User talk:FloNight/archive 5

329:

statement about Shays, using Farrell's campaign as the "reliable" source). I don't know if you want to get involved, or if I should take it elsewhere? Dispute resolutions might not be timely or effective, considering the BLP issues; matters may worsen if anon editors start also injecting POV from both sides as the election nears. I don't think it's reached the level of needing BLP attention, and I can continue to revert BLP violations, but I'm being falsely accused of bias and wikistalking because of doing that. I don't see any progress or de-escalation either, and the talk page discussions don't indicate a hopeful prognosis. What next? Since I've not been successful in conveying the importance of well-sourced edits on BLPs to these editors, the articles may deteriorate as the election nears.

379:(selective, biased press quotes taken out of context). My edit corrected that problem, as well as 3 other problems discussed on the talk page, and was not a restore of only the Iraq section. Copies of an opponent's campaign ads in an article during a closely-watched election does not reflect well upon Wiki. The material needs to be reverted quickly, and then re-written in NPOV. The Iraq section, copied from Farrell, is not salvageable: it needs to be completely rewritten in neutral, encyclopedic tone. Reverting to the original version provides a better starting place, and eliminates the campaign ad copy. This is now the third insert of Democratic campaign material into Shays' article. 3944:. I was in the process of supplying evidence a couple weeks ago, when my wiki-time was interrupted by the holidays (and the fact that I got stuck in the New Mexico snowstorm for a few days). Upon my return to Knowledge, I see that the voting phase on the case has already started, before I was able to finish supplying evidence, and before some of the other involved editors had returned from their own holiday break. :/ May I continue with supplying the rest of my evidence? Or would it be too late at this point? I'd posted alerts about my upcoming absence and return on the ArbCom talk pages, such as at 2875:

interest in conflict resolution. I could not see this in yours; you mentioned your role as a clerk to ArbCom, but I don't think that is evidence of an ability to arbitrate. I voted for candidates where their statements contained things that impressed me; the belief that the ArbCom process must be transparent, the belief that ArbCom should be restricted to its intended role and not become involved in other areas, e.g. policy making. I was also impressed by those who recognised that to have a special role within Knowledge brings responsibility, but not rank over other editors.

1363: 1537: 1501: 1404: 3035: 2285:, FloNight's talk page history same period, some may have been on my page, BunchofGrapes' talk page... Giano's talk page may have gotten some... it was a silly but productive day which was a welcome break from vandal-fighting and trying to calm down disputes, we'd all been attacked and trolled and in the middle of edit wars, and so it was a relief and became a bit of an in joke. Now thats all cleared up - it is all cleared up, yes? We can move back into all that muss again. Yay. 586:

are transferred under my name of which copyright status is distributed on me. I agree, maybe I did not place a correct tag for which you must forgive me. I’m not very much familiar with Knowledge image tagging and confuse between them all the time. But feel free to do whatever you need to do. My only intention was to enrich Knowledge with rare photographs which sit on my computer and are not available for public. Ones again thank you very much for your help, All the best. :)

1781:. Needless to say, this article has only been published on Salon.com and has never been published in reputable media newspapers, magazines or the like. Since this article contains critical, negative and potentially libelous information about Sathya Sai Baba, how can it be used as a reputable or reliabe source when it has never been published in hardcopy form by reputable media? It is only available on the internet as an online article. To me, this appears to violate 2538: 582:

of which are of my work and featured on Gettyimages, Reuters, Eye of Georgia, etc. For some I decided to upload to Knowledge instead of selling them (which I do via gettyimages). Those images which have my signature @Luis Dingley, I am the author and copyright holder. As for parliament.ge images. Georgian parliament has huge collection of images which do not have any copyright and actually are covered by the Georgian law on the images of the government, see here

76: 1834:. I was going to drop a line over on the Admin Noticeboard, but then I discovered you recently saw an example of the behavior my "client" is concerned about. As a lowly advocate, I can't really do much to Drennleberrn other than make comments. I was hoping you might consider a 24 hour block (just to show him that he can't do whatever he wants on WP) based on the following (I know you've seen 3 of these, but I wanted to list them anyway for the record): 2957:

providing you with my vote and a caveat, I chose the latter course. You are a superior candidate and will make a good ArbCom member, and while you surely don't need my vote (especially now that you have it), I would nonetheless encourage you to consider a more complete answer to my question. If you chose to do so, I would, of course, be equally open to revising my support statement to something stronger if this concern were addressed. Best wishes.

3437: 1491: 3474: 3454:. We have nearly 1,000 articles catalogued for our project. And we still have a lot of work to do. We have 500+ articles left to assess for quality, and all our articles, as always, need tender loving care. Please consider dropping by the project and seeing what you might be able to do to move Louisville-related articles forward. Cheers, and Happy New Year! 1926:. I know how to copy and paste the image, and I was just wondering if I'm allowed to do so. Since you're an admin I figured you might know, or at least be able to point me in the right direction. Thanks. By the way, does it make a difference if I "made" (perhaps I should say originated) the article but didn't add the picture in question myself? 470:

this is a good message to send, and it has certainly empowered others to persist in lack of civility towards me, POV editing to articles, and harassment on my talk page. I won't again trouble you with diffs, as that doesn't appear productive. Thanks much for the help towards a better understanding of the workings of Knowledge,

1068:. It's been dead for a while, but I have archived it and taken a new fresh start. I hope this time we will be able to achieve something as I have summarized the main points of both sides (feel free to improve them) and I call you to express your support or oppose on the concrete proposal that I have formulated. Thanks, 4298:

Hi, A favour if I may? I've been trying to help an editor who's received what I believe to be an excessive block. I'm going back through their edits, and those of their accuser, where they overlap, trying to work out if there is any substance to the allegations. My concern is to make sure that the

3010:

You have identified yourself as a proponent of community sanctions. I have some concerns about the practical application of this policy. Specifically, I worry that it may be possible for groups of like-minded administrators to misuse the policy, and mete out dubious punishments against editors with

2820:

Right! I've added those links to my watchlist, and will keep an eye on them. Beyond that, suppose there's not much else that can be done but keep an eye out, as you say. By the way, I must thank you for the nice comment about my writing - of course, I have a lot of help from other good editors, which

737:

BTW, my only contact with Fresheneesz was on the PRT pages - I've never "teamed up" with him (as Radiant alleges) in any context other than on those articles, where we happened to be in agreement. I only got involved with this conflict when it seemed like people were piling on Fresheneesz on ANI, and

585:

Some images which I uploaded have the following statement: “images which belong to me, uploading to wikipedia.” Being the member of various photo distribution companies, I purchase on monthly bases photographs which are for sale on auctions and through dealers. After the purchase is completed, images

469:

guidelines, we don't express concern about tendentious editing (sourcing and then copying verbatim a biased campaign ad into an opponent's bio), and we don't orient relatively new and basically single-topic editors towards the importance of the most fundamental policies of Knowledge. I don't see how

3616:

At this point, I am wondering if arbitration is needed. Since you are on the arbitration committee, could you please tell me whether this would be appropriate? If arbitration is not appropriate, could you instruct me on how to get some type of definitive administrative action in a relatively short

3359:

does not have the typical "welcome to wikipedia" greeting with helpful hints and links on her talk page. I assumed that was somehow done automatically. Could you either tell me where I can copy and paste such a thing or do whatever it is you admin types do to pull that sort of thing off? Thanks!

1868:

Again, let me state that I do not wish to see any editor permanently blocked. I simply want Drennleberrn to understand that his behavior will not be tolerated by this community. Thanks very much for any help you can provide in this matter. You may contact me here or on my talk page (left arrow in

1028:

I see you have now changed your "reason" for making your accusation against me. Why not just admit that you misinterpreted my intentions and let it go-- no harm, no foul? Admins make mistakes all the time and that is what you did with me. No hard feelings on my part, but I want to have a peaceful

398:

posted it to ANI, nobody paid attention, admins all busy fighting over incivility. POV, OR, undue weight, and unbalanced, tendentious, piling on, unencyclopedic edits continue. I tagged the article POV. Had I known it would escalate this far, I certainly would have asked for protection or banning

4244:

It wouldn't be a problem if it simply was a "difference of opinion", as you suggest. Rather, the situation is of one user who deliberately and repeatedly posts falsehoods (and not just in the case itself, but on several public noticeboards) in an attempt to disparage other people, marginalize their

4011:

For what it's worth, I have no intention of challenging the final ArbCom decision, whichever way it goes. I see ArbCom as a useful part of the Knowledge Dispute Resolution process. And just as with an AfD or DRV discussion, I may not always agree with the decision of the closing admin, but I will

2978:

talk page where you gave constructive feedback. It appears that since then there have been numerous other additions making the article bizarre for a company article. I am working on bringing some neutrality to it and having it comply with Knowledge standards. Can you provide feedback through out

2956:

I appreciate your response. I checked out the links you provided and came up short on understanding how you would approach recusals based on personal relationships, as opposed to direct involvement with a particular dispute. Facing a choice between pestering you with follow-up questions or simply

2803:

I hate to be a bother, but when checking my watchlist I found an external link had been deleted from one of the pagges. I checked the link to make sure it was justified, and found to my horror that it appeared to be claims Gould was part of a "Jewish conspiracy" to manipulate views of the holocaust

2106:

Wow... Not expecting this. I have thought about it but not sure that I'm well known enough to get elected. I've only been here a year or so and only recently have spent time on IRC where it is easier to met people. I'm pretty Jeffersonian in my thinking, so I think most experienced Wikipedian that

793:

Thanks for your reply on my talk. Given that this is a transition period in the "clerk's office," I agree it probably makes sense not to add anyone else new right now. However, if you are ever short-staffed again, or need someone to pinch-hit due to recusals or whatever, please feel free to whistle

581:

Hello. I got several questions from several people but please pass on my response to you for others. Thank you for your attention and concerns regarding copyright status of the images. I’m photographer since 1992 and made numerous photo materials from many conflict zones, countries and places. Many

365:

that articulate his views on the Iraq War issue. They are provided without prejudice, POV or commentary. Sandy seems to feel that they constitute an "attack," and has said that they are taken out of context. I have encouraged her to place them in context or provide more information, and yet she has

56:

Hey, could you look at this and vote. I deleted it when the author changed the content to "Where's the article?", but I looked again and decided it should at least go through AFD and should likely be kept. After deleting it after another party put a speedy tag on it, I didn't want to just resurrect

4101:

a few days hither and returned today to find that you've pretty much said everything just as, for instance, would I have. If there were a barnstar for one's demonstrating her brilliance by agreeing with Joe—why isn't there one?—I'd surely bestow it on you; in its absence, you'll have to accept my

3589: 1893:. I monitor the various Knowledge boards and intervene if I see something that needs to be addressed by an experienced editor/admin. and one is not already involved. In this particular case, I felt that the problems was broader than a conflict with one editor and was of the severity that it needed 720:

FloNight, I spent a lot of time in debates with Fresheneesz, almost all of it on the same side of the debate (on the PRT pages). He is bold, blunt, and enthusiastic, and sometimes a little bit stubborn. His bluntness can get on the nerves of some editors. But I believe the picture being painted in

1901:

and the need for an immediate change in the tone and content of their edits and edit summaries. Since then the editor has only made one edit and it was not a problem the best that I can tell. I will continue to monitor the situation. If the user that you are helping sees any other problems let me

990:

My intention was only to say something lighthearted, soothing or constructive before saying that this man just isn't ready for an encyclopedia article. It's not as if I said: "(an example of something I DID NOT say...)Only a stupid, insane person would think there was anything notable about this

782:

Hi, FloNight ... I have a suspicion that you've been a bit busier clerking for the Arbitration Committee that you might have originally bargained for. Let me know if you need another hand to pitch in at some point. At this point, I think I know the ArbCom procedures and policies in some detail,

733:

But since the straw poll removal was an aggressive act that could even be considered as vandalism, is it fair to judge Fresheneesz's actions after that point? And if we do condemn Fresheneesz for incivility that occurred after the removal, should we not also condemn Radiant for the aggressive act

328:

Francisx is making posts to my talk page, accusing me of WikiStalking because I've requested correct sourcing of statements on all the CT candidate articles. There have only been two or three BLP violations to date, one still stands (but is not blatant-egregious, just a weasly and poorly-sourced

339:

I'm not asking for a ban: it's more a matter of someone else might be better able to explain policy than I have, as they don't seem to trust me as the source of the explanation of the importance of getting it right, and sourcing things correctly. In fact, maybe they're not even reading what I'm

378:

Please do not misrepresent my position. I have never used the word "attack" to describe the inserted material. We are talking about a possible copyvio, where you created and structured an entire section in Shays' article directly from Farrell's campaign ad, including exact wording from her ad

4015:

Despite some of the other comments that have been made about my behavior throughout this process, it is my hope that ultimately it will be clear that I am a longtime hardworking Wikipedian (I think I'm currently on the list as one of the 200 most active editors), that I believe strongly in the

2874:

FloNight, I based my votes on the candidates' statements, the rationale being that candidates who are serious about being appointed will put in the effort required to write a good statement. I voted against candidates where I could not see evidence in their statements of both experience and an

729:

to removal of his talk page comments, so when Radiant removed his straw poll, he lost his temper a little bit - but even then his incivility was borderline. He did ask a bunch of other editors for help, but is this so unusual? He believed he was wronged and sought help from others. How is this

2412:

Hello!! I saw that you listed this category for deletion and wondered if you spoke with any of the users in the category first??? This category is humorous yes... but it is really more. It is stress buster for admins that do some of the toughest admin tasks on Knowledge. A way to laugh at the

1233:

It's a tough job, but sooner or later, someone is going to have to close the Giano RfAr. I know you're not clerking that case (I don't know if you're officially recused but I know your initials aren't there). I believe MacGyverMagic was listed as the case clerk but he took his initials down

2423:

As stated in the discussion, I don't have any problem with the article, an associated userbox (or template), or even if someone wished to create a list for them to be a part of... But at the moment, I don't think that the category is a good idea. What's interesting to me in reading over the

3844:

is doing a post-election interview with the arbitrators elected this year. Please answer these questions to the best of your ability. We request that responses be submitted any time between now and Monday, 17:00 UTC, to guarantee that your responses will be published. Please reply on my

3596:

and his rapid category creation, which is out of control. On 1 January 2007, he stopped actually creating category pages after multiple complaints, but he has not stopped adding red linked categories to articles, which is the first step in a technique for creating categories according to

2424:

discussion is that that has been confused by several of those commenting on the nomination(s). Nearly everyone seems to think that this will remove the concept, rather than merely a category. Anyway, I hope you're having a great day. Thanks for taking a moment to offer your thoughts : ) -

2211:

Indeed, although I read that last year there were 68 candidates, so let's qualify "the more the merrier" with "within reason." Meanwhile, one of the other candidates tells me that I'm the only one who asked him a hard question, so I'd better put my thinking cap on for you too. :) Regards,

1279:

Well, they know who we are :) (Dmcdevit offered to make me official, BTW) If it had been closed 24 hours after the 4th vote, there would have been 5 votes to block John Reid for a week. Two arbs changed their minds after the technical deadline. I guess I'll do it in the morning.

2911:

Hi there, my name is Neille and I'm a producer at a public radio show called Weekend America. We're doing a piece on the ArbCom elections and would love to chat with you as a front runner if you have a few minutes today or tomorrow. Thanks! I'm at: nilel (at) marketplace (dot) org.

257:

FloNight, you mentioned I might leave a message on your talk page if BLP problems began to emerge: they have, along with numerous failures to assume good faith. I've invested a lot of time in providing long explanations of edits and policies on the talk pages of all 3 articles

1940:(looks like a weird watch, in case you don't watch the show). Does the fact that the picture is in a different sort of "frame" (i.e., it only has a very brief caption underneath) mean anything in this case? Also, I wanted to utilize a picture or two which someone added to the 1021:

Well, you are entitled to your opinion, no matter how irrational and emotional it may appear when observed by other normal, everyday people. My comment clearly stated the reason that the content of the article does not merit inclusion in Knowledge, and I was very nice.

2107:

understand the culture could do a good job. My main strength is that I have more time to spend researching the cases and writing Finding of fact. Thanks for thinking of me, really. I'll decide in the next few days (so if I run I can get properly grilled with questions.)

1471:

call the whole thing off, but, but... I would like to point out that I'd be much more discreet(1) than this fellow over yonder... So what say you, angle, er, I mean angel? Will you make sweet bloodmusic with me? I'd bare my throat, perhaps... If asked nicely anyway.

4159:

I'm not examining every single one. I'm examining this one as the entire thing is about legal standing for a lawsuit against another user, and I brought it to FloNight because he/she indicated on the Proposed Decision page that he may have been crossing the line.

3011:

whom they are engaged in content disputes. What safeguards would you recommend against such potential abuse? Would you support a policy which allows a set number of administrators to automatically overturn a community sanction, if they believe it was misapplied?

145:

respectively, and may not reflect their intended participation in the case. She has also interspersed her own comments in various places since the massive crosspost (all without signing), so it will be a job figuring out what her response actually is. Thanks.

991:

worthless dude. He'll never amount to anything. Let's flush him down the toilet and hope he dies and goes to heck and never, ever comes back. Ever.(remember, that's just an example... and as far as I know nobody ever seriously said this example comment)"

4020:

groundzero for various disputes. In this one particular case though, I felt strongly that I had an obligation to speak up. But I will be glad when the matter is finally resolved, as I am very much looking forward to getting back to writing articles! :)

2695:

Actually I've been working hard at school. This is my last week of classes; next week is finals. Lots of studying, but I'll be glad to get it over and be free again. I haven't been active a lot on Knowledge 'cause I've been so busy. I'm still here though.

4008:. If you have time, I would appreciate if you could review them. If not though, I understand. To be honest, I feel better just knowing that I was able to complete my section, since its half-finished status was on my mind during the last couple weeks. 1902:

know. (In particular I am looking for new user accounts or IP accounts that use similar tone and article preference.) Otherwise I prefer to see if the warning did the job. Again thank you for contacting me so we can coordinate our efforts. Take care,

2922: 1845:

2. POV motivated AfD. Note the comments from Drennleberrn in the debate, such as "I've never really liked the Auburn University team, because they've never played really well, and so I don't get what the F is going on with this 'great player'."

1317:

From the proposed decision area, the proposed remedy 4A (relating to Tony Sidaway) appears to have passed, but it is not listed in the final decision. Just a clerical error, I guess, so I look to the most active clerk to tidy up. Best wishes,

1029:

existence on Knowledge and I need to set a boundary here. There is no point in continuing further communications between you and me, as there is no indication that your problems with me are related to actual Knowledge policies. In the future,

1990:, and indicate if it accurately represents the way Knowledge works (and feel free to reword it if it doesn't). Basically it states that AFD (etc) are not decided by vote count, and in general voting is discouraged (but not forbidde). Thanks. ( 1011:

The comment was not appropriate. Afd is not a vote. The comments on an Afd need to address the reason(s) that the content of the articles does not merit inclusion in Knowledge. Your comment did not give any reason, rather it is a cutesy quip.

1234:

sometime ago. Thatcher131 has commented on the /Workshop and /Proposed decision talk, although not at all heavily, so he might not feel comfortable doing it. Can you or Drini do it or should we put out a call for volunteers? :) Regards,

4335:. In particular, given a couple days to reflect on others' comments, I make a substantially different point, completely unrelated to furthering accusations toward the administrator. I would appreciate if you'd take a quick glance. 1952:) and was wondering how I should go about requesting pictures in them. Should I scan the Edit Histories and Discussion Pages of related articles to find fellow Wikipedians who might be interested in helping? Thanks for your time. 4370:

Please review and consider voting for the pending motion to dismiss in the Piotros-Ghirla case, given that Ghirlandajo hasn't edited in over a month, and the parties were in mediation before that. Thanks for your consideration.

1244:

Neither Flo nor I are "involved"; however the arbs have just recently modified the John Reid block, and I believe the procedure is to wait 24 hours after the last vote to close is recorded, which was just a couple of hours ago.

3633:, an administrator, has now taken a stronger action regarding this situation. Hopefully, I can discuss future concerns regarding this situation with him. If you have additional comments for me, please contact me. Thank you, 705:

It appears that in the Kosovo arb case, since there are now only 7 active arbs (plus JamesF, who voted before he went inactive) there are 8 on the case, making a majority of 5, so the case is ready to close if they want to.

3949: 2987:. The person did not sign nor did they attempt to go into the talk page to read why the changes were made and to try to engage in discussions. I am therefore going to revert the article back to -- 22:58, 14 December 2006 1545:

Promise Kept! (although I note you didn't have the nerve to LEAVE it there... Since it got reverted, should I tick my vandalism counter then? :) I'll forgoe the half dozen double entendres I had queued up... :) ...for now.

3389:

Thanks! I put a welcome message on the user's talk page. The message is added by people that monitor the site for new accounts. (Look in the history and you can see the template I used. Other editors use different ones.)

4228: 1417:

I'd note that normally I'd refactor this conversation to one place or the other but it will be a bit harder for interlopers to follow this way, and for once... that might be for the best, really. You know I rather like

2492:

that I thought simple has so far generated no clarification, but instead a distasteful chat thread, including a comment from Mackensen which I think is really beyond the pale. Could you please remove the whole thing?

2143:

Personally, there are only 4 people I would vote for on the candidate list as it stands now, and you would be the fifth; since there are 5 open seats, I'd say you have a good shot especially with the format they use.

2723:

That article is well referenced as you can see. I could probably do better by making in-line citations, but when I wrote it I thought the general citations would be enough. I'll look into to it, but all the refs are

435:

Note to all: Sandy is doing some POV pushing him/herself. Why isn't a Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee a good enough source to show Russell is backed by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee?

4299:

benefit of what I'm trying to do (hopefully demonstrate the man's lack of guilt) is in balance with the cost of what I'm doing (possibly encroaching on other users' privacy). Can I trouble you to have a look at

2178: 952:

Please review Knowledge policy about civility and articles that are about living people. Please feel free to contact me on my talk page about this matter or if I can assist you in any other way. Happy editing,

947:

Hello OfficeGirl :-) Welcome to Knowledge and thank you for participating in a discussion about deleting an article. When I closed the above Afd I noticed that your comment was a little harsh for an Afd of a

2750:

Correction, ok I see you are talking about the pic. It will likely have to be looked at, but it's nice to see one in the article. I even thought about drawing one, so I might do that if that one gets pulled.

1569:

Yeah I saw the template but since there is no particular Kven user, the username parameter is dicey. Also I'm not sure if the ban duration is indefinite. So I thought I'd ask for your help. What d'you think?

1204:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on

106: 2659:

I think it would be improper of me to negotiate my vote with you. Instead, I will change my vote to 'neutral' with no guarantees from you of anything, and with a promise I will not revise my vote again.

2608:

So far I have entered examples for the candidates who registered first (from their questions page), and I'm not sure if and when I will get to yours, so you may want to enter an example or two yourself. —

1668:

Two separate issues here. First, there are 8 active arbitrators so 5 is the majority. (6 are away). Second, the cases always take 4 net votes to close. (Support minus the oppose votes). Does this explain?

4001: 3718:

I just noticed your new position amongst the throngs. Congrats. I hadn't said hey to you in nearly a year...as I recall you were a fellow "welcomer." My best wishes to you in this next phase of wikilife.

3005:

Hello. I notice that you weren't able to respond to my questions before the ArbComm voting came to an end. I realize that it won't have any impact on the results, but would you be willing to do so now?

4194: 4038: 3168:

Congratulations! WP will benefit greatly from your tenure. It will be hard work - brace yourself. But I know you'll do just fine. Thank you from all of us for volunteering your time, energy and talents.

2237: 1096:, please take a look and see if you can improve it. If you have suggestions for other nursing related articles which should be chosen as Collaboration of the Month please add them to the project page. — 3968:

Hi Elonka, Thank you for contacting me regarding this matter. I will look over the evidence that you provide. Please let me know when it is complete or if there is going to be another delay. Take care,

4079:, would you be so kind as to add what number preference that is for you (I presume second, given the other one was first) - it just makes Thatcher, Srikeit's etc. job as a clerk much easier. Cheers :) 875:

Please keep an eye on the evidence page. The editor is adding unsigned comments in the middle of other editors's sections and then complainaing about vandalism when I moved them back to her section.

3067:

Never got back to you about my concerns about extended length of ArbCom service. By requesting a seat in one of the other tranches you addressed my very last concern. Good move, and congratulations.

3518:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!

89:. I can't express how much it means to me to become an administrator. I'll work even more and harder to become useful for the community. If you need a helping hand, don't hesitate to contact me. 3945: 3610: 1262:

net close vote that triggers the 24-hour period, but that doesn't contemplate a change such as occurred here, so there is good reason to wait. I only asked because I've seen even a couple of the

3152:

Congrats! Hope you enjoy attending to this new role, and you do not find it too exhausting... I have seen that it is sometimes a thankless job, so I thank you in advance for volunteering to it.

2153:

FloNight, on Thatcher131's page last week, I urged both you and him to run. He has demurred, so it's up to you. :) Of course now he has me wondering who his 4 candidates of choice would be....

1266:

saying they wanted the case speedily closed. In any event, the only person I feel more sorry for than the Clerk who has to close this case is the editor who has to briefly summarize it for the

4353: 3104:

Congratulations, Flo! I was thrilled to read the news and I'm sure you'll make a fantastic arbitrator. I hope you and your family had a very happy Christmas and all the best for the new year,

352:

Please have a look at soon as you can: maybe I do need to post to BLP for advice and help now. It seems tendentious and unencyclopedic to reproduce Farrell's campaign ads on Shays' article.

4000:

Again, please accept my apologies for the multiple delays. It's a been a really tough winter so far! Since the power's back on though, I have finally been able to finish presenting my own

2595: 3117:

Congratulations! I'm very glad you were chosen for the ArbCom, in what has been perhaps the best election yet. You'll make a great arbitrator. You better than me! Cheers and condolences, -

361:

I would normally not start a debate on another user's talk page, but this seems like a significant misrepresentation. What Sandy terms "campaign ads" are reliably-sourced quotations from

137:

onto the arbitration page, containing peoples' comments that she cut and pasted there without proper attribution. So for example Nuclear Umpf and Durova's comments originally come from

2598:, I added a column "Examples" with links that exhibit a candidate's arbitration skills. My motivation is that as a voter, I don't want to just rely on a candidate's words, but also see 984:

I guess that there are a lot of different ways to take those words, depending on how much sarcasm you choose to impute to me. But I didn't mean those words in a sarcastic way at all.

2272:

Sorry about the dupe. I was afraid that my query would be overlooked here under the bumper sticker. Not that I now have any more understanding than I did when I started, though.... :)

3978:

Sorry for my absence -- Missouri was under a state of emergency because of the recent icestorm, but I'm back now. I'll endeavor to have my evidence wrapped up within a day (check my

2304:

Excellent! I was thinking just yesterday as I looked over the list (before you put your name in), gee FloNight would make a good arbiter on the committee... Glad you're running. --

3451: 1612: 602:

were also recently acquired but unfortunately your friend deleted them. Its ok. And please don’t consider me as vandal, i do really appreciate your help and concerns. Thanks.

2894:

I've switched my vote to neutral, though I don't think it matters; you are clearly going to be one of the group of candidates from which Jimbo Wales will make the selection.

3899:

How active a role do you plan to take on ArbCom workshop pages, and in writing ArbCom decisions, a role that has historically been handled mostly by just a few individuals?

3745: 861:

I do hope you follow up that comment on my talk page with those who say I'm a troll that should be permanently banned simply for being a contributor to a disliked website.

123: 4098: 2227: 1983: 1922:

I was wondering about a matter of Knowledge policy and didn't know where I should look for an answer. I wanted to put a picture from the article about a show I like onto

783:

although I would probably need a quick tutorial in terms of how to open the pages and where to find the templates. Please let me know if I can ever be helpful. Regards,

1655: 1024:

In the light of the manner and tone of discussions that run on the AfD pages, singling me out for a public accusation is arbitrary, capricious and completely unjustified.

156:

I think I'm going to move some of it to a subpage after I refactor it a bit more. And ask the ano to fix it by shortening it and using diffs to other peoples comments. --

1602: 1412:

Quite. Only too happy to educate!!! however I must say.. those folk don't seem at all happy at what they are learning about. Are you sure that it's purely educational???

3216: 349:

I'm afraid the problem is growing: I'm not sure if I should revert this right away, if it falls under BLP, if it falls under copyvio, or what I should do with it.

3231: 1574: 1197: 1870: 2378:

Please respond on my talk page. We'll probably go to press late Monday or early Tuesday (UTC), but late responses will be added as they're submitted. Thanks,

3542: 3481: 1181:

in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

836:

I saw that you moved it. I hope the request is not overlooked. (I think that the arbcom members should be paid for their tedious, endless and difficult job. )

831: 524:

bio has been assaulted with no less than 7 vandalism incidents in the last 2 days. Is this enough to request semi-protection again; or is this a non-solution?

4005: 3637: 270:), trying to explain policies early on, in the hopes that editing won't get out of hand as the election nears. Editors so far have deleted well-sourced text, 3941: 3685: 1136: 267: 2836:

Thanks for your kind congratulations. And indeed, leaving some jobs but I hear there are some good people aiming to fill them. ;-) Best of luck and cheers,

1211:. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 846:

The AaronS probation request for reconsideration from the Intangible case also seems to have aged off the RfAr page without being ruled upon by the ArbCom.

3245: 1944:

article I "made." The pictures in that article are all framed in a manner similar to the picture of the Omnitrix. Also, I made some new articles lately (

595:

p.s Dear Flo, Image:TL021461.jpg I purchased in 2003 at Gettyimages, P.O # RC-06-LNB-5478762 From: GettyImages Agent: Amy Jenckins, 877 438 8966, ext 2250

3462: 4312: 3431: 2516: 1890: 1831: 1186: 1169: 4121: 3766:. I've been working with him on some stuff lately, so I'll see what I can discover from him. If you have any other avenues to check, please do. Thanks! 3376: 840: 4342: 4124:

constitute a legal threat? I mean, it does in my mind, but I was wondering what you thought, and if you think I should propose an injunction about it.

3262: 1873: 497: 484:

At some point, when the same problem keeps on cropping up over and over again, and nothing else is getting through, there aren't many options left. --

2276: 2266: 1825: 369:

So as not to waste your time, I won't continue this argument on your talk page, but I don't want you to have any misconceptions about the situation.--

3646: 3266: 3099: 1881: 510: 3624: 2825: 1618:

for arbitration decisions; it has 3 arguments; the user name, length, and case name (just the subpage, not the full name) so you would use it thus:

416: 356: 344: 4300: 3344: 2138: 2121: 1626:

It needs a better name maybe, and for more complicated cases you'll have to go back in once its subst'd and make any corrections, but its a start.

1065: 3920:

Do you plan on finishing your term? If you had to make a choice right now, when your term expires, would you run for re-election? Why or why not?

3394: 2292: 2195: 2157: 1630: 1349: 1297: 1284: 1274: 1249: 798: 4180: 4154: 3126: 3110: 3084: 3016:

Do you believe arbitrators should recuse themselves from Checkuser cases if they have a history of working in collaboration with the complainant?

2992: 2787: 2776: 2766: 2752: 2734: 2711: 2697: 1686: 1673: 911: 58: 3802:

which gave out a little girl's full name, city, scout troop and other personal stuff. Is this the sort of thing that needs to be OVERSIGHTed?

2452: 443: 383: 373: 2961: 2951: 2942: 2898: 2889: 2216: 2148: 1906: 1847: 1639: 825: 691: 681: 474: 429: 403: 333: 169: 160: 3927:

If there's one thing you could say to the Knowledge community, what would you say, and why? Is there anything else you would like to mention?

2475: 2466: 2343: 1594: 1212: 1043: 1016: 1003: 850: 3708: 3173: 2584: 133:

Hi Flo, Be aware when fixing the mess made by the anonymous Gundagai editor in response to my RFAR that she cut and pasted a huge section of

4281: 4269: 3642:

Just now seeing this message. Glad you are getting some help. I will look into it and comment further if I think it will help. Take care, --

3194: 3058: 2790: 2779: 2755: 2737: 2714: 1740: 1336: 3673: 3654: 3161: 2549: 2528: 2172: 1157: 1124: 4239: 4065: 3992: 3973: 3787: 3770: 2684: 2605:

actions. Moreover, I believe a portfolio of "model cases" to remember in difficult situations can be useful for each candidate, as well.

2399: 694: 3756: 3447: 3145: 2443: 4375: 3723: 3301: 3071: 2428: 1969: 1956: 4091: 3820: 3213: 2988: 1105: 769: 619:

My administratorship candidacy succeeded with a final tally of 81/0/1. I appreciate your early and confident support. Results are at

503: 247: 228: 4150:

Examining every one of SC's edits for actionable legal threats is not very becoming. He seems quite capable of sinking his own ship.

366:

not done so. Frankly, I do not understand her concern. I do, however, regret having my hard work summarily reverted, as happened here.

3364: 3269: 2991:. I look forward to seeking a solution to the changes being made by a person critical of a company's small unit in Brighton, UK. 2448:

Thanks for your message. Is it a courtesy copy of a message to someone else, did you mean to send it to me, or err, what? Regards,

897: 2928:

I just wanted to make you aware that I posted a question for you, in case you didn't realize it. Thank you for your consideration.

2616: 2438: 2417: 1238: 437: 3580: 252: 222: 2281:

No nip!~ a simple request, truly. Nipping usually involves wikilinks that start with WP:. Answer: Its in the talk page history of

1936:

Thanks for the quick response, but that wasn't the picture I was interested in. I was interested in the picture they show of the

1072: 1031:

please consult with another Admin if you have another problem with something that I have written and ask that person to contact me

879: 4360: 3728: 3713: 3355:

Flo, big time congratulations! YOU are the glue that keeps this thing in one piece :-) On an unrelated subject, new Wiki editor

2494: 1662: 82: 4245:

opinion, or get them blocked. In other words it appears that the current findings are only a partial resolution to the dispute.

2814: 1100: 957: 810: 533: 2932: 1190: 4085: 3871:

What do you think of the election? Do you think they were conducted properly? What could have been improved, in your opinion?

2879: 2117:

Second that, strongly. You alone can prevent the RUIN of Knowledge (I can have bumper stickers made saying that if you wish.)

684: 1997: 1694: 1207: 61: 1223: 815: 620: 3858: 3329: 3325:

I agree with Zoe. At least you know what you're getting into. You'll make a great arbitrator, I'm confident about that.

666: 183: 41: 4031: 3962: 3780: 217: 4307: 3312:

Or should I say, my sympathies. :) I just saw the announcement on your appointment to the ArbCom. Wear the hat well.

3251: 2387: 1793: 1216: 865: 787: 4197:? There are several remarks by the involved parties regarding issues that haven't been addressed by the ArbCom. Thanks. 4144: 2765:

I checked it and it's got the right email listed. I don't know why it's not working. Let me fiddle with it some more. --

2247: 710: 571: 271: 4365: 4336: 4288: 4110: 4077: 3279:

Hello. Congratulations for your election. You now have oversight access on the English-language Knowledge. Please read

2674: 2333: 1839: 492: 150: 4221: 3663: 3425: 2769: 2700: 2646: 1930: 1114: 3320: 3044: 2843: 2407: 1878: 1077: 884: 410: 326: 324: 3024: 2256: 2185: 1861: 3562: 3501: 3443: 3287: 3256: 3206: 2916: 2864: 1092:. This article is currently a stub and needs major improvement - perhaps we can make it suitable to feature on the 1059: 742: 1820: 1584: 1322: 1258:

Fair enough, thanks; your point is very well taken. Hypertechnically according to the Arbitration Policy it's the

631: 549: 34: 4324: 3835: 3810: 2622: 2523: 2504: 2205: 2111: 1468: 751: 606: 590: 515: 322: 320: 318: 2621:(I may not be watching this page anymore. If you would like to continue the conversation, please do so here and 1830:

Hi. I recently agreed to act as the advocate for an editor who is experiencing extremely uncivil behavior from

999:

on my part-- "criticism should not be attributed to malice unless there is specific evidence of malice." Thanks!

367: 294: 276: 182:

All I can say is that you misunderstood me, but Malber didn't, withdrawing in response. See my response to AnnH

3749: 2319: 1704: 1228: 927: 762: 314: 138: 134: 98: 4284:

as well as my comments on the talk page therein? I posted it a few days ago and haven't gotten any feedback.

2995: 2983:

FloNight, it appears the article has once again been reverted to the bizarre and lengthly attack page against

423:

Instead, engage them. Work with the editors and re-write the content together on the talk page of the article.

3575: 1383: 1083: 932: 662:

this editor does pursue old ways I hope that the right action will be taken this time. Thanks and take care.

538: 236: 2101: 1854: 975:. I'm sure his mommy loves him and thinks he's notable, but he's not ready for inclusion in an encyclopedia. 648: 4037:

Please note that a significant part of Elonka's evidence is either misleading or downright false, as noted

4028: 3989: 3959: 3840: 3741: 3350: 2589: 2359: 1558: 1531: 1484: 1434: 1398: 870: 671: 598:

same goes for Tutsi images. If you provide Fax, i can fax you the papers from Getty. The ones from article

197: 111:

Hey... I do appreciate your popping by and trying to help. I'm frustrated too. Thanks and happy editing. ++

2002: 1649: 4347: 2557: 1178: 996: 2853:

Over twenty, it felt like. ExplorerCDT has compiled and will publish a list of attendees. Stay tuned. -

350: 3826: 3737: 3730: 2329:

Hi Flo, Best of luck in the arbcom election. Just dropping by to say that you have my vote. Regards,

1977: 1162: 809:

Hello :-) Does the GreekWarrior case need Proposed enforcement to log the ban if it becomes necessary?

568: 240: 49: 297: 287: 208:

This user 152.163.100.139 is apparently on some kind of vandalism spree. Can you check thier history?

3935: 3142: 2921: 2796: 2262:

Yes. I blush to confess it involves silverware articles. Please post in one place next time, thanks.

1555: 1528: 1481: 1431: 1395: 804: 203: 120: 4227:

Indeed. I'd appreciate it if the ArbCom members actively involved in this case would take a look at

1386:... as for vampires, I've given you a pic of the sort I prefer... :) PS, the check's in the mail! ++ 1370:

Oh my. that's quite the image you found, isn't it! Did you know that you can put images you find on

3620:(I will be asking several members of the arbitration committee just to get some type of feedback.) 3340: 2869: 2349: 1745: 479: 449:

FloNight, the message in this entire incident has been delivered loud and clear: we don't enforce

4331:

I have completely revised my statement in regards to this RfArb I started regarding administrator

3202:

Thank you All for the support! I've got busy days ahead catching up on some reading. Take care, --

3307: 2808:. Beyond checking the fellow's other entries - which I did - is there anything else I should do? 2613: 317:) about her repeated failures to assume good faith towards me, but I'm making no progress there. 3950:

Knowledge talk:Requests for arbitration/Naming Conventions/Proposed decision#Additional evidence

2191:

there goes my fifth vote (leaving me the only full time clerk, but I won't hold it against you)

1658:, isn't 4 still a majority of 6, or is there some supermajority requirement for closing a case? 4071: 3634: 3621: 3557: 3496: 2840: 2775:

Ok I clicked the box that said "enable email from other users". That was likely the problem. --

2651: 2805: 893:

article. I will be in touch as soon as we have some things to propose for the page. Thanks!

4285: 4151: 3122: 3106: 2192: 2145: 1917: 1627: 1591: 1333: 1281: 1246: 876: 707: 653: 564: 166: 147: 26: 3605:

has not received appropriate administrative attention. I left a request for information at

3095:

of Knowledge has been prevented! My deepest appreciation for taking on this difficult role.

4304: 4293: 4166: 4130: 4090: 3423: 3096: 3042: 2860: 2642: 2330: 2263: 2244: 2118: 395: 193: 2670:

Thank you for raising your concerns, and I hope you continue to do so, if any more arise.

8: 4318: 4188: 4115: 3793: 3698: 3567: 3506: 3373: 3361: 3336: 3280: 3188: 2690: 2574: 1897:

action. I left a message on his talk page explaining about our editor standard regarding

1716: 1700: 1149: 862: 777: 715: 560: 2667:

to negotiate my vote) in a day or so when I have some better time to compose something.

2288:

Thanks, no muss, no fuss. You had to assume someone would ask sooner or later. Regards,

278: 4246: 4198: 4176: 4140: 4081: 4042: 3515: 3248: 2610: 2501: 2324: 1991: 1683: 1659: 1519:

Ya, um... were you gonna ever respond? you promised me something shocking IIRC... :) ++

1309: 1289:

Yes, I saw Dmcdevit's offer to have you named an official Clerk and I was about to add

1174: 1088: 890: 700: 599: 308: 50: 17: 1362: 4275: 3776: 3763: 3552: 3491: 3455: 3404: 3274: 3239: 3229: 3000: 2837: 2822: 2811: 2630: 1798: 1736: 1379: 614: 471: 426: 413: 400: 380: 353: 341: 330: 263: 128: 3221:

just notice you made it :) hope it doesn't end up to be too stressful, Congrats! ▪◦▪

1536: 750:

A.T.E. got himself banned from the Seattle P.I. web forum for ranting and raving.

4372: 4357: 4352:

Hi. If you have time, given your background, you might be well-suited to look into

4232: 4025: 3986: 3956: 3854: 3846: 3704: 3606: 3593: 3581: 3118: 3081: 3055: 3029: 2958: 2948: 2929: 2906: 2895: 2876: 2580: 2520: 2383: 2289: 2273: 2253: 2213: 2182: 2154: 2095:

Are you thinking of running for ArbCom? I'd like to encourage you to consider it.

1949: 1564: 1346: 1294: 1271: 1235: 1153: 856: 847: 822: 795: 784: 663: 645: 274: 142: 94: 38: 2680:

Thank you for your input on this matter. I will consider your concerns, indeed. --

1500: 676:

Now that the Arbcom decision has been reached, can you or an arbcom member delete

4161: 4125: 3530: 3526: 3420: 3157: 3133:

The very heartiest of congratulations, and all best wishes for your success... ++

3039: 2984: 2975: 2855: 2637: 2599: 2472: 2459: 2449: 2168:

If my vote has any weight at all, I fully agree. I think you'd make a great Arb.

1898: 1774: 1732: 1456: 1444: 1040: 1000: 976: 583: 454: 285: 188: 75: 2663:

If you are willing, I'd like to talk more about my general concerns, (but again

2496:(I'm making this request of Thatcher131 as well, as I don't know who's around.) 1403: 4339: 4332: 4314: 3522: 3326: 3247:. I think this finding now throws a bit of a different light on events. Thanks. 3180: 2848: 2831: 2489: 2483: 2090: 1804: 1093: 902: 894: 576: 450: 232: 66: 3885:

What do you think of the other Wikipedians who were appointed along with you?

3613:), but it looks like the Mediation Cabal may not act quickly on this request. 2364:. We're doing a series on ArbCom candidates, and your response is requested. 1789:. Thank you (also requested opinion of Tony Sidaway whom appears to be busy). 4107: 3970: 3946:

Knowledge talk:Requests for arbitration/Naming Conventions/Evidence#Christmas

3817: 3807: 3643: 3602: 3598: 3391: 3317: 3203: 3138: 3034: 3021: 2939: 2913: 2886: 2681: 2497: 2463: 2435: 2414: 2396: 2340: 2233: 2202: 2135: 2131: 2108: 2097: 1987: 1903: 1782: 1755: 1728: 1670: 1636: 1551: 1524: 1477: 1427: 1391: 1357: 1013: 963: 954: 949: 938: 915: 812: 738:

the evidence did not seem to support the amount of criticism he was getting.

603: 587: 554: 507: 466: 458: 440: 370: 304: 300: 290: 281: 259: 157: 116: 57:

it and leave it. Kind of a funny situation. But ho-hum, such is Knowledge. --

1777:

article there are numerous mentions to Michelle Goldberg's article entitled

239:

aiming to improve Knowledge's coverage of Nursing. It would be great if all

3784: 3767: 3753: 3547: 3486: 3294: 3284: 3222: 3170: 2282: 2169: 2127: 1808: 1786: 1759: 1724: 1708: 1579: 1571: 1462: 1450: 1382:, thanks very much! Too bad it's not 4:3 aspect ratio, you could add it to 1220: 1069: 837: 462: 3979: 2537: 725:. And I can tell you this based on my experience with him: Fresheneesz is 4022: 3983: 3953: 3850: 3752:

I thought I'd ask you to take care of this if you wouldn't mind. Thanks!

3720: 3695: 3467: 3356: 3068: 3052: 2969: 2947:

Thank you for responding to my question. I will consider it carefully.

2821:

is always useful. Best of luck with your vote - I'm sure you'll do well!

2671: 2571: 2510: 2379: 2355: 2305: 1966: 1953: 1927: 1923: 1817: 1790: 1173:. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under 1146: 1128: 924: 766: 642: 636: 625: 546: 530: 362: 214: 90: 3611:

Knowledge:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-01-02 Pastorwayne category creation

2252:

Um, is there some inside-joke meaning to "RUIN" here that I am missing?

1773:

publish a newspaper, magazine, or anything else in harcopy form. On the

1608:

seems to be for applying a ban after probation by any admin. I created

3298: 3153: 1720: 1712: 1319: 739: 559:

The thing to do is organize some people and then start a discussion at

521: 3864:

How do you feel about getting the opportunity to serve on the ArbCom?

3676:, we thought you might like to know that the current collaboration is 1127:, we thought you might like to know that the current collaboration is 107:

Chose to answer here although normally I would have answered there....

3677: 3630: 2707: 2596:

Knowledge:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006/Summary table

2425: 2222:

Bumper stickers! All proceeds go to the Committee to Elect FloNight:

1751: 1097: 995:

would have been harsh and mean and I wouldn't have said that. Please

485: 244: 2733:

I'll check my email. I think I changed it, so it should work now. --

2201:

Thanks for the encouragement, folks. I figure the more the merrier.

962:

For the sake of reference, my comment which was made the subject of

3803: 3410:

I found out I got the seat by seeing your congrats on my talk page!

3313: 3134: 2374:

Have you been involved in any arbitration cases? In what capacity?

1937: 1547: 1520: 1473: 1423: 1387: 764: 112: 3892:

After about two weeks on the job, what are your initial thoughts?

3684:

You are receiving this message because your username is listed on

3436: 1803:...ah, the political season; can you please put a semi-protect on 1135:

You are receiving this message because your username is listed on

1035:

Your opinions have been heard and noted, and now this is the end.

3080:

Woo-hoo! Congratulations. Lucky you :P I'm sure you'll do great.

2561: 1375: 658:

Thanks for your response. I’m happy to leave the issue, however

3906:

What do you think are the strengths of the ArbCom? Weaknesses?

2517:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard#Arbcom_campaigning_images

2413:

situation... I hope you will reconsider this nom. Take care, --

2226: 1965:

Darn about the pictures. Oh, well. Thanks again for the help.

1941: 1371: 1293:

when I realized that for this job it didn't work that way. :)

677: 4006:

proposed principles and findings of fact on the Workshop page

3952:, but I'm not sure if anyone saw them. Thanks for your time, 3783:. Please proceed with this move at your convenience. Thanks! 1945: 425:

Sure: I haven't been trying that for a week, have I? Thanks.

3878:

What would you say to those who supported you? Opposed you?

3688:. To stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name! 1984:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Discuss and Vote

1621:{{subst:User article ban arb|Art Domique|indefinitely|Kven}} 1422:, actually. You said you were married though, so ??... :p ++ 1200:, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. 1139:. To stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name! 1039:

I wish you PEACE and a VERY HAPPY LIFE. Live and Let Live.

3779:. Looks like the change was just a personal preference, as 2545: 1490: 680:

image? I don't think it has any legitimate use anymore. --

3913:

If you could change anything, what would you change? Why?

3473: 1590:

I think the template is out of date. Let me work on it.

1086:. The Nursing Collaboration of the Month for November is 941:. Thanks for dropping by my User Talk page. You wrote: 506:? Is been about a month. Does it usually take this long? 3244:

Hello, please note that I have added another motion here

3178:

Congratulations, FloNight! Best of luck with ArbCom! =)

2368:

What positions do you hold (adminship, mediation, etc.)?

1512:

1- given that this all is going down in public anyway...

914:

has been attempting vandalism on several dates, like to

794:(or suggest to the Committee that they do so). Regards, 730:

different than, say, Radiant's request for help on ANI?

177: 2134:

were both in danger of RUIN. Who does such things..?!

641:

Jeez. Yeah, sure thing. Revert on sight, I suppose? –

2974:

Hello FloNight. Your comments are at the top of the

2556:

Please help to improve it to match the quality of an

2126:

lol, KC. Thanks for the offer. :) Last time I looked

296:

made attackish edit summaries and talk page headings,

268:

Connecticut 4th congressional district election, 2006

3982:

if you'd like details on the power outages here). --

2271:

Ouch, did I just get nipped by the puppy? <g: -->

1986:; I would appreciate it if you could take a look at 1838:

1. Personal Attacks on the entire state of Alabama (

761:

Here's a few more examples of A.T.E's bizarre rants.

409:

I asked for a cite for original research/synthesis:

4282:

Knowledge:Arbitration_Committee/Clerks#Organization

4231:

and consider it before closing the case. Thanks. --

1889:Hello Bobby :-) Thanks for contacting me regarding 1754:qualifies as a reputable or reliable source as per 1215:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 1064:Hello, I see you have contributed your thoughts to 439:This user is twisting policy for his/her own aims. 3263:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Arthur Ellis 2371:Why are you running for the Arbitration Committee? 1703:newsletter (November '06 edition) can be found at 1033:. Please do not contact me directly ever again. 3834:Hello, and congratulations on being named to the 1860:4. Uncivil behavior towards fellow Wikipedians. ( 3446:is sprouting its wings for 2007! We have a new 1066:Knowledge talk:Fair use/Fair use images in lists 3293:Hi FloNight. In addition, please subscribe to 273:inserted text not sourced to reliable sources, 3533:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. 3419:sources. :-D Happy New Year to you too, Flo. 3038:Congratulations, Flo, on a well-deserved win. 2786:OK, I'll verify tomorrow. Time for bed now. -- 2515:This was probably inevitable sooner or later: 1378:?... well at any rate thanks, it's gone in my 1177:, but its use in Knowledge articles fails our 832:Request for clarification reg. Sathya Sai Baba 2979:this process? -- Seafront 13 December 2006 1635:Thank you, Thatcher131! This is much better. 1082:Hi, Thanks for signing up as a member of the 284:with direct misquotes of candidate statements 3736:Apparently, I need an administrator to move 3297:. And congratulations on your new status. 987:If your mommy loves you that's a good thing. 3432:WikiProject Louisville growing and changing 2001: 1328:I closed it. Unless I'm seeing things, 4A 293:statements not sourced to reliable sources, 31:This amuses me quite a bit, so thanks. :-) 3940:Hello, I had a question about the current 1853:3. Vulagar and insulting edit summaries. ( 504:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Vivaldi 498:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Vivaldi 3662: 3590:#WP:ANI#Pastorwayne and category creation 1113: 966:'s post herein is quoted in its entirety: 3592:. Several of us have had problems with 3033: 1535: 1499: 1489: 1402: 1361: 621:Knowledge:Recently_created_admins#Durova 340:writing :-) Thanks for having a look. 2706:Someone finally found a picture for my 2434:Reply on Cfd for Category:Rouge admins 1826:Need Admin's Help With an Advocacy Case 14: 4193:Could you please take a brief look at 1699:For your reading pleasure, the newest 4303:and give me your feedback? Regards, 3762:Looks like the move was initiated by 2885:Answer on Alan Pascoe's talk page. -- 1008:In response to my message you wrote: 889:Thanks for your offer to help on the 227:Hi, You may or may not be aware that 2548:and this article is now the current 1750:FloNight, can you kindly tell me if 918:. Can you attempt to shut him down? 3748:. Since you're an administrator in 3283:before using this feature. Cheers! 2444:Deletions of articles about schools 2084:--The Lockless Door by Robert Frost 23: 3674:Science Collaboration of the Month 3655:Science Collaboration of the Month 3514:has smiled at you! Smiles promote 3472: 3435: 3335:Just saw it, congratulations Flo. 2550:Science Collaboration of the Month 2529:Science Collaboration of the month 1125:Science Collaboration of the Month 1106:Science Collaboration of the month 81:Thank you for participating in my 24: 4386: 4354:WP:ANI#Edit_warring_at_Anesthesia 4016:project, and that in general I'm 2339:Thanks for your support Ben. :-) 2536: 2225: 2003: 253:Escalation on Farrell, Shays, CT 223:Nursing Portal & wikiproject 74: 3746:failed Featured List nomination 3714:Congrats from my corner as well 3664: 2488:A request for clarification at 1345:It looks all right to me, too. 1115: 85:, which passed with a tally of 70: 3816:responded on Zoe talk page. -- 2471:Ah, that's OK then. Regards, 1705:Knowledge:Esperanza/Newsletter 1374:that are CC-SA or CC-BY-SA on 1332:is right there with the rest. 1217:Media copyright questions page 399:to avoid tendentious editing. 139:Talk:Gundagai, New South Wales 135:Talk:Gundagai, New South Wales 13: 1: 3798:I just deleted an article at 3744:, as suggested in the list's 3463:01:19, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 3426:13:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 3395:03:27, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 3377:03:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 3365:02:58, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 3345:09:37, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 3330:18:47, 27 December 2006 (UTC) 3321:17:12, 27 December 2006 (UTC) 3302:13:14, 26 December 2006 (UTC) 3288:10:02, 26 December 2006 (UTC) 3270:08:23, 26 December 2006 (UTC) 3217:10:06, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 3207:12:10, 27 December 2006 (UTC) 3195:23:47, 26 December 2006 (UTC) 3174:22:36, 26 December 2006 (UTC) 3162:22:31, 26 December 2006 (UTC) 3146:12:37, 26 December 2006 (UTC) 3127:11:37, 26 December 2006 (UTC) 3111:08:18, 26 December 2006 (UTC) 3100:07:33, 26 December 2006 (UTC) 3085:06:36, 26 December 2006 (UTC) 3072:05:31, 26 December 2006 (UTC) 3059:03:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC) 3045:03:39, 26 December 2006 (UTC) 3025:01:51, 19 December 2006 (UTC) 2996:14:42, 19 December 2006 (UTC) 2962:19:24, 15 December 2006 (UTC) 2952:13:53, 14 December 2006 (UTC) 2943:13:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC) 2933:02:35, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 2917:20:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC) 2899:21:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 2890:14:37, 11 December 2006 (UTC) 2880:13:03, 10 December 2006 (UTC) 2865:02:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC) 2804:and other horrifying claims. 2524:22:19, 29 November 2006 (UTC) 2505:12:27, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 2476:16:07, 27 November 2006 (UTC) 2467:14:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC) 2453:09:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC) 2439:14:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC) 2429:07:54, 27 November 2006 (UTC) 2418:00:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC) 2400:22:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC) 2388:01:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC) 2344:13:42, 19 November 2006 (UTC) 2334:10:57, 19 November 2006 (UTC) 2320:05:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC) 2293:22:37, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 2277:22:28, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 2267:22:24, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 2257:02:23, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 2248:00:42, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 2217:00:31, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 2206:00:29, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 2196:00:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 2186:00:17, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 1998:08:26, 21 November 2006 (UTC) 1970:13:14, 19 November 2006 (UTC) 1957:11:06, 18 November 2006 (UTC) 1931:10:24, 18 November 2006 (UTC) 1907:19:20, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 1882:16:27, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 1695:November Esperanza Newsletter 1191:Replaceable fair use disputed 950:biography of a living person. 734:that escalated the conflict? 4376:04:42, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 4361:02:38, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 4343:23:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 4308:09:42, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 4289:14:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 4270:13:57, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 4240:10:57, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 4222:12:24, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 4181:17:30, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 4155:17:19, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 4145:17:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 4111:19:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 4086:00:03, 12 January 2007 (UTC) 4066:14:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 4032:03:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 3993:18:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 3974:20:43, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 3963:19:49, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 3859:04:27, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 3821:00:55, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 3788:16:19, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 3771:14:03, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 3742:List of people from Kentucky 3672:As a regular contributor to 3521:Smile at others by adding {{ 3252:05:19, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 3232:03:00, 10 January 2007 (UTC) 2844:01:43, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 2826:18:22, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 2815:22:17, 8 December 2006 (UTC) 2791:04:08, 8 December 2006 (UTC) 2780:04:02, 8 December 2006 (UTC) 2770:04:01, 8 December 2006 (UTC) 2756:03:56, 8 December 2006 (UTC) 2738:03:53, 8 December 2006 (UTC) 2715:03:36, 8 December 2006 (UTC) 2701:03:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC) 2685:18:32, 5 December 2006 (UTC) 2675:18:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC) 2647:00:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC) 2617:00:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC) 2585:17:14, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 2173:14:05, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 2158:13:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 2149:13:13, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 2139:12:16, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 2122:11:21, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 2112:12:16, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 2102:11:10, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 1821:21:49, 8 November 2006 (UTC) 1794:20:04, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 1741:20:33, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 1687:20:28, 4 November 2006 (UTC) 1674:19:56, 4 November 2006 (UTC) 1663:19:49, 4 November 2006 (UTC) 1640:03:14, 4 November 2006 (UTC) 1631:03:06, 4 November 2006 (UTC) 1595:02:48, 4 November 2006 (UTC) 1585:01:40, 4 November 2006 (UTC) 1559:13:54, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 1532:01:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 1485:22:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC) 1435:18:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC) 1399:04:53, 29 October 2006 (UTC) 1350:17:11, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 1337:17:06, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 1323:16:21, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 1298:03:13, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 1285:03:08, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 1275:03:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 1250:02:46, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 1239:02:26, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 1224:16:04, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 1213:criteria for speedy deletion 1158:07:48, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 1123:As a regular contributor to 1101:17:42, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 1073:02:15, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 1044:05:53, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 1017:02:37, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 1004:23:22, 26 October 2006 (UTC) 979:05:25, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 958:18:43, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 928:00:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC) 898:18:14, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 880:04:00, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 866:19:33, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 851:19:38, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 841:23:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 826:23:45, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 816:23:13, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 799:21:25, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 788:20:03, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 770:03:19, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 743:16:31, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 711:14:40, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 695:17:02, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 685:07:36, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 667:11:07, 19 October 2006 (UTC) 649:11:42, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 632:20:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 607:18:18, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 591:14:29, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 572:03:45, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 550:12:12, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 534:03:31, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 511:23:57, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 493:23:14, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 475:11:10, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 444:23:38, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 430:22:29, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 417:21:54, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 404:21:45, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 384:06:59, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 374:06:28, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 357:03:50, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 345:20:38, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 334:20:22, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 248:19:16, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 218:20:06, 11 October 2006 (UTC) 170:15:29, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 165:Good luck with that now. :) 161:15:22, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 151:15:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 37:for unleashing the plague.-- 7: 3811:23:46, 9 January 2007 (UTC) 3757:15:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC) 3724:02:50, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 3709:09:35, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 3647:22:35, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 3638:18:48, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 3625:16:35, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 3576:02:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 3415:See? You only use the very 1330:Tony Sidaway's sysop access 411:lack of civility continues. 124:19:05, 8 October 2006 (UTC) 99:15:51, 8 October 2006 (UTC) 62:04:44, 8 October 2006 (UTC) 42:00:19, 8 October 2006 (UTC) 10: 4391: 4366:Piotros-Ghirla arbitration 3738:List of famous Kentuckians 3731:List of famous Kentuckians 3051:Hearty congratulations! – 2063:At the door may have been. 1982:I noticed your remarks on 1187:the image description page 721:the arbitration debate is 461:policies, we don't follow 4004:, as well as a few extra 2408:Cfd Category:Rouge admins 2018:And I thought of the door 2015:But at last came a knock, 1198:the image discussion page 1078:Nursing COTM for November 885:Claria article discussion 299:and failed many times to 3450:and a much more refined 3257:Arthur Ellis sockpuppets 2040:But the knock came again 1811:for repeated vandalism? 1179:first fair use criterion 1060:Fair use images in lists 4280:Flo, would you look at 3942:Naming Conventions case 3665:File:Chemistry-stub.png 1116:File:Chemistry-stub.png 516:Semi-protect Ben Savage 4097:Damn, I looked at the 3477: 3444:WikiProject Louisville 3440: 3047: 2806:diff of it being added 2049:And descended outside. 2035:In prayer to the door. 2008: 1541: 1505: 1495: 1408: 1367: 1229:Closing the Giano RfAr 981: 727:particularly sensitive 3836:Arbitration Committee 3584:: Arbitration needed? 3476: 3448:Assessment Department 3439: 3037: 2238:Arbitration Committee 2046:I climbed on the sill 2032:And raised both hands 2029:I tip-toed the floor, 2026:I blew out the light, 2021:With no lock to lock. 2007: 1539: 1503: 1493: 1406: 1365: 1189:and edit it to add {{ 1167:Thanks for uploading 969: 933:Adam Carr Afd comment 502:What's the status of 3750:WikiProject Kentucky 3686:our list of regulars 3351:Congrats and a favor 3214:Nearly Headless Nick 2590:Portfolio for ArbCom 2074:To hide in the world 2060:To whoever the knock 1613:User article ban arb 1137:our list of regulars 871:Gundagai arbitration 672:Speedy ArbCom image? 4348:Anesthesia edit war 3281:Knowledge:Oversight 3212:congratulations! -- 2232:This user supports 2077:And alter with age. 2043:My window was wide; 2012:It went many years, 1540:Why yes, thank you! 1407:A Fallen Wikipedian 1084:Nursing Wikiproject 723:greatly exaggerated 237:Nursing Wikiproject 3841:Knowledge Signpost 3775:Just checked with 3540:Happy editing!!!-- 3478: 3458:Stevie is the man! 3441: 3048: 2841:(spill your mind?) 2361:Knowledge Signpost 2179:By popular demand! 2057:I bade a "Come in" 2054:Back over the sill 2009: 1978:Discussion request 1762:? Salon.com is an 1542: 1506: 1496: 1420:Fallen Wikipedians 1409: 1368: 1170:Image:AGStumbo.jpg 1163:Image:AGStumbo.jpg 1089:Nursing assessment 891:Claria Corporation 600:Anna Politkovskaya 301:assume good faith. 51:The Erotic Network 18:User talk:FloNight 4178: 4142: 4099:proposed decision 4012:respect it. :) 3936:Evidence question 3693: 3692: 3689: 3635:Dr. Submillimeter 3622:Dr. Submillimeter 3601:. The notice at 3574: 3534: 3513: 3343: 3160: 2923:Election Question 2863: 2797:Possible problem. 2645: 2627: 2569: 2568: 2565: 2241: 2071:I emptied my cage 2004:File:Bluedoor.JPG 1891:User:Drennleberrn 1832:User:Drennleberrn 1650:I don't get it... 1517: 1516: 1513: 1144: 1143: 1140: 997:assume good faith 805:RFAr GreekWarrior 264:Christopher Shays 241:Wikipedian nurses 204:Vandalism user... 200: 104: 103: 4382: 4313:RfArb regarding 4266: 4264: 4262: 4260: 4258: 4237: 4218: 4216: 4214: 4212: 4210: 4177: 4174: 4173: 4170: 4164: 4141: 4138: 4137: 4134: 4128: 4062: 4060: 4058: 4056: 4054: 3701: 3683: 3668: 3666: 3659: 3658: 3573: 3572: 3570: 3565: 3560: 3555: 3550: 3545: 3520: 3512: 3511: 3509: 3504: 3499: 3494: 3489: 3484: 3460: 3452:project template 3339: 3227: 3191: 3186: 3183: 3156: 2859: 2641: 2619: 2604: 2602: 2577: 2555: 2540: 2533: 2532: 2358:, editor of the 2350:ArbCom questions 2317: 2314: 2311: 2308: 2231: 2229: 2005: 1994: 1950:Bloodhounds Inc. 1746:Reliable Sources 1617: 1611: 1607: 1603:User article ban 1601: 1577: 1511: 1440: 1439: 1210: 1134: 1119: 1117: 1110: 1109: 628: 490: 480:Why blocking ... 243:got involved. — 192: 143:User talk:Durova 78: 71: 4390: 4389: 4385: 4384: 4383: 4381: 4380: 4379: 4368: 4350: 4329: 4296: 4278: 4256: 4254: 4252: 4250: 4248: 4233: 4208: 4206: 4204: 4202: 4200: 4191: 4171: 4168: 4167: 4162: 4135: 4132: 4131: 4126: 4118: 4095: 4074: 4052: 4050: 4048: 4046: 4044: 3938: 3832: 3796: 3734: 3716: 3707: 3699: 3657: 3617:time period? 3586: 3568: 3563: 3558: 3553: 3548: 3543: 3541: 3536: 3507: 3502: 3497: 3492: 3487: 3482: 3480: 3470: 3456: 3434: 3407: 3353: 3310: 3308:Congratulations 3277: 3259: 3242: 3223: 3189: 3184: 3181: 3097:KillerChihuahua 3032: 3003: 2985:EDO Corporation 2976:EDO Corporation 2972: 2926: 2909: 2872: 2851: 2834: 2799: 2693: 2654: 2633: 2600: 2592: 2583: 2575: 2531: 2513: 2486: 2446: 2410: 2352: 2327: 2315: 2312: 2309: 2306: 2264:KillerChihuahua 2245:KillerChihuahua 2242: 2119:KillerChihuahua 2093: 1992: 1980: 1920: 1828: 1801: 1775:Sathya Sai Baba 1748: 1697: 1652: 1615: 1609: 1605: 1599: 1575: 1567: 1360: 1312: 1291:Support per nom 1231: 1219:. Thank you. – 1206: 1165: 1156: 1108: 1080: 1062: 935: 905: 887: 873: 859: 834: 807: 780: 718: 703: 674: 656: 639: 626: 617: 579: 557: 541: 518: 500: 486: 482: 396:Aaron Brenneman 255: 225: 206: 180: 131: 109: 97: 69: 54: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4388: 4367: 4364: 4349: 4346: 4333:User:Lucky 6.9 4328: 4311: 4295: 4292: 4277: 4274: 4273: 4272: 4242: 4190: 4187: 4186: 4185: 4184: 4183: 4117: 4114: 4094: 4089: 4073: 4072:Derek Smart PD 4070: 4069: 4068: 3998: 3997: 3996: 3995: 3937: 3934: 3933: 3932: 3931: 3930: 3925: 3924: 3923: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3904: 3903: 3902: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3890: 3889: 3888: 3883: 3882: 3881: 3876: 3875: 3874: 3869: 3868: 3867: 3831: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3800:Jamie Mountain 3795: 3792: 3791: 3790: 3773: 3733: 3727: 3715: 3712: 3703: 3691: 3690: 3682: 3669: 3656: 3653: 3652: 3651: 3650: 3649: 3585: 3579: 3539: 3538: 3519: 3471: 3469: 3466: 3433: 3430: 3429: 3428: 3406: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3397: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3374:Mr Christopher 3372:Thank you :-) 3362:Mr Christopher 3352: 3349: 3348: 3347: 3337:CanadianCaesar 3309: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3276: 3273: 3258: 3255: 3241: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3165: 3164: 3149: 3148: 3130: 3129: 3114: 3113: 3102: 3088: 3087: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3074: 3062: 3061: 3031: 3028: 3018: 3017: 3013: 3012: 3002: 2999: 2982: 2971: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2954: 2925: 2920: 2908: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2871: 2870:My ArbCom vote 2868: 2850: 2847: 2833: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2809: 2802: 2801:Dear FloNight, 2798: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2783: 2782: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2718: 2717: 2692: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2653: 2652:My ArbCom Vote 2650: 2632: 2629: 2591: 2588: 2579: 2567: 2566: 2554: 2544:You voted for 2541: 2530: 2527: 2512: 2509: 2485: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2445: 2442: 2432: 2431: 2409: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2376: 2375: 2372: 2369: 2351: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2326: 2323: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2230: 2224: 2220: 2219: 2199: 2198: 2176: 2175: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2092: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2079: 2078: 2075: 2072: 2069: 2065: 2064: 2061: 2058: 2055: 2051: 2050: 2047: 2044: 2041: 2037: 2036: 2033: 2030: 2027: 2023: 2022: 2019: 2016: 2013: 1979: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1960: 1959: 1919: 1916: 1914: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1876: 1866: 1865: 1858: 1851: 1843: 1827: 1824: 1805:Bob Casey, Jr. 1800: 1797: 1779:"Untouchable?" 1747: 1744: 1717:Celestianpower 1696: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1677: 1676: 1651: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1566: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1515: 1514: 1508: 1507: 1497: 1487: 1458:Extra Friendly 1438: 1437: 1414: 1413: 1359: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1340: 1339: 1311: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1253: 1252: 1230: 1227: 1202: 1201: 1194: 1164: 1161: 1152: 1142: 1141: 1133: 1120: 1107: 1104: 1094:Nursing Portal 1079: 1076: 1061: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1037: 1026: 982: 967: 934: 931: 904: 901: 886: 883: 872: 869: 863:SchmuckyTheCat 858: 855: 854: 853: 833: 830: 829: 828: 806: 803: 802: 801: 779: 776: 775: 774: 773: 772: 756: 755: 754: 753: 717: 714: 702: 699: 698: 697: 673: 670: 655: 652: 638: 635: 616: 613: 611: 578: 575: 556: 553: 540: 537: 517: 514: 499: 496: 481: 478: 447: 446: 420: 419: 393: 392: 391: 390: 389: 388: 387: 386: 254: 251: 233:Nursing Portal 224: 221: 205: 202: 179: 176: 175: 174: 173: 172: 130: 127: 108: 105: 102: 101: 93: 79: 68: 65: 53: 48: 46: 28: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4387: 4378: 4377: 4374: 4363: 4362: 4359: 4355: 4345: 4344: 4341: 4338: 4334: 4326: 4323: 4320: 4316: 4310: 4309: 4306: 4302: 4291: 4290: 4287: 4283: 4271: 4268: 4267: 4243: 4241: 4238: 4236: 4230: 4226: 4225: 4224: 4223: 4220: 4219: 4196: 4195:the talk page 4182: 4179: 4175: 4165: 4158: 4157: 4156: 4153: 4149: 4148: 4147: 4146: 4143: 4139: 4129: 4123: 4113: 4112: 4109: 4105: 4100: 4093: 4088: 4087: 4084: 4083: 4082:Daniel.Bryant 4078: 4067: 4064: 4063: 4040: 4036: 4035: 4034: 4033: 4030: 4027: 4024: 4019: 4013: 4009: 4007: 4003: 3994: 3991: 3988: 3985: 3981: 3977: 3976: 3975: 3972: 3967: 3966: 3965: 3964: 3961: 3958: 3955: 3951: 3947: 3943: 3929: 3928: 3926: 3922: 3921: 3919: 3915: 3914: 3912: 3908: 3907: 3905: 3901: 3900: 3898: 3894: 3893: 3891: 3887: 3886: 3884: 3880: 3879: 3877: 3873: 3872: 3870: 3866: 3865: 3863: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3856: 3852: 3848: 3843: 3842: 3837: 3829: 3822: 3819: 3815: 3814: 3813: 3812: 3809: 3805: 3801: 3789: 3786: 3782: 3781:detailed here 3778: 3774: 3772: 3769: 3765: 3761: 3760: 3759: 3758: 3755: 3751: 3747: 3743: 3739: 3732: 3726: 3725: 3722: 3711: 3710: 3706: 3702: 3697: 3687: 3681: 3679: 3675: 3670: 3667: 3661: 3660: 3648: 3645: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3636: 3632: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3626: 3623: 3618: 3614: 3612: 3608: 3604: 3600: 3595: 3591: 3583: 3578: 3577: 3571: 3566: 3561: 3556: 3551: 3546: 3535: 3532: 3528: 3524: 3517: 3510: 3505: 3500: 3495: 3490: 3485: 3475: 3465: 3464: 3461: 3459: 3453: 3449: 3445: 3438: 3427: 3424: 3422: 3418: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3411: 3396: 3393: 3388: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3378: 3375: 3371: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3363: 3358: 3346: 3342: 3341:Et tu, Brute? 3338: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3331: 3328: 3323: 3322: 3319: 3315: 3303: 3300: 3296: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3286: 3282: 3272: 3271: 3268: 3264: 3254: 3253: 3250: 3249:Richardmalter 3246: 3233: 3230: 3228: 3226: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3215: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3205: 3196: 3193: 3192: 3187: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3172: 3167: 3166: 3163: 3159: 3155: 3151: 3150: 3147: 3144: 3140: 3136: 3132: 3131: 3128: 3124: 3120: 3116: 3115: 3112: 3109: 3108: 3103: 3101: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3089: 3086: 3083: 3079: 3078: 3073: 3070: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3060: 3057: 3054: 3050: 3049: 3046: 3043: 3041: 3036: 3027: 3026: 3023: 3015: 3014: 3009: 3008: 3007: 2998: 2997: 2994: 2990: 2986: 2980: 2977: 2963: 2960: 2955: 2953: 2950: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2941: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2931: 2924: 2919: 2918: 2915: 2900: 2897: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2888: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2878: 2867: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2857: 2846: 2845: 2842: 2839: 2827: 2824: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2813: 2807: 2792: 2789: 2785: 2784: 2781: 2778: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2768: 2757: 2754: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2739: 2736: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2716: 2713: 2709: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2699: 2686: 2683: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2673: 2668: 2666: 2661: 2657: 2656:Hi FloNight, 2649: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2639: 2628: 2626: 2624: 2618: 2615: 2612: 2606: 2597: 2587: 2586: 2582: 2578: 2573: 2563: 2559: 2553: 2551: 2547: 2542: 2539: 2535: 2534: 2526: 2525: 2522: 2518: 2508: 2506: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2477: 2474: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2451: 2441: 2440: 2437: 2430: 2427: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2416: 2401: 2398: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2373: 2370: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2363: 2362: 2357: 2345: 2342: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2332: 2322: 2321: 2318: 2294: 2291: 2287: 2286: 2284: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2275: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2265: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2255: 2250: 2249: 2246: 2239: 2235: 2228: 2223: 2218: 2215: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2204: 2197: 2194: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2184: 2180: 2174: 2171: 2167: 2159: 2156: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2147: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2137: 2133: 2132:Table setting 2129: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2120: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2110: 2104: 2103: 2100: 2099: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2076: 2073: 2070: 2068:So at a knock 2067: 2066: 2062: 2059: 2056: 2053: 2052: 2048: 2045: 2042: 2039: 2038: 2034: 2031: 2028: 2025: 2024: 2020: 2017: 2014: 2011: 2010: 2006: 2000: 1999: 1995: 1989: 1985: 1971: 1968: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1958: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1929: 1925: 1918:Picture Usage 1915: 1908: 1905: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1880: 1877: 1874: 1872: 1863: 1859: 1856: 1852: 1849: 1844: 1841: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1833: 1823: 1822: 1819: 1815: 1812: 1810: 1806: 1796: 1795: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1743: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1688: 1685: 1684:68.39.174.238 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1675: 1672: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1661: 1660:68.39.174.238 1657: 1641: 1638: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1629: 1625: 1620: 1619: 1614: 1604: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1593: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1583: 1581: 1578: 1573: 1560: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1544: 1543: 1538: 1534: 1533: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1510: 1509: 1502: 1498: 1492: 1488: 1486: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1470: 1466: 1465: 1460: 1459: 1454: 1453: 1448: 1447: 1442: 1441: 1436: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1416: 1415: 1411: 1410: 1405: 1401: 1400: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1364: 1351: 1348: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1338: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1321: 1315: 1299: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1283: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1251: 1248: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1237: 1226: 1225: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1209: 1199: 1195: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1171: 1160: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1148: 1138: 1132: 1130: 1126: 1121: 1118: 1112: 1111: 1103: 1102: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1090: 1085: 1075: 1074: 1071: 1067: 1045: 1042: 1038: 1036: 1032: 1027: 1025: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1015: 1010: 1009: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1002: 998: 994: 989: 988: 983: 980: 978: 974: 968: 965: 961: 960: 959: 956: 951: 946: 945: 944: 943: 942: 940: 930: 929: 926: 922: 919: 917: 916:Ronald Reagan 913: 912:68.14.230.227 910:...this user 908: 900: 899: 896: 892: 882: 881: 878: 868: 867: 864: 852: 849: 845: 844: 843: 842: 839: 827: 824: 820: 819: 818: 817: 814: 811: 800: 797: 792: 791: 790: 789: 786: 771: 768: 765: 763: 760: 759: 758: 757: 752: 749: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 741: 735: 731: 728: 724: 713: 712: 709: 696: 693: 689: 688: 687: 686: 683: 679: 669: 668: 665: 661: 654:Thanks, reply 651: 650: 647: 644: 634: 633: 630: 629: 622: 612: 609: 608: 605: 601: 596: 593: 592: 589: 584: 574: 573: 570: 566: 565:The Uninvited 562: 552: 551: 548: 544: 536: 535: 532: 528: 525: 523: 513: 512: 509: 505: 495: 494: 491: 489: 477: 476: 473: 468: 464: 460: 456: 452: 445: 442: 438: 434: 433: 432: 431: 428: 424: 418: 415: 412: 408: 407: 406: 405: 402: 397: 385: 382: 377: 376: 375: 372: 368: 364: 360: 359: 358: 355: 351: 348: 347: 346: 343: 338: 337: 336: 335: 332: 327: 325: 323: 321: 319: 316: 313: 310: 306: 303:I approached 302: 298: 295: 292: 288: 286: 283: 279: 277: 275: 272: 269: 265: 261: 260:Diane Farrell 250: 249: 246: 242: 238: 234: 231:has crated a 230: 220: 219: 216: 212: 209: 201: 199: 195: 191: 190: 185: 171: 168: 164: 163: 162: 159: 155: 154: 153: 152: 149: 144: 140: 136: 126: 125: 122: 118: 114: 100: 96: 92: 88: 84: 80: 77: 73: 72: 64: 63: 60: 52: 47: 44: 43: 40: 36: 32: 27:Instant Karma 19: 4369: 4351: 4330: 4321: 4297: 4294:Sanity Check 4279: 4247: 4234: 4229:this request 4199: 4192: 4119: 4103: 4096: 4092:Husnock RfAr 4080: 4075: 4043: 4017: 4014: 4010: 3999: 3939: 3839: 3833: 3827: 3799: 3797: 3777:Stevietheman 3764:Stevietheman 3735: 3717: 3694: 3671: 3619: 3615: 3587: 3537: 3531:subst:smile3 3527:subst:smile2 3479: 3457: 3442: 3416: 3409: 3408: 3354: 3324: 3311: 3278: 3260: 3243: 3224: 3201: 3179: 3105: 3092: 3019: 3004: 2981: 2973: 2927: 2910: 2873: 2854: 2852: 2835: 2823:Adam Cuerden 2812:Adam Cuerden 2800: 2764: 2694: 2669: 2664: 2662: 2658: 2655: 2636: 2634: 2620: 2607: 2593: 2570: 2543: 2514: 2487: 2447: 2433: 2411: 2377: 2360: 2353: 2328: 2303: 2283:butter knife 2251: 2243: 2221: 2200: 2177: 2128:Butter knife 2105: 2096: 2094: 1981: 1924:my User Page 1921: 1913: 1894: 1867: 1829: 1816: 1813: 1809:Chris Carney 1802: 1778: 1770: 1766: 1763: 1749: 1737:HighwayCello 1698: 1653: 1582: 1568: 1518: 1463: 1457: 1455:... You say 1451: 1445: 1419: 1384:this project 1369: 1329: 1316: 1313: 1290: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1232: 1203: 1168: 1166: 1145: 1122: 1087: 1081: 1063: 1034: 1030: 1023: 992: 986: 985: 972: 970: 936: 923: 920: 909: 906: 888: 874: 860: 835: 808: 781: 736: 732: 726: 722: 719: 704: 675: 659: 657: 640: 624: 618: 610: 597: 594: 580: 558: 545: 542: 529: 526: 519: 501: 487: 483: 448: 422: 421: 394: 311: 256: 226: 213: 210: 207: 189:CrazyRussian 187: 181: 132: 110: 86: 55: 45: 33: 30: 4373:Newyorkbrad 4358:Newyorkbrad 4356:. Regards, 4305:Ben Aveling 4286:Thatcher131 4189:Naming conv 4152:Thatcher131 4116:Derek Smart 3849:. Thanks, 3594:Pastorwayne 3588:Please see 3582:Pastorwayne 3523:subst:smile 3295:Oversight-l 3261:Please see 3119:Will Beback 3082:Herostratus 2959:Thesmothete 2949:Thesmothete 2930:Thesmothete 2896:Alan Pascoe 2877:Alan Pascoe 2710:article! -- 2691:Finals time 2623:let me know 2521:Newyorkbrad 2462:talk page. 2331:Ben Aveling 2290:Newyorkbrad 2274:Newyorkbrad 2254:Newyorkbrad 2214:Newyorkbrad 2193:Thatcher131 2183:Newyorkbrad 2155:Newyorkbrad 2146:Thatcher131 1628:Thatcher131 1592:Thatcher131 1494:An allegory 1347:Newyorkbrad 1334:Thatcher131 1295:Newyorkbrad 1282:Thatcher131 1272:Newyorkbrad 1264:arbitrators 1247:Thatcher131 1236:Newyorkbrad 1129:Antioxidant 877:Thatcher131 848:Newyorkbrad 823:Fred Bauder 796:Newyorkbrad 785:Newyorkbrad 778:ArbClerking 716:Fresheneesz 708:Thatcher131 664:Englishrose 623:. Warmly, 543:Thank you. 363:Chris Shays 167:Thatcher131 148:Thatcher131 39:Jimbo Wales 4104:good on ya 3421:SlimVirgin 3267:Real Times 3040:SlimVirgin 2560:Knowledge 2473:Mr Stephen 2460:Mr Stephen 2450:Mr Stephen 2325:Good luck! 1769:that does 1767:"magazine" 1733:Shreshth91 1467:... Let's 1380:collection 1310:Giano RfAr 1041:OfficeGirl 1001:OfficeGirl 977:OfficeGirl 907:How do... 701:Kosovo arb 522:Ben Savage 289:and vague 211:Thanks!!! 4340:Reswobslc 4315:Lucky 6.9 4301:this page 4276:AC clerks 3847:talk page 3830:interview 3794:OVERSIGHT 3678:Supernova 3607:WP:MEDCAB 3405:Your note 3327:Guettarda 3275:Oversight 3240:Omura Arb 3154:≈ jossi ≈ 3001:Questions 2838:Kat Walsh 2708:Fifinella 2631:Of course 2611:Sebastian 2458:Reply on 2354:Hi. I'm 1799:vandalism 1752:Salon.com 1701:Esperanza 1656:this edit 1366:A vampire 1270:Regards, 1268:Signpost. 1208:this link 895:Kmesserly 615:Thank you 539:thanks... 488:Cyde Weys 280:violated 129:RFAR mess 35:Thank you 4325:contribs 4002:evidence 3971:FloNight 3828:Signpost 3818:FloNight 3804:User:Zoe 3644:FloNight 3529:}} or {{ 3516:WikiLove 3392:FloNight 3314:User:Zoe 3204:FloNight 3091:Now the 3022:CJCurrie 3020:Thanks, 2993:Seafront 2989:SmackBot 2940:FloNight 2914:Neille i 2887:FloNight 2788:DanielCD 2777:DanielCD 2767:DanielCD 2753:DanielCD 2735:DanielCD 2712:DanielCD 2698:DanielCD 2682:FloNight 2564:article. 2498:Bishonen 2464:FloNight 2436:FloNight 2415:FloNight 2397:FloNight 2341:FloNight 2236:for the 2234:FloNight 2203:FloNight 2136:FloNight 2109:FloNight 1938:Omnitrix 1904:FloNight 1899:civility 1862:evidence 1855:evidence 1848:evidence 1840:evidence 1814:thanks! 1764:internet 1729:The Halo 1671:FloNight 1637:FloNight 1565:Re: Kven 1461:, I say 1452:PoTAHtoe 1449:, I say 1443:You say 1175:fair use 1014:FloNight 964:FloNight 955:FloNight 939:FloNight 921:Thanks! 857:Taunting 813:FloNight 604:Ldingley 588:Ldingley 527:Thanks! 455:WP:CIVIL 371:Francisx 315:contribs 305:Francisx 229:User:THB 158:FloNight 59:DanielCD 4235:`/aksha 3838:. The 3785:Acdixon 3768:Acdixon 3754:Acdixon 3285:guillom 3225:≡ЅiREX≡ 3171:Crum375 2938:Done -- 2861:crztalk 2643:crztalk 2562:science 2490:WP:RFAR 2395:Done -- 2170:Crum375 1993:Radiant 1869:sig). 1725:FireFox 1709:Natalya 1504:Not me! 1446:PotAYto 1376:Commons 1221:Quadell 838:Andries 692:Tbeatty 690:thanks 682:Tbeatty 561:WT:SOCK 508:Arbusto 451:WP:NPOV 441:Arbusto 291:weasely 178:Pile-on 4172:Jester 4136:Jester 3851:Ral315 3808:(talk) 3721:Kukini 3603:WP:ANI 3599:WP:CAT 3525:}}, {{ 3357:Yeyewa 3318:(talk) 3158:(talk) 3069:Jd2718 3030:ArbCom 2907:ArbCom 2849:Meetup 2832:Thanks 2724:there. 2672:Jd2718 2614:(talk) 2484:Please 2380:Ral315 2356:Ral315 2091:ArbCom 1988:WP:DDV 1967:Ben 10 1954:Ben 10 1942:Faline 1928:Ben 10 1818:trezjr 1791:SSS108 1785:& 1783:WP:BLP 1758:& 1756:WP:BLP 1464:Fallen 1372:Flickr 1260:fourth 1185:Go to 1070:Renata 973:Delete 937:Hello 925:trezjr 903:Vandal 767:Avidor 627:Durova 577:Images 547:trezjr 531:trezjr 467:WP:DRV 459:WP:AGF 282:WP:BLP 266:, and 215:trezjr 91:NCurse 87:91/1/4 67:My RfA 4249:: --> 4201:: --> 4120:Does 4076:With 4045:: --> 3729:Move 3696:NCurs 3609:(see 3299:Redux 3107:Sarah 2572:NCurs 2558:ideal 1946:Ronno 1895:swift 1875:Bobby 1787:WP:RS 1760:WP:RS 1721:EWS23 1713:Banes 1358:Er... 1320:Xoloz 1147:NCurs 740:ATren 567:Co., 555:Socks 472:Sandy 463:WP:NN 457:, or 427:Sandy 414:Sandy 401:Sandy 381:Sandy 354:Sandy 342:Sandy 331:Sandy 198:email 16:< 4337:Link 4319:talk 4265:< 4217:< 4169:SWAT 4133:SWAT 4122:this 4061:< 4039:here 3980:blog 3948:and 3855:talk 3705:work 3631:Jc37 3417:best 3182:Nish 3093:RUIN 3056:acor 2581:work 2546:Gene 2502:talk 2426:jc37 2384:talk 2181:... 2130:and 1948:and 1807:and 1735:and 1682:OK. 1572:Srik 1469:not 1314:Hi, 1154:work 993:That 821:Yes 678:this 646:acor 569:Inc. 520:The 309:talk 235:and 194:talk 184:here 141:and 95:work 4108:Joe 4106:. 4018:not 3740:to 3549:Why 3488:Why 3468::-) 3185:kid 3135:Lar 2970:EDO 2856:crz 2665:not 2638:crz 2603:eir 2594:On 2511:FYI 2316:el 2098:Guy 1771:not 1707:. — 1654:In 1548:Lar 1521:Lar 1474:Lar 1424:Lar 1388:Lar 1196:On 1098:Rod 637:ANI 563:. 465:or 245:Rod 113:Lar 83:RfA 4041:. 4029:ka 4026:on 4023:El 3990:ka 3987:on 3984:El 3960:ka 3957:on 3954:El 3857:) 3719:-- 3390:-- 3265:. 3190:64 3137:: 3125:· 3121:· 3053:Ch 2810:- 2751:-- 2696:-- 2635:- 2625:.) 2601:th 2519:. 2507:. 2500:| 2386:) 2313:er 1996:) 1739:, 1731:, 1727:, 1723:, 1719:, 1715:, 1711:, 1616:}} 1610:{{ 1606:}} 1600:{{ 1580:it 1570:-- 1550:: 1546:++ 1523:: 1476:: 1472:++ 1426:: 1390:: 1193:}} 660:if 643:Ch 453:, 262:, 186:- 115:: 4327:) 4322:· 4317:( 4263:t 4261:n 4259:a 4257:i 4255:d 4253:a 4251:R 4215:t 4213:n 4211:a 4209:i 4207:d 4205:a 4203:R 4163:⇒ 4127:⇒ 4059:t 4057:n 4055:a 4053:i 4051:d 4049:a 4047:R 3853:( 3806:| 3700:e 3680:. 3569:1 3564:9 3559:9 3554:1 3544:¿ 3508:1 3503:9 3498:9 3493:1 3483:¿ 3316:| 3143:c 3141:/ 3139:t 3123:† 2576:e 2552:! 2382:( 2310:P 2307:M 2240:. 1879:← 1871:→ 1864:) 1857:) 1850:) 1846:( 1842:) 1576:e 1556:c 1554:/ 1552:t 1529:c 1527:/ 1525:t 1482:c 1480:/ 1478:t 1432:c 1430:/ 1428:t 1396:c 1394:/ 1392:t 1150:e 1131:. 971:* 312:· 307:( 258:( 196:/ 121:c 119:/ 117:t

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index