User talk:Georgewilliamherbert/Archives/2009/December

2102:. In the most recent one an admin even proposed banning Drawn Some from Richard. Drawn Some subsequently stopped editing, so it is conceivable that the person behind the account switched accounts to avoid scrutiny when renewing the attacks on Richard's articles? For whatever reason, the Gerbelzodude99 account is going after Richard's article in a manner similar to how Drawn Some did. There may not be sockpuppetry in the sense of using multiple accounts simultaneously, but it is possible that it is a new account being used to evade what would have been a topic ban from Richard? Anyway, it may worth looking into. A number of the AfDs the account has started have already been speedily closed as other participants in the discussions are seeing an antagonistic pattern at the least. Anyway, I thought it was probably worth bringing to your attention. Happy holidays! Sincerely, -- 229:

extensively, so it's not fair to say he hasn't responded to your questions. You may not be satisfied with those answers, but that's no different than his not being satisfied with Cirt's explanations. You didn't exactly drop the accusations you made, you reiterated them in a way that looked pointy, while saying you wouldn't push them further. Redhylin is far from the only one who keeps pushing the dispute. Cirt and Jusdafax have been keeping the flames alive as well. And I came upon a wikialert involving Jusdafax as well. So there's a lot to the whole thing. At some point it would be good if we actually got down to discussing the content and sourcing issues in the appropriate venues. That's what article building is about, not all this arguing. I do apologize for gettign frustrated with it all and lashing out a bit. I'm not perfect either. Only

267:"fanning the flames", and give Off2riorob the kind of attention he feels GWH, Cirt and I merit from them. So, to give only the information above (as at ANI) that I was 'involved' with a wikialert, but with no further information or a link, seems not only less than perfect behavior by ChildofMidnight, but open to question, as is much of the conduct by the parties GWH is in fact questioning. Georgewilliamherbert, allow me to commend you for asking hard questions when and where they need to be asked, which are inquiries that need to be made. In addition to the slanted information regarding me, I submit that CoM's opening paragraph in this thread, at least in my view, is amazingly out of line, and his apology to you is well-merited. But even in doing so, he gets his dig in at me. 1652:. When we lose patience with another editor it's okay to block them (if we're admins) and if the block is roundly rejected then the next step is to take them to Arbcom and try again? That seems outrageous not to mention highly disruptive. If Coren can't work productively with another editor why doesn't he just avoid that editor. Giano works fine with lots and lots of editors. A vendetta campaign from an Arbcom who's block was roundly rejected (and who's involved over the oversighted edit dispute) seems incredibly unhelpful. Coren should be taken to Arbcom from what I've seen of his abusive behavior. But what good would come of that? 847: 31: 947: 875: 1122:

harrassment from that IP user left me feeling so ashamed and unwelcome that I turned to some heavy consumption of alcohol, and one thing led to another, and I got arrested on the 28th of November for driving under the influence. This violated my probation for possession and use of cannabis, so all in all I spent fifteen days in jail over this whole thing. But at least now I see my account has been re-instated. Thanks a ton,

1692:

inappropriate, telling people they ar ehaving hallucinations. Arbcom members are the ultimate mediators (although they often act as judge jury and executioner) they're not daycare. There's no issue to be resolved it's just another silly pissing match. We shouldn't encourage this type of disruption. There are too many busybodies with overinflated egos here playing wikipolitics and going after editors they don't like.

1394:. They were illustrated with a picture that is now deleted due to license violation. Your image is more current and I tried to upload it on commons with commonshelper. But CommonsHelper refuses an upload due to the licensing of that image, so I don't dare to upload it either. Please upload the file if you have Bushmaster's permission. Wishing you a blessed Christmas-time,-- 1681:

I read your statement (twice now). Since I don't approve of the unilateral way you enforce your personal opinions of civility and many other editors feel the same way about the disruption you cause and the incivility your actions instigate, should we have an Arbcom on you? Why? To what end? What will

1208:

Again, this user was supposed to be unbanned since the account was hijacked using a computer owned on an ISD property. This editor account is a useful editor who keeps logs on certain high school pages and cannot edit due to a ban from you that is not fair. Please revert the ban and allow the user to

1056:

The goal was to end the activity. To call it punitive you would have to ascribe an actual limiting effect that it would directly have on their behavior. Neither of them, practically, was kept from editing. Both of them were put on notice that they'd done something blockable and it needed to stop.

600:

Anyway, let's put this behind us, and let's hope that our future interactions will be more congenial. I am sure I could have handled this better too, and would have on a less stressful day. I am sorry if you felt I was being deliberately evasive and will be more upfront, if the situation should arise

562:

I'm sorry that this happened, I now don't think you were doing anything seriously wrong to start with (you should have disclosed the COI but you don't seem to have abused that). The attempted coverup here was unnecessary, and was what caused the problem. You really didn't have anything to hide, but

492:

Hi George. Cirt has reinstigated the disruption with a new ANI report about the old conflict. As I mentioned you in one of the threads (calling for you to be desysoped) I thought I'd mention it to you here. Clearly if you had been fair in the original thread and reminded Cirt to be civil and to avoid

258:

by Off2riorob even after I had complied with his request re: my mention elsewhere that he had previously been blocked, and that his report at was quickly closed as resolved by admisintrator Chillum when I pointed out I had already complied with the request to remove mention of his previous blocks. It

176:

That said, I actually came by to remove my comment. But it's been responded to, so I'll leave it. I think it's accurate, but you don't seem receptive to constructive criticism, and I don't want to heighten the dispute any further. Your refusal to point Jusdafax and Cirt in a more productive direction

2227:

I'm looking more at the article and older context than the AFD itself. Weiss' having come along in sock form and started a fight over it doesn't change the underlying issue there. Cla68 has a personal bone to pick with Weiss and has since the Mantanmoreland case's underpinnings started. He really

596:

As for not mailing you myself -- frankly, I was outraged when you posted the links on my user page, and my first response was to e-mail two arbitrators. No action was taken, for whatever reason, but I felt disinclined to talk to you, especially as I was already working a 20-hour shift trying to make

554:

policy prohibits; other than not disclosing your connection, I agree that you seem to be largely editing neutrally. And you could have responded to either of my queries on your talk page with a request to take the discussion to email. It was more than an hour after you'd deleted the second inquiry

1840:

I trust you'll make careful note that every author supporting this so-called Exodus, occurring over a period of some 23 years, is Jewish. Yet you have the audacity to complain that I have an agenda? I don't see the application of the same principle to those "vested interests" that have written this

64:

Please cease your intimidation and threats of an editor who is frustrated. You are not helping the situation and only causing disruption. If you can't bring yourself to mediate and alleviate the dispute, then just stay out of it. You have repeatedly made unacceptable and unconstructive accusations,

2020:

You are making some good contributions, which I appreciate. But the insults and threats against other users make your presence unacceptable. This project is not one where some good edits outweigh or allow us to overlook the abuse and threats and insults. If you make those insults and abuses you

1719:

Please refrain from distorting what I've said in order to threaten me. Your action was a clear violation of the civility policy and in the future I expect you to refrain from missrepresenting statements made by other editors. I've also tweaked my prior statement to accomodate your sensibilities. I

202:

The question about collaboration with Off2riorob didn't set an ideal stage for resolving things, but I have strenuously avoided even mentioning it to him after they both answered that the collaboration claim was false. I told him last night it was off the table and not an ongoing issue. He still

146:

If you're going to be trying to help mediate things, you owe Redheylin a duty to step up to them and be frank and clear about what the problem is, so that they can address it. I have tried and am not getting good response. I would encourage you and others to try as well. I am attempting to give

647:

I'm sorry this dropped on you on a bad day to respond, and I apologize that it seems to have come out fairly negatively despite the underlying situation not being a significant issue of note. I thought I allowed enough time for a response. If you'd said "please contact Arbcom" I would have done

247:

Believe me, I was really ready to let this go. However, since my name has been brought up here by ChildofMidnight, as it was by them (in the same manner) in the ANI just before the final closure, making it impossible to respond to the comment, I feel the need to clarify CoM's possibly misleading

210:

I understand that the evolution of the incident has not been optimally fair to him, and that the collaboration question didn't ultimately help. But he can't keep pursuing this loudly on ANI and not face the problems he's caused in doing so. I've tried to be as clear as possible and offer him as

1319:

I am intending to upload a couple of images, one photo and one vector. My problem is that I simply cannot find any information anywhere on how to do it and what file formats are acceptable. There should be a simple help page with this information on it but I cannot figure out where. Plenty of

172:

As noted above, I've found you behavior to be very provacative and counterproductive. Apart from your most recent ANI board comment, you've come off as threatening and intimidating to an editor who was frustrated and trying to get assistance in resolving a situation. Some of their concerns have

142:

I understand that they're frustrated. However - that does not absolve them of responsibility to answer the question. If they want to take time off to calm down and answer later, ok, but Redheylin's continuing to attack Cirt as in the ANI edit you deleted (thank you for that) without providing

195:

Any uninvolved admin is openly invited to step in on ANI, if they think they're a better more neutral party. I kept responding as Redheylin kept going, without actually addressing the problem. Anyone else could have taken over and stepped up and worked with him, but nobody did. His ongoing

1121:

This is my first time logging onto my account since our unfortunate blocking incident last November. Thank you for unblocking me and I hope that now you believe me that I was not a secondary account. Unfortunately, my quick block so soon after creating my first account on Knowledge and the

1079:

Well I cannot say I support short blocks. They have traditionally and specifically been prohibited. OTOH, if you want to cite IAR+results, I cannot argue with that much either. I'm not terribly happy about the choice, though.I strongly urge you to consider other approaches in the future.

228:

I don't want to get into a back and forth with you, but I doubt that anyone would have seen fit to block an editor for trying to get admin assistance in a content dispute, especially where their concerns are reasonable. The accusations have flown in both directions. Redhylin has responded

1691:

Can't we just go about improving the encyclopedia. Not everyone is going to get along. Why does Coren need to interact with Giano anyway? He should just mind his own business. He went and posted very aggressive and threatening messages and continues to act in a manner that is completely

530:

Georgewilliamherbert, may I request that the next time you want to quiz a user about some google stalking results, you send them your questions by e-mail, before you drop links on several wiki pages, as you did this time. The way you proceeded showed appallingly poor judgment. Regards,

592:

As I said to Will, I come from a country where members of religious minorities were required to wear an identifying mark on their clothing within living memory. I abhor the concept of making editors submit to a similar regime here, yet the unconscious expectations often seem akin to

1701:

I assumed the oversighting was jsut a mistake. But from what I've seen of the way Giano's concerns have been treated he has every right to be upset, and now I'm not so sure. Anyway, thanks for your response. Don't block good faith editors and cause any more disruptions. Thanks. :)

1350:. Preferred formats are JPEG or GIF for photos, though PNG is acceptable. Graphics in SVG are preferred if they're vector graphics, though PNG or GIF or JPEG are accepted alternates. Some other formats work, but if you can convert to the preferred formats it's much better. 191:

I'm not taking Cirt or Jusdafax' side; if any uninvolved administrator had just taken Cirt's side this would have ended yesterday night with a disruption block on Redheylin. Which would have been improper in not giving Redheylin a chance to address the problems and clear it

138:

I have been trying in good faith for almost 24 hrs to get Redheylin to answer with specifics regarding these claims. You've also been largely helpful so far. It would be extremely helpful if you would attempt to convince them to provide appropriate specific evidence and

173:

finally been addressed, so simply attacking them for not expressing themselves in a more constructive way wasn't useful. Try taking a more collegial approach next time maybe? People tend to be more responsive when they're met with civility, especially when they're upset.

2037:

If you aren't willing to wait that long, then put a request for a mentor and an unblock under mentorship on your main user page, and stop IP editing while that is considered. I don't know if anyone will accept you as someone to mentor, but you can certainly try that.

643:

We run a fine line here, trying to get enough information so people are aware of article content conflicts of interest, without unduly affecting people's privacy. Handling that line is an ugly mess at times. I could have assumed good faith better and inquired more

1389:

Hello GWH, I have seen you uploaded the File:Bushmaster-acr-cropped.jpg. What I want to ask you is to upload it on wikimedia commons if you are allowed to. This picture would be a great illustration for the german, spanish, japanese and polish versions of the

1019:

I agree with what you -did- because it is a reminder to them both that their conduct was unbecoming. However, the way you phrase it makes it seem more punitive ("pay" "penalty") than preventative ("reminders"). This is just a note for future reference.

168:

Someone should just archive that ANI discussion already. Your asking for more input on the underlying sourcing issue doesn't seem helpful to me. If you want to help mediate and look into the actual content and ciation issues then there are other

1035:

And I am here to protest strongly. It is specifically against blocking policy to issue punitive blocks. In no way can a 10 second block be regarded as anything but punitive. How could you possibly rationalize such a thing? This is unacceptable.

131:

ChildofMidnight, you know as well as anyone that making acusations of false sources on Knowledge is very serious. You also know and have been around long enough to know what sort of standards of evidence we're looking for in cases of serious

2185:

I don't fault Cla68 here, but I do think there are a lot of people in that AfD focused on things besides notability. I think Knowledge is at its worst when our content becomes a proxy for inter-user battles. The nominator and early comments

1414:

For your information, "demand" is a poor word choice in english for what you were asking, the word "request" does not imply a forceful insistence and is much more polite. No offense taken, thank you for being aware of that. I understand.

259:

may be worth noting that, unsatisified, Off2riorob attempted to reopen the notice, which was quickly again closed with a warning to him not to do so. Still unsatisified, Off2riorob argued the matter still further at substantial length on

588:

about their religious or philosophical affiliation. How is that equitable? If Will is a Baptist, or a former Baptist, or a Catholic, this is as relevant to his editing religious topics than my having been an Osho follower, or a Sufi,

1807:

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank

2099: 206:

I appreciate you having stepped up and tried to mediate. But you're not doing him good service if he doesn't understand what the problem is. I can't make you stay involved - but if you want to help him, help try and convince

1299:

georgewilliamherbert, why was my request for an unblock denied? I have told admins repeatedly that this account is secure and is under control by the owner but productive edits cannot take place while the account is blocked.

1249:

The account has been taken off school servers to a private PC and is no accessible by anyone except the owner. This account SHOULD be unblocked because proper edits by this account cannot be performed while being blocked.

1752: 558:

If you'd been honest to start with, and attempted to engage in discussion after and not sweep it under the rug, the ANI post would not have happened. But what you did was in every way to create suspicion of serious

2095: 1734: 379:

edit on wikipedia anywhere. Sure, it's good to apologize on wikipedia. But you didn't act overboard. He's the one who went overboard accusing another editor of stalking him through his first edit on wikipedia.

147:

them every reasonable opportunity to resolve this without any sanctions, and so far they keep repeating inappropriate attacks without making specific information to support them. This cannot continue forever.

2091: 577:

I accept your apology and thank you for acknowledging that I edit neutrally. I didn't believe I misled you; I gave you the short answer to which I thought you, as someone I had only just met, were entitled.

1982:

on Knowledge. I didn't make any change without explanation on talk page, but there are still few people who constantly change my relevant edits and that's makes no sense... Best wishes, Orijentolog or --

150:

You put yourself in the middle of this, please be responsible enough to help convince them that they need to do the right thing and clear this up rather than escalate it further by making more attacks.

1212:

This is the third time I have posted this on your page with no comment on whether or not the ban has been lifted. Please address this, I'm not looking forward to a fourth post with no response from you.

1857: 1820: 1796: 1638: 640:

I never had a serious problem admitting who I am online. I've done so since I started. I know others are more private, but I felt it was fair that other people knew who they were dealing with.

199:

You get the admins who are paying attention and care to intervene, not the ultimately most perfect uninvolved ones out there. Welcome to ANI. He's the one that went there in the first place...

1006: 1826: 860: 934: 1767: 958: 2260:

for about 15 months. The article doesn't seem subject to heavy and persistent vandalism or violations of content policy, and it seems constructive edits may be locked out of the article.--

1543:...it's just that I saw what that fool was saying and I about blew my stack. I was literally shaking with rage when I wrote it. I'll remove the comment; hopefully, he got the message. -- 1189:

for about 15 months. The article doesn't seem subject to heavy and persistent vandalism or violations of content policy, and it seems constructive edits may be locked out of the article.--

1803: 1376: 1362: 939: 1711: 1676: 1167: 1089: 1074: 242: 223: 186: 89: 2239: 2061: 886: 1287: 1273: 2047: 1101: 985:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 913:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 673: 550:

Perhaps my initial inquiry should have been via email. But there was no reason for you to have misled us in the first place - I don't see that you actually did anything which our

867: 1594: 1424: 1339:

On the left side of the screen, you should see a navigation box labeled "toolbox". The second to last entry in that box, "upload file", takes you to the image upload start page.

2218: 2030:

The best thing to do would be to temporarily stop editing the English Language wikipedia, participate somewhere else for 3 to 6 months, and then contact us here again under the

711: 659: 632: 614: 572: 2269: 1445: 1045: 981:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

909:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2175: 1968: 1533: 482: 1057:

It was my hope that a very short block would accomplish the putting on notice and ending the abusive confrontation, without keeping them from editing elsewhere productively.

835: 160: 2052:

OK, you have my word I won't change any page in next three months. If I see any problem, I'll just leave message at discussion section and that's all. Happy holidays! :) --

1259: 1244: 1198: 322: 301: 283: 2012: 691: 2146: 1939: 1562:

He's been doing that for several weeks now. I wouldn't bother treating it any more seriously than simple vandalism. I mean, give me a break - ten billion pounds? lolwut

1488: 790: 437: 123: 2057: 1616: 1496: 798: 445: 2138: 1931: 1504: 1480: 806: 782: 453: 429: 1403: 389: 249: 734: 348: 1131: 555:

without so much as an edit comment that I took it to ANI. I didn't know that there was personally identifying information on those links, you could have said so.

1907: 1464: 750: 405: 74: 2122: 1915: 1472: 766: 413: 974:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

902:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

2106: 970:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 898:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 214:

I don't disagree with your conclusion that aspects of this sucked. But he won't let it go, and if he won't then some administrator needs to deal with it.

1891: 1333: 1309: 1221: 306:

Quite the opposite, I assure you. Vince did my 49ers a good turn when he nipped 'Zona yesterday, though my expectations for the post season remain slim.

2203: 2130: 1923: 1740: 774: 421: 580:

As I have just said to Will, offline, what sticks in my craw is the assumption that editors who belong to a religious minority, or even those who ever

2079: 1552: 1094:

All I will say is that if GWH believes his 10-second block achieved anything other than generating even more ill will then he is deceiving himself. --

758: 742: 357: 2111: 1896: 1729: 1661: 1453: 1152: 508: 394: 1991: 1579: 723: 502: 347:

George, so far I know, you've not been involved with David Shankbone. Would you mind reviewing his six-month block? I've explained the situation

1791: 177:

is disappointing. The kind of battlefield approach they've taken isn't helping any more than your antagonism towards one party in the dispute.

2017:

You are not currently welcome on Knowledge, due to your extreme abuse of other users. If you keep this up we will block your entire netblock.

990: 918: 584:

to a religious minority, should make full disclosures here, with a 30-year spiritual CV, while editors like yourself or Will disclose exactly

2247: 520: 1029: 1173: 65:

and as has been noted before, your intervention has been wholly one sided. Please shape up GWH. This kind of behavior is not acceptable.

1384: 544: 2027:

IF you really want to participate here on an ongoing basis - you need to entirely step away from insulting people or threatening them.

1407:

P.S.: As English is not my mother tongue, I'm uncertain about the use of "demand". If it sounds offensive, I request you to tell me.

2257: 1186: 2100:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive198#User:Drawn_Some_seems_to_be_wikistalking_User:Richard_Arthur_Norton_.281958-_.29

2163: 1956: 1650: 1521: 1411:

The image is not open licensed, it's used under our fair-use criteria for english wikipedia. It can't go to Commons. Sorry...

823: 470: 1585:

We haven't been stepping on him hard enough, is why he's still doing it. NLT is what it is - we'd indef if it was accounts.

1432:

I will keep it in mind your advice in mind; the dictionary's suggestions were rather imprecise. I will change the headline to

2078:

Hello! You conducted a checkuser on this account after some suspicions of sockpuppetry. Please note that another user has

2261: 2053: 1849: 1611: 1429:

Thanks for your answer. Then we will have to wait for another picture which is published und er a free license on Commons.

2253: 2159: 2090:

first edited on November 27th. It is possible the same person abandoned the one account and started the new one. Given

1952: 1517: 1347: 1190: 1182: 819: 466: 637:

I was writing something up and edit conflicted, but most of it's rendered obsolete by your having done that. Thank you.

1324:. Please could you point me in the right direction? And perhaps you can just tell me if .WMF is acceptable. Thanks. 1301: 1279: 1251: 1213: 1085: 1062:

If they'd continued, myself or someone else blocking for a not-nominal 24 hrs or some such would have rapidly followed.

1041: 254:, (2.11) which if left without a link looks as if I'm somehow tarnished goods. The exchange shows that I was taken to 962:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 890:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 375:

edit to wikipedia and I somehow followed that? No way. He may not have been caught this time, but no one followed his

2004: 1983: 367:

Please don't go overboard in the apology to make it seem the SPI was unreasonable. He accused me of stalking him for

362: 2235: 2071: 2043: 1763: 1672: 1634: 1590: 1420: 1358: 1269: 1163: 1113: 1070: 655: 568: 219: 156: 85: 1887: 1606: 1574: 105: 1739:

I don't understand you comment on GC's talk page. Just so we don't misunderstand one another, you think the RFC

1862: 1748: 507:

Hello, Georgewilliamherbert. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at

317: 278: 47: 17: 1343: 975: 903: 59: 2154: 1947: 1512: 814: 461: 1264:

The proper procedure is to put an {{unblock|Reason for unblock request}} tag on the account's talk page.

203:

brought it up on ANI in his latest comments. I can't help it if I say it's dropped, and he won't drop it.

2096:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive553#Wikistalking_and_edit_warring_by_User:Drawn_Some

1834:

RE: Editing so-called Jewish Exodus from Arab lands 1948-1971 article, is motivated by having an agenda.

1372: 1329: 1203: 165:

Making accusations about using sources improperly is almost as bad as making accusations about collusion.

619:

I've overcome my resistance and added a statement to my user page. Sorry for the soapboxing. Regards, --

1098: 38: 1538: 2256:. I can see that the page has had some previous vandalism, but I can also see that the page has been 2231: 2039: 1759: 1744: 1725: 1707: 1668: 1657: 1630: 1600: 1586: 1416: 1354: 1265: 1185:. I can see that the page has had some previous vandalism, but I can also see that the page has been 1159: 1148: 1066: 651: 564: 498: 385: 297: 238: 215: 182: 152: 81: 70: 2265: 2214: 2199: 2072: 2031: 1853: 1787: 1127: 2180: 2092:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive563#Drawn_Some_and_Richard_Arthur_Norton_III

1194: 982: 910: 342: 1782:

at the Logicus 2 RfC. I've seen so many similar comments that this one just slipped by me. --

1368: 1325: 1320:

information about style and about not violating copyright, but nothing about what one actually

1314: 1305: 1283: 1255: 1217: 698:

Think no more of it. I've learned something from all of this; the drama wasn't for nothing. --

2008: 1987: 1548: 1238: 1095: 1025: 685: 669: 516: 2171: 1964: 1868: 1721: 1703: 1653: 1557: 1529: 1144: 1081: 1037: 1000: 928: 853: 846: 831: 494: 478: 381: 293: 234: 178: 66: 1720:

trust you'll warn Coren for telling an editor they're hallucinating and having fantasies.

135:

You also know that making serious accusations without evidence is not acceptable behavior.

8: 2210: 2195: 2087: 1973: 1883: 1783: 1572: 1123: 99: 1816: 705: 626: 608: 538: 312: 273: 2034:

terms, showing that you were able to contribute elsewhere without disruption or abuse.

1016:"but you broke the rules, and everyone has to pay at least a little penalty for this" 1667:

Are you reading what I actually wrote? Please re-read, and read Coren's talk page.

1644: 1544: 1441: 1399: 1233: 1228: 1136: 1021: 967: 895: 680: 665: 512: 260: 767:

Knowledge's death report premature, fundraiser, usability, new CSD, noms, and more

128:

Assuming that this was about Redheylin - which CoM hasn't confirmed, Cirt, then...

2167: 2083: 1960: 1525: 1137: 994: 922: 827: 563:

trying to hide it was a poor choice to respond once questions were being asked.

474: 352: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1872: 1773: 1563: 1391: 971: 946: 899: 874: 487: 119: 95: 2103: 1812: 1779: 775:

Ron Livingston sues vandal, disclosure of IP address ordered, brief headlines

700: 621: 603: 551: 533: 307: 268: 255: 109: 963: 891: 289: 1682:

be accomplished? Are we here to play Model UN or to write an encyclopedia?

2191: 1437: 1395: 1011: 525: 511:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

414:

35k donated, WikiProject for Knowledge-Books, 2M rated articles, and more

230: 1735:

a real RFC - with real, enforcable proposals etc - be done. The fake RFC

1473:

Mapping geotagged articles language, import sources enabled, and more

114: 422:

Reports of Knowledge's demise, prescriptions for its ills, and more

1797:

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)

211:

many chances as possible to understand and respond appropriately.

2190:

the nominator have made it very difficult to focus the AfD on

1231:. If an account is compromised, it should not be unblocked.— 1741:

Talk:Scientific opinion on climate change#Request for comment

1623: 493:

disruptive behavior we could have avoided this mess. Cheers.

863:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

196:

escalation made simply dropping it untenable, unfortunately.

1649:

Hi GWH. I don't understand the logic of your argument here

940:

Orphaned non-free image File:SeaLaunch OceanOdysseyDeck.jpg

840: 1998: 1626: 1436:

to avoid being thought of as rude by the quick reader. --

2123:

Flagged revisions petitions, image donations, brief news

868:

Orphaned non-free image File:SeaLaunch Underplatform.jpg

2131:

Criticism from climate change sceptic, decade in review

852:

Hello, Georgewilliamherbert. You have new messages at

2209:

Others may come to a different conclusion, of course.

1827:

My editing of two article is done out of an "agenda"

1465:

Voting closes in the Arbitration Committee Elections

1065:Unconventional, yes, but it seems to have worked. 597:

a deadline, and little needed the extra excitement.

406:

ArbCom election begins December 1, using SecurePoll

2139:Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations 1932:Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations 1871:about why we shouldn't include his name? Thanks. 1481:Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations 989:will be deleted after seven days, as described on 917:will be deleted after seven days, as described on 783:Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations 430:Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations 1143:Please don't disrupt Knowledge to make a point. 1924:Accusation of bias, misreported death, and more 509:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 2228:should not be touching the topic of Weiss... 1505:Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 1348:Knowledge:Uploading images#Technical aspects 1278:How exactly do you do this on the userpage? 807:Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 664:Any objections to archiving the ANI thread? 454:Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 2252:I was writing to request unprotection of 1978:I just want to tell you that I have only 1181:I was writing to request unprotection of 263:. I wonder if ChildofMidnight would call 1342:In terms of formats - you should review 1227:I'm uninvolved, but IP, you should read 248:statement both there and here regarding 1811:This has been an automated delivery by 14: 1916:Fundraiser update, milestones and more 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 25: 2254:List of states with nuclear weapons 2248:List of states with nuclear weapons 1434:request for image upload on commons 1183:List of states with nuclear weapons 1174:List of states with nuclear weapons 959:File:SeaLaunch OceanOdysseyDeck.jpg 23: 1385:reques for image upload on commons 966:. However, the image is currently 945: 894:. However, the image is currently 873: 845: 24: 2280: 1344:Knowledge:Image use policy#FORMAT 2086:last edited on September 26th. 1908:ArbCom election result announced 1497:The Report on Lengthy Litigation 887:File:SeaLaunch Underplatform.jpg 799:The Report on Lengthy Litigation 446:The Report on Lengthy Litigation 94:The editor is not "frustrated", 29: 1831:Dear George (whoever you are)♠ 1844:I look forward to your reply. 251:a wikialert involving Jusdafax 18:User talk:Georgewilliamherbert 13: 1: 2270:14:58, 31 December 2009 (UTC) 2240:22:22, 30 December 2009 (UTC) 2219:22:09, 30 December 2009 (UTC) 2204:22:08, 30 December 2009 (UTC) 2176:02:19, 30 December 2009 (UTC) 2107:02:53, 28 December 2009 (UTC) 2062:15:06, 24 December 2009 (UTC) 2048:21:01, 23 December 2009 (UTC) 2013:18:02, 23 December 2009 (UTC) 1992:17:43, 23 December 2009 (UTC) 1969:02:57, 23 December 2009 (UTC) 1892:23:53, 21 December 2009 (UTC) 1858:16:20, 21 December 2009 (UTC) 1821:09:01, 21 December 2009 (UTC) 1792:02:04, 20 December 2009 (UTC) 1768:22:36, 19 December 2009 (UTC) 1753:22:18, 19 December 2009 (UTC) 1730:18:30, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 1712:08:33, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 1677:08:13, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 1662:08:10, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 1639:01:49, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 1617:01:40, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 1595:01:34, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 1580:01:30, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 1553:08:15, 17 December 2009 (UTC) 1534:15:46, 16 December 2009 (UTC) 1446:09:38, 16 December 2009 (UTC) 1425:02:39, 16 December 2009 (UTC) 1404:21:35, 15 December 2009 (UTC) 1377:12:46, 15 December 2009 (UTC) 1363:22:54, 14 December 2009 (UTC) 1334:22:05, 14 December 2009 (UTC) 1310:21:21, 14 December 2009 (UTC) 1288:05:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC) 1274:02:23, 14 December 2009 (UTC) 1260:18:19, 13 December 2009 (UTC) 1245:02:45, 13 December 2009 (UTC) 1222:02:41, 13 December 2009 (UTC) 1199:16:57, 13 December 2009 (UTC) 1168:02:15, 13 December 2009 (UTC) 1153:18:49, 12 December 2009 (UTC) 1132:00:54, 13 December 2009 (UTC) 1102:03:42, 12 December 2009 (UTC) 1090:03:36, 12 December 2009 (UTC) 1075:01:54, 12 December 2009 (UTC) 1046:16:18, 11 December 2009 (UTC) 1030:15:19, 11 December 2009 (UTC) 1007:07:48, 10 December 2009 (UTC) 976:our policy for non-free media 935:07:47, 10 December 2009 (UTC) 904:our policy for non-free media 751:ArbCom election in full swing 292:fan? You have my sympathies. 284:23:02, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 243:04:03, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 224:02:41, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 187:02:21, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 161:02:01, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 124:01:44, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 90:01:43, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 75:01:39, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 1867:Can you drop a few words at 991:criteria for speedy deletion 919:criteria for speedy deletion 836:05:24, 9 December 2009 (UTC) 759:Interview with David G. Post 712:23:20, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 692:23:23, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 674:23:09, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 660:22:50, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 633:22:41, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 615:21:00, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 573:20:10, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 545:19:42, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 521:19:26, 2 December 2009 (UTC) 503:19:22, 2 December 2009 (UTC) 483:13:20, 1 December 2009 (UTC) 390:07:54, 1 December 2009 (UTC) 358:05:29, 1 December 2009 (UTC) 323:02:45, 1 December 2009 (UTC) 302:02:17, 1 December 2009 (UTC) 7: 1758:Responding on 2/0's page. 1209:retain editing privileges. 735:250th issue of the Signpost 678:Hang one, if you please. 10: 2285: 2155:Read this Signpost in full 1948:Read this Signpost in full 1513:Read this Signpost in full 1118:Dear Mr. William Erebert: 815:Read this Signpost in full 462:Read this Signpost in full 108:) is repeatedly violating 371:. That's absurd: he made 363:Sock puppet investigation 2073:User talk:Gerbelzodude99 2032:Knowledge:Standard offer 1778:Thanks for catching the 1114:Thank you for your trust 2113:The Knowledge Signpost 1898:The Knowledge Signpost 1869:Talk:Star Wars kid#RFC 1863:Star Wars kid...again. 1455:The Knowledge Signpost 951: 879: 854:Skier Dude's talk page 850: 725:The Knowledge Signpost 396:The Knowledge Signpost 2145:Features and admins: 1938:Features and admins: 1743:is fake? If so, why? 1487:Features and admins: 956:Thanks for uploading 949: 884:Thanks for uploading 877: 849: 789:Features and admins: 743:A digital restoration 436:Features and admins: 60:Comments to Redheylin 42:of past discussions. 2232:Georgewilliamherbert 2040:Georgewilliamherbert 1760:Georgewilliamherbert 1745:William M. Connolley 1669:Georgewilliamherbert 1631:Georgewilliamherbert 1613:the legend reborn... 1587:Georgewilliamherbert 1495:Arbitration report: 1417:Georgewilliamherbert 1355:Georgewilliamherbert 1266:Georgewilliamherbert 1160:Georgewilliamherbert 1067:Georgewilliamherbert 797:Arbitration report: 652:Georgewilliamherbert 565:Georgewilliamherbert 444:Arbitration report: 216:Georgewilliamherbert 153:Georgewilliamherbert 143:specifics is not OK. 82:Georgewilliamherbert 2137:Discussion report: 2088:User:Gerbelzodude99 1930:Discussion report: 1841:article 'George.' 1804:November 2009 issue 1503:Technology report: 1479:Discussion report: 1204:User:Azwethinkweizm 972:You may add it back 900:You may add it back 805:Technology report: 781:Discussion report: 452:Technology report: 428:Discussion report: 261:Chillum's talk page 2147:Approved this week 2115:: 28 December 2009 1940:Approved this week 1900:: 21 December 2009 1605:Merry Christmas.-- 1489:Approved this week 1457:: 14 December 2009 952: 880: 861:remove this notice 851: 791:Approved this week 733:From the editors: 601:again. Regards, -- 438:Approved this week 398:: 30 November 2009 80:Which where why? 2080:raised suspicions 1906:Election report: 1823: 1601:Seasons Greetings 1463:Election report: 1369:Man with two legs 1326:Man with two legs 1088: 1044: 964:claim of fair use 892:claim of fair use 749:Election report: 727:: 7 December 2009 404:Election report: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2276: 2121:News and notes: 1914:News and notes: 1879: 1876: 1810: 1629:year! Thanks. 1614: 1570: 1471:News and notes: 1241: 1236: 1084: 1040: 1003: 997: 983:my contributions 954: 931: 925: 911:my contributions 882: 864: 765:News and notes: 708: 703: 688: 683: 629: 624: 611: 606: 541: 536: 412:News and notes: 355: 320: 315: 310: 281: 276: 271: 33: 32: 26: 2284: 2283: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2250: 2183: 2181:McGraw-Hill AfD 2178: 2151: 2117: 2084:User:Drawn Some 2076: 1980:good intentions 1976: 1971: 1944: 1902: 1877: 1874: 1865: 1829: 1799: 1776: 1737: 1722:ChildofMidnight 1704:ChildofMidnight 1654:ChildofMidnight 1647: 1612: 1603: 1577: 1564: 1560: 1541: 1539:You're right... 1536: 1509: 1459: 1387: 1317: 1239: 1234: 1206: 1176: 1145:ChildofMidnight 1141: 1116: 1082:KillerChihuahua 1038:KillerChihuahua 1014: 1001: 995: 943: 942: 929: 923: 871: 870: 865: 858: 843: 838: 811: 729: 706: 701: 686: 681: 627: 622: 609: 604: 539: 534: 528: 495:ChildofMidnight 490: 485: 458: 400: 382:IP69.226.103.13 365: 353: 345: 343:David Shankbone 318: 313: 308: 294:ChildofMidnight 279: 274: 269: 235:ChildofMidnight 179:ChildofMidnight 67:ChildofMidnight 62: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2282: 2262:68.251.188.242 2249: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2229: 2222: 2221: 2182: 2179: 2152: 2150: 2149: 2142: 2141: 2134: 2133: 2126: 2125: 2118: 2116: 2110: 2075: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2054:93.142.181.116 2035: 2028: 2025: 2022: 2021:can't be here. 2018: 1975: 1972: 1945: 1943: 1942: 1935: 1934: 1927: 1926: 1919: 1918: 1911: 1910: 1903: 1901: 1895: 1864: 1861: 1850:99.238.217.129 1847: 1828: 1825: 1809: 1798: 1795: 1784:SteveMcCluskey 1775: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1736: 1733: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1646: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1602: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1575: 1559: 1556: 1540: 1537: 1510: 1508: 1507: 1500: 1499: 1492: 1491: 1484: 1483: 1476: 1475: 1468: 1467: 1460: 1458: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1430: 1412: 1406: 1392:Bushmaster ACR 1386: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1351: 1340: 1316: 1315:Help! (images) 1313: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1205: 1202: 1175: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1140: 1135: 1124:Gerbelzodude99 1115: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1063: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1049: 1048: 1013: 1010: 993:. Thank you. 941: 938: 921:. Thank you. 869: 866: 857: 844: 842: 839: 812: 810: 809: 802: 801: 794: 793: 786: 785: 778: 777: 770: 769: 762: 761: 754: 753: 746: 745: 738: 737: 730: 728: 722: 721: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 715: 714: 696: 695: 694: 649: 645: 641: 638: 617: 598: 594: 590: 578: 560: 556: 527: 524: 489: 486: 459: 457: 456: 449: 448: 441: 440: 433: 432: 425: 424: 417: 416: 409: 408: 401: 399: 393: 364: 361: 344: 341: 340: 339: 338: 337: 336: 335: 334: 333: 332: 331: 330: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 212: 208: 204: 200: 197: 193: 174: 170: 166: 148: 144: 140: 136: 133: 129: 92: 61: 58: 56: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2281: 2272: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2230: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2220: 2217: 2216: 2212: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2202: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2177: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2156: 2148: 2144: 2143: 2140: 2136: 2135: 2132: 2129:In the news: 2128: 2127: 2124: 2120: 2119: 2114: 2109: 2108: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2074: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2036: 2033: 2029: 2026: 2023: 2019: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2010: 2006: 2002: 2001: 1997:Please check 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1949: 1941: 1937: 1936: 1933: 1929: 1928: 1925: 1922:In the news: 1921: 1920: 1917: 1913: 1912: 1909: 1905: 1904: 1899: 1894: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1880: 1870: 1860: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1845: 1842: 1838: 1835: 1832: 1824: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1806: 1805: 1794: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1732: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1625: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1615: 1610: 1609: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1578: 1573: 1571: 1568: 1555: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1514: 1506: 1502: 1501: 1498: 1494: 1493: 1490: 1486: 1485: 1482: 1478: 1477: 1474: 1470: 1469: 1466: 1462: 1461: 1456: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1413: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1312: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1243: 1242: 1237: 1230: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1210: 1201: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1191:71.156.89.167 1188: 1184: 1179: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1139: 1134: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1119: 1103: 1100: 1097: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1061: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1017: 1009: 1008: 1004: 998: 992: 988: 984: 979: 977: 973: 969: 965: 961: 960: 953: 948: 937: 936: 932: 926: 920: 916: 912: 907: 905: 901: 897: 893: 889: 888: 881: 876: 862: 855: 848: 837: 833: 829: 825: 821: 817: 816: 808: 804: 803: 800: 796: 795: 792: 788: 787: 784: 780: 779: 776: 773:In the news: 772: 771: 768: 764: 763: 760: 756: 755: 752: 748: 747: 744: 740: 739: 736: 732: 731: 726: 713: 710: 709: 704: 697: 693: 690: 689: 684: 677: 676: 675: 671: 667: 663: 662: 661: 657: 653: 650: 646: 642: 639: 636: 635: 634: 631: 630: 625: 618: 616: 613: 612: 607: 599: 595: 591: 587: 583: 582:have belonged 579: 576: 575: 574: 570: 566: 561: 557: 553: 549: 548: 547: 546: 543: 542: 537: 523: 522: 518: 514: 510: 505: 504: 500: 496: 484: 480: 476: 472: 468: 464: 463: 455: 451: 450: 447: 443: 442: 439: 435: 434: 431: 427: 426: 423: 420:In the news: 419: 418: 415: 411: 410: 407: 403: 402: 397: 392: 391: 387: 383: 378: 374: 370: 360: 359: 356: 350: 324: 321: 316: 311: 305: 304: 303: 299: 295: 291: 287: 286: 285: 282: 277: 272: 266: 262: 257: 253: 252: 246: 245: 244: 240: 236: 232: 227: 226: 225: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 201: 198: 194: 190: 189: 188: 184: 180: 175: 171: 167: 164: 163: 162: 158: 154: 149: 145: 141: 137: 134: 130: 127: 126: 125: 121: 117: 116: 111: 107: 104: 101: 97: 93: 91: 87: 83: 79: 78: 77: 76: 72: 68: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2251: 2213: 2198: 2187: 2184: 2153: 2112: 2077: 2024:Please stop. 1999: 1979: 1977: 1946: 1897: 1873: 1866: 1846: 1843: 1839: 1836: 1833: 1830: 1802: 1800: 1777: 1738: 1718: 1648: 1608:Sky Attacker 1607: 1604: 1566: 1561: 1558:79.79.30.120 1542: 1511: 1454: 1433: 1388: 1353:Good luck! 1321: 1318: 1302:24.32.49.200 1298: 1280:24.32.49.200 1252:24.32.49.200 1232: 1214:24.32.49.200 1211: 1207: 1180: 1177: 1158:Regarding? 1142: 1120: 1117: 1018: 1015: 986: 980: 957: 955: 944: 914: 908: 885: 883: 872: 813: 724: 699: 679: 620: 602: 585: 581: 559:misbehavior. 532: 529: 506: 491: 460: 395: 376: 372: 368: 366: 346: 290:Matt Leinart 264: 250: 233:is perfect. 113: 102: 63: 55: 43: 37: 2164:Unsubscribe 2160:Single-page 2005:93.143.2.52 1984:93.143.2.52 1974:Orijentolog 1957:Unsubscribe 1953:Single-page 1545:PMDrive1061 1522:Unsubscribe 1518:Single-page 1022:Ottava Rima 824:Unsubscribe 820:Single-page 757:Interview: 741:Editorial: 682:Will Beback 666:John Carter 513:John Carter 471:Unsubscribe 467:Single-page 231:Vince Young 36:This is an 2168:EdwardsBot 2082:as well. 1961:EdwardsBot 1526:EdwardsBot 996:Skier Dude 924:Skier Dude 828:EdwardsBot 644:privately. 475:EdwardsBot 354:SlimVirgin 2258:protected 2211:Cool Hand 2196:Cool Hand 1229:WP:SECURE 1187:protected 288:You're a 96:Redheylin 2104:A Nobody 1888:contribs 1813:BrownBot 1645:Question 1367:Thanks! 1138:wp:point 1099:Fatuorum 987:articles 968:orphaned 915:articles 896:orphaned 859:You can 841:Talkback 369:one edit 106:contribs 1569:delanoy 1096:Malleus 586:nothing 169:places. 139:claims. 132:claims. 39:archive 2098:, and 2003:... -- 1780:WP:NPA 1774:Thanks 1622:And a 1438:Fecchi 1396:Fecchi 1346:, and 1086:Advice 1042:Advice 552:WP:COI 488:Update 256:WP:WQA 110:WP:NPA 2188:about 1875:Azure 1624:Hippo 1240:dαlus 593:that. 16:< 2266:talk 2236:talk 2215:Luke 2200:Luke 2192:WP:N 2172:talk 2058:talk 2044:talk 2009:talk 2000:this 1988:talk 1965:talk 1884:talk 1878:Fury 1854:talk 1848:Jim 1837:So? 1817:talk 1808:you. 1801:The 1788:talk 1764:talk 1749:talk 1726:talk 1708:talk 1673:talk 1658:talk 1635:talk 1591:talk 1576:adds 1549:talk 1530:talk 1442:talk 1421:talk 1400:talk 1373:talk 1359:talk 1330:talk 1322:does 1306:talk 1284:talk 1270:talk 1256:talk 1218:talk 1195:talk 1178:Hi, 1164:talk 1149:talk 1128:talk 1071:talk 1026:talk 1002:talk 930:talk 832:talk 687:talk 670:talk 656:talk 589:etc. 569:talk 517:talk 499:talk 479:talk 386:talk 349:here 298:talk 265:that 239:talk 220:talk 207:him. 183:talk 157:talk 120:talk 115:Cirt 100:talk 86:talk 71:talk 1627:Gnu 1012:Meh 978:). 906:). 707:466 648:so. 628:466 610:466 540:466 526:ANI 377:one 373:one 319:fax 309:Jus 280:fax 270:Jus 192:up. 2268:) 2238:) 2194:. 2174:) 2166:· 2162:· 2158:· 2094:, 2060:) 2046:) 2011:) 1990:) 1967:) 1959:· 1955:· 1951:· 1890:) 1886:| 1856:) 1819:) 1790:) 1766:) 1751:) 1728:) 1710:) 1675:) 1660:) 1637:) 1593:) 1551:) 1532:) 1524:· 1520:· 1516:· 1444:) 1423:) 1402:) 1375:) 1361:) 1332:) 1308:) 1286:) 1272:) 1258:) 1235:Dæ 1220:) 1197:) 1166:) 1151:) 1130:) 1073:) 1028:) 1005:) 933:) 834:) 826:· 822:· 818:· 702:JN 672:) 658:) 623:JN 605:JN 571:) 535:JN 531:-- 519:) 501:) 481:) 473:· 469:· 465:· 388:) 380:-- 351:. 314:da 300:) 275:da 241:) 222:) 185:) 159:) 122:) 112:. 88:) 73:) 2264:( 2234:( 2170:( 2056:( 2042:( 2007:( 1986:( 1963:( 1882:( 1852:( 1815:( 1786:( 1762:( 1747:( 1724:( 1706:( 1671:( 1656:( 1633:( 1589:( 1567:. 1565:J 1547:( 1528:( 1440:( 1419:( 1398:( 1371:( 1357:( 1328:( 1304:( 1282:( 1268:( 1254:( 1216:( 1193:( 1162:( 1147:( 1126:( 1069:( 1024:( 999:( 950:⚠ 927:( 878:⚠ 856:. 830:( 668:( 654:( 567:( 515:( 497:( 477:( 384:( 296:( 237:( 218:( 181:( 155:( 118:( 103:· 98:( 84:( 69:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index