785:"Achaemenid Empire" is former nation which encompassed several modern nations in what now is the Middle East. The term is universally used on the anglophone world (thus en.wiki). If a native name should be put in the article, it should be its Old Persian name - in fact its original name - rather than its New Persian name which have a meaning only for those who speaks New Persian; that's why such an addition is pointless. It's the same as putting the modern Italian name in Roman Empire article as it is for every long-defunct nations such as Babylonia, Ancient Egypt, Neo-Assyria, Sassanid Empire etc. If a name is needed here besides the one in the title, that's the Latin, Akkadian, Ancient Egyptian, Aramaic and Middle Persian respectively.
738:- There are too many other counterexamples of your claim). However, you need to consider that when you are speaking English, you should say "Persian" instead of "Farsi", it is similar to other languages: when you are speaking Persian, you say "Engelisi" not "English". As a result, when you speak in Persian, if you say "English" instead of "Engelisi" is wrong and strange e.g. consider somebody tells you: "Can you speak Engelisi?! that this is like that you say: "Can you speak Farsi?!" Both are exactly similar and also wrong! Because, you are speaking "English" not "Persian". If you have any other "problem" with Persian language, do not hesitate to ask me.
1091:
1154:
1057:
943:
565:
1526:
in the Lead, do you not accept that the 4 cites used do not support the point? Even if our positions were reversed and I thought a contentious statement in the Lead needed supporting, I'd remove those particular sources. Anyway, have a quick look at them and reply here, if that's alright, and we'll
807:
Be sure your attempts is wasteful and useless. I advise you to study "The
Iranian/Persian History" and read at least some books written by some credible historians. It is better than being submerged in delusion. I quote from Pr. Prods Oktor Skjaervo professor of Iranian studies at Harvard university:
998:
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit
718:
Hello, I reverted your recents additions of the Farsi names for
Artaxerxes II and the Achaemenid Empire. While I assume these are correct, the addiction were quite unnecessary here on en.wiki; just think it as the same of adding to every ancient Egyptian pharaoh on en.wiki his modern Arabic name, or
620:
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit
1640:
Either way, I'm not sure if you should be editing WP given my recent interactions with you. You're instrumental in a minor content dispute becoming a total mess, and you've edit warred and avoided requests to explain why you believe certain sources should be included when everyone else agrees they
1192:
and linked pages. Take a look at the template on the left hand side of the menu bar above the edit field when you are editing an article, it will help. Always give page numbers for books, and remember snippets are rarely enough as the next sentence that isn't in the snippet may say "But that's all
1417:
Irrespective of our differences on the Iran article, could I also request that you pay more attention to the indentation? It's hard enough to read sections that you contribute to with all the random bolding/highlighting, without losing the separate converssation threads because you're not using
913:
The reason is clear, just it needs a little thinking. Because, I wouldn't like "common people" who usually don't study (that means reading wikipedia instead of book) remain illiterate. I'll do my best, however, the tragedy and problem is that it is editable by another "common people" with "low
1636:
You're continuing to disrupt the attempt to poll consensus. Please don't. If you want an apology for my blanking your comment and interpreting what your vote would be, I apologise. I did not think it would be controversial to you to ask you to stick to the question asked; perhaps I was
719:
to every ancient Roman emperor on en.wiki his modern
Italian name: quite pointless, also considering that the interlinks on the left columns also give the possibility of reading the corresponding article in other languages, including Farsi. I hope you understand the reason for my revert.
782:"Deir el-Bahari" is a location in Egypt, this name itself - widely used in Western audience - is a rendering of that Arabic name which is written in brackets, a literal translation is provided later, and a part of it was called in ancient Egyptian times Djeser-djeseru, mentioned later.
882:
At this point a question springs to mind, though it might be personal. If you do not trust
Knowledge, why do you write on it? You have access to several books and with a proper use of a neutral point of view, you could enhance its reliability, so it looks like a pity to me.
1553:, where I tried to explain some matters concerning this and added another related reference. Personally, I think for achieving a consensus it's better to discuss only in a single page, where all users are able to see and follow our discussions.
526:
You are adding this image at the section of prehistory. That is an unrelated section. Your first add-up was also damaging the order of the article. I will check the section you have criticized; but this image cannot stay in that
1266:
properties of an empire like other empires such as
British empire! You do not disagree when I say "British" empire?! because, for example Indians in India as a part of this empire are not truly British! ha? Isn't it?
914:
literacy". In fact, there is a great misunderstanding for you. wikipedia needs to be edited by people with enough knowledge to serve other people who do not want or cannot read these books. Hopefully, you get it now.
1021:
Sure, always I prefer to discuss so I explained my "logical" reason, but apparently you along with your friend are doing "Edit-War". Perhaps some editors here think that
Knowledge belongs to them and their friends!
849:
837:
1649:
on the most ridiculous of them, misinterpreted a comment there as support for your position when it isn't. Incidentally, in case it isn't clear to you, the result of that RSN was that your source was laughable.
1166:
1069:
1437:
There's no problem with editing between comments left by different users (although, obviously, one shouldn't edit between paras that a single editor has added. So, if editors A, B, C & D are involved in a
1285:
No idea why you are talking about empire as I was only talking about citation style. You need to follow our guidelines, that is their only reason I posted here. Your response however suggests what we call a
853:
841:
845:
833:
57:
1396:. Basically, you use {{reply to|username}}, that's where you'll see "{{@username}}" sometimes. This will post a notice on their userpage about your message. Hope this helps -
40:. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Knowledge. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place
1519:
Rather than cluttering up an already-messy Talk:Iran page, I thought I'd see if we can quickly resolve it here. If you'd rather turn it into a discussion there, fair enough.
60:
or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about
Knowledge, you might want to consider being "
734:
Of course, I am not agreed with you, but I prefer not to continue an illogical discussion. (Just a counterexample of your claim - a page which you edited as last one:
534:
are all already noted in the article. Also, architecture of the
Achaemenid Empire is shown several times in the article. So there is generally no need for this image.
832:. However, I do not care wikipedia that never has been a credible reference. ... AND do not forget Study about Iranian history ... To help you, some other books:
1147:
1050:
957:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's
579:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's
1178:
1158:
1061:
1142:
1352:
1303:
1276:
1247:
1084:
1580:
1562:
1042:
923:
892:
865:
794:
772:
750:
551:
517:
1508:
171:
1621:
are disruptive. Please cease to disrupt what should be a simple proposal process to establish whether or not we currently have a consensus.
1678:
says, overemphasis can easily undermine that. Other editors would understand your point just as well, if not better, in simple black text. --
1659:
1328:
1224:
759:
I fail to see how my reverting of a vandalism on Deir el-Bahari is a counterexample of that addition. You should rather find a consensus on
1188:
As sources must be verifiable, a Google books link isn't sufficient as sometimes they only work in certain parts of the world. Please see
1339:? In general, did you read only one book on history ? I become happy to hear yes ... These are nationalism thoughts? or your thoughts is
1235:? In general, did you read only one book on history ? I become happy to hear yes ... These are nationalism thoughts? or your thoughts is
1708:
1536:
708:
1038:
215:
69:
37:
193:
156:
1371:. You can also look at your talk page in the editing view; you'll see that it's standard for each participant to add a colon (
1202:
1487:
Regarding the bolding/highlighting, it's best if it's used appropriately, but I'm not sure if there's any guidance on that.
966:
588:
488:. The image which you keep adding to the section is unrelated. If you repeat this edit, you will be reported to the managers.
1687:
223:
1115:
110:
1015:
693:
658:, is not meant to give an explanation on a religious quality. These kinds of contents belong to comprehensive articles.
498:
455:
202:
1514:
991:
613:
227:
85:
728:
1630:
56:
1602:
1424:
The only slightly annoying thing is that one has to remember to do it on every paragraph in a reponse, like this.
1411:
407:
211:
189:
1332:
1228:
958:
580:
266:
206:
1167:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Aidepikiwnirotide reported by User:UCaetano (Result: )
1070:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Aidepikiwnirotide reported by User:Thomas.W (Result: )
1499:
As I said, I'm not sure there's any official guidance on that though, so it's just friendly advice. Cheers,
634:
371:
316:
974:
596:
384:
343:
320:
123:
1671:
969:
for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
591:
for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
1111:
978:
662:
654:, is a descriptive detail on two particular religions. This section, which is a subset of the section of
600:
447:
303:
403:
294:
240:
236:
133:
1157:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
1060:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
1665:
1615:
1613:
1183:
1098:
986:
838:
An
Introduction to Ancient Iranian Religion: Readings from the Avesta and the Achaemenid Inscriptions
608:
262:
1189:
850:
Persian
Kingship and Architecture: Strategies of Power in Iran from the Achaemenids to the Pahlavis
429:
425:
245:
1375:) before their comments to indent them. Then next commenter adds an additional colon and so on.
639:
473:
338:
257:
198:
1700:
1554:
1344:
1340:
1287:
1268:
1239:
1236:
1162:
1107:
1065:
1030:
970:
954:
915:
857:
760:
742:
739:
700:
645:
592:
576:
509:
479:
329:
298:
115:
61:
31:
1320:
I mean your answer exactly about references, so I repeat my question and wait for your answer:
1211:
a Google books link isn't sufficient as sometimes they only work in certain parts of the world
1300:
1258:
And, I forgot to tell you that: "Multiculturalism" ,as next part of this snippet, is one the
1199:
937:
442:
393:
389:
380:
376:
81:
65:
47:
72:
for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the
1392:
Also, if you want to notify a user that you have replied to them, you can "ping" them. See
1026:
438:
270:
232:
51:
504:
I wonder while such this image is related: File:Lula Khamenei TeerĂŁ 2010.jpg, how Tomb of
8:
1655:
1626:
1576:
1532:
1504:
1138:
962:
713:
584:
325:
311:
253:
162:
1683:
1598:
1174:
1078:
1009:
307:
166:
119:
68:
to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click
1398:
1393:
888:
790:
768:
724:
630:
399:
366:
73:
1607:
1368:
1317:
1295:
1255:
1194:
1121:
689:
547:
540:
Would you please stop adding that image? Or I should regard this as an edit-war?...
494:
77:
16:
1675:
1588:
1003:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
625:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
531:
505:
451:
965:
among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See
587:
among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See
1651:
1622:
1572:
1544:
1528:
1500:
1427:
And like this, in order to keep the indent going, but it's easy to get used to.
1134:
995:
617:
433:
249:
1489:
What I do know is that overuse will just lead to people jumping to conclusions
1694:
1679:
1646:
1594:
1336:
1291:
1232:
1170:
1073:
1004:
950:
673:
334:
151:
1593:
Please stop pinging me on talk threads which I'm not involved in. Thanks. --
1421:
Just use one more colon than the comment that you're replying to, like this.
1110:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may
1090:
884:
786:
764:
720:
679:
626:
559:
537:
I understand your national sensations, but you are disordering the article.
129:
1362:
1323:
Would you please give me some references as counterexample? Did you read
1219:
Would you please give me some references as counterexample? Did you read
777:
Maybe I got what you mean, let's see why these are quite different cases:
685:
543:
490:
655:
854:
Early Persian Empires: Power Structures in Achaemenid and Sasanid Iran
1618:
1550:
651:
942:
564:
485:
1118:, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:
1106:
for edit-warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
1496:
CONSTANTLY USED INAPPROPRIATE CAPS TO HIGHLIGHT SENTENCES/POINTS.
650:
The information which you are trying to add into the section of
994:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
660:
Aside from that, you have been also removing the references to
616:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
1433:
Otherwise, the text starts to look like this, which is weird.
846:
The World of Achaemenid Persia: The Diversity of Ancient Iran
668:
1645:
about obscure references, taken umbrage when I've started a
1493:
re. the mental state of editors, just as one might if people
1522:
Irrespective of our relative positions on the inclusion of
678:
Avoid restoring the edition to prevent the formation of an
572:
1672:
bright highlighter-yellow text background and font colours
1699:
OK, Thanks for your advice, I would respect this surely.
1161:
regarding a possible violation of Knowledge's policy on
1064:
regarding a possible violation of Knowledge's policy on
735:
985:
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being
856:
BUT I do not suggest reading wikipedia (you know why!)
607:
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being
1674:
down on talk pages? You're making good points, but as
344:
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (
1367:
Some helpful tips for talk page use. Have a look at
977:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
842:
Imperial Form: From Achaemenid Iran to Augustan Rome
599:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
1641:do not support the point made. You've rambled on
1467:Editor D responds to Editor B's first para, para 3
1462:Editor D responds to Editor B's first para, para 2
1457:Editor D responds to Editor B's first para, para 1
1159:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
1062:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
76:field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!
961:to work toward making a version that represents
583:to work toward making a version that represents
50:and ask your question there. Please remember to
1001:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule
623:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule
1148:Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
1051:Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
64:" by a more experienced editor or joining a
953:shows that you are currently engaged in an
575:shows that you are currently engaged in an
736:https://en.wikipedia.org/Deir_el-Bahari
699:sometimes silence is the best answer.
1452:Editor B responds to Editor A, para 2
1447:Editor B responds to Editor A, para 1
824:(224–650) ..." which clearly shows
13:
1089:
941:
563:
484:I noticed you've been editing the
14:
1719:
1290:mentality and I suggest you read
486:History section of Iran's article
1152:
1055:
834:Iran: Persia: Ancient and Modern
55:
990:—especially if you violate the
949:Your recent editing history at
612:—especially if you violate the
571:Your recent editing history at
172:Request administrator attention
1:
1549:Hi, I prefer to refer you to
1527:take it from there. Cheers,
1481:Editor C responds to Editor A
1472:Editor A responds to Editor B
1389:::: Comment 3. by next user.
1329:The Cambridge History of Iran
1225:The Cambridge History of Iran
1143:15:42, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
1102:from editing for a period of
1085:14:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
1043:14:51, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
1016:14:27, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
924:21:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
893:20:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
866:19:44, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
795:18:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
773:17:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
751:17:15, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
729:22:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
216:Biographies of living persons
116:The five pillars of Knowledge
93:
7:
1387::: Comment 2. by next user.
1385:: Comment 1. by first user.
709:23:51, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
694:21:34, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
635:20:05, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
552:21:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
518:21:02, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
499:19:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
157:New contributors' help page
86:20:00, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
10:
1724:
1670:Would you mind toning the
1412:01:27, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
1353:20:32, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
1304:20:25, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
1277:20:11, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
1248:19:22, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
1203:18:56, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
1179:15:13, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
820:(247 BCE–224 CE), and the
530:Notable topics related to
224:Simplified Manual of Style
152:Frequently Asked Questions
54:on talk pages by clicking
29:Hello, Aidepikiwnirotide!
1515:Iran: Persia Lead sources
1116:guide to appealing blocks
1108:make useful contributions
111:Contributing to Knowledge
1709:20:30, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
1704:
1688:20:16, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
1558:
1348:
1272:
1243:
1190:Knowledge:Citing sources
919:
861:
746:
704:
513:
1660:22:40, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
1631:21:48, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
1603:13:42, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
1581:06:27, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
1563:23:46, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
1537:23:19, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
1509:21:59, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
1442:Editor A makes a point.
372:Help develop an article
181:Policies and Guidelines
1341:Anti-Iranian sentiment
1237:Anti-Iranian sentiment
1094:
946:
761:Talk:Achaemenid Empire
663:Proto-Iranian religion
568:
1335:? Do you know who is
1231:? Do you know who is
1126:Your reason here ~~~~
1114:by first reading the
1093:
945:
672:, which appears as a
567:
508:is unrelated to Iran.
212:What Knowledge is not
190:Neutral point of view
1327:one of them? (e.g :
1223:one of them? (e.g :
987:blocked from editing
609:blocked from editing
394:Translating articles
299:Adopt-a-user program
267:Conflict of interest
207:No original research
816:(550–330 BCE), the
317:No personal attacks
1095:
975:dispute resolution
947:
818:Arsacids/Parthians
808:"... three great
597:dispute resolution
569:
390:Join a WikiProject
385:Requested articles
367:Be bold in editing
321:Resolving disputes
124:Your first article
38:your contributions
1701:Aidepikiwnirotide
1666:Talk page colours
1612:Your recent edits
1555:Aidepikiwnirotide
1408:
1394:Template:Reply to
1345:Aidepikiwnirotide
1269:Aidepikiwnirotide
1240:Aidepikiwnirotide
1184:Citing references
1112:appeal this block
1046:
1031:Aidepikiwnirotide
1029:comment added by
992:three-revert rule
916:Aidepikiwnirotide
858:Aidepikiwnirotide
743:Aidepikiwnirotide
740:Aidepikiwnirotide
701:Aidepikiwnirotide
646:Aidepikiwnirotide
614:three-revert rule
510:Aidepikiwnirotide
480:Aidepikiwnirotide
471:
470:
467:
466:
463:
462:
304:Assume good faith
278:
277:
228:Three-revert rule
92:
91:
1715:
1698:
1548:
1490:
1406:
1318:User:Doug Weller
1298:
1256:User:Doug Weller
1197:
1165:. The thread is
1156:
1155:
1129:
1068:. The thread is
1059:
1058:
1045:
1023:
448:Useful templates
295:Community Portal
282:
281:
241:Image use policy
237:Non-free content
194:Reliable sources
98:
97:
94:
59:
44:
25:
24:
21:
20:
1723:
1722:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1692:
1668:
1610:
1591:
1542:
1517:
1488:
1404:
1365:
1296:
1288:WP:BATTLEGROUND
1195:
1186:
1169:. Thank you.
1153:
1150:
1131:
1119:
1072:. Thank you.
1056:
1053:
1024:
979:page protection
940:
810:Iranian empires
716:
642:
640:Iran: Religions
601:page protection
562:
532:Cyrus the Great
506:Cyrus the Great
476:
474:History of Iran
418:
358:
326:Build consensus
287:
263:Deletion policy
182:
144:
134:upload an image
103:
102:Getting Started
88:
42:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1721:
1667:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1638:
1609:
1606:
1590:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1583:
1571:Fair enough.
1566:
1565:
1551:Iran talk page
1516:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1497:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1464:
1459:
1449:
1439:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1425:
1422:
1403:
1400:
1388:
1386:
1383:
1382:
1380:
1364:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1321:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1280:
1279:
1251:
1250:
1216:
1215:
1185:
1182:
1149:
1146:
1096:You have been
1088:
1052:
1049:
1048:
1047:
939:
936:
935:
934:
933:
932:
931:
930:
929:
928:
927:
926:
902:
901:
900:
899:
898:
897:
896:
895:
873:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
830:IRANIAN empire
800:
799:
798:
797:
783:
779:
778:
775:
754:
753:
715:
712:
698:
683:
677:
659:
649:
641:
638:
561:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
541:
538:
535:
528:
521:
520:
489:
483:
475:
472:
469:
468:
465:
464:
461:
460:
459:
458:
445:
436:
420:
419:
416:
413:
412:
411:
410:
396:
387:
374:
360:
359:
356:
353:
352:
351:
350:
341:
332:
323:
314:
301:
289:
288:
285:
279:
276:
275:
274:
273:
260:
246:External links
243:
230:
220:
219:
218:
209:
203:Citing sources
196:
184:
183:
180:
177:
176:
175:
174:
169:
159:
154:
146:
145:
142:
139:
138:
137:
136:
126:
113:
105:
104:
101:
90:
89:
52:sign your name
36:Thank you for
28:
18:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1720:
1711:
1710:
1706:
1702:
1696:
1690:
1689:
1685:
1681:
1677:
1673:
1661:
1657:
1653:
1648:
1644:
1639:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1620:
1616:
1614:
1605:
1604:
1600:
1596:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1546:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1534:
1530:
1525:
1520:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1495:
1494:
1486:
1482:
1479:
1473:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1465:
1463:
1460:
1458:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1450:
1448:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1440:
1438:conversation:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1426:
1423:
1420:
1419:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1410:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1395:
1390:
1381:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1374:
1370:
1354:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1337:Pierre Briant
1334:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1319:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1305:
1302:
1299:
1293:
1289:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1252:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1238:
1234:
1233:Pierre Briant
1230:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1217:
1213:
1212:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1201:
1198:
1191:
1181:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1145:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1127:
1123:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1100:
1092:
1087:
1086:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1077:
1076:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1008:
1007:
1002:
997:
993:
989:
988:
982:
980:
976:
972:
968:
964:
960:
956:
952:
951:Qajar dynasty
944:
938:February 2016
925:
921:
917:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
894:
890:
886:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
867:
863:
859:
855:
851:
847:
843:
839:
835:
831:
827:
823:
819:
815:
811:
806:
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
796:
792:
788:
784:
781:
780:
776:
774:
770:
766:
762:
758:
757:
756:
755:
752:
748:
744:
741:
737:
733:
732:
731:
730:
726:
722:
711:
710:
706:
702:
696:
695:
691:
687:
681:
675:
671:
670:
669:Median Empire
665:
664:
657:
653:
647:
637:
636:
632:
628:
624:
619:
615:
611:
610:
604:
602:
598:
594:
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
566:
553:
549:
545:
542:
539:
536:
533:
529:
525:
524:
523:
522:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
502:
501:
500:
496:
492:
487:
481:
457:
453:
449:
446:
444:
440:
437:
435:
431:
427:
424:
423:
422:
421:
417:Miscellaneous
415:
414:
409:
405:
401:
398:Cleaning up:
397:
395:
391:
388:
386:
382:
378:
375:
373:
369:
368:
364:
363:
362:
361:
355:
354:
349:
347:
342:
340:
339:Mailing lists
336:
333:
331:
327:
324:
322:
318:
315:
313:
309:
305:
302:
300:
296:
293:
292:
291:
290:
286:The Community
284:
283:
280:
272:
268:
264:
261:
259:
258:Sock puppetry
255:
251:
247:
244:
242:
238:
234:
231:
229:
225:
222:
221:
217:
213:
210:
208:
204:
200:
199:Verifiability
197:
195:
191:
188:
187:
186:
185:
179:
178:
173:
170:
168:
167:make requests
164:
163:ask questions
160:
158:
155:
153:
150:
149:
148:
147:
141:
140:
135:
131:
127:
125:
121:
117:
114:
112:
109:
108:
107:
106:
100:
99:
96:
95:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
63:
58:
53:
49:
45:
39:
35:
34:to Knowledge!
33:
27:
26:
23:
22:
1691:
1669:
1642:
1611:
1592:
1523:
1521:
1518:
1492:
1491:
1480:
1471:
1466:
1461:
1456:
1451:
1446:
1441:
1432:
1399:
1397:
1391:
1384:
1372:
1366:
1324:
1263:
1259:
1220:
1210:
1209:
1187:
1163:edit warring
1151:
1132:
1125:
1103:
1097:
1080:
1079:
1074:
1066:edit warring
1054:
1034:
1025:— Preceding
1011:
1010:
1005:
1000:
984:
983:
948:
829:
825:
821:
817:
813:
809:
717:
697:
667:
661:
656:Demographics
643:
622:
606:
605:
570:
477:
456:User scripts
430:Disambiguity
365:
357:Things to do
346:The Signpost
345:
335:IRC channels
330:Village pump
143:Getting Help
74:edit summary
41:
30:
1297:Doug Weller
1196:Doug Weller
971:noticeboard
826:Achaemenids
814:Achaemenids
714:Farsi names
593:noticeboard
381:Peer review
377:Maintenance
130:edit a page
78:Checkingfax
66:WikiProject
1643:ad nauseum
1524:AKA Persia
1214:" ha ha ..
443:Talk pages
439:User pages
426:Categories
271:Notability
233:Copyrights
161:Where to:
43:{{helpme}}
1652:Bromley86
1623:Bromley86
1619:Talk:Iran
1573:Bromley86
1545:Bromley86
1529:Bromley86
1501:Bromley86
1418:indents.
1369:WP:INDENT
1135:Ymblanter
963:consensus
959:talk page
822:Sasanians
763:instead.
674:vandalism
585:consensus
581:talk page
408:Vandalism
312:Etiquette
254:Vandalism
48:talk page
1695:McGeddon
1680:McGeddon
1676:WP:SHOUT
1608:May 2016
1595:McGeddon
1333:this one
1229:this one
1193:wrong".
1171:UCaetano
1124:|reason=
1075:Thomas.W
1039:contribs
1027:unsigned
1006:Thomas.W
999:warring—
973:or seek
955:edit war
680:edit war
652:Religion
621:warring—
595:or seek
577:edit war
527:section.
308:Civility
128:How to:
120:Tutorial
46:on your
17:Welcome!
1589:Pinging
1379:Example
1331:)Â ? or
1292:WP: AGF
1264:obvious
1227:)Â ? or
1122:unblock
1099:blocked
996:reverts
885:Khruner
787:Khruner
765:Khruner
721:Khruner
627:Mjroots
618:reverts
400:General
62:adopted
32:Welcome
1647:WP:RSN
1637:naive?
828:is an
812:, the
686:Rye-96
544:Rye-96
491:Rye-96
1407:child
1260:first
644:Dear
478:Dear
452:Tools
434:Stubs
1705:talk
1684:talk
1656:talk
1627:talk
1599:talk
1577:talk
1559:talk
1533:talk
1505:talk
1402:WOLF
1349:talk
1325:EVEN
1301:talk
1273:talk
1262:and
1244:talk
1221:EVEN
1200:talk
1175:talk
1139:talk
1035:talk
920:talk
889:talk
862:talk
791:talk
769:talk
747:talk
725:talk
705:talk
690:talk
666:and
631:talk
573:Iran
560:Iran
548:talk
514:talk
495:talk
404:Spam
250:Spam
82:talk
70:here
1617:to
1363:FYI
1104:24h
981:.
967:BRD
603:.
589:BRD
118:•
1707:)
1686:)
1658:)
1629:)
1601:)
1579:)
1561:)
1535:)
1507:)
1351:)
1343:?
1316:@
1294:.
1275:)
1254:@
1246:)
1208:"
1177:)
1141:)
1133:--
1130:.
1128:}}
1120:{{
1041:)
1037:•
922:)
891:)
864:)
852:,
848:,
844:,
840:,
836:,
793:)
771:)
749:)
727:)
707:)
692:)
633:)
550:)
516:)
497:)
454:•
450:•
441:•
432:•
428:•
406:•
402:•
392:•
383:•
379:•
370:•
337:•
328:•
319:•
310:•
306:•
297:•
269:•
265:•
256:•
252:•
248:•
239:•
235:•
226:•
214:•
205:•
201:•
192:•
165:•
132:•
122:•
84:)
1703:(
1697::
1693:@
1682:(
1654:(
1625:(
1597:(
1575:(
1557:(
1547::
1543:@
1531:(
1503:(
1373::
1347:(
1271:(
1242:(
1173:(
1137:(
1033:(
918:(
887:(
860:(
789:(
767:(
745:(
723:(
703:(
688:(
684:–
682:.
676:.
648:,
629:(
546:(
512:(
493:(
482:,
348:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
