586:
46:
311:
459:
510:
420:
653:
emerged from discussion with another user about orphans—as far as I can gauge that was the only substantive criticism to have been made against the article. That user mentioned that articles s/he has created often have numerous incoming links even before they are actually created. It would seem sensible to create such links before reviewing deletion/recreating the article. In any case I have made a copy now.
52:
201:
as many articles on magazines (the magazine infobox also has an OCLC parameter). If you want to change all that, you'll have to provide better evidence than "contact WorldCat if you don't believe me": the onus here is on you to provide evidence for your position flying into the face of established practice. Thanks. --
316:
I've just had a look at your User talk page and a lot of the messages were a bit negative, so I thought I'd make a gesture of appreciation for your contributions :) I find that it can take while to get used to all the rules, norms, and conventions on here. I'm still learning every time I edit. I hope
200:
Sorry, but you're absolutely incorrect about this. Each and every journal has an OCLC number (sometimes a few for different editions). That is exactly the reason why we have an OCLC parameter in the journal infobox. Thousands of journal articles have the OCLC number indicated in their infobox as well
705:
This deletion nomination wasn't made properly--the afdx was fine, but the discussion page should have been created using the afd2 template (which adds several important links for people who wish to evaluate the article, including a link to the article itself and link to the previous AfD discussion)
533:
Hello
Materialscientist. (1) You should have started a new section -- nothing to do with OER. (2) I fail to see what is promotional in my edits. (3) I did not check dois, anyway they are unnecessary if the full, exact citation is given -- you could have simply edited them out. I checked the one you
154:
I daresay you mean well, but I don't think your comments belong on the
Cranfield main site. Perhaps they would be better placed on the specific areas investigated by Cranfield which may need a new topic or on the site (or a linked site) of the particular aircraft affected. It's clearly an important
170:
An encyclopedia page about a university is not the university's "main site" and is not immune from controversy if appropriate. ... However, I have deleted this user's contributions on this matter on a couple of other related pages about the university, primarily because they seem disproportionate
652:
Hi: no, I have not started a deletion review yet. I was wondering whether there is a COI in doing so because I was the original creator of the article. Is there any time limit for starting such a review? If there is, and it expires, presumably one could simply create the page again? Another issue
179:
for additional discussion. If this was indeed an academic integrity issue that received wide reporting as such, then it may merit inclusion as an example. But I'm not convinced by what I've seen. Ankababel, this is an invitation to discuss on the talk pages, if you like.
624:
549:
Right, but no respectable publisher would add "purchase individual article" into the abstract. Please use better sources. Your activity does look like promotion of said publisher and will result in a block from editing if not amended.
155:
topic. However, I have no doubt that there are many aspects of all universities research that draw criticism. I just don't think that a university's main site is the right place for this content - the site should be non-controversial.
695:
335:
I am one of those posters, but I second
Lawsonstu: don't worry about making errors, we won't hold it against you because the only people that don't make errors are those that... Exactly, those that don't do anything! :-)
671:
There is no time limit for initiating a deletion review that I am aware of. Please don't create the page again, because consensus at the deletion discussion was for deletion, and the article would be speedy deleted per
696:
243:
Do not cite yourself or your colleagues. It's called conflict of interest. Many new editors cite themselves mainly and write about topics where they have a vested interest. Such behavior is inappropriate.
628:
236:
primary journal references (tens of thousands appear annually). Citing secondary sources is the encyclopedic style. When the theme is biomedical, the standards are far stricter, we call them
493:
references from a non-notable journal; or adding references to same journal where they are not needed. Your doi links are either broken or directly ask to buy those articles. Please stop.
618:
734:
69:. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Knowledge:
717:, where it can be easily found by those editors who regularly evaluate such things. No harm done--it's just that the official "clock" for the discussion starts now.
646:
706:
and then transcluded on to a daily log page. As a result, a month has gone by without anybody really noticing that anything happened. (I ran across it via a
714:
676:("Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion"). I have deleted the userfied version since you have made a copy, per all of the above.
534:
stated "ask to buy those articles" but it is just the abstract, which is what one expects. Full text with most journals is only available to subscribers.
390:
and I have wondered who chooses to edit OER-related articles and why. Regardless of whether you've taken the WIKISOO course yourself - and/or never even
623:
Hi: I notice that you haven't started a deletion review yet, and it's been almost a week. I am planning on deleting the temporarily userfied article at
62:
502:
592:
585:
635:. If you need it for reference to start a deletion review, I recommend that you save a copy to your computer. Please respond at your convenience.
370:
Hi
Ankababel, I'm sending you this message because you're one of about 300 users who have recently edited an article in the umbrella category of
559:
283:
This type of editing is probably not considered acceptable use for these templates and might be construed as disruptive editing. Please see:
687:
662:
471:
432:
707:
276:
274:
Please refrain from placing "Multiple issues" tags on multiple academic journal articles. It would be best to discuss your views on the
345:
673:
189:
109:
98:
513:
603:
360:
326:
264:
296:
395:
528:
483:
452:
149:
627:
soon, because leaving it in place in userspace indefinitely goes against the grain of the consensus that occurred at
613:
724:
to get a listing of the necessary steps. Thanks, and let me know at my talk page if you have further questions. --
565:
I cannot amend that & anyway I find that nearly all publishers have such a provision. Please name an exception.
517:
301:
599:
400:
before 27 April. No personal data is being collected. If you have any ideas or questions, please get in touch. My
287:. An editor can be blocked for this type of behavior, so please stop doing this. Thanks for your cooperation. ---
164:
463:
428:
379:
215:
66:
210:
574:
543:
93:
413:
269:
83:
555:
524:
498:
479:
448:
112:
using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
383:
371:
40:
351:
I appreciate the comments. Yes, I do feel I'm on a learning curve -- hopefully making progress!
176:
172:
551:
520:
494:
489:
You are adding unencyclopedic phrases like "There is an interesting debate" and source them to
475:
444:
440:
424:
78:
73:
677:
636:
610:
292:
116:
28:
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
632:
341:
206:
195:
145:
120:
8:
365:
322:
260:
248:
221:
124:
105:
732:
721:
515:
185:
65:, Ankababel. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for
490:
579:
409:
401:
387:
288:
160:
337:
284:
237:
202:
141:
131:
697:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Journal of
Biomedical Semantics (2nd nomination)
394:
the term OER before - we'd be extremely grateful for your participation in this
247:
These comments are relevant to removal of your well intentioned contribution to
654:
566:
535:
436:
375:
352:
318:
256:
280:
of the
Academic Journals project before placing these templates on articles.
23:
If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
725:
225:
181:
88:
629:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Journal of
Biological Physics and Chemistry
59:
405:
156:
45:
310:
720:
If you decide to nominate other pages for deletion, please check out
458:
439:" are against Knowledge policy and not permitted. Take a look at the
378:). In evaluating several projects we've been working on (e.g. the
119:! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on
49:
Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!
710:
created by a bot which scans for stale nominations like this)
419:
255:
of us. Many editors here can offer advice. Happy editing. --
51:
606:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
462:
Please do not add promotional material to
Knowledge. While
625:
User:Ankababel/Journal of
Biological Physics and Chemistry
619:
User:Ankababel/Journal of
Biological Physics and Chemistry
171:
and have a fair bit of original research involved. See
427:. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
715:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 February 10‎
317:
you'll stick around and help make Knowledge better!
220:
Welcome to Knowledge. Here are suggested readings:
472:a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion
232:Knowledge prefers citations to reviews and books,
137:on your talk page and ask your question there.
591:Hello, Ankababel. You have new messages at
470:acceptable, Knowledge is not intended to be
443:to learn more about Knowledge. Thank you.
115:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
431:because they appeared to be promotional.
404:page awaits. Thanks for your support! -
44:
228:. The gist of these guidelines are:
519:- there will be no further warning.
466:about beliefs, products or services
251:. Dont be offended - it happens to
13:
584:
14:
745:
713:The discussion is now listed at
508:
457:
418:
309:
50:
1:
735:15:28, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
361:20:43, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
346:18:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
79:The five pillars of Knowledge
688:00:01, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
663:22:50, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
647:18:53, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
593:Northamerica1000's talk page
509:
327:20:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
297:06:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
265:04:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
211:11:57, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
150:11:54, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
94:How to write a great article
7:
614:10:05, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
600:10:05, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
575:22:24, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
560:22:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
544:14:09, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
529:11:11, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
503:10:16, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
484:10:10, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
453:23:21, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
99:Editor's index to Knowledge
10:
750:
435:and using Knowledge as a "
414:20:35, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
372:open educational resources
190:13:40, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
165:21:58, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
429:your recent contributions
658:
570:
539:
356:
302:A cup of coffee for you!
397:brief, anonymous survey
216:Welcome, but be careful
177:Talk:Academic integrity
173:Talk:Cargo cult science
104:Also, when you post on
589:
55:
588:
58:Here's wishing you a
48:
270:Multiple issues tags
63:welcome to Knowledge
249:tricresyl phosphate
125:Knowledge:Questions
604:remove this notice
590:
84:How to edit a page
67:your contributions
56:
41:A belated welcome!
552:Materialscientist
521:Materialscientist
495:Materialscientist
476:Materialscientist
445:Materialscientist
425:Materialscientist
332:
331:
741:
730:
685:
681:
644:
640:
607:
512:
511:
461:
422:
386:), my colleague
384:WikiProject Open
313:
306:
305:
140:Again, welcome!
136:
130:
54:
749:
748:
744:
743:
742:
740:
739:
738:
726:
700:
683:
679:
642:
638:
621:
608:
597:
582:
464:objective prose
368:
304:
272:
218:
198:
134:
128:
43:
37:
34:
32:
17:
12:
11:
5:
747:
699:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
666:
665:
620:
617:
598:Message added
596:
583:
581:
578:
563:
562:
506:
505:
376:open education
367:
364:
349:
348:
330:
329:
314:
303:
300:
271:
268:
245:
244:
241:
217:
214:
197:
194:
193:
192:
110:sign your name
102:
101:
96:
91:
86:
81:
76:
42:
39:
36:
33:
31:
30:
25:
19:
16:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
746:
737:
736:
733:
731:
729:
723:
718:
716:
711:
709:
703:
698:
689:
686:
675:
670:
669:
668:
667:
664:
660:
656:
651:
650:
649:
648:
645:
634:
633:WP:NOTWEBHOST
630:
626:
616:
615:
612:
605:
601:
594:
587:
577:
576:
572:
568:
561:
557:
553:
548:
547:
546:
545:
541:
537:
531:
530:
526:
522:
518:
516:
514:
504:
500:
496:
492:
488:
487:
486:
485:
481:
477:
474:. Thank you.
473:
469:
465:
460:
455:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
421:
416:
415:
411:
407:
403:
399:
398:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
363:
362:
358:
354:
347:
343:
339:
334:
333:
328:
324:
320:
315:
312:
308:
307:
299:
298:
294:
290:
286:
281:
279:
278:
267:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
242:
239:
235:
231:
230:
229:
227:
223:
213:
212:
208:
204:
191:
187:
183:
178:
174:
169:
168:
167:
166:
162:
158:
152:
151:
147:
143:
138:
133:
126:
122:
118:
113:
111:
107:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
80:
77:
75:
72:
71:
70:
68:
64:
61:
53:
47:
38:
29:
26:
24:
21:
20:
18:
727:
719:
712:
704:
701:
622:
611:NorthAmerica
609:
564:
532:
507:
467:
456:
441:welcome page
417:
396:
391:
388:Pete Forsyth
369:
350:
282:
275:
273:
252:
246:
233:
222:WP:SECONDARY
219:
199:
196:OCLC numbers
153:
139:
121:my talk page
114:
103:
74:Introduction
57:
35:
27:
22:
15:
722:WP:AFDHOWTO
702:Greetings,
433:Advertising
423:Hello, I'm
382:course and
366:OER inquiry
289:Steve Quinn
127:, or place
108:you should
602:. You can
374:(OER) (or
338:Randykitty
203:Randykitty
142:Randykitty
123:, consult
117:Wikipedian
106:talk pages
89:Help pages
655:Ankababel
631:and also
567:Ankababel
536:Ankababel
353:Ankababel
319:Lawsonstu
277:talk page
257:Smokefoot
728:Finngall
580:Talkback
285:WP:POINT
238:WP:MEDRS
182:Lquilter
491:primary
437:soapbox
406:Sara FB
380:WIKISOO
60:belated
684:MERICA
674:CSD G4
643:MERICA
226:WP:COI
157:Cj1340
132:helpme
392:heard
708:page
680:ORTH
659:talk
639:ORTH
571:talk
556:talk
540:talk
525:talk
499:talk
480:talk
449:talk
410:talk
402:talk
357:talk
342:talk
323:talk
293:talk
261:talk
224:and
207:talk
186:talk
175:and
161:talk
146:talk
253:all
234:not
661:)
573:)
558:)
542:)
527:)
501:)
482:)
468:is
451:)
412:)
359:)
344:)
336:--
325:)
295:)
263:)
209:)
188:)
180:--
163:)
148:)
135:}}
129:{{
682:A
678:N
657:(
641:A
637:N
595:.
569:(
554:(
538:(
523:(
497:(
478:(
447:(
408:(
355:(
340:(
321:(
291:(
259:(
240:.
205:(
184:(
159:(
144:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
