
8588:
8584:
8580:
8579:
8578:
8575:
8565:
8556:
8552:
8548:
8544:
8540:
8535:
8534:
8533:
8532:
8531:
8530:
8522:
8521:
8520:
8519:
8518:
8517:
8512:
8508:
8504:
8500:
8496:
8492:
8491:
8490:
8489:
8482:
8481:
8480:
8479:
8472:
8467:
8466:
8465:
8464:
8458:
8457:
8456:
8455:
8452:
8449:
8444:
8443:
8438:
8437:
8432:
8427:
8421:
8415:
8414:
8413:
8412:
8408:
8404:
8399:
8396:
8392:
8387:
8385:
8381:
8376:
8373:
8369:
8365:
8360:
8354:
8350:
8349:. Thank you.
8348:
8344:
8336:
8332:
8329:
8325:
8321:
8317:
8313:
8309:
8308:
8307:
8305:
8301:
8297:
8292:
8282:
8281:
8277:
8273:
8269:
8262:
8259:
8254:
8253:
8247:
8243:
8242:WP:NOTSTATUTE
8239:
8237:
8234:
8229:
8228:
8222:
8220:
8217:
8212:
8211:
8205:
8203:
8200:
8195:
8194:
8189:
8188:
8187:
8186:
8182:
8178:
8173:
8163:
8158:
8155:
8150:
8149:
8144:
8143:
8142:
8141:
8136:
8132:
8128:
8119:
8115:
8105:
8102:
8097:
8096:
8090:
8089:
8088:
8087:
8083:
8079:
8074:
8065:
8046:
8043:
8038:
8037:
8032:
8031:
8030:
8029:
8025:
8021:
8017:
8013:
8003:
7998:
7995:
7990:
7989:
7983:
7982:
7981:
7980:
7976:
7972:
7968:
7965:
7954:
7951:
7946:
7945:
7940:
7936:
7933:
7930:
7926:
7923:
7919:
7915:
7911:
7910:
7906:
7905:
7904:
7903:
7900:
7898:
7896:
7895:
7890:
7889:Hammond organ
7886:
7882:
7872:
7870:
7866:
7862:
7858:
7849:
7846:
7841:
7840:
7835:
7820:
7819:
7818:
7816:
7812:
7808:
7804:
7797:
7796:
7792:
7778:
7775:
7770:
7769:
7763:
7762:
7761:
7757:
7753:
7749:
7744:
7743:
7742:
7739:
7734:
7733:
7728:
7727:
7726:
7725:
7721:
7717:
7713:
7687:
7679:
7676:
7671:
7670:
7664:
7663:
7662:
7661:
7657:
7653:
7650:
7634:
7630:
7626:
7622:
7621:
7620:
7617:
7612:
7611:
7605:
7603:
7600:
7595:
7594:
7589:
7585:
7584:
7583:
7579:
7575:
7571:
7570:
7569:
7568:
7565:
7559:
7553:
7545:
7540:
7537:
7532:
7531:
7526:
7525:
7524:
7523:
7519:
7515:
7509:
7508:Journal index
7505:
7501:
7493:
7482:
7478:
7474:
7470:
7469:
7468:
7467:
7466:
7463:
7458:
7457:
7452:
7450:
7447:
7442:
7441:
7435:
7433:
7430:
7425:
7424:
7418:
7416:
7413:
7408:
7407:
7401:
7400:
7399:
7398:
7394:
7390:
7382:orientations.
7380:
7379:
7378:
7376:
7364:
7361:
7356:
7355:
7350:
7349:
7348:
7347:
7343:
7339:
7334:
7331:
7324:
7323:
7322:
7320:
7303:
7298:
7286:
7281:
7280:
7279:
7268:
7264:
7260:
7256:
7252:
7248:
7244:
7240:
7236:
7235:
7234:
7233:
7232:
7231:
7230:
7229:
7215:
7211:
7207:
7203:
7200:] headwaters
7199:
7197:
7193:
7192:
7191:
7190:
7187:
7186:
7185:
7184:
7183:
7182:
7181:
7180:
7169:
7164:
7163:
7162:
7161:
7160:
7159:
7158:
7157:
7146:
7145:
7144:
7143:
7142:
7141:
7140:
7139:
7132:
7129:
7124:
7123:
7118:
7114:
7109:
7105:
7102:
7099:
7096:
7092:
7091:
7090:
7086:
7082:
7078:
7074:
7071:
7070:on both sides
7066:
7062:
7058:
7057:
7056:
7055:
7052:
7049:
7044:
7043:
7038:
7034:
7033:
7032:
7031:
7027:
7023:
7018:
7014:
7007:
7003:
6999:
6995:
6991:
6987:
6981:
6957:
6953:
6950:
6946:
6942:
6938:
6934:
6930:
6926:
6923:
6922:Itchen Bridge
6919:
6915:
6914:New Alresford
6911:
6907:
6903:
6899:
6896:
6892:
6888:
6884:
6880:
6876:
6872:
6868:
6865:
6861:
6857:
6853:
6849:
6845:
6841:
6837:
6833:
6829:
6825:
6821:
6820:
6819:
6813:
6809:
6805:
6801:
6797:
6793:
6789:
6785:
6784:
6779:
6778:
6777:
6774:
6773:
6769:
6754:
6751:
6746:
6745:
6739:
6738:
6737:
6733:
6729:
6724:
6720:
6719:
6718:
6717:
6714:
6711:
6706:
6705:
6699:
6694:
6693:
6692:
6691:
6687:
6683:
6678:(2): 160–174.
6677:
6673:
6667:
6663:
6636:
6633:
6628:
6627:
6622:
6621:
6620:
6616:
6612:
6608:
6607:
6606:
6603:
6598:
6597:
6592:
6587:
6586:Jane Austen's
6583:
6581:
6578:
6573:
6572:
6567:
6563:
6559:
6555:
6554:
6553:
6549:
6545:
6541:
6540:
6539:
6536:
6531:
6530:
6525:
6520:
6518:
6514:
6510:
6506:
6505:
6504:
6501:
6496:
6495:
6489:
6487:
6483:
6479:
6473:
6472:
6471:
6470:
6469:
6468:
6467:
6466:
6465:
6464:
6463:
6462:
6451:
6447:
6443:
6438:
6437:
6436:
6435:
6434:
6433:
6432:
6431:
6430:
6429:
6420:
6417:
6412:
6411:
6405:
6404:
6403:
6402:
6401:
6400:
6399:
6398:
6391:
6387:
6383:
6379:
6378:
6377:
6376:
6375:
6374:
6369:
6366:
6361:
6360:
6354:
6353:
6352:
6351:
6342:
6339:
6334:
6333:
6328:
6327:
6326:
6322:
6318:
6314:
6313:
6312:
6311:
6310:
6309:
6300:
6299:
6298:
6297:
6296:
6295:
6292:
6289:
6284:
6283:
6278:
6272:
6271:
6270:
6269:
6265:
6261:
6244:
6241:
6236:
6235:
6229:
6228:
6227:
6223:
6219:
6214:
6213:
6212:
6209:
6204:
6203:
6197:
6193:
6192:
6191:
6190:
6186:
6182:
6178:
6173:
6163:
6160:
6155:
6154:
6149:
6148:
6147:
6146:
6143:
6138:
6137:
6131:
6127:
6126:
6121:
6114:
6109:
6100:
6097:
6092:
6091:
6086:
6085:
6084:
6079:
6073:
6072:
6061:
6060:
6059:
6056:
6051:
6050:
6045:
6041:
6040:
6039:
6038:
6033:
6027:
6026:
6015:
6010:
6006:
6002:
6001:
5995:
5993:
5989:
5985:
5981:
5977:
5973:
5969:
5965:
5957:
5948:
5941:
5937:
5933:
5929:
5928:
5927:
5924:
5919:
5918:
5912:
5908:
5907:
5906:
5905:
5901:
5897:
5893:
5889:
5885:
5880:
5869:
5865:
5861:
5858:
5855:
5852:
5846:
5843:
5839:
5833:
5831:
5822:
5818:
5813:
5811:
5807:
5803:
5799:
5794:
5789:
5787:
5780:
5772:
5768:
5754:
5750:
5746:
5741:
5740:
5739:
5736:
5731:
5730:
5725:
5721:
5716:
5715:
5714:
5710:
5706:
5701:
5700:
5699:
5696:
5691:
5690:
5685:
5681:
5680:
5679:
5678:
5674:
5670:
5665:
5655:
5650:
5647:
5642:
5641:
5635:
5634:
5633:
5632:
5628:
5624:
5623:Roger 9 Roger
5619:
5616:
5612:
5608:
5606:
5601:
5591:
5588:
5583:
5582:
5577:
5573:
5569:
5564:
5562:
5559:
5554:
5553:
5547:
5546:
5545:
5544:
5540:
5536:
5531:
5528:
5525:
5514:
5511:
5506:
5505:
5499:
5498:
5497:
5496:
5492:
5488:
5484:
5480:
5464:
5461:
5456:
5455:
5450:
5449:
5448:
5444:
5440:
5436:
5431:
5427:
5426:
5425:
5424:
5421:
5418:
5413:
5412:
5406:
5402:
5400:
5397:
5392:
5391:
5385:
5384:
5383:
5382:
5378:
5374:
5370:
5366:
5361:
5359:
5355:
5351:
5347:
5343:
5340:
5335:
5333:
5329:
5326:
5323:
5320:
5317:
5313:
5309:
5307:
5304:
5294:
5293:
5290:
5285:
5284:
5279:
5275:
5271:
5267:
5258:
5256:
5252:
5247:
5242:
5239:unverifiable
5238:
5235:weasel terms
5234:
5233:WP:UKVILLAGES
5230:
5226:
5222:
5218:
5209:
5205:
5203:
5189:
5184:
5183:
5178:
5177:
5171:
5170:WP:Dead horse
5167:
5163:
5162:
5161:
5156:
5155:
5150:
5149:
5143:
5139:
5138:
5137:
5136:
5131:
5130:
5125:
5124:
5115:
5108:
5105:
5100:
5099:
5093:
5092:
5091:
5090:
5085:
5080:
5070:
5064:
5063:
5059:
5055:
5051:
5048:
5046:
5042:
5037:
5035:
5030:
5025:
5013:
5010:
5005:
5004:
4999:
4994:
4993:
4992:
4988:
4984:
4979:
4978:
4977:
4974:
4969:
4968:
4962:
4961:
4960:
4959:
4955:
4951:
4947:
4945:
4941:
4936:
4933:
4932:page curation
4928:
4926:
4914:
4911:
4906:
4905:
4900:
4899:
4898:
4897:
4893:
4889:
4876:
4873:
4868:
4867:
4861:
4860:
4859:
4858:
4855:
4850:
4843:
4840:
4830:
4825:
4822:
4817:
4816:
4811:
4810:
4809:
4808:
4805:
4800:
4799:
4794:
4788:
4786:
4774:
4771:
4766:
4765:
4759:
4758:
4757:
4756:
4753:
4751:
4749:
4748:
4743:
4742:no you didn't
4739:
4728:
4725:
4720:
4719:
4713:
4708:
4707:
4706:
4703:
4701:
4699:
4698:
4693:
4689:
4685:
4681:
4677:
4673:
4658:
4657:
4656:
4653:
4648:
4647:
4642:
4638:
4634:
4629:
4628:
4627:
4626:
4623:
4621:
4619:
4618:
4613:
4610:
4607:
4604:
4589:
4586:
4584:
4578:
4573:
4572:
4570:
4567:
4565:
4563:
4562:
4557:
4553:
4548:
4547:
4545:
4542:
4540:
4534:
4533:
4528:
4521:
4515:
4514:
4513:
4510:
4508:
4506:
4505:
4500:
4497:, smartass!"
4496:
4492:
4488:
4483:
4480:
4476:
4475:
4474:
4471:
4466:
4465:
4459:
4458:
4457:
4456:
4453:
4451:
4449:
4448:
4442:
4441:Sagaciousphil
4438:
4434:
4418:
4415:
4410:
4409:
4404:
4403:
4402:
4398:
4394:
4389:
4388:
4387:
4384:
4379:
4378:
4372:
4368:
4367:
4366:
4365:
4361:
4357:
4353:
4349:
4346:
4334:
4331:
4326:
4325:
4320:
4319:
4318:
4317:
4313:
4309:
4305:
4301:
4300:Sidereal time
4289:
4286:
4281:
4280:
4275:
4274:
4271:
4268:
4263:
4262:
4257:
4254:
4251:
4247:
4246:
4242:
4241:
4240:
4239:
4235:
4231:
4225:
4222:
4219:
4216:
4213:
4211:
4206:
4188:
4187:sidereal time
4184:
4183:sidereal year
4180:
4179:
4178:
4177:
4176:
4175:
4174:
4173:
4163:
4159:
4158:
4157:
4156:
4155:
4154:
4153:
4152:
4145:
4142:
4137:
4136:
4131:
4126:
4125:
4124:
4123:
4122:
4121:
4116:
4112:
4108:
4103:
4102:
4101:
4100:
4094:
4093:
4092:
4091:
4088:
4085:
4080:
4079:
4074:
4069:
4068:
4067:
4066:
4062:
4058:
4053:
4051:
4047:
4043:
4030:
4026:
4022:
4018:
4013:
4009:
4005:
4002:
4001:
3999:
3995:
3994:
3993:
3990:
3985:
3984:
3978:
3977:
3976:
3975:
3974:
3973:
3968:
3964:
3960:
3955:
3954:
3953:
3952:
3949:
3946:
3941:
3940:
3935:
3934:
3933:
3932:
3928:
3924:
3920:
3919:Sidereal time
3916:
3902:
3898:
3894:
3889:
3888:
3887:
3884:
3879:
3878:
3872:
3871:
3870:
3869:
3865:
3861:
3857:
3851:
3847:
3841:
3833:
3830:
3825:
3823:
3817:
3816:
3815:
3814:
3810:
3806:
3792:
3788:
3784:
3779:
3778:
3777:
3776:
3773:
3770:
3765:
3763:
3756:
3752:
3748:
3744:
3743:HMS Hampshire
3739:
3738:
3737:
3734:
3731:
3728:
3725:
3716:
3712:
3711:
3710:
3708:
3704:
3700:
3692:
3677:
3674:
3669:
3668:
3663:
3659:
3655:
3652:
3647:
3643:
3640:
3636:
3634:
3630:
3626:
3622:
3621:
3620:
3617:
3612:
3610:
3603:
3602:
3601:
3597:
3593:
3574:
3573:
3572:
3569:
3564:
3562:
3556:
3555:
3554:
3550:
3546:
3541:
3535:
3532:
3527:
3525:
3518:
3514:
3510:
3509:
3508:
3505:
3503:
3502:
3496:
3494:
3493:
3486:
3485:
3484:
3481:
3479:
3478:
3472:
3470:
3469:
3462:
3456:
3449:
3444:
3443:
3442:
3441:
3437:
3433:
3429:
3425:
3407:
3404:
3399:
3397:
3391:
3390:
3389:
3385:
3381:
3374:
3371:
3367:
3362:
3358:
3354:
3350:
3346:
3342:
3339:
3336:
3335:1580 of these
3332:
3328:
3327:
3326:
3323:
3318:
3316:
3309:
3308:
3307:
3304:
3299:
3297:
3290:
3286:
3285:
3284:
3283:
3279:
3275:
3268:
3263:
3258:
3247:
3246:
3242:
3238:
3226:
3223:
3218:
3216:
3209:
3205:
3204:
3203:
3202:
3198:
3194:
3193:Finn Bjørklid
3190:
3180:
3179:
3176:
3174:
3168:
3156:
3153:
3148:
3146:
3139:
3137:
3134:
3129:
3127:
3120:
3119:
3118:
3117:
3113:
3109:
3093:
3089:
3085:
3081:
3077:
3076:
3075:
3074:
3073:
3072:
3067:
3063:
3059:
3054:
3053:
3052:
3049:
3044:
3042:
3035:
3034:
3033:
3032:
3028:
3024:
3017:
3010:
3007:
3002:
3000:
2993:
2992:
2991:
2990:
2986:
2982:
2966:
2963:
2958:
2956:
2950:
2946:
2941:
2940:
2939:
2935:
2931:
2926:
2925:
2924:
2921:
2916:
2914:
2907:
2906:
2905:
2904:
2900:
2896:
2883:
2880:
2875:
2873:
2866:
2865:
2864:
2863:
2859:
2855:
2851:
2850:Many thanks.
2848:
2844:
2840:
2825:
2824:
2823:
2819:
2815:
2811:
2810:
2809:
2806:
2801:
2799:
2792:
2787:
2786:
2785:
2784:
2780:
2776:
2763:
2760:
2755:
2753:
2746:
2745:
2744:
2743:
2739:
2734:
2728:
2721:
2712:
2711:
2710:
2706:
2702:
2697:
2696:
2691:
2688:
2683:
2681:
2674:
2670:
2666:
2662:
2661:
2660:
2659:
2658:
2657:
2653:
2649:
2641:
2638:
2633:
2631:
2624:
2620:
2615:
2614:
2613:
2602:
2599:
2594:
2592:
2586:
2585:
2584:
2583:
2579:
2575:
2567:
2560:
2557:
2552:
2550:
2544:
2539:
2538:
2537:
2535:
2532:
2527:
2523:
2522:
2512:
2511:
2507:
2503:
2499:
2495:
2494:
2489:
2488:
2478:
2477:
2473:
2469:
2466:The category
2462:
2451:
2447:
2443:
2438:
2437:
2436:
2435:
2434:
2433:
2429:
2425:
2421:
2417:
2415:
2412:
2407:
2405:
2398:
2397:
2393:
2389:
2385:
2384:
2383:
2382:
2378:
2374:
2366:
2363:
2359:
2358:
2357:
2349:
2348:
2344:
2340:
2336:
2332:
2331:
2326:
2325:
2313:
2310:
2305:
2303:
2296:
2292:
2291:
2290:
2289:
2286:
2285:
2278:
2265:
2262:
2257:
2255:
2249:
2245:
2244:
2243:
2242:
2238:
2234:
2230:
2218:
2215:
2210:
2208:
2202:
2197:
2193:
2192:
2191:
2190:
2186:
2182:
2178:
2174:
2171:
2170:
2166:
2163:
2162:
2158:
2146:
2142:
2138:
2134:
2133:Putney Bridge
2130:
2127:
2123:
2122:
2110:
2106:
2102:
2101:Étienne Dolet
2098:
2097:
2096:
2093:
2088:
2086:
2080:
2079:controversial
2076:
2072:
2068:
2067:
2066:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2056:Étienne Dolet
2053:
2048:
2036:
2032:
2028:
2024:
2020:
2016:
2012:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2006:
2003:
1998:
1996:
1990:
1986:
1982:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1971:
1967:
1963:
1947:
1944:
1939:
1937:
1931:
1929:
1926:
1921:
1919:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1895:
1859:
1855:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1839:
1835:
1831:
1827:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1819:
1814:
1812:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1799:
1795:
1788:
1764:
1761:
1756:
1754:
1748:
1747:
1746:
1742:
1738:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1728:
1723:
1721:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1708:
1704:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1695:
1690:
1688:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1675:
1671:
1659:
1656:
1651:
1649:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1595:
1590:
1588:
1582:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1557:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1544:
1532:
1529:
1524:
1522:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1510:
1508:
1507:
1501:
1499:
1498:
1491:
1486:
1482:
1472:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1445:
1442:
1439:
1435:
1432:
1429:
1421:
1418:
1415:
1411:
1403:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1371:
1370:
1365:
1360:
1355:
1351:
1345:
1340:
1335:
1331:
1326:
1324:
1319:
1314:
1309:
1305:
1298:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1278:
1274:
1266:
1263:
1258:
1256:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1238:Unus Multorum
1234:
1230:
1228:
1224:
1223:Stanley Bruce
1219:
1201:
1198:
1193:
1191:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1180:
1175:
1173:
1166:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1144:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1119:
1114:
1112:
1106:
1105:Canvey Island
1102:
1101:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1087:
1085:
1082:
1077:
1075:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1043:
1042:
1037:
1032:
1018:
1015:
1010:
1008:
1002:
1001:
998:
995:
990:
988:
982:
977:
976:
975:
974:
970:
966:
962:
958:
954:
950:
946:
942:
937:
935:
931:
927:
926:cut-and-paste
923:
919:
914:
904:
902:
898:
894:
893:WonderBoy1998
883:
882:
879:
875:
871:
860:
853:
846:
832:
828:
824:
820:
819:
818:
815:
810:
808:
801:
800:
799:
798:
794:
790:
785:
773:
768:
764:
760:
756:
752:
747:
743:
742:
741:
740:
735:
731:
727:
723:
719:
714:
702:
698:
694:
690:
689:
688:
687:
683:
679:
678:Unus Multorum
675:
674:Stanley Bruce
668:Stanley Bruce
665:
664:
661:
657:
653:
642:
635:
628:
618:
617:
613:
609:
594:
591:
586:
584:
577:
576:
575:
574:
568:
564:
560:
556:
552:
551:
550:
549:
542:
541:
540:
539:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
516:
515:
512:
507:
505:
498:
494:
493:Template:Main
490:
485:
480:
475:
470:
466:
462:
461:
460:
459:
456:
451:
449:
442:
441:the church FA
438:
434:
420:
417:
413:
409:
405:
404:this web site
401:
397:
393:
392:
391:
387:
383:
377:
371:
366:
365:
364:
363:
360:
356:
352:
342:
341:
338:
336:
329:
325:
321:
316:
311:
307:
303:
302:
301:
297:
293:
288:
287:
286:
282:
278:
273:
269:
268:
266:
265:
264:
260:
256:
252:
241:
240:
236:
232:
228:
216:
212:
208:
207:
206:
205:
201:
194:
189:
188:
184:
180:
175:
171:
169:
164:
163:
159:
155:
150:
147:
144:
139:
127:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
105:
101:
100:
92:
91:
88:
82:
76:
72:
68:
61:
58:
56:
53:
51:
48:
46:
43:
41:
38:
36:
33:
32:
31:
29:
19:
8868:
8850:remain civil
8843:
8824:
8796:
8756:
8732:
8718:
8705:
8689:
8680:
8664:
8653:
8637:
8618:
8614:
8595:
8582:
8571:
8563:
8543:David Seaman
8499:to an extent
8470:
8441:
8400:
8388:
8377:
8372:The Simpsons
8371:
8368:The Simpsons
8367:
8364:The Simpsons
8363:
8355:
8351:
8340:
8288:
8272:Lord Belbury
8265:
8251:
8245:
8226:
8209:
8192:
8177:Lord Belbury
8169:
8161:
8147:
8116:
8113:
8094:
8075:
8054:
8035:
8009:
8001:
7987:
7962:
7943:
7931:
7922:Joan of Kent
7893:
7878:
7855:— Preceding
7852:
7838:
7833:
7807:85.212.193.4
7801:— Preceding
7798:
7793:
7790:
7767:
7731:
7695:importScript
7690:
7668:
7646:
7609:
7592:
7587:
7557:
7554:
7551:
7543:
7529:
7512:Best wishes
7499:
7497:
7491:
7455:
7439:
7422:
7405:
7385:
7372:
7353:
7335:
7332:
7328:
7319:Main (river)
7316:
7308:13 September
7306:. Retrieved
7291:13 September
7289:. Retrieved
7277:
7250:
7213:
7209:
7205:
7201:
7195:
7121:
7116:
7112:
7107:
7104:River source
7097:
7069:
7041:
7036:
7019:
7015:
7011:
6986:chalk stream
6955:
6933:chalk stream
6928:
6906:chalk stream
6902:River Itchen
6901:
6879:River Thames
6870:
6860:East Molesey
6832:River Thames
6823:
6817:
6811:
6807:
6803:
6799:
6795:
6791:
6787:
6782:
6781:
6775:
6771:
6770:
6766:
6743:
6703:
6697:
6675:
6671:
6661:
6659:
6625:
6611:Murgatroyd49
6595:
6590:
6585:
6570:
6544:Murgatroyd49
6528:
6523:
6509:Murgatroyd49
6493:
6478:Murgatroyd49
6442:Murgatroyd49
6409:
6382:Murgatroyd49
6358:
6331:
6317:Murgatroyd49
6281:
6276:
6260:Murgatroyd49
6256:
6233:
6218:Murgatroyd49
6201:
6181:Murgatroyd49
6174:
6171:
6152:
6136:YorkshireLad
6135:
6123:
6119:
6117:
6107:
6089:
6067:The C of E
6064:
6048:
6021:The C of E
6018:
6013:
5997:
5996:
5961:
5946:
5916:
5876:
5856:
5847:
5827:
5825:
5797:
5795:
5791:
5786:Eta2 Doradus
5784:
5771:Eta2 Doradus
5728:
5720:journalistic
5688:
5683:
5661:
5653:
5639:
5620:
5617:
5613:
5609:
5602:
5599:
5580:
5575:
5551:
5535:Nick Barnett
5532:
5529:
5526:
5522:
5503:
5482:
5476:
5453:
5410:
5389:
5362:
5339:Anglo-Indian
5336:
5314:
5310:
5300:
5282:
5264:
5250:
5245:
5240:
5236:
5225:encyclopedic
5214:
5199:
5181:
5175:
5153:
5147:
5128:
5122:
5118:
5097:
5073:
5052:
5049:
5038:
5031:
5028:
5002:
4966:
4948:
4944:the Teahouse
4940:my talk page
4937:
4929:
4922:
4903:
4884:
4865:
4842:
4836:
4828:
4814:
4797:
4789:
4782:
4763:
4746:
4735:
4717:
4711:
4696:
4645:
4637:WP:EDITORIAL
4633:Good Article
4616:
4601:
4582:
4576:
4560:
4551:
4538:
4530:
4503:
4498:
4463:
4446:
4439:and I think
4430:
4407:
4376:
4370:
4351:
4342:
4323:
4297:
4278:
4260:
4226:
4223:
4220:
4217:
4214:
4207:
4203:
4134:
4077:
4073:sine qua non
4072:
4054:
4039:
4011:
4007:
4003:
3997:
3982:
3938:
3912:
3876:
3852:
3848:
3844:
3821:
3802:
3761:
3755:set in stone
3754:
3751:Laurel Crown
3750:
3746:
3735:
3732:
3729:
3720:
3695:
3666:
3632:
3608:
3560:
3523:
3512:
3500:
3499:
3491:
3490:
3476:
3475:
3467:
3466:
3421:
3395:
3314:
3295:
3261:
3253:
3234:
3214:
3186:
3172:
3164:
3144:
3125:
3105:
3040:
3020:
2998:
2978:
2954:
2948:
2944:
2912:
2891:
2871:
2852:
2849:
2845:
2841:
2838:
2797:
2771:
2751:
2724:
2679:
2673:Kempton Park
2672:
2668:
2644:
2629:
2618:
2610:
2590:
2570:
2548:
2528:
2524:
2518:
2491:
2485:
2484:
2467:
2465:
2427:
2423:
2403:
2370:
2355:
2328:
2322:
2321:
2301:
2282:
2273:
2253:
2226:
2206:
2201:Sister Act 2
2179:
2175:
2172:
2167:
2164:
2159:
2156:
2137:Pjposullivan
2084:
2049:
2046:
2019:St Mary Cray
1994:
1988:
1985:St Mary Cray
1959:
1935:
1917:
1834:West Byfleet
1829:
1810:
1780:
1752:
1719:
1686:
1667:
1647:
1623:
1586:
1563:
1540:
1520:
1505:
1504:
1496:
1495:
1478:
1450:— Preceding
1446:
1443:
1440:
1436:
1433:
1430:
1427:
1424:With respect
1419:
1416:
1412:
1409:
1381:— Preceding
1377:
1334:good article
1328:The article
1327:
1281:
1254:
1235:
1231:
1220:
1217:
1189:
1171:
1164:
1110:
1073:
1049:
1026:
1006:
986:
956:
938:
933:
930:page history
910:
889:
864:
806:
781:
746:TonyTheTiger
713:TonyTheTiger
710:
697:send... over
693:Peacemaker67
671:
646:
604:
579:
578:Best wishes
566:
562:
561:(although I
531:
524:Cley Marshes
503:
483:
444:
430:
374:
348:
340:
339:
337:
320:Dave.Dunford
292:Dave.Dunford
267:
255:Dave.Dunford
248:
247:
231:Okeyes (WMF)
224:
197:
176:
172:
165:
151:
148:
140:
137:
125:
87:Simply south
64:
25:
8848:and remain
8429:What about
8401:Thank you.
8384:WP:FANCRUFT
8318:, and seek
7971:SunnyOne342
7918:Chislehurst
7561:Destroyeraa
7251:needs to be
7006:Stubbington
6945:Basingstoke
6891:Oxfordshire
6862:, opposite
6844:West Sussex
5984:noticeboard
5932:Magnolia677
5909:All of the
5896:Magnolia677
5798:Start-Class
5621:Thank you.
5439:Arianewiki1
5373:Arianewiki1
5303:Culmination
5266:Your change
4848:S Philbrick
4556:Machynlleth
4371:lusitanisme
4345:Junk (ship)
4230:MrDemeanour
3980:sophists.-
3587:instead? --
3257:this revert
3173:Dr. Blofeld
2418:Please see
2270:Watford Gap
1981:manor house
1541:Thanks for
1336:has failed
1218:Hi Adam37,
1054:talk page.
1031:Clem Rutter
886:Slow (song)
589:talk to me?
532:Cornerstone
454:talk to me?
408:Dundry Hill
315:WP:UKCITIES
8300:disruptive
8126:HairedGirl
8020:Domeditrix
7894:Ritchie333
7714:. Thanks,
7586:Not since
7168:Pipp Brook
6956:River Meon
6929:River Test
6920:below the
6824:River Mole
6802:and flows
6172:Hi Adam37
6168:Categories
5745:Obscurasky
5705:Obscurasky
5669:Obscurasky
5664:Bevin Boys
5430:Competence
5365:good faith
5244:run-down"
5229:WP:UKTOWNS
5221:verifiable
5054:Lithopsian
4983:Lithopsian
4950:Lithopsian
4747:Ritchie333
4697:Ritchie333
4687:argument).
4669:crossed it
4617:Ritchie333
4561:Ritchie333
4504:Ritchie333
4479:good topic
4447:Ritchie333
4433:Dr Blofeld
4393:HopsonRoad
4356:HopsonRoad
3717:ABURROW, J
3639:in my talk
3189:Swanscombe
2737:projectors
2356:Hi there.
2295:notability
2181:Chris bore
2075:WP:B class
1626:deer parks
1330:Shepperton
1284:Shepperton
1277:Shepperton
1052:Farringdon
945:"Move" tab
763:WP:CHICAGO
730:WP:CHICAGO
412:River Chew
351:Chew Magna
345:Chew Baker
306:Dove Holes
67:Wikipedian
45:Help pages
8752:Ninetyone
8539:Ernie Els
8391:edit wars
8320:consensus
7916:confirms
7375:A308 road
7239:the Rhine
7198:/ several
7094:pattern:-
7002:Hill Head
6994:East Meon
6990:Hampshire
6937:Hampshire
6910:Hampshire
6875:tributary
6828:tributary
6253:River Wey
6150:Thanks.-
6125:R v Adams
6113:R v Adams
5976:consensus
5972:talk page
5951:July 2020
5860:Sulfurboy
5830:help desk
5802:talk page
5255:user page
5253:. See my
4491:Towcester
4042:this edit
3915:this edit
3631:Section:
3627:Article:
3517:Battersea
3513:new style
3366:like this
3208:consensus
2768:Corollary
2727:this edit
2669:Eden Hall
2531:talk page
2472:talk page
2461:Cranleigh
2388:vagueness
2248:WP:SURREY
2233:Bamyers99
1989:Landmarks
1956:Kevington
1842:Tatsfield
1826:Isleworth
1783:__NOTOC__
1543:the award
784:WP:ENGVAR
767:WP:WAWARD
582:Jimfbleak
479:consensus
447:Jimfbleak
400:this book
370:GOODFAITH
355:Chewbacca
211:talk page
200:talk page
193:Cranleigh
168:talk page
69:! Please
8799:WP:CIVIL
8304:reverted
8246:honi soi
8135:contribs
8114:Hi Adam
7857:unsigned
7803:unsigned
7652:Acabashi
7514:Mertbiol
7473:Mertbiol
7389:Mertbiol
7338:Mertbiol
7287:. gov.uk
7259:Mertbiol
7194:X rises
7117:sources
7081:Mertbiol
7022:Mertbiol
6883:Hellidon
6728:Mertbiol
6682:Mertbiol
6012:warring—
5986:or seek
5968:edit war
5873:May 2020
5533:Regards
5487:Leschnei
5483:existing
5435:Ross 248
5405:Ross 248
5078:MB190417
5050:Thanks,
5024:HD 34137
4925:HD 34880
4641:WP:ESSAY
4532:Chestnut
4527:Cheshunt
4520:watching
4487:Chiswick
4243:In turn:
3714:aboard:-
2623:Edenhall
2428:although
1850:Hanworth
1838:Mortlake
1547:Mrmatiko
1464:contribs
1452:unsigned
1447:MNIGNC
1420:MNIGNC
1410:Hello.
1395:contribs
1383:unsigned
1374:Coulsdon
1292:criteria
1236:Cheers,
949:redirect
878:contribs
868:Dcheagle
839:Talkback
660:contribs
650:Dcheagle
621:Talkback
115:Mrmatiko
50:Tutorial
8853:doktorb
8820:WP:BIAS
8804:doktorb
8495:WP:BOLD
8431:WP:BOLD
8016:H:PLINK
7212:to the
6984:) is a
6877:of the
6848:Horsham
6830:of the
6783:River X
6274:Tons of
6009:reverts
5884:Feltham
5806:develop
5724:WP:LEDE
5428:Again.
5217:Peacock
5215:Subdue
5200:My key
4888:HughJLF
4845:future.
4740:to FA;
4579:" :D
3893:ToaneeM
3860:ToaneeM
3262:doesn't
3237:CalzGuy
3108:Britmax
3058:Britmax
3023:Britmax
3016:WP:SOAP
2981:Britmax
2949:present
2930:Britmax
2895:Britmax
2732:anemone
2566:Clapham
2496:on the
2392:opinion
2362:Hornsey
2333:on the
2284:Lindsay
1876:display
1830:sixteen
1604:Tsm1128
1567:Tsm1128
1481:Portsea
1475:Portsea
1444:Yours,
1406:Request
1359:Pyrotec
1354:Pyrotec
1350:Legobot
1313:Pyrotec
1308:Pyrotec
1304:Legobot
823:Frickeg
789:Frickeg
759:WP:FOUR
734:WP:FOUR
608:doktorb
601:Message
489:be bold
465:notable
427:Comment
179:Pbl1998
154:Pbl1998
111:Farnham
28:welcome
8869:Adam37
8825:Adam37
8757:Adam37
8736:ninety
8719:Adam37
8690:Adam37
8665:Adam37
8596:Adam37
8442:Adam37
8426:WP:GAC
8395:blocks
8380:WP:OWN
8252:Adam37
8227:Adam37
8210:Adam37
8193:Adam37
8148:Adam37
8131:(talk)
8095:Adam37
8036:Adam37
8018:page.
7988:Adam37
7944:Adam37
7875:Edward
7839:Adam37
7768:Adam37
7752:Renata
7732:Adam37
7716:Renata
7669:Adam37
7610:Adam37
7593:Adam37
7530:Adam37
7456:Adam37
7440:Adam37
7423:Adam37
7406:Adam37
7354:Adam37
7243:Danube
7210:length
7122:Adam37
7042:Adam37
6998:Solent
6895:Oxford
6856:Thames
6852:Surrey
6808:length
6792:county
6744:Adam37
6704:Adam37
6626:Adam37
6596:Adam37
6571:Adam37
6529:Adam37
6494:Adam37
6410:Adam37
6359:Adam37
6332:Adam37
6282:Adam37
6234:Adam37
6202:Adam37
6196:WP:CAT
6153:Adam37
6090:Adam37
6049:Adam37
5917:Adam37
5729:Adam37
5689:Adam37
5640:Adam37
5605:WP:OWN
5581:Adam37
5552:Adam37
5504:Adam37
5454:Adam37
5411:Adam37
5390:Adam37
5354:offend
5283:Adam37
5274:Cabayi
5246:unless
5204:task!
5166:WP:AFD
5098:Adam37
5003:Adam37
4967:Adam37
4904:Adam37
4866:Adam37
4853:(Talk)
4815:Adam37
4803:(talk)
4764:Adam37
4738:Dorset
4718:Adam37
4646:Adam37
4501:.....
4464:Adam37
4408:Adam37
4377:Adam37
4352:jonque
4324:Adam37
4308:Jc3s5h
4279:Adam37
4261:Adam37
4135:Adam37
4107:Jc3s5h
4078:Adam37
4057:Jc3s5h
4021:Jc3s5h
3983:Adam37
3959:Jc3s5h
3939:Adam37
3923:Jc3s5h
3877:Adam37
3822:Adam37
3805:Motmit
3783:Buistr
3762:Adam37
3699:Buistr
3667:Adam37
3609:Adam37
3592:rose64
3561:Adam37
3545:Graemp
3524:Adam37
3455:Graemp
3432:Graemp
3396:Adam37
3380:rose64
3359:; and
3315:Adam37
3296:Adam37
3274:rose64
3215:Adam37
3145:Adam37
3126:Adam37
3041:Adam37
2999:Adam37
2955:Adam37
2945:expand
2913:Adam37
2872:Adam37
2798:Adam37
2752:Adam37
2680:Adam37
2630:Adam37
2591:Adam37
2574:Johnlp
2549:Adam37
2502:DexDor
2404:Adam37
2339:DexDor
2302:Adam37
2254:Adam37
2229:Surrey
2207:Adam37
2085:Adam37
2027:Choess
1995:Adam37
1966:Choess
1936:Adam37
1918:Adam37
1901:rose64
1811:Adam37
1794:rose64
1753:Adam37
1720:Adam37
1687:Adam37
1648:Adam37
1587:Adam37
1537:Thanks
1521:Adam37
1417:Yours
1342:; see
1255:Adam37
1190:Adam37
1172:Adam37
1165:inform
1111:Adam37
1074:Adam37
1007:Adam37
987:Adam37
807:Adam37
567:didn't
504:Adam37
433:town's
382:Adam37
277:Adam37
81:helpme
8857:words
8808:words
8583:as to
8124:Brown
8051:ndash
7959:Graph
7834:place
7214:mouth
7196:in/as
7108:named
7037:river
7004:near
6943:near
6931:is a
6904:is a
6873:is a
6846:near
6840:rises
6838:. It
6826:is a
6786:is a
4444:view.
4427:Chill
3260:: it
3082:). --
2424:while
2277:this
1777:NOTOC
1271:Your
934:moved
612:words
310:Combs
16:<
8874:Talk
8830:Talk
8781:talk
8762:Talk
8724:Talk
8695:Talk
8670:Talk
8601:Talk
8551:talk
8507:talk
8474:all?
8447:Talk
8407:talk
8382:and
8276:talk
8257:Talk
8232:Talk
8215:Talk
8198:Talk
8181:talk
8172:this
8153:Talk
8100:Talk
8082:talk
8041:Talk
8024:talk
7993:Talk
7975:talk
7949:Talk
7865:talk
7844:Talk
7811:talk
7773:Talk
7756:talk
7737:Talk
7720:talk
7674:Talk
7656:talk
7629:talk
7615:Talk
7598:Talk
7578:talk
7535:Talk
7518:talk
7506:and
7477:talk
7461:Talk
7445:Talk
7428:Talk
7411:Talk
7393:talk
7369:A308
7359:Talk
7342:talk
7310:2020
7293:2020
7263:talk
7241:and
7208:for
7127:Talk
7085:talk
7047:Talk
7026:talk
6954:The
6941:Ashe
6927:The
6900:The
6869:The
6822:The
6806:for
6780:The
6749:Talk
6732:talk
6709:Talk
6686:talk
6631:Talk
6615:talk
6601:Talk
6576:Talk
6548:talk
6534:Talk
6513:talk
6499:Talk
6482:talk
6446:talk
6415:Talk
6386:talk
6364:Talk
6337:Talk
6321:talk
6287:Talk
6264:talk
6239:Talk
6222:talk
6207:Talk
6185:talk
6158:Talk
6095:Talk
6077:talk
6054:Talk
6031:talk
5936:talk
5922:Talk
5900:talk
5864:talk
5749:talk
5734:Talk
5726:).-
5709:talk
5694:Talk
5684:very
5673:talk
5645:Talk
5627:talk
5586:Talk
5574:and
5557:Talk
5539:talk
5509:Talk
5491:talk
5459:Talk
5443:talk
5416:Talk
5395:Talk
5377:talk
5341:here
5305:here
5288:Talk
5278:talk
5231:and
5223:and
5142:this
5103:Talk
5084:talk
5058:talk
5008:Talk
4998:WP:V
4987:talk
4972:Talk
4954:talk
4909:Talk
4892:talk
4871:Talk
4820:Talk
4798:Tony
4785:this
4769:Talk
4723:Talk
4651:Talk
4575:..."
4535::D
4469:Talk
4413:Talk
4397:talk
4382:Talk
4360:talk
4329:Talk
4312:talk
4284:Talk
4266:Talk
4234:talk
4140:Talk
4111:talk
4083:Talk
4061:talk
4025:talk
3996:The
3988:Talk
3963:talk
3944:Talk
3927:talk
3917:to "
3897:talk
3882:Talk
3864:talk
3828:Talk
3809:talk
3787:talk
3768:Talk
3703:talk
3672:Talk
3624:it:-
3615:Talk
3596:talk
3594:🌹 (
3567:Talk
3549:talk
3530:Talk
3436:talk
3402:Talk
3384:talk
3321:Talk
3302:Talk
3278:talk
3241:talk
3221:Talk
3197:talk
3151:Talk
3132:Talk
3112:talk
3088:talk
3062:talk
3047:Talk
3027:talk
3005:Talk
2985:talk
2961:Talk
2934:talk
2919:Talk
2899:talk
2878:Talk
2858:talk
2818:talk
2814:DBaK
2804:Talk
2779:talk
2775:DBaK
2758:Talk
2705:talk
2686:Talk
2652:talk
2636:Talk
2597:Talk
2578:talk
2555:Talk
2506:talk
2446:talk
2442:DBaK
2410:Talk
2390:and
2377:talk
2373:DBaK
2343:talk
2308:Talk
2260:Talk
2237:talk
2231:. --
2213:Talk
2185:talk
2141:talk
2105:talk
2091:Talk
2060:talk
2031:talk
2023:here
2001:Talk
1970:talk
1942:Talk
1924:Talk
1905:talk
1896:. --
1882:none
1852:and
1840:and
1828:has
1817:Talk
1798:talk
1789:. --
1759:Talk
1741:talk
1737:KJP1
1726:Talk
1707:talk
1703:KJP1
1693:Talk
1674:talk
1670:KJP1
1654:Talk
1634:talk
1608:talk
1593:Talk
1571:talk
1551:talk
1527:Talk
1460:talk
1391:talk
1364:talk
1318:talk
1261:Talk
1242:talk
1196:Talk
1178:Talk
1132:talk
1117:Talk
1095:talk
1080:Talk
1060:talk
1036:talk
1023:IofG
1013:Talk
993:Talk
969:talk
965:X201
897:talk
874:talk
827:talk
813:Talk
793:talk
682:talk
656:talk
559:this
526:and
510:Talk
402:and
386:talk
324:talk
308:and
296:talk
281:talk
259:talk
235:talk
183:talk
158:talk
138:Hi,
119:talk
8740:one
8133:• (
8064:snd
7710:to
7000:at
6988:in
6935:in
6908:in
6885:in
6858:at
6842:in
6834:in
6810:to
6794:in
6790:in
6524:the
6277:Two
5994:.
5568:eth
5360:.
5332:CIR
5321:or
5318:or
5268:to
5257:.
5241:and
5237:and
5036:.
4712:his
4639:or
4552:and
4435:at
4040:In
3590:Red
3492:Pam
3468:Pam
3378:Red
3272:Red
2536:.
1899:Red
1870:toc
1864:div
1858:CSS
1792:Red
1497:Pam
1357:--
1311:--
1107:.-
981:law
726:BIO
563:did
416:Rod
359:Rod
8783:)
8553:)
8509:)
8409:)
8306:.
8278:)
8183:)
8175:--
8084:)
8067:}}
8061:{{
8026:)
7977:)
7941:-
7891:.
7867:)
7813:)
7758:)
7750:.
7722:)
7704:);
7658:)
7631:)
7580:)
7564:🌀
7520:)
7479:)
7395:)
7344:)
7265:)
7087:)
7028:)
6971:iː
6734:)
6688:)
6676:41
6674:.
6617:)
6568:-
6550:)
6515:)
6484:)
6448:)
6388:)
6323:)
6266:)
6224:)
6187:)
6141:✿
5938:)
5902:)
5866:)
5854:.
5769::
5751:)
5711:)
5675:)
5629:)
5541:)
5493:)
5445:)
5379:)
5060:)
4989:)
4956:)
4946:.
4927:!
4894:)
4682:.
4611:,
4608:,
4605:,
4558:.
4399:)
4362:)
4314:)
4236:)
4189:".
4113:)
4063:)
4027:)
4012:3.
4008:2.
4004:1.
3965:)
3929:)
3899:)
3866:)
3811:)
3789:)
3709:]
3705:)
3598:)
3551:)
3438:)
3386:)
3355:;
3351:;
3347:;
3280:)
3243:)
3199:)
3114:)
3090:)
3064:)
3029:)
2987:)
2936:)
2901:)
2860:)
2820:)
2781:)
2740:–
2707:)
2654:)
2580:)
2508:)
2474:)
2448:)
2379:)
2345:)
2239:)
2187:)
2143:)
2107:)
2071:GA
2062:)
2033:)
1972:)
1907:)
1848:,
1800:)
1743:)
1709:)
1676:)
1636:)
1610:)
1573:)
1553:)
1466:)
1462:•
1397:)
1393:•
1325:)
1294:.
1288:GA
1273:GA
1244:)
1134:)
1097:)
1062:)
971:)
899:)
876:•
872:•
829:)
795:)
736:)
699:)
684:)
658:•
654:•
585:-
544:(:
522:,
450:-
388:)
326:)
298:)
283:)
261:)
237:)
213:)
202:)
185:)
170:.
160:)
121:)
83:}}
79:{{
8779:(
8738::
8549:(
8505:(
8422::
8418:@
8405:(
8337:.
8330:.
8274:(
8179:(
8137:)
8080:(
8022:(
7973:(
7863:(
7828:2
7826:⁄
7824:1
7809:(
7754:(
7718:(
7698:(
7654:(
7627:(
7576:(
7558:~
7516:(
7475:(
7391:(
7340:(
7312:.
7295:.
7261:(
7216:.
7083:(
7024:(
7008:.
6980:/
6977:n
6974:ɒ
6968:m
6965:ˈ
6962:/
6958:(
6951:.
6924:.
6897:.
6866:.
6814:.
6730:(
6684:(
6613:(
6546:(
6511:(
6480:(
6444:(
6384:(
6319:(
6262:(
6220:(
6183:(
6080:)
6074:(
6034:)
6028:(
5934:(
5898:(
5862:(
5844:.
5834:.
5747:(
5707:(
5671:(
5625:(
5576:f
5537:(
5489:(
5441:(
5375:(
5276:(
5185:)
5182:☎
5179:(
5157:)
5154:☎
5151:(
5132:)
5129:☎
5126:(
5086:)
5082:(
5056:(
4985:(
4952:(
4890:(
4522:)
4518:(
4395:(
4358:(
4310:(
4232:(
4109:(
4059:(
4023:(
3961:(
3925:(
3895:(
3862:(
3807:(
3785:(
3701:(
3547:(
3501:D
3477:D
3457::
3453:@
3450:)
3446:(
3434:(
3382:(
3369:.
3276:(
3239:(
3195:(
3110:(
3086:(
3060:(
3025:(
2983:(
2932:(
2897:(
2856:(
2816:(
2777:(
2703:(
2650:(
2576:(
2504:(
2444:(
2375:(
2341:(
2235:(
2183:(
2139:(
2103:(
2058:(
2029:(
1968:(
1903:(
1888:}
1885:;
1879::
1873:{
1867:#
1860::
1796:(
1739:(
1705:(
1672:(
1632:(
1606:(
1569:(
1549:(
1506:D
1458:(
1389:(
1366:)
1362:(
1320:)
1316:(
1240:(
1130:(
1093:(
1058:(
1038:)
1034:(
967:(
895:(
854:.
825:(
791:(
769:)
765:/
761:/
757:/
755:C
753:/
751:T
749:(
732:/
728:/
724:/
722:C
720:/
718:T
716:(
695:(
680:(
636:.
384:(
322:(
294:(
279:(
257:(
233:(
181:(
156:(
117:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.