User talk:B/Archive 3

953:

technically a citizen (though I have never taken up the Law of Return), for their making religion a part of the government. What I am saying is that anti-science denialism of any sort are all the same. From a personal standpoint, I do not lump everyone who disagrees with me together, only if they disagree with me on all points. For example, although I don't agree with you across the board, you have my full and absolute respect because of your anti-racism stand, which appears more absolute than mine. So, I don't lump everyone together. if I need to learn one lesson from my conversations with you is that I should be more patient in determining if there is common ground. We seem to have it on magic potions and racism! So if I shouldn't lump everyone together, please don't lump me with anti-Christians or anti-religion of any sort. I have strong religious beliefs, I just prefer that they be kept to myself. I promise to reduce the "lumping" of POV's together.

1619:

log, edit history, move log, whatever to figure out what my current name is so there is no compelling need to maintain it as a redirect. On the other hand, because of Knowledge's insanely stupid policy of allowing user pages to be indexed by Google, someone entering BigDT in a search engine would find my current user page if the old pages are left as a redirect. After sufficient time had elapsed, I deleted the old pages. At the time, the way to stop a page from being created was to transclude it in a protected page. Now, we can protect deleted pages, but at the time, that was not possible. So my old talk page sat there unnoticed until two days ago when another admin apparently decided to ignore my wishes on the subject and redirect my old page here. By doing that, he protected my talk page, presumably inadvertently. I appreciate you alerting me to it and have corrected the problem.

1461:

topic, and I believe people should be more aware of it and what needs to be done. 25:40 is an excellent organization, and I simply want people to be aware. Can you give me suggestions on how to add this organization to Knowledge as a more neutral page, rather than deleting all of the work that I put into that page - it took time and is very frustrating to see it all gone now! I never asked for anything on the page - simply stated their mission as a non-profit, and explained about the area. How is that an advertisement?? Would it be better to headline the article as information about the area, and mention the work that 25:40 has done there? Please help. I'm not really sure how to communicate on Wiki, this is all very new to me, but you can email me at awsoccerstar11@hotmail.com Thank you.

4225:

violations are more debatable, since they included "lack of institutional control" which leaves things very much open to interpretation as to who is guilty of not asserting control. I think the current edit, which says he was found not culpable, is not accurate (especially given the Minnesota findings) and the rewritten summary of the Notre Dame portion of the story is highly biased (deleting references to the woman in question's status as a booster and describing imperissable benefits as an attempt to impress football players). And in the end, I felt and others do (though it's obviously not universal) that while 1 incident may be 'guilt by association', 3 incidents in succession presents a pattern that is important in assessing the career of the coach in question.

5265:

is a "derivative work" of its constituent elements. The copyright holder of a work has exclusive rights to authorize derivative works - so if you take a photograph of a copyrighted work, even if you add other elements, then you cannot legally distribute it. Where it gets dicey is proportionality. Some countries have a freedom of panorama where if it is outside, consent to photograph it is implied. That is not the case in America. For example, if you take a picture of a group of Boy Scouts and one of them is wearing a Winnie the Pooh t-shirt, nobody would claim that you don't have the right to distribute that. But if you zoom in on the t-shirt and the t-shirt is obviously the subject of your photo, then we can't really use that. --

938:

I am sick, I don't want distilled plant roots, bug excrement, or magic foot pads — I want a doctor. And I don't care if that doctor is Christian, Hindu, Jewish, Buddhist, black, white, male, female, young, or old as long as he or she knows what he or she is doing with regards to medicine. You said it before when we were dealing with the "save the south" user that regardless of our disagreements, when you are right, I will vigorously defend you and that's true. It's probably also true of most non-SPA Wikipedians - you will agree on some things and disagree on others - and the "going after" anyone that in some way offends the ID project just isn't very helpful. That's all I was trying to say. --

4176:

report and not easily spotted by the reader? In the college football media, it's generally understood (I would argue) that coaches are held responsible for the NCAA compliance of the programs they represent, but is it fair to say that on wikipedia that is not the case, that they are only responsible for the actions they directly took? I ask because that doesn't seem to be a consistent pattern across other similar biographies (in other NCAA sports, or of players). If that's the rule I'll obviously follow it. (I apologize for putting this in the wrong secetion, but I read the guides and could not figure out how to create a new section)

3755:. I think you live down in that part of the country, so you might avoid him just because of his politics. LOL. Honestly, my interests in sports are Baseball, Ice Hockey, Syracuse University (anything, women's ice hockey, for example), and....well, that's about it. Lucky for me, SU grads are endemic to ESPN, so if SU does anything, it will be there. Hockey is a bit of a problem these days. Cowherd may have mentioned the Stanley Cup playoffs, but if he did, I wasn't listening!!!! I drive a lot in the LA area, so without sports talk, I'd be bored. I love music, but my mind needs a bit of stimulation. 681:

would use to describe Evolution. It is a pejorative term to make it seem like the science of Evolution worships at the altar of Darwin. I might make jokes about it, but in my education, Darwin was a historical figure of huge importance. He set forth the ideas that were the foundation of Evolution, but most research today is done by a mass of biochemists, physiologists, geologists, and a bunch of other -ists, most of whom are not named Darwin. At any rate, Picard has enough articles written about her support of Intelligent design to confirm that her signing the document is notable and important.

1001:

and saying "do the math and you get a 6000-year-old earth - ha ha ha". In reality, there are no dates in the first part of Genesis, so for all we know/care, Adam and Eve could have been chilling out in the garden of Eden for billions of years before trying to make apple pie. The point of Genesis is that at some point, God made the family through whom He would eventually bring forth the nation of Israel, and, in Christian beliefs, His Son into the world for our salvation - the exact timeline is immaterial and is outside the scope of what Moses was trying to get across. --

5736:. The purpose of a disambiguation page is to provide links to articles that exist - they shouldn't be brainstorm lists of everything that might exist. "Red links should not be the only link in a given entry; link also to an existing article, so that a reader (as opposed to a contributing editor) will have somewhere to navigate to for additional information." If there is no other article that gives information about these two organizations, then there is no reason for a link to them. The best solution: create the National Band Association article and then link to it.-- 4711:

completely restrict commercial use. The only alternatives we can offer are (1) no photo, (2) a random amateur photo that someone contributes under a free license, or (3) a quality photo that he contributes under a free license. Jimmy Wales said awhile back that (and I'm paraphrasing here) that we are big enough now that we could request #3 and receive it in a lot of cases because it is preferable to the alternative. While that's probably a true statement of fact, I don't like the attitude one bit ... but it is what it is. --

3429:

to complain. I would say it is much more likely that he suggested these ideas, there was some discussion, he said "anyone object to me posting it", and everyone was on vacation and he took silence to mean consent. That's my best guess, anyway, FWIW. I suppose it's also possible that arbcom expected everyone to rejoice at the pronouncement and when that didn't happen, they decided to just let FT2 take the fall for it. That's the extreme paranoia in me, though. I expect the truth of it is closer to the former. --

31: 4493: 786:. True and verifiable facts aren't going to be removed, but if there are factual errors and he expresses concern, that would be helpful. Knowledge's treatment of BLP articles (or BLP victims as WR more properly calls them) is shameful and it's a shame that we allow these things to be turned into attack pieces. But it's going to take a fundamental change (like banning anyone who thinks that NPOV trumps BLP from ever touching a BLP) to fix it. -- 3138:, or (c) the author explicitly releases all rights to the work. Unless you can demonstrate that the original author of that text explicitly released all rights to it, we cannot use it, regardless of whatever other people may be reusing it. "Copyright" is not the same thing as a "trademark" - with a trademark, if you don't enforce it you lose it, but with copyright it remains copyrighted even if you decline to enforce your rights. -- 3336: 1697:(& there may be more forthcoming) have been engaging tonight in the same damaging reverts for which Kopter was originally blocked. Now Kopter is per se able to be back in the action. Is there a way to shut down this nuisance's entire operation? I am at a loss how to cope, and will soon be compelled to make my own 3rd reversions trying to clean up. Help urgently needed. Thank you in advance. 471: 4695:(which is immune from potential future marrying of the GFDL and Creative Commons licenses) is the best alternative. It can be used commercially, HOWEVER it can only be used under the conditions of the GFDL, which are too annoying for most commercial uses other than online encyclopedias. ALL content on Knowledge is recreated on HUNDREDS of commercial websites (see 4201:

to the NCAA that a coach had bought a dietary supplement for some of his players. The players paid for it so it wasn't an extra benefit - he just collected money at team meetings and ordered the supplements online for everyone that paid him. But the NCAA says that the coaches can't have anything to do with it, so that's a violation. So even though, yes,

3486:

and that was strong non-support. I'm sure I'm going to be taken out behind the shed for calling someone a racist (which appears to be less acceptable than actually being a racist), but I believe that if I were allowed, I can and will make a case that those accusations were accurate to some degree. Exactly what is FT2 afraid of? Being wrong?

3824:, which has anti-Semitic and other xenophobic material on it. A user is claiming that this website is acceptable for use. I believe that this source is not reliable and could be original research, but you you believe that this website can or should this source be relied upon for the article? Please post your determination on the talk page of 2359:

is nothing for me to undelete - I went ahead and put an article for this month. If you have an article you would like to see in there for next month, please add it to the nominations page for the portal ... but nothing helpful will come from creating an empty page. There either needs to be an article there or it needs to be a redlink. --

5403:

though there is obviously a difference between an unrepentant terrorist and a thief), and Knowledge is not the place to try to score political points. There are plenty of fora out there to push talking points for one side or another - Knowledge is not among them. Knowledge is an encyclopedia, not a place for promoting your candidate. --

5706:

change of mine (which I half-agree with, but 'Needs-Based Analysis' is a term in general use as a Google Search will reveal, and I really could have used its presence on the page when I was trying to figure it out!). As I said, I come in peace. I just did not want to undo any of your edits without consulting with you first.

778:. Some people think that if you are an IDer, your article isn't neutral unless it contains lengthy rebuttals of ID. That's silly on its face. But so is denying (or not mentioning) his notable involvement just because it may be inconvenient. Are you in actual contact with him? If so, you can ask him to communicate with 4506:, which passed by a count of 154/7/2 (95.65%). I have read every word of the RfB and taken it all to heart. I truly appreciate everyone's input: supports, opposes, neutrals, and comments. Of course, I plan to conduct my cratship in service of the community. If you have any advice, questions, concerns, or need help, please 2280:, we can no longer enforce language-specific requirements.) Do you read the language that this name is in and is it something offensive in the original language? (Obviously, if someone makes a user name that is profane or otherwise inappropriate in a foreign language, that is still blocked.) Thanks. -- 810:. It's the final article I need to get approved for an Atlantic Coast Conference Championship Game featured article, and I know you'd do a thorough review, given your familiarity with the subject. If you don't think you'd have the time, drop me a message on my talk page, and I'll ask someone else. Thanks! 5514:

This racist editor is harassing good-faith editors on his talk page, despite being indefinitely blocked. Moreover, an admin is intimating that he should be unblocked. I'll take it further, but I know your opinion on racism approximates mine, so maybe you can use your good name to help out. I think

4699:

for a complete list). Anything used here is going to be mirrored and that is one of the reasons that we cannot accept content with a non-commercial use restriction. The GFDL contains enough restrictions that your average, run of the mill, commercial content provider isn't going to want to mess with

4200:

that discuss Holtz's relationship to them. The one at Minnesota, for example, was talking mostly about basketball, which has nothing whatsoever to do with him. Every school has NCAA violations from time to time and most of them are minor. For example, several years ago, Virginia Tech self-reported

4095:

I don't think that's necessary unless he abuses it. A blocked user's only avenue for contacting the blocking admin is email and he may also wish to contact an individual arbiter via email. If he abuses it and starts sending harassing emails, I imagine that it will be rather quickly disabled, so the

1711:

Kopter was blocked for 3RR, not because there was anything otherwise wrong with his edits. I will ask him to stop reverting, log in, and discuss the issue with you as a cross-article revert war is obviously disruptive. If he continues to revert without being at all willing to explain his reverts or

1460:

You deleted a page that I created yesterday, citing it as "blatant advertisement." Yet that was not my purpose. I am not trying to recruit people or convince anyone to donate to this particular organization. However, children suffering from AIDS in South Africa and around the world is an important

937:

is what I was referring to. You are saying that everyone you disagree with — Christians, homeopaths, and racists — are all tied together. This attitude is really causing a problem because it leads to an us vs them mentality. In reality, you and I probably agree 110% on homeopathy and racism. When

871:

article seems to have been taken over completely by Wisdombuddha socks, or by red-linked editors that sound like him. I wish there were some way of handling this using article protection. For instance, apply two months of full protection on a version prior to the sockpuppetry and then let in changes

4281:

To make extra money while I was in graduate/medical school, I used to tutor the basketball team on science. This was about 30 years ago, players used to stay in the program for 3-4 years, and they had to pass their classes. Today, I doubt anyone cares, so maybe you're right, let's stop the pretend

4266:

One of my coworkers had a great idea for reforming college athletics. Give every scholarship athlete an additional period of time (2-4 years) after their eligibility ends that they can continue to be on scholarship and let them drop down to a half-time schedule while they are playing. That way, we

3428:

Now that I have read it, color me paranoid, but the version Kirill gives sounds unlikely. When Kirill says that arbcom did not have prior knowledge, implying that they had not even read any of this before, somehow I doubt that FT2 is stupid enough to make this all up, post it, and not expect anyone

3195:

I'm the person that gave the bio information to Thomas Nelson. It is not their original work. I did not put the origianl article on Knowledge, but I have edited it a couple of times for accuracy. Since this bio is not Thomas Nelson's original work, it seems reasonable that the article should stay on

3176:

That is incorrect. You are correct that facts are not copyrightable, but the presentation of those facts is creative. If the article were, say, a bullet list of churches that he had served in, that's not copyrightable because there is only one way to present a bullet list of that information. But

3107:

The information on the article was not derived from copyrighted material. It may be very similar to the information in the Nelson catalog, but that information is not copyrighted. Both the Knowledge article and the Thomas Nelson information are derived from readily available biographical information

3028:

The article was nothing but ad copy, right down to the welcome message from the mascot. The article told about how easy it is to get to the mall, encouraged visitors to relax a the spa, and suggested nearby tourist attractions. This is an advertisement, not an encyclopedia article. Please see our

2814:

which I've started off with ideas for a basis to formulate the RfC. which I've started off with ideas for a basis to formulate the RfC. We also must try to resolve the dispute and as a first step my suggestion is developing guidelines or procedures aimed improving behaviour from now on, so that the

2688:

Hi, I was just wondering why you deleted this page. I briefly looked into the deletion log and explination, read the "Why was my page deleted" page and "speedy deletion" page, and I am still confused as to why this page was deleted. While I am not the creator of this page, I have made use of it over

2387:

and a consensus has been reached. The article has never really been located at the University of Missouri namespace before except for a few days during a botched move, things have been done properly now I think. If this seems all in order would you be able to delete the article and associated talk

1885:

I have deleted their one remaining unsourced image, but as for these three, they were all taken with the same digital camera and two of them even have the digital camera name for the image, so I'm more inclined to believe their claim of authorship. If you would like for another pair of eyes to look

1618:

Protecting my talk page was most certainly not my intention. Thank you for pointing it out. My old user name, prior to a rename was BigDT. After I was renamed, I left redirects from my old name for a couple of months, then deleted the old pages. Any Knowledge user can easily look at the deletion

1000:

Nobody is opposed to science. Again, that's putting words into someone's mouth. Even "true" YECers (the earth is 6K years old) are not opposed to science. I've heard (don't know how true this is) that the notion that the earth was created 6000 years ago actually came from people mocking the Bible

773:

Just because someone removes their website doesn't mean that we can't cite content from it. There's a lot in there that isn't relevant, but we can grab whatever is being cited from web.archive.org for safekeeping and exchange via email. The article should NOT have lengthy criticisms of his views -

5264:

Geni is correct in what he said there. Depending on how different the photograph was from the original, it is either a "slavish copy" (e.g., like a photocopy), in which case no new "creative work" has been authored and the original copyright applies or, if it is transformative in some way, then it

4224:

Understood and thanks. In the case of the Minnesota violations, Holtz was found 'guilty' of personally giving money to players/recruits on two different occasions. Perhaps instead of just referring to that finding I should have included the specific passages from the NCAA report. The South Carolina

3878:

Well, previous arbitrations have included warnings for FM, so if that didn't solve the problem, I don't know that community action is capable of doing so. Also - and I may be alone in this philosophy - there is very limited damage that a non-admin can do, so I'm less concerned about Cla68 than you

3241:

You can tell I'm a bit new to this so please bear with me. If I understand what you are saying, then it seems that every single article on Knowledge needs someone to explicitly grant it into public domain. Is that true? If it is true, what is that process for doing that and how do you know that the

2942:

I'm almost embarrassed to say that all I noticed was the "ans" fat fingering (I do that all the time on my laptop - I need to get one of those giant 19" ones with the full sized keyboard). I am the world's worst speller and am eternally grateful for the day that Firefox added a spellcheck - it has

2358:

The page contained no content. You wrote "Portal:Christianity/Selected article/June 2008" and then you blanked the page. I have setup the portal so that if nobody creates content for a month, it will use the previous month's content, but by putting an empty page there, no content shows up. There

1961:

You recently undid my entry for the Joe Paterno sculpture. Obviously you found the rumor part objectionable and decided it had no place. Maybe so -- you certainly have more street cred here than I do. (Although I can assure you that tradition has already begun. In fact I decided to research the

5585:

is a perfectly reliable source. Everything in the book is backed by facts and sources are cited. Of course the book is biased, but it only tells facts about the terrorist Yasser Arafat. Everything in that section was cited, with reliable sources, and was neutral. It only said facts. It never said,

3867:

Yes, I did see your submission of evidence concerning Felonious Monk. It could result in sanctions for him, if considered serious enough. That's something that could have been resolved at any time by normal dispute resolution--culminating in arbitration if necessary. This case, I hold, is about

3485:

Apparently, he doesn't care too much to get involved. His friends are watching movies. You'd think if he were doing something this important he would help the conversation along. And once again, I ask, if FT2 had unanimous support, wouldn't they show that somewhere? The only comment is Kirill,

3153:

I understand what you are saying, but the bio is not creative work so it is not subject to the copyright laws. Since people's bios are just factual information, wouldn't you have this same issue with essentially all Knowledge articles on people? You are certainly going to find the same information

3133:

Regardless of whether the material is "readily available", any creative work authored after 1978 is AUTOMATICALLY copyrighted. The author does not have to say "copyright 2008" and the author can even say "please feel free to copy this". It doesn't matter - the work is AUTOMATICALLY copyrighted.

2444:

and I have a slight query regarding the pics and why were they deleted?? I'm a member of this group and I actually took many of the photos myself - even the logo, album cover, t-shirt etc I helped coming up with their design!!! And btw the pics aren't copyrighted since it's just regular members of

1726:

Judging from past experience, he is unwilling to discuss or to edit collaboratively. There have been invitations to talk coming from me and at least one other editor, and now from you. Time will tell. I will go ahead & re-revert the latest changes, pending discussion. Please let me know if

680:

But there are thousands of scientists who don't rate articles on Knowledge. I still am not sure it makes her notable. But, for balance purposes, the article is mostly about her computer work. it is significant that she signed the petition. Oh, by the way, Darwinism isn't a term most scientists

501:

The request appeared to be made in good faith, and I consider it common courtesy to delete images if deletion is requested by the uploader. However, I apologise, I didn't see that you had declined the speedy beforehand. I will have checked to see whether the image was uploaded by the tagger, and I

5187:

Yes, but unfortunately, mirrors can still index user talk pages and those mirrors can be indexed. For the life of me, I don't understand why we don't release articles under the GFDL yet claim "Knowledge-only unless incorporated in an article" or some such thing licenses on non-mainspace content.

4246:

their system like a bunch of socialists (yes, when it comes to capitalism, I tend to be a capitalist), literally enslaving the scholar-athlete (used loosely) to the school. It makes no sense to me. Of course, a football player can sign an MLB contract to play minor league baseball. Go figure.

4205:

is ultimately responsible for what his subordinates do, he probably didn't even know about it and this has nothing whatsoever to do with writing a biography of Frank Beamer. So we don't include it. The question with Holtz is similar - does this have anything to do with a biography of Lou Holtz?

4191:

To make a new section, click the "new section" tab at the top of the page. You should see tabs that say, "user page", "discussion", "etit this page", "new section", and "history". The "new section" button is the one you want. (It might just be a + sign instead of "new section" spelled out - I

4175:

I guess I need some clarification on BLP, particularly the NCAA violations section on Lou Holtz. Do I understand correctly that the objections are a) in only one of the three cases was Holtz directly responsible for actionable violations and b) in that case, the only support is "buried" in a long

3879:

are. I'm far more concerned about the danger of having an admin that straddles the line and plays the game just well enough to not be desysopped. There's a lot of harm that can be done there. I have a very low tolerance for abuse of the admin tools and the drama that their misuse can create. --

4245:

Have you ever looked at the NCAA rules? I swear college programs ought to have an attorney at every single team meeting, shadowing the coaches, so that they don't violate rules. Of course, now I have to rant. These major Division I programs make tons of money off of athletes, yet tries to run

1177:

I've seen it and I've commented on it. This really is silly. When you're writing about something else, be that in a newspaper article, an encyclopedia, an essay for school, or anything else, you don't make yourself a part of the story. (An exception would be if we were columnists or writing a

1161:

article, but the concensus on the talk page doesn't seem as harsh as your comment and actually seems to favor including the dog's name. If you haven't seen that discussion, take a look at it. I think that Wiki has far more latitude than a typical encylcopedia and I don't think that including the

5705:

disambiguation page when both these organisations exist, but just do not have articles yet? Surely possible alternatives are essential to remove all possiblity of misdirection. A cursory Googling shows that they are hardly non-notables. My attention was drawn to this because you also undid a

5402:

The reason should be obvious. The article you cited (and, the content you added based on that article) was a biased opinion piece attempting to argue a moral equivalency between the Ayers-Obama association and the Liddy-McCain association. I am not at all interested in arguing the point (even

4710:

to him, but be careful about giving anything that could be construed as legal advice. If he wants legal advice about the practical implications of the license, he should consult his own lawyer. But to answer your original question, no, there is no way to use it under a claim of fair use or to

1962:

statue as a result of the rumor. Nevertheless...) I'm quite sure the sculpture exists, however! You are doing a disservice by deleting the entire post. Fact check if you need to, but I believe the "verifiable" aspects of the article are correct. Your cries of 'vandalism' are unwarranted.

624:

was harsh and incorrect. Rosalind Picard's only notability whatsoever is that she signed the Discovery Institute petition. It is not an attack piece, it's just that's what makes here notable. And since a recent poll shows that 75% of Americans are anti-science and think Creationism should be

3272:

that permits redistribution as long as you credit the authors and do not add any restrictions of your own. The vast majority of Knowledge content is user-authored so no further statement is needed beyond your implied agreement with the website's terms of use. In the case of non-user-authored

2190:

was in use. It is transcluded in a user's sandbox as well as by all of the other templates you wanted to delete. This makes it very difficult to find out what templates you are asking to delete because all of them have multiple copies of the deletion message. If you would like to have them

4878:

This is to inform you that I created the article Lakan, which, on further examination, I discovered had been previously deleted by you under the db-blank or db-empty rationale. My current version has quite a few flaws left, I'm afraid, especially since there is not much online discussion of

2028:

You give two alternative explanations (that he was being serious or he was trolling) but my reading of that post was that it was neither and that it was humourous. As you'll have seen, I've not (yet?) supported the RfA myself, but I think you should give him the benefit of the doubt on that

952:

Well, I'm in full agreement with you on bug excrement. I do distinguish between Creationists and Christians, I want that clear to anyone reading any diff by me. I just don't think that religion of any sort should run any government. I'm even annoyed by the state of Israel, of which I am

2855:. In particular, whether you think these administrative actions are a reasonable start and whether there are other issues with behavior around the article that I've overlooked. Of course, if you don't want the headache - which I would completely understand - then feel free to ignore this. 3177:

this article was in prose and there are countless ways to convey the same information in your own words. It is a creative work and is subject to copyright, regardless of how often the author enforces that copyright. I have reviewed again the original text (any admin reading this may see

2462:

OK, I've long thought that positive reinforcement was in far too short supply on Knowledge, so here goes. Although we don't always agree, I have a huge amount of respect for your commentary, which is always thoughtful and on-point. You do excellent work here. Keep it up. That's all. :)

290:

G11 still applies - it is blatant advertising. I would suggest not restoring it. If someone independent of the subject wants to create a neutral article and can demonstrate that there are external reliable sources of information, we can discuss it, but the article was a press release.

5830:. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 263:

It seems that the author of this article wrote the biography at privatelessons.com and has emailed us to confirm that there is no copyright violation (ticket #2008042910023622). There may be additional reasons for not restoring the article; please restore or not as appropriate.

4879:

Pre-colonization philippine history (the records of that time for the most part did not survive.) I shall be scouring my books for better references soon, but in the meantime, I am asking for your blessing as the admin who deleted the old article to get it going again. Yours.

3847:

Thank you for cleaning up my mess. I came to the page because "User:Gogoskam" was in the list of Italian porn actors. Watching what you did, I now understand how to use the "nowiki". I'll go on to making new errors now. I'm sorry you had to deal with my most recent one.

1834:

Just wanted to say thanks again for all your help with this and the Virginia Tech bowl games topic (still a work in progress). You may not think you did much, but the link box was a big help, as were all your pictures and everything else you contributed. Thank you so much!

753:

Evidently to gain some privacy about his religious beliefs and activities, Marks has removed from the web sources that were used in his biography. He also removed information from his curriculum vitae and publication list. I have deleted unverifiable claims about Marks per

5019:

Not necessarily, if they were a part of the same film and the copyright was not renewed on that film, or some such thing, they would be - but just from the information given, there is not enough to draw a conclusion. More importantly, what is the basis for believing that

705:". That is the only reason I googled Darwinism as opposed to anything else. I was looking to see how much media attention her signature of that document had gathered - presumably any news article on the subject would use the name of the document somewhere in there. -- 980:

that either all Christians believe as they do, or to define "real" Christians as only fellow Young Earth Creationists. OrangeMarlin was not referring to Christians or even Creationists now that I see the quote; he was referring to YEC. And YEC are definitely a tiny

3089:

Sorry I was referring to whatever nitwit decided there was a cause celebre for journalists (I presumed it was a creationist). If you're a creationist and thought I was referring to you, I apologise. I know you wouldn't import your personal beliefs to Knowledge.

1206:

I'm reluctant to edit someone else's statement to arbcom in case I've misunderstood completely. In your statement re cla68 et al, you might want to change "is not pretty decent" to "is now pretty decent". Or not. I guess most people will read it as a typo anyway.

1178:

blog, which, hopefully, we are not.) I see from your user page that you are a writer, so I'm assuming you would agree with this. Only two people in the "discussion" wanted to have the caption in there - the photographer himself, who is about to be blocked (see

165:

Just removed this article request from the wine project where some previous editore added it. In future, when coming across articles seeming to be nonsense, where do I put a request for checking my opinion, or should I go ahead and just delete it from the list ?

1782:

I have blocked him indefinitely and left a note that he can be unblocked at any time if he agrees to discuss his changes and to not edit while logged out. If one of his IPs edits from now on, let me know and I will block them or range block them if need be.

597:

I've been told I'm a little overly deletionist, so I tend to either nominate or delete, but not both. I still get cursed for my vile destruction of people's creations! (I remain convinced, though, that that one is spam; see the creator's peculiar history.)

4196:. "Guilt by association" is not a good thing and drawing the conclusion that Holtz is responsible for everything that goes on under him is outside the scope of Knowledge's mission. If we're going to talk about Holtz's NCAA violations, we need to have 3868:

something far more serious. I'm sorry if my concentration on the larger issues makes me appear myopic or deaf to other concerns. Fortunately I'm not an arbitrator so I don't have to balance these concerns in the best interests of the encyclopedia. --

1385:

No idea. I don't know a thing about modern music and most real track names look like vandalism to me. ;) I looked and other than the incivility I deleted, there's nothing flagrant that I saw ... but again, I don't necessarily know what I'm looking at.

5337:

I answered the question there. The short version is that the IP user is correct - if two teams finish with the same conference record, they are considered tied. In college football, overall record does not count for anything in conference standings.

5732:", virtually all of the g-hits are simply from lists of what "NBA" stands for. I have no idea if it even exists, but will take your word for it that it does. The National Band Association probably would be a good article topic, but even then, see 2867:

I endorse the block of Andyvphil. The Obama debate is so polarized right now that it's really problematic. Part of the problem is that there is entirely too much trolling about things like his race. I have it watchlisted and will try to help.

1495:

for relevant inclusion guidelines. Any topic which has not received non-trivial media coverage is not going to be covered in Knowledge. Knowledge is not free webhosting, nor is it a means to "get the word out" about your cause or organization.

3724:

afterwards and he is probably the most brilliant of them in terms of his sports knowledge but the problem is that they don't give him his own show and it really isn't as enjoyable when he's just playing referee. One of my coworkers usually has

5721:

You're asking me to explain an edit I made over a year ago? "Needs-based analysis" is used by more than just this single company and giving them free advertising doesn't really make sense. Google gets very few hits for abbreviating it "NBA"

4650:

I was contacted by the subject of an article asking for my help posting a picture of him in his Knowledge article. He didn't want to to release it to the public domain because he didn't want it to be used for commercial purposes. I uploaded

2085:

I'm now agreeing with you on too many issues. Can I rudely yell at you about a random edit of yours, just so I can keep my Liberal/Atheist/Darwinist/Jewish/Democratic/Still-angry-at-Virginia-Tech-for-deserting-the-Big-East credibility?

5664:

There are "edit" links in each of the 5 boxes on that page. Pick one box to add your item to and click "edit" and add it. The five boxes will appear randomly on the portal, so your item will appear when its box is randomly picked.

2149:. The templates are not in use and the only templates that are noted on them are those that I also put up for deletion. So if you would kindly delete them and their document pages, I can go about my business as can you. Thank you. 5294:

of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank

5115:

4786:

3792:

3467:. In response to my question that could be paraphrased as "how can you call it unanimous if Kirill is obviously objecting", FT2 replies with "You need to read Arbcom's founding documents. That was a principle from the beginning." 2230:

3811: 1624:

As for the block of Kopter, yes, you are correct, indefinite was unintentional and I have removed the block as the 24 hours are long up and I will leave an apology on his talk page. Thank you for pointing out most of these issues.

659: 1020:

against science, or want to redefine science to suit themselves etc, or use "science" or what they define as science as a tool for proselytizing or even generating hatred for others of other beliefs. You might want to investigate

666:. I know nothing about her, but on purely a surface glance, she looks to be very well-known in the news media for affective computing work and merely another signer with no particular significance of the darwinism document. -- 5861:

at Knowledge Malay version but I can't register to Knowledge in the English version and the user Penulis in wikipedia English version does even exist. Can you help me with that. I will check you discussion page again later.

5028:, they probably have no idea what they are doing and it is really a copyrighted image. Barring some logical explanation, I'd be more inclined to delete the commons image and restore the en copy with the copyright notice. -- 3037:. It is not appropriate for you to write an article about your employer or someone who is paying you to write the article and it is never acceptable to submit ad content. Even a neutral article is required to have external 2957:

MM I'm just inaccurate - not excuses whatsoever for the most part. My home comp has a spell check in firefox but the work one didn't - and I was in a hurry to make the comment and get on with what I should have been doing.

3281:). Because the copyright has expired, it is fine to use that text. Beyond that, if anyone wants to incorporate text that can be found anywhere on the internet, the copyright status needs to be verified. You can see 2269: 2259: 1923: 625:

taught, we'd fill Knowledge with attack pieces if you were right. (Oh, don't worry, I'm firmly on the side of science, and I just believe Americans are poorly educated in sciences, but that's another discussion).

2697:, I did not delete that page or have anything to do with it, but you can read there for the reason it was deleted. If you are talking about another page, I need something more to know what you are referring to. -- 4663:

be created that would adequately give the same information. Is there any other way for us to include the image without releasing it to the public domain where it could be used for commercial purposes? Thanks!

4267:

quit pretending that these football players, who rarely spend very much time on academics, are student athletes and we give the ones that aren't going pro an honest chance at getting a real college education. --

4349:(Legal mumbo jumbo: I release my edits to that sandbox page into the public domain and you are free to copy/paste any content I have created there without worrying about GFDL attribution/history requirements.) 1829: 2837:. The all-around level of behavior on that article is, I think, exceptionally poor, which is a black eye for Knowledge given its extremely high profile. As a start to dealing with the situation, I've blocked 655: 864: 2449:

Sorry to bother u again :S, but I'm not really sure how to obtain a free license for photos... and for the record, yes, the media has reported on us several times, and not just the Egyptian media for that

110:

indicates the range blocked user has just created an account? It's just been created and has been making the same edits as before as well as making the same kinds of comments on Thunbderbird2's talk page.

2788:. (Don't worry I'm not gonna start illustrating people too, but I don't think I'd mind something like this to illustrate a person of whom we have no photographs.) I'm curious, how do you feel about them? 330:

There are older versions to revert to that don't discuss the infringement, though. G10 is only applicable if there is no good version to revert to. (If you do revert it, please leave the prod in there.)

5835: 3277:), we can provide attribution on the talk page or in the page history so that GFDL requirements are satisfied. Sometimes, we will incorporate text from a source where the copyright has expired (such as 2490: 5729: 5202:

I've noticed the same problem you have with talk-page archives. I deal with it by abusing my administrative tools to protect all of my usertalk archives. A more global solution would be better, though.

5111: 5103: 3636:

It seems like they change networks on a yearly basis. I see it occasionally on ESPN, but unless you just happen to catch two good teams, a lot of times it's just a blowout and really hard to watch. --

5290: 5282: 3862: 2851:), whom I consider to be particularly incorrigible with an ever-expanding block log and no improvement in his approach. I would welcome your honest feedback on my suggestions, which I've posted at 1741:

It did not take long. He is back — without a word anywhere — with a 7th reversion at Boston, a 6th at Philadelphia, a 3rd at Lowell (per my counts, 15 May to date). Two of these latest three as

4782: 4774: 5586:"Arafat should" or "Arafat is the scum of the Earth". So again, all of my sources were cited. I undo your revert as I know that would only be reverted again. I'll bring it up in the talk page. 4949: 3285:

for a sample assertion of authorship and statement of permission. If the author of this bio wants to grant permission for its use, they can forward this or a similar statement of permission to

3242:

person doing so has the right to grant it? If it is not true, then why is it being applied in this instance? It seems like the article is rather innocuous so I'm not sure why this is an issue.

3667: 3663: 5726: 3788: 3780: 3651: 2334: 2226: 2218: 758:, including some I wanted to see in the article (I am self-policing, not wikilawyering). Editors keep reverting to an old version of the article. If you were to weigh in, that would be nice. 387:

The checkuser case referenced in the tag said that it was inconclusive. That account has only three edits from over a month ago, so I'm inclined to leave well enough alone for the moment. --

176:

I would imagine that different WikiProjects have different practices for handling requested articles. You could always leave a message on the project talk page to ask for help/assistance. --

5604:

If everything in that book is cited, then cite the sources themselves, not the book. Problem solved. There is no way that book is a reliable source in and of itself. You should also see

547:

and blanked the page. He was reverted and blanked it again. I reverted, but I cannot move the page back to its correct location. Can you move it back and move-protect his talk page? Thanks.

4379:

Incidentally, could you check my math on the number of wins/losses? I've added everything up a few times, but my totals don't match those of the 2008 media guide, which says that Tech has

5723: 3550: 2977: 2141:, you may note at the bottom of the page the huge list of deleted templates our project is monitoring. Every one of those templates I proposed for deletion using the method I just used 4461: 2902: 783: 4018:

The privilege exempts you from the limit of creating 6 new accounts per IP per day. It is used by users who handle requests for accounts from users caught behind a range block. --

5021: 4985: 3695:

Ever since I got my XM radio a few years ago, I have to admit I listen to sports talk 24/7 (give or take some sleep time). Colin Cowherd is always on during my morning commute!

3837: 2145:

every one of them was no longer in use, most of which got the okay for deletion from the user who created it, as in the case for these templates if you check the last post on my

3589: 5101: 3659: 3652: 2078: 2925: 5280: 3872: 3464: 2265: 3443:

Well, whatever the case may be, it appears that there are going to be consequences to all these dramatics. I'm not sure it's going to make me happy one way or another.

4772: 3921:

I protected the page because it was a repeatedly recreated nonsense page. I have no objection whatsoever to its unprotection if someone has a legitimate need for it. --

2642: 4989: 2137:

propose deletion for templates that are not in use and I have never had a problem before using the means through which I just requested those deletions. If you go to

3599:. If you supported, I'll make sure your confidence is not misplaced; if you opposed, I'll take your criticism into account and try to adjust my behavior accordingly. 4811: 4433: 3778: 3094: 2216: 544: 4192:

have some extra buttons from scripts and I'm not sure if one of my scripts changes the name of the button or not.) As to answer your question, you may want to see

3970:

Thanks for looking after my talk page and taking care of the vandal. His contribs aren't very productive, to put it mildly. Next time I think he should be indef'd.

2573: 1750: 495: 3507: 663: 4328:

Just noticed that you've been working on a page similar to this one in your sandbox. Wanted to give you a heads-up that I've ?completed one and that it's in the

3264:

If you are contributing your own, original, work, which should be the case most of the time, you are automatically agreeing to license it under the terms of the

658:, substantially all of the hits are merely lists of people who signed it, not any actual media coverage of her life based on that signature. On the other hand, 3682: 5173:

I couldn't help but notice the big blue box on this page, as of last week, the User talk space is excluded from the pages Knowledge lets search engines index.

3075: 3021: 2184: 2079: 436:

Hi B, as far as I know, roll back feature is given to non admin user is intended for reverting nonconstructive contributions (vandalism). But this four edits (

2445:

the group, including myself, who take the pics and I just asked them if I could use the pics on wikipedia and they said sure... so what's the problem???!!!

2101: 5733: 3091: 1237: 1233: 5319: 1179: 4599: 2501: 2368: 2045: 1221: 130: 5128: 5447: 2568: 1744: 1673: 1361: 5307: 1183: 4799: 3514:. FT2 said that no one opposed the decision. Kirill says "there was neither a majority nor a vote". These statements don't contradict each other... 3289:

and volunteers from the Wikimedia Foundation will review the submission and add a note to the article talk page that permission has been confirmed. --

1768:(a new sock), one as Kopter. So much for invitations to discussion. P.S. Thank you for posting the dignified and thoughtful tribute to Memorial Day. 1646: 4899: 3805: 2243: 257: 4454: 3351: 2195: 1428:

is unacceptable and had I seen it, I would have blocked him immediately. I have indefinitely blocked the account with a note that if he reads our

5590: 2694: 2451: 1601:(Also, did you mean for your talk page to be protected admin-only? It's transcluded at a protected page, which triggered cascading protection.) — 5701:

Greetings, I come in peace. I am an infrequent Wikipedian who seeks your superior knowledge. What justifies the removal of red links from the

4001:

Hey B, I must be really out of the loop...what the hell is a "Account creator"? (yes I know, dumb question....but....) Just curious... Regards,

2852: 3596: 3063: 3009: 2336: 2276:, we no longer block a user name soley for being non-Latin, but instead ask that they provide a translation or a transliteration. (Because of 1357: 5374:

My input on the Chicago Tribune article on McCain's ties to G. Gordon Liddy was deleted by you. I don't see why, isn't it a reliable source?

1249: 5382: 5353: 5323: 4321: 4226: 4177: 4111: 4075: 1917: 1552: 1540: 3710: 3630: 3471:

in the world was a principle from the beginning? Ignoring objections and calling it unanimous? I must really be missing something here. --

1900:

If you believe them not to be copyvios please replace the image license with {{Multilicense replacing placeholder|class=people|reviewed=1}}.

4895: 4503: 4341: 3687: 3616: 2803: 2070: 1468: 1229: 1222: 5779: 3523: 4392: 3554: 2722: 2255: 3278: 1115:

No, no, no, not about you. I'm just annoyed in general at this point. I think there are a lot of abuses that need to be cleaned up. --

220:

So does that mean they are finally going to remove user pages from google? They should. It's largely unmonitored for spam and libel. --

4762: 3104:

It appears that you are the administrator that deleted the Jon Courson article. If that is so, I believe that there is some confusion.

2518: 1951: 1777: 2008:

and I don't know that it's appropriate for inclusion. But at least then there would be something to consider one way or the other. --

4475: 2585: 1977: 1844: 610: 5222: 4865: 4637: 3888: 2764:

You are correct - when I unchecked anon only, I must have also accidentally unchecked prevent account creation. I have fixed it. --

2396: 2017: 311:

Yeah, I thought about G11, but a lot of that text is devoted to saying something else is an infringement. Prod works too, though. -

300: 5890: 5658: 4935: 4917: 2683: 2424: 2411: 2384: 2326: 2312: 2057: 5765: 5565: 5545: 4309: 4276: 4261: 3770: 3738: 3645: 3501: 3480: 3458: 3438: 3423: 3403: 3298: 3235: 3189: 3147: 3134:

Knowledge only reuses content if (a) the copyright has expired, (b) the author explicitly grants a license under the terms of the

1144: 1124: 1077: 968: 947: 734: 714: 696: 675: 502:

doubt that it was in use when I deleted it, as I doubt I would have done so if it had been. If you want to restore it, feel free.

5878: 5688: 5674: 5093: 5067: 4623: 3084: 2811: 2347: 1824: 1364:, the issue appears to be this user Baous. Does this look like a disruption-only account to you? Please reply on your talk page, 795: 592: 5491: 4374: 4360: 3943: 3930: 3621:

the arena football playoffs comment....I seriously laughed out loud....I don't even know if they are on a tv channel I get....--

3056:

ok! i will revised the content and contribute again later. thank you for your comments. i will modify it and contribute later.

2833:

OK, I'm going to follow up with some canvassing and a request for your feedback. You've dipped a toe into the roiling waters at

2210: 1859: 1445: 1419: 1395: 1323: 1309: 848: 834: 5827: 5745: 5024:

is public domain? The deleted en-wiki revisions show that it was tagged as non-free when it was here. Looking at that user's

4746: 4720: 4164: 2901:

Please be aware that a request for comments has been filed concerning your conduct on Knowledge. The RFC entry can be found at

2773: 1909: 1895: 1806: 1792: 1736: 1721: 1706: 586: 511: 248: 229: 5617: 5530: 5331: 5209: 3282: 3222:

work and whoever that person is would need to explicitly grant it into the public domain or release it under the terms of the

3178: 2888: 2877: 2721:. You've done a good job at expressing what I was trying to convey, so I reckon I'll be stealing your wording in the future. 2675: 2657: 2484: 2174: 1195: 927: 340: 152: 5581:

First I would like to say that I respect you and I don't mean any negativity towards yourself. I would just like to say that

5197: 4322: 3050: 2966: 2952: 2706: 1612: 423: 396: 185: 5412: 5361: 5347: 5274: 5037: 4593: 4581: 4550: 4234: 4215: 4125: 4105: 2823: 1634: 1480: 170: 5623: 5313: 3257: 3211: 3169: 3126: 1969: 1505: 1057: 1010: 324: 3915: 3666:. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, 3611: 2806:, you've expressed an interest in a RfC on behaviour of editors at articles related to intelligent design. As an outcome, 2536: 2469: 1236:. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, 640: 381: 5863: 5473: 4047: 4027: 2758: 2746: 2603: 2512: 2374: 2273: 1956: 1569: 1546: 1525: 1455: 1208: 767: 702: 280: 140: 4149: 3578: 3041:

of information demonstrating that the topic is significant. The only source you had here was the mall's own website. --

1216: 819: 531: 5715: 4675: 4574: 3249: 3203: 3161: 3118: 2807: 2579: 2492: 2038: 1879: 1756: 1685: 1038: 994: 493: 2648:

It looks like someone else blocked those individual IPs, but I went on and hit that range with another month block. --

5831: 5823: 5432: 5214:

Cool, I understand, I know MediaWiki.org uses different licenses for different namespaces, so it is a workable idea.

5159: 4012: 3960: 1658: 566: 160: 4531: 1344: 3388: 2792: 2167: 2128: 1414: 1374: 1294: 1271: 1171: 881: 463: 4365:

Not a problem. I'll be incorporating your coaches column, I think. It's a good idea, and one I hadn't thought of.

909: 5807: 5598: 5582: 5486: 5147: 4696: 2848: 561: 346: 306: 107: 5871: 5847: 4032:

Was there a discussion to add this user right? (not that I want to get rid of it, just for general knowledge...

3370: 2914: 2730: 2123: 2023: 1401: 1109: 446: 443: 5496: 5013: 4682: 3996: 3900: 3857: 3825: 3817: 3541: 2797: 2457: 889: 516: 487: 316: 5826:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the 5322:. Please help myself and the other user establish a concencus on how to handle this. Thank you for your time. 4888: 3330: 2861: 1091: 573: 5394: 4544: 3408:

OK, has this place gone completely mad? Secret meetings apparently were so secret that no one met. Hmmmm.

3312:. The images produced using the application are CC-by-sa; only the site layout itself is CC-by-nc-sa. Phew! 3071: 3017: 2560: 2004:(like a newspaper that talks about it, then it can be considered, although even then, it's nothing more than 1429: 1425: 621: 440: 437: 4926:

Oh! Cool! So that's what happened. Now I know. Thank you very much for that backgrounder. Cheers! :-D --

4838: 2627: 1985: 934: 615: 214: 120: 5646: 5632: 5390: 4185: 3894: 3325: 2936: 2524: 1563: 1379: 529: 5467: 5181: 5134: 4725:

Thank you for the detailed response, this is great information! I'll contact Josephson and suggest using

3729:

on but he really drives me crazy (Rome, not the coworker) ... the manual buzzer is just plain annoying. --

3357: 2591: 2289: 1186:) and SlimVirgin, for whom I have nothing but respect, but she is obviously too close and wrong here. -- 5258: 4905: 4133: 4071: 3111:

Because there is no copyright infringement, it seems that the Jon Courson article should be reinstated.

3099: 2725: 2717:

Just stumbled across your explanation of "cultural Christianity" versus evangelical Christianity over at

2554: 1476: 1350: 905: 3991: 1285:

article, and was wondering if you might have taken any photos at the game that you could share. Thanks!

5696: 5637: 5507: 4972: 4645: 4481: 4089: 3951: 2815:

desired outcomes can be achieved amicably. Your assistance and comments will be much appreciated. . .

2621: 1865: 801: 746: 431: 38: 5446:. His picture was up for a while and was not flagged. If I did something wrong, please let me know. 5146:

This has been an automated delivery, you can opt-out of future notices by removing your name from the

4428: 4074:) (now banned), would it be worth restricting the use of the emailuser feature on his account aswell? 1593: 3583: 3347: 1598:

shows an indefinite block, though the talk page suggests a 24-hour block. Which was your intention?

1511: 1254: 1581: 1157:

Hey, B - I don't care too much one way or the other if the name of the dog is in the caption in the

664:

calls her "one of the leading scientists looking at the interaction of human emotions and computers"

5428: 3869: 3350:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 2735:

Yep, that's a valid autoblock. But I think the "Prevent account creation" box should be ticked for

1973: 536: 273: 1424:

I apologize - I didn't look closely enough at the contributions when you asked me to. Obviously,

5867: 4931: 4884: 3904: 3607: 2740: 2506: 2421: 2393: 2308: 1331: 1212: 1201: 1152: 977: 256: 134: 1930:

is now merged with this case and he is a named party. Also see my case disposition notes there.

1643:

Hello, B. Regarding your unblocking of Kopter, please be advised that two obvious sockpuppets,

5843: 5451: 3626: 3253: 3207: 3165: 3122: 2530: 2380: 1679: 1536: 1521: 662:

gets lots of google news hits (she gets zero with darwinism), including the New York Times who

4460:

I was just about to say the same thing. I've notified all participants in the IfD of the DRV

3662:. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, 2597: 1762: 1691: 1232:. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, 5684: 5654: 5573: 5437: 5140: 4977: 3853: 3218:

Whose original work is it? Regardless of whether it is Thomas Nelson's original work, it is

2351: 2249: 1664: 1652: 1276: 856: 807: 763: 89: 81: 76: 64: 59: 5237:

Pls see the thread "The Story of B-P picture was deleted?" on my Commons talk page. Thanks.

5801: 5536:

It looks like, subsequent to your message, MastCell blanked and protected the talk page. --

5378: 4388: 4370: 4337: 3821: 3245: 3199: 3157: 3114: 3059: 3005: 2910: 2820: 2441: 2162: 2146: 2063: 1965: 1840: 1587: 1464: 1410: 1370: 1319: 1290: 877: 844: 815: 806:

I know you're a busy guy and all, but I'm trying to find someone willing to do a GA review

646:

If her only reason for being notable is that signature and she is not at all known for her

605: 4441:

As a participant in the deletion discussion, I wanted to let you that this is now at DRV.

2785: 8: 5789: 5775: 5711: 5605: 5424: 5418: 5369: 4833: 4756: 4740: 4669: 4633: 4469: 4380: 4351:

I started working on it based on the ECU article, but never got a chance to finish it. --

4147: 4139: 3519: 3364: 3304: 2842: 2779: 2754: 2343: 2119: 2106: 1905: 1875: 1802: 1773: 1732: 1702: 647: 559: 507: 267: 243: 209: 2499:

Hi there, following on from your range block comment and for your records, I have added

1870:

Uploader got themselves blocked indef so see no reason to trust their authorship claims.

5594: 5303: 5155: 5124: 4927: 4880: 4795: 4332:

process right now. If you'd like, once it passes, I can incorporate some of your work.

4193: 3801: 3603: 2896: 2828: 2784:

While I still agree creating a 3d bust of a person would yield odd results, what about

2736: 2671: 2638: 2542: 2417: 2389: 2304: 2239: 1575: 1433: 1259: 1167: 1062:

When I saw it, I thought the same thing. I disappointed to find out otherwise. LOL.

775: 747: 320: 116: 2609: 2299:. It is clearly inappropriate. He suggested to change his name to Анти-Чарльз meaning 5839: 5751: 5551: 5516: 4818: 4729: 4704: 4689: 4449: 4295: 4247: 4170: 3756: 3696: 3622: 3542: 3487: 3444: 3409: 3374: 3067: 3013: 2962: 2932: 2834: 2789: 2718: 2712: 2317:

Thanks Alex, I have declined the request and asked him to choose a different name. --

2087: 2053: 2034: 1532: 1517: 1130: 1095: 1063: 1026: 954: 913: 720: 682: 626: 449: 3551:

Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Orangemarlin#Arbitrator_views_and_discussion

5812: 5680: 5650: 5386: 5357: 5327: 5251: 5086: 5060: 5042:

Well, if you do that, can you help write a FUR that will stick for one of these in

5025: 5006: 4965: 4858: 4616: 4567: 4524: 4507: 4421: 4230: 4181: 3984: 3849: 3842: 3678: 3571: 3343: 2986: 2979: 2919: 2005: 1944: 1608: 1557: 1267: 1085: 982: 759: 537: 527: 352: 100: 5143:! Please visit the linked page to RSVP or for more information. All are welcome! 2432: 5852: 5796: 5642: 5232: 5168: 5072:

Black Kite beat you to it. If you come up with a FUR that'll stick, let me know.

4805: 4384: 4366: 4333: 4065: 3937: 3909: 3748: 2906: 2816: 2155: 2138: 1836: 1472: 1405: 1365: 1337: 1315: 1286: 1282: 1045: 1034: 1022: 990: 899: 873: 840: 811: 651: 599: 458: 191: 985:

group, who frequently campaign against science. Just a point of clarification.--

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

5881:, you can ask that this user be renamed so that you can usurp that identity. -- 5771: 5707: 5501: 5480: 4828: 4752: 4736: 4665: 4629: 4465: 3965: 3833: 3752: 3744: 3515: 3318: 3030: 2838: 2750: 2749:). Unless there's any objection, I'll reblock with that option ticked. Thanks, 2115: 1901: 1871: 1830:

Knowledge:Featured topics/Atlantic Coast Conference football championship games

1798: 1769: 1728: 1698: 1488: 1341: 1158: 548: 503: 238: 204: 126: 5423:

Thanks for flagging. Good catch. Will address/fix asap, probably by monday.

4810:

The new magic word __NOINDEX__ disables search engine indexing on a page. See

5886: 5741: 5670: 5613: 5541: 5463: 5443: 5408: 5343: 5299: 5270: 5205: 5193: 5151: 5120: 5043: 5033: 4978: 4943: 4913: 4871: 4791: 4716: 4589: 4356: 4329: 4272: 4211: 4160: 4101: 4055: 4042: 4023: 4007: 3926: 3884: 3797: 3734: 3717: 3641: 3476: 3434: 3399: 3294: 3269: 3231: 3185: 3143: 3046: 3034: 2990: 2948: 2884: 2873: 2857: 2769: 2702: 2668: 2653: 2635: 2480: 2465: 2407: 2364: 2322: 2235: 2206: 2013: 1993: 1891: 1855: 1788: 1717: 1630: 1501: 1441: 1391: 1349: 1305: 1191: 1163: 1120: 1053: 1006: 943: 868: 857: 830: 791: 755: 710: 671: 582: 483: 392: 336: 312: 296: 287: 225: 181: 148: 113: 5770:

Thanks for taking the time. You have much better manners than OrangeMarlin.

3743:

My brother is a big Jim Rome fan. Or is that clone? I'm starting to enjoy

2114:

I'll blame it on the Buddhist monks that are visiting my church this week.

2044:

NB This is spooky - see the struck comment between oppose numbers 29 and 30

976:

No offense, but a huge part of the problem in the area is the assumption of

867:

that you started justifies taking action on this? The recent history of the

5216: 5175: 4444: 4402: 4202: 4197: 3957: 3658:

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located

3511: 3038: 2959: 2929: 2049: 2030: 2001: 1997: 1228:

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located

402: 360: 167: 4659:, but naturally, that won't work because he's alive and a free equivalent 2191:

deleted, please orphan them (including from the user's sandbox), then use

5240: 5075: 5049: 4995: 4954: 4847: 4605: 4556: 4513: 4410: 3973: 3721: 3674: 3560: 2285: 1989: 1933: 1603: 1492: 1263: 1245: 522: 47: 17: 5649:? I've never worked in any Portal, so I'm asking for your help. Cheers, 5641:, and it appeared on the "Did you know". I feel it should appear in the 3812:

Could you examine the article "Independent National Socialism" for bias?

5608:, which discusses the problems with labeling someone as a terrorist. -- 4656: 4492: 4291: 4061: 3689: 3668:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Geogre-William M. Connolley/Workshop

3664:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Geogre-William M. Connolley/Evidence

1516:

Thank you for the explanation. I will look for a suitable replacement.

1030: 986: 895: 453: 3588: 2985:

my article is non-advertising article. why did you reject my artile?

2943:

dramatically improved the quality of my Knowledge contributions. ;) --

5497: 3829: 3313: 2994: 1436:

policies and promises to edit constructively, he can be unblocked. --

3820:

which is sourced completely from a white nationalist webpage called

1996:

policies, unsourced claims are to be removed, period. Street cred,

1281:

Hate to bother you with something like this, but I'm working on the

125:

If you believe that he is a user evading a block, you can ask for a

5877:

That user does exist - it just has no contributions. If you go to

5819: 5813: 4037: 4002: 3726: 3335: 3108:

on Jon Courson (including information found on many of his books).

1927: 5857:

Hi there. I have this problem that I've register the user name as

4110:

That seems fine, we can wait and see. Thanks for the swift reply.

2903:

Knowledge:Requests for comment/Sceptre, Sxeptomaniac, SirFozzie, B

1129:

This project is getting filled with drama. It's wearing me out.

779: 4119: 4083: 3863:

Your comment on the talk page of the Cla68 case proposed decision

2268:), whom you blocked for a user name, is requesting an unblock at 1727:

you need any additional feedback or data. Appreciate your help!

839:

Thanks! Now I just need to find someone to give the official OK.

784:

Knowledge:Contact us/Article problem/Factual error (from subject)

5550:

Elonka is now going after me. Oh well, I probably deserve it.

4502:

I am very grateful for the confidence of the community shown at

3309:

I emailed the site owner, and he clarified the site's FAQ - see

2277: 1300:

I wasn't at that game. I don't usually go to the bowl games. --

5882: 5750:

I quit reading when he said you had "superior knowledge." :)

5737: 5728:, so I can't imagine that is a useful disambiguation. As for " 5666: 5609: 5537: 5459: 5404: 5339: 5266: 5189: 5029: 4909: 4894:

You're fine. The deleted article was a misplaced user page of

4712: 4585: 4352: 4268: 4207: 4156: 4097: 4019: 3922: 3880: 3730: 3637: 3472: 3430: 3395: 3290: 3227: 3181: 3139: 3042: 2944: 2869: 2765: 2698: 2649: 2476: 2403: 2360: 2318: 2281: 2202: 2009: 1887: 1851: 1784: 1713: 1626: 1497: 1437: 1387: 1301: 1187: 1116: 1049: 1002: 939: 826: 787: 706: 667: 578: 479: 388: 332: 292: 221: 177: 144: 4652: 3653:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Geogre-William M. Connolley

3310: 2342:

I created the above page, why has it been deleted. There is a

2303:

it does not have profanity but still can be a personal attack

5858: 5478:

Thanks, a month will do, seems like random vandalism anyway.

4872: 4060:

Considering the shocking and grossly inappropriate threat by

3747:. He's got funnier stories about sports. I happen to enjoy 3274: 1340:

block FM gave me for 3RR on SV's report to your evidence. --

719:

Yeah I forgot that DI would use Darwinism. OK, never mind.

3751:, but then again, he's Jewish, liberal, and is friends with 3180:) and it is far more than an uncreative listing of facts. -- 2379:

Hey, I saw you removed my speedy delete housekeeping tag on

5515:

his talk page should be protected, but that's my opinion.

4287: 4283: 3816:

I am asking a number of administrators at random to review

3265: 3223: 3135: 5734:

Knowledge:Manual_of_Style_(disambiguation_pages)#Red_links

3557:. You are invited to submit your evidence and statements.. 3283:

Knowledge:COPYREQ#Declaration_of_consent_for_all_enquiries

5702: 4812:

Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost/2008-07-28/Technology report

2062:

Ach, I responded likewise myself, but in the RfA itself.

1162:

dog's in any way makes the info within any less valuable.

4685:

is the best alternative and if protection is a concern,

3935:

Great, thanks. A shame they didn't come here first... —

4844:

Way cool! It's going on all my user pages and subpages!

4751:

Update, the subject decided to just remove the image.

2928:

is always welcome when I am about - thanks for that :)

2548: 1029:

so you can be a bit more educated about this subject.--

4582:

User_talk:J_Milburn#Age_groups_in_Scouting_and_Guiding

4551:

User_talk:J_Milburn#Age_groups_in_Scouting_and_Guiding

3956:

Looks good to me. Thanks for the prompt action. Best,

2615: 2080:

Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Dihydrogen Monoxide 3

1531:

I just went and added the same one you had suggested!

1712:

violates 3RR using socks, we can do a range block. --

1238:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/C68-FM-SV/Workshop

1234:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/C68-FM-SV/Evidence

452:, seems to violation of rollback feature. Thank you-- 143:), though, I don't think they are the same person. -- 4600:

Knowledge:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2008_July_31

3555:

Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration#User:Orangemarlin

2295:

Yes, I can read it. It is in Russian and translated

2180:

The reason I originally sent you a message was that

2000:, and rumors aren't useful here. If you can find a 1016:

With all due respect, many YEC and other extremists

4096:

risk isn't very high - he could only do it once. --

3342:An article that you have been involved in editing, 2111:I can't agree with you on two things in one day. 5318:As you seem to be the creator of the WikiProject, 3273:content, if it is from another GFDL website (like 654:, why not delete or redirect the article? When I 4434:Image:Indiana Jones and the Cross of Coronado.jpg 3373:. As I suspected. BTW, thanks for your support. 4814:. This could be added as a parameter option to 4486: 4347:Feel free to incorporate anything I have done. 3463:I'm scratching my head even more by FT2's reply 3352:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Bill Blankenship 2346:and the notice to create the above page is here 1262:is my alternate account. Thanks for checking. 2695:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Roleplay Online 2693:If you are talking about the page discussed at 197: 4735:and pass along your comments. Thanks again! 2337:Portal:Christianity/Selected article/June 2008 1988:did I say "vandalism". That aside, under our 3553:an RFAR on Orangemarlin has been opend here: 2274:Knowledge:Username_policy#Non-Latin_usernames 1886:at it, you are welcome to bring it to PUI. -- 5635:. I started and developed an article called 5458:That image is a copyright violation, too. -- 2978:Question on rejecting my submitted articles 2689:the years and I was hoping to use it again. 1314:Ah. Bummer. I'll have to dig some up, then. 1223:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/C68-FM-SV 825:Done. See the talk page for my comments. -- 4655:, but the closest tag I could find was the 894:I'm choosing to stay out of the drama with 3369:In case you weren't aware, you better see 3092:Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The 2383:. There has been extensive discussion at 521:Thanks for letting me know about that IP. 196:You may be interested in today's entry of 5794:Sorry man I thought that was a category. 2810:provides a Workspace, with discussion at 3901:WP:RPP#Current requests for unprotection 3673:On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, 3587: 3287:permissions-commons AT wikimedia DOT org 3279:Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition 1243:On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, 5879:Knowledge:Changing username/Usurpations 5589:God bless America and Country First :) 5298:This has been an automated delivery by 5119:This has been an automated delivery by 4790:This has been an automated delivery by 4290:, who are true scholar-athletes. Well 3796:This has been an automated delivery by 2812:User talk:Gnixon/Intelligent design RfC 2348:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Christianity 2234:This has been an automated delivery by 660:"Rosalind Picard" "affective computing" 106:What do you think are the chances that 14: 4628:Thanks for the input on my talk page. 4500:Thank you for participating in my RfB! 1356:Judging from the vandalism earlier on 656:google for "Rosalind Picard" darwinism 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4323:Virginia Tech Hokies football seasons 4282:academics and move along. Or follow 2905:, where you may want to participate. 1918:JzG RFAR merged with Cla68-FM-SV case 5046:, where I now have the Commons one? 3617:fully off topic comment on cla/sv/fm 2786:well done, drawn portraits like this 2385:Talk:University of Missouri–Columbia 1048:was going to be a how-to guide ;) -- 912:, and I'm not sure what you meant? 701:The article in question was called " 25: 4383:. I'd appreciate the help. Thanks. 3720:daily. Sometimes I will listen to 1400:Can you talk to him about comments 703:A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism 23: 5795: 5730:National Brass foundry Association 3394:Holy excrement. That's unreal. -- 3334: 3331:AfD nomination of Bill Blankenship 2808:User:Gnixon/Intelligent design RfC 2493:Knowledge:Abuse reports/217.87.x.x 774:that's covered elsewhere and is a 24: 5902: 5442:Hi. I followed the template for 2475:Thank you for your kind words. -- 543:This user moved his talk page to 4908:). Your article is unrelated. -- 4491: 2684:Deletion of Roleplay_Online page 2440:I was writing the article about 2350:. Could you please undelete it. 908:). But you threw my name about 469: 29: 5802: 5797: 5583:Liberalism is a Mental Disorder 5022:Image:TomandJerryTitleCard1.jpg 4986:Image:TomandJerryTitleCard1.jpg 4697:Knowledge:Mirrors and forks/All 3828:. Thank you for reading this.-- 3549:Per ruling of the arbcom here: 1825:Hey, hey, looky what I found... 593:That Olympia Peninsula spam tag 414: 411: 408: 372: 369: 366: 108:Special:Contributions/TimTomTom 5223:11:40, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 5210:08:07, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 5198:02:33, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 5182:02:30, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 4683:GNU Free Documentation License 3826:Independent National Socialism 3818:Independent National Socialism 404: 362: 274: 268: 13: 1: 5891:18:40, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 5872:16:00, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 5848:05:22, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 5808:15:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC) 5780:13:58, 11 November 2008 (UTC) 5766:00:24, 11 November 2008 (UTC) 5746:23:09, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 5716:21:17, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 5281:WikiProject College football 5160:23:57, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 5129:21:32, 1 September 2008 (UTC) 5102:WikiProject College football 5094:18:20, 1 September 2008 (UTC) 4951:, what do you think of this? 4773:WikiProject College football 4700:it. You may want to suggest 3899:There's a pending request at 3779:WikiProject College football 3226:in order for us to use it. -- 2217:WikiProject College football 1994:biographies of living persons 1551:Greetings! The block log for 1430:Knowledge:No personal attacks 933:I went and looked for it and 417: 405: 375: 363: 5689:09:21, 26 October 2008 (UTC) 5675:23:24, 25 October 2008 (UTC) 5659:07:03, 25 October 2008 (UTC) 5647:Portal:Baseball/Did you know 5645:. How can I make changes in 5633:Portal:Baseball/Did you know 5624:Portal:Baseball/Did you know 5618:00:36, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 5599:22:30, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 5566:18:54, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 5546:18:34, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 5531:16:36, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 5492:22:01, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 5468:23:01, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 5433:23:03, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 5413:01:27, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 5314:WikiProject College football 3002:PLease reply me .. thanks! 359:checkuser evidence? Thanks. 7: 5474:S-Protection of my userpage 5395:22:43, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 5362:12:05, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 5348:03:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 5332:00:13, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 5308:21:55, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 5275:03:13, 2 October 2008 (UTC) 5259:23:11, 1 October 2008 (UTC) 5068:01:26, 31 August 2008 (UTC) 5038:01:23, 31 August 2008 (UTC) 5026:other commons contributions 5014:18:00, 29 August 2008 (UTC) 4973:09:59, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 4936:05:28, 11 August 2008 (UTC) 4918:17:39, 10 August 2008 (UTC) 4889:07:35, 10 August 2008 (UTC) 2375:University of Missouri move 1957:Censorship in Happy Valley? 1547:Duration of block of Kopter 1456:Why was 25:40 page deleted? 10: 5907: 5834:. Reviewers' concerns are 5638:Baseball Before We Knew It 4866:13:40, 3 August 2008 (UTC) 4839:13:04, 3 August 2008 (UTC) 4800:17:20, 1 August 2008 (UTC) 4763:14:34, 2 August 2008 (UTC) 4747:05:09, 2 August 2008 (UTC) 4721:12:04, 1 August 2008 (UTC) 4676:07:00, 1 August 2008 (UTC) 4638:09:28, 1 August 2008 (UTC) 4624:01:07, 1 August 2008 (UTC) 4602:Granada and Crystal City. 4594:00:11, 1 August 2008 (UTC) 3688:Apparently, you listen to 3602:See you around the wiki!-- 872:only via 'editprotected.' 467: 341:03:20, 30 April 2008 (UTC) 325:03:17, 30 April 2008 (UTC) 301:23:32, 29 April 2008 (UTC) 281:19:40, 29 April 2008 (UTC) 249:00:52, 30 April 2008 (UTC) 230:23:34, 29 April 2008 (UTC) 215:18:12, 29 April 2008 (UTC) 198:http://blog.wikimedia.org/ 186:23:39, 29 April 2008 (UTC) 171:13:21, 29 April 2008 (UTC) 153:22:52, 26 April 2008 (UTC) 121:11:37, 26 April 2008 (UTC) 5822:has been nominated for a 5104:September 2008 Newsletter 4990:Image:Tomjerrylogo40s.jpg 4824:or similar templates. --— 4575:13:11, 31 July 2008 (UTC) 4532:08:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC) 4489: 4476:02:01, 26 July 2008 (UTC) 4455:18:51, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 4429:09:35, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 4393:10:13, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 4375:08:10, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 4361:00:02, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 4342:07:25, 24 July 2008 (UTC) 4310:18:18, 23 July 2008 (UTC) 4277:18:01, 23 July 2008 (UTC) 4262:17:55, 23 July 2008 (UTC) 4235:20:04, 23 July 2008 (UTC) 4216:17:41, 23 July 2008 (UTC) 4186:14:47, 23 July 2008 (UTC) 4165:11:40, 21 July 2008 (UTC) 4150:11:39, 21 July 2008 (UTC) 4126:16:00, 20 July 2008 (UTC) 4106:15:56, 20 July 2008 (UTC) 4090:15:52, 20 July 2008 (UTC) 4048:00:42, 16 July 2008 (UTC) 4028:16:59, 15 July 2008 (UTC) 4013:04:22, 15 July 2008 (UTC) 3992:10:18, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 3961:14:53, 11 July 2008 (UTC) 3944:16:00, 10 July 2008 (UTC) 3931:15:48, 10 July 2008 (UTC) 3916:14:59, 10 July 2008 (UTC) 3595:Thank you for !voting on 3579:16:53, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 3524:01:28, 28 June 2008 (UTC) 3510:provides some fodder for 3502:00:24, 28 June 2008 (UTC) 3481:23:52, 27 June 2008 (UTC) 3459:23:43, 27 June 2008 (UTC) 3439:22:37, 27 June 2008 (UTC) 3424:22:35, 27 June 2008 (UTC) 3404:22:27, 27 June 2008 (UTC) 3389:22:25, 27 June 2008 (UTC) 3360:of receiving this notice? 3326:14:28, 25 June 2008 (UTC) 3299:22:07, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 3258:21:37, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 3236:21:12, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 3212:21:09, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 3190:16:52, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 3170:16:44, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 3148:21:10, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 3127:20:40, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 3095:03:15, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 3076:03:27, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 3051:11:50, 12 June 2008 (UTC) 3022:11:26, 12 June 2008 (UTC) 2989:is the similar artile as 2967:13:27, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 2953:13:22, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 2937:13:19, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 2889:18:04, 11 June 2008 (UTC) 2878:13:26, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 2454:02:10 P.M, 5 June (2008) 1090:Did I do something wrong 161:Thomas Jefferson and Wine 5141:5th Washington DC Meetup 4657:non-free fair use in tag 3889:18:26, 9 July 2008 (UTC) 3873:18:18, 9 July 2008 (UTC) 3858:05:35, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 3838:02:43, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 3806:00:15, 5 July 2008 (UTC) 3771:21:42, 8 July 2008 (UTC) 3739:03:01, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 3711:22:46, 3 July 2008 (UTC) 3683:02:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC) 3646:13:10, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 3631:05:57, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 3612:00:12, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 2915:23:58, 9 June 2008 (UTC) 2862:17:45, 9 June 2008 (UTC) 2824:14:08, 9 June 2008 (UTC) 2793:04:18, 9 June 2008 (UTC) 2774:17:40, 8 June 2008 (UTC) 2759:15:58, 8 June 2008 (UTC) 2726:20:15, 7 June 2008 (UTC) 2707:00:40, 8 June 2008 (UTC) 2676:18:02, 8 June 2008 (UTC) 2658:00:47, 8 June 2008 (UTC) 2643:18:05, 7 June 2008 (UTC) 2485:02:34, 7 June 2008 (UTC) 2470:17:00, 6 June 2008 (UTC) 2425:18:07, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 2412:18:06, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 2397:18:00, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 2369:04:33, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 2327:13:55, 3 June 2008 (UTC) 2313:13:25, 3 June 2008 (UTC) 2290:13:16, 3 June 2008 (UTC) 2244:23:11, 1 June 2008 (UTC) 2211:20:22, 1 June 2008 (UTC) 2175:20:00, 1 June 2008 (UTC) 2129:Speedy Deletion Requests 2124:02:49, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 2102:17:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 2071:23:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 2058:15:41, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 2048:. Are we related? :-) -- 2039:15:12, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 2018:17:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC) 1978:15:41, 27 May 2008 (UTC) 1952:21:21, 25 May 2008 (UTC) 1910:22:47, 24 May 2008 (UTC) 1896:13:02, 24 May 2008 (UTC) 1880:12:53, 24 May 2008 (UTC) 1860:17:44, 25 May 2008 (UTC) 1845:09:21, 24 May 2008 (UTC) 1807:02:55, 27 May 2008 (UTC) 1793:14:21, 26 May 2008 (UTC) 1778:04:54, 26 May 2008 (UTC) 1737:06:16, 24 May 2008 (UTC) 1722:05:51, 24 May 2008 (UTC) 1707:05:46, 24 May 2008 (UTC) 1635:04:51, 24 May 2008 (UTC) 1613:04:16, 24 May 2008 (UTC) 1541:23:54, 20 May 2008 (UTC) 1526:23:47, 20 May 2008 (UTC) 1506:14:34, 20 May 2008 (UTC) 1481:14:17, 20 May 2008 (UTC) 1446:01:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC) 1420:00:42, 21 May 2008 (UTC) 1396:03:11, 20 May 2008 (UTC) 1380:02:01, 20 May 2008 (UTC) 1345:04:37, 19 May 2008 (UTC) 1324:23:23, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 1310:12:27, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 1295:09:29, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 1272:04:52, 17 May 2008 (UTC) 1250:11:49, 16 May 2008 (UTC) 1217:19:06, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 1196:18:14, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 1172:17:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 1145:14:27, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 1125:14:04, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 1110:17:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 1078:19:51, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 1058:19:32, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 1039:19:29, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 1011:19:18, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 995:19:07, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 978:Young Earth Creationists 969:19:18, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 948:18:24, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 928:17:47, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 574:The blockness is flowing 5824:featured article review 5454:) 19 October 2008(UTC) 5283:October 2008 Newsletter 3905:Talk:In popular culture 2270:User talk:Чарльз - жопа 882:14:11, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 849:19:55, 7 May 2008 (UTC) 835:12:34, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 820:08:22, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 796:12:45, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 768:06:10, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 735:21:51, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 715:21:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 697:20:07, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 676:18:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 641:17:37, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 611:04:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 587:22:21, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 567:22:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 545:The goodness is flowing 532:19:47, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 512:16:02, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 496:Image:Crusade intro.jpg 488:21:07, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 464:19:04, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 424:23:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 397:10:56, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 382:06:27, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 351:Could you please block 347:Block of confirmed sock 307:Snore Stopper Wristband 234:You see what I see. -- 4775:August 2008 Newsletter 3997:User rights management 3592: 3346:, has been listed for 3339: 2798:Intelligent design RfC 2458:Positive reinforcement 2381:University of Missouri 2169:of the Barbarian Horde 890:Not sure what you mean 863:Hello B. Do you think 517:Thaks for the heads-up 4545:Another input request 3591: 3338: 3085:"Creationist nitwits" 3035:conflicts of interest 3033:and our guideline on 3031:neutral point of view 2354:02:52, 4 June (2008) 2157:Darius von Whaleyland 1336:Feel free to add the 808:ACC Championship Game 42:of past discussions. 5352:Okay. Thank you. :) 5112:September 2008 issue 4580:I left a comment at 3895:Unprotection request 3781:July 2008 Newsletter 2731:Re: user:I'm On Base 2633:to the report page. 2442:Ultras White Knights 2433:Ultras White Knights 2219:June 2008 Newsletter 2024:Comment at H20's RfA 5320:I ask for your help 4134:Wikiversity request 3100:Jon Courson Aritcle 2495:has come back again 2344:Portal:Christianity 648:affective computing 5697:NBA disambiguation 5291:October 2008 issue 4646:BLP Image question 4553:. See my talk too. 4482:RfB Thank You spam 3952:User:Video777 etc. 3593: 3340: 2882:Much appreciated. 2297:Charles is an arse 2029:particular one. -- 1866:Image:101 0574.jpg 1434:Knowledge:Civility 802:Request for Review 748:Robert J. Marks II 616:Not sure I'd agree 478:resolved at ANI -- 432:Misuse of rollback 5764: 5631:You've worked on 5564: 5529: 5398: 5381:comment added by 5310: 5162: 5135:You're invited... 5131: 4802: 4783:August 2008 issue 4761: 4745: 4674: 4541: 4540: 4510:. Again, Thanks! 4474: 4407:You've got mail. 4350: 4308: 4260: 4124: 4088: 3808: 3769: 3709: 3584:SarekOfVulcan RFA 3543:User:Orangemarlin 3500: 3457: 3422: 3387: 3361: 3268:. The GFDL is a 3260: 3248:comment added by 3214: 3202:comment added by 3172: 3160:comment added by 3154:somewhere else. 3129: 3117:comment added by 3078: 3062:comment added by 3024: 3008:comment added by 2964: 2934: 2835:Talk:Barack Obama 2719:Talk:Barack Obama 2246: 2100: 2068: 1998:personal research 1980: 1968:comment added by 1797:Thanks! Will do. 1512:Copyrighted Image 1483: 1467:comment added by 1418: 1378: 1362:User talk:Buura35 1255:Alternate Account 1184:second ANI thread 1143: 1108: 1076: 1027:Ussher chronology 967: 926: 733: 695: 650:work, then under 639: 450:User:Aditya Kabir 95: 94: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5898: 5828:featured quality 5806: 5804: 5799: 5763: 5761: 5756: 5563: 5561: 5556: 5528: 5526: 5521: 5397: 5375: 5297: 5257: 5254: 5248: 5219: 5178: 5145: 5118: 5092: 5089: 5083: 5066: 5063: 5057: 5012: 5009: 5003: 4988:is PD, is this: 4971: 4968: 4962: 4864: 4861: 4855: 4831: 4823: 4817: 4789: 4759: 4755: 4743: 4739: 4734: 4728: 4709: 4703: 4694: 4688: 4672: 4668: 4622: 4619: 4613: 4573: 4570: 4564: 4530: 4527: 4521: 4495: 4487: 4472: 4468: 4447: 4427: 4424: 4418: 4348: 4307: 4305: 4300: 4259: 4257: 4252: 4198:reliable sources 4144: 4122: 4116: 4114: 4086: 4080: 4078: 4035: 3990: 3987: 3981: 3942: 3914: 3795: 3768: 3766: 3761: 3708: 3706: 3701: 3577: 3574: 3568: 3499: 3497: 3492: 3456: 3454: 3449: 3421: 3419: 3414: 3386: 3384: 3379: 3355: 3344:Bill Blankenship 3243: 3197: 3155: 3112: 3057: 3039:reliable sources 3003: 2987:Citygate Outlets 2980:Citygate Outlets 2963: 2933: 2853:this AN/I thread 2632: 2631: 2586:deleted contribs 2565: 2564: 2519:deleted contribs 2352:Kathleen.wright5 2335:Please undelete 2233: 2200: 2194: 2189: 2183: 2173: 2170: 2165: 2161: 2158: 2099: 2097: 2092: 2069: 2067: 1963: 1950: 1947: 1941: 1767: 1766: 1747: 1696: 1695: 1676: 1669: 1668: 1649: 1597: 1570:deleted contribs 1462: 1408: 1368: 1248: 1142: 1140: 1135: 1107: 1105: 1100: 1075: 1073: 1068: 966: 964: 959: 925: 923: 918: 732: 730: 725: 694: 692: 687: 638: 636: 631: 608: 602: 576: 557: 554: 551: 538:User:TheGoodSide 525: 490: 473: 472: 420: 419: 416: 413: 410: 407: 378: 377: 374: 371: 368: 365: 276: 270: 241: 207: 73: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5906: 5905: 5901: 5900: 5899: 5897: 5896: 5895: 5855: 5817: 5792: 5757: 5752: 5699: 5643:Portal:Baseball 5626: 5576: 5557: 5552: 5522: 5517: 5512: 5489: 5476: 5440: 5421: 5376: 5372: 5316: 5286: 5252: 5241: 5238: 5235: 5217: 5176: 5171: 5137: 5107: 5087: 5076: 5073: 5061: 5050: 5047: 5007: 4996: 4993: 4982: 4966: 4955: 4952: 4946: 4876: 4859: 4848: 4845: 4829: 4821: 4815: 4808: 4778: 4757: 4741: 4732: 4726: 4707: 4701: 4692: 4686: 4670: 4648: 4617: 4606: 4603: 4568: 4557: 4554: 4547: 4542: 4525: 4514: 4511: 4484: 4470: 4445: 4436: 4422: 4411: 4408: 4405: 4326: 4301: 4296: 4253: 4248: 4173: 4140: 4136: 4118: 4112: 4082: 4076: 4058: 4033: 3999: 3985: 3974: 3971: 3968: 3954: 3936: 3908: 3897: 3865: 3845: 3814: 3789:July 2008 issue 3784: 3762: 3757: 3749:Tony Kornheiser 3702: 3697: 3693: 3656: 3619: 3586: 3572: 3561: 3558: 3547: 3493: 3488: 3450: 3445: 3415: 3410: 3380: 3375: 3367: 3356:Do you want to 3333: 3307: 3102: 3087: 2983: 2922: 2899: 2831: 2800: 2782: 2733: 2715: 2686: 2571: 2567: 2504: 2500: 2497: 2460: 2435: 2377: 2340: 2252: 2227:June 2008 issue 2222: 2198: 2192: 2187: 2181: 2168: 2163: 2156: 2154: 2151: 2131: 2109: 2093: 2088: 2083: 2066: 2064:Nousernamesleft 2046:in his last RfA 2026: 2002:reliable source 1959: 1945: 1934: 1931: 1920: 1868: 1827: 1748: 1743: 1742: 1677: 1672: 1671: 1650: 1645: 1644: 1555: 1549: 1514: 1458: 1406:Lord Sesshomaru 1366:Lord Sesshomaru 1354: 1334: 1332:3RR block by FM 1283:2006 Gator Bowl 1279: 1257: 1246:John Vandenberg 1244: 1226: 1204: 1202:Minor Copy Edit 1155: 1153:Name of the dog 1136: 1131: 1101: 1096: 1088: 1069: 1064: 1046:Dating Creation 1023:Dating Creation 960: 955: 919: 914: 892: 861: 804: 751: 726: 721: 688: 683: 632: 627: 618: 606: 600: 595: 572: 564: 555: 552: 549: 541: 523: 519: 499: 491: 477: 475: 470: 434: 349: 309: 261: 258:Anna von Urbans 239: 205: 194: 163: 103: 69: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5904: 5894: 5893: 5854: 5851: 5816: 5811: 5791: 5788: 5787: 5786: 5785: 5784: 5783: 5782: 5698: 5695: 5694: 5693: 5692: 5691: 5625: 5622: 5621: 5620: 5575: 5572: 5571: 5570: 5569: 5568: 5511: 5495: 5490: 5485: 5483: 5475: 5472: 5471: 5470: 5439: 5436: 5425:Journalist1983 5420: 5417: 5416: 5415: 5371: 5368: 5367: 5366: 5365: 5364: 5315: 5312: 5296: 5285: 5279: 5278: 5277: 5234: 5231: 5230: 5229: 5228: 5227: 5226: 5225: 5170: 5167: 5165: 5144: 5136: 5133: 5117: 5106: 5100: 5099: 5098: 5097: 5096: 5040: 4981: 4976: 4945: 4942: 4941: 4940: 4939: 4938: 4921: 4920: 4875: 4870: 4869: 4868: 4830:Gadget850 (Ed) 4807: 4804: 4788: 4777: 4771: 4770: 4769: 4768: 4767: 4766: 4765: 4647: 4644: 4643: 4642: 4641: 4640: 4596: 4546: 4543: 4539: 4538: 4535: 4534: 4497: 4485: 4483: 4480: 4479: 4478: 4435: 4432: 4404: 4401: 4400: 4399: 4398: 4397: 4396: 4395: 4381:648 total wins 4325: 4320: 4319: 4318: 4317: 4316: 4315: 4314: 4313: 4312: 4240: 4239: 4238: 4237: 4219: 4218: 4172: 4169: 4168: 4167: 4135: 4132: 4131: 4130: 4129: 4128: 4057: 4054: 4053: 4052: 4051: 4050: 3998: 3995: 3967: 3964: 3953: 3950: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3907:. Just FYI. — 3896: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3864: 3861: 3844: 3841: 3813: 3810: 3794: 3783: 3777: 3776: 3775: 3774: 3773: 3753:James Carville 3745:Scott Van Pelt 3692: 3686: 3655: 3650: 3649: 3648: 3618: 3615: 3585: 3582: 3546: 3540: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3536: 3535: 3534: 3533: 3532: 3531: 3530: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3526: 3508:latest comment 3366: 3363: 3354:. Thank you. 3332: 3329: 3306: 3303: 3302: 3301: 3239: 3238: 3193: 3192: 3151: 3150: 3101: 3098: 3086: 3083: 3081: 3054: 3053: 2982: 2976: 2974: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2921: 2918: 2898: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2830: 2827: 2799: 2796: 2781: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2732: 2729: 2714: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2685: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2661: 2660: 2496: 2491:It looks like 2489: 2488: 2487: 2459: 2456: 2448: 2434: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2376: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2339: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2251: 2248: 2232: 2221: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2150: 2130: 2127: 2108: 2105: 2082: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2025: 2022: 2021: 2020: 1970:148.184.174.61 1958: 1955: 1919: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1867: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1826: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1638: 1637: 1621: 1620: 1548: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1513: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1457: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1353: 1348: 1333: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1278: 1275: 1256: 1253: 1225: 1220: 1203: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1159:Ingrid Newkirk 1154: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1087: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1014: 1013: 974: 973: 972: 971: 891: 888: 886: 865:the ANI thread 860: 855: 854: 853: 852: 851: 803: 800: 799: 798: 750: 745: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 738: 737: 617: 614: 594: 591: 590: 589: 562: 540: 535: 518: 515: 498: 492: 468: 433: 430: 429: 428: 427: 426: 348: 345: 344: 343: 308: 305: 304: 303: 260: 255: 254: 253: 252: 251: 240:Gadget850 (Ed) 206:Gadget850 (Ed) 193: 190: 189: 188: 162: 159: 158: 157: 156: 155: 129:. Looking at 102: 99: 97: 93: 92: 87: 84: 79: 74: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5903: 5892: 5888: 5884: 5880: 5876: 5875: 5874: 5873: 5869: 5865: 5864:60.50.169.223 5860: 5850: 5849: 5845: 5841: 5837: 5833: 5829: 5825: 5821: 5815: 5810: 5809: 5805: 5800: 5781: 5777: 5773: 5769: 5768: 5767: 5762: 5760: 5755: 5749: 5748: 5747: 5743: 5739: 5735: 5731: 5727: 5724: 5720: 5719: 5718: 5717: 5713: 5709: 5704: 5690: 5686: 5682: 5678: 5677: 5676: 5672: 5668: 5663: 5662: 5661: 5660: 5656: 5652: 5648: 5644: 5640: 5639: 5634: 5629: 5619: 5615: 5611: 5607: 5603: 5602: 5601: 5600: 5596: 5592: 5587: 5584: 5579: 5574:Yasser Arafat 5567: 5562: 5560: 5555: 5549: 5548: 5547: 5543: 5539: 5535: 5534: 5533: 5532: 5527: 5525: 5520: 5509: 5506: 5503: 5499: 5494: 5493: 5488: 5484: 5482: 5481:The Dominator 5479: 5469: 5465: 5461: 5457: 5456: 5455: 5453: 5449: 5445: 5444:Jesse Ventura 5438:Image Uploads 5435: 5434: 5430: 5426: 5414: 5410: 5406: 5401: 5400: 5399: 5396: 5392: 5388: 5384: 5380: 5363: 5359: 5355: 5351: 5350: 5349: 5345: 5341: 5336: 5335: 5334: 5333: 5329: 5325: 5321: 5311: 5309: 5305: 5301: 5293: 5292: 5284: 5276: 5272: 5268: 5263: 5262: 5261: 5260: 5255: 5249: 5247: 5245: 5224: 5221: 5220: 5213: 5212: 5211: 5208: 5207: 5201: 5200: 5199: 5195: 5191: 5186: 5185: 5184: 5183: 5180: 5179: 5166: 5163: 5161: 5157: 5153: 5149: 5142: 5132: 5130: 5126: 5122: 5114: 5113: 5105: 5095: 5090: 5084: 5082: 5080: 5071: 5070: 5069: 5064: 5058: 5056: 5054: 5045: 5044:William Hanna 5041: 5039: 5035: 5031: 5027: 5023: 5018: 5017: 5016: 5015: 5010: 5004: 5002: 5000: 4991: 4987: 4980: 4979:Tom and Jerry 4975: 4974: 4969: 4963: 4961: 4959: 4950: 4937: 4933: 4929: 4928:Alternativity 4925: 4924: 4923: 4922: 4919: 4915: 4911: 4907: 4904: 4901: 4897: 4893: 4892: 4891: 4890: 4886: 4882: 4881:Alternativity 4874: 4867: 4862: 4856: 4854: 4852: 4843: 4842: 4841: 4840: 4837: 4835: 4834: 4832: 4820: 4813: 4803: 4801: 4797: 4793: 4785: 4784: 4776: 4764: 4760: 4754: 4750: 4749: 4748: 4744: 4738: 4731: 4724: 4723: 4722: 4718: 4714: 4706: 4698: 4691: 4684: 4680: 4679: 4678: 4677: 4673: 4667: 4662: 4658: 4654: 4639: 4635: 4631: 4627: 4626: 4625: 4620: 4614: 4612: 4610: 4601: 4597: 4595: 4591: 4587: 4583: 4579: 4578: 4577: 4576: 4571: 4565: 4563: 4561: 4552: 4537: 4536: 4533: 4528: 4522: 4520: 4518: 4509: 4505: 4501: 4498: 4496: 4494: 4488: 4477: 4473: 4467: 4463: 4459: 4458: 4457: 4456: 4453: 4451: 4450: 4448: 4439: 4431: 4430: 4425: 4419: 4417: 4415: 4394: 4390: 4386: 4382: 4378: 4377: 4376: 4372: 4368: 4364: 4363: 4362: 4358: 4354: 4346: 4345: 4344: 4343: 4339: 4335: 4331: 4330:Featured List 4324: 4311: 4306: 4304: 4299: 4293: 4289: 4285: 4280: 4279: 4278: 4274: 4270: 4265: 4264: 4263: 4258: 4256: 4251: 4244: 4243: 4242: 4241: 4236: 4232: 4228: 4223: 4222: 4221: 4220: 4217: 4213: 4209: 4204: 4199: 4195: 4190: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4183: 4179: 4166: 4162: 4158: 4154: 4153: 4152: 4151: 4148: 4145: 4143: 4127: 4121: 4115: 4109: 4108: 4107: 4103: 4099: 4094: 4093: 4092: 4091: 4085: 4079: 4073: 4070: 4067: 4063: 4049: 4046: 4045: 4041: 4040: 4031: 4030: 4029: 4025: 4021: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4014: 4011: 4010: 4006: 4005: 3994: 3993: 3988: 3982: 3980: 3978: 3963: 3962: 3959: 3945: 3941: 3940: 3934: 3933: 3932: 3928: 3924: 3920: 3919: 3918: 3917: 3913: 3912: 3906: 3902: 3890: 3886: 3882: 3877: 3876: 3875: 3874: 3871: 3860: 3859: 3855: 3851: 3840: 3839: 3835: 3831: 3827: 3823: 3819: 3809: 3807: 3803: 3799: 3791: 3790: 3782: 3772: 3767: 3765: 3760: 3754: 3750: 3746: 3742: 3741: 3740: 3736: 3732: 3728: 3723: 3719: 3718:Colin Cowherd 3715: 3714: 3713: 3712: 3707: 3705: 3700: 3691: 3685: 3684: 3680: 3676: 3671: 3669: 3665: 3661: 3654: 3647: 3643: 3639: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3628: 3624: 3614: 3613: 3609: 3605: 3604:SarekOfVulcan 3600: 3598: 3590: 3581: 3580: 3575: 3569: 3567: 3565: 3556: 3552: 3544: 3525: 3521: 3517: 3513: 3509: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3498: 3496: 3491: 3484: 3483: 3482: 3478: 3474: 3470: 3466: 3462: 3461: 3460: 3455: 3453: 3448: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3436: 3432: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3420: 3418: 3413: 3407: 3406: 3405: 3401: 3397: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3385: 3383: 3378: 3372: 3362: 3359: 3353: 3349: 3345: 3337: 3328: 3327: 3324: 3323: 3322: 3317: 3316: 3311: 3300: 3296: 3292: 3288: 3284: 3280: 3276: 3271: 3270:viral license 3267: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3259: 3255: 3251: 3247: 3237: 3233: 3229: 3225: 3221: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3213: 3209: 3205: 3201: 3191: 3187: 3183: 3179: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3171: 3167: 3163: 3159: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3137: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3128: 3124: 3120: 3116: 3109: 3105: 3097: 3096: 3093: 3082: 3079: 3077: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3061: 3052: 3048: 3044: 3040: 3036: 3032: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3023: 3019: 3015: 3011: 3007: 3000: 2997: 2996: 2992: 2991:Festival Walk 2988: 2981: 2975: 2968: 2965: 2961: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2950: 2946: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2917: 2916: 2912: 2908: 2904: 2890: 2887: 2886: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2860: 2859: 2854: 2850: 2847: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2826: 2825: 2822: 2818: 2813: 2809: 2805: 2795: 2794: 2791: 2787: 2775: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2745: 2742: 2738: 2737:67.189.185.73 2728: 2727: 2724: 2720: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2677: 2674: 2673: 2670: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2641: 2640: 2637: 2629: 2626: 2623: 2620: 2617: 2614: 2611: 2608: 2605: 2602: 2599: 2596: 2593: 2590: 2587: 2584: 2581: 2578: 2575: 2570: 2562: 2559: 2556: 2553: 2550: 2547: 2544: 2541: 2538: 2535: 2532: 2529: 2526: 2523: 2520: 2517: 2514: 2511: 2508: 2503: 2502:217.87.74.150 2494: 2486: 2482: 2478: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2468: 2467: 2455: 2453: 2446: 2443: 2438: 2426: 2423: 2419: 2418:Grey Wanderer 2415: 2414: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2395: 2391: 2390:Grey Wanderer 2386: 2382: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2338: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2305:Alex Bakharev 2302: 2298: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2264: 2261: 2257: 2256:Чарльз - жопа 2250:Чарльз - жопа 2247: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2229: 2228: 2220: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2197: 2186: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2172: 2171: 2166: 2159: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2126: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2112: 2104: 2103: 2098: 2096: 2091: 2081: 2072: 2065: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1990:verifiability 1987: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1954: 1953: 1948: 1942: 1940: 1938: 1929: 1925: 1924:arb vote here 1911: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1832: 1831: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1764: 1761: 1758: 1755: 1752: 1746: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1693: 1690: 1687: 1684: 1681: 1675: 1666: 1663: 1660: 1657: 1654: 1648: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1623: 1622: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1605: 1599: 1595: 1592: 1589: 1586: 1583: 1580: 1577: 1574: 1571: 1568: 1565: 1562: 1559: 1554: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1416: 1412: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1376: 1372: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1352: 1347: 1346: 1343: 1339: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1277:Photo Request 1274: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1260:Baegisthesock 1252: 1251: 1247: 1241: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1224: 1219: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1209:87.254.71.190 1197: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1160: 1146: 1141: 1139: 1134: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1106: 1104: 1099: 1093: 1079: 1074: 1072: 1067: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1044:I was hoping 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1019: 1012: 1008: 1004: 999: 998: 997: 996: 992: 988: 984: 979: 970: 965: 963: 958: 951: 950: 949: 945: 941: 936: 932: 931: 930: 929: 924: 922: 917: 911: 907: 904: 901: 897: 887: 884: 883: 879: 875: 870: 869:Dorje Shugden 866: 859: 858:Dorje Shugden 850: 846: 842: 838: 837: 836: 832: 828: 824: 823: 822: 821: 817: 813: 809: 797: 793: 789: 785: 781: 777: 772: 771: 770: 769: 765: 761: 757: 749: 736: 731: 729: 724: 718: 717: 716: 712: 708: 704: 700: 699: 698: 693: 691: 686: 679: 678: 677: 673: 669: 665: 661: 657: 653: 649: 645: 644: 643: 642: 637: 635: 630: 623: 613: 612: 609: 603: 588: 584: 580: 575: 571: 570: 569: 568: 565: 560: 558: 546: 539: 534: 533: 530: 528: 526: 514: 513: 509: 505: 497: 489: 485: 481: 466: 465: 462: 461: 457: 456: 451: 447: 444: 441: 438: 425: 422: 421: 400: 399: 398: 394: 390: 386: 385: 384: 383: 380: 379: 358: 354: 342: 338: 334: 329: 328: 327: 326: 322: 318: 314: 302: 298: 294: 289: 285: 284: 283: 282: 278: 277: 271: 259: 250: 247: 245: 244: 242: 233: 232: 231: 227: 223: 219: 218: 217: 216: 213: 211: 210: 208: 199: 187: 183: 179: 175: 174: 173: 172: 169: 154: 150: 146: 142: 139: 136: 132: 131:217.87.83.146 128: 124: 123: 122: 119: 118: 115: 109: 105: 104: 98: 91: 88: 85: 83: 80: 78: 75: 72: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5856: 5840:Andrew Kelly 5818: 5793: 5758: 5753: 5700: 5679:Thanks. :-) 5636: 5630: 5627: 5606:WP:TERRORIST 5588: 5580: 5577: 5558: 5553: 5523: 5518: 5513: 5504: 5477: 5448:Tennisace101 5441: 5422: 5373: 5317: 5289: 5287: 5243: 5242: 5236: 5215: 5204: 5174: 5172: 5164: 5138: 5110: 5108: 5078: 5077: 5052: 5051: 4998: 4997: 4984:Since this: 4983: 4957: 4956: 4947: 4902: 4877: 4850: 4849: 4826: 4825: 4809: 4781: 4779: 4660: 4649: 4608: 4607: 4559: 4558: 4548: 4516: 4515: 4499: 4490: 4443: 4442: 4440: 4437: 4413: 4412: 4406: 4327: 4302: 4297: 4254: 4249: 4203:Frank Beamer 4174: 4141: 4137: 4068: 4059: 4043: 4038: 4008: 4003: 4000: 3976: 3975: 3969: 3955: 3938: 3910: 3898: 3866: 3846: 3815: 3787: 3785: 3763: 3758: 3716:I listen to 3703: 3698: 3694: 3672: 3657: 3623:Rocksanddirt 3620: 3601: 3594: 3563: 3562: 3548: 3512:Kremlinology 3494: 3489: 3468: 3451: 3446: 3416: 3411: 3381: 3376: 3368: 3341: 3320: 3319: 3314: 3308: 3286: 3250:71.92.142.14 3240: 3219: 3204:71.92.142.14 3196:Knowledge. 3194: 3162:71.92.142.14 3152: 3119:71.92.142.14 3110: 3106: 3103: 3088: 3080: 3055: 3029:policy on a 3001: 2998: 2984: 2973: 2923: 2900: 2883: 2856: 2845: 2832: 2801: 2783: 2743: 2734: 2716: 2687: 2667: 2634: 2624: 2618: 2612: 2606: 2600: 2594: 2588: 2582: 2576: 2569:217.87.77.57 2557: 2551: 2545: 2539: 2533: 2527: 2521: 2515: 2509: 2498: 2464: 2461: 2447: 2439: 2436: 2402:Ok, done. -- 2378: 2341: 2301:Anti-Charles 2300: 2296: 2262: 2253: 2225: 2223: 2153: 2142: 2134: 2132: 2113: 2110: 2094: 2089: 2084: 2027: 1960: 1936: 1935: 1926:the RFAR on 1921: 1869: 1850:Good job! -- 1833: 1828: 1759: 1753: 1745:72.70.100.65 1688: 1682: 1674:72.70.106.76 1661: 1655: 1602: 1600: 1590: 1584: 1578: 1572: 1566: 1560: 1550: 1533:Wisdombuddha 1518:Wisdombuddha 1515: 1459: 1358:User:Buura35 1355: 1335: 1280: 1258: 1242: 1227: 1205: 1156: 1137: 1132: 1102: 1097: 1089: 1070: 1065: 1017: 1015: 975: 961: 956: 920: 915: 902: 893: 885: 862: 805: 752: 727: 722: 689: 684: 633: 628: 622:this comment 619: 596: 542: 520: 500: 459: 454: 435: 403: 361: 356: 350: 310: 265: 262: 236: 235: 202: 201: 195: 164: 137: 112: 96: 70: 43: 37: 5790:Sean Taylor 5681:AdjustShift 5651:AdjustShift 5419:Beyer photo 5377:—Preceding 5370:John McCain 5148:invite list 4508:let me know 4194:WP:COATRACK 4036:) Regards, 3850:David in DC 3722:Mike Tirico 3365:Interesting 3305:Word clouds 3244:—Preceding 3198:—Preceding 3156:—Preceding 3113:—Preceding 3058:—Preceding 3004:—Preceding 2780:On drawings 2666:Cheers. :) 2185:S-namesakes 2107:This is bad 1984:Nowhere in 1964:—Preceding 1647:72.74.3.177 1487:Please see 1463:—Preceding 776:WP:COATRACK 760:ThomHImself 601:Orange Mike 36:This is an 18:User talk:B 5139:...to the 4462:filed here 4385:JKBrooks85 4367:JKBrooks85 4334:JKBrooks85 4292:Ivy League 4155:Thanks. -- 3939:Satori Son 3911:Satori Son 3822:Stormfront 3690:ESPN Radio 3220:somebody's 2907:Odd nature 2897:RFC notice 2829:Canvassing 2817:dave souza 2622:block user 2592:filter log 2555:block user 2525:filter log 2164:Great Khan 1837:JKBrooks85 1588:block user 1582:filter log 1402:like these 1338:WP:WHEELed 1316:JKBrooks85 1287:JKBrooks85 1180:ANI thread 874:EdJohnston 841:JKBrooks85 812:JKBrooks85 448:) made by 5772:Gondooley 5708:Gondooley 4753:Dreadstar 4737:Dreadstar 4666:Dreadstar 4653:the image 4630:J Milburn 4466:Dreadstar 4171:Lou Holtz 4142:SB_Johnny 3516:Guettarda 3506:Kirill's 2995:Cityplaza 2839:Andyvphil 2804:this RfAR 2790:Anynobody 2751:Spellcast 2713:Well put. 2628:block log 2561:block log 2272:. Under 2147:talk page 2116:Guettarda 1902:Genisock2 1872:Genisock2 1799:Hertz1888 1770:Hertz1888 1729:Hertz1888 1699:Hertz1888 1594:block log 1342:Kendrick7 983:WP:FRINGE 504:J Milburn 353:this sock 286:Thanks. 275:lifeguard 127:checkuser 90:Archive 9 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 71:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 5820:Ron Paul 5814:Ron Paul 5628:Dear B, 5591:Ryan1159 5508:contribs 5391:contribs 5379:unsigned 5300:BrownBot 5206:MastCell 5152:BrownBot 5121:BrownBot 4906:contribs 4819:userpage 4792:BrownBot 4730:GFDL-1.2 4705:GFDL-1.2 4690:GFDL-1.2 4138:Done. -- 4072:contribs 3843:My error 3798:BrownBot 3727:Jim Rome 3348:deletion 3246:unsigned 3200:unsigned 3158:unsigned 3115:unsigned 3072:contribs 3060:unsigned 3018:contribs 3006:unsigned 2926:boldness 2920:Boldness 2885:MastCell 2858:MastCell 2849:contribs 2747:contribs 2580:contribs 2513:contribs 2466:MastCell 2452:Basedas2 2416:Thanks. 2266:contribs 2236:BrownBot 2139:WP:SBS/T 1966:unsigned 1928:User:JzG 1922:Per the 1757:contribs 1686:contribs 1659:contribs 1564:contribs 1477:contribs 1465:unsigned 1164:Bob98133 1086:Question 906:contribs 652:WP:BLP1E 620:I think 474:Resolved 401:Ah, ok. 313:Eldereft 141:contribs 101:Chances? 5859:Penulis 5853:Help Me 5233:Commons 5218:MBisanz 5177:MBisanz 5169:Comment 4806:NOINDEX 4446:JGHowes 4438:Hello, 4044:toronto 4009:toronto 3958:Gwernol 3358:opt out 3064:Deskpop 3010:Deskpop 2960:Viridae 2930:Viridae 2450:matter. 2050:Dweller 2031:Dweller 1986:my edit 1489:WP:CORP 192:Privacy 39:archive 5759:Marlin 5754:Orange 5578:Hi B, 5559:Marlin 5554:Orange 5524:Marlin 5519:Orange 5383:Bopter 5354:Latics 5324:Latics 4504:my RfB 4303:Marlin 4298:Orange 4294:too. 4255:Marlin 4250:Orange 4227:Ny1995 4178:Ny1995 4113:Rudget 4077:Rudget 3966:Vandal 3764:Marlin 3759:Orange 3704:Marlin 3699:Orange 3675:Daniel 3597:my RfA 3495:Marlin 3490:Orange 3452:Marlin 3447:Orange 3417:Marlin 3412:Orange 3382:Marlin 3377:Orange 2388:page? 2095:Marlin 2090:Orange 2006:trivia 1604:C.Fred 1553:Kopter 1264:Baegis 1138:Marlin 1133:Orange 1103:Marlin 1098:Orange 1071:Marlin 1066:Orange 962:Marlin 957:Orange 921:Marlin 916:Orange 780:m:OTRS 756:WP:BLP 728:Marlin 723:Orange 690:Marlin 685:Orange 634:Marlin 629:Orange 524:Thingg 357:likely 355:, per 288:WP:CSD 5803:Perry 5798:Hairy 5487:Edits 5246:levse 5081:levse 5055:levse 5001:levse 4960:levse 4944:Trend 4896:Lakan 4873:Lakan 4853:levse 4661:could 4611:levse 4598:Also 4562:levse 4519:levse 4416:levse 4062:Tasc0 4056:Tasc0 4039:nat.u 4004:nat.u 3979:levse 3870:Jenny 3566:levse 3275:Wikia 2999:???? 2924:Such 2598:WHOIS 2531:WHOIS 2278:m:SUL 2254:Hi. 2196:db-t3 1939:levse 1763:WHOIS 1692:WHOIS 1665:WHOIS 1469:M2540 1415:edits 1375:edits 1351:Baous 1031:Filll 987:Filll 896:Cla68 16:< 5887:talk 5868:talk 5844:talk 5838:. -- 5836:here 5832:here 5776:talk 5742:talk 5712:talk 5685:talk 5671:talk 5655:talk 5614:talk 5595:talk 5542:talk 5502:talk 5498:Jagz 5464:talk 5452:talk 5429:talk 5409:talk 5387:talk 5358:talk 5344:talk 5328:talk 5304:talk 5295:you. 5288:The 5271:talk 5253:Talk 5194:talk 5156:talk 5125:talk 5116:you. 5109:The 5088:Talk 5062:Talk 5034:talk 5008:Talk 4967:Talk 4948:See 4932:talk 4914:talk 4900:talk 4885:talk 4860:Talk 4796:talk 4787:you. 4780:The 4717:talk 4681:The 4634:talk 4618:Talk 4590:talk 4584:. -- 4569:Talk 4549:See 4526:Talk 4423:Talk 4403:Mail 4389:talk 4371:talk 4357:talk 4338:talk 4288:Army 4284:Navy 4273:talk 4231:talk 4212:talk 4182:talk 4161:talk 4120:logs 4102:talk 4084:logs 4066:talk 4024:talk 3986:Talk 3927:talk 3903:for 3885:talk 3854:talk 3834:talk 3830:R-41 3802:talk 3793:you. 3786:The 3735:talk 3679:talk 3660:here 3642:talk 3627:talk 3608:talk 3573:Talk 3545:RFAR 3520:talk 3477:talk 3469:What 3465:here 3435:talk 3400:talk 3371:this 3315:Neıl 3295:talk 3266:GFDL 3254:talk 3232:talk 3224:GFDL 3208:talk 3186:talk 3166:talk 3144:talk 3136:GFDL 3123:talk 3068:talk 3047:talk 3014:talk 2993:and 2949:talk 2911:talk 2874:talk 2843:talk 2821:talk 2770:talk 2755:talk 2741:talk 2723:Shem 2703:talk 2672:aton 2669:Fnag 2654:talk 2639:aton 2636:Fnag 2616:http 2610:RBLs 2604:RDNS 2574:talk 2566:and 2549:http 2543:RBLs 2537:RDNS 2507:talk 2481:talk 2437:Hey 2422:Talk 2408:talk 2394:Talk 2365:talk 2323:talk 2309:talk 2286:talk 2260:talk 2240:talk 2231:you. 2224:The 2207:talk 2201:. -- 2135:only 2120:talk 2054:talk 2035:talk 2014:talk 1992:and 1974:talk 1946:Talk 1906:talk 1892:talk 1876:talk 1856:talk 1841:talk 1803:talk 1789:talk 1774:talk 1751:talk 1733:talk 1718:talk 1703:talk 1680:talk 1670:and 1653:talk 1631:talk 1609:talk 1576:logs 1558:talk 1537:talk 1522:talk 1502:talk 1493:WP:N 1491:and 1473:talk 1442:talk 1432:and 1426:this 1411:talk 1392:talk 1371:talk 1360:and 1320:talk 1306:talk 1291:talk 1268:talk 1230:here 1213:talk 1192:talk 1182:and 1168:talk 1121:talk 1092:here 1054:talk 1035:talk 1025:and 1007:talk 991:talk 944:talk 935:this 910:here 900:talk 878:talk 845:talk 831:talk 816:talk 792:talk 782:via 764:talk 711:talk 672:talk 607:Talk 583:talk 577:. -- 563:adds 508:talk 484:talk 445:and 393:talk 337:talk 321:talk 297:talk 269:Mike 226:talk 182:talk 168:Lars 149:talk 135:talk 117:aton 114:Fnag 5703:NBA 4464:. 4286:or 2802:At 2143:and 1094:? 1018:are 604:| 556:noy 553:ela 550:J.d 494:Re: 455:NAH 442:, 279:| 5889:) 5870:) 5846:) 5778:) 5744:) 5725:, 5714:) 5687:) 5673:) 5665:-- 5657:) 5616:) 5597:) 5544:) 5466:) 5431:) 5411:) 5393:) 5389:• 5360:) 5346:) 5338:-- 5330:) 5306:) 5273:) 5256:• 5250:• 5239:— 5196:) 5188:-- 5158:) 5150:. 5127:) 5091:• 5085:• 5074:— 5065:• 5059:• 5048:— 5036:) 5011:• 5005:• 4994:— 4992:? 4970:• 4964:• 4953:— 4934:) 4916:) 4887:) 4863:• 4857:• 4846:— 4836:- 4827:— 4822:}} 4816:{{ 4798:) 4733:}} 4727:{{ 4719:) 4708:}} 4702:{{ 4693:}} 4687:{{ 4636:) 4621:• 4615:• 4604:— 4592:) 4572:• 4566:• 4555:— 4529:• 4523:• 4512:— 4452:- 4426:• 4420:• 4409:— 4391:) 4373:) 4359:) 4340:) 4275:) 4233:) 4214:) 4206:-- 4184:) 4163:) 4146:| 4104:) 4034::) 4026:) 3989:• 3983:• 3972:— 3929:) 3887:) 3856:) 3836:) 3804:) 3737:) 3681:) 3670:. 3644:) 3629:) 3610:) 3576:• 3570:• 3559:— 3522:) 3479:) 3437:) 3402:) 3297:) 3256:) 3234:) 3210:) 3188:) 3168:) 3146:) 3125:) 3090:-- 3074:) 3070:• 3049:) 3020:) 3016:• 2951:) 2913:) 2876:) 2868:-- 2819:, 2772:) 2757:) 2705:) 2656:) 2483:) 2420:| 2410:) 2392:| 2367:) 2325:) 2311:) 2288:) 2242:) 2209:) 2199:}} 2193:{{ 2188:}} 2182:{{ 2133:I 2122:) 2056:) 2037:) 2016:) 1976:) 1949:• 1943:• 1932:— 1908:) 1894:) 1878:) 1858:) 1843:) 1805:) 1791:) 1783:-- 1776:) 1735:) 1720:) 1705:) 1633:) 1625:-- 1611:) 1539:) 1524:) 1504:) 1496:-- 1479:) 1475:• 1444:) 1413:• 1404:? 1394:) 1386:-- 1373:• 1322:) 1308:) 1293:) 1270:) 1240:. 1215:) 1194:) 1170:) 1123:) 1056:) 1037:) 1009:) 993:) 946:) 880:) 847:) 833:) 818:) 794:) 766:) 713:) 674:) 598:-- 585:) 510:) 486:) 476:– 460:ID 439:, 415:nd 409:ir 395:) 373:nd 367:ir 339:) 331:-- 323:~ 315:~( 299:) 291:-- 266:– 246:- 237:— 228:) 212:- 203:— 200:-- 184:) 151:) 86:→ 5885:( 5883:B 5866:( 5842:( 5774:( 5740:( 5738:B 5722:( 5710:( 5683:( 5669:( 5667:B 5653:( 5612:( 5610:B 5593:( 5540:( 5538:B 5510:) 5505:· 5500:( 5462:( 5460:B 5450:( 5427:( 5407:( 5405:B 5385:( 5356:( 5342:( 5340:B 5326:( 5302:( 5269:( 5267:B 5244:R 5192:( 5190:B 5154:( 5123:( 5079:R 5053:R 5032:( 5030:B 4999:R 4958:R 4930:( 4912:( 4910:B 4903:· 4898:( 4883:( 4851:R 4794:( 4758:† 4742:† 4715:( 4713:B 4671:† 4632:( 4609:R 4588:( 4586:B 4560:R 4517:R 4471:† 4414:R 4387:( 4369:( 4355:( 4353:B 4336:( 4271:( 4269:B 4229:( 4210:( 4208:B 4180:( 4159:( 4157:B 4123:) 4117:( 4100:( 4098:B 4087:) 4081:( 4069:· 4064:( 4022:( 4020:B 3977:R 3925:( 3923:B 3883:( 3881:B 3852:( 3832:( 3800:( 3733:( 3731:B 3677:( 3640:( 3638:B 3625:( 3606:( 3564:R 3518:( 3475:( 3473:B 3433:( 3431:B 3398:( 3396:B 3321:龱 3293:( 3291:B 3252:( 3230:( 3228:B 3206:( 3184:( 3182:B 3164:( 3142:( 3140:B 3121:( 3066:( 3045:( 3043:B 3012:( 2947:( 2945:B 2909:( 2872:( 2870:B 2846:· 2841:( 2768:( 2766:B 2753:( 2744:· 2739:( 2701:( 2699:B 2652:( 2650:B 2630:) 2625:· 2619:· 2613:· 2607:· 2601:· 2595:· 2589:· 2583:· 2577:· 2572:( 2563:) 2558:· 2552:· 2546:· 2540:· 2534:· 2528:· 2522:· 2516:· 2510:· 2505:( 2479:( 2477:B 2406:( 2404:B 2363:( 2361:B 2321:( 2319:B 2307:( 2284:( 2282:B 2263:· 2258:( 2238:( 2205:( 2203:B 2160:, 2152:– 2118:( 2052:( 2033:( 2012:( 2010:B 1972:( 1937:R 1904:( 1890:( 1888:B 1874:( 1854:( 1852:B 1839:( 1801:( 1787:( 1785:B 1772:( 1765:) 1760:· 1754:· 1749:( 1731:( 1716:( 1714:B 1701:( 1694:) 1689:· 1683:· 1678:( 1667:) 1662:· 1656:· 1651:( 1629:( 1627:B 1607:( 1596:) 1591:· 1585:· 1579:· 1573:· 1567:· 1561:· 1556:( 1535:( 1520:( 1500:( 1498:B 1471:( 1440:( 1438:B 1417:) 1409:( 1390:( 1388:B 1377:) 1369:( 1318:( 1304:( 1302:B 1289:( 1266:( 1211:( 1190:( 1188:B 1166:( 1119:( 1117:B 1052:( 1050:B 1033:( 1005:( 1003:B 989:( 942:( 940:B 903:· 898:( 876:( 843:( 829:( 827:B 814:( 790:( 788:B 762:( 709:( 707:B 670:( 668:B 581:( 579:B 506:( 482:( 480:B 418:a 412:a 406:m 391:( 389:B 376:a 370:a 364:m 335:( 333:B 319:) 317:s 295:( 293:B 272:. 224:( 222:B 180:( 178:B 147:( 145:B 138:· 133:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index