Knowledge

User talk:Akhilleus/archive3

Source 📝

208:"Top-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles" I find there the Parthenon (a mistake, perhaps it should be the Acropolis, but even that is a stretch), the agora (yes, markets are important but what is so special about the Greek market?), and Atlantis (with or without Atlantis the Greeks would still have been Greeks). By the same token, critical articles are missing from the category. The Eleusinian mysteries, for one. The Olympics. Pederasty, which in the opinion of Plato differentiated the Greeks from the barbarians. I agree with your implied critique that a ratings system can lead to disagreements among the editors. Let's try to use outside sources, whenever possible, for buttressing our views, so as to avoid tomayto / tomahto type arguments. I would rather not be bothered with them at all either, but if they are here, then at least let's be accurate. 161:"Amphi-" rather means: "with two items on different sides" like an "Amphora", which has two ears. Translaters, with the Greek island in their minds, ofcourse translated it into "sea-girted." See how 2600 years of thinking in one direction interferes with every aspect of dealing with the issue? Again, as you eagerly jump on every detail and refuse to read the whole chapter by Mr Wilkens, I mentioned the word "amphialos" only as a direction, not as proof. Consider it circumstantial evidence, o.k., but there's more than plenty of it. 1097:
threat, should not be taken lightly. It is a small thing to let the article stay as it is while law enforcement investigates. It is almost certain that this is a crime that will involve substantial penalties. One of the things I learned years ago regarding Risk assessment is that it involves three elements: 1) likelihood of occurrance, 2) degree of awfulness if the risky thing occurs and 3) the cost of prevention or management. In this case, even if 1 is small, 2 is large and 3 is trivial. Patience is a virtue. --
31: 1074:
will see that I suggested more info on his relationships with women which is absent in the article. All I did was agree with Apro and then I proposed additions to the article. That's it. There is a whole lot written on a bunch of "what ifs" and "maybes", but nearly nothing regarding his love affairs with women. Why are you so combative of that edit? And of course I have an interest in Alexander, I originally named my account after him.
133:
I agree, to claim that the most probable location is Hissarlik. But now there is an alternative. Wilkens gives us probabilities that are far more convincing. The Cambridgeshire and Gog Magog Hills area with its thousands of bronze weapons found and many corpses , two war dikes, its rivers, and the wells all do fit the description, I repeat dó fit the description of Homer almost precisely.
977:
place to relax and learn at the same time but I decided not to edit on that article. Not because I don't want to but because I don't know much about the subject. Given the fact that I recieved this email, as well as every Greek on my friends list, it is likely that I know Cretanpride. I don't know who he is but it's likely that I've seen him before and hence the similar IP.
129:
seem to understand how bizarre the idea is and in this line you show your prejudice, which is allright cause everybody is prejudiced, but also, and this is bad, you're unwillingness to overcome it. In order to form a decent opinion on a theory it's not the conclusions that should be judged by their probability or liability at first sight but the arguments that are given.
1006:. I'm not sure that GreekEconomist is Cretanpride; most of his edits have been about Greek musicians, rather than any of Cretanpride's usual haunts. It's certainly conceivable that two different Greeks from California could name themselves "Alexander the Great". Then again, I've been fooled before, so I don't really trust my judgment in this case. — 317:
No problem. I meant to remove that citation as well, but was working from an old version and didn't notice that it was listed in the "references" section as well. I'm about to post to the article's talk page about my attempt at a compromise wording. (I was tempted to put something in about how the
218:
Regarding the whole ratings concept, it is an obvious apple of discord and I too would much rather be rid of it. Until it is removed, I will make an attempt to straighten out at least the "top" section (which I actually started last night before receiving your last message). I'll certainly not resist
976:
I thought you might find this interesting. Someone posted a bulletin in the Greek myspace group "California Greeks" urging people to support Cretanpride's argument. This person also sent me a message over myspace urging me to edit on that article. I decided to join wikipedia because I find it a good
451:
And yeah, I did try to find that supposed academic journal. I even did searches for "Adonis Georgiadis" on the Social Sciences Citation Index, the Library of Congress catalogue, and Google Scholar, and got no hits anywhere. There's no evidence of him in English at all, and I couldn't even get that
132:
Nobody would argue that horses don't have the ability to speak, but most agree that there was a war around 1200 B.C. The question is: where did it take place? Though there are, apart from religious and mythical contents, inconsistencies in the descriptions of locations and distances it's been fair,
1077:
Regarding my edit on your page, I was trying to show to you, that I was not a liar in saying he has posted over myspace groups because you and Josiah Rowe had questioned that. You specifically said that I linked you to that in bad faith, but now you see that I was telling the truth. I don't see why
966:
Cretanpride has not edited on any of the articles I have. My edits mainly deal with Greek musicians. On the Alexander the Great page I merely suggested including more detail on Alexander's military campaigns, I didn't get involved in the discussion. I withdrew what I wrote because I felt it was the
124:
You told me that I don't seem to understand how bizarre Wilkens' theory is: "it's like saying the Old Testament came from India, or the War of the Roses actually happened in Italy." On the contrary; when I started reading Wilkens I was just as sceptical as you are and as probably anybody else would
952:
I couldn't help but notice your accusation. FYI my IP was originally blocked because my username was written in Greek and was therefore confusing. The block was lifted and I replaced it with GreekEconomist. My IP is 66.233.19.91. This has been used by me and only by me. It's not my fault Clearwire
301:
However, our problem editor is not citing Thornton accurately (I have his book, and have been checking the quotes). As far as I can tell he's getting his material from right-wing websites, especially the Greco report. I'm going to take out the Thornton citation, but I don't have anything better to
1073:
I would really like to know why you are so paranoid about me. By doing this you are proving Cretanpride correct in his claim that you do not like competition. I also had no idea user Apro was once blocked. Do you want to investigate him again too? This is getting silly. If you look at my edit you
255:
The Parthenon is a building which still exists and is located in modern Greece, and therefore has a modern Greek name. This is in a sense its "real" name, since that is what it is currently called by the people of the place in which it is located, and I presume it is also its official name, since
128:
Stating that a theory is bizarre is allright but you should never forget that once people considered the theory that the earth is round a bizarre idea too. This might seem a silly argument but it really isn't. 2600 years of believe (that Troy was in Turkey) are hard to blow away. You claim you do
795:
The reason Cretanpride can't wait is that, like almost all systematic sockpuppeters (and I've met quite a lot) they simply can't resist; breaking rules is part of the fun of being in wikipedia; and generally they also feel themselves wronged for this or that. The good news is that Cretanpride is
962:
I appreciate your response, but given my similar IP, I suspect it will still come out confirmed. Noone else has used my IP but I noticed it is similar to Cretanpride's. I posted on the checkuser something similar I posted on your page. What do I do if it comes out confirmed? Again my IP is as I
1096:
I completely agree that such abusive behavior should not be rewarded. I read his edits and I think that if he had been reasonable there would have been some room for some of the things he wants to add. However, this certainly undermines his case. Nevertheless, a death threat, like a suicide
366:
Hi, Akhilleus. I'm glad that you like my suggestions, and I wanted to make sure that you realized that I wasn't scolding you in the last paragraph. I really do understand that you must be sick and tired of dealing with Cretanpride's POV-pushing and obstinacy, but I think that Ellinas has the
846:
from a legitimate editor, it would be something that we could work with and probably incorporate into the article. But we don't want to be encouraging the sockpuppetry of a banned editor. I suppose it's a bit like deciding how to deal with illegal immigration, or how to incorporate former
222:
Regarding pederasty, this exchange, and in particular its removal to "mid-importance," have led me to work on a new section in the article documenting the importance of the practice to the Greeks. Just today I came across a very lucid discussion of just that topic in Nick Fisher's intro to
109:
Thanks for your great works. I am not as I have said a professional Φιλολογος (thank God, else I'd be desparate for work) but an agricultural engineer. Unlike most Greek I recongnise that I do make mistakes and thank you for your input that balances the article for a Greek POV to a NPOV.
207:
I would imagine that ratings will be useful to various entities sorting through the Knowledge to create offshoots, printed versions, CD's what not. They are not without value. Of course, the problem is that they are to some extent subjective. For example, on looking over the category of
433:
Upon examination of Cretanpride and Ellinas' styles, you're right; the two do make similarly defensive comments about "Greek pride" and both misspell Michel Foucault as "Focault". I was probably seeing more differences than there really were, in an attempt to assuage my
166:
I would like to thank you for your patience and the efforts you've made addressing me and I apologize for staying anonymous. I'm just an enthousiastic guy from Rotterdam, and I didn't bother registrating. Maybe I will later, for now, farewell Akhilleus, I
677:
You've been a voice of reason on this article for several months now. While I was on Wikibreak it looks like you were combatting the reappearance of one troublemaker who has been a problem for nearly two years. I've written a summary of "Editor X" at
600:
says "If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice." I guess I'm just confused about the procedure. Maybe I (we?) should just move the completed case into the <noinclude:
718:
I feel like an idiot removing that bit of trivia regarding Joe Mauer living with Morneau, but I never found any articles relating to it when I did an internet search on Google. Thanks for supplying the source and keep up the good work!
1078:
you are so suspicious and paranoid. Besides, even if Cretanpride does use another account, that is not against wikipedia policy, so long as he doesn't use it to show support for a cause, have a revert war, etc. I haven't supported
987:
P.S. I certainly don't want to get blocked. It will take away my credit for the articles I've created. But since your the one who accused me I would hope for your support for an unblock. Sigh. I guess I'm asking for too much.
273:
Is there any other policy I am not aware of that we can utilize here? Mediation and Arbitration don't seem to cover what's going on in the article, or do they? The fact that this has gone on so long is ridiculous.
473:, but I don't quite feel ready to make that argument. Cretanpride has behaved very badly, and we shouldn't forget that; but it's not helpful to sink to his level and match his bigoted rants with rants of our own. 876:
as well. I've blocked him indefinitely now — for whatever good it'll do. I suppose we just have to keep playing whack-a-mole with his sockpuppets until he gets the point that he's not going to be able to win.
298:): Josiah, thanks for exercising your admin powers, and for suggesting inclusion of the opinions of a "small but vocal minority"--you have an excellent knack for suggesting a reasonable compromise. 64:
What is the correct form for supporting the "orthodox" view on the subject? How should I present my support in the call for comment you have launched? I am still learning about wiki, you see. --
835:]: three edits to an article about Cretan history, then straight into the homosexuality debate with Thornton details? It's either Cretanpride or one of the meatpuppets he promised to recruit. 682:. It's long so skim the bullet points for characteristic behavior. Some of the distortions (including footnote damage) remained in the article for months until I tracked the changes today. 246:
Did you remove the two forms of the Greek name because you think one or other is incorrect, or because you don't think both forms should be given? In either case, why do you think this?
231:, in particular p.27 ("pederasty was widely held to have long been an essential element in Greek culture from Homer onwards"), though the whole piece is very well put together. Regards, 536:
Yeah; I will admit that a part of me is relieved that there's a clear policy violation here. I've put a note up at AN/I in case anyone wants to contest the block; he's complaining at
901:
Fair enough; whack-a-mole it is. Mackensen says he's happy to keep confirming the socks, and may be able to put a range block on at some point. We'll see how it plays out. —
136:
I'm not claiming, as neither Wilkens is, that everything in his book is true, because a lot of it is hypothetical. But reading the book I got convinced against my prejudice.
486:
If Cretanpride continues to be disruptive, perhaps we should consider a user RfC. I'm going to respond on the article's talk page to your comments there as well. Best, —
465:
The problem is that although POV-pushing and distortion of external sources are reprehensible, I don't think they're blocking offences. There may be an argument that the
953:
IPs are similar. I don't want to get involved in back and forth polemics but I felt obliged to inform you given Cretanpride's history. Hope I still don't get blocked.
752:
comparison should merely be mentioned as a possibility, not as fact! I think this is a idea from some recent (2000s) article but probably not in any dictionaries. The
367:
potential to be a productive Wikipedian — and who knows, he might even learn a thing or two. (I could comment further on his classmate, but would be violating
638:; this way, when checkuser gets back from vacation the Cretanpride case will be the first on the docket. I think I'll go ahead and block 66.53.237.254, since 171: 142: 125:
be. The difference is: I read Wilkens book completely before forming my opinion, got convinced and thus set aside my prejudice, cause that's what's going on.
756:
version should be presented as uncertain too. To the best of my knowledge, the name's etymology is not known with any certainty. It would be either from a
278: 265: 530: 386: 730: 311: 302:
replace it with right now--I don't want to link to the homophobic and racist websites that are pushing the line of argument Cretanpride is advocating.
1003: 873: 807: 597: 565: 512: 139:
And then there is this: Have you read the part of Wilkens book in which he mentions Cadiz as the probable location of Ithaca? It's very plausible!
1042: 916: 892: 657: 617: 583: 555: 501: 564:
I was about to start making the new checkuser request, but I wasn't sure how to do it, since the old one is still on the page. Do we just edit
470: 333: 351: 288: 984:
I thought you might find this interesting. If your a myspace member perhaps you can send this little chap a message if youd like. Regards...
420: 396: 1138: 1116: 992: 971: 957: 825: 358: 679: 847:
insurgents into civil society in Iraq: balancing the practical needs of the day with the desire not to encourage the illegal behavior.
235: 842:
contest of wills with him, just as he's starting to learn how to contribute to the debate in an appropriate manner. If the last edit
1021: 469:
of Cretanpride's editing (the AfD, the sockpuppets, the distortion of sources, etc.) constitutes disruption, or that Cretanpride has
768:
root, wouldn't it, , if it is Indo-European at all that is, but further than that it's just guesswork. I was much taken in by the
1101: 90: 734: 686: 99: 81: 68: 197: 982: 947: 939: 866: 174: 1064:
to the right profile. If you don't believe me you can look at the group "Greek Omogenia" to see for yourself. Thanks.
701: 184:. . . for adding in the references in the Homosexuality in ancient Greece. Not that they will convince true believers. 145: 1037: 1016: 934: 911: 887: 861: 820: 652: 612: 578: 550: 525: 496: 415: 381: 328: 260: 250: 188: 1086: 1068: 800: 114: 997: 785: 438:
pride (since I had spent so long either assuming that they were two people or hoping that it was still possible).
318:
scholarly consensus was not widely accepted in modern Greece, but decided that would be a bit too provocative.) —
267: 212: 1091: 744:
oh dear, the current version cannot be all mine, can it? It was quite a while ago but I do remember mentioning
708: 772:
idea because of the mythological parallel, but I'd have to do some research to recover that reference, sorry.
669: 350:, an editor extremely competent in ancient Greek topics. As for me, for now I'll wait a checkuser control of 568:
and leave it where it is on the main checkuser page, or do we move it back up to "Outstanding Requests"? —
1107:(to Akhilleus) I don't really have much of an opinion anymore now that I know it's being handled. Ciao. — 537: 59: 38: 691: 832: 697: 634:
I've made the checkuser report. I think that it's OK to have them listed both under checkuser and
721: 95:
Hi Akhilleus. You're quite welcome. A very complicated subject I had found out. Bests. --- (Bob)
86:
I've commented there; if it is not all you would wish - you did ask for an independent opinion.
256:
demotic is now the official language of Greece. Therefore I think both names should be given.
1033: 1012: 930: 907: 883: 857: 816: 648: 608: 574: 546: 521: 492: 411: 377: 324: 295: 179: 74: 704:
to your watchlist? I've uncovered more vandalism by Editor X there. Fixed what I found.
8: 1083: 1065: 989: 968: 954: 790: 777: 724: 307: 47: 17: 1134: 1112: 635: 104: 713: 275: 241: 156:
I agree that we stop posting on each others talk pages so this will be the last time;
1125:
No problem, note that this is following a humorous email from another banned user,
1028: 1007: 925: 902: 878: 852: 811: 643: 603: 569: 541: 516: 487: 406: 372: 319: 194: 1082:
of his arguments. Until I do, I should not have this cloak of suspicion over me.
202: 87: 346:
is often a loss of time; instead, I would advice you to ask help from the admin
219:
any changes you might want to make (like restoring the agora to top importance).
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
773: 347: 303: 257: 247: 150: 96: 78: 1131: 1126: 1109: 1098: 739: 642:
says "Obvious sock puppets may be treated as such without using checkuser." —
639: 368: 343: 228: 73:
Hi Akhilleus. Thanks for your kind message. I will look into the article on
405:
And thanks for the kind words. I was feeling a bit dim for being fooled. —
119: 65: 1051: 705: 683: 670: 393: 354:; if I find he's just another sock, I'll consider measures against him.-- 285: 232: 209: 185: 111: 1129:, in which she admitted to me that she's a racist and anti-Semite. ;-) — 967:
wrong time to post that given the discussion that was going on. Thanks.
797: 355: 796:
quite a mediocre sockpuppeter, and is extremely easy to detect.--
511:
Never mind; I've blocked him for a month for the continued
540:, but not, interestingly, denying that he's Cretanpride. — 838:
The most annoying thing is that we're now stuck in this
77:
when I have time, hopefully very soon! Bests. --- (Bob)
1056:Hey, I really was telling the truth. Cretan really 193:
Add my thanks to the pile, whatever the outcome! -
1060:post stuff over myspace and that link I gave you 598:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Cretanpride 566:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Cretanpride 284:Perhaps your request will give him pause. Or us. 602:box and put the new one where the old one was? — 342:Hi Akhilleus. In my opinion, asking helping to 831:Looks like another sockpuppet to me. See his 963:stated above which has been used only by me. 452:biography page Cretanpride linked to to load. 680:User:Durova/Complex vandalism at Joan of Arc 981:The URL of the person on myspace is this 14: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 392:Elinas indeed. Thanks for the info. 25: 23: 702:Cultural depictions of Joan of Arc 471:exhausted the community's patience 24: 1152: 515:. So much for rehabilitation. — 29: 268:Homosexuality in ancient Greece 1139:20:08, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 1117:19:58, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 1102:19:44, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 1087:01:28, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 1069:20:50, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 1043:16:29, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1022:16:20, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 993:06:11, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 972:05:52, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 958:05:42, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 940:04:54, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 917:04:50, 18 September 2006 (UTC) 893:01:35, 18 September 2006 (UTC) 867:00:16, 18 September 2006 (UTC) 826:01:22, 14 September 2006 (UTC) 801:19:28, 13 September 2006 (UTC) 786:17:52, 12 September 2006 (UTC) 13: 1: 735:00:11, 3 September 2006 (UTC) 709:18:34, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 658:05:21, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 618:05:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 584:04:56, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 556:04:49, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 531:04:09, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 7: 948:Your accusations against me 687:05:39, 27 August 2006 (UTC) 502:04:28, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 421:04:49, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 397:23:17, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 387:07:37, 27 August 2006 (UTC) 359:13:59, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 334:04:47, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 312:04:36, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 289:03:15, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 279:00:27, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 261:15:34, 12 August 2006 (UTC) 251:14:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC) 236:11:29, 13 August 2006 (UTC) 213:10:07, 12 August 2006 (UTC) 198:04:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC) 189:03:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC) 10: 1157: 806:...and the latest sock is 538:User talk:MegasAllexandros 872:And unsurprisingly, it's 175:07:22, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 146:06:15, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 115:09:36, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 100:13:59, 21 July 2006 (UTC) 91:18:44, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 82:18:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 69:08:07, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 1027:Yeah, I'll ask Aldux. — 698:Joan of Arc bibliography 998:Latest checkuser result 227:It is also on the web, 1092:Thanks for the comment 696:Would you mind adding 296:User talk:Josiah Rowe 42:of past discussions. 75:Cyclopean structures 1002:Hmm... we've got a 18:User talk:Akhilleus 225:Against Timarchos. 60:Cyclopaean Masonry 1041: 1020: 938: 915: 891: 865: 824: 784: 656: 616: 582: 554: 529: 500: 419: 385: 332: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 1148: 1137: 1115: 1031: 1010: 928: 905: 881: 855: 814: 776: 733: 728: 646: 606: 572: 544: 519: 490: 409: 375: 322: 33: 32: 26: 1156: 1155: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1130: 1108: 1094: 1054: 1000: 950: 793: 742: 726: 720: 716: 694: 675: 271: 244: 205: 182: 172:212.123.163.102 153: 143:212.123.163.102 122: 107: 88:Septentrionalis 62: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1154: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1120: 1119: 1093: 1090: 1084:GreekEconomist 1066:GreekEconomist 1053: 1050: 1048: 1046: 1045: 1004:partial result 999: 996: 990:GreekEconomist 980: 969:GreekEconomist 955:GreekEconomist 949: 946: 944: 922: 921: 920: 919: 896: 895: 829: 828: 792: 789: 741: 738: 715: 712: 693: 690: 674: 668: 667: 666: 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 589: 588: 587: 586: 559: 558: 509: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 479: 478: 477: 476: 475: 474: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 444: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 426: 425: 424: 423: 400: 399: 364: 363: 362: 361: 348:user:Dbachmann 337: 336: 292: 291: 270: 264: 243: 240: 239: 238: 220: 204: 201: 181: 178: 169: 168: 163: 162: 158: 157: 152: 149: 121: 118: 106: 103: 61: 58: 56: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1153: 1140: 1136: 1133: 1128: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1118: 1114: 1111: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1100: 1089: 1088: 1085: 1081: 1075: 1071: 1070: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1049: 1044: 1039: 1035: 1030: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1018: 1014: 1009: 1005: 995: 994: 991: 985: 983: 978: 974: 973: 970: 964: 960: 959: 956: 945: 942: 941: 936: 932: 927: 918: 913: 909: 904: 900: 899: 898: 897: 894: 889: 885: 880: 875: 871: 870: 869: 868: 863: 859: 854: 850: 845: 841: 836: 834: 827: 822: 818: 813: 809: 805: 804: 803: 802: 799: 788: 787: 783: 781: 775: 771: 767: 763: 759: 755: 751: 747: 737: 736: 732: 729: 723: 711: 710: 707: 703: 699: 689: 688: 685: 681: 672: 659: 654: 650: 645: 641: 637: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 619: 614: 610: 605: 599: 595: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 585: 580: 576: 571: 567: 563: 562: 561: 560: 557: 552: 548: 543: 539: 535: 534: 533: 532: 527: 523: 518: 514: 503: 498: 494: 489: 485: 484: 483: 482: 481: 480: 472: 468: 464: 463: 462: 461: 460: 459: 450: 449: 448: 447: 446: 445: 437: 432: 431: 430: 429: 428: 427: 422: 417: 413: 408: 404: 403: 402: 401: 398: 395: 391: 390: 389: 388: 383: 379: 374: 370: 360: 357: 353: 349: 345: 341: 340: 339: 338: 335: 330: 326: 321: 316: 315: 314: 313: 309: 305: 299: 297: 294:(copied from 290: 287: 283: 282: 281: 280: 277: 269: 266:Cretanpride, 263: 262: 259: 253: 252: 249: 237: 234: 230: 226: 221: 217: 216: 215: 214: 211: 200: 199: 196: 191: 190: 187: 177: 176: 173: 165: 164: 160: 159: 155: 154: 148: 147: 144: 140: 137: 134: 130: 126: 117: 116: 113: 102: 101: 98: 93: 92: 89: 84: 83: 80: 76: 71: 70: 67: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 1095: 1079: 1076: 1072: 1061: 1057: 1055: 1047: 1001: 986: 979: 975: 965: 961: 951: 943: 923: 848: 843: 839: 837: 830: 794: 779: 769: 765: 761: 757: 753: 749: 745: 743: 722:Wikipediarul 717: 695: 676: 513:sockpuppetry 510: 466: 435: 365: 352:User:Ellinas 300: 293: 276:CaveatLector 272: 254: 245: 224: 206: 192: 183: 180:Thanks . . . 170: 141: 138: 135: 131: 127: 123: 108: 94: 85: 72: 63: 55: 43: 37: 1029:Josiah Rowe 1008:Josiah Rowe 926:Josiah Rowe 903:Josiah Rowe 879:Josiah Rowe 853:Josiah Rowe 812:Josiah Rowe 791:Cretanpride 748:-- but the 671:Joan of Arc 644:Josiah Rowe 636:WP:SUSPSOCK 604:Josiah Rowe 596:Right, but 570:Josiah Rowe 542:Josiah Rowe 517:Josiah Rowe 488:Josiah Rowe 407:Josiah Rowe 373:Josiah Rowe 320:Josiah Rowe 304:--Akhilleus 36:This is an 924:Oh, joy. — 371:myself.) — 105:Trojan War 874:confirmed 808:confirmed 714:Good work 673:vandalism 467:sum total 242:Parthenon 97:Wikiklrsc 79:Wikiklrsc 1127:-Inanna- 1099:Blue Tie 1038:contribs 1017:contribs 935:contribs 912:contribs 888:contribs 862:contribs 833:contribs 821:contribs 653:contribs 613:contribs 579:contribs 551:contribs 526:contribs 497:contribs 416:contribs 382:contribs 329:contribs 195:Smahoney 770:saranyu 750:saranyu 746:saranyu 203:Ratings 66:5telios 39:archive 840:stupid 706:Durova 692:Update 684:Durova 640:WP:RCU 394:Haiduc 369:WP:NPA 344:WP:RFI 286:Haiduc 233:Haiduc 210:Haiduc 186:Haiduc 151:Ithaca 112:Ikokki 810:... — 798:Aldux 740:Helen 731:s2221 356:Aldux 167:sign: 16:< 1135:khoi 1132:Khoi 1113:khoi 1110:Khoi 1034:talk 1013:talk 931:talk 908:talk 884:talk 858:talk 851:. — 849:Sigh 844:were 817:talk 764:or 700:and 649:talk 609:talk 575:talk 547:talk 522:talk 493:talk 412:talk 378:talk 325:talk 308:talk 258:Adam 248:Adam 229:here 120:Troy 1080:any 1062:was 1058:did 1052:Hey 774:dab 766:sel 762:yel 758:wel 754:wel 601:--> 436:own 1036:• 1015:• 933:• 910:• 886:• 860:• 819:• 760:, 651:• 611:• 577:• 549:• 524:• 495:• 414:• 380:• 327:• 310:) 1040:) 1032:( 1019:) 1011:( 937:) 929:( 914:) 906:( 890:) 882:( 877:— 864:) 856:( 823:) 815:( 782:) 780:ᛏ 778:( 727:e 725:| 655:) 647:( 615:) 607:( 581:) 573:( 553:) 545:( 528:) 520:( 499:) 491:( 418:) 410:( 384:) 376:( 331:) 323:( 306:( 50:.

Index

User talk:Akhilleus
archive
current talk page
5telios
08:07, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Cyclopean structures
Wikiklrsc
18:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Septentrionalis
18:44, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Wikiklrsc
13:59, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Ikokki
09:36, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
212.123.163.102
06:15, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
212.123.163.102
07:22, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Haiduc
03:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Smahoney
04:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Haiduc
10:07, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
here
Haiduc
11:29, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Adam
14:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Adam

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.