Knowledge

User talk:Bearcat/Archive 13

Source 📝

762: 434:
circles, including being well-reviewed in the The Wire, Dangerous Minds, Le Monde, URB, and other respected music journals and magazines. Moreover women electronic music artists (like many marginalized groups) suffer from a vicious circle of being underreported on in media during and after impressive careers of creativity and influence and then judged not notable enough to be included in accounts of that era. I note there are several lists of women electronic musicians, which suggests that people find women electronic musicians notable in themselves, but beyond that Mutamassik's impressive and globe-spanning career makes her an inspiration to many.
767: 183:, which you initiated. I closed the discussion as "delete", but an editor has now contacted me, providing new sources. All but one of the sources are not available to me, so I cannot comment on their content, beyond the fact that they show that a larger number of scholarly works mention the amphora than was shown to be the case in the deletion discussion. However, I have obtained a copy of the other one of those sources, and I believe it significantly changes the situation from that which existed at the time of the AfD discussion. (It is available at 730:
around 2000. His name was Ted Hodge. In the late 1970s he hosted a call-in show at 6 pm every weeknight called Voice of the People. Toward the end of his career, he worked part time but he was still going in every day Monday - Friday to do news breaks. An article about him in the Elmira Star-Gazette, in May 1985 when he was nearly 77, opines that at that time he might have been the country's oldest radio broadcaster still working daily. He had been in radio since high school, loved the work, and never wanted to do anything else. Cheers!
31: 755: 952: 480: 112: 613: 772: 336: 1037:
Hi there, I'm quite new to this. Robert Pichette asked me to update the Knowledge article of himself. I am not a historian and am not interested in doing scholarly work in New Brunswick history. I have found a few websites that state that he did develop the NB Flag. I've tried to make both French
588:
Hello again Bearcat, Is there any format that I can use to post the links that were posted previously? You mentioned that External links isn't the correct place for those links, my apologies for the error. I intended to mimic other authors pages and found the "External links" section contained on the
729:
Hello Bearcat, I understand you wrote the original content for the WENY AM/FM/TV page. Curious if you have a connection to Elmira or WENY? Anyway, I am planning to add a line or two about my father, who worked at WENY for many years; from 1944 to 1962 and again from about 1972 until he fully retired
187:
if you have JSTOR access.) Because I believe that this information significantly increases the amount of evidence of notability, I have recreated the article, but of course anyone who disagrees is free to take it back to AfD. I am informing everyone who took part in the discussion. The article is at
159:
article that I've also done some editing on, and have questions regarding it being like an advert and notability, which you tagged it with. I didn't create the article, but added on info regarding his latest novel using references to reviews. I think I did cite the publisher too. Is that wrong? Too
912:
isn't the subject of the article himself – I am. I nominated it because I don't want there to be an article about me in the first place, in addition the fact it also looks like it doesn't even belong on Knowledge anyway. I definitely used to know "Nate Diddly" – I'm almost certain I went to school
391:
and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion
433:
Hello Bearcat. I wanted to suggest that Mutamassik's page be undeleted. Her work is notable. She has an entire chapter dedicated to her in the book Pink Noises (you can find it on google books), her solo work and work with morgan craft has been judged notable in avant-garde and electronic music
160:
much like an advert? Looking at the Knowledge guidelines for creative people notability, I suppose there could be an argument that Durcan's not notable. I don't know that everyone whose written a book or three need to be in Knowledge. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated. Cheers. --
1038:& English pages the same. I'm not sure what else I should do. I started working on this a few days ago and saw that his page had broken links that didn't exist anymore. Do you need other sources for other aspects of his life? Please advise. How long do I have to fix things? 978:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
531:. So, nearly all inline citations came out, as nonworking/untraceable, but I added and corrected three (updating and fixing the Chicago Tribune and the Backlot—from deadlinks—and adding a PBS, so his latest job is sourced). 470: 982:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
102: 496: 118: 103: 128: 513: 527:
article. He is not longer at NBC (large NBC template had to go), and his self-published LinkedIn, ABC, and NBC bios, cited throughout, are both non-independent, and (practically),
905: 145: 913:
with him, I still have him on Facebook, and apparently he's now a music promoter in Toronto and New York. I don't know whether that constitues a conflict of interest?
996: 180: 419:
and its subcategories and 3) I think we should just create all of the subcategories for each state or district already. There will be clearly be enough. Thoughts?--
324: 707: 396:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 594: 569: 992: 854: 655: 405: 279: 731: 909: 1000: 894: 534:
Bottom line, the article looks bad because none of its earlier citations / links were valid or working, but it is improved in that the citations that
319: 1031: 260: 941: 453:
Show me the 2013 versions of the Tim Bosma article and it will help me write it. I am not about to waste time if I slave on it only to it deleted.
415:
Hi Bearcat, a few things re: Woman city councilors. 1) Thank you for starting this category. 2) Should we rename it City Council members to match
959: 943: 836: 745: 620: 547: 372:
how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
928: 914: 711: 490:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the 122:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the 975: 847: 815: 786: 696: 593:
page. Could you please let me what section I should place the interview and review links under if any? Many thanks and happy Canada day!
373: 607: 207: 936: 922: 1025: 964: 874: 843: 299: 719: 602: 581: 486: 471: 365: 518: 443: 240:
I have just written my first article for wiki and would appreciate some feedback from someone experienced, before I get it live!
676: 416: 325: 1092: 1058: 423: 927:
Sorry, I re-read your comment and realized you had referred to the nominator and not the creator of the article. My mistake.
870: 867:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 295: 292:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 899: 577: 539: 189: 465: 501: 133: 1088: 1054: 799: 272: 701: 169: 739: 268: 174: 232: 680: 223:. I was just going to get rid of all the copy and paste from his official website, but thankfully it's gone now. 1066: 1021: 428: 859:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
410: 284:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
761: 561:
article. I've added three more sources. Please let me know if this edit is enough for approval. Take care!
987:
Hi, I have nominated a page you contributed to for deletion and wanted to let you know about it as part of
345: 94: 86: 81: 69: 64: 59: 668: 624: 285: 494:
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
126:
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
672: 552: 393: 38: 1017: 968: 598: 573: 558: 543: 491: 352: 203: 123: 1030: 1084: 1050: 1016:? I know it's featured, but it became featured years ago when en-wiki's standards were looser. 1005: 735: 538:
there, are all good, and properly formatted. Take a look if it interests you. Cheers. Le Prof
637:
While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be
448: 1076: 1042: 988: 565: 461: 377: 264: 256: 8: 766: 684: 150: 509: 439: 401: 388: 361: 329: 212: 368:, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not 1080: 1046: 932: 918: 890: 881:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
832: 715: 651: 315: 306:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
199: 141: 47: 17: 638: 165: 456:
I have no vested interest in Tim Bosma. I never heard of the guy until recently.
692: 590: 457: 228: 392:
tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
364:
requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1013: 1006: 860: 661:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
505: 435: 397: 369: 886: 882: 828: 754: 724: 311: 307: 137: 864: 420: 344:
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
161: 156: 688: 224: 220: 213: 557:
Greetings Bearcat, thank you so much for reaching out to me about the
383:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may
184: 524: 771: 376:, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about 192:, having been moved from the original title given in the AfD page. 906:
Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion/Sebastian_Brown_(2nd_nomination)
244: 289: 181:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Two Sided Amphora 63.1515
179:
I am contacting you in connection with the discussion at
957:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
863:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 792:
There were over 350 articles on Women in Entertainment,
679:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
288:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 787:
Thank you for contributing to our June 2016 editathons
644:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
1072:
Any update or is it still "to be deleted?" Thanks.
1069:
to read more as I've added sources as you requested.
794:
55 on Jewish Women's History and 50 on Women in LGBTQ
963:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
632:
One album release, no indication of any notability.
245:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Arden_University 243:Would you be able to have a look at it for me? 366:section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion 976:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Humaninstitut 855:Disambiguation link notification for July 13 280:Disambiguation link notification for June 18 487:Category:Television channels in Thailand 472:Category:Television channels in Thailand 746:Thank you for supporting our editathons 650:notice, but please explain why in your 346:the guide to writing your first article 14: 1067:User_talk:JeanPichette#Robert_Pichette 417:Category:American city council members 119:Category:Fireworks festivals in Canada 104:Category:Fireworks festivals in Canada 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 908:. On your point (B) I can assure you 378:what is generally accepted as notable 742:(maryann dot long at gmail dot com) 529:all were deadlinks, and untraceable! 219:Hi Bearcat, thanks for the edits on 190:Two-handled amphora (Boston 63.1515) 25: 965:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 394:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 351:You may want to consider using the 185:http://www.jstor.org/stable/4171394 23: 770: 753: 639:deleted for any of several reasons 627:because of the following concern: 611: 608:Proposed deletion of Hummer (band) 334: 24: 1105: 974:The article will be discussed at 474:has been nominated for discussion 195:The editor who uses the pseudonym 106:has been nominated for discussion 950: 765: 760: 478: 110: 29: 519:If you are still active editing 523:You might like to look at the 13: 1: 904:Thanks for lending a hand at 900:Re: Renominated for deletion 374:criteria for speedy deletion 355:to help you create articles. 7: 683:allows discussion to reach 664:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 647:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 286:2016 in Canadian television 10: 1110: 675:exist. In particular, the 155:Saw your additions to the 1093:02:54, 21 July 2016 (UTC) 1059:03:13, 19 July 2016 (UTC) 1026:21:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC) 1012:Can you take a goosie at 1001:14:58, 16 July 2016 (UTC) 937:23:38, 14 July 2016 (UTC) 923:14:54, 14 July 2016 (UTC) 895:10:29, 13 July 2016 (UTC) 848:Women in Red/Opt-out list 752: 702:Re-nominated for deletion 669:proposed deletion process 582:19:56, 15 June 2016 (UTC) 514:10:12, 29 June 2016 (UTC) 502:categories for discussion 466:23:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC) 444:21:28, 26 June 2016 (UTC) 424:10:01, 23 June 2016 (UTC) 406:20:45, 22 June 2016 (UTC) 360:A tag has been placed on 320:09:42, 18 June 2016 (UTC) 273:07:40, 17 June 2016 (UTC) 233:18:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC) 208:22:35, 15 June 2016 (UTC) 170:15:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC) 146:02:13, 10 June 2016 (UTC) 134:categories for discussion 967:or whether it should be 844:Women in Red/Invite list 837:16:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC) 740:23:16, 8 July 2016 (UTC) 720:19:32, 8 July 2016 (UTC) 697:13:02, 2 July 2016 (UTC) 603:19:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC) 559:Draft:Shawn_Stewart_Ruff 548:00:07, 1 July 2016 (UTC) 175:Deleted article restored 656:the article's talk page 817:Women in Halls of Fame 775: 758: 706:Could you lend a hand 616: 429:Deletion of Mutamassik 385:contest the nomination 357: 339: 774: 757: 681:articles for deletion 625:proposed for deletion 615: 411:Woman city councilors 342: 338: 42:of past discussions. 1018:Paul Benjamin Austin 883:opt-out instructions 497:the category's entry 308:opt-out instructions 129:the category's entry 873:• Join us at the 795: 776: 759: 673:deletion processes 617: 553:Shawn Stewart Ruff 362:Hand Drawn Dracula 340: 330:Hand Drawn Dracula 298:• Join us at the 1096: 1079:comment added by 1062: 1045:comment added by 878: 851: 825: 824: 783: 585: 568:comment added by 504:page. Thank you. 389:visiting the page 370:credibly indicate 303: 276: 259:comment added by 197: 136:page. Thank you. 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:Bearcat 1101: 1095: 1073: 1061: 1039: 954: 953: 868: 841: 814:Our next event: 809: 769: 764: 750: 749: 666: 665: 649: 648: 614: 584: 562: 482: 481: 337: 293: 275: 253: 193: 114: 113: 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 1109: 1108: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1074: 1065:Please go to : 1040: 1035: 1032:Robert Pichette 1010: 955: 951: 948: 902: 875:DPL WikiProject 857: 846:. Unsubscribe, 842:(To subscribe, 808:#wikiwomeninred 807: 790: 789: 748: 727: 704: 677:speedy deletion 663: 662: 646: 645: 612: 610: 591:Chuck_Palahniuk 563: 555: 521: 483: 479: 476: 451: 431: 413: 358: 335: 333: 326:Speedy deletion 300:DPL WikiProject 282: 254: 217: 177: 153: 115: 111: 108: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1107: 1034: 1029: 1014:Samantha Smith 1009: 1007:Samantha Smith 1004: 949: 947: 942:Nomination of 940: 901: 898: 861:Dig Your Roots 856: 853: 823: 822: 811: 810: 805: 802: 793: 791: 785: 784: 781: 778: 777: 747: 744: 726: 723: 703: 700: 687:for deletion. 667:will stop the 635: 634: 609: 606: 595:Theloudestfire 570:Theloudestfire 554: 551: 540:50.129.227.141 520: 517: 492:categorization 477: 475: 469: 450: 447: 430: 427: 412: 409: 353:Article Wizard 341: 332: 328:nomination of 323: 281: 278: 216: 211: 176: 173: 152: 149: 124:categorization 109: 107: 101: 98: 97: 92: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1106: 1097: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1070: 1068: 1063: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1033: 1028: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1008: 1003: 1002: 998: 994: 991: 990: 989:WP:Good faith 984: 980: 977: 972: 970: 966: 962: 961: 960:Humaninstitut 945: 944:Humaninstitut 939: 938: 934: 930: 925: 924: 920: 916: 911: 907: 897: 896: 892: 888: 884: 879: 876: 872: 866: 862: 852: 849: 845: 839: 838: 834: 830: 821: 820: 819: 818: 806: 803: 801: 797: 796: 788: 782: 780: 779: 773: 768: 763: 756: 751: 743: 741: 737: 733: 722: 721: 717: 713: 709: 699: 698: 694: 690: 686: 682: 678: 674: 670: 659: 657: 653: 642: 640: 633: 630: 629: 628: 626: 622: 621:Hummer (band) 605: 604: 600: 596: 592: 586: 583: 579: 575: 571: 567: 560: 550: 549: 545: 541: 537: 532: 530: 526: 516: 515: 511: 507: 503: 499: 498: 493: 489: 488: 473: 468: 467: 463: 459: 454: 449:show it to me 446: 445: 441: 437: 426: 425: 422: 418: 408: 407: 403: 399: 395: 390: 386: 381: 379: 375: 371: 367: 363: 356: 354: 349: 347: 331: 327: 322: 321: 317: 313: 309: 304: 301: 297: 291: 287: 277: 274: 270: 266: 262: 258: 250: 249:Best wishes, 247: 246: 241: 238: 235: 234: 230: 226: 222: 215: 210: 209: 205: 201: 196: 191: 186: 182: 172: 171: 167: 163: 158: 148: 147: 143: 139: 135: 131: 130: 125: 121: 120: 105: 96: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 1081:JeanPichette 1075:— Preceding 1071: 1064: 1047:JeanPichette 1041:— Preceding 1036: 1011: 986: 985: 981: 973: 958: 956: 946:for deletion 926: 903: 880: 858: 840: 826: 816: 813: 812: 800:Women in Red 732:Maryann.long 728: 705: 671:, but other 660: 652:edit summary 643: 636: 631: 619:The article 618: 587: 564:— Preceding 556: 535: 533: 528: 522: 495: 485: 484: 455: 452: 432: 414: 384: 382: 359: 350: 343: 305: 283: 255:— Preceding 251: 248: 242: 239: 237:Hi Bearcat, 236: 218: 200:JamesBWatson 194: 178: 154: 127: 117: 116: 75: 43: 37: 993:Menschpædia 910:Nate Diddly 865:Roots music 157:Liam Durcan 151:Liam Durcan 36:This is an 885:. Thanks, 458:Tim Bosnia 310:. Thanks, 261:Janeyboo10 221:Mel Norton 214:Mel Norton 95:Archive 20 87:Archive 15 82:Archive 14 76:Archive 13 70:Archive 12 65:Archive 11 60:Archive 10 869:Read the 804:June 2016 685:consensus 623:has been 525:John Yang 294:Read the 1089:contribs 1077:unsigned 1055:contribs 1043:unsigned 578:contribs 566:unsigned 506:Paul_012 436:Djripley 398:Usterday 269:contribs 257:unsigned 969:deleted 929:Brownsc 915:Brownsc 887:DPL bot 829:Ipigott 712:Brownsc 710:again? 500:on the 312:DPL bot 138:PanchoS 132:on the 39:archive 798:Host: 654:or on 252:Jane 162:Trb333 689:Karst 225:Cmr08 16:< 1085:talk 1051:talk 1022:talk 997:talk 933:talk 919:talk 891:talk 833:talk 736:talk 725:WENY 716:talk 708:here 693:talk 599:talk 574:talk 544:talk 510:talk 462:talk 440:talk 402:talk 316:talk 265:talk 229:talk 204:talk 166:talk 142:talk 871:FAQ 536:are 387:by 380:. 296:FAQ 290:BNN 202:" ( 1091:) 1087:• 1057:) 1053:• 1024:) 999:) 971:. 935:) 921:) 893:) 835:) 827:-- 738:) 718:) 695:) 658:. 641:. 601:) 580:) 576:• 546:) 512:) 464:) 442:) 421:TM 404:) 318:) 271:) 267:• 231:) 206:) 168:) 144:) 91:→ 1083:( 1049:( 1020:( 995:( 931:( 917:( 889:( 877:. 850:) 831:( 734:( 714:( 691:( 597:( 572:( 542:( 508:( 460:( 438:( 400:( 348:. 314:( 302:. 263:( 227:( 198:" 164:( 140:( 50:.

Index

User talk:Bearcat
archive
current talk page
Archive 10
Archive 11
Archive 12
Archive 13
Archive 14
Archive 15
Archive 20
Category:Fireworks festivals in Canada
Category:Fireworks festivals in Canada
categorization
the category's entry
categories for discussion
PanchoS
talk
02:13, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Liam Durcan
Trb333
talk
15:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Two Sided Amphora 63.1515
http://www.jstor.org/stable/4171394
Two-handled amphora (Boston 63.1515)
JamesBWatson
talk
22:35, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Mel Norton
Mel Norton

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.