User talk:Millelacs/Archive 5

1845:(and similar list articles) and when doing so thought that instead constructing the list by war and then by protagonist one could list by country and then my war. Of course, one could do this for all countries. However, the one I was most interested in was my own. Perhaps if I had kept the article simple it might have worked. Begin with a tight list and expand if the need arises. I am not preciously bound to the article that I have created but I do think the idea useful. I might need to begin again. However, I am getting a sense, from you and from others, that such an endeavour is a pejorative exercise against Britain - it certainly wasn't meant to be so. The book came out of nowhere for me - my wife laughed when she told me about the book "you are not the only one". That you for sharing your thoughts 64:, as the user doesn't appear to be interested in supplying more content. Your tagging was technically correct, however I strongly encourage you not to tag pages A1/A3 immediately after creation. New users often type a few words a hit save as a sort of test. By tagging the article instantly, you are potentially sending a single "your contribution is not welcome" which might cause them not to write the rest the (potentially useful) article they were intending to write. There is no hurry to tag such articles, so please give people a chance to write more in the future. 1983: 1484: 1613: 1544: 1713: 1373: 1197: 938: 790: 678: 460: 348: 153: 110:(which I've only just put on wiki) - and at the moment, you're not quite there. Graeme Bartlett has given you some great advice though, I'd suggest you'd take it. Keep on doing what you're doing, focus on quality of edits and I'm sure you'll be ready to run in a few months. Perhaps give me another shout in the summer - I'll do a full review and see how you hold up for a nomination then if you like? 588:(a number of whom have long since left, thank goodness) who would like me to be harassed and exposed by having the pages reinstated. Regrettably I need to add this disclaimer in case anyone thinks that they need to "reinstate" my account, against my express wishes. I'm merely replying to let you know that no harm has been done :-) 587:

Oh, and P.S. this is an Optusnet Cable Internet IP address. It's shared amongst a LOT of users of Optusnet. The above comment shouldn't be seen as me in any way coming back to Knowledge (I had my talk pages deleted). Unfortunately, I need to make this clear as there are a number of Knowledge editors

288:

discussion; we're developing a new patrolling interface for new articles, and we want your input like never before :). So if you haven't already seen it, please go there, take a look at the screenshots and mockups and ideas, and add any comments or suggestions you might have to the talkpage. Thanks!

89:

you should think about what kind of administrative work you want to do. Do you want to edit protected pages? Do you want to close controversial discussions? Block vandals, delete pages, protect pages? Then do more work related to that area. Two months of good work should prove your interest and

1330:

is another highly relevant primary source. It covers the history of the Abbasid caliphate from 323-333 A.H./934-944 A.D. and extensively details the careers of the two men. I've seen some versions of the book online, and some major libraries also carry it. Unfortunately I don't believe any English

1092:, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the 253:

Just a notice – I had posted, using an IP address account, that activity would be limited due to security concerns. Though the concerns were all too real at the moment, they have been addressed and there was no risk of my account being compromised.

1510:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

105:

Hi dci. I just thought I'd drop you a not here rather than your editor review, mostly because I don't have time to do a full review. Generally when people ask me about becoming an administrator, I check them against how they hold up to my

902:

is scheduled to be closed on 26 August 2012 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding

1840:

I have always been impressed by Knowledge and I am now beginning to know why. Reading all the comments that people have placed in the delete article talk section has been most informative. I have often used the article

1404: 2010:

Hey, thaks so much...I did notice the same after creating the article & therefore I only tagged it of duplication & merger. Please delete the article as it is actually duplicate however, it was unintentional.

1514:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

893: 1228: 1212: 1744: 1728: 1388: 969: 953: 1220: 379: 363: 184: 168: 1736: 1087: 709: 693: 1113: 1473: 1396: 821: 805: 491: 475: 1236: 961: 1752: 371: 176: 1558:

I award you this token of appreciation for several excellent contributions in historical articles, especially in the more obscure and neglected areas and periods. Keep it up!

1507: 1412: 829: 701: 499: 977: 916: 813: 602:

I'm thinking you might have intended to reply to someone else; I don't recall having anything to do with this template and don't remember any conversation with you before.

483: 387: 192: 717: 837: 507: 1529: 282:

RfC :). It's always great to be able to field questions like these to the community; it's genuinely the highlight of my work! The NOINDEX idea sprung from our

1864:

Hi, just letting you know that I've addressed some of your comments and replied on the review page just in case you don't have it on your watchlist. Cheers,

1132:

that shows off all the features, just in case there are things you're not familiar with. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know

130: 61: 1093: 1916: 2020: 1896: 597: 38:

Hi, I would leave the AfD in place in case the speedy is declined. If the speedy is accepted, the closing admin will remove the AfD anyway. Regards,

1286: 1968: 1180: 1878: 1846: 1578:

I re-opened the peer review. It is standard for the bot to close them if there are no comments in a certain amount of time, but usually they get

1467: 1054: 1027: 652: 633: 616: 298: 1854: 1777: 1437: 1261: 1099: 1002: 862: 742: 532: 437: 412: 217: 1807: 242: 2005: 1033: 887: 557: 1696: 1356: 1308: 1072: 921: 767: 1835: 1712: 1372: 1196: 937: 789: 677: 459: 347: 331: 152: 23: 1145: 1892: 136: 1496: 773: 1899:

first. You are receiving this notification because you commented at one of the articles or AfDs that are cited in the discussion.

1657: 1129: 443: 273: 1292: 1997: 1175: 1773: 1433: 1257: 1109: 1079: 1060:

No hurry. I have outstanding GAN from March/April. A week, at this point, is no longer a time unit I care about that much :) --

998: 858: 738: 664: 528: 408: 279: 213: 76: 326: 1781: 1676:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

1565: 1441: 1265: 1006: 866: 746: 536: 416: 221: 1912: 1873: 1842: 1351: 1944: 1927: 1908: 1038:

Thanks for the heads up. Incidentally, would you be interested in offering a second opinion in the GA review of his son,

107: 1619: 1318:

Hi, I saw that you were interested in creating articles on Bajkam and Tuzun. In addition to the history of Miskawayh in

625: 589: 573: 47: 99: 1959:, and discussion is beginning to take place on the talk page over various crucial issues. Hope you can participate! 1331:

translations are available yet, but if you're interested you should definitely check it out. For secondary sources,

1078: 581: 2047: 1119: 621: 268: 1598: 1128:

recently - this is just to let you know that we've deployed the final version :). There's some help documentation

1830: 1293: 899: 1939: 1039: 1964: 1491: 1475: 1818: 1973: 1150: 1133: 309: 90:

skill. Also many find that RFA is a stressful week, so are you ready to have all your mistakes criticized?

303: 1677: 1663: 1327: 126: 52: 1960: 1859: 1500: 95: 1534: 1313: 569: 1042:? The review there has stalled (reviewer's first review, and he is inactive since August 16th). -- 1904: 33: 2016: 1787: 1686: 1447: 1271: 1141: 1012: 872: 752: 629: 593: 577: 542: 422: 380:

Bomzibar on Subhas Chandra Bose; Hawkeye on corps commanders; Nick-D on American special forces

294: 227: 1612: 1624: 1158: 1151: 111: 1951: 1826: 1125: 91: 8: 2031: 1573: 1562: 911: 72: 17: 1900: 1850: 1795: 1673: 1463: 1304: 1020: 880: 760: 550: 430: 235: 2025: 2012: 1993: 1982: 1935: 1786: