User talk:Just Step Sideways/Archive 24

1872:

idea to prove my identity...since i use the exact same user name in wikimedia, wikibooks, wikiqoute, wikinews, wiktionary, wikinews, ...etc. Therefore, what if i log in and write both of your names on 2 or 3 of my user pages in these sites? Would that satisfy? I'm reluctant regarding "(like sending a trusted user a copy of his license, utility bill, business card)" and confused about signing into a non-existent account. The only account i closed back then was wikipedia because one admin was greatly unfair against me and i was totally clueless regarding how to defend the unfair attacks (i.e.-wikipedia policies/laws/rules/appeals). Aaaaaanyway,...water under the bridge. MBisanz: what's "usurp"? and also, i moved from Carp, i am now in Glendora, not in Murrieta. Thanks again to the both of you.

3867:. So, a year later, I gathered up the shattered bits of what little was accomplished in that fiasco and used it to lay the groundwork for a more structured discussion carefully designed to avoid such problems. I then asked for a "jury" of admins to run the RFC and close it. And then, your proposal opened and was linked from the exact same noticeboard. Your "I'm so bold" edit summary when opening it led me to believe that you were aware of all this and were just pushing ahead anyway. I apologize for that misunderstanding, and I hope you understand that this is in no way about elitism or an idea that only admin opinions are important. It is about learning from the mistakes, my mistakes, of the past and trying not to repeat them. I've now moved the draft RFC into project space at 6506:. Once again, I'm wondering if she was an important person at all to Craig or just a celebrity from there. Too many "stopped for a cup of coffee" interactions inexplicably wind up in too many articles, but I'm sure I really didn't need to point that out. Jerry Mackie is a notable native of Craig, and a very prominent member of the community. If I point that out, is someone going to throw up "notability?" Uhh, lessee. State senator? Yup, notable! The real issue is no article, mainly because he was a state senator in the 1990s rather than now. Perhaps even moreso, is the issue actually one of undue weight towards Holly Madison, and that adding other names would detract from spotlighting her? I've sure seen that in other articles with other people. 1353:

that if the behavior of those who had brought the case hadn't come under scrutiny by now then we wouldn't even be having this conversation as I still wouldn't feel comfortable editing here. I was simply commenting on the timing of the actions and providing a large amount of evidence which thoroughly supports everything I've ever said in the past and completely vindicates me. There was nothing at all celebratory about the content and I felt it was very important to make very clear my reasons for returning and what my position is. Anyway I've tweaked the text to avoid any possible confusion. Many thanks for not re-opening the RFC/U.--

4065:. The quality of the sources was being questioned mostly along the lines of the sources being from Azerbaijan, something that is being used by the same editors to delete other articles on alleged massacres. Most of those objections came from people who support the Armenian side in the dispute and I think their reasons for wanting it deleted are not really based on sources at all. What I think is that the dispute was not one that would merit deletion, but one that could be addressed through making edits to the article or merging to another article as was suggested by one editor.-- 6545:

encounter professionals who consider contributing to Knowledge to be loathsome and look down their nose at people who do. Considering that "professional" isn't as much a reference to skills or experience as much as it is to getting paid, it should become obvious why. We're doing for free what some of these people have been lobbying foundations/governments/other entities for years to do for a paycheck. That is, putting information on the Internet which would have otherwise languished in the basement of a library or in other forms of obscurity.

2036:. It was only then that I went ahead and deleted it. Once this is sorted out it can easily be restored to its former condition and you can make a note there indicating that the now-renamed account was you, but without your login info from that account I don't think there is any way for you to actually resume editing with that account's history in your contribs. I not sure I see why that distinction would be so important anyway, but it looks to me like MBisanz has been very accommodating and is willing to do everything that can be done about it. 890:

reconduct the RfC in his favour. R-41 has now started putting 'satellite site' on other articles which I consider to be possibly trying to prove a point through the back door. Something needs to done to stop these two from disrupting processes and possibly other articles, but now that the ANI has been archived I'm at a loss to know what to do, don't really want to get further involved (I have no opinion on the outcome of the RfC), and I would be glad if an uninvolved admin would look into it.

2150:, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Knowledge administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community 3716:

us, where this "good proposal" actually is. Be sure that if I knew that there is any, I wouldn't start this. There was no notification on wikitech-l, neither any notification board (for developers or community). And yet I still don't know where it is, although many people "slapped" me for starting own while there is clearly "some proposal" already going on (I am definitely not talking about WP:AN which is only a noticeboard for administrators and not really important for the encyclopedia itself) Thank you

6526:

and I would imagine with access to newspaper archives it would be a cinch to write an article on Clem at the bery least, but it looks like th article on Halibut Cove is another census data cookie cutter article for the most part. Alaska is just so big, and so full of larger than life characters, but apparently there aren't a lot of us active on WP. Seems kind of strange to me actually, People are pretty plugged in up here but for whatever reason don't seem to gravitate towards this sort of thing.

3515: 1527: 1071: 251: 1407:

pages in a similar or worse state than this one is not necessarily indicative of uneven application of the rules, it is more a problem with the sheer volume of new articles being added every day. We aren't able to catch every such article right away and they manage to slip through the cracks. A deletion discussion is not a vote, so how many people were on each side is not nearly as important as the quality of the arguments presented, and the basis those arguments have in Knowledge policy.

7213: 31: 952: 1471:) the band My Revenge has an interview with National Public Radio - State Of The Union program with Tina Antolini evidentially being done later this week regarding their activism against topics like racism, sexism, and their work on promoting same sex marriage rights. When this story runs, it should prove to be a quite reliable source and at that time I will incorporate any applicable references and verifications into the article in order to further its improvement. 5292: 6549:

clueless college kids with no real oversight. The professor isn't necessarily going to be concerned with factual accuracy or proper context if they don't reside in Alaska or otherwise have no ties to here. To anyone with firsthand knowledge on the article's topic, the end result winds up resembling something which lacks a clue. Once again, I have to bring up Sarah Palin to provide an example. An editor or editors from a university in Illinois worked on

4474: 4098:

history, gets very little attention from Western media and Western scholars so difficulty in finding English-language sources should be expected and frequent mentions, trivial as they may have been, in such sources point to the likelihood of wider coverage in non-English sources. Here is a translated page from an Azeri newspaper's website (I had to google the Azeri words for the subject to find it) that gives substantial coverage:

7105:

attention whatsoever from reliable sources precisely because it is not important, even in the context of the regional transportation infrastructure. I found the fact that nobody ever bothered to repair damage from the 1964 earthquake pretty compelling evidence that nobody cares, I was surprised nobody else picked up on that but I can't say I'm surprised that the aviation fanatics came out to support this crummy article.

2366:. I'm a little confused with that, do you really think that he's notable or it was just a consensus to keep? And did you count the SP and convassings in the consensus? This article is never important for me and doesn't matter whether it kept or not and sure that there is no objections about it, but I just want to know your opinion about this article as a user who wanted to comment "Keep" or "Delete"? Thanks you. ● 1653: 3983: 2747: 1475:

history. I am quite knowledgeable about music history (with a focus on the past 3 decades) in general, but particularly with Vermont, and that is my impetus for being here and I would like to be able to improve the article so that it meets Knowledge standards and can be included in the Encyclopedia. Thank you very much for your time and your advice on this, I appreciate it. take care,

160:, have periodically weighed in to indicate that the article was developing in the ways outlined at the AfD, based on RS recommended there and others discovered since then. Since I'm a rather obsessive provider of citations, I've never had these kinds of problems in other articles. The same objections that were dismissed at the AfD recur endlessly, and really, it's been like living in 2915: 5857:

complaining about the ARS? Sorry for the harsh tone (the lack of sleep because of time-zone hour change won't help and also I must rush to work), but if all the grudges against the ARS come from badly evaluated "factors put together" plus a dose of creativity in interpreting other people's policy-compliant and good-faith behavior, you should really let it go.

2583:, I'm kind of surprised that they didn't catch this completely unverifiable content, but with the massive size of this project sometimes things slip through the cracks. I'm puzzled as to why you say it was based on "a source" found to be unverifiable since you actually identified the source as Allmusic, and they do in fact have a page on an album of that name 5912:

usable result one way or the other, and then I recruited a team of previously uninvolved users to administrate the RFC. They will determine when the debate has run its course and will close the RFC accordingly. While things are trending in a rather obvious direction at the moment, that all could change as time goes by, nothing is decided yet.

5754:

page, were they informed that their edits were being reviewed, or was there a way that they could be confused about why their edits weren't showing live? Also, was their a way for Reviewers and Admins to see which edits needed to be reviewed, either at Recent Changes or some other page? And how liberally was the Reviewer flag handed out?

1384:

believe according to Knowledge guidelines the article has merits which could allow it to be kept. Numerous Bands on Knowledge also utilize Allmusic.com (the all music guide which is not editable by any outside source) as a verifiable reference, as the My Revenge article did. I have also found another source which I wanted to implement:

6045:, meaning a single user feels that they do not meet our minimum standards. Unlike our other deletion processes, the creator of an article, or anyone else, is free to remove the tag if they do not agree with reasoning. Of course they should only do so if they really believe the nomination is invalid, and should leave a descriptive 4805:. It's adding an NS:0 to the REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE template, but not actually removing the template. There were a couple others as well, though I don't have diffs handy. The result is... well, honestly, it's harmless, but I have no idea why it's doing that. Didn't know if you had any leads as to what's going on, perhaps? Thanks, 3830:

commended for that, and that's in no way diminished by the fact that somebody else was working independently on another RFC. I don't know if there's ever been a situation where two people have worked independently on the same RFC; I imagine it will never be a simple matter in such cases to settle the best way to proceed. :) --

6170:

thankfully at this time does not seem to be happening). I disagree with the editor who claimed there was one option to enable pending changes and two to disable it (in reality it is the other way around) and would prefer not to be lumped into the same category as someone objecting to three options being put forth.

6491:

Yule Kilcher? Leo Rhode? Benjamin B. Talley? Clem Tillion? Diana Tillion? I dare you to tell me that any of these people are not notable. Bet you if I don't WTAF and insert their names into certain articles, someone would try and revert it. Strict adherence to such a policy/practice/mindset sounds rather

4744:, since it was meant to be a wikilink to a category. I've since realized the error of my ways (i.e. realized that wikilinks to categories don't show up as wikilinks in the text), gone back and made it an external link, rather than a wikilink. Is there a better way to handle wikilinks to categories? Thanks! 167:

community decided. I'm done. I need to limit my time on Knowledge at present, and wish for that time to be spent pleasantly and productively. When I've made a commitment, though, it grieves me not to keep it. I'm not asking you to do anything: I'm just explaining why I can't keep my word as given at the AfD.

6618:

I get that you are relatively new here, but I don't get why you can't seem to understand that my only involvement with this was closing the discussion despite having it repeatedly explained to you. The correct place to discuss spinning this back off wuld be the talk page of he article it is currently

6490:

or don't mention it on Knowledge at all." Obviously, we don't have an active project with the resources for such a thing right this moment. Let me throw out several names which should be familiar to a resident of the southern Kenai Peninsula. Brother Asaiah Bates? Milo Fritz? Earl D. Hillstrand?

6482:

The deleted sourced content referred to (among others) two individuals, John Tracy and John Carpenter. Both were at the station for over two decades apiece and are well-known not only for their association with the station, but the role they played in the station literally dominating television news

5191:

Once again, my only role here was to interpret what consensus was wached during the course of the debate, not to particpate on that debate. Also, I believe your questions were answered repeatedly during the course of said debate, you just kept asking them again because you dodn't loke the answers you

5186:

guidelines. Many more references and points are still there which needs further discussion and which may help the editors to reconsider their decisions. Help me out to put my points clearly as i believe the editors are still not clear of many aspects which i am aware of as it has not been discussed.

4942:

was arrived in during the course of the debate, and to take action that reflects that consensus. That is all I did, if one particpates in a discussion they shouldn't be the one to close it. the reasons for these deletions are already explained in the discussions themselves. And you should probably be

3829:

being "bold" in starting it may not be the best approach to get a good outcome. :D (My bold comment is a reference to Petr's edit summary, by the way, for those who haven't seen it. :) It amused me.) Personally, I appreciate your willingness to get going on it, as it's important; I think you're to be

3715:

Hi, before I started my proposal I've been searching for a while if there isn't any similar somewhere. I couldn't find it, and that's why I started it. If there is any rfc regarding PC it would be nice if you could instead of telling me how bad it is to start similar talk beside of existing one, tell

3427:

I gave a warning based on my own experience. Not only was I insulted by an admin, but other admins defended that action and told me I deserved it for daring to make such a proposal. I know not every meta regular is like that, but they stood by and did nothing, apparently not caring about a user being

3378:

are not helpful and, in my opinion, unbecoming of any member of our project, let alone a functionary. You are supposed to represent the best that English Knowledge has to offer; someone who can demonstrate a maturity of spirit and decision notwithstanding the pressures of helping to run a Wiki. Those

2782:

but there is an unforseen consequence. I was about to tackle an editor about serious COI, believing he was adding POV information, and sourcing it to his own attack piece he posted on a citizenwiki type blog, and to a book he wrote. I think I read somewhere among the the various edits removed that he

2475:

This vermont music site was unavailable for a while and had a malware warning but i think it has since been resolved, if not let me know. if you could take a look and let me know if this could be a useful reference to improve the my revenge (band) article in an effort to get it into the encyclopedia,

2424:

Your AfD elaboration was admirable for me and I know it's a very difficult to read completely that long discussion, but my aim was just to know if my AfD POV was correct or not? In fact, I just wanted to know that I understood WP policies right or not?! Please forget my message, I do apologize again.

1871:

You guys are alright, i don't care what they say...Beeblebrox: you got my back, thanks for deleting the email; MBisanz: butt in butt in (btw, i think i remember you...the signature looks familiar). Anyway, Beeblebrox i'm a little confused, how can i sign in as a user that doesn't exist? I got another

1842:

I've done some digging to see if there is any other way to reclaim the account, and I'm afraid it looks like there is not. If we can't verify that you are the same user then we can't accept any request based on that presumption. I'm not saying I don't believe you, but we have had problems on occasion

1596:

Actually, I think I acted too hastily before and didn't look deeply enough into the history of the page. I also failed to notice the redirect I restored was to a category and not a list article. I don't know where the idea came from that such a redirect is appropriate but it is not, at least not when

1474:

As for Big Heavy World, I keep getting that malware warning too. The site had parts of it down for a couple months and now that it's back up, I think they are still trying to work out problems. I'll keep you apprised as to when I see that it's safe to visit the site. My interest lies in Vermont music

1352:

Hi thanks for the reply, I don't really understand the technicalities of the procedure so thanks for explaining things. The large orange box was simply for showing my departure from Knowledge and I've simply added some notes below to show my return. I'm not "grave dancing" whatsoever, and the fact is

1337:

I doubt I will be reopening it, but the certifiers or anyone else who feels it should be re-opened may do so at any time. I would add that the comments about the persons bringing the RFC which you have chosen to post in a large box at the top of your talk page reflect poorly on you. "Grave dancing"

661:

To explain that a bit better, it has been my experience that, regardless of the user's intentions, the "pwn" string gets other users' backs up, making good-faith collaboration difficult, and that was the thrust of my username warning. If they had not wanted to change it, I wouldn't have blocked them.

7127:

who has had 1676 edits since 10 June 2009 and seems to be interested in both geography and aviation. We're not talking about a 10 edit red user whose only contributions are creating an article about his favorite YouTube band. You might be interested in his edits in July of 2009 where he edited a lot

6958:

and had flipped over to the ANI discussion and was working through it when I found you saying, "It's getting late and my wife just opened a bottle of wine, so I am going to be absent for a while here." You ought to get a barnstar of some sort for offering perhaps the best reason for signing off that

6509:

Finally, still on the subject of Craig, this is where it really gets scary to me. No mention of Rachelle Waterman in the article, which could be understandable if there are BLP issues. I don't watch a whole lot of true crime trash television, but I'm sure a lot of people do. It seems the ratio of

5820:

And you see, that kind of half-assed scrutiny and second-guessing is what drives us members of the ARS mad. You're taking offense against the ARS because of an AfD that I found through the standard delsort; I wasn't in "rescue mode", and thus it's unfair to link it to the Squadron behavior for other

5181:

when it ended abruptly. My point on "significant coverage" has still not been answered. I only wrote to the editors that i will be travelling and will have limited access to my mail for 3-4 days. Livitup has done a detailed study has have found one significant coverage and two minor coverage ( which

5046:

It was fairly obvious when initially reviewing the debate that something was fishy, and of course we had one user openly canvassing others on top of it, but on the whole I found the arguments presented by both sides to be rather weak. However, I will adjust my closing statement to reflect that there

4377:

I emailed you because I think you're doing something uncool, and wanted to give you a chance to change your mind and address it quietly first. If I intended to canvass, you would probably not have been a good person to email. I've been discussing this with PR77 via email (no other option), but not

4305:

Yesterday, through nothing more than coincidence, I became aware of a number of unused userboxes and pages with no apparent use or connection to WP in Proofreader's userspace. I nominated them for deletion so that the community could decide if these pages should be retained or not, as with any other

3786:

the RFC when it is finished. There's been a recent movement towards getting three people to close contentious or particularly important RfCs. It does not necessarily need to be admins who do these closes, but admins often do. I feel pretty confident that Beeblebrox intends to open the RfC to comment

2640:

Funny you would say such a thing. I'm actually curious (but don't have time right now to do the research) as to whether or not Young is the longest-serving congressman to have never run unopposed. I'm pretty sure he's always had an opponent, even if some of them have been, ahem, less than positive

2470:

hello beeblebrox I am now working on cleaning up and making the my revenge (band) page workeable. I am an intern working to improve this article and will be putting it into my sandbox shortly. in an effort to improve the references & verifiability i was wondering if you could take a look at this

1800:

Would you please undelete my blank user page that you deleted on January 3, 2010? Or at least help by explaining how to create a user page with the exact same name to reclaim my contributions...i've obviously changed my mind about being here and i'de like to un-red and re-blue my name on the history

1451:

Hi Beeblebrox, thanks a lot for getting back to me and I appreciate your willingness to userfy this article affording me the opportunity to work to rectify the issues. One point about Allmusic.com - Their scope is more narrow than you define it, they only cover professionally published material that

1383:

as just one example of many. This page is not nominated nor tagged, yet the use of the band bio is not in question. This occurs with innumerable Band Articles on Knowledge. Moreover, there were people in favor of deleting the My Revenge article, but also quite a few Editors in favor of keeping it. I

1321:

Hi, following my departure from Knowledge last month you closed a rather absurd RFC/U opened about me. I didn't feel at all comfortable about the lack of scrutiny given to those harassing me and their general misconduct, but I promised to review my decision this month and it really looks as if there

182:

Wow, that is a mess.Certainly no hard feelings on my end, it is clear you endeavored in good faith to improve the article. I have found that knowing when to walk away is an essential skill, not only here but in the real world. Sometimes your presence, despite your best intentions, is harmful rather

6591:

guidelines as the references provided have significant coverage of this idea. Livitup has himself suggested in his detailed study that there is significant covereage in one reference and 2 minor coverages for the idea Dissolve the box. I provide few more new references for the same. Hope this will

6466:

I've started to notice something really weird. Maybe you've noticed the same or have thoughts to share. It's almost as if the Knowledge community is compartmentalizing (or ghettoizing) just who and what can and can't be mentioned on Knowledge. In lots of recent discussion on notability, starting

4178:

I'm not a frequent participant at MFD, so I'll poke around there and see if this really is common. If it is, then I disagree with the practice in general, but then I guess my disagreement would be with the system, not this particular instance. After I've poked around, I'll comment, but to save me

3757:

OK, I didn't really noticed that "f 400/150 users wanted this, then 150/65 editors removed it... Why did the later group get its way" was actually a thread related to open rfc, neither I have User:Beeblebrox/sandbox on my watchlist. I quite agree that it's my bad I didn't check further, but I still

3326:

They have now both deleted material I supplied under the Criticisms section of the Corrections Department page claiming I am using it as a coatrack. I reverted both their edits as in my opinion the information is totally on topic. However, I am new to Knowledge editing. Could you take a look please

2889:

I quit contributing to Meta. It doesn't really have any relevance to this project that I can see and it obviously has no standards for admin behavior, so I don't think I'll be hanging about there anymore except for steward elections. I've also been openly advocating for others to do the same as our

2870:

I took a look. I do believe actions there to be regrettable but I include, again, your own actions in that broad category. I left Nemo a note saying that I wish his actions had been targetted to de-escalate rather than to enflame, and I now leave the same desire here. What actions are you taking

2306:

Not only the phenomena, but what impressed me was your sound and sage advice in how to deal with it. I know we've crossed paths many times over the years .. and there's just always a good feeling associated with my thoughts when I see your sig. Just that I found an excuse to drop by and say hi ..

1827:

A gmail address can be created by anyone and is not proof of anything. I have no way of knowing if that email was ever associated with that account or with the name behind it. You would need to sign in as that user and make this request again, it would then be granted without question. And actually

1611:

Well I'll admit since I personally don't like the use of "lists" on Knowledge and since the page was created by a repeat sockpuppet offender, I nominated it for deletion. But if you find the page necessary and in the guidelines, then so be it. But shouldn't it be "List of visual kei musical groups"

1129:

which edits were a problem. You never did that. Oversight can remove every revision of the page that had any problematic content on it to the point where even administrators won't be able to see it. But you just need to tell us, off wiki through the oversight OTRS system or by emailing me directly,

532:

True, anyone can upload a video, however I am talking about only videos uploaded by the channels ShayCarl, ShayTards, iPhoneTard, ShayLoss, and any other channels that are partner channels run by Shay Carl, or his wife Colette (also known as Katilette) and channels run by his other family members.

7107:

I tried to keep from commenting during the RFA on what pretty much everyone in Alaska thinks of Whittier, which is that they are all insane, or "Whidiots". Over half the population lives in one big, monstrously ugly building, they built a fuel storage facility for their town in front of one of the

7104:

It saddens me how many people will march into a debate like this with criteria that they make up out of thin air, making broad declarations that any airport that is open to the public is automatically notable even if it is essentially a long driveway on a beach and nothing more and has received no

6826:

Further, with respect, I see you responding all over this topic. Nary a single post goes by without your immediate counterargument. I've seen ownership of articles, but this is starting to look like ownership of an entire subject. Perhaps, again with due respect, you ought to stand down a bit, and

6525:

I have notied he growing trend of not being able to distinguish betwen notability sufficient for a stand alone article vs notability to be mentioned in the context of a related subject. I know of most of the people you list, and have amet the Tillions back when Diana was still alive. Great people

6173:

I'm glad that you have been able to clarify the concerns people have expressed regarding the intentions of the RFC and its background while not getting caught up in the merry-go-round—keeping the number of active conversation threads down helps immensely with making the discussion manageable. Good

5911:

I will not be involved in administrating or closing the RFC. I tried that last time and it didn't work out so well, creating the need to do this again without the spectre of the never-ending "trial period" hanging over it. as a result, this time I set up a structure for an RFC designed to force a

5844:

I listed it in the Rescue List to promote the best expected behavior from it, which is to include the available sources into the article, to entice them to find more sources for the other articles in the bundle, and to integrate them into the articles. I didn't have time to do it as I pointed out,

5832:

evaluate the sources to the point that I thought they inferred some notability to the cassette. (if I didn't I wouldn't have listed them there). The whole point of AfDs should be asessing all the evidence available, not deleting anything with unclear status; bringing reasonable coverage of sources

4867:

Hi!Beeblebrox I believe deleting the article without answering the question which i have raised is not fair, nor democratic. I simply request you to go through the questions in my last few comments on the articles for deletion. Deleting without any reasons is not as per the wikipedia spirit.Thanks

4221:

I'm not sure why would need to have this discussion off-wiki, the short answer would be that I consider this nothing more than housekeeping, it is not part of any dispute, and the community will decide what to do with the pages through the usual consnsus based processes. How I came across them was

3805:

My RfC was closed before it even properly started with comment "don't do this this way" I am trying to find out what is wrong on "my way" and correct on "his way" and I still see that only difference is that his RfC is about to be managed and closed by local sysops while mine was started by me and

2218:

I actually did read some of the evidence, and was planning to post an opinion after going through the rest of it. Insofar it would have been along the lines of "meh, people tend to lampoon politicians they don't like and defend those they like; finding sources for that is not hard; among Knowledge

1857:

Sorry to butt in, I've looked at it a bit more. It seems fairly clear that the original account was owned by a Henry Delforn of Carpinteria, CA. If this new person, whose IP locates to Murrieta, CA, could somehow prove he is Henry Delforn (like sending a trusted user a copy of his license, utility

1378:

Dear Beeblebrox, Regarding your deletion of the My Revenge (band) article. I am writing to ask if you would please be willing to tell me a little more about what the article's weaknesses were and why it got deleted. I'm also wondering what I could do, as the Article's primary author, to strengthen

166:

and I simply can't do it any longer. I haven't changed my position on the validity of the article, but I've been accused (on various talk pages, and never the appropriate notice boards) of edit warring, ownership, disruption, and even pedophilia by implication, all for trying to carry out what the

6548:

What to do about it? If there's just one Alaskan willing to step up and actively work with the Ambassador Program, that alone would make a huge step in the right direction, IMO. The AP has done a lot of work towards improving several Alaska-related articles. However, this work is being done by

6540:

I actually have a Clem Tillion story to share, but I'll get back to that. I need to leave for work soon, and hope to stay busy this weekend. Without getting into too much detail about *my job*, I had to roust some homeless dude on Sunday or Monday. He didn't get very far trying to pick a fight

5753:

Hello there! I wasn't around for the PenChan trial run, and I just have a question about how it was administered before I !vote at the RFC, and you seem to be one of the more knowledgable folks around here (globally, but on this issue specifically). When an IP or non-reviewer edited an applicable

4392:

Well, it's only "uncool" if you assume (as you did) that I am acting in bad faith. Asking or community input on some pages of questionable value/relevance to this project is not generally considered an act of bad faith. I'm not sure I even recall having any direct interaction with them during the

3824:

will correct me if I'm wrong, I'm sure, but from my observation I think the concern was simply that this RFC is likely to be tremendously controversial and likely to deadlock if not carefully prepared to avoid that. I don't think there was any issue whatsoever with you starting an RFC, but simply

2180:

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name

1416:

As for Allmusic, I would suggest that regardless of their reliability they are not a source that adds much as far as notability because their goal is to cover absolutely everything, no matter how obscure it may be. So, a reference to a listing there can be good for verification of the basic facts

1406:

As the closer of the debate it was not my task to evaluate the article itself, but rather to determine what the outcome of the discussion about the article was. However I can address some of the concerns you have expressed here. There are thousands of band bio pages on Knowledge, the existence of

1211:

I don't think it is going to go forward. I had hoped to find someone who actually lived in or at least close Anchorage to assist with it but that never materialized and I don't have the time or resources to regularly traverse the 250 miles from where I live. I'm considering the idea that it could

448:

That sounds like a good idea, although Shay Carl has grown considerably in terms of followers since then to over 2,000,000 subscriptions on YouTube split between two channels. Would it be possible for you to get the previous contents of the article for me to give me somewhere to start. Thanks!

340:

Call it my intuition but I'm guessing that his username is a direct challenge to patrolling admin that you guys won't block him based on the username itself, but his contribution speaks volume of his nonsense louder (my other hunch being he's a returning editor!) than his username does. Just my 2

6933:

Short answer: for most nominations I use twinkle, which does everything for you and so I honestly wasn't sure if mfd noms were supposed to be substed or not and apparently I guessed wrong whan manually adding the bundled noms. To be perfectly honest I don't really understand what substing is all

5980:

I assure I read every word of your prolonged exchange with Rangoondispenser, even the parts that were not related to whether we should keep or delete the article. I also read everybody else's remarks, and I believe that the "delete" camp made the more compelling case for their position that the

4238:

I see you have decided that i am lying and you want to make the deletion discussions about me instead of the nominated pages. Classy. This isn't about me, and really it isn't about Proofreader either, it is about a bunch of useless pages with no relation to this project. Please stop attacking my

3854:

My apologies for seeming to ignore this, I apparently got numerous new messages while away and didn't even notice this thread until just now. Peter, last year I did pretty much the same thing that you did, just throw open an RFC about PC and hope that it would result in a usable consensus. While

2625:

Really? Wow, that would be so... stupid. I can't say I'm a huge fan of Young, but the guy just gets re-elected every time without even campaigning, and most Alaskans have a bad taste in their mouth after the crybaby act when Miller couldn't admit he'd lost. Anyway, feel free to re-add that if he

1388:

This interview is from www.bigheavyworld.com, which is the Vermont music Library and Archive. It is the largest collection of Vermont-based music in the state. I thought this would be a reliable source to add to the Article as it provides verifiable information which also cannot be edited by any

6025:

are about to be deleted and I cannot get hold of any editor who could re-evaluate the changes I made and remove the deletion tag. Is there any chance at all you could help me with this, please? I don't know if I can do that myself and I really don't want to break any Knowledge rule. I strongly

5840:

notice the bundled nomination. If you had done your homework you would have noticed that I explicitly mentioned them at the Rescue List notification, and you would have not bring that particular grief to my talk page. In fact a couple of the links were included so that others could see if they

4915:

I believe deleting the article without answering the question which i have raised is not fair, nor democratic. I simply request you to go through the questions in my last few comments on the articles for deletion. Deleting without any reasons is not as per the wikipedia spirit.Thanks Vartmaan

4097:

Please don't focus on just one reason I gave. I cannot review the article to see what sources it included, but it appears those editors were mainly upset about a POV concern, not notability. An article being biased is not itself a legitimate reason for deletion. That area of the world, and its

1991:

MBisanz, i was telling Beeblebrox that i wanted the exact same name to reclaim my contributions. i think that re-registering would not make my red go blue...in other words, i want to reclaim the contributions i made using my name as it was prior to my user page being deleted (which btw, it was

889:

the discussion that proceeded it that led to the RfC. There has been a lot of fast and slow edit warring on the article for years which led me to full protect it after warning editors. Andy is insisting that the RfC is flawed, but I believe that it may possibly a means to

6544:

As far as interest in Knowledge from Alaska? I've done enough reading of material on here to realize that there was a flurry of activity in 2006/7, then pretty much nothing since. Speaking as someone who has been a "hobbyist historian" since around the time of graduation from high school, I

6474:

With the KTUU article, I'm back to an old argument. It's undue weight to only mention Sarah Palin, an insignificant contributor to the station who became a celebrity in another career two-decades-plus later, as having formerly worked at the station. (More OR?)I was regularly watching their

6169:

discussing the three options, please note I explicitly did not disagree with your choice and said I fully understood why three choices were offered. My concern was not regarding the format of the posed question, but what would happen if vote splitting occurred between options 2 and 3 (which,

5465:

If you log out, you'll see that the sections on the main protected page don't have edit buttons on them; even though people can edit the subpages, there's no easy, intuitive way for a non-admin to get to the pages. maybe add a direct link to the subpages, labelled: "vote here" or soemthing?

2409:

No need to apologize, I'm just having trouble understanding why you would want further explanation regarding something you feel is unimportant and does not matter. What I can tell you is that I don't really have an opinion on the article itself, as it was my task to act as a closer and not a

5856:

This also points to a deficiency in the methods used to evaluate the ARS behavior, suggesting that the poor reputation of the ARS is not entirely our own fault. So if you think that little diligence in assessing the evidence is enough reason to hold a grudge, what should we think of people

905:

Gulp. I hadn't really looked into it at all, just going through banned users contribs and trying to erase as much of their footprint as possible. I was actually just about to sign off for the day, but if I can find some time in the next few days I'll have a closer look at all this.

1428:

Of the 528 pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 60 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time Google visited this site was on 2012-02-02, and the last time suspicious content was found on this site was on

6510:

mention of Waterman or her case on Knowledge versus out in the real world is extremely low. It's almost as if it's the result of a concerted effort. Perhaps I shouldn't dwell too much on teenage criminals, seeing as how we were talking about Winona Fletcher this morning at work.

5238:

What's missing from this picture? AFD is not for discussing users or casting aspersions about their motivations. If you see a user who is making a lot of inappropriate nominations, you should talk to them about it on their talk page. If that doesn't work there are myriad forms of

4672:

What happened to 84, 85, 86, 87, 89 ,91 & 93 video clips from the Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade on X-Entertainment website that is not found? Can you tell me WHAT HAPPENED TO THE VIDEO CLIPS FROM MACY'S PARADE? Because it's no place like download or watching. PLEASE HELP!!!

1828:

it is generally considered extremely unwise to post your email address anywhere on Knowledge so I've taken the liberty of redacting it from your post. If you had email enabled on that account you should be able to recover your login information if you have forgotten or lost it.

4651: 6841:

Sorry if it came across that way, it was not meant that way, but is it not the case that AfD is the venue to discuss articles that fail notability and someone thinks should be deleted ? There is no bar on an article being listed (save for one linked to from the main page) and

417:

that ended with a decision to delete. Page protection was only added after the article was repeatedly recreated without the problems identified in that discussion being rectified. So, it would not be appropriate to simply undelete it. I would suggest instead that you create a

6471:(see below) on through these recent AfDs, I hear what to me is a lot of opinion pawned off as policy. It's as if I have no choice to believe that "notability" essentially boils down to "surviving an AfD" and anything else I'm hearing is just so much bullshit and platitudes. 6360:

You didn't see the titling a post on a AFD as 'Racism on Knowledge' as inflammatory? You're clearly lying or deranged. I'm the one who nominated this crash for deletion as I have also nominated around 20 other articles since last Christmas. Your behavior I take as a personal

2559:

It was created by mistake based on a source subsequently found to be unverifiable and removed. When this was discovered, I asked for it to be removed. Seemed to be the appropriate course of action. I appreciate your vigilance in investigating the legitimacy of the issue

2154:, were it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students. 1389:

outside source. I would be grateful if you would take a second look at the article and to reconsider how if it can be kept; or how I, as the primary author, could improve the article to warrant it being kept on Knowledge. I appreciate your time! Thanks a lot, sincerely,

4099: 612: 4222:

nothing more than random happenstance, then I noticed there was a whole pile of subpages there that either served no purpose related to Knowledge, were unused userboxes, or were in violation of policy. That's all there is to it, there is no hidden agenda or subtext.

5833:

should to the talk never been seen in bad light. This is not true of indiscriminate sources as those found in listings and catalogs, but I made sure that my links weren't to those. I voted Keep because I thought the article merits a Keep with the evidence I found.

3394:

Avi, with all due respect I don't see an insult, gratuitous or otherwise, in that comment and I'm unsure why you think there is one. I was warning that user about how Meta has been reacting to any proposal from an en.wp user over there lately, not insulting him.

3084:

Can you link me to them (is there a way for me to see your deletions?). We can't really have Good articles without reviews and it doesn't seem fair to punish the nominators by just delisting, so I thought I would re-assess them quickly myself when I have time.

6808:

Saying that you are "...more than happy to nom any others..." sounds a bit like AfD being used as a tactic to prevent my reverting to the articles. From reading some AfDs, I also see this omnibus being tabled as a possibly concessionary measure to counter the

1626:

Just a note, but the user who created this list has been blocked indefinitely for being a sockpuppet of Yui Ponyo, who got blocked indefinitely for messing around with articles on visual kei bands. If the list is to remain, it should be checked by an expert.

6026:

believe that both of these articles comply with Knowledge's content policies and have neutral points of view. I took the feedback on board and made some changes but was that enough?? Please let me know, I have just 2 hours left now... Thank you so much! Kat

6541:

with me, but he did manage to break my camera in the process. It really would have been a waste of time to press charges, so now I have to hope to have an extra $ 80-120 in my pocket to replace it, as it appears Fred Meyer has cameras on sale this weekend.

5079:

In the interests of transparency, can I please place a talk page notice on the talk page of all editors (both Keep and Delete) that are not subject of blocks about the new discussion ? I propose something along the lines of "Due to serious issues involving

2648:

up to 5,000 pages by now, but seemed to have made it to over 4,800. Shouldn't be too hard, but I may have to deal with other things than this for the next however many weeks. We'll see. LOTS of pretty much useless stubs, but I'm sure you already noticed

5354:? You said on the Hawkins talk page (18:28, 5 March 2012 (UTC)) that the BLP subject was being "deliberately obstructive" and that his objections to having his date of birth included in Knowledge were "not relevant". As far as I can tell from a reading of 1893:

Bingo. If you could log into one of your old accounts on another wiki, I could do it then. It would require some shuffling of stuff around on my end, but once you log in and prove it, I'll provide detailed instructions on what to click and where to do it.

616: 5243:

available to you. Please limit your comments at AFD discussions to the actual topic instead of trying to impugn the integrity of the nominator, who is probably just a user like yourself doing what they think is best to help improve Knowledge. Thanks.

203:

I'm not that bothered but I think that the Mailchimp speedy deletion was a mistake. It did cite that it was one of the more important email marketing programs so it was stating the importance - something that was supposed to be the original problem.

7043:. The timing is not coincidental but they clearly stated it was a serious nom. All the other joke RFAs have been removed so it appears this is being treated as a real RFA. If it isn't it is the least funny of all the lame jokes we saw this year. 618: 5496:

I laid the groundwork for this thing, and the admins coordinating it asked me to be the one to turn it on. I didn't do the protection and I am not administrating the RFC, and I'm not sure what to do about this, I could try adding links I guess.

4531:

Just wondering why the page for Lake Erie Drum and Bugle Corps was deleted, and why I was not notified. Seems kind of sneaky and underhanded. Also, how do you justify deleting an article about an organization that holds a civil rights award?

606: 4600:

says Einstein obtained Swiss citizenship in 1901 so the Swiss side of the dispute might be technically correct. He was born German, invented special relativity while Swiss, but went back to being German later. Aren't nationality disputes fun?

5047:

is no prejudice against a speedy renomination, I think that might be the best course of action now that the event is over, the socks have been caught, and the user doing the canvassing has had it made clear to them that it won't be tolerated.

2174:

The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and

2051:

Yeah, I cannot give you access to an old account you lost the password to, because I don't have a way to reset passwords. The best I can do is to let you have the old username and old userpage with a new, empty, contributions history. Sorry.

1370: 5960:

either way. Rangoondispenser, the editor that more thoroughly argued for a delete on grounds of not enough notability, explicitly agreed to disagree with me; I sincerely can't understand how that position can be summarized as other than a

614: 7166:. They're both back at it again and have both reverted this evening after I warned them both at the article page and on their individual talk pages against continuing to do so. Will you consider the matter again, or should I list it at 6373:

2- I ask him to name one military crash with no fatalities that has an article. I'll be happy to nominate it. Since I follow the yearly templates, I don't know of one. So at the moment I believe this editor's boasts are so much hot

4100:

http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ayna.az%2F2011-04-02%2Fsiyaset%2F5476-kelbecer-agdaban-soyqirim%2Fprint&act=url.--

2730:

Thank you for not considering 4 days too short... Since revoking of talk page and e-mail access better serves the purpose of requesting a block, so be it. Again, as long as you state in the log that this is requested, we are good to

1379:

this article to pass Knowledge Guidelines so that the article could be undeleted if improvements were made. What has confused me is the numerous use of bios from bands' record label websites as references throughout Knowledge. See:

620: 665:

I admit that viewpoint is probably based on my experience of earlier years (the mid-2000s) when it was more common for people to attempt to use that name. If some user seriously wants a name with it, I would not object to an RFC.

4312:

And now Floq has decided to try and tie these nominations back to the previous incident on meta. They are two entirely separate issues, what happened over there has nothing to do with the acceptability of these pages under en.wp

1710:

I was about to rollback the warning but I accidentally rollbacked your reply instead bleh. I rollbacked his revert, obviously he's a clueless new contributor that just started vandalism fighting and got misunderstood. Will warn.

2342:

based on the flood of pages that that editor had created that all seemed questionable (and the vast majority of which were speedied, by others). I was taking a shortcut and hoping to get away with it, but you rightly busted me.

5772:

Users were informed that their edit was being held pending review, although there was sometimes confusion. This is something that could hopefully be rectified when/if the tool is brought back. All pending edits were listed at

5513:

Looks like Floquenbeam beat me to it, all fixed now. Thanks! If there are any further issues, they should probably be addressed to the coordinators on the talk page, I swore my hands would be off this thing once it went live.

3606:

is still very much valid, if the community comes back with a "yes, we want this tool". Having said that, further development will need to be fitted around the other tools we're working on at the moment and in the near future.

2711:

It appears you meet my criteria, but I always like to double-check before imposing such a block that the blockee understand that they will also have talk page and email access revoked and will not be able to appeal the block

123:

where I made a commitment to do as you instructed in the closing statement. There are two editors who have long sought to delete or eviscerate the article, one of whom has used a series of user names (unacknowledged on his

491:

Thanks, would a YouTube video be considered a reliable source if it came from one of Shay's channels, as I see that other articles about YouTube Personalities cite videos from that persons channel(s) on YouTube? Thanks.

3931:

Hello again, I am concerned that the page protection is about to expire and the involved editors have not yet started discussing change to content. Is it appropriate to extend the protect? Or hope someone else will edit

6238:

I did not want to even mention the countless and (I'm sorry) but pathetic articles on United States military aviation incidents that have no fatalities and are not notable. Look them up, why has this page been deleted?

3558: 3346:, and were made primarily to stop your repeated violations of that policy. I don't have any more authority over article content than anyone else and I know basically nothing about this topic. You may want to consider 3736: 4567:

in fact notified, the notice is still right there on your talk page, so your accusations are utterly without merit.Since you participated in the discussion I am puzzled as to why you would feign ignorance about it.

3901:

and who outed whom is a bit confusing. You presumably have the details so could advise and also guide to avoid re-outing or further outing. My post to COIN is my first on this matter, not otherwise involved. Thanks.

6091:

Thanks for letting me know. I've deleted the article and the AFD since there is no need to discuss such an obvious attempt to subvert the discussion. If you see something like that in the future you can tag it with

3772:

I'm afraid that would be a discussion between you and those people who you feel have chastised you, and I have no input there, as I'm not one of them. :) I'll have to let the person you asked handle that one. But I

4115:

My job was to determine what consensus was reached during the debate, and I believe I did that. I'm not going to re-run that debate with you here. You are free to try and create a properly sourced article and/or a

579:

is its independence from the subject. You need to find something where someone besides the subject or the website they post on has written something substantive about them. You can ask about specific references at

4843:

It looks like that script has been in place since 2008, with no problems. Hrm. I thought it might be some recent script change or some technical whatever that was causing an issue. Guess it's no big deal. Thanks!

3202:

As a a banned user their review is invalid, and it they were the only one to edit that review page, so I would say you have a clean slate and can re-nominate it at any time without regard for the previous review.

3186:

and this review has now been deleted, the copy editor chaps are now giving the article a going over and once they are done I wish to nominate it again, but as the first one has been deleted what actually happens?

6692:

by reiterating your not-a-vote tag. I would like to see lots of input, whether support or oppose, with rationale. Maybe omnibus is the way to go. I just want the community to all be heard so we can settle this.

4082:

AFD closes are done based on strength of argument, not who is making the arguments. The argument that there are not sufficient sources was not effectively refuted during the debate, so the article was deleted.

3562: 924:

Thanks. I would appreciate it if you could. Something needs to be done because the RfC is now practically a fiasco and I will soon have to extend the full page protection again until it is resolved.

3069:

There were one or two more. I suppose the alarm bells should have maybe gone off a bit sooner when such a new user dove right in to GA reviewing, he started doing them less than a week after his first edit...

1492: 1235:

Sounds good. In the past, it's been pretty common for a first effort to lead to a successful effort in later years, so you'll be in good company. Thanks for the update, and good luck in your future efforts!

4682: 1322:

have been multiple positive developments in that regard, so I'm notifying you of my return. I understand you technically may be obliged to re-open the RFC/U and I won't take any offence were you to do so.--

2410:

participant in the discussion, so I only evaluated the discussion in order to determine what consensus was reflected by it, and how I arrived a t the conclusion I did is detailed in my closing statement.

3777:

concerned from your note here that you might misunderstand what Beeblebrox was doing at the administrators' noticeboard; he wasn't asking admins to be participants in the discussion, particularly, or to

2444: 610: 2381:

I thought my closing statement was pretty clear about how I came to the conclusion that we keep it. Since you say you don't actually care anyway I don't see any reason to elaborate on it any further.

882: 3871:

and "turned it over" to the admins who volunteered to help out with it. It should be up and running soon, there will probably be a site-wide notice about it but at the very least it will be listed at

3105: 2030:

Actually, if you look at the history of your old talk page, it is clear that the user page was blanked, I left a note on the talk page asking if that should be interpreted as a request to delete it,

4421:

Hi, You deleted the page Category:People educated at Edgeborough school on 23 Feb and so have unlinked several names attached to that category. Would there be a problem in re-creating the Category?

2151: 2798:

If his sourcing is not acceptable, it is equally unacceptable whether he is the author or not, whether he has a proven COI or not. So I would say comment on the sources, not the person using them.

4010:

I've started a thread in good faith, and you've come by to derail it with dismissive comments. Is this intentional? Or just an unfortunate coincidence that makes it look like you're trolling me?

2675:

add up to 4,813 articles. I don't know if this discrepancy is important or if there are automated tools available to check for the problem. Perhaps these three articles erroneously carry two

2168:

All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.

5358:, his objections are highly relevant, and he has every right under policy to ask that this material be excluded from Knowledge. And if that is so, then your comments were very uncalled for. -- 728:

Well, the exact language was "until the 17th" so I suppose that would mean it is over at 12:00am on the 17th. I would be sure to check in with your mentors before re-entering the area though.

3695:

Thank you Sven. As soon as we have three uninvolved admins on board to administrate I'll be moving it to project space so they can take it over and get it running. we only need one more....

6644: 4025:

Coincidence. I assure it is not personal, it appears we are interested in the same policy areas but have differing views on many of the issues and/or their relative importance, that's all.

2663:

Also speaking of that article assessement drive (which I started when it occurred to me that some of these articles were left unassessed for as long as four or five years): the contents of

2511:, this is probably an ok source, but since it is a record label as well and obviously an advocate for the "Vermont music scene" it is not going to be valuable for purposes of establishing 1398: 6665: 5777:

page, and also wee highlighted on watchlists. The reviewer flag was handed out very liberally during the trial, it is/was considered basically an equivalent level of trust to rollback.

6763: 5956:

was met by the sources available. Both positions were amply justified with direct quotes of the relevant guidelines, so I don't see that the discussion meets the conditions for even a

4973:, I believe that all opinions made by IPs in this AfD (plus the already struck one) should have been discounted since from what I can tell they were all made by the same banned person. 5821:

than what the other members have done after my posting a notice there. But the worse thing is that you got the factors you list wrong, and still use them as a cause for prosecution.

471:. As you can see none of the references attached when it was deleted meet the definition of a relibale source, hopefuly you will be able to rectify that. Once that is done it can be 3731:

While I'm not involved in this, I am, of course, quite interested and in checking to see whether it was ready to launch noticed your message. :) The RFC was discussed 9 days ago at

704: 5561:

I'm ashamed to admit I'm not familiar with that parser function; Alarbus, since it looks like you are, could you fix it? (you can edit those three pages, they aren't protected). --

5328: 3806:

was about to be closed by wikipedia community. Does it imply that only correct RfC on important topic is the one started by user with sysop flag, or something like that? Thank you

3898: 516:, which is the problem here. I'm not sure what journalistic outlets with editorial oversight would be writing about YouTube videos, but Google News may be able to find something. 5933: 5273: 4561: 4267:- Just wondering - I am getting feedback via email this is suggesting that , have you had/there has been, some interaction on another wiki that has caused these nominations? 1220:, which is a fairly large area by AK standards and only an short flight or two and a half hour drive or bus ride from Anchorage, but that will have to wait till next year... 722: 2485: 5905: 1992:

deleted without even me requesting deletion). I don't really want to start all over again...know what i mean? i would like to pick up where i left off two years ago. Thx.

6666: 468: 2533:

thanks a lot for your hearty welcome on my talk page. i'm glad to be here. If notability is a primary issue then I will focus my attention on that aspect for purposes of

7098: 6214: 3856: 3428:

trolled by an admin in response to polite request for help that was not in any way directed at the admin who delivered the insult. I'm not the bad guy in that scenario.

3379:

comments, among others, do not exhibit such behavior in my opinion. Of course, since it is only an opinion, please feel free to ignore me if you disagree. Thank you. --

3323:. Your input was very much appreciated as I was feeling quite harassed by the two other people involved. They were claiming I had a C0I. in my opinion, they have one. 5607:

I don't see why, they can watch the individual pages, but in any event this was not my decision and I am not in charge of the RFC, I merely set it up and turned it on.

4815: 2763: 2738: 2725: 6914:

tags on the few recent nominations? The tag isn't usually substituted, and it causes a few minor bot problems. I de-substed the last few that got reported. Regards. —

5417: 5401: 645: 3636:

Yes, and thankfully Oliver can work full time only liason work between the community and engineering this time. :) It was really just a triage effort for me. Cheers,

3554: 1504: 1484: 1444: 7086: 4430: 4129: 4110: 4092: 3169: 2705: 2003: 1964: 1883: 1816: 358:

There are plenty of legitimate reasons to be a returning editor, the username is not a blatant violation of the policy. If you have any evidence of socking file at

5621:

They won't know to. You can use fullurl with action=watch... (like on AC cases) I hear that it's not your thing; I have just have not looked any further to see who

3689: 1435:

for you, which will provide you with a copy of the deleted article that you can work on until such time as the issues that led to the deletion have been rectified.

7078: 5866: 3528: 3152: 2884: 1544: 1088: 268: 631: 6955: 6123: 5891: 5267: 3791:, and it seems that he did invite anybody to help shape it at the thread I linked. I'm sure he'd welcome your collaboration, whether you're an admin or no. :) -- 3758:

don't see what is so wrong on asking the real community of wikipedia, and not only a small part called administrators to start a wider discussion on this topic.

2363: 885:(No 50 on the archive list). This was archived 2 days ago unresolved because there have been no recent edits to it. Andy and R-41 have commandeered the RfC 7108:

few remaining glaciers in the region that is still advancing, and oh yeah, they haven't gotten around to repairing the airstrip that was damaged 48 years ago...

5921: 5423:

To comment you need to edit by section, the sections for endorsements are transcluded subpages. It was decided by the admin coordinators to set it up this way.

3242: 3226: 3212: 2216: 2171:

All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.

7009: 6885: 5223: 5093: 4796: 4416: 2899: 2115: 2096: 841: 821: 6977: 6166: 5876:

me if that sounded too harsh. I mean it and won't rewrite it, but I didn't assumed bad faith at any point on your part and probably the tone was undeserved).

4281: 3911: 3704: 3336: 2292:

Your gut is correct, I am of the male persuasion. Thanks for the praise, I was beginning to wonder if I was the only one who had ever noticed this phenomena.

1837: 1704: 1362: 1347: 6305: 4854: 4834: 4770: 4697: 4356: 3864: 3648: 3631: 3363: 1245: 7141: 7118: 6451: 5475: 4788: 4402: 4387: 4329: 4231: 4216: 4202: 4188: 4173: 3294: 3280: 3264: 1944: 1926: 698: 681:

I don't think you should be slapping the username discussion template, which often has a chilling effect, on the page of a user whose name we all know does

553: 501: 484: 458: 439: 6863: 6836: 6795: 6154: 6081:

This is the Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Turkish army Sikorsky crash moved to another page. The editor who created it did minutes after you deleted it.

6004: 5990: 5885: 5523: 4643: 4629: 4577: 4372: 4248: 3479: 2701:

Toughest week of school career yet...please place a block lasting until 20:30 UTC on Friday, with the entry in the log stating "user request". Thanks much

2419: 2323: 2301: 2287: 2007: 1986: 1968: 1902: 1887: 1852: 525: 6943: 6574: 6535: 6483:

in Anchorage. Tracy has been mentioned as a key player in Lisa Murkowski's write-in campaign. "Not notable" was the pertinent part of the edit summary.

6399: 6111: 5740: 5719: 4459: 4445: 3656: 2688: 2658: 2635: 2546: 2528: 1308: 1290: 238: 6628: 6085: 5808: 5584: 5570: 5395: 5040: 4998: 4956: 4905: 4822: 4802: 3995: 3954: 3941: 3926: 3839: 3815: 3800: 3767: 3752: 3045: 1171: 1143: 371: 192: 7070: 7052: 6386:

5- Fatalities doesn't make a crash article automatically noteworthy or one without fatalities the reverse. In the last three months a crash with 14 dead

5800: 5786: 5662: 5648: 5634: 5616: 5506: 5489: 5460: 5446: 5432: 5205: 4048: 4034: 3464: 3437: 3422: 3404: 3136: 3117: 3099: 3079: 3064: 2959: 2807: 2060: 1866: 934: 915: 802: 751: 737: 405: 6281:

vote, this of course shouldn't make the keep vote any less, I frankly didn't think I needed to reply to every delete vote with a paragraph of comments.

6198: 6070: 5402: 5229: 5157: 5139: 5109: 5074: 5056: 4930: 4888: 3868: 2989: 2844: 2610:

Hmmm...the poli-sci fanboys seem to think he's running against Don Young this year. Actually, I think I would enjoy that...for about 10 or 15 minutes.

2599: 2434: 2404: 2390: 1764: 1732: 1673: 1621: 1606: 1277:

I haven't reviewed your case or even read the request, as soon as I determined for sure that the block was expired I deactivated it to remove you from

1157: 1125:

Well, it's like this: There is no policy based reason to delete the entire page and all it's history. You were asked by the Oversight team to identify

1120: 593: 141: 6778:

Before you do that you should be aware that some of them are redirects following AfD, and I am more than happy to nom any others as none of them meet

4552: 3884: 3375: 1636: 5600: 5556: 4540: 4342:

Ah, thanks for the fine details. I agree the nominations can stand alone as housekeeping suggestions. Just to note - Floq didn't sent me any emails.

1022: 5122:

My personal inclination at this point would be to not do anything that could possibly be interpreted as canvassing, but if you decide to do that be

4620:, stating that it was within 24 hours. I am marking the 3RR as 'No action' in the header but you can revise that if you want to do something there. 3028:

Hi J. The was the first time I used the nuke feature, and I was somewhat surprised it doesn't seem to have anywhere to add a reason, which would be

2955: 1426:

I just tried to check the bigheavyworld site but Google warned me not to navigate to that site, and their diagnostic page had this to say about it "

7079: 6689: 6640: 4299:

Yes, Proofreader was involved in the ridiculous dust-up at meta that I was also involved in, in that he also participated in the discussions there.

4062: 133: 6250: 2165:

Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)

7021: 6604: 5315: 4917: 4876: 4164:

MFD is pretty routinely used to remove pages of no benefit to the project. Feel free to comment there if you object to any of these nominations.

3890: 1590: 6377:

3- If those articles do exist, why don't he nominate them? It is alot easier to do than write talk page posts where you accuse people of racism.

6352: 6266: 6035: 4610: 2679:

templates or similar in their talk header? I certainly don't think I'd catch it, nor even have that much time, were I to go through it by hand.

125: 5981:

sourcing was inadequate. That someone agreed to disagree with you doesn't change any of that, it just means they were done arguing the point.

3503: 1936:

on this page. Then unify/create an SUL as the page instructs. When you return here, an account should automatically have been created for you.

5724:

No worries. I've had that happen to me a few times too (not sure why though). If they request unblocking again, I'll review that one. Cheers!

4730: 1695:. So, maybe you should try responding on the talk page instead of throwing this stupid template at me and acting like I'm some common vandal. 658:

Since it was moved to the holding pen, I probably wouldn't have seen your response if I hadn't by chance moved another report there just now.

7040: 6519: 6175: 5004: 4754: 4074: 3661:

I've closed it, since it didn't have time to get started, and since it's clear that there is work being done on the more structured one. I'm

899: 992: 7188: 7163: 6022: 3457: 3456:

is used for the Committee, Clerks, and subcommittees to make announcements, not for questions like this to the Committee. I've moved it to

3314: 1843:

with users impersonating others or trying to take credit for their actions here, so we tend to err on the side of caution in such matters.

1820: 6612: 6183: 6139: 4564:. My only role was to close the discussion in accordance with the consensus established there, which was to delete the article. You were 3616: 3388: 3196: 2102: 7132:

eventually stays or goes, we can use more like him and less of the 5 edit "create an article on your garage band and scram" red users.--

5766: 2935: 2081: 2045: 1685: 988: 786: 6949: 6076: 5710:

That's odd, I didn't get an edit conflict notice or anything. Feel free to revert or append my remarks below your decline or whatever.

4776: 3859:

did produce some results, it utterly failed to resolve the main issue of whether we would ever use PC again or not. In short, it was a

2941: 2783:

admitted, or was shown to have admitted, being that person. But now the evidence has disappeared. What do you suggest? Just forget it?

2265: 2236: 1271: 6688:

I hope my comments weren't canvassesque. I just think many don't have a clue where to render their opinions. Perhaps I should qualify

5825:

I did not use the ARS Rescue List to find the AfD, so the most common accusation of Canvassing is not present in any way at this case.

4363:

Ah, I guess I assumed that since he tried to discuss this with me by email for reasons that ware not clear to me. Striking that part.

2464: 6927: 6277:

Here's another point; The consensus was not to delete, it's the same few users that nominate every article and then comment to every

5974: 4862: 4589: 3183: 3022: 2969: 1787: 1002: 675: 414: 5259:

Thanks for providing your perspective, and I'll take all this into consideration for the future, focusing on content. Best regards,

5253: 3592: 3413:

No, you insulted all people who are regulars at Meta. You had a bad experience and generalized it to apply to all Meta regulars. --

2865: 2132: 966: 6994: 5169: 3447: 2696: 2188:

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

1749: 1331: 974: 349: 309: 281: 7000:

Huh, i checked that and it said no autoblock was detected, but that feature has been a bit screwy since the last software update.

6848:

consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term

2792: 2375: 1559: 1204: 7279: 7271: 7266: 7254: 7249: 7241: 4741: 4158: 3891: 3320: 2619: 2352: 2206: 1978:

and signing up for a new account using the old name "Henry Delforn" I moved it out of the way, so it should let you re-register.

1715: 379: 264: 97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 6475:

newscasts back then and I'm still scratching my head wondering if I ever remember seeing her. The same undue weight existed at

6370:

Various points on this AFD and this editor's behavior. 1- The editor in question made one post to this AFD and it was a comment.

4019: 3005:

Is the intent to invalidate the GA assessment? If or if not, this is going to pose an interesting problem as I'm trying to get

1597:

an honest attempt at a proper list article exists. I've tried to straighten this out by moving the page and restoring the list.

1540: 1103: 215: 176: 6587:

Hi Beeblebrox! The article on "Dissolve the box" has been directed to "Next What's In" which i believe is not in line with the

6332:

Many of those delete comments had no basis in Knowledge policy, but were rather based on the opinion of the user who wrote them

6145:

Even without the personal attacks, it was basically vandalism and threats, so I've deleted the whole thing and closed the MFD.

5301: 4526: 2829: 2668: 2573: 2182: 2071:

Do you know the hex color of the bright orange edit notices we used to use? If not, could you point me to someone who knows? –

1059: 4975:

I have not read the AfD so I have no opinion on whether this should have changed your evaluation of it, this is purely an FYI.

4007: 3973: 3543: 2962:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2498: 1195:. Do you plan to move forward with this bid? If so, please simply move it to the appropriate section; the deadline is today. - 1084: 995:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 6876:

There are already like three discussions underway regarding this, I don't see any need to open a fourth one on my talk page.

6189:

I've been working in my real life to be more diplomatic, it seems to be assisting me here as well. Thanks for your comments.

5089: 5024: 5016: 5005: 4970: 3490:

As per Muhammad Hammad Ghaffar's request, I am renaming that account to a generic name, and placing a permanent block on it.

2965: 2271:

oops ... if not a "sir" .. my apologies. It's just that I try to have a short wiki-memory, but I had a gut feeling there. —

1564: 998: 871: 508:

Generally, no. YouTube is not a reliable source as anyone can add anything they just made up to it. It could be considered a

6217:, and 4 votes for delete, this page should not have been deleted in such haste when in it is clearly very notable being the 4292:

about this by email, thanks for asking me out in the open. I pretty much already explained this above, but here it is again:

2492: 6012: 5845:

and I'm not well versed in American folk-rock. I knew the article is encyclopedic because I could learn something about it.

5376: 4983: 4652:

Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade video clips from 84, 85, 86, 87, 89, 91 & 93 gone (not found) on X-Entertainment website

2664: 1918: 6895:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

6660: 5704: 4707:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

4521: 2779: 689:" it makes no sense to add it when you know it is not in fact a violation. If it bothers anyone they can take it to RFCN. 2672: 1999: 1960: 1879: 1812: 1771: 7123:

Well, I wouldn't say "nobody cares" as somebody did create the article and on a lark I looked to see who it was. It was

7033: 6561:

was considered a "famous Alaska Republican" at the time. Or going back even further, the same could very well apply to

6102:

and note either on the talk page or in an edit summary where the previous discussion was and it will be speedy deleted.

3725: 2031: 622:

Note that I didn't actually read any of these articles or even click on the links, but it should help you get started.

229:. However, I would certainly not object to it being restored as a redirect, as it was for several momnths before today. 132:, so at first glance it may appear on the talk page there are more than two editors in the 'suppress' camp). I complain 5020: 4850: 4811: 4674: 3575: 1578: 6553:

recently. You'll find a section entitled "Famous Alaska Republicans" which lists only Palin. The section's title is

2819: 5311: 5291: 4767: 4751: 4565: 4117: 3158: 549: 303: 6395:

This editor has a chip on his shoulder because one of his articles got nominated for a AFD. He needs to get over it.

1774:

and see whether these should be redacted? AFAICT they're all a cut-and-paste of the same allegation against Purrum.

764:

You've got a lot of nerve deleting pages in my user-space. Tell me why I shouldn't file a complaint against you. --

6204: 4583: 4548: 3579: 2246: 2034: 1657: 876: 6598: 6390: 4597: 3559:

Knowledge:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 January 24#Template:New York cities and mayors of 100.2C000 population

5735: 5699: 5012: 4484: 4106: 4070: 3563:

Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2012 February 27#User:TonyTheTiger/New York cities and mayors of 100,000 population

3485: 1480: 1394: 1304: 1267: 1191:

I see that you have been working on a Wikimania bid, but have not moved it to the "official" section of the page

627: 5228:

As I'm sure you are aware, there is a lot of concern right now about extremism in AFD discussions. Remarks like

4393:

nonsense at meta. I remember a lot of flowery faux-poetry postings that I didn't really read, that's about it.

2734:

Oh, and please do not notify me on my talk page...have had enough notification e-mails from MediaWiki recently.

6461: 5896:

When will "pending changes" be added to this site? an do you need a certain number of votes to get it passed?--

5370: 4884: 4711: 4239:

motivations, which you imagine anyway, and comment on the actual topic under discussion, the pages themselves.

2835:

Whatever. If we're ignoring it, arguing about how to ignore it does not strike me as a productive use of time.

1460:

I recognize that's still pretty broad, but worth noting that their goal isn't to cover "absolutely everything."

1049: 183:

than helpful, and sometimes a dispute just isn't worth it anymore. Best of luck in your future endeavors here.

1295:

For the sake of my personal edification and future editing, do you know if it would be possible to find out? –

759: 6160: 3255:

it was suggested that a reassessment be done, so I'd like to see what came up in the initial review. Thanks,

1574: 1570: 6174:

work in funnelling people's good intentions to productive ends so far; here's hoping that it will continue!

5685: 4617: 3271:

I've restored all but one of those edits, you can view them in the page history of the current GA page now.

7229: 7061:

Hmm. I'm obviously mistaken. The "OMG" and complaints about talk page archiving made me thing differently!

6861: 6850:

and with 2 AfD's closing like that in the last few hrs and another heading that way, it is a logical step.

6793: 6658: 6582: 6381: 5544: 5308:, a collaborative effort to rescue articles from deletion if they can be improved through regular editing. 5155: 5107: 5072: 5038: 4735: 3369: 1950: 1933: 333: 47: 17: 6387: 2890:

presence there isn't helping this project and it is probably better if we just ignore Meta at this time.

1656:

Hello, and welcome to Knowledge. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Knowledge, at least one of

6773: 5757:

Sorry for being a pain, but I just want to be informed before making a !decision. Thank you, and Cheers!

5748: 3233:

Yes, I meant to do more cleanup after the deletions but real life interfered and I didn't get to it yet.

1581:, without adding itself to the category. The way it currently is, has it listed in Visual kei musicians. 321: 4436:

That would be fine, the only reason it was deleted was that all edits to it were made by a banned user.

2338:

I understand the reason for your decline, and agree. I knew the page probably didn't qualify, but I was

1907:

MBisanz: okayyyy, that's great...so i copied & pasted your message above at the bottom of this link

533:

Those are the types of videos that I am referring to. Also things like YouTube's official statistics.

7220: 7201: 6550: 6437: 5451:

Looks fine to me. You wouldn't have been able to make that edit if the page had full protection on it.

4596:

at 03:15 after your warning at 01:37. You might consider whether this affects your closure. Curiously,

4593: 4102: 4066: 3006: 1476: 1390: 687:

If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why.

623: 38: 6053:, but that process is much different as it involves a minimum of one week of discussion to determine a 5027:

a SPA is blocked for personal attacks and given WHOIS information is likely connected with 63.3.19.1.

6420: 6416: 6117: 6057:

regarding the article. I would also suggest that both of these articles might be good candidates for

5957: 5901: 4492: 3222: 3192: 2909: 327: 120: 7179: 6968: 6832: 6759: 4482:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

4149:

Why are you going thru a blocked editor's user space and nominating harmless pages for deletion? --

3036:

comments are invalid, but if you need the page restored to get the GA going I can do that for you.

2880: 2861: 2445: 2112: 2078: 1922: 1795: 1740:

You had mail - and it looks like you've dealt with it already, but your input would be useful too.

1253: 1192: 817: 6603:

I am not a seasoned wikipedia editor so hope this is the right forum to take it up. Thanking you--

4740:

Hey, Beeblebrox, just fyi, I reverted an edit you made with HotCat on the Teahouse questions page

3603: 1111:

Hi, Please can you tell me the situation regarding the deleting of the talk page please? Thanks --

1033: 7149: 6557:

enough. Even so, I bet I could dig up enough sources from 1957 and 1958 which would assert that

6126:? I might just have missed a joke, but I think there's some pretty problematic stuff which meets 4801:

Hey Beeblebrox, whatever tool you use to close AFDs seems to have gone sideways - have a look at

4779:

that it had been marked as a guideline, which was obviously not correct. Glad it got sorted out.

3835: 3796: 3748: 3740: 3680: 3597: 2994: 2241: 2211: 1681: 1358: 1327: 942: 315: 5480:

I found the subpage, but most will not. There's no way to it from the main page that I can see.

881:

Hi Beeb. I'm glad to see you chiming in as an uninvolved party. You may wish to review

7114: 7048: 7005: 6939: 6899: 6881: 6624: 6595: 6531: 6479:

and may very well exist again. Appropriate weight is given to this in her article, of course.

6446: 6348: 6317: 6300: 6262: 6245: 6194: 6150: 6107: 6066: 5986: 5917: 5782: 5715: 5644: 5612: 5519: 5502: 5456: 5428: 5391: 5201: 5135: 5052: 4994: 4952: 4944: 4901: 4830: 4784: 4693: 4678: 4639: 4573: 4441: 4398: 4368: 4351: 4325: 4276: 4244: 4227: 4198: 4169: 4125: 4088: 4030: 3880: 3700: 3642: 3627: 3612: 3571: 3475: 3433: 3400: 3359: 3332: 3276: 3238: 3208: 3113: 3075: 3041: 2895: 2840: 2803: 2759: 2721: 2631: 2595: 2524: 2415: 2386: 2357: 2297: 2128: 2092: 2041: 1848: 1833: 1728: 1700: 1602: 1500: 1468: 1440: 1343: 1286: 1225: 1167: 1139: 911: 837: 798: 733: 694: 589: 521: 480: 435: 367: 234: 188: 6383:

One where he wrote the article and where someone may have been recruiting people to come vote.

4450:

Many thanks for the speedy reply & totally understood. Re-created and all done 'n dusted!

957:

I'm taking a break for a while, Beeb. Dunno how long it will be. Keep the wheels turning!

7195: 7155: 7137: 7094: 6017:

Hi Beeblebrox, I hope you're well. I know you are aware of my case but now, my two articles

5945: 5927: 5566: 5471: 5323: 5262: 4764: 4748: 4383: 4212: 4184: 4154: 3957:

did make me smile. .. ok, I chuckled ... all right then ... I actually LOLed .. cheers. :) —

3290: 3260: 2856:

Wow, I took a holiday and all hell breaks loose. I'll take a look and see what's going on.

2773: 2137: 1646: 1241: 1200: 671: 641: 545: 497: 454: 401: 297: 286: 278: 257: 250: 7128:

of articles about Alaska airports and towns, this airport being one of them. Whether or not

2822:

I made a bold edit but it got reverted by someone who hasn't even signed the pledge.--v/r -

883:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive736#Incivility and disruption of an RfC

6135: 6000: 5970: 5897: 5881: 5862: 5355: 5249: 5211: 5011:

Can you please re-look at the close of this AfD, as it has now come to light that the IP's

4926: 4872: 4725: 4625: 4606: 4544: 4536: 4302:

As far as I am concerned that matter is in the past, having been concluded a few weeks ago.

3966: 3732: 3498: 3218: 3188: 3174: 2671:

also add up to 4,810 articles. However, the sum total of articles in the subcategories of

2584: 2455: 2316: 2280: 2258: 2232: 2066: 1995: 1956: 1914: 1875: 1808: 1783: 1372: 653: 537: 162: 149: 6049:

and or comment on the article talk page explaining why. The article could still end up at

8: 7171: 6960: 6923: 6828: 6755: 6570: 6515: 5730: 5694: 4516: 4455: 4426: 4289: 4056: 4001: 3937: 3922: 3907: 3217:

OK thank you, what of the failed GA tag on the top of the talk page? Should I remove it?

2931: 2876: 2857: 2813: 2684: 2654: 2615: 2554: 2542: 2481: 2333: 2107: 2073: 1778:: looks like either you or somebody else has taken care of them, all good now. Cheers! -- 1632: 1300: 1263: 813: 211: 6639:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at

6225:

to date. I didn't even get a chance to state my points before it was unfairly deleted.

5437:

Uh, I followed your edit to get in there, but it's not right working right, methinks...

6779: 6608: 5365: 5320:

and help improve Knowledge articles considered by others as based upon notable topics.

4978: 4921: 4880: 4179:(and everyone) from copy-pasting comments, could you combine them all into one MFD? -- 3863:

and caused a lot of hurt feelings all around. You can read more about how it went down

3831: 3792: 3744: 3666: 3548: 3252: 3018: 2605: 2348: 1770:

Thanks for the recent cleanup - if I can trouble you further, could you please look at

1760: 1745: 1677: 1555: 1533: 1526: 1520: 1354: 1323: 1153: 1116: 1099: 1077: 1070: 1052: 512:

source for establshing what is in a particular video, but it's no good for establshing

172: 108: 5192:

were getting. This sort of situation is exactly why editing in areas where you have a

3820:

Oh, I hope not. That wouldn't be a direction I'd want to see the community moving. :/

7159: 7066: 7029: 6554: 6441: 6295: 6240: 5941: 5796: 5762: 5658: 5630: 5596: 5580: 5552: 5485: 5442: 5413: 5351: 5127: 5081: 4845: 4806: 4343: 4268: 4044: 4015: 3638: 3608: 3583: 3566: 3539: 3521: 3514: 3508: 3418: 3384: 3328: 3319:

Hi Beeblebrox. You recently deleted a conversation happening on the talk page of the

3165: 3133: 3096: 3061: 2985: 2976:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2947: 2788: 1975: 1669: 1183: 1162:

Use the "email this user" link in the toolbox in the left hand collumn of this page.

1027: 1018: 1009:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

962: 930: 895: 865: 747: 718: 198: 5995:

OK, thanks for the clarification. (Although that still doesn't look like a reason).

1431:" So I can't help you there as I won't be navigating to that site. What I can do is 7194:

There's no need. We are discussing at the page's talk. Or at least trying to talk.

7133: 7129: 7124: 7090: 6856: 6843: 6788: 6653: 6562: 6219:

second most deadly aviation incident in the whole of the Current War in Afghanistan

6179: 6031: 5562: 5467: 5150: 5102: 5067: 5033: 4761: 4745: 4379: 4208: 4180: 4150: 4141: 3343: 3286: 3256: 2850: 2826: 2569: 2220: 2202: 1617: 1586: 1432: 1316: 1237: 1196: 1064: 853: 667: 637: 541: 493: 450: 397: 292: 275: 244: 4760:

Nevermind, found the ":Category:" thing in an old helpdesk topic. Thanks anyway!

2087:

I don't even know what "hex color" means, so I don't think I can help you, sorry.

1691:

You obviously missed the fact that I attempted to open discussion of these issues

7110: 7044: 7001: 6982: 6935: 6877: 6745: 6740: 6735: 6730: 6725: 6720: 6715: 6710: 6705: 6700: 6620: 6527: 6415:

The incidents that have no fatalities and which I don't feel are notable are the

6344: 6258: 6190: 6146: 6131: 6103: 6062: 6058: 5996: 5982: 5966: 5949: 5913: 5877: 5873: 5858: 5778: 5711: 5640: 5608: 5515: 5498: 5452: 5424: 5387: 5245: 5197: 5131: 5048: 4990: 4948: 4897: 4826: 4780: 4718: 4689: 4635: 4621: 4602: 4569: 4437: 4394: 4364: 4321: 4240: 4223: 4194: 4165: 4121: 4084: 4026: 3961: 3876: 3821: 3811: 3763: 3721: 3696: 3623: 3492: 3471: 3461: 3429: 3396: 3355: 3272: 3234: 3204: 3109: 3071: 3037: 2995: 2891: 2836: 2799: 2755: 2717: 2627: 2591: 2520: 2411: 2382: 2311: 2293: 2275: 2253: 2228: 2124: 2088: 2037: 1844: 1829: 1779: 1724: 1696: 1676:

to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

1598: 1496: 1464: 1436: 1339: 1282: 1221: 1163: 1135: 907: 833: 794: 729: 690: 608: 585: 517: 476: 431: 363: 230: 184: 153: 116: 7228:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3665:

to get flack over this, so please make sure you deliver, and soon, on this RfA.

3029: 1858:

bill, business card, etc), I would be willing to let him usurp the old account.

1457: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

6916: 6634: 6599:

http://www.businessworld.in/businessworld/businessworld/content/Box-Factor.html

6566: 6558: 6511: 6487: 6396: 6096: 6082: 6042: 5841:

included something relevant for the other, since I couldn't evaluate that part.

5725: 5689: 5085: 4511: 4451: 4422: 3949: 3933: 3918: 3903: 3872: 3587: 2927: 2680: 2650: 2611: 2538: 2477: 1908: 1665: 1628: 1338:

in such a manner is generally looked on very negatively by the community here.

1296: 1259: 829: 809: 472: 393: 389: 207: 157: 2743:

It is kind of short, but looks like you have a good, real world cause for it.

7185: 7167: 6974: 6696:

Also, I am considering removing the redirects and restoring the articles at:

6588: 6503: 6499: 6423:, I probably won't nominate them though, I just mentioned them in comparison. 6322: 6127: 6054: 6050: 5953: 5360: 5345: 5305: 5193: 5187:

I am new to wikipedia and your guidance will be of great help. Kindly guide.

5183: 4962: 4939: 4716:

Good close on the RfC notification. The comments were not helpful at all.---

3989: 3710: 3453: 3347: 3014: 2667:

amount to 4,810 articles. The sum total of articles in the subcategories of

2587: 2580: 2344: 2339: 2224: 1953:

came into being. i prefer not to link the accounts...is there no other way?

1756: 1741: 1551: 1213: 1149: 1112: 1095: 1037: 951: 581: 419: 359: 343: 168: 6592:

satisfy you and the editors to have Dissolve the box as a complete article.

4634:

That works for me, hopefully the message has been received by both parties.

3555:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard#WP:TFD deletions by admin User:Fastily

2921:

Thanks for the hearty welcome, and thanks for your input & helpfulness.

7062: 7025: 6908: 6336: 6046: 5792: 5758: 5654: 5626: 5592: 5576: 5548: 5481: 5438: 5409: 5240: 4502: 4040: 4011: 3535: 3414: 3380: 3351: 3161: 3123: 3086: 3051: 2981: 2977: 2784: 2676: 2645: 2516: 2054: 1980: 1938: 1896: 1860: 1014: 1010: 958: 926: 891: 859: 765: 743: 714: 576: 423: 226: 137: 6256:

I am not replying to this until you alter the inflammatory section header.

4775:

Yeah, I wasn't exactly sure what was going on there myself, but there was

7015: 6851: 6783: 6648: 6167:

your edit to the Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012/Discussion page

6027: 5680: 5177:

Thanks a lot for your prompt response. I thought that the discussion was

5145: 5097: 5062: 5028: 4467: 2823: 2565: 2534: 2512: 2508: 2426: 2396: 2367: 2198: 2147: 1712: 1661: 1613: 1582: 1373:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/My_Revenge_(band)

980: 513: 427: 129: 7024:. You might want to look again - apparently the nomination is humorous. 6987:

Hey, when you unblock me, knock the autoblock off my IP too please. :-P

6643:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is

2472: 1385: 6492: 3807: 3759: 3717: 1949:

boy, i can't tell you enough how i resisted linking wiki accounts when

145: 109: 7085:

I always seem to be punching your "airplanz r kool" AFDs. I wonder if

6956:

Knowledge:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#UFC_on_FX:_Alves_vs._Kampmann

6335:

If you still believe I misinterpreted the consensus you may ask for a

3897:

Would appreciate your input. Discussion on possible COI is proceeding

1134:. We can't act if you won't provide us with the information we need. 832:

mysself, especially the first point in the section on spotting divas.

5852:

been improved by members of the ARS, so what was the complaint again?

4479:

Hello, Just Step Sideways. Please check your email; you've got mail!

3247:

Hi Beeblebrox, could you restore the GA review that HtH performed on

385: 5182:

is more than trivial coverage) and therefore significant as per the

6223:

Turkey's most deadly loss of life in the current war in Afghanistan

6018: 2951: 2507:

Well, sources are used for two different purposes. For purposes of

1258:

Could you tell me if you would have accepted the request? Thanks, –

1217: 6486:

This is where it gets scary to me. I'm interpreting all this as "

2537:. I will be in touch as progress occurs and thanks a whole bunch! 2191:

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

6468: 1278: 5774: 4825:. I have no idea why it does it that way, maybe the authors do. 3104:

You can see any admin's deletion by checking their logs, here's

422:

and compose a draft version there. If you are able to find some

5575:

I'm actually late; about out the door... will take quick look.

3602:

Hey Beeblebrox. I've spoke to Erik and Howie; they report that

3248: 6813:

of mass AfDing. This seems like possible gaming of the system.

6389:

didn't survive a AFD and multiple crashes with ZERO fatalities

5934:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Jersey Circus (2nd nomination)

4590:

WP:AN3#User:MadGeographer reported by User:IIIraute (Result: )

4562:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Lake Erie Drum and Bugle Corps

6746:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=UFC_154&redirect=no

6741:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=UFC_152&redirect=no

6736:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=UFC_148&redirect=no

6731:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=UFC_148&redirect=no

6726:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=UFC_147&redirect=no

6721:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=UFC_146&redirect=no

6716:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=UFC_145&redirect=no

6711:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=UFC_144&redirect=no

6706:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=UFC_143&redirect=no

6701:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=UFC_142&redirect=no

5285: 984: 6751:...until this is settled. This was done without consensus. 6667:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mixed martial arts/MMA notability

6596:

http://yourstory.in/2012/03/dissolve-the-box-santosh-sharma/

6294:

unanimous, deleting so soon like this is agaisnt WP policy.

5061:

Done, I have tried to make my nomination clearer this time.

3531:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2586:

but it is by a completely different musician. I'm trying to

2515:, which was the issue that led to the deletion. Knowledge's 1802: 1547:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1091:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

858:

He's not a troll. Just a child who doesn't know any better.—

271:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

6476: 3857:

Knowledge:Pending changes/Request for Comment February 2011

3460:, where I'm sure m colleagues and I will discuss shortly. 3180: 2914: 1723:

way ahead of you, was doing that as you wrote that remark.

5591:

People are going to have trouble watchlisting these, too.

5144:

Hence my question here, and given your response, I won't.

4320:

somebody is canvassing support for his position by email.

1909:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/User:Henry_Delforn#About_User

6782:

as they don't have sources demonstrating lasting effect.

6380:

4- This editor has been recently involved in another AFD.

2451:

Opinion on a reference for my revenge (band article): -->

705:

Expiration of British & Irish political voluntary ban

115:

I'm looking for a way to extricate myself honorably from

5232:

you made at this AFD are a big part of the reason why.

1672:

for any test edits you would like to make, and read the

1573:" needs to be deleted or edited in a way to redirect to 601:@Aaronmchale: I did some Google searches and found some 5948:, the major arguments for and against it were based on 2950:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1380: 983:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 5274:

Invitation to join WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron

5224:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Half Moon Island Trail

5094:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/SFL 1 (2nd nomination)

5019:

were socking for a blocked user, the registered user

3520:

Hello, Just Step Sideways. You have new messages at

3342:

My actions were purely administrative enforcement of

2395:

I didn't expect to see such answer. I do apologize. ●

1532:

Hello, Just Step Sideways. You have new messages at

1076:

Hello, Just Step Sideways. You have new messages at

256:

Hello, Just Step Sideways. You have new messages at

6682:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

5386:

reading that thread and see the rest of my remarks.

5023:

was also a sock of a blocked user (now blocked) and

4666:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

4120:

that addresses the issues that led to the deletion.

6502:and see the only name under "Notable residents" is 6122:Could you take a look at the first few revision of 4823:

Knowledge:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/CloseAFD

3179:This fellow has been blocked as a sock of Claritas 1417:

about a band, but it is not evidence of notability.

793:Replied to the identical remark on your talk page. 136:about their coordination. Other editors, including 5639:You can contact them on the talk page of the RFC. 5403:Knowledge:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012 5235:The bulk of the remark is about who nominated it. 3869:Knowledge:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012 3050:Are there any other GA reviews that were deleted? 713:topic ban ended? or is that when the '17th' ends? 5092:, I have renominated the article for deletion at 1664:, did not appear to be constructive and has been 605:sources you might be able to use in your article. 7080:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Whittier Airport 6934:about, technical stuff has never been my forte. 4193:They are not all nominated for the same reason. 3153:Regions of Alaska and particularly Arctic Alaska 3032:. Your reviewer was a sock of a banned user, so 2249:!!! Job well done. I tip my hat to you sir. — 6641:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 5892:When will pending changes be added to this site 3002:Where do I go to find out why this was deleted? 2162:Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes. 1932:Go over and log into Commons again, then click 636:Thanks for those, I'll have a look at them. -- 225:claim of significance. Wordpress pages are not 4797:AFD closure sorting category shenanigans thing 4417:Category:People educated at Edgeborough school 2590:but your explanation is not really adding up. 1032:Hi there. I believe you're an oversighter, so 396:was delete because of A1, not notibility). -- 3735:, and linked from there. The conversation is 1458:http://allmusic.com/about/product-submissions 119:. I'm leaving a note here because you closed 7164:List of Rock and Roll Hall of Fame inductees 6272:I did not see it as inflammatory, apologies. 3458:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification 1755:Thanks for the info. And the encouragement. 1493:User:Vermont Hardcore Punk/My Revenge (band) 5932:Can you please explain the reasons for how 5809:Your comment about Taboo VI: The Homecoming 2875:the situation, rather than to enflame it? 2476:that would be wonderful. thank you so much 1148:OK thanks, where can i email you please? -- 6645:2012 in UFC events—Battleground disruption 4938:My job as the closer is to interpret what 3327:and give me some advice about this. Thanks 1805:(For id purpose i leave my email address: 1803:http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Henry_Delforn 7162:on March 10 for mutual 3RR violations at 4061:I believe you misjudged the situation at 3657:Knowledge talk:Pending changes/Let's move 3557:, which occured following the closure of 3184:Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War 430:it can then be moved into article space. 415:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Shay Carl 413:Well, there was a deletion discussion at 384:I would like to request that the article 6904:Hi! Any particular reason to subst: the 5350:Beeblebrox, could you have a look in at 2877:Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation 2858:Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation 2716:. I fthat's ok with you we can proceed. 2641:additions to our society or way of life. 2362:Hi my friend, I saw your final point in 2123:Looks to have been resolved without me. 1456:available in their country of release." 6286:This vote should of at least also been 5815:Beware, rant-mode on and at full steam. 5310:For more information, please visit the 3892:Department of Corrections (New Zealand) 14: 7226:Do not edit the contents of this page. 6467:with deletion of sourced content from 5848:Since I posted the notice the article 3553:You participated in the discussion at 2669:Category:Alaska articles by importance 2644:Speaking of time, I was hoping to get 2158:So a few things about the interviews: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 6959:I've ever encountered. Best regards, 6235:, read all the citations, google it. 5090:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/SFL 1 5006:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/SFL 1 4971:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/SFL 1 3980: 2626:seems to be becoming relevant again. 2473:http://bigheavyworld.com/tunk/?p=5277 1386:http://bigheavyworld.com/tunk/?p=5277 1381:http://en.wikipedia.org/Terror_(band) 7207: 6676:The following discussion is closed. 5218:(Received from you on my talk page): 4660:The following discussion is closed. 4483: 3315:Corrections Department (New Zealand) 2778:I obviously appreciate why you made 2665:Category:WikiProject Alaska articles 2579:We have a pretty hard core group of 1801:pages of Knowledge. Thx. Reference: 1207:(member of the Wikimania 2013 jury) 25: 6827:let the community speak up. Best, 5295:WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron 4896:See reply to identical post below. 4560:There was a deletion discussion at 4039:Fair enough. Thanks for the reply. 2673:Category:Alaska articles by quality 1772:Special:Contributions/178.63.32.109 1693:two months ago and nobody responded 23: 6950:Best reason for dropping the mouse 6077:2012 Turkish Army Black Hawk crash 5936:could be closed as a consensus to 5290: 5021:User:The Bachmann Editor Overdrive 4472: 3739:. The RfC is under development at 3513: 3321:New Zealand Corrections Department 2913: 1579:Category:Visual kei musical groups 1525: 1069: 467:Sure, I've userfied it for you at 249: 24: 7293: 6436:I was not involved at all in the 5965:or a relisting of the discussion. 4863:AFD closure for Intent Leadership 4288:I don't know what is up with the 3159:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Alaska 2033:and that message was also blanked 7211: 6891:The discussion above is closed. 5170:AFD closure for Dissolve the box 4703:The discussion above is closed. 3981: 3561:. Be advised that I have opened 3448:Moved your clarification request 2942:Disambiguation link notification 2745: 2697:Third bullet in your page notice 1911:(i own you one, thx)...see ya. 1651: 975:Disambiguation link notification 950: 29: 6323:Decisions are made by consensus 5653:I expect so; gotta go. Cheers, 4598:the bio on the Nobel prize site 3825:that under these circumstances 2564:a deletion request was filed. 2517:definition of a reliable source 2459:-2012-02-17T04:35:00.000Z": --> 2449:-2012-02-17T04:35:00.000Z": --> 2227:terms, but it's the same old." 685:violate policy. Since it says " 380:Recreation of article Shay Carl 6041:Those articles are tagged for 4821:Hmm. the script I am using is 4527:Lake Erie Drum and Bugle Corps 3782:a discussion, but to agree to 1660:, such as the one you made to 1612:to match the category's name? 388:be recreated, see the deleted 13: 1: 5277: 4049:17:16, 29 February 2012 (UTC) 4035:17:09, 29 February 2012 (UTC) 4020:16:50, 29 February 2012 (UTC) 3996:06:13, 29 February 2012 (UTC) 3974:18:46, 28 February 2012 (UTC) 3927:06:06, 29 February 2012 (UTC) 3912:12:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC) 3885:01:57, 29 February 2012 (UTC) 3840:15:08, 28 February 2012 (UTC) 3816:14:03, 28 February 2012 (UTC) 3801:13:12, 28 February 2012 (UTC) 3768:13:04, 28 February 2012 (UTC) 3753:12:54, 28 February 2012 (UTC) 3726:12:05, 28 February 2012 (UTC) 3705:03:12, 28 February 2012 (UTC) 3690:02:26, 28 February 2012 (UTC) 3649:19:46, 27 February 2012 (UTC) 3632:19:05, 27 February 2012 (UTC) 3617:18:04, 27 February 2012 (UTC) 3593:06:39, 27 February 2012 (UTC) 3544:06:02, 25 February 2012 (UTC) 3504:00:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) 3480:20:23, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 3465:20:21, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 3438:18:19, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 3423:02:36, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 3405:02:15, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 3389:02:10, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 3364:01:33, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 3337:01:08, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 3295:23:17, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 3281:22:01, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 3265:21:49, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 3243:19:57, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 3227:19:54, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 3213:19:51, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 3197:19:00, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 3170:16:36, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 3137:20:33, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 3118:20:29, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 3100:20:26, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 3080:18:27, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 3065:02:49, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 3046:19:46, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 3023:02:04, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 2990:10:17, 22 February 2012 (UTC) 2946:Hi. When you recently edited 2936:04:16, 22 February 2012 (UTC) 2900:03:58, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 2885:03:12, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 2866:02:55, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 2845:04:01, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 2830:02:37, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 2808:22:20, 20 February 2012 (UTC) 2793:21:47, 20 February 2012 (UTC) 2764:19:49, 20 February 2012 (UTC) 2739:19:41, 20 February 2012 (UTC) 2726:16:33, 20 February 2012 (UTC) 2706:08:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC) 2689:02:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC) 2659:01:18, 20 February 2012 (UTC) 2636:00:43, 20 February 2012 (UTC) 2620:00:37, 20 February 2012 (UTC) 2600:18:06, 19 February 2012 (UTC) 2574:04:58, 19 February 2012 (UTC) 2547:04:12, 22 February 2012 (UTC) 2529:18:15, 19 February 2012 (UTC) 2490:04:35, 17 February 2012 (UTC) 2435:17:37, 13 February 2012 (UTC) 2420:09:05, 13 February 2012 (UTC) 2405:05:56, 13 February 2012 (UTC) 2391:17:46, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 2376:06:32, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 2353:21:50, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 2219:regulars, that is couched in 2061:17:51, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 2046:03:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC) 2008:01:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC) 1987:15:41, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 1969:05:17, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 1575:Category:Visual kei musicians 1571:List of bands from visual kei 1565:List of bands from visual kei 979:Hi. When you recently edited 577:identifying a reliable source 6440:article or it's AFD debate. 6325:and unanimity is explicitly 6318:Knowledge is not a democracy 6013:Articles about to be deleted 5545:Knowledge:Please use fullurl 4945:Knowledge is not a democracy 4688:Replying on your talk page. 4616:Update about User:IIIraute: 4488:at any time by removing the 3182:He had given a GA review on 2324:23:16, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 2302:22:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 2288:20:28, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 2266:20:24, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 2237:19:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 2207:15:46, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 2133:05:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 2116:04:58, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 2097:01:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 2082:01:13, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 1951:commons:Special:MergeAccount 1945:20:02, 9 February 2012 (UTC) 1934:commons:Special:MergeAccount 1927:02:34, 9 February 2012 (UTC) 1903:05:08, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 1888:03:51, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 1867:02:49, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 1853:02:35, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 1838:01:35, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 1821:22:49, 7 February 2012 (UTC) 1788:07:38, 6 February 2012 (UTC) 1765:13:41, 7 February 2012 (UTC) 1750:06:03, 6 February 2012 (UTC) 1733:20:58, 4 February 2012 (UTC) 1716:20:57, 4 February 2012 (UTC) 1705:20:54, 4 February 2012 (UTC) 1686:20:51, 4 February 2012 (UTC) 1637:22:43, 4 February 2012 (UTC) 1622:20:45, 4 February 2012 (UTC) 1607:20:25, 4 February 2012 (UTC) 1591:20:14, 4 February 2012 (UTC) 1560:06:31, 4 February 2012 (UTC) 1541:06:31, 4 February 2012 (UTC) 1505:18:30, 5 February 2012 (UTC) 1485:17:48, 5 February 2012 (UTC) 1445:23:57, 3 February 2012 (UTC) 1399:23:30, 3 February 2012 (UTC) 1363:17:14, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 1348:16:48, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 1332:06:00, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 1309:02:41, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 1291:02:07, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 1272:01:34, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 1246:05:24, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 1205:01:12, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 1172:16:33, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 1158:02:29, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 1144:03:36, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 1121:03:13, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 1104:12:12, 28 January 2012 (UTC) 1085:12:12, 28 January 2012 (UTC) 1060:12:22, 24 January 2012 (UTC) 1036:may require your attention. 1023:10:29, 24 January 2012 (UTC) 967:10:07, 23 January 2012 (UTC) 935:06:09, 23 January 2012 (UTC) 916:02:14, 23 January 2012 (UTC) 900:02:07, 23 January 2012 (UTC) 872:10:40, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 842:21:17, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 822:20:54, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 803:09:35, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 787:08:17, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 752:04:46, 17 January 2012 (UTC) 738:04:40, 17 January 2012 (UTC) 723:00:18, 17 January 2012 (UTC) 699:17:36, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 676:17:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 646:23:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 632:21:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 594:20:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 575:One of the criteria used in 554:20:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 526:19:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 502:18:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 485:18:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 459:18:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 440:16:19, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 406:14:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 372:16:12, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 350:10:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 282:01:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 265:01:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 239:01:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC) 216:23:46, 13 January 2012 (UTC) 193:02:06, 14 January 2012 (UTC) 177:21:22, 13 January 2012 (UTC) 18:User talk:Just Step Sideways 7: 7089:operates out of here? :) -- 6130:'s second point. Thanks. – 3622:Cool, thanks for the link. 3374:Gratuitous insults such as 3354:that are available to you. 1132:where the actual problem is 10: 7298: 7204:) 13:00 3 April 2012 (UTC) 6886:18:09, 31 March 2012 (UTC) 6864:08:09, 31 March 2012 (UTC) 6837:07:45, 31 March 2012 (UTC) 6796:07:33, 31 March 2012 (UTC) 6764:07:19, 31 March 2012 (UTC) 6661:01:15, 31 March 2012 (UTC) 6629:22:23, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 6613:08:43, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 6575:00:11, 31 March 2012 (UTC) 6551:Republican Party of Alaska 6536:22:12, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 6520:00:14, 30 March 2012 (UTC) 6438:2012 Norwegian C-130 crash 6400:10:44, 29 March 2012 (UTC) 6353:04:11, 29 March 2012 (UTC) 6306:03:56, 29 March 2012 (UTC) 6267:03:49, 29 March 2012 (UTC) 6251:02:15, 29 March 2012 (UTC) 6199:03:53, 29 March 2012 (UTC) 6184:00:58, 29 March 2012 (UTC) 6155:01:08, 29 March 2012 (UTC) 6140:00:40, 29 March 2012 (UTC) 6112:21:55, 28 March 2012 (UTC) 6086:21:32, 28 March 2012 (UTC) 6071:16:48, 28 March 2012 (UTC) 6036:14:49, 28 March 2012 (UTC) 6005:20:42, 27 March 2012 (UTC) 5991:18:18, 27 March 2012 (UTC) 5975:08:26, 27 March 2012 (UTC) 5922:17:02, 26 March 2012 (UTC) 5906:16:32, 25 March 2012 (UTC) 5886:13:56, 26 March 2012 (UTC) 5867:06:17, 26 March 2012 (UTC) 5801:19:57, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 5787:19:54, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 5767:19:44, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 5741:18:38, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 5720:18:35, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 5705:18:32, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 5663:18:26, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 5649:18:22, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 5635:18:20, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 5617:18:11, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 5601:18:09, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 5585:18:09, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 5571:18:07, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 5557:18:04, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 5524:18:02, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 5507:17:59, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 5490:17:57, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 5476:17:55, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 5461:17:50, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 5447:17:48, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 5433:17:45, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 5418:17:42, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 5396:17:26, 22 March 2012 (UTC) 5377:17:09, 22 March 2012 (UTC) 5329:12:46, 21 March 2012 (UTC) 5268:12:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC) 5254:07:23, 21 March 2012 (UTC) 5206:17:17, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 5158:06:07, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 5140:05:53, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 5110:04:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 5075:04:33, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 5057:04:13, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 5041:03:48, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 4999:04:09, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 4984:00:05, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 4957:17:08, 17 March 2012 (UTC) 4931:04:36, 17 March 2012 (UTC) 4906:17:09, 17 March 2012 (UTC) 4889:04:29, 17 March 2012 (UTC) 4855:14:44, 16 March 2012 (UTC) 4835:21:22, 15 March 2012 (UTC) 4816:19:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC) 4789:19:39, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 4771:19:19, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 4755:19:12, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 4731:19:44, 12 March 2012 (UTC) 4698:02:14, 11 March 2012 (UTC) 4683:00:43, 11 March 2012 (UTC) 4644:21:00, 10 March 2012 (UTC) 4630:17:30, 10 March 2012 (UTC) 4611:04:30, 10 March 2012 (UTC) 3007:Game of Thrones (season 1) 2588:take you at your word here 469:User:Aaronmchale/Shay Carl 7189:03:49, 3 April 2012 (UTC) 7142:01:50, 2 April 2012 (UTC) 7119:00:41, 2 April 2012 (UTC) 7099:00:21, 2 April 2012 (UTC) 7071:12:47, 2 April 2012 (UTC) 7053:23:28, 1 April 2012 (UTC) 7034:23:22, 1 April 2012 (UTC) 7010:22:57, 1 April 2012 (UTC) 6995:22:53, 1 April 2012 (UTC) 6978:21:41, 1 April 2012 (UTC) 6944:18:30, 1 April 2012 (UTC) 6928:18:25, 1 April 2012 (UTC) 6452:02:20, 2 April 2012 (UTC) 6421:1948 B-29 Lake Mead crash 6417:1961 Yuba City B-52 crash 5300:You have been invited to 4578:21:03, 9 March 2012 (UTC) 4553:16:36, 9 March 2012 (UTC) 4522:17:43, 7 March 2012 (UTC) 4460:19:11, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 4446:18:58, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 4431:18:54, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 4403:21:36, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 4388:21:21, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 4373:20:28, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 4357:20:24, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 4330:20:07, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 4282:19:48, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 4249:18:27, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 4232:02:46, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 4217:23:08, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 4203:22:16, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 4189:22:14, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 4174:22:09, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 4159:22:07, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 4130:20:07, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 4111:20:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 4093:18:09, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 4075:16:41, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 3942:07:31, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 2146:My name is Jonathan Obar 1371:Hi Beeblebrox regarding: 877:An univolved look please 709:Howdy Beeblebrox, has my 221:The criteria specifies a 6893:Please do not modify it. 6679:Please do not modify it. 6412:Clearing some points up: 6205:Turkish Black Hawk crash 4705:Please do not modify it. 4663:Please do not modify it. 4584:Einstein Swiss or German 3865:in this signpost article 1577:, or more appropriately 1491:Article now userfied at 1193:meta:Wikimania 2013 bids 7087:Alaska Seaplane Service 5952:and the level at which 5306:Article Rescue Squadron 4618:He undid his own revert 3741:User:Beeblebrox/sandbox 3486:Muhammad Hammad Ghaffar 3285:Thanks a lot, will do! 3106:all my recent deletions 1668:or removed. Please use 258:Jasper Deng's talk page 6462:A whole bunch of stuff 5296: 4712:RFC Notification close 4477: 3979:Note, my pants split. 3518: 3157:Please see section on 2918: 1530: 1074: 392:for my reasons (note, 254: 7224:of past discussions. 7186:DR goes to Wikimania! 7156:User:Rusted AutoParts 6975:DR goes to Wikimania! 6124:Knowledge:The Obvious 6061:to related articles. 6051:articles for deletion 5940:? If you dismiss the 5382:Let me know when you 5294: 5126:careful to adhere to 4476: 3517: 2917: 2818:What do you think of 1529: 1477:Vermont Hardcore Punk 1391:Vermont Hardcore Punk 1073: 624:A Quest For Knowledge 475:into article space. 253: 42:of past discussions. 6583:AFD Dissolve the box 5408:gonna unprotect it? 5194:conflict of interest 4736:HotCat Teahouse edit 4378:with anyone else. -- 4306:deletion nomination. 4103:The Devil's Advocate 4067:The Devil's Advocate 3733:Talk:Pending changes 3639:Steven Walling (WMF) 3370:Your recent comments 2978:opt-out instructions 1534:BigDwiki's talk page 1078:JetBlast's talk page 1011:opt-out instructions 150:User:Dominique Blanc 6392:did survive an AFD. 6161:Pending changes RFC 5749:Pending changes RFC 4290:whispering campaign 4207:You've got mail. -- 3832:Maggie Dennis (WMF) 3793:Maggie Dennis (WMF) 3745:Maggie Dennis (WMF) 3522:Nyttend's talk page 2960:fix with Dab solver 2581:new page patrollers 1212:maybe be hosted in 993:fix with Dab solver 760:Britcom's Userspace 5958:WP:ROUGH CONSENSUS 5298:Hello, Beeblebrox. 5297: 5241:dispute resolution 4485:remove this notice 4478: 3875:once it is ready. 3529:remove this notice 3519: 3352:dispute resolution 3350:or other forms of 2968:• Join us at the 2919: 2519:may of some help. 2101:Could you comment 1545:remove this notice 1531: 1433:userfy the article 1089:remove this notice 1075: 1001:• Join us at the 428:verify the content 341:cents. Cheers~! -- 269:remove this notice 255: 7285: 7284: 7236: 7235: 7230:current talk page 7160:User:Scorpion0422 7109: 6926: 6846:(C.4) recommends 6774:talk page stalker 6498:I was looking at 6118:Revision deletion 6043:proposed deletion 5816: 5343: 5342: 5339: 5338: 5335: 5334: 5327: 5314:, where you can 5266: 4892: 4875:comment added by 4853: 4814: 4556: 4539:comment added by 3994: 3972: 3687: 3604:the original plan 3591: 3502: 2973: 2948:Rocky Hill School 2910:A kitten for you! 2322: 2286: 2264: 2142:Dear Beeblebrox, 1998:comment added by 1976:Special:UserLogin 1959:comment added by 1917:comment added by 1878:comment added by 1811:comment added by 1658:your recent edits 1006: 972: 971: 805: 742:Will do, thanks. 557: 540:comment added by 348: 126:current user page 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 7289: 7263: 7238: 7237: 7215: 7214: 7208: 7182: 7176: 7170:? Best regards, 7130:Whittier Airport 7125:user:NorthnBound 7106: 6992: 6990:Ten Pound Hammer 6971: 6965: 6919: 6915: 6913: 6907: 6859: 6854: 6791: 6786: 6777: 6681: 6656: 6651: 6563:James Wickersham 6449: 6444: 6303: 6298: 6248: 6243: 6229:It has 17 deaths 6101: 6095: 5814: 5738: 5728: 5702: 5692: 5686:Back off my turf 5373: 5368: 5363: 5326: 5324:Northamerica1000 5321: 5286: 5282: 5281: 5278: 5265: 5263:Northamerica1000 5260: 5196:is discouraged. 5153: 5148: 5105: 5100: 5070: 5065: 5036: 5031: 4981: 4934: 4891: 4869: 4849: 4810: 4777:bot notification 4721: 4665: 4555: 4533: 4519: 4514: 4509: 4507: 4501: 4497: 4491: 4487: 4475: 4354: 4350: 4346: 4279: 4275: 4271: 3988: 3986: 3985: 3984: 3971: 3969: 3958: 3686: 3681: 3678: 3647: 3645: 3569: 3532: 3496: 3470:Whoops, my bad. 3452:Hi, Beeblebrox, 3131: 3094: 3059: 3009:to a Good Topic. 2963: 2956:check to confirm 2753: 2749: 2748: 2503: 2497: 2469: 2460: 2450: 2431: 2425:Thanks friend. ● 2401: 2372: 2321: 2319: 2308: 2285: 2283: 2272: 2263: 2261: 2250: 2197:Jonathan Obar -- 2057: 2010: 1983: 1971: 1941: 1929: 1899: 1890: 1863: 1823: 1796:Hello Beeblebrox 1655: 1654: 1548: 1463:As I wrote user 1254:Re expired block 1092: 1056: 1047: 1042: 996: 989:check to confirm 954: 947: 946: 868: 862: 792: 784: 779: 772: 556: 534: 424:reliable sources 342: 337: 310:deleted contribs 272: 227:reliable sources 142:User:Peter cohen 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 7297: 7296: 7292: 7291: 7290: 7288: 7287: 7286: 7259: 7212: 7180: 7172: 7152: 7150:Reblock request 7083: 7018: 6988: 6985: 6969: 6961: 6954:Was looking at 6952: 6917: 6911: 6905: 6902: 6897: 6896: 6857: 6852: 6789: 6784: 6771: 6686: 6677: 6670: 6654: 6649: 6647:. Thank you. 6637: 6619:redirected to. 6585: 6464: 6447: 6442: 6337:deletion review 6301: 6296: 6246: 6241: 6207: 6163: 6120: 6099: 6093: 6079: 6015: 5946:WP:IDONTLIKEITs 5930: 5898:Misconceptions2 5894: 5811: 5791:Thank you sir! 5751: 5736: 5726: 5700: 5690: 5683: 5406: 5371: 5366: 5361: 5352:WP:AN#Topic_ban 5348: 5331: 5322: 5276: 5261: 5214: 5174:Hi Beeblebrox! 5172: 5151: 5146: 5103: 5098: 5068: 5063: 5034: 5029: 5025:172.130.252.250 5017:173.241.225.163 5009: 4979: 4965: 4924: 4870: 4865: 4799: 4738: 4719: 4714: 4709: 4708: 4670: 4661: 4654: 4586: 4534: 4529: 4524: 4517: 4512: 4505: 4499: 4495: 4493:You've got mail 4489: 4481: 4473: 4470: 4419: 4352: 4348: 4344: 4316:And apparently 4277: 4273: 4269: 4144: 4118:userspace draft 4059: 4006:So this is the 4004: 3982: 3967: 3959: 3952: 3895: 3713: 3682: 3675: 3671: 3667: 3659: 3643: 3637: 3600: 3598:Pending Changes 3551: 3533: 3526: 3511: 3488: 3450: 3372: 3317: 3219:Darkness Shines 3189:Darkness Shines 3177: 3155: 3125: 3088: 3053: 2999: 2996:Talk:Baelor/GA1 2970:DPL WikiProject 2944: 2912: 2853: 2816: 2776: 2746: 2744: 2699: 2608: 2557: 2462: 2427: 2397: 2368: 2360: 2336: 2317: 2309: 2281: 2273: 2259: 2251: 2244: 2242:just a note ... 2214: 2212:Regarding RfC/U 2140: 2069: 2055: 1993: 1981: 1954: 1939: 1912: 1897: 1873: 1861: 1806: 1798: 1652: 1649: 1567: 1549: 1538: 1523: 1376: 1319: 1256: 1188:Hi Beeblebrox, 1186: 1093: 1082: 1067: 1057: 1054: 1043: 1038: 1030: 1003:DPL WikiProject 977: 959:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 945: 943:A beer for you! 927:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 892:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 879: 866: 860: 856: 828:I was thinking 780: 773: 766: 762: 707: 656: 535: 382: 295: 289: 273: 262: 247: 201: 154:User:Pmanderson 113: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 7295: 7283: 7282: 7277: 7274: 7269: 7264: 7257: 7252: 7247: 7244: 7234: 7233: 7216: 7206: 7205: 7174:TransporterMan 7151: 7148: 7147: 7146: 7145: 7144: 7082: 7077: 7076: 7075: 7074: 7073: 7056: 7055: 7017: 7014: 7013: 7012: 6984: 6981: 6963:TransporterMan 6951: 6948: 6947: 6946: 6901: 6900:MfD tag subst: 6898: 6890: 6889: 6888: 6873: 6872: 6871: 6870: 6869: 6868: 6867: 6866: 6829:Anna Frodesiak 6819: 6818: 6817: 6816: 6815: 6814: 6801: 6800: 6799: 6798: 6756:Anna Frodesiak 6749: 6748: 6743: 6738: 6733: 6728: 6723: 6718: 6713: 6708: 6703: 6685: 6684: 6672: 6671: 6669: 6664: 6636: 6633: 6632: 6631: 6584: 6581: 6580: 6579: 6578: 6577: 6559:Mike Stepovich 6546: 6542: 6463: 6460: 6459: 6458: 6457: 6456: 6455: 6454: 6429: 6428: 6427: 6426: 6425: 6424: 6413: 6405: 6404: 6403: 6402: 6393: 6384: 6378: 6375: 6371: 6365: 6364: 6363: 6362: 6342: 6341: 6340: 6339: 6333: 6330: 6320: 6311: 6309: 6308: 6283: 6282: 6274: 6273: 6206: 6203: 6202: 6201: 6162: 6159: 6158: 6157: 6119: 6116: 6115: 6114: 6078: 6075: 6074: 6073: 6014: 6011: 6010: 6009: 6008: 6007: 5929: 5926: 5925: 5924: 5893: 5890: 5889: 5888: 5854: 5853: 5846: 5842: 5834: 5826: 5810: 5807: 5806: 5805: 5804: 5803: 5750: 5747: 5746: 5745: 5744: 5743: 5682: 5679: 5678: 5677: 5676: 5675: 5674: 5673: 5672: 5671: 5670: 5669: 5668: 5667: 5666: 5665: 5625:running this. 5589: 5588: 5587: 5541: 5540: 5539: 5538: 5537: 5536: 5535: 5534: 5533: 5532: 5531: 5530: 5529: 5528: 5527: 5526: 5478: 5405: 5400: 5399: 5398: 5347: 5344: 5341: 5340: 5337: 5336: 5333: 5332: 5309: 5299: 5289: 5275: 5272: 5271: 5270: 5213: 5210: 5209: 5208: 5171: 5168: 5167: 5166: 5165: 5164: 5163: 5162: 5161: 5160: 5115: 5114: 5113: 5112: 5077: 5008: 5003: 5002: 5001: 4976: 4974: 4968: 4964: 4961: 4960: 4959: 4929:comment added 4914: 4911: 4909: 4908: 4864: 4861: 4860: 4859: 4858: 4857: 4838: 4837: 4798: 4795: 4794: 4793: 4792: 4791: 4737: 4734: 4713: 4710: 4702: 4701: 4700: 4669: 4668: 4656: 4655: 4653: 4650: 4649: 4648: 4647: 4646: 4594:reverted again 4585: 4582: 4581: 4580: 4528: 4525: 4480: 4471: 4469: 4466: 4465: 4464: 4463: 4462: 4418: 4415: 4414: 4413: 4412: 4411: 4410: 4409: 4408: 4407: 4406: 4405: 4360: 4359: 4335: 4334: 4333: 4332: 4314: 4310: 4307: 4303: 4300: 4294: 4293: 4285: 4284: 4264: 4263: 4262: 4261: 4260: 4259: 4258: 4257: 4256: 4255: 4254: 4253: 4252: 4251: 4143: 4140: 4139: 4138: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4058: 4055: 4054: 4053: 4052: 4051: 4003: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3951: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3944: 3894: 3889: 3888: 3887: 3851: 3850: 3849: 3848: 3847: 3846: 3845: 3844: 3843: 3842: 3712: 3709: 3708: 3707: 3673: 3669: 3658: 3655: 3654: 3653: 3652: 3651: 3599: 3596: 3550: 3547: 3525: 3512: 3510: 3507: 3487: 3484: 3483: 3482: 3449: 3446: 3445: 3444: 3443: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3408: 3407: 3371: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3316: 3313: 3312: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3302: 3301: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3176: 3173: 3154: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3146: 3145: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3011: 3010: 3003: 2998: 2993: 2943: 2940: 2938: 2924: 2911: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2852: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2820:this revision? 2815: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2775: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2732: 2698: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2661: 2642: 2607: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2556: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2461: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2407: 2359: 2358:Bahram Nouraei 2356: 2335: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2243: 2240: 2213: 2210: 2179: 2177: 2176: 2172: 2169: 2166: 2163: 2157: 2145: 2139: 2136: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2108:Confession0791 2074:Confession0791 2068: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 1919:206.55.142.144 1855: 1797: 1794: 1792: 1768: 1767: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1708: 1707: 1648: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1566: 1563: 1539:Message added 1537: 1524: 1522: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1472: 1461: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1375: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1318: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1255: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1230: 1229: 1185: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1146: 1083:Message added 1081: 1068: 1066: 1063: 1053: 1029: 1026: 976: 973: 970: 969: 955: 944: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 919: 918: 878: 875: 855: 852: 851: 850: 849: 848: 847: 846: 845: 844: 814:Stephan Schulz 761: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 706: 703: 702: 701: 655: 652: 651: 650: 649: 648: 573: 572: 571: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 558: 505: 504: 462: 461: 443: 442: 394:Talk:Shay Carl 390:Talk:Shay Carl 381: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 353: 352: 338: 288: 285: 263:Message added 261: 248: 246: 243: 242: 241: 200: 197: 196: 195: 158:User:Akhilleus 128:but available 112: 107: 105: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 7294: 7281: 7278: 7275: 7273: 7270: 7268: 7265: 7262: 7258: 7256: 7253: 7251: 7248: 7245: 7243: 7240: 7239: 7231: 7227: 7223: 7222: 7217: 7210: 7209: 7203: 7199: 7198: 7193: 7192: 7191: 7190: 7187: 7183: 7177: 7175: 7169: 7165: 7161: 7157: 7143: 7139: 7135: 7131: 7126: 7122: 7121: 7120: 7116: 7112: 7103: 7102: 7101: 7100: 7096: 7092: 7088: 7081: 7072: 7068: 7064: 7060: 7059: 7058: 7057: 7054: 7050: 7046: 7042: 7038: 7037: 7036: 7035: 7031: 7027: 7023: 7011: 7007: 7003: 6999: 6998: 6997: 6996: 6991: 6980: 6979: 6976: 6972: 6966: 6964: 6957: 6945: 6941: 6937: 6932: 6931: 6930: 6929: 6925: 6921: 6910: 6894: 6887: 6883: 6879: 6875: 6874: 6865: 6862: 6860: 6855: 6849: 6845: 6840: 6839: 6838: 6834: 6830: 6825: 6824: 6823: 6822: 6821: 6820: 6812: 6807: 6806: 6805: 6804: 6803: 6802: 6797: 6794: 6792: 6787: 6781: 6775: 6770: 6769: 6768: 6767: 6766: 6765: 6761: 6757: 6752: 6747: 6744: 6742: 6739: 6737: 6734: 6732: 6729: 6727: 6724: 6722: 6719: 6717: 6714: 6712: 6709: 6707: 6704: 6702: 6699: 6698: 6697: 6694: 6691: 6683: 6680: 6674: 6673: 6668: 6663: 6662: 6659: 6657: 6652: 6646: 6642: 6630: 6626: 6622: 6617: 6616: 6615: 6614: 6610: 6606: 6601: 6600: 6597: 6593: 6590: 6576: 6572: 6568: 6564: 6560: 6556: 6552: 6547: 6543: 6539: 6538: 6537: 6533: 6529: 6524: 6523: 6522: 6521: 6517: 6513: 6507: 6505: 6504:Holly Madison 6501: 6500:Craig, Alaska 6496: 6494: 6489: 6484: 6480: 6478: 6472: 6470: 6453: 6450: 6445: 6439: 6435: 6434: 6433: 6432: 6431: 6430: 6422: 6418: 6414: 6411: 6410: 6409: 6408: 6407: 6406: 6401: 6398: 6394: 6391: 6388: 6385: 6382: 6379: 6376: 6372: 6369: 6368: 6367: 6366: 6359: 6358: 6357: 6356: 6355: 6354: 6350: 6346: 6338: 6334: 6331: 6328: 6324: 6321: 6319: 6316: 6315: 6314: 6313: 6312: 6307: 6304: 6299: 6293: 6290:as it is not 6289: 6285: 6284: 6280: 6276: 6275: 6271: 6270: 6269: 6268: 6264: 6260: 6257: 6253: 6252: 6249: 6244: 6236: 6234: 6230: 6226: 6224: 6220: 6216: 6212: 6200: 6196: 6192: 6188: 6187: 6186: 6185: 6181: 6177: 6171: 6168: 6156: 6152: 6148: 6144: 6143: 6142: 6141: 6137: 6133: 6129: 6125: 6113: 6109: 6105: 6098: 6090: 6089: 6088: 6087: 6084: 6072: 6068: 6064: 6060: 6056: 6052: 6048: 6044: 6040: 6039: 6038: 6037: 6033: 6029: 6024: 6020: 6006: 6002: 5998: 5994: 5993: 5992: 5988: 5984: 5979: 5978: 5977: 5976: 5972: 5968: 5964: 5959: 5955: 5951: 5947: 5943: 5939: 5935: 5928:Jersey Circus 5923: 5919: 5915: 5910: 5909: 5908: 5907: 5903: 5899: 5887: 5883: 5879: 5875: 5871: 5870: 5869: 5868: 5864: 5860: 5851: 5847: 5843: 5839: 5835: 5831: 5827: 5824: 5823: 5822: 5818: 5817: 5802: 5798: 5794: 5790: 5789: 5788: 5784: 5780: 5776: 5771: 5770: 5769: 5768: 5764: 5760: 5755: 5742: 5739: 5734: 5733: 5729: 5723: 5722: 5721: 5717: 5713: 5709: 5708: 5707: 5706: 5703: 5698: 5697: 5693: 5687: 5664: 5660: 5656: 5652: 5651: 5650: 5646: 5642: 5638: 5637: 5636: 5632: 5628: 5624: 5620: 5619: 5618: 5614: 5610: 5606: 5605: 5604: 5603: 5602: 5598: 5594: 5590: 5586: 5582: 5578: 5574: 5573: 5572: 5568: 5564: 5560: 5559: 5558: 5554: 5550: 5546: 5543: 5542: 5525: 5521: 5517: 5512: 5511: 5510: 5509: 5508: 5504: 5500: 5495: 5494: 5493: 5492: 5491: 5487: 5483: 5479: 5477: 5473: 5469: 5464: 5463: 5462: 5458: 5454: 5450: 5449: 5448: 5444: 5440: 5436: 5435: 5434: 5430: 5426: 5422: 5421: 5420: 5419: 5415: 5411: 5404: 5397: 5393: 5389: 5385: 5381: 5380: 5379: 5378: 5375: 5374: 5369: 5364: 5357: 5356:WP:BLPPRIVACY 5353: 5330: 5325: 5319: 5318:join << 5313: 5307: 5303: 5293: 5288: 5287: 5284: 5283: 5280: 5279: 5269: 5264: 5258: 5257: 5256: 5255: 5251: 5247: 5242: 5236: 5233: 5231: 5226: 5225: 5221: 5220: 5219: 5207: 5203: 5199: 5195: 5190: 5189: 5188: 5185: 5180: 5179:absolutely on 5175: 5159: 5156: 5154: 5149: 5143: 5142: 5141: 5137: 5133: 5129: 5125: 5121: 5120: 5119: 5118: 5117: 5116: 5111: 5108: 5106: 5101: 5095: 5091: 5087: 5083: 5078: 5076: 5073: 5071: 5066: 5060: 5059: 5058: 5054: 5050: 5045: 5044: 5043: 5042: 5039: 5037: 5032: 5026: 5022: 5018: 5014: 5007: 5000: 4996: 4992: 4988: 4987: 4986: 4985: 4982: 4972: 4958: 4954: 4950: 4946: 4941: 4937: 4936: 4935: 4932: 4928: 4923: 4919: 4912: 4907: 4903: 4899: 4895: 4894: 4893: 4890: 4886: 4882: 4878: 4874: 4856: 4852: 4847: 4842: 4841: 4840: 4839: 4836: 4832: 4828: 4824: 4820: 4819: 4818: 4817: 4813: 4808: 4804: 4790: 4786: 4782: 4778: 4774: 4773: 4772: 4769: 4766: 4763: 4759: 4758: 4757: 4756: 4753: 4750: 4747: 4743: 4733: 4732: 4729: 4728: 4727: 4723: 4722: 4706: 4699: 4695: 4691: 4687: 4686: 4685: 4684: 4680: 4676: 4667: 4664: 4658: 4657: 4645: 4641: 4637: 4633: 4632: 4631: 4627: 4623: 4619: 4615: 4614: 4613: 4612: 4608: 4604: 4599: 4595: 4591: 4579: 4575: 4571: 4566: 4563: 4559: 4558: 4557: 4554: 4550: 4546: 4542: 4538: 4523: 4520: 4515: 4504: 4494: 4486: 4461: 4457: 4453: 4449: 4448: 4447: 4443: 4439: 4435: 4434: 4433: 4432: 4428: 4424: 4404: 4400: 4396: 4391: 4390: 4389: 4385: 4381: 4376: 4375: 4374: 4370: 4366: 4362: 4361: 4358: 4355: 4347: 4341: 4340: 4339: 4338: 4337: 4336: 4331: 4327: 4323: 4319: 4315: 4311: 4308: 4304: 4301: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4295: 4291: 4287: 4286: 4283: 4280: 4272: 4266: 4265: 4250: 4246: 4242: 4237: 4236: 4235: 4234: 4233: 4229: 4225: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4214: 4210: 4206: 4205: 4204: 4200: 4196: 4192: 4191: 4190: 4186: 4182: 4177: 4176: 4175: 4171: 4167: 4163: 4162: 4161: 4160: 4156: 4152: 4147: 4131: 4127: 4123: 4119: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4108: 4104: 4101: 4096: 4095: 4094: 4090: 4086: 4081: 4080: 4079: 4078: 4077: 4076: 4072: 4068: 4064: 4050: 4046: 4042: 4038: 4037: 4036: 4032: 4028: 4024: 4023: 4022: 4021: 4017: 4013: 4009: 3997: 3993: 3992: 3978: 3977: 3976: 3975: 3970: 3964: 3963: 3956: 3943: 3939: 3935: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3924: 3920: 3916: 3915: 3914: 3913: 3909: 3905: 3900: 3893: 3886: 3882: 3878: 3874: 3870: 3866: 3862: 3858: 3853: 3852: 3841: 3837: 3833: 3828: 3823: 3819: 3818: 3817: 3813: 3809: 3804: 3803: 3802: 3798: 3794: 3790: 3785: 3781: 3776: 3771: 3770: 3769: 3765: 3761: 3756: 3755: 3754: 3750: 3746: 3742: 3738: 3734: 3730: 3729: 3728: 3727: 3723: 3719: 3706: 3702: 3698: 3694: 3693: 3692: 3691: 3688: 3685: 3679: 3677: 3664: 3650: 3646: 3640: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3629: 3625: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3614: 3610: 3605: 3595: 3594: 3589: 3585: 3581: 3577: 3573: 3568: 3564: 3560: 3556: 3546: 3545: 3541: 3537: 3530: 3523: 3516: 3506: 3505: 3500: 3495: 3494: 3481: 3477: 3473: 3469: 3468: 3467: 3466: 3463: 3459: 3455: 3439: 3435: 3431: 3426: 3425: 3424: 3420: 3416: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3409: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3386: 3382: 3377: 3365: 3361: 3357: 3353: 3349: 3345: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3334: 3330: 3324: 3322: 3296: 3292: 3288: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3269: 3268: 3267: 3266: 3262: 3258: 3254: 3250: 3246: 3245: 3244: 3240: 3236: 3232: 3231: 3230: 3229: 3228: 3224: 3220: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3210: 3206: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3194: 3190: 3185: 3181: 3172: 3171: 3167: 3163: 3160: 3138: 3135: 3132: 3130: 3129: 3121: 3120: 3119: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3098: 3095: 3093: 3092: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3077: 3073: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3063: 3060: 3058: 3057: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3035: 3031: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3008: 3004: 3001: 3000: 2997: 2992: 2991: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2974: 2971: 2967: 2961: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2939: 2937: 2933: 2929: 2925: 2922: 2916: 2901: 2897: 2893: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2882: 2878: 2874: 2869: 2868: 2867: 2863: 2859: 2855: 2854: 2846: 2842: 2838: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2828: 2825: 2821: 2809: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2790: 2786: 2781: 2774:Where to now? 2765: 2761: 2757: 2752: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2715: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2704: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2666: 2662: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2647: 2643: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2633: 2629: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2589: 2585: 2582: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2491: 2483: 2479: 2474: 2436: 2432: 2430: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2417: 2413: 2408: 2406: 2402: 2400: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2373: 2371: 2365: 2355: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2341: 2325: 2320: 2314: 2313: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2299: 2295: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2284: 2278: 2277: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2262: 2256: 2255: 2248: 2239: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2222: 2217: 2209: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2195: 2192: 2189: 2186: 2184: 2173: 2170: 2167: 2164: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2155: 2153: 2149: 2143: 2138:MSU Interview 2135: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2117: 2114: 2113: 2110: 2109: 2104: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2080: 2079: 2076: 2075: 2062: 2059: 2058: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2032: 2009: 2005: 2001: 2000:68.237.169.36 1997: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1985: 1984: 1977: 1974:Try going to 1973: 1972: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1961:68.237.169.36 1958: 1952: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1943: 1942: 1935: 1931: 1930: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1910: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1901: 1900: 1892: 1891: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1880:68.237.169.36 1877: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1865: 1864: 1856: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1813:68.237.169.36 1810: 1804: 1793: 1790: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1714: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1678:ChocolateWolf 1675: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1647:February 2012 1638: 1634: 1630: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1604: 1600: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1562: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1546: 1542: 1535: 1528: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1473: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1459: 1455: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1387: 1382: 1374: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1355:Shakehandsman 1351: 1350: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1324:Shakehandsman 1310: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1189: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1128: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1090: 1086: 1079: 1072: 1062: 1061: 1058: 1050: 1048: 1046: 1041: 1035: 1025: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1007: 1004: 1000: 994: 990: 986: 982: 968: 964: 960: 956: 953: 949: 948: 936: 932: 928: 923: 922: 921: 920: 917: 913: 909: 904: 903: 902: 901: 897: 893: 888: 884: 874: 873: 869: 863: 843: 839: 835: 831: 827: 826: 825: 824: 823: 819: 815: 811: 807: 806: 804: 800: 796: 791: 790: 789: 788: 785: 783: 778: 777: 771: 770: 753: 749: 745: 741: 740: 739: 735: 731: 727: 726: 725: 724: 720: 716: 712: 700: 696: 692: 688: 684: 680: 679: 678: 677: 673: 669: 663: 659: 647: 643: 639: 635: 634: 633: 629: 625: 621: 619: 617: 615: 613: 611: 609: 607: 604: 600: 599: 598: 596: 595: 591: 587: 583: 578: 555: 551: 547: 543: 539: 531: 530: 529: 528: 527: 523: 519: 515: 511: 507: 506: 503: 499: 495: 490: 489: 488: 487: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 466: 465: 464: 463: 460: 456: 452: 447: 446: 445: 444: 441: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 416: 412: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 403: 399: 395: 391: 387: 373: 369: 365: 361: 357: 356: 355: 354: 351: 347: 346: 339: 335: 332: 329: 326: 323: 320: 317: 314: 311: 308: 305: 302: 299: 294: 291: 290: 287:Just a hunch? 284: 283: 280: 277: 270: 266: 259: 252: 240: 236: 232: 228: 224: 220: 219: 218: 217: 213: 209: 205: 194: 190: 186: 181: 180: 179: 178: 174: 170: 165: 164: 163:Groundhog Day 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 131: 127: 122: 118: 111: 106: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 7260: 7225: 7219: 7196: 7173: 7154:You blocked 7153: 7084: 7019: 6989: 6986: 6962: 6953: 6903: 6892: 6847: 6810: 6753: 6750: 6695: 6690:my statement 6687: 6678: 6675: 6638: 6602: 6594: 6586: 6508: 6497: 6485: 6481: 6473: 6465: 6343: 6326: 6310: 6291: 6287: 6278: 6255: 6254: 6237: 6233:5 keep votes 6232: 6228: 6227: 6222: 6218: 6211:5 keep votes 6210: 6208: 6172: 6164: 6121: 6080: 6047:edit summary 6016: 5963:No consensus 5962: 5937: 5931: 5895: 5855: 5849: 5837: 5829: 5819: 5813: 5812: 5756: 5752: 5731: 5695: 5684: 5622: 5407: 5383: 5359: 5349: 5312:project page 5237: 5234: 5227: 5222: 5217: 5216: 5215: 5212:Your message 5178: 5176: 5173: 5123: 5086:sockpuppetry 5010: 4966: 4913: 4910: 4871:— Preceding 4866: 4846:UltraExactZZ 4807:UltraExactZZ 4800: 4739: 4726: 4724: 4717: 4715: 4704: 4675:74.72.39.176 4671: 4662: 4659: 4587: 4535:— Preceding 4530: 4420: 4317: 4148: 4146:Beeblebrox, 4145: 4060: 4005: 3990: 3960: 3953: 3896: 3860: 3826: 3788: 3783: 3779: 3774: 3714: 3683: 3668: 3662: 3660: 3609:Okeyes (WMF) 3601: 3567:TonyTheTiger 3552: 3534: 3493:Kingturtle = 3491: 3489: 3451: 3373: 3329:Offender9000 3325: 3318: 3178: 3175:He to Hecuba 3156: 3127: 3126: 3090: 3089: 3055: 3054: 3033: 3012: 2975: 2945: 2926: 2923: 2920: 2872: 2817: 2777: 2750: 2735: 2713: 2702: 2700: 2609: 2561: 2558: 2509:verification 2463: 2428: 2398: 2369: 2361: 2337: 2310: 2274: 2252: 2245: 2215: 2196: 2193: 2190: 2187: 2178: 2156: 2144: 2141: 2122: 2111: 2106: 2077: 2072: 2070: 2067:Edit notices 2053: 2029: 1994:— Preceding 1979: 1955:— Preceding 1937: 1913:— Preceding 1895: 1874:— Preceding 1859: 1807:— Preceding 1799: 1791: 1775: 1769: 1739: 1709: 1692: 1674:welcome page 1650: 1568: 1550: 1454:commercially 1453: 1427: 1377: 1320: 1257: 1190: 1187: 1131: 1127:specifically 1126: 1094: 1044: 1039: 1031: 1008: 978: 886: 880: 857: 808:I'd suggest 781: 775: 774: 768: 767: 763: 710: 708: 686: 682: 664: 660: 657: 654:Storypwner14 638:Aaron McHale 602: 597: 574: 536:— Preceding 509: 494:Aaron McHale 451:Aaron McHale 420:user subpage 398:Aaron McHale 383: 344: 330: 324: 318: 312: 306: 300: 274: 222: 206: 202: 161: 138:User:Nuujinn 114: 104: 78: 43: 37: 7218:This is an 7134:Ron Ritzman 7091:Ron Ritzman 6780:WP:MMAEVENT 6443:John Cengiz 6297:John Cengiz 6242:John Cengiz 6209:There were 5942:WP:ILIKEITs 5563:Floquenbeam 5468:Floquenbeam 4989:See below. 4943:aware that 4925:—Preceding 4762:Writ Keeper 4746:Writ Keeper 4592:. Illraute 4380:Floquenbeam 4209:Floquenbeam 4181:Floquenbeam 4151:Floquenbeam 4057:Agdaban AfD 4002:What gives? 3287:Mark Arsten 3257:Mark Arsten 2873:de-escalate 2814:Ignore Meta 2780:these edits 2555:Baker album 2334:csd decline 2194:Sincerely, 2148:user:Jaobar 1670:the sandbox 1662:Zulu (film) 1429:2012-02-02. 981:Vannathirai 668:Daniel Case 542:Aaronmchale 293:Noeffingway 276:Jasper Deng 36:This is an 7280:Archive 30 7272:Archive 26 7267:Archive 25 7261:Archive 24 7255:Archive 23 7250:Archive 22 7242:Archive 20 7111:Beeblebrox 7045:Beeblebrox 7020:Regarding 7002:Beeblebrox 6936:Beeblebrox 6878:Beeblebrox 6754:Thoughts? 6621:Beeblebrox 6555:WP:PEACOCK 6528:Beeblebrox 6493:Kafkaesque 6397:...William 6345:Beeblebrox 6259:Beeblebrox 6191:Beeblebrox 6165:Regarding 6147:Beeblebrox 6132:hysteria18 6104:Beeblebrox 6083:...William 6063:Beeblebrox 6023:sofalising 5983:Beeblebrox 5914:Beeblebrox 5779:Beeblebrox 5712:Beeblebrox 5641:Beeblebrox 5609:Beeblebrox 5516:Beeblebrox 5499:Beeblebrox 5453:Beeblebrox 5425:Beeblebrox 5388:Beeblebrox 5246:Beeblebrox 5198:Beeblebrox 5132:Beeblebrox 5128:WP:CANVASS 5082:canvassing 5049:Beeblebrox 4991:Beeblebrox 4969:regarding 4949:Beeblebrox 4898:Beeblebrox 4868:Vartmaan 4827:Beeblebrox 4781:Beeblebrox 4720:Balloonman 4690:Beeblebrox 4636:Beeblebrox 4622:EdJohnston 4603:EdJohnston 4570:Beeblebrox 4541:JustRealMC 4438:Beeblebrox 4395:Beeblebrox 4365:Beeblebrox 4322:Beeblebrox 4313:standards. 4309:That's it. 4241:Beeblebrox 4224:Beeblebrox 4195:Beeblebrox 4166:Beeblebrox 4122:Beeblebrox 4085:Beeblebrox 4027:Beeblebrox 4008:third time 3917:Thankyou. 3877:Beeblebrox 3822:Beeblebrox 3697:Beeblebrox 3624:Beeblebrox 3584:WP:CHICAGO 3549:DRV notice 3472:Beeblebrox 3462:Courcelles 3430:Beeblebrox 3397:Beeblebrox 3356:Beeblebrox 3273:Beeblebrox 3235:Beeblebrox 3205:Beeblebrox 3110:Beeblebrox 3072:Beeblebrox 3038:Beeblebrox 2980:. Thanks, 2892:Beeblebrox 2837:Beeblebrox 2800:Beeblebrox 2756:Beeblebrox 2718:Beeblebrox 2628:Beeblebrox 2606:Joe Miller 2592:Beeblebrox 2535:notability 2521:Beeblebrox 2513:notability 2412:Beeblebrox 2383:Beeblebrox 2307:lol. :) — 2294:Beeblebrox 2229:ASCIIn2Bme 2125:Beeblebrox 2105:please? – 2089:Beeblebrox 2038:Beeblebrox 1845:Beeblebrox 1830:Beeblebrox 1780:GenericBob 1725:Beeblebrox 1697:Beeblebrox 1599:Beeblebrox 1569:The page " 1543:. You can 1497:Beeblebrox 1465:Cloveapple 1437:Beeblebrox 1340:Beeblebrox 1283:Beeblebrox 1222:Beeblebrox 1164:Beeblebrox 1136:Beeblebrox 1087:. You can 1013:. Thanks, 908:Beeblebrox 834:Beeblebrox 812:by now. -- 795:Beeblebrox 730:Beeblebrox 711:unofficial 691:Beeblebrox 586:Beeblebrox 518:Beeblebrox 514:notability 477:Beeblebrox 473:moved back 432:Beeblebrox 364:Beeblebrox 328:block user 322:filter log 267:. You can 231:Beeblebrox 185:Beeblebrox 146:User:Wareh 110:Greek love 98:Archive 30 90:Archive 26 85:Archive 25 79:Archive 24 73:Archive 23 68:Archive 22 60:Archive 20 6844:WP:BEFORE 6567:RadioKAOS 6512:RadioKAOS 6288:re-listed 6055:consensus 5872:(You can 5013:63.3.19.1 4940:consensus 4508:template. 4452:Manxwoman 4423:Manxwoman 3934:Babakathy 3919:Babakathy 3904:Babakathy 3827:this time 3789:everybody 3509:Nasseriya 3344:WP:OUTING 3030:WP:CSD#G5 2964:Read the 2928:Music ann 2681:RadioKAOS 2651:RadioKAOS 2612:RadioKAOS 2539:Music ann 2478:Music ann 2247:Fantastic 2221:WP:WEIGHT 2185:instead. 2175:properly. 1629:Michitaro 1297:Roscelese 1260:Roscelese 1184:Wikimania 1028:Oversight 997:Read the 603:potential 386:Shay Carl 334:block log 208:JASpencer 199:Mailchimp 121:this AfD, 117:this mess 6605:Vartmaan 6419:and the 6329:required 6213:for the 6019:smugging 5950:WP:NTEMP 5874:WP:TROUT 5230:this one 4980:Amalthea 4977:Cheers, 4918:Vartmaan 4885:contribs 4877:Vartmaan 4873:unsigned 4549:contribs 4537:unsigned 4142:Question 4063:this AfD 3861:disaster 3527:You can 3122:Thanks. 3015:Jclemens 3013:Thanks, 2952:Harkness 2851:Response 2364:this AfD 2345:Gaijin42 1996:unsigned 1957:unsigned 1915:unsigned 1876:unsigned 1809:unsigned 1757:Reynardo 1742:Reynardo 1666:reverted 1552:BigDwiki 1521:Talkback 1317:My RFC/U 1305:contribs 1268:contribs 1218:Soldotna 1150:JetBlast 1113:JetBlast 1096:JetBlast 1065:JetBlast 854:Jake.edu 550:contribs 538:unsigned 304:contribs 245:Talkback 223:credible 169:Cynwolfe 7221:archive 7063:SmartSE 7026:SmartSE 6983:Unblock 6495:to me. 6488:WP:WTAF 6469:KTUU-TV 6361:insult. 6215:article 5793:Achowat 5759:Achowat 5655:Alarbus 5627:Alarbus 5593:Alarbus 5577:Alarbus 5549:Alarbus 5482:Alarbus 5439:Alarbus 5410:Alarbus 4927:undated 4518:(ʞlɐʇ) 4041:28bytes 4012:28bytes 3873:WP:CENT 3676:anguard 3588:WP:FOUR 3536:Nyttend 3162:Dankarl 2982:DPL bot 2785:Moriori 2056:MBisanz 1982:MBisanz 1940:MBisanz 1898:MBisanz 1862:MBisanz 1279:CAT:RFU 1015:DPL bot 861:Ryulong 830:WP:DIVA 810:WP:DENY 744:GoodDay 715:GoodDay 510:primary 39:archive 7168:WP:EWN 6811:tactic 6635:Notice 6589:WP:GNG 6292:at all 6221:, and 6176:isaacl 6128:WP:CRD 6059:merger 6028:Kt1502 5954:WP:GNG 5938:Delete 5384:finish 5184:WP:GNG 4349:really 4274:really 3950:OK ... 3454:WP:ACN 3348:WP:RFC 3253:WT:GAN 3249:Baelor 3134:(talk) 3097:(talk) 3062:(talk) 2714:at all 2566:Benc90 2502:": --> 2496:": --> 2489:": --> 2471:link: 2468:": --> 2429:Mehran 2399:Mehran 2370:Mehran 2340:WP:IAR 2225:WP:BLP 2199:Jaobar 1713:Secret 1614:Xfansd 1583:Xfansd 1055:berate 582:WP:RSN 360:WP:SPI 279:(talk) 156:, and 6920:KNOWZ 6097:db-g4 5997:Diego 5967:Diego 5878:Diego 5859:Diego 5688:. :) 5346:WP:AN 5317:: --> 5316:: --> 4963:SFL 1 3808:Petrb 3784:close 3780:start 3760:Petrb 3718:Petrb 3711:link? 3663:going 3251:? At 3034:their 2677:WP:AK 2649:that. 2646:WP:AK 2562:after 2501:: --> 2500:: --> 2499:: --> 2495:: --> 2494:: --> 2493:: --> 2488:: --> 2487:: --> 2486:: --> 2467:: --> 2466:: --> 2465:: --> 2458:: --> 2457:: --> 2456:: --> 2454:: --> 2453:: --> 2452:: --> 2448:: --> 2447:: --> 2446:: --> 1214:Kenai 985:Tamil 16:< 7202:talk 7184:) | 7181:TALK 7158:and 7138:talk 7115:talk 7095:talk 7067:talk 7049:talk 7041:this 7039:See 7030:talk 7022:this 7006:talk 6973:) | 6970:TALK 6940:talk 6924:TALK 6918:HELL 6882:talk 6858:king 6833:talk 6790:king 6760:talk 6655:king 6625:talk 6609:talk 6571:talk 6532:talk 6516:talk 6477:KTVA 6448:talk 6374:air. 6349:talk 6302:talk 6279:keep 6263:talk 6247:talk 6231:and 6195:talk 6180:talk 6151:talk 6136:talk 6108:talk 6067:talk 6032:talk 6021:and 6001:talk 5987:talk 5971:talk 5944:and 5918:talk 5902:talk 5882:talk 5863:talk 5797:talk 5783:talk 5775:this 5763:talk 5716:talk 5659:talk 5645:talk 5631:talk 5613:talk 5597:talk 5581:talk 5567:talk 5553:talk 5520:talk 5503:talk 5486:talk 5472:talk 5457:talk 5443:talk 5429:talk 5414:talk 5392:talk 5304:the 5302:join 5250:talk 5202:talk 5152:king 5136:talk 5124:very 5104:king 5084:and 5069:king 5053:talk 5035:king 5015:and 4995:talk 4953:talk 4922:talk 4902:talk 4881:talk 4831:talk 4803:this 4785:talk 4742:here 4694:talk 4679:talk 4640:talk 4626:talk 4607:talk 4588:See 4574:talk 4545:talk 4456:talk 4442:talk 4427:talk 4399:talk 4384:talk 4369:talk 4326:talk 4245:talk 4228:talk 4213:talk 4199:talk 4185:talk 4170:talk 4155:talk 4126:talk 4107:talk 4089:talk 4071:talk 4045:talk 4031:talk 4016:talk 3991:Dave 3962:Ched 3955:this 3938:talk 3923:talk 3908:talk 3899:here 3881:talk 3836:talk 3812:talk 3797:talk 3764:talk 3749:talk 3743:. -- 3737:here 3722:talk 3701:talk 3684:Wha? 3672:ven 3644:talk 3628:talk 3613:talk 3540:talk 3499:talk 3476:talk 3434:talk 3419:talk 3401:talk 3385:talk 3376:this 3360:talk 3333:talk 3291:talk 3277:talk 3261:talk 3239:talk 3223:talk 3209:talk 3193:talk 3166:talk 3128:corn 3114:talk 3091:corn 3076:talk 3056:corn 3042:talk 3019:talk 2986:talk 2932:talk 2896:talk 2881:talk 2862:talk 2841:talk 2804:talk 2789:talk 2760:talk 2751:Done 2736:GotR 2722:talk 2703:GotR 2685:talk 2655:talk 2632:talk 2616:talk 2596:talk 2570:talk 2543:talk 2525:talk 2482:talk 2416:talk 2387:talk 2349:talk 2312:Ched 2298:talk 2276:Ched 2254:Ched 2233:talk 2223:and 2203:talk 2183:HERE 2152:HERE 2129:talk 2103:here 2093:talk 2042:talk 2004:talk 1965:talk 1923:talk 1884:talk 1849:talk 1834:talk 1817:talk 1784:talk 1776:edit 1761:talk 1746:talk 1729:talk 1701:talk 1682:talk 1633:talk 1618:talk 1603:talk 1587:talk 1556:talk 1501:talk 1481:talk 1469:talk 1452:is " 1441:talk 1395:talk 1359:talk 1344:talk 1328:talk 1301:talk 1287:talk 1264:talk 1242:talk 1238:Pete 1226:talk 1201:talk 1197:Pete 1168:talk 1154:talk 1140:talk 1117:talk 1100:talk 1045:lisk 1040:Basa 1034:this 1019:talk 963:talk 931:talk 912:talk 896:talk 838:talk 818:talk 799:talk 748:talk 734:talk 719:talk 695:talk 672:talk 642:talk 628:talk 590:talk 546:talk 522:talk 498:talk 481:talk 455:talk 436:talk 402:talk 368:talk 345:Dave 316:logs 298:talk 235:talk 212:talk 189:talk 173:talk 134:here 130:here 7197:RAP 7016:FYI 6993:• 6909:mfd 6327:not 5850:has 5838:did 5830:did 5737:Man 5701:Man 5681:Oy! 5547:;) 5372:466 5096:". 5088:at 4967:Hi, 4851:Did 4812:Did 4510:-- 4503:ygm 4498:or 4468:YGM 4353:can 4345:You 4278:can 4270:You 3932:it? 3787:by 3580:BIO 3565:.-- 3415:Avi 3381:Avi 3124:AIR 3087:AIR 3052:AIR 2966:FAQ 2871:to 2731:go. 999:FAQ 887:and 782:com 683:not 426:to 7276:→ 7246:← 7140:) 7117:) 7097:) 7069:) 7051:) 7032:) 7008:) 6942:) 6912:}} 6906:{{ 6884:) 6853:Mt 6835:) 6785:Mt 6762:) 6650:Mt 6627:) 6611:) 6573:) 6534:) 6518:) 6351:) 6265:) 6197:) 6182:) 6153:) 6138:) 6110:) 6100:}} 6094:{{ 6069:) 6034:) 6003:) 5989:) 5973:) 5920:) 5904:) 5884:) 5865:) 5836:I 5828:I 5799:) 5785:) 5765:) 5727:TN 5718:) 5691:TN 5661:) 5647:) 5633:) 5623:is 5615:) 5599:) 5583:) 5569:) 5555:) 5522:) 5505:) 5488:) 5474:) 5466:-- 5459:) 5445:) 5431:) 5416:) 5394:) 5252:) 5204:) 5147:Mt 5138:) 5130:. 5099:Mt 5064:Mt 5055:) 5030:Mt 4997:) 4955:) 4947:. 4904:) 4887:) 4883:• 4833:) 4787:) 4696:) 4681:) 4642:) 4628:) 4609:) 4576:) 4551:) 4547:• 4513:DQ 4506:}} 4500:{{ 4496:}} 4490:{{ 4458:) 4444:) 4429:) 4401:) 4386:) 4371:) 4328:) 4318:he 4247:) 4230:) 4215:) 4201:) 4187:) 4172:) 4157:) 4128:) 4109:) 4091:) 4073:) 4047:) 4033:) 4018:) 3987:-- 3968:? 3965:: 3940:) 3925:) 3910:) 3883:) 3838:) 3814:) 3799:) 3775:am 3766:) 3751:) 3724:) 3703:) 3641:• 3630:) 3615:) 3590:) 3542:) 3478:) 3436:) 3421:) 3403:) 3387:) 3362:) 3335:) 3293:) 3279:) 3263:) 3241:) 3225:) 3211:) 3195:) 3168:) 3116:) 3108:. 3078:) 3044:) 3021:) 2988:) 2958:| 2934:) 2898:) 2883:) 2864:) 2843:) 2806:) 2791:) 2762:) 2754:. 2724:) 2687:) 2657:) 2634:) 2618:) 2598:) 2572:) 2545:) 2527:) 2484:) 2433:● 2418:) 2403:● 2389:) 2374:● 2351:) 2318:? 2315:: 2300:) 2282:? 2279:: 2260:? 2257:: 2235:) 2205:) 2131:) 2095:) 2044:) 2006:) 1967:) 1925:) 1886:) 1851:) 1836:) 1819:) 1786:) 1763:) 1748:) 1731:) 1703:) 1684:) 1635:) 1620:) 1605:) 1589:) 1558:) 1503:) 1495:. 1483:) 1443:) 1397:) 1361:) 1346:) 1330:) 1307:) 1303:⋅ 1289:) 1281:. 1270:) 1266:⋅ 1244:) 1203:) 1170:) 1156:) 1142:) 1119:) 1102:) 1021:) 991:| 965:) 933:) 914:) 898:) 870:) 867:竜龙 840:) 820:) 801:) 776:it 769:Br 750:) 736:) 721:) 697:) 674:) 644:) 630:) 592:) 584:. 552:) 548:• 524:) 500:) 492:-- 483:) 457:) 449:-- 438:) 404:) 370:) 362:. 237:) 214:) 191:) 175:) 152:, 148:, 144:, 140:, 94:→ 64:← 7232:. 7200:( 7178:( 7136:( 7113:( 7093:( 7065:( 7047:( 7028:( 7004:( 6967:( 6938:( 6922:▎ 6880:( 6831:( 6776:) 6772:( 6758:( 6623:( 6607:( 6569:( 6565:. 6530:( 6514:( 6347:( 6261:( 6193:( 6178:( 6149:( 6134:( 6106:( 6065:( 6030:( 5999:( 5985:( 5969:( 5916:( 5900:( 5880:( 5861:( 5795:( 5781:( 5761:( 5732:X 5714:( 5696:X 5657:( 5643:( 5629:( 5611:( 5595:( 5579:( 5565:( 5551:( 5518:( 5501:( 5484:( 5470:( 5455:( 5441:( 5427:( 5412:( 5390:( 5367:N 5362:J 5248:( 5200:( 5134:( 5051:( 4993:( 4951:( 4933:. 4920:( 4900:( 4879:( 4848:~ 4829:( 4809:~ 4783:( 4768:♔ 4765:⚇ 4752:♔ 4749:⚇ 4692:( 4677:( 4638:( 4624:( 4605:( 4572:( 4543:( 4454:( 4440:( 4425:( 4397:( 4382:( 4367:( 4324:( 4243:( 4226:( 4211:( 4197:( 4183:( 4168:( 4153:( 4124:( 4105:( 4087:( 4069:( 4043:( 4029:( 4014:( 3936:( 3921:( 3906:( 3879:( 3834:( 3810:( 3795:( 3762:( 3747:( 3720:( 3699:( 3674:M 3670:S 3626:( 3611:( 3586:/ 3582:/ 3578:/ 3576:C 3574:/ 3572:T 3570:( 3538:( 3524:. 3501:) 3497:( 3474:( 3432:( 3417:( 3399:( 3383:( 3358:( 3331:( 3289:( 3275:( 3259:( 3237:( 3221:( 3207:( 3191:( 3164:( 3112:( 3074:( 3040:( 3017:( 2984:( 2972:. 2954:( 2930:( 2894:( 2879:( 2860:( 2839:( 2827:P 2824:T 2802:( 2787:( 2758:( 2720:( 2683:( 2653:( 2630:( 2614:( 2594:( 2568:( 2541:( 2523:( 2480:( 2414:( 2385:( 2347:( 2296:( 2231:( 2201:( 2127:( 2091:( 2040:( 2002:( 1963:( 1921:( 1882:( 1847:( 1832:( 1815:( 1782:( 1759:( 1744:( 1727:( 1699:( 1680:( 1631:( 1616:( 1601:( 1585:( 1554:( 1536:. 1499:( 1479:( 1467:( 1439:( 1393:( 1357:( 1342:( 1326:( 1299:( 1285:( 1262:( 1240:( 1236:- 1228:) 1224:( 1216:/ 1199:( 1166:( 1152:( 1138:( 1115:( 1098:( 1080:. 1051:⁄ 1017:( 1005:. 987:( 961:( 929:( 910:( 894:( 864:( 836:( 816:( 797:( 746:( 732:( 717:( 693:( 670:( 640:( 626:( 588:( 544:( 520:( 496:( 479:( 453:( 434:( 400:( 366:( 336:) 331:· 325:· 319:· 313:· 307:· 301:· 296:( 260:. 233:( 210:( 187:( 171:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index