486:
different times of the day and it is a lot easier to do the review and deletion work in small groups throughout the course of a day or night than to do many articles all at once at the same time each day. I know it is a lot easier to do things in one fell swoop but speaking for myself, it's easier to handle 4-7 PROD'd articles every few hours than 12-15+ all at the same time. In fact, although your User page says you live in the EST time zone, you must keep your own working hours because I've seen your PROD'd articles at all hours of the day and night! Maybe a little insomnia? I use to suffer from that and came to
Knowledge to work but I found it was actually stimulating, not sleep-inducing so I eventually stopped.
1015:
900:
675:
1059:
104:
507:
normal hours so I get on here whenever I can't sleep and do a little work. I am really trying to clean up the film/TV notability tags. At one time the films had 2000+ tagged, but now hover around 10-20. When I started the TV, they had about 1800, but now have less than 900. As you know, they have not all been removed through deletion...I improve what I am able to and remove the tag (or remove it if has already been addressed, but an editor forgot to remove the tag themselves.) Again, thanks again!
570:
proposed deletion. We do have some editors who check out PRODs before they are deleted but it's just a thought that these articles can be made into redirects rather than deleted. You ever want to turn your PROD eye into clearing out some of the articles on obscure children's TV shows, cartoons, anime or their characters, I think you'd be doing the project a service! We have a lot of content that is more appropriate for Fandom than
Knowledge. Thank you for your contributions.
170:
465:
because it has been PROD'd before. You might be surprised by the fact that many editors never look at the page history to see if an article has been PROD'd before. So, thanks again for checking and double-checking articles you tag for deletion to ensure that all of the i's are dotted and the t's are crossed. It makes things much easier for admins who review the daily PRODs to know that I don't need to devote extra scrutiny to the ones you tag. Have a great 2023!
752:
782:
1097:
Deletion, it would save other editors' time from having to do this themselves. This would especially help out relieving the burden from other editors when you go on a mass-tagging spree with a dozen or more articles that have to be
Redirected. Thank you for considering taking a different approach to handing these non-notable album articles.
534:
Just letting you know that the rules around BLPPROD are a bit counter-intuitive. If it has any sort of external link, including authority control, the BLPPROD is invalid. In cases like this a regular PROD might be necessary. With that said, I reiterate the messages above thanking you for your work in
224:
is a script that most editors who "Draftify" articles use because it not only moves the article but it also posts a notification for you. I recommend it. Again, a very handy tool. And, if you like, both the
Draftify script and Twinkle will keep logs if you want, to keep track of pages you have worked
211:
If you want to move pages around from main space to Draft space, there are a few things you need to do to help out your fellow editors. First, please tag the original page for speedy deletion, CSD R2 so that the page is brought to admins' attention and doesn't get forgotten. It should be deleted as a
1096:
Rather than PROD'ding a dozen album articles, please consider changing them to
Redirects to the artist's article. That is usually what happens with these tagged-articles but it is other editors taking care of it for you. If you could just redirect them yourself, rather than tagging them for Proposed
970:
I don't think there is a place for it on
Knowledge. I, also, couldn't find anything to establish it existed. It's a redirect to the man, so I think it is fine. The only other option would be to have the redirect deleted and salted so that it cannot be recreated, but is it worth the effort? Hope this
688:
I've recently been looking for editors to invite to join the new page reviewing team, and after reviewing your editing history, I think you would be a good candidate. Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of
Knowledge policies and guidelines; the new
608:
You might also consider archiving your talk page rather than deleting messages. I thought you hadn't received any talk page messages for months until I looked into the page history. Archiving is easy and allows you to quickly find messages from the past to see if you had had contact with an editor
587:
I came to leave you a message and found that I already did months ago. Instead of PRODding albums, please consider redirecting them to the artist's article. I just did that with about 5 or 6 articles you PROD'd and there are more than will receive that treatment tomorrow. It would be easier if you
506:
Thank you for your kind words. I do spread them out throughout the day, mainly because I do make my own work hours, but also because it takes time to research and vet the articles before nomination (even though I have one or two users who regularly claim I don't do BEFORE). And, yes, I don't sleep
312:
to see what other editors think are films which aren't really up to have their own pages. I usually do a BEFORE to see if I can save them, and there are quite a lot I come across where I find enough citations that I then add to an article and then remove the notability tag. The ones I can't find
464:
I see now that I already have left a message for you earlier in 2022 about the PRODs you do but I just wanted to compliment you again on your
Proposed Deletion work. It is clear that you always check out the page history thoroughly, I have never had to remove a PROD tag from an article you PROD'd
386:
336:
Tracking down references to improve articles is better than deleting them so, bravo! I think that would be a challenge since most of the movies I see tagged are international ones and you'd be evaluating reviews in newspapers in non-English speaking countries. Working on
Knowledge makes me wish I
569:
I see you have moved on from tagging obscure foreign movies for proposed deletion to tagging obscure album recordings. I've noticed that most of these PROD'd articles are challenged and are turned into redirects to the artist's article. You might consider doing this rather than tagging them for
485:
I'll just add to this message instead of starting a new section on your talk page since it is also about your PROD work. I just wanted to say that I appreciate you PROD'ding small groups of articles at different times over the 24 hour clock. Different administrators "patrol" the PROD list at
282:
as I check it over the course of a day and I just wanted to thank you for tracking down and tagging for proposed deletion some truly marginal films that have been made. I don't know how you find these articles but I don't think their deletion is a big loss for the project. I also help out at
489:
Any way, thank you for your consistent efforts to clean up our film and TV series areas of the project. If you ever wanted to review children's TV shows, I think we have a lot of dead wood there as well as we seem to have had a fair number of editors creating articles on obscure children's
66:
The short
Argentine film stubs can be deleted, I never got around to filling them out. They can be restarted at a later date when somebody is willing to do it. German TV series and rivers too, a few thousand there in total. Feel free to prod as many as you want just don't template me. :-)†
953:? Last time around, discussion on the redirect just went around in circles and I think was clouded by my more tendentious attitude. Since then, the only sources even remotely claiming it existed have gone down, and nothing exists but Knowledge mirrors. I still maintain this was a
762:
Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! As the year winds to a close, I would like to take a moment to recognize your hard work and offer heartfelt gratitude for all you do for Knowledge. May this Holiday Season bring you nothing but joy, health and prosperity.
706:
before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, most pages are easy to review, and habits are quick to develop). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us. If you choose to apply, you can drop an application over at
358:
It would help reviewing administrators if, when you remove a PROD tag, you state this in your edit summary (something like "de-PROD" or "removing PROD tag"). It just helps to see which edit has done this when we are scanning over a page history. Thank you!
21:
Can you please not alert me of a PROD or article deletion again, I barely visit this site nowadays let alone have time to waste on trying to save articles that deletionists have made up their mind aren't notable anyway. Thankyou.†
216:
is an excellent tool to use any time you want to tag pages for any type of deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/RFD/TFD/etc.) or just to indicate problems in an article by tagging a section. It's a very helpful tool for editors.
429:
I saw one recently where you correctly de-PRODded a draft, however, since it had been PRODded by the original creator and only substantial contributor, it might have been more suitable to swap it for a
1124:, the queen of country music. I have now expanded the article with more extensive sourcing and with dual focus on both the song and the album. I hope the expansion addresses your concerns.
814:
287:
a bit and I haven't seen an editor come back and contest their deletion which can happen with some PRODs (especially those about companies). Any way, thanks for helping clean things up.
250:, thank you for your advice. I appreciate that you took the time to offer your knowledge. I will consider these options in the future if I move anything else to draft. Thanks again!
1066:
139:
130:
1120:
Your redirecting of the above article was clearly warranted given the minimal sourcing. However, the song and album played an important role in the later career of
129:, for updating and guarding related articles, for "it is helpful for gathering quick information without searching the article for it", - Donald, you are an
637:
82:"It would make a considerable difference if I didn't get notices from User:Donaldd23. I have asked him in the past not to spam my talk page with messages.
665:
831:
815:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Film#:~:text=There%20is%20no%20defined%20order,Knowledge%20policies%20or%20participant%20consensus
818:
417:
648:
183:
60:
922:, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the
884:
733:
337:
spoke languages in addition to English. I've studied several when I was in school but never mastered any of them. Oh, well, stay well!
712:
588:
just chose to do this yourself rather than tagging them for proposed deletion. Please consider doing this in the future. Thank you.
186:(or you could have literally reviewed every single AfD out there in general but I would not even notice it). Keep up the good work!
451:
220:
Also, you need to post a notification on the talk page of the page creator. And there is another tool here that can help you out!
889:
313:
anything for I try to PROD to see if there are any editors who object...or who can find sources I couldn't. But, again, thanks!
348:
327:
264:
697:
195:
126:
935:
370:
203:
236:
77:
32:
1046:
997:
985:
628:
536:
923:
660:
1083:
409:
1038:
990:
Redirects are cheap, but they have to make sense. This one does not make sense to me, so I think it should go.
826:
155:
444:
964:
1174:
867:
800:
521:
1133:
837:
774:
160:
702:
298:
1113:
556:
620:
599:
549:
501:
16:
1005:
805:
376:
279:
191:
440:(and possibly let the user know that you did so). Just something to keep an eye out for, cheerio.
1149:
711:. If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message on my talk page or at the reviewer's
221:
1079:
476:
151:
1114:
880:
405:
110:
957:
perpetrated by a singular personal blog (which was cited in the RFD as "proof" it existed).
68:
38:
23:
1178:
1028:
909:
822:
742:
540:
1108:
8:
187:
581:
708:
270:
114:
1014:
1075:
942:
729:
447:
213:
147:
1170:
931:
917:
899:
891:
401:
284:
118:
89:
1129:
1033:
456:
122:
1058:
109:
Thank you for quality articles about films in series per actors, beginning with
103:
1159:
1139:
972:
954:
950:
943:
841:
508:
314:
251:
52:
674:
845:
790:
764:
400:
For making Knowledge what it is supposed to be: full of sourced articles. :)
143:
1027:
Thanks for being an honest, open-minded and always consistent contributor. -
539:
and source or delete all of the unreferenced BLPs, but they just never end!
51:
alerting you. I will try to not notify you again in the future. Thank you.
724:
441:
423:
1166:
1121:
927:
434:
169:
182:
For your magnificent work, unbiased votes and research for citations at
1125:
1088:
656:
633:
I appreciate and respect your withdrawing your deleting nomination at:
529:
781:
651:
instead approach it as a thoughtful quest for a better encyclopaedia.
751:
385:
1145:
When you blank-and-redirect articles, please tag the redirect with
1138:
1099:
611:
590:
572:
561:
492:
467:
361:
339:
308:. Thanks for the kind words. I appreciate it. I regularly check
305:
289:
242:
227:
810:"Plot and Cast are always first 2 sections of a film article" ...
47:, I only started alerting you again because I was called out for
310:
Category:Film articles with topics of unclear notability
490:
programming over the past two decades. Thanks again!
817:... there is no defined order of these sections. :)
638:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Kid in a Candy Store
914:was updated with an item that involved the article
643:Too many editors see AfDs as a test of wills. It's
856:To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with
666:Would you consider becoming a New Page Reviewer?
832:I have sent you a note about a page you started
844:, while examining this page as a part of our
836:Hello, Donaldd23. Thank you for your work on
418:Something to look out for with misused PRODs
1057:
860:. Please remember to sign your reply with
212:cross-namespace redirect from main space.
422:Some misused PRODs could be changed to
693:from experienced users like yourself.
278:I run into your work regularly at the
696:Would you please consider becoming a
718:Cheers, and hope to see you around,
127:Method to the Madness of Jerry Lewis
1155:. It's also good practice to add a
13:
673:
14:
1189:
1021:The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
870:tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
1013:
898:
780:
750:
535:this area. I'm trying to revive
384:
168:
102:
426:, rather than simply removed.
1179:23:30, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
848:, had the following comments:
629:Thanks for being a good editor
452:11:13, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
410:03:52, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
1:
1134:00:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
885:15:03, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
801:14:58, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
775:14:58, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
734:16:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
621:00:23, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
600:00:20, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
225:on. Thank you for your work.
78:18:26, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
61:17:44, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
33:16:57, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
827:03:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
756:
349:22:30, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
328:19:31, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
299:18:56, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
265:02:04, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
237:01:58, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
7:
1109:22:20, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
866:(Message delivered via the
838:Puppet Master: Doktor Death
779:
759:Merry Christmas, Donaldd23!
477:03:37, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
204:Moving pages to Draft space
10:
1194:
1165:to the target page. Best,
1039:00:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
749:
557:14:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
537:WP:Unreferenced BLP rescue
86:09:20, 10 May 2022 (UTC)"
1065:
1056:
1012:
998:23:17, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
986:23:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
965:22:41, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
936:18:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
861:
857:
672:
582:06:22, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
522:19:47, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
502:19:39, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
390:
383:
167:
1084:07:05, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
661:16:19, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
371:00:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
196:21:11, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
156:20:48, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
142:of Precious, a prize of
56:
222:User:Evad37/MoveToDraft
854:
678:
647:to see you and editor
138:You are recipient no.
850:
846:page curation process
806:Film section sequence
677:
394:The Original Barnstar
111:Fight for Life (film)
1115:We'll Stick Together
1047:Precious anniversary
949:What's your take on
890:ITN recognition for
689:page reviewing team
176:The Special Barnstar
1053:
1006:A barnstar for you!
813:To be clear... per
609:before. Thank you.
377:A barnstar for you!
161:A barnstar for you!
1093:Hello, Donaldd23,
1051:
679:
566:Hello, Donaldd23,
461:Hello, Donaldd23,
275:Hello, Donaldd23,
208:Hello, Donaldd23,
131:awesome Wikipedian
115:Artists and Models
1072:
1071:
1044:
1043:
906:On 2 March 2024,
871:
788:
787:
743:Seasons Greetings
740:
739:
698:New Page Reviewer
555:
482:Hello, Donaldd23,
415:
414:
355:Hello, Donaldd23,
201:
200:
184:film-related AfDs
17:Article deletions
1185:
1164:
1158:
1154:
1148:
1107:
1061:
1054:
1050:
1036:
1031:
1017:
1010:
1009:
995:
993:Ten Pound Hammer
983:
978:
975:
962:
960:Ten Pound Hammer
918:Richard H. Truly
902:
892:Richard H. Truly
865:
863:
859:
858:{{Re|North8000}}
797:
794:
784:
771:
768:
754:
747:
746:
731:
727:
723:
713:discussion board
670:
669:
659:
619:
598:
580:
552:
547:
545:
519:
514:
511:
500:
475:
439:
433:
388:
381:
380:
369:
347:
325:
320:
317:
297:
262:
257:
254:
235:
172:
165:
164:
119:Bowery Buckaroos
106:
75:
45:
30:
1193:
1192:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1162:
1156:
1152:
1146:
1143:
1118:
1098:
1091:
1049:
1034:
1029:
1008:
991:
981:
976:
973:
958:
947:
940:
939:
924:candidates page
903:
895:
834:
808:
795:
792:
769:
766:
745:
725:
721:
720:
668:
655:
631:
610:
589:
571:
564:
550:
543:Thebiguglyalien
541:
532:
517:
512:
509:
491:
466:
459:
437:
431:
420:
379:
360:
338:
323:
318:
315:
288:
280:daily PROD list
273:
260:
255:
252:
226:
206:
163:
136:
135:
123:Max Rose (film)
107:
97:films in series
92:
69:
39:
24:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1191:
1150:R with history
1142:
1137:
1117:
1112:
1090:
1087:
1070:
1069:
1063:
1062:
1048:
1045:
1042:
1041:
1024:
1023:
1018:
1007:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
951:Shep Unplugged
946:
944:Shep Unplugged
941:
904:
897:
896:
894:
888:
833:
830:
807:
804:
786:
785:
778:
761:
755:
744:
741:
738:
737:
700:? Kindly read
685:Hi Donaldd23,
681:
680:
667:
664:
641:
640:
630:
627:
626:
625:
624:
623:
603:
602:
563:
560:
531:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
487:
483:
458:
455:
419:
416:
413:
412:
397:
396:
391:
389:
378:
375:
374:
373:
356:
353:
352:
351:
331:
330:
272:
269:
268:
267:
205:
202:
199:
198:
188:Anonymous 7481
179:
178:
173:
162:
159:
101:
99:
94:
93:
91:
88:
64:
63:
18:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1190:
1181:
1180:
1176:
1175:contributions
1172:
1168:
1161:
1151:
1141:
1136:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1116:
1111:
1110:
1106:
1104:
1103:
1094:
1086:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1055:
1040:
1037:
1032:
1026:
1025:
1022:
1019:
1016:
1011:
999:
994:
989:
988:
987:
984:
979:
969:
968:
967:
966:
961:
956:
952:
945:
938:
937:
933:
929:
925:
921:
920:
919:
913:
912:
911:
901:
893:
887:
886:
882:
878:
877:
872:
869:
868:Page Curation
853:
849:
847:
843:
839:
829:
828:
824:
820:
816:
811:
803:
802:
799:
798:
783:
777:
776:
773:
772:
760:
753:
748:
736:
735:
732:
730:
728:
716:
714:
710:
705:
704:
699:
694:
692:
686:
683:
682:
676:
671:
663:
662:
658:
652:
650:
646:
639:
636:
635:
634:
622:
618:
616:
615:
607:
606:
605:
604:
601:
597:
595:
594:
586:
585:
584:
583:
579:
577:
576:
567:
559:
558:
553:
546:
544:
538:
523:
520:
515:
505:
504:
503:
499:
497:
496:
488:
484:
481:
480:
479:
478:
474:
472:
471:
462:
454:
453:
449:
446:
443:
436:
427:
425:
411:
407:
403:
399:
398:
395:
392:
387:
382:
372:
368:
366:
365:
357:
354:
350:
346:
344:
343:
335:
334:
333:
332:
329:
326:
321:
311:
307:
303:
302:
301:
300:
296:
294:
293:
286:
281:
276:
266:
263:
258:
249:
247:
246:
241:
240:
239:
238:
234:
232:
231:
223:
218:
215:
209:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
180:
177:
174:
171:
166:
158:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
134:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
105:
100:
98:
87:
85:
80:
79:
76:
74:
73:
72:Encyclopædius
62:
58:
54:
50:
46:
44:
43:
42:Encyclopædius
37:
36:
35:
34:
31:
29:
28:
27:Encyclopædius
1144:
1119:
1101:
1100:
1095:
1092:
1076:Gerda Arendt
1073:
1067:Three years!
1035:(Mushy Yank)
1020:
992:
980:
959:
948:
916:
915:
908:
907:
905:
875:
874:
873:
855:
851:
835:
812:
809:
791:
789:
765:
758:
757:
719:
717:
703:the tutorial
701:
695:
690:
687:
684:
653:
644:
642:
632:
613:
612:
592:
591:
574:
573:
568:
565:
542:
533:
516:
494:
493:
469:
468:
463:
460:
428:
421:
393:
363:
362:
341:
340:
322:
309:
291:
290:
277:
274:
259:
244:
243:
229:
228:
219:
210:
207:
175:
148:Gerda Arendt
137:
108:
96:
95:
83:
81:
71:
70:
65:
48:
41:
40:
26:
25:
20:
1122:Kitty Wells
1030:My, oh my!
910:In the news
709:WP:PERM/NPR
402:DareshMohan
84:Dr. Blofeld
982:talk to me
819:milladrive
691:needs help
645:refreshing
518:talk to me
457:Thank you!
324:talk to me
271:Thank you!
261:talk to me
876:North8000
852:Nice work
842:North8000
285:WP:REFUND
113:in 2006,
53:Donaldd23
1052:Precious
306:User:Liz
90:Precious
971:helps.
955:WP:HOAX
726:Raydann
530:BLPPROD
442:Mako001
214:Twinkle
1167:voorts
974:Donald
928:PFHLai
649:Cunard
510:Donald
424:WP:G7s
316:Donald
253:Donald
1160:blarn
1140:BLARs
1126:Cbl62
1089:PRODs
657:A. B.
562:PRODs
450:🇺🇦
1171:talk
1130:talk
1080:talk
932:talk
881:talk
862:~~~~
823:talk
796:5969
793:Onel
770:5969
767:Onel
551:talk
448:(T)
445:(C)
406:talk
192:talk
152:talk
146:. --
140:2600
125:and
57:talk
996:•
977:D23
963:•
722:❯❯❯
715:.
654:--
513:D23
319:D23
304:Hi
256:D23
144:QAI
49:not
1177:)
1163:}}
1157:{{
1153:}}
1147:{{
1132:)
1105:iz
1082:)
1074:--
934:)
926:.
883:)
864:.
840:.
825:)
617:iz
596:iz
578:iz
498:iz
473:iz
438:}}
435:g7
432:{{
408:)
367:iz
345:iz
295:iz
248:iz
233:iz
194:)
154:)
133:!
121:,
117:,
59:)
1173:/
1169:(
1128:(
1102:L
1078:(
930:(
879:(
821:(
614:L
593:L
575:L
554:)
548:(
495:L
470:L
404:(
364:L
342:L
292:L
245:L
230:L
190:(
150:(
55:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
