25:- that means that they must have significant coverage in sources independent of the bank - so magazine articles, reviews etc. I'm guessing that the article constructed didn't have those references and was therefore deleted because it failed to show notability.
32:
and once you are happy with it, I and other editors can take a look and tell you if it would make it as an article. If it does, we can then move it into article space. How does that sound? --
21:
Hi - I see you left a notice on user Fram's talkpage, so you get a quick reply, let me leap in here. For an article to be on wikipedia about a band, they need to have
41:
28:
I would suggest the following - construct the article in your userspace (I have made you a sandbox
37:
16:
8:
33:
29:
13:
14:
52:
1:
42:16:05, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
7:
10:
57:
48:
56:
55:
51:
50:
49:
47:
46:
45:
19:
17:About your band
12:
11:
5:
54:
18:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
53:
44:
43:
39:
35:
34:Cameron Scott
31:
26:
24:
27:
22:
20:
23:notability
38:talk
30:here
40:)
36:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.