User talk:Andrevan/Archives/5

1646:

at all. Both positive and negative aspects belong to it. "On December 5th, which is what I blocked you for the second time, you had something like 5 reverts and I had 3 reverts, with one compromise attempt - a normal change, not a revert. Changes are not the same as reverts. K1Bond007 probably had several as well. Then, you returned with other IPs and continually reverted, so I banned the IPs." On that day I had 6 edits, containing 3 reverts. You had 13 edits, containing 3 reverts. Grover had one revert and some ugen had one too. Still no reason for banning me! "As policy dictates, I am not going to unprotect the page, because I was involved in it. Another admin will have to do that. I'm not going to be involved any longer because I don't care enough about it to be stressed out by your nonsensical (yes, nonsensical), POV, and biased arguments" So when is it going to be unprotected??? Never??? Why don't you tell that guy who locked it to unlock it??? Oh I see, you prefer your version and want it published as long as possible because... it's yoooouuur version with yooooouuur POV. You replaced the word "propaganda" with "advertisement" which is not the same and fails to define it correctly, but I must admit, it sounds better. And I must admit: if you only name that shooting teammates is punished and don't mention that shooting opponents of the US army is lastingly rewarded and indirectly called honorable, it sounds better too. And if you don't mention "propaganda", one of the strongest negative arguments IMO, in the first section of the text but that's for free and has the UT engine and many players... that sounds pretty good as well. But it makes it POV. There's no POV in mine, otherwise you'd have mentioned it. You can try to devaluate my arguments with any word you want, though, they'll remain valid and stable arguments while basically you have none.

1599:. If it was something then it was stubbornness but that's not vandalism and I didn't revert the page but create improved ones. I did most of the article from the correct dates of all versions over to the correct history and to gameplay. I only tried to improve it so it wasn't even stubborness, I kept my mind open all the time. You? You had it locked and tried to dig in the same aspects of the conversation we already had again and again to distract. You changed the article in your favour, lost the argumentation and now you try to win it by calling my arguments "nonsensical" - which is pathetic, since you were the ones without objective ones - and now you run away to have the last word and to win because you locked the article with your version. By the way, you lied about the 3-revert-rule too. On that day, the article has been reverted two times by me, not 3. (1st: from 22:18, 2 Dec 2004 to 22:02, 2 Dec 2004 . 2nd: from 22:57, 2 Dec 2004 to 22:18, 2 Dec) There were only two reverts by me. You? 1st, You reverted from 21:49, 2 Dec 2004 to 21:33, 2 Dec 2004, 2nd from 22:06, 2 Dec 2004 to 21:33, 2 Dec 2004, 3rd from 22:32, 2 Dec 2004 to 22:06, 2 Dec 2004. 3?!?! 3-revert-rule... you remember that word? There hasn't been vandalization by me (look that word up again) but you banned me instead of you. You even banned IPs from me only to keep your version!!! You're abusing your admin rights all the time and I tolerated that. The very least thing you could do is open the main article again and let it improve. Before I came, before I affected the page, it looked like this: 482: 1654:

avoid favoring one version of the article over another, unless one version is vandalism. In this case, the protecting sysop may choose to protect the non-vandalism version." The policy doesn't say you're not allowed to unprotect it so you can do that, especially because there's a solution on the talk page, isn't there? No one has ever opposed the version I suggested (but which was ignored and immeiately called "vandalism"). But what about the article?? Are you trying to keep up a semi-permanently protection and simply stop participating in the talk page to take away all chances of improvement of this article or are you going to make it unprotected again? It's all up to you. You have influence, I don't.

1595:(oh, andre, it's a bit pathetic that all you have as facts against what I have is the simple and childish allegation "craziness"... *clearing my throat*...) YOU'RE NOTHING BUT A LIAR, ANDRE. You quit because you could NEVER oppose my arguments since you neither had arguments nor had facts against my arguments. You still haven't commented on the improvements but while we were in an edit dispute, you had your friend lock it in fovor of your version. Policy: "Do not protect a page you are involved in an edit dispute over." Thus you totally ignored that one. Your little friend called what I did "vandalism". However, it was not 1370:. I also point to this line found in the Guardian: "Essentially a playable piece of PC propaganda", which was ALSO written exactly the same in the America's Army wiki article. Because of just these two lines (have yet to search for more) I do believe that the America's Army article should be reviewed for further possible compright problems. By the way, I believe you're getting Andre and myself mixed up here. If you wish to discuss this further see my talk page. 2). The section "Culture" was discussed in the talk page on more than one occasion. 160: 37: 1666:

1522:, If you want, I can assure you, that as an admin, if I do something that you and the community thinks is inappropriate, I will resign immediately. I really try to follow the rules myself, I’ve never for instance violated the 3 revert rule and do my best to stay out of perpetual revert wars. I believe in creating content, and feel adminship would help me fight vandalism, but i'd never miss-use it in an editorial discussion. 1610:"First of all, I didn't protect the page, Rdsmith4 did, to stop what he (rightfully) called vandalism" Yeah you must be feeling so cool having tricked the system! Just call your admin friend, probably just told him "help me please. just protect that page. thanks." Vandalism: Spam Adding inappropriate external links for self-promotion. 1333:. I am of the opinion that a lot of recent additions have made the article POV (see section: "Culture"). I also believe that a lot of the information currently added is copied from articles that are also linked on the article and would fall under copyright infringement. (See the talk page). Thanks for your time. 1119:

system is not working when there is a 50/50 chance of whose version gets to be protected. All one has to do to beat the system is to get a "tame" admin to protect the page after ones edit has been made. I will be raising this issue on Knowledge:Village pump (policy) as you gunslingers must be restrained. -

1645:

Yes, you're right, 3 edits from you consisting of three reverts. I had 8 edits, containing 2 reverts. Bond had 3 edits, containing two reverts. So why me? Because I added negative aspects of the game to the article which mainly neglected negative aspects. This article is not meant to be advertisement

1665:

It is clear that it was a normal edit war in which you disputed and because you were invloved asked another admin to protect your version. It was on no account vandalism or anything. "Vandalism" is just the excuse in order that the following rules counts in favor of you: "In addition, admins should

1653:

1365:

The exact same line found in the Guardian editorial was found in the America's Army article. AA Article: "...the U.S. Army, the world's biggest games developer, pumping billions into new software,.." Guardian: "The US army is the world's biggest games developer, pumping billions into new software."

1285:

Don't talk to me like I'm a moron, Andre. I'm the only one who's made any serious attempt to discuss anything in this dispute, and I've been ignored every single time. If you want to talk about being "impolite", check out the talk page to see what Reene has written about me in the last few days. I

1118:

Sorry I don't buy that. Why did you wait until the edit was made by the most extreme of editors? This is an issue which is needed to be raised at policy level at Knowledge. This "shooting from the hip" by passing admins must be controlled. If you know nothing about the subject then stay away. The

1661:

Also, "This exception does not apply to reversions of well-established users just because you consider their edits to be "vandalism." Simple vandalism is indisputable—don't confuse it with edits which you simply disagree with." was totally ignored although it should be the case. Within a week, I

1649:

1198:

I have made my point. I believe you came in shooting from the hip. I don't expect you to back down in public. My point is simple the system failled. Any system which acts like a flip of a coin, protecting an article has a 50/50 possibility of entrenching a particular version. This is not clever.

1537:

In response to the message left in my talk page, I already stated that PictoChat uses Nintendo's own proprietary technology, which is seperate from Wi-Fi. Games such as Super Mario 64 DS use the same protocol. Wi-Fi will be used for Internet capabilities sometime...whenever that is.

1673:

IF ANYONE OPPOSES MY PROPOSAL OF CHANGE OF THE AAO-ARTICLE, EXPRESS IT (with arguments) NOW, OR REMAIN QUIET AND ACCEPT IT. IF THERE'S NOONE OPPOSING IT, I'LL CALL THE DISPUTE, THE EDIT CONFLICT, FINISHED IN TWO DAYS AND OFFICIALLY CALL FOR IMMEDIATE UNRPOTECTION OF THE

1503:

In what way was the response inappropriate? I just explained what I was thinking at the time. I see no way how would that impair my possible performance as an administrator, as NPOV our policy, and I’ve never personally pushed for a POV, no matter how i felt.

1128:

Actually the protection policy says more than that. It even gives guidelines as to which version to protect. But gunslingers never worry about the fineprint. You needed to take this particular individuals history into account. You did not. Read up on it:

1423: 1143:

Robert, this isn't the first time I've caught you launching a personal attack on someone you disagree with. Could you please consider what your choice of words does to the atmosphere in this Wiki? --] 07:50, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

1210:

The POV dispute notice is still on the page in question. While you are pushing your POV and the other guy is pushing his, and neither of you is interested in compromise, it's likely to remain there. --] 16:03, 28 Nov 2004

1168:

As a matter of interest, can you recall any discussion on WikiPedia in which you have strongly disagreed with someone but not impugned their motives or personality for expressing that disagreement? --] 18:20, 28 Nov 2004

1641:

Does any of these fit to me??? No! "I did not block it, as policy dictates, though I would have liked to! As for the revert rule: as anyone can see in the page history, I had only three edits on December 2nd:"

1765:

Out of curiosity is there an easy way to find out how many articles you created etc or are you just keeping count? LOL.. I just want to know for grins and I'm not about to go through my history LOL :)

1158:

I once again plead with you to moderate your language. Words like "stalking", "gunslingers" and the like are more reminiscent of Usenet flame wars than civil discussion. --] 16:08, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

1090:

I know you're keen on getting the Firefox article onto the main page. You might already know this, but now that it's gained featured status you can request for it to be put on the main page at the

1574:

for December 12. In case you forgot to check the page, the venue and time have been both been set. We are planning on meeting at the Moonstruck Diner at 1:30pm. Just wanted to let you know. --

1456:

Oppose as per comment added by Michael Snow. 6 months may be time enough to gain sufficient experience and maturity after making such a statement, but I can't see a big difference.

1309:

is anonymously editing things as a SockPuppet in his revert wars, and a few other users as well (on unrelated subjects). What would be the proper method to look into such things?--

530: 1066: 1130: 1351:"I also believe that a lot of the information currently added is copied from articles that are also linked on the article and would fall under copyright infringement." 1403:

Hi Andrevan, I was hoping you could help me with an editing question. I've RTFM. Luckily, there's an example of what I've trying to do on your user page: "4,300

481: 1613:

VandalBot A script or "robot" that attempts to vandalize or spam massive amounts of articles (hundreds or thousands), blanking, or adding commercial links.

1553:

I put the page on my watch list, but it doesn't show up. I planned on making a page to store articles I'm working on, but I don't want to have to bookmark it.

1411: 72:. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than 1353:

if the article is from wikipedia as well, there's no copyright infringement and if the information fits to both articles it should be in both articles

1662:

added three main sections which you too agreed on. I've always tried to correct mistakes, search for compromies and convince on the talk page.

1650:

added three main sections which you too agreed on. I've always tried to correct mistakes, search for compromies and convince on the talk page.

1629:

Adding insults, using offensive usernames, replacing articles with jokes etc. (see also Knowledge:No personal attacks) User page vandalism

1716: 1305:

If it helps, I don't think you did anything out of the ordinary by locking the page on whatever version was the latest. However, I believe a

1274: 1341:

Just an update, the article is now looking like it's going to go through a revert war (again). Since your edit, it's been reverted 3 times.

1688: 1684: 1584: 1747:

Please note that the block occurred just after I had discovered a new RfAr against myself, and was starting to provide rebuttals to it.

1500:

you wrote "I don't think you understand at this point what adminship is about, based on your response to the bringing up of the quote."

1692: 1556:

Also, how do I delete one of my own pages? Do I just blank it, or will someone not be able to see I own it and revert the "vandalism"?

1744:

and I are engaged in an edit war. He has also contributed to a request for arbitration (and RfC) against me. He has just blocked me.

1550:

Is there a way? I put this one, I was using it to test my sig (which though it's probably simply to most vets, I'm quit proud of it)

1619:

Silly vandalism Users will sometimes create joke articles or replace existing articles with plausible-sounding nonsense (example (

1410:

Is there a way to do this without making it an external link? For example, I'd guess the syntax would be something like 4,300

1199:

Sadly, however the likelihood of a particular POV being so entrenched has better than 50/50 odds ... that is a real concern. -

58:

This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than

52: 1727:

Yeah, I'm getting over the steamed up business pretty fast. Anyway, at least something constructive has come out of this! -

1437:

I got your message about not being able to link internally with &. Oh well. Thanks for checking this out for me! --

1635:

Uploading provocative images, inserting political messages, making malicious animated GIFs, etc. Template vandalism

1626:

Sneaky vandalism Vandalism which is harder to spot. Adding misinformation and typos. Attention-seeking vandalism

1107: 1632:

Replacing User pages with insults, profanity, etc. (see also Knowledge:No personal attacks) Image vandalism

1233:

Why is this allowed? I couldn't think of a good reason why, and was wondering what the reasoning behind it is?

499: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 397: 393: 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 369: 365: 361: 357: 353: 349: 345: 341: 337: 333: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 285: 281: 277: 273: 269: 265: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 237: 233: 229: 225: 221: 217: 517: 512: 213: 209: 205: 201: 193: 189: 185: 181: 1545: 1101: 1515:

you worote "I don't think you'd be a bad administrator, I'm just not confident enough in you to support."

176: 159: 144: 69: 21: 491: 120: 1404: 1380:

because it does NOT contain POV at all and is based on facts that can be read at the official website

498:

Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start or revisit a discussion, please do so

138: 1266:

Thanks Andre! I'll keep an eye (or a Firefox tab at least) on the instructions that you sent! --

1110:

is suspicious to say the least. Would you like to declare your interest inthe subject please. -

1075:. It was certainly a wild ride, and I really appreciate you taking some time out to contribute. 1604: 1600: 1381: 1367: 1359: 1180:

That guideline is strictly permissive. You can always appeal to another admin to unprotect. --

147: 132: 1056: 1200: 1162: 1148: 1133: 1120: 1111: 126: 1779: 1728: 1720: 1704: 1571: 1483:

you wrote "What I meant was, I don't think you've matured much since that quote of yours."

8: 1620: 1316:

Umm... who/what exactly is a developer? (Please forgive me if i'm being dense tonight)--

1523: 1505: 1487: 1476: 1463: 1185: 1076: 171: 141: 114: 17: 1091: 1754: 1753:

Could you look into this action, and consider whether un-blocking me is appropriate?

1700: 1306: 1095: 1280: 463: 1085: 1741: 1655: 1589: 1585: 1330: 1317: 1310: 904: 900: 1719:, though I got no warning from him! I'm pretty steamed about the whole issue. - 1767: 1371: 1342: 1334: 1294: 1287: 36: 1398: 446: 1696: 1605:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=America%27s_Army&oldid=8163028

1601:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=America%27s_Army&oldid=7907161

1457: 1392: 1267: 1254: 1234: 1181: 167: 109: 1225: 1578: 1575: 1438: 1427: 1426:

With an ampersand in it so I can use the "hideminor=1" variable. Thanks! --

1415: 1324: 1246:

I don't want to clutter up your talk page, and the search function is down.

1071:

I just wanted to drop you a quick note to thank you for your support in my

1683:

Should RFC pages be placed on VfD to be deleted? I'm considering removing

1678: 1532: 450: 1539: 1378:

then only remove the POVs but let the rest (like accounts & Honour)

451: 83: 1621:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Knowledge&oldid=3005270

1703:. Your comments on whether I should do this would be appreciated. - 1486:

Well, could you kindly further elaborate on that, with an example?

448: 921: 1293:

Out of curiosity, where is the note on Reene's talk page, Andre?

1607:

So could you please open it again and make way for progression?

1106:

It is noted that the timing of your placing protection over the

1414:, but that produces an error. Any thoughts on this? Thanks.-- 1241:

Is there a place where newbies can go and ask "dumb" questions?

1760: 452: 1596: 1065: 1475:

Would you please explain "but I can't see a big difference"?

1230:

I just noticed on user's personal pages, you can edit them.

1391:

Has it been on the front page though? I think it should be

1357:

3) if you create a "revert war" you force me to do the same

1616:

Childish vandalism Adding graffiti or blanking pages.

1603:

Now, with the version I'd like, it would look like this:

1735: 1710: 1355:

2) if there's a POV (see section: "Culture"), discuss it

1147:

Go away Tony. You are one step away from stalking me. -

1565: 1261: 865: 615: 1469: 154: 1773: 1329:I would appreciate it if you could take a look at 1286:suggest you block her for 24 hours for vandalism. 1273:And thanks for supporting my bid for adminship! -- 1447: 1386: 565: 1623:)), or add silly jokes to existing articles. 1300: 1750:I consider this an abuse of his adminship. 1715:I didn't get to them all. I got blocked by 1689:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Jwrosenzweig 1685:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Slrubenstein 1597:http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Vandalism 1422:Cool! But what about something like this? 1693:Knowledge:Requests for comment/John Kenney 1161:Tony would you please stop stalking me. - 690: 590: 790: 81:. The original talk page is located at 14: 1349:1) there is no copyright infringement; 640: 1638:Adding any of the above to templates 1092:tomorrow's featured article talk page 946: 840: 1778:OK, I won't take them away again. - 476: 31: 740: 27: 28: 1792: 1546:Keeping track of my user pages... 1102:Timing of page protection suspect 850:Keeping track of my user pages... 600:Timing of page protection suspect 531:ClueBot Detailed Index Archive #5 1108:Medical analysis of circumcision 1064: 480: 158: 91:ki/User_talk:Andrevan/Archives/5 35: 1021: 13: 1: 1699:. Each of them was listed by 1047:User talk:Andrevan/Archives/5 1022:User talk:Andrevan/Archives/5 997:User talk:Andrevan/Archives/5 972:User talk:Andrevan/Archives/5 947:User talk:Andrevan/Archives/5 922:User talk:Andrevan/Archives/5 891:User talk:Andrevan/Archives/5 866:User talk:Andrevan/Archives/5 841:User talk:Andrevan/Archives/5 816:User talk:Andrevan/Archives/5 791:User talk:Andrevan/Archives/5 766:User talk:Andrevan/Archives/5 741:User talk:Andrevan/Archives/5 716:User talk:Andrevan/Archives/5 691:User talk:Andrevan/Archives/5 666:User talk:Andrevan/Archives/5 641:User talk:Andrevan/Archives/5 616:User talk:Andrevan/Archives/5 591:User talk:Andrevan/Archives/5 566:User talk:Andrevan/Archives/5 513:⬅️ Previous Archive Page (#4) 177:Talk ☎️ Page Archive 📇 Index 1570:Your name is on the list at 996: 971: 7: 1581:] 23:08, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC) 1562:] 21:50, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC) 890: 665: 10: 1797: 1770:23:16, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC) 1518:Well, you can always vote 1337:00:46, Nov 30, 2004 (UTC) 1237:20:38, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC) 1782:06:42, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC) 1757:23:14, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1723:05:20, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC) 1707:03:16, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC) 1542:22:03, Dec 2, 2004 (UTC) 1395:02:33, Dec 1, 2004 (UTC) 1374:22:37, Nov 30, 2004 (UTC) 1345:18:40, Nov 30, 2004 (UTC) 1320:21:43, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC) 1297:02:03, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1290:01:49, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1270:20:44, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1257:20:52, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC) 1165:17:23, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1123:07:07, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1114:06:52, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1098:14:12, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1082:16:12, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1046: 533:🗄️ 🌳 🌱 🌳 🌿 🌳 🍀 🌳 529:🌳 🍀 🌳 🌿 🌳 🌱 🌳 🗄️ 518:Next Archive Page (#6) ➡️ 458: 157: 1731:06:13, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC) 1658:23:24, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC) 1479:20:31, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC) 1471:20:16, Dec 2, 2004 (UTC) 1418:15:12, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC) 1277:20:50, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC) 1203:08:11, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1191:07:52, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1151:08:11, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1136:07:39, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC) 815: 765: 1526:21:37, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC) 1508:21:28, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC) 1490:20:57, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC) 1441:22:30, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC) 1430:21:26, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC) 715: 1382:User talk:62.52.37.172 1368:copyright infringement 1360:User talk:62.52.37.172 462:☕ Threads archived by 1281:Re: Three revert rule 1073:request for adminship 675:Re: Three revert rule 1572:Knowledge:Meetup/NYC 1086:Firefox on Main page 1057:A quick note to say 575:Firefox on Main page 547:A quick note to say 494:of past discussions. 1399:linking with & 775:linking with & 68:you are viewing a 18:User talk:Andrevan 1307:User:Robert Blair 1226:Editing userpages 1052: 1051: 625:Editing userpages 506: 505: 472: 471: 467: 137: 131: 125: 105: 99: 98: 1788: 1679:RFC pages on VfD 1533:PictoChat, Wi-Fi 1466: 1201:Robert the Bruce 1163:Robert the Bruce 1149:Robert the Bruce 1134:Robert the Bruce 1121:Robert the Bruce 1112:Robert the Bruce 1068: 1037:2003-12-11 06:42 1034:2003-12-11 06:42 987:2003-12-10 23:14 984:2003-12-10 23:14 962:2003-12-10 06:13 959:2003-12-10 05:20 937:2003-12-10 03:16 934:2003-12-10 03:16 931:RFC pages on VfD 912:2003-12-08 23:24 909:2003-12-08 23:24 825:PictoChat, Wi-Fi 806:2003-12-02 21:37 803:2003-12-02 20:31 781:2003-12-07 22:30 778:2003-12-02 15:12 681:2003-12-29 02:03 678:2003-12-29 01:49 656:2003-12-28 20:44 653:2003-12-03 20:50 606:2003-12-28 18:20 603:2003-12-28 06:52 581:2003-12-25 14:12 578:2003-12-25 14:12 556:2003-12-24 16:12 553:2003-12-24 16:12 534: 524: 523: 490:This page is an 484: 477: 461: 453: 174: 162: 155: 135: 129: 123: 118: 117: 103: 95: 92: 89: 86: 80: 79: 76: 67: 65: 62: 51: 50: 47: 39: 32: 1796: 1795: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1780:Ta bu shi da yu 1776: 1763: 1738: 1729:Ta bu shi da yu 1721:Ta bu shi da yu 1713: 1705:Ta bu shi da yu 1681: 1593: 1590:User:Nightbeast 1588:craziness from 1568: 1548: 1535: 1464: 1452:You commented: 1450: 1401: 1389: 1327: 1303: 1283: 1264: 1228: 1187:explains it all 1104: 1088: 1062: 1053: 905:User:Nightbeast 903:craziness from 535: 528: 521: 520: 497: 496: 454: 449: 170: 152: 151: 113: 107: 90: 87: 85:https://en.wiki 84: 82: 77: 74: 73: 63: 60: 59: 48: 45: 44: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 1794: 1775: 1772: 1762: 1759: 1737: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1712: 1709: 1680: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1669: 1592: 1586:America's Army 1583: 1567: 1564: 1547: 1544: 1534: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1496: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1473: 1472: 1449: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1432: 1431: 1424:recent changes 1400: 1397: 1388: 1385: 1379: 1376: 1375: 1358: 1356: 1354: 1352: 1350: 1347: 1346: 1331:America's Army 1326: 1325:America's Army 1323: 1322: 1321: 1302: 1299: 1282: 1279: 1263: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1252: 1248: 1247: 1243: 1242: 1227: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1205: 1204: 1193: 1192: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1159: 1153: 1152: 1138: 1137: 1103: 1100: 1087: 1084: 1061: 1055: 1054: 1050: 1049: 1044: 1041: 1038: 1035: 1032: 1029: 1025: 1024: 1019: 1016: 1013: 1010: 1007: 1004: 1000: 999: 994: 991: 988: 985: 982: 979: 975: 974: 969: 966: 963: 960: 957: 954: 950: 949: 944: 941: 938: 935: 932: 929: 925: 924: 919: 916: 913: 910: 907: 901:America's Army 898: 894: 893: 888: 885: 882: 879: 876: 873: 869: 868: 863: 860: 857: 854: 851: 848: 844: 843: 838: 835: 832: 829: 826: 823: 819: 818: 813: 810: 807: 804: 801: 798: 794: 793: 788: 785: 782: 779: 776: 773: 769: 768: 763: 760: 757: 754: 751: 748: 744: 743: 738: 735: 732: 729: 726: 725:America's Army 723: 719: 718: 713: 710: 707: 704: 701: 698: 694: 693: 688: 685: 682: 679: 676: 673: 669: 668: 663: 660: 657: 654: 651: 648: 644: 643: 638: 635: 632: 629: 626: 623: 619: 618: 613: 610: 607: 604: 601: 598: 594: 593: 588: 585: 582: 579: 576: 573: 569: 568: 563: 560: 557: 554: 551: 545: 541: 540: 537: 536: 527: 522: 510: 508: 504: 503: 488: 487: 485: 474: 470: 469: 459: 456: 455: 447: 445: 442: 441: 180: 163: 153: 101: 100: 97: 96: 57: 53:user talk page 40: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1793: 1783: 1781: 1771: 1769: 1758: 1756: 1751: 1748: 1745: 1743: 1730: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1722: 1718: 1708: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1657: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1636: 1633: 1630: 1627: 1624: 1622: 1617: 1614: 1611: 1608: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1591: 1587: 1582: 1580: 1576: 1573: 1563: 1560: 1559:Thanks a ton 1557: 1554: 1551: 1543: 1541: 1525: 1524:GeneralPatton 1521: 1517: 1516: 1514: 1513: 1507: 1506:GeneralPatton 1502: 1501: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1489: 1488:GeneralPatton 1485: 1484: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1478: 1477:GeneralPatton 1470: 1467: 1461: 1460: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1440: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1417: 1413: 1408: 1406: 1396: 1394: 1384: 1383: 1373: 1369: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1344: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1336: 1332: 1319: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1308: 1298: 1296: 1291: 1289: 1278: 1276: 1271: 1269: 1256: 1253: 1250: 1249: 1245: 1244: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1236: 1231: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1202: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1190: 1188: 1183: 1179: 1178: 1167: 1166: 1164: 1160: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1145: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1122: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1113: 1109: 1099: 1097: 1093: 1083: 1081: 1080: 1074: 1069: 1067: 1060: 1048: 1045: 1042: 1039: 1036: 1033: 1030: 1027: 1026: 1023: 1020: 1017: 1014: 1011: 1008: 1005: 1002: 1001: 998: 995: 992: 989: 986: 983: 980: 977: 976: 973: 970: 967: 964: 961: 958: 955: 952: 951: 948: 945: 942: 939: 936: 933: 930: 927: 926: 923: 920: 917: 914: 911: 908: 906: 902: 899: 896: 895: 892: 889: 886: 883: 880: 877: 874: 871: 870: 867: 864: 861: 858: 855: 852: 849: 846: 845: 842: 839: 836: 833: 830: 827: 824: 821: 820: 817: 814: 811: 808: 805: 802: 799: 796: 795: 792: 789: 786: 783: 780: 777: 774: 771: 770: 767: 764: 761: 758: 755: 752: 749: 746: 745: 742: 739: 736: 733: 730: 727: 724: 721: 720: 717: 714: 711: 708: 705: 702: 699: 696: 695: 692: 689: 686: 683: 680: 677: 674: 671: 670: 667: 664: 661: 658: 655: 652: 649: 646: 645: 642: 639: 636: 633: 630: 627: 624: 621: 620: 617: 614: 611: 608: 605: 602: 599: 596: 595: 592: 589: 586: 583: 580: 577: 574: 571: 570: 567: 564: 561: 558: 555: 552: 550: 546: 543: 542: 539: 538: 532: 526: 525: 519: 516: 514: 509: 501: 495: 493: 486: 483: 479: 478: 475: 468: 465: 457: 444: 443: 440: 439: 435: 431: 427: 423: 419: 415: 411: 407: 403: 399: 395: 391: 387: 383: 379: 375: 371: 367: 363: 359: 355: 351: 347: 343: 339: 335: 331: 327: 323: 319: 315: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 243: 239: 235: 231: 227: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 191: 187: 183: 179: 178: 173: 169: 164: 161: 156: 150: 149: 146: 143: 140: 134: 128: 122: 116: 112: 111: 106: 93: 71: 56: 54: 41: 38: 34: 33: 30: 23: 19: 1777: 1764: 1755:CheeseDreams 1752: 1749: 1746: 1739: 1714: 1701:CheeseDreams 1682: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1637: 1634: 1631: 1628: 1625: 1618: 1615: 1612: 1609: 1594: 1569: 1561: 1558: 1555: 1552: 1549: 1536: 1519: 1495: 1474: 1458: 1451: 1409: 1402: 1390: 1377: 1348: 1328: 1304: 1292: 1284: 1272: 1265: 1232: 1229: 1186: 1105: 1096:CheekyMonkey 1089: 1078: 1072: 1070: 1063: 1058: 548: 511: 507: 489: 473: 466:after 72h ☕ 460: 197: 166: 165: 119: 108: 102: 88:pedia.org/wi 42: 29: 1717:User:Silsor 464:ClueBot III 70:mirror site 1761:Edit count 1742:Neutrality 1656:Nightbeast 1006:Edit count 43:This is a 1768:K1Bond007 1372:K1Bond007 1343:K1Bond007 1335:K1Bond007 1295:Everyking 1288:Everyking 1077:Clockwork 1393:GregNorc 1366:This is 1268:Daedelus 1255:GregNorc 1235:GregNorc 1182:Cecropia 515:☕ 🗄️ ☕ 22:Archives 20:‎ | 1736:Request 1711:Hey :-) 1579:Ram-Man 1520:Neutral 1439:Pdurbin 1428:Pdurbin 1416:Pdurbin 1015:Unknown 1012:Unknown 1009:Unknown 981:Request 956:Hey :-) 884:Unknown 881:Unknown 878:Unknown 859:Unknown 856:Unknown 853:Unknown 834:Unknown 831:Unknown 828:Unknown 759:Unknown 756:Unknown 753:Unknown 734:Unknown 731:Unknown 728:Unknown 709:Unknown 706:Unknown 703:Unknown 634:Unknown 631:Unknown 628:Unknown 492:archive 1697:WP:VFD 1566:Meetup 1318:Josiah 1311:Josiah 1275:Woggly 1262:Thanks 1251:Thanks 1059:thanks 875:Meetup 650:Thanks 549:thanks 121:📧mail 1695:from 1674:SITE. 1540:Evice 1459:Andre 1412:edits 1405:edits 1211:(UTC) 1169:(UTC) 168:Andre 133:💀d💀 127:🐣c🐣 78:pedia 64:pedia 49:pedia 16:< 1774:RFCs 1740:Hi, 1691:and 1465:talk 1079:Soul 1031:RFCs 918:9246 812:1805 737:2302 612:3726 500:here 75:Wiki 61:Wiki 46:Wiki 1448:RFA 1387:oic 1043:110 1018:259 993:498 968:398 943:436 887:503 862:527 837:335 800:RFA 787:966 762:114 750:oic 712:515 687:526 662:249 637:435 587:375 562:293 175:'s 145:🗄️ 139:⭐b⭐ 1687:, 1577:– 1538:-- 1407:" 1301:Hi 1184:| 1132:- 1094:. 1028:20 1003:19 978:18 953:17 928:16 897:15 872:14 847:13 822:12 797:11 772:10 700:Hi 609:11 438:65 436:, 434:64 432:, 430:63 428:, 426:62 424:, 422:61 420:, 418:60 416:, 414:59 412:, 410:58 408:, 406:57 404:, 402:56 400:, 398:55 396:, 394:54 392:, 390:53 388:, 386:52 384:, 382:51 380:, 378:50 376:, 374:49 372:, 370:48 368:, 366:47 364:, 362:46 360:, 358:45 356:, 354:44 352:, 350:43 348:, 346:42 344:, 342:41 340:, 338:40 336:, 334:39 332:, 330:38 328:, 326:37 324:, 322:36 320:, 318:35 316:, 314:34 312:, 310:33 308:, 306:32 304:, 302:31 300:, 298:30 296:, 294:29 292:, 290:28 288:, 286:27 284:, 282:26 280:, 278:25 276:, 274:24 272:, 270:23 268:, 266:22 264:, 262:21 260:, 258:20 256:, 254:19 252:, 250:18 248:, 246:17 244:, 242:16 240:, 238:15 236:, 234:14 232:, 230:13 228:, 226:12 224:, 222:11 220:, 218:10 216:, 212:, 208:, 204:, 200:, 196:, 192:, 188:, 184:, 172:🚐 148:🧹 142:🧮 136:😎 130:😎 1468:) 1462:( 1189:® 1040:1 990:1 965:2 940:1 915:1 809:4 784:3 747:9 722:8 697:7 684:2 672:6 659:2 647:5 622:4 597:3 584:1 572:2 559:1 544:1 502:. 214:9 210:8 206:7 202:6 198:5 194:4 190:3 186:2 182:1 124:☕ 115:@ 110:A 104:☕ 94:. 66:, 55:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.