User talk:Bjelleklang

2109:

episode for air crash investigation S14E01 is Choosing Sides. What does it take to burn that into those .... skulls of you 2. God damn funny how every episode out there of this episode all are titled "CHOOSING SIDES". but yet you 2 .... want to make others think you are smart, but yet can not provide 1 video to me that shows the title as M1 Plane Crash. I find that f... HILARIOUS. Bunch of little kids with no jobs or lives wanting to play power control and have no f... clue what they are talking about. You want to talk reliable, for god sakes, there are 50 web sites that list titles and episode numbers for every TV show and movie out there. They do not always jive with each other. That is how reliable your "RELIABLE" is. So get off your piddy pots and grow up and take it like a man and accept you are f.... wrong.

1462:). These are reliable sources that are newer than the ones you base your opinion on; and are no more or less reliable than FIFA or the Guinness book of World Records. The fact that we don't know what Benfica's current membership number is at right now doesn't matter; reliable sources have heard the claim that Bayern has a larger membership and decided to publish the claim; and that is all we need to state so in the article. Before you do any further reverts I strongly advise you to participate in the discussions at the talkpages for Benfica and/or Bayern where this very issue has been discussed before. Also, I'd appreciate it if you could indent your posts and sign them properly using four tildes (~~~~). 3348:], where Holanthony made similarly spurious complaints about reversion of their improper edits, only to have the complaint WP:BOOMERRANG and the discussion closed with a warning "that further edits posing BLP problems are likely to lead to sanctions". Sourcing biographies with tabloid garbage is unacceptable, whether the article subject is living or dead. Supporting an editor who plainly "clearly lack a basic understanding of a number of polices (not limited to just BLP). Including accusations of child molesting against non-notable people in a BLP? When no charges were even brought?" (to quote just one comment in that ANI) is particularly unacceptable for an administrator. Look before you leap. 1832:

resource' for the Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences in the UK. She is also regularly published in the CSIRO Magazine - a national magazine for those interested in science related matters. This is extremely rare for a poet. She has received a grant and had a large body of work vetted by the James Cook University in Queensland. She has a book of her poems published, and many more attributes. i understood by adding this and working on her site, the potential 'deletion' would be removed as I had also logged an objection while editing and improving the content. Berrell is becoming one of Australia's most notable poets. The references on the site all attest to the notability

983:

references to things that date from 2010-2014, are no longer relevant to the article that has been generated in recent weeks. The article is in a prose format. It has citations for verification. It is not an orphan. I am an artist and know the work of the subject. I understand the prose to be mostly information written in the style of other Knowledge entries I have studied. The article is full of real information. Putting up these blatant headings above this article is very discouraging has the feeling that there is some other motive other than reviewing the current article that has been generated without the former article being there in any form. All the very best, ~~Joan~~

4022: 2837:

article. I am a major contributor to the article and the tag indirectly accuses me of COI. The contents of that article were not just written unopposed but only after a thorough discussion with 3rd party editors on the talk page and the article was also reviewed later. The article sufficiently cites the various articles relevant to the controversy hence I find no reason to have a COI tag. No other 3rd party editors involved in the article since inception have agreed to addition of the tag, inspite of repeated calls.

649: 2969:). We would like to kindly inform that there has been considerable reference, news articles and press releases in the topic of Naik foundation. I am given to understand that the page was again deleted in March 2015 based on a deletion article published in 2012. However the rest of the references and the awards given by the government of india between 2012 and 2015 has given much credibility to the article. Please request you to reconsider this before the decision to delete the article is taken up. 3387:: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the 451: 3608: 55: 5528: 5505: 3747: 3566: 2860:

otherwise people might mistake it for bad-faith allegations. Second; the COI tag is to inform readers that a contributor to the article has a COI. If he has a COI as you suggest, the tag might be reasonable. It doesn't accuse you or anyone else of having a COI. Even if an article has a good amount of references, it can still be biased, so that by itself doesn't rule out the COI tag. Also, I happened to notice your latest remark at the SPI case against Md iet;

6764: 6672: 6147: 5364: 4842: 4324: 3865: 3792: 3720: 3469: 3040: 5574: 6090: 5980: 4489:

players whereas the other is awarded to football players, respectively. Also, the page I submitted had much more substance than the Gagliardi page. Why on earth does one trophy have a page but the other award is not allowed to have one? I ask you to reconsider your decision, or have somebody else review my submission, as I spent a lot of hard work, time, and effort into creating a professional and informational page for the sport community.

5946: 5296: 4218: 6171: 5404: 5551: 4715: 3675: 5914: 5890: 2673:

sources to back up this. I would agree with your suggestion to delete this article (because additionally there are no mainstream dictionary definitions I have found for the term). However it would be good to add to / change the Pyrotechnic article to include information re the use of fire and hand held fireworks. Pyrotechnicians do not only use explosive devices (in fact the lead in this article misleads). What do you think?

6375: 6829: 3267: 3627: 5270: 4271: 1585: 4997: 4580: 1789:

two days ago, and hopefully it wont come to that again. If a new EW appears to break out though, the article will be protected and any edits have be requested from the talkpage where a discussion should take place before it's approved. At least that's my view; blocking again won't really do much to resolve any underlying issues, and will only serve to drive people away from the article.

3555: 6874: 4528:

I had a look but didn't find anything other than articles mentioning finalists and winners, and nothing in-depth on the trophy itself. Hopefully someone else can find a few good sources for it, if not it will be deleted in a week or so. If that happens it is unfortunate, but without having any criteria for what can exist on Knowledge, it would simply become yet

2907:

of the world's leading pioneers of venture philanthropy (see my entry). This field is relatively new but growing rapidly all over the world, in large part thanks to him. As I indicated in the entry, he is responsible for almost 400 organizations donating money or professional services to needy non-profits. There is no one who has done more for the field.

143:. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks, 493: 625:. I have allowed myself to suffer under this editor for the past 12 months, that I ve been editing on WP. I cannot tell you how grateful I am for you to look at things and take action- unlike all the other admins we "petitioned". I didnt look who you are until posting this, but I am not surprised. What a breath of fresh air ! Thanks !-- 3426:

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent

3127:

Thank you so much for your helpful advice for the MATE-Museo Mario Testino page, I have added a new update to the main section by including some more references. A lot of the ones that we have used are from the first page on Google searches so I have done my best to find the most notable references.

1831:

Hello, Celia Berrell is a very notable poet. very few poets ever get published. She has her work in the High School Text books in Three Countries - Australia, Ireland and Canada. Education institutions in those countries consider her work worth studying by their students. She is also an 'approved

1046:

I am trying to understand and will review my previous content. There were many references used that came from the web. I now feel pretty discouraged by the removal of so much content that took ages to source and reference. She is an outstanding Australian who has done things in many areas with high

737:

3) This company is unusual & as an investment & management vehicle for its 3 owners, so is it OK to keep some of the ownership part in. I think owners might themselves be described as notable, giving national TV & journalist interviews. But I’ll aim to halve the 6 paragraphs in this part.

712:

5) “Find relevant references that primarily discuss the company and not companies they own or the owners of Greybull” I did have a hunt & will look again. But the many articles I’ve read on Greybull concentrate on their current purchases or deal. Little is visible on what the company is. I quoted

708:

4) “Focus on why Greybull Capital is notable” That’s tricky. I think it is the big companies that it owns which makes Greybull notable. It owns, has shut-down & has rescued household names who are on all main high-streets. I’ll try adding a short heading paragraph at the top, to justify why it is

6798:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of

4527:

As for the other trophy article you mention; this has the same issue as yours. It was created way before the current draft-and-review system was introduced, so it has been without sources since sometime in 2004. As nobody has added any sources to this article at all, I have proposed it for deletion.

4410:

Thank you for taking the time to review my article. I read your feedback and understand what is required of me for a resubmission. Your feedback will help me become a better article publisher and i look forward to learning alot from you. Your profile is to die for! very impressive. Well done for all

2906:

Most people I know don't even know what venture philanthropy is. And Mr. Miller has indeed worked to keep a low profile himself. Philanthropists tend to keep quiet, or everyone is asking them for money. However, he is quoted by no less than Harvard Business Review and numerous other sources as one

2902:

I'm a professional journalist, and I've done a lot of work for nonprofits, including Nobel Laureate Muhammad Yunus of Grameen Bank. I've met a lot of brilliant people in my work, but I am astounded by how much Mr. Miller has accomplished and his bold goals. I believe Mr. Miller's work, like that of

2859:

Sorry for the delay in responding to this, and thanks for the links. First of all, please don't read too much into the picture, as we have no way of knowing the context. If he has admitted to being a member of the DB, please give the exact diff _every time_ you make the allegation that he has a COI,

2786:

Hello, i'm just replying to your message on my talk page, The reason i had reinserted "non-notable" manufactures is i have found websites of them, proving to be active, but now from your message i know that simply a website is not enough, but my OCD senses are going crazy that some manufactures that

2610:

where indenting/moving another editors post is considered acceptable. FWIW, no content was changed, I just moved the post to make the thread easier to follow. I was directly responding to another editors post, one indentation level below their's, so I didn't think a "reply to" was necessary. Anyway,

2554:

by the 24.79.36.94 with the edit sum "it was where I intended it to be, the bold makes them distinct enough". Did I overreact and make a big deal out of nothing? Was it inappropriate for me to move 24.79.36.94's post to ensure proper chronological and contextual order? Again, this is intended to be

2519:, I'd like to ask you a question about article talk page usage. FWIW, I'm not out for blood or to get anyone punished. Rather, I would just like to know what is the preferred course of action in such situations just in case I am faced with the same thing in the future. Anyway, here is what happened. 2281:

Well he was already blocked once, yet his behavior has continued unabated. I've given up working on the pages he becomes involved in because nothing is ever done about him and his sock compatriots. And for that matter, you blocked the page in the version that he has been warring to keep. So he wins

2249:

placed on the ANI board recently. Distressingly, that has now been archived with no action taken, despite every user participating in the discussion being for some sort of sanction, including a topic ban. It is baffling to me that no admin took further action against this user. Everywhere he goes

2198:

Makes a lot more sense :-) At first I was shocked that you'd T-protect a very public page for more than a tiny amount of time (it's meant for ordinary users to be able to use!), especially after a request for just two or three days, but when I checked the page and saw that an IP had edited it hours

589:

Hi Bjelleklang. Thank you very much for your help in ending the harassment by that user. If you don't mind, at the 3RRN report you added the result "blocked", but I think since the filer was blocked, perhaps a mention can be added that it was the filer of the report who got blocked. Thank you again.

4488:

On June 4th, you reviewed the Jostens Trophy page and declared it not significant enough of a subject to have a wikipedia page. However, the counterpart of the Jostens Trophy, the Gagliardi Trophy, does have a wikipedia page. The only differences between the two is that one is awarded to basketball

2296:

I'm sorry, but I can't "decide" what version to protect. That would make me involved, I have to protect the latest revision as long as it doesn't blatantly violate eg. the BLP. The best thing you can do now is to propose an edit, give it a few hours and then tag it with the protected edit template.

1891:

Hello, I noticed something that needs to be changed on the WWE Championship page, I was going to do it myself but the page is locked & protected to prevent vandalism. I then noticed that you can edit the page.. Instead of "John Cena (12 times)", can you please put "John Cena (15 times)" because

775:

is the most important thing to consider here; having notable owners doesn't make the company notable; if they happen to be interviewed frequently you need to look at the context. If a CEO is interviewed for being a successful CEO, he might be notable. If he is interviewed as a representative of the

691:

I've read the link you offered & I think Greybull is notable. I knew nothing about them, but when they were headline news in all papers & on TV last year, I tried to look them up & was surprised that for a company owning such major parts of the UK high street and other business sectors,

295:

article. we are only fans of its imprints Pop Fiction and Sizzle Books. Some followers of this articles are collectors of thess books. We are trying to create an article that will list all the books to help them keep track of their collections. I hope you understand us. With regards to the sections

4800:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

2812:

lists some examples of what to look for. If you can find articles that talk about the company, and not just specific (recent) products you usually have a good start, especially if they mention the history of the company. Also keep in mind that if you can find an article or two, you might also have

2601:

Thanks for the feedback. WP:TPO also says that "Cautiously editing or removing another editor's comments is sometimes allowed, but normally you should stop if there is any objection. If you make anything more than minor changes it is good practice to leave a short explanatory note such as "". Some

2108:

youtube is not a reliable source, seriously. You think the video on there, that someone magically hardcoded in the CORRECT f.... name. I also have recorded the episode from TV on my HD GENIE BOX. You people are like dealing with people who are missing a few marbles in the bunch. Get f... real. The

2046:

Hi, sorry for taking so long to respond to you, but I've been busy offwiki for the past few days. I honestly don't know what to say on this one, it was clearly a 3RR violation and he should have been blocked. I somehow overlooked it and messed it up. I have taken a look at his recent edits, and he

1788:

Regardless of his intentions, the outcome is the same :) If he indeed is trying to manipulate me it's not really going to do much for him; as an admin my task is to prevent disruption and promote cooperation, regardless of how un/involved he is. I blocked you and two others to stop the EW going on

1744:

You attempted to discredit those whom you disagree with by trying to guess where they're from, what they care about, what they do for a living and most importantly, by calling them geeks, trolls, immature and schoolyard bullies (I'll be more than glad to provide Bjelleklang with a diff that proves

1389:

Fair enough, its the record established in 2006. However; it's still outdated, and is challenged by the source you replaced, which is newer. Just because someone set a record several years ago, we don't go around presenting that as still current if others have challenged it; especially as they now

2672:

Hi saw your changes to 'Inflammist' article. Meant to add in my revert that maybe the article should also be deleted as I to only found Google references that were based in this article. While there are people / performers who could be called 'inflammists' (I know some) there are not any reliable

733:

2) If so, can we keep the 4 smaller companies on the list (I’ll try & reduce their single sentence entries). Happy to remove them if asked, but it seems to me that the interest here is that Greybull runs huge companies when it co-ordinates other investors; but it also owns outright & runs

720:

7) “…the owners of Greybull” A journalist said they have a telephonist, but unlike a normal companies of such high value, Greybull appears to be effectively just its 3 owners. Yet it is a company owning & controlling £100M’s of UK business, so the ownership does seems important. I appreciate

4519:

article, but as it's from ODAC itself it cannot be used to assert the notability of the trophy. Good sources to use would be articles or books writing about the importance of the trophy itself, and not just the finalists or winners of the trophy. If you haven't already, please have a look at the

2910:

As a journalist, I appreciate the need to distinguish "notable" people from others. But in a culture that increasingly declares people as "celebrities" when they have done pretty much nothing except appear on television, isn't it important to recognize those who are actually out there trying to

1863:

It's not about being published, it's about having reliable sources for establishing notability. She is a writer as well, and the sources present when I nominated it indicated that some of the credits mentioned in the article was for her as a writer where she also happened to get a poem published

770:

First of all, don't write a short article just for the sake of having a short article, but it's often easier to write if you stick to the most important bits. Listing the most important companies is ok, but keep in mind that notability isn't inherited; just because they happen to own or be major

2735:. Didn't check to see if there were both. Yes I agree with you re the Pyrotechnics article. As you may see on the Pyrotechnicians article the lead mentions 'explosives' rather than the more inclusive definition in the other article. Happy to change the lead but does Knowledge need both articles? 2898:

Thank you for your time in reviewing this entry. I'm very puzzled, however, as to why Mr. Miller is not considered worthy of inclusion, especially after I revised the entry with the first reviewer's comments in mind. I hope you can help me either improve the entry or you will reconsider it.

3018:

Hello. has been protected since Feb 8 of this year, and basically has not been edited since. Perhaps it could be reduced to semi-protected? While I find it amusing that "no-go area" is a no-go area, to change an ampersand into the word "and" I will have to leave a request on the talk page.

2836:

This is as a gentle reminder for the COI related proofs given on my talk page on your request, the user ruqn has proven close connection to one of the claimants namely Mufaddal and to undermine the contents of the article he has put the COI tag eventhough he is not a major contributor to that

1871:

of the article; a "prod" is simply a deletion proposal that runs for a certain period; if it isn't challenged the article is deleted. Once you did that without adding sources that satisfied me of her notability, I decided to do a formal deletion nomination. That will run for 5 days giving the

6537:

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

1127:

Edits to this page over the last few days have several verifiability issues, Nd other editorial problems. Also, just noticed; I think it's a walled garden. Bigger problem too: the multi-million dollars sales reports are massively contentious. A little more balance may be needed on this.

982:

hello, Thank you for your advice and assistance. i understand most of what you are striving to achieve and will continue to do my best to work withinthe guidelines. With regard to the things at the top of the article, there was only a very brief stud article here in December 2014, so all

716:

6) “Ignore the companies it owns” Hopefully there some leeway allowed here? Unlike normal companies, Greybull seems effectively to be just the sum of the companies it owns. Take away those companies’ details & Greybull (though very big in jobs, business & financially), might just be

3939:

suggests that 12 months is a time from which an admin could be desysopped for inactivity, and you are at twice that. In light of the security issues that have existed, I am wondering whether it is worthwhile your continuing to hold rights during hiatus from editing and administration. —

3804:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3877:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1765:

yesterday and predicted exactly what Prhartcom was trying to achieve with his "innocent" question. He assured me that you are an experienced admin and that I should trust your judgement (which I do), however, I thought you might like to know all the facts before making any decision.

790: 3423:. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right. 2409:: Sorry for the late response. I've looked at his contribs, and they seem fine to me, at least for now. You might want to leave him alone, at least for now as he's already been warned by another user for the reverts on ARPANET. Ping me if he keeps reverting, but remember to 4685:

The article has been trimmed down to objective facts only. Long list of forecasts which were published by newspapers, media houses has been removed. And all the references are now highly reliable including two of them have their own wikipedia pages. Please check this draft

3294:

established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

1749:

You're trying to manipulate an admin by pretending to be a learner while where you were heading was obvious right from the beginning. The reason is quite obvious (you do your "friend" a favour and expect one in return, just like you did before). Who cares about what

6639: 929:

These articles are imbalanced, unfavourable to the subjects in them and there is simply no fair arbitration being done by people who actually have any knowledge of the community or the leaders in these articles. I can find not onesingle favourable mention in any of

1390:

claim to have almost 100.000 more supporters than the old record. Fifa also presents a lower number than what the Bundesliga article claims, so it's plain wrong to state that Benefica is the biggest club as a fact when we have at least one source contradicting it.

6696:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

5937: 4420: 6545:. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on 341:. If you want to get rid of it, start a discussion on the article talkpage. And you still didn't answer my question; why can't me merge the info about the imprint into the existing article on Summit Media and create a list of books they have published? 3481:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1636: 1624: 3284: 4171:

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are

2215:

I'm not really sure RD/S needs 3 days of semiprotection, if semiprotection at all. The last trolling was almost 24 hours ago, and it gets frequent good-faith edits from IPs, so it's generally never protected for more than a few hours at a time.

6753: 2246: 1489:

I think KansasBear, HistoryOfIran and Edward321 of one bangs. All of them are uzbekophobs. They even the Uzbek of Bedilya too wanted to make not the Uzbek .They in the page of Uzbeks added nothing but much that removed without explanation.

801:

1. how can I change the title? it seems almost impossible to do that 2. as you advised I would like to add a kind of synopsis right after the title and before the content. But again, I can't seem to do that, all content goes under "content"

2047:

seems to behave himself now, so it will be wrong of me to block him several days after the violation. However, if you do see someone editwarring again, don't hesitate to let me know. Again, sorry for overlooking such an obvious violation.

1609: 4524:, as it describes what is needed and why. If you have any sources you think would be useful, I'd be happy to help. We're here to build an encyclopedia after all, so I'd much rather have good sources and an additional article than not. 1354:

The Guinness Book of World Records entry is the record established in 2006. There's still not a new record. The FIFA source is actual. The source you provide is not from the Bundesliga. Stop reverting my editing or you be blocked.

6728: 6836:

provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5

2155:, and you responded with "Template protected for 3 months" and followed up by saying why you thought it ought to be semiprotected. (1) Which protection level did you intend to use? (2) Which page were you intending to protect? 6840:

Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at

4099:. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh 2941:"Most sources seem to be based on interviews or trivial mentions. Please provide reliable sources that contain enough information to pass the general notability guideline and the policy regarding biographies of living people." 5377: 2537:

in between the Wikimandia's post and my reply, which makes it seem as if I was replying to both editors even though I wasn't. Thinking this was done by accident, I moved the 24.79.36.94's post to the end of the thread per

3374:

based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your

4976:

this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the

776:

company he leads, the company (and not the CEO) might be notable. It all really boils down to finding sources good enough to satisfy the requirement stated in the GNG; if you can do that the rest should be fairly easy.

4163: 704:

3) “Remove contents not directly related to the company” OK I see several & will do; (Greybull’s purchases seem often in tandem with another investor, so I thought that relevant – but it’s certainly not vital).

1984:

that no violation had been made, these are the diffs that were provided with the complaint (original was a bit more verbose and included the original insertion of the material that was deleted by the complainant).

6700:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

4961: 2817:. If you find any articles about the companies and are uncertain if they are enough, please let me know and I'll be happy to look at them as well. If we can expand the list with more companies it would be great! 6795: 4509: 3427:

when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available

2250:

he edit wars, causes disruption, is abrasive to other users, and likely engages in sock puppetry. I encourage you to review this recent complaint. Protecting one page from his disruption is simply not enough.

2831: 905:

and his understanding of partisan editing. Even efforts to balance the topic and give it a genuinely neutral feel have been summarily dismissed. I have been served a ban merely for including facts without any

4501: 4493: 4432: 6568: 2268:; he basically have one choice now; either to participate or to stay away. If he continues to revert once the protection wears out using the same arguments as before, he's likely to end up with a block. 5391: 4869:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4351:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3889:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3816:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3686:

When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (

3493:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2365:, and his English is incompetent, as has been pointed out multiple times and as is evident in his edit comment "and not confusion print run and sold out" and adding text like "print run of 60,000 in 3342:

Multiple editors have objected to the inclusion of the content at issue, which is on its face sensationalist garbage. A single user wishes to restore it, claiming a spurious consensus. That editor,

6201: 685:

Thanks for taking the time for the notes & suggestions with the rejection Bjelleklang. I've been on a long holiday, but I’d like to keep going and try & get the submission right next time.

203: 1620: 6546: 6162: 1103:

Hello, thank you. When I feel up to it again, I will bring up the old information and see what works. I am confused about signing these talk bits. Is this how to use the four tildes <nwiki

4192:

means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

2241:

Thank you for taking action to protect the Xiongnu page due to the edit warring of Uniquark9. You may wish to know, however, that this is a pattern of behavior for this user. He frequently

296:

without citations, I am requesting for it to be semi-protected to avoid vandalism. The history part must not be stated in the article but I cannot remove it as someone posted it for a reason.

5453: 698:

1) “remove contact info”; That would be their address & company nr? Will do. (other wiki company pages gave HO addresses, so I tried to copy them). I’ll reduce it to ‘of London, England’

4635: 845: 5094: 1460: 3732: 3051: 2648:

Thank you very much for having protect Lynn's book against vandalism. I notice that TheRedPenOfDoom continue to delete what he doesn't like of the page. Could you do something for this ?

5927: 4597: 3736: 4885: 4703: 4367: 4286: 3905: 3832: 3509: 3215: 3210: 2159:

shows no protections since last month. (3) All this makes me wonder if you were actually responding to a different request, or if your message accidentally got garbled in some way.

1415:

So I think that the right thing for you to say is that "according to bundesliga numbers Bayern is the biggest club". Such status was not confirmed by FIFA nor recognized by the GBR.

1296:

Benfica is the biggest club in the world, according to the FIFA and the Guiness Book of Records (quotation on page). Please don't revert my change without presenting a valid reason.

863: 6817: 4572: 3219: 139: 6025: 4855: 4555: 4548: 4337: 4202: 3033: 2705:

is the science of using materials capable of undergoing self-contained and self-sustained exothermic chemical reactions for the production of heat, light, gas, smoke and/or sound.

2420:

This is following a notice on his talk page, and having his errors explain to him several times . He's also trying to hide what he did with the edit comment "répétition, space".

6845:. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the 3388: 825: 5997: 4274: 4263: 4261: 3202: 3043: 2445: 1751: 880:. This topic can use all the help it can get. There is a certain amount of partisan editing, but when it occurs it's usually easy to recognize. I've been alerting people under 137:

article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so,

4797: 4740: 4708: 4631: 3279:(also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned 3242: 231: 4978: 4181: 4146: 851:- If you add text before the first heading it will show up above the table of contents. Headings are denoted by equal signs; so add your text before the first ==Background==. 5933: 4442: 2516: 6576: 6123: 2846: 6206: 3178: 2010:

I thought that these "counted" as the requisite four reverts within 24 hours. Can you tell me how I made a mistake, so I can do it correctly if necessary in the future? —

1826: 1726:

someone into adding a version that suited Curly while the discussion was still taking place. So do us all a big favour and drop the act of the so called uninvolved editor.

1257: 4460: 1085:, so instead of writing everything from scratch, you can copy sections from there and fix them as needed. And remember to sign posts on talkpages with four tildes ~~~~. 3400: 2864:". You did the same, didn't you? Please be careful when you present your arguments, as there is a thin line between having a good case and making bad-faith accusations. 6693: 6011: 5116: 4540: 3362: 1454: 1139: 5283: 5128: 2886: 688:

Sorry to make your job harder by being overambitious. I tried to offer as complete & balanced an article as I could, which was reckless for a first time effort.

337:

subject and it must have reliable sources. No admin will protect the article for you in order to get rid of the history section, as this is a clear violation of the

6769:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the following articles to which you have significantly contributed, are suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

6426: 6157: 3930: 1956: 1922: 1900: 6553: 3287:

with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

3163:, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the 2581:

moving other posts aren't allowed, but you can remedy this quite easy by adding {{small|Reply to ]:}} at the start of your post. This should avoid any confusion.

1981: 1018:

I have removed some of the maintenance templates; but the ones regarding BLP and COI has to remain, as these are current issues. You might want to take a look at

5905: 4827: 3074: 2983: 1849: 752: 6642:

on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers,

6133: 4309: 2871:; sorry, but there is no such solution. If he is indeed an IP-hopping vandal (as my impression is), the only thing we can do is to block socks as they appear. 6630:

when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

5373: 4451: 3079: 2787:

i had believed to be notable is no longer on the page. Could you please list some ways to check notability for manufacturers that don't have a Knowledge page?

537: 3694: 3453: 6842: 6822: 3527: 1738: 1556:, please correct this statement: "You're both currently at three reverts each ..." I reverted this editor only twice, not three times, in the past 24 hours: 6802:

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit

3357: 198:; The article has no independent coverage, a quick search through Google doesn't seem to give me any relevant results, so as far as I can tell it fails the 6081: 6067: 3420: 2911:

improve the world? Your readers would benefit tremendously from this entry, as many may either want to contribute to this cause or could benefit from it.

2465: 1553: 6557: 3639: 6414: 4912: 4393: 3337: 3206: 1220: 1191:

my recent edit to this just got reverted and the explanation doesn't seem right. My gut feeling on this is another sock. Could you take a look please?

1154: 937: 312: 297: 254: 239: 193: 177: 3951: 3923: 3850: 6782: 6755: 6495: 6039: 5112: 5083: 3705: 3653: 3000:

Sadly, this article is getting hit with the same kind of vandalism as before. Could this be protected again, perhaps for a longer period than before?

765: 202:

A suggestion might be to drop the lists of books, compress the text a little and merge it into the article on Summit Media. You can also then create a

1946: 6390: 4546: 4505: 4497: 4436: 3761:(John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Knowledge seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009. 3569: 2654: 2110: 2089:

Thanks for letting me know, I double checked the policy and decided to let it slide just in case I was wrong as it wasn't specified as an exception.

1178:

Thanks for telling me; I knew about the SPI and had a feeling they were connected. Unfortunately I've been too busy to help for the past few days :/

1026:

for information; and websites or material created by people or organizations closely related to the subject of an article isn't considered reliable.

3139: 734:

medium size ones itself. These smaller companies are also of serious size (£5M companies / or employing 400 / or dominating their business sector)

6402: 6270: 6254: 6238: 6222: 5457: 4195:

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

3589: 3405: 3379:

in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the

3182: 663:

For investing time in getting to the bottom of an aggressive sock farm which was marring several AfD discussions. Thanks for your time and effort!

6833: 6724: 6521: 6361: 6302: 4653: 4056: 3772: 3768: 3543: 3458: 3119: 1939: 1880: 1601: 6745:

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

5086:. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please 4932: 1552:

on JimMacAllistair's talk page, but I do not think it will do any good. His edits on other articles follow the same pattern. Regarding your AN3

622: 6119: 3198: 2505: 2452:. As you can see by their contributions, the account is dedicated solely to this vandalism. I just thought I'd keep you up to date. Cheers! 2305: 2291: 2276: 1224: 373: 6859: 6711: 6103: 4771:

redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

4567: 4184:

our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular,

6486: 5087: 3988: 3972: 3776: 3160: 2796: 2774: 2460: 2439: 2429: 2397: 567: 4001: 3615: 3611: 3224: 2825: 2764: 2744: 2715: 1818: 1797: 1537: 1166: 967: 349: 305: 267: 247: 214: 6660: 4223: 2245:

to hide all the other warnings and notices placed there. He was blocked in December for using a sock account in an edit war. There was a

1291: 1093: 1067: 1034: 902: 784: 578: 2417: 2362: 2136: 6786: 4832: 4627: 4590: 4314: 3657: 3601: 3597: 2879: 2633: 2620: 2589: 2350: 1444: 1423: 1384: 1363: 1326: 1304: 1200: 1186: 6734:

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

6655: 3186: 2951: 2697:

A pyrotechnician is a person who is responsible for the safe storage, handling, and functioning of pyrotechnics and pyrotechnic devices.

433: 411: 6318: 5387: 3857: 3784: 3573: 3547: 3321: 3236: 3008: 2564: 2510: 2208: 2193: 2055: 1236: 1214: 4952: 3542:

from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please

2993: 1648: 291:; excuse me, where is the "we" in the context? We, the craetor of this article and me. by the way, we are not the contributor for the 6770: 6683: 5771: 5755: 5691: 5675: 5043: 4805:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 3581: 3099: 2485: 2097: 1809:

I understand perfectly, I just wanted to draw your attention to the canvassing issue which, as far as I'm concerned, is a major one.

4157: 2230: 1470: 1435: 1398: 1375: 1345: 1316: 185: 6297: 5739: 5051: 3534: 3419:, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at 2034: 1968: 1912: 1678: 730:

1) Do you think it would be acceptable to keep the companies it owns in the current heading format? (I’ll reduce the entry sizes)

162: 6113: 4515:

The draft was rejected as there were no sources referenced that show that the trophy itself is notable. The closest source is the

1659: 756: 6197: 6077: 6063: 5993: 5723: 5047: 3619: 3585: 1964: 1908: 1690: 1653: 4674: 3697:

closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (

2914:

I look forward to your response. (Also, please note, for some strange reason I could not even see your review until recently.)

2019: 6021: 6007: 5627: 5421: 5323: 5197: 5090:. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged. 5039: 4704: 3371: 3307: 1578: 1331:

You are replacing a fairly recent source (November 2014) with an outdated one from 2006. I have explained this on your talkpage

5439: 3028: 2869:

Please find a permanent solution to this problem as md iet is creating accounts to evade block and bans and wasting admin time

1614: 5815: 5707: 5659: 5643: 4758: 4177: 3577: 3539: 3328: 3232: 3095: 3092:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2481: 2478:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1975: 5075: 2550: 2533: 2527: 2521: 1775: 6651: 6517: 6265: 6249: 6233: 6217: 6190: 4984: 4908: 4623: 4389: 4011: 3919: 3846: 3664: 3593: 3523: 3449: 3428: 3414: 3396: 2926: 1135: 167: 6846: 6286: 6059: 5786: 5579: 5533: 5510: 5035: 4305: 3958: 3228: 3070: 1457: 680: 517: 2809: 945: 5611: 5595: 5556: 5413: 4278: 3047: 2125: 1872:

community a chance to argue either for or against deletion, as well as to propose other actions (such as redirection).

1723: 1506: 1450: 1143: 1019: 634: 475: 120: 6716: 3643: 2987: 2385: 2336: 1708: 893: 6366: 6357: 6350: 6334: 4823: 4642: 4612:

There is currently a backlog of over 1300 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

3273:

Hello, Bjelleklang. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

2979: 2555:

for my own future reference and is not at all to be seen as a complaint against another editor. Thanks in advance. -

1063: 999: 748: 4698: 2259: 2083: 1120: 1003: 721:

transient shareholders are not relevance to most companies, but Greybull is an investment vehicle for its 3 owners.

6345: 4947: 3935:

Hi. I see that it is a long time since you have edited at any Wikimedia site, and nothing here for over two years.

3709: 3013: 2994: 2449: 2242: 2168: 2156: 1947:

http://www.classicalite.com/articles/9518/20140702/john-cena-wwe-world-heavyweight-champion-15-time-winner-2k15.htm

955:

If you are here in order to get the ban lifted I'm sorry to disappoint you. Please follow the instructions left by

4168:

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

3254: 2682: 1734: 1280: 6647: 6513: 6053: 6017: 4904: 4619: 4422: 4385: 4150: 3915: 3842: 3519: 3445: 3392: 3353: 3313: 3174: 2885: 2544: 2378: 2118: 1663: 1332: 96: 92: 88: 84: 80: 76: 72: 4256: 2662: 1695: 936:

You seem to be a diligent and careful appraiser and I would very much appreciate your careful looking into this.

553: 5822: 5431: 5031: 5012: 4973: 3380: 1886: 1227:

seems to behave and edit in a similar manner to the socks and was created two days after the socks got banned.

24: 6579:. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January. 6526: 2756:

It depends; if there are enough material and sources to support two articles there is no problem having them.

1573: 1510: 1453:. Presenting Benfica as the biggest club is wrong when there are multiple reliable sources stating otherwise ( 868:

great, thanks a lot! I managed to change the title and added a small introduction! got it now! cheers, Monica

6129: 5806: 5778: 5762: 5698: 5682: 5337: 5319: 5192: 5174: 3647: 3084:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2470:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2320: 821: 483: 386: 5746: 4173: 4032: 1561: 1557: 607: 596: 5848: 5730: 4928: 4878: 4807: 4724: 4360: 3898: 3825: 3693:

Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Knowledge, an

3502: 2862:"His contributions itself are evidences that it is a sock of md iet as he directly jumped to bohra articles 1995: 1990: 5634: 4938:

If this might be of interest to you, please let me know. If not, please excuse me for distubing you. Bw --

4757:

disambiguates only one extant Knowledge page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a

1335: 6803: 6261: 6245: 6229: 6213: 5961: 5714: 5666: 5650: 5449: 4890: 4372: 3910: 3837: 3712:

to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

3514: 3280: 2471: 2063: 1960: 1904: 1845: 1837: 672: 612: 441: 5070:

After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name

259:; who are 'we' in this context? Also, why does the article have to be a separate one from Summit Media? 6591: 6329: 6293: 5989: 5792: 5586: 5540: 5517: 4802: 3349: 2602:

examples of appropriately editing others' comments:" and then goes on to list various examples such as

2448:

has an autoconfirmed (although very new) account and is continuing with the vandalism, last night with

1431: 1371: 1312: 570:. I decided not to block REPARADOR as he was reverting the removal of a source that seemed legitimate. 206:

listing the books, awards and so on. But as it stands, I don't think the imprint is notable by itself.

5618: 5602: 5563: 5102: 2151:, but I think you made a mistake somewhere. Robert McClenon requested 2-3 days of semiprotection for 2005: 2000: 399:

Already seen it, got a checkuser to help me out. Have closed two AN3 cases, and I'm about to reply to

238:

article. How about if i renamed it to List of Pop Fiction and Sizzle Books Published by Summit Media.

6774: 6687: 6109: 5923: 5351: 5151: 4922: 4476: 3331:. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC) 2324: 2315: 2287: 2255: 2182: 877: 45:

This page does not contain all previous posts, please see the archives in the box to the right -: -->

3300:

Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective

3259: 4731: 2142: 2070:

Hey, just a heads up, users arer allowed to remove active block notices per the "clarification" of

1564:. In each case, I reverted incorrect and unsourced changes to the article by this editor. Regards, 871: 6901: 2607: 2603: 2539: 6031: 5504: 4965: 4694: 4464: 4301: 4233: 3066: 2957: 154: 4658:, feel free to describe any issues you have with the article. You can also improve it yourself, 3346:, has a long history of problematic edits to biographies. See, for example, this ANI discussion 2707:

I'm not sure if we need to be so specific, but feel free to change the articles if you want to.

2157:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special:Log&page=Knowledge%3AReference+desk%2FScience

1205:

Actually, never mind. It seems to address the opposing sources, although it is a little wordy.

713:

a journalist’s description of them as being an address with an unmarked bell push on the wall.

6421: 4472: 4046: 3983: 3967: 3946: 3250: 3085: 2792: 2740: 2678: 2424: 2392: 2373: 1858: 1841: 1833: 1814: 1771: 1644: 1502: 941: 541: 301: 243: 181: 5527: 4456: 2025:

Hi, hope you didn't miss this question. Really interested in what the disconnect is/was here.

792: 6575:

on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can

6313: 6309: 6281: 4866: 4819: 4348: 3886: 3813: 3490: 1116: 1108: 1059: 995: 977: 549: 507:

In appreciation of your efficient behind-the-scenes work to contain an aggressive sock farm.

465:

In appreciation of your efficient behind-the-scenes work to contain an aggressive sock farm.

6556:. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can 4120:

Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers.

6614: 5971: 5333: 5169: 4877:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4359:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4207: 3936: 3897:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3824:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3501:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3241:, I thought I'd let you know an RFC has been started over reliable sources. Please join in 3135: 3024: 2975: 2658: 2611:

it's a mute point now. Live and learn. Thanks again for the clarification and your time. -

2517:

Talk: Remember (The Walking Dead)#RFC: Can the plot summary contain a separate/block quote?

2283: 2265: 2251: 2114: 1952: 1896: 1596:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

1494: 1419: 1359: 1300: 1131: 1051: 987: 915: 889: 809: 744: 668: 6583: 3350:

The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.

1945:@Bjelleklang here is the source to prove that John Cena is indeed a 15-time WWE Champion. 1082: 926:

only with references to groups that are not in support of the community and its practises.

8: 6813: 6493:

page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the

5550: 4680: 4563: 4529: 3376: 2842: 2616: 2560: 2332: 2103: 2064: 1892:

that's the number of wwe championship reigns John Cena has had. Please & thank you!

1543: 1276: 1232: 1210: 1196: 1162: 584: 2297:

As long as you have good arguments for it it shouldn't be a problem getting it through.

6897: 6643: 6635: 6341: 6049: 6003: 5956: 5309: 4690: 4292: 4282: 4252: 3435: 3276: 3191: 3057: 2922: 2667: 2643: 2221: 2071: 911: 630: 514: 472: 430: 383: 145: 5836: 4782: 4634:. If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the 4095:

Recently, several Knowledge admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were

2813:

what it takes to start an article about the company; one sentence is enough to make a

133:

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Articles for creation for a

6466: 6409: 5435: 5417: 4849: 4331: 4199: 4154: 3978: 3962: 3941: 3873: 3800: 3477: 3459: 3291: 3246: 3115: 3106:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

3001: 2804: 2788: 2751: 2736: 2690: 2674: 2501: 2492:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2453: 2421: 2404: 2389: 2370: 2356: 2236: 2204: 2164: 2030: 2015: 1810: 1783: 1767: 1640: 1589: 1569: 1520: 1498: 1153:

It looks like a lot of the contributions to this page came from accounts involved in

817: 525: 363: 37: 4468: 3977:

Never trust tools, double check. I am told that I missed something. My apologies. —

6889: 6624: 5347: 5146: 4943: 4897: 4862: 4814: 4786: 4768: 4667: 4533: 4379: 4344: 4096: 4049:

if your Knowledge account password or email password is reused on another website,

3994: 3882: 3809: 3486: 2944: 2872: 2818: 2781: 2757: 2722: 2708: 2626: 2596: 2582: 2343: 2298: 2269: 2186: 2129: 2090: 2048: 1932: 1873: 1804: 1790: 1758: 1686: 1530: 1463: 1391: 1338: 1179: 1112: 1104: 1086: 1076: 1055: 1027: 1013: 991: 960: 881: 856: 777: 618: 571: 561: 545: 492: 418: 404: 342: 286: 260: 225: 207: 3698: 771:

investors in well-known chains or stores, that doesn't make Greybull notable. The

540:. This user has been disruptive for a number of years. Please see conversation at 6853: 6385: 6185: 6181: 6099: 6045: 4954: 4744: 3343: 3131: 3020: 2366: 2079: 1526: 956: 885: 664: 6796:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of Bengali songs recorded by Shreya Ghoshal

4801:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

4743:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

4039:

The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.

3687: 36:

Please note that unless otherwise stated, I will reply here and notify you with

6808: 6738:

Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR

6600: 6397: 6277: 6035: 4874: 4659: 4559: 4356: 3894: 3821: 3498: 3144: 2854: 2838: 2814: 2728: 2612: 2572: 2556: 2328: 2148: 1868: 1715: 1696: 1632: 1484: 1427: 1367: 1308: 1272: 1228: 1206: 1192: 1173: 1158: 648: 338: 6892:

for good services as an admin, and for resigning the tools in a noble manner.

3434:

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at

1927:

Can you please provide the exact link of the page to be changed, as well as a

1631:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

1529:, don't accuse others of being uzbekophobs and participate in the discussion. 450: 105: 6893: 6592: 4969: 4870: 4663: 4607:

the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

4352: 4248: 4185: 4100: 3890: 3817: 3494: 3167: 3153: 2934: 2918: 2578: 2410: 2218: 2152: 1681:

in the hours after your descicion. IMHO this calls for page protection. Bw --

1674: 1666:

under the reason that there was "Not enough recent disruptive activity .."

919: 793:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:EU_research_and_innovation_for_the_environment

772: 626: 509: 467: 425: 394: 378: 322: 199: 54: 6561: 4043:

Use strong, unique passwords for your Knowledge account and associated email

172:

What's wrong with the article? Pop Fiction and Sizzle Books are imprints of

109: 6325: 5900: 4244: 4228: 4164:

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

3607: 3111: 3107: 2732: 2700: 2497: 2493: 2200: 2176: 2160: 2041: 2026: 2011: 1928: 1704: 1565: 1525:

As you have seen there is a discussion going on at the talkpage. Please be

1023: 835: 813: 326: 292: 235: 173: 6603:; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest. 5074:. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its 3746: 129:

This is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Articles for creation

6864: 5967: 4939: 4723:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

4521: 3758: 3324:

carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.

3283:

was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following

3243:

Talk:List_of_ministers_of_the_Universal_Life_Church#RFC:_Reliable_sources

2199:

after your last comment, I realised that there was a mistake somewhere.

1682: 639: 334: 318: 6607:

AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.

6461: 4881:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4402: 4363:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3901:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3828:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3565: 3505:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

111: 6456: 5279: 5123: 4859:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4516: 4341:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4050: 2832:

Incorrect COI tag in 53rd Syedna succession controversy (Dawoodi Bohra)

2075: 1047:

calibre people. I will give up for now. ~~Joan Silver|Joan Silver~~

602: 591: 5945: 5295: 4792:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

4764:

disambiguates zero extant Knowledge pages, regardless of its title; or

4217: 2895:

I'm writing regarding the rejection of my entry on Douglas L. Miller.

6678: 6662: 6146: 5363: 5305: 4841: 4323: 4076: 3864: 3791: 3719: 3667:, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators. 3468: 2185:

which was protected for 3 months. I protected WP:RDS for three days.

1762: 1677:

and myself are using a slow revert policy; but please take a look at

692:

there was no wiki mention and no business summary visible elsewhere.

400: 369: 6089: 5979: 6534:

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

6170: 5403: 2475: 1549: 798:

Hi and thanks for your comments. I have 2 quick questions for you:

107: 6541:

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin

6374: 4647:

You should delete the article as it does not meet the guidelines.

2965:

With reference to your deletion of the article "Naik Foundation" (

1605: 5913: 5889: 3674: 3089: 5269: 4894:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 4376:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 4131: 3173:

template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at

2727:: There is some confusion. I was referring to the article about 6073: 4884:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

4366:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

3904:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

3831:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

3508:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

3266: 1718:: You somehow "forgot" to mention three very important points. 6828: 5232: 4968:

from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with

4931:. I'm writing this to draw your attention to my message here: 4853:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

4610:

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

4335:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

4127:

How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)?

3626: 922:

in particular have been allowed to have a malign and negative

112: 5934:

List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Iraq War

5105:, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue. 4996: 4117:

Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable).

4114:

Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites).

3961:, so it may be worthwhile replying there rather than here. — 876:

Hello Bjelleklang. I'm glad to see you trying to moderate at

5256:

Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921.

4933:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Norway#Rock_art_articles,_anyone?

3554: 6873: 6694:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Concerned (2nd nomination)

5240: 5184: 4787:

see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information

4687: 4579: 1256: 1150:

also, edit history looks suspiciously like sock puppetry.

791:

Advices on EU research and innovation for the environment

4573:

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

4287:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

3052:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

2966: 923: 907: 6852:

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. —

4145:

This message was sent to all administrators following a

3034:

Nomination for deletion of Template:Attempting wikibreak

727:

So could I ask 3 questions before I try a resubmission?

532: 6676:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

6634:

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at

5138: 4865: