User talk:Iantresman

7006:

Because you have been editing since 05/13/2004 and have made 21,347 edits since that day – you understand that the vast majority of editing interactions are non-controversial (96.8% of your edits remain live) – because you should announce your intention to hold yourself to a voluntarily, self imposed, 1RR restriction to ensure that nothing goes afoul of the 3.2% that might see reversion (if you don't restrict yourself, it will be imposed on you anyway for at least the first year, I'm nearly certain. Self discipline is favored so much more than stipulated discipline that you'd nearly be a stubborn fool to not lay it on the table yourself! To the victor goes the spoil and you and I have lost this war; a long time ago (metaphorically speaking). You can contribute productively on Knowledge because you've faithfully endured a 1,435 day block, without sock evasion and know the full value of proactive block avoidance, because you know the value of not being blocked by contrast, and you know without equivocation which you prefer. Because you've uploaded 166 files to en Knowledge,

6959:

irrefutable demonstration that you have not gamed your sanctions in any way whatsoever since that last request. Additionally, I think You should create an outline based on Newyorkbrad's statement to you at your last appeal. He gave excellent advice for framing a request postured for success. Also, If you recall, advice was given to you that you would be evaluated on whether or not you availed yourself to the advice you were given. I'd review your last appeal and ensure that I incorporated every comment offering advice into my statement, in some thoughtful manner. You have quite a few people pulling for you to get this matter behind you. I would not be surprised to see a few of them posting here in the coming days to give more advice. Either way, you are your best advocate, and you can prevail in this matter. Show the community your best side, they will like what they see if you do it in sincere earnest. And Knowledge will be that much better with your unhindered participation. This is a win win situation. Approach it as such, in my opinion.--

1689:"I don't want to get you banned .. Do I report this .. I'd regret having to do that". This kind of approach to collaborative editing that disgusts me. I haven't edited the article in over 20 months, am doing what an editor is supposed to do: discuss, and even that is unacceptable to you. I will just point out that (1) All the edits I have made to the article are still present, how have your edits faired? (2) I am not the only editor who has expressed their concern, yet you have singled me out. (3) You've offered not one diff in support of your position. You do what you have to do. -- 6028:. This extends not just to direct conflicts of interest, but also to the more general point that a pseudoscientist (which Bauer has been tagged as, like it or not) will necessarily pay more attention to other sources of pseudoscience whether they are noteworthy enough for Knowledge to be able to neutrally do so or not. (Note that this has nothing to do with whether the discussion provided by the conflicted source is reliable or not -- it merely is a question of looking for the sources which are independent in order to establish the notability of an article subject). 1815:, you're an experienced enough editor to know that this is not the way WP is supposed to run. Anyone can find a WP:JUSTIFICATION to legitimize muzzling dissent, but at it's root that's diminishing the marketplace of ideas that WP is supposed to embody. Banning is last resort with someone who's deliberately and maliciously disruptive, not simply making arguments that you find frustrating. You've done a lot of good work and I respect you, barney, but veiled threats of getting someone banned if they irritate you is bad form. 3190:

where there is a legitimate content dispute (how to describe the nature and recognition of the work of the person at issue), administrators will normally scrupulously avoid making any determination about the content, because (a) administrators aren't allowed to use their tools to decide content disputes, and (b) they simply don't know nearly enough about the intricacies of the subject matter to have an informed opinion about it, and don't have the time and inclination to read the huge number of sources that may be relevant.

924: 5075: 7464: 5353: 4716: 4500: 4161: 2978: 2588: 1524: 8231: 8069: 7721: 8011: 7590: 6538: 7962: 5675: 1271: 7872: 7834: 7644: 6750: 5599: 5523: 4139:

that the meaning of "disruption" was being stretched astonishingly far. I am just amazed by the new indefinite ban, which seems to me to stretch "disruption" to the point that it now means pouring forth a large volume of rational argument about a serious subject. Do please do anything you can to get to the bottom of what is going on and to bring back Nina, whose flood of work in the field of English history is very good and should be more valued.

3244:-building camp, for the Sheldrake article... because despite their zeal to 9STEPS anybody they disagreed with elsewhere, wolfie actually seemed reasonably calm to me in the sheldrake context (as opposed to *other* contexts). But nobody likes to get drug into an AE, so I would vote leaving Tento and Dingo and Mary and Wolfie off your list unless they ask... I purposely did not 'ping' them, so they can keep their own counsel. HTH, see you around. 2756:, as "a chronic promoter of pro-pseudoscience bias in articles, Iantresman has consistently disrupted pseudoscience article talk pages dismissing WP:NPOV, and has a history of tendentious and disruptive arguments at Knowledge talk:Neutral point of view, where he's sought to weaken Knowledge:Neutral_point_of_view/FAQ#Pseudoscience and Knowledge:Neutral_point_of_view#Undue_weight to favor his bias", he managed to get himself topic banned. 6862: 4049: 3986: 1322: 757: 569: 4216: 986: 6108:

strawman. I am not claiming that Bauer is unreliable in his discussion of these journals. I am claiming that Bauer's proclivities for being attracted to pseudoscience means he is likely to pay more attention to subjects that are obscure and pseudoscientific to the tune that his focus on these subjects do not help us answer the question as to whether the subject itself is notable. Notability is the question here, not reliability.

2605: 3149:

guy is the world's greatest charlatan or Galileo Galilei reborn. We only care about whether anybody has violated any of Knowledge's conduct rules and needs to be prevented from doing it again. By making content arguments in your statement, you are only wasting your time, and everybody else's. I suggest that you stop contributing to the thread if you have no useful evidence of misconduct to contribute.

3084: 2459: 2387: 98:

to and including one month in length, and up to and including indefinite length after the fifth such block. When each block is lifted or expires, the six-month period shall reset. Additionally, the original topic ban shall be reinstated if Iantresman is subjected to an indefinite block as a result of this restriction. The Arbitration Committee should be notified of this situation should it occur.

1070: 1041: 6206:, you had mentioned a "lack of adequate sourcing that isn't dominated by fringe or unreliable sources (I'm looking at you Henry H. Bauer).", so a misinterpretation on my behalf. Additionally, I may not have read your suggestion that Bauer is not independent, as alternative to the issues regarding reliable sources, rather in addition to the suggestion that he is not reliable. 5865:'s input), BUT, since y'all seem to be getting on so amicably, and since we're all big kids here, and since I have faith in mankind, I will be happy to state that I have no problem with participation in the AfD--as long as it does not become a slugfest or some other carnival, of course. Good luck, and please let me know if I was unclear or did indeed miss something. 6079:. There is no out-weighing of published sources going on. This is simply a matter of evaluating the sources that could plausibly be used to write an article. If we were going to write a book based solely on Bauer's in-depth exploration of the relationship between the journals and Velikovsky Affair, I think we would end up with an article that does not conform to 8028:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 7607:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 6557:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2183:

Anyways, I hope you stay around the talkpage, and keep on keeping your cool, but if you need to take a breather from unduly-caused WikiStress, then do what you gotta do, and come back when your gumption is restored, and you can hold the moral high ground with pride once more. No matter what, sooner or later, mainspace will be NPOV again.

5031:, What Is A Personal Attack: "Using someone's affiliations as an ad hominem means of dismissing or discrediting their views—regardless of whether said affiliations are mainstream". I will remind you that every one of my edits to the Sheldrake article is still present, and I have included edits that are not in Sheldrake's favour. 4987:. Neither he, then, nor I, now, were referring to your mainspace edits, yet in both cases your response was to point to mainspace edits. Guy corrected you then, and I am correcting you again now: I said talk "participation on the Sheldrake talk page", where you are the #1 contributor. My concerns are similar to those of Guy's. 6216:

of independent assessment. In other words, you may be right that Bauer's involvement with fringe subject makes him to close to the subject, and likewise there may be other editors who disagree, suggesting that this is a subjective assessment; the solution is to assess third part sources about Bauer and his book. Because his

7743:. Non-free cover art is generally allowed when it's used for primary identification purposes at the top of or in the main infobox of a stand-alone article about the work in question, but it's use in other articles tends to require that the cover art itself be the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in 3228:

consensus; see my post-disaster-analysis of their true motives, elsewhere. Usually I would let your judgment stand, but as Tumbleman cannot request themselves to be removed due to socking stuff, and I don't want the rest of us lumped in the same bucket, I figured it wouldn't hurt to suggest it to you.

7538:

I'm not sure that's something others can help you with. Sandstein said in the latest ban review: "Iantresman does not indicate that he recognizes that his editing at the time was problematic, and why, and how he would now edit differently." That's about as good a summary of what's expected as you can

6398:

Finally, if Knowledge was only a scientific source (eg a science encyclopedia), then I would happily accept many your points, and if I were editing, I would also remove the articles. Knowledge transcends science, and cover the whole human experience irrespective of whether it is right or wrong, which

3789:

that is a favorite subject of mine. The TC is primarily thought of as a musical instrument, but there is a lot more to it, for example as a totem in battle or authority symbol. There is not much information about the latter uses, and I'm wondering what the Sikhs think about their version. Do you have

3227:

So I would ask that you remove Tumbleman from the "consensus-builder" group (not my favorite name but whatever), and add Tumbleman to a new third group (called "direct-COI editors" methinks... or something gentler if you prefer). They do not belong where they are, because they were not here to build

3148:

Hi, in response to your question at AE, I'm just trying to remove the submissions that are all about content and not about conduct so as to keep the thread to a manageable size. We, the administrators processing the request, simply don't care (and more importantly aren't allowed to care) whether that

2182:

would solve plenty of complaining, would it not? Hard to see how separating a man's mainstream academic career, and his personal religion, both of which belong on a BLP page, from his controversial theories, which are *surely* Notable enough to merit their own page, is all *that* difficult. p.p.s.

1968:

guidelines, #1, the utterance in question is *claiming* to be science rather than spiritual or philosophical, and #2, that the source in which the utterance was published is *not* really Reliable (meaning specifically either Fact-Checked-Editorially or Peer-Reviewed-Academically ... no truth-value is

1720:

FRS isn't a good source because he doesn't have a PhD", "Biologists don't have to follow the scientific method", "The research programme into morphic resonance is just like the one into dark matter", "The generalisation that almost the whole of the scientific community rejects Sheldrake's ideas isn't

97:

is hereby lifted. In its place, Iantresman is subject to a standard 1RR restriction (no more than one revert per article per 24-hour period) on all articles covering fringe science- and physics-related topics, broadly construed, for six months. This restriction may be enforced by escalating blocks up

7015:

and edited 4,434 different pages an average of 5 times each, and hopefully can say that you enjoy the eclectic variety of contributions that have endeared you, and show that you are not singularly motivated. Because you have grown in wisdom, because others have grown in wisdom, because Knowledge has

6325:

I think it is important to acknowledge that Bauer's book is written by someone who supports pseudoscience even while not necessarily supporting Velikovsky. To that end, it seems to me that he is liable to want to look at the pseudo-academy that developed surrounding the proposals. I don't think that

6321:

of 70,000 subscribers would not necessarily make the cut here, for example). What I worry about is the attempts to make things seem more important in the grand scheme of things than they actually are. Were the Velikovsky journals at all influential in the long haul? Did they accomplish anything more

6285:

I also utterly reject the idea that inclusion of any article on any subject in Knowledge is "promotion". If we were to improperly slant the contents of an article to suggest a subject was more widely accepted that it really was, that would be "promotion". I have never suggested that "Velikovsky", or

6215:

Either way, I am not "counting sources" (even though the number of good sources contribute to notability). Rather than accept your point regarding Bauer and independence at face value, and likewise you accept mine, I believe that we should be looking at sources, and sources about sources, as a means

6151:

in Knowledge. Is there a line that can be drawn to determine whether something is keep-able or delete-able when it comes to Velikovsky promotion on Knowledge or not? If there is no line, then at least be honest and argue for that radical inclusionist philosophy. But if there is, I would like to know

6138:

For example, while I am not surprised that you argued to keep the two articles you created, I am confused as to why you won't explain directly why you think these two defunct journals are more worthy of an article than any of the other journals that are devoted to this or that aspect of Velikovsky's

6129:

I guess what I'm saying is that I am on the border between disappointed and frustrated with your contributions thus far to our discussions regarding Velikovsky. Seeing as how 10 years ago you issued at call-to-arms at the late Halton Arp's forum to skew Knowledge towards "maverick" understandings of

5968:

I am trying to understand whether you are really confused about my points or whether you are missing the points I am making on purpose. Perhaps it is because of the history we have, but I truly feel as though it is the latter. We are discussing, for example, whether the sources you listed at the two

4921:

You need to differentiate between owning a domain, and owning and being responsible for the content of a website on that domain. If you have any problems with any of my edits, I suggest that you discuss them on the appropriate talk page, rather than bring up edits from over a decade ago, and try and

4613:

Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Knowledge community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let us know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one

3777:

I was looking through your talk page and found that you had started this article. Years ago I somehow came upon it and did a couple of edits, some along the lines of "why are you knocking this guy without providing citations?" I even telephoned Tifft, looking for a photo. When I mentioned Knowledge,

3239:

p.s. Others that were around when I started, but left... don't know if they have requested you strike them of if they just were errors of omission... would include Tento2 and Dingo1729 plus prolly VeryScaryMary (though she was a bit too excitable for "consensus-building" to apply). Dan skeptic and

3189:

in their aspect as conduct policies (in that all editors are explicitly required to follow them), and in such cases content problems can become conduct problems and subject to discretionary sanctions. But these are normally cases of very evident and persistent POV-pushing. In cases such as this one,

1885:

while we can mention things like "there is a significant base of looneys that believe that the US Government is responsible for 9/11 and an even larger group of misinformed Americans who believe that Iraq was responsible " we DO NOT represent their views as having validity. We present the mainstream

1746:

PS - I will give you the courtesy of answering your question, despite the fact that you haven't answered mine: I have introduced many sources into the article, including a few that are broadly supportive or non-critical. I have spent a good time paying attention to the article which in the words of

1461:

Thanks for the good work on the sheldrake page. I accidently deleted a few comments in TALK because I edited out of an older window which automatically deleted all the posts since, and I believe one or two of them were yours. I am going to give this a scour tmrw but if you see one of yours not there

7137:

To help determine any such consensus, involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections but should not edit the section for discussion among uninvolved editors. Editors are normally considered involved if they are in a current dispute with the sanctioning or sanctioned editor, or have

6921:

doesn't set the discretionary sanction aside himself, which I believe he may in fact do unilaterally, where will you file your appeal? Additionally, your draft statement is a little weak at present so let's work on writing one that a reasonable person, which TC is, will find difficult not to grant.

6220:

has received only positive reviews, suggests that others are willing to accept his views, otherwise I would expect, for example, Velikovskian sources to criticise him on the same point your make, as it is not in their interest to accept Bauer. None seem to, even though his association with the Lock

6120:

of a claim, often hiding behind the argument that as editors we were not capable of doing any editorial analysis whatsoever of a source. This strikes me as being a very dishonest practice and I am not particularly enthused by the point that you link to a number of sources in the AfD which do little

4841:

No, I've heard Sheldrake talk once, about 15 years ago, which I think was also the last conference I attended. The idea that I "run into him at conferences" is laughable. I owned some of those domains (some are defunct) because I was asked to host websites for the relevant organisations concerned.

4785:

I have not discussed the Sheldrake article with Sheldrake. I am sympathetic to Velikovsky being described fairly, just as I am sympathetic to Sheldrake, and anyone else, being described fairly. As I have said before, I do not accept the idea of pet telepathy, nor of Velikovsky's planetary history,

4606:

Remember, if you find this source useful for your Knowledge work, make sure to include citations with links on Knowledge: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful

1715:

Ian, I appreciate very much your explanation that you think this is different now because you're being careful not to edit the article. However, we really do have genuine issues to discuss on the talk page. Extremely creative interpretations of sources, including but not limited to (paraphrasing)

773:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original

497:

Case is modified to read "Standard discretionary sanctions are authorised for all articles relating to pseudoscience and fringe science, broadly interpreted. Any uninvolved administrator may levy restrictions as an arbitration enforcement action on users editing in this topic area, after an initial

334:

Normally I would agree, but there are too many examples of editors concluding the exactly opposite of what the evidence shows. I thought there was no risk in discussing an academic text book on a talk page, but editors said I was pushing fringe theories into an article, that I have not edited since

6391:

lets us make it clear that views are personal, and framing a subject (even in as little as a single sentence) lets us know how the article stands with the mainstream. You can see that with any article on an extreme subject from astrology to the Nazis, where we say quite a lot about them, but it is

6224:

Regarding the inclusion of these journals, first let me say that although they are (a) defunct (b) Velikovskian, contributes zero as to whether they should be included or not. From my point of view, Knowledge does not care as to the subject matter of a journal, nor whether they are in print. So it

6134:

was in astronomy (arguably the source of all subsequent bad blood between us) and basically adopted the tactic of listing papers published by members of the Alternative Cosmology Group as a kind of means to attempt to skew Knowledge towards a non-mainstream approach towards the subject, I hope you

4138:

is indeed in force, but even when it was imposed it struck me as a sledgehammer to crack a nut, and in Nina's subsequent appeal against it every member of what could be called our Shakespearian community who commented on the appeal supported the topic ban being lifted. On both occasions, I thought

3645:

Small world. My first Mini was welded up by a bloke who worked at Elstree Studios. I asked him if he was experienced with Minis, he said "have you seen The Italian Job?" - he was the set welder, mending the cars between takes. Mum still lives at Park Street, when they were first married my parents

3235:

Anyhoo, thanks for keeping your cool in distressing circumstances. I'm not doing as well as I'd like. :-) So I have abandoned the Sheldrake fiasco, except in small infrequent doses. But, that said, I'll go edit some glacier articles, or something like that, and then keep coming back until we

256:

Greetings Iantresman. I noticed this comment on my watchlist. If you are willing to email the corrected file to me, I'll accomplish the upload on your behalf. Additionally, it occurs to me that it may be possible to relax your ban to allow a mentor the leverage to authorize non-controversial edits

6045:

in his book. If we are to claim that Bauer's book makes those defunct publications notable, we have to consider the source itself which is a book which by all accounts pays more attention to pseudoscience than is usual. The problem is that in determining notability we should be clear that certain

5860:

Am I missing something, JPS? I see an article on a journal whose subject matter relates to a fringe Egyptologist etc., but the topic ban is about plasma physics. Oh, wait, it's the astrophysics part? As far as I'm concerned Velikovsky wasn't really a scientist, but I assume that the topic ban was

3263:

I've looked at your recent comments here, and I agree with them. Good work. There is a problem: because of the collapsing box, it is VERY hard to follow the diffs. Clicking the diff number takes you to the diff, but when you return, you return to a somewhat random place, and the collapsing box is

3215:

Hello Iantresman, I was pretty hard on you in my post. :-) Sorry about that; I do like you, even when we disagree. But what I would like to point out, is that you are letting Barney's us-fringe-fighters-the-only-true-wikipedians-versus-the-rest color your prose. "If any editor feels I have

2053:

there followed an "Amendment request" (22 March 2012 - 21 May 2012. See "See also" immediately following the grey box above), that results in an "Arbitration motion regarding iantresman" (second grey box above) in which " The topic ban placed against Iantresman as a condition of unblocking in is

6958:

If I remember correctly, TC felt you had violated the spirit and letter of your sanction in close proximity to your having posted your request. For sure it is imperative that you not have encroached the line since your last unsuccessful request. You really need to be able to approach him with an

5820:

I agree that I am allowed per the rules to proxy on your behalf, but I'm not sure whether I would be a good person to do so considering our past history. It seems like it would be better to get an uninvolved admin who can determine whether your suggested contribution is well-considered or not in

4804:

OK but you know Sheldrake, right? You at least run into him at conferences and whatnot. I hadn't quite been aware of the connection between Velikovsky and until now. Sheldrake appears to be involved with the scene as well, though I haven't heard of him supporting Velikovsky or related topics. I

3223:

correct; Tumbleman was socking, and they in the real-o-verse have at least a personal relationship (some off-wiki sources say more) with Sheldrake. Same goes for Craig Weiland. They are COI-encumbered editors where Sheldrake is concerned, just the same as the young college kid who came here to

418:

Thank you for correcting the image. I was unaware of any problem with any ArbCom problem with making the correction, so I apologise if my request was a difficulty for you. I was only concerned for the accuracy of the encyclopedia given the image's use in an article. Regards, 121.216.157.82 at

6316:

for inclusion in Knowledge. Velikovsky, of course, reaches that standard. You seem to agree that certain auxiliary topics related to Velikovsky do not. Circulation would be an interesting metric by which to judge this, but I don't think that a peak of 70,000 is all that significant in the grand

5740:

could be seen by some as "broadly construed" to exclude me from them, even though there is no discussion about plasma physics and astrophysics. I think there are three options: (1) If you think I can contribute to the discussion without infringing my ban, I am happy to do so, (2) I am happy to

7005:

I remember, having been right there at each befuddling moment. The hard truth is: that question will not be entertained, let alone answered. Here is why you can answer confidently in your editing ability and policy adherence even without a full understanding of WTF happened in the first place:

6375:

While I agree that an article in Knowledge gives a topic currency, I still reject it as a reason to exclude it from Knowledge. The veracity of a subject should never be a criteria for inclusion, and an article's promotion is accidentally. It's a slippery slope I don't think Knowledge should be

4868:

You said "owned", but you still own those four domains which, in your words, are "sympathetic to Velikovsky's work". After a decade of editing you should now understand that it was inappropriate to use Knowledge to promote your own sites, but your comments here do not indicate anything to this

3011:

I apologize for the delay in answering your Arbitration Committee Election questions; I didn't have enough time over Thanksgiving break to sit down and catch up on my questions and immediately upon returning to school I had to prepare for a meteorology exam. I am planning to sit down and do my

6107:

I wrote: "For some reason, you still seem to be in this mode of not really understanding the basic point that I wrote: the reliability of Bauer's book is not anything anyone is arguing against." It's almost as if you aren't commenting directly on what I'm saying but instead are fighting some

4274: 2278:

It claims I am "now repeating the exact same thing with a relatively new user User:Mainstream astronomy", which is also nonsense, as this user was (a) not a new user (b) did not leave the project (c) turned out to be ScienceApologist using multiple sockpuppet that editors found to be used

6762:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1624:

above my head. I am quite disappointed that you would bring this up, but it is consistent with Sheldrake's comments on the BBC World Service radio program "World Update" (1 Nov 2013), that some editors seek to have other editors banned. This is really a very shitty way of collaborating.

338:

The textbook concerned specifically states "cosmological issues are not discussed here" (preface, page v), yet editors have decided that although they can not provide a single quote or reference to say otherwise, that they know better, and they believe that the book is about cosmology.

7656:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

5026:

That you are not directly addressing my points on the Sheldrake talk page concerns me too, as you are having to resort to a decade old edit that has no relevance to the Sheldrake article, and, to any outside interests I may or may not have had outside Knowledge... I suggest you read

6417:

I didn't anywhere say that an exclusion criteria for a WIkipedia topic should be whether the subject is "true" or not. That these journals never existed is not something I am arguing! What I am saying is that the notability of a subject when its community is one that is outside the

30:

Any violations on the above-mentioned restrictions will be enforced through a series of escalating blocks (e.g. 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, a return to your banned state). You may appeal the above topic-bans in six months' time, subject to your conduct and contributions in due course.

4817:

is an interesting diff, wherein you add five external links to "Organisations sympathetic to Velikovsky's work". You own four of the domains and may be affiliated with the fifth. In the intervening decade, you have learned not to use Knowledge to promote your own stuff, right?

4267: 2205:

I would support a split only if it can be shown that individuals other than Sheldrake have been working on morphic resonance with reasonable independence from Sheldrake. Until then, MR is simply not notable enough for its own page. Mentions in Doctor Who don't count.

289:

That's very kind you. In principle a mentor would be great. On the other hand, I'm not allowed to evade a ban by allowing someone else to do my edits. But with the express permission of the Arbitration committee, and/or someone with the authority to do so, no problem.

5421:. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. 4560:. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. 5327:, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Knowledge. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on 5285:, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Knowledge. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on 4305:

I'm not a scientist by trade but am interested in Knowledge as it becomes a more significant & subtle tool of international materialist politics, via such asests as paid Security-state trolls, Big Science- propagandists, and military-careerist terrorists.

4080:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 4017:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 7986:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

7569:

Thanks for taking the time to respond. I could probably write a successful appeal if I knew how to change my behaviour. As far as I know, I followed policies, so I'm after help identifying where I went wrong with my original editing, so I can make changes.

7968: 7952: 5741:

provide the sources here, and you can add them to the page yourself so that everyone can assess them impartially (3) Of course if this comment is itself considered an infringement of my ban, I will strike it, and you can consider the sources buried. --

7325:

I have also endured the current 1,435 day topic ban without further penalty, even though I was on a self-imposed 0RR at the time, and thought I was following Discretionary sanctions guidance at the time to "adopt Knowledge’s communal approaches" in my

6455:

was rejected, I do think we are rather far apart. Knowledge cannot accommodate the fringe viewpoint in a fair way. For example, our articles on alternative medicine do not shy away from pointing out what the mainstream evaluation of the treatments has

7983: 6259: 5611:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

5535:

1969:

relevant for wikipedia unfortunately). One person in one reliable source one time called one of the guy's ideas pseudo... therefore, his PhD is gone, his fellowships are gone, ten years of science are gone, everything he ever did or will do is bad.

3108: 2483: 2411: 5733: 7755:. The only mention of this book in the article about Gray Jolliffe the single sentence "He wrote the Wicked Willie books with Peter Mayle.", and this certainly doesn't require that the reader see a non-free image to be understood per NFCC#8 or 5701:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

2158:

Sorry about this stupid mess, Iantresman; as you may have gathered, you and I prolly disagree about the validity of morphogenetics in particular, and morphic fields more broadly... but you are dead on correct that the article on Sheldrake is a

1297:

7950: 2321:

supposed to foster equal collaboration from diverse perspectives to come to a balanced, neutral POV. Whatever terminology one uses to describe this, I think we all agree that threatening minority contributions is not conducive to that goal.

2314:, and I've seen more comments like that associated with the Sheldrake page than I've seen in years. I'm not suggesting this skeptic guerrilla organization I've seen referenced, but something's got people militant on that article. Thoughts? 6598:

that I was right about the BBC programme just being called Heretic and not Heretics of Science. While I am here, can I say how much I like the images decorating your user page - I think you may be worthy of a barn star for your delightful

1643:

Of course I don't want to get you banned Ian, I fear it always leaves a bitter taste in one's mouth. I think we've done the Sheldrake shuffle on the talk page to death now, but you do seem to raise the same old creative interpretations of

1378:

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to

625:

6383:

pseudoscience. Just because Bauer may investigate the Loch Ness Monster does not imply he supports pseudoscience. If he is wrong about anything, it is because of a flaw in his reasoning, such as lack of evidence, fallacious deductions, or

6340:

in the Velikovsky discussion in that he thinks of the auxiliary clatter as being of greater importance than most commentators on the subject. Gordin doesn't go quite as far, but that's really the only two sources we've got. I find it hard

6262: 6203: 5995:

You write, "From my point of view, it is crucial also to provide a source that link the pseudoscience to the concerns you have about Bauer's book, otherwise it appears as it if is just your opinion, and conclusions only you have made."

5729: 5698: 5425:

Hi, Ian. I believe you're already aware of these discretionary sanctions, but such awareness is supposed to "expire" after a year, so I thought I'd better post a reminder. Sorry for the bureaucracy, it's not my intention to badger you.

1721:

true just because you can only name about a dozen or so who have negatively commented on him" is essentially disingenuous subterfuge. The problem with this approach is that it pointlessly wastes a large amount of time as we get on the

1294: 4272:

In the most recent AFD of a particular article, you made a comment that referenced "original research" or "WP:OR". I am sending this same message to every non-IP editor who metioned either character string in that AFD. Please consider

6125:

the subjects in question (I note you do not provide any description of how one might use the sources you think are appropriate, but instead seem content to merely list them as though they are impressive enough to stand on their own).

7406: 5492:

I certainly agree parties to a case do not require a notice that the discretionary sanctions may apply to them. Compare also Timotheus Canens' close of the thread you link to. But as the years go by, I guess a new alert can't hurt.

2806:

Please don't quote other editors unsubstantiated accusations (ie. "a chronic promoter of pro-pseudoscience"). There was a good reason that the editor concerned provided not one diff in support of this. If you check the "Finding of

2658:, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system. 1415:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in

662:

476: 1236:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

2681:

This is ridiculous. Anyone who participates on this article's Talk Page is getting these warnings. Don't let it intimidate you. Any editor can post a warning but only an Admin can enforce sanctions if they are deemed warranted.

6091:. This is entirely different than questioning whether the judgment of you or me is sufficient to "out-weigh" published sources. In fact, no one would argue that this would ever be the case, but this question you are posing is 257:

that could otherwise be "broadly construed a violation" provided the request and authorization are threaded on your talk page in advance of the edit in question. Would you accept a mentor arrangement, if it could be arranged?

6177:(jps) for taking the time to explain your position. I'd like to do the same, but can't at the moment, but thought I'd give you the courtesy of an acknowledgement first. More when I can devote a bit more time to a response. -- 2237:) for his clarification regarding the terms of his unbanning. I am curious though as to what makes you think that you now have the competence to edit fringe pages, when previously people seemed to believe that you didn't? 2050:, following my Appeal to BASC resulting in my "topic banned indefinitely from editing any articles or its associated talk pages related to fringe science and physics-related subjects, broadly defined" (first grey box above) 3945: 3919: 3893: 3867: 3538: 3508: 3384: 6253: 6704:

The main difference between astronomy and astrophysics is when I am on the airplane and the person next to me asks what I do. If I want to talk to them, I say I'm an astronomer. If I don't, I say I'm an astrophysicist.

2794:

More misrepresentation, incivility and nonsense. When I originally requested the case on 2 Oct 2006, I called the case "Pseudoscience vs Pseudoskepticism", and questioned whether there was a level of "Pseudoskepticism".

3941: 3915: 3889: 3863: 3534: 3504: 3380: 6286:

any subject is accepted more than it really is or isn't. For the record, Velikovsky was wrong in a great many areas, not least astronomy, but that does not prevent us describing his views and his critics neutrally. --

7016:

improved, and because people are willing to help you wherever a need might arise. I have no doubt whatsoever that you can contribute to Knowledge in accordance with policy; you should come to know this of yourself.--

6050:

than others. Bauer's ongoing support of pseudoscience makes his attention to those journals suspect. It's not a question of whether we should not use Bauer in Knowledge. It's a question of whether the Bauer source

2252:

Your comment comes across as a little condescending: I wouldn't ask you about your competence to assess my answer, and I hope you would feel taken aback if I did. You are assuming that there are competence issues.

8144: 7990:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

5705:

1301:

6303:

Thanks for responding. I think the discussion will rapidly descend into a meta-discussion which is fine with me. I would like to expand a bit more on some points now, but I think I might say more in the future:

6032:

You write, "For my part I have already said that I have looked at reviews of Bauer's book, and they all appear positive (even if I may not agree with them all myself), and of course I am happy to provide them."

5664: 5182:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2643:. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the " 2286:

Ironically the Community Ban Noticeboard was itself subsequently banned, partly because it found the process of my banning to be "One amazing example five hours and eleven minutes rather unfair to a longtime

235:

Well spotted. While I have corrected the error, I have recently been" banned from all articles, discussions and other content related to plasma physics and astrophysics, broadly construed across all namespaces".

531: 7522:

Despite many attempts to get help to find how to improve my editing (and presumably behaviour), I am finding just about everyone talks at me, rather than with me. I want to know what I should do differently.

7781: 4115:, or Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford, all broadly construed." My involvement in the dispute is minimal, but I would still appreciate it if you'd edit your comment to avoid giving out false information. – 1104:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Knowledge must require all contributors to understand and comply with its

4165: 3568: 2272:

It claims I "repeatedly harassed User:ScienceApologist who eventually left the project over a variety of issues, including Ian's behavior" which is nonsense, as he states his reason for leaving at the time.

146: 6490:

I would say that's not true. Knowledge cannot accommodate viewpoints that the relevant communities which discuss such viewpoints have not commented upon. This is the essence of the exclusionary aspects of

8169: 3728: 3687: 1260: 6690:

I am sure I can find editors and admins who would agree with you, but then we know that most of them don't know the difference between astronomy and astrophysics, and don't care either. I'll bow out. --

3564: 2407: 6280: 6252:

was included in the article on the Society for Interdisciplinary Studies. Personally, I think there were sufficient sources (not all included in the article), eg. one or both mentioned in Palmer's book

1175: 4076:

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

4013:

51: 7899:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 7668:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 6774:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 5623:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 5547:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3167:

Thank you for taking the time to reply. I just thought that if conduct is based on content, then the latter will determine whether an editor's conduct is appropriate or not. But I take your point. --

1000:

text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from {{{url}}}. As a copyright violation,

7728: 7714: 4401: 3668:. Nice anecdote. I learnt to drive in my mum's mini, in the days when I could drive home from the Mops and Brooms with 8 passengers, and the phrase "compulsory seatbelts" hadn't been conceived. -- 1667:) who unblocked you with that complaint? I'd regret having to do that. But what really has changed since 2011? How do you think you can contribute positively now, when you couldn't back then? 8020: 6476:

viewpoint in a fair way by simply stating and attributing that viewpoint. Of course we should not shy away from including the mainstream viewpoint, as it is by definition, the main viewpoint. --

4194:

of the discretionary sanctions system. I thought you'd like to know Draft v3 has now been posted to the main review page. You are very welcome to comment on it on the review talk page. Regards,

8076: 8062: 6922:

If you frame your request to him thoughtfully and well, I believe your appeal will succeed by his discretion and you'll be finished. That's what I'd aim to accomplish. It's doable, I believe.--

5345: 3778:

he cursed it and hung up on me (really). I have no idea what drew me to his article, since I have no intrinsic interest in Tifft, red shift, etc. It was probably a random article. Or maybe the

7138:

taken part in disputes (if any) related to the contested enforcement action. Administrators having taken administrative actions are not normally considered involved for this reason alone (see

5981:. I have been trying to emphasize this in the distributed locations we have been discussing, but nevertheless find your repeated revisiting of concepts of "reliability" as well as demands for 4622:. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Knowledge Library can offer. 4286: 8005: 6917:

Hello Iantresman, I noticed you preparing an appeal of your discretionary sanctions and wanted to wish you the best. I also wanted to offer my assistance if I can be of any. I am curious, if

2596: 1095: 1058: 1032: 7278: 6662:". History and astronomy, yes, astrophysics, no, as is shown by the references and categories in the article. Can you make the connection? I am sure you will have no problems whatsoever. -- 2175:

treatment, trying to drive you away as a means to win some piddly content-dispute; folks like 76 and myself cannot have watchlists, so that's the only way we can know such things are afoot.

1169: 8000: 7709: 7079: 751: 1777:

I will answer your question tomorrow, as I am off out now, suffice to say that I utter reject your distorted paraphrasing, which is why diffs are the proper way to refer to criticism. --

4043: 524: 185:, you are hereby banned from all articles, discussions and other content related to plasma physics and astrophysics, broadly construed across all namespaces. You may appeal this ban at 3012:

catching up today and you can expect answers to your questions by 6:00 UTC December 4. Thank you for your patience, and again my apologies for any inconvenience this delay has caused.

7915: 7684: 7508: 7310: 6790: 6549: 5830: 5715: 5639: 5563: 2479: 563: 304:

In my personal opinion, Ian could add something about quadratic equations with no risk that it would be considered to be violating his topic ban from plasma physics and astrophysics.

6387:

I disagree that "like minded" sources make it difficult to attain WP:NPOV. Neither of us would have any problem with like-minded mainstream astronomy sources supporting one another.

4595:

You are receiving this message because the Knowledge Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

7115: 1316: 1148: 1140: 1013: 1001: 993: 979: 501:

Existing discretionary sanction remedies that this motion will deprecate may be stricken through and marked as redundant in the usual manner. Enforcement should now be sought under

7885: 6710: 6681: 6644: 6530: 6512: 6463: 6356: 6159: 5826: 5796: 5786: 5711: 4655: 4426: 4391: 4354: 2171:

cabal, if you like, any time. :-) Barney is welcome to join as well, of course, if he'll just do what pillar four demands. Please alert folks on the talkpage if you get the

1311: 1307: 1152: 7364: 4599:

Make sure that you can still log in to your HighBeam account; if you are having trouble feel free to contact me for more information. When your access expires you can reapply at

2879: 2779: 2238: 2207: 2119: 2047: 1812: 1748: 1668: 1606: 1183: 977: 5861:

issued for behavior related to suchlike topics. On that assumption, which can be proven wrong of course, I'd say that it does fall under the topic ban (and I always appreciate

7845: 7043:

That's what I thought you'd say, though you've said it better than I could. I might appropriate a couple of your phrases! I'll make some enhancements in the next day or so. --

4405: 3040:

were adequate to deal with current issues. Failure by users to edit constructively or comply with Knowledge's policies and guidelines should be brought up at the arbitration

2546: 1908:

Of course we do not present any view with having more validity, credulity, veracity, support, or whatever, with the proper sources. That doesn't stop us from describing them

459: 8277: 8057: 6912: 3104: 2904:

and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

2798: 2310:

I'm glad this issue seems to be dying down, but I'm still a little concerned about what provoked it. You said you've been threatened with banning by several other editors,

1532: 7475: 7599: 5282: 5267: 3046: 6637:

Can you clarify whether you've successfully appealed your topic ban or not relating to astrophysics? These things are not well-documented at Knowledge, as you well know.

6135:

can understand how I might be wary of your current tack. What I would appreciate at this point is a bit of honesty in your approach rather than this hiding behind lists.

6099:

You write, "So that brings us to the suggestion that because Bauer's associated with other fringe subjects, that makes him unreliable to comment on all fringe subjects."

3304: 2542: 6706: 6677: 6640: 6508: 6459: 6370: 6352: 6197: 6172: 6155: 5822: 5782: 5723: 5707: 4651: 4422: 4387: 4350: 2842: 1303: 505:, rather than under previous decisions concerning sub-topics of pseudoscience, but previous or existing sanctions or enforcement actions are not affected by this motion. 7411: 5456: 3817: 3764: 3723: 3240:

IrWolfie and MilesMoney (plus maybe Johnuniq?) used to be active amongst the fringe-fighters... and truth be told, I would actually be tempted to include wolfie in the

1859:, yes we most definitely include the scientific point of view (SPOV), but this is NOT the neutral point of view, a writing style that neutrally describes the SPOV, and 7584: 6422:

should not be established by sources that are written by authors who are outside the mainstream. We would want mainstream sources to establish notability, or, really,

3980: 2294:

To summarise, no diffs supporting claims, an editor using socks abusively, and a flawed process that was subsequently banned, and you're asking me about competence? --

1334:. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. 225: 26:

Iantresman is topic banned indefinitely from editing any articles or its associated talk pages related to fringe science and physics-related subjects, broadly defined.

430: 7401: 7396: 6944:

That's very kind of you, I would accept any advice you can offer. I was initially thinking of appealing via WP:AE, as my last appeal directly to TC was declined. --

4682: 71: 8238: 8224: 7433: 5216: 3779: 3352: 2520: 1989:

it is the person making the extraordinary claim that there is any support for magical nonsense in the academic mainstream who would need to provide such proof. --

1019:

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the

833: 698: 581:. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. 5434: 2644: 2357:

Editors have heard, as is clear by the fact that they respond, and give a rationale as to why they might disagree. Disagreement is not the same as not hearing. --

1508:. The Sheldrake talk page is short of people who express opinions politely and helpfully. Anything at all from such a person could serve as an example to others. 1451: 794:

to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Knowledge. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a

7327: 7295:

of that notification. The appeal may not be processed otherwise. If a block is appealed, the editor moving the appeal to this board should make the notification.

5376: 4519: 2901: 2651: 2620: 1134: 1129: 7822: 7367: 4677:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

2282: 1147:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

5261: 4984: 4887: 3835: 2280: 2093: 1722: 812: 8052: 7391: 7206: 5657: 4949:), but I am not interrogating you over who you may, or may not have had contact with. I do not consider it appropriate to ask as the connection is tenuous. -- 1550: 7126:. According to the procedures, a "clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors" is required to overturn an arbitration enforcement action. 4185: 4101: 1209: 6981: 4312:. It concerns an effect on WP I've noticed which if cautiously exploited could occasionally allow suppressed information to become more available here. 3937: 3911: 3885: 3859: 3734: 3693: 3530: 3500: 3376: 2813:

If you are going to criticise my editing, do the decent thing and provide some diffs, otherwise your comments could be misconstrued as personal attacks. --

6988: 6980:

Thanks again for your input. Newyorkbrad asks whether I am confident that I'll be able to edit articles consistent with Knowledge policies and guidelines.

851: 5135: 2215: 1605:

in editing "fringe science articles, broadly construed", or have I missed something subsequent to that which overturns the overturn of the previous ban?

6581: 6395:

I'm fine with other sources in their totality. I'm not expecting analysis from each one, but together they all mount up. I'm happy to agree to disagree.

5298: 8214: 7941: 7827: 7702: 6808: 5925:

Hi Ian. How are you? I can see arguments both ways, but you've posted and you obviously asked first, so I doubt anyone is going to get upset. I'm not.

5455:

editor EdJohnston said that "A party should not require a special notice that the discretionary sanctions of that case can apply to them" (11 Nov 2012)

4492: 2288: 140: 6855: 2887: 2822: 2803:

and focus was only on "pseudoscience". I didn't shoot myself in the foot, I had my gun taken away from me and given to the other editors. Hardly fair.

2787: 2303: 2127: 1786: 1756: 1698: 1676: 1634: 1188:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. :

847: 336: 7837: 7221: 5588: 5303: 5156: 7360:(given without a single diff in evidence, and with such short deliberation that it contributed to the banning of the Community Sanctions Noticeboard 4462:"...banned from all articles, discussions and other content related to plasma physics and astrophysics, broadly construed across all namespaces.... 4038: 7123: 6083:

because it would be a repeat of Bauer's positions. We do have other sources, and the best one listed is Grodin's book, but the question we face is

5388: 5340: 5211: 4294: 2592: 1528: 494: 478: 7631: 7300: 6931: 6821: 6728: 6714: 6699: 6685: 6671: 6516: 6485: 6467: 6412: 6186: 5890: 5853: 5808: 5790: 5750: 5256: 4444: 4430: 4416: 4395: 4381: 3598: 3346: 2576: 881: 5512: 4731:

topic ban "from all articles, discussions and other content related to plasma physics and astrophysics, broadly construed across all namespaces."

4527: 1164: 236: 62: 3975: 3340: 1998: 1978: 1337:

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

8219: 7335: 7291:

The appealing editor is asked to notify the administrator who made the enforcement action of this appeal, and then to replace this text with a

6815: 4664: 3747:

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

3706:

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

3210: 486: 6433:

to supporting pseudoscience, but Bauer is a known supporter of pseudoscience and we have the citations that indicate this in his very article.

5874: 4947: 4582: 4081: 4018: 3253: 400: 362: 167: 2810:, you will see there was no evidence of "pushing pseudoscience", although there was a bizarre criticism of my "orientation" based on hearsay. 2366: 2012: 1943: 1929: 1903: 1880: 1255: 781:

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a

4224:

Message added 02:21, 16 July 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

3232:

applies, of course; it has been there awhile, and though I don't want it that way in the page-archives, please do what you think is best.

713: 247: 7857: 7217: 6908: 4730: 4331: 4204: 3560: 2196: 774:

copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the

178: 111: 7320: 6891: 6004:

that the book in question about Velikovsky promotes pseudoscience. Rather the concern is that Bauer is partial to pseudoscientific claims

5682: 5666: 4703: 4636: 2352: 2269:

It claims I am "a general POV-warrior of all sorts of pseudoscience and fringe science repeatedly POV pushing" but no diffs are provided.

1850: 1476: 1278: 1262: 8091: 5948: 5934: 5581: 5091:

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

4944: 1841:. And people who cannot work towards that goal can and are banned from interfering with people who are attempting to reach that goal. -- 1346: 593: 7361: 7093: 7073: 7052: 7025: 7000: 6968: 6953: 6295: 5920: 5768: 3829: 3288: 2908: 1360:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 1120:

She is a living person who makes any number of public appearances in her "trademark" looks for which a free use photo could be taken.--

607:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 348: 313: 7862: 7636: 6742: 5461: 4070: 4007: 3328: 3202: 3176: 2869: 2841:

Hello, given your previous history I felt you may be interested in observing and providing assistance with the new wikipedia entry for

2655: 2106:) is correct, we need more sources that support Sheldrake, but I'm really struggling to find them. It looks like the best we can do is 1405: 652: 299: 276: 7437: 6112:

I am not sure how much more plain I can make this. I am reminded of previous disputes we've had where you seemed content to engage in

5501: 5485: 4619: 4148: 2953:

I'm reading your ?'s you posted ... you're aware that they've essentially already all been answered in the previous questions, right?

827: 7973: 6850: 5687: 5410: 5236: 4549: 3851: 3368: 2556: 2331: 1824: 1493: 1425: 1283: 1214: 1050: 861: 672: 229: 6623: 6202:(jps) Thank you for being patient. If I seem confused, then this is the case. I would not deliberately miss or avoid points. In the 5904: 3631:

Born in Elstree, had a flat in Borehamwood for a while, so I drive through Park Street whenever I visit my folks from the M1/M10. --

3072: 2246: 1614: 971: 8315: 7515: 7376: 5069: 5051: 4997: 4958: 4900: 4851: 4828: 4795: 4723: 3025: 2895: 216:

showing the roots of a quadratic equation. Unfortunately, you have missed the minus sign in the numerator that should precede the

123: 8040: 7619: 7556: 6569: 5468: 4762:

Hi, in the past Rupert Sheldrake had reached out to several Knowledge editors about his Knowledge article. Have you discussed the

2941: 7168: 3840:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

3677: 3659: 3640: 3357:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

2707: 447: 7338: 38: 8298: 8190: 7802: 7341: 7242: 5393:

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means

5161: 4532:

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means

4523: 4421:

Thanks, Ed. You might want to post that on your userpage somewhere, Ian. It appears you are under no more restrictions at all.

3032: 1009: 2549:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 854:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 462:

has been proposed and is being voted on by the Arbitration Committee, which would affect you. For the Arbitration Committee --

5232: 5229:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3847: 3844:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3364: 3361:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2854: 2801: 2552: 2103: 857: 7309:

I have had one appeal declined over a year ago, and this is summarised in my deferred appeal in Dec 2017 (described in the "

6360: 6163: 4065:, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge is acceptable. Please go to 4002:, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge is acceptable. Please go to 1505: 7937: 7698: 7254: 6804: 5895:

OK. Now, let me tell you--you've been topic-banned since 2012? This participation could be a test case for you. Good luck.

5653: 5207: 5152: 4632: 4066: 4057: 2670: 2257: 2051: 1447: 1230: 694: 584:

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

471: 221: 207: 135: 6676:

I'm pretty sure that any third-party would argue that this is related to astrophysics. Would you like me to ask an admin?

6648: 1920:

which probably means different things to different people, and might make us inadvertently draw misleading conclusions. --

1471: 909: 7272: 7260: 5978: 5402: 5328: 5286: 4541: 4358: 4089: 4026: 3245: 3001: 2795: 2399: 2188: 1970: 1664: 1433: 886: 799: 775: 765: 680: 426: 7501: 3816:, except that it reminded me of the influence of astronomy on ancient cultures. I did try and find out more information 3806: 3224:

write a BLP article about her sorority-sister that was in some indie film (a flop by all accounts) a couple years ago.

2966: 2273: 1562: 1544: 1482: 8210: 7841: 7418:

This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.

7248: 5320: 5278: 5194:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

4309: 2883: 2800:

But when the case was opened in 12 Oct, it was no longer about "Pseudoskepticism" the term being removed from the case,

2783: 2242: 2211: 2123: 1752: 1725:

of explaining to you how over and over and over again the basics of how science works, and how Knowledge works because

1672: 1610: 8024:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 7603:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 7332: 6869: 6861: 6553:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3646:

lived at Frogmore (technically - actually it was a cottage on the Handley Page site, opposite the George and Dragon).

2063: 1729:. I humbly submit to you it would be better for you to allow other people to discuss without any inane interruptions. 1576: 1401: 1064:

If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to

648: 7483: 7266: 6348:

I would happily discuss the other sources, but they seem very flat indeed. Mere mentions rather than worthy analysis.

4750: 4471: 4262: 4085: 4022: 2836: 782: 746: 94: 4659: 3161: 2993:

I've just answered your question. Sorry about the slight delay in doing so, I've had an unexpectedly busy weekend.

1596: 953: 558: 202: 7162: 6654:

I am still topic banned from plasma and astrophysics related articles. If you are referring to my participation in

5773:

I would ask for dispensation from an admin. I am too involved in the controversy to proxy on your behalf, I think.

5394: 4077: 4014: 2767: 2752:

as it was he who brought the issue to the attention of the arbcom in the first place, and in a spectacular case of

2745: 2234: 1590: 1517: 89: 17: 6326:

necessarily paints the idea as notable. I liken this concern to the ones I had about a person like David Wilcock:

4268:

Request for comment on using secondary RSs at "List of scientists opposing maintream assessment of global warming"

4180: 3138: 2515: 2452: 7933: 7694: 6800: 5649: 5414: 5372: 5203: 5148: 5144: 5074: 4694: 4674: 4628: 4574: 4553: 4487: 4128: 4124: 4111:"She is also topic-banned indefinitely from editing any article relating to the Shakespeare authorship question, 3273: 3064: 2612: 1250: 1144: 117: 7449: 6507:

does not have a Knowledge page in spite of the fact it is very easy to attribute to him that which he has said.

5728:@jps. Thank you for the notification. I can provide several third-party independent sources for the AfD on both 4814: 2808: 22:

Per your discussions with the Ban Appeals SubCommittee, you have been unblocked under the following conditions:

8302: 8194: 7806: 6886: 5313: 5271: 3813: 3316: 1456: 1090: 719: 8029: 7608: 6558: 3785:

I also took notice of your photo File:Sikh-temple-adornment.jpg. This thing has an uncanny resemblance to the

3020: 1934:

show me there is any significant percentage of the mainstream academic community that views him otherwise. --

489:

of 8-0 in response to a request for clarification, the Arbitration Committee has passed the following motion:

7579: 7532: 6659: 6021: 5221:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

4890:

on the Sheldrake talk page, now going on for well over a year and a half, it seemed appropriate to just ask.

4708: 4587: 3334: 3322: 3030:

This is a courtesy notice to inform you that a request for arbitration, which named you as a party, has been

2960: 2937: 2525:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1409: 838:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

656: 577: 538: 7373: 3107:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

2482:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

2410:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

2167:

bad for wikipedia, which is why David is there, and why I am there, and why you are there. You can join my

7908: 7677: 6783: 5632: 5556: 5032: 4779: 4608: 3741: 3700: 2631:. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the 2526: 1330: 1179: 7192: 6608: 5979:

different from the question as to whether there are reliable sources which simply mention the publications

2336:"threatening" minority viewpoint holders for being minority viewpoint holders is obviously not conductive. 1240: 8290: 8242: 8220: 8182: 8080: 8058: 7920: 7794: 7732: 7710: 7689: 6795: 5644: 5568: 5199: 4003: 3994: 3769: 3310: 2914: 1417: 1225: 1057:

If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at

914: 892: 795: 725: 664: 544: 182: 7180: 6328:]. Basically when the only sources are those who are like-minded, it becomes difficult to give a proper 6233:

to a much lesser degree. Both have coverage, and had circulations that exceeded many astronomy journals.

4209: 8294: 8186: 7995: 7798: 7358: 7236: 6877: 6846: 5406: 4545: 4467: 4282: 3181:

There are a few cases where writing really questionable content can violate core content policies like

2988: 2640: 2264: 1429: 1394: 1387: 769:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 676: 641: 634: 453: 358: 198: 6345:

to discount Bauer which leaves just Gordin and the concomitant perspective that cannot be neutralized.

4404:. The pseudoscience area still has discretionary sanctions, though. The full Arbcom discussion was at 3621: 2982: 7977: 6113: 6037:

But this entirely misses the point. No one is asking for reviews of Bauer's book because, crucially,

5691: 5418: 5359:

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Knowledge. It does

5336: 5294: 4557: 4506:

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Knowledge. It does

4234: 2731: 2693: 2344: 2340: 2097: 1990: 1935: 1895: 1856: 1842: 1554: 1536: 1287: 1121: 1114: 1005: 7984:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience: From Alien Abductions to Zone Therapy

7384:, and have been directly involved in the attainment of 4 good articles (one subsequently reassessed) 2317:

And yes, TRPoD, I've read what WP is about. Perhaps marketplace was a poor choice of words, but WP

7186: 5986: 4154: 3841: 3358: 3143: 2955: 2674: 2667:

page you will face blocking or banning. Please note that talk pages count as editing. Thank you.

2616: 1441: 1086: 1021: 688: 517: 467: 4400:

For the lifting of Iantresman's ban from fringe science and physics-related subjects in 2012, see

4342: 2663:

This is a warning: Please note that your contributions are disruptive and if they continue on the

1602: 6902: 4277:

about adding secondary RSs to the listing criteria at that talk page. Thanks for your attention.

3249: 2192: 1974: 1658: 1572: 1246: 941: 7379: 7013: 5799:", I think I would be OK to post, as my banned topics are mentioned no-where in the articles? -- 5759:

will allow you to post my sources on my behalf, as they are both "verifiable and productive". --

1964:). If you want to elide their sources, you have to show, on a source-by-source basis, that per 8251: 8206: 7445: 7174: 7089: 7021: 6964: 6927: 6655: 5398: 4678: 4670: 4537: 4483: 2632: 1747:

Wolpert "it clearly does not deserve". I don't mind people copyediting stuff that I've added.

1726: 1499: 7080:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Arbitration_enforcement_action_appeal_by_iantresman

6895: 5397:

administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the

5312:. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Knowledge uses a set of 5270:. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Knowledge uses a set of 4536:

administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the

4226: 2860:

Thanks for the notification, unfortunately my current topic ban precludes by participation. --

7896: 7665: 7231: 6918: 6771: 5960: 5931: 5620: 5544: 5324: 5309: 4578: 4463: 4402:

Knowledge:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 8#Arbitration motion regarding Iantresman

4346: 4278: 4106: 3419: 3077: 3068: 3006: 2380: 1368: 615: 354: 194: 6308:

I think we need to be aware that inclusion of a topic in Knowledge lends the topic to being

2948: 2900:

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at

1863:

views. Previous attempts to make the NPOV equivalent to the SPOV in scientific articles has

1531:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic

1295:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Pensée (Immanuel Velikovsky Reconsidered) (2nd nomination)

238:

Since algebra is used in physics, I am unable to upload it as it would contravene my ban. --

7907:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 7676:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 7354:

a retention rate that is as good as all but two active members of the Arbitration Committee

7139: 6824:

arbitration amendment request has been closed and archived. For the Arbitration Committee,

6782:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 6437: 6419: 6076: 6013: 5699:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Pensée (Immanuel Velikovsky Reconsidered) (3rd nomination)

5631:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5555:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5332: 5290: 5190:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5039: 4886:

Considering that Sheldrake had contacted several editors in the past, and considering your

4412: 4258: 4088:

and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the

4025:

and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the

3802: 3269: 3258: 3134: 2925: 2511: 2448: 1513: 1106: 1016:

has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

997: 790: 422: 309: 6991:" (as of 2012). I am not trying to be difficult, but I don't know which policy I broke. -- 3279:

Try holding down the Shift key when you click the link, to open it in a new tab/window. --

1829:

Knowledge absolutely does NOT claim to be "marketplace of ideas". Have you even looked at

8: 8306: 8198: 7818: 7810: 7744: 7382: 7352: 6629: 5471:

and discussing the article as required by AC/DS, and made a big effort to provide sources

5195: 4757: 4691: 4570: 4144: 4120: 3793:

And of course I notice your contributions to that notoriously pseudomathematical subject

3760: 3748: 3719: 3707: 3060: 2850: 2753: 2636: 2433:"http://collections-search.bfi.org.uk/web/Details/ChoiceFilmWorks/150022778 Choral Cameos 1653:

But you can see it does rather put me in a difficult position. Do I report this to, say

1489: 1467: 1437: 684: 510: 463: 272: 163: 131: 107: 1422:

Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

669:

Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

7487: 7331:

I have made efforts to improve my editing, reaching out to Timotheus Canens for advice

6884: 5756: 5498: 5460:

That the article I was involved with was not related to pseudoscience (and failed the "

5431: 4600: 4533: 4336: 4326: 3953: 3752: 3711: 3443: 3229: 2184: 2178:

p.s. If the article were once again split into a morphogenetics page, and a BLP page,

1654: 1568: 1342: 839: 810: 589: 35: 4647: 3219:

You are putting Tumbleman into the same group as me, David, yourself, et al. That is

1952:, TRPoD ... Iantresman and VeryScaryMary have supplied plenty of Reliable Sources (cf 1504:

It could be very helpful, IMHO, if you could post some sort of opinion (ANY opinion)

1080: 962:

That's very kind of you, it was a group effort of course, but we got there in then. --

8273: 8202: 8165: 7879: 7777: 7652: 7441: 7427: 6987:

adhering to Knowledge policies including those mentioned at Discretionary sanctions "

6758: 6589: 6086: 5607: 5589: 5577: 5531: 5513: 5252: 5243:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

5222: 5171: 5162: 4983:

The same thing happened when Guy raised the issue of your talk page participation in

4479: 4176: 4097: 4034: 3971: 3962:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

3875: 3594: 3585:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

3576: 3423: 2994: 2933: 2572: 2563:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2327: 1986: 1886:

academic views. In the case of Sheldrake, the OVERWHELMING academic views range from

1820: 1621: 1361: 1201: 1193: 1160: 937: 877: 868:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

608: 172: 8260: 8152: 7764: 7740: 7927: 7892: 7852: 7661: 7470: 7454: 7357:

I appreciate ban avoidance more than most, having endured a 1,515 day Community Ban

6840: 6767: 6604: 6595: 6492: 6441: 5926: 5900: 5870: 5862: 5616: 5540: 5191: 5175: 4763: 4191: 3927: 3786: 3603: 3483: 3479: 3431: 2775: 2749: 2664: 2471: 2172: 1965: 1949: 1913: 1197: 949: 843: 190: 3608:

Just as a matter of curiosity, are you from they parts? I grew up in Park Street.

1031:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at

8048: 7756: 7752: 7627: 7571: 7524: 7363:

that was instigated by an editor who was described as having misled the community

7305:

I would like my topic banned to be considered for lifting. Since my ban in 2012:

7198: 7151: 7085: 7065: 7059: 7044: 7038: 7017: 6992: 6975: 6960: 6945: 6939: 6923: 6720: 6691: 6663: 6615: 6577: 6477: 6423: 6404: 6287: 6178: 6068: 5940: 5912: 5882: 5845: 5800: 5760: 5742: 5477: 5043: 5028: 4993: 4950: 4896: 4843: 4824: 4787: 4775: 4742: 4436: 4408: 4373: 4254: 4202: 3821: 3798: 3669: 3632: 3516: 3471: 3463: 3459: 3451: 3447: 3427: 3411: 3280: 3265: 3168: 3130: 3088: 3037: 2981:

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at

2861: 2814: 2757: 2735: 2699: 2581: 2507: 2463: 2444: 2391: 2358: 2311: 2295: 2224: 2107: 2055: 2004: 1921: 1872: 1838: 1778: 1717: 1690: 1626: 1620:

I think you have missed something, and are at least the third editor to hold the

1582: 1509: 963: 819: 705: 439: 392: 340: 305: 291: 239: 79: 64: 8259:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

8151:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

7763:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

7748: 7543:

probably write a successful request to have the topic ban lifted - but it's not

7122:

Procedural notes: The rules governing arbitration enforcement appeals are found

5795:

Thank you for the suggestion and pinging Drmies. Having read the guidelines on "

4607:

partnership will be renewed. For more information about citing this source, see

798:. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the 7904: 7814: 7673: 7552: 7292: 6779: 6452: 6400: 6329: 6080: 5628: 5552: 5384: 5187: 5179: 4786:

but am embarrassed how some editors find it to distort the facts to say so. --

4688: 4565: 4140: 4135: 4116: 4062: 3999: 3756: 3715: 3546: 3491: 3467: 3455: 3439: 3399: 3193: 3186: 3152: 3055: 2846: 2628: 2260: 2168: 2118:

a Quaker philosopher. At least I'm working on it rather than whinging about it.

1961: 1868: 1837:??? It is an encyclopedia where a wide variety of volunteer editors attempt to 1485: 1463: 1408:

justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See

1205: 905: 742: 655:

justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See

554: 258: 149: 127: 103: 7010: 6248:, and this is reflected in the lack of sources, and hence non-notability. The 2902:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests#Persistent Bullying of Rupert Sheldrake Editors

1567:

Thank you for your sensible offer of the slight change needed for this page:)

1109:. Knowledge takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators 148:

and consider assisting to clarify the matter before the committee. Thank you,

8088:

Unused except on creator's userpage in gallery of uploaded files; should use

7900: 7669: 6881: 6775: 6318: 5970: 5624: 5548: 5494: 5443: 5427: 5380: 5183: 5082: 5035: 4642: 4316: 3901: 3770: 3665: 3654: 3648: 3628: 3616: 3610: 3520: 3415: 3395: 2725: 2624: 2160: 2115: 1834: 803: 7216:

Topic ban from the subject of "plasma physics and astrophysics", imposed at

6504: 6429:

Claiming that nobody supports pseudoscience is a strange contention. Nobody

3216:

misrepresented them here, I will happily strike their name. --Iantresman"

145:

And you have been mentioned as an involved party. Please review the request

8310: 8025: 7604: 6554: 6333: 6064: 5573: 5448:

Thank you for the reminder, though it made no difference when I received a

5248: 5244: 4726: 4300: 4244: 4172: 4093: 4030: 3967: 3963: 3782:

was somehow at work. As I recall, I was just exercising my editing skills.

3590: 3586: 3435: 3041: 2929: 2568: 2564: 2323: 2111: 1957: 1830: 1816: 1811:

Again with the threats of banning folks from the Sheldrake page? Come on,

1156: 873: 869: 186: 2275:

which says nothing about being harassed, or anything about me specifically

1894:. Any other views within the academic community are vanishingly small. -- 1356:

Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to

923: 603:

Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to

7849: 6600: 6500: 6496: 6451:

If your argument is that Knowledge should include these articles because

6041:

Rather the subjects of the articles are defunct publications which Bauer

5973:

of the defunct Velikovskian publications to the extent that they deserve

5896: 5866: 5839: 5776: 3550: 3391: 3182: 3013: 2538: 2534: 2263:

know the reason for the restrictions. This followed my 2007 Community ban

1953: 945: 7911:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

7680:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

7007: 6786:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

6312:

if for no other reason than it announces to the world that the topic is

6229:

was quite significant it its time (with a peak 70,000 circulation), and

5635:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

5559:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

5352: 5085:

has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and

4715: 4499: 4190:

Hi. You have commented on Draft v1 or v2 in the Arbitration Committee's

4168:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

3264:

collapsed. The effect is to make it easy not to investigate your diffs.

2595:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is

8044: 7889:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

7623: 6573: 5226: 4989: 4892: 4820: 4771: 4735: 3487: 3475: 3403: 2530: 2259:

took place in private. It neither accountable nor transparent, so only

2985:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

2698:

Thanks for the heads up. I've already commented on their talk page. --

7871: 7643: 7564: 7548: 7463: 6834: 6826: 6749: 6403:. And that is why I also think many of the articles should remain. -- 5598: 5522: 4943:

You have also made extensive edits to the Sheldrake article (50 times

4314:

When it comes to deception, summon all the spacious dragons to hear

4061:. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under 3998:. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under 3407: 900: 770: 737: 704:

Permission has now been acquired, and is listed on the image page. --

549: 8139:{\displaystyle {\color {Blue}{\sqrt{x^{3}}}\equiv x^{\frac {3}{2}}}} 7969:

Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience: From Alien Abductions to Zone Therapy

7953:

Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience: From Alien Abductions to Zone Therapy

7387:

I am always open to discussion with any editor regarding my editing,

6225:

comes down to reliable sources for notability, and the fact is that

3729:

Ways to improve List of Fellows of the Royal Society elected in 1666

3688:

Ways to improve List of Fellows of the Royal Society elected in 1665

7509:

An earlier appeal on the same ban "Amendment request: Pseudoscience

7084:

I'm sorry. I think your appeal will be fine. I wish you the best.--

6448:

be treated differently here. To do otherwise is asking for trouble.

6131: 4363: 4195: 3794: 2721: 2683: 2604: 2439:",BFI | Film & TV Database, retrieved 13 Nov 2013.</ref: --> 74:

of 7-4, the Arbitration Committee has passed the following motion:

7407:

Discussion among uninvolved editors about the appeal by iantresman

3236:

get it fixed. Hope this helps, thanks for improving wikipedia.

3092: 2467: 2395: 6594:

Thank you for saying on the talk page attached to the article on

6016:

source would. In the context of determining whether a concept is

5178:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

4769:

Also, out of curiosity, are you still sympathetic to Velikovsky?

2343:

behavior, which when continued does result in blocks or bans. --

213: 7924:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 4299:

Jello! I see you've grown as an editor and a kind supporter of

3294: 7914:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

7683:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

6789:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

6085:

to what extent do these sources speak to the notability of the

5881:

Thank you for your input, in which case I shall participate. --

5638:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

5562:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

5346:

Discretionary sanctions alert, pseudoscience and fringe science

5110:: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices 3100: 3096: 2475: 2403: 8006:

Orphaned non-free image File:Encyclopedia-of-pseudoscience.jpg

6503:

made but since no one noticed they don't belong in Knowledge.

5363:

imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

4729:, you are cautioned to avoid making edits in the area of your 4510:

imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

4308:

I write now to refer you to a note I've left with Elerner at

2734:) - I too think this warning was not probably not necessary. 2619:

to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at

6898:

at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

5387:, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is 4526:, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is 4221:

Hello, Iantresman. Please check your email; you've got mail!

1892:

his nonsense is harmful to the way people view actual science

1170:

File:1763-cerne-abbas-giant-anonymous.jpg listed for deletion

7500:

10 Apr 2018: A rejected appeal to have a topic ban removed "

7351:

I have made over 21,000 edits, of which 96.8% are still live

5122:: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs 2971: 752:

File source problem with File:Fodens 12-piece brass band.jpg

353:

It's not a violation of your topic ban to update the image.

7547:

understanding of the issues that needs to be demonstrated.

5319:

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from

5277:

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from

4044:

Non-free rationale for File:Adam-Maitland-portrait-1928.jpg

1374:

to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

1155:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

621:

to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

220:. Perhaps you might upload a corrected version? Thanks. 6868:

Hello, Iantresman. Your question has been answered at the

6440:

is completely different from like-minded sources that are

2623:) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to 2339:

Neither is it conductive for editors to have to deal with

1551:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Lou_Sander

564:

File permission problem with File:Robin-ramsay-lobster.jpg

7436:

your appeal of your topic ban as declined. This has been

7116:

DRAFT Arbitration enforcement action appeal by iantresman

6658:, then I believe this is outside of the description of " 6000:

I think I have been abundantly clear that the concern is

4685:

if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you.

2650:

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at

1317:

File permission problem with File:Aluminium-can-white.jpg

7883:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

7316:

I have received no other sanctions from over 4000+ edits

7222:

Knowledge:Arbitration_enforcement_log/2012#Pseudoscience

6531:

Orphaned non-free image File:Big-bang-never-happened.jpg

5116:: advise on building tools to support the library's work 2110:(who defends him but doesn't specifically endorse him), 2003:

This is not the place to discuss Sheldrake's article. --

8301:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

8283:

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing

8193:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

8175:

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing

7966:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

7895:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

7846:

the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page

7805:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

7787:

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing

7664:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

6770:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

5680:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

5619:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

5543:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

5225:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 4618:

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out

3751:. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at 3710:. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at 2909:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests#Requests for arbitration

2652:

Knowledge:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions

2621:

Knowledge:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions

2529:, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 1839:

represent the mainstream academic views of the subjects

1276:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

842:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 8266:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

8158:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

7770:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

6568:

will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

6332:

treatment of the subject without delving into massive

6059:

You write, "This is the big question, can an editor's

2163:

that is full of extremely non-neutral stuff. That is

1412:

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

659:

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

8094: 6983:

I have no confidence that I can, because I thought I

3103:

by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just

3050:

for further potential suggestions on moving forward.

2223:

Meanwhile, excusing 74's bizarre verbiosity, I thank

438:

No problem. Accuracy of the encyclopedia is vital. --

7972:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

6317:

scheme of things (a peak membership to a commercial

5686:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

4084:. If the file is already gone, you can still make a 4021:. If the file is already gone, you can still make a 3938:

List of Fellows of the Royal Society elected in 1919

3912:

List of Fellows of the Royal Society elected in 1692

3886:

List of Fellows of the Royal Society elected in 1683

3860:

List of Fellows of the Royal Society elected in 1673

3735:

List of Fellows of the Royal Society elected in 1666

3694:

List of Fellows of the Royal Society elected in 1665

3531:

List of Fellows of the Royal Society elected in 1662

3501:

List of Fellows of the Royal Society elected in 1661

3377:

List of Fellows of the Royal Society elected in 1663

2878:

That's a very commendable position for you to take.

1282:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

1025:(CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following: 7502:

Arbitration enforcement action appeal by iantresman

7482:, contact the responding user(s) directly on their 6820:At the direction of the Arbitration Committee, the 3733:Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Iantresman, thanks for creating 3692:Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Iantresman, thanks for creating 2478:by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just 2406:by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just 1432:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 679:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 8138: 8039:will be deleted after seven days, as described in 7844:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at 7739:Decortive use of non-free cover art being used in 7618:will be deleted after seven days, as described in 7585:Orphaned non-free image File:CorelDraw X8 logo.png 7473:has been answered. If you need more help, you can 7381:, edited over 4000 pages (on average 5 times each) 4681:. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at 3981:Non-free rationale for File:Adam-Maitland-1928.jpg 3812:Unfortunately I have no background information on 2187:Hope this helps, thanks for improving wikipedia. 1151:. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at 898:Can you please revisit and give an update here? — 6907:This is my draft appeal against my 2012 Topic Ban 5170:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 2429:drama film directed by ] and starring ], ] and [[ 6244:never attained the same interest/circulation as 6139:ideas. For example, there are no articles about 5217:Disambiguation link notification for February 26 4303:over the years. Kudos for doing him a justice. 3353:Disambiguation link notification for December 27 3115:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: 3036:. The arbitrators felt that the already imposed 2521:Disambiguation link notification for November 24 2490:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: 2418:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: 1022:Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 834:Disambiguation link notification for December 28 479:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience 7372:I have also uploaded over 60 files to Knowledge 6880:after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by 6039:Bauer's book is not the subject of any article. 4458:Above there is still a topic ban notification: 4386:Can you link to that lifting? I can't find it. 4166:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 2593:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 1871:). ie. we work toward the NPOV not the SPOV. -- 1529:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 1386:If you believe the media meets the criteria at 1135:Possibly unfree File:Cerne-abbas-giant-1950.jpg 633:If you believe the media meets the criteria at 458:This is a courtesy notice to inform you that a 8041:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion 8035:Note that any non-free images not used in any 7620:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion 7614:Note that any non-free images not used in any 6564:Note that any non-free images not used in any 6322:than making object lessons for retrospectives? 5409:. Administrators may impose sanctions such as 5262:License tagging for File:CorelDraw X8 logo.png 4548:. Administrators may impose sanctions such as 4171:Your input here would be greatly appreciated! 3836:Disambiguation link notification for January 3 7440:at the relevant arbitration enforcement log. 6913:Preliminary discussion regarding draft appeal 5821:light of the controversial subject material. 4805:suppose the common thread is just fringyness. 4186:Discretionary sanctions 2013 review: Draft v3 2797:The request was approved around 6 Oct (4/0/0) 7496:I'm seeking help with my editing following: 6075:But this isn't a question, or, rather, it's 6063:out-weight published sources. Or is it just 4435:It is shown near the top of my talk page. -- 3561:List of Founder Fellows of the Royal Society 7474: 2597:Consensus by exhaustion at Rupert Sheldrake 1061:with a link to where we can find that note. 996:, please note that Knowledge cannot accept 7828:Nomination for deletion of Module:FRSyears 4493:Discretionary sanctions notification - CAM 2656:Knowledge:Arbitration Committee/Procedures 1601:Ian, might it be suggested that violating 141:A request for clarification has been filed 124:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement 6392:still clear that they are not acceptable. 5683:Pensée (Immanuel Velikovsky Reconsidered) 5667:Pensée (Immanuel Velikovsky Reconsidered) 5304:License tagging for File:Coreldraw x8.png 4518:The Arbitration Committee has authorised 1279:Pensée (Immanuel Velikovsky Reconsidered) 1263:Pensée (Immanuel Velikovsky Reconsidered) 1176:File:1763-cerne-abbas-giant-anonymous.jpg 1051:Knowledge:Requesting copyright permission 785:and ask for a chance to fix the problem. 7078:OK, due to time constraints, now posted 6221:Ness Monster would be an obvious target. 4310:Endless Disputes Among The Talking Heads 4295:Endless Disputes Among The Talking Heads 4055:Thanks for uploading or contributing to 3992:Thanks for uploading or contributing to 1345:or another acceptable free license (see 936:Thanks for all the work you did, to get 592:or another acceptable free license (see 8272:notice, but please explain why in your 8164:notice, but please explain why in your 7776:notice, but please explain why in your 7729:File:Wicked-willie-mans-best-friend.jpg 7715:File:Wicked-willie-mans-best-friend.jpg 7319:I have upheld the 1RR restriction on me 6876:Please note that all old questions are 6856:Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! 5367:Please carefully read this information: 4514:Please carefully read this information: 3744:tools, as having some issues to fix. / 3703:tools, as having some issues to fix. / 1428:. You may wish to read the Knowledge's 1351:at the site of the original publication 1341:make a note permitting reuse under the 675:. You may wish to read the Knowledge's 598:at the site of the original publication 588:make a note permitting reuse under the 8021:File:Encyclopedia-of-pseudoscience.jpg 6816:Arbitration amendment request declined 6499:. There are many statements have been 5098:: help distribute free research access 4665:Possibly unfree File:Saturn-aurora.jpg 4524:Complementary and Alternative Medicine 3211:third category, for direct-COI editors 1402:Knowledge:File copyright tags#Fair use 1239:If you have any questions, please see 1035:and send an email with the message to 649:Knowledge:File copyright tags#Fair use 8096: 8077:File:Radical equation equivalence.svg 8063:File:Radical equation equivalence.svg 6149:Chronology & Catastrophism Review 5331:. Thank you for your cooperation. -- 5289:. Thank you for your cooperation. -- 4669:A file that you uploaded or altered, 3740:I've just tagged the page, using our 3699:I've just tagged the page, using our 3091:. I have automatically detected that 2983:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard 2466:. I have automatically detected that 2394:. I have automatically detected that 1174:A file that you uploaded or altered, 1139:A file that you uploaded or altered, 992:Hello. Concerning your contribution, 543:Please see image review comments, at 7880:2019 Arbitration Committee elections 7653:2018 Arbitration Committee elections 7458: 7064:OK, now updated. Too much detail? -- 6759:2017 Arbitration Committee elections 5608:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 5532:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 4225: 4058:File:Adam-Maitland-portrait-1928.jpg 1231:File:Adam-Maitland-portrait-1928.jpg 1096:File talk:Tallia-storm-publicity.jpg 1094:, and note that you have done so on 1059:File talk:Tallia-storm-publicity.jpg 1033:File talk:Tallia-storm-publicity.jpg 52:Amendment request: BASC (Iantresman) 7974:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 7514:11 Nov 2012: The actual topic ban " 7228:Administrator imposing the sanction 5939:Thank you, pleased to hear that. -- 5688:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 5450:Discretionary topic ban in Nov 2012 5329:Knowledge:Media copyright questions 5287:Knowledge:Media copyright questions 4478:Has that topic ban been lifted? -- 4164:There is currently a discussion at 2654:, with the appropriate sections of 2591:There is currently a discussion at 2400:List of Elstree Studios productions 1527:There is currently a discussion at 1400:or one of the other tags listed at 1284:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 766:File:Fodens 12-piece brass band.jpg 647:or one of the other tags listed at 189:or to the arbitration committee at 13: 8261:deleted for any of several reasons 8245:because of the following concern: 8229: 8153:deleted for any of several reasons 8083:because of the following concern: 8067: 8009: 7863:ArbCom 2019 election voter message 7765:deleted for any of several reasons 7735:because of the following concern: 7719: 7637:ArbCom 2018 election voter message 7588: 7412:Result of the appeal by iantresman 7366:by using multiple socks abusively. 7287:Notification of that administrator 6860: 6743:ArbCom 2017 election voter message 6536: 5911:It certainly can't do any harm. -- 5104:: seek new donations from partners 5073: 4275:participating in a poll discussion 4214: 4047: 3984: 2495:His most recent role was in '']'', 2256:My 2011 "Result of Appeal to BASC" 1912:per NPOV. That includes excluding 1320: 984: 755: 567: 92:) as a condition of unblocking in 14: 8326: 8286:{{proposed deletion/dated files}} 8269:{{proposed deletion/dated files}} 8178:{{proposed deletion/dated files}} 8161:{{proposed deletion/dated files}} 7982:The article will be discussed at 7790:{{proposed deletion/dated files}} 7773:{{proposed deletion/dated files}} 7650:Hello, Iantresman. Voting in the 6756:Hello, Iantresman. Voting in the 5697:The article will be discussed at 5605:Hello, Iantresman. Voting in the 5529:Hello, Iantresman. Voting in the 5196:review the candidates' statements 3797:. You are just incorrigible. ;-) 1477:Don't edit other peoples comments 1293:The article will be discussed at 1222:The media files you uploaded as: 1215:Files missing description details 212:Hi... I believe you uploaded the 102:For the Arbitration Committee, -- 7960: 7870: 7832: 7642: 7462: 7402:Statement by (involved editor 2) 7397:Statement by (involved editor 1) 7311:Amendment request: Pseudoscience 6748: 6550:File:Big-bang-never-happened.jpg 5673: 5597: 5521: 5351: 5070:The Knowledge Library needs you! 4714: 4498: 4345:preclude you from commenting on 4159: 3082: 3026:Request for arbitration rejected 2976: 2896:Arbitration Request Notification 2647:" section of the decision page. 2603: 2586: 2457: 2385: 1522: 1269: 1068: 1039: 922: 183:WP:ARBPS#Discretionary sanctions 7918:and submit your choices on the 7687:and submit your choices on the 7347:Since my time as a Wiki editor 6793:and submit your choices on the 5379:to be used for pages regarding 5349: 5316:to indicate this information. 5274:to indicate this information. 4727:Arbitration Enforcement request 4675:Knowledge:Possibly unfree files 4592:Hello Knowledge Library Users, 4522:to be used for pages regarding 4496: 3790:any special insight into that? 3053:For the Arbitration Committee, 2748:) should be very familiar with 1145:Knowledge:Possibly unfree files 1141:File:Cerne-abbas-giant-1950.jpg 1014:File:Tallia-storm-publicity.jpg 1002:File:Tallia-storm-publicity.jpg 994:File:Tallia-storm-publicity.jpg 980:File:Tallia-storm-publicity.jpg 509:For the Arbitration Committee, 419:22:02, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 34:For the Arbitration Committee, 6055:onto the subjects in question. 5977:. The question is one that is 5737: 5449: 5202:. For the Election committee, 5172:Arbitration Committee election 5163:ArbCom elections are now open! 4372:It did until it was lifted. -- 4090:Media copyright questions page 4027:Media copyright questions page 3814:File:Sikh-temple-adornment.jpg 3120:{{MolFormDisambig|heading= 3}} 1434:Media copyright questions page 800:Media copyright questions page 681:Media copyright questions page 54:(22 March 2012 - 21 May 2012). 39:11:28, 18 September 2011 (UTC) 1: 8316:05:11, 28 December 2022 (UTC) 8215:15:50, 11 December 2022 (UTC) 8053:18:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC) 8030:our policy for non-free media 8001:16:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC) 7942:00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC) 7897:Knowledge arbitration process 7703:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 7666:Knowledge arbitration process 7609:our policy for non-free media 7392:Statement by Timotheus Canens 6772:Knowledge arbitration process 6582:18:28, 18 February 2017 (UTC) 6559:our policy for non-free media 6436:Like-minded sources that are 6413:18:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 6361:20:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC) 6296:19:18, 29 December 2016 (UTC) 6187:15:17, 27 December 2016 (UTC) 6164:13:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC) 6116:rather than dealing with the 5983:sources which discuss sources 5949:18:39, 24 December 2016 (UTC) 5935:18:10, 24 December 2016 (UTC) 5921:14:48, 24 December 2016 (UTC) 5905:14:11, 24 December 2016 (UTC) 5891:22:35, 23 December 2016 (UTC) 5875:22:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC) 5854:17:09, 23 December 2016 (UTC) 5831:15:26, 23 December 2016 (UTC) 5809:10:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC) 5791:10:44, 23 December 2016 (UTC) 5769:20:34, 22 December 2016 (UTC) 5751:20:10, 22 December 2016 (UTC) 5716:20:13, 21 December 2016 (UTC) 5658:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 5621:Knowledge arbitration process 5582:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 5545:Knowledge arbitration process 5257:15:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC) 5212:22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC) 4472:06:45, 11 November 2012 (UTC) 4332:11:39, 15 February 2015 (UTC) 4181:09:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC) 4149:16:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC) 3830:15:00, 31 December 2013 (UTC) 3807:14:48, 31 December 2013 (UTC) 3765:12:22, 29 December 2013 (UTC) 3724:12:21, 29 December 2013 (UTC) 3641:23:02, 28 December 2013 (UTC) 3622:22:56, 28 December 2013 (UTC) 3599:08:56, 27 December 2013 (UTC) 3341:WP:AE/Appeal by Alfonzo Green 3289:09:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC) 3274:02:39, 20 December 2013 (UTC) 3254:19:49, 18 December 2013 (UTC) 3203:21:49, 18 December 2013 (UTC) 3177:18:05, 18 December 2013 (UTC) 3162:17:33, 18 December 2013 (UTC) 2967:11:11, 30 November 2013 (UTC) 2942:19:58, 29 November 2013 (UTC) 2888:22:59, 29 November 2013 (UTC) 2870:21:23, 29 November 2013 (UTC) 2855:16:49, 29 November 2013 (UTC) 2823:12:26, 29 November 2013 (UTC) 2788:11:12, 29 November 2013 (UTC) 2708:23:23, 28 November 2013 (UTC) 2694:23:17, 28 November 2013 (UTC) 2577:09:04, 24 November 2013 (UTC) 2516:16:34, 29 November 2013 (UTC) 2453:17:56, 13 November 2013 (UTC) 2367:19:26, 12 November 2013 (UTC) 2353:15:51, 12 November 2013 (UTC) 2332:09:29, 12 November 2013 (UTC) 2304:19:34, 11 November 2013 (UTC) 2247:11:02, 11 November 2013 (UTC) 2216:11:02, 11 November 2013 (UTC) 2197:01:21, 11 November 2013 (UTC) 2128:11:02, 11 November 2013 (UTC) 2064:19:46, 10 November 2013 (UTC) 2013:19:36, 11 November 2013 (UTC) 1999:13:10, 11 November 2013 (UTC) 1979:01:21, 11 November 2013 (UTC) 1944:21:35, 10 November 2013 (UTC) 1930:20:08, 10 November 2013 (UTC) 1904:19:59, 10 November 2013 (UTC) 1881:19:45, 10 November 2013 (UTC) 1851:16:38, 10 November 2013 (UTC) 1825:16:09, 10 November 2013 (UTC) 1591:19:45, 10 November 2013 (UTC) 1452:14:34, 7 September 2013 (UTC) 1410:Knowledge:File copyright tags 1364:. If you take this step, add 1312:20:40, 6 September 2013 (UTC) 1165:09:46, 19 February 2013 (UTC) 882:12:36, 28 December 2012 (UTC) 828:09:48, 17 December 2012 (UTC) 813:03:26, 17 December 2012 (UTC) 747:10:52, 16 December 2012 (UTC) 657:Knowledge:File copyright tags 611:. If you take this step, add 578:File:Robin-ramsay-lobster.jpg 559:01:59, 30 November 2012 (UTC) 525:22:46, 15 November 2012 (UTC) 472:19:23, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 448:22:32, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 401:20:19, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 363:19:00, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 349:18:45, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 314:17:29, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 300:17:23, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 277:15:54, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 248:14:51, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 230:14:25, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 203:06:45, 11 November 2012 (UTC) 181:, and under the authority of 168:06:14, 11 November 2012 (UTC) 78:The topic ban placed against 63:Arbitration motion regarding 7858:20:51, 8 November 2019 (UTC) 7375:, over 100 images to Commons 7322:, and will continue to do so 6809:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 6570:criteria for speedy deletion 6336:. I think that Bauer's work 4609:Knowledge:HighBeam/Citations 4287:20:33, 28 October 2014 (UTC) 4230:at any time by removing the 4129:01:01, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 4102:00:53, 13 January 2014 (UTC) 4082:criteria for speedy deletion 4039:00:53, 13 January 2014 (UTC) 4019:criteria for speedy deletion 3139:11:16, 7 December 2013 (UTC) 3073:01:53, 5 December 2013 (UTC) 3021:17:36, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 3002:17:42, 1 December 2013 (UTC) 2527:The Five(ish) Doctors Reboot 1787:12:18, 9 November 2013 (UTC) 1757:12:10, 9 November 2013 (UTC) 1699:10:03, 9 November 2013 (UTC) 1677:22:52, 8 November 2013 (UTC) 1635:17:05, 8 November 2013 (UTC) 1615:16:14, 8 November 2013 (UTC) 1603:the terms of your unblocking 1577:18:37, 28 October 2013 (UTC) 1563:09:22, 24 October 2013 (UTC) 1545:09:18, 24 October 2013 (UTC) 1518:02:11, 23 October 2013 (UTC) 1494:20:54, 15 October 2013 (UTC) 1426:criteria for speedy deletion 1381:permissions-en@wikimedia.org 1358:permissions-en@wikimedia.org 1331:File:Aluminium-can-white.jpg 1180:Knowledge:Files for deletion 1130:17:34, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 1117:from editing. Thank you. 972:20:46, 15 January 2013 (UTC) 954:17:41, 15 January 2013 (UTC) 714:15:12, 4 December 2012 (UTC) 699:03:23, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 673:criteria for speedy deletion 628:permissions-en@wikimedia.org 605:permissions-en@wikimedia.org 208:Error in quadratic root file 136:19:50, 9 November 2012 (UTC) 112:21:07, 4 November 2012 (UTC) 7: 8305:allows discussion to reach 8197:allows discussion to reach 7809:allows discussion to reach 7632:17:07, 22 August 2018 (UTC) 7486:, or consider visiting the 6872:. Feel free to reply there! 6851:21:30, 8 January 2018 (UTC) 6517:22:33, 1 January 2017 (UTC) 6486:22:11, 1 January 2017 (UTC) 6468:18:34, 1 January 2017 (UTC) 6008:and, as such, is liable to 5975:separate Knowledge articles 5755:Later note: I believe that 5642:and submit your choices on 5566:and submit your choices on 5198:and submit your choices on 5108:Communications coordinators 4614:of our partner's resources. 4069:, and edit it to include a 4006:, and edit it to include a 3995:File:Adam-Maitland-1928.jpg 3976:09:02, 3 January 2014 (UTC) 3678:12:08, 1 January 2014 (UTC) 3660:11:07, 1 January 2014 (UTC) 2915:Knowledge:Arbitration guide 1472:07:28, 9 October 2013 (UTC) 1256:15:54, 17 August 2013 (UTC) 1226:File:Adam-Maitland-1928.jpg 910:04:21, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 893:Talk:Lobster (magazine)/GA1 887:Talk:Lobster (magazine)/GA1 735:, please see link above. — 726:Talk:Lobster (magazine)/GA1 545:Talk:Lobster (magazine)/GA1 391:Acknowledged. Corrected. -- 10: 8331: 8297:exist. In particular, the 8189:exist. In particular, the 7934:MediaWiki message delivery 7823:05:51, 17 April 2019 (UTC) 7801:exist. In particular, the 7695:MediaWiki message delivery 7600:File:CorelDraw X8 logo.png 7580:21:57, 13 April 2018 (UTC) 7557:21:50, 13 April 2018 (UTC) 7533:18:52, 13 April 2018 (UTC) 7450:15:08, 13 April 2018 (UTC) 7378:created over 900 new pages 7313:, Notes to @Newyorkbrad ). 6892:16:05, 28 March 2018 (UTC) 6801:MediaWiki message delivery 6472:Knowledge can accommodate 6399:is why it rightly rejects 6105:just before you wrote this 6095:to the discussion at hand. 6010:pay more attention to them 5738:topic ban from 11 Nov 2012 5650:MediaWiki message delivery 5640:the candidates' statements 5564:the candidates' statements 5341:23:06, 16 March 2016 (UTC) 5299:23:05, 16 March 2016 (UTC) 5268:File:CorelDraw X8 logo.png 5204:MediaWiki message delivery 5149:MediaWiki message delivery 4751:20:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC) 4704:08:04, 21 April 2015 (UTC) 4660:01:37, 21 April 2015 (UTC) 4637:16:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC) 4629:MediaWiki message delivery 4341:I'm not sure, but doesn't 4205:00:14, 16 March 2014 (UTC) 1533:Lou Sander's notice to you 1388:Knowledge:Non-free content 1210:00:56, 19 March 2013 (UTC) 635:Knowledge:Non-free content 8291:proposed deletion process 8183:proposed deletion process 8010: 7795:proposed deletion process 7589: 7207:17:09, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 7094:16:04, 6 April 2018 (UTC) 7074:17:10, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 7053:22:06, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 7026:16:36, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 7001:13:55, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 6969:19:45, 1 April 2018 (UTC) 6954:19:01, 1 April 2018 (UTC) 6932:18:53, 1 April 2018 (UTC) 6729:19:42, 30 July 2017 (UTC) 6715:18:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC) 6700:17:13, 30 July 2017 (UTC) 6686:17:03, 30 July 2017 (UTC) 6672:15:16, 30 July 2017 (UTC) 6649:10:07, 30 July 2017 (UTC) 6537: 6278:On the margins of science 5467:That I was following the 5052:20:55, 28 June 2015 (UTC) 4998:20:25, 28 June 2015 (UTC) 4959:19:29, 28 June 2015 (UTC) 4901:15:41, 28 June 2015 (UTC) 4852:10:25, 28 June 2015 (UTC) 4829:21:05, 27 June 2015 (UTC) 4796:20:28, 27 June 2015 (UTC) 4780:19:51, 27 June 2015 (UTC) 4583:06:31, 6 April 2015 (UTC) 4488:07:04, 6 April 2015 (UTC) 4445:09:29, 3 April 2015 (UTC) 4431:01:08, 3 April 2015 (UTC) 4417:00:56, 3 April 2015 (UTC) 4396:23:36, 2 April 2015 (UTC) 4382:23:25, 2 April 2015 (UTC) 4359:22:46, 2 April 2015 (UTC) 4263:02:21, 16 July 2014 (UTC) 4067:the file description page 4063:non-free content criteria 4004:the file description page 4000:non-free content criteria 3952:added a link pointing to 3926:added a link pointing to 3900:added a link pointing to 3874:added a link pointing to 3575:added a link pointing to 3047:the Arbitrators' opinions 2843:Plasma-Redshift Cosmology 2837:Plasma-Redshift Cosmology 1069: 1040: 921: 335:2006. I was topic banned. 7976:or whether it should be 7932:to your user talk page. 7749:context for non-free use 7575: 7528: 7202: 7069: 7048: 6996: 6949: 6724: 6695: 6667: 6624:22:32, 7 June 2017 (UTC) 6619: 6609:19:11, 7 June 2017 (UTC) 6481: 6408: 6291: 6182: 5944: 5916: 5886: 5849: 5804: 5764: 5746: 5690:or whether it should be 5502:08:02, 17 May 2016 (UTC) 5486:22:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC) 5481: 5435:16:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC) 5157:04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC) 5128:: run reference services 5047: 4954: 4847: 4791: 4766:article with Sheldrake? 4440: 4377: 3825: 3673: 3636: 3545:added links pointing to 3515:added links pointing to 3390:added links pointing to 3284: 3172: 2880:Barney the barney barney 2865: 2818: 2780:Barney the barney barney 2703: 2641:normal editorial process 2362: 2299: 2239:Barney the barney barney 2208:Barney the barney barney 2120:Barney the barney barney 2059: 2008: 1925: 1876: 1813:Barney the barney barney 1782: 1749:Barney the barney barney 1694: 1669:Barney the barney barney 1630: 1607:Barney the barney barney 1593:===Barney objections=== 1586: 1286:or whether it should be 1079:a postal message to the 1010:speedy deletion criteria 978:Copyright problems with 967: 823: 763:Thank you for uploading 709: 443: 396: 344: 295: 243: 18:Result of Appeal to BASC 7301:Statement by iantresman 7213:Sanction being appealed 6152:how you would draw it. 5989:, if you get my drift. 5377:discretionary sanctions 4520:discretionary sanctions 3109:my operator's talk page 3042:enforcement noticeboard 3038:discretionary sanctions 2484:my operator's talk page 2412:my operator's talk page 2348:aka The Red Pen of Doom 2266:which is equally vague. 1994:aka The Red Pen of Doom 1939:aka The Red Pen of Doom 1899:aka The Red Pen of Doom 1846:aka The Red Pen of Doom 1558:aka The Red Pen of Doom 1540:aka The Red Pen of Doom 1125:aka The Red Pen of Doom 1004:appears to qualify for 118:Arbitration enforcement 8257: 8252:File:Plasma-sheath.svg 8250:Unused, superseded by 8239:File:Plasma-sheath.png 8234: 8225:File:Plasma-sheath.png 8149: 8140: 8072: 8015: 7842:nominated for deletion 7761: 7724: 7594: 7334:, and to the Help Desk 6870:Teahouse Q&A board 6865: 6656:Coherent catastrophism 6542: 6257:Biblical Archaeologist 5114:Technical coordinators 5078: 4671:File:Saturn-aurora.jpg 4219: 4086:request for undeletion 4052: 4023:request for undeletion 3989: 3780:Mystic Sheldrake Force 1888:he is talking nonsense 1457:Good sir, I apologize! 1325: 989: 783:request for undeletion 776:image description page 760: 720:GA on Hold for Lobster 572: 507: 177:For reasons stated in 100: 8247: 8243:proposed for deletion 8233: 8141: 8085: 8081:proposed for deletion 8071: 8018:Thanks for uploading 8013: 7893:Arbitration Committee 7877:Hello! Voting in the 7747:so as to provide the 7737: 7733:proposed for deletion 7723: 7662:Arbitration Committee 7597:Thanks for uploading 7592: 7343:(all without success) 6864: 6768:Arbitration Committee 6547:Thanks for uploading 6540: 5617:Arbitration Committee 5590:ArbCom Elections 2016 5541:Arbitration Committee 5514:ArbCom Elections 2016 5403:standards of behavior 5373:Arbitration Committee 5310:File:Coreldraw x8.png 5308:Thanks for uploading 5266:Thanks for uploading 5176:Arbitration Committee 5145:The Knowledge Library 5126:Research coordinators 5120:Outreach coordinators 5083:The Knowledge Library 5077: 4922:make capital of them. 4709:AE result - cautioned 4679:file description page 4673:, has been listed at 4588:TWL HighBeam check-in 4542:standards of behavior 4347:Talk:Rupert Sheldrake 4218: 4051: 3988: 3420:Anthony Ashley Cooper 3317:WP:AE/198.189.184.243 2613:Arbitration Committee 1328:Thanks for uploading 1324: 1245:Message delivered by 1178:, has been listed at 1149:file description page 1143:, has been listed at 988: 930:The Original Barnstar 759: 575:Thanks for uploading 571: 539:Image review comments 491: 76: 8303:files for discussion 8278:the file's talk page 8195:files for discussion 8170:the file's talk page 8092: 7807:files for discussion 7782:the file's talk page 7741:Gray Jolliffe#Career 7477:ask another question 7012:, created 904 pages, 7009:92 files to Commons, 6719:Now that's funny. -- 6268:(London) newspaper, 6198:WoKrKmFK3lwz8BKvaB94 6173:WoKrKmFK3lwz8BKvaB94 6077:begging the question 6020:, sources which are 5724:WoKrKmFK3lwz8BKvaB94 5411:editing restrictions 5399:purpose of Knowledge 5314:image copyright tags 5272:image copyright tags 5245:opt-out instructions 5102:Partner coordinators 5096:Account coordinators 4888:dogged participation 4550:editing restrictions 4538:purpose of Knowledge 3964:opt-out instructions 3842:disambiguation pages 3587:opt-out instructions 3359:disambiguation pages 3329:WP:AE/Barleybannocks 3299:For my own benefit: 3099:may have broken the 2637:standard of behavior 2633:purpose of Knowledge 2565:opt-out instructions 2474:may have broken the 2402:may have broken the 2114:(a journalist), and 1462:please let me know. 1390:, use a tag such as 1081:Wikimedia Foundation 870:opt-out instructions 796:list of your uploads 788:Please refer to the 637:, use a tag such as 5180:arbitration process 4700:(a.k.a. John Carlo) 4113:William Shakespeare 3946:fix with Dab solver 3920:fix with Dab solver 3894:fix with Dab solver 3868:fix with Dab solver 3569:fix with Dab solver 3539:fix with Dab solver 3509:fix with Dab solver 3385:fix with Dab solver 3335:WP:AE/Alfonzo Green 3323:WP:AE/Alfonzo Green 2547:fix with Dab solver 2502:"", BBC programmes, 915:A barnstar for you! 852:fix with Dab solver 126:that concerns you. 122:There is a case at 8295:deletion processes 8235: 8187:deletion processes 8136: 8134: 8073: 8016: 7909:arbitration policy 7799:deletion processes 7745:WP:NFC#cite_note-3 7725: 7678:arbitration policy 7595: 7340:, and the Teahouse 6896:remove this notice 6866: 6784:arbitration policy 6543: 6505:Lord Steven Christ 6272:, BBC publication 6270:Skeptical Inquirer 6053:confers notability 5969:AfDs speak to the 5633:arbitration policy 5592:: Voting now open! 5557:arbitration policy 5516:: Voting now open! 5235:• Join us at the 5192:arbitration policy 5143:Send on behalf of 5087:we need your help! 5079: 4227:remove this notice 4220: 4134:This topic ban on 4071:non-free rationale 4053: 4008:non-free rationale 3990: 3954:John William Evans 3850:• Join us at the 3444:Archibald Campbell 3367:• Join us at the 2989:Candidate question 2555:• Join us at the 2423:*], a 1929 British 2341:WP:IDIDNOTHEARTHAT 1424:, as described on 1326: 1083:permitting re-use 990: 860:• Join us at the 840:Lobster (magazine) 761: 671:, as described on 573: 454:Arbitration motion 8221:Proposed deletion 8131: 8114: 8059:Proposed deletion 8026:claim of fair use 7948: 7947: 7813:for deletion. -- 7711:Proposed deletion 7605:claim of fair use 7494: 7493: 7479:on your talk page 7144: 7133: 7128: 6888:DESiegel Contribs 6833: 6660:Broadly construed 6555:claim of fair use 6218:Beyond Velikovsky 6046:sources are more 5987:WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT 5985:to be borderline 5797:broadly construed 5462:broadly construed 5240: 5223:Sax Pax for a Sax 4946:more than I have 4701: 4639: 4620:this short survey 3876:Giles Strangeways 3855: 3658: 3620: 3577:William Brouncker 3424:William Cavendish 3372: 3201: 3160: 2945: 2928:comment added by 2560: 2349: 2054:hereby lifted".-- 1995: 1948:Incorrect use of 1940: 1900: 1861:other significant 1847: 1622:Sword of Damocles 1597:Barney objections 1559: 1541: 1535:. Thank you.-- 1484:. Don't do that, 1446: 1395:non-free fair use 1247:Theo's Little Bot 1182:. Please see the 1126: 1053:for instructions. 959: 958: 938:Cerne Abbas Giant 865: 693: 642:non-free fair use 493:Remedy 13 of the 481:and related cases 477:Motion regarding 425:comment added by 8322: 8313: 8309:for deletion. -- 8288: 8287: 8271: 8270: 8232: 8201:for deletion. — 8180: 8179: 8163: 8162: 8145: 8143: 8142: 8137: 8135: 8133: 8132: 8124: 8115: 8113: 8108: 8107: 8098: 8070: 8012: 7964: 7963: 7931: 7874: 7867: 7866: 7836: 7835: 7792: 7791: 7775: 7774: 7722: 7646: 7591: 7568: 7516:WP:AE#iantresman 7481: 7466: 7459: 7282: 7232:Timotheus Canens 7196: 7169:deleted contribs 7135: 7130: 7120: 7063: 7042: 6979: 6943: 6919:Timotheus Canens 6899: 6831: 6752: 6596:Rupert Sheldrake 6545: 6539: 6374: 6282:, and elsewhere. 6242:The Velikovskian 6201: 6176: 6145:The Velikovskian 5929: 5843: 5836:I'll wait until 5780: 5727: 5677: 5676: 5669:for deletion (3) 5601: 5525: 5447: 5355: 5230: 5138: 4764:Rupert Sheldrake 4749: 4747: 4740: 4722:Pursuant to the 4718: 4699: 4648:WP:AE#Iantresman 4626: 4502: 4367: 4322: 4319: 4279:NewsAndEventsGuy 4251: 4249: 4243: 4239: 4233: 4229: 4217: 4210:You've got mail! 4200: 4163: 4162: 4155:ANI Notification 4078:my contributions 4050: 4015:my contributions 3987: 3942:check to confirm 3928:Edward Southwell 3916:check to confirm 3890:check to confirm 3864:check to confirm 3845: 3787:Turkish crescent 3652: 3614: 3565:check to confirm 3535:check to confirm 3505:check to confirm 3484:Henry Pierrepont 3480:Sir Francis Fane 3432:William Brereton 3381:check to confirm 3362: 3347:WP:AE/Tom Butler 3200: 3198: 3191: 3159: 3157: 3150: 3144:Your AE question 3125: 3086: 3085: 3049: 3035: 3018: 2999: 2980: 2979: 2965: 2963: 2958: 2944: 2922: 2691: 2665:Rupert Sheldrake 2639:, or follow any 2607: 2590: 2589: 2550: 2543:check to confirm 2500: 2472:Adam Paul Harvey 2461: 2460: 2438: 2428: 2389: 2388: 2350: 2347: 1996: 1993: 1941: 1938: 1901: 1898: 1848: 1845: 1560: 1557: 1542: 1539: 1526: 1525: 1444: 1430:image use policy 1399: 1393: 1373: 1367: 1323: 1273: 1272: 1127: 1124: 1107:copyright policy 1075: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1046: 1044: 1043: 1042: 987: 926: 919: 918: 855: 848:check to confirm 844:Security service 808: 791:image use policy 758: 691: 677:image use policy 646: 640: 620: 614: 570: 520: 434: 266: 157: 96: 8330: 8329: 8325: 8324: 8323: 8321: 8320: 8319: 8311: 8299:speedy deletion 8285: 8284: 8268: 8267: 8230: 8228: 8191:speedy deletion 8177: 8176: 8160: 8159: 8123: 8119: 8109: 8103: 8099: 8097: 8095: 8093: 8090: 8089: 8068: 8066: 8043:. Thank you. -- 8008: 7993: 7965: 7961: 7957: 7925: 7865: 7855: 7854:it has begun... 7838:Module:FRSyears 7833: 7830: 7803:speedy deletion 7789: 7788: 7772: 7771: 7720: 7718: 7707: 7706: 7647: 7639: 7622:. Thank you. -- 7587: 7562: 7457: 7430: 7414: 7409: 7404: 7399: 7394: 7303: 7234: 7154: 7118: 7057: 7036: 6973: 6937: 6915: 6905: 6903:Draft DS appeal 6900: 6889: 6875: 6858: 6818: 6813: 6812: 6753: 6745: 6632: 6592: 6572:. Thank you. -- 6534: 6533: 6368: 6261:, Gordin's book 6236:Magazines like 6195: 6170: 6114:source counting 5992:To illustrate: 5963: 5927: 5837: 5774: 5721: 5678: 5674: 5671: 5662: 5661: 5645:the voting page 5602: 5594: 5586: 5585: 5569:the voting page 5526: 5518: 5441: 5423: 5422: 5375:has authorised 5356: 5348: 5333:ImageTaggingBot 5306: 5291:ImageTaggingBot 5264: 5237:DPL WikiProject 5219: 5200:the voting page 5166: 5140: 5136: 5072: 5038:and don't make 4760: 4755: 4754: 4743: 4736: 4734: 4719: 4711: 4702:from Knowledge 4697: 4667: 4645: 4590: 4562: 4561: 4503: 4495: 4361: 4339: 4320: 4317: 4297: 4270: 4252: 4247: 4241: 4237: 4235:You've got mail 4231: 4223: 4215: 4212: 4196: 4188: 4160: 4157: 4109: 4048: 4046: 3985: 3983: 3852:DPL WikiProject 3838: 3775: 3731: 3690: 3606: 3517:George Villiers 3472:William Erskine 3464:Sir Samuel Tuke 3460:Sir Peter Wyche 3452:William Hammond 3448:Anthony Lowther 3428:Sir John Talbot 3412:Alexander Bruce 3369:DPL WikiProject 3355: 3311:WP:AE/Tumbleman 3297: 3261: 3213: 3194: 3192: 3153: 3151: 3146: 3121: 3083: 3080: 3045: 3031: 3028: 3014: 3009: 2995: 2991: 2977: 2974: 2961: 2956: 2954: 2951: 2923: 2898: 2839: 2684: 2661: 2660: 2648: 2608: 2587: 2584: 2557:DPL WikiProject 2523: 2501:''.<ref: --> 2496: 2458: 2434: 2424: 2386: 2383: 2345: 2108:Brian Josephson 2094:TheRedPenOfDoom 1991: 1960:which *define* 1936: 1896: 1843: 1727:WP:IDONTHEARYOU 1718:Sir John Maddox 1599: 1555: 1549:the section is 1537: 1523: 1502: 1479: 1459: 1418:your upload log 1397: 1391: 1371: 1365: 1321: 1319: 1274: 1270: 1267: 1258: 1241:Help:Image page 1217: 1208: 1172: 1137: 1122: 1067: 1065: 1038: 1036: 985: 983: 917: 889: 862:DPL WikiProject 836: 804: 802:. Thank you. — 756: 754: 731:GA on Hold for 722: 665:your upload log 644: 638: 618: 612: 568: 566: 541: 518: 483: 464:Alexandr Dmitri 456: 420: 262: 210: 175: 153: 143: 120: 115: 93: 68: 42: 20: 12: 11: 5: 8328: 8289:will stop the 8227: 8218: 8181:will stop the 8130: 8127: 8122: 8118: 8112: 8106: 8102: 8065: 8056: 8007: 8004: 7959: 7958: 7956: 7951:Nomination of 7949: 7946: 7945: 7916:the candidates 7886:eligible users 7875: 7864: 7861: 7853: 7829: 7826: 7793:will stop the 7717: 7708: 7685:the candidates 7648: 7641: 7640: 7638: 7635: 7586: 7583: 7560: 7559: 7520: 7519: 7512: 7505: 7492: 7491: 7484:user talk page 7467: 7456: 7453: 7429: 7426: 7425: 7424: 7421: 7420: 7413: 7410: 7408: 7405: 7403: 7400: 7398: 7395: 7393: 7390: 7389: 7388: 7385: 7370: 7355: 7345: 7344: 7329: 7323: 7317: 7314: 7302: 7299: 7298: 7297: 7288: 7284: 7283: 7229: 7225: 7224: 7214: 7210: 7209: 7149: 7148:Appealing user 7117: 7114: 7113: 7112: 7111: 7110: 7109: 7108: 7107: 7106: 7105: 7104: 7103: 7102: 7101: 7100: 7099: 7098: 7097: 7096: 7076: 7055: 6914: 6911: 6904: 6901: 6887: 6874: 6859: 6857: 6854: 6817: 6814: 6791:the candidates 6754: 6747: 6746: 6744: 6741: 6740: 6739: 6738: 6737: 6736: 6735: 6734: 6733: 6732: 6731: 6631: 6628: 6627: 6626: 6614:No problem. -- 6591: 6588: 6586: 6532: 6529: 6528: 6527: 6526: 6525: 6524: 6523: 6522: 6521: 6520: 6519: 6457: 6449: 6434: 6427: 6396: 6393: 6385: 6377: 6350: 6349: 6346: 6323: 6314:notable enough 6301: 6300: 6299: 6298: 6283: 6234: 6222: 6210: 6209: 6208: 6207: 6190: 6189: 6110: 6109: 6097: 6096: 6087:fringe journal 6057: 6056: 6030: 6029: 5962: 5959: 5958: 5957: 5956: 5955: 5954: 5953: 5952: 5951: 5908: 5907: 5878: 5877: 5857: 5856: 5818: 5817: 5816: 5815: 5814: 5813: 5812: 5811: 5672: 5670: 5665:Nomination of 5663: 5603: 5596: 5595: 5593: 5587: 5527: 5520: 5519: 5517: 5511: 5510: 5509: 5508: 5507: 5506: 5505: 5474: 5473: 5472: 5465: 5458: 5405:, or relevant 5385:fringe science 5357: 5350: 5347: 5344: 5305: 5302: 5263: 5260: 5218: 5215: 5169: 5165: 5160: 5142: 5134: 5132: 5130: 5129: 5123: 5117: 5111: 5105: 5099: 5071: 5068: 5067: 5066: 5065: 5064: 5063: 5062: 5061: 5060: 5059: 5058: 5057: 5056: 5055: 5054: 5011: 5010: 5009: 5008: 5007: 5006: 5005: 5004: 5003: 5002: 5001: 5000: 4985:that AN thread 4970: 4969: 4968: 4967: 4966: 4965: 4964: 4963: 4962: 4961: 4932: 4931: 4930: 4929: 4928: 4927: 4926: 4925: 4924: 4923: 4910: 4909: 4908: 4907: 4906: 4905: 4904: 4903: 4877: 4876: 4875: 4874: 4873: 4872: 4871: 4870: 4859: 4858: 4857: 4856: 4855: 4854: 4834: 4833: 4832: 4831: 4809: 4808: 4807: 4806: 4799: 4798: 4759: 4756: 4720: 4713: 4712: 4710: 4707: 4687: 4683:the discussion 4666: 4663: 4644: 4641: 4616: 4615: 4611: 4604: 4589: 4586: 4544:, or relevant 4504: 4497: 4494: 4491: 4476: 4475: 4456: 4455: 4454: 4453: 4452: 4451: 4450: 4449: 4448: 4447: 4338: 4335: 4313: 4307: 4304: 4296: 4293: 4291: 4269: 4266: 4222: 4213: 4211: 4208: 4187: 4184: 4156: 4153: 4152: 4151: 4108: 4105: 4045: 4042: 3982: 3979: 3960: 3959: 3958: 3957: 3934: 3933: 3932: 3931: 3908: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3882: 3881: 3880: 3879: 3837: 3834: 3833: 3832: 3774: 3768: 3730: 3727: 3689: 3686: 3685: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3605: 3602: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3554: 3547:Robert Spencer 3527: 3526: 3525: 3524: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3494: 3492:Thomas Henshaw 3468:Henry Slingsby 3456:Edward Montagu 3440:Charles Howard 3400:Thomas Stanley 3354: 3351: 3350: 3349: 3343: 3337: 3331: 3325: 3319: 3313: 3307: 3305:Previous cases 3296: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3260: 3257: 3212: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3145: 3142: 3127: 3126: 3117: 3116: 3079: 3076: 3027: 3024: 3008: 3005: 2990: 2987: 2973: 2970: 2950: 2947: 2919: 2918: 2912: 2897: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2873: 2872: 2838: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2811: 2804: 2774:familiar with 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2671:134.139.22.141 2645:Final decision 2635:, satisfy any 2629:fringe science 2617:administrators 2615:has permitted 2610: 2609: 2602: 2601: 2583: 2580: 2522: 2519: 2504: 2503: 2492: 2491: 2441: 2440: 2430: 2420: 2419: 2382: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2337: 2315: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2284: 2276: 2270: 2267: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2200: 2199: 2176: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 1918:overwhelmingly 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1638: 1637: 1598: 1595: 1501: 1500:Sheldrake Talk 1498: 1497: 1496: 1478: 1475: 1458: 1455: 1438:Magog the Ogre 1376: 1375: 1354: 1318: 1315: 1268: 1266: 1261:Nomination of 1259: 1234: 1233: 1228: 1220:Dear uploader: 1218: 1216: 1213: 1192: 1171: 1168: 1153:the discussion 1136: 1133: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1066:permissions-en 1062: 1055: 1037:permissions-en 982: 976: 975: 974: 957: 956: 933: 932: 927: 916: 913: 896: 895: 888: 885: 835: 832: 831: 830: 753: 750: 729: 728: 721: 718: 717: 716: 685:Magog the Ogre 623: 622: 601: 565: 562: 540: 537: 536: 535: 482: 475: 455: 452: 451: 450: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 403: 376: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 367: 366: 365: 323: 322: 321: 320: 319: 318: 317: 316: 282: 281: 280: 279: 251: 250: 222:121.216.157.82 209: 206: 179:this AE thread 174: 171: 142: 139: 119: 116: 67: 61: 60: 58: 56: 55: 44: 28: 27: 19: 16: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 8327: 8318: 8317: 8314: 8308: 8304: 8300: 8296: 8292: 8281: 8279: 8275: 8264: 8262: 8256: 8255: 8253: 8246: 8244: 8240: 8226: 8222: 8217: 8216: 8212: 8208: 8204: 8200: 8196: 8192: 8188: 8184: 8173: 8171: 8167: 8156: 8154: 8148: 8147: 8128: 8125: 8120: 8116: 8110: 8104: 8100: 8084: 8082: 8078: 8064: 8060: 8055: 8054: 8050: 8046: 8042: 8038: 8033: 8031: 8027: 8023: 8022: 8003: 8002: 7999: 7998: 7992: 7988: 7985: 7979: 7975: 7971: 7970: 7954: 7944: 7943: 7939: 7935: 7929: 7923: 7922: 7917: 7912: 7910: 7906: 7902: 7898: 7894: 7888: 7887: 7882: 7881: 7876: 7873: 7869: 7868: 7860: 7859: 7856: 7851: 7847: 7843: 7839: 7825: 7824: 7820: 7816: 7812: 7808: 7804: 7800: 7796: 7785: 7783: 7779: 7768: 7766: 7760: 7758: 7754: 7750: 7746: 7742: 7736: 7734: 7730: 7716: 7712: 7705: 7704: 7700: 7696: 7692: 7691: 7686: 7681: 7679: 7675: 7671: 7667: 7663: 7658: 7655: 7654: 7645: 7634: 7633: 7629: 7625: 7621: 7617: 7612: 7610: 7606: 7602: 7601: 7582: 7581: 7577: 7573: 7566: 7558: 7554: 7550: 7546: 7542: 7537: 7536: 7535: 7534: 7530: 7526: 7517: 7513: 7510: 7506: 7503: 7499: 7498: 7497: 7489: 7485: 7480: 7478: 7472: 7468: 7465: 7461: 7460: 7452: 7451: 7447: 7443: 7439: 7435: 7423: 7422: 7419: 7416: 7415: 7386: 7383: 7380: 7377: 7374: 7371: 7368: 7365: 7362: 7359: 7356: 7353: 7350: 7349: 7348: 7342: 7339: 7336: 7333: 7330: 7328: 7324: 7321: 7318: 7315: 7312: 7308: 7307: 7306: 7296: 7294: 7289: 7286: 7285: 7280: 7277: 7274: 7271: 7268: 7265: 7262: 7259: 7256: 7253: 7250: 7247: 7244: 7241: 7238: 7233: 7230: 7227: 7226: 7223: 7219: 7215: 7212: 7211: 7208: 7204: 7200: 7194: 7191: 7188: 7185: 7182: 7179: 7176: 7173: 7170: 7167: 7164: 7161: 7158: 7153: 7150: 7147: 7146: 7145: 7143: 7141: 7140:WP:UNINVOLVED 7132: 7129: 7127: 7125: 7095: 7091: 7087: 7083: 7082: 7081: 7077: 7075: 7071: 7067: 7061: 7056: 7054: 7050: 7046: 7040: 7035: 7034: 7033: 7032: 7031: 7030: 7029: 7028: 7027: 7023: 7019: 7014: 7011: 7008: 7004: 7003: 7002: 6998: 6994: 6990: 6986: 6982: 6977: 6972: 6971: 6970: 6966: 6962: 6957: 6956: 6955: 6951: 6947: 6941: 6936: 6935: 6934: 6933: 6929: 6925: 6920: 6910: 6909: 6897: 6893: 6890: 6885: 6883: 6879: 6873: 6871: 6863: 6853: 6852: 6848: 6845: 6842: 6839: 6836: 6829: 6828: 6823: 6822:Pseudoscience 6811: 6810: 6806: 6802: 6798: 6797: 6792: 6787: 6785: 6781: 6777: 6773: 6769: 6764: 6761: 6760: 6751: 6730: 6726: 6722: 6718: 6717: 6716: 6712: 6708: 6703: 6702: 6701: 6697: 6693: 6689: 6688: 6687: 6683: 6679: 6675: 6674: 6673: 6669: 6665: 6661: 6657: 6653: 6652: 6651: 6650: 6646: 6642: 6638: 6635: 6625: 6621: 6617: 6613: 6612: 6611: 6610: 6606: 6602: 6597: 6587: 6584: 6583: 6579: 6575: 6571: 6567: 6562: 6560: 6556: 6552: 6551: 6544: 6518: 6514: 6510: 6506: 6502: 6498: 6494: 6489: 6488: 6487: 6483: 6479: 6475: 6471: 6470: 6469: 6465: 6461: 6458: 6454: 6450: 6447: 6443: 6439: 6438:WP:MAINSTREAM 6435: 6432: 6428: 6425: 6421: 6420:WP:MAINSTREAM 6416: 6415: 6414: 6410: 6406: 6402: 6397: 6394: 6390: 6386: 6382: 6378: 6372: 6367: 6366: 6365: 6364: 6363: 6362: 6358: 6354: 6347: 6344: 6339: 6335: 6331: 6327: 6324: 6320: 6315: 6311: 6307: 6306: 6305: 6297: 6293: 6289: 6284: 6281: 6279: 6275: 6271: 6267: 6263: 6260: 6258: 6254: 6251: 6247: 6243: 6239: 6235: 6232: 6228: 6223: 6219: 6214: 6213: 6212: 6211: 6205: 6199: 6194: 6193: 6192: 6191: 6188: 6184: 6180: 6174: 6168: 6167: 6166: 6165: 6161: 6157: 6153: 6150: 6146: 6142: 6136: 6133: 6127: 6124: 6119: 6115: 6106: 6102: 6101: 6100: 6094: 6090: 6088: 6082: 6078: 6074: 6073: 6072: 6070: 6066: 6062: 6054: 6049: 6044: 6040: 6036: 6035: 6034: 6027: 6023: 6019: 6015: 6011: 6007: 6003: 5999: 5998: 5997: 5993: 5990: 5988: 5984: 5980: 5976: 5972: 5966: 5961:Clarification 5950: 5946: 5942: 5938: 5937: 5936: 5933: 5930: 5924: 5923: 5922: 5918: 5914: 5910: 5909: 5906: 5902: 5898: 5894: 5893: 5892: 5888: 5884: 5880: 5879: 5876: 5872: 5868: 5864: 5859: 5858: 5855: 5851: 5847: 5841: 5835: 5834: 5833: 5832: 5828: 5824: 5810: 5806: 5802: 5798: 5794: 5793: 5792: 5788: 5784: 5781:for example. 5778: 5772: 5771: 5770: 5766: 5762: 5758: 5754: 5753: 5752: 5748: 5744: 5739: 5735: 5731: 5725: 5720: 5719: 5718: 5717: 5713: 5709: 5703: 5700: 5695: 5693: 5689: 5685: 5684: 5668: 5660: 5659: 5655: 5651: 5647: 5646: 5641: 5636: 5634: 5630: 5626: 5622: 5618: 5613: 5610: 5609: 5600: 5591: 5584: 5583: 5579: 5575: 5571: 5570: 5565: 5560: 5558: 5554: 5550: 5546: 5542: 5537: 5534: 5533: 5524: 5515: 5503: 5500: 5496: 5491: 5490: 5489: 5488: 5487: 5483: 5479: 5475: 5470: 5466: 5463: 5459: 5457: 5454: 5453: 5451: 5445: 5440: 5439: 5438: 5436: 5433: 5429: 5420: 5416: 5412: 5408: 5404: 5400: 5396: 5392: 5390: 5386: 5382: 5381:pseudoscience 5378: 5374: 5369: 5368: 5364: 5362: 5354: 5343: 5342: 5338: 5334: 5330: 5326: 5322: 5317: 5315: 5311: 5301: 5300: 5296: 5292: 5288: 5284: 5280: 5275: 5273: 5269: 5259: 5258: 5254: 5250: 5246: 5241: 5238: 5234: 5228: 5224: 5214: 5213: 5209: 5205: 5201: 5197: 5193: 5189: 5185: 5181: 5177: 5173: 5164: 5159: 5158: 5154: 5150: 5146: 5139: 5133: 5127: 5124: 5121: 5118: 5115: 5112: 5109: 5106: 5103: 5100: 5097: 5094: 5093: 5092: 5089: 5088: 5084: 5076: 5053: 5049: 5045: 5041: 5040:WP:ASPERSIONS 5037: 5033: 5030: 5025: 5024: 5023: 5022: 5021: 5020: 5019: 5018: 5017: 5016: 5015: 5014: 5013: 5012: 4999: 4996: 4995: 4991: 4986: 4982: 4981: 4980: 4979: 4978: 4977: 4976: 4975: 4974: 4973: 4972: 4971: 4960: 4956: 4952: 4948: 4945: 4942: 4941: 4940: 4939: 4938: 4937: 4936: 4935: 4934: 4933: 4920: 4919: 4918: 4917: 4916: 4915: 4914: 4913: 4912: 4911: 4902: 4899: 4898: 4894: 4889: 4885: 4884: 4883: 4882: 4881: 4880: 4879: 4878: 4867: 4866: 4865: 4864: 4863: 4862: 4861: 4860: 4853: 4849: 4845: 4840: 4839: 4838: 4837: 4836: 4835: 4830: 4827: 4826: 4822: 4816: 4813: 4812: 4811: 4810: 4803: 4802: 4801: 4800: 4797: 4793: 4789: 4784: 4783: 4782: 4781: 4778: 4777: 4773: 4767: 4765: 4753: 4752: 4748: 4746: 4741: 4739: 4732: 4728: 4725: 4717: 4706: 4705: 4698: 4696: 4693: 4690: 4684: 4680: 4676: 4672: 4662: 4661: 4657: 4653: 4649: 4640: 4638: 4634: 4630: 4623: 4621: 4612: 4610: 4605: 4602: 4598: 4597: 4596: 4593: 4585: 4584: 4580: 4576: 4572: 4568: 4567: 4559: 4555: 4551: 4547: 4543: 4539: 4535: 4531: 4529: 4525: 4521: 4516: 4515: 4511: 4509: 4501: 4490: 4489: 4485: 4481: 4473: 4469: 4465: 4461: 4460: 4459: 4446: 4442: 4438: 4434: 4433: 4432: 4428: 4424: 4420: 4419: 4418: 4414: 4410: 4406: 4403: 4399: 4398: 4397: 4393: 4389: 4385: 4384: 4383: 4379: 4375: 4371: 4370: 4369: 4365: 4360: 4356: 4352: 4348: 4344: 4334: 4333: 4330: 4329: 4328: 4324: 4323: 4311: 4302: 4292: 4289: 4288: 4284: 4280: 4276: 4265: 4264: 4260: 4256: 4246: 4236: 4228: 4207: 4206: 4203: 4201: 4199: 4193: 4183: 4182: 4178: 4174: 4169: 4167: 4150: 4146: 4142: 4137: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4130: 4126: 4122: 4118: 4114: 4107:Re: NinaGreen 4104: 4103: 4099: 4095: 4092:. Thank you. 4091: 4087: 4083: 4079: 4074: 4072: 4068: 4064: 4060: 4059: 4041: 4040: 4036: 4032: 4029:. Thank you. 4028: 4024: 4020: 4016: 4011: 4009: 4005: 4001: 3997: 3996: 3978: 3977: 3973: 3969: 3965: 3956: 3955: 3950: 3949: 3947: 3943: 3939: 3936: 3935: 3930: 3929: 3924: 3923: 3921: 3917: 3913: 3910: 3909: 3904: 3903: 3902:Edward Haynes 3898: 3897: 3895: 3891: 3887: 3884: 3883: 3878: 3877: 3872: 3871: 3869: 3865: 3861: 3858: 3857: 3856: 3853: 3849: 3843: 3831: 3827: 3823: 3819: 3815: 3811: 3810: 3809: 3808: 3804: 3800: 3796: 3791: 3788: 3783: 3781: 3772: 3771:William Tifft 3767: 3766: 3762: 3758: 3754: 3750: 3745: 3743: 3742:page curation 3738: 3736: 3726: 3725: 3721: 3717: 3713: 3709: 3704: 3702: 3701:page curation 3697: 3695: 3679: 3675: 3671: 3667: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3656: 3651: 3650: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3638: 3634: 3630: 3626: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3618: 3613: 3612: 3601: 3600: 3596: 3592: 3588: 3579: 3578: 3573: 3572: 3570: 3566: 3562: 3559: 3558: 3553: 3552: 3548: 3543: 3542: 3540: 3536: 3532: 3529: 3528: 3523: 3522: 3521:Richard White 3518: 3513: 3512: 3510: 3506: 3502: 3499: 3498: 3493: 3489: 3485: 3481: 3477: 3473: 3469: 3465: 3461: 3457: 3453: 3449: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3433: 3429: 3425: 3421: 3417: 3416:Richard Jones 3413: 3409: 3405: 3401: 3397: 3396:Richard Boyle 3393: 3389: 3388: 3386: 3382: 3378: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3370: 3366: 3360: 3348: 3344: 3342: 3339:16 Jan 2014: 3338: 3336: 3333:26 Dec 2013: 3332: 3330: 3327:20 Dec 2013: 3326: 3324: 3321:22 Nov 2013: 3320: 3318: 3315:21 Oct 2013: 3314: 3312: 3309:17 Oct 2013: 3308: 3306: 3303:2008 - 2013: 3302: 3301: 3300: 3290: 3286: 3282: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3271: 3267: 3256: 3255: 3251: 3247: 3246:74.192.84.101 3243: 3237: 3233: 3231: 3225: 3222: 3217: 3204: 3199: 3197: 3188: 3184: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3174: 3170: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3158: 3156: 3141: 3140: 3136: 3132: 3124: 3119: 3118: 3114: 3113: 3112: 3110: 3106: 3105:edit the page 3102: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3078:December 2013 3075: 3074: 3070: 3066: 3062: 3058: 3057: 3051: 3048: 3044:. Please see 3043: 3039: 3034: 3023: 3022: 3019: 3017: 3007:ACE questions 3004: 3003: 3000: 2998: 2986: 2984: 2969: 2968: 2964: 2959: 2946: 2943: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2916: 2913: 2910: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2903: 2889: 2885: 2881: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2809: 2805: 2802: 2799: 2796: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2769: 2766: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2744: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2730: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2709: 2705: 2701: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2692: 2689: 2688: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2676: 2672: 2668: 2666: 2659: 2657: 2653: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2625:pseudoscience 2622: 2618: 2614: 2606: 2600: 2598: 2594: 2579: 2578: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2561: 2558: 2554: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2518: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2499: 2494: 2493: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2485: 2481: 2480:edit the page 2477: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2455: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2437: 2431: 2427: 2422: 2421: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2413: 2409: 2408:edit the page 2405: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2381:November 2013 2368: 2364: 2360: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2351: 2342: 2338: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2320: 2316: 2313: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2289: 2285: 2283: 2281: 2277: 2274: 2271: 2268: 2265: 2262: 2258: 2255: 2254: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2233: 2230: 2226: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2204: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2198: 2194: 2190: 2189:74.192.84.101 2186: 2181: 2177: 2174: 2170: 2166: 2162: 2157: 2156: 2129: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2116:Lorna Marsden 2113: 2109: 2105: 2102: 2099: 2095: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2052: 2049: 2014: 2010: 2006: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1997: 1988: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1971:74.192.84.101 1967: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1942: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1902: 1893: 1889: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1849: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1728: 1724: 1723:WP:ROUNDABOUT 1719: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1663: 1660: 1656: 1655:Mailer diablo 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1623: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1594: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1579: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1569:Veryscarymary 1565: 1564: 1561: 1552: 1547: 1546: 1543: 1534: 1530: 1520: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1481: 1480: 1474: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1464:The Tumbleman 1454: 1453: 1449: 1443: 1439: 1436:. Thank you. 1435: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1413: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1396: 1389: 1384: 1382: 1370: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1335: 1333: 1332: 1314: 1313: 1309: 1305: 1299: 1296: 1291: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1280: 1264: 1257: 1254: 1252: 1248: 1243:. Thank you. 1242: 1238: 1232: 1229: 1227: 1224: 1223: 1221: 1212: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1186: 1181: 1177: 1167: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1132: 1131: 1128: 1118: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1097: 1093: 1092: 1088: 1082: 1078: 1074:wikimedia.org 1063: 1060: 1056: 1054: 1052: 1045:wikimedia.org 1034: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1024: 1023: 1017: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1003: 999: 995: 981: 973: 969: 965: 961: 960: 955: 951: 947: 943: 939: 935: 934: 931: 928: 925: 920: 912: 911: 907: 903: 902: 894: 891: 890: 884: 883: 879: 875: 871: 866: 863: 859: 853: 849: 845: 841: 829: 825: 821: 817: 816: 815: 814: 811: 809: 807: 801: 797: 793: 792: 786: 784: 779: 777: 772: 768: 767: 749: 748: 744: 740: 739: 734: 727: 724: 723: 715: 711: 707: 703: 702: 701: 700: 696: 690: 686: 683:. Thank you. 682: 678: 674: 670: 666: 660: 658: 654: 650: 643: 636: 631: 629: 617: 610: 606: 602: 599: 595: 591: 587: 586: 585: 582: 580: 579: 561: 560: 556: 552: 551: 546: 534: 533: 529: 528: 527: 526: 523: 521: 514: 513: 506: 504: 503:Pseudoscience 499: 496: 495:Pseudoscience 490: 488: 480: 474: 473: 469: 465: 461: 449: 445: 441: 437: 436: 435: 432: 428: 427:58.167.48.111 424: 402: 398: 394: 390: 389: 388: 387: 386: 385: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 364: 360: 356: 352: 351: 350: 346: 342: 337: 333: 332: 331: 330: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 324: 315: 311: 307: 303: 302: 301: 297: 293: 288: 287: 286: 285: 284: 283: 278: 274: 270: 269: 265: 261: 255: 254: 253: 252: 249: 245: 241: 237: 234: 233: 232: 231: 227: 223: 219: 215: 205: 204: 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 170: 169: 165: 161: 160: 156: 152: 147: 138: 137: 133: 129: 125: 114: 113: 109: 105: 99: 95: 91: 88: 85: 81: 75: 73: 66: 59: 53: 50: 47: 46: 45: 41: 40: 37: 36:Mailer Diablo 32: 25: 24: 23: 8293:, but other 8282: 8274:edit summary 8265: 8258: 8249: 8248: 8236: 8203:Mdaniels5757 8185:, but other 8174: 8166:edit summary 8157: 8150: 8087: 8086: 8074: 8036: 8034: 8019: 8017: 7996: 7994: 7989: 7981: 7967: 7955:for deletion 7919: 7913: 7890: 7884: 7878: 7831: 7797:, but other 7786: 7778:edit summary 7769: 7762: 7751:required by 7738: 7726: 7688: 7682: 7659: 7651: 7649: 7615: 7613: 7598: 7596: 7561: 7544: 7540: 7521: 7507:2 Jan 2018: 7495: 7476: 7471:help request 7442:TonyBallioni 7431: 7417: 7346: 7304: 7290: 7275: 7269: 7263: 7257: 7251: 7245: 7239: 7189: 7183: 7177: 7171: 7165: 7159: 7156: 7136: 7134: 7131: 7121: 7119: 6984: 6916: 6906: 6867: 6843: 6837: 6825: 6819: 6794: 6788: 6765: 6757: 6755: 6639: 6636: 6633: 6593: 6585: 6565: 6563: 6548: 6546: 6535: 6473: 6445: 6430: 6388: 6380: 6376:considering. 6351: 6342: 6338:takes a side 6337: 6313: 6309: 6302: 6277: 6274:The Listener 6273: 6269: 6265: 6256: 6249: 6245: 6241: 6237: 6230: 6226: 6217: 6154: 6148: 6144: 6140: 6137: 6128: 6122: 6117: 6111: 6104: 6098: 6092: 6084: 6060: 6058: 6052: 6047: 6042: 6038: 6031: 6025: 6017: 6012:than a more 6009: 6005: 6001: 5994: 5991: 5982: 5974: 5967: 5964: 5844:comments. -- 5819: 5704: 5696: 5681: 5679: 5643: 5637: 5614: 5606: 5604: 5567: 5561: 5538: 5530: 5528: 5424: 5370: 5366: 5365: 5360: 5358: 5318: 5307: 5276: 5265: 5242: 5220: 5167: 5141: 5131: 5125: 5119: 5113: 5107: 5101: 5095: 5090: 5086: 5080: 5034:. Remember, 4988: 4891: 4819: 4770: 4768: 4761: 4744: 4737: 4721: 4686: 4668: 4646: 4624: 4617: 4594: 4591: 4564: 4563: 4517: 4513: 4512: 4507: 4505: 4480:BullRangifer 4477: 4457: 4340: 4327: 4325: 4315: 4298: 4290: 4271: 4253: 4197: 4189: 4170: 4158: 4112: 4110: 4075: 4056: 4054: 4012: 3993: 3991: 3961: 3951: 3925: 3899: 3873: 3839: 3792: 3784: 3776: 3753:the Teahouse 3749:my talk page 3746: 3739: 3732: 3712:the Teahouse 3708:my talk page 3705: 3698: 3691: 3647: 3609: 3607: 3584: 3574: 3544: 3514: 3436:George Smyth 3356: 3345:2 Mar 2014: 3298: 3262: 3259:Sheldrake AE 3241: 3238: 3234: 3226: 3220: 3218: 3214: 3195: 3154: 3147: 3128: 3122: 3081: 3054: 3052: 3029: 3015: 3010: 2997:Roger Davies 2996: 2992: 2975: 2952: 2924:— Preceding 2920: 2899: 2840: 2771: 2770:) should be 2764: 2761: 2754:WP:BOOMERANG 2742: 2739: 2728: 2686: 2685: 2669: 2662: 2649: 2585: 2562: 2524: 2505: 2497: 2456: 2442: 2435: 2432:<ref: --> 2425: 2384: 2318: 2231: 2228: 2222: 2179: 2164: 2112:Brian Inglis 2100: 2045: 1917: 1914:weasel words 1909: 1891: 1887: 1864: 1860: 1661: 1600: 1580: 1566: 1548: 1521: 1503: 1460: 1421: 1414: 1404:, and add a 1385: 1380: 1377: 1369:OTRS pending 1357: 1350: 1336: 1329: 1327: 1300: 1292: 1277: 1275: 1265:for deletion 1244: 1235: 1219: 1189: 1184: 1173: 1138: 1119: 1110: 1103: 1084: 1076: 1048: 1020: 1018: 991: 942:good article 929: 899: 897: 867: 837: 805: 789: 787: 780: 764: 762: 736: 732: 730: 668: 661: 651:, and add a 632: 627: 624: 616:OTRS pending 604: 597: 583: 576: 574: 548: 542: 532:Discuss this 530: 515: 511: 508: 502: 500: 492: 484: 457: 421:— Preceding 417: 267: 263: 259: 217: 211: 176: 158: 154: 150: 144: 121: 101: 86: 83: 77: 69: 57: 48: 43: 33: 29: 21: 7921:voting page 7690:voting page 7255:protections 6989:For Editors 6894:. (You can 6796:voting page 6389:Attribution 6103:Crucially, 6089:in question 6048:independent 6022:independent 5928:Doug Weller 5863:Doug Weller 5757:WP:PROXYING 5469:DS guidance 5464:" criteria) 5323:, click on 5281:, click on 5137:Sign up now 4625:Thank you. 4601:WP:HighBeam 4192:2013 review 3551:George Lane 3392:David Bruce 3295:WP:AE Cases 3230:WP:REQUIRED 3087:Hello, I'm 2539:Dan Starkey 2535:Nick Jordan 2462:Hello, I'm 2390:Hello, I'm 2185:WP:DEADLINE 998:copyrighted 7905:topic bans 7850:* Pppery * 7674:topic bans 7572:Iantresman 7525:Iantresman 7267:page moves 7220:logged at 7218:Iantresman 7199:Iantresman 7187:block user 7181:filter log 7152:iantresman 7086:John Cline 7066:Iantresman 7060:John Cline 7045:Iantresman 7039:John Cline 7018:John Cline 6993:Iantresman 6976:John Cline 6961:John Cline 6946:Iantresman 6940:John Cline 6924:John Cline 6780:topic bans 6721:Iantresman 6692:Iantresman 6664:Iantresman 6616:Iantresman 6501:verifiably 6478:Iantresman 6405:Iantresman 6288:Iantresman 6250:SIS Review 6204:Pensee AfD 6179:Iantresman 6169:Thank you 6121:more than 6093:irrelevant 6014:mainstream 6006:in general 5971:notability 5941:Iantresman 5913:Iantresman 5883:Iantresman 5846:Iantresman 5801:Iantresman 5761:Iantresman 5743:Iantresman 5629:topic bans 5553:topic bans 5478:Iantresman 5395:uninvolved 5247:. Thanks, 5227:Andy Scott 5188:topic bans 5044:Iantresman 4951:Iantresman 4844:Iantresman 4788:Iantresman 4733:Thanks... 4534:uninvolved 4437:Iantresman 4409:EdJohnston 4374:Iantresman 4337:Sheldrake? 4255:Nikkimaria 3966:. Thanks, 3822:Iantresman 3799:Lou Sander 3670:Iantresman 3633:Iantresman 3589:. Thanks, 3488:Peter Ball 3476:John Beale 3404:John Lucas 3281:Iantresman 3266:Lou Sander 3196:Sandstein 3169:Iantresman 3155:Sandstein 3131:BracketBot 3089:BracketBot 2949:ArbCom ?'s 2862:Iantresman 2815:Iantresman 2772:intimately 2758:Iantresman 2736:Iantresman 2700:Iantresman 2567:. Thanks, 2531:Matt Smith 2508:BracketBot 2464:BracketBot 2445:BracketBot 2392:BracketBot 2359:Iantresman 2312:Iantresman 2296:Iantresman 2279:abusively. 2225:Iantresman 2056:Iantresman 2005:Iantresman 1987:WP:REDFLAG 1922:Iantresman 1873:Iantresman 1779:Iantresman 1691:Iantresman 1627:Iantresman 1583:Iantresman 1510:Lou Sander 1185:discussion 1085:under the 1008:under the 964:Iantresman 872:. Thanks, 820:Iantresman 818:Sorted. -- 706:Iantresman 440:Iantresman 393:Iantresman 341:Iantresman 306:EdJohnston 292:Iantresman 240:Iantresman 80:Iantresman 65:Iantresman 8307:consensus 8241:has been 8237:The file 8199:consensus 8079:has been 8075:The file 7901:site bans 7840:has been 7815:Marchjuly 7811:consensus 7753:WP:NFCC#8 7731:has been 7727:The file 7670:site bans 7428:AE appeal 7261:deletions 7193:block log 6776:site bans 6630:Topic ban 6590:Thank you 6493:WP:WEIGHT 6442:WP:FRINGE 6384:whatever. 6266:The Times 6118:substance 5736:, but my 5625:site bans 5549:site bans 5325:this link 5321:this list 5283:this link 5279:this list 5231:Read the 5184:site bans 4758:Sheldrake 4566:Callanecc 4464:T. Canens 4250:template. 4173:The Cap'n 4141:Moonraker 4136:NinaGreen 4117:Roscelese 3846:Read the 3757:Sulfurboy 3716:Sulfurboy 3408:Seth Ward 3363:Read the 3242:consensus 3093:your edit 3056:Callanecc 2972:Sheldrake 2921:Thanks, 2847:Orrerysky 2776:WP:ARB/PS 2750:WP:ARB/PS 2551:Read the 2468:your edit 2396:your edit 2324:The Cap'n 2173:WP:9STEPS 1966:WP:FRINGE 1950:WP:BURDEN 1910:neutrally 1817:The Cap'n 1486:IRWolfie- 1406:rationale 1347:this list 856:Read the 771:copyright 653:rationale 594:this list 498:warning." 355:T. Canens 195:T. Canens 191:WP:A/R/CA 173:Topic ban 128:IRWolfie- 104:Lord Roem 49:See also: 8211:contribs 8146:instead. 8037:articles 7757:WP:FREER 7616:articles 7488:Teahouse 7455:Help me! 7243:contribs 7163:contribs 6878:archived 6634:Hi Ian, 6566:articles 6426:sources. 6424:WP:FRIND 6381:supports 6310:promoted 6132:redshift 6069:WP:SYNTH 6043:mentions 5965:Hi Ian, 5495:Bishonen 5444:Bishonen 5428:Bishonen 5407:policies 5081:We hope 5029:WP:WIAPA 4627:Sent by 4575:contribs 4546:policies 4125:contribs 3795:Fraction 3604:Frogmore 3129:Thanks, 3065:contribs 3033:declined 2938:contribs 2926:unsigned 2768:contribs 2746:contribs 2732:contribs 2720:I agree 2506:Thanks, 2443:Thanks, 2235:contribs 2104:contribs 1985:No, per 1665:contribs 1644:sources. 1343:CC-BY-SA 1087:CC-BY-SA 1006:deletion 944:status. 590:CC-BY-SA 423:unsigned 90:contribs 8312:Minorax 7978:deleted 7928:NoACEMM 7539:get. I 7432:I have 7326:editing 6599:images! 6453:WP:SPOV 6444:. They 6401:WP:SPOV 6379:Nobody 6330:WP:NPOV 6319:website 6123:mention 6081:WP:NPOV 6061:opinion 6018:notable 5692:deleted 5574:Mdann52 5249:DPL bot 4869:effect. 4301:Elerner 4094:Stefan2 4031:Stefan2 3968:DPL bot 3591:DPL bot 3187:WP:NPOV 2930:Askahrc 2582:Warning 2569:DPL bot 2169:WP:NICE 1962:WP:NPOV 1869:WP:SPOV 1288:deleted 1251:opt-out 1157:Stefan2 1115:blocked 874:DPL bot 733:Lobster 8276:or on 8168:or on 7780:or on 7434:closed 7273:rights 7249:blocks 6601:Vorbee 6431:admits 6255:, the 6246:Kronos 6231:Kronos 6227:Pensee 6024:are a 5897:Drmies 5867:Drmies 5840:Drmies 5777:Drmies 5734:Kronos 5730:Pensée 5452:, and 5419:blocks 5401:, our 5174:. The 5147:using 5036:WP:AGF 4558:blocks 4540:, our 3773:, etc. 3101:syntax 3097:C3H2F4 3016:Ks0stm 2962:&L 2476:syntax 2404:syntax 2346:TRPoD 2287:user", 2165:really 2161:WP:BLP 2048:Barney 1992:TRPoD 1937:TRPoD 1897:TRPoD 1865:failed 1844:TRPoD 1835:WP:NOT 1556:TRPoD 1538:TRPoD 1198:BRIDGE 1123:TRPoD 946:Ykraps 460:motion 8045:B-bot 7997:StarM 7624:B-bot 7541:could 7469:This 7438:noted 6827:Kevin 6574:B-bot 6456:been. 6334:WP:OR 6147:, or 6130:what 6065:WP:OR 5417:, or 4990:Manul 4893:Manul 4821:Manul 4772:Manul 4643:WP:AE 4635:) at 4556:, or 4318:Hilar 3655:Help! 3617:Help! 2807:Fact" 2599:. 1958:WP:RS 1916:like 1867:(see 1857:TRPoD 1831:WP:OR 1190:Jay8g 485:By a 268:Strat 187:WP:AE 159:Strat 70:By a 8207:talk 8049:talk 7938:talk 7891:The 7819:talk 7699:talk 7660:The 7628:talk 7576:talk 7565:Huon 7553:talk 7549:Huon 7529:talk 7446:talk 7293:diff 7237:talk 7203:talk 7175:logs 7157:talk 7124:here 7090:talk 7070:talk 7049:talk 7022:talk 6997:talk 6965:talk 6950:talk 6928:talk 6835:L235 6805:talk 6766:The 6725:talk 6711:talk 6696:talk 6682:talk 6668:talk 6645:talk 6620:talk 6605:talk 6578:talk 6513:talk 6497:WP:N 6495:and 6482:talk 6464:talk 6446:must 6409:talk 6357:talk 6292:talk 6240:and 6238:Aeon 6183:talk 6160:talk 6141:Aeon 6067:and 6026:must 5945:talk 5932:talk 5917:talk 5901:talk 5887:talk 5871:talk 5850:talk 5827:talk 5805:talk 5787:talk 5765:talk 5747:talk 5732:and 5712:talk 5654:talk 5615:The 5578:talk 5539:The 5499:talk 5482:talk 5432:talk 5415:bans 5389:here 5383:and 5371:The 5337:talk 5295:talk 5253:talk 5208:talk 5153:talk 5048:talk 5042:. -- 4994:talk 4955:talk 4897:talk 4848:talk 4825:talk 4815:This 4792:talk 4776:talk 4724:this 4695:2012 4656:talk 4633:talk 4579:logs 4571:talk 4554:bans 4528:here 4484:talk 4468:talk 4441:talk 4427:talk 4413:talk 4392:talk 4378:talk 4355:talk 4343:this 4283:talk 4259:talk 4177:talk 4145:talk 4121:talk 4098:talk 4035:talk 3972:talk 3826:talk 3820:. -- 3818:here 3803:talk 3761:talk 3720:talk 3674:talk 3637:talk 3595:talk 3549:and 3519:and 3490:and 3285:talk 3270:talk 3250:talk 3183:WP:V 3173:talk 3135:talk 3069:logs 3061:talk 2934:talk 2884:talk 2866:talk 2851:talk 2819:talk 2784:talk 2762:talk 2740:talk 2726:talk 2704:talk 2675:talk 2627:and 2611:The 2573:talk 2537:and 2512:talk 2449:talk 2363:talk 2328:talk 2300:talk 2261:BASC 2243:talk 2229:talk 2212:talk 2193:talk 2180:that 2124:talk 2098:talk 2060:talk 2009:talk 1975:talk 1956:and 1954:WP:V 1926:talk 1877:talk 1821:talk 1783:talk 1753:talk 1695:talk 1673:talk 1659:talk 1631:talk 1611:talk 1587:talk 1573:talk 1514:talk 1506:HERE 1490:talk 1468:talk 1362:here 1353:; or 1308:talk 1206:MFIC 1202:WPWA 1194:WASH 1161:talk 1111:will 1091:GFDL 1089:and 1049:See 968:talk 950:talk 906:talk 901:Cirt 878:talk 824:talk 743:talk 738:Cirt 710:talk 609:here 600:; or 555:talk 550:Cirt 547:. — 519:Talk 487:vote 468:talk 444:talk 431:talk 397:talk 359:talk 345:talk 310:talk 296:talk 273:talk 244:talk 226:talk 214:file 199:talk 164:talk 132:talk 108:talk 84:talk 72:vote 8223:of 8061:of 8032:). 7713:of 7611:). 7279:RfA 6985:was 6882:DES 6832:aka 6707:jps 6678:jps 6641:jps 6561:). 6509:jps 6474:any 6460:jps 6371:jps 6353:jps 6343:not 6156:jps 6071:?" 6002:not 5823:jps 5783:jps 5708:jps 5361:not 5233:FAQ 5168:Hi, 4738:Zad 4692:pag 4652:jps 4508:not 4423:jps 4388:jps 4364:JzG 4351:jps 4321:leo 4245:ygm 4240:or 4198:AGK 3848:FAQ 3666:Guy 3649:Guy 3629:Guy 3611:Guy 3365:FAQ 3221:not 3185:or 3095:to 2722:Liz 2553:FAQ 2470:to 2398:to 1890:to 1553:-- 1383:. 1304:jps 1113:be 940:to 858:FAQ 630:. 8280:. 8263:. 8213:) 8209:• 8172:. 8155:. 8117:≡ 8051:) 7980:. 7940:) 7930:}} 7926:{{ 7903:, 7848:. 7821:) 7784:. 7767:. 7701:) 7693:. 7672:, 7630:) 7578:) 7570:-- 7555:) 7545:my 7531:) 7448:) 7205:) 7197:– 7142:). 7092:) 7072:) 7051:) 7024:) 6999:) 6967:) 6952:) 6930:) 6849:) 6807:) 6799:. 6778:, 6727:) 6713:) 6698:) 6684:) 6670:) 6647:) 6622:) 6607:) 6580:) 6515:) 6484:) 6466:) 6411:) 6359:) 6294:) 6276:, 6264:, 6185:) 6162:) 6143:, 5947:) 5919:) 5903:) 5889:) 5873:) 5852:) 5829:) 5807:) 5789:) 5767:) 5749:) 5714:) 5694:. 5656:) 5648:. 5627:, 5580:) 5572:. 5551:, 5497:| 5484:) 5476:-- 5437:. 5430:| 5413:, 5391:. 5339:) 5297:) 5255:) 5210:) 5186:, 5155:) 5050:) 4992:~ 4957:) 4895:~ 4850:) 4842:-- 4823:~ 4794:) 4774:~ 4745:68 4689:Jc 4658:) 4650:. 4581:) 4577:• 4573:• 4552:, 4530:. 4486:) 4470:) 4443:) 4429:) 4415:) 4394:) 4380:) 4368:. 4357:) 4349:? 4285:) 4261:) 4248:}} 4242:{{ 4238:}} 4232:{{ 4179:) 4147:) 4127:) 4123:⋅ 4100:) 4073:. 4037:) 4010:. 3974:) 3948:) 3944:| 3922:) 3918:| 3896:) 3892:| 3870:) 3866:| 3828:) 3805:) 3763:) 3755:. 3737:! 3722:) 3714:. 3696:! 3676:) 3639:) 3597:) 3571:) 3567:| 3541:) 3537:| 3511:) 3507:| 3486:, 3482:, 3478:, 3474:, 3470:, 3466:, 3462:, 3458:, 3454:, 3450:, 3446:, 3442:, 3438:, 3434:, 3430:, 3426:, 3422:, 3418:, 3414:, 3410:, 3406:, 3402:, 3398:, 3394:, 3387:) 3383:| 3287:) 3272:) 3252:) 3175:) 3137:) 3123:}} 3111:. 3071:) 3067:• 3063:• 2957:ES 2940:) 2936:• 2886:) 2868:) 2853:) 2845:. 2821:) 2786:) 2778:. 2706:) 2690:iz 2677:) 2575:) 2545:| 2533:, 2514:) 2498:]] 2486:. 2451:) 2414:. 2365:) 2330:) 2319:is 2302:) 2245:) 2214:) 2195:) 2126:) 2062:) 2011:) 1977:) 1928:) 1879:) 1833:/ 1823:) 1785:) 1755:) 1697:) 1675:) 1633:) 1625:-- 1613:) 1589:) 1581:-- 1575:) 1516:) 1492:) 1470:) 1450:) 1445:• 1420:. 1398:}} 1392:{{ 1372:}} 1366:{{ 1349:) 1310:) 1290:. 1163:) 1077:or 1047:. 1012:. 970:) 952:) 908:) 880:) 850:| 826:) 778:. 745:) 712:) 697:) 692:• 667:. 645:}} 639:{{ 619:}} 613:{{ 596:) 557:) 512:NW 470:) 446:) 433:) 399:) 361:) 347:) 339:-- 312:) 298:) 290:-- 275:) 264:76 260:My 246:) 228:) 201:) 193:. 166:) 155:76 151:My 134:) 110:) 8254:. 8205:( 8129:2 8126:3 8121:x 8111:2 8105:3 8101:x 8047:( 8014:⚠ 7936:( 7817:( 7759:. 7697:( 7626:( 7593:⚠ 7574:( 7567:: 7563:@ 7551:( 7527:( 7518:" 7511:" 7504:" 7490:. 7444:( 7369:) 7337:, 7281:) 7276:· 7270:· 7264:· 7258:· 7252:· 7246:· 7240:· 7235:( 7201:( 7195:) 7190:· 7184:· 7178:· 7172:· 7166:· 7160:· 7155:( 7088:( 7068:( 7062:: 7058:@ 7047:( 7041:: 7037:@ 7020:( 6995:( 6978:: 6974:@ 6963:( 6948:( 6942:: 6938:@ 6926:( 6847:c 6844:· 6841:t 6838:· 6830:( 6803:( 6723:( 6709:( 6694:( 6680:( 6666:( 6643:( 6618:( 6603:( 6576:( 6541:⚠ 6511:( 6480:( 6462:( 6407:( 6373:: 6369:@ 6355:( 6290:( 6200:: 6196:@ 6181:( 6175:: 6171:@ 6158:( 5943:( 5915:( 5899:( 5885:( 5869:( 5848:( 5842:: 5838:@ 5825:( 5803:( 5785:( 5779:: 5775:@ 5763:( 5745:( 5726:: 5722:@ 5710:( 5652:( 5576:( 5504:. 5480:( 5446:: 5442:@ 5335:( 5293:( 5251:( 5239:. 5206:( 5151:( 5046:( 4953:( 4846:( 4790:( 4654:( 4631:( 4603:. 4569:( 4482:( 4474:" 4466:( 4439:( 4425:( 4411:( 4407:. 4390:( 4376:( 4366:: 4362:@ 4353:( 4281:( 4257:( 4175:( 4143:( 4119:( 4096:( 4033:( 3970:( 3940:( 3914:( 3888:( 3862:( 3854:. 3824:( 3801:( 3759:( 3718:( 3672:( 3664:@ 3657:) 3653:( 3635:( 3627:@ 3619:) 3615:( 3593:( 3563:( 3533:( 3503:( 3379:( 3371:. 3283:( 3268:( 3248:( 3171:( 3133:( 3059:( 2932:( 2917:. 2911:; 2882:( 2864:( 2849:( 2817:( 2782:( 2765:· 2760:( 2743:· 2738:( 2729:· 2724:( 2702:( 2687:L 2673:( 2571:( 2559:. 2541:( 2510:( 2447:( 2436:] 2426:] 2361:( 2326:( 2298:( 2241:( 2232:· 2227:( 2210:( 2191:( 2122:( 2101:· 2096:( 2058:( 2046:@ 2007:( 1973:( 1924:( 1875:( 1855:@ 1819:( 1781:( 1751:( 1716:" 1693:( 1671:( 1662:· 1657:( 1629:( 1609:( 1585:( 1571:( 1512:( 1488:( 1466:( 1448:c 1442:t 1440:( 1306:( 1253:) 1249:( 1204:- 1200:- 1196:- 1159:( 1098:. 966:( 948:( 904:( 876:( 864:. 846:( 822:( 806:ξ 741:( 708:( 695:c 689:t 687:( 553:( 522:) 516:( 466:( 442:( 429:( 395:( 357:( 343:( 308:( 294:( 271:( 242:( 224:( 218:b 197:( 162:( 130:( 106:( 87:· 82:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index