User talk:Fram/Archive 19

211:

most of the mentioning of it is by geo databases generated in the Internet ancient period of 1995-1996. It is not always easy to do, so I think in a lot of cases, particularly if there is no government sources/population data census data online a tabled list with coordinates would be better?? The thing is most of them are real places in the real world it is just the terrible uneveness of the web info for many developing Asian and African countries on here that makes it difficult for us to know what the place really is, you know a hamlet in the desrt or actually a thriving small town.. User:Calliopejen1 also shares my enthusiasm for the world on here but she also believes than generating stubs based on very questionable databses isn't a good idea in seperate articles anyway. At least in some places info is gradually becoming available online, which may have some information about small towns so I believe they should be created when we have access to it, not create a bunch of sub stubs and leave them hanging around for years and being unedited. I know I only created those Yemen stubs about 4 weeks ago but believe me I have completely changed my outlook on here as how to go about building wikipedia whilst not affecting quality..

4879:

for the future. My approach is that we should try to keep additional items from getting on the list. But then, that's what I'm accustomed to, because it's what I do routinely at prod and speedy patrol, It takes longer than what some people there do, just remove the tag for deletion and hope someone else will fix the problem. A person who tags without trying to fix and a person who un-tags without trying to fix will each see things in an incomplete way. I think of keeping and deleting as reciprocal, & do a similar amount of each (actually, I spend more time on the fixes, because they need more; I delete about 10 articles a day and usually fix 5; I have been responding to the BLP initiative by trying to fix 10-- even though it has taken time away from equally important projects. But at least, doing them in subject groups , not alphabetically, has the considerable advantage of letting people who know the subject fix a batch. How do you select them? Have you thought about notifying the wikiprojects when you're doing a batch in their area?

193:

some time sorting them out. If you could merge into a list with the coordinates given in the articles this would be better than completely deleting I think.... I think you'd find most of them are actually valid settlements. But the major problem is lack of web sources to expand and lack of anybody working on Yemen articles. I don't think there is much point in these articles hanging round. I have tried to expand a few but there is literally nothing on the web to flesh them out except geo databases like falling rain which are unreliable. Personally I think falling rain should be blacklisted as although coordinates are usually correct the other data usually isn't.. I think the best thing to do about sub stubs which use unreliable databases especially on countries in the developing world would be to merge them intoa list. Ther eisn't much point in having say 700 articles in one category and 698 of them all being one liners that at the present me can't access the knowledge to expand them, agreed?

1901:

successful. What we have seen from A Nobody a failure to abide by the terms or to seek to work meaningfully to resolve the matter. (this can be seen at more recent discussions as well, such as John Vandenberg's talk page where he called for Jack's head and refused to agree to change anything about himself) He is thumbing his nose at the community... "more often than not not helpful and often actively annoying", as you yourself said... I don't think you should be threatening Jack with a block for endorsing an RfC that has been running almost a month, which contained shot after shot taken at him by Ikip, and with no participation by the subject. Jack didn't comment, didn't escalate, he merely endorsed some views... and he used a bare signature, not even the words that others used. Seriously, please reconsider your position here. I am pretty confident that if this goes to AN/I you will be admonished. Jack is not the bad guy you make him out to be... ++

3711:

the "likely" result of the checkuser as fact and banned me indefinetly, I tried to explain but they wouldn't listen and there was no admin like Chris there, so I'm permanently banned, but that happened 2-3 years ago. The annoying thing is that every now and then this guy pops up again with new sockpuppets and I was always brought up again, sometimes I was banned for a few days until they realised their mistake, or they contacted me like this. Eventually I helped take down some of his accounts, I don't want him around cause it always brings the chance again of me getting banned, I'm unlucky they called the case "case Kermanshahi...", but I can recognise his style from miles away, so he's unhappy about what I did and that's why he tried to get me banned several times. If there are any further questions I am willing to answer all, if you want to know more about this guy I'm willing to help.

3464:...I couldn't agree more. Gigs, nearly every falling rain page has incorrect population data (which has been used as a population reference) and the altitude has regularly shown itself to be incorrect compared to google earth. One major one was a coatal village on the western coast of Madagascar which is barely above sealevel yet fallingrain claimed it was 360 metres. It doesn't stop there. The names and spelling ad widely known to often be transliterated incorrectly and the data is 15 years out of date and oftne lists villages/railways etc which no longer exist. The only correct data generally is the coordinates and nearby settlements but even those listed are often settlements which no longer exist or are minimal. Basically linking to that site can be misleading.... Have a good Christmas anyway! 2437:, item 4. Belgium is definitely a multilingual country, but not in the sense that there are minority parties. The parties on which we are talking about are mainstream parties whose names should be translated in English: there is no reason for not doing just that, en.Knowledge needs uniformity! Almost every European political party, no matter the country, has an article with and English title. Don't you agree that users would find more easy to understand the name of the parties if the titles are in English? I'm sure that if you think a little bit about it you will agree with me: having the articles' titles in English is more practical and correct for an English encyclopedia. I hope we can set the issue by ourselves, otherwise I will bring the issue to 3706:

same on the Dutch wikipedia. I myself didn't know that these were sockpuppets or even that they were all that guy but because of being associated with the first few (talking with them on wiki, them constantly editing my user page) I was suspected aswell. Several cases have been put up here and it was never proven that I was a sockpuppet, they said it was "likely" or "possible" because basicly, I never logged in on his computer and he never logged in on mine but we live in the same city and due to "close geographical location" they suspected I could be a sockpuppet also due to the fact I talked to them (him) a lot at the beginning. But never any solid evidence was put up, this administrator, there was this admin called

1841:. Feel free to start any ANI thread you want though, but don't expect me to agree with you after that previous incident. As for lack of consensus, I'm glad you so thoroughly agree with Jack Merridew about this, but most people did seem to agree that I was spot on as to what Jack Merridew was supposed to do. The only oppose was about my statement about A Nobody, but stated "Though I will reverse my opinion if this proposal garners enough support to simply apply it to JM and not merely suggest it." So basically, there was no opposition to the proposal wrt Jack Merridew, and some people supported it. To read this as a "lack of consensus" is a very one sided view of that section. 4550:

After a few months and those 10,000 taggings, it got picked up by other people, and a bot (not run by me) tagged most of the next 40,000. Now, this tag and its huge backlog has lead to the whole unsourced BLP deletion RFC, mobilizing large parts of the community, and the backlog actually gets tackled and thousands of articles get sourced. From your reply, it looks to me as if you just oppose the template in general, and enforce this on stubs because there you have somewhat more support. I don't believe that the current situation is the same as it was five years ago though, and that community opinion about unsourced articles has changed considerably.

2843:. Hanson's quotation that "To sixteenth century Christians, the sudden muster and vast size of the Christian fleet at Lepanto were proof of Christ to resist the Muslim onslaught" demonstrates the religious significance of the victory to the comabtants and would help flesh in that short section of the main articles. The entries on this list contain various such examples that indeed are not duplicative of the main battle articles and for which we can actually augment those battle articles, notice references that appear in the article under discussion at 3064: 1886:

the benefit of the doubt anymore, no series of escalating blocks and so on. Being unbanned does not mean that whatever happened in the past is to be ignored and forgotten, although it means that he doesn't get blocked for pre-ban edits. Warning him that current actions and behaviour may lead to a new block is not "unilaterally modifying the conditions of his return", it's applying dispute resolution procedures. As for "starting...", I think this has gone on long enough already so the word is not really applicable.

4896:

perspective, an I have no problem with anyone focusing on my BLP tags and adding sources. I try to get the problem and the backlog covered as good as possible, so that we at some point can claim that the vast, vast majority of older BLP articles are either sourced or tagged for sourcing. For the moment, no one knows how many untagged and unsourced ones theer are still floating around, and because it varies wildly from category to category, I have no idea either (but so far, the majority was already tagged).

1749: 31: 3379: 2191: 747: 2127: 3126: 1919:

Ikip). And I was not threatening the block for endorsing the RfC, pleae go and reread the discussion. I didn't start that thread because of the RfC, but because of the RfA. I only commented on the RfC because he left it well alone for the whole duration, but just happened to endorse 7 views first thing after I warned him to stay awayfrom A Nobody. To endorse views on an RfC is not a problem, but to do so with such an

3540: 3041:

no matter how egregious, just because the editor has a similar viewpoint. So it is really heartening and inspiring to see someone who can see wrong and act upon it, no matter who the editors are. Fram makes me believe in Knowledge again. I dont know if this endorsement from me is helpful or harmful, but I would support an Arbcom nomination for Fram in a heartbeat, despite our continued entrenched differences.

3567:: when you are reverted, don't redo your edit, but discuss things. Finally, if you do want a votecount, I see Fram, JohnBlackburne, Ash, Plvekamp, ScienceApologist and 2over0 opposing; and Camilo Sanchez, Abyssal, Martin Hogbin, Wikigratia, Aladdin Sane, The Good Locust, and Labongo supporting. That's 6 opposing and 7 supporting, which is when going by votecount a clear "no consensus", not a "support". 4490:, "Contributors intending to make a large number of assisted edits are advised to first ensure that there is a clear consensus that such edits are desired." In this case, there is not a clear consensus that stubs should be tagged as unreferenced; in fact documentation of the template you re adding already discourages it, and this has been discussed on the talk page of the template recently. 4710:: I regret a participant remove verifiable informations of great Walloon scholars. I think it very impossible following the rules of Wp. But I feel that I am not able to avoid a war-edition. So I answer only that I am not happy with that. Is it possible you act as a (non-official) referee? Sorry but I think I am not able to resolve myself the problem. Sincerely, 4382:, or other creative works" so it seems to be the wrong code? The main reason I'm upset/confused is that this software seems to be held to a different notability standard than other news aggregators listed on that page. I wouldn't have created the page if it didn't look like so many other less popular aggregators had their own page. 2097:@Fram; I'm fine with you raising concerns with John, or Moreschi or Cas. I do stand by my view that I'm a messenger here, and I'm quite glad to see others sharing the same concerns. I tried to have a chat with you before; we could try again. I'm a reasonable person and, as noted by both of us, we have a bit of common ground. 4510:

that is already tagged as woefully incomplete and then add more tags that also come down to "this article needs to be expanded". So I remove the unreferenced tag from stubs when I see it, but I don't make any special effort to remove it from all stubs. I'm not planning to go through and revert your edits

4981:

This is getting old, I may not be an admin, and I may not have the popular view of veteran editors, but I know what is going on. You are attempting to silence me with a 3RR. Don't modify my comments again. You can be blocked with less that 3RR. You are aware of that. Changing and tweaking comments is

4549:

Wrong on both accounts. The tags are useful, and it is not because it hadn't happend before that there is no consensus for it. I created the BLPunsourced tag, and singlehandedly tagged 99% of the first 10,000 entries of the BLP unsourced category, often doing hundreds a day. Many of those were stubs.

3218:

I have noticed that you have been consistently removing images from articles where I have collaborated, you have even removed images from my own Knowledge User page. Although I respect your commitment to Knowledge I have found an interesting pattern of behavior on your editions and my collaborations,

3040:

My respect for Fram in this situation has been phenominal, a barnstar on her talk page would not be enough to convey this deep respect. Just this summer she was arguing with me fiercely and our interactions have never been without conflict. Too often I think the norm is that editors justify behavior

2939:

Thanks for your concern regarding the energy being image in the article. The image is a clear artistic interpretation that has been added to give the reader an idea of what an energy being is. The image is not to be taken as a factual reference but as an interpretation and it is a part of a series of

2624:

Most of these are minority parties (item 4 is about them, of course) or minor parties, while the two major Irish parties have Irish-titled articles because English media use the Irish names too for them, others need to have an English article too. Minority parties and Irish parties are exactly what I

2475:

So why ALL articles about European political parties have English titles? I urge you to think again on the issue... Why do you want this exception to the general rule? I hope that you will understand that praticality and uniformity are very important reasons for having also the articles about Belgian

192:

Yeah when we hit 3 million actually it suddenly dawned on me, it is just a figure, most of our existing articles are very poor and need my attention. I'd be happy actually if you deleted the Yemen stubs that Blofeld created anyway. The thing is since a few editors have added geo coordinates and spent

4878:

We often have different ideas, but considering the amount of disagreement on issues we have had in the past including many issues involving BLP, I had hoped that here we could find some way for us to work together, in order to see each others' perspective and to build a basis of increased good will

4845:

You've been placing BLP tags on them, and I;ve been following after and sourcing them at least minimally. It takes me about 3 minutes each, from G News Archive, using no automatic tools. Recently you asked me to check on a problem academic bio, so I suggest to you that perhaps we might work more

4685:

as being part of the comics project (Superman = comics, logical so far), when I noticed that that category had entries like Rock around the Clock or Roll over Beethoven. I then only added the comics project to the "real" superman songs (those with a clear connection to or inspiration from the comic,

3710:

who researched the case a lot and he said he was convinced that I was a different person, that's how I was unblocked. I have also never vandalised atricles or been involved in Frisian stuff and making hoaxed and all the kind of things "Mrlob" was doing. On the Dutch wikipedia however the admins took

3256:

I removed images from your user page because they were fair use images, which are not allowed outside articles, ever. I removed other images because they did not add anything of value to the articles they illustrated, and because it became clear that most editors supported me in this. Your flags you

1960:

it is six months old that I warned him again, just like I did on WT:AFD some time ago (you know, where you didn't mind Jack Merridew's comments about A Nobody but faulted me for replying to it on that page instead of somewhere else). If it would have been closer together, he would have been blocked.

1900:

The ANI was 6 months ago. The discussion ended up saying both parties needed to work to resolve differences and to disengage.... IF both parties agreed and abided. What we have seen from Jack is an effort to do that, with some backsliding (we are none of us perfect, after all), but in my view mostly

1788:

Somewhere I read about not building memorials honouring vandalism, maybe RBI? If I did this would be about twenty or so which I'm sure pales to many. In any case appreciate your reverting the nonsense whatever it was. I just don't see any use in giving them any energy or added attention. In any case

4576:

I don't oppose the template in general; I just think it's useless because there is no evidence that the backlogs can ever be cleared out. But I have no objections if other people spend their time adding it instead of adding actual references to articles in their area of expertise. On stubs, though,

4279:

This has been discussed numerous times on the talk page of the article. No agreement could be found on whether these people were in any way representative or typical Dutch. There was e.g. a lack of women, and adding a Jewish immigrant from Austria (or Germany?), i.e. Anne Frank, makes it only clear

4047:

First let's see what happens when I try to join. If there's any balking, off to XfD it goes. if not, then yes, it needs reshaping (and your help would be welcomed as well). The idea of helping new article writers better reference things and make sure their articles are compliant is an excellent one

2078:

I wasn't aware of that editor review (gives you an idea of how actively I am following him :-)), and again, my block was not based on the arbcom restrictions, but on current behaviour, with that difference that with his history, there is no need to go through the 24 hour - 48 hour - ... routine for

1885:

I don't modify the conditions of his return, I warn him that his current behaviour will lead to him being blocked, a move for which there was considerable support at the ANI section, with many people already agreing to a ban at that time. The only difference is that, withhis history, he doesn't get

721:

rules. That most pages about fictional characters and so on are in a poor state is no reason to ignore this. As to why this article specifically was tagged: I often use the "random article" function, and then I tag every article I encounter that is unsourced, no matter if it is about a character, a

4863:

I'm going through all articles about persons to check if they are sourced. I do a few thousand a day like this (through AWB). I just tag them, so anyone interested can source them. It's just a coincidence that I am now going through college presidents, before that I had criminals (G10 mostly), BYU

4509:

tag in the first place. The huge backlogs indicate that this template is not actually useful for anything except generating backlogs. But for non-stubs I just ignore the template; they really aren't an issue to me. On stubs, the template is especially dubious, because it's silly to take an article

4377:

The software is over a year old and was downloaded 5000 times last year. Though it did only recently get a dedicated website. I'm not sure what qualifies software as notable aside from a third party writing the article. Anyway, I do understand the conflict of interest. However, A7 says that it

3705:

The vandal you are talking about was a guy I used to know personally (but I haven't seen him for over 2 years), I could give you his name if you want. He is the one who made all these accounts and he kept contacting me with all his sockpuppets (such as Mrlob, Haggawaga Oegawagga, ect.), he did the

2729:

Any evidence that the claim on commons is correct though? When there is no evidence that the copyright has not been renewed, we have to consider it to be copyrighted. The company was active at the time of the need for copyright renewal, so it seems strange that they would have let the copyright on

559:

vs. Yah̨īş) or can't just be found (we don't have an article on Taw'ar, but World Gazetteer lists it as having some 3000 inhabitants). I'm stil thinking about what will be the best way to proceed, balancing time spent on it with result (kepping good things, removing unreliable stuff). I'll work on

210:

My major concern is that while some of them clearly do appear to be settlements which you can see my satellite, a worrying number of them just look like desert or just terrain and little evidence can be seen that they really exist, neither is there much proof online to verify their existence when

150:

Why? We don't leave notes for other websites were the articles are deleted, redirected or merged. Nothing is done to the Northern Sami Knowledge, the discussion was about the English Knowledge article. I wouldn't expect to be heard if the Northern Sami Knowledge would have a discussion about their

1918:

I have no problem with anyone taking action against A Nobody if and when needed. Jack Merridew was unlucky enough to make some comments about A Nobody on pages I was actively looking at, like the Kww RFC: I acted on what I noticed, I have not set out to look at theactions of either of them (or by

1815:

Your threats to Jack are out of line. Jack can endorse views at an RfC (note that he has not participated the entire time it was running, while others were taking shot after shot at him, he just turned the other cheek) and he can vote in RfAs. You do not get to unilaterally impose sanctions like

4895:

I'm going through Category:people, and use subcats (recursive) in AWB. I have just finished all "members of organizations", which varies from college presidents over IRA members and Royal Society fellows to yakuza bosses. It's not really targeted on any one or two projects. Anyway, I do see your

1955:

One of you previous comments here was "The next comment that you make to Jack, if it's other than one of the form "I'm sorry, I went too far and I'm dropping this" will result in my raising this at AN/I." I did since post in the very same thread, but not to apologize. Now again you make the same

5009:

Tweaking comments is not usual three days later, adding bolded parts is changing the original message. As for the "original disruption", have you tried discussing that with the editor who did this? I didn't think so... As for "you can be blocked with less than 3RR", no kidding? You'ld better be

2769:

I've seen too many "wrong" images at Commons to believe the claims made there outright. The images for Classic Comics have no indication apart from the uploaders say-so that the copyright indeed wasn't renewed. For a company that was still in business producing those comics in 1971, the lack of

2054:

However in your second message you did threaten to block him, and that isn't necessary or supported by the arbitration committee decision. The unban allows for uninvolved admins to block him for violations of the conditions they set out. The conditions do not restrict him from commenting on A

3599:

What has "I am not doing any polling" to do with this? It's an RfC on images you added, and in which you commented. I hope you don't claim to be uninvolved? And reverting an incorrect closure is not against any Knowledge guidelines. I have not continued to edit the RfC, I have just removed the

3734:

I noticed their was an attempt to create an article for the singer, song-writer, and multi-instrumentalist Nataly Dawn. The notability was apparently a factor, but Jack Conte, her boyfriend and Pomplamoose co-founder has his own page. I ask, why can't she? She has gained a following on the

3714:

And incase you're interested in my two cents, I tell you that IP adress is definetly him, it's definetly not a school IP cause as you say, he's the only one which uses it and does he sound like a school administrator to you? ... I advise you to have a look at the talk pages of several of his

2460:

about minority parties in that exception. The names in English may be more practical, but I doubt it. It certainly is not more correct (why would our translation of the name of a political party be more correct than the name used by the party itself, official documents, and most national and

4204:

Please only revert the correct ones, e.g. there should be no links in section headers. I've expanded the Latin West article to make it clear that the earlier focus on Christianity was only one part of the meaning of it: the current redirect created by you is correct, the earlier one wasn't.

3888:

There's a possibility that if sent through Afd, an interested editor might find a reliable source or two (print? offline?), considering some of the very specific claims to notability (longest serving transgendered government worker in America, one of the first people to ever go through sex

4931: 4416:. It describes (twice) that there is no general agreement that unsourced articles that are already marked as stubs should have the "unreferenced tag" added. The tag tends to overwhelm the text of the article in stubs, while its benefits are entirely hypothetical. I routinely remove 3546:

Hey Fram, it is obvious that there is support from the community to leave those images. Let it go already. It has been 30 days since you added the RfC. Stop reverting my edits please. Out of all the editors involved in the discussion the majority supported the inclusion . Happy new

4280:

that the description of the article on "Dutch people" doesn't match the image many people have of Dutch people. In short, every collage of such pictures caused new discussion, no agreement could be reached, and an anonymous, everyday picture had the preference of most editors.

3214:

Dear editor Fram: Thanks for your concern on making Knowledge a good thing. It is understanding that some people may be passionate about editing but it is also important to realize that not all of us are here to inflict damage on Knowledge but to make it a good encyclopedia.

3837:

Not an attack page, but an article with contentious (potentially negative) unsourced or very, very poorly sourced material. Stating that people are transsexuals without very good sources is a typical example of the kind of articles that can and should be deleted under

2010:

If by that you meant that you would block first, that would not be good at all. If by that you mean that you would raise your concerns first (by, for example, contacting John to discuss the matter), that would be goodness. I hope you meant the latter. Can you clarify?

1979:" Ooh, I'm so scared." ??? Not exactly a very constructive approach you have here, is it? Forget the request for an apology, one can't force apologies. But if you again open with a threat after a new incident, it won't be good. Open with dialog, not threats. Please. ++ 4429:

Really, you should get bot approval before making large-scale tagging runs. One point of that is to help detect when something seems like it might be a good idea to you, but doesn't actually have community consensus – like tagging all unreferenced stubs with the

2051:, as Jack had steered clear of that RfC until now. I do see where you are coming from, but I also know that Jack has been trying, and is receptive to advice from the mentors. I am sorry he was not more receptive to your initial advice that he should "Drop it". 3715:

sockpuppets, you can see his defence here is extremely similar to his defence there, he talks in the same manner, it is 100% his style and also the atricles he targets... I'd say keep the IP blocked forever and block it's talk page too, but he'll be back though.

4120:. It was proving useful, but now I find it has been deleted. I'm not intending to get into the reasons why that was, but could you possibly supply me with the list of references that the article had? It really would be very useful to me. Hoping you can help. 3562:

First of all, majority vs. minority is irrelevant, it is not a votecount but a discussion. Second, as an involved editor, you should not be the one to decide the consensus (niether should I), nor to act upon your self-declared consensus. Third, please follow

2861:: The battle article has few references. The content cited from Davis in the list article is different from the citation in the battle article. Thus, this and possibly the other reference from this list would add new content/sourcing to the battle article. 2610:. I have obviously not checked all European countries, and Belgium is one of the few multilingual ones anyway (Switzerland is the main other one). Anyway, don't capitalize "all" when it is not really, actually true, as a very short search would have shown. 1582:

The answer is "no". Fram is somebody who thinks these parishes are not each and every one of them suitable for a stand-alone encyclopedia article (as opposed to entry in the Catholic Directory). The way to respond is to explain why you think they might be.

4458:

I do not need bot approval for anything of this sort, I am doing (quite slow) AWB tasks I previously did manually. I will get bot apporval before I use a bot, not for anything else. I will probably start an RfC about this ridiculous rule on the unref tag.

2844: 2836: 4626:

Hi Fram, I was wondering about the wisdom of deleting this. I can't vouch for the contents, because I haven't checked them, but it looks fairly decent, and we don't have a huge number of decent philosophy articles. Would you consider letting it stand?

114:, I am not surprised at your opinion. Nor am I burning and blazing to get it removed. But I do think it would be more proper to maintain a distinction between maintenance templates and informational templates. Let's see how the discussion will evolve. 3226:.My images are being accused of Original Research. As you might know, editors are encouraged to upload their own drawings to improve the article as long as it illustrates the article without adding susbtantial changes. I would like to invite you to 2748:

I've got a problem with that... IIUC, we are supposed to assume, barring good evidence at hand, that the information posted to Commons is solid. Not ask "are you sure" every time the image is used. That sort of negates part of the purpose of the

4157:

as work of a banned editor, but after review of the material, I am willing to stand behind the edits. Also, a review of the history will show edits by others that I deem "substantial" enough to qualify, although Fram may not have felt that way.

4523:

However, you do need to look into bot approval whenever you are thinking of tagging hundreds of articles (with pretty much any template). If there was really consensus to do the tagging, someone else would probably have done it already. — Carl

2980:

The image is an illustration. Why are you against adding an illustration that interprets the sense of the article and ads to the quality of such?. The image is a self-made contribution that forms part of the set I specifically made for the

1937:

You're not listening to what I said. A 6 month old discussion that called for things to happen which did not happen is no basis for your threats. Threaten Jack again without first discussing the issues with him, and I will take it to AN/I.

3005:

Hi Fram, it looks like HP1740-B isn't going to respond to the comments made at the Wikiquette alert. But hopefully he/she has read the comments made there and taken them into consideration. I hope that that is sufficient. Kind regards,

3346: 3152: 4594:

AWB in general encourages people to do mass tagging actions that they should avoid. In this case, I'm sure you'll wait to the end of the RFC before continuing, anyway, so the RFC is a fine substitute for bot approval. — Carl

3585:. However the RfC lasted 30 days and the self removing template is gone. Besides if you are so interested in following the practices of wikipedia guidelines you should not remove the boilerplate, you start a new section.-- 2873:

contains NO internally cited statements, whereas the list article features SIX citations that can be used in the battle article, thereby taking an article on a major battle with no footnotes and adding at least six to

814:

FWIW, Killer Chihuahua is female; changing the pronouns might make it a bit easier to follow, too; it's hard to tell if you are talking about Giano, Sandstein, or KC when you use "he", especially since KC is a "she".

2825:. I regret that I failed to notice it myself and this revelation has sparked my curiosity as well. The history of Georgia example on that link is astonishing. I wonder how much of that actually goes on? Best, -- 4350:

Your brand new software had no indication of any notability. It is in general not a good idea to write articlesabout yourself or things you are closely affiliated to, like things you have developed. You can check

4304:. Perhaps you should delete most of those too (those developed by individual software engineers?) Frankly I did a better job of outlining Feed Notifier's capabilities than most people in the comparison tables. 2094:@both; I will, and have, refrained from unnecessary comment on that pair for on the order of six months. My Editor Review has been open for 3 weeks and has been prominently mentioned on my user page, to no avail. 3519:

as keep, merge or redirect (i.e. it is clear that they aren't going to be deleted because you don't present an argument for deletion so much as one for merging) are just an unnecessary burden on the AFD backlog.

2969:

Rather than being literally composed of energy in the physical sense, energy beings are typically rendered as being composed of a translucent glowing fluid, somewhat in common with the representations of ghosts.

1529:

Please consider discussing your concerns with the relevant users before pursuing deletion further. If you still think the articles should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may send them to

3889:

re-assignment surgery, etc). While the article began as an overly-promotional and severely NPOV piece of fluff, if this is the case of a notable person with a poorly-sourced article, I think it's worth a shot.

858:. Since when historic "parishes" are not notable?. Prove it first. As the Administrator, you should act more responsible. Part of your responsibility is to improve it not remove it. This parish is one of the 3821:

seemed to be the direct polar opposite of an attack page. If reliable sources are the issue (and I enthusiastically agree that they are), then I feel this article would be better served over at Afd. Cheers,

2822: 2690:

ALthough I must have encountered her name when reading some Hergé biographies, I did not recall her at all until I read this article, and have nothing to add to it. Her notability is truly borderline, in my

1956:"threat" of starting an AN/I. Ooh, I'm so scared. Why don't you just go ahead and do so instead ofsimply repeating yourself and Jack Merridew here? As for the ANI discussion being six months old, it is just 990: 3504:

please consider refraining from submitting AFDs that are obvious merge candidates. The most efficient approach would be to merge them yourself. If you cannot be bothered to do that, you should just leave a

2389:

so far, he copied the old discussions from previous talk page (the history of those pages were not deleted) including parts that were about importing problems from other Knowledge's. As can be seen in his

3818: 2380:

were cleared, a message explaining the user is indefinitely blocked was put in place and these pages were protected from editing. Yesterday the same user started editing here under his new user account:

2770:

renewal is not something to be taken for granted (although it is of course possible). Just like I don't take anything on Wikipêdia at face value, I don't automatically presume that Commons is correct.

1755: 4577:

the template actually has some negative effects, and the same lack of positive ones, so I remove it from those as I see it. On non-stubs that I edit, there are references anyway, so it's a moot point.

3735:

Internet as has Jack Conte and Pomplamoose. Just wondering about the whole thing because I have been thinking about creating a page on her, but wanted to ask because I saw that message of deletion.

3632:

My need? You stated, in your first post; "Out of all the editors involved in the discussion the majority supported the inclusion"... Please stay of my talk page if you can't have a decent discussion.

3487: 694:

Sorry, but may I ask why the page is marked as unsourced? Most other pages about fictional characters aren't, and they certainly don't cite anything, not even the series/books from which they came.--

4864:

alumni, scientists, ... and next may be soccer players or voice actors. It's more convenient for me now to focus on the tagging than to switch between looking for unsourced ones and sourcing them.

2944:. This illustrations resemble the information provided in the article and give the user a reference on what the being might look like compared to a human. Please do not remove it again. Thanks.-- 1662:

Apologies re red links. When I'm doing clean up, I sometimes go the limit. l also feel a need to write the copy for red links. You're right about Ritt, so in future I'll try to write that one.

1867:

Again, your threats are out of line, you do not get to unilaterally modify the conditions of Jack's return. They are also singularly unhelpful, starting with a threat is the wrong approach. ++

2867:: The list article uses Fuller and Davis, which again, the battle article does not. Merging these items would certainly strengthen the sections of the battle article on importance/aftermath. 2625:

meant when I spoke of exceptions and these are reasonable ones. I don't understand why Belgian parties should be an exception, so I will bring the issue to a broad constituency of editors at

1705: 1694: 876:

You should be never the Administrator of Knowledge. Your action to remove all historical catholic parishes (all of them have listed reliable sources) is an Act of Religious discrimination. --

4986: 5059:

I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to take it to AfD. The IP says that s/he will update the article, and I have given advice about notability and copyright. Regards,

4234: 4641:

Anyone is free to undelete it if they want to take the responsibility for the contents, and have no problem aiding a serial sockpuppeteering banned user. I will not do it myself though.

3140:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 3114: 171:

No, check my editing history, I haven't created those articles under this account. The reason why is because I am now focusing on quality, expanding geo articles. Look at articles like

4846:

effectively if you did the necessary quick check for WP:V instead of just tagging, since practice is they are all notable, and I worked on any thing you could not quickly handle. .

4773: 1692: 3750:

I am going out on a limb here by saying that no response here or on my talk page that her notability is on the same level of Jack Conte and that an article can be created about her.

3151:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

1716:

with Solicitr before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to

2349:

article about a year or so. Since then, I did some expansion on the article. Would you please kindly re-evaluate the article to see if it deserves to be promoted to C-class status?

1408: 3363: 2711:

Now, while I agree, the gallery is not needed, all it really needed to conform to image use policy was the removal of 2 image and the flipping of the infobox to the Commons image.

1820:

sanctioned. The next comment that you make to Jack, if it's other than one of the form "I'm sorry, I went too far and I'm dropping this" will result in my raising this at AN/I. ++

128: 4776:. While it isn't mentioned in the article yet (although the cat for the publisher is added), it is something that should be added, and where the comics project may be of help. 3076: 3094: 2461:

international media?). The English tranlation of the name of the party should be given in the first sentence of the article lead, but should not be the title of the article.

135:

It would have only been polite to leave a note of some sorts for the bureaucrats and admins on the Northern Sámi wikipedia at the same time you decided to take this to AfD. -

4818:

You could have, at least, add your arguments - not simply jump to a conclussion and impose your will. That's bullining I am talking about. And I do have ways to stop that.

2368:

Hello Fram, earlier this year you indefinitely blocked the user with IP 86.83.155.44 for disruptive editing after he had been blocked multiple times on this Knowledge (see

4387: 4337: 4316: 4240: 1855:

Well *I've* got AN/I watchlisted. Do note that I'm at UTC+8 so I've only a few hours left on here today. I'll check back tomorrow, though. Oh, replied at my page. Cheers,

1397: 1254: 551:

Yes, but that is a massive task, certainly because e.g. the Tageo name and World Gazetteer name don't match. Some are identifiable (just with or without diacritics, like

509: 2547: 1620:. If someone, without thinking, seeks to remove about 60 articles within 10 minutes, ignoring sources and the complexity of the project. Such actions are unacceptable.-- 4254: 2555: 129: 4957:

Stop reverting my edits. I only removed that sentence for clarity. If you don't like my changes, revert then, strike the comments I removed, but don't revert them.

3927: 3185: 2048: 3817:

article a little while back, and remember doing some tagging and removing some overly-promotional language. I was really surprised to see it deleted under G10, as

1729: 4383: 4333: 4312: 3903:

Allright, restored (plus talk), and sent to AfD. We'll see how it goes. Anyway, thanks for having a polite and friendly discussion about it, it's refreshing :-)

575: 4967:

Apart from the fact that you don't make sense in your last sentence: don't change three days old comments you made, and to which people have already responded.

1839: 859: 2434: 2079:

similar behaviour. Having said that, I will, if I happen to notice other comments or actions I don't approve of, contact you instead of taking action myself.

2062:

If he unnecessarily comments on A Nobody again in the next two months, I will start or endorse an RFC. Until then, some advice and constructive criticism at

3842:. There is nothing wrong with actually being a transsexual, but many peoplewho are not transsexual would be offended to be described like that on Knowledge. 3257:

wanted to introduce on country articles did not get any support. Your edits are in good faith, but that doesn't mean that all of them are useful or welcome.

3219:

this being that for some particular reason many of them are being removed by you even if they are in good faith intended to add to the quality of articles.

1210: 4955: 4953: 4174:(note the capitalization is lowercase w, I've taken the liberty of correcting the header of this section, but not Poltair's words, I leave that to him/her.) 144: 3582: 4179: 4341: 3814: 3807: 2373: 663: 3093:

I may be a member of ARS, but does my actively trying to actually improve articles mandate that my opinion somehow means less? I have responded to you

2912: 3222:

This is a collaborative encyclopedia and most of us wish to collaborate. In particular I like to collaborate with SVG imagery as it can be seen in my

3659: 2994: 1592: 4477:

The rollback was completely an error; I didn't even realized I did it, so it must have happened when I looked at a page history. I apologize for it.

4198: 3647: 3031: 2898: 2888: 5045: 4827: 3759: 3352: 4992:

You are supposed to be an admin, please act like one, not an editor, edit warrior attempting to get a 3rr on someone's views you disagree with.

3912: 3898: 3883: 3869: 3851: 2176: 4300:

I see that you deleted the Feed Notifier page. I'd like to know what makes it less qualified than any of the other news aggregators listed on

924: 849: 640: 625:, you did not sign. I am not sure if we are allowed even if allowed, how to sign for anyone, but just wanted to give you a heads up. Best, -- 569: 1838:

Yes, I noticed you ignoring his disruption the last time I discussed them, but complaining then that the location of my response was incorrect

1635:

I'm with Cameron Scott and Paularblaster. Fram is following due process; the proper response is to actually give a reason why these parishes

4391: 4364: 2158: 1663: 1621: 1522: 1511: 1500: 1489: 1478: 1467: 1463: 1456: 1445: 1434: 1423: 1412: 1401: 1390: 1379: 1368: 1357: 1346: 1335: 1324: 1313: 1302: 1291: 1280: 1269: 1258: 1247: 1236: 1225: 1214: 1203: 1192: 1181: 1170: 1159: 1148: 1137: 1126: 1115: 1104: 1093: 1082: 1071: 1060: 1049: 1038: 1027: 1016: 1005: 994: 983: 972: 961: 950: 939: 928: 896: 877: 863: 3988:

Perhaps, we can see what he answers to my post, and in any case wait for an ANI report until he is unblocked, so he can easily participate.

3053: 2551: 2088: 1629: 885: 871: 4799: 4785: 4289: 3641: 3627: 3609: 3594: 3576: 3436: 3334: 3320: 3302: 3284: 3266: 3109: 2794: 2626: 2438: 1646: 622: 5032: 2303: 1859: 4766: 4226: 4214: 4695: 4650: 4324: 4011: 3997: 2398:. So there is no reason to doubt this is the same user who is now avoiding the block for the IP address by editing under a username. - 1762: 1441: 946: 843: 4091: 4074: 4060: 4042: 4028: 3973:

I'm not at all happy with this. I agree it was canvassing and he shouldn't be calling it a Wikiproject. Should this be raised at ANI?

2313: 4925: 3137: 3119: 3025: 1748: 1430: 1276: 1067: 904: 275: 4065:

I may well help if you join and he makes it open and official. It would be great if we could get new writers to properly reference!

3831: 2422: 2059:

admin who opposed Jacks unban, and you are now threatening to ban him without warning, so I can see why he views you as "involved".

731: 604: 4170: 3446:

I didn't want to take the RfC offtopic, but what is wrong with fallingrain.com? Are they scraping some other source or something?

2811: 2779: 2764: 2739: 2652: 2638: 2619: 2485: 2470: 2433:

I should have talked with you before doing the moves and I'm sorry about that. However I'm not convinced by your interpretation of

1686: 1518: 1243: 1155: 668: 652: 3724: 3614:

I mentioned polling in lieu of your need to make a count on the amount of votes regarding the discussion..that is called polling.

3227: 2044: 828: 160: 5023: 4996: 4976: 3798: 3789: 2277: 1452: 1133: 1001: 4905: 4890: 4873: 4607: 4559: 4536: 4468: 4355:

for more on this. Other articles may have the same problems or worse, I don't know, I have only checked yours as a new article.

2953: 2023: 2005: 1991: 1974: 1950: 1932: 1913: 1895: 1850: 1550: 4719: 4320: 3402:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page 2503: 2450: 2328: 2244: 2214:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page 2164: 2118: 1232: 1012: 968: 770:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page 4273: 3982: 3695: 3418:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

2723: 2531: 2226:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

2063: 1567: 1199: 979: 782:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

4143: 4129: 2272: 1652: 4722: 4675: 4265: 3962: 3088: 3083: 2072: 1375: 3968: 3476: 3072: 2840: 2708:, from the gallery you removed were Commons links which use a PD tag. Even the infobox image has a PD version in Commons. 2358: 804: 703: 545: 524: 223: 205: 187: 4742: 4635: 3250: 3204: 2924: 2104: 957: 753: 5052: 4048:(although it may overlap other projects and initiatives) but including only certain community members is just Not On. ++ 3385: 3289:

Where do you get those numbers? Only Abyssal supported you, NeilN removed them, and Zagalejo took a middle position. On

3010: 2335: 809: 3744: 3369: 2197: 1496: 512:

has some data on the top ffew hundred or so towns. Maybe we ought to use that as a guideline for main cities and towns?

111: 123: 4857: 2920: 2789: 2428: 2407: 2250: 1575: 1816:

that, especially given the lack of consensus the last time this was brought up. I suggest you stop, or you may find

5068: 3455: 2806: 1611: 1265: 1188: 1100: 1078: 634: 4835: 4452: 3556: 3529: 1805: 4707: 4295: 3926: 3700: 3115: 2695: 2684: 2369: 2284: 1298: 2340: 2324: 4961: 4301: 2181: 1879: 1832: 1778: 1671: 1507: 1419: 1386: 1353: 1331: 1122: 1111: 1089: 801: 684: 3774: 3494: 709:

Then those other pages need to be marked as unsourced as well. Articles about fiction are not exempt from our

4109: 3894: 3865: 3827: 3461: 1364: 1342: 1320: 1034: 1023: 910: 4982:

common, so is selective enforcement of rules, which you are showing in abundance with your piety reversions.

2882: 2829: 4754: 4750: 3230:

the deletion of some of my images and I politely remind you that my editions and collaborations are all in

2982: 2941: 2152: 1514:, with summary '(Undid revision 318031416 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1503:, with summary '(Undid revision 318032601 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1470:, with summary '(Undid revision 318031505 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1437:, with summary '(Undid revision 318031897 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1426:, with summary '(Undid revision 318032679 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1415:, with summary '(Undid revision 318033065 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1404:, with summary '(Undid revision 318032450 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1382:, with summary '(Undid revision 318031803 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1371:, with summary '(Undid revision 318032518 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1360:, with summary '(Undid revision 318031850 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1349:, with summary '(Undid revision 318031948 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1338:, with summary '(Undid revision 318032015 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1327:, with summary '(Undid revision 318032086 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1316:, with summary '(Undid revision 318032161 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1305:, with summary '(Undid revision 318032196 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1294:, with summary '(Undid revision 318032757 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1283:, with summary '(Undid revision 318032247 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1261:, with summary '(Undid revision 318031661 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1250:, with summary '(Undid revision 318033028 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1239:, with summary '(Undid revision 318032877 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1228:, with summary '(Undid revision 318032561 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1221: 1206:, with summary '(Undid revision 318032370 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1195:, with summary '(Undid revision 318032962 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1184:, with summary '(Undid revision 318031354 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1166: 1162:, with summary '(Undid revision 318031101 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1151:, with summary '(Undid revision 318031146 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1144: 1140:, with summary '(Undid revision 318031197 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1129:, with summary '(Undid revision 318031256 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1118:, with summary '(Undid revision 318031041 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1107:, with summary '(Undid revision 318030978 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1096:, with summary '(Undid revision 318030876 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1085:, with summary '(Undid revision 318030323 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1074:, with summary '(Undid revision 318030243 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1063:, with summary '(Undid revision 318030173 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1052:, with summary '(Undid revision 318030074 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1041:, with summary '(Undid revision 318030124 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1030:, with summary '(Undid revision 318030041 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1019:, with summary '(Undid revision 318029966 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 1008:, with summary '(Undid revision 318029914 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 997:, with summary '(Undid revision 318029844 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 986:, with summary '(Undid revision 318029790 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 975:, with summary '(Undid revision 318029743 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 964:, with summary '(Undid revision 318029645 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 953:, with summary '(Undid revision 318029597 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 942:, with summary '(Undid revision 318029483 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 935: 931:, with summary '(Undid revision 318029525 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to indicate not notability)' 629: 592: 534: 513: 212: 194: 176: 4737: 3234:

and that I didn't start editing in the Knowledge yesterday, so I am well aware of some guidelines such as

2858: 2571: 2323:

As Halloween is my favorite holiday, I just wanted to wish those Wikipedians who have been nice enough to

4743: 3673: 3432: 3235: 3231: 3058: 2752:

That being said, if there is something, putting the images up for deletion there might mot be a bad idea.

2499: 2495: 2256: 1640: 1525:, with summary '(Undid revision 318033157 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to prove not noatability)' 1492:, with summary '(Undid revision 318033095 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to prove not noatability)' 1056: 1045: 892: 689: 2852: 1481:, with summary '(Undid revision 318031466 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to prove not notability)' 1459:, with summary '(Undid revision 318031578 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to prove not notability)' 1448:, with summary '(Undid revision 318031617 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to prove not notability)' 1393:, with summary '(Undid revision 318031744 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to prove not notability)' 1272:, with summary '(Undid revision 318032799 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to prove not notability)' 1217:, with summary '(Undid revision 318032335 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to prove not notability)' 1173:, with summary '(Undid revision 318032409 by Fram (talk)No supporting evidence to prove not notability)' 529:

I think if population data from 2004 is known which confirms it as a town, we should keep articles like

4840: 4701: 3679: 3419: 3405: 3176:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 3133: 2934: 2227: 2217: 1485: 1309: 1287: 1177: 783: 773: 737: 38: 4715: 4666:

I reverted your addition of listing the song as a part of Knowledge Comics. I don't see how it is. --

2855:: Grote and Grant from the list article could be used in the battle article, which does not cite them. 2491: 4659: 4167: 4088: 4057: 4025: 3806: 3106: 2020: 1988: 1947: 1910: 1876: 1829: 1571: 97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 4821:

I will therfore revert your changes and you are free to report me. Actually - do so and let us see.

2579: 2507: 4815:

I will report you to the hiearchy for disrespect above all, interventions without a consensus etc.

4795: 4762: 4269: 4259: 3890: 3861: 3823: 3655: 3623: 3590: 3552: 3488:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Renewed_disruption.2Fhounding_by_User:Jack_Merridew

3330: 3280: 3246: 3000: 2990: 2949: 2870: 2308: 611: 4149:(copied from article talk) I've restored this article and the talk. It was properly deleted under 4916:

for an example where a reference is in a template, and as such wasn't detected by your AWB sweep.

4749:

Just curious as to why you added this article which is about a series of eight fantasy novels to

4682: 4619: 4401: 3441: 3200: 2519: 2515: 1607: 1588: 834:

Thanks, I'll try to correct it. I'm always using "he" for everyone, it's a bit careless of me...

608: 3275:

Most editors?? Two editors voiced support on leaving the images, only one said no..support??? --

2539: 5056: 3755: 3740: 3428: 3016:

Thanks for your efforts. Let's hope that indeed something will change when he resumes editing.

2887: 2666: 2563: 2377: 2363: 2043:

I agree that Jack should avoid mentioning A Nobody where it isn't necessary, and I agree that

600: 4486:

Bot approval is not only about speed; it is also about the scale of the project. According to

3378: 2190: 746: 5044: 4503: 4434: 4420: 4410: 4251: 4223: 4195: 4117: 4110: 3720: 3390: 2916: 2543: 2299: 2202: 2172: 1996:

Rest assured, if a similar incident happens in the near future, I won't start with threaths.

1725: 1539: 1474: 758: 648: 105: 4711: 4079:

Put it on your watchlist and give it a bit of time. It either changes or it goes, agreed? ++

3162:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

4930:

I was aware of that, but searching for Ian Brooker gave no results through that reference:

4671: 4308: 4070: 4038: 4007: 3978: 3691: 3190: 3181: 3141: 3099: 2908: 2864: 2803: 2591: 2583: 2068: 2055:

Nobody, and the community also declined to restrict him in that manner. Also, you are the

1810: 1563: 824: 583: 579: 487: 3153:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of male performers in gay porn films (5th nomination)

8: 4947: 4791: 4758: 3860:

announcing a song called "The Peoples Tranny", I don't think this is one of those cases.

3729: 3651: 3619: 3586: 3548: 3525: 3326: 3276: 3242: 3223: 3209: 2986: 2945: 2382: 2240: 657: 119: 5051:

Hi. You PRODded this article more than two years ago, and it was deleted. An IP has now

1712:

with the following edit summary '(Object to deletion- see Discussion)'. Please consider

555:) but others are different enough to make you wonder if they are the same place or not ( 5029: 4921: 4831: 4807: 3874:

Do you believ it is worth restoring? No reliable sources,as far as I could tell, so...

3765: 3415: 3397: 3196: 2527: 2268: 2223: 2101: 1856: 1790: 1783: 1713: 1603: 1584: 799: 779: 3132:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

2575: 4660: 4139: 4125: 3942: 3751: 3736: 3499: 3166:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

2835:

Also, to answer your question about what specifically can be merged, please consider

2567: 2403: 2047:

could have been delivered without the A Nobody/Ikip part. I am also disappointed by

1774: 1657: 699: 596: 3409: 3063: 2837:

Battles_of_macrohistorical_importance_involving_invasions_of_Europe#Battle_of_Vienna

5064: 5019: 4972: 4901: 4869: 4781: 4691: 4646: 4555: 4464: 4360: 4285: 4248: 4220: 4210: 4192: 3993: 3958: 3908: 3879: 3847: 3785: 3716: 3687: 3637: 3605: 3572: 3465: 3347:

Jack Merridew and threats of being blocked for bringing up Jack Merridew's behavior

3316: 3298: 3262: 3021: 2775: 2760: 2735: 2719: 2648: 2634: 2615: 2559: 2481: 2466: 2446: 2418: 2354: 2295: 2168: 2109: 2084: 2001: 1970: 1928: 1891: 1846: 1742: 1721: 1701: 1682: 1667: 1625: 1535: 916: 900: 881: 867: 839: 727: 672: 644: 565: 427: 166: 156: 3460:

Incidentally Fallingrain is currently proposed for black listing at the bottom of

3036:

I almost posted this on the review, but felt it would be best to post this here.

919:

to inform you the PROD templates you added to a number of articles were removed:

4667: 4628: 4620: 4247:. I've restored the article and I'm willing to stand behind the current version. 4066: 4034: 4003: 3974: 3177: 2798: 2587: 2372:). Besides that block that also prevented him from creating an user account, his 2319:

Photograph of my Halloween-themed Hush Puppies plush basset hounds in my bedroom.

817: 140: 4244: 4219:

I think I've re-linked only where appropriate, you're welcome to check my work.

4150: 3686:

comment, so couldn't resist adding it to the essay! Nice one, made me laugh :-)

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4727: 3707: 3521: 3516: 3509: 3481: 3451: 3359: 3049: 2672: 2523: 2346: 2236: 2209: 1555: 680: 115: 47: 17: 4772:

There were also some graphic novel adaptations /spin offs of the series, e.g.

2823:

User:PrimeHunter/Alphascript Publishing sells free articles as expensive books

2599: 2595: 2511: 2391: 2386: 1961:

Now, I repeated the earlier warning. Don't you think he is quite aware of the

4917: 4886: 4853: 4602: 4531: 4487: 4447: 4352: 4163: 4084: 4053: 4021: 3839: 3564: 3491: 3290: 3173: 3163: 3156: 3145: 3080: 3007: 2879: 2826: 2680: 2332: 2264: 2148: 2016: 1984: 1943: 1906: 1872: 1825: 1734: 1717: 1709: 1545: 1531: 793: 626: 290: 277: 4686:

like Kryptonite), but forgot to revert the "Give a little bit" one. Thanks!

4440:

tag. Please do get approval before doing any more runs of this task. — Carl

2395: 4135: 4121: 4016:

As a note, Ikip got blocked, and also, I've decided to join the project. ++

3938: 3534: 2816: 2399: 1770: 714: 695: 4426:

from stubs on my watchlist, and will continue to do so when I edit them.

2607: 2603: 643:

in order to offer us your thoughts? It would be most appreciated. Thanks.

5060: 4913: 2845:

Battles_of_macrohistorical_importance_involving_invasions_of_Europe#Notes

2756: 2715: 2630: 2477: 2442: 2350: 2126: 718: 710: 616: 407: 387: 4753:? I have read all but the last novel and I don't see any connection to 4188: 4181: 2535: 765: 533:

I think and just redirects the ones where so further data can be found?

530: 136: 5015: 4993: 4968: 4958: 4897: 4865: 4777: 4732: 4687: 4642: 4551: 4460: 4356: 4281: 4206: 4154: 3989: 3954: 3904: 3875: 3843: 3795: 3781: 3771: 3633: 3601: 3568: 3447: 3355: 3312: 3294: 3258: 3071:

I just wanted to wish those Wikipedians who have been nice enough to

3045: 3017: 2771: 2731: 2644: 2611: 2462: 2414: 2080: 1997: 1966: 1924: 1887: 1842: 1678: 835: 723: 676: 576: 561: 447: 152: 4724:

and other things as the word "occupation" I think very important...

3325:

I am not talking about the flags, stay on the topic at hand dude..--

2394:

he still uses his nickname 'dAb' and/or 'D.A. Borgdorff' just as he

4881: 4848: 4598: 4527: 4443: 4159: 4116:

Hi. I was doing some research early this morning using the article

4080: 4049: 4017: 3857: 3125: 2676: 2144: 2012: 1980: 1939: 1902: 1868: 1821: 3539: 556: 552: 347: 257: 172: 110:

Thanks for your reaction. Based on your previous posts there and

4912:

Please be aware that your auto searching can be incorrect - see

4264:

why there will be no pictures representing famous Dutch people?

4989:, removing the items which we are all supposed to be voting on. 4824:

I had enough of likes like you. They are destroying Knowledge.

2940:

self made SVG format illustration that seeks to illustrate the

2259:(something about 'practice what you preach') and for the rest; 2135:

Sometimes, being turned back at the door isn't such a bad thing

467: 367: 327: 4985:

If you were really concerned about the integrity of the page,

2396:

did when he was still working anonymously from that IP address

5028:

So "piety reversions" would be reverts done in good faith ;)

5011: 586: 307: 4241:

The General Idea of the Revolution in the Nineteenth Century

4235:

The General Idea of the Revolution in the Nineteenth Century

1765:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1255:

St. Stanislaus Bishop & Martyr's Parish, South Deerfield

3353:

User_talk:Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise#Your_closing_of_the_ANI

2548:

Volkssozialistische Bewegung Deutschlands/Partei der Arbeit

2435:

Knowledge:Naming conventions (political parties)#Exceptions

4706:

Would it be possible you would have a glance at the page

3615: 2556:

Schleswig-Holsteinische Bauern- und Landarbeiterdemokratie

1560:

Is Fram a vandal? The question is asked. Please answer.

4499:

Really, I think you are chasing windmills by adding the

4191:. If you want to discuss this I'd be happy to. Regards, 4378:

does not apply to "articles about their books, albums,

3770:

I promise you that it will remain deleted. My mistake.

3646:

Hey Fram, no need for agitation. As it is suggested in

130:

Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion/Northern_Sámi_Wikipedia

860:

Polish-American Roman Catholic parishes in New England

5010:

careful then... As for my "piety reversion", thanks!

4987:

you would not have supported the technical disruption

3307:

And for the (earlier) flags you wanted to introduce,

1211:

St. Stanislaus Bishop & Martyr's Parish, Chicopee

4681:

You're right. I was tagging all songs listed in the

3937:

notable. Send to Afd if you disagree, or merge it.

1761:

Message added 02:28, 14 October 2009 (UTC). You can

1677:

No problem. It did get on my nerves a bit though...

587:

_Cantalupo_di_Bevagna-2009-09-09T15:29:00.000Z": -->

577:

_Cantalupo_di_Bevagna-2009-09-09T15:29:00.000Z": -->

5014:: "In spiritual terminology, piety is a virtue." 2312: 3949:A church with (max.) 50,000 adherents is not a 2841:Battle_of_Lepanto_(1571)#Religious_significance 2700:Just a heads up... but all but 2 of the image, 4239:FYI: I've reviewed the content of the article 2282:Why have you deleted the discussion page from 1700:Hello Fram, this is an automated message from 1639:be considered notable in and of themselves. -- 925:Our Lady of Perpetual Help Parish, Quaker Hill 915:Hello Fram, this is an automated message from 621:Hello! Just a quick note... in your top post 1704:to inform you the PROD template you added to 1464:Our Lady of Czestochowa Parish, Turners Falls 3195:I'm off. Nice to have seen you around. :) -- 3079:, etc., a Happy Thanksgiving! Sincerely, -- 2627:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Political parties 2439:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Political parties 991:St. Michael the Archangel Parish, Bridgeport 2797:; I was just about to do the same thing. -- 2441:or to a broader constituency of editors. -- 3486:Dear Fram, please note that I cite you at 2552:Reichspartei für Volksrecht und Aufwertung 1442:Our Lady of the Rosary Parish, Springfield 947:St. Mary of Czestochowa Parish, Middletown 3394:was updated with a fact from the article 3138:List of male performers in gay porn films 3120:List of male performers in gay porn films 2671:Got anything to add to this new article, 2331:, etc., a Happy Halloween! Sincerely, -- 2290:The article was there all along, but its 2206:was updated with a fact from the article 1431:Immaculate Conception Parish, Springfield 1277:Sacred Heart of Jesus Parish, Easthampton 1068:Immaculate Conception Parish, Southington 762:was updated with a fact from the article 595:Thanks for sorting out the move! Cheers, 151:article on the English Knowledge either. 4187:Hi Fram, I'm reverting your de-links to 3856:Considering the tone of the article and 3794:Really, sorry. I feel bad about that :( 3616:check this if you don't know what I mean 3293:, another editor supported the removal. 3062: 3032:Fram makes me believe in Knowledge again 1756:Talk:Currency in Dumas' Musketeer novels 1519:St. Stanislaus Kostka Parish, Woonsocket 1244:Our Lady of Czestochowa Parish, Coventry 1156:SS. Cyril and Methodius Parish, Hartford 669:Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion/Sula_Kim 508:What are your thoughts about this. Also 3515:template. But submitting AFDs that are 3172:This is an automatic notification by a 1754:Hello, Fram. You have new messages at 1453:SS. Peter and Paul Parish, Three Rivers 1134:St. Michael the Archangel Parish, Derby 1002:St. Stanislaus Kostka Parish, Waterbury 14: 4812:Dear Fram (or whatever your name is), 4332:Still waiting for your clarification. 2504:Partei National Orientierter Schweizer 1735:Learn how to opt out of these messages 1546:Learn how to opt out of these messages 1534:for community discussion. Thank you - 1233:Our Lady of Jasna Gora Parish, Clinton 1013:SS. Peter and Paul Parish, Wallingford 969:St. Anthony of Padua Parish, Fairfield 850:Creating pages on non notable parishes 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4033:Then please turn it into a real one. 2821:For what it is worth, good spot with 2413:Thanks, obvious case, indef blocked. 2159:Need your opinion on some photographs 2064:Knowledge:Editor review/Jack Merridew 1769:I nominated the article at the AfD. 1720:for community discussion. Thank you, 1200:St. Anthony of Padua Parish, Chicopee 980:Sacred Heart of Jesus Parish, Danbury 4406:Please look at the documentation of 2962: 2345:Excuse me Fram but you evaluated my 1708:has been removed. It was removed by 1376:St. John Cantius Parish, Northampton 25: 4243:which you reasonably deleted under 2163:Hi. Can you provide you opinion on 1706:Currency in Dumas' Musketeer novels 1695:Currency in Dumas' Musketeer novels 958:Holy Name of Jesus Parish, Stamford 228:I'd recommend something like this: 23: 3581:I am not doing any polling as per 3538: 3311:supported you, many opposed them. 3124: 1747: 1497:St. Stanislaus Parish, West Warren 560:it, but not immediately probably. 24: 5079: 4933:. So I tagged it as no sources... 3600:incorrectly added closure of it. 3073:give me a barnstar or smile at me 2859:Battle_of_the_Metaurus#References 2847:, but not in the individual ones: 2325:give me a barnstar or smile at me 3813:Hi there. I had come across the 3377: 2853:Battle_of_Thermopylae#References 2532:Bürgerrechtsbewegung Solidarität 2314: 2189: 2125: 1266:St. Andrew Bobola Parish, Dudley 1189:St. Joseph Parish, Central Falls 1101:Sacred Heart Parish, New Britain 1079:St. Stanislaus Parish, New Haven 745: 29: 4708:History of the Walloon Movement 4180:I'm reverting your de-links of 3819:the version I was familiar with 2476:parties with English titles. -- 2315:File:Halloween Hush Puppies.jpg 2285:83rd Wallajahbad Light Infantry 2278:83rd Wallajahbad Light Infantry 2119:WP:Requests for adminship/Kww 3 2117:Thank you for participating in 1409:St. Adalbert Parish, Providence 1299:Sacred Heart Parish, Greenfield 4302:Comparison of feed aggregators 3933:Bishops of major churches are 2942:series of alleged alien beings 1508:Holy Trinity Parish, Westfield 1420:St. Hedwig Parish, Southbridge 1387:Holy Family Parish, Pittsfield 1354:Christ the King Parish, Ludlow 1332:Mater Dolorosa Parish, Holyoke 1123:St. Stanislaus Parish, Bristol 1112:St. Stanislaus Parish, Meriden 1090:Holy Cross Parish, New Britain 893:Knowledge:Discrimination#Cases 844:20:48, 22 September 2009 (UTC) 829:20:33, 22 September 2009 (UTC) 805:22:08, 19 September 2009 (UTC) 732:07:17, 18 September 2009 (UTC) 704:07:09, 18 September 2009 (UTC) 685:00:44, 16 September 2009 (UTC) 653:06:55, 10 September 2009 (UTC) 13: 1: 5069:18:55, 26 February 2010 (UTC) 5033:20:21, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 5024:13:38, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 4997:13:31, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 4977:13:26, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 4962:13:24, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 4926:17:45, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 4906:07:29, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 4891:17:13, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 4874:09:32, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 4858:02:23, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 4836:08:54, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 4800:20:22, 16 February 2010 (UTC) 4786:12:07, 16 February 2010 (UTC) 4767:11:07, 16 February 2010 (UTC) 4738:16:50, 15 February 2010 (UTC) 4720:20:45, 13 February 2010 (UTC) 4696:15:20, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 4676:15:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 4651:07:51, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 4392:04:21, 11 February 2010 (UTC) 4365:07:53, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 4342:03:33, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 3530:13:51, 29 December 2009 (UTC) 3495:17:45, 24 December 2009 (UTC) 3477:13:40, 25 December 2009 (UTC) 3462:MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist 3456:05:08, 24 December 2009 (UTC) 3437:11:42, 19 December 2009 (UTC) 3205:16:57, 29 November 2009 (UTC) 3186:01:42, 28 November 2009 (UTC) 3110:21:44, 27 November 2009 (UTC) 3084:07:01, 27 November 2009 (UTC) 3054:15:53, 25 November 2009 (UTC) 3026:12:15, 25 November 2009 (UTC) 3011:12:10, 25 November 2009 (UTC) 2995:18:51, 25 November 2009 (UTC) 2954:04:38, 25 November 2009 (UTC) 2925:12:20, 22 November 2009 (UTC) 2883:16:13, 19 November 2009 (UTC) 2830:15:47, 19 November 2009 (UTC) 2812:05:05, 13 November 2009 (UTC) 2780:07:54, 10 November 2009 (UTC) 2653:07:53, 12 November 2009 (UTC) 2639:21:46, 11 November 2009 (UTC) 2620:20:28, 10 November 2009 (UTC) 2486:18:23, 10 November 2009 (UTC) 2247:19:07, 24 October 2009 (UTC) 1739:20:50, 13 October 2009 (UTC) 1365:St. Stanislaus Parish, Nashua 1343:All Saints Parish, Housatonic 1321:Holy Trinity Parish, Hatfield 1035:St. Casimir Parish,Terryville 1024:St. Hedwig Parish, Union City 630:20:11, 9 September 2009 (UTC) 606:15:29, 9 September 2009 (UTC) 570:12:19, 9 September 2009 (UTC) 546:12:12, 9 September 2009 (UTC) 525:11:58, 9 September 2009 (UTC) 230: 224:11:41, 9 September 2009 (UTC) 206:11:33, 9 September 2009 (UTC) 188:11:21, 9 September 2009 (UTC) 161:06:40, 3 September 2009 (UTC) 145:22:34, 2 September 2009 (UTC) 124:19:47, 1 September 2009 (UTC) 4755:Knowledge:WikiProject Comics 4751:Knowledge:WikiProject Comics 4636:23:26, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 4608:14:44, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 4560:14:32, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 4537:14:15, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 4469:13:59, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 4453:13:47, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 4325:15:55, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 4290:21:03, 3 February 2010 (UTC) 4274:16:31, 3 February 2010 (UTC) 4255:23:12, 1 February 2010 (UTC) 4227:15:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC) 4215:15:25, 1 February 2010 (UTC) 4199:15:08, 1 February 2010 (UTC) 4171:11:29, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 4144:09:33, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 4130:09:30, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 4092:12:54, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 4075:12:19, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 4061:12:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 4043:12:06, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 4029:12:05, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 4012:08:59, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 3998:08:45, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 3983:08:44, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 3963:13:17, 25 January 2010 (UTC) 3913:14:02, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3899:13:41, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3884:13:30, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3870:13:27, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3852:13:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3832:13:12, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3799:08:53, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3790:08:46, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3775:08:45, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3760:10:22, 25 January 2010 (UTC) 3745:07:05, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3725:16:15, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 3696:12:01, 14 January 2010 (UTC) 3364:18:43, 5 December 2009 (UTC) 3335:08:45, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 3321:07:28, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 3303:07:27, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 3285:01:42, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 3267:08:17, 3 December 2009 (UTC) 3251:08:12, 3 December 2009 (UTC) 3089:One opinion instead of five? 2983:List of alleged alien beings 2765:22:15, 9 November 2009 (UTC) 2740:08:27, 9 November 2009 (UTC) 2724:15:33, 8 November 2009 (UTC) 2685:19:03, 7 November 2009 (UTC) 2471:08:04, 9 November 2009 (UTC) 2456:That naming convention says 2451:23:08, 6 November 2009 (UTC) 2423:20:29, 5 November 2009 (UTC) 2408:13:05, 5 November 2009 (UTC) 2359:03:33, 4 November 2009 (UTC) 2336:23:54, 30 October 2009 (UTC) 2304:20:19, 30 October 2009 (UTC) 2273:14:44, 26 October 2009 (UTC) 2245:17:54, 24 October 2009 (UTC) 2177:01:54, 21 October 2009 (UTC) 2153:18:35, 20 October 2009 (UTC) 2133: 2105:14:19, 15 October 2009 (UTC) 2089:14:04, 15 October 2009 (UTC) 2073:13:54, 15 October 2009 (UTC) 2024:14:32, 15 October 2009 (UTC) 2006:13:38, 15 October 2009 (UTC) 1992:13:37, 15 October 2009 (UTC) 1975:13:29, 15 October 2009 (UTC) 1951:13:18, 15 October 2009 (UTC) 1933:12:53, 15 October 2009 (UTC) 1914:12:35, 15 October 2009 (UTC) 1896:12:11, 15 October 2009 (UTC) 1880:11:27, 15 October 2009 (UTC) 1860:11:17, 15 October 2009 (UTC) 1851:11:07, 15 October 2009 (UTC) 1833:10:27, 15 October 2009 (UTC) 1806:11:33, 14 October 2009 (UTC) 1779:02:28, 14 October 2009 (UTC) 1730:20:50, 13 October 2009 (UTC) 1687:12:15, 13 October 2009 (UTC) 1672:12:11, 13 October 2009 (UTC) 1222:St. Joseph Parish, Claremont 1167:St. Stanislaus Parish, Adams 1145:St. Adalbert Parish, Enfield 936:St. Joseph Parish, Rockville 175:if you don't believe me.... 7: 4744:Incarnations of Immortality 3660:17:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 3642:17:05, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 3628:17:03, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 3610:16:55, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 3595:16:52, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 3577:16:47, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 3557:16:37, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 3136:. The nominated article is 2500:Mouvement citoyens genevois 2257:Knowledge:Assume good faith 1653:13:26, 6 October 2009 (UTC) 1630:13:21, 6 October 2009 (UTC) 1612:13:08, 6 October 2009 (UTC) 1593:12:51, 6 October 2009 (UTC) 1576:12:05, 6 October 2009 (UTC) 1551:20:37, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 1057:St. Joseph Parish, Suffield 1046:St. Mary Parish, Torrington 905:14:38, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 886:14:10, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 872:13:38, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 612:_Cantalupo_di_Bevagna": --> 609:_Cantalupo_di_Bevagna": --> 605:_Cantalupo_di_Bevagna": --> 593:_Cantalupo_di_Bevagna": --> 10: 5084: 3680:Knowledge:Appeals to Jimbo 3370:DYK for Robert Hood Bowers 2385:. As can be seen from his 1486:St. Casimir Parish, Warren 1398:St. Louis Parish, Portland 1310:Holy Rosary Parish, Hadley 1288:St. Joseph Parish, Gardner 1178:St. Joseph Parish, Ansonia 854:Your action is the act of 4134:Much appreciated. Thanks 3159:with four tildes (~~~~). 2790:Reversion on my user page 2706:The Prince and The Pauper 2572:Union populaire française 2429:Belgian political parties 2116: 675:has been indef blocked. 251: 248: 242: 239: 236: 233: 5057:WP:DEL#Proposed deletion 4790:Makes sense. Thanks -- 2871:Battle of Toulouse (721) 2795:Thanks for catching this 1714:discussing your concerns 810:Sandstein's admin review 635:Request for your opinion 245: 4683:category:Superman music 4296:Feed Notifier deletion. 3928:Thomas Abraham (bishop) 3701:User talk:194.171.76.11 3678:I just wrote the essay 3420:Did you know? talk page 3075:, supportive enough to 2897:Can you watch the page 2865:Battle_of_Chalons#Notes 2696:About Classic Comics... 2520:Hin Stuttligi Flokkurin 2516:Volkspartei der Schweiz 2492:Eidgenössische Sammlung 2327:, supportive enough to 2228:Did you know? talk page 784:Did you know? talk page 722:person, a village, ... 3543: 3129: 3068: 2807:egg-throwing coleslaw? 2580:ADFE-Français du Monde 2564:Combats Souverainistes 2508:Parti Libéral Genevois 2496:À gauche toute! Genève 2320: 2182:DYK for Cromwell Dixon 1752: 1642:Ser Amantio di Nicolao 5053:requested restoration 4118:Eternity of the world 4111:Eternity of the world 3542: 3164:articles for deletion 3146:What Knowledge is not 3128: 3066: 2730:their comics expire. 2544:Deutsche Reichspartei 2318: 1751: 1693:Removal of PROD from 1475:St. Mary Parish, Ware 911:dePRODing of articles 42:of past discussions. 3969:Ikip's 'Wikiproject' 3858:her official website 3155:. Please be sure to 3142:Knowledge:Notability 2592:Herritarren Zerrenda 2584:Abertzaleen Batasuna 2540:Völkisch-Social Bloc 2392:recent contributions 2341:Motley's Crew update 2251:On my 'minor edits'. 2066:is probably needed. 584:Cantalupo di Bevagna 580:Cantalupo di Bevagno 249:Nearest settlements 3891:Steamroller Assault 3862:Steamroller Assault 3824:Steamroller Assault 3684:argumentum ad Jimbo 3674:Argumentum ad Jimbo 3228:read my response to 3067:Happy Thanksgiving! 3059:Happy Thanksgiving! 2629:. See you there. -- 2383:User:D.A._Borgdorff 2294:page is now lost.-- 1923:timing is telling. 690:Lord John Grey page 4841:College Presidents 4702:Unofficial referee 3682:, and I read your 3544: 3398:Robert Hood Bowers 3157:sign your comments 3130: 3069: 2959:The article reads: 2935:Energy being image 2702:Tale of Two Cities 2528:Bund der Deutschen 2321: 1763:remove this notice 1753: 1648:Lo dicono a Signa. 1598:Is Fram a vandal? 1517:PROD removed from 1506:PROD removed from 1495:PROD removed from 1484:PROD removed from 1473:PROD removed from 1462:PROD removed from 1451:PROD removed from 1440:PROD removed from 1429:PROD removed from 1418:PROD removed from 1407:PROD removed from 1396:PROD removed from 1385:PROD removed from 1374:PROD removed from 1363:PROD removed from 1352:PROD removed from 1341:PROD removed from 1330:PROD removed from 1319:PROD removed from 1308:PROD removed from 1297:PROD removed from 1286:PROD removed from 1275:PROD removed from 1264:PROD removed from 1253:PROD removed from 1242:PROD removed from 1231:PROD removed from 1220:PROD removed from 1209:PROD removed from 1198:PROD removed from 1187:PROD removed from 1176:PROD removed from 1165:PROD removed from 1154:PROD removed from 1143:PROD removed from 1132:PROD removed from 1121:PROD removed from 1110:PROD removed from 1099:PROD removed from 1088:PROD removed from 1077:PROD removed from 1066:PROD removed from 1055:PROD removed from 1044:PROD removed from 1033:PROD removed from 1022:PROD removed from 1011:PROD removed from 1000:PROD removed from 989:PROD removed from 978:PROD removed from 967:PROD removed from 956:PROD removed from 945:PROD removed from 934:PROD removed from 923:PROD removed from 754:September 19, 2009 738:DYK for Jan De Nul 4828:Damir Ibrisimovic 4736: 4661:Give a Little Bit 4634: 4606: 4535: 4451: 4328: 4311:comment added by 4175: 3953:church at all... 3815:Glamorous Monique 3808:Glamorous Monique 3780:Alright, thanks. 3528: 3429:Materialscientist 3426: 3425: 3413: 3386:December 19, 2009 2977: 2976: 2928: 2911:comment added by 2810: 2234: 2233: 2140: 2139: 1789:thank you again! 1738: 1566:comment added by 1549: 827: 790: 789: 667:Could you close: 639:Hi. Can you join 506: 505: 291:36.983°N 72.700°E 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5075: 4735: 4633: 4631: 4596: 4525: 4508: 4502: 4441: 4439: 4433: 4425: 4419: 4415: 4409: 4384:Michael.fogleman 4334:Michael.fogleman 4327: 4313:Michael.fogleman 4305: 4260:Infobox pictures 4173: 3524: 3514: 3508: 3490:. Sincerely, -- 3474: 3473: 3403: 3381: 3374: 3373: 3102: 3001:Wikiquette alert 2963: 2927: 2905: 2801: 2568:Parti de l'Ordre 2560:Bloc des gauches 2316: 2309:Happy Halloween! 2261:ga boeven vangen 2198:October 24, 2009 2193: 2186: 2185: 2129: 2114: 2113: 2071: 1802: 1796: 1766: 1732: 1643: 1578: 1543: 823: 820: 749: 742: 741: 673:User:Pastor Theo 613: 610: 594: 588: 578: 543: 542: 522: 521: 302: 301: 299: 298: 297: 292: 288: 285: 284: 283: 280: 252:Map/coordinates 231: 221: 220: 203: 202: 185: 184: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5083: 5082: 5078: 5077: 5076: 5074: 5073: 5072: 5049: 4950: 4843: 4810: 4747: 4730: 4704: 4664: 4629: 4624: 4621:Illuminationism 4506: 4500: 4437: 4431: 4423: 4417: 4413: 4407: 4404: 4402:Unsourced stubs 4306: 4298: 4262: 4237: 4185: 4114: 3971: 3931: 3811: 3768: 3732: 3703: 3692:Ta bu shi da yu 3676: 3537: 3512: 3506: 3502: 3484: 3467: 3466: 3444: 3442:fallingrain.com 3372: 3349: 3212: 3193: 3123: 3100: 3091: 3061: 3034: 3003: 2937: 2906: 2892: 2819: 2792: 2698: 2669: 2588:Corsica Nazione 2576:Europe Écologie 2431: 2366: 2343: 2311: 2280: 2253: 2221: 2184: 2161: 2112: 2069:John Vandenberg 2067: 1813: 1800: 1794: 1786: 1767: 1760: 1745: 1698: 1660: 1651: 1641: 1568:195.177.247.202 1561: 1558: 913: 852: 818: 812: 777: 740: 692: 660: 641:this discussion 637: 619: 590: 536: 535: 515: 514: 510:World Gazetteer 295: 293: 289: 286: 281: 278: 276: 274: 273: 214: 213: 196: 195: 178: 177: 169: 133: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5081: 5048: 5043: 5042: 5041: 5040: 5039: 5038: 5037: 5036: 5035: 5002: 5001: 5000: 4999: 4990: 4983: 4949: 4946: 4945: 4944: 4943: 4942: 4941: 4940: 4939: 4938: 4937: 4936: 4935: 4934: 4842: 4839: 4809: 4806: 4805: 4804: 4803: 4802: 4792:Captain-tucker 4759:Captain-tucker 4746: 4741: 4729: 4726: 4703: 4700: 4699: 4698: 4663: 4658: 4656: 4654: 4653: 4623: 4618: 4617: 4616: 4615: 4614: 4613: 4612: 4611: 4610: 4585: 4584: 4583: 4582: 4581: 4580: 4579: 4578: 4567: 4566: 4565: 4564: 4563: 4562: 4542: 4541: 4540: 4539: 4518: 4517: 4516: 4515: 4494: 4493: 4492: 4491: 4481: 4480: 4479: 4478: 4472: 4471: 4403: 4400: 4399: 4398: 4397: 4396: 4395: 4394: 4370: 4369: 4368: 4367: 4345: 4344: 4297: 4294: 4293: 4292: 4266:196.217.18.251 4261: 4258: 4236: 4233: 4232: 4231: 4230: 4229: 4184: 4178: 4177: 4176: 4113: 4108: 4107: 4106: 4105: 4104: 4103: 4102: 4101: 4100: 4099: 4098: 4097: 4096: 4095: 4094: 3970: 3967: 3966: 3965: 3930: 3925: 3924: 3923: 3922: 3921: 3920: 3919: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3915: 3810: 3805: 3804: 3803: 3802: 3801: 3767: 3764: 3763: 3762: 3731: 3728: 3702: 3699: 3675: 3672: 3671: 3670: 3669: 3668: 3667: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3663: 3662: 3652:Camilo Sanchez 3644: 3620:Camilo Sanchez 3587:Camilo Sanchez 3549:Camilo Sanchez 3536: 3533: 3501: 3498: 3483: 3480: 3443: 3440: 3424: 3423: 3414:and add it to 3382: 3371: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3348: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3337: 3327:Camilo Sanchez 3305: 3277:Camilo Sanchez 3270: 3269: 3243:Camilo Sanchez 3211: 3208: 3192: 3189: 3122: 3118:nomination of 3113: 3090: 3087: 3060: 3057: 3043: 3042: 3033: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3002: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2987:Camilo Sanchez 2975: 2974: 2971: 2967: 2961: 2960: 2946:Camilo Sanchez 2936: 2933: 2931: 2899:Anthony Bochon 2891: 2889:Anthony Bochon 2886: 2876: 2875: 2868: 2862: 2856: 2849: 2848: 2818: 2815: 2791: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2782: 2753: 2750: 2743: 2742: 2697: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2673:Josette Baujot 2668: 2667:Josette Baujot 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2524:Vinnuflokkurin 2430: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2365: 2364:Avoiding block 2362: 2342: 2339: 2310: 2307: 2289: 2279: 2276: 2252: 2249: 2232: 2231: 2222:and add it to 2215: 2210:Cromwell Dixon 2194: 2183: 2180: 2160: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2138: 2137: 2131: 2130: 2122: 2121: 2111: 2108: 2092: 2091: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1812: 1809: 1785: 1782: 1759: 1746: 1744: 1741: 1697: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1659: 1656: 1645: 1633: 1632: 1596: 1595: 1557: 1554: 1527: 1526: 1515: 1504: 1493: 1482: 1471: 1460: 1449: 1438: 1427: 1416: 1405: 1394: 1383: 1372: 1361: 1350: 1339: 1328: 1317: 1306: 1295: 1284: 1273: 1262: 1251: 1240: 1229: 1218: 1207: 1196: 1185: 1174: 1163: 1152: 1141: 1130: 1119: 1108: 1097: 1086: 1075: 1064: 1053: 1042: 1031: 1020: 1009: 998: 987: 976: 965: 954: 943: 932: 912: 909: 908: 907: 851: 848: 847: 846: 811: 808: 788: 787: 778:and add it to 771: 750: 739: 736: 735: 734: 691: 688: 659: 656: 636: 633: 618: 615: 589: 574: 573: 572: 504: 503: 501: 499: 497: 495: 493: 490: 484: 483: 481: 479: 477: 475: 473: 470: 464: 463: 461: 459: 457: 455: 453: 450: 444: 443: 441: 439: 437: 435: 433: 430: 424: 423: 421: 419: 417: 415: 413: 410: 404: 403: 401: 399: 397: 395: 393: 390: 384: 383: 381: 379: 377: 375: 373: 370: 364: 363: 361: 359: 357: 355: 353: 350: 344: 343: 341: 339: 337: 335: 333: 330: 324: 323: 321: 319: 317: 315: 313: 310: 304: 303: 296:36.983; 72.700 271: 269: 267: 265: 263: 260: 254: 253: 250: 247: 244: 241: 238: 237:Official name 235: 168: 165: 164: 163: 132: 127: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 18:User talk:Fram 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5080: 5071: 5070: 5066: 5062: 5058: 5054: 5047: 5046:Laura Carlsen 5034: 5031: 5030:Jack Merridew 5027: 5026: 5025: 5021: 5017: 5013: 5008: 5007: 5006: 5005: 5004: 5003: 4998: 4995: 4991: 4988: 4984: 4980: 4979: 4978: 4974: 4970: 4966: 4965: 4964: 4963: 4960: 4956: 4954: 4932: 4929: 4928: 4927: 4923: 4919: 4915: 4911: 4910: 4909: 4908: 4907: 4903: 4899: 4894: 4893: 4892: 4888: 4884: 4883: 4877: 4876: 4875: 4871: 4867: 4862: 4861: 4860: 4859: 4855: 4851: 4850: 4838: 4837: 4833: 4829: 4825: 4822: 4819: 4816: 4813: 4801: 4797: 4793: 4789: 4788: 4787: 4783: 4779: 4775: 4771: 4770: 4769: 4768: 4764: 4760: 4757:, thanks. -- 4756: 4752: 4745: 4740: 4739: 4734: 4725: 4723: 4721: 4717: 4713: 4712:José Fontaine 4709: 4697: 4693: 4689: 4684: 4680: 4679: 4678: 4677: 4673: 4669: 4662: 4657: 4652: 4648: 4644: 4640: 4639: 4638: 4637: 4632: 4622: 4609: 4604: 4600: 4593: 4592: 4591: 4590: 4589: 4588: 4587: 4586: 4575: 4574: 4573: 4572: 4571: 4570: 4569: 4568: 4561: 4557: 4553: 4548: 4547: 4546: 4545: 4544: 4543: 4538: 4533: 4529: 4522: 4521: 4520: 4519: 4513: 4505: 4498: 4497: 4496: 4495: 4489: 4485: 4484: 4483: 4482: 4476: 4475: 4474: 4473: 4470: 4466: 4462: 4457: 4456: 4455: 4454: 4449: 4445: 4436: 4427: 4422: 4412: 4393: 4389: 4385: 4381: 4376: 4375: 4374: 4373: 4372: 4371: 4366: 4362: 4358: 4354: 4349: 4348: 4347: 4346: 4343: 4339: 4335: 4331: 4330: 4329: 4326: 4322: 4318: 4314: 4310: 4303: 4291: 4287: 4283: 4278: 4277: 4276: 4275: 4271: 4267: 4257: 4256: 4253: 4250: 4246: 4242: 4228: 4225: 4222: 4218: 4217: 4216: 4212: 4208: 4203: 4202: 4201: 4200: 4197: 4194: 4190: 4183: 4172: 4169: 4165: 4161: 4156: 4152: 4148: 4147: 4146: 4145: 4141: 4137: 4132: 4131: 4127: 4123: 4119: 4112: 4093: 4090: 4086: 4082: 4078: 4077: 4076: 4072: 4068: 4064: 4063: 4062: 4059: 4055: 4051: 4046: 4045: 4044: 4040: 4036: 4032: 4031: 4030: 4027: 4023: 4019: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4009: 4005: 4001: 4000: 3999: 3995: 3991: 3987: 3986: 3985: 3984: 3980: 3976: 3964: 3960: 3956: 3952: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3944: 3940: 3936: 3929: 3914: 3910: 3906: 3902: 3901: 3900: 3896: 3892: 3887: 3886: 3885: 3881: 3877: 3873: 3872: 3871: 3867: 3863: 3859: 3855: 3854: 3853: 3849: 3845: 3841: 3836: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3829: 3825: 3820: 3816: 3809: 3800: 3797: 3793: 3792: 3791: 3787: 3783: 3779: 3778: 3777: 3776: 3773: 3761: 3757: 3753: 3749: 3748: 3747: 3746: 3742: 3738: 3727: 3726: 3722: 3718: 3712: 3709: 3698: 3697: 3693: 3689: 3685: 3681: 3661: 3657: 3653: 3649: 3645: 3643: 3639: 3635: 3631: 3630: 3629: 3625: 3621: 3617: 3613: 3612: 3611: 3607: 3603: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3592: 3588: 3584: 3580: 3579: 3578: 3574: 3570: 3566: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3558: 3554: 3550: 3541: 3532: 3531: 3527: 3523: 3518: 3511: 3497: 3496: 3493: 3489: 3479: 3478: 3475: 3472: 3471: 3463: 3458: 3457: 3453: 3449: 3439: 3438: 3434: 3430: 3421: 3417: 3411: 3407: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3393: 3392: 3391:Did you know? 3387: 3383: 3380: 3376: 3375: 3365: 3361: 3357: 3354: 3351: 3350: 3336: 3332: 3328: 3324: 3323: 3322: 3318: 3314: 3310: 3306: 3304: 3300: 3296: 3292: 3291:energy beings 3288: 3287: 3286: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3273: 3272: 3271: 3268: 3264: 3260: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3248: 3244: 3239: 3237: 3233: 3229: 3225: 3220: 3216: 3207: 3206: 3202: 3198: 3197:Paularblaster 3188: 3187: 3183: 3179: 3175: 3171: 3167: 3165: 3160: 3158: 3154: 3149: 3147: 3143: 3139: 3135: 3127: 3121: 3117: 3112: 3111: 3108: 3107: 3104: 3103: 3096: 3086: 3085: 3082: 3078: 3077:agree with me 3074: 3065: 3056: 3055: 3051: 3047: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3027: 3023: 3019: 3015: 3014: 3013: 3012: 3009: 2996: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2979: 2978: 2972: 2968: 2965: 2964: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2943: 2932: 2929: 2926: 2922: 2918: 2914: 2910: 2902: 2900: 2895: 2890: 2885: 2884: 2881: 2878:Sincerely, -- 2872: 2869: 2866: 2863: 2860: 2857: 2854: 2851: 2850: 2846: 2842: 2838: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2828: 2824: 2814: 2813: 2808: 2805: 2800: 2796: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2762: 2758: 2754: 2751: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2721: 2717: 2712: 2709: 2707: 2703: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2654: 2650: 2646: 2643:Fair enough! 2642: 2641: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2628: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2541: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2490:Switzerland: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2483: 2479: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2459: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2436: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2388: 2387:contributions 2384: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2370:this blocklog 2361: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2347:Motley's Crew 2338: 2337: 2334: 2330: 2329:agree with me 2326: 2317: 2306: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2287: 2286: 2275: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2248: 2246: 2242: 2238: 2229: 2225: 2219: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2205: 2204: 2203:Did you know? 2199: 2195: 2192: 2188: 2187: 2179: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2166: 2154: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2141: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2123: 2120: 2115: 2107: 2106: 2103: 2102:Jack Merridew 2098: 2095: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2070: 2065: 2060: 2058: 2052: 2050: 2046: 2025: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1959: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1861: 1858: 1857:Jack Merridew 1854: 1853: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1808: 1807: 1804: 1803: 1797: 1781: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1764: 1757: 1750: 1740: 1736: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1696: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1655: 1654: 1650: 1649: 1644: 1638: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1604:Cameron Scott 1601: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1585:Paularblaster 1581: 1580: 1579: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1553: 1552: 1547: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1007: 1003: 999: 996: 992: 988: 985: 981: 977: 974: 970: 966: 963: 959: 955: 952: 948: 944: 941: 937: 933: 930: 926: 922: 921: 920: 918: 906: 902: 898: 894: 890: 889: 888: 887: 883: 879: 874: 873: 869: 865: 861: 857: 845: 841: 837: 833: 832: 831: 830: 826: 822: 821: 807: 806: 803: 800: 798: 796: 785: 781: 775: 769: 768: 767: 761: 760: 759:Did you know? 755: 751: 748: 744: 743: 733: 729: 725: 720: 716: 712: 708: 707: 706: 705: 701: 697: 687: 686: 682: 678: 674: 670: 665: 664: 655: 654: 650: 646: 642: 632: 631: 628: 624: 614: 607: 602: 598: 585: 581: 571: 567: 563: 558: 554: 550: 549: 548: 547: 544: 541: 540: 532: 527: 526: 523: 520: 519: 511: 502: 500: 498: 496: 494: 491: 489: 486: 485: 482: 480: 478: 476: 474: 471: 469: 466: 465: 462: 460: 458: 456: 454: 451: 449: 446: 445: 442: 440: 438: 436: 434: 431: 429: 426: 425: 422: 420: 418: 416: 414: 411: 409: 406: 405: 402: 400: 398: 396: 394: 391: 389: 386: 385: 382: 380: 378: 376: 374: 371: 369: 366: 365: 362: 360: 358: 356: 354: 351: 349: 346: 345: 342: 340: 338: 336: 334: 331: 329: 326: 325: 322: 320: 318: 316: 314: 311: 309: 306: 305: 300: 272: 270: 268: 266: 264: 261: 259: 256: 255: 232: 229: 226: 225: 222: 219: 218: 208: 207: 204: 201: 200: 190: 189: 186: 183: 182: 174: 162: 158: 154: 149: 148: 147: 146: 142: 138: 131: 126: 125: 121: 117: 113: 106:Living people 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5050: 4951: 4880: 4847: 4844: 4826: 4823: 4820: 4817: 4814: 4811: 4748: 4731: 4705: 4665: 4655: 4625: 4511: 4504:unreferenced 4435:unreferenced 4428: 4421:unreferenced 4411:unreferenced 4405: 4379: 4299: 4263: 4238: 4186: 4133: 4115: 3972: 3950: 3934: 3932: 3812: 3769: 3733: 3713: 3704: 3683: 3677: 3648:wp:stay cool 3545: 3503: 3485: 3469: 3468: 3459: 3445: 3427: 3410:quick check 3396: 3395: 3389: 3308: 3240: 3221: 3217: 3213: 3194: 3191:All the best 3170:Please note: 3169: 3168: 3161: 3150: 3131: 3105: 3098: 3092: 3070: 3044: 3035: 3004: 2938: 2930: 2903: 2896: 2893: 2877: 2820: 2793: 2713: 2710: 2705: 2701: 2699: 2670: 2457: 2432: 2367: 2344: 2322: 2291: 2283: 2281: 2260: 2255:Please read 2254: 2235: 2208: 2207: 2201: 2162: 2134: 2099: 2096: 2093: 2061: 2056: 2053: 2045:this comment 2042: 1962: 1957: 1920: 1866: 1817: 1814: 1811:Your threats 1798: 1792: 1787: 1768: 1699: 1661: 1647: 1636: 1634: 1617: 1599: 1597: 1559: 1528: 914: 875: 855: 853: 816: 813: 794: 791: 764: 763: 757: 693: 666: 661: 638: 620: 597:Ian Spackman 591: 538: 537: 528: 517: 516: 507: 243:Description 227: 216: 215: 209: 198: 197: 191: 180: 179: 170: 134: 109: 78: 43: 37: 4948:Stop please 4914:Ian Brooker 4307:—Preceding 4249:Paul August 4221:Paul August 4193:Paul August 3730:Nataly Dawn 3717:Kermanshahi 3688:Tbsdy lives 3650:. Thanks.-- 3470:Dr. Blofeld 3210:Dear editor 2913:Cheb Youyou 2907:—Preceding 2600:Fianna Fáil 2594:. Ireland: 2526:. Germany: 2512:solidaritéS 2296:FwdObserver 2169:Nightscream 2165:this matter 2100:Sincerely, 1722:SDPatrolBot 1702:SDPatrolBot 1562:—Preceding 1536:SDPatrolBot 1523:User:WlaKom 1512:User:WlaKom 1501:User:WlaKom 1490:User:WlaKom 1479:User:WlaKom 1468:User:WlaKom 1457:User:WlaKom 1446:User:WlaKom 1435:User:WlaKom 1424:User:WlaKom 1413:User:WlaKom 1402:User:WlaKom 1391:User:WlaKom 1380:User:WlaKom 1369:User:WlaKom 1358:User:WlaKom 1347:User:WlaKom 1336:User:WlaKom 1325:User:WlaKom 1314:User:WlaKom 1303:User:WlaKom 1292:User:WlaKom 1281:User:WlaKom 1270:User:WlaKom 1259:User:WlaKom 1248:User:WlaKom 1237:User:WlaKom 1226:User:WlaKom 1215:User:WlaKom 1204:User:WlaKom 1193:User:WlaKom 1182:User:WlaKom 1171:User:WlaKom 1160:User:WlaKom 1149:User:WlaKom 1138:User:WlaKom 1127:User:WlaKom 1116:User:WlaKom 1105:User:WlaKom 1094:User:WlaKom 1083:User:WlaKom 1072:User:WlaKom 1061:User:WlaKom 1050:User:WlaKom 1039:User:WlaKom 1028:User:WlaKom 1017:User:WlaKom 1006:User:WlaKom 995:User:WlaKom 984:User:WlaKom 973:User:WlaKom 962:User:WlaKom 951:User:WlaKom 940:User:WlaKom 929:User:WlaKom 917:SDPatrolBot 696:little Alex 658:Another one 645:Nightscream 412:Ārtīn Jelow 408:Artin Jelow 392:Arghandakān 388:Arghandakan 234:Place name 36:This is an 4808:Disrespect 4668:MartinezMD 4630:SlimVirgin 4189:Latin West 4182:Latin West 4067:Dougweller 4035:Dougweller 4004:Dougweller 3975:Dougweller 3766:Sorry Fram 3690:(formerly 3406:here's how 3232:good faith 3178:Erwin85Bot 3095:at the DRV 2799:Slgrandson 2558:. France: 2536:Die PARTEI 2518:. Faroër: 2218:here's how 2167:? Thanks. 1784:Thank you! 819:Horologium 774:here's how 766:Jan De Nul 531:Al-Ghurfah 98:Archive 25 90:Archive 21 85:Archive 20 79:Archive 19 73:Archive 18 68:Archive 17 60:Archive 15 5055:, so per 4245:WP:CSD#G5 4155:User:Fram 4151:WP:CSD#G5 3708:Chirslk02 3517:WP:SNOWed 3500:Your AFDs 3224:user page 3097:. Best, 2608:Sinn Féin 2604:Saor Éire 2378:talk page 2237:Gatoclass 1658:Red links 856:VANDALISM 539:Himalayan 518:Himalayan 452:Ashkāsham 448:Ashkasham 246:Altitude 240:District 217:Himalayan 199:Himalayan 181:Himalayan 116:Debresser 112:this edit 4918:The-Pope 4774:this one 4512:en masse 4380:software 4321:contribs 4309:unsigned 3752:Mr. C.C. 3737:Mr. C.C. 3618:thanks-- 3492:A Nobody 3416:DYKSTATS 3241:Thanks-- 3134:deletion 3101:Schmidt, 3081:A Nobody 3008:Spitfire 2921:contribs 2909:unsigned 2904:Thanks 2880:A Nobody 2827:A Nobody 2804:How's my 2691:opinion. 2333:A Nobody 2265:HP1740-B 2224:DYKSTATS 2110:RFA spam 1965:by now? 1818:yourself 1743:Talkback 1710:Solicitr 1564:unsigned 780:DYKSTATS 627:A Nobody 167:Articles 4136:Poltair 4122:Poltair 3939:Bearian 3583:wp:poll 3547:year.-- 2894:Hello, 2749:Commons 2458:nothing 2400:Robotje 1958:because 1921:unlucky 1771:Tim1357 553:Ghadran 492:Bahārak 488:Baharak 352:Anjoman 348:Anjoman 282:72°42′E 279:36°59′N 262:Āb Gach 258:Ab Gach 173:Ma-ubin 39:archive 5061:JohnCD 4728:thanks 4488:WP:BOT 4353:WP:COI 4002:Sure. 3935:per se 3840:WP:BLP 3565:WP:BRD 3482:Notice 3309:no one 2757:J Greb 2716:J Greb 2631:Checco 2596:éirígí 2478:Checco 2443:Checco 2351:GVnayR 1963:issues 1664:Pepso2 1622:WlaKom 1556:Vandal 1532:WP:AfD 897:WlaKom 878:WlaKom 864:WlaKom 825:(talk) 582:-: --> 557:Yashi` 472:Āshnām 468:Ashnam 372:Arakht 368:Arakht 332:Andowj 328:Andowj 5012:Piety 4994:Okip 4959:Okip 4887:talk 4854:talk 4733:Okip 3951:major 3510:merge 3236:WP:OR 3144:and " 2675:? :) 2586:(!), 2049:these 1637:might 1521:, by 1510:, by 1499:, by 1488:, by 1477:, by 1466:, by 1455:, by 1444:, by 1433:, by 1422:, by 1411:, by 1400:, by 1389:, by 1378:, by 1367:, by 1356:, by 1345:, by 1334:, by 1323:, by 1312:, by 1301:, by 1290:, by 1279:, by 1268:, by 1257:, by 1246:, by 1235:, by 1224:, by 1213:, by 1202:, by 1191:, by 1180:, by 1169:, by 1158:, by 1147:, by 1136:, by 1125:, by 1114:, by 1103:, by 1092:, by 1081:, by 1070:, by 1059:, by 1048:, by 1037:, by 1026:, by 1015:, by 1004:, by 993:, by 982:, by 971:, by 960:, by 949:, by 938:, by 927:, by 797:hamal 715:WP:RS 662:Per: 312:Āmūrn 308:Amurn 137:Yupik 16:< 5065:talk 5020:talk 5016:Fram 4973:talk 4969:Fram 4952:RE: 4922:talk 4902:talk 4898:Fram 4870:talk 4866:Fram 4832:talk 4796:talk 4782:talk 4778:Fram 4763:talk 4716:talk 4692:talk 4688:Fram 4672:talk 4647:talk 4643:Fram 4603:talk 4556:talk 4552:Fram 4532:talk 4465:talk 4461:Fram 4448:talk 4388:talk 4361:talk 4357:Fram 4338:talk 4317:talk 4286:talk 4282:Fram 4270:talk 4211:talk 4207:Fram 4140:talk 4126:talk 4071:talk 4039:talk 4008:talk 3994:talk 3990:Fram 3979:talk 3959:talk 3955:Fram 3943:talk 3909:talk 3905:Fram 3895:talk 3880:talk 3876:Fram 3866:talk 3848:talk 3844:Fram 3828:talk 3796:Ikip 3786:talk 3782:Fram 3772:Ikip 3756:talk 3741:talk 3721:talk 3656:talk 3638:talk 3634:Fram 3624:talk 3606:talk 3602:Fram 3591:talk 3573:talk 3569:Fram 3553:talk 3535:List 3526:(𒁳) 3452:talk 3448:Gigs 3433:talk 3360:talk 3356:Ikip 3331:talk 3317:talk 3313:Fram 3299:talk 3295:Fram 3281:talk 3263:talk 3259:Fram 3247:talk 3201:talk 3182:talk 3148:"). 3050:talk 3046:Ikip 3022:talk 3018:Fram 2991:talk 2985:. -- 2950:talk 2917:talk 2839:and 2817:Note 2776:talk 2772:Fram 2761:talk 2736:talk 2732:Fram 2720:talk 2704:and 2681:talk 2649:talk 2645:Fram 2635:talk 2616:talk 2612:Fram 2482:talk 2467:talk 2463:Fram 2447:talk 2419:talk 2415:Fram 2404:talk 2376:and 2374:user 2355:talk 2300:talk 2292:Talk 2269:talk 2241:talk 2173:talk 2149:talk 2085:talk 2081:Fram 2057:only 2002:talk 1998:Fram 1971:talk 1967:Fram 1929:talk 1925:Fram 1892:talk 1888:Fram 1847:talk 1843:Fram 1793:Banj 1775:talk 1726:talk 1683:talk 1679:Fram 1668:talk 1626:talk 1608:talk 1589:talk 1572:talk 1540:talk 901:talk 891:See 882:talk 868:talk 840:talk 836:Fram 728:talk 724:Fram 719:WP:N 711:WP:V 700:talk 681:talk 677:Ikip 649:talk 623:here 601:talk 566:talk 562:Fram 432:Ārūn 428:Arun 157:talk 153:Fram 141:talk 120:talk 4882:DGG 4849:DGG 4599:CBM 4528:CBM 4444:CBM 4160:Lar 4153:by 4081:Lar 4050:Lar 4018:Lar 3694:) 3522:dab 3384:On 3174:bot 3116:AfD 2874:it. 2677:BOZ 2196:On 2145:Kww 2013:Lar 1981:Lar 1940:Lar 1903:Lar 1869:Lar 1822:Lar 1791:-- 1718:AfD 1618:Yes 1600:No. 752:On 617:Sig 287:/ 5067:) 5022:) 4975:) 4924:) 4904:) 4889:) 4872:) 4856:) 4834:) 4798:) 4784:) 4765:) 4718:) 4694:) 4674:) 4649:) 4601:· 4558:) 4530:· 4507:}} 4501:{{ 4467:) 4446:· 4438:}} 4432:{{ 4424:}} 4418:{{ 4414:}} 4408:{{ 4390:) 4363:) 4340:) 4323:) 4319:• 4288:) 4272:) 4213:) 4162:: 4158:++ 4142:) 4128:) 4083:: 4073:) 4052:: 4041:) 4020:: 4010:) 3996:) 3981:) 3961:) 3945:) 3911:) 3897:) 3882:) 3868:) 3850:) 3830:) 3788:) 3758:) 3743:) 3723:) 3658:) 3640:) 3626:) 3608:) 3593:) 3575:) 3555:) 3520:-- 3513:}} 3507:{{ 3454:) 3435:) 3422:. 3408:, 3388:, 3362:) 3333:) 3319:) 3301:) 3283:) 3265:) 3249:) 3238:. 3203:) 3184:) 3052:) 3024:) 2993:) 2973:” 2966:“ 2952:) 2923:) 2919:• 2901:? 2778:) 2763:) 2755:- 2738:) 2722:) 2714:- 2683:) 2651:) 2637:) 2618:) 2606:, 2602:, 2598:, 2590:, 2582:, 2578:, 2574:, 2570:, 2566:, 2562:, 2554:, 2550:, 2546:, 2542:, 2538:, 2534:, 2530:, 2522:, 2514:, 2510:, 2506:, 2502:, 2498:, 2494:, 2484:) 2469:) 2449:) 2421:) 2406:) 2357:) 2302:) 2271:) 2243:) 2230:. 2200:, 2175:) 2151:) 2087:) 2015:: 2011:++ 2004:) 1983:: 1973:) 1942:: 1938:++ 1931:) 1905:: 1894:) 1871:: 1849:) 1824:: 1801:oi 1777:) 1728:) 1685:) 1670:) 1628:) 1610:) 1602:-- 1591:) 1583:-- 1574:) 1542:) 903:) 895:-- 884:) 870:) 862:-- 842:) 792:≈ 786:. 756:, 730:) 717:/ 702:) 683:) 671:, 651:) 603:) 568:) 294:/ 159:) 143:) 122:) 94:→ 64:← 5063:( 5018:( 4971:( 4920:( 4900:( 4885:( 4868:( 4852:( 4830:( 4794:( 4780:( 4761:( 4714:( 4690:( 4670:( 4645:( 4605:) 4597:( 4554:( 4534:) 4526:( 4514:. 4463:( 4450:) 4442:( 4386:( 4359:( 4336:( 4315:( 4284:( 4268:( 4252:☎ 4224:☎ 4209:( 4196:☎ 4168:c 4166:/ 4164:t 4138:( 4124:( 4089:c 4087:/ 4085:t 4069:( 4058:c 4056:/ 4054:t 4037:( 4026:c 4024:/ 4022:t 4006:( 3992:( 3977:( 3957:( 3941:( 3907:( 3893:( 3878:( 3864:( 3846:( 3826:( 3784:( 3754:( 3739:( 3719:( 3654:( 3636:( 3622:( 3604:( 3589:( 3571:( 3551:( 3450:( 3431:( 3412:) 3404:( 3358:( 3329:( 3315:( 3297:( 3279:( 3261:( 3245:( 3199:( 3180:( 3048:( 3020:( 2989:( 2948:( 2915:( 2809:) 2802:( 2774:( 2759:( 2734:( 2718:( 2679:( 2647:( 2633:( 2614:( 2480:( 2465:( 2445:( 2417:( 2402:( 2353:( 2298:( 2288:? 2267:( 2263:. 2239:( 2220:) 2216:( 2171:( 2147:( 2143:— 2083:( 2021:c 2019:/ 2017:t 2000:( 1989:c 1987:/ 1985:t 1969:( 1948:c 1946:/ 1944:t 1927:( 1911:c 1909:/ 1907:t 1890:( 1877:c 1875:/ 1873:t 1845:( 1830:c 1828:/ 1826:t 1799:b 1795:e 1773:( 1758:. 1737:) 1733:( 1724:( 1681:( 1666:( 1624:( 1606:( 1587:( 1570:( 1548:) 1544:( 1538:( 899:( 880:( 866:( 838:( 802:¤ 795:C 776:) 772:( 726:( 713:/ 698:( 679:( 647:( 599:( 564:( 155:( 139:( 118:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index