Knowledge

User talk:Bearian/ArchivesLateAugust2007

Source 📝

31: 360: 176: 298:
is notable for writing on law in the US, but there's not a lot of that in the article. It's kinda difficult for me to write about his views on class action and tort reform because I don't much understand what either of those are or what's significant to mention in the article. :) Can I ask that you
458:
Hi Bearian, I remembered the RFA nomination that I offered you, so I decided to create a user subpage with the text of my nomination for whenever you decide to accept it. If you copy it into the RFA, you should state in your edit summary that you copied it with my permission. I am not putting
64:
Hi. Glad to see you got the pics. To put them on your User Page, you have to first upload them to Knowledge on their own page. (This is the page that you go to whenever you click on a pic in an article.) I did this for you just now. You can see them by clicking
109:
has been created and deleted twice - I think with two entirely separate articles - and I gather that the last to be deleted was a no-contest deletion as a spammy article with no assertion of notability. I haven't seen it of course, since it was deleted.
73:. I did not upload the one with me and Kat in it because I do not like posting pics of myself on the Net, and I do not know if Kat would want me to do so with her. To put the pics in an article or user page, just follow the instructions at 198:
seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
334:
Fair use images of living people aren't allowed on Knowledge just to show what they look like. Btw, what you mind sifting through his legal opinions and writing up the recorded viewpoints section? It really could do with a lawyer.
460: 113:
IMO Christianity Explored is notable and Wiki should have a good article about it ... but rather than leap in where Angels fear to tread (or fly?) I have created a personal sandbox page to draft something.
155:
So what would you like me to take a stab at? I'm not a hunter, so I don't have any particular expertise, and I'm better at finding old news stories, but hey, maybe I'll learn something. -
377:
We are a growing community of Knowledge editors dedicated to identifying, categorizing, and improving articles of interest to the LGBT community. Some points that may be helpful:
271: 214:, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at 91: 257: 381:
Our main aim is to help improve LGBT-related articles, so if someone asks for help with an article, please try your hardest to help them if you are able.
117:
I would be grateful for your views - I am contacting all those who commented in the last deletion debate, as you will have seen the previous article.
340: 329: 319: 404: 229: 415: 400: 81: 464: 408: 396: 264: 211: 195: 187: 169: 278: 159: 247: 422: 467: 430: 385: 97: 304: 224:
this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.
448: 369: 407:, all of which you are welcome to take part in. We also have a unique program to improve our lower quality articles, 167: 143: 459:
pressure on you to try RFA at a particular time: do it whenever you are ready. The nomination statement is here:
389: 77:. Just make sure you credit it to me by placing a wikilinked mention of me in the caption, okay? Thanks! 59: 203:, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please 191: 38: 150: 453: 204: 139: 131: 310:
Oh, that would be great. Btw, looked in your sandbox - would you be interested in joining
8: 275: 263: 222:
if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that
244: 243:
who did the heavy lifting. I wouldn't have known to cite that Oxford U Press book...--
200: 414:
If you have another language besides English, please consider adding yourself to our
283: 234: 210:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
47: 17: 350: 88: 78: 74: 66: 226: 219: 183: 135: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
311: 156: 70: 291: 254: 240: 215: 194:
from Knowledge. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
444: 336: 325: 315: 300: 295: 284: 395:
The project has several ongoing and developing activities, such as
359: 175: 205:
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
384:
Most important discussions take place on the project's
461:
User:Shalom/Drafts and archives/Nomination for Bearian
299:look him up and decipher it for the common reader? 190:, by another Knowledge user, requesting that it be 421:If you're planning to stay, have a square in our 270:I have restored the article to your userspace 418:, to help us improve our foreign LGBT topics. 294:and was wondering if you could help me out. 98:Christianity Explored - request for advice. 429:If you have any questions, feel free to 14: 425:! You can put anything you want in it. 411:, so please consider signing up there. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 274:so that you may continue to edit it. 433:, and we will be happy to help you. 405:a project-wide article collaboration 388:; it is highly recommended that you 25: 23: 358: 290:Heya! I noticed you a fair bit on 174: 146:) 21:07:30, August 19, 2007 (UTC). 24: 478: 29: 354: 182:Hello, this is a message from 13: 1: 341:15:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC) 92:15:08, 5 September 2007 (UTC) 324:Poke. Teddy's waiting... :) 201:criteria for speedy deletion 7: 468:22:23, 30 August 2007 (UTC) 449:22:52, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 330:21:44, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 320:22:40, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 305:22:33, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 279:22:41, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 258:19:11, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 248:18:56, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 230:17:32, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 218:. Feel free to contact the 186:. A tag has been placed on 160:22:52, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 82:15:54, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 10: 483: 436:And once again - Welcome! 397:article quality assessment 443:Welcome to the cabal. :) 357: 370:WikiProject LGBT Studies 368:Hi, Bearian, welcome to 87:Any time, brother. :-) 363: 179: 362: 178: 134:comment was added by 107:Christianity Explored 42:of past discussions. 431:ask on the talk page 386:main discussion page 60:Pics from the Wiknic 447:(Have a nice day!) 416:translation section 339:(Have a nice day!) 328:(Have a nice day!) 318:(Have a nice day!) 303:(Have a nice day!) 239:Thanks, but it was 364: 180: 120:The article is at 463:. Best regards, 441: 440: 147: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:Bearian 474: 355: 192:speedily deleted 184:an automated bot 129: 75:Knowledge:Images 33: 32: 26: 482: 481: 477: 476: 475: 473: 472: 471: 456: 374: 353: 288: 268: 237: 173: 153: 151:Hunting license 130:—The preceding 105:I noticed that 100: 62: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 480: 455: 452: 439: 438: 427: 426: 419: 412: 393: 382: 366: 352: 349: 348: 347: 346: 345: 344: 343: 287: 282: 276:Carlossuarez46 267: 262: 261: 260: 236: 233: 209: 208: 172: 168:Notability of 166: 164: 152: 149: 99: 96: 95: 94: 61: 58: 56: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 479: 470: 469: 466: 462: 454:RFA revisited 451: 450: 446: 437: 434: 432: 424: 420: 417: 413: 410: 406: 402: 398: 394: 391: 387: 383: 380: 379: 378: 375: 373: 371: 361: 356: 342: 338: 333: 332: 331: 327: 323: 322: 321: 317: 313: 309: 308: 307: 306: 302: 297: 293: 286: 281: 280: 277: 273: 266: 259: 256: 252: 251: 250: 249: 246: 245:SarekOfVulcan 242: 232: 231: 228: 225: 221: 217: 213: 206: 202: 197: 193: 189: 185: 177: 171: 165: 162: 161: 158: 148: 145: 141: 137: 133: 126: 123: 121: 118: 115: 111: 108: 103: 93: 90: 86: 85: 84: 83: 80: 76: 72: 68: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 457: 442: 435: 428: 390:watchlist it 376: 367: 365: 289: 269: 238: 223: 220:bot operator 181: 163: 154: 127: 124: 119: 116: 112: 106: 104: 101: 63: 55: 43: 37: 401:peer review 265:Joe Stenard 212:Joe Stenard 196:Joe Stenard 188:Joe Stenard 170:Joe Stenard 89:Nightscream 79:Nightscream 36:This is an 409:Jumpaclass 227:CSDWarnBot 136:Springnuts 296:Ted Frank 285:Ted Frank 235:Tom Smith 157:Crockspot 351:Welcome! 255:Shsilver 241:Shsilver 144:contribs 132:unsigned 125:Regards 312:WP:LGBT 253:Thanks. 128:Simon 39:archive 465:Shalom 445:Dev920 337:Dev920 326:Dev920 316:Dev920 301:Dev920 292:WP:LAW 216:WP:WMD 423:quilt 16:< 403:and 272:here 140:talk 102:Hi, 71:here 69:and 67:here 399:, 314:? 207:. 142:• 122:] 392:. 372:! 138:( 50:.

Index

User talk:Bearian
archive
current talk page
here
here
Knowledge:Images
Nightscream
15:54, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Nightscream
15:08, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
unsigned
Springnuts
talk
contribs
Crockspot
22:52, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Joe Stenard

an automated bot
Joe Stenard
speedily deleted
Joe Stenard
criteria for speedy deletion
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
Joe Stenard
WP:WMD
bot operator
CSDWarnBot
17:32, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Shsilver

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.