User talk:Jorge Stolfi

7056:"When Caesar inquired of them what states were in arms, how powerful they were, and what they could do, in war, he received the following information: ... The Remi said, that they had known accurately every thing respecting their number, because being united to them by neighborhood and by alliances, they had learned what number each state had, in the general council of the Belgae, promised for that war. That the Bellovaci ... could muster 100,000 armed men, promised 60,000 picked men out of that number, and demanded for themselves the command of the whole war. That the Suessiones were their nearest neighbors and possessed a very extensive and fertile country; ... that they had twelve towns; that they had promised 50,000 armed men; and that the Nervii, who are reckoned the most warlike among them, and are situated at a very great distance, as many; the Atrebates 15,000; the Ambiani, 10,000; the Morini, 25,000; the Menapii, 9,000; the Caleti, 10,000; the Velocasses and the Veromandui as many; the Aduatuci 19,000; that the Condrusi, the Eburones, the Caeraesi, the Paemani, who are called by the common name of Germans , they thought, to the number of 40,000. " ( 1551:: Obviously no one can predict what will happen to the rates next month, much less 20 years from now. The exponential decay model is conceptually reasonable *if* IN = 0. It simply assumes that the chance of an editor dropping out in any given year is the same, no matter how long he has been editing. The logistic model assumed that the slowdown was due to some sort of "saturation" or "completion" of Knowledge, but by now it is clear that it does not fit the data. Note that the "linear decay" model is more drastic than my exponential model, it predicts a drop to zero in a much shorter time. Now if the recruitment rate IN of regular editors is not zero, then my model would indeed predict a finite but nonzero editor pool in the limit, and therefore a nonzero steady rate of work (including the creation of new articles). However, the data of the last four years fits fairly well an exponential decay (times a seasonal factor); so this limiting pool and limiting creation rate (if any) must be much smaller than today's. The current rate is about 35,000 per month, about half of what it was in July 2006 (Zachte's column G). 813:

come from an "independent" source. Knowledge requires that notability be estalbished by a certain number of outside sources, but content in an article about a website can certainly come from that website... it would have to, because you can't assume that an outside reporter will arrange to cover every single fact that someone might want to know. In the case of these microstates, information such as supposed land claims and currencies are essential data to appreciating the content and scale of the project, and the best and most reliable source for that data is the website in question. It's no different that putting up an item of celebrity news based on a press release from their website, which we do routinely. It's a biased but valid source, which is why we use citations to warn people of bias when we quote them. As it happens, I do have a citation to support the "purported currency" and "population" figures, which I'll try to dig up. They were mentioned in a European radio broadcast a few months back...

1800:

from us. The development of the web is in this direction, and the possibilities are enormous, and grow as our database gets bigger and as other s become available. The possibility of really accurate biographies is an example. The possibility of automatically updating after a census is another. The possibility of changing a scientific classification when opinion in that field changes. The possibility of constructing a database focused on publishers, or birthplaces. All this will be not just accessible to the programmers, but to any end user. Think of what we could do, for example, if the data in the successive editions of the old Soviet encyclopedia were semantically tagged! I look forward to every Knowledge article being structured as much as possible-- we could then focus the displays according to need. You could, for example, have an interface converting all structured data to sentences (which is a lot easier than going the other way, though this is increasingly possible also).

3497:

click the name and get taken to a page from which they need to make another click to get where they really want to go. Where there are only two possible meanings, having one of those meanings at the undisambiguated title means that hopefully at least half the time, the reader landing on that page does not need to click any further, because they have found exactly what they are looking for. For the reader who is looking for the other meaning, it is right there in the hatnote, so they are not inconvenienced any more than they would be if they had gone to a disambiguation page. The basic question, of course, is which of the two pages should be at that title, but in this case that is easy because there is only one page that contains an exact match to the title. So, in short, avoiding a disambiguation page here inconveniences no one, while saving at least half the people who come to the page from having to read, decide, and click again. Cheers!

934:

to Statistics Canada, for example, are you equipped to verify their claims? When any reporter reports their statistics, they're getting their data from Statistics Canada, not from an independent source. Yes, you can argue that they operate in the "real world" but you already know how I'll respond to that. You can argue that they have thousands of employees fact-checking and verifying, but when you get down to the level of the individual, you or me looking at their publications, it's still just a question of putting your trust into what they tell you. Sometimes, when you're writing an encyclopedic (which Webster, of course, defines simply as "complete"), you have to admit that the best cource for information about a group is the group itself. The group may not be trustworthy, but in absence of better or more up-to-date sources of information, it *may* be necessary so that the article is complete.

1967:

that half of the entries in histories are now totally dispensable robot edits, like removing extra blank spaces between words (which have no effect on the visible text), changing hyphens to en-dashes, capitalizing template names, etc.. I used to think that robots should be limited to absolutely uncontroversial and beneficial edits, such as spelling corrections, and only with the approval of the Wikmedia Foundation board. Now I think that not even Jimbo should be allowed to use them, for any reason whatsoever. Robots are "weapons of mass vandalism" and it is practically impossible to prevent their abuse. As for spelling errors, I now think that they are actually a good thing: they remind the reader, better than any tag, that the article was written by amateurs and was not properly reviewed, not even for spelling. Only users who actually *read* the article should be allowed to remove them.

1922:

format. Whether the default display should be tabular or in paragraphs, would be an interesting question. Considering that over 90% of the use of Knowledge seems to be for quick look-ups, there's a lot to be said for tables. What would I myself set up as my default: tables, almost certainly. In the RW I tend to put everything possible, including paragraphs of text, into a spreadsheet. What we want ads an editing format is quite uncertain, but again, we will probably need more than one. Again, for editing, I would prefer as much of a db structure as possible. For editing large amounts of material, we need the development of better tools for updating groups of articles; search/replace is even more direct in a database format. We just need tools.

1963:

transversal editing tools, but Knowledge *must not* have them. The lack of such toolls forces editors to read at least one paragraph or so of every article that they edit, and spend a minute of their brain's time doing and checking each edit. That not only improves the quality of one's own edits, but it also forces every editor to spend a fraction of his time checking other peoples edits. And, more importantly, it limits the amount of editing that one user can do; so that a single editor cannot do much damage before someone noticing, cannot trigger the watchlists of too many fellows, and cannot impose his tastes on more than a couple hundred articles. So, please let's *not* have search/replace, not even within a single article.

1392:"Pick the good ones from history": I saw this idea being discussed several times. AFAIK, the problem is: who does the selection? Someone still has to check new edits and decide which are good and which are bad. This must be a steady-state process, i.e. one cannot allow a backlog to build up, while thousands of new articles get created per month. Also having one version of the articles that readers see, and another one that editors see, creates many operational problems and probably would discourage editing. When one gets down to concrete proposals anad quantitative estimates, I suspect that the current system — instant publication — turns out to be the "least inefficient" of all alternatives. I believe that 1658:: quite likely. There seem to be more than 10 million chemical products that have been synthesized, studied, and published. I don't know how many published living species there are but it is probably several million. High schools currently are considered "notable enough"; if there is one high school for every 6,000 people that is another million articles. Printed books probably number in the millions too. And so on. Note that each of those things is important to dozens if not thousands of people, so there is no lack of potential manpower out there to create and maintain those articles. We only need to convince those people to become WP editors... 7052:

pollicitus sit cognoverint. Plurimum inter eos Bellovacos ... posse conficere armata milia centum, pollicitos ex eo numero electa milia LX totiusque belli imperium sibi postulare. Suessiones suos esse finitimos; fines latissimos teracissimosque agros possidere. ... oppida habere numero XII, polliceri milia armata L; totidem Nervios, qui maxime feri inter ipsos habeantur longissimeque absint; XV milia Atrebates, Ambianos X milia, Morinos XXV milia, Menapios VII milia, Caletos X milia, Veliocasses et Viromanduos totidem, Atuatucos XVIIII milia; Condrusos, Eburones, Caerosos, Paemanos, qui uno nomine Germani appellantur, arbitrari ad XL milia.

1144:

too. On the other hand, wikipedia (en) has about 10,000 "regular editors". This number of course depends on the definition of "regular editor", but that gives an idea of the discrepancy between the amount of work to be done and the number of volunteers that will have to do it. Moreover, this number, which was doubling every 11 months until 2005, has been halving every 4 years since 2006. So it is a fact that, since 2006, more editors are leaving than joining. The breakdown is not so clear, but the best explanation for the plots I could find is that the drop-out rate has not changed, while the join-in rate fell suddenly to zero in 2006.

1652:: Seems a reasonable assumption. To undertake such a task (for 6,000,000 articles, note) requires commitment to the WP project and some experience about what is a "good" article. The regular WP editors are the obvious candidates for that. If WP cannot recruit enough editors to clean up the articles, even partially, it seems unlikely that it will be able to recruit people to do the much more boring (and probably more work intensive) job of evaluating them. Note that typical productive editing does not require a careful reading of the whole article nor checking all the sources, whereas validating an article requires both. 894:

reader to decide if the micronation is a political entity, a political simulation, or a game, without trying to bias their PoV. All I'm asking is that you refrain from comments such as "most of the internet-centered ones --- and Aerica in particular." Anything in life can be thought of as a game, but there's an important distinction to be found in "exists as a game" and "is a source of entertainment value." At the very least, I appreciate the fact that you haven't put such statements into the article itself... I suppose it's not my place to decide what vocuabulary you do or don't use on talk pages.

1458:. So, in my first month, I would have been counted as a "regular" editor, and then I would have seem to have "left". Now I'm a Wikipedoholic. Furthermore, even though the number of editors qualifying for "recently a regular" has decreased, this tells us nothing about the output of the regulars. It would only be natural to assume that productivity of an editor increases with experience. I'm only slowly starting to use all kind of automation tools, and am far from having settled into a routine. I'm still all over the place, trying things, learning, and expect to keep doing so for quite a time. 1546:: Indeed, I believe that just filling all the "holes" in Knowledge, at the current "notability" levels defined by the deletionists, would easily require another 10 million new articles. If we were to lower the criteria a bit (e.g. include elementary schools, minor rivers and mountains, etc.) the count is much greater. But that is why the scenario is a "doomsday" one: Knowledge will not stop because it is somehow "complete", but because there will be no editors to fill its millions of holes and fix its millions of poor articles. 1079:(Actually infoboxes do not bother me that much, even when I am editing articles. I do not remove infoboxes wantonly; in fact I have never done that before as far as I remember. I removed the infoboxes in *those* articles because, in *that* situation, they contained mostly inappropriate information and were worse than useless. Indeed, if Tedder had just restored the valid parts of the infoboxes, without throwing away some 3-4 hours of ^my hard work and who-knows how much work by the other editors, I would not mind at all.) 4721:

allowing people who have at least a basic comfort with markup language but little familiarity with citation conventions to produce consistent, appropriate citations. I fall into that category, and I personally find filling in a Cite template far quicker and easier than opening up a copy of the Chicago Manual of Style to try to remember which elements of the citation are separated by periods and which by semicolons, which are abbreviated and which are not, what the standard sequence of elements is, etc. Food for thought...

259:. In my opinion, the article on organic chemistry is probably not the right place to discuss some highly specialized compounds that fall into the gray area. The page is viewed thousands of time each day by readers who, I am guessing, mainly want to know about regular organic compounds. IMHO, readers are probably not interested in the "hair-splitting" definitions that fascinate you and me. The topic is sufficiently broad that we could continue the conversation on the Chemistry project page, if you wish.-- 917:

definition you're using?). You'll note that it doesn't specify "primarily" or "solely" or anything like that, so that if I'm enjoying this discussion with you right now, it's arguably a game by definition. If I enjoy suturing a wound or putting a sample into the mass spectrometer (to take examples from our respective fields of science), if I find it amusing, does that make it a game? What I think you mean (please correct me if I'm wrong) is that you feel that these micronations are founded

4025: 3968: 3926: 3345: 2200: 2094: 490: 3851:

assume that the scarf is initially a flat square it will take a shape that has folds in it. The scarf will see small normal (size change) and shear strains (shape change) but much of the shape change will be caused by rigid body translations and rotations. Therefore, if we ignore rigid body motions in our definition of deformation, we not only severely restrict the possible kinematics but also eliminate much of what we understand to be deformations in the common sense use of the term.

970:. For ex: "Faluts", "Misuse", "Misunderstanding" should be removed and the titles should simply be "Tantra" instead of "Misunderstanding of Tantra". Then in the section we must write neutrally, so-and-so argues that so-and-so has misunderstanding of tantra....so-and-so argues that so-and-so's understanding of tantra is correct... presenting both the views. This was on my todo list for quite some time and thanks for initiating this. I will chip in once I have some free time. Thanks. -- 22: 3821:

creep into articles in the process. For example, you wrote in an article that true stress is what most people know as stress (I'm paraphrasing arbitrarily). But that's not correct. Most engineers who deal with stress don't even know of the existence of true stress. All their calculations use the "nominal stress" which is the force in the undeformed reference direction divided by the undeformed area. One has to be careful about such things so that people don't get confused.

3790:

do not have easy access to the source material. A large amount of explanatory text is not what such an audience is looking for. Over time these articles on mechanics that you've been playing with have morphed into things that neither satisfy a lay audience nor an audience that specializes in mechanics. Please make your changes keeping in mind the Knowledge dictum that you shouldn't include your original research (e.g., on Cauchy stress and its definition) in the articles.

8137: 5604: 5208: 7310: 6370: 4477: 9369: 8965: 8626: 8013: 843:

a person or group is often best found in their own press-releases, despite the fact that, as you say, anybody with a computer and a first-grade reading level can create a website and put news on it. I believe you 100% about how anyone can post fake information online, but if you cite only a group's official website, then barring vandalism, that's usually a good way to get their news and not that of, for example, a rival splinter-group, as with the Talossas.

5990: 9469: 9160: 8907: 8570: 8504: 8447: 5938: 5550: 4848: 4416: 341: 9068: 8711: 8355: 7923: 7448: 6483: 6130: 5862: 5786: 2230: 5313: 5023: 2567: 526: 2336: 1074:"consensus" decisions really reflect the opinion of a majority of the editors. I would expect that anyone genuinely interested in the welfare of Knowledge would want to see that data, too. I have asked for such estimates several times, in public forums and to individual users; and I have provided my own. I never got back satisfactory answers; worse, it seems that no one in those forums sees those questions as relevant. Sigh again. 1266:. Note that the number of regular users in the "en" wikipedia has been falling since a high of 54,000 in 03/2007 and is now about 40,000, the same level it was in mid 2006. Compare that with the growth from 2001 to 2005. Note also that their definition of "regular user" is pretty generous: 5 edits in the the month in question, including users who started in that same month, made 5 edits to one article, then disappeared forever. 6207: 4268: 8828:, a disambiguation page. There is an easy way to avoid linking to disambiguation pages: if you go to "Preferences", "Gadgets", and look under "Appearance" you'll see "Display links to disambiguation pages in orange" towards the bottom of the section. Select that tickbox, and whenever you Preview a page you'll be able to see whether you've accidentally linked to a disambiguation page. I've fixed this one to link to 7185: 6311: 6709:). It seems that neutral CH (and R-C) can be in several excitation states, some of which have one unpaired electron, while other have three. So, when people want to be specific about the excitation state, they can write CH or CH. It seems that the two have different official names, in fact: "methylylidene radical" and "methanetriyl radical". "Methylidyne radical" is a generic name for both. The notations •CH and 9523: 6803:

the "clock-face 4"). I've honestly never seen "VIIII" - on a clock face or anywhere else - it does get due mention in the body of the article, and in better context. AND even people who have never seen RN year numbers on buildings may have seen them on the title or end screens of movies and tele programs, so I found space to add that as well. Unless you've any further remarks - it's on to the next section! --

5707: 5632: 4926: 4330: 7609: 1166:

infobox fields in a non-intuitive syntax. Even if he recognizes those lines as the infobox, he probably assumes that (a) he must understand the infobox syntax and fields in order to do *any* kind of edit, and (b) he *must* provide an infobox when creating a new article. Now, what are the chances of that reader becoming a regular editor? (Of course vandals are not deterred by that problem).

437: 860:

article on the United States includes information about its states -- information which has proven not to be permanent -- for the same logic. As it was presented in the Aerican Empire article, it was arguably encyclopedic -- meaning it was a complete list -- and seemes to me to be relevant. I can't argue with you regarding permanency, but it was currently accurate, at least.

2676:, I noticed that the endpoint of the arrow that represents the X-axis concides with a corner of the part of the YOZ-plane that is shown in your figure. Because the whole set-up and use of colours in this figure is very good in my opinion, I wonder if you would agree that this figure can be further improved by extending the three axes a little bit? Thank you and regards, 1519:(about 1/2 every 4-5 years). In my analysis, it is the "IN" term that dropped abruptly to near zero in 2006. But, again, my reasoning for the "IN" and "OUT" separately is rather flimsy, and I deduced the difference IN-OUT from the slope of the new-article plot, which is measurable and definitely changed from very positive to frankly negative in 2006, quite abruptly. 4092:

fixits. Try doing that with stub templates. And the people doing stub sorting are pretty sweet little old ladies. The NPP taggerz are often aggressive 14 year-olds who don't write articles, couldn't be aggressive to a man in real life, get warped looking at crap articles and can't judge good ones, and just the type who degrade Wiki into an edit war piece of shit.

7867:

of an editor who visits these articles often and did not know about a merge proposal. One positive comment (I read it as a negative) combined with your own view is not consensus. You're disrupting article histories by bullying your way to what you want. Revert your edits, and go through the process by inviting other editors for their comments and consensus first.

7268:, after the contents may or may not have been merged with the latter. I have been trying to undo the merge since they are quite different concepts, in spite of the similar names and some superficial similarities in their definitions. I have generally noted the moves and reshuffles in the comments, even though there may not be explicit links. -- 1957:

only the pictures and a wikilink behind. Users who like tables could set an option in their profile to have the infoboxes transcluded by default; users who don't care for them would see only the link. Then everybody would be happy, including those who wish for a pure database without the text. (I had a similar proposal to handle <ref: -->

6820: 1775:

article base keeps growing, and the wikihackers and wikibosses keep inventing more and more bizarre ways to waste everybody's time. What is scary is not so much this situation but the fact that so few editors seem to be concerned about it. *This* is Wikipedias real problem, not BLPs or whatever. All the best, --

1522:

half-life of about 9 years. On the other hand the rate of new articles per day (Column G) dropped about 260 (18%) in the same period, meaning a half-life of 3.5 years. So either column D overestimates the regular editors, or the average "fertility" of regular editors has been falling too, not just their count.

1113:"What do infoboxes offer in return": Err, they look nice? Sorry, but I fail to see your point of harmfulness. Making the source code "readable" is a simple matter of adding undisplayed whitespace. I don't have that problem, but that is just my view. As regards, the amount of work involved: Maybe, but who says 2077:. I should have withheld the adjective and added more details (it is about the aromatic cores contributing to magnetic properties of the cations or some such). I was editing an article about another anion, saw that bit about mellitate, and tried to save the ref for later (or never 8-). All the best, -- 7095:

As for your other old edits - by all means restore your "history" one - but do review it very carefully yourself first, please. I'd like to talk about the "Alternate forms' section - not so sure about those headings of yours. And anyway, after all you may have second thoughts about how we even phrase

6764:

At my age I'm allowed (expected even) to be grumpy and opinionated - on the other hand I do try to be extra patient with recalcitrant grown-up grandchildren, fellow wiki editors and other people like that. As a peace offering - have a look at my latest suggestion on the talk page (and disregard other

4720:

A comment on your comment: you say that the Cite template offers "no gain" and only makes citations more difficult to enter or edit for the "non-specialist"; however, you seem to assume that the non-specialist is already a specialist at writing academic citations. The template's principal value is in

4212:

in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this,

4003:

I just talked to you over phone. I am the same person who wrote the above message. I had forgotten to sign in hence my name does not appear. There are several definitions of stress and strain. Results from your analysis depend on what definition you use. I have prepared some material on this topic. I

3988:

I read some of your comments about stress, strain etc. I think we can help each other out. Hence, I called you at your two numbers at your office. No one picked up. I tried to reach your office to leave a message that I have tried to send you an e-mail. I hope I have the right address. If you receive

3805:

I appreciate the work you've put in and understand how much effort is needed to weave a good narrative into Knowledge articles - particularly technical ones. I agree that Wikibooks and Wikiversity are useful for pedagogic purposes. Knowledge is meant for quick reference and that's how the mechanics

3789:

Not everyone around the world has access to a good library. Nor can they afford to pay USD 50 for an equation in a journal article. Several of these Knowledge articles on mechanics were designed with the intention of providing a set of reference materials for an audience interested in mechanics who

3697:

One thing that really frustrates me is having all the different formats for references. Actually it does not bother me that different things exist...not picky about that. But bothers me that I am expected to learn 100 different formats and can't just learn and perfect a "house style" so I know I am

3383:

It's my understanding that a carbene (H2C: in particular, or the functional group in general) is not intrinsically a "radical" (would depend on its spin-state). You have added that statement several times, including re-adding it without explanation after I removed it with explanation. Please don't do

2884:

our article on brydiosides or the category for curcubitanes, because they're sitting wholly outside the category tree. Essentially, using a redlinked category instead of an existing bluelink causes the article to become hidden, such that you can only find it in one of two cases: (a) you type the word

1956:

But I do not think that it is necessary to spoil my fun for you to get yours. Rather than convert Knowledge to a database, it would be much easier — indeed, perhaps even feasible! — to remove all the infoboxes and navboxes from the articles and put them in a separate namespace, say "Table:*", leaving

1921:

I'd go further than " building that database *inside* Knowledge articles.". I would advocate rewriting Knowledge completely to convert it into such a format, and provide for a tabular display of as much information as possible. There are then the two separate questions of editing format and display

1799:

The real reason is that they are semantic data, because of the tagging. They permit integration and manipulation of the material with outside program, both for serious analysis, and for the construction of special purpose compilations. for example, any new WP could easily translate exactly an infobox

1756:

Actually, of course we do lose experienced editors. Very few active people remain more than 3 or 4 years. Even the most active people leave sometime. About half of those who ever got the admin tools have not edited at all for many months. If nothing else, we are all going to die eventually. We rely

1540:

Sorry again for confusing language. I was not worried about "how are the selectors chosen". I meant that, if the editor pool keeps shrinking at the current rate, the selection of good versions will never get done, because the work required for that task is much, much greater than the total work that

1398:

As for enjoyment, we obviously agree. By "goals"I meant article quality, not deadlines or article counts. I think that most people would be satisfied if we could maintain the current average quality while expanding the coverage, i.e. improvements in old articles compesate the creation of new but bad

1146:

If these trends continue, Knowledge will keep growing, but at a slower and slower pace, while editing activity will keep decreasing. The final result, say 30 years from now, is easy to forecast: about 6,000,000 articles, of which perhaps 3,000,000 or more will be stubs and 2,000,000 will need urgent

1135:

What that plot shows is new *articles*, not new *editors*. If you look closely you will see that the rate of creation of new articles has been falling. (Note that "zero growth" is not at the bottom of the plot but just below the 4th tic mark on the left side.) For a wider look, and some discussion of

1073:

Quite right, I cannot expect anyone to take my opinons or analyses for granted, or even show respect for them. However, I have the right to demand an explicit cost/benefit analysis (even if a rough one) for each proposed rule or feature, such as infoboxes; as well as the extent to which the so-called

1006:

Please post references in that talk page demonstrating why a metaphorical acid test is not destructive to imitations. In a literal sense it is definitely untrue, but to effectively challenge the metaphorical meaning, a brief digression into the relevant etymology would be both relevant and helpful.

933:

Lastly, as for statements about a group by a group, I still don't agree with you. Yes, a lot of the statements made in the article can only be backed up by their website... but really, how is that different from some of the statements made in the articles for the United States and Canada? When you go

893:

You're absolutely right: saying that the Aerican Empire is "not a game" is a biased point of view. Saying that it "is a game" is *also* a biased point of view, and one without any sources to back it up, to my knowledge. This is why the wiki article doesn't say, one way or another. It's left up to the

842:

I don't recall seeing this as an official guideline, though it's possible I'm mistaken. That said, it happens in quite a lot of articles. Go to Google and type in 'wikipedia "according to her website"' and you'll find that this exact phrase appears on quite a number of articles. The latest news about

816:

Lastly, I'd appreciate it if you refrained from making sweeping comments about micronations being games or role-playing. I don't ask you to say that they're valid political organizations, but given that the people involved don't consider it to be playing a game, it's arguably not accurate to say that

113:

To chemists, there is essentially only one propylene oxide (the one made on the billion kg scale per Ullmann article on "Propylene oxide"). The second isomer is of minor importance and usually called trimethylene oxide. The nomenclature is imperfect, which irritates purists and some others. In any

8534:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of

7866:

The merge discussion was incomplete because you didn't invite a group of editors from the different article histories to participate. When a merge discussion is silent, it means that most editors don't know about it -- there was no "merge" banner at the tops of the different articles. I'm an example

7226:

template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons

6882:

And most of these "modern" (well, post medieval anyway) too. Still fair to say it's much less frequent than "IIII". How is the current state of the article from your point of view? I am looking hard at the "Alternate forms" section at the moment - I can see what you're trying to do, but I'm far from

6802:

Oh dear. Two ancient ones in the same place! A geriatric nurse's nightmare. Kidding aside, I've taken the liberty of adding a third version to the article. I've cut the reference to subtractive notation back to the bare essentials (for people who might notice that we used "IV" rather than "IIII" for

4064:

Since the BLP deletion debates, I have long respected your opinions. From my user page, I even direct people to read one of your comments that hit the nail on the head. I see you have written much more, detailed, analytical suggestions to improve wikipedia, which we both know will be heard by deaf

3850:

About the definition of "deformation": Since you're interested in animation you will may have run into a situation where you need to drape a silk scarf over a Stanford bunny under the action of gravity. Assume that the bunny is stiff so that it does not deform much. But will the scarf deform? If we

2898:

And honestly, if you want to use a category that doesn't exist yet, it really isn't that hard, and doesn't take more than a minute or two at most, to create it so that you can use it. If you're enough of an expert in curcubitanes that you can identify and create all the missing articles, then surely

1966:

Indeed, robots — which allow some users to bypass that limitation — are now at the top of my (rather long) list of "things that are wrong with wikipedia". It is because of robots that we got all those unsighty and idiotic editorial tags, like "orphan" or "this article needs expansion". I would guess

1929:

As for chemicals in terms of notability, I think the usual informal convention now is that "appearing in two referenced articles" justifies an article--if I remember correctly , this is about 5% of the 50 million chemicals in CA. This turns out to be comparable to biology, where the established

1824:

The database suffers, for example, because one cannot add an entry about XX without also creating a Knowledge article about XX. Since articles are created completely at random, at the whim of individual editors, the database will have an extremely poor coverage, like a swiss cheese minus most of the

1480:

that restrict the set of possible models so much that the data set can actually exclude certain possible future trends. Take one very simple example: Does the data set actually exclude exponential decay not to zero, but to, say, 10k new articles per month? I'd be very surprised if that was the case.

1268:

As for "so what": I suspect that most wikipedians will disagree with the view that a "dead, mostly bad" wikipedia is Ok. Besides, if the trends continue, the regular editors will soon be unable to keep up with vandalism and junk articles, so the percentage of garbage may well increase and reach 100%

925:

Next, you comment on members not being united. You're right that most of them don't live in the same region, but I have to dispute you when you say they lack a shared cultural heritage. The members from a dozen countries are united by geekdom... not a national heritage, but certainly a cultural one.

141:

exactly is reading these articles. My guess is that our main readership includes those interested in the ingredients in consumer goods and technicians and students that are tasked to work with or write about these materials. My thinking on propylene oxide is not just about preserving legacy names,

7018:

By the way, I think that the reason why you see IIII but not VIIII on clock faces, and you don't see "XXXX" on the Colosseum is the same I mentioned before: writing "IV" instead of "IIII" saves only one stroke out of 4, and the space of one "I" out of 4 (25%). Writing "IX" instead of "VIIII" saves

4216:

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would

4101:

Net/net: The stubs aren't needed, but they're really not evil. Actually I really think they are sort of cute. I even (maybe barely) feel inclined to help out an article that has that cute little icon down there. The turdboxes though? Dated to 2008 and dropped by people who don't even engage on

3717:

Of course in most cases, we are talking about people who don't really write large swathes of content. And a few who do, but still think "I figured it out, everyone else should...walked uphill through snow to school...liked MSDOS and UNIX and FORTRAN"...not realizing they are losing vast amounts of

3523:

The discussion about anisotropy seems to make clear the need for a segment on the historical development from Hooke through Cauchy through Lekhnitskii to modern times. In particular, the reader may want to know why the article (and the mechanics community) made the sudden transition from forces to

2826:

If the tag really offends your sensibilities that much, then the simple solution is to create and file the category that you want to use. If you do that, the article won't get tagged in the first place. But if you can't be bothered to do that, and are content to just leave it sitting in a redlinked

1774:

Yes, old editors are leaving, presumably as they always did. What is clear so far is that something changed abruptly in 2006 that turned vigorous and steady growth of the editor pool into a steady decline, which is at least consistent with the hypothesis of zero influx of new editors. Meanwhile the

1389:

Anyway, even though the value of IN and OUT are uncertain, the doomsday forecasts depend only on IN−OUT which has been measured independently and is decaying. From my plots the editorial workforce falls to 1/2 every 4 to 5 years. Then in 30 years it will be around 1/100 of today's. That same model

1143:

Knowledge (en) has a bit over 3,000,000 articles; 1,600,000 of them are still marked as "stubs", and perhaps another 1,000,000 need major rewite and cleanup. Many of the articles in my watchlist have been stubs for many years now; and many of the new articles that are still being created are stubs

929:

You also comment that the word "government" isn't appropriate, but again, how is the word meant to be used? "The body of persons that constitutes the governing authority of a political unit or organization." No mention of states. Schools have student governments. Fan clubs have presidents. The word

859:

I would say that this information is different from bus schedules and numbers of bathrooms in so far as it's essential information to understanding the group. In so far as it's a land-claiming political entity (however dubious), it's land claims are central to it and useful to understanding it. The

812:

I don't agree with you about the infobox. The labels on the box are indicative of the subjective claims made by the state; hence labels such as "purported currency" and "area claimed" as opposed to "currency" and "territory" as seen in the standard country templates. The information doesn't have to

6262:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

3904:

I am a new editor who has recently tried to improve the Calorie article. I could not see how to do the major rewrite that was needed. I thank you very much for your editing. I have learnt from your addition of a disambiguation page and your organisation of references using LDR style that does make

3835:

I have stopped editing articles that deal with fundamental concepts - it's too stressful (no pun intended) :) My contributions to Knowledge will continue to be on topics that are not well covered and to add new content. I have decided to leave editing to others. Please continue with your changes

3820:

Regarding "original research": Our understanding of a subject depends on the amount of time we have spent thinking about it. I've sometimes inadvertently added information that I "know" but cannot bother to find a reference for. I was warning you against that error because personal opinions can

3496:

Let me couch this in terms of informing readers, then. If a term has only two meanings, at least half the time the reader will be looking for one of those meanings. If that title is a disambiguation page, then the reader must figure out which meaning to go on to. In other words, they would type or

2790:

it if it doesn't already exist; leaving it red is doing the very same passive-aggressive "I think somebody should do this for me, but I can't be bothered to do it properly myself" thing that you seem to think categorization tagging is. I can't always create the category for you, because especially

1899:

By turning Knowledge into a database, the infobox mania is betraying the very premises of the project, and the expectations of many of the people who built it. I joined WP in 2004 because its stated aim was to build an encyclopedia. If its stated goal had been "build an unsystematic and incomplete

7003:

I now think that "VIIII" and "IX" are just like "Doctor" and "Dr." Everybody understands that they are exactly the same thing, and either is fine in any context; but most people use the latter because it is shorter. A Wikipedian of the far future may think that in Ancient Westernia there were two

6921:

My conclusion now is that the "additive" notation was never considered "wrong" or even "obsolete", from early Rome to this day. People just used the subtractive notation because it was more convenient, but they viewed is as a shorthand for the additive one, and would write LXXXX etc if they just

6557:

page just to get it back to the earlier state. I just looked your talk page and it is clear you are not a new blockchain editor and now i am a bit ashamed i reverted your edits. Maybe we could have a discussion first on the talk page over at Ethereum Classic? I just felt this subject of the start

5406:

Jorge -- thanks for your thoughts on my Talk page concerning your wish to use Purpura bacca in the acai article. I work in the supplement industry, have known acai products over their entire history in the US and have never heard of Purpura bacca. Well beyond my judgment, it's a vague relation to

4091:

1. They are a lot less deadly than the fixit templates ("turdboxes"). They's at the bottom of the page (benefitting both reading and editing). They are not obtrusive and nastily worded like the fixit templates. You pretty much CAN piss all over an article (on purpose) to annoy the editor with

2271: 1883:

Also, with the current design one must go through the entire article edit cycle in order to update *one* field of *one* record. If an editor finds a public table with, say, the melting points of 200 alkanes, he will have to edit 200 articles in order to enter that information in the database. In

1852:

Since infoboxes have to be displayed in Knowledge, their width and length are limited, and there are severe constrains about the size and formatting of their fields. For example, an industrial chemical often has several dozen alternative names, some of them very long and boring. Public chemistry

1324:

for participation. What I am suggesting is that we need to keep in mind that enjoyment is the only tangible reward a contributor can get from participating in Knowledge. This implies that stressing ourselves over non-existant deadlines or arbitrary article count goals is bad for Knowledge. See it

1259:

Still the wrong plot. The blue line of that plot presumably includes IP users, in particular new vandals and "users" who got as far as to click "save" but never came back. The green/gray line is the total number of distinct such "users" since the start of WIkipedia. If you have been around for a

916:

You wrote, "all English words should be used with the meaning that they have for the majority of readers." Again, I agree with you. The problem is deciding what the majority of readers think it means. Webster defines a game as "activity engaged in for diversion or amusement" (I assume this is the

7569:

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it.

7396:

This person has been making multiple, largely (but unfortunately not entirely) self cancelling edits - I am trying hard to be patient, friendly, and non-judgemental (among other things trying hard not to duplicate problems you and I had!) but this is getting a bit ridiculous. Of course it is the

7051:

Cum ab iis quaereret quae civitates quantaeque in armis essent et quid in bello possent, sic reperiebat: ... De numero eorum omnia se habere explorata Remi dicebant, propterea quod propinquitatibus adfinitatibus quo coniuncti quantam quisque multitudinem in communi Belgarum concilio ad id bellum

4301:

and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the

1896:

And so on. Besides, for almost every infobox template, there is a public database that covers that subject much better (and with more high-quality support) than Knowledge can ever hope to get. For chemistry, for example, the only really useful fields in the infobox are the links to the external

1161:

As for consensus, well, the notability rule and editorial templates are examples of decisions where the majority clearly *does* have a problem, but "any resistance is pointless". Moreover, many editors apparently accept the rules because they do not know what "consensus" means in Knowledge, and

274:

Thanks for your note. I used to be interested in the inorganic-organic distinction (and like you was amused by the irony that Woehler's urea is inorganic). You'll find however that organic chemists find the distinction completely trivial. I hope that you liked the cluster that I inserted into

3617:

Tens of thousands of papers are written annually according to Chem Abs. J Phys Chem publishes 45,000 pages annually. It is one of hundreds of journals. The number of papers poses practical problems for editors. Am I to conclude that you and Plasmic feel sufficiently authoritative to pick and

1970:

As for article splitting, I do not have a fixed rule either. I create sub-articles whenever I feel that a section or topic does not fit well in one article, because of its volume or for other reasons (and sometimes I do the opposite). I would normally treat books like you do, but if I fell like

1925:

You raise a different question, about the virtue of small vs merged articles. Here, I am not dogmatic: At present I would for example merge most routine books into a page for the author, and combine the pages for all minor fictional characters in a work or franchise, though in each case without

1368:

I stand corrected about the count including IP edits and the new editor rate being zero, sorry. Nevertheless the difference IN−OUT, where IN = (New *regular* editors joining), OUT = (Established regular editors leaving) is definitely negative. If IN is indeed in the thousands per month, as you

1165:

As for infoboxes loking nice, that is definitely *not* my opinion, and I gather that I am not alone. As for readability, the problem is that when a reader clicks "edit" for the first-time, in order to fix a spelling error or add a sentence, what he sees is not the lead paragraph, but a bunch of

921:

for amusement, which isn't the case, at least for the Aerican Empire. That's a hard statement to prove, but I can point to it being mentioned in an article or two, I'm sure. It can be fun and diverting without that being its main purpose, and I, for one, feel that means it's not a game. I don't

8253:

réis. The $ became a decimal point only later, when the escudo was defined as the main currency, worth 1000 réis; and then 123$ 500 means "123 escudos and 500 réis" for a long while, until the escudo was re-divided into centavos. I have seen many examples of the former in classical Portuguese

3613:

My position is that we should favor secondary references, i.e. use them more frequently than primary sources in articles and require them to establish notability. Listen, I know I am not going to win this battle, which I have waged for years. But I like to at least make the case to reasonable

3233:

I strongly concur with almost everything you said, except that personally never bothered me when I had to register my user to do anything. Therefore I bet in the other reasons cited by you: hostility imposed against newbies and particular articles; tags (a real plague); ... and if I may add in

2854:

in a way that can viably act as a primary work queue. And yes, you are missing something in your latter question: of course any article on Knowledge can be found through the search tool or through a comprehensive database scan. What it fails to do, if the article doesn't have a real bluelinked

2423: 1521:

Zachte's table 1, column D (number of users with at least 100 edits in the month) gives an upper bound to the editor pool, and its differences give another estimate for IN-OUT. By that coulumn, wikipedia lost about 300 of those editors (about 7.5%) between Oct/2008 and Oct/2009, which means a

1795:

Jorge, I think you are missing the point on infoboxes. The real reason for them is not just a consistent appearance (although this is a customary sign of high quality workmanship ). Nor is it even ease of use--some people will always prefer prose to a tabular presentation, but others just the

1157:

If the waste of work was strictly voluntary, that would already be a problem, because Knowledge was not created for the enjoyment of its editors. But the real problem is when the cost of a feature falls on editors who would rather work on other things, and may not even like the feature. For

4066: 7163:

Having read your opinions on the above topic, I couldn't agree more! This formatting adds nothing to the utility of the citation and just makes editing any article with these pernicious things in them far more laborious. Some people just seem to enjoy pointless elaboration for its own sake.

1962:

By the way, you mention the need for tools that would allow editing many articles in a single seesion, e.g. search/replace style (or what I called "transversal editing" above). Here too I think that the needs of Knowledge and databases are exactly opposite: a database *must* have efficient

731: 3524:

stresses. Please go ahead and add that information if you have the resources at hand. A wonderful resource is "Mechanics of Solids: Volume 1: The Experimental Foundations of Solid Mechanics" in Handbuch der Physik, ed. S. Flugge and C. Truesdell. The article was written by J. F. Bell.

3724:

And then an amazing suspicion of anything new. This place is both so amazingly conservative AND suboptimal (I.e. the Nash Equilibrium not at value maximizing spot). It's amazing how silly IAR is. It's a bromide, but really it should be PATECR (pay attention to every conflicting rule).

2493:. That was very passionate and well said. I appreciate your support for the article, and it is good to know that I have not just imagined the phenomenon. There are a lot of good people around here, but I have unfortunately run into a few admins who are Machiavellian with their tools. 6142:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4065:

ears. But I agree with most of what you say. And both of us continue to contribute to the world's knowledge anyhow, each in our areas of expertise (though I must admit yours is far more academic and thus significant to mine). So it is today I am honored to notice that both you and I

8317:

Thank you, that looks a lot better now. (Yes, I knew about Portugal being in the eurozone so my "since 1942, the cifrão has been used" etc wouldn't have worked without getting bogged down in off-topic explanations.) If you have time, you might want to apply your mathematical magic to

6495:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

7566:, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Knowledge. 1926:

losing information. I agree with you about the problem that the world considers "Separate /Wikipedia article" to mean "RW importance." However, there's not much we can do about it. To a certain extent , we need to conform to expectations. Ultimately, again I think we want choices.

2806:

every article to be filed in at least one existing, bluelinked category, or tagged as uncategorized if it isn't. There are no grounds for deeming some improperly categorized pages to constitute some sort of special exemption to the rule that applies to the rest of them; every page

1668:: again, we need real data. I have toyed with the idea of downloading the Wp database dumps and generating statistics myself, but it seems that the available files are either too meager or too large. Perhaps I can convince some of the statisticians to add another column or two... 1260:

while you know that casual users may contribute one paragraph or two, but it is the regular users — those who do hundreds of edits per month, over many months — who actually write most of the contents and do virtually all the cleanup work (including adding and filling infoboxes).

1757:

on an inflow of new editors; converting readers to editors; converting editors to active editors; getting active editors to take a role in the operations of the encyclopedia. we rely on this not just for growth, but for maintenance-- all articles will always need updating.

7397:

article that matters, rather than the personality of its editors, but... Could you have a look at Soumya's edits to your own work on this article (if it has been effected) and restore anything that has been cut at random or damaged? Or even tell me I am being "unnecessary"?--

1464:"doomsday scenario": Let me try to cure you of that one. If I understand it correctly, this is meant to imply the we're now in an exponential decay to zero, right? If that is the case, then this model has to answer to the same objection as the logistic model: There will 2330: 1103:"right to demand an explicit cost/benefit analysis": Absolutely, but what is gained by that? There is no deadline, we don't have to worry about performance, the content is free. The only thing we really need to worry about is whether we enjoy doing volunteer work here. 6454:. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged 1270:

As for the enjoyment of editors: Knowledge has a fairly definite goal, and its fundamental rule is that you are allowed to play only by helping it move towards that goal. Editors who don't enjoy doing that are not welcome here. But I am sure I don't need to tell you

9044:

This unsigned and undated notification was apparently mistaken, as the article was not deleted but renamed. The compound clearly exists; and even if it didn't, an article is deserved even for a hypothetical compound which has been the subject of theoretical studies.

3671:

I also hate the callouts to various databases (JSTOR, Medwatch, etc.) If you have the article and maybe a link that is all you need. Really annoying to get 4 of these callouts just for the few editors having that access AND too lazy to cut and past the citation.

2540:

Hello professor. I saw some of your comments on the damage caused by deletionists and rule-mongers, and just want to say that I agree with and appreciate your opinions and your work, and it is inspiring that you continue despite the anguish they cause. Cheers, :-)

2380:

Hi Sir, I found a copy of the previous "Pre-Siberian American Aborigines" article under your user profile. To your knowledge, was this article deleted from Knowledge some time ago? Due to which reasons? (I guess is original research or merged into another article)

4217:

sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

3441:

You may not have noticed these because your user settings render math tags as HTML when applicable. I have them set to always render PNGs, so the TeX renderer threw dozens of errors. You should do the same while editing just to be sure the markup is all correct.

578: 1884:

contrast, if the infobox contents were stored in a proper database separate from Knowledge, there would necessarily exist tools for such "transversal" editing — so that the editor would simply upload that table in some standard format, with a single transaction.

1471:

But here is the real problem: For any given data set, and for any given prediction of future development, there are incountably many smooth curves that can be fitted to the data to arbitrary precision. What this means is that the fit of a curve to a data set is

9493:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

9184:

8931:

8594:

8471:

1589:

new article, if we discount a handful of redirects. Also, the times when topics without an article were aplenty are gone. Useful work is shifting towards improvement of existing topics. If my experiences are any indication, then that is the real work ahead of

876:

How so? The coins are physical. They get bought and sold. They're unrecognised in most shops, but they're still a form of currency minted metal currency. At the very least, they're novelty coins, which qualifies them as "purported currency" according to the

5671: 1825:

cheese. For example, WikiProject Chemistry has about 4200 articles, of which half are "stub" or "start", 800 are "unassessed", and many of the rest are about processes or classes of products, rather than substances. So the number of substances that have a

1076:

My point is not "I do not like infoboxes". My point is that "infoboxes are extremely harmful to Knowledge", for several reasons. I pointed out some of those reasons above, and gave a crude cost estimate for one of them. What do infoboxs offer in return,

1215:"30 years from now": For the sake of discussion, let's assume I consider the argument valid. My question is: So what? We'd be left with an English encyclopedia containing about one million articles that do not "need major rewite and cleanup". Not bad for 77:

Hi, I didn't remove the list of Pirahã features because they're controversial. If you read my edit summary, you'll see that I removed them because all that information is elsewhere in the article and lists like that are not good wikipedia style. Best,

533: 519: 2181:

I'd rather keep the version in my userspace more or less as an archive of what Stolfi wrote (maybe fix a couple spelling errors). If you want to edit it we might move it into WP space as an essay, or you could take a copy as well into your userspace.

5874:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

5798:

5758: 5683: 3660:), you can have a half minute delay when doing an edit and then saving. Makes it hard for even an FA editor to upgrade the topic. Imagine a newbie (less investment) and the turnoff to them. (maybe less if they were going to do a one time change). 4951: 4355: 8984:

This compound has just 12 hits in the CAS database, almost exclusively related to theoretical investigations, thus this compound does not appear notable. Moreover, there is confusion is regard to the name and stereochemistry of the compound in the

3675:

Also hate the proliferation of blue in citations. The external link gets lost with the Wikilinking of editor name, publication (!), and then the extra blue for ISBN and the like (we have to link to a definition of ISBN....10 million times or so.)

653:

Hi, thanks for moving that bit of essay to the correct name. I was not aware of the missing "User:", and got quite upset when I got a "deletion" notice on an essay that I had not even finished writing yet. Sorry for the bother, and all the best.

8935:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

8598:

6039:

you added a works reference "According to a 1777 source, he had written several manuscripts on chemistry and botany". However, when I lookup that source there is no mention of Jacobus Sinapius, did you maybe meant another book? Thanks. Book pages

5746: 5964:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

5576:

4874:

4442:

3609:

I am responding to your note where you state that the rules do not apply to you: "I don't think the WP recommendation is relevant to specialized topics". Well congratulations, most editors behave exactly the same way. So you must be right.

114:

case, I recommend that we move good ole propylene oxide back to its old name. You are welcome to contribute to the discussion on the Wikichemicals page. PS you are doing interesting and welcome work on the carbon oxides. Try the sulfides!--

1162:

assume that it means "majority opinion". I wonder how many editors would respect those rules if the statement "this gudeline is a consensus" were to be replaced by the more honest "this guideline is the opinion of a microscopic minority".

3288:. I see that now both entries have been edited, mostly by you, and I wonder if you could combine the two back into the viscous stress tensor page, since you are probably more aware of the differences that might now exist between the two. 9496:

9187:

7851:

And please wait until the reorganization is complete before judging the result. I have experience with marjor reorganizatons and celanups such as this one, and the results seem to have generally been accepted by all interested editors.

5263: 1796:

opposite. I think that for those who are not familiar with English, the tabular one might be better--confirmed on my own experiences working getting information for the enWP from foreign language articles in languages I can barely read.

8217:

Fixed that spurious section. As for the pillars of Herclules, the theory is reported in a couple of internet article that do not seem to be total garbage. It is a fact that some Spanish dollars had the pillars, and (if the WP article

4577:

Thank to Dr. Jorge Stolfi, Please check again, I change minnor: Dao's eight circles problem, a generalization of Brianchon's theorem, proved by Luis González. Thank to You very very much again. Best regards. Sincerely --Dao Thanh Oai

1376:, that says that only 500,000 of those 11,000,000 users made more than 10 edits in their entire life. It would seem that every month 300,000 readers create an account but 290,000 of them give up forever before making 10 edits. Indeed 514: 3946:

I started a discussion on infoboxes inspired by a comment of yours at the Signpost. I had an idea so I posted for feedback. Seems good to me at the moment... I'm curious what others will say and what ramifications I didn't consider.

1333:

affect you in any meaningful way (the realistic figure being more like 99.9%). I'd say: backup what interests you, collect permalinks to good versions, and if WMF goes totalitarian, you can always fork off, and be none for the worse.

1310:"dead, mostly bad" / "unable to keep up with vandalism": Pick the good ones from history. I don't really understand why readers are not treated to links to assessed versions of articles. Takes the urgency out of dealing with the kids. 8809:

In the reference to "A Sketch of the Indo-European Finite Verb", where does the mention of Arbeitman come from? Google books seems to have confused its Schwartzes and added the Isadore middle name erroneously in its cataloguing (see

380:

makes very good sense. You seem to have resaerched this extensively. Some people might argue that you can model anything with 10 parameters, but you explained quite satisfactory (to me at least) what the purpose af these parameters

1581:

I'll take you up on that bet. I'll send you my favorite shiny new Euro coin if you can show that the typical editor starts, peaks, and the stops after some time. Shouldn't be to hard, just three million edit histories to sic a bot

1147:

editing — but there will be only a few hundred editors working on it. So wikipedia is not just a "work in progress": it is a ship doomed to run aground halfway to the port, unless something radical is done to reverse those trends.

2459: 1461:"who does the selection?": Anyone who wants to. People will quickly ferret out whose assessments they find useful, and whose not. That's Attention Economy 101. But that digresses into my ideas about peer-hosted Knowledge 2.0. ;) 2785:

always a valid pointer to the "correct" category for an article; some redlinks are needless duplicates and clutter. And if you really think any given category that you want to add is the correct one, then the onus is on you to

1971:

writing more than a couple of paragraphs about a particular book I will just create an article for it. So I have even written a couple of articles each about a single short poem --- that is, about a *single page* of a book". (

1382:

Unfortunately I could not find any statistical study that measured IN and OUT (of *regular* editors) separately. The reasoning that led me to belive that IN ≈ 0 is a bit convoluted, but it is based on the shape of my plots in

2360:

i tend to agree with you about the cite template, but i do find it useful for cutting and pasting google books and news sources, a little faster, but uglier -- is the template savable? is there a way to migrate to Wikisource?

2400:

For fighting the good fight against the loathsome Info Boxes I proudly present you with the most applicable barnstar... Your essays inform my user page and if there was a President of Knowledge, you'd be my first choice...

1887:

Knowledge is a more visible and accessible resource than DBpedia, so it attracts a lot of vandalism. Embedding the database records in Knowledge exposes them to such vandalism. What is the use of a database that cannot be

1614:

How well? Better than exponential decay with a significant non-zero asymptote? As stated above, showing that the curve fits is meaningless as long as you can't show that it fits better than all the other curves than can be

5452:

Regarding the ban on anonymous new articles: would it help to have a system where new anonymous articles have to be approved by a registered user? (so that even the user itself could approve it, if he chose to register)

2745:

There is a list, generated daily, of all new articles that have no active categories on them; six months ago, that list had approximately 25,000 articles on it. There is an absolute requirement that the list get cleared

7115:

I have removed your WP:RM/TR requests as they involve a large number of articles, and somewhere the community will have to step in if it is necessary. Rather than fix it later, it's best to test the waters beforehand.

3663:

They do make a hash of the edit view also. Actually...I think the best thing to change edit view is LDR (put the references all at the bottom...you know in the reference section) and just have name calls in the text.

8280:

ok, that makes sense now. As originally written, it was just too terse and confusing and indeed looked like a typo. Could I suggest that you rewrite it to say something like "since 1942, the cifrão has been used as a

7138: 1371:

The assertion that 300,000 new *named* accounts are created per month is quite surprising in view of the Usability Project statistics that I cited above (which are consistent with other statistics I have seen); or of

4102:

talk and rip through 100 articles a night? Would love to do A/B testing. I think that if we exclude the article creators (and bullying them is just vile), that the tags actually create less help than the opposite.

808:

Thank you for explaining your rationale, and thank you for talking it over with me before reverting my changes. It's always nice to meet someone here open to talk through a disagreement. Wish it happened more often.

8248:

I found now that the notation 123$ 500 predates the introduction of the escudo, and was originally used as the thousands separator for amounts of réis. That is, the notation "Rs. 123$ 500" or "123$ 500 Rs." meant

2119:

Hi, thanks for getting the subjects seperated. If you like, I could email you the ODNB articles about the theologian and the schoolmaster - just email me through Knowledge and I will send them to you. Best wishes,

8475:

5968:

5580:

4878:

4446:

3445:

Ideally, you should NOT use math tags on basic stuff like "3 x 3" or "A", so I highly recommend you go through your changes and leave those kind of math stuff alone. It's a good idea to change the use of <sup:

2443: 5505:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 5436: 1158:

example, I see many users wasting time filling superfluous fields in infoboxes, because they mistakenly believe that infoboxes are an "official" Knowledge requirement, and that all their fields "must" be filled.

3197:

which organized by date. When the template is moved to the talk page, this function no longer works. So if you wish to move these templates, please initiate a discussion about Knowledge structure, at say the

7555: 6989:. Maybe, now and then? I just haven't seen it. Of course It's very true that people have used RNs very erratically - we have always been aware of that - hence the first para of the "Alternate form" section. -- 8194:

Also, the "pillars of Hercules" theory comes in an out of the article and has always seemed suspect to me; if you have access to the sources, maybe you should check that they contain what is claimed they do?

1853:

databases (such as PubChem) easily carry all those names; but an infobox is too small to contain them. Ditto for optical and microwave spectra, vapor pressure tables, relevant biological reactions, etc. etc..

789:

looks like your cup of tea, esp the dicarboxylic acid. The article mentions nitrosocyanacetate, which is one of those special organic things that are barely organic. I am not even sure what it is. Cheers--

6585:. When you copy from one Knowledge article to another, you need to provide attribution. This is done by saying in your edit summary that the material was copied, and where you got it. Please have a look at 1950:

Dear DGG, I shiver at the idea of Knowledge turning into a set of tables. As I said, that is not what I came here for. If that ever becomes Knowledge's goal, I will have to find some other way to waste my

8055: 3667:

I had not thought about the volume, issue description. Not 100% sure that is needed. Often we do give more content than an ACS type journal (typically giving the title of the article and often a link).

7600: 5667: 6838: 2872:, then it isn't particularly critical that the article be properly categorized, because you can type "brydioside" in the search box. But if you don't already know about brydiosides, and are trying to 9097:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 8740:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 8382:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 7950:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 7475:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 6844: 6507:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 6154:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 5886:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 5810:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3310:

Just a note: normally, chemboxes contain information, including images, of the ground-state molecule. Could you please ensure that the chembox in methylene only contains the triplet relavent images.

3238:

simply is exact. Yet, I think the best insight said by you is "Knowledge is not an encyclopedia. It is not..."; that is the point in my opinion too (always it was to me). This is just logic. Thanks,

2350: 817:

it is one. Some of these countries certainly openly admit to being games, but by and large, the ones with Wiki articles don't. Obviously, though, I'm biased on this point, and I freely admit that.

8020: 8006: 632: 393:

the technical report mentions 2 different values for the Limiting size: At paragraph 7 you mention about 5.9 million articles, but in the abstract a finite limit a little over 8 million articles.

142:

but is motivated by optimizing the approachability of an intrinsically difficult topic by using familiar names. To wander off the subject, did you see that one of the most consulted articles is

8811: 1691:

My point exactly, editors may not be the best choice for rating the content they produce. Film reviews are typically done by journalists or people you happen to know(!), not directors or actors.

1106:'so-called "consensus" decisions really reflect the opinion of a majority': We seem to be talking past each other. Consensus can very well be represented by a minority, as long as the majority 129:

Thanks for the note. I think that I will move the article back. Your words encouraging accessibility to non-specialists resonates. For this reason I try to spend time on general topics like

6458:. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. 5742: 2521:

I've emailed you a copy, I'm afraid that's the best we can do in a situation where you won't be working on it for some time.I can't see that it will make any practical difference in any case.

207:

describes a collection of fields in the record (0 multiplication factor, implied length 80) NAME DS CL20 ADDRESS1 DS CL20 ADDRESS2 DS CL20 CITY DS CL20

9165: 9150: 5073: 2957: 384: 6455: 2750:

each and every time somebody works on it, with no exceptions, precisely because it can never, ever be allowed to hit 25,000 again. And because it picks up somewhere between 100-300 articles

8258:. Brazil never defined the "escudo" (people used instead "mil-réis", pronounced "mirréis", for that amount), so the "real" (and the "$ " as thousands separator) remained use until ~1942.-- 9180: 6089:" might be a problem. Most silicates (not the ones you and I encounter) exist at high pressures and adopt denser structures consisting of octahedral Si sites. This hit gives some info: 696: 625: 8001: 7178: 5927: 3618:

choose your way through these? You have searched "iron hydride" on Chem Abs and are so experienced that you know which of the 962 sources represent the field? How do you guard against

2885:

directly into the search box, which you can only do if you already know that the topic exists, or (b) you do a complete scan of the entire database to list every single article that we

2308: 757: 7004:

version of English: "Undotted English" with the words "Doctor", "Professor", and "Mister"; and "Dotted English" in which those words were replaced by "Dr.", "Prof.", and "Mr."... 😊 --

6856: 4947: 9148: 9113: 8756: 8398: 8121: 7966: 7624: 7491: 6523: 6170: 5945: 5929: 5902: 5826: 4510:

When you made an article for the Occidental Language in 2005(?) you wrote that with the apearance of interlingua the Occidental language declined Do you have a source for this? Thanx

2490: 3806:

pages were designed. For instance, a student will have to troll through at least three textbooks to find some of the information contained in the Knowledge article on Hooke's law.

5030: 3974: 9082: 8725: 8368: 7936: 7461: 6081:

At normal pressures and for our students, tetrahedral Si in silicates is a convenient concept. I suspect however that the statement "In the vast majority of silicates, including

5961: 4351: 3587: 2261: 8868:

I noticed the Google Books mixup too. As far as I can tell, the "Isadore" middle name does not appear anywhere in that book, or in any of the other publications by the linguist.

7595: 3932: 3925: 7387: 4256: 2516: 7173: 4524: 2479: 1991:

because the latter is about a type of artists' oil paint now replaced by the synthetic paint "Alizarine Crimson" (both with very definite composition); while the former is the

4735: 216:

describes a 'dummy section' representing offsets from a 'pointer' register NAME DS CL20 ADDRESS1 DS CL20 ADDRESS2 DS CL20 CITY DS CL20

7636: 5017: 4125:

Your edits to the article are a "massive" improvement, and I drew a couple of simple diagrams for the examples you added (two masses in 1d and the rotating dumbbell). Thanks

8117: 6418: 5355: 4470: 3084: 2470:

during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

3013: 2040: 4837: 3749:

You are a great editor. Srsly. Give yourself a pat on the back...and no backtalk or humbleness. Just very incredible all your new articles and your thoughtful essays.

2777:

exists at a different wording, and there are also some people who don't understand the categorization process and instead create nonsense categories which should rightly

9308: 6403: 6195: 3538: 1980: 1155:

So that is why every feature needs a critical cost/benefit analysis: because the work of editors is too precious to waste,and we desperately need to recruit new editors.

930:

government, as applied to a micronation, is equally valid whether you consider them a group of kids or a political entity. The same logic is true of the word "politics."

7019:

three strokes out of 6, and the space of three "I"s outof six (50%). Writing "XL" instead of "XXXX" saves 4 strokes out of 8, and the space of 4 "I"s out of 8 (50%). --

5978: 8289:

in 1942 (when one escudo replaced 1000 Reis), the cifrão was used as a thousands separator, so 123,456 Reis was written as 123$ 456." Or something like that anyway? --

7892:

recommendations well enough. The effect on article histories is is not a problem: WP:Merge says that flagging the merge in the edit summaries for both pages is enough.

5539: 5297: 3895: 3092: 4098:

3. There is a mild benefit to the stub tags in that you may (very sometimes) be able to get a tagger to layoff, since of course the thing has issues...it's a STUB!

8493: 7733: 7716: 6090: 5557: 5541: 4855: 4839: 4757: 4737: 4689: 3994: 3550: 4553: 3059: 9489: 9269: 7847:

The merge notices have been up for 3 weeks and no one has objected; the only comment was positive. I would say that there is consensus that the merge is warranted.

7406: 3564:. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. 1018: 1001: 483: 2911:

you. Is there an actual reason why you're so resistant to the simple solution of "if the category you want to use is a redlink, then create it so it turns blue"?

1313:"regular users": I see. Now you only need to convince me that the predictions of doom will hold up under scrutiny. You might want to take into account that I'm a 8172: 8154: 7428: 6259: 6232: 6200: 5573: 4871: 4832: 3698:

right. The cite template system is sort of a pseudo house style, but annoyingly there is anadequate explanation of how to implement that house style manually.

3648:

One thing you ought to add is the issues with large articles and edit delays (this was proven by experiment). For large articles with a lot of references (e.g.

3078: 2900: 2869: 2467: 2451: 2445: 196: 5920: 4500: 9457: 8531: 7243: 4685: 3051: 2325: 1390:

gives a formula for the number or articles, which tends to a finite limit of about 6 million no matter how long one waits (the math is fairly straightforward.)

1273:

Finally, for "thousand" readers becoming regular editors, see above. The number of regular editors is shrinking, there is no doubt about that. All the best, --

852:

Now, "data" such as the precise areas which the Aericans decided to claim as their territory is of this sort: neither relevant, nor permanent, nor encyclopedic

8100: 6341:

about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting

5449:

I agree completely that the hostility towards newbies – in terms of deletions and tagging, and the wikisource complexity – is very detrimental to Knowledge.

5116: 2530: 1149:

The main culprit for the lack of new editors seems to be the rule instituted in dec/2005 that limited article creation to registered users only. However the

9197: 8927: 7765: 6572: 4005: 2299: 1819:

Using infoboxes for that purpose is bad for the database, and very bad for Knowledge. I have already written about the latter, so let me expand the former:

1216: 8538:

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit

7577:

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

4701: 4659: 4626: 4598: 4568: 6326: 5616: 366: 8425: 7992: 7745:

They are called EMACs for a reason. The term might not be perfect, but both Peng and Cotton use this term. Please ask before renaming stuff like this. --

5590: 5441: 4318: 3576: 2754:, it would get there in three months flat if the list isn't cleared regularly. The whole point of the uncat tag is that there is actually a whole project 462:

by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!

9283:

See my reply in the talk page. I will try to check your changes, but I am a bit too busy today, so don't expect a prompt answer - sorry. All the best,

8895: 7517: 6541: 6188: 5476: 5307: 5193: 4405: 2893:

to fish brydioside out of a list of well over a million titles. And either way, you're not really helping the average user find what they're looking for.

1995:

of that paint (and of many other things). In that case, I found that discussing both concepts in the same article was simply too confusing. and so on...

1930:

rule is that every species gets an article. There are probably identified about 1.5 million eucaryotes & I expect we will do every one of them.

1022: 496: 489: 4439: 503: 8553: 8331: 8312: 8298: 8232: 7424: 6314: 5994: 5224:

article. It is a difficult area to improve due to the low quality of many sources on the matter and your suggestions may result in future improvement.

2244:

I just wanted to let you know that your efforts at creating and improving chemistry articles is appreciated. Thank you for all your contributions. --

98: 83: 3914: 3718:

very smart professors and the sort who don't want to play code-monkey when they are used to MS Word and it all working fine when they submit papers).

3604: 1515:

leave en masse in 2006. Quite the contrary, I believe that they all survived the event and continued working at the same rate as before, dropping out

926:

This is why most of these groups are called micronations instead of microstates; they're based on an adopted national identity, not a physical border.

6632: 5851: 5534: 5160: 3097:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

3064:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

3028: 2791:

with science topics I don't always know where its correct place in the category scheme is. A page cannot be left improperly categorized just because

1817:

Dear DGG, I understand the value of putting information in a database format; what I object to is building that database *inside* Knowledge articles.

6892: 6292: 191: 9357: 7362: 6692: 5043: 4614: 4541: 4537: 4526: 3045: 6765:

GOM remarks). This adds (I hope) the details you consider missing from the current lead without adding dismay, confusion and gnashing of teeth. --

4460: 3109: 1730: 245: 7042: 7028: 7013: 6998: 6910: 6812: 6793: 6749: 6724: 6652: 6607: 5775: 5612: 4890: 3194: 2555: 9140: 8783: 8488: 7769: 7432: 6243:

how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the

4069:

at the same time. Congratulations. Keep up the good work. And please continue your astute analysis and honest tongue. Your voice is needed.

3073: 1790: 1751: 8609: 8435: 7110: 5661: 5396: 5047: 4900:

Dear Dr Jorge Stolfi, the Dao's theorem keep or delete that is not important with me than you. I thank to You and grateful to You very much. --

3164: 3128:

may be relevant. I suggest if you disagree with WP's policies you take it up somewhere suitable, and do not resort to attacking me personally.

1553:

Well, enough rambling for now. Thank you very much for the comments, they are forcin me to think harder about this question. All the best, --

715: 477: 328: 8267: 7806: 7365:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 6952: 6931: 2007: 9508: 8322:, where I was interested to read that a familiar term dating from over 100 years ago has been rolled forward and applied to the €200 note! -- 7772:

when evidence is submitted without diffs, that evidence is likely to be discounted or not even reviewed by the arb committee. Best regards,

3638: 2662: 344: 333: 161: 94: 79: 8948: 8176: 6387: 6070: 4909: 3549:

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Noise (signal processing) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at

1741: 1710: 1683: 1630: 1562: 1490: 1410: 1343: 1282: 1242: 1195: 1177: 1126: 8558: 7204:

does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Knowledge, this is supplied at minimum in an

5844: 5731: 5152: 2086: 1396:

has some sort of article vetting, but AFAIK they have only 30,000 articles so far. But all this is only my speculation, not a firm belief.

9208: 7092:

Note that I have already had to 'defend' this - have made a sincere effort to do this tactfully this time rather than grumpily reverting!

5275: 5012: 1090: 1066: 644: 387:

for the seasonal pattern for Knowledge as search criterium. It is quite the contrary of the editors, with valleys at summer and Christmas.

8953: 8468: 8345: 7913: 7294: 7277: 6015:

Subpages should not be created in article space. There are appropriate ways to try to save a copy of an article that is facing deletion.

4730: 3414: 677: 663: 425: 93:

Hello, that's a good point, but if we're going to do that, do you think we go further and have a section actually about the controversy?

6244: 2952: 300: 155: 9452: 9054: 7438: 7133: 6826: 6475: 6122: 5656: 4481: 3799: 3784: 3692: 2934: 2846:

tool for the categorization project to help identify articles that need to be added to that queue; but it does not and cannot act as a

1451: 7903: 7876: 7861: 6303: 5770: 5695: 3860: 3845: 3830: 3815: 3471:

Greetings! Please do not create disambiguation pages having only two pages; such situations are generally handled with a hatnote. See

2586:

Not notable. The basic meaning of the topic is covered well in other "social class" articles. It does not need an article of it's own.

2176: 2163: 9478: 9169: 8916: 8591: 8581: 8520: 8458: 6443: 6267:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 5950: 5562: 4860: 4655: 4594: 4428: 4306:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request 4228: 4221: 3459: 2390: 1941: 1784: 1209: 323: 8114:

article, how exactly do you create these illustrations? Is it a program that automates this process, or is it simply an SVG editor?

7382: 4197: 3182:

While, I may agree with you that editorial comment should be placed on the talk page, there is a problem with moving templates like

2920: 1701:

suffice to analyze edit histories? If not, you could get an account at toolserver, so you can query the database directly. Regards,

1222:"Knowledge was not created for the enjoyment of its editors": ?!? Knowledge is not just an encyclopedia. It is an encyclopedia that 1097: 945: 7720: 6240: 3643: 2375: 1839:

provides for free as a sample of its database (which, AFAIK, lists several million substances). Not to mention that many of those

411: 348: 6236: 6091:

https://hazen.carnegiescience.edu/sites/hazen.gl.ciw.edu/files/Systematics%20of%20high-pressure%20silicate%20structures%202000.pdf

3707: 3512: 3438:. I suggest you fix all the TeX markup errors and use the preview function to double-check everything before committing a change. 3408: 3297: 396:

can you provide the is modelled values for future article numbers? I would like to add them in the monthly graphs, if that is OK?

102: 4042: 3981: 3939: 3358: 3247: 3163:

in the List of oxocarbon anions in the orthocarbonate entry. I have no idea about how to fix such things. Can you look at it? --

2735: 2213: 2107: 1399:

articles. Unfortunately the doomsday scenario above implies that many of the articles that are bad today will remain bad forever

1384: 1137: 507: 377: 306: 9277: 8158: 7550: 5620: 5301: 3687: 3599: 3333: 3319: 405: 9432: 9292: 9060: 9029: 8703: 8689: 8076: 6330: 6196: 5484: 5376: 5094: 4257: 3629:

Again, I know that I have lost this battle, but I thought that you should hear my reasoning. Best wishes and happy editing, --

2986: 2958: 2827:

category and move on instead, then there's no point in being surprised when somebody else comes along and tags it for cleanup.

2701: 2642: 605: 6470: 4251: 4178: 4095:

2. Yeah, the stub sorting is a waste. duplicative of categories. But they are wasting their own people's time, not others.

3040: 1731:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Knowledge%3AWikiProject_Missing_encyclopedic_articles&action=view&diff=349423930

906: 826: 8204: 6744: 6687: 5700: 5625: 5611:

I like very much the above image which you contributed. Do you have a similar visualization of a positive definite tensor? --

3428: 3420: 2864:

Not everybody using Knowledge is necessarily already an expert in the topic they're researching — if you already know that a

2695:

I just wanted to let you know that one of your comments and a few of your brilliantly sarcastic templates have been included

2068: 371: 7655: 3760: 3172: 2410: 1911: 9326:

Sorry, I am a bit busy right now with other projects. But hopefully I will check on that page eventually... All the best,

9136: 8779: 8421: 7988: 7513: 6537: 6184: 5916: 5530: 5293: 5112: 4715: 4220:

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just

4203: 3741: 3274: 3262: 2940: 2154:

I am flattered, please help yourself. Besides, that text was released "under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL". 8-) --

7105: 6774: 5256: 3399:

Or are you using a different meaning of "radical" other than IUPAC's specific definition of unpaired-electron structures?

2836: 2285:

For bringing a fresh and stimulating point of view about WP. A beautiful startpoint to reflect on things and change them.

2148: 7834: 7786: 7729: 7712: 6664:

you made in 2013. Thank you for your contributions to Knowledge. Can you do me a favor and check the chemical symbol for

6435: 6359: 5595: 5124: 4243: 3990: 3890: 3533: 2842:

The daily list is generated offsite as a text file whose only viable use is to set up a batch tagging run in AWB. It's a

2685: 8871: 7282:

A comment as to what the source article was in your edit summary at the destination article is what's needed. Thanks, —

2139:

Do you mind if I reproduce your essay on a page in my user space? It would be a shame to lose it when the RfC closes.

9349: 9335: 7602: 7228: 7189: 6612: 6592: 6338: 6318: 5517:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

5230: 4992: 4156: 3149: 2690: 2129: 1233:"what are the chances of that reader becoming a regular editor": Several thousand try it on any given day. 'Nuff said. 1014: 803: 770: 359: 329: 268: 6052: 2931:

np: your point has been noted. thanks for the link and i suppose you're right Otelemuyen 03:49, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

985: 9254: 8829: 7668:

Please see following subject, the eights circles theorem, if You like the subject, please write a article in enwiki.

7663: 7380: 6334: 6025: 5422:. That's why I reverted your edit and feel it's a small but accurate matter to exclude Purpura bacca. Kind regards -- 4780: 4773: 4519: 4491:

I do want to emphasize that I don't think you have done anything wrong, I just want other editors to be aware of it.

3125: 3018: 2134: 123: 9550: 7033:

That very idea has occurred to me now and then since I started to edit this article - so we must be right, eh? 😊 --

6117: 6059: 5431: 3373: 3234:

special: the bureaucrats actually filled with their consensual povs (not neutral), ownership, etc. Your other essay:

3202:. However, pending such a change, I have restored the templates at the Sardinia article. See the documentation for 2029: 9265:

I see that you also tried to improve this article in the past. What is your opinion on this change in the article?

9258: 8855: 8127: 7812: 7539: 6041: 4987: 3586:

Based on your opinions from your various essays linked to from your talk page, that you may be able to add to this

3154: 2395: 1811: 1768: 1527:

Not sure I agree. Individual editors have very erratic work patters (check mine for example), but my bet is that,

320: 45: 42: 39: 9239: 8889: 6784:

age gives me the same privilege too. 😜😊 Your proposal for the lead is great, see the talk page. All the best, --

6413: 5135: 3956: 3393: 3027:

earlier this year, and I wanted to check that you were OK with the nomenclature changes I implemented, summarised

1061: 87: 9436: 9245: 9132: 9033: 8791: 8775: 8693: 8417: 8327: 8294: 8200: 8080: 7984: 7706: 7509: 6640: 6587: 6533: 6447: 6180: 6036: 5912: 5526: 5380: 5098: 4113: 3967: 3144: 2646: 2370: 2034: 1535:

of his articles may improve with time, but I don't see why he would create more articles per month as he matures.

1369:

believe, then OUT must be in the thousands per month, too. Somehow I fail to find that possibility reassuring...

609: 5479: 4400: 3518: 1575:

editor left. All the data shows is that many editors edit less than they used to. Do they actually stop editing?

1531:, the productivity of a regular editor reaches a maximum after a few months, and then stabilizes or falls. The 1325:

this way: Even if you're really into it, you're not likely to use more than a few tens of thousands of articles

8814:), but I see no mention of Arbeitman, and it can't be that Kerns was a pseudonym of Arbeitman because A edited 8110:

This is probably an incredibly stupid question, but regarding your illustrations of oxocarbon molecules on the

7792:

I would hope your comments would not be disregarded, and encourage you to add diffs if you have time. Regards,

7574:

and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

7532: 6322: 4485: 4151: 4054: 3217: 3186:

from the article to the associated talk page. Namely, the way Knowledge is currently constructed the template

2740: 2550: 996: 979: 6715:

The ground (lowest energy) state is CH, but I don't know which state one would find in interstellar space. --

4078: 3779: 3736: 2253: 886:

A Knowledge article about a micronation (or any other entity) should not be written from the group's viewpoint

9513: 9411: 8516: 7641: 7546: 6567: 5281: 5189: 5148: 5008: 4905: 4828: 4697: 4651: 4622: 4590: 4564: 4549: 4134: 4038: 4013: 3490: 3252: 2667: 1880:. Either template will hold only part of the information. A separate database could carry the union of both. 798: 353: 6680:. I notice they are not consistent. Is that an error? Is ⫶CH still the correct rendering of the symbol? --- 6426:

is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means

6354: 4950:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

4354:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

3998: 3989:

my e-mail, please respond. I am in Toronto. I need your opinion on some of my creations. Let us communicate.

1585:

I don't think that article creation works as a measure of productivy. I have 2k+ edits, and created exactly

922:

presume to say what the average wikipedia user thinks, since most of them aren't as over-educated as we are.

9106: 8792: 8749: 8391: 8255: 8093: 7959: 7817:

You don't have consensus to merge them all together. I for one do not agree with it. Be patient and follow

7754: 7701: 7484: 7370: 6516: 6216: 6163: 6002: 5895: 5819: 5244: 4233: 3872: 3581: 3424: 3303: 3088: 3055: 3009: 2903:

would belong in the category tree — I'm not a science guy, so I don't have that knowledge, and therefore I

2511: 2458:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 1698: 1107: 186: 6558:

date of this blockchain is likely a controversial topic. Thanks! No offense intended with the revert. :-)

3435: 2766:

nose; it's an active cleanup project that people actively work on each and every day, and the tag is what

1304: 9424: 9380: 9358: 9273: 9118: 9021: 8976: 8954: 8761: 8681: 8637: 8615: 8539: 8403: 8068: 8024: 8002: 7971: 7496: 6528: 6423: 6391: 6175: 6006: 5907: 5831: 5522: 5467: 5401: 5368: 5324: 5238: 5198: 5086: 5034: 4505: 4031: 4024: 2634: 2578: 2556: 1186:, beginning with the section "Wiki Syntax is not that hard to ignore (in small doses)". All the best, -- 597: 537: 515: 8303:

OK, will do. But Portugal switched to the euro in 1999, so the escudo+centavos notaion is defunct too.

3222:

As you are an experienced editor, would be appreciated your opinion in this, as yet, non-consensual and

416:

It appears you can use relative path names as well. Feel free to revert if you don't like it. Thanks!

9428: 9320: 9025: 8685: 8323: 8290: 8243: 8212: 8196: 8188: 8072: 7343: 7128: 6439: 6264: 5998: 5974: 5372: 5090: 4726: 4303: 4213:

as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

3560:

is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on

2978:

I liked your thesis on oriented projective-geometry, and I would guess that you might be interested in

2877: 2638: 2331:

Thank you for your excellent view on the BLP "problem" and your caustic analysis on the master-syndrome

2206: 2199: 749: 601: 166:

I've reverted it because it's plain wrong to make void "the same" as unit type in that context because

9261:) that was rejected - although in my opinion, the argumentation in the discussion was not convincing. 7354: 7231:. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — 6832: 4278:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done for the following reason: 9482: 9304: 9173: 8920: 8585: 8524: 8462: 7402: 7101: 7038: 6994: 6888: 6808: 6770: 6738: 6681: 6451: 6021: 5954: 5566: 4864: 4432: 4298: 4275: 4261: 4083: 3595: 3540: 3369: 3351: 3344: 3329: 3315: 3114: 3024: 1984: 1320:"Editors who don't enjoy doing that are not welcome here.": I was not suggesting that enjoyment is a 1153:

survey pointed out the complexity of wikisources as another factor that scares away would-be editors.

703: 250: 9538: 6093:

I guess, if my suspicion is correct, one could correct the above quote as: "In the vast majority of

2815:

good isn't a reason not to tag an article, either; it's much more important that an encyclopedia be

1468:

be new articles to add, though the sustained growth rate would be considerably below current levels.

9474: 9459: 9376: 9362: 9008: 7759: 7591: 7542: 7526: 7347: 7302: 6342: 6223: 5185: 5144: 5004: 4901: 4824: 4693: 4647: 4618: 4586: 4560: 4545: 4496: 4009: 3243: 2346: 2114: 2025: 6591:

for an example of how it is done. Please let me know if you have any questions, or have a look at

1380:

seems to say that 8,800,000 of those 11,500,000 named accounts *never made a single edit*. Why???

8484: 7632: 6430:

administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the

5170: 5136:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:No_original_research#Primary.2C_secondary_and_tertiary_sources

4946:

by modifying 1 ""s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just

4247: 3378: 3226: 2615: 721: 692: 621: 183: 108: 72: 8614: 7571: 7563: 7154: 6269: 4302:

speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

4282:

Sri Lanka Kaffir language is not Sri Lankan Portuguese creole. So, the redirect is not right way

3284:

page, not realizing that it had not been deleted, but rather had been moved to a separate page:

146:, a product that contains one of your favorites - peroxycarbonate - as the active ingredient. -- 8511: 8495: 7802: 7782: 7257: 7193: 6757: 6431: 6239:, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not 6076: 6030: 5766: 5691: 5472: 5320: 3712: 3199: 420: 7671: 7216:. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted 6661: 5414:), impresses as distantly related to all the commercial or scientific information about acai, 5337:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

5055:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

4287: 836:

Knowledge does not consider "the contents of a website" to be a suitable topic for an article.

9212: 9194: 9094: 8912: 8897: 8737: 8379: 7947: 7707:

https://vi.wikipedia.org/%C4%90%E1%BB%8Bnh_l%C3%BD_t%C3%A1m_%C4%91%C6%B0%E1%BB%9Dng_tr%C3%B2n

7616: 7580:

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

7472: 6504: 6151: 6066: 6048: 5970: 5883: 5807: 5586: 5446:

Your essay/article is wonderful, and very though-provoking for a long-time Knowledge reader.

4722: 3952: 3285: 3258: 3069: 2995: 2989:.... If you are not yet a member, then I am sure that the project-members would welcome you. 2355: 1057: 1046: 992: 975: 766: 9224: 7316:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

4975: 4559:

Dear Dr. Jorge Stolfi, I am very thank to You for your comment. Best regards. Sincerely --

4388: 9105:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 8799: 8748:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 8390:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 7958:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 7894:

Again, if you have specific objections to the proposal, please offer them. All the best, --

7725: 7651: 7483:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 7414: 7398: 7339: 7201: 7097: 7034: 6990: 6938: 6884: 6804: 6766: 6700: 6636: 6624: 6563: 6515:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 6379:

it contains important information about an administrative situation on Knowledge. It does

6248: 6162:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 6017: 5894:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5818:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5718:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

5648: 5643:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

5513:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5289: 5271: 5252: 4983: 4919: 4643: 4582: 4454: 4396: 3591: 3572: 3561: 3365: 3325: 3311: 3304: 2731: 2546: 2526: 2475: 2125: 1857: 1737: 1706: 1626: 1486: 1339: 1238: 1122: 1010: 451: 175: 2795:

don't know where to categorize it, which is why there's a process for flagging it so that

2460:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Jorge Stolfi/Pre-Siberian American Aborigines

1976: 8: 9440: 9345: 9316: 9037: 8972: 8958: 8944: 8697: 8549: 8182: 8084: 7750: 7587: 7535: 7261: 7197: 6669: 6665: 6654: 6364:

The community is aware that these pages have been very disrupted by financial interests:

6113: 5518: 5384: 5107: 5102: 4998: 4492: 4118: 4074: 3775: 3634: 3614:

editors who might not be in the chem research business, which is what I do for a living.

3270: 3239: 3203: 3187: 3183: 3140: 2948: 2658: 2650: 2626: 2603: 2342: 2064: 2021: 1377: 794: 613: 589: 566: 296: 264: 151: 119: 8105: 6883:

sure it's an improvement, really. Lets get the earlier sections agreed first, anyway. --

4423: 4407: 2059:. How many of these do you think we should cite? From your skeptical fellow editor, -- 1208:"plot shows is new *articles*, not new *editors*": Sorry, pasted the wrong link, here's 8877: 8825: 8480: 8167:

Hi, sorry for this comment completely out of context. It is about your templates. --LG,

7691: 7628: 7169: 6730: 6677: 6582: 6427: 4018: 3919: 3886: 3856: 3841: 3826: 3811: 3795: 3529: 3464: 3036: 2574: 2560: 2505: 2386: 2323: 2297: 2249: 2100: 2093: 1836: 1028: 688: 617: 459: 455: 383:

The seasonal pattern for article creation peaks at February and August. Have a look at

2172:

Gigs, let me know where, I would love to tweak the comments a bit myself for clarity.

1699:

http://download.wikimedia.org/enwiki/20100116/enwiki-20100116-stub-meta-history.xml.gz

311:

What are your definitions of "TooCuteForWikipedia"? Are there any common definitions?

288: 9546: 9533: 9504: 9448: 9407: 9327: 9284: 9231: 9076: 9046: 9004: 8881: 8719: 8664: 8362: 8304: 8259: 8224: 8051: 7930: 7895: 7853: 7793: 7773: 7686: 7681: 7455: 7290: 7269: 7239: 7205: 7145: 7020: 7005: 6944: 6923: 6919:

is an example by an unquestionable Roman. Search for "VIIII" and "CCCC", for example.

6902: 6850: 6785: 6716: 6603: 6491: 6297: 6138: 6098: 6082: 6010: 5983: 5870: 5852: 5840: 5794: 5776: 5762: 5711: 5687: 5636: 5494: 5485: 5419: 5392: 5351: 5225: 5174: 5166: 5069: 4939: 4798: 4741: 4681: 4677: 4636: 4632: 4610: 4323: 4225: 4193: 4174: 4143: 3910: 3770:

I edited the MOS. Take a look, nothing sinister. We want this thing to be concise.--

3472: 3465: 3448:

tags and such, but not EVERYTHING that's a math symbol needs to be inside math tags.

3168: 2916: 2832: 2681: 2611: 2406: 2366: 2220: 2155: 2078: 2015: 1999: 1903: 1776: 1675: 1554: 1402: 1274: 1187: 1169: 1082: 941: 902: 822: 707: 673: 655: 640: 574: 417: 256: 9394: 8991: 8651: 8038: 7676: 5338: 5056: 2592: 1041: 555: 9191: 9125: 9090: 8768: 8733: 8410: 8375: 8168: 8150: 8098: 7978: 7943: 7503: 7468: 7358: 6916: 6647: 6554: 6500: 6466: 6350: 6147: 6062: 6044: 5879: 5803: 5736: 5582: 5514: 5498: 4316: 4059: 4050: 3948: 3765: 3507: 3485: 3404: 3389: 3338: 3107: 3065: 2979: 2962: 2535: 2056: 1874: 1864: 1843: 1829: 1053: 988: 984:

Saw your question on Somnath Bhattacharya, there are several news sources, for ex:

971: 762: 546: 401: 241: 8222:

is to be believed) the contemporaneous Chinese called the coin "<something: -->

8187:

I support your changes. But I guess inadvertently, you have left a section header

7534:

you made unsourced claims about the Voynich manuscript and Asiatic languages. Per

7334:. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called 6729:

Thank you for that. It is certainly better now. I would appreciate it if you kept

4781:

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/AdvancedPlaneGeometry/conversations/topics/774

4774:

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/AdvancedPlaneGeometry/conversations/topics/773

4290:, articles that do not meet basic Knowledge criteria may be deleted at any time. 4088:

I just read some of the kerfuffle about stub elimination from a couple years ago.

1183: 8319: 8286: 7889: 7818: 7647: 7335: 7220: 7057: 6901:

Do you mind if I restore my edits to the "Alternative" and "History" sections? --

6897:

There are many from 79 AD (Roman coins), one from 4th century, one from 581 AD...

6644: 6559: 6060:

https://archive.org/stream/bub_gb_l6hSAAAAcAAJ#page/n165/mode/2up/search/Sinapius

5463: 5267: 5248: 5178: 4979: 4930: 4515: 4480:

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at

4449: 4392: 4334: 4004:

want to know if it is good enough from your point of view. So let us communicate.

3619: 3568: 3456: 3160: 2727: 2715: 2591:

While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

2542: 2522: 2471: 2121: 1733: 1702: 1622: 1482: 1335: 1314: 1234: 1118: 957: 781: 554:

While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

447: 347:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

179: 9393:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

8990:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

8650:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

8037:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

6263:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

6235:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

6042:

https://archive.org/stream/bub_gb_m6hSAAAAcAAJ#page/n91/mode/2up/search/Sinapius

1263: 201:

The IBM/360 Assembler language contained numerous ways of defining records. eg.

9341: 9312: 9298: 9220: 9102: 8940: 8846: 8745: 8544: 8387: 8219: 7955: 7872: 7830: 7746: 7480: 7389: 7331: 7209: 7122: 6758: 6548: 6512: 6409: 6399: 6283: 6159: 6109: 5891: 5815: 5754: 5679: 5510: 5502: 5427: 5415: 4974:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

4533: 4387:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

4307: 4209: 4166: 4070: 3771: 3649: 3630: 3266: 3136: 2972: 2944: 2654: 2484: 2187: 2144: 2060: 790: 467: 316: 292: 260: 147: 115: 6713:

CH may be used too, to mean the same thing; but are not in the IUPAC standard.

6329:

are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on

5753:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

5678:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

5473:

https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Jorge_Stolfi/DoW/Intro#Baseless_assumptions

3177: 279:, which you have expanded so well. There are zillions of these things. In Fe 54: 9098: 8870:

I saw the "= Yoël Arbeitman" in some reference, don't remember which. Indeed

8798:

Thanks for creating this - I was alerted to it because I created the article

8741: 8383: 8282: 7951: 7888:

I did put "merge" banners at the top of those articles. I believe I followed

7822: 7740: 7476: 7327: 7265: 7165: 6508: 6155: 5887: 5811: 5506: 5361:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

5079:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

4964:

glycosides''' are the ] responsible for the sweet taste of the leaves of the

4886: 4109: 3882: 3852: 3837: 3822: 3807: 3791: 3756: 3732: 3703: 3683: 3557: 3525: 3293: 3119: 3115: 3032: 2621:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

2495: 2463: 2455: 2382: 2312: 2286: 2245: 1937: 1807: 1764: 967: 584:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

58: 21: 9268:

Could I count on your support in the future to introduce it to the article?

4374:

in fact coincided with what ] considered the height of summer and ''[[yang (

3721:

There is also the whole "never ascribe to evil what stupidity can explain".

2811:

be directly accessible from the category system. That you don't think a tag

2673: 2307:(The barnstar template seems to complain if I include links, but I refer to 778:

Where you display it is up to you. Feel free to move it to your talk page.

9542: 9500: 9444: 7283: 7251: 7232: 6596: 5836: 5408: 5388: 4343: 4189: 4184:

OK, I have now replaced your drawing by a correct one which I found in the

4170: 4126: 3906: 3877:

I'll be tied up with real work for a while. Please take your questions to

3623: 2912: 2828: 2677: 2402: 2362: 1972: 937: 898: 818: 669: 636: 9417:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

9014:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

8674:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

8136: 8061:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

7200:. While you are welcome to re-use Knowledge's content, here or elsewhere, 5603: 3905:

the markup easier to use and I will use this myself in future. My thanks.

2926: 8668: 8453: 8437: 8088: 7208:

at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and

6462: 6346: 6215:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

6102: 6086: 5411:, doesn't have a botanical relationship (Purpura is the gastropod genus, 5207: 4785:

This is nice property of median line and the centroid of any triangle.

4312: 4239: 4185: 4119: 3498: 3476: 3400: 3385: 3100: 2802:

At any rate, the core point is that there's actually a policy explicitly

1988: 1393: 397: 237: 178:. Honestly, despite your CS professorship, you're starting to act like a 9109:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

8815: 8752:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

8394:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

7962:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

7768:, where you submitted evidence. I thought you might want to review the 7702:

http://www.journal-1.eu/2016-2/Dao-Thanh-Oai-sixteen-points-pp.21-24.pdf

7487:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

7309: 6519:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

6369: 6166:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

5898:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

5822:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4999:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dao%27s_theorem

4465: 2051:

have interesting magnetic properties." Interesting - says who? 84,000

1373: 633:

User:Jorge_Stolfi/Death_of_Wikipedia/Why_uniformity_should_not_be_a_goal

340: 60: 9086:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

8821:

Standard format is "(died 1981)" rather than "(-1981)": I've fixed that

8729:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

8372:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

7940:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

7696: 7556:

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

7465:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

6859:(Paleochristian tombstone for baby 1 yr 9 months, 4th century AD, Rome) 6853:(Coin by the Republic of Venice, 1787, year 9 of duke Renier's mandate) 6395: 5723: 5459: 4511: 4368:

its use for protection against disease, snakes, and evil spirits. The ]

3961: 3452: 2865: 2566: 1900:

database, without any clear scope or plan" I would never had bothered.

525: 7256:

OK. Just for the record, at some point in the past the whole articles

6406:. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a 6254:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

4377:

an ] containing or made of realgar. Realgar is also used in Chinese "

4293:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

1998:

Well,time to go home. Thanks for a pleasant chat, and all the best, --

9216: 9067: 8863: 8837: 8710: 8576: 8560: 8354: 8111: 7922: 7883: 7868: 7842: 7826: 7447: 7118: 6734: 6482: 6274: 6129: 6001:. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read 5989: 5861: 5785: 5423: 4162: 3281: 2758:

to getting articles properly categorized, a whole team of people who

2183: 2173: 2140: 1856:

Moreover, a WP article can carry only one infobox. Therefore, in the

987:

and couple of other journals / books which I cannot recollect now. --

171: 167: 9181:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Proofs of elementary ring properties

7849:

Please give specific objections, rather than just "needs dscussion".

4208:

Hey Jorge Stolfi. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the

2335: 2270: 2229: 1571:

What gets me is the term "leave". There is nothing to indicate that

9537:

with another article. If you are interested, please participate in

9388:

Little more than a dictionary definition - nothing shows notability

9202: 6863:

Chronicon Marius ... 531, Indictione VIIII, P.C. Lampadi et Orestis

6345:

and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you.

6247:, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about 4881: 4105: 3752: 3728: 3699: 3679: 3653: 3289: 3257:

Hello Jorge Stolfi, I started a discussion on a possible merger of

2422: 1932: 1802: 1759: 534:

Jorge Stolfi/Death of Knowledge/Why uniformity should not be a goal

520:

Jorge Stolfi/Death of Knowledge/Why uniformity should not be a goal

170:

cannot actually be stored; it's one of the key differences between

143: 56: 6321:. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a 5727: 5652: 4935: 4339: 3280:

Hi - I restored the section "linear viscous stress tensor" to the

2454:, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for 758:

List of minor characters from The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

730: 6706: 5501:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

5221: 5220:

Thank you for your work to point out areas of improvement on the

5050:

for deletion, i.e. an attempt to circumvent the deletion process.

4536:, so You are knowledgeable classical geometry, please read pages 4532:

Dear Jorge Stolfi, I known You because You are creator of pages

3897: 2055:

publications appeared in 2003 alone. More each year. Check out

2020:

Could you kindly weigh in on new thread on PV talk page? Thanks.

786: 276: 9122:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 8880:

was a disamb page, but seem that I missed the warning. Sorry. --

8765:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 8407:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 7975:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 7821:. This usually takes weeks of discussion before a merge occurs, 7500:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 7322:

imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

6865:(Chronicle of years 455-581, from 581 AD, Lausanne, Switzerland) 5962:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Hexahydroxy-2,3-naphthalenedione

4350:

by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just

4161:

Hello. Could you please correct your drawing of the CH3+ ion at

3208:

There is currently no consensus on where to place this template.

3023:

Hi, I see that you were doing a lot of very useful rewriting of

2939:

There's a discussion on one of your favorite topics going on at

2773:

Sometimes, furthermore, the appropriate category for an article

1450:? The most we can say that activity patterns have shifted. Take 1096:"Knowledge is not recruiting any new editors": That is not what 687:

Sorry - I should have caught the missing "User" from the title.

9522: 9112:

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

9080:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All

8755:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

8723:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

8633: 8619: 8397:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

7965:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

7490:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

6629:

Tank you for your message. I have replied to it on my talkpage.

6522:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

6169:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

5901:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

5825:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

4943: 4347: 3657: 2048: 1959:

entries; but I have never met a worse salesman than myself...).

1182:

PS. In the usability initiative, I was referring explicitly to

130: 8366:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

7934:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

7608: 7214:

copied content from ]; see that page's history for attribution

7184: 6862: 6383:

imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

6310: 5437:

Comments on "Knowledge is dying" (User:Jorge Stolfi/DoW/Intro)

5243:

You might like to contribute to the discussion on accuracy at

2466:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

1511:

Sorry if I wasn't clear, in my theory the established editors

1226:

can edit. There are rules, sure. But any game has rules, even

61: 7615:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

6817:

Here are some examples of "VIIII", per gratia Sancti Googli:

5993:

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as

5412: 2437:

Infoboxes are WikiSpam! Keep up the good work fighting them!

1227: 1150: 134: 8645:

Does not belong in an encyclopedia, is already in Wiktionary

7192:

to Knowledge. It appears that you copied or moved text from

4045:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3984:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3942:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3361:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3324:

I tweaked the nomenclature section, is it missing anything?

2216:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2110:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1596:

What makes you think that (only) editors will do the rating?

510:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

458:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the

9527: 9515: 7672:

https://ijgeometry.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/49-53.pdf

7179:

Copying within Knowledge requires attribution (2nd request)

6578: 5264:

Properties of iron hydride at high temperature and pressure

3236:

Impact_of_editorial_tags_on_the_recruitment_of_new_editors,

2044: 1602:

I recall reading an estimate of upwards of 400 million. ^_^

1541:

all the current and future editors will do before leaving.

1034: 631:

You created the essay in the main article space. Moved to:

8285:, do that 12.5 escudos is written as 12$ 50. Prior to the 6833:

Mangostanaxanthone VIIII, a new xanthone from Garcinia ...

5997:, to Knowledge, as doing so is not in accordance with our 4970:

n plant '']'' (]), and the main ingredients (or [[chemical

3551:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Noise (signal processing)

6821:

CAIETANII LAVRENTII ... VIIII K.{Kalendas?} MDCCLXXXVIIII

3878: 1835:

in Knowledge is about 1/10 of the number of entries that

436: 349:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

9490:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Spindle (disc packaging)

7459:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

6101:, each silicon atom occupies the center of an idealized 6085:, each silicon atom occupies the center of an idealized 2262:

Barnstar - For your comments at the unreferenced BLP RFC

1136:

what the plots mean in terms of editor recruitment, see

9473:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

9435:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

9164:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

9093:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

9032:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

8911:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

8736:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

8692:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

8574:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

8509:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

8451:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

8378:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

8079:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

8032:

Non-notable association, nothing to suggest notability.

7946:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

7471:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

6673: 6613: 6503:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

6150:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

5943:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

5882:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

5806:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

5574:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Mathcad rounding syntax

5555:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

5418:

and the use in Brazil you refer to is excludable under

5379:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

5097:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

4872:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Dao's six point circle

4853:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

4421:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

3190:

when active on an article's page, places an entry in a

2819:

than it is that each and every page meet your personal

2517:

User talk:Jorge Stolfi/Pre-Siberian American Aborigines

2468:

User talk:Jorge Stolfi/Pre-Siberian American Aborigines

2452:

User talk:Jorge Stolfi/Pre-Siberian American Aborigines

2446:

User talk:Jorge Stolfi/Pre-Siberian American Aborigines

9400:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

8997:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

8657:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

8532:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Randomization function

8519:, is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to 8044:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

5344:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

5062:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

4544:. Thank to You very much. Best regards. Sincerely -- 4488:

incident in which you may be involved. Thank you.

2598:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

1902:

Anyway, thanks for your comments, and all the best, --

561:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

8928:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Proto-Altaic language

7766:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Medicine/Evidence

6943:

By the way, the first hit of "VIIII" is "19,000". --

6733:

on your watch list for a few days while it is on the

4540:

and comment anything You think. Delete or keep pages

4471:

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

3881:

and I'm sure you'll get a lot of insightful answers.

225:

4 unamed fields of 20 bytes each comprising a record

9477:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

9168:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

8915:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

8580:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

8457:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

8223:

pillar(s)" But I will try to find a better source.--

7692:

http://forumgeom.fau.edu/FG2018volume18/FG201845.pdf

6985:

Yeah, OK - but I was actually talking about "VIIII"

5949:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

5561:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

4859:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

4427:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

3263:

Talk:Newtonian fluid#Merger of viscous stress tensor

3214:

not where in Wikispace. --15:44, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

962:

Appreciate the cleanup you have done on the article

15: 5018:

Proposed deletion of Dao's six circumcenter theorem

4820:I am graterful to You, I am thank to You very much 1454:: 11 edits in my first month, then nothing for two 289:

http://www.3dchem.com/inorganicmolecule.asp?id=245#

137:. It would be interesting to know a lot more about 8874:Probably another mixup. Will delete that "=" then. 8805:A question and a couple of points of information: 7687:https://cms.math.ca/crux/v41/n5/Solutions_41_5.pdf 7682:https://cms.math.ca/crux/v40/n5/Solutions_40_5.pdf 6009:. If you would like to experiment, please use the 5995:User:Jorge Stolfi/Hexahydroxy-2,3-naphthalenedione 3938:Message added 08:00, 13 March 2013 (UTC). You can 2714:. Thanks, and if you object then let me know :o) 1897:databases, PubChem (public) and CAS (commercial). 255:Hi Jorge. I slashed your definitional section in 8818:later. So where did you find the ""? I'm puzzled. 8802:a long time ago, and was alerted by links to it. 7677:https://cms.math.ca/crux/v39/n5/Problems_39_5.pdf 5493:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 5247:. I believe you were the creator of the article. 5181:original these theorem also are their problems. 4440:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Les géants de Mu 3626:? Or dont these guidelines apply to you either? 2489:Thanks for your comment on the AfD discussion of 1860:article, for example one must choose between the 1646:: Good point. I will try to get some actual data. 1439:The read-only user mistery is solved, I trust it? 1329:. This means that at least 98% of Knowledge will 4959:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: 4363:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: 2762:that their active priority. It's not a tweak to 2057:http://pubs.acs.org/cen/science/84/8448sci1.html 1975:'s "Trees" would definitely deserve an article, 484:Talkback re: Subroutine and the unreferenced tag 6618: 6577:Hi. It looks like you copied some content from 6402:. The details of these sanctions are described 5262:I have made a proposal to re-name the article: 4030:Hello, Jorge Stolfi. You have new messages at 3973:Hello, Jorge Stolfi. You have new messages at 3931:Hello, Jorge Stolfi. You have new messages at 3427:article was full of markup errors, so I had to 3350:Hello, Jorge Stolfi. You have new messages at 3195:Category:Articles needing additional references 3079:File:Ph-people-wolsey-1.jpg listed for deletion 2645:can result in deletion without discussion, and 2205:Hello, Jorge Stolfi. You have new messages at 2099:Hello, Jorge Stolfi. You have new messages at 869:However the currency info is still pure fantasy 608:can result in deletion without discussion, and 495:Hello, Jorge Stolfi. You have new messages at 197:COBOL was NOT the first language to use records 6442:. Administrators may impose sanctions such as 6237:section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion 4639:earlier when You note that me didn't add.... 966:. There are still problems related to POV and 478:user:Jorge Stolfi/Templates that I sorely miss 470:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. 430: 389:A few questions about predicting the future: 6619:_vs._{{Chem2}}-2019-04-01T17:54:00.000Z": --> 6614:_vs._{{Chem2}}-2019-04-01T17:54:00.000Z": --> 6573:Copying within Knowledge requires attribution 4169:, there should be no lone pair of electrons. 2781:exist in the form suggested. So a redlink is 2770:the article into that project's work queue. 1033:Here are the couple of discussion related to 668:No problem. Glad to have been of assistance. 7770:Guide to arbitration on submitting evidence; 7646:Thank you - I literally laughed out loud. -- 7047:Here is the Julius Caesar quote,by the way: 5456:A single help page seems like a good idea. 1979:; and I am tempted to start another one for 1444: 1442:"OUT": Huh? Who says that editors have left 8469:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Color image 7623:redirect, you might want to participate in 7353:For additional information, please see the 7338:is in effect. Any administrator may impose 5308:Proposed deletion of George McDowell School 5286:I am Dao Thanh Oai, Happy new year to You 4238:Jorge, could you please participate in the 1544:" There will always be new articles to add" 9521: 8254:literature and historical documents, like 7619:. Since you had some involvement with the 7350:, when making edits related to the topic. 4482:Knowledge:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 3451:I hope you understand my point. Cheers! — 2876:about biochemical compounds by navigating 1983:.) Recently I split off the tiny article 1608:Sure, but that pesky "if" is a problem. ;) 234:reserved storage for up to 9 card records 8592:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Math Suks 8189:Dollar sign#Drawn with two vertical lines 5161:Name after title of the article is normal 4613:, Yes OK, I will no edit any more around 2899:you know enough about them to know where 2420: 2268: 1525:"Productivity increases with experience": 728: 9253:I recently made a change to an article ( 6377:Please read this notification carefully, 5602: 3046:File:Fruitnveg-3.png listed for deletion 2334: 1052:Off-topic so dropping a message here. -- 9406:notice, but please explain why in your 9003:notice, but please explain why in your 8663:notice, but please explain why in your 8050:notice, but please explain why in your 6847:(History book, written in Latin, 1709?) 6660:Hi Jorge, I come to you after noticing 6217:the guide to writing your first article 5350:notice, but please explain why in your 5068:notice, but please explain why in your 4525:Please read and comment delete or keep 4240:Knowledge:Peer review/Fluorine/archive3 3605:Here's the deal on secondary references 2985:I may have missed your userbox for the 2610:notice, but please explain why in your 573:notice, but please explain why in your 9303:Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to 8876:The WP editor probably warned me that 8021:Damanese Portuguese-Indian Association 8007:Damanese Portuguese-Indian Association 7419:sorry! I have a tendency to over edit. 7342:on editors who do not strictly follow 7111:Please seek community consensus via RM 3231:Death_of_Wikipedia/Wikipedia_is_dying, 2987:Knowledge:WikiProject Computer science 2959:Knowledge:WikiProject Computer science 1385:Knowledge:Modelling Knowledge's growth 1138:Knowledge:Modelling Knowledge's growth 1002:Reversions made to "Acid test" article 378:Knowledge:Modelling Knowledge's growth 9215:, was "Gerber" a typo for "Graeber"? 6249:what is generally accepted as notable 4933:. I have automatically detected that 4337:. I have automatically detected that 3436:your old revision is still accessible 3229:. By the way, I just read your essay 3083:A file that you uploaded or altered, 3050:A file that you uploaded or altered, 1303:"plot presumably includes IP users": 1140:, specifically the "two-phase model". 162:Your change to Set (computer science) 9166:Proofs of elementary ring properties 9151:Proofs of elementary ring properties 9077:2023 Arbitration Committee elections 8720:2022 Arbitration Committee elections 8363:2021 Arbitration Committee elections 7931:2020 Arbitration Committee elections 7697:https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.10345.pdf 7456:2019 Arbitration Committee elections 7264:had been replaced by a redirects to 6851:PAULI REINERJ PRINC:MUNUS ANNO VIIII 6845:Antiquitates Britanno - Belgicae ... 6492:2018 Arbitration Committee elections 6139:2017 Arbitration Committee elections 6005:; you might also consider using the 5871:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 5795:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 2941:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Chemicals 1674:: Thanks again, and all the best, -- 1606:conceptually reasonable *if* IN = 0: 454:) has smiled at you! Smiles promote 9479:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 9170:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 9061:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message 8917:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 8704:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message 8582:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 8521:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 8459:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 8346:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message 7914:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message 7764:Hello, Jorge. I am a party to the 7355:guidance on discretionary sanctions 6489:Hello, Jorge Stolfi. Voting in the 6265:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 6222:You may want to consider using the 6136:Hello, Jorge Stolfi. Voting in the 6058:Okay found him in book III page 93 5951:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 5868:Hello, Jorge Stolfi. Voting in the 5792:Hello, Jorge Stolfi. Voting in the 5563:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 5407:acai for the English encyclopedia, 4861:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 4779:Profesor Garcia Capitan answer at: 4429:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 4304:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 3896:Thank you for wonderful editing of 3415:Eigenvector article revision errors 2855:category on it, is to be locatable 2850:for that queue, because it doesn't 13: 9395:deleted for any of several reasons 9383:because of the following concern: 9367: 8992:deleted for any of several reasons 8979:because of the following concern: 8963: 8652:deleted for any of several reasons 8640:because of the following concern: 8624: 8530:The discussion will take place at 8039:deleted for any of several reasons 8027:because of the following concern: 8011: 7607: 7601:"Spindle (fire making)" listed at 7439:ArbCom 2019 election voter message 7229:Knowledge:Copying within Knowledge 6476:ArbCom 2018 election voter message 6205: 6123:ArbCom 2017 election voter message 5339:deleted for any of several reasons 5327:because of the following concern: 5311: 5057:deleted for any of several reasons 5037:because of the following concern: 5021: 4266: 4023: 3966: 3924: 3785:Your changes to mechanics articles 3693:out of body reffing is interesting 3343: 2935:Inorganic vs organic dividing line 2593:deleted for any of several reasons 2581:because of the following concern: 2565: 2198: 2092: 1695:downloading the Wp database dumps: 1549:"Drop to zero or to a finite rate" 556:deleted for any of several reasons 540:because of the following concern: 524: 488: 435: 287:, the carbon is square pyramidal: 14: 9561: 9487:The article will be discussed at 9178:The article will be discussed at 8925:The article will be discussed at 8830:Lincoln University (Pennsylvania) 8590:The article will be discussed at 8467:The article will be discussed at 6827:Ars Gregoriana Supplementum VIIII 6553:Hi, i reverted your edits on the 6108:Hope things are well with you, -- 5960:The article will be discussed at 5572:The article will be discussed at 5519:review the candidates' statements 4870:The article will be discussed at 4438:The article will be discussed at 3975:Compression (physics)'s talk page 3933:Knowledge:Village pump (idea lab) 3126:Knowledge:Requests for undeletion 1612:fairly well an exponential decay: 1067:Knowledge's statistics and future 9467: 9158: 9066: 8905: 8709: 8568: 8502: 8445: 8353: 8135: 7921: 7446: 7308: 7183: 6899:I am busy now, will check later. 6705:I have revised those pages (and 6595:for more information. Thanks, — 6481: 6368: 6309: 6128: 5988: 5946:Hexahydroxy-2,3-naphthalenedione 5936: 5930:Hexahydroxy-2,3-naphthalenedione 5860: 5784: 5705: 5630: 5607:Illustration of typical stresses 5548: 5206: 4924: 4846: 4475: 4414: 4328: 4165:? As pointed out by User:Dan at 3644:I agree about the cite templates 2491:Administrator abuse on Knowledge 2421: 2376:Pre-Siberian American Aborigines 2269: 2228: 2039:"Mellitates (and salts of other 729: 412:User:Jorge Stolfi/Oxocarbon test 339: 20: 9307:, would you be interested in a 9257:) (after a previous extensive 9116:and submit your choices on the 8759:and submit your choices on the 8401:and submit your choices on the 8149:This is realy good. I like it! 7969:and submit your choices on the 7538:, I have removed the material ( 7494:and submit your choices on the 6526:and submit your choices on the 6366: 6173:and submit your choices on the 3836:but keep my comments in mind. 2975:, and thought I'd say "hello". 2704: 1849:es are still practically empty. 9551:17:17, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 8949:20:58, 16 September 2023 (UTC) 7425:—Your's sincerely, Soumyabrata 5525:. For the Election committee, 5495:Arbitration Committee election 5486:ArbCom elections are now open! 5031:Dao's six circumcenter theorem 4242:/upgrade party for Fluorine? 3556:If you're new to the process, 3334:11:50, 17 September 2013 (UTC) 3074:14:43, 11 September 2011 (UTC) 2971:I saw your (needed) caveat on 2703: 2496: 1151:Knowledge Usability Initiative 702:It is me who must apologize. " 480:, and wanted to thank you. ;) 246:09:09, 20 September 2009 (UTC) 1: 9240:19:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC) 9225:13:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC) 9198:06:23, 17 December 2023 (UTC) 9141:00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC) 9095:Knowledge arbitration process 9055:20:38, 15 November 2023 (UTC) 8890:10:58, 4 September 2023 (UTC) 8856:09:55, 4 September 2023 (UTC) 8784:00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC) 8738:Knowledge arbitration process 8489:19:14, 20 December 2021 (UTC) 8426:00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 8380:Knowledge arbitration process 7993:01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC) 7948:Knowledge arbitration process 7721:09:15, 24 December 2019 (UTC) 7656:07:58, 12 December 2019 (UTC) 7637:08:37, 24 November 2019 (UTC) 7596:21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC) 7551:08:54, 23 November 2019 (UTC) 7518:00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC) 7473:Knowledge arbitration process 6857:ANNo I MeNsibus VIIII IN PACE 6568:17:45, 14 February 2019 (UTC) 6542:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 6505:Knowledge arbitration process 6152:Knowledge arbitration process 5921:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 5884:Knowledge arbitration process 5845:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 5808:Knowledge arbitration process 5771:00:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC) 5701:Reference errors on 31 August 5626:Reference errors on 29 August 5535:22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC) 5480:11:28, 18 November 2015 (UTC) 5432:15:15, 12 February 2015 (UTC) 5132:Please help me check detail: 4635:, I am sorry because I wrote 4229:21:55, 1 September 2013 (UTC) 3915:02:02, 25 February 2013 (UTC) 3861:22:22, 26 February 2013 (UTC) 3846:22:22, 26 February 2013 (UTC) 3831:21:39, 25 February 2013 (UTC) 3816:21:39, 25 February 2013 (UTC) 3800:23:51, 24 February 2013 (UTC) 3780:15:52, 23 February 2013 (UTC) 3761:22:00, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 3737:16:07, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 3708:10:41, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 3688:10:37, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 3639:22:24, 17 February 2013 (UTC) 3600:20:55, 16 February 2013 (UTC) 3577:02:16, 12 February 2013 (UTC) 3150:10:20, 11 November 2011 (UTC) 3014:23:00, 22 February 2011 (UTC) 2736:07:19, 10 December 2010 (UTC) 2254:20:46, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 2177:12:21, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 2164:11:11, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 2149:04:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 2130:00:46, 22 February 2010 (UTC) 771:02:15, 30 December 2009 (UTC) 716:01:31, 21 December 2009 (UTC) 697:21:25, 20 December 2009 (UTC) 678:21:23, 20 December 2009 (UTC) 664:21:19, 20 December 2009 (UTC) 645:21:15, 20 December 2009 (UTC) 626:20:56, 20 December 2009 (UTC) 504:03:38, 20 December 2009 (UTC) 426:17:17, 15 December 2009 (UTC) 406:20:26, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 372:Your accurate two-phase model 367:10:04, 27 November 2009 (UTC) 324:06:04, 26 November 2009 (UTC) 301:20:41, 15 November 2009 (UTC) 269:18:54, 15 November 2009 (UTC) 9526:An article that you created— 9246:Function - formal definition 8793:Benjamin Schwartz (linguist) 8101:01:18, 31 January 2021 (UTC) 6245:criteria for speedy deletion 6226:to help you create articles. 6189:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 6071:21:11, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 6053:21:01, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 6003:Knowledge:Your first article 5397:18:02, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 5276:13:26, 5 December 2014 (UTC) 5257:13:34, 3 December 2014 (UTC) 5231:17:41, 22 October 2014 (UTC) 5194:16:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC) 5153:03:50, 16 October 2014 (UTC) 5117:23:57, 14 October 2014 (UTC) 5013:21:31, 13 October 2014 (UTC) 4988:04:40, 13 October 2014 (UTC) 4910:20:31, 13 October 2014 (UTC) 4891:20:10, 12 October 2014 (UTC) 4833:11:10, 11 October 2014 (UTC) 4716:Utility of the Cite template 4702:01:05, 10 October 2014 (UTC) 4676:Thank to You very much dear 4617:, thank to You very much, -- 4288:criteria for speedy deletion 4204:Article Feedback Tool update 3742:be still my beating heart... 3534:01:58, 8 February 2013 (UTC) 3513:15:13, 6 February 2013 (UTC) 3491:13:56, 6 February 2013 (UTC) 3460:02:16, 4 February 2013 (UTC) 3425:eigenvalues and eigenvectors 3409:14:28, 28 January 2013 (UTC) 3394:14:00, 28 January 2013 (UTC) 3374:03:49, 28 January 2013 (UTC) 3320:05:00, 27 January 2013 (UTC) 3298:05:09, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 3173:03:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC) 3159:There's an image missing on 3110:19:40, 25 October 2011 (UTC) 3089:Knowledge:Files for deletion 3056:Knowledge:Files for deletion 2953:05:00, 30 January 2011 (UTC) 2921:20:28, 12 January 2011 (UTC) 2837:05:42, 12 January 2011 (UTC) 2686:20:31, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 2087:21:35, 6 February 2010 (UTC) 2069:21:04, 6 February 2010 (UTC) 2030:15:10, 24 January 2010 (UTC) 2008:04:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC) 1942:02:55, 7 February 2010 (UTC) 1912:22:43, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 1812:20:16, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 1785:20:38, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 1769:20:16, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 1711:01:46, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 1684:22:56, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 1631:17:29, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 1563:07:07, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 1491:01:32, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 1411:22:30, 26 January 2010 (UTC) 1344:20:36, 26 January 2010 (UTC) 1283:17:13, 26 January 2010 (UTC) 1262:The statistics you want are 1243:13:39, 26 January 2010 (UTC) 1196:12:29, 26 January 2010 (UTC) 1178:12:05, 26 January 2010 (UTC) 1127:01:38, 26 January 2010 (UTC) 1091:23:00, 25 January 2010 (UTC) 1062:16:24, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1023:04:04, 18 January 2010 (UTC) 997:06:43, 12 January 2010 (UTC) 980:06:25, 12 January 2010 (UTC) 745:For removing the gratuitous 466:Smile at others by adding {{ 7: 9509:09:29, 24 August 2024 (UTC) 9453:09:26, 24 August 2024 (UTC) 9439:allows discussion to reach 9420:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 9403:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 9309:taskforce on oral tradition 9036:allows discussion to reach 9017:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 9000:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 8696:allows discussion to reach 8677:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 8660:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 8332:22:07, 14 August 2021 (UTC) 8313:14:26, 13 August 2021 (UTC) 8299:08:09, 13 August 2021 (UTC) 8268:21:50, 12 August 2021 (UTC) 8233:18:25, 12 August 2021 (UTC) 8205:17:49, 12 August 2021 (UTC) 8083:allows discussion to reach 8064:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 8047:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 7904:16:04, 30 August 2020 (UTC) 7877:15:39, 30 August 2020 (UTC) 7862:15:29, 30 August 2020 (UTC) 7835:15:22, 30 August 2020 (UTC) 7326:You have shown interest in 6593:WP:Copying within Knowledge 6360:General sanctions on crypto 5905:and submit your choices on 5829:and submit your choices on 5696:00:20, 30 August 2016 (UTC) 5621:08:02, 19 August 2016 (UTC) 5596:Cmec_stress_ball_f02_t6.png 5521:and submit your choices on 5468:09:03, 7 October 2015 (UTC) 5383:allows discussion to reach 5364:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 5347:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 5302:03:46, 1 January 2015 (UTC) 5125:Please help me check detail 5101:allows discussion to reach 5082:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 5065:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 4731:13:31, 8 October 2014 (UTC) 4660:15:49, 9 October 2014 (UTC) 4627:04:52, 9 October 2014 (UTC) 4599:07:16, 6 October 2014 (UTC) 4569:06:21, 5 October 2014 (UTC) 4554:04:23, 5 October 2014 (UTC) 4520:18:43, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 4252:18:00, 6 October 2013 (UTC) 3352:Plasmic Physics's talk page 3275:14:12, 3 October 2012 (UTC) 3085:File:Ph-people-wolsey-1.jpg 2857:through the category system 2672:Hi, in your drawing titled 2663:13:49, 31 August 2010 (UTC) 2649:allows discussion to reach 2041:benzene polycaboxylic acids 1689:typical productive editing: 1478:independent of the data set 1117:have to do it? ;) Regards, 946:17:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC) 907:13:36, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 827:03:29, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 799:16:45, 3 January 2010 (UTC) 612:allows discussion to reach 192:19:39, 18 August 2009 (UTC) 10: 9566: 9431:exist. In particular, the 9350:19:09, 1 August 2024 (UTC) 9336:19:03, 1 August 2024 (UTC) 9321:18:29, 1 August 2024 (UTC) 9293:10:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC) 9278:12:45, 12 March 2024 (UTC) 9133:MediaWiki message delivery 9028:exist. In particular, the 8872:Kerns died in October 1975 8776:MediaWiki message delivery 8688:exist. In particular, the 8418:MediaWiki message delivery 8075:exist. In particular, the 7985:MediaWiki message delivery 7807:13:34, 15 April 2020 (UTC) 7787:02:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC) 7510:MediaWiki message delivery 7388:Strange multiple edits of 7348:page-specific restrictions 7212:to the copied page, e.g., 7134:07:59, 30 April 2019 (UTC) 7106:23:31, 22 April 2019 (UTC) 7043:12:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC) 7029:05:50, 23 April 2019 (UTC) 7014:05:36, 23 April 2019 (UTC) 6999:03:23, 23 April 2019 (UTC) 6953:10:41, 22 April 2019 (UTC) 6932:10:38, 22 April 2019 (UTC) 6911:10:01, 22 April 2019 (UTC) 6893:09:55, 22 April 2019 (UTC) 6813:06:08, 22 April 2019 (UTC) 6794:23:40, 21 April 2019 (UTC) 6775:22:08, 21 April 2019 (UTC) 6750:20:58, 20 April 2019 (UTC) 6725:19:51, 20 April 2019 (UTC) 6693:12:39, 20 April 2019 (UTC) 6608:14:33, 31 March 2019 (UTC) 6534:MediaWiki message delivery 6390:has authorised the use of 6339:not for general discussion 6181:MediaWiki message delivery 5913:MediaWiki message delivery 5903:the candidates' statements 5827:the candidates' statements 5527:MediaWiki message delivery 5375:exist. In particular, the 5093:exist. In particular, the 4993:Please see my last comment 4976:these opt-out instructions 4389:these opt-out instructions 4157:Methenium has no lone pair 4079:09:40, 10 April 2013 (UTC) 4055:16:52, 17 March 2013 (UTC) 4039:16:52, 17 March 2013 (UTC) 4014:18:12, 15 March 2013 (UTC) 3999:17:43, 15 March 2013 (UTC) 3957:08:00, 13 March 2013 (UTC) 3539:Deletion discussion about 3041:18:50, 8 August 2011 (UTC) 2878:Category:Organic compounds 2691:Your Wisdom has been Noted 2391:07:42, 24 March 2010 (UTC) 2371:16:35, 19 March 2010 (UTC) 1742:21:35, 12 March 2010 (UTC) 1619:forcin me to think harder: 1538:"who does the selection?": 1217:a Rome built by barbarians 1047:Talk:Mahabharata#Move_back 804:Re: Aerican empire infobox 755:template from the article 156:00:15, 2 August 2009 (UTC) 124:22:07, 1 August 2009 (UTC) 9425:proposed deletion process 9305:Saci (Brazilian folklore) 9022:proposed deletion process 8682:proposed deletion process 8610:19:48, 16 June 2022 (UTC) 8517:significantly contributed 8134: 8069:proposed deletion process 7755:00:42, 2 March 2020 (UTC) 7664:The Eight circles theorem 7433:06:47, 28 June 2019 (UTC) 6642:17:54, 1 April 2019 (UTC) 6471:14:22, 22 June 2018 (UTC) 6394:for pages related to the 6355:14:20, 22 June 2018 (UTC) 6231:A tag has been placed on 6026:15:59, 22 July 2017 (UTC) 5979:12:10, 21 July 2017 (UTC) 5591:02:13, 27 June 2016 (UTC) 5369:proposed deletion process 5205: 5087:proposed deletion process 5003:Thank to You very much.-- 4501:19:19, 31 July 2014 (UTC) 4461:21:08, 17 June 2014 (UTC) 4401:16:08, 11 June 2014 (UTC) 4319:11:16, 3 March 2014 (UTC) 4276:Sri Lanka Kaffir language 4274:A tag has been placed on 4262:Sri Lanka Kaffir language 4222:drop them at the talkpage 4179:02:11, 17 June 2013 (UTC) 4152:18:43, 15 June 2013 (UTC) 4114:21:47, 11 June 2013 (UTC) 4067:join the Top 2500 editors 3891:02:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC) 3541:Noise (signal processing) 3248:17:41, 17 June 2012 (UTC) 3025:Cyclohexane conformations 3019:Cyclohexane conformations 2702: 2635:proposed deletion process 2551:19:01, 29 June 2010 (UTC) 2531:15:04, 29 June 2010 (UTC) 2512:04:37, 29 June 2010 (UTC) 2427: 2411:14:40, 2 April 2010 (UTC) 2351:11:59, 1 March 2010 (UTC) 2326:10:09, 1 March 2010 (UTC) 2300:10:09, 1 March 2010 (UTC) 2275: 2234: 2227: 2135:Your essay on the bLP RfC 1985:alizarine crimson (color) 1981:Woodsman, spare that tree 1269:in the limit.<bt/: --> 735: 704:Honi soit qui mal y pense 598:proposed deletion process 476:Had a good laugh reading 385:Google Insight for Search 103:04:14, 25 July 2009 (UTC) 88:23:42, 24 July 2009 (UTC) 9481:or whether it should be 9475:Spindle (disc packaging) 9460:Spindle (disc packaging) 9377:Spindle (disc packaging) 9363:Spindle (disc packaging) 9331: 9288: 9235: 9172:or whether it should be 9130:to your user talk page. 9050: 8919:or whether it should be 8885: 8773:to your user talk page. 8584:or whether it should be 8554:01:04, 25 May 2022 (UTC) 8461:or whether it should be 8415:to your user talk page. 8308: 8263: 8228: 8177:18:26, 20 May 2021 (UTC) 8159:18:21, 20 May 2021 (UTC) 8128:Du erhältst einen Orden! 7983:to your user talk page. 7899: 7857: 7813:Merging the fat articles 7603:Redirects for discussion 7508:to your user talk page. 7407:19:55, 9 June 2019 (UTC) 7383:14:18, 20 May 2019 (UTC) 7295:12:36, 17 May 2019 (UTC) 7278:09:10, 17 May 2019 (UTC) 7273: 7244:20:52, 15 May 2019 (UTC) 7174:20:18, 14 May 2019 (UTC) 7058:DeVitte-Bohn translation 7024: 7009: 6948: 6927: 6906: 6835:(by Arab chemists, 2019) 6789: 6720: 6668:on the following pages: 6293:07:20, 28 May 2018 (UTC) 6118:03:09, 13 May 2018 (UTC) 5953:or whether it should be 5759:report it to my operator 5684:report it to my operator 5565:or whether it should be 5332:Non-notable grade school 5245:Talk:Iron–hydrogen alloy 5140:I am very thank to You. 5129:Dear Dr. Jorge Stolfi, 4863:or whether it should be 4431:or whether it should be 4198:01:22, 19 May 2014 (UTC) 3746:u r into chemistry too? 3590:in a favourable manner. 3155:List of oxocarbon anions 2396:Jorge Stolfi is my hero! 2159: 2082: 2003: 1907: 1780: 1679: 1666:how close to exponential 1558: 1406: 1278: 1191: 1173: 1086: 1042:Talk:Kali#Requested_move 711: 9412:the article's talk page 9009:the article's talk page 8669:the article's talk page 8106:Oxocarbon illustrations 8056:the article's talk page 7627:if you wish to do so. 7625:the redirect discussion 7359:Arbitration Committee's 7336:discretionary sanctions 7194:Specific heat capacity 6841:from Titus time, ~79 AD 6335:policies and guidelines 5558:Mathcad rounding syntax 5542:Mathcad rounding syntax 5356:the article's talk page 5171:Droz-Farny line theorem 5074:the article's talk page 4952:my operator's talk page 4356:my operator's talk page 2889:on Knowledge, and then 2697:(and attributed to you) 2643:speedy deletion process 2616:the article's talk page 2480:19:07, 9 May 2010 (UTC) 2035:Interesting - says who? 1727:how many living species 606:speedy deletion process 579:the article's talk page 547:not for personal essays 497:Pointillist's talk page 330:Nomination for deletion 174:and void, as explained 9514:Merger discussion for 9391: 9372: 8988: 8968: 8816:a book commemorating K 8648: 8629: 8540:the configuration page 8512:Randomization function 8496:Randomization function 8191:without any content. 8118:Boring Internet Person 8035: 8016: 7612: 7258:specific heat capacity 6436:standards of behaviour 6412:per twenty-four hours 6270:deleting administrator 6256:contest the nomination 6228: 6210: 5716:automatically detected 5641:automatically detected 5608: 5321:George McDowell School 5316: 5165:Please see history of 5026: 4856:Dao's six point circle 4840:Dao's six point circle 4758:Dao's six point circle 4738:Dao's six point circle 4690:Dao's six point circle 4295:contest the nomination 4271: 4028: 3971: 3929: 3546:Hello, Jorge Stolfi, 3348: 3218:Invitation for comment 3206:. Note, when it says 2741:Uncategorized articles 2570: 2462:and please be sure to 2431:The Anti-Spam Barnstar 2339: 2203: 2097: 1445: 529: 493: 440: 9539:the merger discussion 9437:articles for deletion 9385: 9381:proposed for deletion 9371: 9213:Talk:History of money 9091:Arbitration Committee 9074:Hello! Voting in the 9034:articles for deletion 8981: 8977:proposed for deletion 8967: 8913:Proto-Altaic language 8898:Proto-Altaic language 8734:Arbitration Committee 8717:Hello! Voting in the 8694:articles for deletion 8642: 8638:proposed for deletion 8628: 8376:Arbitration Committee 8360:Hello! Voting in the 8324:John Maynard Friedman 8291:John Maynard Friedman 8244:John Maynard Friedman 8213:John Maynard Friedman 8197:John Maynard Friedman 8081:articles for deletion 8029: 8025:proposed for deletion 8015: 7944:Arbitration Committee 7928:Hello! Voting in the 7642:Templates that I miss 7621:Spindle (fire making) 7617:Spindle (fire making) 7611: 7469:Arbitration Committee 7453:Hello! Voting in the 7202:Knowledge's licensing 6501:Arbitration Committee 6325:, talk pages such as 6233:Liquid Glass Nanotech 6213: 6209: 6201:Liquid Glass Nanotech 6148:Arbitration Committee 6097:silicates, including 5880:Arbitration Committee 5853:ArbCom Elections 2016 5804:Arbitration Committee 5777:ArbCom Elections 2016 5657:broken reference name 5606: 5499:Arbitration Committee 5381:articles for deletion 5325:proposed for deletion 5315: 5282:Happy new year to You 5214:The Editor's Barnstar 5099:articles for deletion 5035:proposed for deletion 5025: 4772:Original I posted at 4484:regarding a possible 4270: 4210:Article Feedback Tool 4027: 3970: 3928: 3558:articles for deletion 3347: 3286:Viscous stress tensor 3259:Viscous stress tensor 3253:Viscous stress tensor 3087:, has been listed at 3054:, has been listed at 2968:Hi Professor Stolfi! 2901:Category:Curcubitanes 2870:Category:curcubitanes 2674:Coord system CA 0.svg 2668:Coord system CA 0.svg 2647:articles for deletion 2579:proposed for deletion 2569: 2338: 2279:The Socratic Barnstar 2202: 2096: 610:articles for deletion 538:proposed for deletion 528: 492: 439: 321:let it off your chest 314:Warmest Regards, :)-- 307:"TooCuteForWikipedia" 9230:Yes, thanks! Fixed. 8800:Benjamin I. Schwartz 8515:, to which you have 7344:Knowledge's policies 6823:(Church Latin, 1789) 6653:Chemical symbol for 6648:_vs._{{Chem2}}": --> 6645:_vs._{{Chem2}}": --> 6641:_vs._{{Chem2}}": --> 6625:_vs._{{Chem2}}": --> 6444:editing restrictions 6432:purpose of Knowledge 6315:Welcome to Knowledge 5649:Copper(II) carbonate 5600:Hallo Jorge Stolfi, 4942:may have broken the 4486:conflict of interest 4346:may have broken the 4234:Science article help 3873:Stress measures etc. 3582:Assistance requested 3519:Re: Hooke's law etc. 3305:Methylene (compound) 3212:where in the article 3052:File:Fruitnveg-3.png 2101:Jdrewitt's talk page 1858:acetylsalicylic acid 1656:400 million articles 1621:Happy to oblige. ;) 1600:always new articles: 1476:. You need criteria 1474:entirely meaningless 739:The Special Barnstar 376:Your new section at 8973:Alpha-Propiolactone 8959:Alpha-Propiolactone 8523:or if it should be 7588:User:Martin Urbanec 7543:Geographyinitiative 7262:molar heat capacity 7198:Molar heat capacity 7139:"Please do not use 6670:Methylidyne radical 6666:Methylidyne radical 6655:Methylidyne radical 5503:arbitration process 5402:Acai, Purpura bacca 5239:Iron–hydrogen alloy 5199:A barnstar for you! 5186:Eightcirclestheorem 5145:Eightcirclestheorem 5005:Eightcirclestheorem 4902:Eightcirclestheorem 4825:Eightcirclestheorem 4694:Eightcirclestheorem 4686:Van Lamoen's circle 4648:Eightcirclestheorem 4619:Eightcirclestheorem 4587:Eightcirclestheorem 4561:Eightcirclestheorem 4546:Eightcirclestheorem 4506:Occidental Language 3204:Template:Refimprove 1791:Virtue of infoboxes 1752:Editors are leaving 232:RECORDS DS 9CL80 223:CARD DS 4CL20 205:CARD DS 0CL80 9429:deletion processes 9373: 9107:arbitration policy 9026:deletion processes 8969: 8878:Lincoln University 8826:Lincoln University 8750:arbitration policy 8686:deletion processes 8630: 8392:arbitration policy 8073:deletion processes 8017: 7960:arbitration policy 7613: 7570:Please sign up at 7485:arbitration policy 7190:your contributions 6731:Helium hydride ion 6678:Helium hydride ion 6583:Allotropes of iron 6517:arbitration policy 6388:community decision 6343:our reference desk 6327:Talk:Bitccoin Cash 6319:your contributions 6317:and thank you for 6211: 6164:arbitration policy 5896:arbitration policy 5855:: Voting now open! 5820:arbitration policy 5779:: Voting now open! 5609: 5515:arbitration policy 5373:deletion processes 5317: 5091:deletion processes 5027: 4272: 4043:remove this notice 4032:Mabdul's talk page 4029: 3982:remove this notice 3972: 3940:remove this notice 3930: 3359:remove this notice 3349: 3178:Template placement 2639:deletion processes 2575:Social environment 2571: 2561:Social environment 2464:sign your comments 2444:MfD nomination of 2340: 2238:The Chemistry Star 2214:remove this notice 2204: 2108:remove this notice 2098: 1837:Chemical Abstracts 1327:in your whole life 602:deletion processes 530: 508:remove this notice 494: 444:Hello Jorge Stolfi 441: 9359:Proposed deletion 9270:Kamil Kielczewski 9143: 8955:Proposed deletion 8786: 8616:Proposed deletion 8433: 8432: 8428: 8164: 8163: 8143:Der Beitragsorden 8003:Proposed deletion 7999: 7998: 7737: 7728:comment added by 7524: 7523: 6588:this edit summary 6424:General sanctions 6392:general sanctions 6260:visiting the page 6241:credibly indicate 6099:silicate minerals 6083:silicate minerals 5740: 5665: 5304: 5292:comment added by 5236: 5235: 5167:van Lamoen circle 5110: 4940:Steviol glycoside 4682:Van Lamoen circle 4663: 4646:comment added by 4637:Van Lamoen circle 4633:Van Lamoen circle 4602: 4585:comment added by 4299:visiting the page 4084:stubs versus tags 4053: 3562:how to contribute 3091:. Please see the 3058:. Please see the 3007: 2980:oriented matroids 2963:oriented matroids 2882:not going to find 2557:Proposed deletion 2441: 2440: 2305: 2304: 2259: 2258: 1110:with the outcome. 1013:comment added by 776: 775: 750:citations missing 516:Proposed deletion 472: 363: 319: 291:. Best wishes,-- 257:organic chemistry 251:Organic chemistry 189: 67: 66: 9557: 9525: 9471: 9470: 9422: 9421: 9405: 9404: 9370: 9162: 9161: 9131: 9129: 9070: 9019: 9018: 9002: 9001: 8966: 8909: 8908: 8867: 8853: 8844: 8774: 8772: 8713: 8679: 8678: 8662: 8661: 8627: 8607: 8605:Ten Pound Hammer 8572: 8571: 8506: 8505: 8449: 8448: 8416: 8414: 8357: 8350: 8349: 8252: 8247: 8216: 8139: 8132: 8131: 8066: 8065: 8049: 8048: 8014: 7982: 7925: 7918: 7917: 7887: 7846: 7799: 7779: 7760:Medicine arbcase 7723: 7572:the contest page 7527:Unsourced claims 7507: 7450: 7443: 7442: 7418: 7378: 7373: 7312: 7303:Important Notice 7288: 7255: 7237: 7225: 7219: 7215: 7187: 7158: 7153:Empty citation ( 7151: 7149: 7141: 7132: 7127: 7096:some of them? -- 6942: 6922:felt like it. -- 6747: 6741: 6704: 6690: 6684: 6649: 6646: 6631:Best regards, -- 6626: 6620: 6615: 6601: 6590: 6555:Ethereum Classic 6485: 6400:cryptocurrencies 6372: 6333:and the project 6331:reliable sources 6313: 6290: 6281: 6272: 6208: 6132: 5992: 5971:OrganoMetallurgy 5940: 5939: 5864: 5788: 5734: 5709: 5708: 5659: 5634: 5633: 5552: 5551: 5366: 5365: 5349: 5348: 5314: 5287: 5210: 5203: 5202: 5175:Marden's theorem 5106: 5084: 5083: 5067: 5066: 5048:under discussion 5042:Fork of part of 5024: 4969: 4955: 4928: 4927: 4850: 4849: 4799:Lester's theorem 4742:Lester's theorem 4723:Bryanrutherford0 4680:. Could you use 4662: 4640: 4601: 4579: 4479: 4478: 4457: 4452: 4424:Les géants de Mu 4418: 4417: 4408:Les géants de Mu 4382: 4373: 4359: 4332: 4331: 4315: 4269: 4049: 4046: 3985: 3943: 3505: 3483: 3423:of yours to the 3421:this recent edit 3362: 3265:. Best regards, 3148: 3133: 3103: 3006: 3004: 2993: 2927:re-merindinlogun 2725: 2720: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2632: 2631: 2625: 2609: 2608: 2602: 2510: 2503: 2425: 2418: 2417: 2321: 2315: 2295: 2289: 2273: 2266: 2265: 2232: 2225: 2224: 2217: 2207:Okip's talk page 2115:John of Cornwall 2111: 1958:...</ref: --> 1879: 1873: 1869: 1863: 1848: 1842: 1834: 1828: 1448: 1401:All the best, -- 1378:this other table 1168:All the best, -- 1025: 754: 748: 733: 726: 725: 595: 594: 588: 572: 571: 565: 511: 464: 365: 361: 356: 343: 315: 187: 62: 24: 16: 9565: 9564: 9560: 9559: 9558: 9556: 9555: 9554: 9519: 9498: 9472: 9468: 9464: 9433:speedy deletion 9419: 9418: 9402: 9401: 9368: 9366: 9301: 9248: 9205: 9189: 9163: 9159: 9155: 9146: 9145: 9123: 9071: 9063: 9030:speedy deletion 9016: 9015: 8999: 8998: 8964: 8962: 8938: 8910: 8906: 8902: 8861: 8847: 8838: 8836:Happy editing! 8796: 8789: 8788: 8766: 8714: 8706: 8690:speedy deletion 8676: 8675: 8659: 8658: 8625: 8623: 8603: 8601: 8573: 8569: 8565: 8542:. Delivered by 8507: 8503: 8500: 8478: 8450: 8446: 8442: 8408: 8348: 8320:Portuguese real 8287:currency reform 8250: 8241: 8210: 8185: 8130: 8108: 8077:speedy deletion 8063: 8062: 8046: 8045: 8012: 8010: 7976: 7916: 7881: 7840: 7815: 7797: 7777: 7762: 7743: 7666: 7644: 7606: 7558: 7529: 7501: 7441: 7415:Soundofmusicals 7412: 7399:Soundofmusicals 7394: 7374: 7371: 7368: 7367: 7313: 7305: 7286: 7249: 7235: 7223: 7217: 7213: 7181: 7161: 7152: 7143: 7142: 7140: 7125: 7117: 7113: 7098:Soundofmusicals 7035:Soundofmusicals 6991:Soundofmusicals 6987:on a clock face 6939:Soundofmusicals 6936: 6885:Soundofmusicals 6805:Soundofmusicals 6767:Soundofmusicals 6762: 6745: 6739: 6701:Coffeeandcrumbs 6698: 6688: 6682: 6658: 6622: 6599: 6586: 6575: 6551: 6546: 6545: 6486: 6478: 6460: 6459: 6417:, as described 6373: 6362: 6300: 6284: 6275: 6268: 6229: 6206: 6204: 6197:Speedy deletion 6193: 6192: 6133: 6125: 6079: 6033: 6018:Robert McClenon 5986: 5941: 5937: 5934: 5925: 5924: 5908:the voting page 5865: 5857: 5849: 5848: 5832:the voting page 5789: 5781: 5706: 5703: 5631: 5628: 5598: 5553: 5549: 5546: 5523:the voting page 5489: 5444: 5439: 5404: 5377:speedy deletion 5363: 5362: 5346: 5345: 5312: 5310: 5284: 5241: 5201: 5179:Schiffler point 5163: 5127: 5115: 5095:speedy deletion 5081: 5080: 5064: 5063: 5022: 5020: 4995: 4965: 4934: 4925: 4922: 4851: 4847: 4844: 4805:should edit to 4745: 4718: 4641: 4580: 4530: 4508: 4476: 4473: 4468: 4466:Required notice 4455: 4450: 4419: 4415: 4412: 4378: 4369: 4338: 4329: 4326: 4311: 4284: 4267: 4265: 4258:Speedy deletion 4236: 4206: 4159: 4148: 4123: 4086: 4062: 4047: 4036: 4021: 3986: 3979: 3964: 3944: 3937: 3922: 3902: 3875: 3787: 3768: 3744: 3715: 3695: 3646: 3607: 3592:Plasmic Physics 3584: 3544: 3521: 3499: 3477: 3469: 3447:or <sub: --> 3417: 3381: 3379:Carbene radical 3366:Plasmic Physics 3363: 3356: 3341: 3326:Plasmic Physics 3312:Plasmic Physics 3308: 3255: 3220: 3180: 3161:Oxocarbon_anion 3157: 3134: 3129: 3123: 3101: 3081: 3048: 3021: 2996: 2994: 2966: 2937: 2929: 2743: 2721: 2716: 2706: 2693: 2670: 2629: 2623: 2622: 2606: 2600: 2599: 2564: 2538: 2519: 2494: 2487: 2449: 2398: 2378: 2358: 2333: 2319: 2318: 2313: 2293: 2292: 2287: 2264: 2223: 2218: 2211: 2137: 2117: 2112: 2105: 2037: 2018: 1877: 1871: 1867: 1861: 1846: 1840: 1832: 1826: 1793: 1754: 1315:singularitarian 1210:the correct one 1069: 1031: 1008: 1004: 960: 806: 784: 752: 746: 724: 722:Congratulations 592: 586: 585: 569: 563: 562: 523: 512: 501: 486: 474: 433: 423: 414: 374: 358: 352: 351:. Thank you. — 337: 309: 286: 282: 253: 235: 226: 217: 208: 199: 164: 111: 109:Propylene oxide 75: 73:Pirahã features 63: 57: 29: 12: 11: 5: 9563: 9518: 9512: 9466: 9465: 9463: 9458:Nomination of 9456: 9443:for deletion. 9423:will stop the 9365: 9356: 9355: 9354: 9353: 9352: 9300: 9297: 9296: 9295: 9264: 9247: 9244: 9243: 9242: 9204: 9201: 9157: 9156: 9154: 9149:Nomination of 9147: 9114:the candidates 9083:eligible users 9072: 9065: 9064: 9062: 9059: 9058: 9057: 9040:for deletion. 9020:will stop the 8961: 8952: 8904: 8903: 8901: 8896:Nomination of 8894: 8893: 8892: 8875: 8869: 8834: 8833: 8824:You linked to 8822: 8819: 8795: 8790: 8757:the candidates 8726:eligible users 8715: 8708: 8707: 8705: 8702: 8700:for deletion. 8680:will stop the 8622: 8613: 8567: 8566: 8564: 8559:Nomination of 8557: 8501: 8499: 8494:Nomination of 8492: 8444: 8443: 8441: 8436:Nomination of 8434: 8431: 8430: 8399:the candidates 8369:eligible users 8358: 8347: 8344: 8343: 8342: 8341: 8340: 8339: 8338: 8337: 8336: 8335: 8334: 8273: 8272: 8271: 8270: 8236: 8235: 8220:Spanish dollar 8184: 8181: 8180: 8179: 8162: 8161: 8146: 8145: 8140: 8129: 8126: 8107: 8104: 8087:for deletion. 8067:will stop the 8009: 8000: 7997: 7996: 7967:the candidates 7937:eligible users 7926: 7915: 7912: 7911: 7910: 7909: 7908: 7907: 7906: 7893: 7850: 7848: 7814: 7811: 7810: 7809: 7761: 7758: 7742: 7739: 7665: 7662: 7660: 7643: 7640: 7605: 7599: 7564:Google Code-In 7557: 7554: 7528: 7525: 7522: 7521: 7492:the candidates 7462:eligible users 7451: 7440: 7437: 7436: 7435: 7421: 7420: 7393: 7392:by Soumya-8974 7390:Roman numerals 7386: 7332:fringe science 7314: 7307: 7306: 7304: 7301: 7300: 7299: 7298: 7297: 7188:Thank you for 7180: 7177: 7160: 7137: 7112: 7109: 7084: 7083: 7082: 7081: 7080: 7079: 7078: 7077: 7076: 7075: 7074: 7073: 7072: 7071: 7070: 7069: 7068: 7067: 7066: 7065: 7064: 7063: 7062: 7061: 7054: 7016: 6968: 6967: 6966: 6965: 6964: 6963: 6962: 6961: 6960: 6959: 6958: 6957: 6956: 6955: 6920: 6900: 6898: 6873: 6872: 6871: 6870: 6869: 6868: 6867: 6866: 6860: 6854: 6848: 6842: 6836: 6830: 6824: 6797: 6796: 6761: 6759:Roman Numerals 6756: 6755: 6754: 6753: 6752: 6714: 6657: 6651: 6630: 6628: 6621: 6611: 6574: 6571: 6550: 6547: 6524:the candidates 6487: 6480: 6479: 6477: 6474: 6438:, or relevant 6374: 6367: 6361: 6358: 6299: 6296: 6224:Article Wizard 6212: 6203: 6199:nomination of 6194: 6171:the candidates 6134: 6127: 6126: 6124: 6121: 6078: 6077:Tetrahedral Si 6075: 6074: 6073: 6032: 6031:Book reference 6029: 6007:Article Wizard 5985: 5982: 5935: 5933: 5928:Nomination of 5926: 5866: 5859: 5858: 5856: 5850: 5790: 5783: 5782: 5780: 5774: 5755:false positive 5751: 5750: 5702: 5699: 5680:false positive 5676: 5675: 5627: 5624: 5597: 5594: 5547: 5545: 5540:Nomination of 5538: 5492: 5488: 5483: 5443: 5440: 5438: 5435: 5403: 5400: 5387:for deletion. 5367:will stop the 5335: 5334: 5309: 5306: 5294:118.70.131.119 5283: 5280: 5279: 5278: 5240: 5237: 5234: 5233: 5217: 5216: 5211: 5200: 5197: 5162: 5159: 5157: 5126: 5123: 5121: 5111: 5108:JohnBlackburne 5105:for deletion. 5085:will stop the 5053: 5052: 5019: 5016: 4994: 4991: 4972: 4971: 4961: 4960: 4921: 4918: 4917: 4916: 4915: 4914: 4913: 4912: 4845: 4843: 4838:Nomination of 4836: 4818: 4817: 4816: 4815: 4814: 4813: 4812: 4811: 4810: 4809: 4801:; please edit 4770: 4769: 4768: 4767: 4766: 4765: 4764: 4763: 4762: 4761: 4744: 4734: 4717: 4714: 4713: 4712: 4711: 4710: 4709: 4708: 4707: 4706: 4705: 4704: 4665: 4664: 4629: 4606: 4605: 4604: 4603: 4572: 4571: 4534:Pascal theorem 4529: 4523: 4507: 4504: 4493:CombatWombat42 4472: 4469: 4467: 4464: 4413: 4411: 4406:Nomination of 4404: 4385: 4384: 4375: 4365: 4364: 4325: 4322: 4280: 4264: 4260:nomination of 4255: 4235: 4232: 4205: 4202: 4201: 4200: 4167:Talk:Methenium 4158: 4155: 4146: 4122: 4117: 4085: 4082: 4061: 4058: 4037:Message added 4035: 4022: 4020: 4017: 4006:Rajen Merchant 3978: 3965: 3963: 3960: 3936: 3923: 3921: 3918: 3901: 3894: 3874: 3871: 3870: 3869: 3868: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3863: 3786: 3783: 3767: 3764: 3743: 3740: 3714: 3713:yeah...I agree 3711: 3694: 3691: 3650:painted turtle 3645: 3642: 3606: 3603: 3583: 3580: 3543: 3537: 3520: 3517: 3516: 3515: 3468: 3463: 3416: 3413: 3412: 3411: 3380: 3377: 3355: 3342: 3340: 3337: 3307: 3302: 3301: 3300: 3254: 3251: 3240:Excalibursword 3219: 3216: 3179: 3176: 3156: 3153: 3122: 3113: 3080: 3077: 3047: 3044: 3020: 3017: 2992:Best regards, 2973:metaheuristics 2965: 2956: 2936: 2933: 2928: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2895: 2894: 2880:, then you're 2861: 2860: 2817:well-organized 2742: 2739: 2699:as part of my 2692: 2689: 2669: 2666: 2653:for deletion. 2633:will stop the 2589: 2588: 2563: 2554: 2537: 2534: 2518: 2515: 2486: 2483: 2448: 2442: 2439: 2438: 2434: 2433: 2428: 2426: 2415: 2397: 2394: 2377: 2374: 2357: 2354: 2343:Power.corrupts 2332: 2329: 2316: 2303: 2302: 2290: 2282: 2281: 2276: 2274: 2263: 2260: 2257: 2256: 2241: 2240: 2235: 2233: 2222: 2219: 2210: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2167: 2166: 2136: 2133: 2116: 2113: 2104: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2036: 2033: 2022:AmericanGringo 2017: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 1996: 1968: 1964: 1960: 1953: 1952: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1927: 1923: 1901: 1898: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1854: 1850: 1818: 1792: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1753: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1692: 1669: 1659: 1653: 1647: 1634: 1633: 1616: 1609: 1603: 1597: 1591: 1583: 1576: 1552: 1547: 1542: 1536: 1529:on the average 1523: 1520: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1469: 1462: 1459: 1440: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1400: 1397: 1391: 1388: 1381: 1370: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1318: 1311: 1308: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1272: 1267: 1261: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1231: 1220: 1213: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1180: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1156: 1154: 1148: 1145: 1141: 1130: 1129: 1111: 1108:has no problem 1104: 1101: 1098:the statistics 1081:All the best-- 1080: 1078: 1075: 1068: 1065: 1050: 1049: 1044: 1030: 1027: 1003: 1000: 959: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 950: 949: 948: 931: 927: 923: 896: 895: 891: 890: 889: 879: 878: 874: 873: 872: 862: 861: 857: 856: 855: 845: 844: 840: 839: 838: 805: 802: 783: 780: 774: 773: 742: 741: 736: 734: 723: 720: 719: 718: 685: 684: 683: 682: 681: 680: 648: 647: 616:for deletion. 596:will stop the 552: 551: 522: 513: 502:Message added 500: 487: 485: 482: 463: 434: 432: 429: 421: 413: 410: 409: 408: 394: 388: 382: 373: 370: 336: 327: 308: 305: 304: 303: 284: 280: 252: 249: 230: 221: 214:CARD DSECT 212: 203: 198: 195: 163: 160: 159: 158: 110: 107: 106: 105: 74: 71: 65: 64: 59: 55: 53: 50: 49: 35: 34: 31: 30: 25: 19: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 9562: 9553: 9552: 9548: 9544: 9541:. Thank you. 9540: 9536: 9535: 9532:proposed for 9529: 9524: 9517: 9511: 9510: 9506: 9502: 9495: 9492: 9491: 9484: 9480: 9476: 9461: 9455: 9454: 9450: 9446: 9442: 9438: 9434: 9430: 9426: 9415: 9413: 9409: 9398: 9396: 9390: 9389: 9384: 9382: 9378: 9364: 9360: 9351: 9347: 9343: 9339: 9338: 9337: 9333: 9329: 9325: 9324: 9323: 9322: 9318: 9314: 9310: 9306: 9294: 9290: 9286: 9282: 9281: 9280: 9279: 9275: 9271: 9266: 9262: 9260: 9256: 9251: 9241: 9237: 9233: 9229: 9228: 9227: 9226: 9222: 9218: 9214: 9210: 9200: 9199: 9196: 9193: 9186: 9183: 9182: 9175: 9171: 9167: 9152: 9144: 9142: 9138: 9134: 9127: 9121: 9120: 9115: 9110: 9108: 9104: 9100: 9096: 9092: 9087: 9085: 9084: 9079: 9078: 9069: 9056: 9052: 9048: 9043: 9042: 9041: 9039: 9035: 9031: 9027: 9023: 9012: 9010: 9006: 8995: 8993: 8987: 8986: 8980: 8978: 8974: 8960: 8956: 8951: 8950: 8946: 8942: 8937: 8933: 8930: 8929: 8922: 8918: 8914: 8899: 8891: 8887: 8883: 8879: 8873: 8865: 8860: 8859: 8858: 8857: 8854: 8852: 8851: 8845: 8843: 8842: 8831: 8827: 8823: 8820: 8817: 8813: 8808: 8807: 8806: 8803: 8801: 8794: 8787: 8785: 8781: 8777: 8770: 8764: 8763: 8758: 8753: 8751: 8747: 8743: 8739: 8735: 8730: 8728: 8727: 8722: 8721: 8712: 8701: 8699: 8695: 8691: 8687: 8683: 8672: 8670: 8666: 8655: 8653: 8647: 8646: 8641: 8639: 8635: 8621: 8617: 8612: 8611: 8606: 8600: 8596: 8593: 8587: 8583: 8579: 8578: 8562: 8556: 8555: 8551: 8547: 8546: 8541: 8536: 8535:the article. 8533: 8528: 8526: 8522: 8518: 8514: 8513: 8497: 8491: 8490: 8486: 8482: 8477: 8473: 8470: 8464: 8460: 8456: 8455: 8439: 8429: 8427: 8423: 8419: 8412: 8406: 8405: 8400: 8395: 8393: 8389: 8385: 8381: 8377: 8371: 8370: 8365: 8364: 8359: 8356: 8352: 8351: 8333: 8329: 8325: 8321: 8316: 8315: 8314: 8310: 8306: 8302: 8301: 8300: 8296: 8292: 8288: 8284: 8283:decimal point 8279: 8278: 8277: 8276: 8275: 8274: 8269: 8265: 8261: 8257: 8245: 8240: 8239: 8238: 8237: 8234: 8230: 8226: 8221: 8214: 8209: 8208: 8207: 8206: 8202: 8198: 8192: 8190: 8178: 8174: 8170: 8166: 8165: 8160: 8156: 8152: 8148: 8147: 8144: 8141: 8138: 8133: 8125: 8123: 8119: 8115: 8113: 8103: 8102: 8099: 8097: 8096: 8092: 8091: 8086: 8082: 8078: 8074: 8070: 8059: 8057: 8053: 8042: 8040: 8034: 8033: 8028: 8026: 8022: 8008: 8004: 7995: 7994: 7990: 7986: 7980: 7974: 7973: 7968: 7963: 7961: 7957: 7953: 7949: 7945: 7939: 7938: 7933: 7932: 7927: 7924: 7920: 7919: 7905: 7901: 7897: 7891: 7885: 7880: 7879: 7878: 7874: 7870: 7865: 7864: 7863: 7859: 7855: 7844: 7839: 7838: 7837: 7836: 7832: 7828: 7824: 7820: 7808: 7804: 7800: 7796: 7791: 7790: 7789: 7788: 7784: 7780: 7776: 7771: 7767: 7757: 7756: 7752: 7748: 7738: 7735: 7731: 7730:14.248.84.234 7727: 7722: 7718: 7714: 7713:117.4.247.124 7709: 7708: 7704: 7703: 7699: 7698: 7694: 7693: 7689: 7688: 7684: 7683: 7679: 7678: 7674: 7673: 7669: 7661: 7658: 7657: 7653: 7649: 7639: 7638: 7634: 7630: 7629:Shhhnotsoloud 7626: 7622: 7618: 7610: 7604: 7598: 7597: 7593: 7589: 7584: 7581: 7578: 7575: 7573: 7567: 7565: 7561: 7553: 7552: 7548: 7544: 7540: 7537: 7533: 7531:In this edit 7520: 7519: 7515: 7511: 7505: 7499: 7498: 7493: 7488: 7486: 7482: 7478: 7474: 7470: 7464: 7463: 7458: 7457: 7452: 7449: 7445: 7444: 7434: 7430: 7426: 7423: 7422: 7416: 7411: 7410: 7409: 7408: 7404: 7400: 7391: 7385: 7384: 7381: 7379: 7377: 7366: 7364: 7360: 7356: 7351: 7349: 7345: 7341: 7337: 7333: 7329: 7328:pseudoscience 7324: 7323: 7321: 7311: 7296: 7292: 7285: 7281: 7280: 7279: 7275: 7271: 7267: 7266:heat capacity 7263: 7259: 7253: 7248: 7247: 7246: 7245: 7241: 7234: 7230: 7222: 7211: 7207: 7203: 7199: 7195: 7191: 7186: 7176: 7175: 7171: 7167: 7156: 7147: 7136: 7135: 7130: 7124: 7120: 7108: 7107: 7103: 7099: 7093: 7090: 7089: 7059: 7055: 7053: 7049: 7048: 7046: 7045: 7044: 7040: 7036: 7032: 7031: 7030: 7026: 7022: 7017: 7015: 7011: 7007: 7002: 7001: 7000: 6996: 6992: 6988: 6984: 6983: 6982: 6981: 6980: 6979: 6978: 6977: 6976: 6975: 6974: 6973: 6972: 6971: 6970: 6969: 6954: 6950: 6946: 6940: 6935: 6934: 6933: 6929: 6925: 6918: 6914: 6913: 6912: 6908: 6904: 6896: 6895: 6894: 6890: 6886: 6881: 6880: 6879: 6878: 6877: 6876: 6875: 6874: 6864: 6861: 6858: 6855: 6852: 6849: 6846: 6843: 6840: 6837: 6834: 6831: 6828: 6825: 6822: 6819: 6818: 6816: 6815: 6814: 6810: 6806: 6801: 6800: 6799: 6798: 6795: 6791: 6787: 6783: 6779: 6778: 6777: 6776: 6772: 6768: 6760: 6751: 6748: 6742: 6736: 6732: 6728: 6727: 6726: 6722: 6718: 6712: 6708: 6702: 6697: 6696: 6695: 6694: 6691: 6685: 6679: 6675: 6671: 6667: 6663: 6656: 6650: 6643: 6638: 6634: 6617:vs. {{Chem2}} 6616:<chem: --> 6610: 6609: 6605: 6598: 6594: 6589: 6584: 6580: 6570: 6569: 6565: 6561: 6556: 6544: 6543: 6539: 6535: 6531: 6530: 6525: 6520: 6518: 6514: 6510: 6506: 6502: 6497: 6494: 6493: 6484: 6473: 6472: 6468: 6464: 6457: 6453: 6449: 6445: 6441: 6437: 6433: 6429: 6425: 6422: 6420: 6416: 6415: 6411: 6405: 6401: 6397: 6393: 6389: 6384: 6382: 6378: 6371: 6365: 6357: 6356: 6352: 6348: 6344: 6340: 6336: 6332: 6328: 6324: 6320: 6316: 6312: 6307: 6305: 6295: 6294: 6291: 6289: 6288: 6282: 6280: 6279: 6271: 6266: 6261: 6257: 6252: 6250: 6246: 6242: 6238: 6234: 6227: 6225: 6220: 6218: 6202: 6198: 6191: 6190: 6186: 6182: 6178: 6177: 6172: 6167: 6165: 6161: 6157: 6153: 6149: 6144: 6141: 6140: 6131: 6120: 6119: 6115: 6111: 6106: 6104: 6100: 6096: 6092: 6088: 6084: 6072: 6068: 6064: 6061: 6057: 6056: 6055: 6054: 6050: 6046: 6043: 6038: 6028: 6027: 6023: 6019: 6016: 6012: 6008: 6004: 6000: 5996: 5991: 5981: 5980: 5976: 5972: 5966: 5963: 5958: 5956: 5952: 5948: 5947: 5931: 5923: 5922: 5918: 5914: 5910: 5909: 5904: 5899: 5897: 5893: 5889: 5885: 5881: 5876: 5873: 5872: 5863: 5854: 5847: 5846: 5842: 5838: 5834: 5833: 5828: 5823: 5821: 5817: 5813: 5809: 5805: 5800: 5797: 5796: 5787: 5778: 5773: 5772: 5768: 5764: 5760: 5756: 5748: 5744: 5738: 5733: 5729: 5725: 5721: 5720: 5719: 5717: 5713: 5698: 5697: 5693: 5689: 5685: 5681: 5673: 5669: 5663: 5658: 5654: 5650: 5646: 5645: 5644: 5642: 5638: 5623: 5622: 5618: 5614: 5605: 5601: 5593: 5592: 5588: 5584: 5578: 5575: 5570: 5568: 5564: 5560: 5559: 5543: 5537: 5536: 5532: 5528: 5524: 5520: 5516: 5512: 5508: 5504: 5500: 5496: 5487: 5482: 5481: 5478: 5474: 5470: 5469: 5465: 5461: 5457: 5454: 5450: 5447: 5434: 5433: 5429: 5425: 5421: 5417: 5413: 5410: 5399: 5398: 5394: 5390: 5386: 5382: 5378: 5374: 5370: 5359: 5357: 5353: 5342: 5340: 5333: 5330: 5329: 5328: 5326: 5322: 5305: 5303: 5299: 5295: 5291: 5277: 5273: 5269: 5265: 5261: 5260: 5259: 5258: 5254: 5250: 5246: 5232: 5229: 5228: 5223: 5219: 5218: 5215: 5212: 5209: 5204: 5196: 5195: 5191: 5187: 5182: 5180: 5176: 5172: 5168: 5158: 5155: 5154: 5150: 5146: 5141: 5138: 5137: 5133: 5130: 5122: 5119: 5118: 5114: 5109: 5104: 5100: 5096: 5092: 5088: 5077: 5075: 5071: 5060: 5058: 5051: 5049: 5045: 5044:Dao's theorem 5040: 5039: 5038: 5036: 5032: 5015: 5014: 5010: 5006: 5001: 5000: 4990: 4989: 4985: 4981: 4977: 4968: 4963: 4962: 4958: 4957: 4956: 4953: 4949: 4948:edit the page 4945: 4941: 4937: 4932: 4911: 4907: 4903: 4899: 4898: 4897: 4896: 4895: 4894: 4893: 4892: 4888: 4884: 4883: 4876: 4873: 4868: 4866: 4862: 4858: 4857: 4841: 4835: 4834: 4830: 4826: 4821: 4808: 4804: 4800: 4796: 4795: 4794: 4793: 4792: 4791: 4790: 4789: 4788: 4787: 4786: 4783: 4782: 4777: 4775: 4759: 4755: 4754: 4753: 4752: 4751: 4750: 4749: 4748: 4747: 4746: 4743: 4739: 4733: 4732: 4728: 4724: 4703: 4699: 4695: 4691: 4687: 4683: 4679: 4675: 4674: 4673: 4672: 4671: 4670: 4669: 4668: 4667: 4666: 4661: 4657: 4653: 4649: 4645: 4638: 4634: 4630: 4628: 4624: 4620: 4616: 4615:Dao's theorem 4612: 4608: 4607: 4600: 4596: 4592: 4588: 4584: 4576: 4575: 4574: 4573: 4570: 4566: 4562: 4558: 4557: 4556: 4555: 4551: 4547: 4543: 4542:Dao's theorem 4539: 4538:Dao's theorem 4535: 4528: 4527:Dao's theorem 4522: 4521: 4517: 4513: 4503: 4502: 4498: 4494: 4489: 4487: 4483: 4463: 4462: 4459: 4458: 4453: 4444: 4441: 4436: 4434: 4430: 4426: 4425: 4409: 4403: 4402: 4398: 4394: 4390: 4381: 4376: 4372: 4367: 4366: 4362: 4361: 4360: 4357: 4353: 4352:edit the page 4349: 4345: 4341: 4336: 4321: 4320: 4317: 4314: 4309: 4305: 4300: 4296: 4291: 4289: 4283: 4279: 4277: 4263: 4259: 4254: 4253: 4249: 4245: 4244:98.117.75.177 4241: 4231: 4230: 4227: 4223: 4218: 4214: 4211: 4199: 4195: 4191: 4187: 4183: 4182: 4181: 4180: 4176: 4172: 4168: 4164: 4154: 4153: 4150: 4149: 4142: 4140: 4137: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4121: 4116: 4115: 4111: 4107: 4103: 4099: 4096: 4093: 4089: 4081: 4080: 4076: 4072: 4068: 4057: 4056: 4052: 4044: 4040: 4033: 4026: 4016: 4015: 4011: 4007: 4001: 4000: 3996: 3992: 3991:99.243.184.97 3983: 3976: 3969: 3959: 3958: 3954: 3950: 3941: 3934: 3927: 3917: 3916: 3912: 3908: 3899: 3893: 3892: 3888: 3884: 3880: 3862: 3858: 3854: 3849: 3848: 3847: 3843: 3839: 3834: 3833: 3832: 3828: 3824: 3819: 3818: 3817: 3813: 3809: 3804: 3803: 3802: 3801: 3797: 3793: 3782: 3781: 3777: 3773: 3763: 3762: 3758: 3754: 3750: 3747: 3739: 3738: 3734: 3730: 3726: 3722: 3719: 3710: 3709: 3705: 3701: 3690: 3689: 3685: 3681: 3677: 3673: 3669: 3665: 3661: 3659: 3655: 3651: 3641: 3640: 3636: 3632: 3627: 3625: 3621: 3615: 3611: 3602: 3601: 3597: 3593: 3589: 3579: 3578: 3574: 3570: 3565: 3563: 3559: 3554: 3552: 3547: 3542: 3536: 3535: 3531: 3527: 3514: 3511: 3510: 3506: 3504: 3503: 3495: 3494: 3493: 3492: 3489: 3488: 3484: 3482: 3481: 3474: 3467: 3462: 3461: 3458: 3454: 3449: 3443: 3439: 3437: 3432: 3430: 3426: 3422: 3410: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3397: 3396: 3395: 3391: 3387: 3376: 3375: 3371: 3367: 3360: 3353: 3346: 3336: 3335: 3331: 3327: 3322: 3321: 3317: 3313: 3306: 3299: 3295: 3291: 3287: 3283: 3279: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3264: 3260: 3250: 3249: 3245: 3241: 3237: 3232: 3228: 3225: 3215: 3213: 3209: 3205: 3201: 3196: 3193: 3189: 3185: 3175: 3174: 3170: 3166: 3162: 3152: 3151: 3146: 3142: 3138: 3132: 3127: 3121: 3117: 3112: 3111: 3108: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3096: 3095: 3090: 3086: 3076: 3075: 3071: 3067: 3063: 3062: 3057: 3053: 3043: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3030: 3026: 3016: 3015: 3011: 3005: 3003: 2999: 2990: 2988: 2983: 2981: 2976: 2974: 2969: 2964: 2960: 2955: 2954: 2950: 2946: 2943:. Cheers, -- 2942: 2932: 2922: 2918: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2897: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2862: 2858: 2853: 2849: 2845: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2834: 2830: 2824: 2822: 2818: 2814: 2810: 2805: 2800: 2798: 2794: 2789: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2771: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2757: 2753: 2749: 2738: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2726: 2724: 2719: 2713: 2712: 2698: 2688: 2687: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2665: 2664: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2628: 2619: 2617: 2613: 2605: 2596: 2594: 2587: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2580: 2576: 2568: 2562: 2558: 2553: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2533: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2514: 2513: 2509: 2508: 2504: 2502: 2499: 2492: 2482: 2481: 2477: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2447: 2436: 2435: 2432: 2429: 2424: 2419: 2416: 2413: 2412: 2408: 2404: 2393: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2373: 2372: 2368: 2364: 2356:Cite Template 2353: 2352: 2348: 2344: 2337: 2328: 2327: 2324: 2322: 2310: 2301: 2298: 2296: 2284: 2283: 2280: 2277: 2272: 2267: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2242: 2239: 2236: 2231: 2226: 2215: 2208: 2201: 2189: 2185: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2175: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2132: 2131: 2127: 2123: 2109: 2102: 2095: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2032: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1955: 1954: 1949: 1948: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1934: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1886: 1882: 1876: 1866: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1845: 1838: 1831: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1804: 1797: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1761: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1693: 1690: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1670: 1667: 1663: 1660: 1657: 1654: 1651: 1648: 1645: 1641: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1617: 1613: 1610: 1607: 1604: 1601: 1598: 1595: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1579:productivity: 1577: 1574: 1570: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1550: 1545: 1539: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1479: 1475: 1470: 1467: 1463: 1460: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1447: 1441: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1395: 1386: 1379: 1375: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1332: 1328: 1323: 1319: 1316: 1312: 1309: 1306: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1265: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1218: 1214: 1211: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1164: 1160: 1152: 1142: 1139: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1109: 1105: 1102: 1099: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1071: 1064: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1048: 1045: 1043: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1036: 1026: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1012: 999: 998: 994: 990: 986: 982: 981: 977: 973: 969: 965: 947: 943: 939: 936: 935: 932: 928: 924: 920: 915: 914: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 908: 904: 900: 892: 887: 884: 883: 881: 880: 877:numismatists. 875: 870: 867: 866: 864: 863: 858: 853: 850: 849: 847: 846: 841: 837: 834: 833: 831: 830: 829: 828: 824: 820: 814: 810: 801: 800: 796: 792: 788: 779: 772: 768: 764: 760: 759: 751: 744: 743: 740: 737: 732: 727: 717: 713: 709: 705: 701: 700: 699: 698: 694: 690: 689:Singularity42 679: 675: 671: 667: 666: 665: 661: 657: 652: 651: 650: 649: 646: 642: 638: 634: 630: 629: 628: 627: 623: 619: 618:Singularity42 615: 611: 607: 603: 599: 591: 582: 580: 576: 568: 559: 557: 550: 548: 545:Knowledge is 543: 542: 541: 539: 535: 527: 521: 517: 509: 505: 498: 491: 481: 479: 473: 471: 469: 461: 457: 453: 449: 445: 438: 428: 427: 424: 419: 407: 403: 399: 395: 392: 391: 390: 386: 379: 369: 368: 364: 355: 350: 346: 342: 335: 331: 326: 325: 322: 318: 312: 302: 298: 294: 290: 278: 273: 272: 271: 270: 266: 262: 258: 248: 247: 243: 239: 233: 229: 224: 220: 215: 211: 206: 202: 194: 193: 190: 185: 181: 177: 173: 169: 157: 153: 149: 145: 140: 136: 132: 128: 127: 126: 125: 121: 117: 104: 100: 96: 92: 91: 90: 89: 85: 81: 70: 52: 51: 48: 47: 44: 41: 37: 36: 33: 32: 28: 23: 18: 17: 9531: 9520: 9499: 9488: 9486: 9462:for deletion 9427:, but other 9416: 9408:edit summary 9399: 9392: 9387: 9386: 9375:The article 9374: 9328:Jorge Stolfi 9302: 9285:Jorge Stolfi 9267: 9263: 9252: 9249: 9232:Jorge Stolfi 9206: 9190: 9179: 9177: 9153:for deletion 9117: 9111: 9088: 9081: 9075: 9073: 9047:Jorge Stolfi 9024:, but other 9013: 9005:edit summary 8996: 8989: 8983: 8982: 8971:The article 8970: 8939: 8934: 8926: 8924: 8900:for deletion 8882:Jorge Stolfi 8849: 8848: 8840: 8839: 8835: 8804: 8797: 8760: 8754: 8731: 8724: 8718: 8716: 8684:, but other 8673: 8665:edit summary 8656: 8649: 8644: 8643: 8632:The article 8631: 8604: 8602: 8597: 8589: 8575: 8563:for deletion 8543: 8537: 8529: 8510: 8508: 8498:for deletion 8479: 8474: 8466: 8452: 8440:for deletion 8402: 8396: 8373: 8367: 8361: 8305:Jorge Stolfi 8260:Jorge Stolfi 8225:Jorge Stolfi 8193: 8186: 8142: 8116: 8109: 8094: 8089: 8071:, but other 8060: 8052:edit summary 8043: 8036: 8031: 8030: 8019:The article 8018: 7970: 7964: 7941: 7935: 7929: 7896:Jorge Stolfi 7854:Jorge Stolfi 7816: 7794: 7774: 7763: 7744: 7724:— Preceding 7710: 7705: 7700: 7695: 7690: 7685: 7680: 7675: 7670: 7667: 7659: 7645: 7620: 7614: 7585: 7582: 7579: 7576: 7568: 7562: 7559: 7536:WP:UNSOURCED 7530: 7495: 7489: 7466: 7460: 7454: 7395: 7375: 7369: 7352: 7325: 7319: 7317: 7315: 7270:Jorge Stolfi 7206:edit summary 7182: 7162: 7114: 7094: 7091: 7088:Lead section 7087: 7085: 7050: 7021:Jorge Stolfi 7006:Jorge Stolfi 6986: 6945:Jorge Stolfi 6924:Jorge Stolfi 6915:By the way, 6903:Jorge Stolfi 6786:Jorge Stolfi 6781: 6763: 6717:Jorge Stolfi 6710: 6659: 6623: 6576: 6552: 6527: 6521: 6498: 6490: 6488: 6461: 6407: 6385: 6380: 6376: 6375: 6363: 6323:general rule 6308: 6301: 6286: 6285: 6277: 6276: 6255: 6253: 6230: 6221: 6214: 6174: 6168: 6145: 6137: 6135: 6107: 6094: 6080: 6037:back in 2010 6034: 6014: 5987: 5967: 5959: 5944: 5942: 5932:for deletion 5906: 5900: 5877: 5869: 5867: 5830: 5824: 5801: 5793: 5791: 5763:ReferenceBot 5752: 5747:Ask for help 5715: 5712:ReferenceBot 5704: 5688:ReferenceBot 5677: 5672:Ask for help 5640: 5637:ReferenceBot 5629: 5610: 5599: 5579: 5571: 5556: 5554: 5544:for deletion 5490: 5471: 5458: 5455: 5451: 5448: 5445: 5405: 5371:, but other 5360: 5352:edit summary 5343: 5336: 5331: 5319:The article 5318: 5288:— Preceding 5285: 5242: 5226: 5213: 5183: 5164: 5156: 5142: 5139: 5134: 5131: 5128: 5120: 5089:, but other 5078: 5070:edit summary 5061: 5054: 5041: 5029:The article 5028: 5002: 4996: 4973: 4966: 4923: 4920:October 2014 4880: 4877: 4869: 4854: 4852: 4842:for deletion 4822: 4819: 4806: 4802: 4784: 4778: 4771: 4719: 4678:Jorge Stolfi 4642:— Preceding 4611:Jorge Stolfi 4581:— Preceding 4531: 4509: 4490: 4474: 4448: 4445: 4437: 4422: 4420: 4410:for deletion 4386: 4379: 4370: 4344:Realgar wine 4327: 4294: 4292: 4285: 4281: 4273: 4237: 4226:Okeyes (WMF) 4219: 4215: 4207: 4160: 4144: 4138: 4135: 4129: 4127: 4124: 4104: 4100: 4097: 4094: 4090: 4087: 4063: 4048: 4002: 3987: 3945: 3903: 3876: 3788: 3769: 3751: 3748: 3745: 3727: 3723: 3720: 3716: 3696: 3678: 3674: 3670: 3666: 3662: 3647: 3628: 3616: 3612: 3608: 3585: 3566: 3555: 3548: 3545: 3522: 3508: 3501: 3500: 3486: 3479: 3478: 3470: 3450: 3444: 3440: 3433: 3418: 3382: 3364: 3323: 3309: 3256: 3235: 3230: 3223: 3221: 3211: 3207: 3200:Village Pump 3191: 3181: 3158: 3130: 3124: 3099: 3098: 3093: 3082: 3060: 3049: 3022: 3001: 2997: 2991: 2984: 2977: 2970: 2967: 2938: 2930: 2908: 2904: 2890: 2886: 2881: 2873: 2856: 2851: 2847: 2844:supplemental 2843: 2825: 2823:standards. 2820: 2816: 2812: 2808: 2803: 2801: 2796: 2792: 2787: 2782: 2778: 2774: 2772: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2744: 2722: 2717: 2707:Wiki Wisdom 2700: 2696: 2694: 2671: 2641:exist. The 2637:, but other 2620: 2612:edit summary 2597: 2590: 2585: 2573:The article 2572: 2539: 2520: 2506: 2500: 2497: 2488: 2450: 2430: 2414: 2399: 2379: 2359: 2341: 2309:this comment 2306: 2278: 2237: 2156:Jorge Stolfi 2138: 2118: 2079:Jorge Stolfi 2074: 2052: 2038: 2019: 2000:Jorge Stolfi 1992: 1973:Joyce Kilmer 1931: 1904:Jorge Stolfi 1895: 1801: 1798: 1794: 1777:Jorge Stolfi 1758: 1755: 1726: 1694: 1688: 1676:Jorge Stolfi 1672:think harder 1671: 1665: 1661: 1655: 1649: 1644:productivity 1643: 1639: 1618: 1611: 1605: 1599: 1593: 1586: 1578: 1572: 1568: 1555:Jorge Stolfi 1548: 1543: 1537: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1507: 1477: 1473: 1465: 1455: 1443: 1403:Jorge Stolfi 1330: 1326: 1321: 1275:Jorge Stolfi 1223: 1188:Jorge Stolfi 1170:Jorge Stolfi 1114: 1083:Jorge Stolfi 1072: 1070: 1051: 1032: 1015:71.170.109.2 1005: 983: 964:Kali's Child 963: 961: 918: 897: 885: 868: 851: 835: 815: 811: 807: 785: 777: 756: 738: 708:Jorge Stolfi 686: 659: 656:Jorge Stolfi 604:exist. The 600:, but other 583: 575:edit summary 560: 553: 544: 532:The article 531: 475: 465: 443: 442: 418:Plastikspork 415: 375: 338: 313: 310: 254: 236: 231: 227: 222: 218: 213: 209: 204: 200: 165: 138: 112: 76: 68: 38: 26: 9340:No worries 9299:Wikiproject 9192:Jasper Deng 9119:voting page 8762:voting page 8454:Color image 8438:Color image 8404:voting page 8183:Dollar sign 8169:Dwain Zwerg 8151:Dwain Zwerg 7972:voting page 7711:Thanks you 7583:Thank you! 7497:voting page 6839:Roman coins 6829:(Church, ?) 6529:voting page 6414:restriction 6176:voting page 6103:tetrahedron 6087:tetrahedron 6063:prokaryotes 6045:prokaryotes 5710:Hello, I'm 5635:Hello, I'm 5583:fgnievinski 5046:while it's 4929:Hello, I'm 4333:Hello, I'm 4224:. Thanks! 4186:carbocation 4120:Mass matrix 3949:Jason Quinn 3434:Naturally, 3066:Nadiatalent 3031:. Thanks, 2705:Nuggets of 1989:Rose Madder 1394:Citizendium 1322:requirement 1054:TheMandarin 1009:—Preceding 989:TheMandarin 972:TheMandarin 882:You wrote, 865:You wrote, 848:You wrote, 832:You wrote, 763:HairyWombat 468:subst:Smile 345:Template:@@ 334:Template:@@ 9530:—has been 9259:discussion 9103:topic bans 8812:title page 8746:topic bans 8388:topic bans 7956:topic bans 7648:Goldsztajn 7481:topic bans 7159:templates" 7086:(outdent) 6780:Bad luck, 6633:Light Code 6560:Jtbobwaysf 6513:topic bans 6428:uninvolved 6396:blockchain 6160:topic bans 6035:Hi Jorge, 5892:topic bans 5816:topic bans 5761:. Thanks, 5757:, you can 5732:cite error 5724:Green rust 5686:. Thanks, 5682:, you can 5511:topic bans 5420:WP:PRIMARY 5268:Biscuittin 5249:Biscuittin 4980:BracketBot 4978:. Thanks, 4931:BracketBot 4631:Pleas see 4393:BracketBot 4391:. Thanks, 4335:BracketBot 4286:Under the 4041:. You can 3879:imechanica 3588:discussion 3475:. Cheers! 3473:WP:TWODABS 3466:WP:TWODABS 3188:Refimprove 3184:Refimprove 3094:discussion 3061:discussion 3010:Discussion 2907:create it 2866:brydioside 2848:substitute 2627:dated prod 2604:dated prod 2543:Shreevatsa 2523:Dougweller 2472:Dougweller 2122:DuncanHill 1734:Paradoctor 1703:Paradoctor 1623:Paradoctor 1594:selection: 1483:Paradoctor 1374:this table 1336:Paradoctor 1235:Paradoctor 1119:Paradoctor 1029:IAST usage 968:word usage 590:dated prod 567:dated prod 506:. You can 448:Paradoctor 354:This, that 46:/Archive 3 43:/Archive 2 40:/Archive 1 9497:finished. 9441:consensus 9379:has been 9342:Kowal2701 9313:Kowal2701 9209:this edit 9188:finished. 9099:site bans 9038:consensus 8975:has been 8941:Warrenmck 8742:site bans 8698:consensus 8636:has been 8577:Math Suks 8561:Math Suks 8545:SDZeroBot 8384:site bans 8112:Oxocarbon 8085:consensus 8023:has been 7952:site bans 7747:Smokefoot 7477:site bans 7361:decision 7346:, or the 7340:sanctions 6735:Main Page 6662:this edit 6509:site bans 6298:Not forum 6156:site bans 6110:Smokefoot 5984:July 2017 5888:site bans 5812:site bans 5730:caused a 5728:your edit 5714:. I have 5655:caused a 5653:your edit 5639:. I have 5507:site bans 5385:consensus 5323:has been 5103:consensus 5033:has been 4936:your edit 4688:on pages 4340:your edit 4324:June 2014 4188:article. 4163:Methenium 4071:Trackinfo 3772:Smokefoot 3631:Smokefoot 3429:revert it 3419:Hey man, 3282:Viscosity 3267:Crowsnest 3210:it means 3131:Grandiose 3002:Wolfowitz 2945:Smokefoot 2821:aesthetic 2804:requiring 2655:Beeshoney 2651:consensus 2577:has been 2221:Thank you 2061:Smokefoot 2053:chemistry 2016:Popol Vuh 1725:(update) 1697:Wouldn't 1650:selection 1481:Regards, 1184:this page 919:primarily 791:Smokefoot 614:consensus 536:has been 360:the other 317:thecurran 293:Smokefoot 261:Smokefoot 172:unit type 168:Void type 148:Smokefoot 116:Smokefoot 8985:sources. 7890:WP:Merge 7819:WP:MERGE 7726:unsigned 7560:Hello, 7357:and the 7318:It does 7166:Urselius 7146:citation 6440:policies 5999:policies 5613:Alva2004 5290:unsigned 4656:contribs 4644:unsigned 4595:contribs 4583:unsigned 4060:Top 2500 4019:Talkback 3980:You can 3920:Talkback 3883:Bbanerje 3853:Bbanerje 3838:Bbanerje 3823:Bbanerje 3808:Bbanerje 3792:Bbanerje 3766:Me again 3654:Fluorine 3620:WP:UNDUE 3567:Thanks, 3526:Bbanerje 3357:You can 3339:Talkback 3224:critical 3145:contribs 3033:Walkerma 2797:somebody 2456:deletion 2383:Chakazul 2250:Edgar181 2212:You can 2106:You can 1977:methinks 1888:trusted? 1870:and the 1446:en masse 1077:exactly? 1037:usage : 1011:unsigned 460:WikiLove 456:WikiLove 180:WP:RANDY 144:oxiclean 27:Archives 9543:Chidgk1 9534:merging 9501:Chidgk1 9483:deleted 9445:Chidgk1 9174:deleted 9126:NoACEMM 8921:deleted 8769:NoACEMM 8586:deleted 8525:deleted 8463:deleted 8411:NoACEMM 8251:123 500 7979:NoACEMM 7798:Georgia 7778:Georgia 7504:NoACEMM 7284:Diannaa 7252:Diannaa 7233:Diannaa 7210:linking 6707:carbyne 6597:Diannaa 6095:crustal 6011:sandbox 5955:deleted 5837:Mdann52 5722:On the 5647:On the 5567:deleted 5442:Comment 5416:WP:TRIV 5389:ukexpat 5227:Chillum 5222:Bitcoin 4865:deleted 4803:Gilbert 4433:deleted 4190:Dirac66 4171:Dirac66 3907:Nerlost 3900:article 3898:Calorie 3165:Dougher 2913:Bearcat 2829:Bearcat 2775:already 2756:devoted 2752:per day 2748:to zero 2723:thoreau 2678:Bob.v.R 2403:Carrite 2363:Pohick2 1875:drugbox 1865:chembox 1844:chembox 1830:chembox 1662:if IN=0 1615:fitted. 1533:quality 1513:did not 1452:my case 958:Cleanup 938:Timcrow 899:Timcrow 819:Timcrow 787:Furazan 782:Furazan 670:Jarkeld 637:Jarkeld 277:carbide 9410:or on 9195:(talk) 9007:or on 8667:or on 8634:Servus 8620:Servus 8054:or on 7823:WP:CON 7221:copied 6746:crumbs 6740:Coffee 6689:crumbs 6683:Coffee 6676:, and 6549:revert 6463:Jytdog 6452:blocks 6434:, our 6410:revert 6347:Jytdog 6302:About 5726:page, 5651:page, 5497:. The 5354:or on 5072:or on 4944:syntax 4807:Gibert 4736:About 4451:McDoob 4348:syntax 4051:mabdul 3658:Israel 3569:atnair 3502:bd2412 3480:bd2412 3401:DMacks 3386:DMacks 3384:that. 3192:hidden 3120:WP:NPA 3116:WP:UND 3102:SKATER 2998:Kiefer 2961:& 2891:happen 2788:create 2614:or on 2536:Thanks 2507:• talk 2485:Thanks 2075:Touché 2049:cobalt 1517:slowly 1509:"OUT": 1466:always 1224:anyone 577:or on 398:HenkvD 362:(talk) 357:, and 131:ketone 95:Arxack 80:Arxack 9203:Typo? 8481:Aasim 7795:Sandy 7775:Sandy 7741:EMACs 7196:into 6737:.--- 6450:, or 6105:". 5460:FSund 5409:WP:EN 5113:deeds 4887:talk 4684:than 4609:Dear 4512:Naytz 4313:Anton 3624:WP:OR 3453:Kieff 2905:can't 2874:learn 2868:is a 2813:looks 2799:can. 2779:never 2498:Minor 2174:Okip 2043:) of 1993:color 1987:from 1951:time. 1938:talk 1808:talk 1765:talk 1456:years 1331:never 1271:that. 1228:Nomic 706:". -- 283:C(CO) 135:alkyl 69:: --> 9547:talk 9528:Soot 9516:Soot 9505:talk 9449:talk 9346:talk 9332:talk 9317:talk 9289:talk 9274:talk 9255:here 9250:Hi 9236:talk 9221:talk 9217:NebY 9137:talk 9089:The 9051:talk 8945:talk 8886:talk 8864:PamD 8780:talk 8732:The 8550:talk 8485:talk 8422:talk 8374:The 8328:talk 8309:talk 8295:talk 8264:talk 8256:this 8229:talk 8201:talk 8173:talk 8155:talk 8122:talk 7989:talk 7942:The 7900:talk 7884:Zefr 7873:talk 7869:Zefr 7858:talk 7843:Zefr 7831:talk 7827:Zefr 7803:Talk 7783:Talk 7751:talk 7734:talk 7717:talk 7652:talk 7633:talk 7592:talk 7547:talk 7514:talk 7467:The 7429:talk 7403:talk 7363:here 7330:and 7291:talk 7274:talk 7260:and 7240:talk 7170:talk 7155:help 7119:qedk 7102:talk 7039:talk 7025:talk 7010:talk 6995:talk 6949:talk 6928:talk 6917:here 6907:talk 6889:talk 6809:talk 6790:talk 6771:talk 6721:talk 6637:talk 6604:talk 6579:Iron 6564:talk 6538:talk 6499:The 6467:talk 6456:here 6448:bans 6419:here 6408:one 6404:here 6398:and 6351:talk 6304:this 6185:talk 6146:The 6114:talk 6067:talk 6049:talk 6022:talk 5975:talk 5917:talk 5878:The 5841:talk 5802:The 5767:talk 5737:help 5692:talk 5662:help 5617:talk 5587:talk 5531:talk 5477:Vano 5464:talk 5428:talk 5424:Zefr 5393:talk 5298:talk 5272:talk 5253:talk 5190:talk 5149:talk 5009:talk 4984:talk 4906:talk 4829:talk 4740:and 4727:talk 4698:talk 4692:??-- 4652:talk 4623:talk 4591:talk 4565:talk 4550:talk 4516:talk 4497:talk 4456:AU93 4397:talk 4308:here 4248:talk 4194:talk 4175:talk 4110:talk 4075:talk 4010:talk 3995:talk 3953:talk 3911:talk 3887:talk 3857:talk 3842:talk 3827:talk 3812:talk 3796:talk 3776:talk 3757:talk 3733:talk 3704:talk 3684:talk 3635:talk 3622:and 3596:talk 3573:talk 3530:talk 3457:Talk 3405:talk 3390:talk 3370:talk 3330:talk 3316:talk 3294:talk 3271:talk 3244:talk 3227:talk 3169:talk 3141:talk 3118:and 3070:talk 3037:talk 3029:here 2949:talk 2917:talk 2887:have 2852:work 2833:talk 2809:must 2768:puts 2764:your 2760:make 2732:talk 2682:talk 2659:talk 2547:talk 2527:talk 2476:talk 2407:talk 2387:talk 2367:talk 2347:talk 2314:Cycl 2288:Cycl 2188:talk 2184:Gigs 2160:talk 2145:talk 2141:Gigs 2126:talk 2083:talk 2065:talk 2047:and 2045:iron 2026:talk 2004:talk 1908:talk 1781:talk 1738:talk 1707:talk 1680:talk 1664:and 1642:and 1627:talk 1569:OUT: 1559:talk 1487:talk 1407:talk 1340:talk 1317:. ;) 1305:Nope 1279:talk 1264:here 1239:talk 1219:. ;) 1192:talk 1174:talk 1123:talk 1100:say. 1087:talk 1058:talk 1035:IAST 1019:talk 993:talk 976:talk 942:talk 903:talk 823:talk 795:talk 767:talk 712:talk 693:talk 674:talk 660:talk 641:talk 622:talk 452:talk 402:talk 381:are. 297:talk 265:talk 242:talk 228:or 188:ping 184:Pcap 176:here 152:talk 133:and 120:talk 99:talk 84:talk 9361:of 9211:at 9207:In 8957:of 8841:Pam 8618:of 8608:• 8095:Jay 8090:Jay 8005:of 7805:) 7785:) 7541:). 7376:WBG 7320:not 7227:at 6743:and 6686:and 6627:Hi, 6581:to 6381:not 6278:Pam 6273:. 6258:by 6251:. 5743:Fix 5741:. ( 5668:Fix 5666:. ( 5491:Hi, 5177:or 5173:or 5169:or 4997:at 4938:to 4882:DGG 4797:At 4776:; 4756:At 4342:to 4310:. 4297:by 4147:τlk 4106:TCO 3753:TCO 3729:TCO 3700:TCO 3680:TCO 3553:. 3446:--> 3290:PAR 3261:on 2909:for 2783:not 2718:Red 2559:of 2501:4th 2320:pia 2311:)-- 2294:pia 1933:DGG 1803:DGG 1760:DGG 1640:OUT 1590:us. 1587:one 1582:on. 1573:any 1115:you 518:of 332:of 238:ken 219:or 210:or 139:who 9549:) 9507:) 9485:. 9451:) 9414:. 9397:. 9348:) 9334:) 9319:) 9311:? 9291:) 9276:) 9238:) 9223:) 9176:. 9139:) 9128:}} 9124:{{ 9101:, 9053:) 9045:-- 9011:. 8994:. 8947:) 8923:. 8888:) 8782:) 8771:}} 8767:{{ 8744:, 8671:. 8654:. 8588:. 8552:) 8527:. 8487:) 8465:. 8424:) 8413:}} 8409:{{ 8386:, 8330:) 8311:) 8297:) 8266:) 8231:) 8203:) 8195:-- 8175:) 8157:) 8124:) 8058:. 8041:. 7991:) 7981:}} 7977:{{ 7954:, 7902:) 7875:) 7860:) 7852:-- 7833:) 7825:. 7753:) 7736:) 7719:) 7654:) 7635:) 7594:) 7586:-- 7549:) 7516:) 7506:}} 7502:{{ 7479:, 7431:) 7405:) 7293:) 7287:🍁 7276:) 7242:) 7236:🍁 7224:}} 7218:{{ 7172:) 7150:: 7148:}} 7144:{{ 7116:-- 7104:) 7041:) 7027:) 7012:) 6997:) 6951:) 6930:) 6909:) 6891:) 6811:) 6792:) 6782:my 6773:) 6723:) 6674:CH 6672:, 6639:) 6606:) 6600:🍁 6566:) 6540:) 6532:. 6511:, 6469:) 6446:, 6421:. 6386:A 6353:) 6337:, 6306:: 6187:) 6179:. 6158:, 6116:) 6069:) 6051:) 6024:) 6013:. 5977:) 5957:. 5919:) 5911:. 5890:, 5843:) 5835:. 5814:, 5769:) 5745:| 5694:) 5670:| 5619:) 5589:) 5569:. 5533:) 5509:, 5475:— 5466:) 5430:) 5395:) 5358:. 5341:. 5300:) 5274:) 5266:. 5255:) 5192:) 5184:-- 5151:) 5143:-- 5076:. 5059:. 5011:) 4986:) 4908:) 4889:) 4867:. 4831:) 4823:-- 4729:) 4700:) 4658:) 4654:• 4625:) 4597:) 4593:• 4567:) 4552:) 4518:) 4499:) 4435:. 4399:) 4383:". 4250:) 4196:) 4177:) 4128:M∧ 4112:) 4077:) 4012:) 3997:) 3962:TB 3955:) 3913:) 3889:) 3859:) 3844:) 3829:) 3814:) 3798:) 3778:) 3759:) 3735:) 3706:) 3686:) 3656:, 3652:, 3637:) 3598:) 3575:) 3532:) 3455:| 3431:. 3407:) 3392:) 3372:) 3332:) 3318:) 3296:) 3273:) 3246:) 3171:) 3147:) 3143:, 3139:, 3137:me 3072:) 3039:) 3012:) 2982:. 2951:) 2919:) 2835:) 2734:) 2728:-- 2684:) 2661:) 2630:}} 2624:{{ 2618:. 2607:}} 2601:{{ 2595:. 2549:) 2529:) 2478:) 2409:) 2389:) 2369:) 2349:) 2252:) 2246:Ed 2162:) 2147:) 2128:) 2085:) 2067:) 2028:) 2006:) 1940:) 1910:) 1878:}} 1872:{{ 1868:}} 1862:{{ 1847:}} 1841:{{ 1833:}} 1827:{{ 1810:) 1783:) 1767:) 1740:) 1729:: 1709:) 1682:) 1629:) 1561:) 1489:) 1409:) 1342:) 1281:) 1241:) 1194:) 1176:) 1125:) 1089:) 1060:) 1021:) 995:) 978:) 944:) 905:) 825:) 797:) 769:) 761:. 753:}} 747:{{ 714:) 695:) 676:) 662:) 654:-- 643:) 635:. 624:) 593:}} 587:{{ 581:. 570:}} 564:{{ 558:. 446:, 431::) 422:―Œ 404:) 299:) 285:15 267:) 244:) 182:. 154:) 122:) 101:) 86:) 9545:( 9503:( 9447:( 9344:( 9330:( 9315:( 9287:( 9272:( 9234:( 9219:( 9135:( 9049:( 8943:( 8884:( 8866:: 8862:@ 8850:D 8832:. 8778:( 8548:( 8483:( 8420:( 8326:( 8307:( 8293:( 8262:( 8246:: 8242:@ 8227:( 8215:: 8211:@ 8199:( 8171:( 8153:( 8120:( 7987:( 7898:( 7886:: 7882:@ 7871:( 7856:( 7845:: 7841:@ 7829:( 7801:( 7781:( 7749:( 7732:( 7715:( 7650:( 7631:( 7590:( 7545:( 7512:( 7427:( 7417:: 7413:@ 7401:( 7372:∯ 7289:( 7272:( 7254:: 7250:@ 7238:( 7168:( 7157:) 7131:) 7129:c 7126:桜 7123:t 7121:( 7100:( 7060:) 7037:( 7023:( 7008:( 6993:( 6947:( 6941:: 6937:@ 6926:( 6905:( 6887:( 6807:( 6788:( 6769:( 6719:( 6711:⫶ 6703:: 6699:@ 6635:( 6602:( 6562:( 6536:( 6465:( 6349:( 6287:D 6219:. 6183:( 6112:( 6065:( 6047:( 6020:( 5973:( 5915:( 5839:( 5765:( 5749:) 5739:) 5735:( 5690:( 5674:) 5664:) 5660:( 5615:( 5585:( 5529:( 5462:( 5426:( 5391:( 5296:( 5270:( 5251:( 5188:( 5147:( 5007:( 4982:( 4967:] 4954:. 4904:( 4885:( 4827:( 4760:: 4725:( 4696:( 4650:( 4621:( 4589:( 4563:( 4548:( 4514:( 4495:( 4395:( 4380:] 4371:) 4358:. 4246:( 4192:( 4173:( 4145:И 4141:ε 4139:ħ 4136:c 4130:Ŝ 4108:( 4073:( 4034:. 4008:( 3993:( 3977:. 3951:( 3935:. 3909:( 3885:( 3855:( 3840:( 3825:( 3810:( 3794:( 3774:( 3755:( 3731:( 3702:( 3682:( 3633:( 3594:( 3571:( 3528:( 3509:T 3487:T 3403:( 3388:( 3368:( 3354:. 3328:( 3314:( 3292:( 3269:( 3242:( 3167:( 3135:( 3068:( 3035:( 3008:( 3000:. 2947:( 2915:( 2859:. 2831:( 2793:I 2730:( 2680:( 2657:( 2545:( 2525:( 2474:( 2405:( 2385:( 2365:( 2345:( 2317:o 2291:o 2248:( 2209:. 2190:) 2186:( 2158:( 2143:( 2124:( 2103:. 2081:( 2063:( 2024:( 2002:( 1936:( 1906:( 1806:( 1779:( 1763:( 1736:( 1705:( 1678:( 1625:( 1557:( 1485:( 1405:( 1387:. 1338:( 1307:. 1277:( 1237:( 1230:. 1212:. 1190:( 1172:( 1121:( 1085:( 1056:( 1017:( 991:( 974:( 940:( 901:( 888:. 871:. 854:. 821:( 793:( 765:( 710:( 691:( 672:( 658:( 639:( 620:( 549:. 499:. 450:( 400:( 295:( 281:5 263:( 240:( 150:( 118:( 97:( 82:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index