Knowledge

User talk:Alarbus

Source 📝

487: 310: 4002: 1677:
should be added, relating to reader utility. Does the article give the reader what he wants? It's difficult. I try every shabby trick to keep the reader of one of my articles reading, but that doesn't help the person who comes in for a specific point, like the guy on McKinley who wanted John Sherman's first name (see talk page). Like the surge of interest in the Gough Whitlam article, 15,000 clicks over the past two days instead of a few hundred. What are they reading? Do they just want to see if we caught Margaret's death?
3857: 360: 3761: 1709:
at least. Whitlam is in the news and Google is driving a lot of hits to the article. Mostly it would be younger people who really don't know his history, so they look it up. And editors here swarm any in-the-news article, usually with poor effect. The more serious readers are the ones clicking through to related articles. With Titanic's centenary soon, I've been editing a fair number of the related articles because I know they will all be read a lot next month. Gotta go.
3537: 732: 3398: 2943: 2644: 1099: 4057: 3931: 213: 205: 1424: 23: 3314:"The restriction on using multiple/alternate accounts on User:Barong, formerly known as User:Jack Merridew is modified as follows: User:Barong is directed to edit solely from that account. Should Barong edit from another account or log out to edit in a deliberate attempt to violate this restriction, any uninvolved administrator may block Barong for a reasonable amount of time at their discretion." 2950: 1106: 3724: 3131:. I already did that once. I just wanted to say goodbye to a great editor who helped me a lot in the past while asking nothing in return. I wonder how long it will take to the people at the top to figure it out that they are losing good editors... fast. I barely edit here anymore, others, do not edit at all. What a place... -- 2532:
will always suffer from having to be re-written when a new idea comes along. If editors get into the habit of working in this way, it becomes the norm, and we don't then have to second-guess the hypothetical probability of some worthwhile advancement and make a case for it every time. Surely there's sense in that? --
2783:
of preview/load time. {sfn} also auto collates which this list needs some of; there are two refs that are copypasta'd and would otherwise be combined with icky named refs. re the sorting, there are a lot of explicit display:none in there and I believe there's a template to hide that markup; some n00b
2677:
which is the new standard way of doing this. The accessibility structure seems well in hand. It is a bit odd having the row header as the second column but it's done properly so it more a 'look' anomaly than anything else. I'd take the references to a more robust system, of course; would be easy, too
2531:
then you future-proof your work by allowing developments to use the parameters you pass in whatever way may be useful - emitting metadata, for example - without having to rewrite every article where the call is used. There's almost no downside to enabling developments in this way, whereas hard-coding
1723:
I suppose. The problem with working on an article like that is that the literature is huge. The plague of a FA writer is too much or too little. I'm home Thursday and hope to get some work done on the Great Redesign of U.S. coins I've been slowly working on. That's really to complete the featured
1708:
But we don't really know. Maybe the foundation does; Maryana might be a good person to have that talk with. A reader trends study. They have elements of this going already, article rating, editor feedback, probably more. The timeframe for gathering and analysing such data is long; long in wiki-time,
2764:
as it makes it so much easier for future maintainers to find errors and broken links, etc. in them. Although 150+ extra templates are likely to add a few extra seconds to the edit preview time, it certainly won't have any significant impact on the pages served via the squid cache to normal viewers.
2489:
implementation does do the concatenation that you're doing by hand, but if there is a need down the road to change that algorithm to something else, your having set explicite values in articles will cause the articles to break when {sfnRef} and the related other templates are changed. Worse, having
1924:
Amazing that he though he could get away with it. They must be rare. Yeah, the eagle is mixed for disambig; was before I got there. I'll move them all along. Some of the new/current stuff, like Jefferson, have a lot of non-print sources and they should be kicked into using short footnotes, too. See
525:
page which details the host roles within the Teahouse pilot and the importance that hosts play in providing a friendly, special experience not always found on other welcome/help spaces on Knowledge. It also explains how Teahouse hosts are important regarding metrics reporting during this pilot. Are
3739:
Thanks for helping the article improve to FA standards by your reference cleanup ! Not only did you fix the article but also you taught me how to improve references in my future articles. Though you may kept away from Knowledge editing, the effect of your constructive edits is impossible to erase.
3278:
it is made clear "Davenbelle is an former sockpuppeteer. He is now using the username 'Jack Merridew'. He has been unblocked per the direction of the Arbitration Committee". What you see there is Jeff G making a fool of himself by asking in May 2010 for a SPI on Jack Merridew, who was unblocked by
2109:
went away (again). I noticed the warning class when I looked up the error class (in the served css). The 1.19 release of mw is when a lot of the junk messages began appearing; {citation} in {reflist} sort of things. I want's after the yellow specifically, just a different look. The second class or
1746:
Prioryman did most of the work on the Titanic article. I'm sure there are endless 'sources', mostly junk. What coin articles have I missed that are related to your Feature topic plans? Name them, and I'll work on them; any that are not done, too. I'll look from your sandbox navbox and review… I'll
1699:
With old bullion coins, isn't it mostly the collectibility that drives their market value? Not the content. With bullion value only coming into play when it's a common coin in poor condition? With new ones it would be more about the content but still a limited edition high pressure proof kept in a
1282:
I do not know anything about template synchronization but I want to learn more, and in addition to that, I work with a Knowledge outreach group in India so through them I have a personal stake in the quality of the Hindu template template. I would love to be a part of this conversation and help in
506:
Week one showed that the need for Teahouse hosts to invite new editors to the Teahouse is urgent for this pilot period. It also showed that emailing new users invitations is a powerful tool, with new editors responding more to emails than to talk page templates. We also learned that the customized
438:
mentality. I think we can find a way to introduce better accessibility features while retaining existing visible styles. But this requires that you actually work with people. If you are not capable of doing that, then I suggest you back out now and let one of the other people Frietjes canvassed
3344:
Good to know that he isn't out for good. I hope he'll return one day, although I'm sure that his "friends" will be waiting for the smallest mistake he may commit. Good times those when editors actually cared about articles, not each others... or power on a virtual website. How many have a sterile
3178:
indefinitely blocked from editing Knowledge. This account is indeed blocked, but the user is only under restriction to edit from a single account. ArbCom, as well as Lecen, has recognised the value of the contributions, but it would seem that a lynch mob mentality doesn't care about improving the
3126:
Hello, Dave. I believe we haven't met yet. Nice to know you. Was he using the accounts to disrupt something? Like move requests, talk pages, etc...? As far as I know, he helped so many people around here that he deserved a little bit more of consideration. But who am I to speak that, after all, I
1985:
script produces. That's indeed annoying, and I should do something about it. I'm thinking of coding it so that it only puts errors on references that are inside a section named "References" or so (or realistically, within the first HTML node following the references header). The risk with that is
1612:
I can see people being after that sort of information. Of course most coins are made of zinc or aluminium. That box the same one used for Krugerrand and other bullion coins? The label should be short as it will line-wrap and tend to force the left column wider. Tables do an auto-proportioning of
1040:
Scotch whisky will be mostly book sources by time I'm done, not to worry. The only thing I haven't figured out is how to anchor a source that doesn't have an author. I put ref=swa in both the sfn and citation templates, but it still won't link. Maybe using sfnref is the key. Thanks for the help!
3213:
Hi, Dave 1185. Rexx is correct; the user is not banned; he is restricted to using one account at present. The account was globally locked because the user himself publicly revealed the password. If you wish to learn more about this complex and lengthy case, here are a few handy links to get you
1676:
in Grandma's attic, and wanna find out what the silver content is before selling it to a dealer. The problem is, we are given very little data on how people use articles. It's why if an IP complains about something in an article, I'm taking it very seriously. In my view, a sixth FA criterion
3623:
day the editor was not only desysoped, but blocked as well. In another (private) matter, at least 28 hours have now passed on a likely trivial, yet real life matter with no feedback. It seems that while AC is content to deal with "virtual" reality - they are less inclined to deal with "real"
1375:
and getting mixed results as too many people don't really get it; they think every topic should have its own unique and special stand alone infobox. This results in most of them being rudimentary. Consolidating infoboxes is about leveraging the heavy lifting that's gone into large and complex
2023:
Hi. I'm looking and like. I'll try the '2' version and give you some feedback. I've been meaning to talk to you about sfn and sfnm and will get my thought together and post them to your talk. This script is very helpful. I would like to tone it down; maybe use small instead of strong, and
2449:
see how "|ref={{harvid|Smith|2001a}}" is better than "|ref=CITEREFSmith2001a". It could be argued it saves having to type "CITEREF", but overall that is no saving. I don't see that Harvid does (in this case) anything more than trivially concatenating the arguments. What is benefit? ~
2005:, which only marks citations within a section called one of "References", "Bibliography", "Literature cited", "Works cited", "Citations", "Sources", or "Notes". I'll try it for a while to see how well it works, and then hopefully transfer it to the main HarvErrors script. 2765:
On the other hand, it's probably less of an issue for this article as the list is essentially complete and any further references are unlikely to be added in the near future. Alarbus may have further thoughts on my comments both here at at the list talk page. Cheers, --
2070:
I think there is some value in consistent error messages, but I agree that it's a good idea to tone them down a bit, especially for the false positive-prone search for citations with nothing leading to them. I hadn't heard of class="warning" before: it looks like
3227:
Discussion of potential lifting of the last of the Arbcom restrictions. Jack applies for lifting of restrictions, Feb 21, 2011; withdraws from discussion and scuttles accounts; Feb 24; discussion re-opened by Skomorokh, May 7; Arbcom decision posted on June 4,
1641:
That works fine, thanks, I'll put in over the next few days. I'll let you know if you need tweaking. I don't remember specifically but it's always possible I played with nbsps to make it look OK, The coin template can be a pain in the neck to deal with.
2110:
message is only about cites that might be better in a further reading, or better removed. The first set are real problems where they omitted ref=harv or got something else wrong and the footnote links are busted (which you know, but we have an audience).
3290: 3323:. Would you be kind enough to revert yourself in the interests of accuracy, please, when you've had a chance to review the evidence. Or do you feel able to adduce your own evidence demonstrating the decision your assertion is based upon? Cheers, -- 1695:
I know I need tweaking, but that's another topic. I'd like to try cutting the nbsps; they seem to have been about indenting but it really doesn't seem helpful and I don't like the look when lines wrap (which may be less as you move info to the new
536:
at the Teahouse. New & experienced editors to Knowledge can add a brief infobox about themselves and get to know one another with direct links to userpages. Drop off some wikilove to these editors today, they'll surely be happy to feel the
2882:
Thanks for the tests. The benefits of the better citation system certainly warrant the trivial overhead. {dts} sounds like the ticket; will say so on articles talk if there's much debate going on. Thinkin' I'll just help the refs along, too.
2444:
to encapsulate the string being being encoded in a citeref. Now I do understand the use of a procedure to encapsulate standardized processing of a datum (rather than writing such processing anew each time the daturm is processed). But I do
3566:, showing Luther's words "amore e studio elucidandae", roughly translating to "love and eagerness to enlighten". We believe that he has it, and that the project would be better with him than against him. "Well, you have to start somewhere." 3069:
Hey, Alarbus. Just passed here to give a hello. I hope you're fine. I'm barely editing here since I don't have enough time. Please share the news, I like to hear them. P.S.: I hope Wehwalt is doing well too, I'm really away from everything.
3304: 3307:"Jack Merridew is to be commended for making a clean return from an indefinite ban. On review of the past year, the Arbitration Committee replaces the previous motion with the following conditions:" - restrictions reduced to 4 conditions 1259:
with the others redirected there. It will take a bit of looking into, but they're very good at this. The point here is to focus efforts on somewhat fewer, but more robust templates. There are issues like having the templates emit
1887:
to using years. We spoke of this before as useful when pulling stuff together for your redesign article. Still liking the idea? I'd have to make a pass over all the coins (or a subset) to see which one were omitting the years.
3239: 2907:
Thanks very much, gents. I'll reply to the suggestions on the field marshals on that talk page in due course. Is there any chance you could get the MilHist coordinator icon to appear between the admin icon and the OTRS icon?
1703:
Most people don't read whole articles. It takes a lot for me to read a full sized article straight through. I think most readers pop in to look something up; a movie detail or something they were talking about with someone.
3360:
I don't know about all the past political drama, but this user was polite, did nothing nefarious and was extremely helpful on several articles at my request. I also hope there is a way for him to continue to contribute.
2297:
meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Knowledge. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse
2650:
I moved some things around and you have a new subpage for the top icons. It looks reasonable to me in both skins, so you can probably cut the alt-skin link. I take it the ambox was not really about this issue. Best,
2242: 3232: 3111:, please don't get smoked by the pretentious one here. Another thing, Alarbus is a self-admitted sockpuppet of Jack Merridew, Jack is now one step closer to being nominated for eligibility to be BANNED. -- 2850:
would add around 2 seconds to the edit preview time - a pretty negligible addition. Obviously it only affects editors, not normal page viewers, so I agree with you that it's nothing even for Slim to worry
2173:
to sfn and efn, could you check my work? I'll probably nominate that at FAC later this week. Also, I just heeded your advice and installed the harverrors script. The first article I came to after that was
3311: 2508:
What you are saying is, essentially, that someday the tags might be generated by some other process than simple concatenation. Is the chance of that anything greater than a hypothetical possibility? ~
2124:
Yes, it previously didn't get false positives on ones within refs. Apparently, there's another span in there now for some reason. I've changed the second set of errors to warnings, per your suggestion.
1627:
Try the new fields; they're a knock of Mass. Seems most of this information is currently in the Composition field (if at all). And I think the nbsps should go; they mostly seems to make things weird.
1681:, the companion article, got a modest uptick. Are people reminiscing? Are they kids in school who have been asked to look up the Whitlams? Shouldn't that be material to how we write articles?-- 1910:
I know. One of the great numismatic anecdotes, and this one actually true. May not actually be a mix, may be for disambiguation. But yeah, I'd be grateful if you could make them consistent.--
1859:
Not a big deal either way. Shield was my first coin article, it's still a bit primitive, though I had Howard Spindel, one of the experts on Shield nickels go over it and he seemed to like it.--
3224: 1319:
for FAQ. We have tens of thousands of templates doing very similar things. Mostly this has happened as a result of endless copy-paste-paste-pasting. Most of them are not very well made; a few
194: 1613:
widths based on content and most infoboxes just let that happen. There are also some odd nbsp being forced in as prefixes to a few fields… you know if that's really intended or appropriate?
3283: 2628:
Hi, Harry. Looking now (and watchlisted the field marshals…) I'm using vector but am willing to switch back to monobook a few times to sort things out. Should be done soon enough. Best,
2245:
would be what's coming soon. Anyway, Rosenberg looks fine; I see a few small adjustments and will make a few tweaks. Free Ride's not showing anything for me, now. This talk started at
3902: 3788: 3297: 3218: 2139:
Ah, the added span makes your first fix make sense to me; I'd not seen that they tweaked the generated structure. I've seen the warning class being emitted and it seems fine. Thanks.
486: 254:
Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a tea, especially if it is someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy!
2754:, and I'd agree with Alarbus that the list is good quality already, although minor improvements are always possible. I'd be tempted to seriously consider upgrading the references to 2751: 3866:
Thank you for holding up the torch for reformation, for elucidating love and study, for a free project that everybody can edit without petty restrictions, for peace, - you are an
467: 1214: 4064: 3890: 2604:, and see if you can get the top row (the admin icon, etc) to line up, preferably in both Monobook and Vector settings, but I'd settle for just Monobook. You could also check 1429: 3615:. Sort of along the lines of Wehwalt's comment. This is going to come across as really snarky, it's not meant that way, and I honestly do have the utmost respect for the 3558:
We know that Alarbus is one of many inventive names of a creative contributor who has a long and difficult history with Knowledge from the project's beginnings. He created
4010: 3127:
know what it feels like to be on the losing side. And Raul shouldn't have blocked Alarbus, as both had a well known awful relationship, to say the least. But I'm not here
1312: 278: 28:
Hello, and welcome to Knowledge. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Knowledge, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to
372:
Thank you for holding up the torch for reformation, for elucidating love and study, for a free project that everybody can edit without petty restrictions, for peace, --
3867: 3151:←) has been BLOCKED & BANNED by Wikipeida's arbitration commitee for using multiple accounts to conduct abusive edits across a number Wikimedia projects on top of 267: 249: 1587:
Do you think it is worth adding an "Actual precious metal content" field to the coin infobox? I fear that this is why many people are consulting the articles ...--
1166:
You're welcome. The whiskey page looks to have a conflation of Regulation and Association which needs sorting out; have not looked too closely. You need to install
966:
I'm really happy I happened to see your discussion about the sfn template. I've been looking for something like that. I wish I would have known about it when I did
2431: 919:
Mostly it's a matter of getting people pulling in the same direction and not have one set adding more while others are going in the other direction. cite.php and
1008:
will be an easy update; I'll just do it. Scotch whisky might not be as good a candidate as {sfn} is geared toward sources with pages, not web sources. Anything
3275: 3148: 3147:
Hi and hello to you too. Actually, I stand corrected as Alarbus is indeed BANNED as the sockpuppet of Jack Merridew, whose master account of Davenbelle (see →
3795:
struck me immediately as immensely valuable? - I put "Letting go of the past" on top of my talk, still not giving up my hope for reformation in the future, --
196: 559: 165: 2574:
the chance this would be needed is greater than that of a snowball in hell. Well, I will take this under advisement. Thank you all for you assistance. ~
3159:, effectively to BLOCKED and then LOCKED away for good as they have overstayed their welcome here. Just don't be fooled by their faked goodwill, ever. -- 526:
you an experienced editor who wants to help out? Take a look at the new page today and start learning about the hosts tasks and how you can participate!
2284: 1729: 746: 3453: 3319:
So as you can see, there is a restriction in the number of accounts this user may use (at most one), but there is no current block, much less a ban,
3274:
Please don't edit-war, Dave. Re-reverting a reversion is a poor way of conducting a debate. Keep checking and you'll see that on the page you linked
1986:
that there are probably so many ways to declare a reference section out in the wild that the script is likely to miss some cases. What do you think?
2836:, then the preview takes the server around 5.4 seconds. That's about 14 ms per template, which is pretty good. I stand by my guess that putting 150 2692:
via foor notes. I'm not quite done with Woodes; I'll be revisiting the refs still in the footnotes section, and can do the same for yours See also:
2318:
The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!
3477: 3085:
I'ts amazing to see that once you fall from grace, so many people simply ignore you. No one to say a single "goodbye, my friend". Quite a shame.
2779:
Hi, Rexx. I'll have a look at your full review. Above, I was suggesting {sfn}. It's a very lightweight template so I think we're talking a few
1264:, which the current ones may not do, or may not do as well (I've not looked, but Andy's the expert on these things). I'll point them at this… 546:
after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username
2818:, an edit preview takes the server around 8.2 seconds to create the html (as reported in the last line of a "view source"). If I disable the 2721: 292: 1230:(based on Infobox Mandir, some parameters different, used in some articles, 2011). How can I merge them without affecting functionality? -- 416: 2667:
I've looked at the field marshals. I added a missing name, which was pretty obviously just an omission. I also flipped the notes to using
2328: 3819: 512: 3668: 3654: 2384: 185: 3641: 3519: 2922: 2847: 2605: 663: 212: 204: 2927:
Re-ordering the icons is trivial; I'll do so in a sec. They're all using the {top icon} mechanism now, so you can fiddle as you like.
2369: 3977: 3607: 3593: 1497: 1388: 1298: 399: 54:
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Knowledge articles, and
3702: 2936: 2745: 2660: 2637: 2419: 2272: 2258: 1273: 1179: 1161: 1092: 1054: 1031: 972:, because I like that ability to click the notes and be taken to the corresponding source. It will be useful as I start working on 932: 913: 899: 807: 764: 702: 688: 677: 640: 629: 615: 601: 2583: 2561: 2518: 2503: 2222: 2204: 3559: 3473: 2608:
for accessibility if you were feeling charitable, though Rexx promised over a whisky that he'd look at it at some point. Cheers,
828: 3291:
Knowledge talk:Requests for arbitration/Coolcat, Davenbelle and Stereotek#Request for appeal: /Coolcat, Davenbelle and Stereotek
3058: 2541: 461: 3619:
at arbcom, but as a collective group? Case in point: At 7:08 on April 6 an edit was made to the main page. By 23:41 of that
3563: 2967: 2340: 1956: 1938: 1919: 1905: 1868: 1854: 1800: 1786: 1756: 1741: 1718: 1690: 1655: 1636: 1622: 1596: 1582: 1568: 1554: 1540: 1511: 1127: 508: 338: 178: 3201: 3167: 3119: 2490:
these in the wild serves as an impediment to making needful changes. Eventually a bot will come along and change them on you;
2148: 2134: 2119: 2088: 2062: 2037: 3552: 3365: 3332: 3179:
encyclopedia; it only cares about playing a MMORPG where facts are less important than levelling by eliminating opponents. --
2892: 2877: 2793: 2774: 2014: 1678: 3023: 2600:
I'm sure you have for more worthy things to be doing, but this one shouldn't take you too long! ;) Could you have a look at
3188: 3140: 3098: 2246: 1777:
in the nickel series. Thanks for your fine work. I'll probably be working in userspace on whichever article I do first.--
507:
database reports created for the Teahouse have the highest return rate of participation by invitees. Check out the metrics
2237: 2049: 1761:
Don't bother with Brundage, I'm going to do a complete rewrite, so it's pointless now. Let me see, you haven't gotten to
1083:. You should never put an explicit value in the ref parameter (other than "harv" or an {sfnRef}); that's for ] awfulness. 3305:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Jack Merridew ban review motion#Motion to amend User:Jack Merridew's 2008 unban motion
2732: 4046: 3989: 3971: 3918: 3882: 2404: 1879: 1236: 452:
Not impressed with the rhetoric. Accessibility is a core WMF priority and many existing visible styles are really poor.
2548: 1461: 750: 324: 300: 3579: 3089:
I had warned you of this months ago. They will remove one by one, until a large majority stays silent out of fear. --
2726: 3240:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive694#Continuation of Editing from 125.162.150.88 (Jack Merridew)
2024:
class="warning" on the second message? I'd prefer to be able to able to distinguish these at a glance from the hard
862: 4080: 1465: 1112: 1079: 74: 70: 3804: 3781: 956: 792: 3906: 3156: 3108: 2622: 1646:
shows that, it is creaking and may collapse if they do change the composition to .999 for collectors next year.--
1361: 1316: 890:
I've been updating the easy ones. I saw that Crisco 1492 has started using this, too, which is goodness. Thanks,
577:? I'm doing a copyedit on it right now for someone, it's probably going to be nominated for FAC soonish. Thanks, 547: 73:, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please 2263:
Alright, Free Ride looks fine to me now too, looks like it all works out then. Thanks for the tip on Rosenberg.
2189: 1502:
Work is underappreciated around here, alas. No interest in doing the trial, the whole thing was a put-up job.--
854: 573:
Hi Alarbus, I know you're a pretty busy guy, but if you get a chance, could you take a look at the templates on
3450: 2341: 113: 4068: 3792: 2390: 1478: 1337: 1195: 522: 519:
A refreshed "Your hosts" page encourages experienced Wikipedians to learn about the Teahouse and participate.
142: 95: 4029: 381: 128: 3848: 3494: 3425: 3388: 3128: 3010:
Not a question of personal preference, it's an issue of merit. The MOS does often get things wrong, but we
2693: 2299: 668:
You're welcome, thanks for an interesting read. I'll get to doing a full pass on the others in due course.
434:
Just a thought, but edit summaries like "will prevail here" are not helpful. I suggest you avoid taking a
1728:
research started but that's really waiting for some archive visits, probably in May. Also thinking about
586: 3746: 3544:
Every day, we lose what the wrongly blocked would have given that day. And a little bit of our souls.
3255: 2601: 2459: 1440: 1347: 722: 2334: 1995: 1839: 90: 3354: 3079: 2365: 2002: 780: 3843: 3536: 3279:
ArbCom in December 2008. I'll give you the pointers you need to see how far wide of the mark you are:
3043: 2986: 989: 157: 3952: 3944: 3527: 3003: 2303: 2180:, which had 8 "There is no link pointing to this citation" errors, how would I go about fixing them? 942: 774: 533: 446: 428: 272: 226: 186:
http://www.SPAMFILTEREVASIONexaminer.com/wiki-edits-in-national/wikipedia-features-cartoon-anal-probe
3233:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive692#Editing from 125.162.150.88 (Jack Merridew)
1665: 1484:
You're welcome, Tony. It's a nice article and Bryan was an interesting fellow. Then there was the
4051: 2958:. There's something odd about that milhist icon; needs custom offsets. Or I'm missing something. 2686: 2170: 1884: 1762: 1327: 1253: 1224: 1204: 4076: 4042: 3985: 3967: 3914: 3878: 3831: 3815: 3800: 3777: 3754: 3575: 3515: 3421: 3384: 3300:
Jack Merridew "Indefinite block lifted with editing restrictions" unblocked with 8 restrictions
2595: 2195:
The problem was in my script, not in your article; the error messages should no longer appear.
1982: 1457: 1371:
is using it; a fishing hut). There is a pretty steady trend of proposing such consolidation at
1291: 1167: 555: 377: 51: 3397: 3345:
real life and only find true fulfillment here? Someone should create an article about it... --
3664: 3650: 2917: 2617: 2400: 2361: 2311: 2294: 2268: 2218: 2185: 2164: 1156: 1049: 984: 909: 850: 836: 611: 582: 17: 2814: 1926: 976:, especially since I'm naming references and there are multiple books by the same author. -- 3899: 3634: 3489: 3086: 2579: 2514: 2455: 1661: 1434: 1408: 309: 109: 1845:
Nope, only did two of them, so far. I cut those nbsp; looks better to me, you ok with it?
8: 4001: 3825: 2701: 1485: 952: 842: 813: 803: 788: 233: 63: 1947:
Not very. Under a hundred buck even in fairly new condition. I'll keep an eye on it.--
3269: 3174:
Dave, you need to check your facts before you start slapping tags around. This user is
3064: 3038: 2713: 2697: 2290: 1976: 1643: 1604: 491: 480: 443: 424: 237: 3791:? Doing so for the first time to someone I didn't know for a long time - because your 3787:
Did you know that the above Precious was my 24th PumpkinSky Prize? Proclaiming you an
866:
them for better clarity and maintainability. There are only a few hundred pages using
4072: 4038: 3981: 3963: 3910: 3874: 3811: 3796: 3773: 3603: 3589: 3571: 3511: 3467: 3417: 3380: 3312:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Jack Merridew ban review motion#Motion (June 2011)
3251: 3152: 2977: 1952: 1915: 1889: 1864: 1835: 1782: 1766: 1737: 1686: 1673: 1651: 1592: 1578: 1550: 1507: 1469: 1452: 1404: 1398: 1284: 968: 551: 373: 320: 219: 153: 47: 2994:
involved? FWiW, the MOS doesn't dictate style of using citations or bibliographies.
3741: 3696: 3660: 3646: 3286:- what started it all, see "Efforts by Davenbelle and Stereotek to monitor Coolcat" 2991: 2909: 2717: 2609: 2396: 2264: 2214: 2200: 2181: 2130: 2084: 2010: 1991: 1774: 1517: 1242: 1231: 1149: 1042: 977: 905: 846: 683: 658: 645:
Thanks a lot for improving the referencing. Thanks for improving the references of
635: 607: 578: 435: 350: 259: 55: 2752:
Talk:List of field marshals of the British Army#Accessibility and usability review
1573:
I didn't mean you, sorry. I greatly value your work and the kudos are deserved.--
3976:... eight years, and still remembered as the model for this award, and inspiring 3894: 3629: 3503: 3481: 3376: 3371: 3350: 3328: 3184: 3136: 3094: 3075: 2873: 2770: 2575: 2537: 2526: 2510: 2479: 2469: 2451: 2438: 2425: 2348: 1071: 1016: 880: 565: 495: 135: 105: 59: 40: 3856: 359: 3714: 3029: 2999: 1725: 1473: 1246: 948: 870: 799: 784: 35: 2375:
It most certainly does; my typo. Sorry I didn't notice and thanks for fixing.
3889:
Three years ago, you were the 24th recipient (but I counted wrong, more like
3839: 3760: 3195: 3161: 3113: 3011: 2709: 2679: 2324: 1893: 1874: 1770: 1372: 973: 440: 420: 410: 315:
Thank you for your thoughtful comments and patient work on so many articles.
947:
Thanks for the fix. I had not encountered that particular situation before.
78: 3599: 3585: 3362: 3247: 3050: 3015: 2959: 2928: 2884: 2862: 2840: 2822: 2809: 2802: 2785: 2758: 2737: 2705: 2671: 2652: 2629: 2566:
Yes, yes, I hear what you guys are saying, I understand the principle, and
2553: 2495: 2411: 2376: 2250: 2140: 2111: 2054: 2029: 1948: 1930: 1911: 1897: 1860: 1846: 1831: 1792: 1778: 1748: 1747:
find time to nudge Brundage along, too. And will watch for the Bryan page.
1733: 1710: 1682: 1669: 1647: 1628: 1614: 1588: 1574: 1560: 1546: 1532: 1503: 1489: 1412: 1380: 1265: 1261: 1171: 1119: 1084: 1023: 998: 924: 891: 820: 756: 694: 669: 621: 593: 453: 391: 330: 316: 284: 170: 149: 120: 98: 2359:
This broke the template because parameter list requires a number after it.
2025: 3691: 2196: 2176: 2126: 2106: 2080: 2006: 1987: 1368: 961: 731: 1545:
Part of the game is accepting credit for the work of others, I gather.--
1249:
can probably build a template that deals with all the needs, possibly @
81:, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again. 3346: 3324: 3225:
Knowledge talk:Requests for arbitration/Jack Merridew ban review motion
3180: 3132: 3090: 3071: 2869: 2766: 2533: 2169:
Hi Alarbus, I just tried to convert all the ref and cref2 templates on
4056: 3930: 1283:
any way that I can. Where is this conversation happening? Right here?
2995: 2978: 1022:, but it's more work. I'll watchlist that and see where you take it. 3284:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Coolcat, Davenbelle and Stereotek
1315:, where Andy proposed merging some templates into a common one. See 1313:
Knowledge:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 March 17#Deity templates
144:
Another approach would be to assign FA status outside their process.
3835: 816: 3298:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Jack Merridew ban review motion
3219:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Jack Merridew ban review motion
3014:
in those cases. I'm reworking all of Wehwalt's FA this way ;-: -->
904:
Alright, we'll get rid of all those old clunkers sooner or later!
104:
ANN scored at 0.899497 on 2011-11-01T09:41:00+00:00 . Thank you.
50:
for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the
779:
I'm having trouble getting reference 16 (Olson et al) to work on
654: 646: 148:– such behavior will not be tolerated. Consider yourself warned. 85: 29: 1423: 258:
Spread the lovely, warm, refreshing goodness of tea by adding {{
3730: 3510:, with thanks for your precious image that made it possible, -- 3507: 3155:. Normal procedure for us when handling such souls would be to 2001:
That was easier than I expected. I've created a new version at
1981:
I saw your posts at Sfn talk about the false positives that my
1379:
I left Thumperward and Gadget850 notes, but no comment as yet.
650: 574: 566: 3723: 1559:
Well, it was your writing; I just helped with the structure.
1520:
and is undramatic, which is why most here don't do much of it.
246:
and hopefully this has made your day ever so slightly better.
3238:
Second drama board thread, including failed ban discussion:
3193:
Checked again, he is BANNED, see above link for evidence. --
2289:
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at
1929:; lots happening under the hood for all of these templates. 755:
You're welcome; however there are hundreds more uses to-do…
620:
Just started; don't edit conflict me in the next few hours.
3246:
I am sure there is more, but this will get you started. --
2523:
Who knows? But what does it matter? If you use a call like
812:
I fixed them all up properly. !Nice to know this place has
3221:
Material that covers period up to the end of December 2009
886:. There are rather more of their older cousins, which are 1724:
topic, as is the nickel article I'll work over. I have
798:
Actually don't worry, another editor has sorted it out.
266: 248: 2247:
template talk:sfn#why are there errors in the template?
530:
Introduce yourself and meet new guests at the Teahouse.
84:
The following is the log entry regarding this warning:
1531:
to lose. Mencken was great (but Hornbeck was better).
1407:, I would like to thank you for your contributions to 2465:
You did see what Redrose64 said to you there, right?
197:
Knowledge:Featured articles/2012 RfC on FA leadership
3830:
If you decide to start editing again you might find
3472:
Thank you for expressing your support for me in the
841:
Hi Alarbus, I took a stab at fixing the Endnotes on
532:
Take the time to welcome and get to know the latest
3810:
A good legacy: The only real nation is humanity. --
2485:, although once that was not the case. Anyway, the 521:With community input, the Teahouse has updated the 417:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ice_Hockey#Accessibility
4067:were found precious. That's what you are, always. 2293:would like your feedback! We have created a brief 1730:William Jennings Bryan presidential campaign, 1896 3584:Time for ArbCom to get off its collective butt.-- 1601:I wasn't really worried about it; just checking. 32:, did not appear to be constructive and has been 2808:is a lightweight template. I did a benchmark on 1896:is sans-years. I loved the story about "Clark". 592:Looks interesting, I'll take a pass through it. 62:users from editing if they repeatedly engage in 3276:WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Davenbelle/Archive 3149:WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Davenbelle/Archive 2546:What Rexx said ↑↑↑ This is also what Redrose64 1357:, not just the doc). A poorer example would be 262:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. 163:Your empire does seem an intolerant bunch. Try 634:Thanks for taking a look. Will stay away :) -- 511:and see how you can help with inviting in our 2053:still needs to be applied to the '2' script… 4055: 2213:Oh, Ok, I see the thread above now, thanks. 606:Thanks, it is quite an interesting article. 119:That wasn't vandalism. I'm putting it back. 3686:Without them we have no one but the trolls. 1791:ok, all watchlisted; will push them along. 1200:There are three templates on Hindu temples 471:- Issue One - Recent news from the Teahouse 4000: 3929: 3740:Cheers, Hope you can return some day... -- 2848:List of field marshals of the British Army 2722:Luís Alves de Lima e Silva, Duke of Caxias 2606:List of field marshals of the British Army 2285:Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey! 283:Glad to have you back (sips contentedly). 4033:not to lose a "little bit of our souls", 2858:markup is exactly the date table sorting 2678:since, it's heavy on the one source. See 1660:The idea is that people may have found a 744:Thanks for fixing Kosovo-note. All best! 3683:His kind are leaving the site in droves. 3107:FWIW, Lecen you really need to learn to 2784:might lose an eye, seeing such a thing. 1210:(created 2006, primarily used infobox), 485: 1830:Thanks for that. I see you did them.-- 1220:(different layout, hardly used, 2007), 4034: 3962:... and sometimes enjoyable to live -- 2868:template that I was recommending :D -- 2105:Purged-all and the false-positives in 4027:Your impact ... four years after the 3659:Under a single account, naturally... 2750:Harry, I've done a review for you at 2570:I even agree. I just don't see that 2430:Help me to understand something. At 1679:1975 Australian constitutional crisis 1411:, which has fairly recently achieved 1376:templates that offer many advantages. 2410:You're welcome; I try to be useful. 1418: 918:Good to hear; I just did two ;-: --> 475:Hi! Welcome to the first edition of 3553:User talk:Wehwalt#Sanddunes Sunrise 3476:thread and/or participating in the 2733:Isabel, Princess Imperial of Brazil 2494:see this and use the template, ok? 2067:It does; I'll make that change now. 1012:be used with {sfn} if you also use 13: 3036:can you enable e-mail? Or mail me? 2828:by replacing all 198 instances of 1769:in the Great Redesign series, and 1311:This particular thread started at 682:Thanks for pointing out. Fixed. -- 211: 203: 21: 14: 4091: 4037:, and at times heavy to carry, -- 2727:Afonso, Prince Imperial of Brazil 479:, the official newsletter of the 3855: 3759: 3722: 3535: 3396: 2948: 2941: 2854:The template to encapsulate the 2642: 1732:, which will be a lot of fun. -- 1422: 1104: 1097: 730: 358: 308: 265: 247: 3689:(OMG did I just write poetry?) 2990:to your preferred style, isn't 2314:to be taken to the survey site. 1317:Knowledge:Infobox consolidation 923:direction are to be preferred. 490:Spring has sprung! Stop by the 439:initiate an actual discussion. 2342:Template:OhioRepresentatives02 1323:and that's a lot of work. See 504:Metrics are out from week one. 1: 4081:06:56, 17 February 2022 (UTC) 4047:10:57, 17 February 2016 (UTC) 4018: 3990:07:39, 17 February 2020 (UTC) 3972:08:17, 17 February 2017 (UTC) 3919:11:35, 18 February 2015 (UTC) 3883:16:29, 17 February 2012 (UTC) 3844:10:12, 7 September 2013 (UTC) 3805:16:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC) 3765: 3673:Need more like him, not less, 400:15:23, 18 February 2012 (UTC) 390:much Gerda. That's a keeper. 382:16:29, 17 February 2012 (UTC) 69:ClueBot NG produces very few 3940:composed "in new simplicity" 2694:Ernest Augustus I of Hanover 1672:or if they are very lucky a 339:20:02, 6 February 2012 (UTC) 325:10:45, 6 February 2012 (UTC) 293:20:02, 6 February 2012 (UTC) 279:06:54, 6 February 2012 (UTC) 179:04:52, 28 January 2012 (UTC) 169:. I consider myself amused. 158:20:25, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 129:09:44, 1 November 2011 (UTC) 114:09:41, 1 November 2011 (UTC) 7: 3938:Did you know that Max Reger 3480:thread. Peace to everyone. 2602:User:HJ Mitchell/Recognised 1925:the thread just below, and 494:for a cup of tea under the 218:Wikipedians also recommend 10: 4096: 3820:07:26, 18 April 2014 (UTC) 3782:07:26, 18 April 2014 (UTC) 3747:17:48, 17 April 2012 (UTC) 3703:00:59, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 3680:Really, they are the best. 3669:01:44, 18 April 2012 (UTC) 3655:01:01, 18 April 2012 (UTC) 3642:18:12, 17 April 2012 (UTC) 3608:13:59, 17 April 2012 (UTC) 3594:12:17, 17 April 2012 (UTC) 3580:07:30, 17 April 2012 (UTC) 3520:11:28, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 3495:00:50, 16 April 2012 (UTC) 3231:First drama board thread: 3059:16:41, 27 March 2012 (UTC) 3044:07:24, 27 March 2012 (UTC) 3024:00:06, 27 March 2012 (UTC) 3004:23:40, 26 March 2012 (UTC) 2968:00:22, 26 March 2012 (UTC) 2937:00:09, 26 March 2012 (UTC) 2923:21:59, 25 March 2012 (UTC) 2893:00:09, 26 March 2012 (UTC) 2878:18:08, 25 March 2012 (UTC) 2798:Hey Alarbus, I agree that 2794:17:19, 25 March 2012 (UTC) 2775:17:01, 25 March 2012 (UTC) 2746:05:18, 25 March 2012 (UTC) 2682:for example; it also uses 2661:02:59, 25 March 2012 (UTC) 2638:01:09, 25 March 2012 (UTC) 2623:00:10, 25 March 2012 (UTC) 2584:20:34, 26 March 2012 (UTC) 2562:23:52, 25 March 2012 (UTC) 2542:23:31, 25 March 2012 (UTC) 2519:18:57, 25 March 2012 (UTC) 2504:01:17, 25 March 2012 (UTC) 2460:23:28, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 2420:18:24, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 2405:18:20, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 2385:19:20, 21 March 2012 (UTC) 2370:18:15, 21 March 2012 (UTC) 2329:15:08, 20 March 2012 (UTC) 2273:14:42, 20 March 2012 (UTC) 2259:02:12, 20 March 2012 (UTC) 2223:01:19, 20 March 2012 (UTC) 2205:00:51, 20 March 2012 (UTC) 2190:00:35, 20 March 2012 (UTC) 2149:02:51, 21 March 2012 (UTC) 2135:23:53, 20 March 2012 (UTC) 2120:02:57, 20 March 2012 (UTC) 2089:02:37, 20 March 2012 (UTC) 2063:02:26, 20 March 2012 (UTC) 2038:02:20, 20 March 2012 (UTC) 2015:20:07, 19 March 2012 (UTC) 2003:User:Ucucha/HarvErrors2.js 1996:19:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC) 1957:23:49, 21 March 2012 (UTC) 1939:21:57, 21 March 2012 (UTC) 1920:21:32, 21 March 2012 (UTC) 1906:21:27, 21 March 2012 (UTC) 1869:21:04, 21 March 2012 (UTC) 1855:16:42, 21 March 2012 (UTC) 1840:14:58, 21 March 2012 (UTC) 1801:10:04, 20 March 2012 (UTC) 1787:08:47, 20 March 2012 (UTC) 1757:02:36, 20 March 2012 (UTC) 1742:21:53, 19 March 2012 (UTC) 1719:16:59, 19 March 2012 (UTC) 1691:12:15, 19 March 2012 (UTC) 1656:05:02, 19 March 2012 (UTC) 1637:00:44, 19 March 2012 (UTC) 1623:23:02, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 1597:22:52, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 1583:22:46, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 1569:22:44, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 1555:22:46, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 1541:21:41, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 1512:21:36, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 1498:20:26, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 1479:20:17, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 1389:18:37, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 1299:16:59, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 1274:06:29, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 1237:06:07, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 1180:06:32, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 1162:06:05, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 1128:05:43, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 1093:05:09, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 1055:04:59, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 1032:04:39, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 990:04:13, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 957:03:21, 15 March 2012 (UTC) 933:06:27, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 914:05:34, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 900:05:27, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 855:04:35, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 829:03:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 808:22:51, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 793:22:19, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 781:Sinking of the RMS Titanic 765:11:22, 12 March 2012 (UTC) 751:11:04, 12 March 2012 (UTC) 703:10:48, 17 March 2012 (UTC) 689:09:31, 17 March 2012 (UTC) 678:00:23, 11 March 2012 (UTC) 664:12:53, 10 March 2012 (UTC) 641:05:45, 10 March 2012 (UTC) 630:05:40, 10 March 2012 (UTC) 616:05:38, 10 March 2012 (UTC) 602:05:10, 10 March 2012 (UTC) 188:(delete SPAMFILTEREVASION) 4016: 4008: 3999: 3956:of a tree growing in her? 3945:Unser lieben Frauen Traum 3937: 3928: 3721: 3454:23:59, 7 April 2012 (UTC) 3426:22:31, 7 April 2012 (UTC) 3389:22:45, 5 April 2012 (UTC) 3366:17:20, 2 April 2012 (UTC) 3355:15:01, 2 April 2012 (UTC) 3333:02:24, 2 April 2012 (UTC) 3293:Davenbelle et al indeffed 3256:02:11, 2 April 2012 (UTC) 3202:00:57, 2 April 2012 (UTC) 3189:00:51, 2 April 2012 (UTC) 3168:00:57, 2 April 2012 (UTC) 3141:00:40, 2 April 2012 (UTC) 3120:00:31, 2 April 2012 (UTC) 3099:23:35, 1 April 2012 (UTC) 3080:22:34, 1 April 2012 (UTC) 2919:Penny for your thoughts? 2619:Penny for your thoughts? 1927:User talk:Ucucha#sfn/sfnm 1353:for examples (and I mean 783:. Could you please help? 729: 587:21:26, 9 March 2012 (UTC) 560:15:57, 9 March 2012 (UTC) 462:02:49, 9 March 2012 (UTC) 447:02:38, 9 March 2012 (UTC) 429:22:03, 8 March 2012 (UTC) 357: 3157:WP:Revert, block, ignore 3054: 3019: 2963: 2932: 2888: 2812:out of interest. In its 2789: 2741: 2656: 2633: 2557: 2499: 2415: 2380: 2254: 2144: 2115: 2058: 2033: 1934: 1901: 1850: 1796: 1752: 1714: 1666:Standing Liberty quarter 1632: 1618: 1564: 1536: 1493: 1384: 1269: 1175: 1123: 1088: 1027: 928: 895: 824: 760: 698: 673: 625: 597: 457: 415:All comments welcome at 395: 334: 329:You're /munch/ welcome. 288: 174: 124: 3624:reality. </rant: --> 3613:Warning - upcoming rant 2712:; many others, really ( 2335:Global message delivery 2171:Elias Abraham Rosenberg 1885:Indian Head gold pieces 1763:Indian Head gold pieces 1441:featured article status 1148:Thank you very much. -- 301:Biscuits aren't enough! 4060: 3832:User:Ucucha/HarvErrors 2241:would be the fix. And 1516:"Work" is not part of 1362:Infobox Australian Hut 1168:User:Ucucha/HarvErrors 499: 216: 208: 26: 4059: 3564:Knowledge Reformation 2984:Why change from this 2391:Learned something new 1873:And I've mostly done 1196:Infobox consolidation 1170:to see broken links. 738:The Editor's Barnstar 489: 215: 207: 25: 3849:Precious anniversary 3793:call for Reformation 3109:WP:Don't give a fuck 1662:Franklin half dollar 1435:Cross of Gold speech 1409:Cross of Gold speech 1338:infobox officeholder 1215:Infobox Hindu Temple 274:Mistress Selina Kyle 228:Mistress Selina Kyle 58:have the ability to 3996: 3925: 3766:Precious and missed 2702:Neville Chamberlain 2434:you advocate using 1486:Scopes Monkey Trial 843:George Went Hensley 723:A barnstar for you! 693:Glad you agree ;-) 166:assuming good faith 4061: 3994: 3923: 3868:awesome Wikipedian 3789:awesome Wikipedian 3129:for one last stand 2714:Pedro II of Brazil 2698:Washington quarter 2333:Message sent with 2291:Knowledge:Teahouse 1644:Washington quarter 1348:infobox settlement 542:You are receiving 500: 217: 209: 27: 4025: 4024: 3960: 3959: 3951:about a dream of 3752: 3751: 3640: 3560:Sanddunes Sunrise 3555: 3528:Sanddunes Sunrise 3502:Extended Easter, 3474:Sanddunes Sunrise 3273: 3200: 3166: 3153:English Knowledge 3118: 2475:is a redirect to 2351:, you substituted 2327:, Teahouse host, 1890:Indian Head eagle 1767:Indian Head eagle 1674:Indian Head eagle 1608: 1477: 1448: 1447: 943:Harvard citations 775:Reference problem 772: 771: 562: 407: 406: 346: 345: 4087: 4032: 4030:original warning 4017:in lighting the 4004: 3997: 3993: 3933: 3926: 3922: 3897: 3859: 3834:interesting. -- 3763: 3744: 3726: 3719: 3718: 3701: 3699: 3694: 3639: 3637: 3626: 3550: 3539: 3492: 3487: 3484: 3400: 3267: 3242:May 6 to 8, 2011 3235:May 2 to 4, 2011 3194: 3160: 3112: 3087:First they came… 3041: 2989: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2945: 2944: 2920: 2914: 2867: 2861: 2845: 2839: 2827: 2821: 2817: 2807: 2801: 2763: 2757: 2718:Empire of Brazil 2691: 2685: 2676: 2670: 2646: 2645: 2620: 2614: 2551: 2530: 2484: 2478: 2474: 2468: 2443: 2437: 2362:Roseohioresident 2347:In editing this 2321:Happy editing, 2240: 2078: 2074: 2052: 1882: 1775:Jefferson nickel 1602: 1455: 1426: 1419: 1366: 1360: 1352: 1346: 1342: 1336: 1332: 1326: 1296: 1295: 1289: 1258: 1252: 1243:User:Thumperward 1234: 1229: 1223: 1219: 1213: 1209: 1203: 1159: 1154: 1115: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1101: 1100: 1082: 1076: 1070: 1052: 1047: 1021: 1015: 1006:L'ange de Nisida 1003: 997: 987: 982: 969:L'ange de Nisida 885: 879: 875: 869: 865: 749: 734: 727: 726: 686: 661: 638: 541: 513:Invitation Guide 362: 355: 354: 312: 305: 304: 269: 251: 244: 168: 147: 93: 24: 4095: 4094: 4090: 4089: 4088: 4086: 4085: 4084: 4063:Ten years ago, 4054: 4052:Always precious 4028: 3895: 3887: 3886: 3860: 3851: 3828: 3769: 3757: 3742: 3717: 3697: 3692: 3690: 3635: 3627: 3548: 3547: 3546: 3541: 3540: 3530: 3490: 3485: 3482: 3478:Easter Egg Tree 3470: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3377:He was despised 3374: 3067: 3039: 3032: 2985: 2982: 2949: 2947: 2942: 2918: 2910: 2865: 2859: 2843: 2837: 2825: 2819: 2813: 2805: 2799: 2761: 2755: 2689: 2683: 2674: 2668: 2643: 2618: 2610: 2598: 2576:J. Johnson (JJ) 2547: 2524: 2511:J. Johnson (JJ) 2482: 2476: 2472: 2466: 2452:J. Johnson (JJ) 2441: 2435: 2428: 2393: 2349:Template:Navbox 2345: 2287: 2236: 2235:I see it, too. 2167: 2076: 2075:(as opposed to 2072: 2048: 1979: 1878: 1449: 1432:helped promote 1401: 1364: 1358: 1350: 1344: 1340: 1334: 1330: 1324: 1293: 1292: 1285: 1256: 1250: 1232: 1227: 1221: 1217: 1211: 1207: 1201: 1198: 1157: 1150: 1111: 1105: 1103: 1098: 1078: 1074: 1068: 1050: 1043: 1019: 1013: 1001: 995: 985: 978: 964: 945: 883: 877: 873: 867: 861: 860:Much better. I 845:, did I do ok? 839: 777: 745: 725: 684: 659: 636: 571: 496:cherry blossoms 473: 413: 408: 353: 347: 303: 297: 264: 238: 236:. Tea promotes 223: 201: 191: 164: 141: 138: 132: 89: 71:false positives 22: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4093: 4053: 4050: 4035:repeated above 4023: 4022: 4014: 4013: 4009:Thank you for 4006: 4005: 3958: 3957: 3955: 3950: 3941: 3939: 3935: 3934: 3905:, repeated in 3865: 3854: 3853: 3852: 3850: 3847: 3827: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3785: 3784: 3758: 3756: 3755:Precious torch 3753: 3750: 3749: 3736: 3735: 3727: 3716: 3713: 3712: 3711: 3708: 3707: 3706: 3705: 3687: 3684: 3681: 3675: 3674: 3671: 3657: 3644: 3610: 3596: 3582: 3542: 3534: 3533: 3532: 3531: 3529: 3526: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3469: 3466: 3465: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3460: 3459: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3428: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3392: 3373: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3308: 3301: 3294: 3287: 3244: 3243: 3236: 3229: 3222: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3123: 3122: 3102: 3101: 3066: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3049:replied ;: --> 3037: 3035: 3031: 3028: 3027: 3026: 2981: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2857: 2852: 2835: 2831: 2687:London Gazette 2664: 2663: 2640: 2597: 2596:A small favour 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2544: 2529:|Smith|2001a}} 2427: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2392: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2360: 2358: 2356: 2354: 2352: 2344: 2339: 2286: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2208: 2207: 2166: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2068: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2018: 2017: 1978: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1892:is a mix and 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1726:Avery Brundage 1701: 1697: 1658: 1625: 1610: 1585: 1521: 1446: 1445: 1427: 1417: 1400: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1377: 1328:infobox person 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1287:Blue Rasberry 1277: 1276: 1254:Infobox temple 1247:User:Gadget850 1225:Infobox temple 1205:Infobox Mandir 1197: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1035: 1034: 963: 960: 944: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 935: 838: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 776: 773: 770: 769: 768: 767: 741: 740: 735: 724: 721: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 705: 570: 564: 539: 538: 527: 516: 472: 466: 465: 464: 433: 412: 409: 405: 404: 403: 402: 369: 368: 363: 352: 349: 348: 344: 343: 342: 341: 313: 302: 299: 298: 296: 295: 255: 232:has given you 210: 202: 200: 193: 192: 190: 189: 182: 181: 137: 134: 133: 117: 116: 82: 79:report it here 67: 56:administrators 34:automatically 19: 16: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4092: 4083: 4082: 4078: 4074: 4071:remembered -- 4070: 4066: 4058: 4049: 4048: 4044: 4040: 4036: 4031: 4020: 4015: 4012: 4007: 4003: 3998: 3992: 3991: 3987: 3983: 3979: 3974: 3973: 3969: 3965: 3954: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3936: 3932: 3927: 3921: 3920: 3916: 3912: 3908: 3904: 3901: 3898: 3892: 3885: 3884: 3880: 3876: 3871: 3869: 3864: 3858: 3846: 3845: 3841: 3837: 3833: 3821: 3817: 3813: 3809: 3808: 3807: 3806: 3802: 3798: 3794: 3790: 3783: 3779: 3775: 3771: 3770: 3768: 3767: 3762: 3748: 3745: 3738: 3737: 3734: 3732: 3728: 3725: 3720: 3710: 3709: 3704: 3700: 3695: 3688: 3685: 3682: 3679: 3678: 3677: 3676: 3672: 3670: 3666: 3662: 3658: 3656: 3652: 3648: 3645: 3643: 3638: 3632: 3631: 3622: 3618: 3614: 3611: 3609: 3605: 3601: 3597: 3595: 3591: 3587: 3583: 3581: 3577: 3573: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3565: 3561: 3556: 3554: 3545: 3538: 3521: 3517: 3513: 3509: 3505: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3498: 3497: 3496: 3493: 3488: 3479: 3475: 3455: 3452: 3451:Jack Merridew 3448: 3445: 3444: 3443: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3436: 3427: 3423: 3419: 3416:– Rising – -- 3415: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3409: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3405: 3399: 3391: 3390: 3386: 3382: 3378: 3367: 3364: 3359: 3358: 3357: 3356: 3352: 3348: 3334: 3330: 3326: 3322: 3318: 3313: 3309: 3306: 3302: 3299: 3295: 3292: 3288: 3285: 3281: 3280: 3277: 3271: 3270:edit conflict 3266: 3265: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3260: 3259: 3258: 3257: 3253: 3249: 3241: 3237: 3234: 3230: 3226: 3223: 3220: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3203: 3199: 3198: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3177: 3173: 3169: 3165: 3164: 3158: 3154: 3150: 3146: 3145: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3138: 3134: 3130: 3125: 3124: 3121: 3117: 3116: 3110: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3077: 3073: 3060: 3056: 3052: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3042: 3025: 3021: 3017: 3013: 3009: 3008: 3007: 3005: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2988: 2980: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2954: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2934: 2930: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2921: 2915: 2913: 2906: 2905: 2894: 2890: 2886: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2864: 2855: 2853: 2849: 2842: 2833: 2829: 2824: 2816: 2811: 2804: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2782: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2772: 2768: 2760: 2753: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2735: 2734: 2729: 2728: 2723: 2719: 2715: 2711: 2710:Richard Nixon 2707: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2688: 2681: 2680:Woodes Rogers 2673: 2666: 2665: 2662: 2658: 2654: 2649: 2648:Seems better. 2641: 2639: 2635: 2631: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2621: 2615: 2613: 2607: 2603: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2550: 2545: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2528: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2516: 2512: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2488: 2481: 2471: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2448: 2440: 2433: 2421: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2367: 2363: 2350: 2343: 2338: 2336: 2331: 2330: 2326: 2322: 2319: 2316: 2315: 2313: 2307: 2305: 2301: 2296: 2292: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2239: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2206: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2178: 2172: 2165:Couple things 2150: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2108: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2069: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2051: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1984: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1894:shield nickel 1891: 1886: 1881: 1876: 1875:shield nickel 1872: 1871: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1771:Shield nickel 1768: 1764: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1731: 1727: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1707: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1611: 1606: 1605:edit conflict 1600: 1599: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1519: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1454: 1443: 1442: 1437: 1436: 1431: 1428: 1425: 1421: 1420: 1416: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1403:On behalf of 1390: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1363: 1356: 1349: 1339: 1329: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1300: 1297: 1290: 1288: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1255: 1248: 1244: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1235: 1226: 1216: 1206: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1160: 1155: 1153: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1081: 1073: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1056: 1053: 1048: 1046: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1018: 1011: 1007: 1000: 994: 993: 992: 991: 988: 983: 981: 975: 974:Scotch whisky 971: 970: 959: 958: 954: 950: 934: 930: 926: 922: 917: 916: 915: 911: 907: 903: 902: 901: 897: 893: 889: 882: 872: 864: 859: 858: 857: 856: 852: 848: 844: 837:Hensley notes 830: 826: 822: 818: 815: 811: 810: 809: 805: 801: 797: 796: 795: 794: 790: 786: 782: 766: 762: 758: 754: 753: 752: 748: 743: 742: 739: 736: 733: 728: 704: 700: 696: 692: 691: 690: 687: 681: 680: 679: 675: 671: 667: 666: 665: 662: 656: 652: 648: 644: 643: 642: 639: 633: 632: 631: 627: 623: 619: 618: 617: 613: 609: 605: 604: 603: 599: 595: 591: 590: 589: 588: 584: 580: 576: 568: 563: 561: 557: 553: 549: 545: 535: 531: 528: 524: 520: 517: 514: 510: 505: 502: 501: 497: 493: 488: 484: 482: 478: 470: 463: 459: 455: 451: 450: 449: 448: 445: 442: 437: 431: 430: 426: 422: 418: 401: 397: 393: 389: 385: 384: 383: 379: 375: 371: 370: 367: 364: 361: 356: 340: 336: 332: 328: 327: 326: 322: 318: 314: 311: 307: 306: 294: 290: 286: 282: 281: 280: 277: 276: 275: 268: 263: 261: 260:subst:wikitea 256: 252: 250: 245: 243: 242: 235: 231: 230: 229: 221: 214: 206: 198: 187: 184: 183: 180: 176: 172: 167: 162: 161: 160: 159: 155: 151: 146: 145: 131: 130: 126: 122: 115: 111: 107: 103: 100: 97: 92: 87: 83: 80: 76: 75:read about it 72: 68: 65: 61: 57: 53: 49: 45: 44: 42: 38: 37: 31: 18:November 2011 4073:Gerda Arendt 4062: 4039:Gerda Arendt 4026: 3982:Gerda Arendt 3975: 3964:Gerda Arendt 3961: 3943: 3942: 3911:Gerda Arendt 3888: 3875:Gerda Arendt 3872: 3862: 3861: 3829: 3812:Gerda Arendt 3797:Gerda Arendt 3786: 3774:Gerda Arendt 3764: 3729: 3628: 3620: 3616: 3612: 3572:Gerda Arendt 3557: 3549: 3543: 3512:Gerda Arendt 3471: 3447:Terima kasih 3446: 3418:Gerda Arendt 3413: 3381:Gerda Arendt 3375: 3343: 3320: 3245: 3212: 3196: 3175: 3162: 3114: 3068: 3033: 2983: 2956: 2946: 2911: 2856:display:none 2815:present form 2810:Albert Speer 2781:milliseconds 2780: 2731: 2725: 2706:Albert Speer 2647: 2611: 2599: 2572:in this case 2571: 2568:in principle 2567: 2491: 2486: 2446: 2429: 2394: 2346: 2332: 2323: 2320: 2317: 2309: 2308: 2288: 2175: 2168: 1980: 1829: 1705: 1696:parameters). 1670:Mercury dime 1668:or indeed a 1528: 1524: 1453:TonyTheTiger 1450: 1439: 1433: 1402: 1354: 1320: 1286: 1262:Microformats 1199: 1151: 1117: 1102: 1044: 1009: 1005: 979: 967: 965: 946: 920: 887: 840: 778: 737: 572: 544:The Tea Leaf 543: 540: 529: 518: 503: 477:The Tea Leaf 476: 474: 469:The Tea Leaf 468: 436:battleground 432: 414: 387: 374:Gerda Arendt 365: 273: 271: 257: 253: 240: 239: 234:a cup of tea 227: 225: 224: 143: 139: 118: 101: 52:welcome page 39:(undone) by 33: 4069:reformation 4011:your impact 3909:style ;) -- 3826:Harv Errors 3743:Redtigerxyz 3733:says Thanks 3661:Crisco 1492 3647:Mark Arsten 3617:INDIVIDUALS 3562:and voiced 3321:on the user 2912:HJ Mitchell 2612:HJ Mitchell 2432:TT:Citation 2397:Floquenbeam 2265:Mark Arsten 2215:Mark Arsten 2182:Mark Arsten 2177:A Free Ride 2107:A Free Ride 2026:mw:cite.php 1706:Look it up. 1609:And thanks. 1369:Keebles Hut 1355:view source 1233:Redtigerxyz 1152:Laser brain 1045:Laser brain 980:Laser brain 906:Mark Arsten 847:Mark Arsten 747:WhiteWriter 685:Redtigerxyz 660:Redtigerxyz 637:Redtigerxyz 608:Mark Arsten 579:Mark Arsten 48:the sandbox 46:Please use 3310:Jun 2011: 3303:Dec 2009: 3296:Dec 2008: 3289:Apr 2008: 3282:Oct 2005: 3065:Dropped by 2552:. Sheesh. 2395:thanks. -- 1983:HarvErrors 1977:HarvErrors 1470:WP:CHICAGO 1405:WP:CHICAGO 523:Your hosts 386:Thank you 222:with tea. 106:ClueBot NG 41:ClueBot NG 3468:Thank you 3449:, Gerda. 3363:• Astynax 3214:started: 3012:ignore it 2992:WP:Retain 2979:C.D. Howe 2736:). Best, 2357:list1=. 2300:Questions 1518:WP:MMORPG 1430:This user 1399:FA Thanks 949:Finetooth 814:talk page 800:Prioryman 785:Prioryman 537:wikilove! 64:vandalism 3893:) of my 3040:Amalthea 2549:told you 2306:page. 2028:errors. 1415:status. 863:formated 817:stalkers 492:Teahouse 481:Teahouse 421:Frietjes 351:Precious 241:WikiLove 220:biscuits 36:reverted 3907:br'erly 3896:Pumpkin 3586:Wehwalt 3483:Pumpkin 3372:Passion 3051:Alarbus 3016:Alarbus 2960:Alarbus 2929:Alarbus 2885:Alarbus 2846:s into 2786:Alarbus 2738:Alarbus 2653:Alarbus 2630:Alarbus 2554:Alarbus 2496:Alarbus 2487:current 2426:Harvid? 2412:Alarbus 2377:Alarbus 2251:Alarbus 2141:Alarbus 2112:Alarbus 2055:Alarbus 2030:Alarbus 1949:Wehwalt 1931:Alarbus 1912:Wehwalt 1898:Alarbus 1861:Wehwalt 1847:Alarbus 1832:Wehwalt 1793:Alarbus 1779:Wehwalt 1749:Alarbus 1734:Wehwalt 1711:Alarbus 1683:Wehwalt 1648:Wehwalt 1629:Alarbus 1615:Alarbus 1589:Wehwalt 1575:Wehwalt 1561:Alarbus 1547:Wehwalt 1533:Alarbus 1527:; ACLU 1504:Wehwalt 1490:Alarbus 1474:WP:FOUR 1381:Alarbus 1266:Alarbus 1172:Alarbus 1120:Alarbus 1085:Alarbus 1024:Alarbus 1004:rocks. 925:Alarbus 892:Alarbus 821:Alarbus 757:Alarbus 695:Alarbus 670:Alarbus 657:too. -- 655:Vithoba 647:Ganesha 622:Alarbus 594:Alarbus 454:Alarbus 392:Alarbus 331:Alarbus 317:Wehwalt 285:Alarbus 171:Alarbus 150:Raul654 136:Warning 121:Alarbus 96:Alarbus 91:changed 86:Titania 30:Titania 3995:Impact 3978:dreams 3731:Ahalya 3715:Thanks 3600:Dianna 3414:Easter 3248:Dianna 3030:E-Mail 2987:format 2851:about. 2527:harvid 2492:please 2480:sfnref 2470:harvid 2439:Harvid 2310:Click 2304:Guests 2295:survey 2197:Ucucha 2127:Ucucha 2081:Ucucha 2007:Ucucha 1988:Ucucha 1883:moved 1529:wanted 1373:WP:TFD 1343:, and 1294:(talk) 1158:(talk) 1072:sfnRef 1051:(talk) 1017:sfnRef 986:(talk) 888:worse. 881:cnote2 876:, and 651:Iravan 575:Ahalya 567:Ahalya 534:guests 4019:torch 3924:dream 3903:Prize 3863:torch 3508:peace 3347:Lecen 3325:RexxS 3228:2011. 3181:RexxS 3133:Lecen 3091:Lecen 3072:Lecen 2870:RexxS 2834:((sfn 2832:with 2830:{{sfn 2767:RexxS 2534:RexxS 2353:list= 2077:error 1700:safe. 1413:WP:FA 1067:Yup; 871:cref2 552:Sarah 411:hlist 366:torch 199:: Tea 60:block 4077:talk 4043:talk 3986:talk 3968:talk 3953:Mary 3915:talk 3879:talk 3840:talk 3816:talk 3801:talk 3778:talk 3693:N419 3665:talk 3651:talk 3630:Ched 3621:same 3604:talk 3590:talk 3576:talk 3551:nb: 3516:talk 3506:for 3504:eggs 3491:talk 3422:talk 3385:talk 3351:talk 3329:talk 3252:talk 3197:Dave 3185:talk 3163:Dave 3137:talk 3115:Dave 3095:talk 3076:talk 3055:talk 3020:talk 3000:talk 2996:Bzuk 2964:talk 2955:Done 2933:talk 2889:talk 2874:talk 2790:talk 2771:talk 2742:talk 2657:talk 2634:talk 2580:talk 2558:talk 2538:talk 2515:talk 2500:talk 2456:talk 2416:talk 2401:talk 2381:talk 2366:talk 2355:for 2325:J-Mo 2312:here 2269:talk 2255:talk 2243:This 2238:This 2219:talk 2201:talk 2186:talk 2145:talk 2131:talk 2116:talk 2085:talk 2073:this 2059:talk 2050:This 2034:talk 2011:talk 1992:talk 1953:talk 1935:talk 1916:talk 1902:talk 1880:Here 1865:talk 1851:talk 1836:talk 1797:talk 1783:talk 1773:and 1765:and 1753:talk 1738:talk 1715:talk 1687:talk 1652:talk 1633:talk 1619:talk 1593:talk 1579:talk 1565:talk 1551:talk 1537:talk 1525:know 1508:talk 1494:talk 1385:talk 1270:talk 1176:talk 1124:talk 1113:done 1089:talk 1080:here 1028:talk 953:talk 929:talk 921:that 910:talk 896:talk 851:talk 825:talk 804:talk 789:talk 761:talk 699:talk 674:talk 653:and 626:talk 612:talk 598:talk 583:talk 556:talk 548:here 509:here 458:talk 444:lute 441:Reso 425:talk 396:talk 388:very 378:talk 335:talk 321:talk 289:talk 195:RE: 175:talk 154:talk 140:Re: 125:talk 110:talk 88:was 4065:you 3900:Sky 3891:18a 3836:PBS 3598:-- 3486:Sky 3176:not 3034:Hi, 2863:Dts 2841:sfn 2823:sfn 2803:sfn 2759:sfn 2724:, 2672:efn 2447:not 2302:or 2079:). 1664:or 1466:BIO 1438:to 1321:are 1245:or 1077:as 1010:can 999:sfn 962:sfn 483:! 102:(t) 99:(u) 94:by 4079:) 4045:) 3988:) 3980:-- 3970:) 3917:) 3881:) 3873:-- 3870:! 3842:) 3818:) 3803:) 3780:) 3772:-- 3698:BH 3667:) 3653:) 3636:? 3633:: 3625:— 3606:) 3592:) 3578:) 3570:-- 3518:) 3424:) 3387:) 3379:-- 3353:) 3331:) 3254:) 3187:) 3139:) 3097:) 3078:) 3070:-- 3057:) 3022:) 3006:. 3002:) 2966:) 2935:) 2916:| 2891:) 2876:) 2866:}} 2860:{{ 2844:}} 2838:{{ 2826:}} 2820:{{ 2806:}} 2800:{{ 2792:) 2773:) 2762:}} 2756:{{ 2744:) 2730:, 2720:, 2716:, 2708:, 2704:, 2700:, 2696:, 2690:}} 2684:{{ 2675:}} 2669:{{ 2659:) 2636:) 2616:| 2582:) 2560:) 2540:) 2525:{{ 2517:) 2502:) 2483:}} 2477:{{ 2473:}} 2467:{{ 2458:) 2442:}} 2436:{{ 2418:) 2403:) 2383:) 2368:) 2337:. 2271:) 2257:) 2249:. 2221:) 2203:) 2188:) 2147:) 2133:) 2118:) 2087:) 2061:) 2036:) 2013:) 1994:) 1955:) 1937:) 1918:) 1904:) 1877:. 1867:) 1853:) 1838:) 1799:) 1785:) 1755:) 1740:) 1717:) 1689:) 1654:) 1635:) 1621:) 1595:) 1581:) 1567:) 1553:) 1539:) 1523:I 1510:) 1496:) 1488:… 1476:) 1451:-- 1387:) 1365:}} 1359:{{ 1351:}} 1345:{{ 1341:}} 1335:{{ 1333:, 1331:}} 1325:{{ 1272:) 1257:}} 1251:{{ 1228:}} 1222:{{ 1218:}} 1212:{{ 1208:}} 1202:{{ 1178:) 1126:) 1091:) 1075:}} 1069:{{ 1041:-- 1030:) 1020:}} 1014:{{ 1002:}} 996:{{ 955:) 931:) 912:) 898:) 884:}} 878:{{ 874:}} 868:{{ 853:) 827:) 819:. 806:) 791:) 763:) 701:) 676:) 649:, 628:) 614:) 600:) 585:) 558:) 550:. 460:) 427:) 419:. 398:) 380:) 337:) 323:) 291:) 270:-- 177:) 156:) 127:) 112:) 77:, 43:. 4075:( 4041:( 4021:! 3984:( 3966:( 3949:, 3913:( 3877:( 3838:( 3814:( 3799:( 3776:( 3663:( 3649:( 3602:( 3588:( 3574:( 3514:( 3420:( 3383:( 3349:( 3327:( 3272:) 3268:( 3250:( 3183:( 3135:( 3093:( 3074:( 3053:( 3018:( 2998:( 2962:( 2931:( 2887:( 2872:( 2788:( 2769:( 2740:( 2655:( 2632:( 2578:( 2556:( 2536:( 2513:( 2498:( 2454:( 2414:( 2399:( 2379:( 2364:( 2267:( 2253:( 2217:( 2199:( 2184:( 2143:( 2129:( 2114:( 2083:( 2057:( 2032:( 2009:( 1990:( 1951:( 1933:( 1914:( 1900:( 1863:( 1849:( 1834:( 1795:( 1781:( 1751:( 1736:( 1713:( 1685:( 1650:( 1631:( 1617:( 1607:) 1603:( 1591:( 1577:( 1563:( 1549:( 1535:( 1506:( 1492:( 1472:/ 1468:/ 1464:/ 1462:C 1460:/ 1458:T 1456:( 1444:. 1383:( 1367:( 1268:( 1174:( 1122:( 1116:. 1087:( 1026:( 951:( 927:( 908:( 894:( 849:( 823:( 802:( 787:( 759:( 697:( 672:( 624:( 610:( 596:( 581:( 569:? 554:( 515:. 498:. 456:( 423:( 394:( 376:( 333:( 319:( 287:( 173:( 152:( 123:( 108:( 66:.

Index

Titania
reverted
ClueBot NG
the sandbox
welcome page
administrators
block
vandalism
false positives
read about it
report it here
Titania
changed
Alarbus
(u)
(t)
ClueBot NG
talk
09:41, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Alarbus
talk
09:44, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Another approach would be to assign FA status outside their process.
Raul654
talk
20:25, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
assuming good faith
Alarbus
talk
04:52, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑