User talk:Doncram/Archive 20

693:, an article I had just created and was developing. The block was upon the emailed request to Courcelles of editor SarekOfVulcan, who was then engaging in an apparent game of contesting my edits on this and other new architect articles, and who was apparently at 5 reversions on the Charles Coker Wilson article in fact. S had been closely following my edits in new articles, often within one minute of a new article being created, and making small or large changes, sometimes edit conflicting. I don't object, in fact I welcome many of S's edits adding to articles I have recently started in mainspace. I was mostly accepting S's contributions and continuing to develop, but in I do think that to avoid disruption that if there is a disagreement, some deference should be given to the editor creating an article. In my reverting S about a reference format in the process of continued development at the article, I thought I was making a thoughtful, constructive point that was reasonable, and that S should defer a bit. In fact S did later partly agree on the point, reflected in the current article. S was blocked for a shorter time than me for the edit warring, and has requested and received unblock. In retrospect again, S's pattern seemed calculated to find a point of disagreement and then to seek dispute for wp:ANI actions. S's name for the game is "mutual blockdom" as termed by himself in his later unblock request; it appears from his edits and later request for unblocking that he was engaging in a game to seek the blocking of me and, necessarily, himself also, but for shorter time. It appears from Courcelles' edit summaries and/or comments at S's talk page that S actually requested the block and discussed the appropriate lengths of time for him and me both. I acknowledge also that editor Courcelles and some other administrators and editors have had concerns about my involvement in editing that are reflected in a number of ANI noticeboard discussions and in blocks of me. This, indeed, is partly what S was exploiting, that he could initiate dispute in an obscure article and expect that if I were to open an ANI or 3RR discussion that would seem to bear out negative views and would likely backfire upon me. S's own view of me is highly negative, reflected by multiple edit summaries invoking "Competence is required" dictum to imply that my development was not competent, while i disagree. I believe that I am a productive editor and would like to have my reputation as that re-established. I would be interested in there being a mediation or other dispute resolution to address what issues other editors have, or for peace to prevail otherwise. In my returning from the last block, I had engaged in simple development of needed articles, and I don't think that the community would find general fault, except about how one is to deal with the heavy-handed, harassment type editing of S as a dispute-seeking editor. I don't have a good answer about how to deal with S when S is operating in that mode, except to say that S's assertion in his own unblock request is that he will not seek mutual blockdom going forward, so perhaps the issue should not arise going forward. To be clear I was not following S or any other editor; S was following me. Again in this specific case, I thought i put in a good reference within my own edits and restored that 3 times, I thought, while further developing the article that I had just started at 21:09, 28 December 2011‎. Upon seeing S's repeated edits, and negative edit summaries, I thought that continuing to develop to a stopping point and opening a discussion at the talk page would be best, rather than opening an ANI. The best option in my view for S would have been to discuss the point at the Talk page. I could have opened a Talk page discussion sooner, but have found that not to work with S. Upon seeing one more change by S, anyhow, I did stop developing and reverting and I opened a Talk page discussion. S's edit at 22:17 i think was apparently his 5th reversion (which I thot was his 4th). I did not change it, but rather posted at Talk page at 22:24, 28 December 2011, opening discussion. I had low hopes for any rational discussion, as I have found S to be unwilling to discuss at Talk pages I've opened. On previous occasions, not leading to blocks, S had contested up to 3RR and then ceased, and would sometimes engage in perfunctory Talk page discussion thereafter. S then disputed at the Talk page that my opening a Talk section there was sincere, and he made requests to Courcelles to have him and me blocked. As a matter of fact, my editing of the page had ceased, and the blocking was not necessary to prevent edit warring at the time. I guess S's wording of request would stand for me too: "It has not been enjoyable not being able to edit over these past two weeks, and I think I've learned the lesson I needed to. "Mutual blockdom" is definitely not a disruption I will be engaging in in the future. I'd like to request that the block be reduced to time served. Thanks for your time." 1269:

While I think S deliberately exceeded 3RR, and further that he ten believed he was exceeding 4RR. I dunno, in the context of S following and confronting and writing what seem to be insulting edit summaries about competence (e.g. "Undid revision 468157872 by Doncram (talk) again, WP:CIR", please do compare his vs. my edit summaries), I don't think my continuing development of the article should look that bad. In S's request for adminship not far back i expressed difficulty about S's not communicating, not answering direct questions, and other editors agreed that was a concern. It followed a number of cases where S had intervened on articles i was developing and having followed a "modus operandi" of reverting without explaining, without answering my followup questions at Talk pages about what his objection was. Given that recent history, and continued experiences, in this case where after his reversion S was apparently insisting on something, I a) did not expect he would actually discuss it at the Talk page before he had to, and b) expected he would eventually agree he was in fact mistaken in his initial belief. The least burdensome-to-the-community approach to deal with this, seems to me to be pretty much the course I followed, i.e. restoring the change that i implemented, not reciprocating with insulting edit summaries, and opening a Talk page discussion at the point when I expected S would deign to explain and discuss somewhat. Or, in S asserting that I exceeded 3RR, is this merely about the fact that I restored an Under Construction tag to the article, which S had removed after my very first edit, when in fact i was very much constructing the article??? --

966:. I support a significant reduction in the length of the block or even an unblock. Yes, Doncram has been stubborn about starting rough drafts of articles in main space rather than user space. When he returned from the last block, his editing appeared to have improved, except for the ongoing feuding with Sarek. I don't want to pass judgment on who was more in the right or more in the wrong, but I understand that both Sarek and Doncram were blocked. I would hate to see Knowledge lose such a valuable contributor. The Doncram saga is really troubling. This is a guy who has a passion for Knowledge and for historic sites. He is tireless and wants to contribute. His contributions, on the whole, have been a very big plus for the encyclopedia. There has to be a better solution than a 6-month block that not only punishes Doncram but also deprives Knowledge of six months of his work. Perhaps Doncram could make a commitment to creating rough drafts in user space and only moving them into main space when he's confident that they are ready for prime time. I know that Doncram does not like the idea, but such a commitment might persuade others to support an unblock. 3890:. "The Littleton barn was the structure that would forever change the fate of the round barn construction business in Indiana", it notes, and blames strife among the builders for contributing to the end of the round/polygonal barn era. I know some of the Pulliams (some of them were high school friends), so I've sent off a Facebook note; let's see if they know of additional sources. As far as the Ohio barns: I think I'll not do anything quite yet. If you look at the county lists for where they're located, you'll see that most other properties in these counties have their own articles; some time back I requested the nomination form for one of them, only to be sent a redacted MPS form. As a result, I'm left thinking that there's no substantial easily-accessible coverage of these barns (I don't have time to visit the area just to do research in local documentation for Knowledge articles!) and was planning to write a single article for the MPS, comparable to the 3841:

see any big morals to state or apologies to make. I have previously enjoyed contributing new articles and adding to existing articles in wikipedia, and I hope to restart doing so. I have enjoyed being away from Knowledge and its drama. I hope that giving it all a rest prove to have taken the edge off of whatever people's issues are, mine and/or theirs. I do hope that others see their way to choose to avoid violating civility, harassment and other basic good Knowledge and human being practices, and so will I. If you are a person reading this who has in the past engaged in what a reasonable person can view as hateful behavior, please reconsider your interest here, and please go away, please leave me alone. Thank you again to those who have tried to be helpful. --

2782:

1325:, I revised crediting of Bisher to reduce overstatement of Bishir's general role with the North Carolina Architects and Builders encyclopedia, and to increase Bisher's credit with respect to this particular article. S's subsequent edits and summaries were about restoring Bisher to display as overall editor of that encyclopedia, in a way that I thot was excessive. Later, after S was unblocked, he actually returned to reduce the overstatement by removing Bishir's name altogether. At the time, I deliberately went off to develop some other articles: to create 2528: 3990:. It is not obvious to find a note at a NRHP county list page, to bring that info back to the List of round barns article. Probably the natural way is for editors over time to bring photos and bits of info to the individual NRHP articles, which then get brought back to the list article. If you can accelerate that process, great. I'll make some more effort now on developing the Wisconsin ones in the list-article, too. Thanks for your interest in developing material about historic sites. -- 3647: 31: 526: 1385:

your contributions. Commit to leaving every edit of a page as a working, complete article. If someone reverts you, dont count how many edits you've made, go immediately to the talk page. If you feel yourself getting angry at someone in Knowledge, walk away for a bit. It's not going anywhere. I like your contributions in general, but I really dislike the negative interactions with others. It's up to you to convince people you will act different, not anyone else.

439: 115: 371: 272: 177: 1334:

more examples in order to have a better-informed discussion with S, as I believed that with more perspective he would see that crediting Bishir as overall editor in every reference to that encyclopedia would be excessive. Which he later agreed to, on his own. It seems unfortunate to be blocked for 6 months for the fact that discussion was cut off, especially when S, upon further consideration, actually agrees largely with my initial view. --

1733: 603: 4046: 2218:. Many of the NHLs were visited and photographed and nominated by Federal staff in the 1960s, even before the much larger NRHP program began; Federal staff produced photos would generally be public domain (PD). I wonder if the term refers to that original set of NHL documentation. I recommend inquiring directly to the National Register about what the term means in a specific usage of theirs. Hope this brief reply helps. -- 2349: 2064: 3183: 1575:

this long of a block was needed — the block from the community discussion was three months, and other than that, Doncram has never had a block longer than three weeks. Let's reduce to time served, since this is his longest block to date other than the one from the community discussion, but only with a provision that it will be restored for its full length if the actions that prompted it are repeated once.

2454: 3582:

order into a State-City-name order; I think that would meet the reader need you express. The mostly alphabetical order was most convenient for me to start the list. Reordering might more easily be done by another editor more facile with spreadsheet sorting than I am, or simply by anyone more interested in contributing by implementing that improvement. A number of similar lists, such as

1127:

on his 3 month block at the time. In no way can what happened here be considered to be even a tenth of that. It doesn't fit, and it's as convenient as an ending to a Law & Order episode where McCoy throws the book at one instead of both purpetrators evenly because one talked. Only here, it's because one has a big rap sheet and has civility issues.

3608:

notes-to-self, I'll not complain if you move it back. However, it would greatly help if you did just a little work developing a list before moving it to mainspace or before creating it there; since we have no deadline, it would be appreciated if you created lists offline and added basic updates before putting them online. Look at what I did with

731:, yet fail to take into account how ridiculously disruptive you have been, and how much time has been wasted trying to deal with that disruption. In short, you still don't get it, and I see no reason to believe that reducing this block - based on the request above - will amount to a hill of beans when it comes to your behaviour ( 1164:

that Doncram has been pretty much consistently unwilling to "give an inch" in order to help us all through the situation. Nonetheless, there is some good mixed among the detritus. My suspicion is that if Doncram yielded, say, 65% then we would all be happy. But that is a number plucked pretty much out of thin air. -

2686: 1834:, but is felt by the majority that this is being applied more against the user in question and than this particular incident. Therefore given the circumstances we request that the length of Doncram's block be reduced to time served, or to 6 weeks (unblock on Saturday, 11 February 2012). Thank you & Best, 3959:

Have you looked for images or content? I have found a bunch of Wisconsin round barn images in county articles with no effort. I'm concerned that you were going against consensus spitting out a whole bunch of tiny articles without even researching. Looks like about 2 minutes of effort per article. The

3795:

Got your Ohio barns message; will reply after I get off work, as I'm just on break now. No chance on a zoomed-in image for Littleton; it's somewhat far from the road (which has no convenient parking spots), I got no other photos when I was there before, and I've not been in Hancock County in several

3484:

Your "List of round barns" is a nice start, but Nyttend and I have both concluded that it's not nearly ready for main space. Your creation of rough drafts in article space has been a concern in the past; we both moved this one to user space where you can work out the problems without embarrassment to

3443:

It was already on the list, like many other images. You'll note that the Round Barns in the Black Swamp of Northwestern Ohio are all illustrated, their locations are all provided, and their links are changed on the county lists. Given the draft status of the list (especially the contradictory intro

1706:

Just stopped by - I would certainly go for "time served" given a statement by Doncram that he knows what the problem is and how to avoid it. Part of the problem (just part) is that a couple editors seem to want to go after him (i.e. they have the same problem) (not referring to Elkman). Doncram has

1662:

I'm minded to support a shorter block. I don't support the suggestion of creating articles in Sandboxes, articles belong in mainspace. But I have a suggestion for Doncram, would you be willing to try and work to 1rr? I'm not suggesting this as a condition, but as a sincere commitment from you and yes

1627:

editors should had been blocked, but only one is. Also, because in most cases it depends on who reports it first, irrespective of who did what, when and how - as this case was. And also because far too many times it depends, not on who the disruptive editor was, but on who is the more astute editor -

1544:

I'm not convinced there's an understanding yet by Doncram of why he keeps getting blocked. Without that, applying restrictions are meaningless, because he's very unlikely to remember to stick to them. Last time he just served out the block without discussion - this time there does seem some prospect

1268:

as changing the form of the displayed reference, when it did not. In that edit i compacted the text but did not change what displayed at all. Several weeks later, I mistakenly agreed with S that I had seemed to exceed 3RR. I initially believed i had not, and it seems i truly had not, exceeded 3RR.

688:

Request unblock due to arguable unfairness in the nature and sentence length of the original blocking process, and due to time served, and due to there being no apparent further need for blocking to prevent edit warring. I agree that edit warring is in general not a good thing, and will seek to avoid

4011:

Added from an NRHP MPS document about 3 of 6 Wisconsin barns in the list-article. I think that is all the NRHP nom refs that can be added right away. Unfortunately individual NRHP docs are not available online for Wisconsin, AFAIK. Another editor created one of the articles, one of the two having

3581:

I would prefer to develop the list-article in mainspace, for editors to cooperate in adding pics and so on, and to discuss improvements cooperatively at its talk page. But, about the organization/sorting of the list, I was expecting it to be resorted eventually from its original mostly-alphabetical

2852:

Thank you for your recent article. There are a number of issues which need addressing. I have left some tags on the article for your attention. I had been expecting a new editor. I was very suprised to see that the article was created by an auto-patrolled user. There is not a single reference in the

1853:

We don't generally lift blocks because of an ad-hoc vote of interested users who happen upon the blocked user's talk page, especially when the unblock request is placed by someone other than the blocked editor. If you wish the block to undergo community review, one of the commenters here can start a

1639:

Four, as for the fateful F/U, if there is any one here that can say he would never break down and spit out an F/U John Doe when confronted with enough harrassment, then I say he probably hasn't lived long enough to have seen enough evil in the world yet. Could he have endured more harrassment before

1574:

I came over here simply because I wondered if anything had been going on, not knowing about this long discussion. I'd have to agree with Dudemanfellabra about the best possible solution: long blocks are appropriate when disruptive actions continue despite shorter blocks, but I'm not quite sure that

1559:

I'm not sure I'd belong in the "keep 6 month block" bucket. I'm in the I agree with the point Bwilkins was making. I hope Doncram changes how he interacts so that the positive side of his contributions can start being what people remember. If he demonstrates that, I'd be happy with time served.

1163:

Ah. Well, I beg to differ on that on, Elkman. We all can learn from our mistakes and, believe me, I have made them! On the other hand, I do appreciate the frustration. There is no easy answer but in the weird microcosm that is en-WP there are policies, guidelines and, yes, consensus. My own sense is

1153:

I don't even see anything wrong with the idea of jailing people so they won't commit repeated crimes, whether in real life or figuratively on Knowledge. Past behavior predicts future behavior. As the saying goes, "once a criminal, always a criminal". If someone screwed up in the past, that person

1057:

was set by multiple parties. I'm all for punishing bad behavior, but in this case the punishment does not fit the crime, and if Sarek is blocked or unblocked doesn't make any difference: the point is that it was not only Doncram that should have known better and that the two editors have history. As

480:

Hi, there should be an existing Buildings and structures in . . . category for almost all the counties in every state of the United States. So, when you create an article about a building or structure, please use the Buildings and structures in ... County, State category, instead of just the County

4097:

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can

2982:

tells me that you're unfamiliar with the organization and with Alaska in general. Since I'm eligible for membership in the organization (30-year or greater Alaska residency), I may possibly be biased. I'll seek the opinion of the few other participants of WP:ALASKA, or you could do it yourself if

1600:

Much of what I could had said in support of an "immediate unblock with time served" (i.e., great contributing editor; shows remorse and contrition; Sarek was the one going after Doncram and mostly with the sole purpose to irritate him and not the other way around; Doncram gets the credit over Sarek

1359:

Content is an absolute red herring right now. Why not address your behaviour overall. Why not take a good close look at the unblock condition I provided? If you can't accept it, then you basically accept that you are unable to bring your behaviour anywhere close to Knowledge community standards.

1333:

where Bishir is appropriately given no credit. I think S agrees with those treatments, and that if we had had a discussion at the Talk page, that S would have agreed either to my then-preferred treatment or that I would have agreed to the later-implemented treatment. I was specifically developing

1219:

It appears some people are wholly missing the point here: even an indefinite block means "until the community is convinced that the disrupting behaviour will not recur". Although this is a 6 month block based on escalation, the arguments surrounding any shortening of the block need to focus on the

1126:

he should not have a 6 month ban. The way this is being discussed, if feels more like "this is just another stop on the process to banning him for life" than what actually happened -- an incident with a particular editor on a particular (newly created page). I did follow the pages of the discussion

980:

I have to disagree with this. Doncram has a behavioral problem that goes beyond simply publishing incomplete articles into mainspace, instead of just userspace. When he was blocked for three months on August 2, 2011, I figured I could set a timer for three months and then know when his disruptive

3840:

To Markvs88, Multichill, Cbl62, Mercy11, WereSpielChequersm, BD2412, and others, thank you for your attention and positive words previously. As you will have noted, I did not choose to continue the appeal process about the block. I thought about making some speech or something but honestly don't

2781:

1384:

Totally agree with this. Doncram, please realize that arguing about how to count edits for interpretation of 3rr is an excellent example of why you are in this mess (eg: that was a good faith edit). If you'd like my support for this unblock, you need to demonstrate a real change in how you view

496:

Okay, thanks, I'll try to use that. But, it is irritating to see more refined categories simply removed by another editor, if the category doesn't exist. Erring by being more general, less specific, seems safer. Like there seems to be a category for "Buildings and structures in Tulsa, Oklahoma,

3566:

template would permit you to display it as you've done currently but to sort it the other way; if I understand the template right, ] would provide a link to the city that displays normally but sorts as "I" instead of as "R". It would help by enabling readers to group by state; right now the only

3462:

I'm sorry, I don't accept your view about that, and I have restored the list to mainspace, and will continue developing it. If you don't want to contribute to its development that is fine. But it is a valid wikipedia list-article, already well-started, and I don't think it is helpful for you to

2548:

will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future!

1052:

Elkman, then you are saying that (philosophically) you agree with the position that if an inmate serves his sentance and is released that he should then be re-incarcerated at the maximum sentance regardless of the circumstances or the severity of the next infraction. Like a guy with a grand theft

1030:

on December 28. That counts as less than two days of good behavior before the latest six-month block. If Doncram is unblocked now, I predict it would only be a matter of a week to a month until his edit-warring, name-calling, and ownership of articles starts up again. Asking for an unblock to

3607:

The reason that I moved it to userspace is that it was sourced only to placeholder text, and there were notes-to-self and extraneous comments (e.g. the "ND" entries in the comments) as well as obviously broken links in the page. When you've fixed the egregious errors and removed things such as

2962:

The Pioneer School House and Whitney Section House articles refer to their respective present locations, but fail to mention that they were both moved there from their original locations (especially important in the case of Whitney, which was originally located near what is now the main gate of

2471:

Hello Doncram. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Knowledge, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The

1263:

I recognize that this and following "Point of fact" are not proper form arguments in requesting unblock, but they seem relevant to consider. Point 1: SarekOfVulcan asserted to the blocking administrator by email (I believe, am not privy to the emails, and/or to how Courcelles was brought in

3062:, an article obviously worth developing from its one-sentence start, conservatively rated low-importance by me. I usually rate all my new articles as low-importance for wikiprojects I do not belong to, to avoid presuming too much. The high-importance rating i gave for Wikiproject Alaska at 726:

approach that you have taken on this project - specifically with certain editors. In terms of the escalation process, 6 months is valid, and appropriate because you do not seem to be able to stop yourself from behaviours detrimental to the project as a whole. Serial disruption by serial

3612:

and its history (and that of the other 88 Indiana historical marker lists) — everything important was already there, and just as I don't complain at myself for making some smaller problems that needed to be fixed later, I'll not fault you for having some not-so-egregious problems.

4078:, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see 1628:

as, regretabbly, is the case here also. I am of the belief that astuteness should not be rewarded in the world at large nor in the little microcosm of Knowledge that we do "control"; said differently: don't be fooled by the more clever editor when passing down a block judgment.

1224:

every time they're unblocked, the same disrupting behaviour recurs. Clearly, there's no proof that the behaviour will not recur in the future - indeed, there's not even a suggestion that Doncram will ensure it does not recur. Here's the only possible unblock condition: if

2950:

I had some issues of my own to address regarding this article and some of the related articles you created. I'm on my slow-ass phone, which has crashed two or three times already just in the course of typing this (hail Android!), so any further cleanup will have to wait.

1295:

as a reversion, then you could argue I eventually exceeded 3RR. But, that was a good faith improvement of the reference that S had constructively added; I think S's reversion following is the first edit that goes into 3RR counting, if you actually want to be technical.

1902:

Thank you to many editors who have commented here, for your good efforts and thoughts. I am busy in real life and was not following this closely. I will try to catch up and make a new unblock request or otherwise reply substantially here within a day or two. Thanks,

4012:

photos in the articles now; thanks for finding and adding that pic. He/she encountered other editors removing his/her development and references at that article. It would be great if you would help him/her develop it, drawing from the currently deleted references? --

2175:

I'm trying to track down the copyright status of a photo described as coming from the National Historic Landmarks collection. So far, my searches haven't definitely identified what this is, and specifically, whether inclusion in this collection means the photo is pd.

875:

BWilkins, if he were the only one who did wrong I'd agree with you. If Sarek wasn't an Admin, I'd agree with you. If it weren't with someone Doncram had a history with, I'd agree with you. But all of those things put together? I simply don't agree with it. Best,

3325:

Thanks. I just tried merging in the NRHP information into the version you created. Please feel free to revise further. I'll redirect the NRHP article to yours. The merged article could be renamed later, if necessary, but I am happy with yours. Cheers

1633:

Three, is that yeah, yeah, yeah, Doncram should had known that his request for unblock should had come with a higher dosis of self-guilt while focusing less on Sakes's volations (as real as they are), but I am myself convinced Doncram has learned that by

1196:

If Doncram will agree to start articles in user or talk space and only move them into mainspace once they are deemed ready by the community, the block can be shortened (I suggest three months), and the remainder of the sentence can be served as a type of

3252:

Hello! Thank you for your work on round barns! I have been patrolling several of your pages along the way. I noticed you created the central wisconsin state fair round barn. I also created an article about the exact same location. My work can be found

3894:. Manchester is the only exception: I've seen a bunch of coverage for it, since it's so much larger and grander than the others, so I had counted on the MPS article having a short summary for it and linking a separate article with fuller coverage. 3908:

My Pulliam friend doesn't have any information; he's heard of a book on Indiana round barns, but doesn't know anything more. Looks like we'll have to stick with NR and other historic preservation documentation, aside from what you already found.

2167: 1264:

otherwise) and at the talk page that I exceeded 3RR on the new Charles Coker Wilson page, which i did not believe I had, back then when I posted at the Talk page and stopped editing the article, but in fact I had not. I think S mistakenly viewed

397:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

481:

category. If there is no existing Buildings and structures category for that county, please create it. Thanks so much. I hope you are enjoying working on these historic building articles. You are really the expert! Happy holidays.

1135:. This is a classic example of the rules not being applied evenly. Will Doncram do something to get blocked again? Yeah, probably. That's not the issue here. The issue is the rules not being applied in a manner consistant with context. 4104:

to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with

3009:

back in 2007 and 2008 and have not found my way to any great amount of Alaskan wikipedia editor interest. Glad you do have an interest and knowledge and position to add. I certainly do welcome greater development of the new

4034: 3257:. I think we should find a common ground as to merging this information. I will get some additional information on the best course of action. Possibly putting my information on your page and then closing my page out. Cheers! 2974:

I realise that you're taking the NRHP info at face value, but there's an inconsistency between the AEC cottage articles being titled "A.E.C. Cottage" and "Alaska Engineering Commission Cottage," since they are one and the

2472:

survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

1138:

So the question stands... do we jail people so they won't commit crimes? If not, then this is excessive given the circumstances. If so, then just ban him for life and be done with it, at least it will end the drama. Best,

1130:

Bans don't follow a linear line. I've seen dozens of times where an Admin blocked an editor for a week, then for 2 weeks, then for 72 hours... etc. So I still cannot agree that 6 months makes any sense for what happened

401:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

2274: 4110: 3683:, click the GIS/Tax Information button, and follow the links that lead toward "map"; eventually you'll reach the aerial map from which you can select the property and find a decent amount of information. 3678:

By the way, on the Littleton Round Barn, let me see what I can do to help you expand it; I have the nomination form. If you don't want to wait, you can get information from the Hancock County GIS: go to

2011: 1402:

I realize I'm a bit late to the party, but I would favor reducing this block length by half. Doncram is generally a good contributor who tends to be zealous, not vandalistic or necessarily destructive.

1107:

But it is not just Sarek with whom Doncram has had problems. How many people do we stick with an interaction ban etc, which is effectively what you are suggesting? At what point does the balance tip? -

3052: 821:. It's probably not worth much as I am not an Admin (and for all that Doncram and I have sparred in the past) but a 6 month block is egregious for what happened since it was a tit-for-tat spat 3129: 2380: 2364: 3528:

Please don't edit either of the lists right now: I'm about to perform a history merge, so edit conflicts would cause technical problems. I'll let you know when it's done in a few minutes.

2192: 2095: 2079: 1605:

him and not the other way around; it was Sarek and not Doncram the first editor that got personal in the edit summaries, etc., etc.,) has already been said. I add the following four points.

360: 3277:

Hi, thanks for contacting me. The link to your article does not work for me, could you fix that? I would tend to prefer to have my new article's info merged into your older article. --

4138: 2372: 2103: 2172:

Don, I fully understand that, in light of current events, you may not be inclined to respond to my question, but I hope you will, mainly because I think you care about this project.

2087: 394: 1951:

Thanks for your efforts, Markvs88. I see that item at "Reduced block requested for Doncram". I am busy in real life but will reply substantially within a day or two. Thanks. --

2515: 1663:

I appreciate it won't be easy. Though I can suggest various ways to help that, one being to keep several writing projects on the go and walk away from ones that get contentious.

2388: 2311: 1505:

I'm too involved to weigh in with an opinion, other than to say that an uninvolved administrator needs to consider whether appropriate criteria for unblocking have been met. --

3965: 3196: 3139: 2111: 223: 1122:

Multichill, Sitush, & Orlady, I agree with all of your points. My POV (and remember, I have no particular affection for Doncram!) is that YES he is often disruptive, but

3567:

states that I noticed that could do this are Ohio (because all of the barns are simply "Round Barn") and North Dakota (because of your "ND" notice in the comments column).

3609: 3254: 1927: 1797: 667: 424: 3151: 3055:, but i hesitated about coining a new phrase that does not exist in practice. Using the exact NRHP names seems more conservative. Anyhow, glad about your interest. 1423: 2179:

I think you are knowledgeable in this area, so I am hoping you can tell me, or point me in the right direction (and perhaps others reading this may know as well.)--

3361:. A number of editors have commented there, and you might wish to respond. In my opinion, you should consider postponing your request for a few months. Thank you, 2748:

I've been watching for your return. Welcome back. If you need a second set of eyes or hands at any point, don't hesitate to ask...although I may end up saying no.

3745:

article, especially because it is your pic illustrating the article, and because it makes for a great DYK item. I was thinking of a DYK nom along the lines of:

3753:

Or the DYK could be about the rivalry to have the biggest diameter round barn. The article was started July 7, so a DYK nom has to be started soon, actually. --

3774:

For the DYK and probably for the article, could we get a zoomed-in version of the barn? I think just the barn itself should be included in a small DYK pic. --

3751:(pictured) embodied true circular barn design features that were granted a 1905 patent, causing other Iowa farmers to construct multi-polygonal barns instead?" 3176: 2666: 2488:

You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated

1822:

have weighed in (not counting Doncram himself). The vote is 11 for immediate unblocking, 3 for keeping the six month block, and 3 have abstained. It is opined

2214:

I have seen the term but don't know specifically what it means. I wonder if it means photos that are used in the old system of NHL summary webpages, such as

3205: 1892:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

775:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

3051:

articles, I also agree with your comment. I followed the NRHP names literally, so far. I did wonder if both could best be covered in one article, perhaps

1601:

for having opened the Talk discussion (and in so doing showed he -did- learned something from his previous 3-month block), beyond irritating Doncram, Sarek

4100: 3304: 3259: 2251: 1945: 3209: 981:

activities would continue. It took him a few weeks after his reinstatement, but the arguments eventually picked up again, culminating with the infamous "

1201:. For the next three months after Doncram returns, he will be under watchful eyes, and if he gets into a dispute, the block is reinstated. Sound fair?-- 3485:

Knowledge. Your move-warring to put it back into main space almost looks like an effort to get yourself blocked again -- I hope that's not the case! --

3271: 3583: 1679: 1554: 1497: 1459: 3586:

have been rapidly, cooperatively developed that way. If you would see your way to returning the list-article to mainspace, I would appreciate it. --

3302:. I think I would prefer for the page to be merged into yours because if a larger barn is ever built, my article will be rendered useless. Thoughts? 2913: 2819: 3201: 2922:

If you want to help with re-setting auto-patrol for me, that would be fine. If you have comments/suggestions about the article, please comment at

2833: 2722: 1693: 1252: 1210: 4071: 4039: 3247: 927: 916: 902: 3342: 3316: 3293: 3070:

where that high rating was in place, but it did seem logical to me that Alaskans would likely want to rate the two of them the same. Cheers, --

2209: 2942: 2438: 2413: 2136: 1464:

The numbers are now : 8 lesser block (6 weeks/time served/on condition...), (3 abstainations) and 3 for the six month block. That's 8:3. Best,

1322: 1292: 1265: 950: 4028: 4006: 3392: 3006: 2234: 2161: 490: 4160: 3086: 2875: 1716: 1539: 1473: 1117: 1102: 885: 870: 161: 3370: 3048: 2332: 1967: 1655: 1618:

action, and on which blocks should not be based; it is not the definition of "preventing additional disruption" as some seem to be arguing.

1478:

The numbers are now : 11 lesser block (6 weeks/time served/on condition...), (3 abstainations) and 3 for the six month block. That's 11:3.

1379: 1067: 842: 475: 3918: 3903: 3857: 3813: 3790: 3769: 3622: 3602: 3576: 3551: 3537: 3479: 3457: 3438: 3123: 2772: 1990: 1569: 1514: 1394: 1312: 1158: 1148: 1084: 3523: 3494: 2992: 2348: 2063: 2031: 1584: 851:

Let me say it again ... "escalating blocks". If doncram only wanted a 6 week block, he should have stopped the battle a few blocks ago (

513: 3503:

article, I don't welcome your adding to contention, but if you seriously believe it is not a valid wikipedia article, please discuss at

2798: 2505: 1173: 975: 2489: 2327: 2047: 1043: 355: 3507:

or open an AFD, which I believe is the appropriate Knowledge forum to draw uninvolved editors' views towards a consensus. Thanks. --

383: 2853:

article and you have wiki-linked the same thing multiple times in the same article (this should only be done on the first ocasion).

2708: 2263: 3954: 3499:

I don't agree with your views. Orlady, I respectfully ask that you back off and avoid the appearance of wiki-hounding. About the

2672: 2581: 1827: 1004: 999: 3980: 2006: 1610:

One, increasing the amount of time blocked to 6 months solely on the basis that Doncram had been previously blocked for 3 months -

1008: 3463:

contest that out of momentum from past disagreements or for any other reaseon. Please don't launch contention unnecessarily. --

4114: 4035: 3692: 3412: 3352: 3171: 2736: 2690: 2409: 2315: 2132: 2000: 1933: 1830:: that it is a punishment not befitting the events which transpired. There is some concern among the dissenting vote regarding 136: 791:. What was I supposed to do, back then, given apparent wp:BATTLE mentality of SarekOfVulcan in disputing my edits, though? -- 3403:

It would be appreciated if you would take a moment to look for photos; this article already had a photo on the county list.

2845: 2638: 2417: 2305: 2140: 991: 331:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

242:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

3556:

Just an idea — is there a chance that you could have the "City, State" column sort states first and then cities? Using the

3242: 3228: 3025:

About the specifics you mention, about Mears Memorial Bridge, great comment, I agree, and I just added link and pic to the

3002: 2757: 1867: 1773: 643: 467: 209: 3886:

I suppose so, but it will be such small resolution...At any rate, yes, the nomination says that the owner was then (1991)

3194:

has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

2477: 595: 1877: 1350: 760: 570: 262: 213: 750: 278: 183: 3108: 3063: 3019: 2923: 1285: 807: 709: 3796:

months, so we'll have to stay with this image. By the way, you may want to consult the Hancock County edition of the

2978:

Glad to see that someone finally created an article on the Pioneers of Alaska, but assessing it as low importance for

1418: 3891: 3015: 2680: 2444: 1919: 985:" on December 19. After his block expired on December 27, he started editing again, culminating in a forest fire at 378: 362: 127:

For your participation in one of my contests, as part of the NRHP contest, I award you the Photographer's Barnstar!

3445: 2300: 2242: 2198:

The specific request is resolved, but I'm still in the dark regarding the National Historic Landmarks collection.--

1745:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

1053:

auto and burglary gets picked up selling pirated DVDs getting life. I must disagree here, since the forest fire on

615:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

3162: 1013: 167: 4079: 2964: 2215: 938:

I have to agree with Markvs88 here. Sarek was laying out a trap and Doncram was stupid enough to step into this.

825:

an Admin, whose first edit was less than 5 minutes after Doncram started the article. I suggest time served, or

2704: 1373: 1246: 864: 830: 744: 576: 351: 1058:

I said before, time served might be a little light, but 6 months is excessive. I still suggest 6 weeks. Best,

4155: 4023: 4001: 3852: 3785: 3764: 3597: 3518: 3474: 3448:. Please don't move it back until you've implemented actual citations and cleaned it up to list standards. 3433: 3398: 3387: 3337: 3288: 3081: 3026: 3011: 2937: 2846: 2793: 2716: 2631: 2229: 1962: 1914: 1791: 1768: 1345: 1307: 1280: 1025: 982: 802: 704: 661: 638: 508: 419: 156: 3040:

articles, glad to have any interest at all, and I'll revisit them now (and welcome your adding to them too).

2883: 1975:

The "Reduced block requested for Doncram" matter can be found at the Administrator's Archive #231, item #8

1760: 630: 4055: 3187: 3135: 2649: 2535: 2517: 1640:

breaking down? In hindsight we will all say "yes", yet none of us were in his shoes at that moment in time.

722:

In August 2011 you were blocked for 3 months, with hopes that when you return you would no longer show the

584: 204: 195: 97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 1756: 626: 3067: 2810: 1670: 1550: 554: 105: 1782: 1093:

from editing articles which Doncram just created would be a good way to not have additional disruption.

652: 4106: 4087: 3748: 3742: 3650: 1726: 787:

Sorry about length of above, and that you perceive my behavior negatively. I didn't and don't want to

332: 318: 243: 229: 38: 3299: 3219:

I sent you an e-mail. Gosh, it's been so long I can't remember how to sign this. Ahh, there it is. --

3214: 2168:

Apologies in advance if now is not the right time to ask a question about National Historic Landmarks

1746: 1206: 995: 616: 588: 533: 387: 4082:

for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on

1229:

admin perceives any type of incivility or battleground behaviour, then Doncram will be indefinitely

4062: 3504: 1823: 1801: 1778: 1740: 1220:

same idea: will the behaviour recur? The whole reason that the block has escalated to 6 months is

1021: 671: 648: 610: 305: 3099:

Looks like you hit the ground running! Happy to see you back!!! Wish you success! Cheeeeeeeeeers,

1450:

towards a lesser block by 5:3. I don't see where to go from here unless the numbers change. Best,

1329:, where no one has disagreed about Bishir showing as an author not an overall editor, and to edit 4091: 3309: 3264: 3166: 3156: 3044: 2959:. It amounts to undue weight to not include mention of that simply because it's not on the NRHP. 2743: 2556: 1863: 1435:

Lesser block, conditional: Dudemanfellabra, Sitush(?), Dmadeo, Pubdog, WereSpielChequersm, BD2412

1036: 922: 897: 429: 3358: 2687:

Talk:National Register of Historic Places featured properties and districts/New Article Template

1764: 634: 3797: 2905: 2867: 2805: 2499: 2423: 2146: 1665: 1602: 1546: 1017: 727:

edit-warriors is wholescale improper on a collegial project. You have focused far too much on

550: 542: 252: 2254:; if you post any additional relevant references here, I will try to add them to the article. 2009:" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so 1831: 1623:

Two, I generally have little trust in the Knowledge block system because in the bulk of cases

1520:

You can put me down as "abstaining in an attempt not to make things any worse", if you like.--

271: 233: 176: 4134: 3094: 3037: 2956: 1787: 657: 519: 283: 188: 1976: 1707:

to understand that that's possible to happen again, but he still has to avoid the problem.

4083: 3974: 3964:

was demolished earlier this year. If you were spending minimal effort with a google search

3366: 3033: 2244: 2204: 2186: 1712: 1330: 1202: 1098: 1054: 987: 946: 690: 546: 8: 3987: 3500: 3419: 2988: 2967:, quite some distance from its present location at the transportation museum next to the 2753: 2259: 2036: 580: 457: 132: 2721:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at

1932:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at

3059: 2698: 2431: 2268: 2154: 1941: 1859: 1839: 1535: 1527: 1493: 1469: 1455: 1361: 1234: 1144: 1090: 1063: 912: 881: 852: 838: 732: 345: 328: 299: 290: 239: 497:

but not one for Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, when I do try to comply with your request. --

4150: 4018: 3996: 3961: 3914: 3899: 3887: 3847: 3809: 3801: 3780: 3759: 3688: 3618: 3592: 3572: 3547: 3533: 3513: 3469: 3453: 3428: 3408: 3382: 3332: 3283: 3238: 3224: 3191: 3119: 3104: 3076: 2932: 2894: 2856: 2788: 2732: 2494: 2422:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

2323: 2224: 2145:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

2040: 2016: 1986: 1957: 1909: 1651: 1580: 1340: 1326: 1302: 1275: 797: 728: 699: 503: 416: 310: 151: 47: 17: 3200:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

921:

Yes, in August I was still an admin, as I was in June where we were both blocked. --

3490: 2979: 2829: 2574: 2024: 1886: 1689: 1565: 1510: 1428:(Note Orlady & Sarek have commented but not come down on one side or another.) 1413: 1390: 1233:

with no avenue of appeal for 1 year. Put the money where the mouth should be ... (

1169: 1113: 1080: 788: 769: 723: 560: 486: 322: 2015:. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the 3986:

Hi RoyalBroil, I would be happy for you to help develop the Wisconsin section of

3969: 3362: 3147: 2968: 2768: 2199: 2181: 1708: 1094: 971: 942: 592: 4075: 4074:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

3804:; that will likely be in the nomination, which I've not looked at for a while. 1075:

Blocking isn't about punishment; it's about preventing additional disruption. --

226:.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4118: 3163:

http://www.cityrealty.com/nyc/midtown-west/the-columns-32-west-40th-street/5888

3138:. I added a little bit, found a clearer image, and have nominated it for DYK: 2984: 2749: 2585: 2255: 453: 315:

You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page

128: 3967:

you would have found its image on Knowledge and sources about its demolition.

2623: 829:

6 weeks including time served because while Doncram should have known better,

3646: 3560: 3542:

History merge complete; your changes that were on list 2 are now on list 1.

2694: 2570: 2566: 2527: 2435: 2427: 2158: 2150: 2028: 1937: 1835: 1531: 1489: 1465: 1451: 1368: 1241: 1140: 1059: 908: 877: 859: 834: 739: 341: 1936:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Best,

4145: 4013: 3991: 3910: 3895: 3842: 3805: 3775: 3754: 3684: 3614: 3587: 3568: 3543: 3529: 3508: 3464: 3449: 3423: 3404: 3377: 3327: 3278: 3234: 3220: 3115: 3100: 3071: 2927: 2783: 2728: 2662: 2319: 2219: 1982: 1952: 1904: 1855: 1751: 1647: 1576: 1335: 1297: 1270: 792: 694: 621: 498: 403: 217: 146: 1595:

Vote for "immediate unblock with time served" reconsideration by Admin(s).

4054:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

3486: 2825: 2279: 2020: 1685: 1561: 1506: 1404: 1386: 1291:

Oh, feh, it could possibly depend on how you count. If you want to view

1165: 1155: 1109: 1076: 1040: 482: 438: 2725:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

689:

it. Specifically I was blocked by editor Courcelles for edit warring at

114: 3143: 2764: 967: 907:

Apologies! But you were (I think!) the last time he was blocked? Best,

3444:

sentences about Canada, which are cited to "title"), I've moved it to

1432:

Unblock or lesser block: Markvs88, Multichill, Cbl62, Mercy11, Nyttend

3114:

Oops, just read now under "Good to see you" above. Cheers anyway!!!.

1198: 1032: 395:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Helfensteller, Hirsch & Watson

3182: 2562:

Planning of regular Boston meetups (any other New England cities?)

941:

This now appears to be a trick of some admins to shut up Doncram.

3680: 1858:

to garner wide community input, or Doncram can appeal to arbcom.

1826:

that the six month block is being used contrary to point #3 of

256: 3140:

Template:Did you know nominations/De Mores Packing Plant Ruins

3130:

Template:Did you know nominations/De Mores Packing Plant Ruins

224:

Template:Did you know nominations/Dr. Franklin E. Kameny House

3066:

was almost accidental, as I copied its wikiproject tags from

2453: 2824:

Welcome back! Please let me know if I can help in any way

295:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 200:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 3741:

Thanks, that would be great, if you would help develop the

3610:

List of Indiana state historical markers in Harrison County

3014:

article and other Alaska articles. I'll watch and post at

2763:

It's good to have you back -- hopefully for the long haul!

2693:. I suggest a further move into the Knowledge namespace. — 583:. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek 313:, in a unified Spanish colonial style to foster community? 2035:

You were sent this message because you are a listed as a

1874:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

757:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

2685:

It was a bit pedantic of someone to put a speedy tag on

2591: 1894:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

777:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2483:

Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.

376:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

2671:

You can remove your name from this meetup invite list

831:

Sarek should have as well and said as much on his talk

1545:

of discussion, so I'd let it brew for a while yet. --

587:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 2891:, even though you have the badge on your user page… 2252:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Noel Owen Neal House

1739:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

609:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

382:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

222:

The nomination discussion and review may be seen at

2365:

From the editors; award recipients; contest results

2080:

From the editors; award recipients; contest results

549:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to 2096:Nick-D Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books 1438:Abstain: Orlady, SarekofVulcan, Elen of the Roads 3584:List of governors' mansions in the United States 1928:Notice of Administrators' Noticeboard discussion 1488:I have now entered a new unblock request. Best, 3800:. Also, per GIS, the owners are the family of 2723:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 1323:this my first change of the displayed reference 4076:section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion 4072:List of traditional gentlemen's club buildings 4040:List of traditional gentlemen's club buildings 3177:DYK nomination of De Mores Packing Plant Ruins 1684:I vote for Option 1, Unblock or lesser block-- 3418:Thanks for finding that. I added it also to 3007:List of National Historic Landmarks in Alaska 553:. If you would like to be unblocked, you may 3049:Alaska Engineering Commission Cottage No. 25 3005:article and many of the articles indexed by 1192:I would support a shortening of the block, 4109:. If the page is deleted, you can contact 4086:subjects and should provide references to 2565:Planning for upcoming coordinated events ( 2412:. To receive it on your talk page, please 2381:Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books 2135:. To receive it on your talk page, please 1424:So after all that, we have these opinions: 575:During a dispute, you should first try to 287:was updated with a fact from the article 192:was updated with a fact from the article 3645: 2646: 2373:The month's Featured and A-class content 2088:The month's Featured and A-class content 1441:Keep 6 month block: BWilkins, Elkman, DM 303:, the sibling partnership of Arthur and 4056:the guide to writing your first article 3248:Central Wisconsin State Fair Round Barn 3001:Hi RadioKAOS -- In fact I started the 2353: 2068: 1293:this, my first change of that reference 1031:"time served" seems about as likely as 208:in Washington, D.C., was listed on the 14: 3053:Alaska Engineering Commission Cottages 2691:User:Doncram/NRHP new article template 2389:Ian Rose discusses article assessments 2316:Category:Chicago school (architecture) 1037:asking for free meals at the town hall 819:I disagree with the refusal to unblock 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2955:The AEC was also responsible for the 2546:New England Wikimedia General Meeting 2536:New England Wikimedia General Meeting 2518:New England Wikimedia General Meeting 2104:Kirill Lokshin, the first coordinator 1934:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard 1524:(talk) 14:52, 23 January 2012 (UTC)-- 3003:Alaska Native Brotherhood/Sisterhood 1818:After two weeks of open commenting, 476:Categories for new building articles 266: 210:National Register of Historic Places 171: 168:DYK for Dr. Franklin E. Kameny House 25: 4144:Deletion withdrawn by nominator. -- 4117:the page or email a copy to you. 4107:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 4061:You may want to consider using the 2277:, to remove "neighborhood" column? 384:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 309:, designed the oil company town of 23: 4113:to request that the administrator 4044: 3064:Talk:Alaska Engineering Commission 3020:Talk:Alaska Engineering Commission 2924:Talk:Alaska Engineering Commission 2526: 2452: 2216:this one for Riverby Studio in NYS 1731: 1154:should never be trusted again. -- 601: 524: 379:Helfensteller, Hirsch & Watson 363:Helfensteller, Hirsch & Watson 24: 4172: 3892:Historic Firehouses of Louisville 3018:, and welcome discussion also at 3016:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Alaska 2803:Thanks Doncram and welcome back! 2639:700 Boylston St., Boston MA 02116 393:The article will be discussed at 3446:User:Doncram/List of round barns 3181: 2522: 2448: 2356:Your Military History Newsletter 2347: 2071:Your Military History Newsletter 2062: 1446:in order words, deadlock with a 437: 369: 270: 259:) 00:04, 13 December 2011 (UTC) 175: 113: 29: 3058:By all means, please do add to 2965:Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson 2559:and should we work towards one? 2500: 2495: 3681:http://www.hancockcoingov.org/ 3353:Your request for Autopatrolled 2582:WikiProject Academical Village 2493: 2312:Category: Chicago architecture 2007:Military Historian of the Year 2001:Military Historian of the Year 1860:A fluffernutter is a sandwich! 13: 1: 4127: 4122: 4101:the page's talk page directly 3359:Knowledge:PERM/A#User:Doncram 3192:Did You Know nominations page 3027:Alaska Engineering Commission 3012:Alaska Engineering Commission 2847:Alaska Engineering Commission 2739:, and I approve this message. 2584:) and cultural institutions ( 2439:09:44, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 2328:23:16, 19 February 2012 (UTC) 2306:Category:Chicago architecture 2301:23:02, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 1993:, and I approve this message. 1832:Blocks should be preventative 1828:Blocks should not be punitive 1658:, and I approve this message. 596:22:31, 28 December 2011 (UTC) 577:discuss controversial changes 537:from editing for a period of 514:00:47, 28 December 2011 (UTC) 491:16:06, 27 December 2011 (UTC) 468:23:15, 24 December 2011 (UTC) 425:15:42, 17 December 2011 (UTC) 356:08:04, 15 December 2011 (UTC) 4065:to help you create articles. 3376:Thanks. I replied there. -- 3188:De Mores Packing Plant Ruins 3136:De Mores Packing Plant Ruins 2650:Knowledge:Meetup/New England 2619: 2605: 2410:Military history WikiProject 2264:21:28, 6 February 2012 (UTC) 2250:This former NHRP site is at 2235:21:06, 6 February 2012 (UTC) 2210:23:33, 3 February 2012 (UTC) 2193:19:38, 3 February 2012 (UTC) 2162:23:55, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 2133:Military history WikiProject 2041:Military history WikiProject 2032:22:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 1968:20:47, 6 February 2012 (UTC) 1946:19:32, 6 February 2012 (UTC) 1920:20:45, 6 February 2012 (UTC) 1868:20:06, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 1717:21:21, 3 February 2012 (UTC) 1694:22:37, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 1680:21:07, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 1656:19:11, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 1585:13:30, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 1570:06:09, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 1555:16:47, 23 January 2012 (UTC) 1540:16:23, 23 January 2012 (UTC) 1515:15:19, 23 January 2012 (UTC) 1498:19:54, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 1474:15:53, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 1460:13:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC) 1419:17:11, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 1395:17:16, 21 January 2012 (UTC) 1380:12:03, 21 January 2012 (UTC) 1351:03:21, 21 January 2012 (UTC) 1313:03:56, 21 January 2012 (UTC) 1286:03:21, 21 January 2012 (UTC) 1253:15:08, 20 January 2012 (UTC) 1211:15:00, 20 January 2012 (UTC) 1174:02:24, 21 January 2012 (UTC) 1159:23:52, 20 January 2012 (UTC) 1149:17:26, 20 January 2012 (UTC) 1118:16:56, 20 January 2012 (UTC) 1103:16:53, 20 January 2012 (UTC) 1085:16:01, 20 January 2012 (UTC) 1068:14:48, 20 January 2012 (UTC) 1044:23:05, 19 January 2012 (UTC) 976:21:52, 19 January 2012 (UTC) 951:21:19, 19 January 2012 (UTC) 928:22:47, 19 January 2012 (UTC) 917:22:42, 19 January 2012 (UTC) 903:22:09, 19 January 2012 (UTC) 886:20:35, 19 January 2012 (UTC) 871:20:21, 19 January 2012 (UTC) 843:20:14, 19 January 2012 (UTC) 808:20:11, 19 January 2012 (UTC) 751:20:00, 19 January 2012 (UTC) 710:19:47, 19 January 2012 (UTC) 452:Thanks for all you do here, 212:for its significance in the 196:Dr. Franklin E. Kameny House 162:00:00, 7 December 2011 (UTC) 137:23:58, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 7: 4119: 4111:one of these administrators 3960:county list shows that the 3068:Talk:Alaska Road Commission 2336:: Issue LXXI, February 2012 1743:, who declined the request. 613:, who declined the request. 263:DYK for Fisher & Fisher 121:The Photographer's Barnstar 10: 4177: 3749:Frank Littleton Round Barn 3747:"Did you know... that the 3743:Frank Littleton Round Barn 3651:Frank Littleton Round Barn 3186:Hello! Your submission of 2667:08:34, 11 April 2012 (UTC) 2580:Outreach to universities ( 2342: 2273:Hey, did anything come of 2057: 1991:04:01, 17 March 2012 (UTC) 569:, but you should read the 447:and best wishes for 2012! 4161:14:13, 13 July 2012 (UTC) 4139:04:15, 11 July 2012 (UTC) 4070:A tag has been placed on 4029:14:11, 13 July 2012 (UTC) 4007:12:03, 13 July 2012 (UTC) 3981:03:50, 13 July 2012 (UTC) 3919:16:01, 11 July 2012 (UTC) 3904:20:30, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 3858:23:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC) 3814:17:23, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 3791:16:43, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 3770:16:40, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 3300:Worlds Largest Round Barn 3243:02:54, 11 July 2012 (UTC) 3161:Ah, the light dawns. :-) 2799:23:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC) 2773:01:59, 30 June 2012 (UTC) 2758:01:55, 30 June 2012 (UTC) 2737:21:22, 10 June 2012 (UTC) 2709:20:26, 10 June 2012 (UTC) 2681:NRHP new article template 2543: 2534: 2525: 2506:23:23, 5 April 2012 (UTC) 2445:Dispute resolution survey 2310:See my proposal to merge 2051:: Issue LXX, January 2012 1878:guide to appealing blocks 1842:) 2:55 pm, Today (UTC−5) 761:guide to appealing blocks 571:guide to appealing blocks 551:make useful contributions 436: 112: 3693:21:06, 9 July 2012 (UTC) 3653:full picture, not zoomed 3623:17:20, 9 July 2012 (UTC) 3603:16:31, 9 July 2012 (UTC) 3577:15:03, 9 July 2012 (UTC) 3552:14:49, 9 July 2012 (UTC) 3538:14:45, 9 July 2012 (UTC) 3524:14:07, 9 July 2012 (UTC) 3505:Talk:List of round barns 3495:14:02, 9 July 2012 (UTC) 3480:13:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC) 3458:02:59, 9 July 2012 (UTC) 3439:02:08, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 3413:23:28, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 3393:18:29, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 3371:17:59, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 3343:18:02, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 3317:17:50, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 3294:17:44, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 3272:17:41, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 3229:15:35, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 3210:10:42, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 3172:21:54, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 3152:21:36, 3 July 2012 (UTC) 3124:15:46, 2 July 2012 (UTC) 3109:15:44, 2 July 2012 (UTC) 3087:11:21, 2 July 2012 (UTC) 2993:08:21, 2 July 2012 (UTC) 2943:00:41, 2 July 2012 (UTC) 2914:00:02, 2 July 2012 (UTC) 2876:23:59, 1 July 2012 (UTC) 2834:19:22, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 2820:14:15, 2 July 2012 (UTC) 2567:Knowledge Love Libraries 386:or whether it should be 306:William Ellsworth Fisher 3197:your nomination's entry 3045:A. E. C. Cottage No. 23 1854:discussion about it on 1231:banned from the project 333:Did you know? talk page 244:Did you know? talk page 4067: 4049: 3654: 2531: 2457: 2112:Hchc's English Castles 1736: 896:an admin, actually. -- 606: 529: 4052: 4048: 3955:Wisconsin round barns 3649: 3399:Bert Leedy Round Barn 3038:Whitney Section House 2957:Mears Memorial Bridge 2717:Notifying as required 2689:. I have moved it to 2661:Message delivered by 2648:Please sign up here: 2632:Boston Public Library 2530: 2462:Dispute Resolution – 2456: 2005:Nominations for the " 1788:change block settings 1735: 729:someone else' actions 658:change block settings 605: 565:Your reason here ~~~~ 528: 42:of past discussions. 3168:SarekOfVulcan (talk) 3034:Pioneer School House 2571:Wiki Loves Monuments 2408:is published by the 2245:Noel Owen Neal House 2131:is published by the 1614:- the definition of 1331:Frank Pierce Milburn 1055:Charles Coker Wilson 988:Charles Coker Wilson 924:SarekOfVulcan (talk) 899:SarekOfVulcan (talk) 691:Charles Coker Wilson 547:Charles Coker Wilson 3988:List of round barns 3501:List of round barns 3420:List of round barns 2626:, Johnson Building, 2624:Conference Room C06 557:by adding the text 300:Fisher & Fisher 291:Fisher & Fisher 214:gay rights activism 145:Yay! :) Thanks! -- 106:A barnstar for you! 4050: 3655: 3298:Here is the link: 3060:Pioneers of Alaska 2552:Potential topics: 2532: 2458: 1737: 1528:user talk:Markvs88 1091:user:SarekOfVulcan 607: 585:dispute resolution 530: 444:Season's greetings 205:Frank Kameny House 3962:Dougan Round Barn 3888:Eugene S. Pulliam 3802:Eugene C. Pulliam 3134:Nice work on the 3032:About the linked 2677: 2676: 2657: 2656: 2614:1:30 PM – 4:30 PM 2557:Wikimedia chapter 2513: 2512: 2508: 2402: 2401: 2398: 2397: 2125: 2124: 2121: 2120: 2044: 1547:Elen of the Roads 1355: 1327:Joseph F. Leitner 555:appeal this block 473: 472: 464: 339: 338: 326: 250: 249: 237: 142: 141: 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:Doncram 4168: 4158: 4153: 4148: 4131: 4126: 4121: 4094:their content. 4088:reliable sources 4047: 4026: 4021: 4016: 4004: 3999: 3994: 3977: 3972: 3855: 3850: 3845: 3788: 3783: 3778: 3767: 3762: 3757: 3600: 3595: 3590: 3565: 3559: 3521: 3516: 3511: 3477: 3472: 3467: 3436: 3431: 3426: 3390: 3385: 3380: 3340: 3335: 3330: 3315: 3312: 3307: 3291: 3286: 3281: 3270: 3267: 3262: 3185: 3169: 3084: 3079: 3074: 2940: 2935: 2930: 2912: 2911: 2908: 2901: 2890: 2874: 2873: 2870: 2863: 2817: 2813: 2808: 2796: 2791: 2786: 2670: 2660: 2634:—Central Library 2609:Sunday, April 22 2523: 2516:You're invited! 2504: 2502: 2497: 2487: 2449: 2426:. Your editors, 2414:join the project 2351: 2344: 2343: 2340: 2339: 2299: 2297: 2294: 2291: 2288: 2285: 2282: 2232: 2227: 2222: 2207: 2202: 2191: 2189: 2184: 2149:. Your editors, 2137:join the project 2066: 2059: 2058: 2055: 2054: 2034: 1965: 1960: 1955: 1917: 1912: 1907: 1891: 1885: 1807: 1805: 1794: 1776: 1774:deleted contribs 1734: 1677: 1673: 1668: 1411: 1376: 1372: 1364: 1353: 1348: 1343: 1338: 1310: 1305: 1300: 1283: 1278: 1273: 1249: 1245: 1237: 1194:with conditions. 1029: 1011: 925: 900: 867: 863: 855: 805: 800: 795: 774: 768: 747: 743: 735: 707: 702: 697: 677: 675: 664: 646: 644:deleted contribs 604: 568: 545:, as you did at 527: 511: 506: 501: 462: 441: 434: 433: 414: 409: 406: 373: 372: 316: 279:15 December 2011 274: 267: 227: 184:13 December 2011 179: 172: 159: 154: 149: 117: 110: 109: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4176: 4175: 4171: 4170: 4169: 4167: 4166: 4165: 4156: 4151: 4146: 4068: 4045: 4043: 4036:Speedy deletion 4024: 4019: 4014: 4002: 3997: 3992: 3975: 3970: 3957: 3853: 3848: 3843: 3786: 3781: 3776: 3765: 3760: 3755: 3598: 3593: 3588: 3563: 3557: 3519: 3514: 3509: 3475: 3470: 3465: 3434: 3429: 3424: 3401: 3388: 3383: 3378: 3355: 3338: 3333: 3328: 3310: 3305: 3303: 3289: 3284: 3279: 3265: 3260: 3258: 3250: 3245: 3217: 3215:Good to see you 3179: 3167: 3159: 3157:Henry Whitfield 3132: 3097: 3082: 3077: 3072: 2969:Wasilla Airport 2938: 2933: 2928: 2906: 2903: 2895: 2892: 2882: 2868: 2865: 2857: 2854: 2850: 2815: 2811: 2806: 2794: 2789: 2784: 2746: 2744:Good to see you 2719: 2683: 2594:is this summer. 2521: 2480:to participate. 2467: 2447: 2442: 2394: 2358: 2338: 2308: 2295: 2292: 2289: 2286: 2283: 2280: 2278: 2271: 2248: 2230: 2225: 2220: 2205: 2200: 2187: 2182: 2180: 2170: 2165: 2117: 2073: 2053: 2003: 1963: 1958: 1953: 1930: 1915: 1910: 1905: 1897: 1889: 1883: 1882:, then use the 1871: 1844: 1795: 1785: 1771: 1754: 1747:blocking policy 1732: 1729: 1675: 1671: 1666: 1426: 1405: 1374: 1366: 1362: 1346: 1341: 1336: 1319:Point of fact 2 1308: 1303: 1298: 1281: 1276: 1271: 1261:Point of fact 1 1247: 1239: 1235: 1203:Dudemanfellabra 1002: 986: 983:Fuck you, Sarek 923: 898: 865: 857: 853: 803: 798: 793: 780: 772: 766: 765:, then use the 754: 745: 737: 733: 713: 705: 700: 695: 665: 655: 641: 624: 617:blocking policy 602: 599: 589:page protection 558: 525: 522: 509: 504: 499: 478: 461: 432: 430:Merry Christmas 422: 410: 407: 404: 374: 370: 367: 297:... Architects 265: 253:The DYK project 170: 157: 152: 147: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4174: 4164: 4163: 4080:Knowledge:Stub 4063:Article Wizard 4051: 4042: 4038:nomination of 4033: 4032: 4031: 4009: 3956: 3953: 3952: 3951: 3950: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3944: 3943: 3942: 3941: 3940: 3939: 3938: 3937: 3936: 3935: 3934: 3933: 3932: 3931: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3927: 3926: 3925: 3924: 3923: 3922: 3921: 3838: 3837: 3836: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3832: 3831: 3830: 3829: 3828: 3827: 3826: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3821: 3820: 3819: 3818: 3817: 3816: 3772: 3716: 3715: 3714: 3713: 3712: 3711: 3710: 3709: 3708: 3707: 3706: 3705: 3704: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3700: 3699: 3698: 3697: 3696: 3695: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3631: 3630: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3626: 3625: 3400: 3397: 3396: 3395: 3354: 3351: 3350: 3349: 3348: 3347: 3346: 3345: 3320: 3319: 3249: 3246: 3232: 3216: 3213: 3178: 3175: 3158: 3155: 3131: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3096: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3089: 3056: 3041: 3030: 3023: 2996: 2995: 2976: 2972: 2960: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2917: 2916: 2888:auto-patrolled 2849: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2776: 2775: 2745: 2742: 2718: 2715: 2713: 2682: 2679: 2658: 2655: 2654: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2636: 2628: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2611: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2595: 2589: 2578: 2563: 2560: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2533: 2520: 2514: 2511: 2510: 2485: 2482: 2469: 2460: 2446: 2443: 2421: 2403: 2400: 2399: 2396: 2395: 2393: 2392: 2384: 2378:Book reviews: 2376: 2368: 2362:Project news: 2359: 2354: 2352: 2337: 2331: 2307: 2304: 2270: 2267: 2247: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2169: 2166: 2144: 2126: 2123: 2122: 2119: 2118: 2116: 2115: 2107: 2101:Review essay: 2099: 2093:Book reviews: 2091: 2083: 2077:Project news: 2074: 2069: 2067: 2052: 2046: 2002: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1929: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1872: 1851: 1847:Decline reason 1816: 1812:Request reason 1809: 1730: 1728: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1660: 1642: 1641: 1636: 1635: 1630: 1629: 1620: 1619: 1607: 1606: 1597: 1596: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1557: 1542: 1517: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1476: 1443: 1442: 1439: 1436: 1433: 1425: 1422: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1316: 1315: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1214: 1213: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1136: 1128: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 960: 959: 958: 957: 956: 955: 954: 953: 939: 936: 935: 934: 933: 932: 931: 930: 846: 845: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 810: 755: 720: 716:Decline reason 686: 682:Request reason 679: 600: 531:You have been 523: 521: 518: 517: 516: 477: 474: 471: 470: 458: 449: 448: 446: 445: 442: 431: 428: 420: 368: 366: 361:Nomination of 359: 337: 336: 327:and add it to 311:Parco, Wyoming 275: 264: 261: 248: 247: 238:and add it to 180: 169: 166: 165: 164: 140: 139: 124: 123: 118: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4173: 4162: 4159: 4154: 4149: 4143: 4142: 4141: 4140: 4136: 4132: 4130: 4125: 4116: 4112: 4108: 4103: 4102: 4095: 4093: 4089: 4085: 4081: 4077: 4073: 4066: 4064: 4059: 4057: 4041: 4037: 4030: 4027: 4022: 4017: 4010: 4008: 4005: 4000: 3995: 3989: 3985: 3984: 3983: 3982: 3979: 3978: 3973: 3966: 3963: 3920: 3916: 3912: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3901: 3897: 3893: 3889: 3885: 3884: 3883: 3882: 3881: 3880: 3879: 3878: 3877: 3876: 3875: 3874: 3873: 3872: 3871: 3870: 3869: 3868: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3863: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3856: 3851: 3846: 3839: 3815: 3811: 3807: 3803: 3799: 3794: 3793: 3792: 3789: 3784: 3779: 3773: 3771: 3768: 3763: 3758: 3752: 3750: 3744: 3740: 3739: 3738: 3737: 3736: 3735: 3734: 3733: 3732: 3731: 3730: 3729: 3728: 3727: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3723: 3722: 3721: 3720: 3719: 3718: 3717: 3694: 3690: 3686: 3682: 3677: 3676: 3675: 3674: 3673: 3672: 3671: 3670: 3669: 3668: 3667: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3660: 3659: 3658: 3657: 3656: 3652: 3648: 3624: 3620: 3616: 3611: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3601: 3596: 3591: 3585: 3580: 3579: 3578: 3574: 3570: 3562: 3555: 3554: 3553: 3549: 3545: 3541: 3540: 3539: 3535: 3531: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3522: 3517: 3512: 3506: 3502: 3498: 3497: 3496: 3492: 3488: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3478: 3473: 3468: 3461: 3460: 3459: 3455: 3451: 3447: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3437: 3432: 3427: 3421: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3414: 3410: 3406: 3394: 3391: 3386: 3381: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3368: 3364: 3360: 3344: 3341: 3336: 3331: 3324: 3323: 3322: 3321: 3318: 3314: 3308: 3301: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3292: 3287: 3282: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3273: 3269: 3263: 3256: 3244: 3240: 3236: 3231: 3230: 3226: 3222: 3212: 3211: 3207: 3203: 3199: 3198: 3193: 3189: 3184: 3174: 3173: 3170: 3164: 3154: 3153: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3137: 3125: 3121: 3117: 3113: 3112: 3111: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3095:Welcome back! 3088: 3085: 3080: 3075: 3069: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3039: 3035: 3031: 3028: 3024: 3021: 3017: 3013: 3008: 3004: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2994: 2990: 2986: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2970: 2966: 2961: 2958: 2954: 2953: 2952: 2944: 2941: 2936: 2931: 2925: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2915: 2909: 2902: 2900: 2899: 2889: 2887: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2871: 2864: 2862: 2861: 2848: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2818: 2814: 2809: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2797: 2792: 2787: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2741: 2740: 2738: 2734: 2730: 2724: 2714: 2711: 2710: 2706: 2703: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2688: 2678: 2674: 2668: 2664: 2653: 2651: 2645: 2640: 2637: 2635: 2633: 2629: 2627: 2625: 2621: 2620: 2615: 2612: 2610: 2607: 2606: 2604: 2596: 2593: 2590: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2576: 2572: 2568: 2564: 2561: 2558: 2554: 2553: 2551: 2550: 2547: 2542: 2537: 2529: 2524: 2519: 2509: 2507: 2503: 2498: 2491: 2490:research page 2484: 2481: 2479: 2476:Please click 2473: 2468: 2466: 2465: 2464:Survey Invite 2455: 2451: 2450: 2441: 2440: 2437: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2419: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2391: 2390: 2385: 2383: 2382: 2377: 2375: 2374: 2369: 2367: 2366: 2361: 2360: 2357: 2350: 2346: 2345: 2341: 2335: 2330: 2329: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2313: 2303: 2302: 2298: 2276: 2266: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2246: 2236: 2233: 2228: 2223: 2217: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2208: 2203: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2190: 2185: 2177: 2173: 2164: 2163: 2160: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2114: 2113: 2108: 2106: 2105: 2100: 2098: 2097: 2092: 2090: 2089: 2084: 2082: 2081: 2076: 2075: 2072: 2065: 2061: 2060: 2056: 2050: 2045: 2042: 2038: 2033: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2013: 2008: 1994: 1992: 1988: 1984: 1978: 1974: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1966: 1961: 1956: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1921: 1918: 1913: 1908: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1896: 1895: 1888: 1881: 1879: 1870: 1869: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1850: 1848: 1843: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1815: 1813: 1808: 1803: 1799: 1793: 1789: 1784: 1780: 1775: 1770: 1766: 1765:global blocks 1762: 1761:active blocks 1758: 1753: 1748: 1744: 1742: 1741:administrator 1718: 1714: 1710: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1678: 1674: 1669: 1661: 1659: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1644: 1643: 1638: 1637: 1632: 1631: 1626: 1622: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1608: 1604: 1599: 1598: 1594: 1593: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1558: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1543: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1523: 1522:SarekOfVulcan 1518: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1477: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1444: 1440: 1437: 1434: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1421: 1420: 1417: 1416: 1412: 1410: 1409: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1377: 1371: 1370: 1365: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1352: 1349: 1344: 1339: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1314: 1311: 1306: 1301: 1294: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1284: 1279: 1274: 1267: 1262: 1254: 1250: 1244: 1243: 1238: 1232: 1228: 1223: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1195: 1191: 1190: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1157: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1137: 1134: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1056: 1051: 1050: 1045: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1010: 1006: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 984: 979: 978: 977: 973: 969: 965: 962: 961: 952: 948: 944: 940: 937: 929: 926: 920: 919: 918: 914: 910: 906: 905: 904: 901: 895: 891: 890: 889: 888: 887: 883: 879: 874: 873: 872: 868: 862: 861: 856: 850: 849: 848: 847: 844: 840: 836: 832: 828: 824: 820: 817: 816: 809: 806: 801: 796: 790: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 779: 778: 771: 764: 762: 753: 752: 748: 742: 741: 736: 730: 725: 719: 717: 712: 711: 708: 703: 698: 692: 685: 683: 678: 673: 669: 663: 659: 654: 650: 645: 640: 636: 635:global blocks 632: 631:active blocks 628: 623: 618: 614: 612: 611:administrator 598: 597: 594: 590: 586: 582: 578: 572: 566: 562: 556: 552: 548: 544: 540: 536: 535: 520:December 2011 515: 512: 507: 502: 495: 494: 493: 492: 488: 484: 469: 466: 465: 455: 451: 450: 443: 440: 435: 427: 426: 423: 417: 415: 413: 399: 396: 391: 389: 385: 381: 380: 364: 358: 357: 353: 350: 347: 343: 334: 330: 324: 320: 314: 312: 308: 307: 302: 301: 294: 293: 292: 286: 285: 284:Did you know? 280: 276: 273: 269: 268: 260: 258: 254: 245: 241: 235: 231: 225: 221: 219: 215: 211: 207: 206: 202:... that the 199: 198: 197: 191: 190: 189:Did you know? 185: 181: 178: 174: 173: 163: 160: 155: 150: 144: 143: 138: 134: 130: 126: 125: 122: 119: 116: 111: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4128: 4123: 4099: 4096: 4069: 4060: 4053: 3968: 3958: 3746: 3402: 3356: 3251: 3218: 3195: 3180: 3160: 3133: 3098: 2949: 2898:Fly by Night 2897: 2896: 2885: 2860:Fly by Night 2859: 2858: 2851: 2804: 2747: 2726: 2720: 2712: 2701: 2684: 2659: 2647: 2630: 2622: 2613: 2608: 2592:Wikimania DC 2545: 2486: 2475: 2474: 2470: 2463: 2461: 2459: 2405: 2404: 2387: 2379: 2371: 2363: 2355: 2333: 2309: 2272: 2249: 2178: 2174: 2171: 2128: 2127: 2110: 2102: 2094: 2086: 2078: 2070: 2048: 2017:coordinators 2010: 2004: 1980: 1972: 1931: 1893: 1875: 1873: 1852: 1846: 1845: 1819: 1817: 1811: 1810: 1783:creation log 1750: 1738: 1664: 1645: 1624: 1615: 1611: 1603:wiki hounded 1526:copied from 1521: 1519: 1485: 1484: 1447: 1427: 1414: 1407: 1406: 1401: 1367: 1318: 1317: 1260: 1259: 1240: 1230: 1226: 1221: 1193: 1132: 1124:in this case 1123: 1072: 963: 893: 858: 826: 822: 818: 776: 758: 756: 738: 721: 715: 714: 687: 681: 680: 653:creation log 620: 608: 574: 564: 543:edit warring 538: 532: 479: 456: 411: 400: 392: 377: 375: 365:for deletion 348: 340: 304: 298: 296: 289: 288: 282: 251: 203: 201: 194: 193: 187: 120: 78: 43: 37: 4098:also visit 3357:Please see 2983:you desire. 2727:My name is 2597:Your ideas! 2416:or sign up 2139:or sign up 1981:My name is 1727:New request 1646:My name is 1035:asking for 323:quick check 234:quick check 36:This is an 3363:EdJohnston 3043:About the 2555:What is a 2370:Articles: 2269:NRHP table 2201:SPhilbrick 2183:SPhilbrick 2085:Articles: 1820:17 editors 1779:filter log 1709:Smallbones 1448:small lean 1354:Small text 1095:Multichill 943:Multichill 649:filter log 593:Courcelles 319:here's how 230:here's how 98:Archive 25 90:Archive 22 85:Archive 21 79:Archive 20 73:Archive 19 68:Archive 18 60:Archive 15 3306:Keystoner 3261:Keystoner 3233:Another. 3202:LauraHale 2985:RadioKAOS 2980:WP:ALASKA 2750:Dru of Id 2424:this page 2406:The Bugle 2334:The Bugle 2256:Dru of Id 2147:this page 2129:The Bugle 2049:The Bugle 1876:read the 1798:checkuser 1757:block log 1486:Therefore 1266:this edit 1199:probation 1133:this time 789:wp:BATTLE 759:read the 724:WP:BATTLE 668:checkuser 627:block log 581:consensus 579:and seek 460:<: --> 454:Ruhrfisch 129:Buggie111 3029:article. 2816:Chequers 2705:contribs 2695:RHaworth 2669:. Note: 2428:Ian Rose 2151:Ian Rose 1973:Comment. 1938:Markvs88 1836:Markvs88 1769:contribs 1676:Chequers 1616:punitive 1532:Markvs88 1530:. Best, 1490:Markvs88 1466:Markvs88 1452:Markvs88 1369:BWilkins 1242:BWilkins 1141:Markvs88 1089:Banning 1060:Markvs88 1033:Socrates 909:Markvs88 878:Markvs88 860:BWilkins 835:Markvs88 833:. Best, 740:BWilkins 639:contribs 563:|reason= 539:6 months 352:contribs 342:Casliber 329:DYKSTATS 257:nominate 240:DYKSTATS 218:namesake 4084:notable 3911:Nyttend 3896:Nyttend 3806:Nyttend 3685:Nyttend 3615:Nyttend 3569:Nyttend 3544:Nyttend 3530:Nyttend 3450:Nyttend 3405:Nyttend 3313:(speak) 3268:(speak) 3235:Lvklock 3221:Lvklock 3190:at the 3116:Mercy11 3101:Mercy11 2884:You're 2729:Mercy11 2663:Dominic 2577:, etc.) 2386:Op-ed: 2320:Hugo999 2109:Op-ed: 2039:of the 1983:Mercy11 1887:unblock 1792:unblock 1752:Doncram 1648:Mercy11 1577:Nyttend 1222:because 1005:protect 1000:history 964:Comment 827:at most 770:unblock 662:unblock 622:Doncram 561:unblock 534:blocked 388:deleted 216:of its 39:archive 4115:userfy 4092:verify 3487:Orlady 2575:Wiknic 2496:Steven 2434:) and 2206:(Talk) 2188:(Talk) 2157:) and 2037:member 2027:) and 2021:Nick-D 1686:Pubdog 1507:Orlady 1408:bd2412 1375:←track 1248:←track 1166:Sitush 1156:Elkman 1110:Sitush 1077:Orlady 1041:Elkman 1009:delete 892:Sarek 866:←track 746:←track 573:first. 483:Jllm06 4090:that 3976:broil 3971:Royal 3798:IHSSI 3144:Cbl62 2975:same. 2812:Spiel 2765:Cbl62 2501:Zhang 2314:into 1880:first 1856:WP:AN 1672:Spiel 1363:talk→ 1236:talk→ 1197:wiki- 1073:Note: 1039:. -- 1026:views 1018:watch 1014:links 968:Cbl62 894:isn't 854:talk→ 763:first 734:talk→ 459:: --> 421:What? 16:< 4135:talk 3915:talk 3900:talk 3810:talk 3689:talk 3619:talk 3573:talk 3561:sort 3548:talk 3534:talk 3491:talk 3454:talk 3422:. -- 3409:talk 3367:talk 3311:idin 3266:idin 3255:Here 3239:talk 3225:talk 3206:talk 3148:talk 3120:talk 3105:talk 3047:and 3036:and 2989:talk 2926:. -- 2907:talk 2881:Oh! 2869:talk 2830:talk 2807:Ϣere 2769:talk 2754:talk 2733:talk 2699:talk 2673:here 2586:GLAM 2544:The 2478:HERE 2432:talk 2418:here 2324:talk 2275:this 2260:talk 2243:Re: 2155:talk 2141:here 2025:talk 2012:here 1987:talk 1977:HERE 1942:talk 1864:talk 1840:talk 1824:here 1713:talk 1690:talk 1667:Ϣere 1652:talk 1634:now. 1625:both 1581:talk 1566:talk 1551:talk 1536:talk 1511:talk 1494:talk 1470:talk 1456:talk 1391:talk 1207:talk 1170:talk 1145:talk 1114:talk 1099:talk 1081:talk 1064:talk 1022:logs 996:talk 992:edit 972:talk 947:talk 913:talk 882:talk 839:talk 823:with 541:for 487:talk 346:talk 133:talk 4152:ncr 4129:six 4124:dog 4120:red 4020:ncr 3998:ncr 3849:ncr 3782:ncr 3761:ncr 3594:ncr 3515:ncr 3471:ncr 3430:ncr 3384:ncr 3334:ncr 3285:ncr 3142:. 3078:ncr 2934:ncr 2886:not 2790:ncr 2665:at 2226:ncr 1959:ncr 1911:ncr 1802:log 1749:). 1342:ncr 1321:In 1304:ncr 1277:ncr 1227:any 799:ncr 701:ncr 672:log 619:). 505:ncr 405:Liv 277:On 182:On 153:ncr 4157:am 4147:do 4137:) 4025:am 4015:do 4003:am 3993:do 3917:) 3902:) 3854:am 3844:do 3812:) 3787:am 3777:do 3766:am 3756:do 3691:) 3621:) 3599:am 3589:do 3575:) 3564:}} 3558:{{ 3550:) 3536:) 3520:am 3510:do 3493:) 3476:am 3466:do 3456:) 3435:am 3425:do 3411:) 3389:am 3379:do 3369:) 3339:am 3329:do 3326:-- 3290:am 3280:do 3241:) 3227:) 3208:) 3165:-- 3150:) 3122:) 3107:) 3083:am 3073:do 2991:) 2971:). 2939:am 2929:do 2893:— 2855:— 2832:) 2826:dm 2795:am 2785:do 2771:) 2756:) 2735:) 2707:) 2573:, 2569:, 2492:. 2436:Ed 2326:) 2318:. 2262:) 2231:am 2221:do 2159:Ed 2029:Ed 2019:, 1989:) 1979:. 1964:am 1954:do 1944:) 1916:am 1906:do 1903:-- 1890:}} 1884:{{ 1866:) 1849:: 1814:: 1796:• 1790:• 1786:• 1781:• 1777:• 1772:• 1767:• 1763:• 1759:• 1715:) 1692:) 1654:) 1612:IS 1583:) 1568:) 1562:dm 1553:) 1538:) 1513:) 1496:) 1472:) 1458:) 1393:) 1387:dm 1378:) 1347:am 1337:do 1309:am 1299:do 1296:-- 1282:am 1272:do 1251:) 1209:) 1172:) 1147:) 1116:) 1101:) 1083:) 1066:) 1024:| 1020:| 1016:| 1012:| 1007:| 1003:| 998:| 994:| 974:) 949:) 915:) 884:) 869:) 841:) 804:am 794:do 773:}} 767:{{ 749:) 718:: 706:am 696:do 684:: 666:• 660:• 656:• 651:• 647:• 642:• 637:• 633:• 629:• 591:. 567:}} 559:{{ 510:am 500:do 489:) 408:it 390:. 354:) 321:, 281:, 232:, 186:, 158:am 148:do 135:) 94:→ 64:← 4133:( 4058:. 3913:( 3898:( 3808:( 3687:( 3617:( 3571:( 3546:( 3532:( 3489:( 3452:( 3407:( 3365:( 3237:( 3223:( 3204:( 3146:( 3118:( 3103:( 3022:. 2987:( 2910:) 2904:( 2872:) 2866:( 2828:( 2767:( 2752:( 2731:( 2702:· 2697:( 2675:. 2652:! 2588:) 2430:( 2420:. 2322:( 2296:3 2293:8 2290:F 2287:J 2284:T 2281:C 2258:( 2153:( 2143:. 2043:. 2023:( 1985:( 1940:( 1862:( 1838:( 1806:) 1804:) 1800:( 1755:( 1711:( 1688:( 1650:( 1579:( 1564:( 1549:( 1534:( 1509:( 1492:( 1468:( 1454:( 1415:T 1389:( 1360:( 1205:( 1168:( 1143:( 1112:( 1097:( 1079:( 1062:( 1028:) 990:( 970:( 945:( 911:( 880:( 837:( 676:) 674:) 670:( 625:( 485:( 463:° 418:/ 412:⇑ 349:· 344:( 335:. 325:) 317:( 255:( 246:. 236:) 228:( 220:? 131:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index