User talk:Girth Summit/Archive 16

11150:. In last moth end part of it got deleted first then contested by a user and subsequently that user was proved to be sock. The sock user had added talk page message to contest the content, by the time I partially prepared reply in my sandbox, other users seems to have realized that it was a sock account and content was restored and their talk page message was reverted (by your edit dif 1101324993) , so I had no hurry to post my reply. (Almost immediately after sock edits were reverted, another user entered the scene to delete the next sourced content section added by me so my priority changed towards thinking over discussion for the same, which still I have not written and opened. Personally I make point to not engage in any content edit wars or personalizing disputes from my end and limit myself to talk page content dispute resolution mechanisms). 12229:. When the new account was created, their edits were identical (me and one other user reverted them, so I saw the edits yesterday before they were deleted.) My thought process was that this new account was evading a block and making the exact same edits that were permanently deleted the day prior for whatever reason. My fault was not checking the talk page to see what kind of block was made (soft or hard,) but I only saw the contributions page and noticed the block. Just wanted to explain my thought process so it didn't seem like I was filing the case in bad faith, which is something I really do try hard to avoid. I do appreciate the feedback though and will keep all of this in mind moving forward. Thanks! 3609:, apologies for the slow response - it's getting near the end of the school year, and work is very busy at the moment. So, my problem here is that my hands are somewhat tied by the CU policy in what I can say publicly about IP addresses, when I have run checkuser on an account. I'm going to leave that report to another SPI clerk/admin to handle. In general terms, I'd say that you shouldn't give too much thought to their denials - someone who has recently been caught evading their TBan by editing through an IP is not likely to be given much credence when they claim not to have continued doing the same thing to evade a block. 8677:

Scots. So when the Scots crowned Charles II it was as king of Britain (not Scotland). Which, with massive understatement, could be described as a provocation. In short order Oliver Cromwell was leading an English army across the border. The campaign was hard fought, but ended with the whole of Scotland subjugated. OK, in some ways it ended with Charles and the Scots' army going down to defeat in Worcester. Which part of Scotland is Worcester in, you ask? Read the article. Lovingly crafted and fresh from a rigorous GAN courtesy of Tayi Arajakate we believe this is ready for the exigencies of a FAC." --

15483: 13233: 7356: 15818: 11624: 3783: 12480: 11328: 3103: 8668: 13244: 13202: 11338: 11214: 7265: 2817: 2733: 13449: 9176: 4562: 790: 31: 3849: 13169: 11317: 7254: 2712: 7303: 2775: 13180: 7367: 7333: 2723: 14135: 14090: 13848: 13545: 9890: 9845: 9706: 9571: 9272: 5293: 5248: 4953: 4658: 1552: 1507: 1277: 1181: 886: 11529: 7322: 16506: 16295: 16155: 16047: 15874: 12897: 12343: 8538: 7044: 6996: 4399: 4321: 3185: 723: 327: 279: 231: 160: 13330: 11412: 7411: 2906: 4168: 13996: 13983: 13944: 1316: 14174: 9929: 5332: 5075: 5049: 1591: 1368: 16368: 6823: 14888: 10972: 6363: 2622: 14867: 9779: 5182: 1441: 13294: 11386: 7385: 2862: 13362: 11433: 7430: 5062: 1303: 12784: 12688: 12154: 12069: 11712: 9066: 9693: 9680: 9667: 13970: 13957: 1355: 1342: 1329: 1290: 442: 2806: 8440: 13262: 11361: 2835: 13473: 9200: 4586: 814: 12949: 12839: 3790: 16220: 6581: 14831: 9743: 5146: 1405: 10956: 6347: 2606: 15506: 13225: 11309: 7348: 2798: 8627: 6943:: "Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns." 7964:. Not sure what you mean by that. The oldest account is R1322. Do you mean that you couldn't see ("detect") the edits made in January because the account is stale but were only able to confirm through login data? Even so, if you can confirm and call them a confirmed sock, it seems that they should be the master. I'll obviously defer to your decision, but...-- 7753:, where user places the warred-over content on a related page, strikes me as highly inappropriate, especially with the user's stated intention in the edit summary to begin edit warring again at Stavros Halkias as soon as protection expires on there. Any advice on what to do? I don't want the war to simply move to another page. Thanks, 7854:). Meanwhile they have been creating a fair amount of disruption creating new articles, new drafts, articles-forced-into-drafts, and submitting drafts created by other users for review (I see no pattern to the submissions in terms of a connection between the user and the authors of the drafts). They also copied 2900:. Autoconfirmed users will be able to access basic information about an IP address that includes the country and connection method. Those with advanced privileges (admin, bureaucrat, checkuser) will have access to extra information that includes the Internet Service Provider and more specific location. 15258:

Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to

12659:

I have a bored whippet lying next to me who wants me to take her for a walk! No need for embarassment though, and not a mistake at all - there's no reason it should have been obvious to you that the creator was the sock of a banned user. If you've spent time assessing the sources and think an article

11937:

I took a look - the fact that one of Kbabej's first socks was called PDX_er1 did make me suspicious. However, CU doesn't point to a connection between the accounts, and there's nobody else on their IP. A bit of Googling tells me that PDX is the code for Portland International Airport, so perhaps it's

11544:

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly

10949:

6340:

2599:

15050:

September is the time for the annual Wiki Loves Monuments competition to get quality photographs of listed buildings and scheduled monuments in the UK. It would be good if any members in the Yorkshire area got out and about taking images of any monuments or listed buildings that they find. There are

11905:

I know you're more than capable of standing up for yourself, but I felt obliged to leave an NPA warning nonetheless. I concur on the obvious sockiness. My own first edits, a decade ago, were to start an AfD (as you may recall, having defended me from the ensuing sockpuppetry accusations). My defense

11677:

If you are no longer very active on Knowledge or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and

11564:

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower.

7978:

By 'I can detect', I meant that there is probably an older master. I'd overlooked R1322's deleted edits from January - if you want to move the case to that name I wouldn't object at all, but I wonder whether the more prolific (if slightly later) account is a more useful name in terms of recognisable

7862:. Ilenekrall created the sandbox back in 2017 and has done nothing else with that account. I've come close to blocking them for disruption, but I'd like to know if they are a sock first. Of course, any evidence that they are a sock may be too old, but I think there's enough here to warrant a check.-- 3936:

3232:

I just discovered that I've been blocked for "Disruptively adding findagrave pages." I ceased doing that as soon as I was asked to, but I never thought of it as disruptive. Some biographies on Knowledge have findagrave links and some don't; I thought I was being helpful, completing incomplete pages.

12986:

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2019. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are almost caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply to let us know not to send you any

12876:

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2020. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are just getting caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply (with a ping) to let us know

8676:

Thank you today for that one, introduced: "Another joint venture from the itinerant repeat nominator Gog the Mild and the Scottish history expert Girth Summit. Charles I was king of England and Scotland, as two entirely separate matters. When the English chopped his head off they didn't consult the

3814:

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net

3033:

Hello Girth Summit! It's been a long time and I hope all is well with you! I received a call from an actress and producer named Mycole Metcalf because her long-standing Knowledge page has Disappeared without reason. I'm wondering if you can take a look at it to see what happened and if it can be

16015:

Girth Summit -- I am far too old to know any of this, so I envy you! And to the IP, I did not mean to cast aspersions upon you or any other specific person, but I think what I said holds true. And even if an article were to be created with the best of intentions, I personally believe there is no

4190:

So I see. I would advise you to withdraw that complaint - Cullen didn't make an adjudication, he left a comment, offering an opinion. He was in no way been negligent, and you will not enjoy any success in convincing anyone that he was. You also need to collapse those massive walls of text - diffs,

4055:

Yeah - Paris is a different kettle of fish, you can't rely on them speaking English. In my experience, the most competent English language speakers in Europe are the Dutch, then the Norwegians, then the Belgians. Swedes and Danes rank highly too. The English themselves are probably in the top ten,

16399:

Hi Girth Summit - Sorry to trouble you with this. A new editor has recently tagged some 40 articles, some of which I have written, with notability tags. While the editor may well have a point that these articles can be improved, these articles are about large listed companies (constituents of the

15718:

I am happy to say, I have had little prior experience with such templates or with UTRS. In many ways I still feel like a trusted amateur. Only doing the easy part of the work. Dipping my toes in deeper waters these days. Could use all the feedback I can get from editors in this conversation. Just

8971:

Hah - I knew you must be fallible! I too use the 'desktop' mode on my mobile, and can do most things with it, but anything vaguely CheckUserey is a total no go. As for your pay grade - we CUs are all living it large, earning up to 1,000,000% of regular admin wages - you should apply this October!

3675:

Did you read Blablubb's guide, which I linked to at the SPI? That has some good advice. We're looking for diffs, not just a link to an account or an IP adress and you saying 'they are doing the same thing' - show us that they're doing the same thing, give us diffs that the sockmaster or previous

12247:

No worries, easy mistake to make. Just check the type of block before reporting in future. Their edits were completely inappropriate, I've left them some guidance on their talk. Let me know if they ignore that and keep adding it - they're not socking, but they are replacing sourced content with

10744:

Happy Yorkshire Day to all our members. Thanks to all for looking after the Yorkshire articles that we support as a project. Would be good if more members would get involved in improving the articles and in fixing the various problems flagged on the articles. There are also a number of articles

7201:

There were a few issues with it - you filed it under the stock's name rather than the master's, and it didn't actually link to the master, but don't worry about it - SPI formatting is tricky to get right, especially if you don't do it regularly. I've fixed the issues with it, but didn't want to

11183:

I do not know if discussed account is sock or not and what are observation and sock control processes. While replying that account in good faith, as responsible member of WP community I wish to keep you informed of the developments, so you can guide me, if needed. This is for your information.

8249:

No worries. I didn't really do a behavioural investigation - all these connections were purely technical. The impression I got was GHBH, where the GH had an interest in patrolling and SPIs (amongst other things), and the BHs did random childish trolling, with an interest in racism and being an

4021:

False noses? Well, I did say it was bad schoolboy French, and I meant it! I actually lived in Brussels for a year in the early 2000s, but my ability to learn either of the languages was hampered by the locals' tendency to raise their eyebrows at my poor attempts and then reply to me in perfect

3907:

recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

6652:

Hello, I see that you've previously given very patient advice to user Kitchen Knife. They seem to be going off the rails again. Perhaps you can provide some third party advice to them (or to me, as you see fit). I see they have been an editor with thousands of contributions since 2007, so I'm

16000:

I would like to make it clear that I am neither a supporter nor member of KF. I have been heavily involved in the dropkiwifarms campaign and am a member of one of the marginalized groups that they target. I believe that not only should there be an article on Christine be created based on its

13303: 8341:

Thank you, Girth Summit! I am always trying to learn more about the AfD process - I recently became aware of a procedural issue I had managed to miss despite my reviews of the various guidelines etc, so I was wondering whether I had missed another finer point of the process. Thanks again,

7850:, whose account was created on June 28, claims on their userpage (the Good Article icon) that they helped bring an article to Good Article status back in October 2021. They also claim that they live in Germany - I just blocked an IP range they are using, which geolocates to Virginia (see 211:! I've been diligently fighting Vandalism on Knowledge for the last 2 days. I would love for you to train me, once you have open trainee spots! I'm new and inexperienced, but ready to learn about any mistakes I might make, using the wrong warnings, etc. Looking forward to your answer! -- 11166:

and personal aspersions. Idk if they are same sock account, but IMHO other users are less likely to keep track of my sandbox which is named very unrelated. Idk what are sock related identity and processes. I have kept good faith from my side. Posted reference sources shared by them @

4493:. I've advised the person who left the original comments that they were inappropriate; the lm corporate account has been blocked as a username violation. For future reference, accounts that have names representing a company, and which are editing about that company, can be reported to 11846:, a user who Welcomed them, ostensibly because of their interest in Oregon articles (Kbabej was unblocked several years ago after I CU-blocked them - I didn't even realize there might be a connection until I started writing this). The user's edit summaries are not that of a new user. 3864:

has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

3825:

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

4281:

Hi Revi - apologies, I should have been more careful there. The script allows me to select which accounts I want to request lock on, I should have unticked the boxes for accounts that had already been reported. I take it that it's OK to use the script if I avoid double-reporting?

11849:

What brought the user to my attention initially, was none of the above. It was a multiple speedy tagging of an article that I reverted and for which I warned the user. I also asked them about other accounts. Their reaction was, uh, not optimal. See their Talk page. What do you

3810:

on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000 at the end of May.

4135:

and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the

16001:

notability, but also to provide a nuetral, non-hateful source of information, as currently the first result for her name is the "real life villains wiki". I believe that the article about her should be placed under page protection to prevent bad faith edits against her.

3404:

I just deleted some draft pages and blocked a couple of users who were creating pages about Abdur Rahman, a YouTuber, but I don't remember the exact name of the SPI case. There also seemed to be some overlap in participation of editors identified as sockpuppets in

8514:

I think semi is fine this time around, since you've already blocked the main offending autoconfirmed editor. Pretty sure this is a sock situation – most of the IPs are from the Toronto area – but I have very little experience in this stuff. Anyway, thanks again,

8112:

Thank you for your kind e-mail! I am not at all put off by your response, which would have been reasonable 90+ percent of the time. I believe that when you see my brief response, yours will be something along the lines of, "Yep." It's all good. Take care!

13708: 9435: 4821: 1049: 6720:

idk if a youtube query search in which a decent list of info is available to define the term "monkey branching" is valid as a source. Regardless, here is the link if you should be so inclined to pick and choose to determine if the definition holds.

7915:

visiting parents. Today I've been on a driving tour, taking pictures of historic buildings to decorate my next few articles. Glad to say that it's about 15 degrees C cooler here than it is in Englandshire - still warm and sunny though. Happy days!

3805:

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new

6502:

Ha, I had it all typed out for the help desk, then decided to try creating the reference manually. I was using the cite option in the visual editor, which must do some errant magic to the URL when it's generated. Long story short, I is good now.

15719:

asked Liz to critique me with my AfD work. Went back through new page patrol school with Atsme a few months ago. So much to be familiar with... A sticking point is my pagespace work; there's an inner stuckness I haven't been able to breech yet.

3015:

Hi, I'm Anuran, and I've been looking on my chat. it seems that I've made a mistake. I can't edit articles without a source meaning that even if I am true, I must bring a reference for my edit no matter what like Arthropleura is a herbivore...

6694:

Hi - sorry for the delay, haven't logged in for a couple of days. I see you blocked already, but I took a quick look and they are confirmed. Any other accounts at present, but they're using a couple of very wide ranges so it's hard to be sure.

3550:

I totally understand, I'm low on time myself. And no problem, I think I'll make a new SPI when time allows. I had just remembered you asked me to let you know if the IP came back (it's the same range), so I wanted to inform you first. Regards,

8295:, because I thought my !vote for a redirect is essentially a !vote to delete. I would have more clearly !voted to delete if I did not think there was article history worth preserving - from my view, the article has potential. But per the 7998:

We frequently have sockmasters who have made fewer edits than their socks. I see no reason to make an exception here. With your permission, I'll request a clerk move the case and retag (patrolling administrators aren't permitted to move

15434:

On some Wikimedia projects, an editor's IP addresses may be checked upon their request, typically to prove innocence against a sockpuppet allegation. Such checks are not allowed on the English Knowledge and such requests will not be

12546:

It's a range block on 92.40.160.0/19, which was being used by an abusive LTA. It's always possible there could be good faith users affected by any range block, so I've got no problem with your reinstating good edits you see from it.

13130:

Oh crap, scratch that - I did receive them, and I even replied to the first one confirming that I had. I somehow managed to mute the thread however, so Gmail didn't show me the reminders you sent - many apologies. I'll get onto it.

4213:

I apologize for my late response to this. I had not followed your talk page and did not realize you had replied until you mentioned it just now. I thank you for your comments and advice, which are well noted for future activity.

4473:

page but a recently created account 'LM Corporate' removed. I would say both of these users should be prevented from editing further but I wasn't sure who to warn first...any help you might have would be very appreciated. Best,

4268:

where same accounts and additional accounts are being requested) please don't use script and edit the original request manually, unless the request has already been handled. It makes our (crazy) life easier. Thanks! — regards,

8201:

Have another look now - I was doing a bit more poking around. There were a few more, with some pretty nasty stuff in their contribs, and more than one had TPA/e-mail revoked. I've re-blocked all sans TPA/e-mail, and tagged.

3239:

Incidentally, I am writing today because I wanted to correct information about actor Ronald Colman (1891-1958). The name of his first wife does not agree with the name in his obituary in Variety (21 May 1958, p. 79<ref:

11373:

has been closed with consensus to add javascript that will show edit notices for editors editing via a mobile device. This only works for users using a mobile browser, so iOS app editors will still not be able to see edit

2853: 7877:

I see you've blocked already. The editing other users' user pages and copying drafts from their sandboxes was indeed suspicious, so I took a look. I'm going to record what I found in an SPI case for future reference...

6517:

If you were using the visual editor, I'm doubly the wrong person to ask! I remember looking at it once, years ago; my main recollection is a strong sense of confusion tinged with dismay. Maybe it's improved since then?

3245:): His first wife was English actress "Thelma Victoria Maud, whom he married in 1918. They were divorced in 1936." The Knowledge page identifies his wife as "Thelma Raye," which was one of her many surnames <ref: --> 6969:

guidelines still apply, but providing the subjects they're writing about are notable (I doubt there are many non-notable NT properties) and their editing is neutral and properly sourced, there shouldn't be a problem.

12169: 480:

to someone else's talk page, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. In addition, you can spread the sunshine to anyone who visits your userpage and/or talk page by adding

12530:

Hi, I'm a bit puzzled by the 3-month block of this IP. Their only edit was actually a good one (despite being reverted, I've since restored it). I must be missing something, can you tell me what? Thanks and cheers!

3057:. I wasn't part of the process, and I haven't reviewed the deleted article thoroughly, but from a quick look I can see why people took issue with it - it seems to be lacking any sources which tick all the boxes of 13899: 13344: 12799: 9622: 8479:

after full protection expired. And as usual nothing on talk page. Any suggestion on next steps? I'm happy to put in a request at RPP if you'd suggest that, but figured I'd ask you here first. Thanks for the help,

5004: 3590:

the IPs come from the same sock range, including the new ones I reported, and that Solavirum actually edited with that same range again even after their sock block. I thought you should be aware of this. Regards,

1232: 2887: 15733:

There's a lot to learn! Still, you don't need to learn it all - we all find our niches. That doesn't look like the right template - it's talking about anonymous users - I think the one you wanted there was

122: 4315: 11991:- I don't think a CU is needed but it's a little time sensitive cause I'd like to stop the disruption via page hijack that has happened yet again (and before Google indexes it.) They're obvious ducks. 6450:

Any ideas on how to use its pages as a functioning link? It has the pertinent information I used in the Hillyland article, but I can't link it as a reference because it's javascript and returns a 404.

536:

No thing's up, I just didn't think that list was an improvement. I don't think a list of protagonists would be helpful. If you want to pursue it, you could raise a suggestion on the article talk page.

15058:

If you are not in Yorkshire then you are still able to join in as the competition covers the whole of the UK, separate competitions are available for other areas of the world if you are not UK based.

7822:

has been a candidate for over three weeks, and there are almost no comments. I would really appreciate it if you took some time to leave a comment (it doesn't necessarily have to be a full review) :)

8116:(Also: I'm used to it being 114 F. outside in July but I knew I was getting into that when I moved to the Mojave Desert! Wishing you and your neighbors a safe end to the heat as soon as possible!) - 3456:, and apologies for the delay - the end of the school year is approaching, and things are pretty busy at work. I've investigated the Gamer10101 case, and been able to confirm a bunch of those socks. 13075:

Hi Girth Summit, I was wondering if you've sent a reply to ArbCom emails from Jul 26, Jul 29, and Aug 18? If you have (since Aug 18), we haven't received it. A reply would be helpful. Thanks! Best,

12022:

re: protection - I think it's probably best not to since it'll just slip under the radar, it's a good honeypot, especially now that it'll be on a few more peoples WL. But if you wouldn't mind G5ing

15602: 12498:, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated. 13271: 3860:

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Knowledge's projects and policy pages.

13371:

The new pages patrol (NPP) team has prepared an appeal to the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) for assistance with addressing Page Curation bugs and requested features. You are encouraged to read the

2883: 15626:

It's not something I'd do myself as the blocking admin - except when it's a sock of an LTA, I only revoke TPA on accounts I've blocked myself in fairly extreme circumstances, on the grounds of

13340: 7421: 7141:

I have considered it, and I think I've applied temporary blocks in the past. The problem is that it's an incredibly busy range - there would be a lot of good faith users affected by the block.

4041:

lol. I did better. I lived in Paris for a few years, and most of the French couldn't speak "perfect English". I became so fluent I began to dream in French. It's fairly rusty now from disuse.--

3531:- apologies, I haven't been around much over the last couple of weeks, real life is unusually busy. If it's a problem, please raise another SPI case, listing the IPs and similarities. Cheers 16460:

The account was the sock of an LTA. After a bit of digging around, I just blocked about fifty accounts, including that one. I have rolled back all their live article-space contribs. Cheers

16374:

to the others. Next time, please raise the case so that the oldest account is the master (even if they're already blocked), and the new account is listed as a sock. I'll go tidy it up now.

15246: 14858: 12225:

Hi Girthsummit! I noticed the note on the SPI case I filed, and kind of wanted to explain my rationale for filing it. I looked at the contributions for Communicationstmathews, and saw that

10937: 9770: 6990: 6328: 5173: 4393: 2915: 2587: 1432: 717: 16346:

since I am not exactly sure how a user would go about messaging Knowledge to alert they are the copyright holder to an image used by The NY Times. Also, this same user is possibly a sock (

11370: 7938:, although perhaps not quite as hot as it has been lately. Where we used to live, it sometimes climbed over 100 degrees F, but we moved to a much cooler part of the country, thank god.-- 128:

For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

16248: 11172: 7186:

Can you please let me know if I made any mistakes when reporting this sock puppet yesterday, something I've never done before, and if so, what corrections do I need to make? Thank you.

321: 6466: 2845: 16513: 3310:

Hi. I wish to be an administrator and check user. I always edit regularly and I won't block the wrong user. If I'm a check user, I will not assume that someone is a sockpuppet.Thanks

8788:

Hang on a minute - that looks like actual Welsh, not Welsh English - we've already got a project for that! It's the cocknies I feel sorry for - where's their project, me old china?

2938: 15825: 15051:

still several entries on the various list articles without images and it would be best to prioritise these if you are in the right place. Details for this years competition can be

15881: 12891: 12337: 6606: 3843: 15387:, Recently, I used my brother sim card to browse and editing wikipedia. So, I want to check that is there any other account that was created by this ip? Or to be safe from sock. 4358: 4106:

Ah - OK, good point, understood. Hopefully 'others' will take heed and do something about it! Now I'm going to stick my head back into CU logs and then go to bed - nighty-night!

7859: 14887: 13521:

has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 18,141 last month to 18,166 on 31 August 2022). In the area of GAs

6440: 15228: 10919: 9248:

has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 18,093 last month to 18,141 on 28 July 2022). In the area of GAs

6310: 4634:

has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 18,038 last month to 18,093 on 28 June 2022). In the area of GAs

3991: 2569: 13277: 862:

has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 17,979 last month to 18,038 on 6 June 2022). In the area of GAs

15779: 15620: 11755: 11092: 8164:

Because that's the sort of thing that interests people like that, for some reason. Blocked. I can't see an existing case to connect them to, will start one in a minute...

7033: 4436: 760: 15630:. That said, there's nothing stopping any other admin from drawing a line under it by modifying my block if they think the requests are just a time sink at this point. . 13314: 13209: 15922: 10971: 8391:- happy to chat by e-mail. I'm sure you're aware that I'll be limited by the CU policy in what I can disclose, just noting that here for the benefit of anyone watching. 7370: 3577: 3484: 3325: 364: 15770:

I find the tasks I gravitate towards largely involve making peace and herding folks in a positive direction. Don't need tools for that, but the trust I feel is useful.

7483: 3819: 2977: 15037:

The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.

10733:

The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.

7181: 6136:

The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.

2395:

The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.

12610: 12267:

Will do, thank you! I really do appreciate the feedback, and I'll be sure to keep that in mind moving forward! Always working to be a better contributor where I can!

3986: 13891: 13887: 9614: 9610: 7812: 6362: 4996: 4992: 2993: 2621: 1224: 1220: 7296: 7292: 7280: 7272: 7268: 4228:

No need to apologise. You ought to have received a notification about the reply (unless you have notifications switched off), so sorry you didn't see it until now.

13418: 9104: 7038: 3406: 3179: 2768: 2764: 2752: 2744: 2740: 2736: 273: 225: 105: 13310: 7231: 7195: 4015: 13716: 13372: 12934: 12495: 12380: 11604: 9443: 7504: 4829: 1057: 711: 681: 667: 653: 639: 621: 603: 589: 575: 561: 526: 149: 13247: 11506: 16232: 16212: 15279: 13911: 13476: 12608: 10994: 9634: 5016: 4141: 3573: 1244: 154: 11699: 7081: 4265: 3222: 316: 268: 13915: 9638: 8410:(Also for page watchers) I'd never ask for privileged CU information to be disclosed. Just wanted to discuss what kind of evidence to file next time without 8322:, I should have read your comments more closely. I've reverted my close, and will allow someone else to decide whether to relist, or close as they see best. 7439:

The New Pages Patrol queue has around 10,000 articles to be reviewed. As all administrators have the patrol right, please consider helping out. The queue is

5020: 3992: 3409:

which you handled a few days ago. I just like to report these incidents to a checkuser who is involved in SPI cases in case some reporting needs to be done.

2760: 2756: 1248: 8755:

Oh yeah, I know about that one - I meant that we should fork Knowledge and have a separate Scottish English version. And a scouse one. And a Geordie one...

3488: 197: 16500: 16347: 16289: 16260: 14882:

Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...

12524: 12503: 11682: 10966:

Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...

9203: 6815: 6618: 6385: 6357:

Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...

4589: 4537: 3941: 3572:, denying that the new IPs are them and that they haven't edited since the sock block. I found this denial extremely odd to say the least, since the range 3340: 3305: 2644: 2616:

Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...

4132: 3708: 3690: 3115:

Thank you for handling the slog of cases at SPI, I don't send a thank you ping on each case close, but I wanted to say that your efforts are appreciated.

2849: 16149: 16041: 15868: 15494: 13776: 12293: 11988: 11558: 11280:

which then led me to the helpful "how to edit" links on your user page, which will come in handy if I ever find the time to become a more active editor.

9503: 8532: 4889: 3637: 3623: 3600: 3560: 3545: 3522: 3236:

I was also blocked because I haven't responded to questions directed to me, but I don't recall ever seeing any, so my question is: Where do they appear?

1117: 817: 12653: 11765: 11607:. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive. 7532: 6709: 4242: 4223: 4205: 550: 13800: 13768: 12108: 11175:

for India related articles improvement vis a vis discrimination against women in India. And there after replied the new user account @ their talk page

9527: 9495: 8453: 7572: 7336: 6984: 6917: 6899: 6837: 6546: 6532: 6512: 6497: 4913: 4881: 3768: 1141: 1109: 7169: 7155: 7136: 7122: 6780: 3173: 424: 406: 16543: 16332: 7897:

Thanks for checking, and thanks for the ping at the SPI. Yes, the disruption the user was causing kept rising, and I wasn't sure how busy you were.--

7216: 6478: 4529: 4515: 4120: 3470: 2820: 16192: 16084: 15911: 13151: 11402:

Administrators will now see links on user pages for "Change block" and "Unblock user" instead of just "Block user" if the user is already blocked. (

9114: 8575: 7236: 6952: 4368: 3299: 3087: 2694: 13792: 13213: 13205: 12753:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 12123:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 11770:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 11341: 9519: 9119:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 8250:

edgelord (amongst other things). Feel free to peruse their contribs to get a feel for them - some of the revdelled stuff is particularly pleasant.

8069: 6883: 6748: 6735: 6727: 4905: 4172: 1133: 13313:

system to improve the reporting of harmful incidents through easier and safer reporting. You can leave comments on the talk page by answering the

4469:

There is something going on that I thought an admin might be able to help with. A new user left what was clearly a disgruntled Yelp review on the

4307: 4296: 4070: 4050: 4036: 3388: 15535: 15477: 15338:, Can you run a checkuser on my account? I ask you this because is there any other account that was created by this (36.252.223.121) IP address. 13903: 13395: 13352: 13032: 12738: 11483: 11353: 11349: 9626: 8495:

I've reverted, blocked the IP, and applied semi protection for one month - full protection may have been overkill. Let me know if it carries on.

8312: 7460: 6864: 6848: 5008: 4156: 3722: 3492: 2954: 1236: 11377: 11053: 7690: 7679: 7658: 7644: 6642: 121:

for July 22, 2022. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at

16284: 16197: 15578:

Would have been useful this summer, it's been toasty. Facing a Yorkshire winter now though, so it will probably sit in a drawer for a while...

11600: 11423: 8280: 7552: 7444: 6537:

It's mostly decent. I have to revert to the source editor for the occasional thing, but I recommend it, especially if you're just copyediting.

3427: 3365: 3262: 3254: 3054: 12695: 12118: 12076: 11297: 13875: 13680: 13400: 11719: 11488: 9598: 9407: 9073: 8899:

I've blocked because well, obvs. Can't bring the case to mind though - I mean, I block a lot of accounts every day, help me out here! Cheers

7851: 7712: 7583: 7465: 4980: 4793: 3566: 3431: 2959: 1208: 1021: 13424: 8158: 6756: 3443: 3250:, but not her maiden name. Since I'm blocked, a punishment I shall have to learn to live with, perhaps you want to consider the correction. 511: 13700: 12748: 11835: 11345: 11281: 9427: 8545: 8136: 7276: 4813: 4388: 3774: 3246: 2748: 1041: 15416: 15378: 12628:. Which is great, more science communication is needed on and off wiki, but may not assist a narrow assertion of notability, in this case 12465: 12430: 4483: 3570: 494: 16107: 14060: 12214: 9815: 8918: 8281: 7768:

Indef p-blocked from article space. They can still use talk pages, so can make the case for their changes and attempt to gain consensus.

5218: 3739:). Personally I don't see a reason to request this in the SPI, especially given how obvious it is with that evidence. Thanks in advance. 1477: 14685: 14589: 12331: 11797: 10440: 10344: 8659: 7108:

Done. That /32 IP range has a bunch of different vandals and LTAs who operate out of it; I don't recognise that particular one however.

5843: 5747: 4275: 2102: 2006: 14695: 14690: 14680: 14599: 14594: 14581: 14561: 14556: 14546: 14430: 14401: 14070: 14065: 14055: 14028: 13390: 13183: 11843: 11839: 11478: 10553: 10450: 10445: 10435: 10354: 10349: 10336: 10316: 10311: 10301: 10185: 10156: 9825: 9820: 9810: 8489: 8466: 7455: 6931: 6715: 6560: 5956: 5853: 5848: 5838: 5757: 5752: 5739: 5719: 5714: 5704: 5588: 5559: 5228: 5223: 5213: 3270: 2949: 2215: 2112: 2107: 2097: 2016: 2011: 1998: 1978: 1973: 1963: 1847: 1818: 1487: 1482: 1472: 220: 16388: 15959:

Apologies for the inadvertent talk page stalking, but just wanted to say there is likely to be more of this nonsense given the recent

15713: 14700: 14604: 14566: 14444: 14415: 13050:

Sorry for the lack of response, I've been away from the screen for a protracted period. Looks like someone else dealt with it. Cheers

12194: 11906:

at the time was, essentially, that you can start an AfD successfully just by being book-smart. These edits read street-smart, though.

11331: 10455: 10359: 10321: 10199: 10170: 9151: 6800: 5858: 5762: 5724: 5602: 5573: 3748: 2117: 2021: 1983: 1861: 1832: 15862: 15681:

I think that's reasonable, but you should probably put a template on there indicating that you've done that, pointing them at UTRS. (

14531: 14517: 14304: 14075: 13692: 13347:

as part of the final decision to create a request for comment (RfC) on how to handle mass nominations at Articles for Deletion (AfD).

11660: 11512: 10286: 10272: 10059: 9830: 9419: 8723: 8706: 8184: 8137: 7003: 5689: 5675: 5462: 5233: 4805: 3919: 3807: 2926:. The remedy previously authorised administrators to delete or reduce to a stub, together with their talk pages, articles related to 1948: 1934: 1721: 1492: 1033: 16141: 16127: 16094:

Hi. I figured I'd notify you in case you feel it's worth taking any action: after a period of quiet, the Toronto IP appears to have

14502: 14374: 14339: 14314: 14309: 14299: 10257: 10129: 10094: 10069: 10064: 10054: 9146: 8524: 8509: 8476: 7782: 5660: 5532: 5497: 5472: 5467: 5457: 1919: 1791: 1756: 1731: 1726: 1716: 15954: 15662: 15592: 15573: 14654: 14488: 14384: 14379: 14349: 14344: 13907: 13379: 12824: 12598: 12579: 12561: 12518: 12051: 12032: 12017: 11443: 10409: 10243: 10139: 10134: 10104: 10099: 9630: 9040: 9021: 8952: 8929: 8913: 8860: 8647: 7602: 5812: 5646: 5542: 5537: 5507: 5502: 5012: 4459: 3969:

The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.

3124: 2071: 1905: 1801: 1796: 1766: 1761: 1240: 730: 16488: 16474: 16455: 16437: 15237:

which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.

14661: 14473: 14190: 14106: 13020: 12279: 12262: 11923:

I wouldn't say you're unique in being able to start an AfD as your first edit, but I would say that you're relatively rare. :-) --

10928:

which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.

10416: 10228: 9945: 9861: 9005: 8986: 8966: 8769: 7762: 6319:

which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.

5819: 5631: 5348: 5264: 2923: 2578:

which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.

2078: 1890: 1607: 1523: 765: 15728: 15446: 14629: 14293: 14266: 14228: 14200: 14195: 14185: 14155: 14150: 14116: 14111: 14101: 13187: 12405: 12311: 11262: 11127: 10384: 10048: 10021: 9983: 9955: 9950: 9940: 9910: 9905: 9871: 9866: 9856: 8835: 8816: 8802: 8783: 8351: 8336: 8101: 7499:

is a sock only here vandalizing pages and adding ' ' Ok ' ' in edit summary. Please stop them to cause further mischief. Thanks.

7288: 7284: 6459: 5787: 5451: 5424: 5386: 5358: 5353: 5343: 5313: 5308: 5274: 5269: 5259: 3822:

have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

2931: 2726: 2046: 1710: 1683: 1645: 1617: 1612: 1602: 1572: 1567: 1533: 1528: 1518: 16029: 16010: 15995: 15972: 15799: 15752: 15699: 15644: 15555: 14276: 14271: 14261: 14238: 14233: 14223: 12757:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 12674: 12127:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 11997: 11774:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 11591:

will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.

10031: 10026: 10016: 9993: 9988: 9978: 9123:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 8618: 7632: 6688: 5434: 5429: 5419: 5396: 5391: 5381: 5096:

There are 93 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! A warm welcome to the new members that have joined us since the June newsletter.

3656:

I'm new to this sockpuppet investigations thing, so could you please help me be a better evidence finder? What do I need to do?

3510: 3241: 3043: 1693: 1688: 1678: 1655: 1650: 1640: 15738:. I almost always use a tool like Twinkle or SPIhelper to apply blocks - they select the right template for you automatically. 14459: 14366: 14331: 13195: 13191: 12816: 12186: 11159: 10214: 10121: 10086: 5617: 5524: 5489: 4126: 4100: 3285:. Since you are now aware of the issue, and you're willing to stop adding them, I'll unblock your account. Thanks and regards, 1876: 1783: 1748: 16365:

I'm personally not an export on handling copyvios, especially image ones - however, the SPI was a good shout, this account is

15940:

Yeah, I know - they tried creating an RfC on its talk page (see Yapperbot's message above this), which I have twice now G8ed.

15842: 15676: 13064: 11970: 11956: 11879: 11599:

The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at

11289: 8749: 8264: 8230: 8216: 8196: 8178: 8027: 8008: 7993: 7947: 7930: 7906: 7892: 7835: 7750: 7726: 7102: 4371:

to which you were listed as a party has been declined, as the Committee felt it was premature. For the Arbitration Committee,

16162: 16054: 13156: 13145: 13125: 12144: 11942:

suspicious. I agree that the editing looks like someone who has been here before, but I can't point to anyone in particular.

11704: 11302: 11199: 10746: 8590: 8433: 7538: 7241: 7092: 4184: 3583: 3073:, we might be in a position to create a new article, but someone would need to do the legwork in terms of finding them. Best 2699: 15518:

more than a t-shirt. I can't make any promises, but if you would prefer to receive socks, feel free to say it in the email!

13044: 12436:

Ok, I want to know my ip address because I want to know that any other people use this ip address to edit wikipedia or not.

8881:

Hi Girth. I figured I'd just contact you, rather than post at ANI. That Thai IP who was trolling and range-hopping is back:

8425: 8405: 7546:: if you're interested in the why, I can email you. Not gonna disclose on Knowledge but it's a kinda standard UPE hallmark. 3138: 15735: 15472: 15396: 15347: 15210: 15160: 14902: 14618: 14179: 14140: 14095: 13871: 13760: 13414: 12996: 12886: 12514: 11695: 11502: 11239: 10901: 10869: 10598: 10373: 9934: 9895: 9850: 9594: 9487: 7479: 6662: 6436: 6292: 6278: 6001: 5776: 5337: 5298: 5253: 4976: 4873: 4363: 3982: 3504: 3420: 2973: 2551: 2260: 2035: 1596: 1557: 1512: 1204: 1101: 648:

Batman may not be the sole protagonist of DC Comics but Spider-Man is the sole protagonist of Marvel Comics is that right?

16413: 16259:

You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself

12774: 8081: 6617:

You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself

3153: 3002: 2997: 386: 16401: 16089: 15249:

to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.

14255: 14217: 13556: 12978: 12868: 10940:

to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.

10010: 9972: 9283: 6740: 6331:

to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.

5413: 5375: 4669: 4252: 2989: 2590:

to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.

1672: 1634: 897: 334: 15071:

The September 2022 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.

13317:. Users who have faced harmful situations are also invited to join a PIRS interview to share the experience. To sign up 11932: 11918: 8131: 3669: 16002: 13855: 13720: 13624: 11838:

for deletion. After that he nominated many other articles for deletion and voted in others. There's also this very odd

11176: 9578: 9447: 9351: 8296: 8244: 8087:

Weird - I'm sure I typed out a comment, maybe a misclick, or maybe the script did something odd. I've left a note now.

7973: 7508: 4960: 4833: 4737: 4464: 1188: 1061: 965: 685: 671: 657: 643: 625: 607: 593: 579: 565: 530: 202: 114: 106: 16238:

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive.

7558:

I can probably take an educated guess about their motivations, but I'd be grateful for your perspective - yes please.

3998:

Chaussettes? :p That word does indeed mean socks, but of the kind some of us use on our feet, not sock puppets. Check

3331:

I'll leave this here so you don't have to look at history to see it and in case you wish to look for other accounts.--

16359: 15124: 13973: 13879: 13740: 13375:

before it is sent, and if you support it, consider signing it. It is not a discussion, just a signature will suffice.

12754: 12540: 12124: 11771: 11635: 10833: 10762:

The August 2022 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.

9602: 9467: 9120: 9058: 8471: 7806: 7500: 6242: 4984: 4853: 2896: 2519: 1212: 1081: 97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 15934: 4501:

were not an attempt to use the {{which}} template, they were references to the UK consumer group of that name. Best

125:, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. 13895: 13883: 13676: 12445: 12409: 9618: 9606: 9403: 8612: 6153:

The July 2022 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.

5000: 4988: 4789: 3227: 2412:

The June 2022 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.

1228: 1216: 1017: 16095: 13318: 13101: 8893: 7797:

which I keep sending to draft. I reached the limits of my patience and was hoping you could take a look. Regards.

6598:

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

16302: 15311: 13999: 13986: 13859: 13840: 13836: 13832: 13828: 13824: 13820: 13816: 13812: 13808: 13804: 13784: 13780: 13772: 13764: 13756: 13748: 13744: 13580: 13509: 13458: 13434: 13410: 12510: 12277: 12239: 11691: 11498: 11026: 9709: 9582: 9563: 9559: 9555: 9551: 9547: 9543: 9539: 9535: 9531: 9511: 9507: 9499: 9491: 9483: 9475: 9471: 9307: 9236: 9185: 9161: 8381: 7475: 6432: 6417: 5065: 4964: 4945: 4941: 4937: 4933: 4929: 4925: 4921: 4917: 4897: 4893: 4885: 4877: 4869: 4861: 4857: 4693: 4622: 4571: 4547: 3978: 3317: 2969: 2890:

to all wikis as a Beta Feature. Any autoconfirmed user may enable the feature using the "IP info" checkbox under

2676: 1332: 1319: 1306: 1293: 1280: 1192: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1125: 1121: 1113: 1105: 1097: 1089: 1085: 921: 850: 799: 775: 709: 16113:

So I see. I've protected for three months now. Why this person won't just engage on the talk page is beyond me.

11113:

please could you file a case at SPI? I'm travelling at the moment, I don't have time to look at this right now.

11104: 11082: 11064: 3737: 3734: 167: 15129: 13867: 13863: 12241: 11793: 10838: 9590: 9586: 9142: 8598: 8059: 7935: 7871: 7638:

I talked to Alaa yesterday about them (or a few days ago) and he said they were a sock but didn't specify who.

6247: 5126: 4972: 4968: 3023: 2524: 1200: 1196: 15429: 14706: 14610: 14572: 14450: 14421: 11859: 11615:

Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated

10461: 10365: 10327: 10205: 10176: 5864: 5768: 5730: 5608: 5579: 2123: 2027: 1989: 1867: 1838: 14838:

to all the editors who labour away quietly and help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed.

14727: 14537: 13656: 13568: 12401: 11603:). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it 10482: 10292: 9750:

to all the editors who labour away quietly and help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed.

9383: 9295: 8957:

I may be good at editing with a smartphone but the intricacies of IP rangeblocks are way above my pay grade.

8686: 8594: 8586: 6936: 5885: 5695: 5153:

to all the editors who labour away quietly and help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed.

4769: 4681: 4383: 2144: 1954: 1412:

to all the editors who labour away quietly and help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed.

997: 909: 14741: 14734: 14720: 14508: 13035:. I'm not entirely sure if it's the same editor or if they are simply being paid by the same clients. Best, 12741:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 12111:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 11758:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 10496: 10489: 10475: 10263: 9107:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 6745: 5899: 5892: 5878: 5666: 2158: 2151: 2137: 1925: 16273: 14767: 14748: 14322: 13588: 13026: 11749: 11643: 11133: 10522: 10503: 10077: 9315: 7740: 6631: 5925: 5906: 5480: 4701: 3716: 2184: 2165: 1739: 929: 14667: 14479: 14392: 14357: 10422: 10234: 10147: 10112: 5825: 5637: 5550: 5515: 2084: 1896: 1809: 1774: 15468: 15423: 15392: 15343: 14926: 13736: 13648: 12441: 12350: 12061: 11982: 11893: 11819: 11587:

have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out.

10622: 9463: 9375: 8580: 7612: 6025: 5110: 4849: 4761: 4137: 3093: 2284: 1077: 989: 432: 14637: 14208: 14163: 14124: 14017:

There are 93 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! The membership is unchanged since the August newsletter.

10392: 9963: 9918: 9879: 5795: 5366: 5321: 5282: 3247:

https://footlightnotes.tumblr.com/post/42172461451/thelma-raye-n%C3%A9e-thelma-victoria-maud-bell-morton

2054: 1625: 1580: 1541: 16343: 15498: 15111: 14284: 14246: 13947: 13712: 13097: 12812: 12758: 12744: 12182: 12128: 12114: 11775: 11761: 11740: 11731: 11616: 11457: 11453: 10820: 10039: 10001: 9439: 9124: 9110: 8731: 8301:

the page has no unique and usable content, but information about the topic is found in another article.

7811: 6796: 6229: 5442: 5404: 4825: 4441: 3311: 2506: 1701: 1663: 1053: 699: 692: 482: 286: 132: 38: 13709:

Candaules, King of Lydia, Shews his Wife by Stealth to Gyges, One of his Ministers, as She Goes to Bed

12969:

article reviews during 2019. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -

12859:

article reviews during 2020. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -

12712:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 12093:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 11736:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 11642:

exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page

11154:

While I could not find time to open discussions @ the article talk page a new user account opened up

9727:

There are 93 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! The membership is unchanged since the July newsletter.

9436:

Candaules, King of Lydia, Shews his Wife by Stealth to Gyges, One of his Ministers, as She Goes to Bed

9090:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 4822:

Candaules, King of Lydia, Shews his Wife by Stealth to Gyges, One of his Ministers, as She Goes to Bed

4520:

Oh, that makes a lot more sense. Thanks for note about WP:UAA, I'll keep that in mind for the future.

1050:

Candaules, King of Lydia, Shews his Wife by Stealth to Gyges, One of his Ministers, as She Goes to Bed

16206: 16016:

way it would not be damaging and harmful to its subject. As such, I will be a forever no !vote, but

13995: 13982: 13943: 13704: 12904: 12304: 9431: 8882: 8737: 8711: 8451:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at

8125: 6569: 4817: 3702: 3663: 1389:

There are 91 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! The membership is unchanged since the May newsletter.

1315: 1045: 507: 490: 461: 15356:

Why do you keep asking people about checkuser? So far you've asked me to check you twice, you asked

12620:

Tidy reference 1 - my Spanish is limited, but this would appear to be about his participation in an

7202:

investigate it myself at the time. I may come back to it, or another admin or clerk may pick it up.

5061: 3017: 1302: 15650: 15608: 15361: 15201: 15052: 15031: 14975: 12680: 11204: 10727: 10671: 9101:

clock mechanism was replaced in 1872 because the original was "utterly worthless as a time keeper"?

6940: 6130: 6074: 4406: 3569:. Since then, the master (after more than a month) commented and pinged us both on their talk page 3396: 3192: 2389: 2333: 238: 16526: