592:. Can you tell me whether your changes are following any WP guidelines? I've done several tables like this before with no problems. I don't like: 1 - gathering most of the refs into a heap at the top and away from the text they support, 2 - removing the column width parameter meaning that dates now split into two lines and three lines when viewed on a mobile device, 3 - italicising one registration - why that one? 4 - I had the two undelivered Rapides in with the rest of the Rapides to keep them together - moving them out of the table makes them easily missable. I really want to revert - please comment.
937:
31:
71:
1068:
1010:
976:
769:, and here's the hard part - I can't find the slightest shred of evidence that it actually ever existed. The creator made a boatload of similar unsourced single-line priory/monastery stubs back in 2010, and the majority of them have been deleted, but for some reason that one was left alone. The only hits I've been able to find on any search are two amateur websites that both cite Knowledge (
531:". I don't think the exception "if it simply repeats information covered in the main text", or the others is met. If the information is not supplementary to the article, ie you want the reader to read it, then it ought to be shown, if it's not important for the reader to read, then perhaps it shouldn't be there at all.
837:
Now those look verifiable because they are on the list. Which means prod is out of the question for dealing with them. One could... 1) grab the text and reference from the list - which would just make them a duplicate of the list content 2) turn them into redirects to the list - may be valid for long
425:
You removed a section hatnote that directed the reader to another page for further information. That is not a citation. A self reference to WP is a citation to a WP article. Also, please be careful about the citations you are applying to that article because
Dugdale is not in the Hansard list so have
126:
That, in turn, made me realize that the telephone spelling alphabets likely were the direct ancestor of the radiotelephony alphabets. This should have been obvious, but wasn't to me and cleared up a big mystery I had with why there was so much confusion over when the first radiotelephony alphabet was
375:
sorry, forgot to cite the source (The Tanks of TOG) but the standard frontal armor of the TOG 2 prototype is actually 114mm (more accurately 144.3mm), but the 76mm armor was fitted on the TOG 2 some time before it was sent to
Bovington - yes currently the TOG 2 in Bovington has 76mm of frontal armor
563:
Consensus at the moment is that there is no problem with tables being present, and I'm not against the tables - though presentationally I think some have issues (a dependence on colour and tags to convey information...). And double column for Meyer is off. I'd just be changing the default collapsed
470:
Without a url to your edit, I have no idea what the content of your edit was. My last (maybe only, I didn't go back into the deep history) edit to Call of Duty WWII was bringing some formatting into line with the manual of style, and a minor copyedit on what Cobra was and stress on a piped link. I
1278:
Graeme just thought I would notify you I was just going through the list of aircraft on the list of
British military equipment and discovered that a FAA Aircraft was in that list that was not on our FAA Aircraft list. It was the Hellcat I added it with citations feel free to edit what I did. Just
788:
It's not on the list of monasteries in Essex, even as an alternate name. There's no clue as to which order of monks it might belong to nor a geographical location so checking any of the sources listed for Essex priories might throw up multiple possibilities. Just searched and there's no match. I
122:
article, but your action made me realize that was silly, and take a closer look at the IITS alphabet. When I finally realized the
Western Union alphabet was used over the telephone, it suddenly became obvious the right path was to take all of the telephone spelling alphabets and put them in one
612:
1. Cites are there so the information can be checked. Putting them in a column of their own adds width to table for no benefit to the average reader. Attached to the table, they are out of the way but still associated with the list. If a reference applies to a single aircraft then ref could be
395:
Would you please tell me what you understand by a self reference to WP? A note which directs the reader to another article is not a self reference. Please explain. Also, how do you know that the
Hansard lists are exclusive to the war ministry? Some of the ministers in 1945 were members of the
239:
It was probably a partial removal from those articles by me. My fault. I'll put some work into cleaning up the faulty ones (either removing the non-matching tags, or removing every instance of "small") Do you know if there's a tool that makes it easier?
196:
341:. It adds a "LintHint" button at the top of the page that shows and links to individual Linter errors, like mismatched formatting tags and other stuff. There is a bit of a learning curve for figuring out how to identify and fix some of the errors.
852:
Not a problem, if they're legitimately priories I have no concerns with them being stubs. I just got worried that there might have been a whole pile more of unverifiable articles sitting there. Thanks again for your time, I appreciate it!
966:
1186:
The Only way, that I can see, to keep the use of fractions consistent throughout this article, is to use the {{frac}} template, and shortcuts thereof. — There are just not enough ASCII codes for all the different fractions in this
217:), but it looks like they have subsequently been removed again, at least from some articles. At this point, there are a bunch of "List of monastic houses in ..." articles with non-matching tags, including those listed at
336:
The most useful tool for finding formatting errors is the Syntax
Highlighter (in Preferences - Gadgets). The other one is a bit technical, but if you are comfortable adding to your .js configuration file, take a look at
233:
1025:
1003:
996:
546:
1001:
625:
On my mobile device, the dates wrapped onto three lines before i removed the column width, and the table had to be scrolled sideways to read the notes (which were an equal width to the reference column)
1095:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
984:
622:
3. Column width was set to fixed number of points. If the column needs to be a certain width, use percentages, or use the Nowrap template to fix (longest element) that you don't want on two lines.
944:
376:(the TOG 2 armor is modular - you could easily take pieces off and put thinner/thicker pieces back on, that's why those giant rivets are there and the armor looks like it's split into pieces)
1146:
817:
1053:
789:
then cast the net wider over all the volumes of that resource on history of Essex with no luck. I'd say since 1 ) we can't verify it 2) there's no content to save - flag it for deletion.
509:, it states "Consideration may be given to collapsing tables which consolidate information covered in the prose." I think the WPMILHIST guideline is therefore in line with MOS. Cheers
1111:
1202:
1304:
628:
Extra thought: On the subject of dates, unless you're going to sort by dates, you could get same effect for the term of service in a single column eg "| 1 Jan 1965 - 15 May 1972|"
1081:
1137:
881:
861:
847:
832:
811:
798:
783:
435:
420:
1382:
695:
573:
558:
540:
322:
Once I started it seemed wrong to stop. and I discovered the search/replace function in the editing window. Is there something that makes it easier to find the errors?
518:
907:
168:
that is relevant to a Naomi Wu talk page conversation about 8 sources, but your comment may not be noticed since it appears in a different section of the talk page.
1397:
1263:
1249:
1231:
1217:
480:
354:
331:
317:
303:
289:
275:
249:
711:
411:
Self reference as in reference to Draft mainspace. If you have a problem with a specific cite, you're welcome to check it out yourself and change it if incorrect.
1339:
654:
640:
1035:, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
549:), I was told to collapse the info as the table space should not dominate the article. I am fine with either or. In my opinion, it should be done consistently
919:
308:
Wow, that was fast! Thanks for the cleanup. I found and fixed some additional italic markup. Those articles have a lot of non-MOS-compliant formatting. –
1368:
1363:
707:
745:
961:
680:
191:
177:
1288:
766:
759:
671:
Hi GraemeLeggett, thanks for the edits. However, several seem to be uncited... and this is a reviewed GA. Refs would be appreciated. All the best,
631:
Hope that explains my thinking. If you want to discuss it further, then it's probably better on the article talkpage then buried in this talk page.
487:
465:
449:
263:
405:
1354:
you will see that a revert war has been starting up. If you think it a good idea, please could you respond on the article talk page. — Cheers,
495:
457:
385:
1315:
You've been around here a long time. What's "eating" you? You're making ill thought-through edits then making er, inconsequential ones. Why?
524:
601:
500:
1240:
Sorry for the late response, but I was distracted by health and other personal issues — nevertheless: Thank you for taking it so well !!
1058:
218:
1166:
of your edits, that I disagreed with — but you had already made so many subsequent edits, that it had become impossible to undo just a
214:
1324:
545:
Obviously I want the readers to have access to this info. The last time this was discussed (I have to search for the discussion, see
866:
I can't find anything about "Cannons Priory" but
Burstead Grange and Takeley Priory do appear to exist though might not be notable.
118:
Thanks for undoing my deletion; it made me reevaluate how to handle the telephone alphabets. I was going to consolidate them in the
645:
Thanks for that, and for today's edits. I've taken your comments and edits on board and just finished my rewrite/expansion. Cheers
1031:
In accordance with our policy that
Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
165:
723:
254:
If I were to take it on, I would copy the entire content of each article to a text editor and do a complete find and removal of
224:
If people really want to reduce the font size in those tables, it should be done at the table level, not with a million tags. –
897:
506:
773:
1284:
1133:
980:
210:
968:
202:
838:
gone priories as not much more info will be out there 3) tag them for relevant
Wikiprojects and let them sort it out.
1345:
737:
and I'm hoping you have some familiarity with the topic and might be able to help me with de-orphaning something? ♠
734:
1373:
I'm confused- why? Cite work is not available on the wizard thing and I can't find any guidance of when to use it
1280:
1129:
821:
338:
770:
619:
4. Two
Rapides that didn't get delivered, weren't part of the fleet and a table wide cell breaks up the table.
113:
1193:
fractions in the first column is because the first and second columns serve as Row Headers in the table. --
1104:
924:
858:
829:
808:
780:
742:
1116:
714:
had an important distinction of 9 vs 14 and I agree with your other changes. So just a quick thank you.
666:
547:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Military history/Archive 143#Victory claim lists in fighter_ace biographies.
159:
38:
1351:
987:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
1393:
1350:
Thanks for engaging. But is this largely uncited list of types the right way to go? If you check the
1335:
1300:
1259:
1227:
1213:
843:
794:
755:
728:
691:
636:
569:
536:
476:
443:
431:
416:
401:
381:
327:
299:
285:
245:
187:
280:
Thanks, that method seems to work. I can also address the use of italics in the lists at same time.
583:
1039:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
616:
3. One military serial italicized means I set out to italicize the lot but didn't get round to it.
875:
854:
825:
804:
776:
738:
676:
554:
514:
173:
47:
17:
957:
820:. A ton more. I grabbed all the Essex ones that are still single-line and alphabetized them at
589:
390:
119:
1359:
1092:
985:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 18#No. 1404 (Meteorological) Flight RAF
1103:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1036:
915:
427:
397:
377:
132:
613:
attached to the thing it qualifies like eg the accident. Or just the aircraft registration
8:
1378:
1245:
1198:
1032:
491:
453:
370:
350:
313:
271:
229:
1179:
For instance, in the large models table, you used the ASCII symbol for ½-tons – but you
1389:
1331:
1296:
1255:
1223:
1209:
992:
868:
839:
790:
751:
687:
672:
632:
565:
550:
532:
510:
472:
412:
342:
323:
295:
281:
241:
197:
Is there consensus to remove small tags from "List of monastic houses in ..." articles?
183:
169:
1320:
1310:
1075:
953:
650:
597:
1355:
1123:
1088:
1021:
719:
182:
That's the bloody mobile version of Knowledge talkpages for you. It's a liability.
1295:
I see what you did and why, but that's not the way that list works so I undid it.
908:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Ships#perpetual issue: ncships and the definite article
911:
816:
Oh lord, I'm not sure if it's something you want to put time into, but there's...
206:
128:
936:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1374:
1241:
1194:
1100:
701:
346:
309:
267:
225:
101:
93:
1096:
1017:
988:
1016:
Hello, GraemeLeggett. It has been over six months since you last edited the
209:
has reverted the previous removal of some small tags from articles (e.g. at
205:
after I had fixed the non-matching tags. Removing the tags is fine with me.
1316:
1273:
646:
593:
105:
84:
Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
715:
1107:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
775:). I was hoping you might know enough to know what's going on with it. ♠
64:
1085:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
803:
Brilliant, thanks for your help. I've stuck a PROD tag on it. Cheers! ♠
70:
1067:
527:
still says "Collapsible templates should not conceal article content
89:
1254:
De nada as the Spanish say. Hope things are getting better for you.
1044:
150:"a lot of bad formatting...." tell that to yourself "smarty" one!
59:
1173:
Even looking at your last version version of the article, it was
525:
Knowledge:Manual_of_Style#Scrolling_lists_and_collapsible_content
471:
don't think either of those last two changed the actual content.
1120:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
750:
I can but try and help if I can. What needs to get some links?
396:
caretaker ministry which is the subject of a different article.
1110:
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
262:, then copy and paste the content back into the article. Doing
1079:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
975:
156:"revert to earlier good version" wasn't "good" version either
136:
1042:
Thanks for your submission to Knowledge, and happy editing.
145:
1183:
the {{3/4}}-ton, and the {{frac|1|1|2}}-ton notation...
1147:
Article 'Dodge WC series' – your two days worth of edits
712:
Air transport of the British royal family and government
1091:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
906:
Hi Graeme, I'm hoping to get some support from you at
979:
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
967:"No. 1404 (Meteorological) Flight RAF " listed at
1004:Draft:Template:Air warfare in Europe during WWII
221:, and the group of articles is inconsistent.
588:Hi - you just reformatted the Fleet list in
1369:changing website to work on Uboat.net cites
507:Knowledge:Manual of Style/Tables#Appearance
219:User:Galobot/report/Articles by Lint Errors
1222:I've left the fractions alone, this time.
1026:Template:Air warfare in Europe during WWII
935:
266:as an example took me about 30 seconds. –
215:List of monastic houses on the Isle of Man
1177:not consistent in its use of fractions...
733:Hi there, I saw you did some cleanup at
201:I see that you removed small tags from
14:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1076:2020 Arbitration Committee elections
981:No. 1404 (Meteorological) Flight RAF
501:Collapsible tables for victory lists
25:
1059:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
211:List of monastic houses in Scotland
23:
1008:
564:to expanded if I come across them.
203:List of monastic houses in Suffolk
153:a lot of bad "formatting" is you!
114:Telephone spelling alphabet thanks
69:
24:
1409:
345:has links to more information. –
77:Dear GraemeLeggett/Archives/2021,
1066:
974:
735:List of monastic houses in Essex
29:
1114:and submit your choices on the
983:. The discussion will occur at
824:, if you want to have a look. ♠
686:Good point. I shall find them.
339:User:PerfektesChaos/js/lintHint
127:created. So double-thanks! :-)
1388:Turns out it's only an alias.
13:
1:
1305:10:15, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
1289:22:58, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
1279:informing you of the changes
1232:20:50, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
1218:19:55, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
1203:18:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
1138:01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
1093:Knowledge arbitration process
1054:01:03, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
426:provided false verification.
1398:20:20, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
1383:19:12, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
1364:11:09, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
1340:09:00, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
1325:08:59, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
997:05:00, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
529:by default upon page loading
7:
1264:12:45, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
1250:11:31, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
962:09:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
920:16:54, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
10:
1414:
1281:Anonymous contributor 1707
1130:MediaWiki message delivery
1346:Fourth generation fighter
943:
934:
862:19:29, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
848:17:04, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
833:14:53, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
812:14:39, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
799:14:31, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
784:13:56, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
760:07:47, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
746:03:34, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
724:20:30, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
696:13:29, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
681:13:23, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
655:20:32, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
641:18:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
602:15:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
574:07:42, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
559:04:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
541:10:38, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
519:09:04, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
496:14:56, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
1151:Dear fellow Wikipedian,
1128:to your user talk page.
969:Redirects for discussion
882:18:00, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
609:In no particular order.
481:17:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
458:16:10, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
436:20:24, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
421:20:11, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
406:19:51, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
386:21:09, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
355:17:23, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
332:17:15, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
318:17:10, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
304:07:44, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
290:19:06, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
276:18:42, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
250:18:16, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
234:13:52, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
192:06:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
178:22:17, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
108:(see "invisible note").
104:. Originally created by
448:calling my edit lying?
18:User talk:GraemeLeggett
1013:
590:United Airways Limited
505:You may want to check
120:NATO phonetic alphabet
100:This message promotes
74:
1208:These things happen.
1089:Arbitration Committee
1073:Hello! Voting in the
1018:Articles for Creation
1012:
86:From a fellow editor,
73:
42:of past discussions.
1170:offending items ...
1002:Your draft article,
925:Precious anniversary
1024:page you started, "
931:
667:Aircraft camouflage
1105:arbitration policy
1014:
929:
343:Special:LintErrors
160:Misplaced comment?
75:
1189:Also: the use of
1144:
1143:
950:
949:
729:Priories in Essex
444:Call of Duty WWII
294:(Update) - Done.
109:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1405:
1127:
1070:
1063:
1062:
1052:
1011:
978:
939:
932:
928:
900:definite article
878:
871:
584:Table formatting
469:
261:
257:
99:
83:
33:
32:
26:
1413:
1412:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1371:
1348:
1313:
1276:
1149:
1121:
1061:
1043:
1009:
1007:
972:
927:
904:
876:
869:
731:
704:
669:
586:
503:
463:
446:
428:No Great Shaker
398:No Great Shaker
393:
378:LuckyBlockYoshi
373:
260:</small: -->
259:
255:
199:
164:You just added
162:
148:
116:
111:
79:
67:
65:Happy New Year!
62:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1411:
1401:
1400:
1370:
1367:
1347:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1312:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1275:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1235:
1234:
1220:
1188:
1178:
1148:
1145:
1142:
1141:
1112:the candidates
1082:eligible users
1071:
1060:
1057:
1020:submission or
1006:
1000:
971:
965:
948:
947:
941:
940:
926:
923:
903:
896:
895:
894:
893:
892:
891:
890:
889:
888:
887:
886:
885:
884:
814:
767:Cannons Priory
730:
727:
703:
700:
699:
698:
668:
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
629:
626:
623:
620:
617:
614:
585:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
502:
499:
486:oh ok. my bad
484:
483:
445:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
392:
391:Self reference
389:
372:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
292:
256:<small: -->
198:
195:
161:
158:
147:
144:
142:
115:
112:
87:
85:
81:HAPPY NEW YEAR
78:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1410:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1390:GraemeLeggett
1387:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1366:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1332:GraemeLeggett
1329:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1297:GraemeLeggett
1294:
1293:
1292:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1256:GraemeLeggett
1253:
1252:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1224:GraemeLeggett
1221:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1210:GraemeLeggett
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1184:
1182:
1176:
1171:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1152:
1140:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1125:
1119:
1118:
1113:
1108:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1084:
1083:
1078:
1077:
1072:
1069:
1065:
1064:
1056:
1055:
1051:
1049:
1048:
1040:
1038:
1034:
1029:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1005:
999:
998:
994:
990:
986:
982:
977:
970:
964:
963:
959:
955:
946:
942:
938:
933:
922:
921:
917:
913:
909:
901:
883:
879:
873:
872:
870:Crouch, Swale
865:
864:
863:
860:
856:
851:
850:
849:
845:
841:
840:GraemeLeggett
836:
835:
834:
831:
827:
823:
819:
815:
813:
810:
806:
802:
801:
800:
796:
792:
791:GraemeLeggett
787:
786:
785:
782:
778:
774:
771:
768:
765:Thanks, it's
764:
763:
762:
761:
757:
753:
752:GraemeLeggett
748:
747:
744:
740:
736:
726:
725:
721:
717:
713:
709:
697:
693:
689:
688:GraemeLeggett
685:
684:
683:
682:
678:
674:
673:Chiswick Chap
656:
652:
648:
644:
643:
642:
638:
634:
633:GraemeLeggett
630:
627:
624:
621:
618:
615:
611:
610:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
599:
595:
591:
575:
571:
567:
566:GraemeLeggett
562:
561:
560:
556:
552:
551:MisterBee1966
548:
544:
543:
542:
538:
534:
533:GraemeLeggett
530:
526:
523:
522:
521:
520:
516:
512:
511:MisterBee1966
508:
498:
497:
493:
489:
482:
478:
474:
473:GraemeLeggett
467:
462:
461:
460:
459:
455:
451:
437:
433:
429:
424:
423:
422:
418:
414:
413:GraemeLeggett
410:
409:
408:
407:
403:
399:
388:
387:
383:
379:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
335:
334:
333:
329:
325:
324:GraemeLeggett
321:
320:
319:
315:
311:
307:
306:
305:
301:
297:
296:GraemeLeggett
293:
291:
287:
283:
282:GraemeLeggett
279:
278:
277:
273:
269:
265:
253:
252:
251:
247:
243:
242:GraemeLeggett
238:
237:
236:
235:
231:
227:
222:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
194:
193:
189:
185:
184:GraemeLeggett
180:
179:
175:
171:
170:HouseOfChange
167:
157:
154:
151:
143:
140:
138:
134:
130:
124:
121:
110:
107:
103:
97:
95:
91:
82:
72:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1372:
1349:
1314:
1277:
1190:
1185:
1180:
1174:
1172:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1153:
1150:
1115:
1109:
1086:
1080:
1074:
1046:
1045:
1041:
1030:
1015:
973:
954:Gerda Arendt
951:
905:
899:
867:
749:
732:
705:
670:
587:
528:
504:
485:
447:
394:
374:
223:
200:
181:
163:
155:
152:
149:
141:
125:
117:
98:
80:
76:
60:January 2014
55:
43:
37:
1356:Steelpillow
1162:in undoing
1158:to be more
1117:voting page
945:Four years!
371:TOG 2 armor
36:This is an
1101:topic bans
912:Broichmore
822:my sandbox
207:JohnArmagh
129:PetesGuide
90:FWiW Bzuk
1375:Lyndaship
1311:Nuisance?
1242:GeeTeeBee
1195:GeeTeeBee
1160:selective
1097:site bans
1037:this link
1033:mainspace
902:and ships
708:Your edit
488:TheGorg14
466:TheGorg14
450:TheGorg14
347:Jonesey95
310:Jonesey95
268:Jonesey95
226:Jonesey95
166:a comment
146:a comment
1187:article.
989:Petebutt
930:Precious
264:this one
102:WikiLove
1352:history
1330:Diffs?
1317:Eddaido
1124:NoACEMM
647:Lestocq
594:Lestocq
123:place.
106:Nahnah4
39:archive
859:(talk)
830:(talk)
809:(talk)
781:(talk)
743:(talk)
716:Mark83
702:Thanks
1175:still
1156:tried
1022:Draft
137:K6WEB
16:<
1394:talk
1379:talk
1360:Talk
1336:talk
1321:talk
1301:talk
1285:talk
1274:List
1260:talk
1246:talk
1228:talk
1214:talk
1199:talk
1191:Bold
1181:kept
1164:some
1134:talk
1087:The
1028:".
993:talk
958:talk
916:talk
898:the
877:talk
844:talk
818:more
795:talk
756:talk
720:talk
706:Hi,
692:talk
677:talk
651:talk
637:talk
598:talk
570:talk
555:talk
537:talk
515:talk
492:talk
477:talk
454:talk
432:talk
417:talk
402:talk
382:talk
351:talk
328:talk
314:talk
300:talk
286:talk
272:talk
258:and
246:talk
230:talk
213:and
188:talk
174:talk
133:talk
94:talk
1168:few
880:)
855:PMC
826:PMC
805:PMC
777:PMC
739:PMC
710:on
135:) (
96:)
1396:)
1381:)
1362:)
1338:)
1323:)
1303:)
1291:.
1287:)
1262:)
1248:)
1230:)
1216:)
1201:)
1154:I
1136:)
1126:}}
1122:{{
1099:,
1050:iz
995:)
960:)
952:--
918:)
910:.
857:♠
846:)
828:♠
807:♠
797:)
779:♠
772:,
758:)
741:♠
722:)
694:)
679:)
653:)
639:)
600:)
572:)
557:)
539:)
517:)
494:)
479:)
456:)
434:)
419:)
404:)
384:)
353:)
330:)
316:)
302:)
288:)
274:)
248:)
232:)
190:)
176:)
139:)
88:--
1392:(
1377:(
1358:(
1334:(
1319:(
1299:(
1283:(
1258:(
1244:(
1226:(
1212:(
1197:(
1132:(
1047:L
991:(
956:(
914:(
874:(
853:♠
842:(
793:(
754:(
718:(
690:(
675:(
649:(
635:(
596:(
568:(
553:(
535:(
513:(
490:(
475:(
468::
464:@
452:(
430:(
415:(
400:(
380:(
349:(
326:(
312:(
298:(
284:(
270:(
244:(
228:(
186:(
172:(
131:(
92:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
