Knowledge

User talk:Drm310/Archive 12

Source 📝

954: 2259:
been deleted . If you need any proof, i can give it as iam the owner and author of all that stuff written in jutialians.com so your argument of copy right doesn't fit to me. For other reasons, of notability and references, should i recall that the institution is already referenced and present on wikipedia as : Public School & College, Jutial Gilgit, so pretending this association to be UN-notable doesn't make sense. References are already given, facebook page hs 2 k likes, other articles and writes are there.
2371: 1177: 927: 152: 31: 2081: 557:
dozen years. My "source" is my own eyes ears, nose, tongue, and hands. It is the stories of my neighbors. It is the verbal history which has no physical "source", for which I hope to establish with this wiki. Please come here and help cite a generation who's ways are quickly and quietly vanishing... or otherwise, stopping trying to prevent such documentation with your desire for citation and re-instate whatever content you obstructed.
1155:
the University of Essex and all the information on the page is factually correct and non-promotional. The Knowledge Gateway is now a physical location and an address, and 20+ companies are now based there. Please advise on how I can alter or edit the copy so it will be approved. Many thanks, Jo. I havwe also posted this on: Jodaviesuniessex (talk) 12:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
2588:
other editors I mentioned above, who might be better able to explain the discrepancy. I could try, but football is one topic area where there are subtleties with the inclusion criteria, and I have no experience with them. I'd rather you engage with them instead of getting some potentially bad advice from me.
1423:
Hi, Thanks for your comment related to the quasardb content. Indeed I work for this company, but I tried to create the most objective page with the relevant sources whenever required. All the sources used are public and cross reference-able to ensure its objectivity. I'm fairly new to Knowledge as an
1154:
Hi Drm310, I am trying to talk to Jimfbleak as he has deleted a page that I created last week, but his talk page isn't allowing me to leave a message. Perhaps you could help or forward this message, please? I created the University of Essex Knowledge Gateway page as a paid communications employee of
693:
Human knowledge is better served by high-quality, sourced information from credible sources. The presence of unsourced or poorly sourced material is more damaging to Knowledge's usefulness and credibility. Therefore it is better for it not to exist at all. I am sorry that you've taken the removal of
556:
I appreciate your concern that my additions to the page for the Iya Valley do not include a "source" but I can not cyber-tastically "cite" the 90 year old woman sitting next to me who has lived in this village her entire life on this page. Have you ever visited this place? I've lived here for over a
2587:
On Dutch Knowledge, it seems all 16 teams are deemed notable per Dutch Knowledge's notability criteria. However, there is some dispute about some teams here on English Knowledge. I can understand your confusion and frustration, as this seems inconsistent. That's why I suggested you reach out to the
2258:
As I mentioned before, I did write the stuff at site www.jutialians.com and i own that site too. That site is an alumni site, nonprofit organization where old fellows come across.The article there is written by myself and same I wanted to publish in intro for this association, on Knowledge that has
651:
OK, citations required. Everything's got to be verified, right? But why didn't you erase the whole Iya Valley page then, being that there are no other citations on the page? As a matter of fact, much of what's on many wiki pages have no citations, so it looks like you have a lot of deleting to do.
2543:
What do you mean by "what makes a particular club notable" in this context? Does it mean is worthy to have a Wiki page? If so why are all 16 teams in the Dutch Wiki allowed to have a team page and only 12 out of 16 in the English Wiki? Or better why the remaining 4 not? Or does it mean something
754:
I posted proposed edits to the talk page for Tom Joyce to address the maintenance tag for NPOV that you added to the article in April. I have not received any response on the talk page to my proposed edits and would like to move forward with cleaning up the article so that the tag can be removed.
246:
ESDOT is public domain (CC0) text and code I authored that will freely help people all the way from the high school level to the Ph.D. level. I have not created the ESDOT wikipedia page but I would like to do this. The Nicholas Karlson page is meant to provide information to ESDOT users about the
2121:
The deletion of my article is one of the best thing I encountered with in Knowledge, really I created the article as a test and furthermore I am from a place with mere contributors I.e Nigeria, despite we have many more to share with the world but we play no in exposing it. Therefore I want to
1758:
Thank you for your feedback. This is the 1st time I have tried to write a Knowledge submission. I wrote the text on the website that I used in the submission. It is my work. Is there a copyright issue if I am the author? I also modified it from the website version so it would not sound like a
1383:
DGG has deleted it and say he'll talk to the user. I'd say no SPI. Evidence is a single edit posting the same text. Could be an observer who kept a copy, a sock, or a colleague. who knows? We seek the path of least resistance. In this case, the outcome we want is the text gone and no further
1310:
Yeah, I don't disagree with you. I just see such name structures being routinely accepted, and in this case the person who changed the username allowed it to go through, so it already has a stamp of acceptance. Knowledge, being the amorphous blob that it is, frequently disagrees with itself.
2583:
You are correct when you say "what makes a particular club notable" = "worthy to have a Wiki page". Because each language version of Knowledge has slightly different rules and editing culture, the existence of an article on one version doesn't necessarily guarantee its acceptance on
1786:
on Knowledge even if you are the copyright holder. In short, a copyright owner cannot offer Knowledge a one-time license for use. Rather, the copyright to the material has to be released – permanently and irrevocably – into the public domain or under a free copyright license that is
2627:
Thanks for clarifying "notable", cause it had me puzzled. And yes, it is confusing and frustrating if someone deletes your work without contacting you first. Especially if it results in an inconsistency. Apparently what is notable or not depends on the mood of who ever does some
1893:, where it would be at less risk for deletion. This is an area outside the main article space, where you can have more time to develop the article. Then when you are ready, you can submit it for review by other uninvolved editors. However you would still have to abide by the 1906:
I'm sorry this message could not be more favourable. Writing articles for Knowledge is a difficult task, and it's easy for new users to get discouraged when their initial efforts don't succeed. However, I would encourage you to stay and try following this helpful guide:
1816:
for how to grant us permission to use your content. Bear in mind, though, that Knowledge articles are edited continuously by other users. Your content will likely be edited by others, perhaps significantly over time, and the creator of an article has no right of
445:
why did you undo my changes to the page Weethalle, NSW. I am a resident of this town and with respect, think i know a little more about what is going on in regards to local religion than you, some school kid sitting behind his computer half a world away.
2478:
To be completely honest, I don't usually look at football articles as I lack the experience or the interest for them. I simply saw that a number of your articles were tagged for deletion, so I found the notability essay and thought it would be
1612: 1542: 1526: 1245: 200: 290:
process. That will allow you to create a draft article that can then be reviewed by other uninvolved editors. As long as you are transparent about your connection to the subject and have reviewed Knowledge's guidelines about
689:
A great deal of stuff exists on Knowledge that should not. Some bad articles persist for a long time because no one has noticed or taken enough of an interest in them to check their quality. Volunteer editors can only do so
1400:
I agree with Anne's approach to this . Though I think its very probably the same editor, there's no point spending our time investigating isolated events of this sort. As she indicates, if it recurs, that's another matter.
1424:
editor so I tried my best to make this page in Knowledge's rules respect. Please let me know if by doing so I failed and I will see how to amend it to make sure it is 100% in line with Knowledge's objectives. Best, gilles
191: 2292:
Stating your copyright ownership here isn't enough. You have to provide definitive proof of your identity and copyright ownership, and agree to release the material for reuse on Knowledge, using the steps outlined at
234: 876:
Hi, thanks for that information about my contributing to Knowledge for Michel Olatuja. I didnt know that, and I thought that is a very good drafting. I never do to copy, sorry. I will think about that. Thanks.
682:. The article is not unsourced - poorly sourced, certainly, yet there are a couple of external link sources. However the way it's written now is dreadful, and it needs a massive cull, perhaps as far back as a 102: 2402:
of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again
991:
Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.
1633:
Thank you for your comments re The Imagination Gap page. I will try to navigate the copyright permission and other pages so I can create an entry re: the book, and the concepts addressed in the book.
1210:
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.
2305: 137: 2450:
In the league I worked on there are 12 teams with a team page and 4 without. I created a team page for the 4 without a page by copying the page of 1 of the other 12 and adjusting the team info.
1590:. They are at less risk for deletion than articles created in the main space. It will give other, more experienced editors to review it and give you feedback before publication. Good luck. -- 1018: 272: 1616: 1530: 1244:
Hey. I saw your warning message regarding this user's username. Originally, it was User:TimminsChamberofCommerce, and they changed it to what it is now. Since the rename was performed (
1446:
Hello Gilles, and thanks for your message. Looking at your article, I think you've done a very good job at keeping it factual and neutral. What I would advise you to do now is:
1369:
I first suspected this might be this individual's colleague and a simple COI, but now I'm inclined to take it to SPI. Do you think there's enough behavioural evidence for it? --
626:
To summarize: whether you know something to be true or untrue is irrelevant. If the facts have never been published by a reliable source, then they cannot exist on Knowledge. --
239:
Thanks for your message regarding the page Nicholas Karlson. I am Nicholas Karlson and I am the author of ESDOT - Econometrics, Statistics, and Data Analysis -- Open Text. See
2028:
to become familiar with their purpose, and what is and is not considered acceptable content. While you're at it, it's also probably a good idea for you to look at Knowledge's
1043:
is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at
1149: 1008: 950:, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October. 2456:
Sending me a link to a page about notability doesn't help me. Can you be specific about what is wrong with the pages I created because up till now I got no clue at all. --
1880:. In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see 904:
as a starting point. That will guide you through step by step and hopefully you will avoid some of the more common mistakes made by new editors. Best of luck to you. --
1128: 975:
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to
2580:
Forgive me, I did not see your signature from your first message. Please ignore my notice about signing your posts, and feel free to delete it from your talk page.
1164: 1966:
In general, it is usual to avoid substantially editing another's user and user talk pages other than where it is likely edits are expected and/or will be helpful.
900:
You're welcome. Knowledge can be a confusing place, with lots of rules that you might not know about until you accidentally break them. You might want to try out
1156: 1028: 376: 281: 260: 2044: 616:. Editors may not add content solely because they believe it is true, nor delete content they believe to be untrue, unless they have verified beforehand with a 2215:
and discovered there is a 10 user limit. I've split off the remaining users into a separate grouping like before. Now I know it was like that for a reason! --
1044: 2435: 1232: 1108: 1087: 581: 470: 344:. It is nearly impossible to accurately judge your own notability and write about yourself objectively. If you are a notable person according to Knowledge's 1861:
such as newspapers, magazines, or online publishers to establish notability. New articles about persons or organizations that are not notable are typically
2424: 1220: 1057: 969:
by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing
384: 226: 215: 2129: 1661: 1640: 403: 2253: 1194:
and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.
2070: 2008: 2486:, which is in the "grey" area mentioned in that essay. If you want to know why they are being deleted, I suggest you talk to the following editors: 2278: 1620: 1602: 1256: 1252: 2287: 2266: 2075: 1938:
if it was vandalism or not. He thought the edits were funny, as he is my friend in real life. Notice how he didn't attempt to change the page. --
361: 1876:. If you have an affiliation with this organization, then writing about it is strongly discouraged, as it is difficult to maintain the required 1504: 1333: 1122: 1068: 521:
Thank you, I appreciate it! I've actually been editing Knowledge for a while now, but this is the first time I got around to making an account.
1393: 1378: 895: 878: 703: 661: 635: 510: 2378:
Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 826 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If
1577:
they will not count toward establishing notability. Any band can claim that they are notable, but the true test is - did enough other writers
865: 836:
information about yourself and your Wikimedia-related activities. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is
1999:
Please undo what you did. I apreciated that he took his time and effort to edit my page. Please ask me before you do anything to my page.
1720: 1035: 813:
I do not remember what was on your user page when I tagged it for deletion, but the reviewing administrator agreed that its content was of a
434: 2108: 1988: 1412: 415: 1738: 1320: 1305: 1189: 1137: 602:. Your own unpublished personal knowledge and experience cannot be cited as a source as is impossible for a reader to verify it. The essay 422: 2176: 1923: 2357: 1834:
the source material. As my earlier message states, even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to
545: 247:
author of ESDOT. I will gladly wait to post the Nicholas Karlson page after posting the ESDOT page if that is the appropriate procedure.
1288:
Retracted, although I was loathed to do so. In terms of a position, there's barely a difference between "intern" and "secretary", which
913: 2245: 2227: 737: 114:
for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See
2643: 2603: 2560: 2527: 2345:
To summarize: if no published, independent writings about this organization exist, then it is not worthy of inclusion on Knowledge. --
1652: 396:
I would like to draw your attention to the relevance of the article and field any concerns relating to its legitimacy as an article.
2363: 2066: 2004: 1809: 1216: 1169: 1053: 919: 318:
of the subject to establish its notability. You won't be able to cite your own unpublished personal knowledge, as this is considered
211: 1534: 2465: 2294: 2141: 329:
over it. What you post will be editable by anyone at any time, perhaps significantly over time. Article content is arrived at by
144: 2482:
There appears to be some disagreement amongst editors about what makes a particular club notable, especially concerning ones in
2442: 1947: 1768: 1487:, if you haven't already done so. You've done a good job at following the rules so far, but it's good idea to review them fully. 886: 1275: 461: 391: 268: 572: 2209: 1748: 1737:
appears to be an autobiographical article, it did assert notability, by stating that the subject was a soccer player in the
2431: 2062: 2016: 2000: 1935: 1228: 1145: 1095: 1064: 653: 564: 453: 222: 133: 2192: 1433: 1208:
We now have 826 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
1099: 795: 110:
are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on
1492:
Thank you again for your contributions. I hope you will continue to contribute to Knowledge in the future. Take care. --
2453:
So either there was something in the page I used as "template" or the other 12 teams shouldn't have a team page either.
2137: 2021:
Although I tagged the page, for deletion, I did not delete it. I do not have admin rights so that is beyond my ability.
1648: 694:
your edits so personally. Perhaps you should try editing a different topic where you have less emotional investment. --
603: 411: 764: 501:. Good faith edits to any article can be made by any editor, regardless of their location, knowledge or experience. -- 2161: 1808:
If you'd like to use the copyrighted content in an article but are not its owner, you can follow the instructions at
799: 286:
Thank you for your message. You are welcome to create an article for ESDOT, but I would recommend using Knowledge's
1628: 1547:
I am not an administrator and I did not delete your page, nor do I have the power to restore it. It was deleted by
1349: 2544:
else like the use of some template/category/reference or I don't know what? Anyway, I have no clue what "notable"
1799:
and copyable by anyone, so all content must be licensed for that purpose. You can learn more about this policy at
1384:
resources spent. Let's let sleeping dogs lie and search "Biswajeet Pradhan" once in a while, for a while. Cheers,
1259:. I'm with you; generic usernames like that seem unacceptable, but I can see the other side of the argument too. 2427: 1224: 1141: 1060: 871: 218: 170:
This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.
129: 1782:
Hello, and thanks for your message and for your interest in creating an article. Unfortunately, you cannot post
530: 2274: 1703:
outside the main article space. This will give other uninvolved editors a chance to review and suggest changes.
2308:. I also see no mention of it in any other Knowledge articles. Even if there was, it wouldn't matter because 2113: 1994: 1753: 2447:
What did I do with "Notability of football clubs"? The reference you gave me doesn't clarify a thing to me.
2096:, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Knowledge project for ten years or more. 1908: 1831: 1696: 901: 264: 755:
Should you have any suggestions for further edits to bring this article to compliance please let me know.
1929: 1239: 94: 89: 84: 72: 67: 2312:. The organization must be independently notable before being considered worthy of a standalone article. 2092: 2080: 1160: 1091: 568: 457: 380: 59: 38: 490:
what you'd added. Your own unpublished personal knowledge and experience (referred to on Knowledge as
2166: 1569:
The only sources you have are the band's own website and Facebook page. Both can be considered valid
1525:
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Thank you in advance!)--
1510: 1429: 791: 482:
Be that as it may, the reversions were justified on the basis that they did not provide the required
348:, then it's best to leave the writing up to someone who's better equipped to write with the required 2133: 1745: 1644: 1389: 1345: 657: 407: 1556:
Knowledge is selective about the topics it includes. The subject of an article must be considered
1292:
cites as an example of an unacceptable username. I don't agree with the others' interpretation of
2183:
but they don't appear in the live list at all. Some typo causing a truncation of the template? -
853: 749: 440: 341: 2489: 2172: 1047:; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later. 551: 1692:, and writing about your book would seem to confirm that your intentions are for that purpose. 375:
Thanks for your help and advice Drm310. I appreciate the upwards boost on the learning curve!
2334:
You should not even be writing about this topic anyway, for reasons explained in Knowledge's
1943: 1813: 1564:, so this group would need to satisfy them in order for an article about them to be accepted. 1470: 845: 2495: 2270: 2262: 2180: 2125: 1800: 1792: 1726: 1636: 1450: 1441: 1425: 1316: 1271: 1083: 837: 783: 720:
Since I wrote that last response, I have added a number of external links to articles from
560: 449: 399: 256: 162: 1551:- you can make a request to him. However, before you do, please be aware of the following. 8: 2309: 2157: 1822: 1764: 1742: 1385: 1357: 1341: 1263: 652:
Better get to work! Onward wiki-soldier! Such a fine benefit to human knowledge you are!!
330: 2315:
The organization's own website, Facebook and other social media sites are by definition
2415: 2408: 2147: 2025: 1973: 1674: 1670: 1374: 1301: 1118: 909: 861: 821: 808: 787: 774:
hello mr Drm310, I was a humanist of the city of Cirebon, West Java, Indonesia 45 155.
733: 699: 631: 541: 526: 506: 430: 357: 476: 2324: 1788: 1689: 1570: 953: 882: 814: 679: 336:
I would advise you not to create an article about yourself, for reasons explained at
1741:. So I declined the speedy deletion and moved it to a properly capitalized title. -- 2599: 2523: 2353: 2241: 2223: 2188: 2040: 1984: 1955: 1939: 1919: 1897:, and even so, there is still a likelihood that the article may be declined due to 1890: 1716: 1700: 1598: 1587: 1500: 1418: 1075: 849: 617: 613: 337: 47: 17: 2639: 2556: 2461: 2335: 2029: 1969: 1961: 1898: 1854: 1812:
on how to obtain the proper licensing. If you are the copyright holder, refer to
1695:
If you believe that your book meets Knowledge's notability criteria as stated at
1548: 1484: 1312: 1283: 1267: 841: 829: 825: 760: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2339: 2153: 1881: 1777: 1760: 1678: 1561: 1520: 1480: 965:
The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month.
947: 769: 683: 516: 349: 115: 2370: 1176: 926: 306:
to be included in Knowledge. You will be expected to show that this topic has
151: 2551:
And why send me a message about signing my messages? Isn't that what I do? --
2508: 2404: 2316: 2104: 1894: 1877: 1872: 1839: 1818: 1685: 1574: 1457: 1408: 1293: 1289: 1022: 1012: 587: 522: 498: 491: 345: 326: 319: 296: 292: 287: 125: 1466:
Avoid editing the article directly from this point onward. Instead, use the
2504: 2328: 2320: 1862: 1858: 1796: 1783: 1734: 1727: 1578: 1040: 777:
I am not doing spam, but is being revised on all pages of Cirebon culture.
721: 599: 483: 315: 311: 240: 121: 2414:
Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read
1853:. I am not sure the organization you are writing about is notable enough, 2622: 2592: 2538: 2516: 2499: 2483: 2346: 2301: 2237: 2216: 2200: 2184: 2053: 2033: 1977: 1912: 1849: 1835: 1709: 1591: 1557: 1493: 1370: 1328: 1297: 1219:. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from 1114: 1056:. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from 1001: 1000:
This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering
905: 857: 729: 725: 695: 675: 646: 627: 612:
Any material added to Knowledge must have been published previously by a
595: 537: 502: 487: 426: 370: 353: 303: 235:
Knowledge entry autobiography vs information on author provided by author
214:. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from 2635: 2575: 2552: 2473: 2457: 756: 103:
BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
1560:
to be considered worthy of inclusion. There are specific criteria for
295:, then other editors will be more confident that you are contributing 118:. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) 497:
Finally, do not act as if you own the page - Knowledge articles are
2631:
Anyway, thanks for explaining and I will contact one of the others.
2100: 1403: 1364: 1021:
of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community
728:
of content being determined by previously published information. --
2122:
change the history, with you and your kind helping hand. Thanks
1262:
Anyway, I would recommend you retract your uw-username warning to
2297:. This process is non-negotiable and must be followed as written. 1248:), we can presume that this form of the username is acceptable. 1113:
I'm sorry, but I do not know what you are trying to say to me. --
724:. Rewriting the article with these as the basis will satisfy the 2342:
about a topic with which you have a close personal involvement.
1449:
Make a formal disclosure of your employment on your user page,
325:
If and when an article is created about it, you won't have any
1759:"marketing pitch". I appreciate any guidance you can give me. 1476:
template to alert other editors to changes that you want made.
1011:
of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community
2338:. It is correct for others to question your ability to write 2323:. They won't count towards establishing this organization's 1334:
User talk:Prof. Biswajeet Pradhan#Recreation and new account
2394:
backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!
2090:
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the
1080:(four tildes)**** User talk to talk :Drm310 (new section) 1251:
I encountered a similar username a couple of years ago. I
479:, you will see that I had no part in reverting your edits. 2304:, there is no mention of this association in the article 1516: 2507:, the administrator who declined the speedy deletion of 1847:
There are other potential issues, the first of which is
1830:
You could try rewriting the content so that it does not
210:
Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter
2205:
Thanks for pointing that out. I looked at the template
1838:
information and to demonstrate that the content is not
1296:
and we're sending mixed messages by allowing these. --
674:
Your point is flawed. The subject is almost certainly
1669:
Your username is the same as your business, which is
1677:. Your account will be blocked unless you request a 2591:
Anyway, try not to get discouraged... good luck. --
1515:Good evening. Please restore the page. References: 1136:to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See 838:not a personal website, blog, or social media site 243:for a link to a very brief introduction to ESDOT. 2179:is not all showing. Eg: your moved the entry for 1129:New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections 1140:. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. 2492:, the user who tagged the articles for deletion 116:BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon 2423:If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go 1857:, to have an article. We require write-ups in 1581:think they were worthy enough to write about? 1521:https://www.facebook.com/transylvania.group/ 1138:Knowledge talk:New pages patrol/Coordination 423:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Fusion Radio 302:Please note that a topic must be considered 2336:plain and simple conflict of interest guide 1485:plain and simple conflict of interest guide 594:that any material added to an article must 536:Ah, well a belated welcome then! Cheers. -- 2254:Deletion of Jutialians fellows association 1666:I'm afraid your problems don't end there. 1810:Knowledge:Requesting copyright permission 1031:is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry. 2306:Public Schools and College Jutial Gilgit 2295:Knowledge:Donating copyrighted materials 1889:You could try writing an article in the 1825:in accordance with Knowledge's policies. 1814:Knowledge:Donating copyrighted materials 1739:North American Soccer League (1968–1984) 952: 241:https://nicholaskarlson.github.io/ESDOT/ 2076:Invitation to join the Ten Year Society 1795:. This is because Knowledge aims to be 1611:Good evening. Thanks for the answer. -- 946:Most of us requested the user right at 14: 2171:Hi, I'm not sure what has happened at 824:. There are some specific rules about 333:in accordance with Knowledge policies. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1960:Very well, although I will point out 2398:But do remember: Rather than speed, 1968:" Also, user pages aren't meant for 1936:User:Not-a-parted-haired-libertarian 25: 1821:. Article content is arrived at by 944:We now have 826 New Page Reviewers! 23: 2369: 2079: 1481:paid-contribution disclosure rules 1175: 925: 604:Knowledge:Verifiability, not truth 150: 24: 2661: 2364:New Page Review - Newsletter No.4 1684:Writing about your own work is a 1586:My suggestion is to create a new 1463:template to save you some typing. 1170:New Page Review - newsletter No.3 920:New Page Review - newsletter No.2 832:. Your user page is intended for 310:received significant coverage in 2498:, the administrator who deleted 1699:, then you could try creating a 29: 2329:independent of the organization 2063:Not-a-parted-haired-libertarian 2017:Not-a-parted-haired-libertarian 2001:Not-a-parted-haired-libertarian 1870:The other potential problem is 475:If you bothered to look at the 145:New Page Review - newsletter #2 1895:conflict of interest guideline 1819:ownership or editorial control 973:- that's about 5 minutes work! 392:Deletion of Fusion Radio page. 346:notability criteria for people 327:ownership or editorial control 322:and not accepted on Knowledge. 13: 1: 1321:21:04, 28 February 2017 (UTC) 1306:21:02, 28 February 2017 (UTC) 1276:20:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC) 1233:15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC) 1165:12:42, 20 February 2017 (UTC) 1150:08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC) 546:22:44, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 531:22:23, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 511:13:11, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 462:09:31, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 435:13:59, 16 December 2016 (UTC) 416:06:10, 16 December 2016 (UTC) 385:18:29, 14 December 2016 (UTC) 362:21:39, 12 December 2016 (UTC) 273:21:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC) 227:06:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC) 2443:Please don't talk in riddles 2210:connected contributor (paid) 2030:guidance for younger editors 1909:Knowledge:Your first article 1859:reliable third party sources 1697:Knowledge:Notability (books) 1123:16:34, 7 February 2017 (UTC) 1100:16:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC) 1069:06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC) 914:20:42, 26 January 2017 (UTC) 902:Knowledge:Your first article 887:19:49, 26 January 2017 (UTC) 866:14:18, 11 January 2017 (UTC) 800:06:05, 11 January 2017 (UTC) 138:23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC) 7: 2310:notability is not inherited 2152:Thank you Drm310. Will do. 1970:excessive unrelated content 840:, nor should it be used to 780:Sincerely, Mohamad Katavi 765:21:45, 7 January 2017 (UTC) 738:17:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC) 704:15:46, 4 January 2017 (UTC) 678:enough to be retained, per 662:12:47, 4 January 2017 (UTC) 636:16:56, 1 January 2017 (UTC) 573:09:40, 1 January 2017 (UTC) 10: 2666: 2428:MediaWiki message delivery 2246:15:51, 18 April 2017 (UTC) 2228:15:49, 18 April 2017 (UTC) 2193:15:30, 18 April 2017 (UTC) 2024:Please review Knowledge's 1721:15:36, 29 March 2017 (UTC) 1653:15:19, 29 March 2017 (UTC) 1621:22:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC) 1603:04:04, 21 March 2017 (UTC) 1535:00:29, 21 March 2017 (UTC) 1505:15:34, 16 March 2017 (UTC) 1434:07:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC) 1225:MediaWiki message delivery 1142:MediaWiki message delivery 1061:MediaWiki message delivery 820:Please review Knowledge's 338:Knowledge is not about YOU 219:MediaWiki message delivery 199:Reduce your review load: 184:ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT TO VOTE 130:MediaWiki message delivery 2162:23:23, 9 April 2017 (UTC) 2142:12:31, 8 April 2017 (UTC) 2109:18:12, 7 April 2017 (UTC) 2071:23:59, 6 April 2017 (UTC) 2045:23:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC) 2009:21:39, 6 April 2017 (UTC) 1989:18:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC) 1948:18:39, 6 April 2017 (UTC) 1924:16:21, 5 April 2017 (UTC) 1911:. Best of luck to you. -- 1769:15:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC) 1749:04:26, 3 April 2017 (UTC) 1413:04:10, 4 March 2017 (UTC) 1394:21:28, 3 March 2017 (UTC) 1379:16:10, 3 March 2017 (UTC) 1350:09:30, 3 March 2017 (UTC) 1266:is it's not necessary. -- 971:only 2 or 3 reviews a day 600:reliable published source 176:Getting the tools we need 2644:22:46, 24 May 2017 (UTC) 2604:22:32, 24 May 2017 (UTC) 2561:22:16, 24 May 2017 (UTC) 2528:21:54, 24 May 2017 (UTC) 2466:19:58, 24 May 2017 (UTC) 2436:15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC) 2327:. Only sources that are 2087:Dear Drm310/Archive 12, 1629:Thanks for your comments 1215:Discuss this newsletter 1052:Discuss this newsletter 2358:00:23, 8 May 2017 (UTC) 2279:17:47, 7 May 2017 (UTC) 2236:Ah. Pesky templates! - 2061:Oh, okay. Thank you.-- 1972:. Both are part of the 1855:as Knowledge defines it 1688:. Knowledge is not for 1573:, but because they are 1562:musicians and ensembles 1185:Voting for coordinators 872:wikipedia and copyright 342:Knowledge:Autobiography 161:Please help reduce the 2548:means related to Wiki. 2374: 2317:self-published sources 2173:Talk:Raheja Developers 2084: 1771:Susan K, April 5 2017 1690:promotion or publicity 1517:http://transylvania.cc 1180: 962: 930: 623: 155: 2373: 2114:Deletion appreciation 2083: 1878:neutral point of view 1754:Camp Dogwood feedback 1179: 1009:this very recent case 967:Only 20 reviews a day 956: 929: 609: 350:neutral point of view 288:Articles for Creation 154: 42:of past discussions. 2319:, and therefore not 2026:user page guidelines 1873:conflict of interest 1801:Knowledge:Copyrights 1797:freely distributable 1793:Knowledge's licenses 1784:copyrighted material 1686:conflict of interest 1479:Look at Knowledge's 1451:User:Gilles-quasardb 1036:Coordinator election 1019:this case in January 822:user page guidelines 293:conflict of interest 1995:About the user page 1974:userpage guidelines 1930:About the user page 1264:User:Intern at TCOC 1240:User:Intern at TCOC 190:Improve the tools: 112:Thursday 8 December 2382:reviewer did just 2375: 2085: 1899:lack of notability 1832:closely paraphrase 1679:change of username 1579:with no connection 1453:. You can use the 1181: 985:Second set of eyes 963: 931: 494:), cannot be used. 253:Nicholas Karlson 156: 108:New Page Reviewers 2490:Jone Rohne Nester 2438: 2400:quality and depth 2281: 2265:comment added by 2167:Tidying at Raheja 2144: 2128:comment added by 1840:original research 1655: 1639:comment added by 1613:Елизавета Павлова 1543:Елизавета Павлова 1527:Елизавета Павлова 1519:official site1. 1511:Transylvania band 1257:deemed acceptable 1235: 1102: 1086:comment added by 1071: 802: 786:comment added by 575: 563:comment added by 492:original research 464: 452:comment added by 418: 402:comment added by 320:original research 275: 259:comment added by 229: 141: 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2657: 2626: 2597: 2579: 2542: 2521: 2477: 2422: 2393: 2387: 2351: 2321:reliable sources 2291: 2260: 2221: 2214: 2208: 2204: 2123: 2093:Ten Year Society 2057: 2038: 2020: 1982: 1959: 1917: 1863:speedily deleted 1781: 1714: 1665: 1634: 1596: 1546: 1498: 1475: 1469: 1462: 1456: 1445: 1368: 1361: 1287: 1221:the mailing list 1214: 1157:Jodaviesuniessex 1134:Your last chance 1112: 1081: 1058:the mailing list 1051: 1045:NPR Coordinators 978: 960: 899: 842:promote yourself 812: 781: 722:reliable sources 650: 585: 558: 474: 447: 397: 387:Nicholas Karlson 377:Nicholas Karlson 374: 312:reliable sources 285: 282:Nicholas Karlson 261:Nicholas Karlson 254: 216:the mailing list 209: 186: 163:New Page backlog 119: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 18:User talk:Drm310 2665: 2664: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2620: 2595: 2573: 2536: 2519: 2496:RickinBaltimore 2471: 2445: 2440: 2395: 2389: 2383: 2366: 2349: 2331:are acceptable. 2285: 2256: 2219: 2212: 2206: 2198: 2181:Bhaskargupta269 2169: 2150: 2145: 2116: 2078: 2051: 2036: 2014: 1997: 1980: 1953: 1932: 1915: 1775: 1756: 1731: 1712: 1675:username policy 1673:by Knowledge's 1659: 1631: 1594: 1571:primary sources 1549:User:Ritchie333 1540: 1513: 1496: 1473: 1467: 1460: 1454: 1442:Gilles-quasardb 1439: 1426:Gilles-quasardb 1421: 1362: 1355: 1331: 1281: 1242: 1237: 1204: 1187: 1172: 1131: 1109:VUONG&TRUMP 1106: 1088:VUONG&TRUMP 1078: 1073: 1038: 987: 976: 958: 940: 922: 893: 874: 826:what is allowed 806: 772: 752: 750:Tag Maintenance 644: 618:reliable source 614:reliable source 579: 554: 519: 499:owned by no one 484:reliable source 468: 443: 441:changes to page 394: 368: 279: 237: 232: 182: 178: 166: 147: 105: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2663: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2632: 2629: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2549: 2531: 2530: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2502: 2493: 2480: 2455: 2454: 2452: 2451: 2449: 2448: 2444: 2441: 2420: 2377: 2367: 2365: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2343: 2332: 2313: 2298: 2255: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2231: 2230: 2168: 2165: 2149: 2146: 2120: 2118:Dear Drm310, 2115: 2112: 2099:Best regards, 2077: 2074: 2059: 2058: 2048: 2047: 2022: 1996: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1931: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1903: 1902: 1886: 1885: 1867: 1866: 1844: 1843: 1827: 1826: 1805: 1804: 1755: 1752: 1743:Metropolitan90 1730: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1693: 1682: 1630: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1606: 1605: 1583: 1582: 1575:self-published 1566: 1565: 1553: 1552: 1512: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1477: 1464: 1420: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1386:Anna Frodesiak 1358:Anna Frodesiak 1342:Anna Frodesiak 1330: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1241: 1238: 1212: 1209: 1206: 1205: 1198: 1188:has now begun 1183: 1173: 1171: 1168: 1130: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1077: 1074: 1049: 1037: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1026: 1016: 998: 997: 989: 988: 983: 974: 945: 942: 941: 934: 923: 921: 918: 917: 916: 873: 870: 869: 868: 818: 771: 768: 751: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 691: 687: 667: 666: 665: 664: 654:125.215.91.136 639: 638: 608: 607: 582:125.215.91.136 565:125.215.91.136 553: 552:Re: Iya Valley 550: 549: 548: 518: 515: 514: 513: 495: 480: 471:180.181.69.183 454:180.181.69.183 442: 439: 438: 437: 393: 390: 389: 388: 365: 364: 334: 323: 300: 250:Kind regards, 236: 233: 207: 206: 205: 197: 180: 179: 174: 168: 167: 159: 148: 146: 143: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2662: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2630: 2628:verification. 2624: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2605: 2601: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2582: 2577: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2547: 2540: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2529: 2525: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2509:SDV Barneveld 2506: 2503: 2501: 2497: 2494: 2491: 2488: 2487: 2485: 2481: 2475: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2439: 2437: 2433: 2429: 2426: 2419: 2417: 2412: 2410: 2406: 2401: 2396: 2392: 2388:reviews, the 2386: 2381: 2372: 2368:Hello Drm310, 2359: 2355: 2348: 2344: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2330: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2296: 2289: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2247: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2229: 2225: 2218: 2211: 2202: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2174: 2164: 2163: 2159: 2155: 2143: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2119: 2111: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2097: 2095: 2094: 2088: 2082: 2073: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2055: 2050: 2049: 2046: 2042: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2018: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1990: 1986: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1964:that states " 1963: 1957: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1925: 1921: 1914: 1910: 1905: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1874: 1869: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1851: 1846: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1806: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1790: 1785: 1779: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1751: 1750: 1747: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1729: 1722: 1718: 1711: 1707: 1702: 1701:draft article 1698: 1694: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1671:not permitted 1668: 1667: 1663: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1604: 1600: 1593: 1589: 1588:draft article 1585: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1554: 1550: 1544: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1523: 1522: 1518: 1506: 1502: 1495: 1491: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1472: 1465: 1459: 1452: 1448: 1447: 1443: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1405: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1366: 1359: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1336: 1335: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1285: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1260: 1258: 1255:, but it was 1254: 1249: 1247: 1246:see log entry 1236: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1211: 1202: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1193: 1192: 1186: 1178: 1174:Hello Drm310, 1167: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1152: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1110: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1072: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1059: 1055: 1048: 1046: 1042: 1030: 1029:This Reviewer 1027: 1024: 1020: 1017: 1014: 1010: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1003: 995: 994: 993: 986: 982: 981: 980: 972: 968: 955: 951: 949: 938: 933: 932: 928: 924:Hello Drm310, 915: 911: 907: 903: 897: 892: 891: 890: 888: 884: 880: 867: 863: 859: 855: 854:autobiography 851: 847: 843: 839: 835: 831: 827: 823: 819: 816: 810: 809:Mohamadkatavi 805: 804: 803: 801: 797: 793: 789: 788:Mohamadkatavi 785: 778: 775: 767: 766: 762: 758: 739: 735: 731: 727: 723: 719: 718: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 705: 701: 697: 692: 688: 685: 681: 677: 673: 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 663: 659: 655: 648: 643: 642: 641: 640: 637: 633: 629: 625: 624: 622: 621: 619: 615: 605: 601: 597: 593: 589: 583: 578: 577: 576: 574: 570: 566: 562: 547: 543: 539: 535: 534: 533: 532: 528: 524: 512: 508: 504: 500: 496: 493: 489: 485: 481: 478: 472: 467: 466: 465: 463: 459: 455: 451: 436: 432: 428: 424: 421: 420: 419: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 386: 382: 378: 372: 367: 366: 363: 359: 355: 351: 347: 343: 339: 335: 332: 328: 324: 321: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 298: 297:in good faith 294: 289: 283: 278: 277: 276: 274: 270: 266: 262: 258: 251: 248: 244: 242: 231: 228: 224: 220: 217: 213: 204: 203: 198: 195: 194: 189: 188: 187: 185: 177: 173: 172: 171: 165: 164: 158: 157: 153: 149:Hello Drm310, 142: 139: 135: 131: 127: 123: 117: 113: 109: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2545: 2446: 2421: 2413: 2399: 2397: 2390: 2384: 2379: 2376: 2261:— Preceding 2257: 2177:your tidying 2170: 2151: 2130:Amararranawi 2124:— Preceding 2117: 2098: 2091: 2089: 2086: 2060: 1998: 1965: 1934:You can ask 1933: 1871: 1848: 1757: 1735:Jim messemer 1732: 1728:Jim Messemer 1662:Littlemmedia 1641:Littlemmedia 1635:— Preceding 1632: 1524: 1514: 1471:request edit 1422: 1402: 1340: 1337: 1332: 1261: 1250: 1243: 1213: 1207: 1200: 1190: 1184: 1182: 1153: 1133: 1132: 1082:— Preceding 1079: 1050: 1039: 999: 990: 984: 970: 966: 964: 943: 936: 875: 856:. Thanks. -- 846:fake article 844:, or host a 833: 828:and what is 782:— Preceding 779: 776: 773: 753: 611: 610: 606:states that: 598:by citing a 591: 590:. Knowledge 586:Please read 559:— Preceding 555: 520: 477:page history 448:— Preceding 444: 404:Fusion Radio 398:— Preceding 395: 307: 255:— Preceding 252: 249: 245: 238: 208: 201: 192: 183: 181: 175: 169: 160: 122:user:Kudpung 111: 107: 106: 78: 43: 37: 2546:effectively 2500:ASV Dronten 2484:Hoofdklasse 2407:. Get help 2340:objectively 1956:Mr.Election 1940:Mr.Election 1891:draft space 1253:reported it 1002:Orangemoody 852:or lengthy 830:not allowed 815:promotional 726:requirement 316:independent 36:This is an 2325:notability 2302:notability 2148:Talk page. 1850:notability 1789:compatible 1313:Hammersoft 1284:Hammersoft 1268:Hammersoft 680:WP:GEOLAND 596:verifiable 95:Archive 15 90:Archive 14 85:Archive 13 79:Archive 12 73:Archive 11 68:Archive 10 2416:THIS PAGE 2154:Fudge0321 1823:consensus 1778:Sking3600 1761:Sking3600 1733:Although 850:CV/resumé 331:consensus 314:that are 202:Vote here 193:Vote here 60:Archive 5 2584:another. 2479:helpful. 2288:Ashfaqhk 2275:contribs 2267:Ashfaqhk 2263:unsigned 2138:contribs 2126:unsigned 1962:WP:NOBAN 1649:contribs 1637:unsigned 1419:quasardb 1199:Still a 1096:contribs 1084:unsigned 1076:VUONG-DE 1004:, and 957:Hitting 889:Ailimes 796:contribs 784:unsigned 592:requires 561:unsigned 523:Cattyboi 450:unsigned 412:contribs 400:unsigned 269:contribs 257:unsigned 2505:Hut 8.5 2300:As for 1882:WP:PAID 1558:notable 1203:backlog 1201:MASSIVE 1041:Kudpung 939:backlog 896:Ailimes 879:Ailimes 817:nature. 676:notable 308:already 304:notable 39:archive 2623:Drm310 2593:Drm310 2539:Drm310 2517:Drm310 2391:22,000 2347:Drm310 2238:Sitush 2217:Drm310 2201:Sitush 2185:Sitush 2054:Drm310 2034:Drm310 1978:Drm310 1913:Drm310 1836:verify 1746:(talk) 1710:Drm310 1592:Drm310 1494:Drm310 1371:Drm310 1338:Best, 1298:Drm310 1294:WP:ISU 1290:WP:ISU 1115:Drm310 977:70,000 959:17,000 906:Drm310 858:Drm310 770:Review 730:Drm310 696:Drm310 647:Drm310 628:Drm310 588:WP:NOR 538:Drm310 517:Thanks 503:Drm310 488:verify 427:Drm310 371:Drm310 354:Drm310 2636:Sb008 2576:Sb008 2553:Sb008 2474:Sb008 2458:Sb008 2425:here. 2380:every 1791:with 1409:talk 996:Abuse 834:basic 757:NewQi 690:much. 16:< 2640:talk 2600:talk 2557:talk 2524:talk 2462:talk 2432:talk 2409:HERE 2405:HERE 2354:talk 2271:talk 2242:talk 2224:talk 2189:talk 2175:but 2158:talk 2134:talk 2105:talk 2067:talk 2041:talk 2032:. -- 2005:talk 1985:talk 1976:. -- 1944:talk 1920:talk 1765:talk 1717:talk 1645:talk 1617:talk 1599:talk 1531:talk 1501:talk 1483:and 1458:paid 1430:talk 1390:talk 1375:talk 1346:talk 1317:talk 1302:talk 1272:talk 1229:talk 1217:here 1191:HERE 1161:talk 1146:talk 1119:talk 1092:talk 1065:talk 1054:here 979:. 961:soon 948:PERM 937:HUGE 910:talk 883:talk 862:talk 792:talk 761:talk 734:talk 700:talk 684:stub 658:talk 632:talk 569:talk 542:talk 527:talk 507:talk 458:talk 431:talk 408:talk 381:talk 358:talk 352:. -- 340:and 265:talk 223:talk 212:here 134:talk 124:for 2101:Bri 1404:DGG 1365:DGG 1329:FYI 1023:ban 1013:ban 486:to 128:. 126:NPR 2642:) 2634:-- 2602:) 2596:🍁 2559:) 2526:) 2520:🍁 2515:-- 2464:) 2434:) 2418:. 2411:. 2385:55 2356:) 2350:🍁 2277:) 2273:• 2244:) 2226:) 2220:🍁 2213:}} 2207:{{ 2191:) 2160:) 2140:) 2136:• 2107:) 2069:) 2043:) 2037:🍁 2007:) 1987:) 1981:🍁 1946:) 1922:) 1916:🍁 1884:). 1767:) 1719:) 1713:🍁 1708:-- 1651:) 1647:• 1619:) 1601:) 1595:🍁 1533:) 1503:) 1497:🍁 1474:}} 1468:{{ 1461:}} 1455:{{ 1432:) 1411:) 1392:) 1377:) 1348:) 1319:) 1311:-- 1304:) 1274:) 1231:) 1223:. 1163:) 1148:) 1121:) 1098:) 1094:• 1067:) 935:A 912:) 885:) 877:-- 864:) 848:, 798:) 794:• 763:) 736:) 702:) 660:) 634:) 571:) 544:) 529:) 509:) 460:) 433:) 425:-- 414:) 410:• 383:) 360:) 271:) 267:• 230:. 225:) 136:) 64:← 2638:( 2625:: 2621:@ 2598:( 2578:: 2574:@ 2555:( 2541:: 2537:@ 2522:( 2476:: 2472:@ 2460:( 2430:( 2352:( 2290:: 2286:@ 2269:( 2240:( 2222:( 2203:: 2199:@ 2187:( 2156:( 2132:( 2103:( 2065:( 2056:: 2052:@ 2039:( 2019:: 2015:@ 2003:( 1983:( 1958:: 1954:@ 1942:( 1918:( 1901:. 1865:. 1842:. 1803:. 1780:: 1776:@ 1763:( 1715:( 1681:. 1664:: 1660:@ 1643:( 1615:( 1597:( 1545:: 1541:@ 1529:( 1499:( 1444:: 1440:@ 1428:( 1407:( 1388:( 1373:( 1367:: 1363:@ 1360:: 1356:@ 1344:( 1315:( 1300:( 1286:: 1282:@ 1270:( 1227:( 1159:( 1144:( 1117:( 1111:: 1107:@ 1090:( 1063:( 1025:. 1015:. 908:( 898:: 894:@ 881:( 860:( 811:: 807:@ 790:( 759:( 732:( 698:( 686:. 656:( 649:: 645:@ 630:( 620:. 584:: 580:@ 567:( 540:( 525:( 505:( 473:: 469:@ 456:( 429:( 406:( 379:( 373:: 369:@ 356:( 299:. 284:: 280:@ 263:( 221:( 196:. 140:) 132:( 120:( 50:.

Index

User talk:Drm310
archive
current talk page
Archive 5
Archive 10
Archive 11
Archive 12
Archive 13
Archive 14
Archive 15
BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon
user:Kudpung
NPR
MediaWiki message delivery
talk
23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

New Page backlog
Vote here
Vote here
here
the mailing list
MediaWiki message delivery
talk
06:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
https://nicholaskarlson.github.io/ESDOT/
unsigned
Nicholas Karlson
talk
contribs

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.